Dec. 23, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:40
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on this, people. | |
| I got a free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know you don't like hearing that. | |
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Welcome. | ||
| It is Friday, 23 December in the year of our Lord 2022. | ||
| It is the eve of the eve of Christmas Day. | ||
| And I want to thank everybody, Real America's Voice. | ||
| We are going to have a five o'clock show today. | ||
| I know most people aren't even broadcasting today, but we're going to have shows all next week and tomorrow. | ||
| So we're going to be wall to wall. | ||
| And over the weekend, we're going to do about America and trying times. | ||
| I got Larry Swickert from the Patriot's History of the U.S. | ||
| and, of course, Patrick K. O'Donnell. | ||
| The Best Combat Historian. | ||
| We're going to talk about the Christmases of years like 1814 after the Capitol and the White House. | ||
| The Capitol had been burned and the White House had been desecrated. | ||
| We're going to talk about 1941. | ||
| We're going to talk about Trenton and the Christmas night of 1776. | ||
| We're going to see. | ||
| You think we're in tough times now? | ||
| We're going to show you tough times. | ||
| And the resilience and grit and determination of the American people over the holiday season and what the Christmas spirit means to people and how it innovates everybody. | ||
| OK. | ||
| We've got a lot to get through and we've got limited time to do it. | ||
| So I want to turn to Dave Clements. | ||
| Clements is – we saw this guy early on, a former prosecutor who was in the school of business at New Mexico, I think New Mexico State down in Las Cruces, when he became enamored with how the election of 2020 was stolen and became a real warrior. | ||
| Clemens, you've arrived. | ||
| By the way, we went to one of the best events we went to all election season 2022 in New Mexico. | ||
| The folks in New Mexico are just absolutely incredible. | ||
| The Patriots out there, the MAGA movement out there. | ||
| Dave, it was incredible. | ||
| But you know you've arrived, sir. | ||
| And if Denver can please get this up and put it up when it's appropriate. | ||
| When I think it's Reuters, and people should understand, Associated Press Uh, agency, uh, France Press AFP and Reuters in Bloomberg, I would say probably the four biggest constant news services in the world. | ||
| Massive, massive news services with Reuters being one of the old, uh, kind of original gangsters. | ||
| I think it's Reuters, correct me if I'm wrong, Dave Clements, but Reuters, I think it's a two or three hander. | ||
| They got like three people on it and it's a complete, it is right up on Dave Clements to take him down. | ||
| This is what I call a hit piece, but quite frankly, Not only didn't they land any blows, I actually think, I thought at first, I said, this is like a free media. | ||
| Did Clemens pay for this as a paid advertisement? | ||
| So walk me through Clemens. | ||
| No, Reuters, they got three or four people on it, names on it. | ||
| And you know, when they do that, they got 10 more people working behind the scenes, the grundoons that are putting everything together. | ||
| So this is one of the major news services in the world. | ||
| Has determined that Dave Clements is, uh, is, uh, notorious enough. | ||
| That he requires a major takedown hit piece. | ||
| We're going to put four of our best guys on it and you read it. | ||
| I'm going, man, no, man, it's like a paid advertisement. | ||
| Clemens, his wife must've got this for him for a Christmas present. | ||
| Dave, tell us what, what, what's their angle of attack on you in this piece? | ||
| Well, it's a nine person team. | ||
| You had two editors, you had an art director, you had a photo editor, and you had four reporters. | ||
| If you go to the bottom of this. | ||
| And I think the main issue here is that what I'm selling as a prescription, they're very scared of, or they would not be paying attention to me. | ||
| And that is from having a ground up movement to get rid of these voting machines. | ||
| And we just saw the city of Milton in Georgia, inside of Fulton County, take a vote to get rid of Dominion and basically have their elections run at a quarter of the cost. | ||
| We had 15 precincts in Alaska that got rid of Dominion. | ||
| We have the work of Jim Marchant. | ||
| They're terrified of we, the people, stepping up and saying, you know, we're not going to have... Hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| And you didn't come at this, this is not selecting Dominion because you don't like them as a business company or whatever. | ||
| You didn't come at this predisposed. | ||
| You had no, you had no... | ||
| There was nothing that you brought to this that said, oh, I've got to take these machines out. | ||
| You did this, as I remember, when I first met you, when you even in New Mexico says a business professor from your prosecutors perspective, just looking at the evidence that was there and saying, hey, Even if I can't go back and work on these different election issues, there's a fundamental issue here that we have to do something different. | ||
| And that focus, your evidence base was around the machines. | ||
| Is that essentially what has been your kind of angle of attack into this thing? | ||
| Yes, Steve. | ||
| We just follow the evidence wherever it goes. | ||
| And this isn't just us spitballing. | ||
| This is report number one, which is a hundreds, of pages of report of our findings of anomalies before we got a full commissioned audit, which we did in eight states with another 500 page report. | ||
| If you'll notice the Reuters story does not debunk or take to task any claim that we have made over two calendar years. | ||
| All I've done is resorted to angry clerks that name call and is call me a liar, but they don't exactly call me out on what I'm being untruthful about. | ||
| And I've been to 42 states in person giving hours long presentation. | ||
| There's hundreds of hours of tape where I've made claims and arguments about the legal deviations. | ||
| You won't find any of those arguments placed in this article. | ||
| So it's more of the same. | ||
| They're just scared to death. | ||
