All Episodes
Feb. 23, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
47:33
WarRoom Battleground EP 240: The WHO And Tyranny Throughout The Globe
Participants
Main voices
m
mike davis
07:10
n
naomi wolf
16:27
s
steve bannon
11:27
Appearances
j
joe allen
03:32
p
peter thiel
01:04
Clips
e
elon musk
00:22
y
yuval noah harari
00:53
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
steve bannon
This is what you're fighting for.
I mean, every day you're out there.
What they're doing is blowing people off.
If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians get total control and total power.
Because this is just like in Arizona.
This is just like in Georgia. It's another element that backs them into a quarter and shows their lies and misrepresentations.
This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged.
As we've told you, this is the fight.
unidentified
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth.
joe allen
War Room. Battleground.
unidentified
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
steve bannon
Okay, welcome back. It's Ash Wednesday.
It is the 20th of February in the year of our Lord, 2023.
We are trying to track down.
We're going to start with a little about Lent with Father McTeague, our favorite Jesuit.
We're trying to track him down.
Also, John Mills hopefully will join us in a little while to give us an update of what's happening out at Oak Ridge.
It's kind of very murky right now.
But we just had Peter Navarro.
I want to continue on this discussion.
I got Naomi Wolf here.
Naomi, you've got other Research reports we want to talk about, but I got to ask you about this WHO. You were very helpful with us back, and I think it was in the spring of last year when people were all over this.
It seems to have raised its head.
Peter Navarro has kind of gone off the chain on this thing and said, we got to get focused on this.
This is really bad, and it's just unacceptable.
Give us your thoughts, since you were so important the last time around.
naomi wolf
Thank you, and I want to really credit James Roguski, who really sounded the alarm early on when this was going to be buried.
So these people, they're like a hydra.
You can lop off one head metaphorically and think you're safe, and then another one will just rise up and come at you.
This is the same global treaty with which we were threatened, I think, four or five months ago.
And it's a treaty that is a World Health Organization treaty that basically declares that when the WHO says there's a pandemic, however they define pandemic, they get to kind of take over operations related to public health and global health that would previously been the domain of that nation state.
So it's basically dissolving nation states, which is what these globalists Always want to do.
They hate the nation state because the nation state empowers citizens and the nation state is what you need to have a democracy.
So it's back again, you know, like a horror movie.
And basically, once again, they're kind of sneaking in when there are a lot of distractions, a lot of drama happening on the chessboard to draw our attention away from it.
But it's and it's there are not a lot of details that I can find.
But basically, it's the same premise that it's a global treaty They want 127 nations to sign it.
They want the United States to sign it.
The United States, I believe, is planning to sign it and basically does hand over kind of our sovereignty.
There's no other way to put it to what will be a kind of a global health police and giving all of the decision making to the World Health Organization, which, of course, is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation disproportionately and their best friends, the Chinese Communist Party.
steve bannon
Plus, it's in Geneva, and I keep trying to tell people.
We want to make sure people get oriented here.
When we talk about the United Nations, the kind of showtime in the place where there's all high drama is New York City with the amazingly elegant building, and it's had so much coverage over the years and so many dramatic moments.
But that's a very small part of it.
The engine room where the work really takes place is in Geneva.
Right? And in Geneva, you've got World Health, you've got UNESCO, you've got all of them.
That is the apparatus that runs things, and they're totally globalist.
But as Ambassador Bremberg, who is the ambassador, there's two ambassadors to the UN, one that goes to New York, which is the Nikki Haley, the other that goes and does the hard work, which is Geneva.
And he's a pretty sophisticated guy.
He said, Steve, when I got there, I was stunned of how much the Chinese Communist Party is everywhere.
They've staffed everything. Here's what I think is shocking to people, Naomi.
If it hadn't been for Rogowski, who's a lone investigative reporter out in LA, and then people like yourself getting on top of this, people are sitting there going, how much of this stuff is happening that we don't even see?
If you didn't have Rogowski and then you didn't have Naomi and some other people jump on this thing, you would not know, we would never know about this.
How much of this is actually going on day to day?
naomi wolf
Well, it's nonstop.
And I think, I hope that this audience by now sees all the interlocking pieces All these pieces work together.
They're trying to implement them all at once.
And again, they won't stop.
So the same week or two weeks that we see the reintroduction of this treaty, and if you think that the Global Health Police aren't scary, remember that HHS kind of diverted all of our taxpayer money over the last three years and essentially militarized it down to the county level, keeping you in your home, doing horrible things to separate you from decision-making about your child.
