June 15, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:52
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Thanks for joining us. | ||
| Remember when Steve Bannon was first on the scene, you know, let's blow the whole thing up. | ||
| When you're seeing elected Republicans who have been in office for years taking on the DOJ, making arguments that they know aren't true, what's their plan? | ||
| So distrust across the American people? | ||
| Well, it's interesting that you bring up Steve Bannon because he advises a number of these Republicans behind the scenes, and they appear on his show in which they discuss some of these very tactics that they use then on the floor of Congress and in their committees. | ||
| But yes, I mean, one of the things is to blow up the public confidence in the justice system and in institutions, At large, in this case, the idea is to attack the FBI and the Justice Department as harsh as they can and to take whatever steps possible to make it unpleasant to ever bring charges against Donald Trump again or continue with the cases. | ||
| And if that means issuing subpoenas, Hauling in various FBI officials to answer questions, restricting funds. | ||
| Those are the steps they're going to take. | ||
| I mean, the latest thing they're going to do is to try to block funding for a new FBI headquarters in retaliation for this case being brought. | ||
| And so they're trying to make it as painful as possible, and they're acting sort of as a As a defense counsel in the Hall of Congress for Donald Trump. | ||
| Okay, Thursday, 15 June, Year of our Lord 2023. | ||
| Jeff Clark, the wingman for Russ Vogt, is going to join us here momentarily to talk about this New York Times leading piece that Stephanie Ruhl kind of alluded to that was coming in the morning. | ||
| We're going to get into the details that are quite important about the deconstruction of the administrative state. | ||
| In the taking apart of the cartel. | ||
| Stephanie Ruhle also, by the way, she had an amazing piece last night with a new author. | ||
| I'm going to try to play in the 6 o'clock show. | ||
| Stephanie Ruhle, I think, is going to get a big, as you know, we watch that. | ||
| It's one of the shows we watch because she puts out pretty good information. | ||
| She's going to have a big audience this week because the U.S. Open is in primetime on NBC and will lead right into her MSNBC at 11. | ||
| So make sure everybody checks it out. | ||
| I want to bring in Congressman Andrew Clyde. | ||
| Congressman Clyde, big win this week, but it came at a cost. | ||
| Walk us through, and then you had the situation yesterday with not holding Schiff accountable. | ||
| We understand there's all kinds of games being played. | ||
| You're one of the key parts here. | ||
| Talk to us first about where we stand with pistol brace, how we're going to get that to be a law, and then walk us through this massive fight that is going on behind the scenes with you and the other patriots over in the House, sir. | ||
| Well, good morning, Steve. Let me lay out the path for you about how we're going to be successful with a pistol brace. | ||
| We passed it in the House on a bipartisan basis, which was phenomenal. | ||
| 219 of us voted for it. | ||
| Sorry, 219 voted for it. | ||
| 210 voted against. | ||
| But now it goes to the Senate, and I'm confident that Senator Marshall and Senator Kennedy We'll bring this to the Senate floor at the right time when it will be most advantageous to pass it in the Senate. | ||
| It will be privileged in the Senate for about another month, a little over a month, which means that they only have to meet the 51-boat threshold. | ||
| They don't have to worry about the 60-boat threshold in a filibuster. | ||
| So I think that that's going to happen. | ||
| I'm pretty confident of that in the next week or two. | ||
| That will come out of the Senate, be passed in the Senate. | ||
| Then it will go to President Biden. | ||
| Now, he has already said threatened to veto it, and that's what President Biden decides to do. | ||
| But I think the greatest win here that we will have for this particular piece of legislation is that it will send a resounding message to the court system because the pistol brace rule That ATF put in place is being challenged on multiple levels in the United States court. | ||
| And when Congress can send that kind of message from the legislative branch, the ones who make the law, that's us. | ||
| All right. We send that message to the court system. | ||
| The court system will listen. | ||
| And I believe the court system will strike it down. | ||
| If that doesn't happen, we still have the appropriations process. | ||
| And I'm on the subcommittee to make that happen as well. | ||
| The Commerce Justice Science Subcommittee. | ||
| To defund the rule, and I've seen that wording, I've seen that amendment already in the base bill, so I'm very excited about that, that we will defund that ATF rule because it cannot be allowed to stand. | ||
| You cannot allow an agency, an executive agency, to create a law that makes millions of law-abiding citizens into felons overnight for absolutely doing nothing. | ||
| That is just so un-American. | ||
| Hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| Slow down. Just repeat what you just said, because this is the whole New York Times piece, which they got one element of. | ||
| But just repeat that again about making law. | ||
| Oh, the ATF does not have the authority to make law. | ||
| Only that authority resides in Congress. | ||
| It's called separation of powers. | ||
| When ATF is allowed to make law, And then, through that law, have a criminal penalty, a felony penalty, you know, 10 years in jail, $250,000 fine. | ||
| And you can do that when someone, to law-abiding citizens, to millions of law-abiding citizens who have done absolutely nothing, some of them don't even know about this rule, and they're automatically felons as of midnight on June the 1st, that is absolutely inexcusable, it's un-American, that is not our system of justice. | ||
| So this rule has to be struck from the record, and that's what we're doing. | ||
| I want to talk about the other one, the lead story in the Hill, where about this appropriations and where the appropriators are. | ||
