Sept. 17, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:50
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| You're a domestic terrorist, right? | ||
| You're unruly. | ||
| You go to school boards and demand that kids be taught, not indoctrinated. | ||
| You demand that we have sovereignty. | ||
| You're not up in Martha's Vineyard crying big tears because 50 people show up. | ||
| Four million! | ||
| Four point! | ||
| Why do you think Hispanics in the Rio Grande Valley, why do you think Hispanics in South Texas are going to vote for us in record numbers? | ||
| Why did they shift to Donald Trump? | ||
| Because they understand they're being destroyed by their bettors in Martha's Vineyard in Nantucket. | ||
| If you've never had contempt for people, see how they've handled that in Martha's Vineyard. | ||
| It's revolting. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They don't mind if it's happened in Del Rio, Texas. | ||
| They don't mind if it's happened in Eagle Pass. | ||
| As long as it's Hispanics and white working class, they could care less. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's why they're unworthy of our support. | |
| It didn't just happen. | ||
| Right? | ||
| The people you put in office, the people that are supposed to know better, just look the other way. | ||
| And quite frankly, made out like bandits. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| But it can't go on. | ||
| Those three elements Are, what is the Party of Davos? | ||
| A massive administrative state, whether that's in Brussels, or whether it's in Beijing, or whether it's in the United States of America, in conjunction with state capitalism, these big oligarchs that get bigger and bigger and less and less competitive. | ||
| What, there's three or four media companies, all, you know, a handful of big tech companies. | ||
| You can see it across the board. | ||
| And a funding mechanism. | ||
| In this case, the Federal Reserve, that just continues to print money. | ||
| You do understand we're hurtling towards a financial and economic crisis of incalculable destruction and disaster. | ||
| Because all they're going to come back and do is they're just going to print more money. | ||
| They're just going to do more deficit spending. | ||
| How did we get to $31 trillion? | ||
| If you break it down, $8 trillion The wars in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan, eight or nine trillion dollars, right? | ||
| Another 14 or 15 trillion dollars just on deficit spending. | ||
| Which, by the way, the deficit is going to be about a trillion and a half, two trillion a year because we spend a trillion dollars on our military, right? | ||
| And then the other 10 trillion is from the COVID relief. | ||
| That doesn't even count. | ||
| Really, the five trillion dollar orgy of spending we've seen off balance sheet with Biden and these radicals, right? | ||
| So how do we get here? | ||
| You know, they say you go bankrupt slowly and then all at once. | ||
| We're beyond bankrupt. | ||
| The only thing that we can do is continue to print money because of the prime reserve currency. | ||
| Remember, if you see all the coaches with the queen and everything, they're sitting there in this very elegant and pomp and circumstance. | ||
| That ain't Britain today. | ||
| That ain't Britain after the war. | ||
| That's from a time when the pound was the prime reserve currency. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They're still living off that capital. | ||
| Although they're not a particularly relevant nation on the world stage today. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because the same problem. | ||
| Once it goes off the prime reserve currency, we're like Argentina. | ||
| We're exactly like Argentina. | ||
| It didn't just happen, right? | ||
| The people you put in office, the people that are supposed to know better, just looked the other way and quite frankly, made out like bandits, right? | ||
| But it can't go on. | ||
| Those three elements are what is the party of Davos. | ||
| A massive administrative state, whether that's in Brussels, or whether it's in Beijing, or whether it's in the United States of America, in conjunction with state capitalism, these big oligarchs that get bigger and bigger and less and less competitive. | ||
| What, there's three or four media companies, a handful of big tech companies. | ||
| You can see it across the board. | ||
| And a funding mechanism. | ||
| In this case, the Federal Reserve, that just continues to print money. | ||
| You do understand we're hurtling towards a financial and economic crisis of incalculable destruction and disaster. | ||
| Because all they're going to come back and do is they're just going to print more money. | ||
| They're just going to do more deficit spending. | ||
| How did we get to $31 trillion? | ||
| If you break it down, $8 trillion. | ||
| The wars in Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan. | ||
| Eight or nine trillion dollars, right? | ||
| Another 14 or 15 trillion dollars just on this. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| We're in the War Room. | ||
| It's Saturday, 17 September in the year of our Lord 2022. | ||
| Welcome. | ||
| We've got Calamity Jane Zirkle, Captain Maureen Bannon, Jack Posobiec, the team here. | ||
| We're in the Great Reset. | ||
| Actually, Defeat the Great Reset. | ||
| Defeat the Great Reset. | ||
| There was some confusion about that I saw yesterday in the comments. | ||
| Yes, yes. | ||
| Defeat the Great Reset. | ||
| Not to explain the Great Reset. | ||
| Defeat the Great Reset. | ||
| We've got an amazing guest today. | ||
| We're going to have Dr. James Lindsay. | ||
| We've got Patrick Woods from Technocracy. | ||
| Really the author and father of that line of thinking. | ||
| Of course, our own Joe Allen. | ||
| Terry Schilling is going to join us. | ||
| So it's packed. | ||
| A lot of the speakers are here today. | ||
| We're going to talk about day two of the conference that kicked off last night. | ||
| And we're going to have some other cuts from the speech. | ||
| The speech last night was two things. | ||
| One is to walk through just the nomenclature and the statics and dynamics of the process of the party of Davos, right, to make sure that we can lay it out at the beginning of the conference. | ||
| But it was really what's going to take to defeat it. | ||
| What's going to take to defeat it is a populist uprising. | ||
| It's not Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Shirley Kirk, Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Calamity Jane and Moe are not going to defeat the Great Reset or the Party of Davos, the World Economic Forum. | ||
| It's going to come from this audience, which is, I'm glad to say, really turned out in big numbers. | ||
| Jane's got a package in the B Block. | ||
| Moe went into the crowd and talked to a lot of people. | ||
| Jack, give us your assessment, particularly starting off last night. | ||
