Jan. 11, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| You're just not gonna get a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not gonna stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
| MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Thanks for joining us. | ||
| Speaking yesterday, the president commented on the matter for the first time since details of the probe came to light on Monday. | ||
| People know I take classified documents and classified information seriously. | ||
| I was briefed about this discovery and surprised to learn that there were any government records that were taken there to that office. | ||
| But I don't know what's in the documents. | ||
| My lawyers have not suggested I ask what documents they were. | ||
| And we're cooperating fully, cooperating fully with the review, and which I hope will be finished soon, and there'll be more detail at that time. | ||
| Two sources familiar with the matter tell NBC News President Biden's personal lawyers discovered fewer than a dozen classified documents at the Penn Biden Center in Washington back on November 2nd, immediately after the White House says it notified the Department of Justice and National Archives and turned over the documents the next day. | ||
| Since then, sources say a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney has been reviewing the matter for the Department of Justice. | ||
| And Attorney General Merrick Garland has been briefed on preliminary findings from the FBI. It is now up to Garland to decide whether to open a criminal investigation into the situation. | ||
| When asked yesterday why the discovery of the documents was not disclosed sooner, a spokesman for the White House Counsel's Office wrote in a statement, quote, This is an ongoing process under review by DOJ, so we're going to be limited in what we can say at this time. | ||
| We are committed to doing this the right way, and we will provide further details when it is appropriate. | ||
| I mean, do they really have the power to go in? | ||
| And look at their own investigations, criminal probes against Republican members that are ongoing right now. | ||
| I mean, do they really have the right? | ||
| Some of the most extreme crackpots, do they really have a right to look At intel information, top-secret classified intel information that for years only the top eight intel officials on Capitol Hill members have been able to look at. | ||
| I can't imagine. | ||
| That the White House, that the Senate, that others are going to sit back and let these people destroy American intelligence agencies, destroy the FBI, harm our national security because they've got a grudge in the name of Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, Jackie's absolutely right. | |
| There's a longstanding policy at DOJ. They're not going to disclose any intel that relates to an ongoing investigation. | ||
| It's almost impossible. | ||
| Actually, it is impossible to imagine that they would somehow reverse course under the weight of the new Congress, a very slim Republican majority, where there are clear conflicts going on right now because some of the members of The Republican majority are under investigation. | ||
| It would completely compromise the investigation, they'll argue. | ||
| It doesn't mean that these House Republicans won't test the theory, right? | ||
| They'll push and push and push. | ||
| You can see a future in which they try to litigate this in the court system, the congressional right to oversight here. | ||
| versus the DOJ's prerogatives in their investigations. | ||
| But this also raises some clear questions about motivations for the members of Congress. | ||
| And to your point, whether this is being done at the behest of their party leader, Donald Trump, and some of the members who are under investigation, it's going to be a fascinating couple months, I guess. | ||
| But ultimately, you see a future in which this is just ground to a halt because the DOJ will say, pound sand. And again, Willie, this is the Republican Party, once again, not reading the room. | ||
| And by the room, I mean the United States of America. | ||
| Not reading the American voters who rejected them in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2022. | ||
| And now they're going to try to politicize intelligence. | ||
| They're going to try to get... | ||
| Yeah. Okay. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, I just want to make sure you understand. | ||
| This is going to be every day. | ||
| Look at these rats when you start turning over. | ||
| Look at the cockroaches when you start turning over the rocks. | ||
| I could literally watch this all day long. | ||
| And the fight's going to be intense. | ||
| They're going to go to court. They're going to go, oh, it's intelligence, all of it. | ||
| No. No. We're going to get to the bottom of the deep state inside the apparatus, okay? | ||
| They know it's coming, and Morning Mika can sit there and have the big salt tears and cry and Hal Torres, you know. I notice when they're talking about the top secret, see the top secret information. | ||
| What about the top secret information? | ||
| Compartmented. They never say compartmented top secret information. | ||
| But somebody's going to join me in a second. | ||
| The other thing, and I'm going to connect dots here. | ||
| We're going to come back, and the whole show is kind of going to be weaving this in and out, is that CNN just reports. | ||
| That is CNN just reports, and I want to give you the headline. | ||
| At 6 o'clock tonight, we're going to be going through with experts and going through all this. | ||
| But CNN headline, FDA vaccine advisors disappointed. | ||
| And angry, those are both in quotes, disappointed and angry that early data about the new COVID-19 booster shot wasn't presented for review last year. | ||
| Let me repeat this. FDA vaccine advisors disappointed and angry. | ||
| That early data about new COVID-19 booster shot wasn't presented last year. | ||
| Some vaccine advisors to the federal government say they're disappointed and angry that government scientists and the, wait for it, pharmaceutical company Moderna didn't present a set of infection data on the company's new COVID-19 booster during meetings last year when the advisors discussed whether the shot should be authorized. | ||
| Inmate available to the public. | ||
| As you remember, we were doing specials. | ||
