July 7, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:15
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
| All this nonsense. | ||
| All this spin. | ||
| They can't handle the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| It is Thursday, 7 July, the year of Erler 2022. | ||
| And as we like to do in the 6 o'clock show, is bring on the heaviest of the heavy hitters and the junkyard dogs. | ||
| We got two of them. | ||
| National Public Radio, NPR, is going after a couple of the leading personages and heroes in the 3 November movement. | ||
| And, of course, the quantum election deniers. | ||
| I've got two. | ||
| I'm going to have, tomorrow morning, Mike Lindell is going to join us, but I've got two of the four, two of our greatest warriors, Captain Seth Keshel and David Clements. | ||
| David's from New Mexico and Seth Keshel now from Fort Worth, Texas. | ||
| Guys, thank you very much. | ||
| Let me start with David Clements first. | ||
| David, just to update the audience, you're a former prosecutor, I think you were a business professor, associate professor, professor at I think it was New Mexico State's business school. | ||
| After 3 November you got caught up in this. | ||
| Just give us a short background, pricey in the background, how you got involved in all this, and then why is NPR When they got everyone in the universe to come after and attack and highlight as enemies of the people, why did they pick Dave Clements and Seth Keschel, sir? | ||
| Well, I think it's because we have credibility. | ||
| I was an award-winning prosecutor, had eight first-degree murder convictions under my belt, and I took that same framework when I started looking at what happened on November 3rd, 2020, because it's a crime scene, and the evidence is overwhelming. | ||
| And so NPR doesn't really challenge our findings. | ||
| You see that with all of the different people that are in this movement. | ||
| But we bring credibility to it. | ||
| So they're in a pickle. | ||
| Do they either cover us because we have credibility or do they ignore us? | ||
| And we've got them in this trap where they have to acknowledge that we're there. | ||
| But that's how I got involved is more or less just taking my prosecutorial background and applying it to what I saw on November 3rd. | ||
| When you say crime scene, walk me through that. | ||
| What do you mean by crime scene? | ||
| Well, the standards to hear a witness to a crime are very, very low. | ||
| They're simple. | ||
| Did you see something happen? | ||
| Did you hear it happen? | ||
| And I was one of the first people that read thousands upon thousands of affidavits that would have subjected people to perjury. | ||
| We don't have one prosecution for perjury. | ||
| So that should tell you something. | ||
| And then I've consulted with experts across the country that have looked at the Dominion machines. | ||
| And what we found is just major, major flaws. | ||
| In Otero County, for instance, we found out that the entire election file for 2020 was white, which is a violation of federal and state law. | ||
| So that in and of itself is an example of criminal activity that I can go on. | ||
| I just want to make sure, before I go to Seth, that there were 3,000, I think, over 3,000, maybe 3,500 affidavits brought together by Rudy and Bernie Kerrick, etc. | ||
| Your claim to fame, in fact, I think the first time we had you on the show was you had gone through 2,000 of those affidavits and kind of starting to make your case, is that correct? | ||
| Yeah, I started off with one lawsuit, then 10, then 56, then 90, then you have about Election fraud lawsuits that are related to November 3, 2020. | ||
| And I've read most of those very closely, looked at the expert reports. | ||
| And I think I was the first person with my credentials to articulate that most of the cases, about 99.9% of them were dismissed on legal standing grounds. | ||
| So there was never an evidentiary hearing that was afforded to these lawsuits. | ||
| And so I think that was my initial claim to fame. | ||
| And I also just want to remind people that you're an award-winning prosecutor. | ||
| When you came in, I think it was the first or second time we had you on, you said, hey, Steve, as a prosecutor, I got to make a decision whether to have enough evidence to actually take, because it's an opportunity cost, right? | ||
| Do I actually have the evidence in front of me that I think, beyond a reasonable doubt, I can win in front of a jury? | ||
| And you said, hey, I will look at these affidavits. | ||
| I see, you know, tons of criminal suits that could be brought in one in front of a jury. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| Not given even additional investigation, just off what you saw off the original affidavits? | ||
| The evidence is overwhelming. | ||
| You know, and here's my point. | ||
| The Rasmussen polls that we've looked at show that 85% of Republicans believe that 2020 was stolen. | ||
| Over 40% of Democrats believe that it was stolen. | ||
| That's with just getting information through legacy media that suppresses the truth. | ||
| So if the American people, more than half, have already come to the conclusion that our elections are not trustworthy, of course I believe that we could carry the day before a jury actually providing them with the evidence that we have sifted through, examined over the past year and a half. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| No, I want to say, I saw a poll the other day, I think 52% of non-college educated white males, which I think is still the largest voting bloc, 52% believe that the election was fraudulent, and I think 50% of non-college graduate Caucasian women, which are pretty stunning statistics given the fact they've just seen it from legacy media. | ||
| Let me go to Seth Keschel. | ||
| Hang in there, Dave. | ||
| Let me go to Seth Keschel. | ||
| One thing people will probably remember, we're coming up on the first anniversary of the Cyber Conference. | ||
| The Cyber Conference had a lot of pros to it. | ||
| There was a couple of hiccups also. | ||
| But two guys stood out in that, really gave star turns that came out of the Cyber Conference in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, as stars. | ||
| And that was Captain Seth Keschel and Dave Clements. | ||
| Seth, get people up to speed on your background and why is NPR coming after you? | ||
| Former Army Intelligence Captain, Afghanistan veteran. | ||