| We finished the show yesterday here, the afternoon show, we finished. | ||
| And, you know, not to give away our location too directly, but we're in a studio that's kind of offset from where the main ballroom is that everyone's meeting for this. | ||
| And it's not just a conference, by the way. | ||
| It's more of a summit. | ||
| It's a seminar. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A workshop. | |
| It's a workshop. | ||
| It's not a rah-rah. | ||
| It's not a rah-rah. | ||
| Plenty of time for that at AmericaFest, by the way. | ||
| But this is understanding. | ||
| If you're going to get your fingers dirty, you're going to meet people, you're going to network, you're going to read. | ||
| We've got the new book out. | ||
| It's Defeating the Great Reset. | ||
| You go to tposa.com. | ||
| If you can't make it today, you watch the live stream. | ||
| You go get the book. | ||
| By the way, any donation whatsoever gets you the book. | ||
| So it's quick. | ||
| It's got me, Steve, myself, Charlie. | ||
| This book is fantastic. | ||
| It's all action items. | ||
| It's 50 pages, but man, you understand the World Economic Forum, you understand the Great Reset, you understand basically the philosophy. | ||
| Who they are, how we beat them. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| So you go to tpsa.com, you get that. | ||
| It's so easy. | ||
| But when we finished the show yesterday, I walk outside, And I'm looking down over and I said, man, what are all these people standing around outside for on the outside here? | ||
| What are they? | ||
| And then it just kind of dawns on me because they look up and they all start going, hey, Pozo! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, it's Pozo! | |
| I realized it's a line of people wrapped all the way around the building waiting for the doors to get open for the Defeating the Great Reset conference to begin. | ||
| And it just kind of hit me. | ||
| Look, I just flew in from Israel. | ||
| Yeah, my arms are tired, all that. | ||
| But, you know, I'm a little jet lag. | ||
| Oh, man, these are all people. | ||
| Can we hear any more about the Israel trip? | ||
| Are you going to drop that a few more times? | ||
| I didn't even mention it once yesterday. | ||
| I thought about it after the show. | ||
| I was like, I didn't mention it one time at all. | ||
| I'm waiting for Tanya. | ||
| Tanya Tay is going to give me the... No, it's when we're off air. | ||
| I'm showing Steve the pictures. | ||
| Wait, wait, I'm going to put you on blast right now because you told me you have not been there yet. | ||
| Never been. | ||
| You've never been to the Holy Land, to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, to the Via Dolorosa, the Stations of the Christ. | ||
| I set up the President's trip there that time and had to come back because of the molar. | ||
| We're going to get you there, Steve. | ||
| We're going to get you there. | ||
| Trump was supposed to do a speech in Masada. | ||
| I had it all set up. | ||
| Dude, that's the IEF. | ||
| Riyadh, Jerusalem, Rome. | ||
| That was my deal. | ||
| They still do there. | ||
| Because you were on the Saudi trip, right? | ||
| I went to the Saturday, we set it all up, but I had to, Reince and I had to come back because of the molar emission. | ||
| We had to come back early. | ||
| We came back right at the end. | ||
| I had the whole Masada thing set up, all of it. | ||
| Very disappointing. | ||
| Not good. | ||
| Second term. | ||
| Second term. | ||
| Second term we start Masada. | ||
| Really impressive. | ||
| Jane, give us your thoughts. | ||
| Tell us what you thought on the first night. | ||
| We've got to package you in the B block. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the attendees here are really, really energized, and that's what these globalist elites fear most, because these people are taking action, action, action. | |
| They are in their communities, they are volunteering, they are participating in precinct strategy, and that absolutely terrifies the left and it terrifies the elitists. | ||
| Your package in the B Block is you ask the question, what are you more afraid of? | ||
| Climate change? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Or global warming? | |
| Global warming or global governance. | ||
| Global warming or global governance. | ||
| It's good. | ||
| It's got a whole lot. | ||
| Mo, you weren't in the crowd last night talking to folks. | ||
| What's the basic attitude of the folks here? | ||
| Oh, they're energized. | ||
| And so many people came from far and wide to see you. | ||
| A lot of people, as soon as they saw me. | ||
| She's such a good daughter. | ||
| As soon as they saw me. | ||
| Can we book Mo more often? | ||
| said that they came just to see you and they watch and they watch and they watch. | ||
| Notify, tell my agent he's fired. | ||
| The guy came up like, oh I should have gotten, how did I not get that ball cap from last night? | ||
| They watch War Room four hours every day on Saturday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| Watch repeats. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| I mean so many people are here because of Charlie Kirk, you guys did an incredible job. | ||
| I mean, the place is packed. | ||
| You guys just came up with this conference, what, a week ago? | ||
| Three weeks ago. | ||
| This is three weeks of planning, but because Turning Point, and correct me if I'm wrong, and I'll ask Mo this question, but is this the first public event Steve's done since New York? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| This will be the first public event. | ||
| Was New York a public event? | ||
| In a sense, it was a public spectacle. | ||
| The hanging comes later. | ||
| John Brown and Steve Banner. | ||
| John Brown and Steve Banner. | ||
| What Turning Point does though, and this is actually Turning Point Action, so that's the C4 arm of the operation. | ||
| That these events, they've gotten so developed and so mature at holding these events over half a decade now of holding the main events, a decade plus of the Turning Point organization as a whole, that when you come into these, you see the aesthetics, you see the lighting, you see the stuff that people don't see backstage, the way the screens operate, the huge team that's back there running everything, the music, and this is just for, I hate to call this a smaller event, | ||
| But even for the hundreds of people who are here now, we run it the same way that we would run an event that has thousands and thousands of people. | ||
| So you go to tposa.com, you can watch the live stream, you get the booklet, and then you can also see that we're holding another event coming up. | ||
| It'll be December, I believe it's the 16th to the 19th, and that's AmericaFest, and that's going to be over at the Convention Center here in Phoenix. | ||
| The Convention Center. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not just in the Convention Center, it is the Convention Center. | |