| We covered that wall to wall, and we're going to have on today, later, Malone, Naomi Wolf, Ed Dowd, hopefully Dr. | ||
| McCullough, the whole posse that was on top of that. | ||
| You're going to see a lot of this. | ||
| This is what you're going to see over the next couple of weeks, whether it's the FDA and CDC or the intelligence agencies or Joe Biden. | ||
| Oh, my gosh. Oh, my gosh. | ||
| Look at that. Now that we're in charge, you're going to find a lot of them like in the intelligence. | ||
| I didn't know that. Look at the Biden have that over. | ||
| In the closet over in the Chinese-financed think tank over at the University of Pennsylvania. | ||
| Wow, look at that. Hey, was there not data? | ||
| Did Moderna really, did we not have, did they actually have data and the government scientists had it and we didn't actually present it? | ||
| Oh my gosh, I'm angry and disappointed. | ||
| You're going to see a lot of angry and disappointed. | ||
| I'm very disappointed. | ||
| I'm very angry at you. | ||
| I'm very angry at you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look at Joe Biden wandering around. | |
| This is totally different in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Here's the lie. He had to move it twice. | ||
| They moved it first, and then they had to move it to the new building. | ||
| They moved these documents twice. | ||
| These are multiple felonies. | ||
| Just like we're going to get multiple felonies on Moderna. | ||
| A new day has dawned. | ||
| Okay? You're going to see a lot of angry and disappointed. | ||
| Gosh, how did that happen? | ||
| You're going to see stuff exploding on here that we've been telling you they've been lying from day one. | ||
| And the weaponization of government, the church, the Frank Church-like committee that we've argued for now for four or five years. | ||
| When I went into the White House, I could see the corruption, the incompetence, Of the intelligence services and the corruption and competence of the FBI, the corruption at DOJ, it's sickening. | ||
| And Joe Scarborough, you can sit there and whine all you want and pull your hair out all you want and Mika can whine all she want and give that screwed up face and look in the camera and knit her brows. | ||
| It's coming, baby. | ||
| Yeah, you're first that these rats are going to run. | ||
| They're going to go to court. Oh, we can't do it. | ||
| It's so, so highly secure and let's go down to the skiff. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. Let's like Comer said, let's get them on national TV. Put them down there. | ||
| You had your J6 thing. | ||
| You had your J6 show trial. | ||
| Hey, baby, you had your fun. | ||
| You're about to get it. | ||
| You're about to get a high, hard one. | ||
| Okay? Ladies and gentlemen, understand every day you want to take your country back. | ||
| You want to save this republic. | ||
| It's a grind. And here's the kind of folks we need to do it. | ||
| I want to bring Joe Kent in. | ||
| Joe, I just got a couple questions about your opponent. | ||
| And I know you got something you want to tell us. | ||
| But just before we tee that up, your opponent who was out there running, she was basically running as mini me, Joe Kent. She was a populist, nationalist, working class. | ||
| I'm for the small business owner. | ||
| I'm going to be here. | ||
| I'm going to make sure it's open. | ||
| I don't report to anybody in the Democratic Party. | ||
| That's all nonsense. I'm not some progressive left nutcase. | ||
| I'm actually a populist nationalist for the entrepreneur, for working-class people. | ||
| I am a blue-collar candidate. | ||
| Joe, did she vote for the rules changes that actually break the imperial system? | ||
| And that even people on the progressive left tweeted all weekend, we wish we had a Matt Gaetz. | ||
| We wish we had the courage and the guts to stand up to Pelosi a couple of years ago to break the imperial speakership. | ||
| If we had done that, we had gotten more done. | ||
| Did she vote for or against the rules package that opened it up to the American people, Joe Kent? | ||
|
unidentified
|
She voted against it. | |
| She wanted to keep the status quo of Nancy Pelosi. | ||
| She voted in lockstep with Hakeem Jeffries and the rest of the Democrats, unfortunately. | ||
| Okay. Hang on. | ||
| Did she vote the IRS agents that are specifically targeted to entrepreneurs, the little middle class and working class entrepreneurs? | ||
| She's the voice of the entrepreneurs is what she told us, right? | ||
| She's the voice of the entrepreneurs. Did she vote to rescind the funding for the IRS agents, Joe Kent? | ||
|
unidentified
|
He did not. She voted against defunding the 87,000 IRS agents who are going to go after small business owners and they're going to go after the American working middle class. | |
| Did she, the weaponization of government against the middle class and working class, the weaponization of government against civilians and parents and all this woke ideology, the weaponization of the FBI, DHS, the DOJ, even CIA, and by the way, modeled on one of the biggest liberals in the Senate in the 1970s, a hero, Frank Church of Idaho. | ||
| The church committee, as the Liberals said, this thing's out of control. | ||
| We've cut clips and put them up there. | ||
| It's absolutely brilliant how pressing he was about the administrative state. | ||
| Did she vote for or against the weaponization of government committee in the House, sir? She voted against the formation of that committee. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She likes the status quo and absolutely out of control and weaponized, FBI going after parents that show up at school board meetings because she is in lockstep with this woke ideology. | |
| Didn't she promise, correct me if I'm wrong, because we followed this one quite closely, and she only won about, what, 2,000 votes under 1%. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is what I understand. | |
| I thought she stood up at all these town halls, and she swore to the folks in that district that the one thing you could count on her is that she was an independent thinker, and the one thing she would never do, ever do, Just vote in lockstep with the Democratic Party national apparatus. | ||
| Was that a bald-faced lie, Joe Kent? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was a bold-faced lie. | |
| She did a very good job of concealing who she truly is on the campaign trail, but she can't hide from the record that she's quickly developing. | ||
