Jan. 23, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:52
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal stream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| The reason I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Warren, here's your host, Stephen K. Ban. | |
| In 2023, we will continue to work to make progress while maintaining stability and follow a proactive fiscal policy and a prudent monetary policy. | ||
| policy, we will strive to maintain reasonable economic growth and keep prices and jobs stable. | ||
| Our focus will be placed on expanding domestic demand. | ||
| keeping industrial and supply chains smooth, supporting the healthy development of private sector, Deepening state-owned enterprises reform, attracting foreign investment, | ||
| and preventing and diffusing economic and financial risks. | ||
| If we work hard enough, we are confident that in 2023, China's growth will most likely return to its normal trend. | ||
| And the Chinese economy will see a significant improvement. | ||
| A noticeable increase of import, more investment by companies, and residential consumption returning back to normal can be expected. | ||
| Okay, that was last week in Davos, and that's Lee He. | ||
| So the chain of command for one part of how the CCB works is Xi at the top, and then he's got his financial kind of genius, Wan Shishan, one of the most evil people on earth. | ||
| Part of the gangster element in Beijing. | ||
| He's the one that was at Lula, although he's in very ill health, and he's the one. | ||
| Bloomberg went to Singapore a couple of years ago and introduced him at the Bloomberg Conference in Singapore as the most important person in the world, right? So you got Wan Shishan. | ||
| Then you have Li Hu. And Li Hu has always rolled out to the Americans and British as being much more acceptable. | ||
| I think he's Harvard-educated, absolutely brilliant, individual, well-read. | ||
| Very gentle. Remember, the entire CCP are nothing but mafia. | ||
| But they roll this out to make you feel better because he's the one that can talk about books and big ideas. | ||
| So they roll him to Davos this year to say, hey, China's coming back. | ||
| The economy collapsed last year, but we're going to lead you out of the recession just like in 2008, that China's there to save you. | ||
| And on cue... The Financial Times of London this morning. | ||
| Just, you know, no coincidence. | ||
| Eurozone to avoid recession in 2023 as energy prices and China boost outlook. | ||
| Okay? So they're going to avoid, the Europeans now know because Lee Hook came there, they're going to avoid and integrate back into the world system and we're not going to uncouple. | ||
| And the buried lead here is that they're going to avoid recession because of bumper Their, quote, bumper government support means printing more money by central banks in Europe in the earlier than anticipated reopening of the Chinese economy, which is set to boost global demand. | ||
| I want to bring in now Dr. | ||
| Bradley Thayer to an amazing piece that essentially said in The Hill, and I'm kind of shocked they published it, that every word that came out of Li Hu's mouth was a lie. | ||
| Is that the way you describe it, Dr. | ||
| Thayer? That's right, Steve, and it's great to join you again today. | ||
| But that's exactly right, barring a great Mary McCarthy's dismissal of Lillian Hellman as saying, every word that she wrote was a lie, including and and the. | ||
| Well, every word that Lee He said at Davos was a lie, including and and the. | ||
| Tell me why that, because he kind of came as the emissary to the West to say, you know, we're not going to do this decoupling. | ||
| We're going to integrate back in. | ||
| We're all going to work together. | ||
| Bad old Trump, Orange Man Bad is gone, and his crazy deputies, Navarro and Bannon, who we've already sanctioned, right? | ||
| We've sanctioned these guys. | ||
| We got Trump out, and now we can have a group hug. | ||
| So walk me through. What were the biggest lies that you told? | ||
| There were three. First, China's back. | ||
| That's the first lie. | ||
| When in fact China's not back, they have profound structural problems in their economy. | ||
| They have tremendous demographic problems, environmental problems. | ||
| They have endemic corruption in their economy. | ||
| And they're going through COVID still. | ||
| So the 3 % growth that China released, if you remember, Steve, about two weeks ago, 10 days ago, That's going to be far closer to the norm than the way they were growing in the past. | ||
| So that's the first big lie that China's back, when in fact it's not. | ||
| Second big lie was... | ||
| Hold on, hold on, hold on. Hang on. | ||
| Whoa, whoa, whoa. Hang on one second. | ||
| If they publish, just for the audience, because I know the Warren Posse is very sophisticated about this now, but if they publish three and a half percent, that means it's zero, right? | ||
| Every number they put forward is a lie. | ||
| Are we correct in assuming that, Dr. | ||
| Thayer? Every number is a lie. | ||
| That's exactly right, Steve. | ||
| And so, absolutely. | ||
| The second big lie was with respect to investors. | ||
| He was saying that it's okay. | ||
| China's fine. As you know, we're coming back. | ||
| So don't take your investment money and go elsewhere. | ||
| Vietnam, India, Indonesia. | ||
| Keep the investments in China and everything will be fine in terms of your returns for investors and in terms of helping the Chinese economy. | ||
| The third big lie that he said was that climate change is something the Chinese take seriously, which of course is simply absurd, and that there was a relationship between climate change and global health crises. | ||