You know, denying people health care if they weren't vaccinated or denying them jobs, trying to impose mandates, doing awful things to us, you know, trying to create quarantine camps that here in New York State we narrowly diverted through massive opposition.
But they're, you know, they succeeded in creating quarantine camps in places like Australia, New Zealand, certainly China.
And so that's just one piece of it.
But the other piece happened in the same two weeks is Tony Blair declaring that There needs to be a global ID or a social credit score basically in Britain and making the statement that there needs to be kind of this global digital identifier about which we've been screaming since March of 2021 when we realized what a vaccine passport really was, which is a China-style social credit system.
And the United States has declared that they're rolling out a digital currency.
And other countries also are rolling out a digital currency.
So you should see, you should recognize by now that all these pieces want to interlock, as well as the 15-minute cities.
And I'm a big environmentalist, but they're definitely using climate change and green energy and the need to create a green economy as a stocking horse for global totalitarianism.
And, you know, smart cities, 15-minute cities, You know, a massive centralization of economies.
I didn't think they were really, these people were really communists till I read the Green New Deal a couple of years ago.
And it actually centralizes the economy in the hands of 15 unelected Americans, basically.
It's a Marxist centrally planned economy.
So all of these things are locked into place.
And I used to think that people who talked about, you know, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, which is, these are kind of UN maps to A kind of digitized, surveilled, feudal global autocracy run by technocrats out of the UN, World Economic Forum, World Health Organization.
I thought people who talked about that were crazy, but we all see that these are real policies that are really being rolled out by real globalists, you know, presented in Davos, rolled out six months to a year and a half later, and we are the target.
So we have to be hypervigilant all the time.
It is It is a battle.
And I just want to add in closing that I've been saying to you, Steve, and to your audience that we're under attack.
I've been saying it for a year.
I think there's no doubt now it's a hot war.
Things are blowing up and derailing, sabotage, derailment, explosions, attacks on our food supply in multiple locations.
And it's really escalating.
A balloon, a spy balloon, another all kinds of...
Structures are traversing our skies, and it's being demonstrated to us that our sovereignty is a joke.
And if we can't read that theatrics, we're blind.
So that's what I see happening.
steve bannon
Real quickly, how do people, because we're going to talk in a second about the reports and another of these reports you're doing.
Your call to actions get a lot of people motivated, and your work product has been so powerful.
People, hey, if I'm going to give my time or my money to Naomi, something good's going to happen.
What's the call to action here?
What do people need to do on this WHO situation?
naomi wolf
It's difficult. I mean, they have to do what they did before, and we have to keep doing it.
I mean, last time it was nothing but Hundreds of thousands of people mobilizing to berate their elected officials to stop the signing of this treaty.
And people are going to have to do it again.
They're going to have to scream and yell at their elected officials.
They're going to have to go to their state houses as well because there's really interesting models we're seeing of states seceding from globalist plans.
Counties in Florida not taking COVID money, not taking Basically, money laundered from the CCP through the CARES Act and all the way down to coerce us at the state and local level.
I think we have to pass legislation to basically say we will never, and one bill can do it, right?
We will never be part of a global treaty that suspends our sovereignty in any way.
I mean, that's supposed to be the Constitution of the United States, but obviously that's not restraining these people, but we have to We have to pass a bill, and now you guys are in the majority, so nothing should stop you.
steve bannon
Okay. We're going to get the numbers.
I think Michelle Bachman is going to join us tomorrow, Friday.
We're going to get on top of this, get all the numbers, what you have to do, because this is another big one to have a cold arms.
You've got more research.
I want to go back. I want to talk about the continuing.
You know, they had this fiasco over at Veritas with these hits.
Who knows if we're going to see any more of those.
What we have is your research with the Warren Posse, these great lawyers you have, Amy Kelly, the entire team.
naomi wolf
Give us the latest. I will, but before I do, I just want to say I know it's hard to imagine that you can pass legislation to say never will we be part of a treaty that suspends our national sovereignty given the Senate and this administration, but I think it's worth fighting that fight because I think there may be people who are as alarmed on both sides of the aisle.
steve bannon
Oh, I think, by the way, I think it's a great messaging thing.
I want to get that out there.
I think in 2024, people like yourself, people who would never work together, who think each other are enemies, all of a sudden start saying, well, hang on, I kind of agree with that.
What is this? I think these types of things are going to see much more.
We're remaking politics right now in this country, right?
Right. With different alliances and different coalitions.
So I think, like I said, Robert F. Kennedy could jump into the Republican primary for president and Only DeSantis and Trump, I think, would do better.