| The Convention Center is like 15,000 people, dude. | ||
| Yeah, we have the whole place. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| We have the whole place. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| So this event, as big as it is and as amazing as the shots look, this is the size of possibly a breakout session. | ||
| We're doing three days live at the War Room here in December. | ||
| We're going to do three days live. | ||
| Excellent. | ||
| And there's some other shows, I can't say publicly yet, but there's some other pretty well-known shows that are going to be live here as well. | ||
| Some pretty well-known shows that don't travel that much. | ||
| Pretty well-known shows. | ||
| It's like Trump the other day. | ||
| Big problems. | ||
| Last year, AmFest had 10,000 participants. | ||
| So the goal is this year. | ||
| That's amazing. | ||
| And it's a great way to fire up the football with the new administration. | ||
| And I just want to say, at most turning point events, you see... Hey, you're in war where you gotta butt in. | ||
| If you don't, I'm hogging the mic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You see high school and college... Calamity Jane's too nice. | |
| She just kind of sits there waiting for her package. | ||
| Turning Point events, you see a lot of high school and college, but I want to say here, the audience size is not only high school, college, it's also, you know, my generation, generations older than me. | ||
| There's some boomers here. | ||
| I would say there's more radio audiences. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There was a study that came out in the morning consult that said since 2017 there has been a 13% shift in young Americans that's age 18 to 34 who now no longer identify as liberal. | |
| So that's 13% less since 2017. | ||
| That's because of the work Charlie Kirk and you guys are doing. | ||
| I mean, it's getting that word out. | ||
| The liberal program that these people are being offered, that's essentially what the Great Reset is. | ||
| It's instant gratification, but you realize that you're on this hamster wheel. | ||
| There's no wealth formation, there's no capital formation, there's no families, there's no kids. | ||
| And you start to get to the point where if you were, you know, this sort of centennial, you're a millennial, you're a Zoomer, you realize that all the things that we were promised early on going into the financial crisis as we were getting out of college, hey, wait a minute, why are none of those things materializing? | ||
| And now you're sitting there, if you're one of these elder group, you're going into your 40s at this point. | ||
| You're looking at 40 and you're saying, how come I'm not married yet? | ||
| How come I don't own a home? | ||
| How come I don't have kids? | ||
| Why did that stuff all pass me by, but oh wait, here's the next Marvel movie, the next Netflix, Disney's pushing a new Star Wars thing, and am I just supposed to focus on that, or is there something more to life? | ||
| Here's what we're going to do. | ||
| We got a package from Jane. | ||
| We also have Mike Davis, the great Mike Davis. | ||
| Two things last night. | ||
| Garland and these guys hit the panic button and filed, I think, an emergency stay late last night with the federal judge. | ||
| But, as Jack Posobiec points out, the Fifth Circuit dropped a bomb last night. | ||
| Dude, they're losing their minds over the Fifth Circuit. | ||
| As remember, we always said Roe v. Wade, which is a monumental decision of the last court. | ||
| The more important one in history will actually be the EPA versus West Virginia because that's the deconstruction of the administrative state through the legal methods in the courts. | ||
| That's what this fifth district could be, the equivalent of that. | ||
| This is a bombshell to the progressive left. | ||
| Mike Davis from Article 3 is going to join us next. | ||
| We have a package. | ||
| We got Patrick Woods, Dr. James Lindsay, the great Terry Schilling. | ||
| Of course, our own Joe Allen with the executive order of the president. | ||
| We've got a big robot telling us nothing's going to happen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Short break. | |
| Back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Hey Mo and Jane, do something for me. | ||
| The gentleman that came and gave me the ball cap last night. | ||
| I remember the ball cap fell off the podium. | ||
| I want to make sure we get the ball cap. | ||
| If that individual is watching the show, make sure you connect with Mo. | ||
| Wait, what did that say? | ||
| I couldn't see it. | ||
| I was so in the moment with the speech, I couldn't focus on it. | ||
| Chris, your security was worried about that. | ||
| My security, my security, my on-the-ball security was great. | ||
| Guy walks right up to the audience, right? | ||
| Yeah, I was looking at it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's going to be like Abe, dude. | |
| In that moment, it's just going to go. | ||
| We've got the great Mike Davis. | ||
| We're going to change the show up a little bit. | ||
| Ask Mike Davis from Article 3. | ||
| And the reason is, big developments overnight with President Trump and really Merrick Garland. | ||
| I think, and I'm not a lawyer, I think humiliating themselves even more with the middle of the night, I think emergency stay, but then a blockbuster decision out of the Fifth Circuit yesterday. | ||
| Mike Davis, let's start with the update. | ||
| What is Merrick Garland doing now? | ||
| How are they continuing their ongoing humiliation on the Raid and Ransack of Mar-a-Lago, sir? | ||
| Well, Merrick Garland is panicking. | ||
| He filed for an emergency motion for a partial stay of Judge Cannon's special master order. | ||
| They filed this motion last night in the 11th Circuit, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which is the appellate court that oversees the Southern District of Florida. | ||
| Essentially, they're continuing this incorrect, willfully incorrect legal arguments that Classified records are not presidential records. | ||
| Therefore, Trump had no right to have them. | ||
| And Trump having them, the special master looking at them, is endangering our national security, which is complete nonsense, and jeopardizing their criminal case, which is complete nonsense. | ||
| Why did they wait 18 months to go get these records if Trump having these records at Mar-a-Lago either endangered national security or was a crime? | ||
| They are in full panic mode. | ||
| I think it's a frivolous motion. | ||
| I hope the 11th Circuit immediately denies it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's what I don't understand. | |
| The optics here, why put it in the middle of the night on a Friday night? | ||
| You should have been organized enough on this thing to come back right away. | ||
| The optics look terrible. | ||