| And I'll tell you what we're paying attention to right now, which is When you get to these certification votes, like in Mojave County, and you've got supervisors saying, the only reason why I'm voting is I'm afraid of being arrested, that this is a duress vote. | ||
| And we're seeing commissioners and supervisors across the country saying, the only reason why I'm certifying this election is because I'm afraid to be arrested. | ||
| That's where we're at right now. | ||
| And we've driven the point home. | ||
| They know the elections are stolen. | ||
| They just don't want to be thrown in jail over them. | ||
| I want to go back to the trial the last couple days, and I don't even know what company makes the machines, because there's a couple of these companies that are in this business and have private equity investors. | ||
| So I don't know who it is. | ||
| But just watching the testimony about the ballots, it's what the technology people said when we first started getting involved in this. | ||
| It's just so complicated. | ||
| I mean, if you look at Scott Jarrett, it is so confusing even for people that follow it. | ||
| When you hear the testimony, but for the average citizen, it's like, and for the people to show up that day to vote, it's like, hey, what's the story of these machines? | ||
| You got this stuff, you get ballots, what size? | ||
| I got a door number three. | ||
| It's just the it's the added complexity that the machines add on regardless of who the manufacturer is. | ||
| Is that part of the one of the big issues that we've got? | ||
| It's huge. | ||
| You've got three major manufacturers. | ||
| You've got Dominion, ES&S, and Hart InterCivic. | ||
| And here's the deal. | ||
| They're basically all have the same components. | ||
| They might have a little bit different window dressing, and they all have the same software design. | ||
| So you have the same issues with all of them, regardless of whether it's Dominion or not. | ||
| And what I would tell people, if you need the crayon translation of what's going on in Arizona, yes, there's a lot of technical stuff about You know, 19 inch images being projected on incorrectly sized ballots. | ||
| The point here is that you had a 40% at least of the equipment malfunctioning and no modern day election should have that type of error. | ||
| And even when the machines don't break down, they have been set up through our analysis of cast vote records to have a, an effect on your races where. | ||
| People are being selected, and that's something that Carrie Lake hit out of the park either yesterday or today in one of her press conferences. | ||
| These are selection devices. | ||
| So yeah, we need to get rid of the complexity and get back to something that is tried and true. | ||
| That's a big challenge. | ||
| Do you think you have the evidence today? | ||
| You're a prosecutor. | ||
| And part of prosecutor is not just I think the guy's a bad guy got evidence, but can I prove it in court? | ||
| Right? | ||
| Because you guys weigh and measure too. | ||
| There's there's certain bad guys that go away because you just don't think you've got enough to convince a jury in an open court with evidence. | ||
| Correct. | ||
| Do you think you have the evidence today to be able to go into court and actually prove this thing about the cast votes? | ||
| Do you believe you have that or is that still your theory of the case? | ||
| Or do you believe as a prosecutor you could actually go and improve that in a court of law to a jury? | ||
| Well, I can't speak for other prosecutors. | ||
| I know I could bring this home. | ||
| You know, we actually got the cast vote record in Sandoval County, New Mexico, and I'm not speaking out of turn. | ||
| This is something that is reported and documented in our report that shows absolute quantitative proof of machine algorithms at work and also proof of ballot stuffing. | ||
| And that has not been debunked or disputed from anyone. | ||
| Now the way that you get this to 100% proof is to have the source code provided, which has not been provided. | ||
| But the reason why it's not being provided is because it confirms what we already know. | ||
| So we're using a very, very strong piece of evidence to do that. | ||
| And how do I know that we would carry the day? | ||
| If you look at Reuters own polls, Reuters put out a poll that says two thirds of all Republicans believe that the election was stolen. | ||
| You look at Rasmussen, the same thing. | ||
| So I see that as my jury pool. | ||
| And the standard in a criminal case is beyond a reasonable doubt. | ||
| It's not beyond all doubt. | ||
| It's not beyond a shadow of a doubt. | ||
| Basically, you just have to render a decision, you know, before you, you act on the graver affairs in life, you know, and the example I would give is before you cross the road, did you look left? | ||
| Did you look right? | ||
| And if you've got enough information to go forward, then, then you've basically achieved the beyond a reasonable doubt standard. | ||
| And the question here is, is based on public trust. | ||
| Do we trust? | ||
| Do we have enough information that our election system's broken? | ||
| There's no doubt about it. | ||
| So yes, we could carry the day with anyone that doesn't have a level of corruption. | ||
| Is there a, after your study of this from a prosecutorial point of view, would you have recommendations if the three manufacturing companies were to, let's leave the clerks and those people out of it, but the manufacturers themselves? | ||
| And so not the price of the potato. | ||
| Are there changes that you would recommend they could make? | ||
| That would lead you to say, hey, maybe the machines could add value here and make it quicker to count or more thorough to count or less human error. | ||
| Is there a punch list that you have that would do that? | ||
| Or are you saying this is kind of irredeemable and I do believe we need to go to the French system, which is paper ballots, game day vote, and or even they vote earlier, paper ballots counted by the community, etc. | ||
| That one of the two options. | ||
| Or is there anything that you've come up with That you think the machine companies will be amenable to that can make them satisfactory to you. | ||
| Well, tell you what, the only recommendation I would give dominion is nested heart is that they need to apologize to the American people. | ||
| And so this is an irredeemable system. | ||
| The only place for technology in these elections is one of transparency. | ||
