Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Thank you for coming on. | ||
First of all, thank you for seeing this for yourself. | ||
Tell us what you saw. | ||
unidentified
|
So we've seen the debacle in Afghanistan and it appears the Biden administration is going to double down on it by bringing people who are unvetted into our country. | |
I was at Fort McCoy in southwestern Wisconsin last Friday where there were 2,000 evacuees from Afghanistan. | ||
And what we found out is none of them were there on a special immigration visa. | ||
They were all there on parole. | ||
And for our listeners, the special immigration visa is a thorough vetting process that can take up to two years to find out if a person should be coming to the United States. | ||
The parole authority is granted to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and he could just wave people in. | ||
They have circumvented, the Biden administration has circumvented the SIV process, and they're just bringing people in on parole. | ||
Second thing that we saw, Tucker, was that people could leave the base. | ||
Including without the authority of the general that is overseeing Fort McCoy. | ||
So we've got two islands off the coast. | ||
I'm not talking about Guantanamo Bay. | ||
I'm talking about Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard. | ||
And I don't think any of these refugees have been moved to Nantucket or Martha's Vineyard. | ||
They've all been moved to places like Wisconsin and Maine and like far away from the centers of power. | ||
Is there anything we can do to change it? | ||
If we're going to import thousands of unvetted Afghan Pashtun tribesmen, why aren't we moving them to the places where the people who make these decisions live? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, that would really be a good idea. | |
But what I have suggested, and there are Afghans that should be able to come into our country. | ||
I've talked to servicemen in my district who said there are people that should be able to come from Afghanistan because they Some of them have given almost their lives being threatened by the Taliban. | ||
And they should be able to come to the United States. | ||
However, these people are not being vetted thoroughly. | ||
And what should happen is they should go to a safe third country, like Qatar, someplace like that, and be vetted there. | ||
And then if they get through the vetting, they should be able to come in. | ||
Because 84% of the people in the first quarter of this year that tried to get an SIV in Afghanistan, They were rejected. | ||
Only 16% were able to get in. | ||
There has to be a thorough vetting process. | ||
The Biden administration is circumventing it. | ||
Yeah, they're just using a crisis to change our country. | ||
They'll never lose another election. | ||
That's the point. | ||
Okay, welcome. | ||
It's Wednesday, June 22, Year of Our Lord 2022. | ||
This concept of parole and just quote-unquote waving them in, that was big this morning with Todd Bensman. | ||
We talked about the southern border. | ||
We were honored to have Congressman Tiffany, Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin 7 out in Chippewa Falls in great part of the country, western Wisconsin up there next to Minnesota. | ||
Congressman, you're the only guy I think we can talk to that's been both down the Darien Gap and have dealt with this Afghanistan issue. | ||
Let me deal with Afghanistan first. | ||
That was you on talk show the other night. | ||
Just a really a star turn. | ||
How could this be going on? | ||
How could, particularly, how could Mayorkas just deem upon himself to quote-unquote wave these people through, given all the problems we've had with radical Islamic terrorism? | ||
And quite frankly, all the problems that were in Afghanistan for the 20 years we were there with, you know, was it blue-on-blue, you know, problems. | ||
We had advisors, we didn't even know who was the enemy and who wasn't. | ||
It was one of the big issues in Afghanistan. | ||
How could Mayorkas take it upon himself just to use this parole system? | ||
unidentified
|
So Steve, you know, I sit on the Judiciary Committee where Jim Jordan's the ranking member, and we saw this with Secretary Mayorkas a month or two ago, where he basically just misleads us. | |
Some people would call it lies. | ||
They've just taken the matter into their own hands. | ||
Parole is meant to be used on a case-by-case basis to bring people in the United States. | ||
They just waved in over 70,000 people using parole, and so it's just lawless. | ||
It's similar to what happened in Afghanistan back in August of last year, where the Biden administration, President Biden just said, we're going to get out of here and we don't care what the ramifications of it are. | ||
So you had the Taliban vetting the people coming out of that Kabul airport, the Department of State saying that, let's just wave them through. | ||
We're not going to do a full review of them until later. | ||
And so it's just really a lawless situation with this administration, and we've seen that in so many ways, right? | ||
I want to go back to something. | ||
You were with Michael Yan, and I think you went down with Congressman Burgess Owens from Utah. | ||
I think you're the only two guys to actually go all the way down to the Darien Gap. | ||
We have the same situation now with this invasion. | ||
You know, Todd Benson was on today saying, hey, look, they're just taking this parole authority, the same concept they're using here on the Afghan. | ||
Yeah, twice we've had him before the committee, and he just misleads us. | ||
They are determined to bring as many people into this country as possible, and it's an invasion. | ||
him on this? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, twice we've had him before the committee and he just misleads us. | |
They are determined to bring as many people into this country as possible and it's an invasion and it's not just the southern border. | ||
They will take any opportunity. | ||
As we saw with Afghanistan, with that debacle, they said, we're just going to wave in 75,000 people. | ||