| She's voting in lockstep with the radical Hakeem Jeffries, who's completely aligned with Nancy Pelosi. | ||
| Like we said, she voted against reigning in the IRS that's going after the middle class, going after small businesses. | ||
| She voted in lockstep to keep the intelligence community of this national security state Targeting the American people, targeting parents that show up at school board meetings. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So she's really exposing herself as nothing more than just another woke foot soldier for the Democrats. | |
| We got about a minute here, and I'm gonna hold you through the break, but you came on today to actually talk to the American people and the people in your district. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you have something to tell us? I knew absolutely. | |
| Hey, over the last two years, people have really gotten to know me. | ||
| They know I'm a combat veteran, fought for this country. | ||
| They know that I'm okay with taking on the Republican establishment. | ||
| I beat a 12-year incumbent. | ||
| And during the course of the campaign, the people in the district really didn't get a chance to know my opponent, Marie Perez. She really said that she was some sort of a moderate and she was going to work for change, work across the aisle. | ||
| We can see that now that's a complete lie. | ||
| So I'm announcing today that I'm officially running for Congress in 2024. | ||
| To take on Marie Perez, and then to reclaim this district, Washington's third congressional district, as a common-sense conservative district. | ||
| Joe Kent, you're a patriot and a hero, and I gotta tell ya, if Joe Kent had been there last week, it'd have been even more explosive for the good of the team. | ||
| I think even McCarthy's guys agree that that needed to be done. | ||
| That needed to be done. | ||
| You've got a house right now that is on fire. | ||
| On offense. Joe Kent's going to join us after break. | ||
| I got Jack Posobiec. We have Mike Davis on the Biden crime family. | ||
| Now crimes with handling highly classified compartment information. | ||
| Colonel Derek Harvey and all the investigations. | ||
| Harmeet Dillon, Caroline Levitt, Ben Harnwell from Rome. | ||
| We are jammed wall to wall today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Back in a moment. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| It's Wednesday, 11 January in the year of our Lord, 2023. | ||
| And right out of the box to start the new year, Joe Kent has announced he's running for Congress against a bald-faced liar. | ||
| She looked those people in the district. | ||
| I've followed all the town halls. | ||
| We watch it quite closely. | ||
| This is the New York Times, you know, the premier house race. | ||
| And boy, think about Joe. | ||
| We had Joe Kent last week. | ||
| Think of the heroes that stood up, you know, the Eli Cranes, guys that are very close to the Joe Kents of the world, cut from the same cloth, the cut of their jibs. | ||
| As we say in the Naval Services. | ||
| Joe, I just want to make sure people understand this. | ||
| This is what this country needs now in its time of trial. | ||
| This CNN report, and I got Naomi Wolf, I got Malone, I got Doubt. | ||
| This thing is massive. | ||
| This is massive. | ||
| They have lied to you. | ||
| They have lied to you consistently. | ||
| And where is the media? They have lied to you. | ||
| And now they're finding, oh, look in the drawer. | ||
| God, is that there? Wow, how did that happen? | ||
| You're going to see a lot of this. | ||
| Here's the thing, this guy Offit, this Dr. | ||
| Offit, that he's sad and angry and disappointed. | ||
| He's very angry and disappointed this happened. | ||
| This is the scumbag that's working with the White House in the Twitter files to suppress the Naomi Wolfs and the Dr. | ||
| Malones and the Dr. | ||
| McCullers when these experts are coming forward and Naomi's organizing everything with Amy Kelly and the team. | ||
| They're coming forward, putting this information. | ||
| That scumbag, don't get me angry and disappointed, dude. | ||
| You're part of the problem and you're going to be held accountable. | ||
| I'm angry and disappointed. I'm very angry and disappointed. | ||
| Moderna, who would have thunk it? | ||
| Who would have thunk Moderna? | ||
| Would have ever done such thing, held back information, and nobody asked? | ||
| In the time of trial, as we saw last week, human agency is everything. | ||
| Divine providence, yes, you can pray all we want, and you have to pray. | ||
| There's no doubt. This is a spiritual war. | ||
| But divine providence works through human agency. | ||
| In the Revolution, in the Civil War, in the Great Depression and World War II, this is the fourth turning of this nation. | ||
| And you saw last week a handful of people, a handful of people change the direction of the country against all odds and against conservative ink. | ||
| The controlled opposition all played their cards. | ||
| I don't need to name names because you in the audience know them. | ||
| And listen, remember, life comes down to what they call in the military the unforgiving minute, right? And that unforgiving minute when you have to make a decision and you have to commit. | ||
| Joe Kent, you've seen that. | ||
| Joe Kent, how many combat tours have you served for your country, sir, overseas? | ||
|
unidentified
|
11 combat tours, Steve. | |
| And you were there to defend democracy, defend the American way of life, correct, sir? | ||
| Absolutely. Do you think this fight is as important as that fight at that time? | ||
| Do you think this fight to save democracy in this nation and to make sure that we're not overwhelmed by an administrative state, a deep state, the oligarchs in Silicon Valley, the titans on Wall Street, all the great corporate forces, the World Economic Forum, all of it, there's a raid against us, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely, Steve. I really thought that when I was fighting overseas, that that would be the struggle for my generation, that that was going to be our big test. | |
| It certainly was after 9-11, but now that we see all the lies, all the misrepresentations of the Iraq war, of what the ruling class has done to this country, I can see now clearly, and I think many people in my generation do, we saw a lot of great heroes like Eli Crane, he's another post-9-11 combat vet, Anna Paulina Luna, really stepping up And continuing that fight against the establishment, that fight against our permanent ruling class to restore the people's voice back to Washington, D.C. And that's why I'm not quitting and that's why I'm running again. | ||