| So if you want to have the technology to capture and make sure that people aren't doing anything irregular. | ||
| Having transparency and providing the source code to be reviewed. | ||
| I mean, these are things that they won't do. | ||
| The two things that they don't want you to do is a canvas or review their source code. | ||
| And those are the two and only things that you can actually use to audit these elections. | ||
| And they basically use through their special interest lobby, lobby groups, methods to obscure and make sure that we don't get to the truth. | ||
| Well, we've gotten to the truth despite their efforts. | ||
| So the place for technology is simple, you know, transparency. | ||
| Have scanners that don't tabulate. | ||
| Maybe there's a place for that. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Is there an argument for the machine companies that it takes out the human error in counting so many ballots within a certain percentage of time? | ||
| Or do you refute that also? | ||
| Oh, I absolutely refute it. | ||
| Because every time we have a machine count issue, what do we do? | ||
| We do a hand count. | ||
| The hand count has always been the check against the machine. | ||
| So anytime there's an anomaly with Vote counts, close totals, what do you do? | ||
| You resort to a hand count. | ||
| And that's still the law everywhere in the country. | ||
| There are so many more errors that you can actually have through the tabulation process. | ||
| Humans have a pretty good idea of interpreting how the vote should be counted. | ||
| You've got ways to double blind test these tests. | ||
| You've got Democrats, you've got official Republicans, Libertarians, you've got control groups. | ||
| So these recounts are actually quite thorough and they're definitely more efficient when you actually just look at the time and expense that we're looking at with two years after 2020. | ||
| There's no trust. | ||
| So it would have been much more efficient to just do it the French way two years ago and be done with it than go through the nonsense that we're doing right now. | ||
| Dave, I want, we're going to put the, I was waiting to put the story up until you came on. | ||
| Where does your crusade – I tell you what. | ||
| I want to hold off and I want a minute or two with you on the other side because I want to see where this crusade of yours is going to go. | ||
| A nine-person team from Reuters, one of the most powerful and influential news organizations in the world. | ||
| What's called a wire service, right? | ||
| Just like Associated Press or the old UPI, United Press International. | ||
| Nine-person team on a takedown story regarding Dave Clements. | ||
| Don't think it actually, as we say in the business, hit the mark. | ||
| Dave Clements is going to join us on the other side. | ||
| I have Dave Walsh is back. | ||
| We've got a lot to catch up with Dave Walsh on energy. | ||
| And Darren Beatty is also going to join me about the Ukraine, the FBI, Twitter, all of it next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Cause we're taking down the CCP! | |
| Spread the word all through Hong Kong! | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone! | |
| We rejoice when there's no more! | ||
| Let's take down the CCP! | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Back. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| MyPillow.com promo code WAROOM It's going to be a bitterly cold winter. | ||
| Not just this blast is coming through. | ||
| That's going to ease up a little bit. | ||
| I think middle late next week, but it's going to be a cold winter. | ||
| Make sure you're ready for it and make sure you're ready. | ||
| All these stories coming out right now. | ||
| What the American people want more than anything is a good night's sleep. | ||
| Some report, I think 25% of the people have sleepless nights, like 10, 10 days a month. | ||
| I'll get into more of that next week. | ||
| Pretty stunning. | ||
| MyPillow.com promo code war room. | ||
| Sleep the sleep of the just. | ||
| Get the products from MyPillow. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Go check it out now. | ||
| The sales are just unbelievable. | ||
| Huge, still big discount, 80% off. | ||
| Many products on inventory clearance sales. | ||
| Go check it out. | ||
| And plus, if it's not perfect, up until March 31st of 2023, the end of the first quarter, you can send it back. | ||
| Money-back guarantee. | ||
| Go check it out now. | ||
| Dave, I want to make sure people understand, and particularly this audience, when they're coming after Trump, when they're coming after me, when they're coming after Tucker, it's because of this audience. | ||
| They come after Dave Clements and they put a nine-man team at Reuters on a takedown piece. | ||
| It's not about Dave Clements. | ||
| It's what Dave Clements represents. | ||
| It's that polling he was talking about at Rasmussen. | ||
| It's the polling he's talking about at Two-Thirds. | ||
| It's the polling that – and it's what's happened in the Carey Lake situation with the – literally I think all the streaming services combined were over 100,000 live people in chat rooms. | ||
| That's what they fear. | ||
| They're coming after Clements because they are coming – they fear you. | ||
| They don't want you to get uppity. | ||
| They don't want you to get like your, hey, maybe these elections are being stolen. | ||
| Maybe we ought to go to a French system. | ||
| Or if you're going to keep the machines, maybe they have to be these radical changes, so they have to be transparent. | ||
| Whatever the give-and-take is, however it ends up, what they fear is you having a say-so. | ||
| That's what they fear. | ||
| They want you just to sit there, shut up, go to work every day, pay your taxes, and just be, you know, be this kind of, was it lumpenproletariat, or, you know, just part of the mass and not have an opinion. | ||
| Dave Clements has kind of started a new career on a crusade, really, to get this sorted, to set things right. | ||
| As Clint Eastwood would say. | ||
| Dave, how do people join you in this crusade? | ||
| How do they find out more information? | ||
| And my point is that, with his evidence, if the machine companies don't like it, to me, what they should do is come in and debate. | ||
| We reach out to these guys all the time. | ||
| We would love to offer up. | ||