| The point I'm making, and how you're doing Mike, it seems to me from just an optics perspective, Is that they don't want this special master looking at these documents. | ||
| They're trying to stop the special master from taking a crack at these documents because maybe, just maybe, the Department of Justice has been a little bit less than truthful, possibly, in their filings regarding their categorization of these documents. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, what are they hiding? | ||
| They went in and so Biden greenlighted this unprecedented, unnecessary, unlawful home raid of his political enemy, future and past political enemy. | ||
| They went in and grabbed 11,000 documents. | ||
| They went through Melania's underwear drawer, 16-year-old Barron's room. | ||
| They got all these documents. | ||
| They got a general warrant from a biased judge, Bruce Reinhart, who just recused from President Trump's civil lawsuit versus Hillary Clinton after a 2017 Facebook post, post trashing Trump. | ||
| They went back to this biased judge, got this illegal general warrants, raided his home, got all these documents. | ||
| And they got all these documents based upon a false legal argument that the president was not entitled to have these records. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's absolutely entitled to have all these records. | |
| But hang on a second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Posobiec actually said it better than I did. | |
| That, and that was the optics. | ||
| Not the first time. | ||
| And that, that's the optics, thank you. | ||
| This is where you're a good wingman. | ||
| That's what the, that's what the optics situation, why did they come in last night and it read like, oh my god, you know, somebody in the Justice Department looked like they made a decision, okay, let this thing go, and then somebody said, no, no, no, no, no, we can't let him start looking at this stuff. | ||
| And that's why they threw this thing up at the last second. | ||
| That's my point about the optics. | ||
| Because the judge already ruled. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah. | |
| You're trying to appeal a ruling, the judge already ruled. | ||
| Did you see any Anything in there that would be unique to reverse this or give you an additional stay. | ||
| That's why the optics look terrible to me as a non-lawyer. | ||
| No, I mean, it's a frivolous filing. | ||
| Why is the Biden Justice Department so scared to have a sitting Article III judge to | ||
| be a good one. | ||
| Obama, Biden, Hillary, the FBI, the intel community, because they show that they cooked up the Russian collusion hoax, maybe with foreign intel agencies to get Trump. | ||
| They wanted to influence the 2006 election. | ||
| MI5, MI6. | ||
| Yeah, the Brits are all over this. | ||
| Mike, we're going to have a lot more on this. | ||
| And you can tell they're on their back foot, the raid and ransack of Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Mike Davis has called this. | ||
| I'm trying to figure out who's got better calls, Cortez on capital markets and Navarro or Mike Davis on legal. | ||
| It's pretty tight, pretty tight race. | ||
| Article 5, you know, PSOBIC As much as they hate you and they hate what's happened in Mar-a-Lago and they're saying the judge, you know, you got George Conway on CNN every day, you got the MSNBC guys, you've got your brother Weisman's in full meltdown as Mike Davis trolls him on Twitter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Under the rule of law! | |
| Under the rule of law. | ||
| Weisman said that Trump, remember the tale was he said that Trump's second term, they actually talked about it the other night, he said there's not enough liquor in his cabinet to get him through Trump's second term. | ||
| I may send him a couple of bottles. | ||
| We can help you out, Andrew. | ||
| Yeah, we'll work through on that. | ||
| But talk about the 5th Circuit, this bombshell that came out about Ken Paxton. | ||
| Wait, can I just... Yeah, yeah, tee it up, tee it up. | ||
| So I'm looking, this 5th Circuit decision, which allows the Ken Paxton ruling to go forward, the Texas law, and this, what came down... | ||
| And I'm just looking at Twitter. | ||
| These guys, it's trending 24 hours, almost 48 hours after. | ||
| They're losing their minds. | ||
| They're saying, this is crazy. | ||
| The 5th Circuit has gone nuts. | ||
| All these Trump appointees. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I saw those ones. | |
| He said, we should launch the 5th Circuit into outer space. | ||
| And these are lawyers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These are lawyers coming in. | |
| And all your top blue checks, Archon, all these people losing their ever-loving minds over this decision. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A hundred years of First Amendment jurisprudence thrown out the window because of Trump judges, Trump appointees. | |
| So, Mike Davis, break this down to me from a legal perspective. | ||
| What did this ruling do and why is it they're losing their minds so much? | ||
| Well, to the second question, why are they losing their minds? | ||
| Because almost all of those Twitter trolls are on Google's payroll, so you can rest assured that they're working overtime last night. | ||
| Inside baseball. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| Inside baseball. | ||
| Mike Davis inside baseball. | ||
| We're trying to tell the audience this is the way the world works, okay? | ||
| It's just spontaneous outrage on a Friday night. | ||
| Okay, right. | ||
| Let's talk about this decision. | ||
| So it's Judge Andy Oldham on the Fifth Circuit, the U.S. | ||
| Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. | ||
| Andy Oldham, a great Trump appointee. | ||
| He's brilliant. | ||
| I hope he goes on the Supreme Court someday. | ||
| Essentially, this is what happened. | ||
| Texas passed a law That bans social media companies with 50 million or more monthly users from viewpoint discrimination. | ||
| They can't discriminate against conservatives and others with whom they disagree. | ||
| This applies to Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, essentially, right? | ||
| So they file a First Amendment lawsuit in Texas. | ||
| They get an injunction on the First Amendment grounds. | ||
| The Fifth Circuit Reversed and said essentially that these corporations do not have a First Amendment rights to discriminate against people with whom they disagree. | ||
| The 5th Circuit essentially considers these big tech platforms As common carriers, just like your telephone, the telephone company can't get on your phone and listen to, you know, or read my text messages to Jack or to Bannon and say, you know what, Mike's crazy, so we're going to kick him off his phone because he's crazy. | ||
| They can't do that because these are common carriers. | ||
| Same with these social media platforms. | ||
| Texas calls them common carriers. | ||
| The Google-funded shills will say the sky is falling. | ||