| When this show would go out of their way to highlight the Eli Cranes and the Anna Paulina Lunas and the Caroline Levitts and the Joe Kents, there was a method to our madness. | ||
| We knew last week was going to come. | ||
| We knew last week was going to come. | ||
| And you had to have people of a certain caliber and timber, right? | ||
| A certain spiritual, moral, ethical dimension to them. | ||
| Because the practicality of the fight, the fight's always different in different elements. | ||
| But Joe, you know what I mean. You've been in combat. | ||
| You know what I mean about the unforgiving minute. | ||
| You've been there when that decision you make and the commitment you make is what defines men and women for their entire careers like was defined last week. | ||
| We know who the cowards are. | ||
| We know who the controlled opposition is. | ||
| It's quite evident, right? | ||
| And we know who the heroes are. | ||
| The hard six and the other 14, the other 14 were fantastic too and cut many of the deals. | ||
| But you needed that anchor of also the hard six. | ||
| That's the Joe Kents and the Caroline Levins. | ||
| By the way, even the McCarthy team would admit, hey, it came out better, and we're now more focused, and we know what we've got to do, and we're on point. | ||
| It's not going to be perfect. I was born at night, but I was not born last night. | ||
| Joe Kent, walk through what this audience has to do to help you. | ||
| And we now understand why we need the Joe Kents and the Caroline Levitts. | ||
| We need these heroes. | ||
| We need these young patriots who are never going to back down, ever. | ||
| Joe Kent, walk us through the campaign and how can we, in the way the War Room audience can find out, as we say, find out more about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. We're announcing early because this is going to be a long and hard fight. | |
| We need to raise as much funding as we possibly can. | ||
| At the end of the day, this comes down to resources and being able to put money on target. | ||
| So I need everybody in the posse to go to joekentforcongress.com. | ||
| Please share that out. If you can make any kind of donation, Last time I didn't take any corporate PAC money. | ||
| I'm not taking any corporate PAC money this time. | ||
| I'm going to run all off of money coming from individual donors. | ||
| So JoeKentForCongress.com is the place to make a donation if you possibly can or just to get more information about my campaign and the fight that we're in right now. | ||
| Let me just be very simple to the folks out in, because I don't want to make this too complicated because it doesn't need to be. | ||
| For the folks out in Washington 3 who are the backbone of this nation and who are great people and believe somebody, only a thousand votes or two thousand votes different, but she looked you in the eye day in and day out and said, hey, I am not going to vote for the National Democratic Party, what they do. | ||
| On the most important things at the beginning of this, she is, let me just summarize briefly, a bald-faced liar. | ||
| She looked you in the eye and she lied to you. | ||
| That is a typical politician. | ||
| Joe Kent, honored to have you on here, sir, and you're the exact type of warrior we need in Washington, D.C., and I cannot wait to see you in the city. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you very much, Steve. I really appreciate it. | |
| Thanks, brother. Posobiec, let me bring in Posobiec. | ||
| I got two fighters. I got a Polish and I got a red-haired Mick in Davis. | ||
| Then I got Harvey. I mean, and Harmeet Dillon. | ||
| I mean, it's nothing but Fighters Day. | ||
| Caroline Lovett. We're on the attack here. | ||
| Posobiec, how important, you're a naval intelligence officer, how important is it to have guys like Joe Kent? | ||
| Going through what we did last week, and you and Charlie Kirk did amazing coverage, how important is it to have the Joe Kents of the world in this city now? | ||
| Well, Steve, you've got to remember that We went through, after World War II, after the Korean War, we went through a period where so many members of Congress had military experience, so many members were veterans themselves. | ||
| We've now gotten to the point where we're at the lowest level of military service in the United States Congress. | ||
| That doesn't mean that you have to serve in the military to be some great Congressman to be some great leader. | ||
| But you want people with that kind of experience, that kind of steely-eyed gaze who understand what it means to actually be there and look a thousand yards ahead at the enemy dead in the eye. | ||
| That's what Joe Kent brings to the table. | ||
| And so you want people like that in there. | ||
| Also people like Joe Kent who understand more than anyone because people forget Joe Kent is a gold star widower himself who understand The sacrifice that it means to send our men and women into harm's way and that it should only be done for the highest and most essential purposes and not to further the special interests and corporate interests of the American elite. | ||
| Only against actual clear and present dangers to the United States and our homeland. | ||
| By the way, we're reloading. | ||
| People say, man, Joe Cannon's the first couple days of January. | ||
| Wow, it's two years away. We're reloading right now. | ||
| We're going to fill this place with even better people next time, right? | ||
| Even more and better people. | ||
| The Joe Kents, the Caroline Levitts. | ||
| These are the fighters and tigers you need. | ||
| Let's play, I tell you, because here's the clowns you're up against. | ||
| Let's play, this morning, no plane can take off. | ||
| Let's find out why. Let's go ahead and play that one, Posobiec's response. | ||
| But this all, we'll get to that. | ||
| We'll get to all of you. We'll get to all of you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But this all means money. | |
| This is business. Well, it absolutely does. | ||
| And it's an inconvenience for so many people, business travelers and leisure travelers. | ||
| We're back to pre-pandemic levels. | ||