| And we've been highlighting, as you know, when you were on here last time, now we're about 100 days out. | ||
| And there's going to be a massive battle when people come back from the August recess, if there even is an August recess. | ||
| But in mid-September, there's going to be a firestorm about the appropriations, about what the House does now. | ||
| I understand they're not back to the 2022 level, but is this all just going to be performance? | ||
| Because McCarthy have the stones right now. | ||
| Because this is going to come down to a showdown with the Senate and with Biden about at midnight on the 30th of September. | ||
| Because if the appropriations process has not been approved and we don't have the allocation of the money, then the government, starting at one minute after midnight, On the 30th, on October, the government doesn't have any money. | ||
| It really doesn't, can't make any payment, even beyond the debt ceiling. | ||
| So is this just all going to be performative, that McCarthy's going to sit there and play games, so everybody's going to feel better, and we're going to get a CR, and then on Christmas Eve, we're going to get a $7 trillion omnibus bill, sir? | ||
| Well, we are, in appropriations, working to make sure that is not the case. | ||
| We plan on passing 12 appropriations bills in the House. | ||
| Sending it over to the Senate and working with them to make sure that they pass those bills. | ||
| Now, whether they do or not, I can't say, but it would be very, very bad for us to have a 1 % cut, a CR with a 1 % cut, because what's going to happen is that will be a cut from 2023 levels, which means that the non-defense discretionary money Will be increased and the defense discretionary money will be decreased through this cut. | ||
| And that's bad for defense and it's bad for a weaponized government because that means the weaponized government moves forward and all the policy riders that are going to be in these appropriations bills, those won't be part of it if we get a CR. So we're working very hard to make sure that we don't get a CR. I think that's the way our country needs to go in order to save our country. | ||
| What are your thoughts next week? | ||
| Is there going to be another power struggle about the returning, about who controls the House floor? | ||
| Give us your insights on that, because the next couple of weeks, people should understand, strap in, because it's going to get just as gnarly as it has been. | ||
| What are your thoughts, Congressman? | ||
| We're working through that right now with leadership. | ||
| Nothing is firm yet, but I think that there's going to be required to be some good faith on both sides. | ||
| We want the House floor to work the way it's supposed to work, but we also have to make sure that we do not continue to let this unfettered spending continue, because that will eventually, as Speaker McCarthy has said many, many times, that is the greatest internal threat to America. | ||
| So we have got to rein in this out-of-control spending. | ||
| And that's what we're working hard to do. | ||
| And that's what just has to happen. | ||
| You're a good man and you have the humility of a devout Christian. | ||
| But how can Andy Clyde, Commander Andy Clyde Seabees, Sit there and say it's got to be good faith on both sides. | ||
| You're the living example. | ||
| You're the personification of they have no good faith. | ||
| The pistol brace which you had worked and labored around to get it make it bipartisan and people don't understand what a huge effort is to make the pistol brace in the house. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi's Democratic Party a bipartisan and they sit there and they tell you because you're sitting there go we can't put the rule forward because they're gonna lose our leverage and they take that off. | ||
| Sell me on good faith. | ||
| How can you possibly have good faith on the other side? | ||
| If you can sell me, I can sell the posse. | ||
| So just tell me, how do we have good faith with the leadership? | ||
| You have good faith by doing what you say you're going to do. | ||
| And then you have leverage to make sure that people do what they say they're going to do. | ||
| Washington works on leverage, and that's what we have to have to make sure that good faith stays the way it's supposed to be. | ||
| I'm a man of my word. | ||
| Nobody's got any problem with the good faith of you or the 20. | ||
| It's the good faith on the other side. | ||
| But anyway, we'll take that up on a different day. | ||
| Commander, how do people get to you? | ||
| Because we've got a lot of work to do in the Senate. | ||
| You've got a lot of work to do in public to make sure that Biden doesn't veto this. | ||
| So tell people where to go to support your crusade on this. | ||
| You can go to clyde.house.gov. | ||
| To our website, to sign up for our newsletter to see what we're doing, or you can follow us on Twitter, on Getter, on Facebook at RepClyde. | ||
| So thank you, Steve. | ||
| It's always great to be with you. | ||
| Congressman Clyde, thank you. | ||
| Next time, hopefully get your schedule and notice worked out so we can get you over here actually in the Word of Himself. | ||
| Thank you very much for doing it remote. | ||
| Appreciate it. Thanks, brother. | ||
| Jeff Clark. Clark, before I get into all that, because Andy Clyde made the case about the administrative state, but I want to go back to Halderman, because I know you've got some thoughts and observations on this. | ||
| Talk to me about what this report and what happened in Georgia, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, Steve. So here's my point about what Garland Favarito was on earlier about in terms of Professor Haldeman. | |
| So this is a little-known fact, which is in 2019, the D.C. Circuit held its annual judicial conference. | ||
| And I attended. | ||
| And it was attended by all of the D.C. Circuit judges. | ||
| Those are the appellate judges, all the trial court judges in the district court for the District of Columbia. | ||
| And they called the conference Cyber Everything. | ||
| And a big focus of it was all of this nonsense that there was a lot of Russian hacking in the 2016 election to kind of fear monger about Trump's election, which obviously at that point was already a done deal. | ||