| My methodology is open source, and it predicted 2016 perfectly in all 50 states. | ||
| So I have the receipts on that, and I put together the same research. | ||
| Nobody knew who I was going into 2020, and my research shows a very clear Trump electoral victory of 326 electoral votes, which would be the 2016 map, plus Nevada, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and holding every state, of course, and a maximum performance of about 390 electoral votes. | ||
| So I can go into any audience in any county and show clearly with the methodology, the number of excess votes that are likely for Joe Biden in 2020. | ||
| And everywhere we've had an expose of exactly what happened. | ||
| So even in Maricopa County or in Mesa County, you can see that my numbers are always lenient. | ||
| So I always estimate lenient. | ||
| And when they come out to show a very clear Trump victory, it paints a huge picture that we actually have a major pandemic in this country that I like to call electile dysfunction. | ||
| So that's something that we go around the country and discuss, and it helps aid in canvassing. | ||
| And obviously, in the legal cases that may come, my statistical affidavits were present in all of the contested states in 2020. | ||
| So that's where my origins in the movement are. | ||
| And when the audit movement picked up, of course, my research was very handy and easy to use. | ||
| And in 2021, of course, on social media, my work was everywhere. | ||
| I want to say, after I was able to meet Captain Cashel in Sioux Falls, I got a Pracy, I got his analysis, and I sent it to some very sophisticated hedge fund guys. | ||
| After you see his statistical analysis, Not one person. | ||
| Everybody comes back and goes, you're right. | ||
| It was impossible. | ||
| It just mathematically, it just doesn't hold up. | ||
| Your report is so brutal. | ||
| Let me get it up to date then. | ||
| What have you been doing recently? | ||
| I mean, NPR had the entire universe. | ||
| To choose from, right? | ||
| And they chose three prominent figures that came out of, and I think Dr. Frank also, the fourth. | ||
| But you three guys were the star turns with Mike Lindell. | ||
| So what have you done recently that has gotten the National Public Radio, because they're trying to put on the horizon, these are the guys we got to stop. | ||
| What, Captain Kestrel, have you done recently that's got the work that you've been doing? | ||
| They call you an election denier that has NPR worked up. | ||
| Notice when they call me names like that, they never talk about the actual research or show the work. | ||
| There's a number of states you can point to if you want to prove election fraud in 2020. | ||
| I would direct you to Washington or Hawaii, states that are not even on the map, for the discussion. | ||
| We talk about the six contested states. | ||
| NPR, which is an acronym that stands for National Propaganda Radio, they caught up alongside me in Fulton, Maryland on May 10th. | ||
| I was at an event for Dan Cox, who is the Trump-endorsed gubernatorial candidate in Maryland. | ||
| Trump said, of course, he wanted to rid the state of the stench of Larry Hogan, which I thought was a pretty interesting soundbite. | ||
| And Alison Mollenkamp, who was one of the co-authors of that hit piece in NPR, she was off to the right. | ||
| I could see her off my peripheral vision, and she was adjusting her mask for every sip of water, and I figure she was probably with the press. | ||
| Now, they're trying to stop a two-front war. | ||
| The two-front war is the research into 2020, which is the foundation of all the election tricks, techniques, and procedures that are going to be exported across this country, like California's were exported in 2020. | ||
| As you say, it's California versus America in many ways. | ||
| And then the other front of this war is the future elections that come. | ||
| And I have a platform called the 10 True Points to Election Integrity, and a number of heavy-hitter candidates are backing this, especially Mark Fincham out in Arizona, Cox in Maryland, and a number of big-time candidates. | ||
| The 10 points are very clear, and if we were able to implement those in this two-front war, then we would absolutely put the vice grips on election fraud to where it would really be a thing of the past. | ||
| They're trying to stop any ideas like that from taking off or finding traction because it's clear 2020, like David said, has put the cat out of the bag and everything to come in the future hinges on what we do now with our legislative power. | ||
| David, you've been very controversial. | ||
| There's a county out in a couple of counties, I think, in New Mexico that didn't want to certify, I think, based upon your work or your associates' work. | ||
| And it got to be a big brouhaha, I think, with the Republican establishment. | ||
| If I'm correct, can you get our audience up to speed on exactly what happened and what you found? | ||
| People are so up in arms against my efforts is that we've got this thing called the County Commission Strategy, which is Effectively, the Doctrine of Lesser Magistrates, where we stand between, we stand in the gap between top-down tyrants and we represent the people. | ||
| And we framed whether we use these cheap machines under the architecture of, do you trust? | ||
| You trust the machines. | ||
| This is a public trust issue. | ||
| And in Otero County, after we oversaw a full forensic audit, found out that there were at least 13 violations of the election code. | ||
| And so when you have lawbreakers, And for instance, one of the things that's required in our state is that we have to be using the most recent Election Assistance Commission standards. | ||
| And we found out that we're not. | ||
| And if you're not using the most recent standards, our law calls for decertification of machines. | ||
| So we put that to the forefront, and we got Otero County Commission to vote to get rid of Dominion in the upcoming election. | ||
| We also got them to vote to get rid of the drop boxes. | ||
| And so we've started a movement, and if everyone takes their cues from Otero County, you're going to have a revolution, a peaceful revolution, where we get rid of these rigged election devices. | ||
| And it's not just Otero County. | ||
| Jim Marchant did a terrific job in Nevada for a unanimous vote to get rid of the machines in Nye County, in Esmeralda County. | ||