| I mean, yesterday, 1.67 million people passed through TSA checkpoints in the U.S. That is more than on the same day in 2019. | ||
| So we are back to pre-pandemic levels. | ||
| And people are flying. | ||
| Millions of people are flying. At peak operational times, you have 5,400 planes in the air. | ||
| And all those connections, all of those business travelers and vacations that are happening here. | ||
| So this is a big inconvenience. | ||
| And it's not because of weather. | ||
| And it's not because of flight crews that are not available or overstretched or staffing issues. | ||
| This is 100 percent because of an FAA outage. | ||
| And I was emailing with United Airlines, you know, we're complying with that directive, that directive from the FAA to Where's the secretary of transportation? | ||
| Where's the mayor? | ||
| Is Howdy Doody? Where's Howdy Doody? | ||
| Or is it Alfred E. Newman? | ||
| Where's Alfred E. Newman today? | ||
| What me worry? | ||
| The McKinsey consultant? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where's the genius who's going to be president of the United States? | |
| Where is he? Yeah, Secretary Buttigieg of, you know, D. McKinsey, D. Langley, if he's not over to Michigan waiting to campaign for Senate, because we all know that's what he's trying to do out there next, he's nowhere to be found. | ||
| He's blaming the Senate. Look, you got to understand, this was an entire shutdown of the national airspace system of the FAA. Do you know why you had to ground all air traffic because of this? | ||
| Because they would not be able to send out any of the NOTAMs. | ||
| This is the NOTAMS system, the notice to air missions system. | ||
| That means when you're, that's your entire C2 for command and control for the entire US airspace. | ||
| And Steve, I'm not going to say this is what it was, but this is exactly what a high level cyber attack would look like on the US. Imagine sustained outage of our NOTAMS system, sustained outage of all, downing of all commercial flights immediately. | ||
| Hang on. I got Poso. | ||
| I got Davis. I got Derek Harvey. | ||
| I got the top guys on Intel and the legal aspects of all these investigations and the top secret compartment information. | ||
| But I got to finish when we come back. | ||
| Mayor Pete's somewhere wandering around Europe getting ready for Davos. | ||
| The guy took on the supply chain. | ||
| He wasn't around. Where is this guy? | ||
| Steve Ratner made. Captain John Cox, longtime commercial pilot made. | ||
| The former head of the FAA, Mr. | ||
| Babbitt, was with us. He made the point, too, which is that, yes, it is an outdated system, but also it's the best in the world, meaning the skies are safe on a day-to-day, hour-to-hour basis, but there certainly are updates, upgrades, and technology improvements that could be made to the system just to make it more efficient, to prevent moments like this where you've got a couple of hours of planes sitting on the ground disrupting an entire day of travel. | ||
| Transportation Secretary Buttigieg did tweet out a short time ago that he has directed an after-action process to determine root causes and recommend next steps. | ||
| So it'll either happen at the cabinet level or the congressional level, but there will be an investigation into what exactly took down the system today. | ||
| Let's get a congressional investigation. | ||
| Buttigieg wandering around Europe, I think, getting ready for Davos. | ||
| He's going to do an after-action report. | ||
| The engine room, the war room engine room informs me. | ||
| I don't want to thank the engine room this morning. | ||
| The DOT, Department of Transportation, Posobiec Transportation Statistics Annual Report. | ||
| They're supposed to go through and analyze all this. | ||
| 234 pages. Equity, the word equity, is mentioned on over 13 % of the pages. | ||
| Their big focus is on equity, not on actually making sure the system works. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But hey, Posobiec, feel better, baby. | |
| Alfred E. Newman Buttigieg. | ||
| Alfred E. Buttigieg is on it. | ||
| He's going to do an after-action report. | ||
| Just want you to know, he's phoning in from Europe. | ||
| You feel better on that? | ||
| Is Joe Biden wandering around somewhere? | ||
| Does he feel better for that, Jack Posobiec? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. Paging Secretary Buttigieg to the white zone. | ||
| Paging Secretary Buttigieg to the white zone. | ||
| This is the red zone. You better shut up with that white zone. | ||
| No, no, no. But when you when you that's my my airman line, but we've got a government that it doesn't know. | ||
| And keep in mind, Biden just came out and threw him under the bus because Buttigieg said early on there's no evidence of a cyber attack. | ||
| And then they asked Biden about it and he said, well, we don't know if it's a cyber attack. | ||
| So now we don't know which way he's coming or going. | ||
| We don't know what's happening here because they haven't briefed Biden on what the line is supposed to be. | ||
| And I'm gonna tell you something right now that everybody's asking about cyber attack. | ||
| This is exactly what An invasion of Taiwan scenario would start out like. | ||
| This is something, everyone's talking CNN the other day, oh, you know, the United States would win, it would be hard fought, but we'd win. Now, they would come at us with unrestricted warfare. | ||
| You would see cyberattacks, the first thing you'd see is aircraft, every aircraft, one system. | ||
| Single point of failure. | ||
| The NOTAM system goes down. | ||
| Guess what? Every flight is grounded. | ||
| You know what happens next? You go to pick up your phone, and your GPS doesn't work. | ||
| You can't drive anywhere. You know how many people drive with their GPS? Every one these days. | ||
| No Uber, no GPS, all of it's down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Every Uber, at least every Uber driver. | |
| Okay, Jack, but hey, I feel better. | ||
| Because Alfred E. Buttigieg is on the case. | ||
| What, me worry? I'm doing an after-action report. | ||
| That's the kind of guy CEOs love. | ||
| I'm going to do an after-action report. | ||
| He has no worthy idea what's going on. | ||
| Jack, I want to pivot here because we've got a lot to get through. | ||
| I want to deal with Biden and the felonies. | ||
| You're a naval intelligence officer. | ||
| How big a deal are the compartment at Top Secret? | ||