| Well, I don't know if that's true, but there certainly is a relationship between the CCP and global health crises, and the fact that the CCP turned an outbreak in Wuhan into a The pandemic that we've obviously been wrestling with since the winter and spring of 2020. | ||
| So when you go through that address, when you go through that speech, you can see that the lies are endemic. | ||
| They're inherent because he's desperate, because he recognizes that they're incredibly vulnerable to pressure at this time. | ||
| So he's reaching out to Davos to help China, not to scare the horses, if you will, but to ensure that everything is going to be okay if people keep their money in China, continue to have faith in the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| As you said with the FT, Li, that China will be one of essentially the forces that ensure there's not going to be a global recession. | ||
| So it's all a lie. | ||
| And you shouldn't, of course, expect anything else from the CCP at Davos. | ||
| But the implications, of course, are profound, not only because of the lies that he's spinning, of course, but because of the way that he's essentially keeping the world from what it needs to do, and that's decouple from China. | ||
| That's what we need to do. | ||
| And we also need to take advantage of their vulnerabilities and put greater pressure on the Chinese Communist Party now at this time, ideally to evict them from power in China. | ||
| So if we recognize he's coming from the standpoint of weakness, we can see a lot of the genesis, the motivation for the lies that he's telling at Davos. | ||
| Why is it the people at Davos are supposed to be the insider's insider. | ||
| Davos, man, you know, whether they're hedge funds, marketing firms, they're all in the information business. | ||
| It's an open secret. | ||
| Everybody knows that the Chinese Communist Party is a brutal dictatorship that oppresses and suppresses Lao Beijing in essentially a nationwide, virtually a continental concentration camp. | ||
| Whether that's the Uyghurs in real concentration camps or the social credit score that leads people to kind of have like the lives of others, as you saw the Stalinists, how the Stalinists ran East Germany back in the Cold War. | ||
| This thing's such an open charade. | ||
| Why is it embraced so much by European elites? | ||
| And particularly what's most disturbing is the Germans. | ||
| The Germans, and people should understand this, the German political and economic elites are getting deeply in bed with the Chinese Communist Party, right? Particularly the middle companies, the manufacturing companies that the Chinese have almost overrun. | ||
| The Germans, which NATO is supposed to be predicated around, are rubbing up on the Chinese like nobody else. | ||
| Why is it such a...why the hypocrisy of Davos? | ||
| Why do they need the Chinese Communist Party, sir? | ||
| Well, Steve, as you said, it's not ignorance. | ||
| These individuals know exactly what's happening in China, and it's simply that they don't care about the human rights abuses or genocide against Muslims in Xinjiang, suppression of Tibetans and the entire population, as well as the threat to the order from which they profit. | ||
| If China gets its way, they're going to destroy Davos. | ||
| on the way of replacing the United States as the dominant state in international politics. | ||
| So they don't care because they've been making money off of it. | ||
| It's been incredibly profitable for decades and they hope that happy time continues. | ||
| And that's true of the Germans, certainly. | ||
| It's true of almost everyone in international politics who recognizes that indeed so much money was earned, was generated from investment and support as well as from receiving CCP money and their investment in infrastructure and political parties around the world. | ||
| So I simply think, Steve, they don't care, frankly, about their abuses of the CCP because the CCP has made them money and has generated Tremendous influence there at the same time. | ||
| Additionally, I think there's an element of anti-Americanism too, and that is the recognition that China, if it can be backed, if it can be supported, actually will replace the United States. | ||
| And that totalitarian government is something with which individuals at Davos may be would maybe essentially quite willing to dismiss the profound negative consequences of that type of government for its efficiency, its quote unquote efficiency. | ||
| When in fact, of course, it's not efficient. | ||
| It is the most corrupt government in international politics. | ||
| So I think if we're looking at it that way, we can see that there are going to be, as long as China is making money, there's going to be that coincidence of interests. | ||
| Of course, they don't recognize that China's siphoning off everything and has been, as you well know, for decades. They've been siphoning off knowledge. | ||
| They've been siphoning off technology with respect to manufacturing. | ||
| So the Germans, as you well know, Steve, the auto industry, of course, German excellent auto industry, heavily invested in China, but the Chinese are learning how to make their own Mercedes, their own BMWs, their own Audis. It's a fool's errand to engage with China, as so many companies have recognized around the world, particularly when there are better places to invest and there are better places to make automobiles or to manufacture around the world. | ||
| However, at the same time, they have tremendous influence, as you well know, in political capitals around the world. | ||
| Because they have converted their wealth into tremendous political influence in the United States, Canada, of course, Europe, Asia, Africa, around the world. | ||