| We have a county in Colorado, I think it's Rio Blanca, that's getting rid of the machines. | ||
| And so my whole pitch to people out there is, don't worry about the masks. | ||
| Don't worry about having statistics debates. | ||
| If you don't trust the machines, you can vote them out. | ||
| And you don't have to run your elections to vote them out through Dominion. | ||
| So there's a beauty to this movement, and it's all predicated on we, the people, becoming involved. | ||
| So I think people are scared because if you can fix your county, you can fix the country. | ||
| Can you give—how do people get access to this, to join this program? | ||
| Marshawn is going to follow you, too, guys. | ||
| What is—by the way, we have Jim Marshawn ready to go. | ||
| Okay, Jim Marshawn's ready to go. | ||
| David, how do people follow you on social media, and how do they get to your—this movement you've got to vote these machines out at the local level? | ||
| Well, there's two places. | ||
| The first would be The Professor's Record. | ||
| You can find me on Rumble, Telegram, or on Truth as Professor David Clements. | ||
| The last one is a film called StandingInTheGapFilm.com, and it really documents efforts of the trench warfare types that aren't, you know, on TV all the time. | ||
| We're just grinding. | ||
| We're actually following and taking our marching orders from the war room, and we're in the gap. | ||
| So if people want to learn more about how to get involved, how to show up at county commission meetings, I'd invite many of y'all to watch StandingInTheGapFilm.com. | ||
| That's where you'd go. | ||
| And we have a template in place where people can say, you know, hey, it doesn't require A lawyer, an attorney, it doesn't require someone to show up to a commission meeting, stand up and say, I don't trust these machines. | ||
| I don't want to use them. | ||
| What are the steps to get rid of them to where you get back to a very, very honest and understandable election system? | ||
| David, thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
| We're going to put that link up to that film. | ||
| Look forward to having you back on. | ||
| This is something everybody ought to take a hard look at, so thank you. | ||
| Seth Keschel, you've been all over the country. | ||
| You're speaking all the time. | ||
| I follow you about where you're going to motivate people. | ||
| How do people find you? | ||
| What's the next step on Seth Keschel's that's going to make NPRs make their head blow up again? | ||
| Well, the next step... | ||
| Right now is to update their map. | ||
| They missed a few appearances by not only myself, but Doctor Frank. | ||
| I'm not sure about David or or Mike Lindell, but we're going to send him a list of appearances that they missed and tell him they need to be a little bit more studious because I still have five more states to go to check off all 50 in 2022. | ||
| So right now the goal is to get cracking on 2022 and beyond to get candidates that are running now to sign what is a new contract with America based on supporting the 10 points to true election integrity. | ||
| So anybody can do that by keeping up with my work. | ||
| You'll find me on Telegram, Truth and Getter at Real Eskeshal, and you can also follow my substack, eskeshal.substack.com, which has a lot of these actionable ideas. | ||
| It is a two-front war. | ||
| We cannot give up 2020 with all the lessons it has or remediation of that. | ||
| And likewise, 2022 and beyond is important because we have to absolutely get ready for what's to come. | ||
| Can I put out a challenge right now to the NPR reporters and the executives of NPR? | ||
| You know, we follow NPR very closely. | ||
| They're obviously ideologically not aligned with us, but they do quality work. | ||
| Can we put out a challenge right now to have, and we'll do it live, or have, even if it's not live, have a segment where those reporters sit down with you, Captain Kestrel, and you walk through your same presentation, updated. | ||
| That you gave in Sioux Falls, South Dakota that's been so powerful when I've handed it to very sophisticated people that have a fiduciary responsibility to handle people's money that you would walk it through there and have them try to punch holes in it, sir? | ||
| I would 100% be open to that. | ||
| To that I would say, I'm your huckleberry. | ||
| And by the way, so when they followed you around, did they ever approach you and say, hey, could you sit down and walk us through this? | ||
| Did they ever come up when they were following you, these things, did they ever come to you and say, we want you, we want to go through this because we think you're, you're wrong or you're incorrect or your data's wrong, or maybe you think the data's right, but you've misconstrued what happened here, sir? | ||
| No, absolutely not. | ||
| They never want to expose the data. | ||
| So what they typically do is they go after your associations because this is a controversial movement and it's obviously a, of movement full of A types who butt heads. | ||
| So it's easy to go after your associations and not your data. | ||
| So they've not asked to sit down. | ||
| Although a number of people who are sort of impartial to this, I've explained the entire methodology from soup to nuts, especially voter registration by party. | ||
| That indicator shows probably a 10 point plus Trump win in Florida and Pennsylvania and North Carolina together. | ||
| So nobody really wants to get far into this because the red states were much redder than he thought. | ||
| A lot of the purples were easily red and some of the blues were red as well. | ||
| I agree with you. | ||
| I agree particularly with Minnesota and New Hampshire. | ||
| We won those in 16, right? | ||
| And definitely New Hampshire was stolen. | ||
| Minnesota, we were under 1%, and I think if you had a real count there, we would have won. | ||
| Captain Keschel, one more time, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| Getter, Truth Social, and Telegram at realskeschel.com Captain Keschel, thank you very much. | ||
| Jim Marchant. | ||
| Jim, people, I want to talk about these events you've got next week because you've now become like a national figure about the coalition. | ||
| I know you're in a tough race out there in November as the representative running for Secretary of State in Nevada, and that's your first responsibility, but you've also got this coalition. | ||