| Just the material. I'm going to get Davis in here. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to join us right now. | ||
| But how big a deal is... | ||
| Did you have the ability when you're in Naval Intelligence to take compartment at Top Secret and take it back home where Tiny is cooking your dinner and just kind of flip through it and get some work done, sir? No, I'm serious. You're a Philadelphia guy. | ||
| Couldn't you have taken it over to the University of Pennsylvania and had a cup of coffee in the Starbucks and kind of flipped through it, sir? | ||
| Well, you know what I would do is I would walk into the skiff with my cell phone and just start photographing, you know, different computer screens, make sure, you know, look up, you know, little things like our submarine locations, make sure I send, take those over to the local Chinese restaurants. | ||
| You would, you know, just flip through it. | ||
| People should understand. | ||
| Yeah. People are trying to stand in the skiffs where these things, you've got to go to review these things. | ||
| The phones have to be left outside the vault. | ||
| These things are all vaults. | ||
| The phones have to be put into boxes outside. | ||
| Outside the vote in a box cut off that the world can't get to. | ||
| Outside, yes. And then you got to go or even into the wall safes. | ||
| And then you go into the skiffs, which all have codes. | ||
| I mean, when I was in the Pentagon, I worked in a skiff that was a vault, right? | ||
| And nothing could get in or out of there. | ||
| The concept that you could take compartmented, which is above top secret. | ||
| Could take that out and you know he doesn't know remember they moved it twice as mike davis is going to remind but i just want to make sure everybody understand timeline how important is this information okay go ahead so hit me because look i was the guy that came out and said that it looked like the documents the fbi was after at mar-a-lago were the russia gate documents they were not able to find them they were not able to find what was there because the contents matter we're told But the timeframe of these documents, 2013 to 2016, it included classified information on where? | ||
| Ukraine. What was being run in Ukraine? | ||
| What operations were the intelligence agencies running in Ukraine in 2013 to 2016? | ||
| That's the entire Maidan revolution, the Maidan coup. | ||
| When the president of Ukraine duly elected, remember, defend democracy, defend democracy, except for that one, he gets knocked off in a U.S.-backed color revolution. | ||
| Then we're also told UK what was going on in the UK in 2016. | ||
| Let's ask Gina Haspel because she was the CIA station chief right there in London. | ||
| Crossfire hurricane was being run out of London with the MI6 agent Christopher Steele. | ||
| That's where the meetings were taking place. | ||
| That's where Mifsud was. | ||
| That's where Papadopoulos was. | ||
| They were running all of this out of London. | ||
| So my question to them is why were those documents brought back from that timeframe? | ||
| Did this have anything to do Why is it in an office at 101 Constitution Avenue? | ||
| Same building, by the way, as One American News and Epoch Times, right upstairs there, funded by the Chinese government. | ||
| Why are those documents sitting in the Penn Biden Center in the first place? | ||
| Penned by and signed and financed by the CCP. Jack, hang on one second. | ||
| I want to bring in Mike Davis. | ||
| Mike, great hit last night on Jesse Waters. | ||
| Get us up to date on your thinking about this. | ||
| How serious is it? Because they're trying to do, and particularly the cover-up too, because, oh my gosh, and this all came about because we have a Republican House of fighters and tigers that are going to be all over these jackals. | ||
| Walk us through what's your latest thinking on this, Mike Davis, because they're making it seem like, oh, it's no big deal. | ||
| It's not... As bad as Trump at Mar-a-Lago, and Trump's terrible, and Trump's horrible, and Biden's just a nice guy, and he didn't know anything happened. | ||
| Mike Davis? It's actually much worse than Trump, because President Trump had the absolute constitutional power as commander-in-chief and the statutory power under the Presidential Records Act to take his presidential records when he left off, classified or not. He could declassify them, he could take classified records, and the Office of Former President They have a federally funded office space. | ||
| They have federally funded staff. | ||
| The staff get security clearances. | ||
| They have SCIFs or secure compartment information facilities. | ||
| They have Secret Service protection to guard the paper records. | ||
| If anyone's ever been to Mar-a-Lago, it's heavily guarded. | ||
| He's a former president. | ||
| They get lifetime Secret Service protection. | ||
| Contrast that with then-former Vice President Joe Biden. | ||
| He had none of those powers. | ||
| He did not have any power to declassify. | ||
| He had no power under the Presidential Records Act to take any records. | ||
| It's theft of government property. | ||
| It's also mishandling of classified records when he took them to his office. | ||
| And remember, as we talked about, he moved these twice. | ||
| He moved these before January 20th, 2017, when he left the office of vice president. | ||
| And then he moved them again in February 2018 when he went to the 101 Constitution. | ||
| And they found these documents apparently in his personal files. | ||
| So he moved them twice and they were in his personal files at 101. | ||
| So it's just not credible. | ||
| He didn't know what these documents were. | ||
| He didn't know that he had them. That's just not believable. | ||
| These are major felonies, Mike Davis. | ||
| Is that correct? These are major felonies since he doesn't have the plight to declassify. | ||
| Remember, too, just to make sure that you understand the conversion of the stories, in The Laptop from Hell, they also remind us that this is the moment when he's got his brother and his pervert, sexual maniac, drug addict son trying to shake down the Chinese for more cash. | ||
| Just a random occurrence where the Chinese are already pumping money into the UPenn Center. | ||
| He's on the payroll there. | ||
| They're trying to get more money. | ||
| And he's got highly classified compartmented documents. | ||
| How big are the felonies here, Mike Davis? | ||
