June 23, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:52
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, it is Thursday, 22 June, excuse me, 23 June, or actually today, 23 June, all day. | ||
| Year of the Lord 2022, big breaking news at the Supreme Court, and it's not the Dobbs decision. | ||
| Let's go to Star News Network's E.D. | ||
| Heiple. | ||
| E.D., tell us about this breaking news, this decision, that I guess the opinion is written by Justice Thomas. | ||
| What happened? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, as you can see, the crowd's kind of thinned out behind me once they figured out the Roe decision wasn't going to come down today. | |
| But there's been huge news out of New York. | ||
| The 6-3 decision written by Clarence Thomas came down in favor of the Second Amendment. | ||
| There was a New York law, basically, that prevented people from possessing a license to kill. | ||
| Conceal carry just based on self-defense. | ||
| So this is a huge win for gun rights and obviously only this is one of the more controversial cases of the season in addition to the Dobbs one. | ||
| Huge. | ||
| Edie, how do people follow you at Star News Network? | ||
| We're going to go to Mike Davis here in a second. | ||
| How do people follow you throughout the day? | ||
| How do they get the Star News Network? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They can find me on Twitter. | |
| My handle is edmhypel. | ||
| Edie, thank you very much. | ||
| Great job today. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Edie and the team, Joanna Miller, Edie, the entire team, Michael Patrick, the team will be out there next week as we wait for the Dobbs report. | ||
| It'll be a little different environment. | ||
| It'll be like it was early in the morning. | ||
| Okay, let's get Mike Davis's changes scheduled to join us. | ||
| Mike Davis, how big a deal is this decision about this New York law written by Justice Clarence Thomas, sir? | ||
| This is a monumental decision by the Supreme Court, and it got six votes. | ||
| So that means it got the Chief Justice, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Barrett, now we clearly know that there are six constitutionalist justices on record who are willing to stand up for the Americans' right to keep and bear arms, and that is our God-given right as guaranteed by the Second Amendment as it relates to the federal government and the Fourteenth Amendment as it relates to states. | ||
| And what's so important about this decision is in New York, You had to prove to the government, you had to go to the government and prove that you were worthy of a concealed carry permit to keep and bear arms on you while you're traveling around New York City, for example. | ||
| What the Supreme Court says is no, no, no, no, that's not how it works. | ||
| You have a God-given right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the second and 14th amendments. | ||
| It's the government's job to prove that we are unworthy of having guns, whether that's because we're a felon or because we are We have a mental illness that makes us a danger to the community, but it's not our burden as Americans to prove that we have a right to keep and bear arms. | ||
| Remember what the whole point of the Second Amendment is to protect us from government. | ||
| So if we have to go in to government to get permission to protect us from government, that defeats the whole purpose of the Second Amendment. | ||
| Isn't it ironic, because I'm not seeing, I want everybody to know, 202-224-3121 is the switchboard for the United States Senate. | ||
| We need you to call today, because we're going to have the second vote. | ||
| Brother Davis, I haven't actually seen a really organized effort. | ||
| What the Senate is doing is outrageous. | ||
| The House just said, virtually to a man, they're going to oppose on the Republican side. | ||
| On the day you have this monumental decision, it's ironic that you've got the Senate trying to push laws like this. | ||
| Am I incorrect? | ||
| I'm not a lawyer, and I'm certainly not a constitutional lawyer. | ||
| Am I incorrect in my analysis? | ||
| No, you're not incorrect at all, Steve. | ||
| These red flag laws are unconstitutionally overbroad. | ||
| And the reason is, let's look at this scenario. | ||
| Someone in my liberal neighborhood in D.C. | ||
| sees my Trump sign, And reports me to the authorities and says I'm an insurrectionist and a danger to the community. | ||
| So then DC Mayor Bowser can come take away my guns for three days a week, two weeks, three weeks a month until they adjudicate whether I'm sane. | ||
| That's just not how our Constitution works. | ||
| Again, the heavy burden is on the government to prove to a court that we are unworthy of exercising our rights. | ||
| Our rights are not absolute, but it is the heavy burden of government It's not our job to prove that we deserve those rights or we're worthy of those rights. | ||
| Why do you see the Senate actually doing this? | ||
| Why is the Republican Senate when we still have almost no real information coming out of Ovalda and none about the shooter? | ||
| They're suppressing that, obviously. | ||
| Why is this this rush to basically prop up the Biden regime, sir? | ||
| Because we're weak and stupid. | ||
| Okay, I'm 1,000% with you there. | ||
| Brother Davis, how do people get to you? | ||
| I'm going to get you back on tomorrow. | ||
| We've got to talk about what's going to happen in the Supreme Court and the violence and all the political violence, everything like that. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| How do they follow you on social media? | ||
| How do they get to your site? | ||
| So it's article3project.org, article3project.org, and it's at article3project, at article3project on Twitter and Getter. | ||
| And my personal is MRD. | ||
| D-M-I-A-M-R-D-D-M-I-A-M-I-C-H-L-O-R-D-A-V-I. | ||
| You're amazing. | ||