| They've done that. | ||
| So it's a formidable adversary. | ||
| But now is the time to exploit their vulnerabilities, right? | ||
| Again, the lead is Lee's identified that they're vulnerable. | ||
| And he's scared that individuals are going to act against him to take advantage. | ||
| At this time, so this is the time to act against them. | ||
| Real quickly, Dr. | ||
| Thayer, how do they get to your writings? | ||
| What are your coordinates? CenterForSecurityPolicy.org, or I'm on Truth, and at Getter, of course, as well, Steve. | ||
| Thank you. Thank you. | ||
| Okay, Natalie Winters, we're going to talk about the Wuhan lab, and we also have Naomi Wolf on here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Big pivot coming on the vax, looks like. | |
| Also, Rebecca Koffer is going to join us in a little while on Ukraine. | ||
| We're going to tie it all together, only in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Back in a moment. MyPillow.com. | |
| Of course, Mike Lindell is one of the candidates running for the RNC. We're going to have Mike. | ||
| We're going to have Harmeet. Maybe even, if not too busy, Rana again. | ||
| I know the audience would be thrilled at that. | ||
| We're going to try to give everybody equal billing. | ||
| It's going to be a real Donnybrook there this week. | ||
| We'll do actually more coverage this afternoon about the RNC winter meeting where they're going to select a new chairman. | ||
| Make sure you go to MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM, sheets as low as the Giza sheets as low as $29.99. | ||
| You can't, look. Particularly in this year, which is going to be a tumultuous year at best. | ||
| I think one of the most intense years in modern American history, and particularly political and geopolitical history, financial. So much coming together. | ||
| You're going to want to man the ramparts. | ||
| Your duty is to man the ramparts. | ||
| You need a great night's sleep. MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. We're going to have other sales, the slippers. I'm glad to see that the War Room Posse really responded to get that cheap deal on the slippers. | ||
| So we're going to have other specials. | ||
| Starting very soon, but now $29.99, and they've still got the inventory. | ||
| So certain inventory categories are as low as 80 % off. | ||
| MyPillow.com, promo code WARM, just for the WARM posse. | ||
| You've got your own square right there. | ||
| Natalie Winters, Wuhan Lab. | ||
| And by the way, this is all going to now connect, and the dots are going to be tied. | ||
| Hunter's Laptop, the Wuhan Lab, all the involvement. | ||
| You're going to have various committees on here, hearings, investigations, all of it. | ||
| But lo and behold, ma'am, Correct me if I'm wrong, are we still shoveling money there or in studies around there? | ||
| What's going on? What's your latest report? | ||
| Well, if this audience was outraged at the prospect of pandemic amnesty, they're gonna be outraged to the, I think, nth degree over this story because it shows that the same key players who played an integral role really to the birth of COVID-19, that is, of course, EcoHealth Alliance, are still getting millions in taxpayer dollars to conduct research that has really striking similarities to what they were doing with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| So just to briefly provide some context, EcoHealth Alliance is this New York-based nonprofit that's led by an individual very near and dear to my heart by the name of Peter Daszak, if people recall. I did a lot of reporting on this individual and his ties to the Chinese Communist Party, which ultimately led to his recusal from the Lancet COVID-19 Commission. | ||
| Now, not only is EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak Are they, in the Chinese Communist Party's own words, long-time partners of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their top BAT researcher, the BAT lady, also known as Shi Zhengli. | ||
| But Peter Doshak really played a leading role, really, in being a propagandist on the origins of COVID-19, silencing people who talked about, even dared to discuss the lab leak theory, always saying that COVID-19 developed, organically developed, naturally. | ||
| So the Trump administration basically pulled back all federal funds that were going to this group to conduct their research because there was a lot of questions about the oversight and why in the first place they were even collaborating with a Chinese state-run scientific institution with links to the People's Liberation Army. | ||
| But since the Biden regime has come to power, they've slowly been doling out grants back to EcoHealth Alliance, reinstating some of these previously existing grants To the tune of millions of dollars, and it's not even just that they're renewing. | ||
| The story that we have up today shows that the Biden regime actually launched an entirely new program worth $3 million. | ||
| They launched it on December 12th of 2022, and it's set to run through December 11th of 2025. | ||
| And what's really concerning about this grant, not just the fact that it's egregious that this group that has repeatedly lied, Peter Daszak, has failed to comply with subpoenas and turn over relevant information as to what exactly his group was doing with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but the type of research that these millions are going to fund, again, your taxpayer dollars, has to do explicitly with weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| That's not a conspiracy theory. | ||
| That's a direct quote. | ||
| From the Federal Register, from the grant database, outlining the type of work that they're going to be engaging in. | ||