| You've got an event next week I want to put on everybody's radar because we're going to try to do a live feed to hear your speech there. | ||
| Walk us through what's going on and why the Seth Keschels and the David Clements are going out grinding at the local level. | ||
| Why are they so important? | ||
| They've been part of our group from the beginning and what Seth said about The news media not taking us up on our challenge for them to look at our data is exactly right. | ||
| When I was ambushed by CNN in a few months ago, same thing. | ||
| They claimed, oh, you don't have any evidence. | ||
| I said, I even said this, then they even showed this in the video. | ||
| I said, we do have the evidence and they wouldn't print the rest or they wouldn't show the rest of it. | ||
| But I actually asked him, I said, anytime you want to look at the evidence, I says, I will be there. | ||
| Anytime, anywhere, we will show you the evidence. | ||
| We even sent a formal letter to the New York Times, same thing, saying that if you want to see the evidence, we will show you right now, anytime. | ||
| And they never take us up on it, just like Seth said. | ||
| And for the exact reason that he said, they don't want to know the truth. | ||
| They know that we're on to something, and their power doesn't exist if we expose the truth that we have. | ||
| And there's no doubt in my mind, and that's why I've been, you know, as active as I've been since November 4th of 2020, because I knew what happened. | ||
| And just like Seth, he knew what happened also. | ||
| So we're just gonna, you know, we're warriors trying to bring the truth to the people of the country. | ||
| Jim, Molly Hemingway's got a great piece up on the Federalist. | ||
| We're actually going to do a special on it. | ||
| We're going to ask you to come back and join us. | ||
| She's very worried about what Biden's doing at the emergency plan. | ||
| We're jammed for time, but I need a minute from Jim Marchant to tell folks how the Marchants of the world are thinking about the 2022 election. | ||
| How we're going to make sure, before you guys are empowered, how we're going to stop any steel in 2022. | ||
| Well, one of the things that I'm doing, matter of fact, tomorrow I've got a meeting with the next clerk of Nye County and we're going to begin implementing our paper ballot hand count on a precinct level system and he actually is going to be installed as the clerk because the current clerk didn't want to do this after the county commissioners asked her to. | ||
| And she resigned. | ||
| So they appointed our guy and actually won the election to be the next clerk of Nye County. | ||
| So we're going to start the process right now. | ||
| And we're going to the system that we put together is something that we can export all over the country. | ||
| And that's exactly what we're going to do. | ||
| So we're doing that. | ||
| We're meeting with these constitutional sheriffs here in Las Vegas next week. | ||
| We're doing a lot of things and, uh, you know, we're, we're concentrating on the future and how we can affect the election in 2022. | ||
| And, uh, that's what we've got to do. | ||
| Jim, give us, uh, the, how do people find out more about your campaign in Nevada for secretary of state? | ||
| Absolutely critical. | ||
| And then about the coalition, where they go to find out more information. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| So jimmarchant.com, J I M M A R C H A N T.com. | ||
| And then SOS4America.com. | ||
| SOS4America.com is our coalition, and the momentum we have with this coalition is astounding, and I'm just looking forward to doing more great things than what we're doing right now. | ||
| Jim Marchant, your real warrior, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Look forward to your speech in front of the Constitutional Sheriffs next, I think it's next Tuesday, the 12th, in Nevada. | ||
| 12th, yes. | ||
| We'll be following it. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Jim Marchant, thank you, brother. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| I want to go now, we love Tennessee, love the folks in Tennessee, love that state legislature, love everything that's going on. | ||
| But they've got a barn burner there. | ||
| Robbie Starbuck, one of the big influencers in the Trump movement. | ||
| Robby, in Tennessee 5, you gotta explain it to me slowly. | ||
| Are you on the ballot, not on the ballot? | ||
| Are you in the race, not on the race? | ||
| I try to follow it, and every day there's another breaking story. | ||
| You're kind of a beloved figure in the Trump movement, particularly among younger people and the influencers. | ||
| What the heck's going on out there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, it's been an absolutely bizarre, bizarre race from that context. | |
| On the ballot, off the ballot. | ||
| Well, so the state court put me on the ballot, then the Supreme Court, the party went and appealed to, they took me off the ballot. | ||
| But the state allowed me to be a legal write-in candidate, and a lot of people said, well, you know, write-in candidates don't have a chance to win, right? Because that's, you know, psychologically how we've kind of been trained to think about these races. | ||
| Well, then Barris goes, and I think you can attest Barris is, you know, one of, if not the best pollster in the country, goes and pulls the race and finds that I'm not only in this tight race, but that I'm going to run away with it if President Trump jumps in and endorses me. | ||
| So it's a pretty wild deal, and it speaks to really the grassroots movement we had built, and that we had such a lead when they removed us, that there's still so many people willing to go out and write in and say, no, this is who we want representing us. | ||
| Because ultimately, this is a 10-person race, and I'm the only America first person in the race. | ||
| If you want that, you know, Trump policy, and you want somebody who's going to actually be loyal to the agenda, you really only have one option, and it's to do something historic here. | ||
| Robby, once again, how long have you been running on this? | ||
| I know you're not from Tennessee, and I think that's one of the issues about being in the district, but how long have you been at the job of running in this primary from the first day that you started? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, over a year. | |