Like I said, you could add up Nikki Haley and everybody else.
Now, I know he won't do that, but my point is, if he had said that a couple of years ago, people would say, Steve, you're a nutcase, right?
But now he's got such a...
On our audience, he's got a massive following.
I mean, I think we sold 750,000 copies of the book, right, just in the war room.
He sold over a million and a half copies of the book, right, or almost a million seven-five now, I think.
It's incredible. People love this guy.
But no, you're going to see different coalitions.
I think part of it is like what you've pulled together.
You know, when you first came on the show, if you had told me a year and a half or two years later that Naomi Wolf would put out a personal call to action on the show and 3,500 volunteers from our vast audience would turn up and work like crazy and create something that was historic and it's changing that, I said, no, it's not going to happen.
These kind of miracles, these mini-miracles are coming along every day, and that's why I think people love getting you on here with your updates about what other bomb you drop on us, all right?
And Father McTeague is going to follow you with why we need Lent more than ever.
So I want Naomi to go first, so you really feel like you need it before I get Father McTeague up.
All right. So tell us about your latest.
naomi wolf
Yeah, you're going to really want any kind of repentance that...
You know, divine intervention after you hear this one.
You know, any religion, I'll take it.
Like, whatever works.
So this is Report 57, and it's, you know, it's as shocking as any of them.
And this is from Joseph Garrett, M.D., and I stress the M.D., Barbara Garrett, M.D., Dr.
Chris Flowers, and Lori Britt.
And these are team one of the War Room Pfizer documents, the War Room Daily Cloud Pfizer documents volunteers team.
And it shows that 542 neurological adverse events were reported to Pfizer in the first 90 days after their rollout began.
95 % of those were serious, and there were 16 deaths.
As in many, many of these reports, we see the same trend or theme of women.
Really, it's a war against women, women suffering and dying at disproportionate rates.
In this case, Females suffered adverse events more than twice as frequently as males did.
So believe it or not, in this document, 5.3.6, there's something called a system organ class of adverse events.
And these are neurological.
These include altered function of the brain.
And remember, we've been talking and I wrote an essay about people reporting personality changes, cognitive changes, dementias in their loved ones after vaccination.
I know the mechanism for that now, sadly, spinal cord or peripheral nerves.
So they remind you that all of these adverse events were in only 90 days, and key points include the 501 neurological events, of which 95 % were serious.
16 patients died, as I mentioned.
Now, yet again, and this is the third time there's this pattern, 50 % of the events occurred within the first 24 hours after injection, equating to over 270 adverse neurological events in a single day.
So, you know, the spokesmodels say correlation is not causation.
We don't know it was the vaccine.
Well, it's pretty clear it was the vaccine if it happened within 24 hours of the injection.
69 % of the neurological events affected females, as mentioned.
There were 376 seizures reported.
12 of which were status epilepticus, a rare condition of prolonged seizure or a series of seizures that is life-threatening.
There were 38 cases of multiple sclerosis following this injection, 11 cases of transverse myelitis, which is a destructive inflammation of the spinal cord, 10 cases of of optic neuritis, inflammation of the optic nerve, the nerve of the eye, threatening blindness.
24 cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, ascending paralysis from nerve inflammation.
You've seen that in influencers on social media showing their Guillain-Barre syndrome, their asymmetrical faces with paralysis.
Three cases of meningitis, which is infection and inflammation of the fluid and membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
Seven cases of encephalopathy, which is a disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure.
And the hallmark is that altered mental state.
Again, so many people saying, my loved one is explosive.
He used to be so calm.
My loved one, you know, can't make decisions now.
My loved one has no focus.
Altered mental states. And only this is, you know, yet another example.
This is just so evil and maddening of Pfizer doing kind of You know, Satan's science in the sense of lying, lying, lying with science.
In this case, and they've done this throughout, in this case, they only report adverse events that occurred two or more times are specifically reported in the diagnoses list.
There are 20 serious events that happened just once and thus Pfizer did not include them.
So they peel down the real number by just arbitrarily saying if it has to happen twice, In order to be recorded here as an adverse event.
So, you know, this is yet another incredibly shocking report.
We actually now know the mechanism, or at least what could be one mechanism, which is these lipid nanoparticles, which I go back to over and over, that for 10 years they've known they traverse every membrane in the human body.
They also traverse the myelin sheath.
And that's the sheath around the nerve.
And it's the sheath that allows for nervous conduction, for the electrical impulses of nerve conduction to be successful.