| And there was a separate grant that was given to EcoHealth Alliance on December 13th of 2022 coming from USAID. And just remember, these are the same entities, kind of the same branches of the government. | ||
| That we're funding EcoHealth Alliance's research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| So it really is a sense of deja vu all over again for a group that not only has repeatedly lied about its role in COVID-19, the potential development of it, but has lied about its relations with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, yet they still seem to be getting millions in taxpayer dollars. | ||
| Give me that one more time on Weapons of Mass Destruction. | ||
| That's music to our ear. | ||
| How did they describe that? | ||
| So this is the quote from the description of the grant. | ||
| To support the advancement of fundamental knowledge and understanding of the sciences with an emphasis on exploring new and innovative research for combating or countering weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| And I think it just goes back to the fundamental premise. | ||
| I think the thesis that has led a lot of my work on this issue of pandemic funding, pandemic response, If the same people who are profiting from the cures to these so-called pandemics, the people who are getting millions of dollars in grants, billions of dollars in federal funding, if they're also the ones who are engaging in the research that is supposed to allegedly or ostensibly combat these pandemics, that is a textbook conflict of interest. | ||
| And that's why this whole pandemic prevention industry is a racket. | ||
| It's a racket. It also shows about Tony Fauci. | ||
| The gain-of-function part of it is also weaponizing this. | ||
| They're creating weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| That's what hopefully this investigation will get into. | ||
| Talk to me about these charities. | ||
| We now have charities that are pumping money into CCP-controlled operations. | ||
| Am I correct in you telling me that? | ||
| Yeah, they've unfortunately been around for a long time, and I think that this kind of dovetails with the broader narratives that we discuss on the show, which really is that there is a new axis of evil that exists between the globalist ruling class in tandem with these woke corporations, but also I think the key component, and a lot of it is secretive just by nature because of financial disclosures and the lax regulations there, | ||
| But it's these NGOs and these non-profits and oftentimes I think they're kind of the foot soldiers, the vessels to either launder the money or at least pump the money to the kind of the right actors to carry out this globalist agenda. | ||
| And a perfect example of this is really the tens of millions of dollars That foundations like the Gates Foundation, like the Ford Foundation, have been plowing in, not just to China, not to help the Lao Beijing, not to help the Chinese people, but to explicitly Chinese state-run institutions. | ||
| And you can kind of link this all back to COVID if you single out, say, for example, the Gates Foundation. | ||
| Now, the Gates Foundation, in the first two years of the COVID pandemic, right, when lockdowns were at an all-time high, They funneled over $54 million to Chinese state-run scientific institutions to conduct research, among which was the Wuhan University, which had partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the birthplace of COVID-19. | ||
| In the past, but the relationships even extend, I mean, really decades prior in the sense that the Gates Foundation had partnered with a group called the National Natural Science Foundation of China. | ||
| And this is the same group that was sort of the Chinese counterpart to Anthony Fauci in terms of the funding of EcoHealth Alliance's work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| So again, another kind of shady connection there. | ||
| But I think that the most concerning aspect of where these charities are getting involved, or at least in the case of the Gates Foundation, is that they've actually been a longtime partner with what's called the Cyberspace Administration of China. | ||
| And I know a lot of these terms, I feel like Rudy saying Ukraine names, but they're important to remember. | ||
| Because they sort of continue to rear their ugly heads. | ||
| And what I mean by that is that the Cyberspace Administration of China really has been a blueprint for how some of these private corporations and social media platforms here in the United States have set out to censor conservatives. | ||
| It was also the leading voice that spearheaded the Chinese Communist Party's campaign to do online censorship. | ||
| about the origins of COVID-19. | ||
| So it's certainly curious when you see the Gates Foundation who's simultaneously funding and partnering with groups that are linked to the origins of COVID-19 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology also being partners with the Chinese Communist Party's largest in mass scale censorship operation about the origins of COVID-19. | ||
| Like I said, it really is an axis of evil where you have all these key players working together in concert On topics that really affect our day-to-day lives, COVID-19 is a perfect example of that. | ||
| Just hang on, I'm going to bring Naomi Wolf on now. | ||
| Naomi, you were the first to bring also the connection to the CCP on the business side, on the vaccine part of it, correct? | ||
| I mean, this all becomes part of a whole cloth, ma'am? | ||