| And I was also the first candidate in the race. | ||
| I jumped in when I was going to have to run against Democrat Jim Cooper, who's been there for over 30 years. | ||
| But then the seat got redistricted and all the, you know, establishment rhinos decided, hey, this is an opportunity for us to go get some power. | ||
| And then they jumped in the race late. | ||
| There was no discussion of me being removed at all until these people who had all these special interest dollars and lobbyist spouses decided, hey, we can go get some power. | ||
| And then suddenly, you know, these, you know, sort of establishment hacks behind the scenes decide, let's plot this plan to get rid of him. | ||
| And that's what they did. | ||
| They used a bylaw that's obscure to get rid of me. | ||
| It had nothing to do with my residency. | ||
| I've lived here well beyond the residency requirements. | ||
| It was just, you know, every excuse under the sun except for actually giving people a real reason you would remove a candidate. | ||
| And so it's just bizarre. | ||
| But the people are speaking up loudly here, and this poll is frankly shocking. | ||
| I mean, this would be history-making if President Trump jumps in here, endorses, and we win the race as a write-in. | ||
| No, look, we got a lot of time for Richard Barris. | ||
| We love Barris. | ||
| He was our election knight on November 3rd, 2020, and nailed it in about the big steal. | ||
| He's been fantastic. | ||
| That's why I was so shocked when I saw this. | ||
| Real quickly, we're out of time, but in the district, if I was to go to the district today, going to the district, what's the number one issue you feel that's at the top of the mind of folks in the district about the primary? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'd say the economy, but also offense. | |
| People here want a fighter. | ||
| They want somebody to fight. | ||
| And I think what I've done throughout this process of them trying to kick me off the ballot shows I'm the fighter that Tennessee Five needs. | ||
| And so if people want to get involved, they can go to starbuck2022.com and sign up to volunteer, door knock with us. | ||
| We are the grassroots campaign. | ||
| So we're the door knockers that are going crazy all over the district and have signs everywhere. | ||
| You can get involved with us and let's make history together. | ||
| By the way, talking about a fighter, Robbie's wife, also one of the great advocates out there in this whole trafficking situation. | ||
| She does incredible work. | ||
| Robbie, say hi to the missus. | ||
| Joyed having you on. | ||
| Looking forward to having you back. | ||
| It's the wildest, maybe the wildest, congressional primary. | ||
| And that's saying something. | ||
| There's a couple of three barn burners. | ||
| This is a wild one. | ||
| Robbie Starbuck, thank you very much for joining us in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Talk to you soon. | ||
| War Room Battleground. | ||
| We're going to have some of the other candidates there. | ||
| We're going to have Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
| This one in Tennessee Five is historic. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We're going to go out to Missouri. | ||
| I think we've got Kyle LeBue on. | ||
| Also, Naomi Wolf. | ||
| All types of things breaking about the CDC, the vaccine, all of it. | ||
| We're going to get back here in just a moment. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battlegrounds with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| I want to go to Missouri, Missouri 4 and Kyle Labreau. | ||
| Kyle, you wrote an incredible piece for us at War Room. | ||
| It's gotten a lot of traffic so far. | ||
| I like the way you talk about algorithms, talk about the, it's kind of the imperial capital has a certain way they look at the country and a certain way they look at the people. | ||
| And you're saying, hey, it's kind of confusing because you don't really have a grasp of what's happening here. | ||
| And what you're putting forward to kind of control us is not working. | ||
| Take it away, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, for me, we've got to protect our families on the front line. | |
| And it seems like the government has one idea of what it's like to protect your family. | ||
| And then the rest of us have a completely different idea, which is, we don't want to wait for somebody else to protect our family. | ||
| We want to do it on a day-to-day basis. | ||
| I mean, you see some of the leftist-leaning agenda that's going on today. | ||
| What we were told, don't call women mothers anymore. | ||
| Call them birthing individuals or something. | ||
| It's just completely crazy what we have going on in this world today. | ||
| They want to redefine what the nuclear family is, and they want to try to shove that down our family's throats. | ||
| And then on top of that, they want to tell us that we don't have the right to protect our family. | ||
| So that's really what that article is about. | ||
| It's about saying, I'm not waiting for the government to protect my family. | ||
| I'm not waiting for somebody else to protect my family. | ||
| For me, I'm going to protect my family every single day. | ||
| That's why I'm in this race. | ||
| I'm one of the only candidates that's funding myself. | ||
| I pulled this money out myself, and I'm running on my own dime. | ||
| And the reason because I'm running on my own dime is because I believe it's worth the investment to try to protect my family and all the rest of America's families. | ||
| If I was to go out to the district, because this is what I like to ask candidates and ask people in the district, is this their sense, too, that Washington is so far removed? | ||
| I mean, we're going to have Dr. Naomi Wolf on here in a second talking about some new data coming out from CDC, FDA. | ||
| I mean, it's enough. | ||
| It's enough to boggle your mind. | ||
| We had Dr. Robert Malone on today talking about the administrative state. | ||
| And just the gap between the experts and the smartest people in the room in D.C. | ||
| and what's happening out in the provinces couldn't be bigger. | ||
| But if you go out to Missouri 4, is this a sense that people are telling you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I mean, you look at the professionals. | |
| I mean, look at gas prices, for instance. | ||
| You know, they're up 50 percent, if not more. | ||