| We would put on a town hall and underwrite it. | ||
| Bring the best technology people, not independent, bring the best technology people from the machine companies. | ||
| Bring the heads of the machine companies, the heads of sales or the CEOs, whoever they want, and any experts they want, like old Fresno State. | ||
| Anywhere, anytime, anyone. | ||
| Against just Dave Clements, and I tell you what, we won't even let him have notes. | ||
| Just be Clements up on a stage. | ||
| Absolutely, Steve, and here's the deal. | ||
| If you want to bring a team of 12 people, bring it and just Clements and we will do that at any time and we open that invitation because we love free, fair, intense, heated debates. | ||
| That's what the United States is about. Clements, would you be down for that if we could set that up? Would you do that? | ||
| Absolutely, Steve, and here's the deal. I used to teach intellectual property and it baffles me that we haven't gotten to the issue of the source code with these machines because in courts of law, every day we have people that have lawsuits over whose IP is what. | ||
| And they have these things called in-camera hearings, and you could seal the record, but a judge can hear evidence from everyone, experts for the state, experts for the clerks, experts for the we, the people, and they can get to a decision. | ||
| And it baffles me for this reason, when you've got Dominion suing people like Mike Lindell for $1.3 billion, if you actually had the strength of your conviction, subject yourself to an in-camera hearing, put this matter to rest, and prove people like myself to be a liar. | ||
| They do it in courts of law all the time. | ||
| The reason why Dominion won't subject themselves to an in-camera hearing in a court of law is because we're right, and I know it. | ||
| So I would absolutely take the invitation, and we've got the leading experts to deal with this. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Let me get to the topic. | ||
| They are in a court where people have ... The lawyers have gone in, both the News Corp lawyers and Lindell's lawyers, and asked these things to be thrown at. | ||
| And they're progressing to the point that they're having depositions. | ||
| And I think they're leaking depositions now of people, or at least not leaking, given the general indication of what people are saying. | ||
| So courts are seeing that there's enough here, at least at this stage, to go forward into trial. | ||
| Well, the evidence has always been there. | ||
| I think this is just an issue of corruption, and that's one of the more frustrating things. | ||
| You know, when you brought me on your show, you know, a year ago or a year plus, you know, I was basically the first person with my credentials to say that the vast majority of these cases are being dismissed on standing. So you don't even get to the evidence. When you actually look at the evidence, there's tons of evidence and even the case with Kerry Lake was stripped down to two counts and there was a lot of valid things that should have been hit on. That's not Team Lake's fault, that's just the court trying to to limit folks. So it's not a | ||
| question of whether we've got evidence now, it's a question of courage. | ||
| Do we have any judges in the country that are willing to do the right thing when the vast majority of the American people, conservatively, at least 60% of the American people, have no faith in our current election system? | ||
| What does that say about the, many of these are Republican judges and selected by, a bunch of these are people that are, and I think one of the cases, I don't know if it was D.C. | ||
| because it gets confusing to me, but I think one of them is a Trump Appointee and you know the Federalist Society and Leonard Leo and people there was a huge vetting | ||
| We have a problem where the pressure is so intense that even people that are selected as in the rigor that Leonard Leo and others in the Federalist Society and other advisors and consultants put these things through and you end up getting a Judge Gorsuch and a Judge Kavanaugh or Justice Kavanaugh and a Justice Amy Comey Bryant and you got Barrett and you've got Gorsuch | ||
| As great as he is, that system fails? | ||
| Or is it just the pressure so intense they're going to all go John Roberts on you? | ||
| Well, there's no guarantee that you're going to get it to the Supreme Court. | ||
| And I think that's what your trial district court judges are bracing themselves for. | ||
| You know, I did a deep dive in over 400 election fraud cases stemming from 2020. | ||
| Ninety of them were much more substantively thorough because they were filed by attorneys and not pro se litigants. | ||
| And what I found there is that only three or four of those 90 cases had Trump appointees. | ||
| So what it tells me is that, you know, the Mark Eliases of the world, Perkins Coie, they know how to war game this. | ||
| They know how to get their, their cases in front of particular judges. | ||
| And the vast majority of the judges that heard these decisions were Barack Obama appointees or, or Bush appointees. | ||
| They weren't Trump appointees. | ||
| So we need to dispel that myth right now. | ||
| But yeah, we need a miracle. | ||
| We need to have these cases make their way up to the Supreme Court so we can start having new law that's examined. | ||
| And what do I mean by new law? | ||
| The biggest issue here is standing. | ||
| And people fundamentally misunderstand standing. | ||
| Standing is only appropriate, you know, where you can dismiss cases because you've got the political remedy. | ||
| You could always say, well, you didn't like the law. | ||
| You didn't like Obamacare. | ||
| Well, fine. | ||
| You can vote the bums out of office. | ||
| Well, when we're talking about elections, you can't vote the bums out of office because we're talking about the very, very subversion of our election system. | ||
| So we need a whole new branch of law to discuss the world that we live in now. | ||
| They're applying outdated law to the election system. | ||
| Until the Supreme Court ferrets that out and figures it out, we're going to have the same buzzsaw effect where we, the people, really don't get to hear, have our voices heard before the highest court in the land. | ||
| Dave, how can people follow you on your crusade? | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