| Thanks, Mike Davis. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| You see that 6-3 decision? | ||
| A lot of that is the hard work of Mike Davis. | ||
| I'm going to go to somebody that's not weak nor stupid, but is a warrior, a patriot. | ||
| That is Tina Peters. | ||
| She's calling in by phone and joins us. | ||
| Tina, give us an assessment of where we stand. | ||
| We're running through the tape now in Colorado. | ||
| Where does your campaign stand and what can our patriots in this audience do to find out more and to support you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good morning, Steve. | |
| We are working around the clock to get this done Tuesday, June 28th, this primary day. | ||
| And up against me is a Center for Tech and Civic Life Zuckerberg operative and a spoiler in there that is on the board with Obama, our AG, appointed Obama person, and we are fighting. | ||
| It's a groundswell of patriots that want Colorado back. | ||
| And Steve, as you know, Jenna Griswold, who is the Secretary of State here, is the chair of the Democrat Association of Secretary of State. | ||
| Dominion is headquartered here. | ||
| And so everything that Colorado goes is the way the nation goes. | ||
| And we've been able to, through the America First Secretary of State Coalition, been able to see that the tactics that Jenna Griswold is using in Colorado is actually the tactics that she's using in Michigan against Christina Caramo and other states to terrorize anyone that is a political opponent against the Soros-funded operative. | ||
| And so this is, I mean, this is it. | ||
| And I need the support of people that want to contribute to the campaign, to people that want to advocate, to people that vote for me as Secretary of State. | ||
| I mean, I've put everything on the line. | ||
| She has come at me with everything she can to try to villainize me, to try to get the go-along, get-along Republicans that don't like to see any kind of ruckus or, you know, or flack. | ||
| And I tell you, we're right over the target, Steve. | ||
| We are going to take Colorado back during this primary election. | ||
| And then I'm ready on day one to go after the belly of this beast in Colorado to become the next Secretary of State to bring security to the vote. | ||
| To bring transparency, to bring back the trust in our elections that has been stolen from us. | ||
| Tina, we just had these five generals on Morning Joe this morning, a big op-ed in USA Today saying that they're putting out a pledge for democracy because the Tina Peters of the world are the problem. | ||
| What would be your response to them? | ||
| They're saying, oh, we just want free and fair elections, but the Tina Peters of the world, the Jim Marchants of the world, the Mark Finchams of the world, Christine Karamos, they're the problem. | ||
| That's the rise of a new anti-democratic movement. | ||
| What would be your response, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think that what they're trying to do is to point the finger at us, the people, we the people. | |
| I mean, we're, we're, they're coming after all of us. | ||
| We're just standing in the way. | ||
| And if they can take the spotlight off of the real criminals, which is Jenna Griswold, which is, uh, which is all these operatives that are pointing the finger and trying to say that we are the problem. | ||
| I think when, when we see who really is the problem, Uh, that, uh, that they're going to realize that, you know, we're going to lose this country if we don't, if we don't look, if we don't get involved as Americans, we're going to lose this country and elections have consequences. | ||
| And that's why we're dealing with six and $8 gas prices. | ||
| That's why we're dealing with all this right now is because these elections are the foundation of this country. | ||
| And if we don't get, if we don't get ahold of this, And get transparency and we're the only ones that can do it. | ||
| Soros has actually gone years ago against Secretary of State while we as conservatives were sleeping on the job. | ||
| And now we've risen up, we know what they're doing, and we're calling them out on it. | ||
| So when people point their finger at us, it's to keep anyone from recognizing that they are the criminals. | ||
| The ones that are saying this and accusing us are the criminals. | ||
| A hundred percent. | ||
| Elections have consequences. | ||
| Stolen elections have catastrophic consequences, as we're seeing in our beloved nation. | ||
| Tina, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| How do they get to your campaign? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, Tina, for 22 is Getter and Twitter, and then TinaPetersForColorado.com. | |
| And we've got to get through this primary, and then I'm ready to go right for the belly of this beast. | ||
| We need funding. | ||
| Uh, you know, she's already raised three million dollars using my name and she declared me as her opponent already. | ||
| So she knows and she's raising money on, uh, to try to defeat me and to try to make me the criminal. | ||
| Everything that has come down where she has, has persecuted me, had me arrested, had the FBI, the weaponized FBI come after me, all these things. | ||
| She, she sued me when I would not agree to a, A election security memorandum that said that I had to recount, recount, renounce, and repudiate that I wanted these machines to be more transparent to the people, and also that I wouldn't agree to have Dominion, to agree to use Dominion. | ||
| And I said Dominion can buy for the contract, just like any other vendor, to who is most secure and most transparent. | ||
| And when I wouldn't sign it, she went to a judge and said, see, she's going to break the law. | ||
| She's she wouldn't sign my security agreement. | ||
| And she sued me. So all of this is political theater. | ||
| And we've got to stop falling for this, Steve, because these Republicans that have been go along, get along, let's get away from anybody that's causing a ruckus. | ||