So the lipid nanoparticles are degrading the sheath around the nerves that allows the nerve to behave normally.
And that's one possible reason that you're getting all of these Inflammatory conditions, all these degradings of neural function.
And it's absolutely heartbreaking.
steve bannon
Where do you go from here on this one?
naomi wolf
I mean, where do we go from here?
You know, our lawsuits continue.
The two teams are continuing to prosecute their lawsuits.
steve bannon
Let me ask you, I know we've reached out to Big Pharma, to Pfizer and these guys.
If they want to bring somebody on here, we just get crickets.
Nothing. They don't know. Have you guys reached out?
Is anybody on your team reaching out?
It's probably too early for the lawyers, but has anybody just reached out and said, hey, maybe we're misreading this.
Maybe we don't have it correct.
Can you help us out here? Do they have any hotline to walk people through the documents the federal court made them turn over?
naomi wolf
This has been so extraordinary, Steve, because there's been no coverage, zero coverage of these massive findings.
No response from Pfizer, no response from pharma, and no response from the legacy media except the kind of backtracking that you see, you know, the major media doing as it becomes clear that they've debilitated and hurt and murdered a bunch of Americans and people around the world.
So we do have some contact with pharma spokespeople.
Our wonderful reporter Etana Hecht went undercover to a discussion for the kind of spokesmodel influencers.
It was a public discussion and she recorded it and she wrote a piece about it.
And she basically asked, you know, what do we say to people when they ask us about the damage that's now coming to light?
And she got kind of a non-answer from them.
I haven't formally reached out to Pfizer.
I will. I will tomorrow.
I expect they won't respond to me.
I certainly can reach out to Rochelle Walensky.
I'll call her tomorrow. I'll certainly call Carol Crawford, who is the target of my lawsuit because she illegally colluded with Twitter and the White House and the CDC to de-platform and attack me after my correct warning to women about menstrual harms in June of 2021.
You know, I'll try, but I think their method is pretty clear.
Memory hold it, hope we go away, hope that we get boxed in to alternative media and to talking to conservatives who don't hold the major microphone right now in terms of American media.
They've got the big guns.
Outlawyer us, outgun us, outweigh us.
That's why I think it's so important for individuals to use the template that James Ostrowski, our lawyer, created where you can file criminal and civil complaints.
I think it's also really, really important to advance the kind of legislation that we're seeing across the United States and also at the federal level to, for instance, strip impunity and immunity from pharma and end the PrEP Act, allow them to be sued.
But it's now time for criminal investigations.
And respectfully, I am waiting for the Republicans on the Hill to do more than a theatrical dressing down of Rochelle Walensky.
I mean, there's a lot more to be done.
You know, that was barely a slap on the wrist.
steve bannon
It's too performative right now.
How do people get to the site?
How do they get to all these reports?
How do they get the book? How do they get your bodies of others and all your content?
naomi wolf
Thank you. And I do want to say, Daniel Horowitz, to his credit, is giving the War Room Daily Clout, Pfizer Documents Analysis Reports book to elected officials at the state level.
And he's He's trying to pass really good legislation at the state level, and we at Daily Cloud are partnering with him to help him, and I think that's a great way to go.
I mean, there are a bunch of good bills to, you know, tie the hands of these people, if not to prosecute them yet.
And so what you can do is you must please go to Kindle and look up War Room Daily Cloud Pfizer Documents analysis reports.
You can order them on Kindle, but very exciting.
You can also pre-order.
We're going to have a landing page up This week on Daily Cloud, you can preorder your paper back so that you can physically, as I said earlier, plop this book down, all 500 plus pages on the desk of your evil or negligent doctor, evil or negligent elected official, and force them to confront the truth, the receipts, as Daniel Horowitz puts it, of this massive crime against humanity.
And you can always come to us at dailycloud.io, become a member.
Or support us. We're working so hard using all of your support to continue to hold these people accountable, and this document really is a map to prosecution.
steve bannon
Naomi, fantastic work.
We're going to come back to you on this WHO situation for next week, but really appreciate you coming on and all the hard work you guys are doing over there.
Just incredible leadership. Thank you.
naomi wolf
Thank you so much, Steve. I appreciate you.
steve bannon
Should we run? Should we run?
Should Naomi Wolf run for the Senate in New York State?
Maybe we'll talk about that.
Maybe in the Senate, take on Gillibrand in AOC or whoever else is going to run.
Naomi Wolf. I kind of like that.
I like the sound of that.
I like the sound of that.
naomi wolf
Well, I'm looking for denying that idea.