| And I want to make sure we get the Reuters article everywhere, the kill shot on David Clements. | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
| You can find me on Truth at Professor David Clements and on Telegram The professor's record. | ||
| Clements brother Clements. | ||
| Thank you for joining us here. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| I want to make I want to make sure particularly people go to get her every now and again. | ||
| I get a comment like how did you put this article up? | ||
| This is terrible. | ||
| This is attacking Trump or this attack and voted. | ||
| No 80% of what I put up probably 90% of what I put up is just like we do the cold opens in the morning is to show you how The enemy is looking at this how they're crafting the narrative and let you 90% of the comments get it. | ||
| Oh, I see what they're saying. | ||
| They're liars. | ||
| I see how they're trying to position is because this is what the American people's being fed. | ||
| That's what we love when when something like Rorders goes after Dave Clements. | ||
| We want to play that up so you can see how they're trying to basically smear David Clements, but they're absolutely clear. | ||
| They're 180 wrong and that's why it's actually. | ||
| And make sure you just understand that when you're in my getter feed because 80% of the stuff I put up is negative to me and to Trump and to you, the audience, right? | ||
| They hate MAGA. | ||
| I always put up the hate MAGA pieces. | ||
| Let me go to Dave Walsh. | ||
| Dave, first thing, and we'll hold you through the break, this is the coldest Christmas, I don't know, in living memory, or at least since, I think, the 70s. | ||
| Is the grid going to withstand, given all the social justice warrior Green New Deal things we've done to our grid, will the grid withstand this Mother Nature's slaughter over Christmas? | ||
| Hey, to your point on temperatures, my hometown, Pittsburgh, In an hour and a half, it's going to be one degree Fahrenheit in my lifetime. | ||
| We have not seen those type of temperatures ever. | ||
| Four, five, three days before Christmas. | ||
| Unbelievable. | ||
| And then we've got five governors have announced various states of emergencies and warnings in their states about home heating oil, diesel fuel shortages, and or electricity shortages, which is pretty unprecedented in cold weather periods when you're supposed to have a system robust enough to deal with the coldest And warmest of times. | ||
| So yeah, we've got Wisconsin, West Virginia, Oklahoma, New York, and Connecticut governors issuing various warnings. | ||
| Wisconsin on liquid fuels and heating oils. | ||
| West Virginia on electricity. | ||
| Oklahoma on power outage risk. | ||
| Oklahoma, 39% wind content in their energy sources when it's below zero. | ||
| Generally speaking, in 50 mile an hour higher winds, wind turbines don't tend to work. | ||
| New York State of Emergency. | ||
| Again, warnings about power outages. | ||
| A large importer of electricity. | ||
| New York and Connecticut the same. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So yeah, there's some major issues. | |
| Take a short commercial break. | ||
| It's the 23rd of December. | ||
| We got Dave Walsh on some energy issues that you're going to hear about. | ||
| Particularly, is there a question about can the electric grid withstand this? | ||
| Also, Darren Beattie next in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice with a low ball, let's take down the CCD! | |
| They have all our- Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb Okay, some programming notes at 8pm, uh- this evening, Eastern Standard Time, 8 p.m. | ||
| The Savage Angels, you got Jane Zirkle, you got Captain Bannon, Grace Chung will be doing a live Vox Populi, so make sure that's on Getter, so make sure you go check that out. | ||
| Getter on War Room, I think I got that right, the War Room Getter will have a Vox Populi, get your questions. | ||
| So go check that out. | ||
| Also, we're going to have a show again at 5 o'clock today, thanks to Real America's Voice. | ||
| We're going to have some updates on Brazil and other things that are going. | ||
| Big things, we want to make sure you get, you are able to see this before the holiday weekend starts. | ||
| There'll be a lot going on there. | ||
| I think we've got Dr. Huff coming on, Matthew Tierman, some updates on the Cary Lake and the RNC. | ||
| A lot of situations get updated. | ||
| One more time, and you've warned about this, with all this kind of woke, you know, you've got windmills. | ||
| By the way, we're all for sustainability. | ||
| We're supposed to be stewards of the Earth, so the way that you can do this and do it appropriately, it makes sense, and you've got to investigate all these. | ||
| But you also have to understand the basic law of physics, right? | ||
| You can't just wish physics away. | ||
| Is the electrical grid the American people have been able to depend upon, I don't know, since 1910 or 1920, for a hundred years, let's say? | ||
| Is there a possibility of mass failures here during this bitter cold snap that we're going to have over the next, I don't know, week? | ||
| Well, there is. | ||
| We've put ourselves at risk. | ||
| One sin has been the hundreds of billions spent on subsidizing renewables over the past 15 years that has been huge, the investment in them, the subsidies in them, but the bigger sin has been the advanced and rapid decline and tear down of base load continuous duty energy sources for electricity, coal and nuclear, while renewables have been built up and they're not ready for prime time because of their intermittency and part-time nature. So, of these five states where | ||
| governors have come out already with warnings and the various executive orders, West Virginia, Oklahoma, New York and Connecticut all have in them concerns about states of emergency on electricity also, which is a new thing for us in in cold times. | ||
| And why is that happening? | ||
| New York, for example, shut down the Indian Point nuclear power plant a few years ago. | ||
| 2,000 megawatts of continuous baseload nighttime duty electricity for cold and hot periods Was 25% of New York City's energy supply for electricity. | ||
| That's gone. | ||
| Connecticut also, and New York, major importers of electricity from Canada. | ||
| So when you have times like these, it's also even colder in Canada. | ||