| Yeah, unfortunately, I found pretty early on that BioNTech had transferred, and this is, you know, I've mentioned this before, but it's definitely worth repeating and fitting into this puzzle that Natalie Winters is so effectively putting together and other people in the show put together. | ||
| BioNTech transferred its IP for the vaccine to China in the SEC filing in 2021 and identified the tech transfer as 100 % complete by the end of 2021. | ||
| Which means the IP, however you define that, whether it's the processes for manufacturing the vaccine or the data collected in the process of manufacturing and distributing the vaccine, are entirely owned by China. | ||
| And as I've noted before, the SEC filing doesn't say a Chinese individual or a Chinese corporation. | ||
| It says to China, the country of China. | ||
| Again, I want to talk about, remind everyone about what we found about manufacturing and distribution. | ||
| Fosun Pharmaceuticals, which is owned by the Chinese Communist Party, run by a senior member of the Chinese Communist Party, distributes, built manufacturing plants, 13 of them, throughout Western Europe. | ||
| And also they built two manufacturing plants here in the United States, one in Princeton, New Jersey, and one in Springfield, Massachusetts. | ||
| So now when you have NPR saying, Oh good, every year you're going to get an injection. | ||
| It's China creating, manufacturing, distributing that injection. | ||
| Hang on for one second. | ||
| Naomi Wolf, we're going to drill down more on this. | ||
| Also, the Wall Street Journal and Dancing Around, they're now in shock. | ||
| There's gambling going on in this house about the boosters. | ||
| Also, additional report about fertility in Europe, about the vaccine. | ||
| All of it from Naomi Wolf's great work over at Dairy Cloud. | ||
| Short commercial break. Back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Winters of... Your host, Stephen K. Van. | |
| Okay, let's go back to Naomi. | ||
| Naomi, you take it and run with it. | ||
| You've got a lot to report today. | ||
| Wall Street Journal, NPR, the marketing plan. | ||
| You've been talking about the billions of dollars they've been pumping into the marketing plan of taxpayer money. | ||
| You've got more reports. | ||
| By the way, the book right now stands where? | ||
| On Amazon. I want to make sure everybody in the board and posse, since your other posse members helped create this, I want to make sure everybody piles into this thing. | ||
| Tell me about the book first. | ||
| Sure. We published the incredible 3500 War Room Daily Cloud. | ||
| Pfizer Documents research volunteers, 50 reports that you helped to initiate and all of this audience helped to support. | ||
| We published it as an e-book PDF on our website, but also as a Kindle e-book on Amazon. | ||
| To my amazement, Amazon hasn't censored us yet, apparently. | ||
| So incredibly, we went from about a quarter of a million slots down to top 20. | ||
| Or 25 in nonfiction for Kindle out of all of Amazon within 48 hours. | ||
| So this is all you, but it's very, very important. | ||
| Hold, hold, hold. But hang on. But hang on. | ||
| Don't bury the lead. | ||
| This is just for the war room and daily clout in civilians. | ||
| And it got to the highest 20. | ||
| Harry's book, which has got the biggest marketing campaign in human history, was number one. | ||
| We're 19 slots down from Harry Hewitt's book, right? | ||
| Right. And I'm glad to say we've been above Yuval Harari, one of the most evil globalists of all. | ||
| But yeah, this is all word of mouth. | ||
| And it's also right. It's also, you know, as Amy Kelly said, people are so hungry for truth and uncorrupted facts about this material that two thirds of Americans have had injected into their bodies, you know, by their will or because they couldn't find a way around truth. | ||
| I think it's a historic publication with shocking headlines, but we have to kind of keep getting the word out because it is changing the chessboard. | ||
| I want to make sure people, as they come to this report, which everybody in the positive should get, because it's a manifestation of the power of this audience and the reason this audience is feared, okay? And here's the reason. | ||
| All the analyses you see in there, all the Pfizer documents were supposed to be held secret for 75 years. | ||
| Think about that. It's like the Warren Commission. | ||
| Earl Warren said, not in your lifetime. | ||
| Remember, 75. The thing that's most shocking about it to me, Naomi, is, and I think, look, I'm not obviously a scientist or anything, but it looks like, as Dr. | ||
| Malone says, the beginning of a failed clinical trial. | ||
| Right? But that was supposed to be kept from people for 75 years. | ||
| And what's the power? Once that federal court released it, you jumped on it with Amy Kelly and your great team at Daley Klatt, and of course, The War Room responded by volunteering, and you've got these great lawyers, and it's a seminal document. | ||
| And now I think it's one of the reasons you're seeing all of a sudden the Wall Street Journal, upon further review, they're like Daily Cloud. | ||
| They're like War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Murdoch's Wall Street Journal is like, hey, no, what are you talking about? | |
| We never touted the vaccine. | ||
| Naomi Wolf, your turn. | ||
| Yeah, you know, books can change politics, and that's what I'm seeing because If you have this book, if it's in the public eye now in the top 20 or 25, the facts are incontrovertible. | ||
| It's not just a failed experiment. | ||
| I would respectfully go beyond how Dr. | ||
| Malone characterized it. You can't help concluding looking at these reports that Pfizer and the FDA knew that it was causing stroke, knew that it was causing infertility, knew that babies were dying, knew that fetuses were dying, knew that baby boys' testes were being degraded. | ||