So lots of work for us all to do.
unidentified
Thank you so much. Thank you, ma'am.
steve bannon
Appreciate it. I want to bring in Father Frank McTeague now.
One of my favorite books is Christendom Lost and Found.
And normally, Father, when I think of you, it's one of the great books you've written about.
You did the philosophy of everyday life and this, which is just a great—it nurtures you.
I didn't think I'd find spiritual guidance in one of my favorite tabloids, the Boston Herald, but I'm the Boston Herald, and I've got Why We Need Lent More Than Ever.
Why do we need Lent more than ever, Father?
unidentified
Because we still haven't learned our lesson.
The lesson is this.
We're sinners who are called to be saints.
We can't fix that problem on our own.
We need to get free from the illusions and the addictions that the world, the flesh, and the devil offer us.
And then we need to get free for the grace and glory that God desperately wants to give us.
And because we get distracted, oh, shiny, dance is what stars is on.
We decide that we don't really have to pay attention to God We can just get on as business as usual and then we're owed the happiness of heaven and the reason that we get ashes on ash wednesday i don't have mine yet because i haven't offered mass yet is to remind us that business as usual is over business as usual is going to kill us it's time for us to get serious that christ crucified is christ risen is christ reigning is christ returning and we have to get ready for those great events Father,
steve bannon
we have a large evangelical audience and obviously Jewish and people that are secular.
Walk through Ash Wednesdays today.
What is it? We've got about two minutes here and we'll hold you through the break.
Ash Wednesdays today, but then there's 40 days.
Walk us through the power of it.
What's the structure of it?
unidentified
We know that the Sunday before Easter is Palm Sunday and we pass out palms in our churches and wave them around.
And then we burn them afterwards, and those ashes are what we are marked with on Ash Wednesday.
The traditional formula when we're marked with ashes is to say, remember man that thou art dust, and unto dust thou shalt return.
And this is something that the evangelicals will understand very well.
When you die, are you going to go to heaven?
And if we die as sinners rather than saints, the answer is no.
So we spend 40 days in fasting prayer Sacrifices, contemplating Christ crucified, so that we can enter into the joy and glory of Easter, not only in April, but also at our death as well.
So it's 40 days of rigorous sacrificial preparation to get us ready for Easter.
And the celebration of Easter is meant to get us ready for eternity.
steve bannon
Father, can you just hang on one second?
We're going to take a short break.
I want to bring you back on the other side.
Father Frank McTague, one of the most articulate Jesuits out there.
We also have Mike Davis.
We were at the Supreme Court on this massive tech lawsuit the other day.
It got quite complicated, and quite frankly, at the oral arguments, It wasn't kind of your normal oral arguments.
Didn't go quite well. I think for either side, we're going to get Mike Davis in here.
Of course, Joe Allen is going to be here with more updates on transhumanism and particularly artificial intelligence.
Short commercial break.
We're going to be back in the war room on Ash Wednesday.
So, in a moment.
Why the rigor? Why the fasting, the abstinence, the prayer, the meditation?
unidentified
Why all of it? Well, 40 is a very biblically significant number.
Our Lord spent 40 days in the desert.
The Hebrew people spent 40 years wandering in the desert.
So we have 40 days to prepare ourselves for Easter.
Why the rigor?
Why the fasting? I want to draw an analogy.
Recently, the Navy said, It was going to lower its physical standards in order to meet its recruitment goals.
That's not how warriors are made.
Spiritually, Christians are meant to be warriors.
Ephesians 6, put on the whole armor of God.
1 Peter 5, the devil is a roaring lion.
If we only play at being sinners, we can only play at being saved.
And if we can't discipline our appetites for something so simple As not eating a hamburger on a Friday in Lent, what are we going to do when the world, the flesh or the devil offer us the really good stuff?
When they start to offer us power and money and so on.
An alcoholic knows that he can't play at trying to get sober.
It's all the way in or he's going to die.
Likewise, as sinners, we have to train to be warriors.
We know that sin will kill us.
It will deprive us of the happiness of heaven and that the world gets to us through the flesh.
So in imitation of the rigors and disciplines of our crucified Lord, we take on these challenges, not out of contempt for the body, but respect for body and soul together.
steve bannon
By the way, the article's in the Boston Herald.
We're gonna put it up everywhere on all our sites and in the chat rooms right now.
Grace Chung and Captain Banner will do it.
Also the book, Christendom Lost and Found, essays for a post-post-Christian world.
Very powerful and of course, real philosophy, real people.
Father, what is your website?