| Their demand for electricity for heating grows. | ||
| What's left to export declines, puts New York and Connecticut in more risk. | ||
| Oklahoma, the risk issue is it's more than Texas. | ||
| 39% dependent on wind energy now. | ||
| When it's below zero, generally speaking, unless these wind turbine blades are winterized or have de-icing systems embedded in them, which many of those in Oklahoma and Texas do not, they don't work. | ||
| They also don't operate at 50 mile an hour plus wind speeds. | ||
| So you've got shortages of electricity in Oklahoma being broadcast by the governor as a concern. | ||
| And finally, Wisconsin, West Virginia. | ||
| West Virginia is part of the PGM system. | ||
| Wisconsin, part of the MISO system. | ||
| MISO itself, just in the last year, that's Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, generally, 14 state region, have reduced 4 more gigawatts of base load coal and nuclear capacity just since last winter. | ||
| That's 4 million people worth of base load continuous nighttime, when by the way it's the coldest, continuous duty electricity. | ||
| So Wisconsin and West Virginia now talking about possible electricity shortages. | ||
| I want to have you back on to drill on this next week deeper. | ||
| Now that you're back, but I got BD coming up. | ||
| We're going to talk about Ukraine and social media and the administrative state part of it. | ||
| But you just came back from Europe. | ||
| Give me a couple of minutes on the status of the energy situation. | ||
| One, given their madness of filing Greta Thunberg, but number two, the whole situation with the Ukraine war, sir. | ||
| Well, unfortunately, the EU has doubled down on its green policies now with the imposition of higher duties and tariffs on any products containing man-caused CO2. | ||
| Specifically, in their view, fossil fuel imports will have now additional duties and tariffs. | ||
| In the middle of the worst energy shortage Europe has seen since World War II. | ||
| That's rather amazing. | ||
| The UK specifically, 14 million people now living under the poverty level due to, among many other things, the very high cost of energy. | ||
| I saw a lot of evidence in London, in nice districts, of an unprecedented number of people now living in the streets on sidewalks, bundled up in sleeping bags on the sidewalks, beginning to look more like San Francisco than London, due to the cost of living and the financial issues there, while they're importing natural gas from us and a few other sources, such as Norway, at four times The cost of what it would cost themselves. | ||
| England is full of natural gas. | ||
| Most of the folks we talked to over there are very, very familiar with the fact that the government basically has taken a green position to sit on the gas they have underfoot and instead happily import LNG at four times the cost from the U.S., from Qatar, from Norway. | ||
| So there's the devastation wreaked through the economy. | ||
| Most folks recognize why this is. | ||
| It's these policies. | ||
| Rather unbelievable. | ||
| How can people follow you? | ||
| We look forward that you're back and we get you more integrated back into the show. | ||
| How do people follow you, sir? | ||
| Merry Christmas to everybody in the posse and it's Dave Walsh Energy on Getter. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Merry Christmas, Brother Walsh. | ||
| Thank you for carving out some time here. | ||
| Beattie, I know, look, and you know I'm not one to kind of smirk or, you know, say I told you so or anything like that, but Our pom-pom's down, and by the way, I want to give a shout-out to Elon Musk. | ||
| There's a new interview up, and we're not going to have time to get it into the system, but Mediaite's got it up. | ||
| He gives, during a live interview, Elon Musk says Twitter is, quote, like a burning plane going down at a very high speed, end quote. | ||
| Tell me what this fiasco, we had one of the influencers on last night, That had just put up something on a meme about the Ukraine speech and I think the Ukrainian flag being in the capital and he was banned for I think 12-15 hours. | ||
| What's happened? | ||
| Why is Ukraine such a third rail over with Elon Musk and the team at Twitter? | ||
| Well, you know, it's an interesting situation. | ||
| I was frankly shocked when I saw all these accounts getting zapped, you know, great accounts ALX, the Great Columbia Bugle, it's one of the best kind of America First accounts there on Twitter, and a lot of others were getting censored for mild stuff, simply mocking the grotesque display that we saw at Congress from Zelensky. | ||
| And it was a very bizarre thing. | ||
| Now, immediately I was outraged and said, what's going on? | ||
| And I thought, is this something to do with Elon's connection to the security state? | ||
| We all saw the stuff going on with Starlink where basically the Pentagon bullies him around and says, okay, we're going to use your Starlink and we're not even going to pay you for it. | ||
| That kind of thing. | ||
| So does it come from that direction? | ||
| But it turns out that Elon has addressed the issue and I think we should give him the benefit of the doubt that he didn't sign off on this. | ||
| He didn't support this and actually There were, again, we've said from the beginning, Twitter is absolutely replete with influence operations, both from our people and from other governments as well, and it looks like this was a concerted influence operation conducted in order to tarnish and mass-report the accounts that were mocking Zelensky's visit. | ||
| Hold it, hold it, hold it. | ||
| This thing's a hundred times worse than I thought. | ||
| Are you telling me That given everything we know about Twitter and everything that he's done so far to downsizing it, that they still have a remnant organization inside that still is an influence operation tied back to things like the DHS and FBI that you could actually just, in the Columbia Bugle, we actually had ALX on last night. | ||
| These great voices who very mildly said something and the influence operation is so powerful and the algorithms are so powerful that it took these people down, unbeknownst to Elon Musk. | ||
| Well, yeah. | ||
| I mean, I'm not suggesting my, you know, I don't know the full story yet. | ||
| It's something that has to be investigated. | ||