| And they're saying, Oh, just go out and get you an electric car. | ||
| Nevermind that electric car is $60,000 to $80,000. | ||
| And the average household income in my district is probably, you know, they're trying to get by on $3,000 a month, $4,000 a month. | ||
| So they have no idea what the average American family is going through. | ||
| You know, when that family goes to the grocery store and sees every single day, the food prices is going up and up and up. | ||
| They've got to look at what's going on and going, we've got to find a stop to this because it just can't keep going the way it is. | ||
| Truly, government does not have any idea which way this country is going for the average small town family. | ||
| Kyle, how do people find out more about you? | ||
| How do they find out more about the fight? | ||
| And we're going to put this article up everywhere. | ||
| It's a very powerful piece. | ||
| How do people get to your campaign? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's kylelabrew.com. | |
| And I'm on Twitter. | ||
| I'm on Gitter. | ||
| I'm on Facebook. | ||
| Please check us out. | ||
| Join us in the fight. | ||
| We're out right now just doing the old grassroots door-to-door thing. | ||
| It's 100 degrees here. | ||
| I'm on my third shower of the day. | ||
| But we're going to get this done the old way, shaking hands and looking people in the eyes. | ||
| That's what we're about in Missouri. | ||
| We're the show me state. | ||
| And we're ready for the government to show us some change. | ||
| Well, they're going to show change when guys like you get in there. | ||
| So the young men and women that are running right now, this is the vanguard of change. | ||
| Kyle, thank you so much. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for your time, Steve. | |
| Appreciate you. | ||
| You know, we had the guys on NPR that they focus on, Captain Seth Keshel, Dave Clements. | ||
| We had Jim Marchant running the coalition. | ||
| One thing, I had people do this over the weekend, and I want people to get this. | ||
| Go to electionfun.com. | ||
| You got this game. | ||
| This is a heuristic device. | ||
| The election thing can get kind of complicated when you read the Navarro report. | ||
| I mean, we try to lay it out so you get it, but a lot of times it's just too complicated. | ||
| I want everybody to go to electionfund.com and check out this game. | ||
| This is a way to, for you to learn what happened in November 2020. | ||
| More importantly, it's a way for you to have a community like your friends, your neighbors, people that won't even, never cut on War Room or never going to watch any of the shows or any of the, any of the videos or any of the, never going to watch 2000 Mules or anything like that. | ||
| What you do is you take this game and start to play it with them. | ||
| This game is a heuristic device. | ||
| This is a learning device. | ||
| Electionfund.com. | ||
| This is only going to heat up. | ||
| The 3 November election is not going to go away. | ||
| It's going to be a central piece of 2022 and then beyond. | ||
| We've got to clean this system up and we're going to have to do it like Clement said. | ||
| It's going to be precinct by precinct. | ||
| It's going to be district by district. | ||
| That's how it's going to change. | ||
| Nobody's going to wave a magic wand in Washington, D.C. | ||
| It's going to change. | ||
| It's not going to happen. | ||
| That's why you need to learn the details of what went on and particularly the way it was done. | ||
| The way you do is go to electionfund.com and get the game. | ||
| I had great feedback over the weekend of people who played over the 4th of July and now I'm really gung-ho and pushing this thing out. | ||
| I want to bring in Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Naomi, I had Malone on this morning. | ||
| He just heard Kyle LaBru. | ||
| You know, we have Congress, people running for Congress every day and the same It's the same argument coming from people, right? | ||
| And I know you used to live in a metropolitan area and now you have a residence that's in small town America. | ||
| There's just this huge gap between the way that the experts and the expert mentality of the coastal elites, and particularly the imperial capital of Washington, D.C., and out in the provinces with the backbone, really the broad shoulders, the backbone of the country. | ||
| But then you show me data today, and it's like, I mean, it's mind-boggling. | ||
| So I think we may have the charts in Memphis. | ||
| I want you to walk through of your latest developments, and particularly I know the petition got delivered, but you've also got new information. | ||
| So take it away, ma'am. | ||
| Yeah, thank you so much. | ||
| So, you know, what your previous guest was saying is really true. | ||
| There is this massive divide, and one of the things that Washington gets wrong is they assume the people they're talking to, especially the other side, are stupid and ill-educated and will never check. | ||
| So, what I shared with you earlier that I want to share with everyone when it comes to protecting our kids, and you all know that the CDC and the FDA are trying to Trying all they can to get these mRNA injections into six-month-olds to under fives, and already have been injecting five to 11-year-olds. | ||
| So I found that Rochelle Walensky, Dr. Walensky, is simply lying. | ||
| She's lying over and over and over, and I don't use that word lightly, but this is a press briefing in which she claimed that from March 2020 through April 2022, and this is a quote from whitehouse.gov lying to you, COVID-19 was among the top five leading causes of death in every age group of children under the age of 19 and the number one infectious cause of death in children. | ||
| So if you're a parent, you're listening to this and you're thinking, oh my God, that is really terrifying. | ||
| I need to inject my kid. | ||
| My kid is at terrible risk. | ||
| But then if you look at the CDC's actual databases, you know, this is the stuff they assume we are too dumb to look at. | ||
| Well, you know, I build databases with my development team out of government data at Daily Cloud, and I understand exactly what we're seeing here. | ||
| And the team that is forcing a grand jury investigation of Dr. Walensky also explained to me that she is simply lying about the causes of death. | ||