| You know, they need to step up. | ||
| They need to invest. | ||
| They need to use their talent and their treasure to invest in candidates. | ||
| They're going to fight for this country. | ||
| And now is the time. | ||
| You can't wait. | ||
| Like Mike Lindell says, you can't wait for a rainy day. | ||
| It's pouring outside. | ||
| Tina Peters, fight on. | ||
| Look forward to having you back on the show. | ||
| Thank you so much, Steve. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to do this. | |
| Thank you, Tina. | ||
| Let's go to Georgia and Heather, Real America's Voice, Heather Mullins. | ||
| Heather, Brad Raffensperger, what's happening down there at this press conference this morning, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, big news coming out of Georgia, Steve. | |
| Brad Raffensperger's race and the results for the primary here are going to be challenged in all 159 counties. | ||
| Now this comes because there was an audit done in Cobb County, a Vining Cityhood race, right? | ||
| A monitor team counted the Secretary of State's results and found that the machine had actually added over 15% of the vote to his totals. | ||
| In this one county. | ||
| Now this comes after a Democrat running for Commissioner in DeKalb County District 2. | ||
| She noticed that in her precinct, her and her husband's votes weren't counted when she noticed that it said that she had zero in her own precinct. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So they did a recount there, Steve, and found that in the Democrat primary race, the machine was off their almost 3,000 votes. | ||
| So now you have two recounts in Georgia, different counties, different races, different political parties, showing that these machines were off. | ||
| Heather, hang on. | ||
| We're going to hold you through the break. | ||
| Heather Mullins, we've got from Brownstone, we've got Toby Rogers, we've got Dr. Naomi Wolf, Michael Pack, Mark Pagliatella tells us about Clarence Thomas, all next, where? | ||
|
unidentified
|
in the War Room. | |
| you. | ||
| Okay, I want to go back to Georgia and Real America's Voice investigative reporter Heather Mullins. | ||
| So Heather, they're challenging this in every county in Georgia, Raffensperger. | ||
| Explain to me again exactly what's happening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so they're filing lawsuits that's going to cover all 159 counties to challenge the election results based off of this recount that found that the machine gave an additional 15% of votes to Brad Raffensperger in that one race. | |
| And like I had mentioned before the break, there was a Democrat running in DeKalb County who her recount in the Democrat primary found the machine was off almost 3,000 votes there. | ||
| So you have several recounts statewide that are showing these machines are not recording accurate results. | ||
| And we know the federal government's top cybersecurity agency recently weighed in on that federal lawsuit here out of Georgia saying the machines can be compromised, they can be exploited, they can be hacked, you can switch votes. | ||
| You know that Halderman report that it still hasn't been redacted and released to the public details exactly how to do that. | ||
| And what we're seeing from these recounts from county to county, from different political parties, is that the machines are not reliable. | ||
| Hand recounts, right? | ||
| What this lawsuit that they're going to release today and they're talking about today does is it demands recounts for all 159 counties because you can't trust the results, Steve. | ||
| Hand recounts, right? | ||
| They're demanding hand recounts in all the counties? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Hand recounts of every county, all 159 counties. | ||
| And this is something that there's been several counties here that I've specifically been talking to where they were originally going to do recounts, but they were intimidated by the Secretary of State's office. | ||
| Their legal team reached out to the election board members and told them that they had to certify. | ||
| And so there's time and time again you keep hearing the Secretary of State here, Brad Raffensperger, pushing back, intimidating local election workers and election board members not to do recounts. | ||
| And now here he is apparently going to be testifying on the J6 committee hearings against Donald Trump for questioning the outcome of Georgia's election results. | ||
| You can't make this stuff up, Steve. | ||
| That's a mess down there. | ||
| Heather, how do people follow you on social media? | ||
| How do they get to you on Real America's Voice? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, absolutely. | |
| Social media, I'm on every platform. | ||
| I'm on Twitter, I'm everywhere. | ||
| We're going to be following this closely because people deserve to know. | ||
| Thank you so much. This is this is big in that your report on the Sisa report on Holden the Dr. Holden's report is amazing. Okay and I want everybody to get that maybe we get that put it back up. Okay thank you Heather. Hey look I know enough math and arithmetic I said this from day one. | ||
| There's because I followed it all night There's zero probability that Raffensperger stayed above 50% all night. | ||
| Just I I'm I'm I and I'm not a machine guy as people know But I got to see the paper ballots to back that up in the timing when they came through It's just it's in an MTG's district. | ||
| She won by 50% Raffensperger won it by 25% I'm not buying that one either Cannot buy it. | ||
| There's something not right down there in Georgia with his entire election process in a Fulton County. | ||
| It's a it's a disaster It's a nightmare. | ||
| I don't care how many times he comes up here in front of this bogus show trial And and spouts his inanities that it's just no way Okay, we got Of everything we've done in the last couple of days, the biggest bomb I think that's been dropped in the show is by Toby Rogers over at Brownstone Institute, and of course, Dr. Naomi Wohl. | ||