What's your social media? How do people follow you, sir?
unidentified
Sure. Go to heraldofthegospel.org, heraldofthegospel.org.
And you can find my daily show, The Catholic Current, at thestationofthecross.com.
steve bannon
Father, honored to have you on here.
Thank you very much for joining us on Ash Wednesday.
unidentified
Thank you so much. A happy privilege.
Look forward to next time. Great.
steve bannon
Thank you, sir. Mike Davis.
By the way, I've got Joe Allen with another blockbuster transhumanist.
Mike, I want to get you in here because there's been a lot of confusion.
People reached out to me, and you've been our sherpa in all this, the guide.
What happened the other day?
You've been on, we've got to get the big tech, and we've got to take big tech apart, and then we had this huge case in the Supreme Court.
But the reporting has been...
Were the judges not up to speed?
Did the justices not know what's going on?
Were the arguments bad? It seems like it was more than any other thing that's happened recently in one of these big cases, a fairly chaotic oral argument.
Am I misreading that?
mike davis
Well, I mean, you have to look at the cases here.
These are not exactly the perfect vehicles to challenge Section 230.
In the Gonzalez case, what they're looking at is whether these big tech platforms are aiding and abetting or providing substantial assistance to terrorism under our American anti-terrorism law so these families can recover for the deaths of their kids in these terrorist attacks.
And in the Gonzalez case, you have to look at two things.
These algorithms that Big Tech uses radicalized these terrorists and caused these people to go on to commit these terrorist acts.
Was that substantial assistance or aiding and abetting terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act?
And if it is, does Section 230 protect the Big Tech platforms from being sued under Section 230?
In the second case, That the court heard today, it was just the aiding and abetting substantial assistance theory.
These are tough cases for the court to decide because Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is written pretty broadly.
And the courts have to decide whether, in the Gonzalez case, whether algorithms are exempt from Section 230.
And in the case today, the Twitter case today, the court has to decide whether allowing a terrorist to use Twitter is providing substantial assistance to terrorism.
So I don't think that the court's not up to speed in these issues.
They have to hear cases in every different issue imaginable.
It's just these are very tough cases under Section 230.
What I think at the end of the day, what it's going to have to come down to, Steve, is Congress needs to amend Section 230.
They can't expect the court to do their work for them.
Congress needs to amend Section 230.
We passed Section 230 back in 1996 to protect these Internet infants, CompuServe, Prodigy.
America Online from being sued off the map by the publishers based upon what their users post.
Affamatory comments that their users post on these online messaging boards.
And fast forward 27 years, and these Internet infants are now trillion-dollar big tech monopolists, Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple.
And it's through this very bad combination of antitrust amnesty and Section 230 immunity that these big tech platforms have way too much power.
The courts... I agree with the plaintiffs here.
The courts have misinterpreted, interpreted too broadly their immunity under Section 230 over the last 27 years.
But Congress needs to update our century-old antitrust laws.
Congress needs to update Section 230.
Maybe we do a carve-out.
Maybe for the smaller companies, if you have maybe a $600 billion market cap or less, you can get Section 230 immunity so long as you don't And anyone above that market cap of $600 billion or whatever it is, why do they need the training wheels?
Why do they need Uncle Sam's coddling?
Why do we need to keep protecting these trillion-dollar big tech companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple when they're profiting off of revenge porn and terrorist videos and all the other filth that they peddle online?
steve bannon
Are you comfortable where we are in the House right now on the hearings and what you feel needs to be done?
If the courts are not going to bail us out, you've got to do it through investigation and through legislation.
Are you happy? Because you're pretty aggressive.
Do you think we're far enough down the road now, or do you think it's still going way too slow?
mike davis
Look, I've been a critic of Jim Jordan and Kevin McCarthy.
I'm trying to give them running room here to get up and running, but we need to get moving.
We need to get moving on these investigations.
We need to get serious.
We need to get more converts out of House Republicans on holding Big Tech accountable.
We need aggressive oversight of the Biden Justice Department.
We can't have two systems of justice in America, one for Biden supporters and a different one For Trump and his supporters, our Justice Department has been politicized.
It's been weaponized. We've known this for a long time.
Big tech is too big, too powerful.
It needs broken up. We need to get rid of their antitrust amnesty and Section 230 immunity.
I've seen House Oversight Chairman James Comer off to a running start.
He's doing a fantastic job.
I hope that the other House committee chairmen get moving because we have a short window of opportunity to do oversight before we get back into presidential election mode and this all gets tuned out.
steve bannon
Real quickly, Jared and Ivanka got Jack Smith subpoenaed them today for the D.C. grand jury.