| And the judges watched in awe as Professor Halderman was on a panel and he described how easy it was and how vulnerable our system was to electronic hacking. | ||
| In reality, as we now know, Russians maybe spent A couple hundred thousand dollars on some social media accounts, nothing that could have possibly affected our billion dollar federal presidential election. | ||
| But back then, they were hanging on his every word when he was describing the vulnerabilities of the system. | ||
| But then magically, we go forward to the 2020 election, and President Trump starts talking about the vulnerability of the election system. | ||
| He fires Chris Krebs because the system is vulnerable, and Krebs is saying ridiculous things like, It's the most secure election in history. | ||
| I want to specifically address the audience members and others who come in and say, oh, you keep blaming Chad Wolf. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's really Chris Krebs. Krebs reported to Wolf. | |
| Wolf allowed Krebs to go out there and lie. | ||
| That was a lie. Most secure. | ||
| Remember, he was on 60 Minutes. | ||
| He was on and on and on. | ||
| Most secure election in American history. | ||
| Most secure election in American history. | ||
| That was Krebs. He reported to Chad Wolf. | ||
| Chad Wolf could have shut down anytime he wanted to. | ||
| He got into the facts. | ||
| Chad Wolf is implicated in this up to his eyeballs. | ||
| And anybody who has any of these conservative conferences, he doesn't understand. | ||
| This is another feckless, hapless, controlled opposition. | ||
| Short break. Jeff Clark bringing the heat to the administrative state. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Who says so? The New York Times. | |
| Next in the War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, Jeff Clark, let's pivot to the... | ||
| Just real quickly, why was Fox... | ||
| They're lawyers not all over getting this report out. | ||
| Jeff Clark, I'm totally corn-fused on this topic, sir. | ||
| And by the way, I'm not a machine guy. | ||
| People know that. People have watched this show forever. | ||
| We're the non-verification of the mail-in ballots. | ||
| That's how they plan to steal this thing. | ||
| I'm not saying something didn't happen on the machines. | ||
| Maybe it did. That's ought to be it. | ||
| I know Mike and these guys are totally focused on it. | ||
| And I've told Mike, now that his technical people have briefed me, In others, the complexity of the machines makes no sense whatsoever given what their task and purpose is. | ||
| So there's something clearly fishy there. | ||
| But this report's pretty explosive. | ||
| It's been hidden. I don't understand, Jeff, why the Murdoch lawyers weren't all over this, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think, Steve, that if you hire an establishment law firm at this point, you're basically getting things that their defenses and how they approach cases are tied into a mainstream media narrative. | |
| And so there are certain defenses that can't be presented because they would challenge that narrative, even though you have a duty of zealousness. | ||
| The most basic ethical duty for an attorney is to zealously represent your client, right? | ||
| But in reality, these firms, I think, to continue getting lots of high-level corporate business when they're taken over by ESG and DEI and woke this and that, they conform to some They don't want to cross the private equity group and the venture capitalists and the hedge funds. | ||
| Tell me about the New York Times. | ||
| You're going to, in the 6 o'clock show, give us a deep drill down for hopefully 20 or 30 minutes to really go through this. | ||
| But give me just a headline. You see the New York Times this morning. | ||
| Your picture's all over it. | ||
| Russ's picture's all over it. | ||
| Tell me what's going on. Sure, Steve. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I've written this paper called The DOJ is Not Independent, and I trace the history of From the Federalist Papers to the text of the Constitution, how Article II works. | |
| And the president is the unitary figure who is in charge of the executive branch, Steve. | ||
| And as I'm sure you know, there were four original cabinet officers that Washington created. | ||
| One of them was the Attorney General, but there was no Department of Justice created. | ||
| It's probably not widely known that the Justice Department did not exist as an entity until 1870. | ||
| For most of the Republic, we went through and had a system in which we just had an Attorney General. | ||
| Clearly, that Attorney General was a subordinate to the President. | ||
| There's never been an amendment to the Constitution to the contrary. | ||
| It's Watergate disease at some important level because this whole idea that the DOJ is or should be independent starts as a kind of virus as a result of the New Deal and arguments that President Nixon couldn't be trusted to have an attorney general that reports to him and then followed his orders and his direction and his parameters. | ||
| They tried to pass a statute to make DOJ into an independent agency. | ||
| And that failed. So the fallback was the creation of the independent counsel statute. | ||
| And you know that that bedeviled presidents on both the right and the left for a time. | ||
| And the law was set up to have a sunset time. | ||
| And it was allowed to sunset because at that point it had hit both sides. | ||
| So to the extent that statute, which there was a lot of question about whether it was constitutional or not, Justice Scalia certainly thought that it was not. | ||
| Those questions have now all been mooted by the fact that that statute has lapsed and we're in a world clearly where the Attorney General reports to the President. | ||
| And any attempt to do anything to the contrary, Steve, is essentially an attempt to capture the Justice Department because, as Russ had said earlier today on your program, I'll put it this way, DOJ is a meta-agency that really flows through the entire administrative state. | ||
| It's almost like a capstone. | ||