| We've destroyed the country. | ||
| We've destroyed the First Amendment. | ||
| We're going to destroy the Internet. | ||
| It's nonsense. | ||
| This applies to Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. | ||
| Well, you see, the argument that I saw a lot of them making, and the one judge who dissented on this panel, seemed to be holding to this argument that the social media, these tech companies, are like newspapers. | ||
| And this was the argument that the industry coalition was putting together in their arguments. | ||
| But they're not newspapers. | ||
| It's, as you just said, they're communications platforms, period. | ||
| That's what they are. | ||
| And by the way, this is only one step before. | ||
| I would go a step further and go ahead and just label them public utilities. | ||
| But this is one step before doing that. | ||
| Because you can't turn off somebody's water if you don't like their politics. | ||
| You can't turn off somebody's power. | ||
| Unless you're in California. | ||
| You can't turn off somebody's access to basic utilities if you don't like their politics. | ||
| Obviously, social media is a communications platform. | ||
| So the way I look at it is this is one step before going to the ultimate step. | ||
| And by the way, I'm going to say that what I think you're alluding to is the fact that it isn't just liberals, by the way, because you also see who? | ||
| Big tech funded libertarian organizations. | ||
| I'll say small L libertarian organizations that are also coming out against this. | ||
| Is this like the clean air in California? | ||
| How can this be kept in Texas? | ||
| Is this like the clean air decisions in California because it affects the whole nation? | ||
| Yes, so it's like the California admission standards. | ||
| Anytime California changes the admission standards, the auto industry has to change their automobiles worldwide because they have to meet those standards and they can't just not sell cars in California. | ||
| It's the same with Texas. | ||
| Texas is so big That, you know, Twitter can't just say, OK, we're going to stop doing business in Texas. | ||
| They're going to have to change their censorship regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you saying don't mess with Texas? | |
| I mean, this is this is a this is a huge ruling out of the Fifth Circuit. | ||
| And it's that now that now the Democrats, the Biden White House, can't just run to Twitter and deplatform their enemies. | ||
| Hang on a second, Mike. | ||
| We're going to ask you to stay over. | ||
| I know you're jammed this morning, but I've got a couple other questions the audience wants to put to you. | ||
| Mike Davis, Article 3, Blockbuster Decision. | ||
| This shows you, ladies and gentlemen, the importance of these down-ticket races. | ||
| These AGs and Secretary of State of the AGs, Ken Paxson, has been at the tip of the spear. | ||
| He was the very first guy we interviewed. | ||
| On January 20th, right after the inauguration, we had Ken Paxson say how he was going to work with Biden, where they could do it but fight otherwise. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Short break. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| It is Saturday, 17th September in the year of our Lord 2022. | ||
| It is the anniversary of the Battle of Sharpsburg or Antietam, depending on what side of the football you're on. | ||
| Single bloodiest day. | ||
| Single bloodiest day in American history. | ||
| And if people have not been to the Antietam battlefield, In Maryland, it is quite an experience. | ||
| The cornfield, the sunken road, and the bridge. | ||
| It's an incredible, incredible battle between the Army of Northern Virginia and General McClellan. | ||
| Maybe we'll get a chance to talk a little bit about that later, Jack, try to fit it in. | ||
| Very honored, we've got Patrick Wood. | ||
| And he is a technocracy in the hard road to the world order, also rising technocracy rising. | ||
| These are kind of definitive books that really called out the history of the World Economic Forum and globalization and all that years ago. | ||
| Patrick, thank you so much. | ||
| We're going to get to you in a second. | ||
| We got Patrick Wood. | ||
| We got Joe Allen. | ||
| And Patrick, part of my speech last night was about the executive order. | ||
| And Patrick, you were the first guy really to drill into that. | ||
| So we're going to spend that time with these guys for the next couple of segments. | ||
| I want to go while we got Mike Davis. | ||
| Mike, just what's the implication? | ||
| Bluecheck Twitter's losing it. | ||
| The paid hacks and trolls of Twitter. | ||
| How seminal is this decision right now? | ||
| And will this go immediately? | ||
| Is this going to go to the Supreme Court in this session? | ||
| What's the status of this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because this, Jack, this term... This is a trillion-dollar fight. | |
| Trillions of dollars on the line. | ||
| And by the way, is War Room going to be back on YouTube this afternoon? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that what's going to happen? | |
| I've been banned everywhere, baby. | ||
| Are we going to the Lone Star? | ||
| Do we have to domicile in the Lone Star State to do that? | ||
| Mike, what's the implication of this? | ||
| ProSobic said it's a trillion-dollar fight. | ||
| Is that true, sir? | ||
| Yes, and it will go to the Supreme Court. | ||
| I'm not sure how the Supreme Court will rule. | ||
| There's the Clarence Thomas. | ||
| Clarence Thomas supports Andy Oldham's theory about common carrier. | ||
| So, you know, it could be 5-4 for Texas or 5-4 for Big Tech. | ||
| It's just unclear how it will shake out in the Supreme Court. | ||
| I hope it's 5-4 for Texas. | ||
| You're saying, by the way, but Gorsuch and Thomas are of one thought on this, in Alito, basically the center of gravity of the thinking of the new right? | ||
| I think it's going to come down to Kavanaugh. | ||
| in Roberts and it's going to be, I mean, it doesn't really matter with, with, with Roberts as much anymore because Trump transformed the five to four John Roberts court to the five to four Clarence Thomas court. | ||
| So it's going to come down to Kavanaugh, whether he, but isn't that okay. | ||
| You've dedicated, you people don't realize you do so much for us on Trump and all this stuff and you're the best and you do this ring or justice. | ||
| Really, your focus has been this whole thing about the tech oligarchs. | ||
| I mean, Mike Davis has dedicated his life to saying, hey, we've got to really start taking these things apart. | ||
| I mean, it's really, to go after the administrative state's technological parts, the reason we've got Patrick Wood here today. | ||
| But Mike, when you mention that, don't we get into the whole, you know, Kavanaugh and Roberts. | ||
| They're part of the D.C. | ||
| elite, correct? | ||
| The D.C. | ||
| elite don't want it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The D.C. | |