| And they kept going. | ||
| So I think it's a successful experiment on killing and maiming human beings. | ||
| And I think the Chinese background and funding and giant money transfers, you know, through these nonprofits to leading people in our world and in the West, you know, certainly helped to explain this. | ||
| This is why I am certain it's a bioweapon. | ||
| And so I guess you are going to see, you know, it's kind of funny in a bitter way, but this always happens when a regime collapses or when, you know, when truth emerges, like when Auschwitz was opened or when the Pentagon Papers emerged. | ||
| Quickly, some people dug in deeper and consulted their lawyers and stuck to their lies. | ||
| And other people were like, oh, I was a partisan forever. | ||
| We're the Wall Street Journal. | ||
| We've always been critical of these boosters. | ||
| We never were on board with the science. | ||
| And you've got NPR kind of going, it's okay. | ||
| There is expert. | ||
| Experts disagree. We're just going to keep injecting this in you every single year. | ||
| So I think people will be scrambling. | ||
| It'll be interesting to see because this is the greatest crime against humanity, you know, in 150 years, certainly. And it's all fully documented. | ||
| But if I can pivot now to the latest report, report number 52, that shows a systematic war on the reproduction level of Western Europe and North America. | ||
| That adds another important piece to this horrific puzzle. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can I dig right in? Yeah, go ahead. | |
| Please jump in. All right. | ||
| So, Dr. | ||
| Robert Chandler, who's been one of the great leaders and experts in this effort, Sports medicine physician who's treated the Angels and the Lakers, very distinguished, a peer reviewer. | ||
| Well, he completed extensive research looking at government databases around the world, and he recaps with two very important findings, and he was instrumental in a couple of these. | ||
| One is he's reminding us that within 48 hours, the lipid nanoparticles in the mRNA accumulate in the ovaries, right? Other organs too, but in the ovaries. | ||
| And with the second injection, they accumulate more. | ||
| With the third injection, they accumulate more. | ||
| The point is he's seen, and our experts have seen, no mechanism whereby these materials, which include industrial fats covered in polyethylene glycol, Leave the ovaries. | ||
| And I really want every woman, every grandma, you know, every teenage girl listening, anyone who loves a woman to really process that, that every time you get an injection, it packs your ovaries with this alien material. | ||
| Then he also wants to remind people that if there was this trial, a Pfizer trial of 40,000 people, they deliberately excluded pregnant women. | ||
| But nonetheless, 270 of them got pregnant. | ||
| Pfizer and the FDA managed to lose the records of 236 of those, which is itself illegal. | ||
| But of the 34 pregnant women whose pregnancies were completed, over 80 % of them lost their babies. | ||
| The babies died. | ||
| And that's important to recap and we're seeing grotesque rises as we've been reporting here for months in spontaneous abortions and miscarriages. | ||
| And I just had a horrifying lengthy interview with Dr. | ||
| Chandler in which he warned, That he's the guy who also found that Pfizer has a table of like 20 plus horrible names for horrible things that happened to women's menstrual cycles in their documents, meaning Pfizer knew, right? | ||
| The FDA knew that it would ruin women's menstrual cycles every, you know, Millions of women and they just kept going. | ||
| And he also found that 16 % of the of the adverse events sustained by women who themselves are 72 % of those who suffer adverse events are in Pfizer's own words, quote, reproductive disorders. | ||
| So they knew they were ruining human reproduction. | ||
| They knew it. So now let's fast forward nine months after Pfizer. | ||
| The rollout, the mass rollout of this mRNA injection. | ||
| Dr. Chandler has found that nine months following the rollout, substantial birth rate drops were seen in 13 of 19 European countries and also England and Wales, Australia and Taiwan. | ||
| He found that the decline of births in Switzerland was the largest decline in 150 years, a steeper decline than during two world wars, the Great Depression and the wide rollout of available birth control. | ||
| There was an 8.3 % drop in the birth rate of Germany through three quarters of this year, 2022. England and Wales had a 12 % birth rate drop through June of 22, which is when their government stopped publishing data related to this. | ||
| Remember, I reported that the BBC had to publish a spike in miscarriages and spontaneous abortions while they decided to stop looking over there in Britain in June of this past year. | ||
| Taiwan reported an alarming birth rate drop, but its data also are incomplete. | ||
| Australian birth rates, I hope you're sitting down. | ||
| fell 21 % from October to November 2021, followed by a 63 % decrease from November to December of 2021. | ||
| Dramatic drop. | ||
| And on August 25, 2022, a Swiss research group called Hagemann Group published a statement regarding the decline of live births in Europe. | ||
| Quote, my analysis puts the monthly birth figures in relation to the average of the last three years In advance, it should be noted that every single examined European country shows a monthly decline in birth rates of up to more than 10 % compared to the last three years. | ||
| I can show that this very alarming signal cannot be explained by infections with COVID-19. | ||