| Everything. Yes, so you need it both for prosecutions, you need it for all defensive regulations. | ||
| The New York Times in trying to politicize this or in the wrong way makes it like this is all about Trump and what happened in Miami and all this. | ||
| It's far deeper than that. | ||
| The Leviathan, the administrative state, and you just heard Clyde on there talking about ATF, they make up their own laws. | ||
| They have their own executive branch, they have their own legislative branch, and they have their own enforcement branch. | ||
| Not just their own lawyers are coming after you, but they've got up-armored SWAT teams. | ||
| We're taking that apart. | ||
| And the brilliance of Clark, And Russ in their organization is that they have focused on the connective tissue or kind of the fungus that connects everything. | ||
| The lawyers and the general counsels and how it weaves into the entire system. | ||
| And that's what the delousing exercise is going to be that. | ||
| And Jeff Clark wrote this brilliant thing, and their heads are blowing up. | ||
| Because remember, this is what I keep telling people when they, oh, you know, the Constitution's been shredded. | ||
| So don't give me any, oh, the Constitution's been shredded by these people, been absolutely shredded. | ||
| And a new postmodern Constitution exists that they misinterpreted. | ||
| Look at Kavanaugh. But not just that, and they had an article the other day on some, I think it was some, not even a right-wing site, that the entire apparatus, these people are all neo-Marxist virtually to a person. | ||
| That's what you've got to take the trenching tool and take the trenching tool to it. | ||
| Take the trenching tool to it. | ||
| This is why the Republicans are controlled oppositions. | ||
| This is why you see the Keebler elves. | ||
| When they're talking about the Keebler elves are having a conversation amongst themselves that's not relevant to the point in history where the American Republic hanging by a thread is right now. | ||
| This is why I jumped on Massey the other day. | ||
| This kind of a feat intellectualism is fine for the parlors and the salons in a different time. | ||
| Don't waste our time now. | ||
| We're in a fight. We're in a fight for this republic. | ||
| Jeff Clark, we're going to bring you back at 6 for a deeper drawdown, particularly the paper you wrote that's got their heads blown up. | ||
| Because remember, they've got to make this false argument. | ||
| Oh, it's totally independent. That's why every time you walk in the Oval Office, you can't discuss over DOJ, you can't talk. | ||
| DOJ is in everything. | ||
| Just remember the whole big fight over the border and the invasion. | ||
| It ain't DHS, right? | ||
| It's really DOJ and the State Department. | ||
| State Department's legal is all over this. | ||
| So you've hit a tripwire. | ||
| Particularly the city, the imperial capital is all controlled by lawyers. | ||
| You've gone to the heart of it, Jeff, because you're talking about the big paydays for all the big white shoe law firms. | ||
| You truly are an apostate. | ||
| That's why they're trying to take your legal license. | ||
| They're throwing you out of the brotherhood, dude, because you didn't quite get the memo of how everybody makes tens of millions of dollars. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Jeff Clark. Well, Steve, you're absolutely right. | |
| It is tied into that. | ||
| And look, let me give you one example of how important this constitutional principle is. | ||
| And it's not about Trump. I thought about this from the first time I read the Constitution, probably around 1984, 1985, before I even went to college or law school. | ||
| I've just continued to think it. | ||
| It's the kind of thing where any conservative you talk to, they'll nod their head in the corner about it because they don't really have any arguments to the contrary, but that's not how they actually behave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What they've done since the Carter administration, Steve, is they've set up these memos One from the DOJ side and one from the White House side. | |
| And those memos say they try to tie down the president and prevent him from talking to the Justice Department. | ||
| And then they limit who in the Justice Department can be spoken to. | ||
| So, you know, the president under the memo doesn't even have the freedom to speak to and all of his Senate confirmed officials at the at the Justice Department. | ||
| Right. It makes absolutely no sense. | ||
| It's completely contrary to the take care clause of the Constitution. | ||
| And to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, which lets the President appoint anyone who's going to wield significant power and be a Senate-confirmed official. | ||
| Okay, 6 o'clock, I've got Naomi Wolf and I've got Jeff Clark. | ||
| We're going to do deep drill-downs on very important topics. | ||
| Jeff, how do people get to you? | ||
| How do they get to your social media and follow you over at the Center? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. So I'm at JeffClarkUS on Getter and Twitter and at RealJeffClark on Truth Social. | |
| And the center where you can follow our work and follow Russ Vogt is AmericaRenewing.com, Steve. | ||
| You know much, it hurts them to put Jeff Clark on the front page of the New York Times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That hurts deep. That hurts them deep, bro. | |
| Oh my God, suck on that. | ||
| Jeff Clark, you're doing God's work. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, sir. Thank you, Steve. | |
| My God, so great. | ||
| Natalie Winters, another... | ||
| You know, Natalie, I like to think I'm shocked. | ||
| Well, your story shocked me, and maybe I shouldn't be shocked. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've got too gentle a sensibility. | |
| Biden promoted Ukraine ambassador who attacked investigation into Hunter Biden. | ||
| Walk us through this. A piece up on Warren.org. | ||
| Walk us through this. Sure. | ||
| This really is just a wild story. | ||
| I know I used to be an investigative reporter. | ||
| Sometimes I take a break to help host the show, but this is one of those stories that I had to put my hat back on as an investigative reporter because this really is the connective tissue. | ||