But you had this grand jury foreman in Fulton County who's been doing a media blitz.
I don't ever remember.
I thought grand jury proceedings were secret.
Can you tell us what's going on here in your opinion?
And is this clouding whatever Fulton County did?
Is that going to be thrown out? What are your thoughts on that?
mike davis
Well, this Fulton County, Georgia grand jury forewoman is a nut job.
She is a Wiccan witch.
She's doing a media tour on CNN and MSNBC. And she's even making the Democrats cringe because she's completely destroying any case that the Fulton County DA could have against Trump.
But yet they don't have a case.
It's not a crime.
to politically jawbone people related to political matters.
That's protected by the First Amendment.
Nothing that President Trump did in Georgia is illegal.
Even if he's trying to twist arms to get politicians to do things, that's not illegal.
That's the political process.
So we have this bogus Fulton County investigation, this hoax like they've done, many Democrats have done, many times against Trump for many years.
But this Fulton County investigation Four woman going on CNN and MSNBC. First of all, she's probably breaking the law because under Georgia statute, she has a legal obligation to keep these proceedings confidential.
So I don't know what she's thinking.
I don't know if she's trying to be the Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnick from the Kavanaugh confirmation.
I don't know if she's just trying to pop onto the scene to get fame and fortune.
But any case that Fulton County May have had against Trump and his supporters is now out the window.
steve bannon
Do you think, just real quick for you, do you think that the DA in Fulton County signed off on this?
Do you think she just solo? And if she's not signed off, wouldn't they have shut it down after she talked to the AJC, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, before she hit the New York Times and CNN and everybody?
It's the most bizarre thing I've seen.
Do you think the DA signed off on it?
mike davis
I mean, from what I understand from this Fulton County DA, the DA is a goofball, a Democrat partisan operative, so who knows?
But this forewoman going on CNN and MSNBC and doing her media tour completely undermines the grand jury investigation, the grand jury reports.
I don't see how there's any way now that the Fulton County DA can move forward with charges after this forewoman has gone out and Maybe broke Georgia law by opening her mouth and completely politicizing this investigation and frankly showing what a joke it is.
This Fulton County forewoman is out there complaining that she hopes that Trump is indicted because the DA investigation, grand jury investigation, took so much of their time.
unidentified
It's just bizarre. Yeah, it's bizarre.
steve bannon
And she could swear Trump in a thing.
It's just bizarre. Mike, how do people get to you, sir?
mike davis
What are your coordinates? Article3Project.org, Article3Project.org, at Article3Project, at Article3Project.
And my personal is MRDDMIA, at MRDDMIA. Thank you, Steve.
steve bannon
And by the way, his getter's got tons of information.
Get him on getter. But if you like it a little spicy, follow him on Twitter, too.
Mike Davis, thank you very much, sir.
Honored to have you on here. We got a cold open from Joe.
It's another stunning one. Let's go ahead and play it and we'll bring in Joe Allen.
unidentified
So in our current sovereign nation-state system, fear is a major factor.
So fear of nuclear war, you know, another war.
We really need a world government for these kinds of reasons.
We want to get rid of war.
What a waste. I'm a former brain builder.
I was building China's first artificial brain before I retired.
And there are projects like this popping up like mushrooms all over the planet.
So in the 2020s, this research will have moved over to D, you know, R&D. So research will move more into development.
Artificial intelligence will keep increasing.
So the gap between machine intelligence level and human intelligence level, that gap will close.
This century's global politics will be dominated by this issue.
steve bannon
When do you think the singularity's coming?
unidentified
Ah, Ray Kurzweil says 2045.
Suppose in 2025, Google DeepMind or my own AI team in SingularityNet and OpenCog, like, one of us manages to create an AI that is essentially as smart as a human being.
Like, how far are you from a true Singularity?
Because this AI can then copy itself.
You can make a million of those, right?
And improve itself. So the potential for superintelligence.
It kind of lies dormant in matter, much like the power of the atom lies dormant throughout human history, patiently waiting there until 1945.
In this century, scientists may learn to awaken the power of artificial intelligence.
And I think we might then see an intelligence explosion.
peter thiel
Oxford professor Nick Bostrom, I think of him as sort of a mouthpiece of the zeitgeist.
And he sort of wrote this paper back in 2019 called the Vulnerable World Hypothesis.
And it outlines all these different existential risks.
Climate change, nuclear weapons, runaway nanotechnology, the robots killing everybody, the AI killing everybody, runaway bioweapons, etc, etc.