| elite are in business. | ||
| Remember, Facebook, one of the people, the secret inside baseball, is the reason it's tough to sue these guys, they've hired every law firm, they've hired all the lobbyists. | ||
| Remember, when your business is based upon algorithms, your operating income is massive. | ||
| These guys throw off so much cash and they've bought everybody in town. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| That's why it takes a guy like Ken Paxton to go after him. | ||
| Right? | ||
| That's why you need Kobach in Kansas. | ||
| We need more of these AGs to start taking things on. | ||
| Because all the law firms, it's even hard to sue these guys. | ||
| Am I wrong, Mike Davis, that it's even hard to take these guys to court with great teams? | ||
| Because they basically got D.C. | ||
| bought and paid for? | ||
| And they've had DC bought and paid for for decades. | ||
| They passed the Communications Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act back in 1996, which gives them unprecedented immunity to do what they do. | ||
| So I started the Internet Accountability Project after I started the Article 3 Project. | ||
| The Article 3 Project does the judicial fight. | ||
| Internet Accountability Project was the first group on the right to take on Big Tech. | ||
| And we're calling for Big Tech's breakup. | ||
| We're calling for repeal of Section 230. | ||
| We want to change the whole business model. | ||
| The business model for Big Tech is They give you all this free stuff. | ||
| Oh, free internet searches, free email, free Google Maps, free everything we think. | ||
| But how did Google become a trillion dollar company if they're giving out freebies all day? | ||
| It's because they're selling us. | ||
| We're the commodity. | ||
| They gather as much information as they can on us. | ||
| It's a surveillance model. | ||
| And then they sell us to advertisers and they make trillions of dollars off of that. | ||
| And if there's anything, like you guys discussed, Jack discussed, and you did too, Steve, if you mess with their algorithms, that is their business model. | ||
| That's why this is so deadly to Big Tech and their business model. | ||
| I want to try to walk people through this, because this is the war room. | ||
| This isn't the 101 level. | ||
| This is the 301. | ||
| This is the master's graduate level. | ||
| So the common carrier argument, and correct me if I'm wrong on my history on this, but this actually goes back to Teddy Roosevelt, the trust busting, and the railroads, if I remember correctly. | ||
| You know, if you're a railroad and you had, you know, some kind of special deal with a certain company, it was about the freight and you couldn't, you know, drop people or charge people more because this idea was that it was so important that you had to have public accommodations. | ||
| Now, the other public accommodation laws that we see come along are through the civil rights area, but originated actually with railroads, if I have that right. | ||
| Yeah, that's correct, Jack. | ||
| And think about it this way. | ||
| These companies are so... With Big Tech, these are government-created and government-sponsored monopolies. | ||
| They're government-created and sponsored. | ||
| Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amen, brother. | |
| They have Section 230 immunity. | ||
| Which was supposed to protect these tech infants from being wiped off the map from defamation lawsuits by advertisers, and the tech infants from 25 years ago are now trillion-dollar big tech monopolists. | ||
| Google, Amazon... This is Al Gore, Al Gore. | ||
| I want to protect this industry. | ||
| I want it to flourish. | ||
| I want it to do well. | ||
| That's government. | ||
| Mike, before we let you go, it's Posobiec, right? | ||
| I've argued this for a long time, but I'm not a lawyer. | ||
| Are these essentially public utilities? | ||
| You know, you can opt in, but your data is your own. | ||
| Your digital self is yours to decide if you want to monetize or not. | ||
| know get the rate of return that a public utility has is and basically be you know you can opt in but your data is your own your digital self is yours to decide if you want to monetize or not is that the way to do it sir yes we need Not only are they public utilities, we need to break them up. | ||
| And we've proven that these are actually just government agencies. | ||
| When the White House can call, when Tony Fauci, Jen Psaki can call Facebook, when they can call Twitter, when they can call Google's YouTube and say, you know, kick this COVID denier or science denier off the platform, that is government sponsored censorship. | ||
| And when we have monopoly, that's why we need to break up monopolies. | ||
| That's why we need to get behind S-2992, the Big Tech non-discrimination bill. | ||
| We need to break up Big Tech. | ||
| Mike, how do people get to both of you? | ||
| Article 3 and what you're doing here on the Internet Accountability Act. | ||
| How do they get to all the aspects? | ||
| See, Mike Davis, what we say in the business, he's got range. | ||
| Mike Davis has range. | ||
| How do they get to all of it, Mike? | ||
| And particularly, the hottest Twitter feed. | ||
| He's even spicier than Jack Pasovic. | ||
| Mike Davis' Twitter feed. | ||
| Because he's got these battles with guys like Weissman and this. | ||
| Because he's winning. | ||
| Because he locks horns. | ||
| I just drop bomb. | ||
| Mike, how do people get to you? | ||
| How do they get to you? | ||
| So it's article3project.org, article3project.org, at article3project, at article3project, and my personal is at MRDDMIA, MRDDMIA, and we have a link on there to get to the Internet Accountability Project. | ||
| Brother, thank you so much. | ||
| Your audience loves you and I wish you were out here with us, but fantastic. | ||
| Steve, can I connect something real quick? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, sure, sure. | |
| I want to go back to what you spoke about last night. | ||
| We played at the beginning here. | ||
| Traditionally, there have been three power nodes in the United States. | ||
| It's been DC, Wall Street, Hollywood. | ||
| You walked through Wall Street at length last night. | ||
| You walked through DC at length. | ||
| Hollywood, of course, we know that's a power node when it comes to public influence. | ||
| But now, Since the rise of the dot-com bubble and the tech oligarchs, there's a fourth power node, and that's big tech, that's Silicon Valley. | ||
| The algorithm. | ||
| And that's the only one that hasn't been brought to, and so the other... Brought to heel. | ||
| Hasn't been brought to heel. | ||
| Where it hasn't been brought to heel, but the other three, by the way, are also looking As to ways they can either, A, cash in on this, or B, get in on, use that power for themselves, usurp it for themselves. | ||
| Because you see, of course, the way that these three all play together. | ||