| Obviously, the FBI is going to stonewall every inch, every millimeter. | ||
| Of this investigation into that 1023 form, but when you really look at the personnel that Joe Biden has been promoting within his regime, I think you can sort of reverse engineer a lot of the corruption that happened. | ||
| And a key individual to know the name of is someone called Jeff Pyatt. | ||
| Now, not only because he was the ambassador to Ukraine while Hunter Biden was on the payroll of Burisma, his appointment conveniently overlapped just about a year after Hunter Biden started getting His million-dollar-a-year retainer from the Ukrainian oil and gas company. | ||
| But what's even more interesting is that he used this very prominent public position to actually attack Viktor Shokin, the Ukrainian prosecutor general that Joe Biden had been basically lobbying to get removed from his position for conducting investigations into Burisma, into the corruption that was plaguing that company. | ||
| And we do have the clip of what he says, if Cameron wants to play it, I can either play it later tonight or when we return. | ||
| It's worth playing. No, no, no. | ||
| Yeah, I tell you what we're going to do. | ||
| We're taking a short commercial break. | ||
| What we're going to do is I want to play that as you're cold open when you come back. | ||
| This is what's so brazen about this, is their efforts now to suppress this, because, you know, you've got the crime and then you've got the cover-up. | ||
| The cover-up is actually jaw-dropping. | ||
| It is jaw-dropping. | ||
| And it's going to take... This is why Anna Paulina Luna, Natalie Winters, it's going to take these savages to break this and to get into it and to get all the information. | ||
| They are playing Stonewall Smash Mouth like you've never seen before. | ||
| Short break. Natalie Winters joins us on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the CCP. Here's your host, Stephen K. However, there is one glaring problem that threatens all of the good work that regional leaders here in Odessa, in Kharkiv, in Lviv and elsewhere are doing to improve the business climate and build a new model of government that serves the people. | ||
| That problem hinders everything that the RADA, the Cabinet, and the National Reform Council and others are doing to push political and economic reforms forward and make life better for Ukrainians. | ||
| And it flies in the face of what the revolution of dignity is meant to achieve. | ||
| That obstacle is the failure of the institution of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine to successfully fight internal corruption. | ||
| Rather than supporting Ukraine's reforms and working to root out corruption, corrupt actors within the Prosecutor General's office are making things worse by openly and aggressively undermining reform. | ||
| In defiance of Ukraine's leaders, these bad actors regularly hinder efforts to investigate and prosecute corrupt officials within the prosecutor general's office. | ||
| They intimidate and obstruct the efforts of those working honestly on reform initiatives within that same office. | ||
| The United States stands behind those who challenge these bad actors. | ||
| Okay, what did we just hear there? | ||
| And by the way, I should mention that Ukraine, the hundreds of billions of dollars you're given until we're going to fight until the last Ukrainian soldier is dead. | ||
| You're seeing this right now. | ||
| Guardian, everybody's got to... | ||
| Oh, they're being very quiet on the spring offensive, which they'd be beating their chest, and the reason the Russians are just... | ||
| These massive missile strikes into Odessa last night, I think back to Zelensky, also Zelensky's hometown. | ||
| The Russians are dug in and one of the, I think it's the Guardian said it's a ring of steel around eastern Ukraine. | ||
| And so this all ties together. | ||
| This is why, you know, people can't figure, why are we giving hundreds of billions of dollars to destroy the country and they're not going to take these territories back? | ||
| It's absurd on the face of it. | ||
| They're losing their country, they're losing their towns, they're losing their city. | ||
| What did we just see, Natalie? | ||
| Sure. I mean, these aid packages that we're seeing are not foreign aid. | ||
| I stand by my claim that they are taxpayer-funded bribes from the Biden regime to keep Ukraine quiet. | ||
| And this story is a perfect example of that. | ||
| So Jeff Pyatt, this was some career appointee. | ||
| He really was really a backbencher for the globalist wing of D.C. in the sense that he was hovering around All these random posts, like I said, was just a career appointee until he gets to the Ukraine desk and you start seeing him parrot these talking points coming from Joe Biden, criticizing Victor Shokin, the prosecutor general, going after Burisma. | ||
| But where this story really gets interesting and why I think Congress really should subpoena this individual, make him testify, Is because all of a sudden in the Joe Biden regime, he now becomes a political appointee and gets the highly coveted position of assistant secretary of state for energy resources and does all these media labs talking about how he is Joe Biden's quote point man on energy security. | ||
| So put simply an individual who was a career appointee, he really had no real status within the Democratic Party. | ||
| Starts attacking Burisma, rather the people investigating Burisma. | ||
| He's appointed at some point to be ambassador to Greece. | ||
| All of a sudden, Joe Biden becomes president, and now he's basically running energy security out of the State Department. | ||
| Yeah. Natalie's going to host a day at five. | ||
| She's going to get more into this. Here's what upsets me more. | ||
| They treat us like fools. | ||
| This is so brazen and up in your grill. | ||
| That they don't really even do an effort to hide it. | ||
| I mean, it's just so blatant and so brazen. | ||
| And if we don't stop this, if we can't stop this, you might as well give it up. | ||