And there are four things that must be done to stabilize the world.
Number one, restrict technological development.
Number two, Ensure that there does not exist a large population of actors representing a wide and recognizably human distribution of motives.
Number three, establish extremely effective preventive policing.
And number four, you need to establish effective global governance.
You know, in the sort of quasi-mythological New Testament account, the slogan of the Antichrist is peace and safety.
Perhaps we should fear Perhaps we should fear the one world totalitarian state more than Armageddon.
elon musk
I know this is called the World Government Summit, but I think we should be maybe a little bit concerned about actually becoming too much of a single world government.
If I may say that we want to avoid creating a civilizational risk by having, frankly, this may sound a little odd, too much cooperation between governments.
yuval noah harari
I don't believe in a single global government all over the world.
I think it's a bad idea.
It's not only won't work, it's really a bad idea.
We need better cooperation between nation states.
I think that the key message is not that we need to replace nation states with a global government.
No, we need nation states working together on their common interests.
We are facing a completely new threat that we have never known before.
In brief, technology now enables The creation of completely new totalitarian regimes, digital dictatorships.
For the first time in history, it's possible to monitor all the people all the time.
It wasn't possible in the Soviet Union.
It wasn't possible in Nazi Germany.
It is becoming possible now.
unidentified
And we are just now where we move into the exponential phase.
Artificial intelligence, but not only artificial intelligence.
The metaverse, near-space technologies, synthetic biology, who masters those technologies in some way will be the master of the world.
steve bannon
Yeah, Klaus Schwab has got my definition there, Joe Allen.
Tell us what we just saw and the importance of that for this audience.
joe allen
Steve, you know, we've been talking about this.
The tension you see there is between those who want to drive forward the singularity, they admit that it's extremely dangerous, and so they propose world government as a way to mitigate the dangers and to control and harness the power of that singularity.
That includes Hugo de Garris, that includes Ben Gertzel, and that includes Nick Bostrom.
On the other side, you have people who are also, by and large, accelerationists, with the exception of maybe Harari.
And they're arguing, and you can hear from, I mean, you see these are high-level conversations.
They're discussing this, right, the possibility of global government.
And they're arguing against it.
You have Peter Thiel, who's arguing against it from a somewhat Christian perspective.
You have Elon Musk, who argues against it from a much more secular, worldly perspective.
And you had Yuval Noah Harari, who most people would associate with the kind of conspiracy towards world government, but he has on many occasions, that being just one of them, argued against it.
And then, of course, you have Klaus Schwab, who, you know, does he argue for anything?
All he argues is this is happening.
We should get it under control.
Whether or not he's open to global government or not, that's an open question.
I think the importance of this is twofold, really.
One, anyone who has looked at the development in artificial intelligence in detail over the last five to ten years knows The sort of complacency that one could rest in to believe that it's just a gimmick, that it's just garbage in, garbage out, that it's just programmed, that you can just pull the plug on it.
I understand why that would be an impression someone would have.
None of those are really true.
To the extent that artificial intelligence continues on the path that it's going, It is able to make its own decisions.
It is not programmed in the sense that you would say it just simply has rules that it follows.
It learns from huge amounts of data.
And to the extent you can steer it, you steer it, but it makes its own observations and decisions.
And as that rockets forward through something like a singularity, whether it meets that full definition or not, It endangers our way of life.
It endangers our way of thinking.
It endangers our way of being.
And if it were to actually break out and begin to wreak havoc on the digital prison that we have created around ourselves, then it would kill off some number of human beings, if not all of us.
The option of global government I don't think is acceptable either.
So we're kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place here, Steve.
steve bannon
And we're going to work our way through it.
What a better way to conclude our Ash Wednesday broadcast and what a better way to kick off the 40 days and 40 nights of Lent.
Joe, where do people go to get all your brilliant writing?
joe allen
Got a new piece up, Mental Jigsaw, How AI Carves Out Space in Your Brain.
It's about how these technologies affect human psychology.
It's up at jobot.xyz.
It's up at warroom.org under the transhumanism tab.
And it's at the top of my social media at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z at Ditter and Twitter.
Thank you very much, Steve.
steve bannon
Happy Ash Wednesday. Joe Allen, thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate it. Okay, we're going to be back tomorrow morning.
We're going to go actually try to pick up a little of Ed and Karen.
I think they're going to be live in East Palestine, Ohio.
We'll start there.
But we've got a lot to get through tomorrow as we chop our way through the early days of the Third World War right here in the war room.
Export Selection