| Well, they're huge. These are the same charges that they're trying to go after Trump on. | ||
| The problem is that Trump is a former president. | ||
| It is legally impossible for President Trump to have violated the Espionage Act because he was the president. | ||
| It is legally impossible. It's impossible for President Trump to mishandle classified information and destroy presidential records and destroy government property. | ||
| They're trying to charge President Trump under the General Government Document Destruction Act when the Presidential Records Act applies. | ||
| That doesn't work for a former vice president. | ||
| The National Archives, which is so hair on fire about Trump, the cover-up here, you guys are guilty of felonies too. | ||
| You never brought it forward. National Archives, you're going to have Garland, the FBI, National Archives, they're all going to get outed in this in the cover-up. | ||
| Mike, hang her for one second because I know Jack's got to punch it. | ||
| I want to ask you about weaponization of government. | ||
| Jack, you saw the cold open with Morning Joe on the weaponization of government. | ||
| And man, they're, oh no, you can't show this. | ||
| These are the top secret things. | ||
| It can't be in the SCIF. We're going to fight them. | ||
| They can subpoena. What is your assessment on the new church committee? | ||
| I've got a Washington Post story up on Getter. | ||
| They're in full meltdown. | ||
| This is the biggest thing I think that's ever happened because the administrative state understands you've got Jim Jordan and guys that are coming right for you. | ||
| Jack Posobiec. Morning Joe, MSNBC, what did we see throughout the Russiagate investigation? | ||
| We saw that all of the leaks ran from John Brennan, Clapper, to people like Jake Tapper, to people like Morning Joe, like Morning Mika. | ||
| All of the leaks that were coming out of the intelligence community were going to media, and then they were turning around and using that media for parallel reconstruction. | ||
| To say, well, this has been reported in the media, so we've got to run an investigation on it. | ||
| Steve, we are going to find the names like Joe Scarborough, like Mika Brzezinski in these documents. | ||
| I guarantee their own sources are going to have to be outed. | ||
| Because we are going to see everyone who was leaking like a shifty shift to every single one of them. | ||
| And they know the jig is up. | ||
| And I couldn't be happier. I honestly couldn't be happier. | ||
| But I want to see the subpoena list. | ||
| I want to see the targets. Because I don't care if we're going to have some 12-hour session and depose Hillary Clinton. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. I want scalps. | ||
| I want as many scalps as possible. | ||
| And I want to investigate this all the way down to the brass tacks. | ||
| No Benghazi. No Trey Gowdy clowns. | ||
| No Trey Gowdy clowns. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No Benghazi. No, Trey Gowdy can go do his social media act with his little bow tie. | |
| Yeah, and he can go do whatever, his brilliant Sunday show on Fox. | ||
| Have fun on Sundays. Have fun. | ||
| God bless you. We go to Mass, and then we watch Trey Gowdy. | ||
| That's what half my family spends every Sunday. | ||
| A hand grenade with a bad haircut. | ||
| How do we get to you? | ||
| What's all the social media? Look, you've got to watch Human Events Daily. | ||
| We just dropped the China Files, all five series of them, parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. | ||
| This Sunday, by the way, our Sunday special. | ||
| Who have we got on Facebook? Masako Ganaha, the international journalist out of Okinawa, describing for us the Chinese influence operations in Japan and the threat that they pose to Okinawa just about 450 miles from Taiwan. | ||
| You've got to watch this episode. | ||
| Oh, brother, the first four were fantastic, sir, the first four or five. | ||
| Thank you very much. Mike, I got a minute in this segment, but I want to hold you over, and I'm going to bring up Derek Harvey. | ||
| You heard Morning Joe. | ||
| Are they going to be able to run and hide and rope-a-dope this, like they're saying, that you've got to fight us with subpoenas? | ||
| We're never going to give up investigations. | ||
| What's your thoughts, Mike Davis? | ||
| I mean, they're going to have to. | ||
| If they don't think that the FBI and the intel agencies are subject to congressional oversight, that they're just power sinners onto themselves and they're not accountable to anyone, that's exactly the problem with the FBI and the intel community, is they don't think that they're accountable to anyone. | ||
| And that has to change, and it's going to change. | ||
| My former boss, Senator Chuck Grassley, on the Senate Judiciary Committee, was able to uncover a lot of this, the Russian collusion hoax and many other scandals in the FBI and the intel community. | ||
| And I think this select committee is going to take the baton. | ||
| Mike, hang on for one second. | ||
| I've got a couple more questions on the other side. | ||
| We've got Colonel Derek Harvey. | ||
| We have Mike Davis, Harmeet Dillon, Caroline Levitt. | ||
| We're going to go Cardinal Pell died yesterday. | ||
| The American Spectator has a blockbuster story out about what he was working on about the Vatican. | ||
| Hmm. A lot of double dealing there as they're totally beholden to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You see a pattern here? Short break, back a second. | |
| Arrived. The new social media taking on big tech. | ||
| Protecting free speech. | ||
| And canceling cancel culture. | ||
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| We're all over Getter. Go to my Getter account right now. | ||
| We're putting up stuff nonstop, particularly on the CNN report of the lies of the FDA and the CDC about this vaccine. | ||
| Now they're outed, suppressing and hiding information. | ||
| You're going to see a lot of information start coming out. | ||
| Wow, we didn't know we had that from every different aspect of the lying administrative state because now they're going to be outed. | ||
| Mike Davis, your concluding thoughts here, you've been all over this about how hard this has to be pressed and about the comments Joe Biden's already making about this regarding Merrick Garland. | ||
| Yeah, this is a huge problem. | ||
| So this came out. The Biden team disclosed these records on November 2nd, six days before the midterm elections. | ||