| However, one can establish a clear temporal correlation to COVID vaccinations incidents in the age group of men and women between 18 and 49 years, meaning childbearing age. Therefore, in-depth statistical and medical analyses have to be demanded. | ||
| So, Dr. | ||
| Chandler has categorically proven the mechanism for the drop in birth rate, the fact that Pfizer knew and the FDA knew that women's fertility was going to be ruined, as well as men's fertility ruined by these injections, that they went ahead anyway, that 80 % of the babies that they followed died, and they went ahead anyway, and now nine months later, there is a double-digit drop in live births in Western Europe. | ||
| Other advanced countries like Australia. | ||
| And, you know, we haven't seen the numbers for the United States. | ||
| I'll ask him to work on that. | ||
| But this fits in completely with what Natalie Winters is finding and this bioweapon theory because they're killing off Western Europe. | ||
| Let's assume for a person's discussion that's all facts. | ||
| Why is that not the screaming headline in the Financial Times of London? | ||
| Why is it not in the Times of London? | ||
| Why is it not the lead story in the BBC? Why is it not in Australia, the great paper, The Age? | ||
| Why is this not ABC, the Australian broadcasting company that has its own 60 minutes? | ||
| If this is all true, why are the great papers of Europe The great state broadcasters, RAI, the BBC, all the great networks they have up in Scandinavia. | ||
| Why is it just deafening silence, ma'am? | ||
| I can only speculate. | ||
| One thing I can say is that we saw that the White House colluded with Twitter and with Facebook. | ||
| And we also saw millions of dollars flowing from the CARES Act, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to these news outlets, to legacy news outlets, to promote the vaccine. | ||
| So I think one reason they're silent is that they are complicit in this crime against humanity. | ||
| There's a number of versions of criminality, according to our lawyers, that they could be complicit in. | ||
| One is false advertising. | ||
| But it looks like they're accomplices to a mass murder because they pushed and pushed and pushed it. | ||
| And they also went along with requests from the White House and the CDC to To smear people who, you know, who were raising questions about it. | ||
| I mean, look, you know, Twitter de-platformed me for raising one of the very first signals and flags about this. | ||
| And the subpoenas have found that the White House and the CDC were aligned with Twitter to silence this story, to suppress the story, which has hurt millions of women and now millions of babies through its suppression. | ||
| I guess the other reason is that Well, it's very interesting. | ||
| You know, I think that the number one thing is legal, and the other thing is maybe guilt and shame, because if they look at what they've done, they've failed as journalists. | ||
| Hang on for a second. | ||
| Guilt and shame in journalists? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Naomi? Short break. | |
| We're gonna return. We got Natalie Winters, Naomi Wolf in the war room next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you are over Cause we're taking down the CCP Spread the word all through Hong Kong We will fight till they're all gone We rejoice when there's no more Let's take down the CCP The new social media taking on big tech. | |
| protecting free speech, and canceling cancel culture. | ||
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. Naomi, you've got the Wall Street Journal coming out with a big editorial. | ||
| You've got NPR now coming out. | ||
| Oh, it's just like the annual, like the flu. | ||
| But you've got Dr. Lena Nguyen. | ||
| I think of Johns Hopkins, who's now trying to cover her tracks by saying, oh, it's been overreported. | ||
| It's just like in the Biden thing on the highly classified papers. | ||
| You're going to have a lot of... People jumping ship here and changing the narrative. | ||
| But we're going to be on top of each one of them. | ||
| Tell me about the Journal and the NPR part of this, ma'am. | ||
| Yeah, well, the Wall Street Journal's editorial board, which is a really big deal, came out and basically said the presentation of the boosters is deceptive and the FDA shouldn't have cleared them because there was no And also, they can't formulate a formula In time or speedily enough to capture the latest variant that they're targeting. | ||
| Well, this is really, I mean, yay, the Wall Street Journal finally living in the world of reality, sort of, belatedly, you know, millions of dollars, billions of dollars late to the party. | ||
| But it's also very frustrating because very brave doctors like Dr. | ||
| Alexander, Dr. | ||
| Risch, Dr. | ||
| McCullough, I believe, were warning this Like a year ago, that there was no way that the booster would usefully target the current circulating variant. | ||
| By the time you formulate a formula, that variant is over already. | ||
| They've been seeing it for months and months and months and months, and they were right. | ||
| So, you know, the Wall Street Journal finally noticed that, you know, there were only eight mice involved in the trials and there were other problems with the trials. | ||
| And so they're slapping the FDA on the wrist. | ||
| I have to wonder, too, you know, we're almost up against that January 31st deadline that Yale students are facing. | ||
| God bless them and protect them. | ||
| Where they're being forced to take a booster. | ||
| And I think a lot of Ivy League parents have kind of woken up over the spring break. | ||
| And, you know, that's the world that the Wall Street Journal inhabits. | ||
| They're kind of going, ah, my kid doesn't need this booster. | ||