| And this is why I get back to the effete intellectualism that is embedded in the Republican establishment and they go into Georgetown and these parties and everything here in the Imperial Capital. | ||
| We're at war. Okay? | ||
| And we're taking on the administrative state and we're taking on the corruption and what has happened. | ||
| The founders warned us against this. | ||
| Warned us about this constantly. | ||
| And now you're seeing it in these reports by Natalie. | ||
| And also you've seen the congressman over its watch looking at the SARS reports and Treasury which they can't get the redacted version unclassified in a skiff that they can't take notes out of. | ||
| They're just in your grill and it's going to take a blunt force instrument. | ||
| Did I mention Donald Trump? | ||
| A blunt force instrument to break this cartel. | ||
| And since they control the most powerful nation in the history of the earth, they're not just going to sit there, as I said, the day after we won in 16, they're not going to sit there and pat you on the head and say, this is terrific. | ||
| Here are the keys. That's not going to happen. | ||
| You're going to have to go in and take it. | ||
| Natalie Winters, how do people get to you? | ||
| And we'll see you back here tonight. | ||
| But where do people go in the interim? | ||
| When you set out to take Vienna, you got to take Vienna. | ||
| You can find me at Natalie G. Winters on all social media platforms. | ||
| When you set out, as Napoleon told his marshals, when you set out to take Vienna, take Vienna. | ||
| Natalie Winters, God bless you. | ||
| Look forward to the night. To show you what they really want to do, let's go to Michael Yan, the great Michael Yan. | ||
| Michael, tell us, you're reporting on this situation in the United States. | ||
| Michael Yan is not deep into Central America right now. | ||
| Michael, tell us what you've been doing, you and Benzman, but you've been doing this amazing. | ||
| If we can get some of the footage up, it's shocking. | ||
| What is happening inside the boundaries of the United States of America, sir? | ||
| Well, you know, yeah, Todd, Benjamin and I, we just spent a couple of days together in these colonias. | ||
| This is a massive colonia that you're showing right now, just north of Houston, near a place called Plum Grove. | ||
| I'm told, Todd and I were told a couple of days ago that the owner of this property just bought another 35,000 acres atop all this. | ||
| So for a total, maybe 55,000 acres, we're trying to nail that down. | ||
| We had to go get an airplane the next day after this footage was taken. | ||
| We got an airplane yesterday. | ||
| Unfortunately, we could only get 1,800 feet above it due to cloud cover. | ||
| And 1,800 feet was not enough for us to get... | ||
| This is drone footage you're looking at here, but we were much higher in the airplane. | ||
| But even at 1,800 feet in the airplane, we could not get... | ||
| We couldn't see it all. | ||
| I mean, it's so big. | ||
| You have to, you know, get much higher. | ||
| So I'm gonna go back with a helicopter. | ||
| But bottom line is... | ||
| This is a city for illegal aliens, run and controlled by illegal aliens, basically helped finance by the cartels. | ||
| Is that what we're seeing here in the United States? | ||
| Well, you know, the Department of Homeland Security just announced yesterday, I just got it late last night, announced that they're doling out more than $200 million. | ||
| Was it $239 million? | ||
| I read it late last night to communities that are taking in the illegals. | ||
| This was obviously on the ground, Todd and I, the other day. | ||
| Keep in mind, these colonias, they're called colonias in Spanish, which means colony. | ||
| These are all over the place. | ||
| They're all over Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and they're popping up in different parts of the United States. | ||
| This one's massive. One elected official, I won't say his name, but he told us a couple of days ago he thinks that 200,000 can fit in the one that you're showing now when they're finished constructing it. | ||
| Again, this is just north of Houston. | ||
| Keep in mind, many of the people that are coming in, the different sorts of aliens that are coming in, go into different ecosystems. | ||
| For instance, the Chinese. | ||
| Many of those go to, for instance, New York, like Flushing, New York. | ||
| They have communities that they go into already that are sort of waiting for more hands to come in. | ||
| Some of the Chinese were just arrested on some of the illegal marijuana farms in different states in the last week or so. | ||
| So the Chinese will go into their ecosystem, Indians go into their ecosystem, Somalis will go up to Somaliland, and many of the Venezuelans and the Guatemalans and the Mexicans, they will go into these colonias, many of those will. | ||
| In fact, two days ago, Todd Benzman and I were at one of the colonias where about a month ago, one of the illegal aliens, a Mexican who had been deported multiple times, he was out shooting his rifle at night and the neighbors complained. | ||
| So he came over to the neighbor's house. | ||
| We were just at the neighbor's house. | ||
| There's bullet holes in the door. | ||
| The illegal alien, a Mexican, shot through the door and there's holes in the door. | ||
| We were just there and he killed them. | ||
| He killed five of them, right? | ||
| So he killed a child and some women and a total of five. | ||
| Slow down. The mass killing that took place outside of Houston a couple weeks ago, that was in this colony? | ||
| Very close to it. | ||
| We drove to it from this call, and it was 15 minutes away or so. | ||
| Todd and I were there. | ||
| The one house, law enforcement gave us the address. | ||
| The one house where the neighbor, the illegal alien Mexican who had been deported, was in that house. | ||
| He was out shooting his rifle at night. | ||
| The other neighbor complained and called 911 multiple times. | ||
| The alien Mexican with the rifle came over to their house next door. | ||
| We were at both houses. They're next door to each other. | ||
| And shot through the door. | ||
| And there's bullet holes still in the door. | ||
| And went inside and killed them. | ||
| Killed five of them, including a nine-year-old child. | ||