| This was covered up for two months. | ||
| We didn't find out about this for two months, which is a cover-up onto itself. | ||
| You have the Attorney General who appointed a special counsel for President Trump, but won't appoint a special counsel for his own boss, President Biden. | ||
| There is a much clearer case. | ||
| There's a much clearer conflict of interest. | ||
| For Merrick Garland investigating Biden than Merrick Garland investigating Trump. | ||
| This U.S. attorney that was appointed, they say it was a Trump U.S. attorney, this was actually a hand-picked attorney by Dick Durbin in Illinois. | ||
| He was one of two U.S. attorneys who Biden capped. | ||
| That tells you all you need to know about this guy. | ||
| And so Merrick Garland must appoint a special counsel. | ||
| And President Biden is already putting political pressure on Garland. | ||
| He came out in a statement and said, review which I hope will be over soon. | ||
| That is improper legal pressure on Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Biden Justice Department. | ||
| That's their boss saying, get this over with quickly. | ||
| Sweep it under the rug. There must be a special counsel. | ||
| Davis, how do people, particularly in the next couple of days, that want to be all over the story, how do they follow you? | ||
| Article3project.org, Article3project.org, at Article3project, at Article3project, on Getter, Twitter, Truth. | ||
| My personal is at MRDDMIA, MRDDMIA. Thank you, Steve. Thank you, brother. | ||
| Great hit last night on Fox. I want to bring in Colonel Derrick Harvey. | ||
| Just so you understand, I wanted to give you the structure. | ||
| Under Devin Nunez, which is the best chairman of the intel committee we've had in living memory, Nunez controlled it. | ||
| He had his chief counsel, Kash Patel, but he also had the intelligence officer, DIA, U.S. Army colonel, a legend for what he did in Iraq, a legendary figure, Colonel Derrick Harvey. | ||
| Colonel Harvey joins us now. | ||
| Colonel Harvey, give us your assessment of this Biden, I think, crimes of Joe Biden, sir. Well, first off, Steve, I was the chief investigator for Devin Nunes and the strategic advisor to figure out how to navigate through all the obstacles that we're going to confront. | ||
| And I'd first like to just piggyback off some of these comments about the investigations. | ||
| And it will play a part, I think, with the Biden piece that we're going to talk about. | ||
| The oversight and the investigations going after... | ||
| Go ahead, Steve. | ||
| Sorry. No, you go ahead. | ||
| You just roll. We want to hear what you have to say. | ||
| We have subpoena authority to go after these people, and it's going to work real well, I think, with Speaker McCarthy. | ||
| We're not going to have obstacles like we had with Paul Ryan, who blocked the subpoenas that Devin Nunes wanted to submit to DOJ and FBI and some of the others to get at the bottom of the Russia hoax. | ||
| But it's incredibly important to line up the right leadership that's going to be aggressive. | ||
| You need the right kinds of staff in there that are going to know the topics, be technically proficient, and will be aggressive. | ||
| We need the resources to do it, and you need a strategy, and you need to be able to execute it. | ||
| And at the end of the day, once you have all that, you need a good media strategy to communicate it If you remember, we started to get a little more traction when Lee Smith and Amanda Milius combined on getting the movie out that dealt with the Russia hoax. | ||
| We need a media strategy that's going to connect all the dots so we establish a narrative going into 2024. | ||
| We dig, we get the evidence out, we exploit it, we amplify it, but we need that narrative that will influence the campaign in 2024. | ||
| For the President, for the Senate, and elsewhere. | ||
| We've got to have all those things. | ||
| We're going to get after these investigations. | ||
| Some are more important than others. | ||
| The weaponization one is really important. | ||
| But the obstacles we're going to face, and I know, Steve, you know it, but for the audience out there, all of these agencies and departments working for President Biden are going to delay, obfuscate, give a little bit, show a little leg, and then, you know, Come back again. | ||
| And what we're going to wind up with is subpoenas that are not going to be enforced by DOJ. Or we'll play rope-a-dope. | ||
| And so we're going to have to execute and play hardball with things like the Holman Rule and find other legislative ways of pinning these people down so that they are compelled to provide the information, the documents, and testify. | ||
| And it's going to be slow for a while, and that's going to Also, just one other thing. Devin Nunes was spied on. | ||
| Kash Patel was spied on. | ||
| My records were accessed by the FBI. All in an attempt to dig up dirt on us. | ||
| These staff and leaders are going to wind up facing some of the same sorts of dirty tricks by the intelligence community. | ||
| I'll just make one note here. | ||
| The CIA and the FBI have files on the congressman. | ||
| We need to find out what they have put in those files. | ||
| And the justification for it and what they're doing to dig it up and how they're acquiring this information on sitting congressmen. | ||
| This is pretty explosive. I want to go back. | ||
| I'll tell you what. I want to get this through the next break. | ||
| It's a 90-second break. Derek Harvey is one of the most revered individuals in the Army and particularly in the intelligence aspect of the Army for the work he did in Iraq and other places throughout the world, a true hero and a patriot. | ||
| When he drops bombs like this, About Kash Patel, about Devin Nunez, about himself, and also now talking about the congressman, you're seeing how this is a fight. | ||
| This is a war to the knife here. | ||
| You want to talk about the direction of your country until you wrested control back from the Praetorian Guard that is the administrative state and their deep state elements? | ||
| That's a Praetorian Guard. | ||
| Kennedy, Nixon, Trump. | ||
| They want to be able to select who they want. | ||
| And if you think they're going to give up that power easily, you are incorrect. | ||
| Colonel Derek Harvey joins us on the other side of his shortwave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no war. |
Export Selection