| With Silicon Valley, though, the question, though, is they're tied directly to the people. | ||
| And if the people actually start going and working with folks like Ken Paxton in Texas, electing these people, get Abe Hamadeh up in Arizona. | ||
| Mike, we're going to have you back on Monday to go through this in detail. | ||
| Naomi Wolf, we've got tons of people on the medical freedom side. | ||
| Malone, all of them want to come on. | ||
| Monday's going to be a big show. | ||
| So we'll have you back on. | ||
| what they're going to be able to do. This is the Teddy Roosevelt model. You need the Bull Moose energy and that's the new way. | ||
| Mike, we're going to have you back on Monday to go through this in detail. Naomi Wolf, we've got tons of people on the medical freedom side. Malone, all of them want to come on. | ||
| Monday's going to be a big show. So we'll have you back on. | ||
| Mike, thank you so much for taking time away today on Saturday to join us. David's tip of the spear and all A real warrior. | ||
| Thank you, Mike. | ||
| So, Joe Allen, do the introduction of Patrick Wood. | ||
| We've had Patrick on the show before. | ||
| He's a seminal thinker. | ||
| And one of the reasons we're here with The Great Reset is that years ago, decades ago, he was warning us about this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Joe Allen. | |
| Yes, Steve. | ||
| Patrick Wood actually has been a huge influence in my own work. | ||
| We've been in contact since I interviewed him for the Federalist. | ||
| It must have been a year and a half ago. | ||
| You know, there was a formulation that really, really stuck with me that he presented in a talk called Transhumanism and Technocracy, the Evil Twins, or something like that. | ||
| I think I just mangled your title, sorry. | ||
| But I do remember the formulation, which is that as technocracy is to the society, so transhumanism is to the people in that society. | ||
| And they're oftentimes conflated, but those two concepts, technocracy, rule by experts, rule by scientists, and transhumanism, the more personal kind of religious philosophy, inherent in that. | ||
| Two separate concepts, but they are intimately wed. | ||
| And I think that he has really done more than anyone to bring consciousness to the technocracy movement. | ||
| And he's got a forthcoming book. | ||
| I'll let him announce that, I suppose. | ||
| A forthcoming book that really shows the connection between technocracy and transhumanism. | ||
| Patrick, great man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great. | |
| You know, during World War II, when the Allies were lining up on both sides of the fight, they didn't all exist at the beginning of the conflict. | ||
| It took time to develop the Allied relationships and so on. | ||
| This is exactly what's happened. | ||
| between technocracy and transhumanism. | ||
| They weren't necessarily connected, say, 20, 30 years ago, but they are now. | ||
| And they found common ground from a number of reasons, but they found common ground to work together. | ||
| And now we see the World Economic Forum is openly talking about both of these items, not only the Great Reset and the Sustainable Development, which I argue is technocracy, But also transhumanism, especially transhumanism. | ||
| They're very open about hijacking the evolutionary process and taking over and recreating man and other living things into their own image or their own ideas or imagination. | ||
| It's absolutely crazy. | ||
| We're going to get back to some definitional work in a second. | ||
| We only got a minute here before break. | ||
| But the executive order, it was, you know, Joe Allen told me immediately says, hey, Patrick Woods got to the heart of that executive order. | ||
| Those two lines in there where they say essentially the human cell and biology is just as programmable as the silicon chip. | ||
| Is that the tell? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is. | |
| There was a lot more than that because it reinforced it, but that is absolutely the tell. | ||
| This is pure, unadulterated transhumanism, and it's being brought into the entire institution, whole-of-government type of operation it was called. | ||
| Whole-of-government. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whole-of-government. | |
| That's kind of a new term in the last 20 years, but it's very dangerous, and it is a complete wholesale giveaway of our country towards the transhuman movement. | ||
| If you look at, we're going to get into transhumanism. | ||
| If you think it's been science fiction, you know, we've had Joe Allen now with us I think about a year and a half. | ||
| If you think it's science fiction, understand it is hardcore science fact now from the White House with two billion dollars of your money to back it up, plus all the private equity. | ||
| Trillions of dollars are going to go into this. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| Patrick Wood, the father of the concept of technocracy. | ||
| Joe Allen, our transhumanist specialist. | ||
| Jack Posobiec from Human Events Daily and one of the leaders of the Charlie Kirk's Great effort here on defeating, defeating the Great Reset. | ||
| Remember, there is no substitute for victory. | ||
| OK, short commercial break. | ||
| We'll be back in a warm in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
moment. | |
| Join the marketplace of ideas. | ||
| The platform for independent thought has arrived. | ||
| Superior technology. | ||
| No more selling your personal data. | ||
| No more censorship. | ||
| No more cancel culture. | ||
| Enough. | ||
| Getter has arrived. | ||
| It's time to say what you want, the way you want. | ||
| Download now. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| We have Patrick Wood, Jack Posobiec, and Joe Allen. | ||
| Patrick, so in this block, I want you just to take it and talk about, I want to make sure people understand, what is technocracy? | ||
| You've described it. | ||
| What's the history of how we got here to this fusion of, to the Oval Office on Thursday where they signed this executive order that is going to have profound implications, but here's the good news. | ||
| We're now out in open battle, right? | ||
| There's no more hiding the football. | ||
| This thing is in your face, and it's so well thought through, and they had the summit on Friday to actually put the money, and you said the whole of government. | ||
| They want a whole of society. | ||
| They want a whole society. | ||
| What is technocracy? | ||
| Why is it not more nutcase, you know, conspiracy theory, etc., etc., sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think you said it right. | |
| You said it first, I'm sure, that transhumanism is going to be The main topic on people's minds in the next couple of years, especially moving into the 2024 election cycle. | ||
| I think you're right on that now. | ||
| I had a question mark at first. | ||
| I thought, well, I know it's coming, but I didn't really see how much. | ||