| Are you saying that these colonies, are they subject? | ||
| Is law enforcement actually... | ||
| Are they executing on U.S. law there, or are they run by themselves? | ||
| Are these no-go zones? | ||
| Well, from what law enforcement told Todd and I in the last couple of days, ICE doesn't even go in there. | ||
| Other law enforcement has started to do some raids into this colonia, but mostly it's like a giant no-go zone. | ||
| And right now, according to Benzman, you know, Todd Benzman is a serious guy. | ||
| Actually, the last chapter in his latest book is a very interesting chapter. | ||
| The book is called Overrun. | ||
| And the last chapter in his book, Overrun, is about this colonia in Liberty County, Texas. | ||
| Liberty County is just north of Houston. | ||
| So, again, it's so big that I have to go back with a helicopter. | ||
| We were out in a Cessna yesterday and we could only get to 1,800 feet. | ||
| I've got to go back and get better footage from the air. | ||
| Michael, Todd told Jessica it's 75,000 to 100,000 people, but you're breaking additional news. | ||
| Are you telling this audience that there's other of these colonias or colonies in other states, New Mexico, Arizona, California? | ||
| Is this just not Liberty County in Texas? | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's others? There are others. | |
| This is the biggest, according to Benzman and others that we were speaking with over the last couple. | ||
| Todd and I just spent two days together running around, actually four days together. | ||
| We were two days in another part of Texas. | ||
| And so these colonias are all over the place, actually. | ||
| And as you know, we can break this down further and go to another part of this whole story is La Raza and Reconquesta. | ||
| Of course, there's many Mexicans that want to take huge parts of the United States, including all of Texas. | ||
| A big part of California and other states, New Mexico, Arizona. | ||
| And they're making progress. | ||
| And this is, there's a reason they call them colonias, right? | ||
| I mean, they are colonizing. | ||
| They are literally taking over parts of Texas slowly. | ||
| I talked with a rancher the other night. | ||
| Her husband is dead now. | ||
| And we talked for a couple of hours. | ||
| And she said she picked up three hotspots on her phone the other night because, and she lives way out In the middle of nowhere, she said suddenly she's getting three hotspots because there's aliens so close to her home, right? | ||
| Suddenly she just happened to notice she got three new hotspots on her phone. | ||
| You'll see down here, you know Kenny County, you know Sheriff Coe. | ||
| He'll tell you stories. | ||
| The other sheriffs will tell you stories. | ||
| about that they come in, the aliens come in and instead of breaking down the front door, which will maybe set off alarms, they get on the roof and go like a rat through the roof and break into the home, live in the home and go out the roof or go out the front door if they don't care the alarm goes off when they leave. | ||
| So this is happening all over the place. | ||
| It's being reconquered now because ranchers are leaving. | ||
| Michael, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| How do they follow your reporting? | ||
| Where do they go to the website? Thanks, Steve. | ||
| I'm on Getter at MichaelYan1776. | ||
| And I took that photo of the sniper in combat in Afghanistan, actually. | ||
| And I'm on Twitter, of course, Michael underscore Yan. | ||
| And I'm on Getter every day. | ||
| And I'm on Locals at MichaelYan. | ||
| Your stuff's amazing. | ||
| This colony story, we've got to put it to the Texas officials. | ||
| Forget the federal government who is exacerbating. | ||
| Why is Abbott and Texas officials looking the other way on this? | ||
| Because people are making a ton of money. | ||
| Michael Yon, thank you, sir. | ||
| Stay safe. Terry Schilling next in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there's no war. | |
| Let's take down the CCP. Your host, Stephen K. Band. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. Charlie Kirk at noon, Posobiec at 2. | ||
| We're back 5 to 7. | ||
| It's going to be insane this evening. | ||
| We've got so much going on, as you can tell from this morning's show. | ||
| The big march from the cathedral to Dodger Stadium to stop this desecration of Of the Catholic Church out there and Christianity will take place. | ||
| Go to Yelp. Let's get the poster up. | ||
| Mo and Grace put it out to everybody. | ||
| It's going to start, I think, at 4.30 Pacific time. | ||
| Make sure everybody's out there. | ||
| Particularly Hispanic Catholics, it's time to step up to the plate. | ||
| The Archdiocese is a disgrace of how they're saying we've got to die. | ||
| You don't dialogue with these people. | ||
| You shut this stuff down. | ||
| There's nothing to talk about. | ||
| No need to dialogue. | ||
| There is nothing to talk about. | ||
| Terry Schilling, Brother, I'm going to try to get you on the show. | ||
| You can't do this afternoon. Maybe we do tomorrow. | ||
| The Washington Post coming after America Principles Project because the polling is shifting dramatically in our favor and they don't like it, sir. | ||
| Yeah, well, Steve, if you look at the headline that The Washington Post is running, they're saying that LGBTQ Americans have largest support they've ever had, but also facing the fiercest backlash. | ||
| You dig into that story, Steve, and you look at the polling from Gallup, they're losing on the policy fronts. | ||
| And what are the policy fronts? | ||
| It's all around our kids. It's around girls and their sports. | ||
| It's around the LA Dodgers and what we're seeing is a complete mockery of our Christian faith. | ||
| We are kicking their tails. | ||
| We are kicking their butts. All across the board, we've got 22 states that have protected women's sports, 20 states that have banned these gender destruction surgeries, and they don't know what to do with it because the polling shows that people support transgender people doing what they want, but they're seeing this huge backlash just because it's all about kids. | ||