| She's got some new reporting to do, other analysis coming out of your guys' efforts to do this, and other reporting throughout the world. | ||
| But I've got to bring Toby in. | ||
| Toby, you had this report in Brownstone, which you guys are doing, Jeffrey Tucker and the team over there are doing incredible. | ||
| But walk through this concept. | ||
| Do it like you did last night. | ||
| I need you to walk through what this new framework is or the framework for the future and what it means for citizens of our country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, thanks for having me on the show, Steve. | |
| It's great to be with you. | ||
| So Pfizer and Moderna have a problem. | ||
| And the problem is that their mRNA COVID-19 shots do not stop infection. | ||
| They don't stop transmission. | ||
| They don't stop hospitalization. | ||
| They don't stop Death from Coronavirus. | ||
| And so everyone knows, whether it's at the FDA, White House, CDC, wherever, that these shots need to be reformulated. | ||
| Now, Pfizer and Moderna want to keep $50 billion worth of revenue coming in. | ||
| And so they want to find a way to try to make these shots work. | ||
| The problem is, if you change even a single molecule in these shots, well, we don't know how that's going to impact health outcomes. | ||
| And so, anytime you change these shots, you necessarily need to do a new clinical trial. | ||
| Well, if you do a new clinical trial, it is entirely possible that the clinical trial will fail. | ||
| Or that when it goes through the regulatory review process and people actually get a look at this terrible data, that these shots will be rejected. | ||
| So Pfizer and Moderna, as enabled by the FDA, have come up with a scheme. | ||
| The scheme is called the Future Framework, and the idea is to skip clinical trials in perpetuity. | ||
| What the FDA is proposing to do, and they're going to vote on this in five days, they're going to vote on it on Tuesday, June 28th. | ||
| And the proposal is to say that any reformulated COVID-19 shots are biologically similar to existing COVID-19 shots. | ||
| And so therefore they can skip clinical trials altogether. | ||
| So we won't have any human data at all. | ||
| Right now we have some data. | ||
| It's terrible, but it's better than nothing. | ||
| Going forward, as of June 29th, if this goes through, we will have no data at all. | ||
| We'll have a little bit of information from test tube studies, a little bit of information from mice studies, but we will have no human data whatsoever. | ||
| And this is a nightmare. | ||
| It is the FDA completely giving up on science altogether. | ||
| They're losing the game and so they're just gonna throw the chessboard across the room and say, let's just not have any data. | ||
| Just trust us. | ||
| The FDA has moved from pretending to do science to engaging entirely in fantasy. | ||
| And just saying, believe us, trust us, we're the FDA. | ||
| That's not science. | ||
| Hang on one second. | ||
| Is the basics of the mRNA enough that they can make the argument, hey, these tweaks are just on the margins, so just give us authorization and we'll just keep tweaking this on the margins? | ||
| So, they're engaged in a sleight of hand. | ||
| That is certainly the argument that they're making. | ||
| least they're trying to put out, that the basic fundamental technology is so similar that if they make tweaks, it's on the margin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So they're engaged in a sleight of hand. | |
| That is certainly the argument that they're making. | ||
| They're saying, we understand vaccines, we understand the immune system, and therefore we can make changes on the fly and it will not impact health outcomes. | ||
| And the point I want to make is, these are not traditional vaccines. | ||
| These do not operate the way that older vaccines operate. | ||
| For the FDA and CDC to pretend that they understand how these things work, And how these things are going to interact with the human body, with human mRNA, with human DNA is dishonest. | ||
| Hang on one second. | ||
| Naomi, what you've been arguing and what the posse with the 3,000 volunteers and your 250 lawyers are, you're saying that hey, essentially they've been running a clinical trial from the beginning on the American people and it's a clinical trial that failed. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So now they want to blank it by using a slight of hand as Toby's laying out. | ||
| They want to just get a blank check to keep going. | ||
| Is that essentially the bid in the ass between what you and Toby are arguing and what they're going to try to push through? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| I mean, I certainly am interested in hearing what the lawyers have to say about the future framework, because it sounds like it could also kind of create, you know, indemnity, of course, going forward for anything that happens and maybe even retroactively. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| But I think that what I want to stress is yes, people were told this is a trial. | ||
| People were told that the clinical trials don't end for another two years, but that was in the fine print and it was drowned out by safe and effective, safe and effective. | ||
| I think what's so notable about what Toby is saying is that yesterday when we spoke on this show in the afternoon, I read some studies of lipid nanoparticle delivery systems | ||
| I read from the website of the manufacturers of lipid nanoparticles, and I also pointed out that CRISPR, which is Bill Gates and the eugenicists' favorite thing, which is gene editing, a new technology, also depends on lipid nanoparticle delivery, and in both cases I read excerpts that say we don't know how this works. | ||
| So this is categorically an experiment, and as he says, an experiment that has failed. | ||