| So there's data on deaths right there on the CDC website involving, check how the words change, COVID-19 among ages zero to 19. | ||
| And then you've got this spreadsheet that shows really minute numbers of kids with deaths involving COVID-19. | ||
| But even in their own database, you go to another page on their database, that lists the top 20 causes of death for minors. | ||
| And in their own database, you see that COVID isn't even in the top 10 causes of death for kids. | ||
| And not only that, but you see they're lumping in influenza and pneumonia, along with deaths, quote, involving COVID. | ||
| But it's not, it's like number 19. | ||
| It's not in the top five causes of death at all, according to their own CDC Wonder digital database. | ||
| And in fact, a bunch of other things come first. | ||
| Accidents, congenital malformations, chromosomal abnormalities, assault, malignant neoplasms, diseases of the heart, flu and pneumonia are right there, cerebrovascular diseases, certain conditions originating in the perinatal period, septicemia, in situ neoplasms. | ||
| That's not the top five. | ||
| And the other thing that you're going to see is that 2020 was the first year of the pandemic, right? | ||
| You would have thought the kids Had died by the droves in 2020, but again, not in the top five, not in the top 10 in their own data. | ||
| But what you do see is that you can't check what Rochelle Walensky is saying from the end of 2020 to the present, when presumably there's data to back up her claims, because they stopped counting at the end of 2020. | ||
| But what you do see with other people looking at other databases, and this is where things get very dark indeed, is that kids are dying After vaccination rollouts, kids are dying after vaccination rollouts. | ||
| And a very respected site called Ethical Skeptic drew on the Euromomo.eu database, which is a, again, government EU supported database. | ||
| It's a credible database. | ||
| And they show that all cause mortality, zero to 14 years old, cumulative excess deaths, I'm sorry, 10 to 14 years old in the EU and the EEA are way up. | ||
| After the rollout of the vaccines, and another respected site called Boricagato Substack pointed out that all cause mortality effects of COVID vaccines in European children are up, the deaths are up, and the deaths and this author very helpfully presented a red line, a vertical red line showing where deaths started to go up among these young | ||
| Kids, 10 to 14 year olds, minors, because, you know, we're the only we're the only Western country that's trying to inject people, you know, under under the 11 year old, let alone the five year old cohort. | ||
| So the data that exists in Europe is for 10 to 14 year olds. | ||
| They are dying. | ||
| They are dying after the rollout of the vaccines. | ||
| And we've shown you with the material from the 3000 volunteers, Of the War Room, Daily Cloud, Pfizer Research Group, all the many mechanisms that could lead to vaccinated children dying. | ||
| We've listed about seven or eight different mechanisms, but kids are dying. | ||
| They are not dying from COVID. | ||
| Rochelle Walensky is lying. | ||
| It is not in the top five cause of death. | ||
| It's not even the number one infectious disease death, that's influenza or pneumonia. | ||
| They're playing with numbers just as the state senators, Senator Thatcher and Senator Linthicum and Dr. Henry Ely, the doctor in Oregon, are warning with their grand jury investigation, this is willful misconduct. | ||
| And it's got a horrible risk to all of us because when the CDC director, who is a mom, which drives me crazy that she's doing this with other people's children, she should know better about, you know, the importance of keeping your kids safe. | ||
| You know, she is literally lying about the number of kids who are being injected, I'm sorry, the number of kids who are passing away From COVID. | ||
| Oh, involving COVID. | ||
| Oh, you can't find those kids on our own CDC website. | ||
| Oh, we stopped counting. | ||
| But she's doing it to scare everyone into injecting their children. | ||
| Now they're six month olds to under fives with this mRNA injection, which is so risky that, you know, this may be the proximate cause of deaths in kids subsequent to the injections rising so dramatically. | ||
| Okay, hang on for a second, hang on a second. | ||
| There is going to be formal congressional investigation in this starting in January of 2023. | ||
| If you're not the first witness that gets called, I think you'll be a special advisor to that committee. | ||
| But is there any possibility in your professional opinion who do this for a living? | ||
| That somehow the staff of the CDC has just incompetently botched the statistics and she's actually not, because this is pretty harsh, you call her a liar and you say this is willful misconduct. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Now we're talking about children's lives. | ||
| I know that segues into just not civil, but maybe criminal. | ||
| So I want to make sure we've given her the benefit of the doubt. | ||
| Is there any possibility, as you've seen and have gone through this, that this could just be They don't understand their own data. | ||
| They've messed up in their presentation. | ||
| The CDC is not that competent. | ||
| Before you go down on the spectrum of actual willful misconduct, and she knows what the data is, and she's purposely presenting a false picture to parents across the United States of America. | ||
| Ma'am. | ||
| So, this is so critical. | ||
| I'm not a doctor and I'm not a lawyer. | ||
| So to me, it looks like willful misconduct and it looks like criminal charges should be brought against her and the CDC right away. | ||
| But what I am is CEO, as I mentioned, of a tech company that builds digital dashboards out of government data. | ||
| It is literally the same technology that's being used in the CDC database. | ||
| And it's not complicated technology. | ||
| Any coder, Can build a searchable database out of government data, especially digitized government data. | ||
| And you know that there's been millions flowing to questionable third parties unlawfully. | ||
| We broke that story here to the CDC so that they can build their databases so everyone can search them. | ||
| So the question, you know, and again, to me as a female executive, the fact that Rochelle Walensky said, I believe in the springtime, oh, it was a coding logic error. | ||