| Biden's executive order blew it wide open. | ||
| It just absolutely put it over the top. | ||
| Where this started, this whole ideology is mechanistic ideology that we're all just a bunch of atoms that happen to get together. | ||
| And, you know, we ended up being real smart or something like that. | ||
| This started back in the 1930s. | ||
| Technocracy was a movement back then at Columbia University. | ||
| They crystallized what they called a new economic order. | ||
| They wanted to be a resource-based economic system, exactly like sustainable development is today with the United Nations. | ||
| This is what it became. | ||
| And it kind of died out in the 30s and 40s, but Zbigniew Brzezinski in the early 70s brought it back. | ||
| He was at Columbia University, too, and he did. | ||
| He wrote a book called Between Two Ages, America's Role. | ||
| I just want to pause here, because you're the first guy who really brings it up. | ||
| Mika Brzezinski's father, who was the National Security Advisor after Kissinger, was always looked at as the marked-down version of Kissinger. | ||
| Kissinger wrote these big books. | ||
| And Patrick's the first guy to say it. | ||
| If you go back, Kissinger's books are kind of all in the moment. | ||
| Brzezinski's book actually was prophetic about where the world was really going, correct? | ||
| And that's why he's kind of the father of this new line of thinking. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He was brilliant. | |
| I didn't agree with anything he said, but he's absolutely a brilliant strategist, and his mark on the world will be felt for as long as we're here, I have to say. | ||
| But Brzezinski brought it back, and that was the birth of modern globalization at that point. | ||
| And technocracy became the meme, primarily to grab the resources of the world and put it into the hands of the elite. | ||
| It was a resource grab and the simplest point of it, that was their dilemma back then when the dollar was unhooked from gold and fiat currency was the thing of the day. | ||
| The big bankers like David Rockefeller knew that there would be a finite end, a definite end to money one day and the thing to do in the meantime is to grab all the resources. | ||
| The fiat currency. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right, the fiat currency. | |
| So now they're grabbing resources all around the world and we see almost every industry is consolidated down to four or five companies. | ||
| We see the You know, the heritage zones have been established all around the world to take prime development out of, you know, the development sphere. | ||
| Private property. | ||
| Patrick, if I could just point out something that you've talked about a lot, too. | ||
| Along with gathering up and taking ownership and command of resources, that includes genetic codes. | ||
| You've talked a lot about this. | ||
| Basically, there's a desire to own not only the resources itself, the natural resources, but to patent certain genetic codes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely right. | |
| And this is where transhumanism has merged in with technocracy, the idea of resources. | ||
| Nobody really realized when they first started talking about resources that you and I are resources. | ||
| This changes everything. | ||
| When we become the resources as well, then that means they want to modify and examine and take over the human condition as well. | ||
| And genetic modification has been in the works now from Visibly, since the early 1990s with the establishment of the Gena 21 and sustainable development. | ||
| It was the biggest thing back then and it's still the biggest thing today. | ||
| Taking over genetic life is just absolutely insane, but that was their stated goal and it still is their stated goal today. | ||
| We see it in the executive order. | ||
| In the executive order. | ||
| The executive order essentially, basically says, almost quote, is that we view a biology in the human cell as programmable as a silicon chip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Right? | ||
| You know, Patrick immediately drew the connection to eugenics. | ||
| I mean, the philosophy that the human being is inherently flawed genetically and can be either perfected or corrected or eliminated, that sits at the basis of the quest to perfect the human genome, and he immediately drew that. | ||
| The three things they're talking about is edited Homo sapien, Enhanced homo sapien the man-machine merger right the man-machine merger and then human 2.0 This is why it has to we have to put we are politicizing this We're gonna go I mean we're gonna make these people famous that are doing it right the reason we have to do it We have to have a national dialogue and discussion right now. | ||
| If we're to go down this path, the country has to be united, and that's the path. | ||
| As disunited as we are, you have to be united. | ||
| And by the way, you're going to see the cards flip over here. | ||
| You're going to see who's on our side of the football. | ||
| I don't want to say one of my big rivals in the White House the other day said, you know, he wanted to live forever, right? | ||
| Be immortal. | ||
| Because when he cut through it all, with all these guys and what they're working on, you know, Bezos and all these, Elon Musk, with the nerdship, The elites, because they're godless and have no spirit, they're 100% focused on immortality for themselves. | ||
| When you look at the real research behind the scenes, Joe Allen, Patrick, your thoughts, they're focused on their own immortality. | ||
| Right and they don't get the devil catch the high most of any kind of societal destruction, but the convergence here that you have homo sapiens on this side of that line and you have on the other you have you have you know homo sapien 2.0. | ||
| Is the most critical discussion we have to have as a society, Patrick Wood? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It should. | |
| And if you think that your data is at issue right now, people are complaining about Facebook and Google. | ||
| If you think your data is important, how about your DNA? | ||
| I mean, that's kind of an order of magnitude or three or four or five beyond just the data. | ||
| The CCP is building massive data libraries of your biodata. | ||
| You need to understand this. | ||
| 23andMe, all this stuff, it's all being shared. | ||
| That's where the mining centers are. | ||
| Why is it that the CCP, through their Wuxi investment firm, is invested as an investor in 23andMe? | ||
| Was it the physical, the biological, and the digital? | ||
| Is that it, Joe Allen? | ||
| The physical? | ||
| Is that the Hegelian dialectic? | ||
| We're going to talk about that next? | ||
| The Hegelian dialectic? | ||
| I think we're getting some of that. | ||
| It's very important. | ||
| Hang in here. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We're at the Defeat the Great Reset Conference. |
Export Selection