| The American people are much smarter than what the mainstream media gives them credit for, and that is because the American people know that it's our kids that are in the crosshairs now. | ||
| They've already got the equality stuff for all the adults that are LGBTQ. What they're going to now, where they're expanding, is to our kids. | ||
| And, you know, Steve, I just want to say 22 states, women's sports are being protected. | ||
| 20 states are banning these procedures that are destroying our kids' genders and erasing them. | ||
| And I remember this fight was so lonely in the early days. | ||
| But War Room, you guys, the War Room Posse, they were the first ones to come on board in this fight. | ||
| And we'd be nowhere without you guys. | ||
| No, they're going to man the ramparts. | ||
| Where do people go on social media? | ||
| How do they find out about American principle? | ||
| We'll have you back on to drill down more of this. | ||
| But clearly, this can't be left to stand. | ||
| Let me just be blunt. That desecration that took place at the White House last Saturday is horrific. | ||
| One of the worst things. The worst thing that's happened at the White House since it got burned by the British. | ||
| Okay? The worst thing. | ||
| A complete and total desecration of old glory, our flag, of the White House itself. | ||
| Terry, where do people go? Well, if you guys want to take back the White House in 2024 and really push back against all this, go to AmericanPrinciplesProject.org. | ||
| Support our campaigns and elections project to take back the White House and take this whole fight federally. | ||
| We're maxed out at the state level, and we've got to take back the White House if we want to turn things around now. | ||
| Fights that matter. Terry, thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you for being the tip of the spear here. | ||
| Appreciate it. Thanks, Steve. Someone's putting their values where their business is. | ||
| Glenn Story of Patriot Mobile and Lee Walmscott. | ||
| Tell us, this fight, walk us through how, and we keep telling people, stop giving money to people that hate you. | ||
| Walk us through the Patriot Mobile story. | ||
| Why should we use Patriot Mobile and what's the benefit from it? | ||
| Yeah, I'll do that first, Lee. | ||
| Then you jump in where I mess up, because she's always a little bit more articulate than I am. | ||
| But anyway, my name is Glenn Story. | ||
| I'm the CEO and founder of Patriot Mobile, and Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservatives wireless provider. | ||
| What is a wireless provider? | ||
| Well, we sell cell phones and cell phone service to large organizations and individuals, and we carve out a portion of every invoice and donate that to one of our four pillars. | ||
| That would be First Amendment, Second Amendment, Right to Life, Military and First Responders. | ||
| And we really look at that and say, we think those are biblical principles in nature. | ||
| So we like to put God first in everything we do. | ||
| He is at the helm of our business, and we are His stewards. | ||
| And we really feel like we are Christians in everything that we do doesn't make us perfect, but it certainly makes us where we want to support Christian values. | ||
| Well, I mean, you talk about censorship and all these other issues. | ||
| You know, look, we as Christian conservatives, we're on the road to forming a red economy, and we're one piece of that pie. | ||
| And I think if people really look at every aspect of their life and where they're spending their money, you know, it's really crazy. | ||
| I have volunteers that walk hundreds of houses, and people give hundreds of thousands of dollars to campaigns. | ||
| And you spend all of this time fighting evil and trying to protect your children, but yet you're giving money to organizations constantly. | ||
| And entities who are funding the very things that are tearing at the fabric of America, it just doesn't make sense. | ||
| So we're growing by leaps and bounds because people are waking up to what's really happening out there. | ||
| And we're doing great. | ||
| Obviously, we want more and more business because the stronger we get, the more we can give back to the cause and support a freer America. | ||
| Amen. Glenn, what they're trying to do with what Lee just said, whether it's The Economist magazine, BBC, The Guardian, New York Times, they're trying to say, well, Glenn's story is, and we've just got about a minute and a half here, but Glenn's story is the head of really a Christian nationalist movement in this nation. | ||
| What say you, sir? You know, if that's what they want to call us as a Christian nationalist, so be it. | ||
| You know, if we put God first, you know, I look at it as God, country, and family. | ||
| And if we put those three things in front of it and that makes us a Christian nationalist, well, so be it. | ||
| Hey, I do want to bring up one thing very quickly. | ||
| You know, I'm about to say how we are going to be. | ||
| Go ahead. Where are we going to be next week? | ||
| So, you know, next week, next Saturday is the one-year anniversary of the Dobbs case that overturned Roe v. | ||
| Wade, and we are a sponsor of the National Celebrate Life Rally at the Lincoln Memorial, 1030 in Washington. | ||
| I just did. I'm going to interrupt. | ||
| You know, she and I, we're very good friends. | ||
| We work together almost every day. | ||
| What's really gonna happen? | ||
| You get to speak from the National Monument, Lee. | ||
| It's a bucket list thing. | ||
| Patriot Mobile is a sponsor of the event, and I get to speak at the Lincoln Memorial to talk about a God thing. | ||
| It's gonna be pretty incredible. | ||
| Well, we'll do live coverage of it. | ||
| Okay, I want to have you guys back on. | ||
| I want to promote this. Make sure we get a massive crowd out there. | ||
| Lee, Glenn, thank you very much. | ||
| Patriot Mobile. You just heard it from Glenn's mouth. | ||
| Hey, if they're going to call us Christian nationalists, so be it. | ||
| He ain't backing off. | ||
| Not one inch. | ||
| Stop giving your money to people that hate you. | ||
| Give your money for services and products for people that support your values. | ||
| Charlie Kirk, Jack Posobiec, three hours. |
Export Selection