| Oops, sorry, and had to correct an overstatement of other assertions of deaths by 40%. | ||
| That is so offensive. | ||
| So to answer your question, no, no, there is no way. | ||
| They just didn't count the data correctly. | ||
| There's no way they didn't notice that their counting ended in 2020. | ||
| There's no way that they can't check. | ||
| I was married to a White House speechwriter. | ||
| I advised a presidential campaign. | ||
| I advised a vice president. | ||
| There is no way the White House website is going to take a quote that says it's in the top five causes of death, it's the number one infectious respiratory disease cause of death, and that the fact checkers in the speech department or in the website department aren't going to check with the CDC that this is Correct. | ||
| So there's layers and layers and layers of checks and balances to make sure a fib does not get through. | ||
| If a fib gets through on that venue, on the website, it's because people are choosing to put a fib there. | ||
| And when it comes to the database, no, this is machine counting. | ||
| You can't ruin it, right? | ||
| And there are people tasked with correcting errors, like sometimes it happens. | ||
| Sometimes there's a glitch, you know, and the tech goes wrong or, you know, something doesn't upload correctly. | ||
| Well, there are developers and coders and people who work for the developers and coders all the way down the chain who are tasked with correcting that within 48 hours at the most. | ||
| And so it is now 14 months. | ||
| It's now two years later since the end of when they stopped counting. | ||
| It's, you know, it's now clearly, you know, 14 months or 15 months. | ||
| Since she began making these claims about children and children dying, and there's literally no way if she's tasked with checking, even if she's not the developer, and I'm not a developer, right? | ||
| But she is, the buck stops with her. | ||
| She is the one that the developers talk to, she talks to the developers, and there is literally no way that no one would say, Dr. Walensky, that's not right. | ||
| Look right here on this chart, where is the only place you're gonna get that list of people dying from other causes, It's not in the top five. | ||
| And there's also no way that, you know, this is machine counting, right? | ||
| So these charts count what the developers tell the charts to count, right? | ||
| It's not human beings going through and tallying up deaths. | ||
| It's machines reading forms that are submitted digitally and entering them into an algorithm. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So there's no way this could be a mistake. | |
| That's the brilliant analysis of how the White House and all the apparatus in the administrative state works. | ||
| The checks and balances, the double checks. | ||
| You never would put the principal to be embarrassed by something like that. | ||
| We've got a couple of minutes. | ||
| I've got to talk to you about your petition. | ||
| Tell us about the status of the petition and how can people assist? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, it does seem as if this multi-front peaceful attack using the law, not just from Daily Clout and Health Freedom Defense Fund, With our wonderful lawyers, Scott Street and John Howard, but also Children's Health Defense sent a stern legal letter to the FDA about the kids injections. | ||
| So there's a lot of activity and it's getting results. | ||
| Our lawyer's letter, which was sent I believe last Friday, that's correct, and we announced it just a couple of days ago here, already has an answer. | ||
| From the FDA. | ||
| It's not a very satisfying answer. | ||
| They've said, we received your petition. | ||
| You know, we're, our gears will start to move on this to whatever we're going to do next. | ||
| But at least they got back to us right away. | ||
| They're not ignoring us. | ||
| They're not making us wait months and months. | ||
| And I think, I think these people feel the midterms breathing down their necks. | ||
| And I think they feel just what you said, which is, you know, a lot of doctors are, are coming forward now. | ||
| And a lot of people are coming forward who should have come forward 14 months ago, but they know there are going to be investigations. | ||
| There are going to be civil and criminal charges and congressional investigations. | ||
| And so agencies may be trying to get ahead of the punishments that are rightly due to them for this hideous, hideous malfeasance. | ||
| Naomi, quickly, how do people get to Daily Clout? | ||
| How do they support your work? | ||
| How do they become a volunteer on the team? | ||
| How do they see the petition? | ||
| Social media, give it to us all. | ||
| Sure thing. | ||
| So, please continue to support the lawyers. | ||
| You can do it on dailyclout.io. | ||
| There's a link there, and you can also go to a link that goes straight to Health Freedom Defense Fund, in which case every penny will go to this one action, the FDA letter, and then the letter to Pfizer. | ||
| Um, and the, you know, the battle back and forth with whatever they come back at us with. | ||
| Uh, you can also join the effort. | ||
| Uh, you can volunteer to read the Pfizer documents, especially if you have special skills. | ||
| Uh, but even if you are just a helpful person, you know, we, we can use everybody. | ||
| Um, if you're a lawyer, join the lawyer's team and you can certainly become a member and support of Daily Cloud, as I mentioned. | ||
| Also follow me on Dr. Naomi or Wolf on Getter. | ||
| And please do, uh, continue to support the bodies of others. | ||
| This book that explains to you exactly how we got here and what we can do to fight back, because it really is a war, and a peaceful war, but we all need to know how we can be on the offense. | ||
| You will not put this book, that I guarantee, you buy this book, The Body of Others, you start, you'll read it in one sitting. | ||
| It's that powerful, The Bodies of Others. | ||
| Dr. Naomi Wolf, one of the best-selling books in the country, in particular on this topic. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, Naomi, thank you very much for the hard work. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, and to Amy Kelly and the volunteers, and thank you. | |
| Amy Kelly, you guys are killing it. | ||
| Tomorrow morning at 10 o'clock, be back in the War Room. | ||
| We're going to be on fire, and you're going to see why. |
Export Selection