| I want to say one more thing, if I may, and move it to the geopolitical level, unless that's too early. | ||
| No, go ahead. | ||
| You've got some new breaking headlines, so give it to us. | ||
| Well, I just think that kind of this finding and what Toby is saying kind of relate, which is that, as you know, I've been seeing the immense harms of the Pfizer documents that went on for, you know, 14 months, haven't stopped. | ||
| They're going after the kids. | ||
| As there's no way to avoid interpreting it as a national security breach. | ||
| And I believe that Toby agreed yesterday. | ||
| Well, I did find in the Pfizer documents yesterday something shocking, which is that of more than 42,000 adverse events cases right in three months, of which there were actually 150,000 plus adverse events represented because a lot of those people had a lot of things bad happen to them. | ||
| 34,000 plus were in the United States and this was a global rollout. | ||
| I'm going to say that again, 34,000 plus out of a little over 42,000 were in the United States of America. | ||
| The next biggest group of adverse events in Pfizer documents was Great Britain followed by Germany, followed by France, followed by Spain and Portugal, so Western Europe. | ||
| The final group of 7,000 total comprised all the rest of the 56 countries. | ||
| We've got a little technical problem. | ||
| We're going to go to break. | ||
| We're going to go to break here, and we're going to be back. | ||
| We've got Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| We've got Toby Rogers from Brownstone Institute. | ||
| We're about to talk about the Clarence Thomas book, Created Equal, all next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, we've got this framework for the future, a future framework. | |
| We're going to be getting a lot of deep into this. | ||
| We've got Rogowsky is going to be on at six o'clock tonight. | ||
| Also, we're going to have Toby from Brownson Institute is going to join us again to get into this. | ||
| This is next Tuesday, the 28th at the FDA. | ||
| Dr. Wolff, we're crammed for time, but you've got another more analysis coming up, another study you want to talk about. | ||
| Tell us about it. | ||
| Yeah, very important. | ||
| And again, I think that what Toby has is explaining, you know, It's a massive missing piece because it's just kind of carte blanche to do whatever they want to the American people forever, you know, with no recourse. | ||
| You'll never know what's in the things they're mandating that you be injected with and that's a brilliant way to defeat a superpower among other things. | ||
| So I want to talk about intravenous injection of coronavirus disease 2019 mRNA vaccine can induce acute myopericarditis in mouse model. | ||
| This is an August 2021 peer-reviewed study in clinical infectious diseases by a bunch of scientists who happen to be in China, and they take two groups of mice. | ||
| They inject one with the mRNA vaccine through the muscle, which is the way we're all told we were being injected with this mRNA vaccine, and they inject the others intravenously, which is the way that the Pfizer documents show The injection is going through our bloodstreams, lodging in the liver and so on. | ||
| And they found out in August of 2021, but didn't tell us that 34% of the mice who were injected in the bloodstream developed enlarged hearts. | ||
| And there are, when they were autopsied, there were giant visible white patches visible to the naked eye on their hearts. | ||
| And they developed other diseases in their organs, cytokine storms, The ones who were injected in the muscle also developed damage and cytokine storms not as dramatic. | ||
| The point is this was an astronomical amount of damage to these mice and the conclusion was not take this off the market, it's enlarging the hearts of the mice. | ||
| The conclusion was keep going. | ||
| But the other really scary thing and you know, you know, I'm never wrong is the horrible things when I keep going back to the geopolitical The geopolitical pay attention to this they these Chinese scientists who are answerable to the Chinese Communist Party Which doesn't let scientists do what they want, right? | ||
| These Chinese scientists said if you inject it intravenously and don't aspirate the needle it will enlarge the heart and harm the hearts did Seriously damage the hearts and livers by the way of this group of mice or you can inject in the muscle less damage Well, it turns out the CDC and the NIH stopped telling people to aspirate the needle two years ago and Actually changed their guidance so that it is going into the bloodstream. So to me this | ||
| This study is basically like, how do you kill people? | ||
| Do you have the study up on your site right now? | ||
| Can people go there and get it? | ||
| It's pinned to my getter, but I will forward it to Cameron right now and then pin it on the site. | ||
| How do people get to you, Dr. Wolf? | ||
| Come to dailycloud.io. | ||
| Our lawyers are hard at work with the actions against the FDA and against Pfizer. | ||
| And please also track down a copy of The Bodies of Others, which even libraries are telling you you can't order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can order it from allseasonspress.com. | |
| It's a big hit anyway. | ||
| We'll get up the order, how you order it. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| Toby, you're going to be back on with us this evening, but tell people how to get to Brownstone Institute and how they get to you on social media. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so the future framework is the worst idea in the history of public health. | |
| And if it goes forward, we will have no science going forward as far as clinical trials in connection with COVID-19 shots. | ||
| It's the end of science in America. | ||
| I have a call to action up on my substack. | ||
| My substack is tobyrogers.substack.com. | ||
| And you can also find me on the Brownstone Institute. | ||