| My sense is this is not like an in-house Twitter operation, but Twitter's rules lend themselves to abuse and exploitation. | ||
| And I think that there was very likely a concerted effort by a state actor or a cutout proxy of a state actor because the targeting was very specifically directed to Ukraine and the Zelensky visit, and so I think we can make reasonable inferences about that, but as the story developed, it doesn't look like this was something that Elon signed off on, or it's in-house Twitter. | ||
| It's just another example of the global public... I'm missing this. | ||
| If it's not in-house Twitter, if it's an influence operation from the outside, someone in Twitter has to agree That actually we're going to hit the kill switch on ALX for 12 hours. | ||
| We're going to hit the kill switch on Columbia Bugle for 15 hours. | ||
| It has to be somebody, it has to be some remnant inside that is in coordination with the influence operation from the outside. | ||
| Correct? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And I suspect there could be a rogue employee of that sort, or frankly, you know, it could be that when certain accounts are mass reported, there's some kind of automatic hold, automatic freeze on it. | ||
| I don't know the internal mechanisms of it, but of course it's very possible that there are not one, but several rogue employees that remain at Twitter and are up to no good. | ||
| So again, it just needs to be investigated more. | ||
| But Elon, to his credit, he did address it publicly. | ||
| He did say, these tweets do not violate our terms of service. | ||
| There's something wrong here. | ||
| And to the best of my knowledge, All of the accounts that were targeted by this have been fully reinstated to their functionality. | ||
| Let's pull the camera back for a second. | ||
| With the Zelensky visit, we understand now he was asking, he came here obviously for the theatrics of it and the embarrassing, kowtowing nature of the American elite, but he was here specifically to ask for precision long-range missiles, battle tanks, and fighter aircraft to basically take the war into Russia. | ||
| Give me your perspective, because with the Omnibus that now gives them $50 billion, and Biden gave them another $1.8 billion, and I think Patriot Missile Systems We are entering a danger zone, Brother Beattie. | ||
| Do you concur with that? | ||
| Well, I mean, it is a danger zone. | ||
| I mean, you can look at it from a number of different perspectives. | ||
| From the geopolitical perspective, all this does is prolong the suffering on all sides. | ||
| And the suffering is very bad in Ukraine, too. | ||
| And I don't think this is in the best interest of the Ukrainian people either. | ||
| You know, the question is, where is all this money going? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| He says he wants all of these weapons. | ||
| We're giving billions and billions. | ||
| I think that the number cumulatively at this point is close to a hundred billion dollars. | ||
| Now these people, these people signing off on those figures, I'm telling you, most of these congressmen, they're so dumb. | ||
| They couldn't even tell you how many zeros are in a billion and they're approving a hundred billion dollars for this. | ||
| Where's all that money going? | ||
| Meanwhile, Americans are struggling. | ||
| We're suffering under inflation. | ||
| Mitch McConnell, who's one of the lead Republicans is out there saying this is the most important objective of the Republican Party. | ||
| The people, the executives at Raytheon and Lockheed are buying more mansions, bigger mansions, bigger jets. | ||
| And the American people are sitting around wondering what the hell are they thinking? | ||
| If you, if you weren't cynical enough, I think this recent episode invites us to take that additional step. | ||
| This is a joke country. | ||
| The GOP is a joke party. | ||
| And you really, as I keep saying, you owe the system nothing. | ||
| What better example of the pure, unadulterated, dripping contempt that these corrupt clowns have for the ordinary American citizen that they're throwing billions to this corrupt scam operation in the Ukraine. | ||
| What better example of this? | ||
| And no ordinary people are benefiting. | ||
| American people aren't benefiting. | ||
| Ukrainians aren't benefiting. | ||
| Nobody is. | ||
| It's just the scumbags in charge and the scumbags at Raytheon. | ||
| Hang on one second there. | ||
| I'm going to hold you to the break. | ||
| According to the Pentagon, 40,000 civilians, principally women and children, dead in the Ukraine in the first 10 months of this war. 40,000. | ||
| 40,000 dead in the Ukraine. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Getter has arrived. | |
| The new social media taking on big tech, protecting free speech, I'm cancelling cancel culture. | ||
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. | ||
| Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be back at 5 p.m. | ||
| Eastern. | ||
| We've got the big show tomorrow, and we always do the Boxing Day on Monday. | ||
| But also, if you go to Getter, it's totally free. | ||
| We're going to be up over the weekend, tonight at 8 p.m. | ||
| The gals, Captain Bannon, Grace Chung, you know, Grace the Queen of the Trolls, and Jane Zirkle are going to do a Vox Populi, where you get to put your questions out and they'll answer them, etc. | ||
| Those things are amazing. | ||
| But there'll probably be other stuff over the weekend. | ||
| The 5 o'clock show, Tiermon on Brazil. | ||
| We're going to have Dr. Huff on Wuhan. | ||
| We've got breaking news there. | ||
| We're going to have Tony Lyons, who's just done something great with Darin Beatty. | ||
| He's going to talk about that at the 5 o'clock show. | ||
| We've got also Matt Gaetz and Caroline Wren about the Kerry Lake situation, about the RNC, and about the McCarthy, the huge vote that's going to take place on 10 days, January 3rd. | ||
| BD, you're causing more problems, and the New York Times has all worked up. | ||
| Tony Lyons, and remember, Tony Lyons is a former liberal. | ||
| He's like Bobby Kennedy Jr. | ||
| He's like, you know, Naomi Wolf, Dr. Malone. | ||
| These guys are either all big progressives or liberals or, you know, Democrats, career Democrats, and they are the tip of the spear. | ||
| And as this grand jury that Governor DeSantis and Dr. Latipo have got rolling in Florida, On the vaccine. | ||