| Stop forcing my child. | ||
| That's speculation. But so, you know, welcome Wall Street Journal. | ||
| I wish you'd been paying attention to the facts, you know, literally a year ago, but better late than never. | ||
| Now, moving to NPR, there you get into rather dangerous territory because NPR, you know, ran this story. Obviously, the FDA is doing a rearguard action. | ||
| They're trying to pivot. | ||
| They've been caught out. | ||
| Again, I think that our book documenting the horrors overseen by the FDA may be having Some impact, and they may be being presented with questions, but they're kind of going, oh, okay, okay, okay, we're just going to treat it like the flu. | ||
| Now, be careful, because A, if you read that NPR piece, you'll find that it's the gibberish that journalism engages in when they're doing something indefensible, legacy journalism. So it's very hard to tell what's actually happening or why. | ||
| They're kind of going, okay, some experts say the booster doesn't really work, and so we're just going to treat it like the flu shot. | ||
| It's just endemic. It's just once a year. | ||
| But be very careful because, A, they're basically admitting Something scary, which is they're just making it up as they go along in terms of the formulation. | ||
| One of the changes the FDA is making is you can use the injections interchangeably. | ||
| Moderna, Pfizer, it doesn't matter! | ||
| And I think that could be a response to the story we broke that Moderna is more than three times more lethal than Pfizer because it has 100 micrograms of active ingredients Bad ones, as opposed to Pfizer. And so they're kind of going, okay, okay, never mind, never mind, it's not an issue. | ||
| But it just shows you that they invented the dosage in the first place, right? | ||
| And as I will remind you, the 100-microgram dose was too dangerous initially. | ||
| They dropped it in the Pfizer trials internally without telling you. | ||
| And I guess the other thing I just want to warn you about is, remember what I just said before the break about the lipid nanoparticles' Packing into the ovaries into your spleen into your brain into the liver into all of the into the adrenals all of these organs and not leaving the body well if now they're saying It's not just one pandemic. | ||
| It's come and gone. | ||
| You know, you've had three boosters. | ||
| You've had four boosters. Now you're done. | ||
| No, it's every year like the flu shot, right? | ||
| Well, that's very dangerous because these Hong Kong studies that we showed, you can see the sacrifice rats on my substack, overseen by the People's Liberation Army of China in 2021, showed that the first injection is dangerous and enlarges the heart. | ||
| The second injection is catastrophic. | ||
| And puts white patches on the enlarged heart and leads to multi-organ system failure. | ||
| So if you're now being asked to do it every year to be up to date with your vaccines, that is a slow mass murder as opposed to a fast mass murder, which they thought they could get away with. | ||
| Naomi, how do people get to the book, how they get to the bodies of others, and how they get to all your writing over at Daily Clout and become part of this? | ||
| Thank you. Please, guys, we have to keep this book At or above number 20 on Amazon for a week to hit the legacy media bestseller list, which is not just good for the book and the project, but it's also good for the conversation forcing the evildoers to be confronted. | ||
| So please help keep that going by ordering your Kindle ebook on Amazon, Pfizer documents, the War Room Daily Clout volunteers, And you can also get it as a PDF on dailycloud.io. | ||
| And we're talking to publishers about publishing it as a physical book, because so many people want it as a physical book that they can slam down on the desks of their physicians to say, see, I told you so, or slam down or send to their representatives. | ||
| So that's where you can get those books. | ||
| And please keep supporting that. | ||
| As you see, we've made very good use of your donations. | ||
| We made every penny count. | ||
| And if you want The Bodies of Others, which explains this whole picture, you can get that at allseasonspress.com or also on Amazon. | ||
| And I'm on Substack at Naomi Wolf. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And thank you, Steve. And thank you, War Room Posse. | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Naomi. | ||
| Natalie, your coordinates. | ||
| How do people get to you, ma'am? | ||
| Natalie G. Winters on all platforms and go to warroom.org for our latest stories. | ||
| Perfect. We're going to be back at 5, I think. | ||
| Check with us. I don't know if it's 2 or 3 o'clock, but go to Getter. | ||
| You'll see. We're going to pick up the Tina Peters, Mike Lindell discussion this afternoon over on Twitter. | ||
| We're going to stream it on Getter. | ||
| We'll be back here from 5 to 7. | ||
| Explosive. We're going to drill down. | ||
| We've got a lot of – we're going to get to this whole new pivot. | ||
| Pivot. Wait for it. Pivot. | ||
| Now all of a sudden Zelensky, you know who his number one priority is? | ||
| It's not the new Russian offensive. | ||
| It's corruption. It's corruption. | ||
| Last night, Big Story and Associated Press, he's all about corruption and making sure that none of the money gets scammed. | ||
| One of his ministers, they say, we're going to start locking guys up. | ||
| That's the new priority of the Ukrainian government. | ||
| Brought to you by the War Room Posse, trust me. | ||
| Here's how much money we're going to send to Ukraine. | ||
| Zero. Back here, five to seven. | ||
| We'll be down dirty on the RNC race. |
Export Selection