| And we have to rally the troops because The Future Framework is an existential threat to the future of the United States, and the FDA has lost its mind and must be stopped. | ||
| We're going to do it all, Toby. | ||
| This article was absolutely brilliant. | ||
| We're going to get you back on tonight, get everybody worked up to make sure that they're calling and doing everything we can. | ||
| Toby, Dr. Wolf, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you guys on here. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play The Cold Open. | ||
| We've got a couple of very special guests coming on about a very special person. | ||
| Let's play The Cold Open. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Judge Thomas, you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. | |
| I do. | ||
| Please be seated. | ||
| When I was six, I wandered the streets by myself. | ||
| And I'll see you next time. | ||
| I had gone to the seminary. | ||
| I had gone to all-white schools. | ||
| I was never gonna be a part of that world. | ||
| I was never gonna be white. | ||
| The problem is, I could never go back completely to the world I came from. | ||
| We're supposed to be revolutionaries. | ||
| We were for anybody who was kind of in your face. | ||
| I saw what I had become, lashing out at every single thing. | ||
| And then I asked God, if you take anger out of my heart, I'll never hate again. | ||
| And that was the beginning of the slow return to where I started. | ||
| I want my candidacy to unify our country. | ||
| I was under constant attack. | ||
| You're not really black because you're not doing what we expect black people to do. | ||
| I will nominate Judge Clarence Thomas to serve as Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. | ||
| That's when all heck broke loose. | ||
| Judge Thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex. | ||
| We know exactly what's going on here. | ||
| This is the wrong black guy. | ||
| He has to be destroyed. | ||
| You really didn't matter. | ||
| What mattered was what they wanted. | ||
| So you'd still like to serve on the Supreme Court? | ||
| I'd rather die than withdraw from the process. | ||
| I wouldn't be able to say I lived up to my oath and did my best. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Created equal. | ||
| Clarence Thomas in his own words. | ||
| Two incredibly special guests. | ||
| Michael Pak, I think the greatest of all conservative filmmakers. | ||
| And Mark Pagliato, who was a great warrior in the Trump White House. | ||
| Michael, do we have Mark up yet? | ||
| I know we got Michael. | ||
| This is both a book and a... Pak, you take it first. | ||
| This is both a book and a film. | ||
| It's absolutely stunning and the timing could not be better. | ||
| Michael Pak. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've been very lucky with timing on this. | |
| Well, it began several years ago when some friends of Justice Thomas were tired of the left and his enemies telling his story, and they approached me to tell his story. | ||
| And we came up with this format of him looking directly into camera and telling the audience about his life from the beginning to today. | ||
| It was based on 30 hours of interviews with Justice Thomas and his wife, Ginny, and they're the only ones interviewed. | ||
| So it was really no Supreme Court Justice ever has given that kind of access. | ||
| So it was really an honor and a privilege. | ||
| But we can only it's only to our film. | ||
| So there was a lot of extra material. | ||
| And Mark Palletta, my co-author, felt strongly and I came to agree that the audience wanted to see more. | ||
| And so we put in the book a lot of things that were not in the film. | ||
| It's 95 percent new material. | ||
| So I encourage your viewers and listeners to buy the book and watch the movie. | ||
| The movie is still streaming on Amazon, on Salem, on Newsmax, many places, and available everywhere. | ||
| And I think they're both good in their different ways, but they both tell Justices Thomas's powerful life story, which even in that little trailer I think you get a sense of. | ||
| Mark, let me bring you in. | ||
| By the way, there was a historic today on the Supreme Court about the gun situation up in New York. | ||
| Justice Thomas wrote the opinion. | ||
| And people don't understand, you wouldn't be getting these 6-3 decisions if it hadn't been for the pick-and-shovel work that Mark did in the White House. | ||
| You're a true hero, brother. | ||
| Tell me about your involvement, why you wanted to do the book coming off the film. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| So the the the movie was made. | ||
| We connected up with Michael and I was helped to make that film and was there watching the interviews with Justice Thomas when Michael was interviewing him again, 25 hours. | ||
| And as we made the film and we saw and I saw all of this great material getting cut away. | ||
| Right. | ||
| That Justice Thomas was talking about different issues, more in depth on things taken on the left, their tactics, their policies, talking about You know, again, his amazing life and his way of explaining things is just so riveting. | ||
| I thought it would be a shame. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And I've dedicated to you. | ||
| I was on your show, I think, in 2016, when I first set up the website to fight back against that horrible, you know, malicious movie called Confirmation to get the truth out about Clarence Thomas, because he's not interested in defending himself. | ||
| Right. | ||
| He has the litany of humility that says is a prayer to the Lord that, you know, Cleanse me of any desire to be respected, you know, and to kind of defend himself. | ||
| And so this was a great way, this movie, and then in terms of all the material that was cut away, to get it into a book. | ||
| And a book is a lot more accessible than a movie. | ||
| The movie is incredible. | ||
| That trailer to watch again makes me want to watch it again. | ||