| Hey, these guys are going to become more in the hunt. | ||
| So this thing's a whole new politics is changing here. | ||
| The New York times has worked up brother, because the Darren Beatty, our own Darren Beatty at revolver, you wrote the introduction to, because they're putting this document out. | ||
| It's 9,000 pages on the, on the J six and different publishing companies are putting it out. | ||
| The Skyhorse put out one and you wrote this amazing introduction and the New York times is melting down. | ||
| Why is that, sir? | ||
| Well, it's very funny. | ||
| I mean, we all know that I've never seen anything like it. | ||
| I remember, it's now over a year ago, when Revolver News first introduced into the national conversation this idea that, you know, January 6th was a Fed's erection. | ||
| I hadn't seen that level of attack and incoming, I don't know if you remember, but it was a full-scale media freakout everywhere. | ||
| And, you know, they don't want this kind of narrative in the public consciousness. | ||
| And for these people at Skyhorse, who, you know, they've done a lot of great things. | ||
| I think they did Robert Kennedy's book. | ||
| They did a number of great books. | ||
| And their subsidiary is Simon & Schuster, I believe. | ||
| And so this kind of mainstream credibility and for them to say, okay, we're going to have the foreword to the corrupt January 6th committee report written by Darren Beattie, which will actually Dare to address and explore comprehensively the questions that the J6 committee was set up specifically to obfuscate and ignore. | ||
| That was a bridge too far for the New York Times and Washington Post and others. | ||
| So there have been a number of hit pieces on this thing. | ||
| How dare they let Darren Beattie run this introduction? | ||
| We want only one side of the story. | ||
| Couldn't you have found some kind of Republican hack who will, you know, not talk about the Fed's direction, will give the semblance of even handedness, but really won't talk about the things that they, you know, the American people want to hear. | ||
| So it's been sort of a scandal and they had a piece now in the New York Times kind of addressing it as well. | ||
| So we'll see. | ||
| I mean, the people have their own choice. | ||
| They can go, they can get the Skyhorse version. | ||
| They can read my introduction. | ||
| It's very comprehensive. | ||
| And it addresses every single aspect of what I think the January 6th committee was set up to obfuscate from the composition of the committee itself, the dark history of people like Benny Thompson, the pedigree of the theory of the case that goes all the way back to color revolution operative Norm Eisen. | ||
| That's in there. | ||
| And plus more extensive coverage of the Ray Epps stuff, the pipe bomb stuff. | ||
| The doctored surveillance footage that the FBI released, it's all in there. | ||
| So I do recommend people to grab the version. | ||
| Be sure you get the Skyhorse version. | ||
| And frankly, I hope a lot of people on the left purchase this. | ||
| And I wonder if they'll purchase it inadvertently because the big demand for this is also going to be leftists who want to have The J6 report on their coffee table so they can talk about what an evil criminal Trump is. | ||
| How great would it be if they inadvertently buy the one with my introduction? | ||
| Well, no, this is what we got. | ||
| By the way, I think it's an imprint deal they've got. | ||
| They're not subsidiary of Simon & Schuster. | ||
| They do have an imprint. | ||
| Simon & Schuster actually does the physical distribution, which is close enough. | ||
| That's beautiful. | ||
| Simon & Schuster is putting their muscle to this. | ||
| Remember, and this is what we talked about to start the show, we bring it back around, the entire J16, the 14 recommendations, recommendation number one, and you can skip the rest, recommendation number one was Trump cannot run anymore for federal office. | ||
| The whole thing! | ||
| The whole thing! | ||
| They finally flipped over their face cards. | ||
| By the way, they've got That was the whole thing from the beginning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We ran a piece. | |
| I wish it was up right now. | ||
| I'll try to get it up in a little bit. | ||
| They're all worked up. | ||
| They got all that, but their number one, the one that they focus on was, hey, this whole thing is that Trump can't run again. | ||
| Trump can't run again. | ||
| That was the whole thing from the beginning. | ||
| We ran a piece. | ||
| I wish it was up right now. | ||
| I'll try to get it up in a little bit. | ||
| So if listeners revisit the site in like 10 minutes, it should be up. | ||
| But we traced the whole pedigree of this one. | ||
| A lot of people forget, Benny Thompson sued Donald Trump in his personal capacity. | ||
| And he laid out a whole theory of the case. | ||
| So this is really an extension of, this is a third impeachment. | ||
| Totally corrupt from top to bottom. | ||
| Totally partisan. | ||
| BD, how do people get to Revolver? | ||
| You're going to stuff up over the entire holiday weekend. | ||
| You're fantastic. | ||
| Merry Christmas. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| Merry Christmas and yes, I talked about this with Trump in an interview and that will be out very soon. | ||
| So a lot of explosive stuff coming out. | ||
| Revolver.news, we're going to be covering J6 from a lot of different angles, so go there. | ||
| If you need a refresher, read our classics and share them with friends, family and foes Foes can be the most interesting sometimes. | ||
| Foes are good. | ||
| Shove it in their face. | ||
| Let them see the truth. | ||
| Get a Christmas gift and give it to the nephew that hates you the most because you're a Trump thing. | ||
| Give him that big old Darren Beattie introduction to the J6. | ||
| Suck on that for Christmas. | ||
| Okay, come on, and tell him, tell him, tell him to go to Revolver over the Christmas dinner. | ||
| Let's have a throwdown. | ||
| Come on, duke it out over the turkey. | ||
| Darren Beatty, love you. | ||
| Back here at five o'clock Eastern time. | ||
| Come on down. | ||
| You'll be in the War Room. | ||
| Merry Christmas. | ||
| Do some great shopping today. | ||
| Make sure you go to mypedaler.com promo code war room. | ||
| We'll see you back here at five. |
Export Selection