| But the book is something you can open up and go to a section. | ||
| We've made it so that the table of contents makes it very sort of subject specific as to if you want to read about his time at the EEOC or his time at Holy Cross or wherever it is in his life, you can access it pretty quickly. | ||
| And I'm really excited the book is out. | ||
| As I said, it's 25 hours with Justice Thomas. | ||
| And we kind of took those interviews and made it into this book. | ||
| Michael, with that, you're, I think, and you've been a mentor for me for a long time in filmmaking. | ||
| You're our best filmmaker. | ||
| The hero's journey here. | ||
| Give me two minutes of the arc of what you show in the film of Justice Thomas' life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It really is a hero's journey. | |
| It fits that model. | ||
| I mean, he, I mean, to do this quickly and not to do it justice, you know, he was born in the segregated South in dire poverty. | ||
| His father left before he could remember. | ||
| His mother was having trouble raising her two boys and brought him to her father, his grandfather, to raise. | ||
| He was about eight years old then, and that turned his life around. | ||
| His grandfather gave him discipline and hard work and sent him to Catholic schools. | ||
| They were all-black, segregated schools, but the Irish nuns who taught there continued to reinforce those principles and values. | ||
| That was going along until the 60s hit and Clarence Thomas rebelled against that and became a radical, embraced black power, embraced ... He said the more radical the better. | ||
| He was, in his own words, an angry black man. | ||
| Then the film describes how he came back around from that to the principles of his grandfather and the nuns. | ||
| Then finally working for Ronald Reagan and coming out as a conservative black man in the public sphere and he's been attacked ever since, reaching a crescendo in the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings with Anita Hill's allegations of sexual harassment. | ||
| Going on to today, Clarence Thomas has been attacked in a way that very few people have I mean, using, I think, naked racist stereotypes we have in the film, cartoons where he's in Ku Klux Klan robes, he's portrayed as a shoeshine boy to Justice Scalia, he's regularly called an Uncle Tom, tactics that would be unacceptable if applied to somebody with progressive views. | ||
| And it goes on to attacks on Ginny very recently. | ||
| It's a hero's journey, yes, but it's a hero's journey that hasn't ended, luckily. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short break. | ||
| Our two authors and filmmakers, Michael Peck, Mark Pagliato, is going to return and talk about this, Created Equal. | ||
| And I don't know if it's reached a crescendo yet, Brother Peck. | ||
| I think we haven't seen that crescendo. | ||
| Because clearly Justice Thomas is a target of the progressive left. | ||
| A target right now because of his stability that he gives. | ||
| I don't think we've seen the end of this story yet. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Michael and Mark on the other side. | ||
| I'm Steve Stern, CEO of Flagshirt.com, a third-generation, veteran-owned small business. | ||
| I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
| I'm asking you today to visit FlagShirt.com. | ||
| Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
| Be a flag waver. | ||
| Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
| Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10% off site-wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
| Action. | ||
| Remember the five generals today, Save Democracy, some movement they've got is to counter Shultz and Steve Stern. | ||
| Steve Stern right there at the Flagship Company, what they're doing on the precinct strategy and getting people to volunteer to participate in democracy. | ||
| Canvas board members, school board members, precinct committee, all of that. | ||
| So make sure you go check it out today, particularly the run-up to the 4th of July for the flagship. | ||
| Okay, Michael, how do people get to the film? | ||
| So how do they still, if they haven't seen it, where do they go? | ||
| What's the best way for them to get to this film about Judge Justice Thomas? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the film is still streaming, and first it was in movie theaters, then it was nationally broadcast on PBS, and now it's been streaming. | |
| And they can go to Amazon, they can go to many other sites, but perhaps the easiest way is to go to our site, manifoldproductions.com, where we list everywhere that it's streaming. | ||
| Yeah, there it is. | ||
| And it's really many, many places, and it's easy to get, and I encourage your listeners and viewers to watch, and to watch with people who don't agree with Clarence Thomas. | ||
| We designed the film to reach to the middle, and I was happy it was on PBS so the people Don't agree with Clarence Thomas can try to understand what he thinks and understand his life. | ||
| I think it's great. | ||
| And the footage is incredibly powerful. | ||
| So the 30 hours down to the two for the film, Mark, you then made the book. | ||
| How do people go get this book? | ||
| Is it got to read the book to particularly given the importance he's got on this court going forward? | ||
| It's it's on Amazon. | ||
| It's on Barnes and Noble. | ||
| You know, it's on the Regnery. | ||
| Regnery is the publisher. | ||
| But I encourage Amazon and Barnes and Noble probably the easiest. | ||
| It's in bookstores. | ||
| I encourage your viewers to go get this book. | ||
| It's a wonderful read. | ||
| You will love it. | ||
| It's a great companion to the movie. | ||
| It's about a great man, our greatest justice and our greatest living American. | ||
| It's his birthday today. | ||
| He was born June 23, 1948 in Pinpoint, Georgia. | ||
| And so it's a great day for America. | ||
| So he's 74 years old today. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| My math? | ||
| He is. | ||
| And you know, when he went on the court, he was 43 years old, Steve. | ||
| Uh, 43 years old at one of the youngest justices ever. | ||
| And he said, they took my life from me. | ||
| They took my reputation from me and I'm going to serve another 43 years. | ||
| Uh, I'm going to serve 43 years. | ||
| So, um, so he's at 31 right now. | ||
| So I'm expecting he's in great health. | ||
| Uh, he loves his job. | ||
| He's, uh, it's Thomas in full right now. | ||
| You just saw the second amendment case that he wrote, um, other great cases coming down. | ||
| Uh, and, uh, and, and Thomas will be there for a long time. | ||
| And I know you've had a long association with him. | ||
| So this is a very, it's an amazing moment. | ||
| And I tell you, the impact of Justice Thomas, we haven't seen the full impact yet. | ||
| He's going to be such an important person going forward, individual going forward in the country. | ||
| Mark, Michael, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We're really honored. | ||
| Guys, thanks. | ||
| Let's get this up on every platform. | ||
| I want everybody, this is the hero's journey. | ||
| This is a man they have tried to destroy. | ||
| And he has stood in the breach. | ||
| And I agree with Mark. | ||
| I think he's one of the greatest jurors we've ever had and one of the greatest Americans we've ever had. | ||
| And this story is the hero's journey. | ||
| OK, Captain Bannon, you're out at this 50th anniversary of Title IX, and now it's more controversial than ever. | ||
| This was a law that was passed that young women then got into sports in a great way. | ||
| It was a ticket out for so many minority students. | ||
| And now the radical left is trying to change all that. | ||
| Tell us what's happening today in Washington, D.C. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have some great speakers, many great speakers so far. | |
| The crowd is motivated and Antifa has shown up. | ||
| I don't know if you can see them behind me. | ||
| They've shown up and they're trying to damper the mood, but the mood is still going strong. | ||
| People are here and they're motivated and they're not going to let Antifa stop us. | ||
| What is Antifa got a problem with women? | ||
| I thought Antifa were supposed to be, I don't know, feminist or pro-women. | ||
| What's Antifa's beef? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mo, where do they go? | |
| It's not women's rights, human rights. | ||
| So that's that seems to be their beef this morning is that we shouldn't be fighting for women's sports. | ||
| We should be fighting for sports for all. | ||
| But as many of the signs you can see behind me, it's women's sports. | ||
| That's what we're fighting for to keep it female in sports. | ||
| Mo, where do they go? Is there a website people go to get to either get the live stream or see the videos of the speakers? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, you can watch. They are live streaming all of the speakers on our bodies, our sports dot com. | |
| You can watch it there, and you can see the remaining speakers. | ||
| Okay, we'll try to get it up on our getter account. | ||
| But also, Mo, this is just the beginning. | ||
| This is not just a celebration. | ||
| This is going forward. | ||
| This is going to be a real fight to keep women's sports for women. | ||
| So once again, give the site where people go to, and what's your getter handle, what's your social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So people can watch the live stream at OurBodiesOurSports.com and they can also find me on Twitter and Getter at Maureen underscore Bannon and also on Instagram at Real Maureen Bannon and I will be posting throughout the day and I also am speaking right now projected at 114. | |
| Okay, those things are always in flux. | ||
| Good luck today and see you back here in the War Room. | ||
| 2-0-2, 2-2-4, 3-1-2-1 is the number. | ||
| That's the Senate switchboard. | ||
| We had a historic ruling today by Justice Thomas. | ||
| He wrote the opinion. | ||
| But a 6-3 vote in the Supreme Court about this gun situation, and particularly what the government has to prove against you, what your freedom is for owning guns in the state of New York, in the Empire State. | ||
| A very important ruling. | ||
| But at the same time, you've got these 14 collaborationists. | ||
| Once again, whether it's the American Recovery Act that caused the inflation, you've got these collaborationists, whether it's the infrastructure bill, another disaster, the only way the Biden administration is propped up is by collaborationists. | ||
| Collaborationist Republicans. | ||
| Now you've got 14 in the Senate that are there for another gun grab, and we don't really have any real information coming out of Ovalda. | ||
| We don't have any idea of the shooter, of what really went on, and the story changes every day. | ||
| And no offense, Texas DPS and the Rangers, they're blaming the school board, which looked terrible, the school police. | ||
| But we still don't have the facts of who was there, what was the chain of command, all that. | ||
| And yet they're trying to do a radical gun grab. | ||
| 2-0-2, 2-2-4-3-1-2-1. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be back at 5 o'clock. | ||
| We're going to have a lot on this, on this whole gun situation, what's happening in the Senate, plus the future framework of the FDA. | ||
| There looks like a bait-and-switch going on. | ||
| We're going to be all over that, plus economic news, politics, geopolitics, what's happening in the Ukraine, EU today. | ||
| Ben Harnwell is going to go live right at the end of this show. | ||
| 17 seconds. | ||
| Go at Harnwell. | ||
| Everybody's watching us on Getter. | ||
| Go at Harnwell. | ||
| Ben's going to explain the geopolitics of the EU and Ukraine right now. | ||
| Make sure you go see Harnwell. |
Export Selection