And now they're talking about sending more people in. | ||
But I equate what's happening down in Panama. | ||
And I was there just a little over a year ago with your friend, Michael Yan. | ||
And I equate it to a pipeline. | ||
On January 20th, 2021, President Biden, his first action was to shut down the Keystone Pipeline, but he opened up the pipeline from Panama to bring all these people in. | ||
And it works just like a pipeline. | ||
They surge people from Columbia through places like Panama on up to Costa Rica. | ||
Costa Rica surges them. | ||
And it works just like a pipeline all the way to our southern border. | ||
And they're getting really good at it with groups like the International Organization for Migration, a group that is headquartered with the United Nations. | ||
And they're getting really good at pumping thousands of people up from South America to our southern border. | ||
Do you just use the term and by the way, we have Kat, Congressman Kat Kamek on in the next hour. | ||
She's going to play footage of her. | ||
She was actually down in the rear of Grand Valley last week. | ||
We're going to have incredible footage of her. | ||
She's referred to it also as an invasion. | ||
You're not a fire breather. | ||
You're kind of a steady Eddie. | ||
When you use the term invasion, that's pretty harsh. | ||
Do you actually believe that Mayorkas and Biden, these guys are allowing an invasion of the United States to our southern border, sir? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I don't know how you can view it any other way, because the courts have said a couple times, hey, you guys need to stop this. | |
The American people are clearly saying, hey, we want some controls on our southern border. | ||
They don't stop. | ||
This is intentional. | ||
And the American people, I think, are finally waking up to this that, you know, it's just not a policy that is misguided. | ||
This is truly intentional, whether it's high energy prices, not dealing with crime, And also the southern border. | ||
This is intentional on the part of the Biden administration. | ||
And it's it's really jarring for someone who expects our country to run in a lawful manner. | ||
Congressman, you kind of, you know, got the Wisconsin nice. | ||
When you say he's avoided or misled us. | ||
Let's be specific. | ||
When he sat before your committee, a guy like you and Jim Jordan are very fair, even-handed people. | ||
Do you believe that under oath you've asked or people on the committee have asked questions about documents, about information? | ||
Do you believe that he's lied to the committee? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, for example, I believe he has. | |
For example, he said that there are actually fewer people coming in illegally to the country than in the Trump administration. | ||
I mean, that's just demonstrably false. | ||
And there's other instances where he's said these type of things and they're just not true. | ||
Yesterday, the Daily Mail had the lead story that the Attorney General Merrick Garland was talking to a legal official, Attorney General, about a border. | ||
Now it wasn't the southern border and it wasn't the Attorney General of Arizona or Texas. | ||
He was in the Ukraine talking about potential war crime tribunals for Russians. | ||
Is that just by happenstance, or do you think that they're trying to send a signal just to rub people's noses in it? | ||
I don't believe Merrick Garland's ever been to the southern border, given what you call an invasion. | ||
Cat Comet calls it an invasion. | ||
People who are not bomb throwers call it an invasion. | ||
Do you think that Merrick Garland is doing this on purpose? | ||
unidentified
|
You know, I don't know what the rationale is behind that, but you know, clearly this administration has hung their hat on. | |
They're going to do everything they can to say they're saving the Ukraine when they actually did great damage to the Ukraine on January 20th of 2021 when they said, we're no longer going to be energy independent. | ||
It's at that point, Vladimir Putin knew he had America right where he wanted it. | ||
And that was confirmed with the Afghanistan debacle. | ||
I think it's, they're just trying to change the narrative. | ||
And they don't want to go to the border. | ||
They don't want to deal with crime. | ||
And Merrick Garland has caused tremendous headaches for this administration as Representative Jordan and others on the Judiciary Committee have highlighted so many times when they went after parents with school boards. | ||
I think it's just, they're trying to put up an alternative narrative that perhaps the American people will stick with them. | ||
And gosh, I sure hope that's not happening. | ||
And I sure hope in November. | ||
The American people send a clear message because if this is not an election like 2010 or 1994, our country is in very, very deep trouble. | ||
Of course, 2010 is the Tea Party Revolt. | ||
63 seats in 1994 is the Newt Gingrich Revolution. | ||
Let's go back to Afghanistan. | ||
Your solutions orient guide people in Wisconsin are practical. | ||
What would be your recommendations to solve this problem that you think that we can get our arms around? | ||
What would you recommend about this Afghan refugee situation? | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, could you plug me in my laptop? | |
Hey, yeah, sorry. | ||
My laptop's running a little bit low on energy. | ||
What I would say, what I would say is, hang on just a second. | ||
Caroline, it's right underneath there. | ||
Right underneath. | ||
Pull it out. | ||
Plug it in. | ||
So, restate the question, Steve. | ||
I want to answer it. | ||
When you get your energy jacked up, what would you do? | ||
What's your recommendation for the Afghan situation in the United States? | ||
What would Tom Tiffany tell New Yorkers? | ||
Here's how you got to solve this. | ||
unidentified
|
First of all, you stop using parole. | |
Parole is meant to be done on an individual basis, not bringing mass groups of people. | ||
The SIV or Special Immigrant Visa process should be used on everyone. | ||
Afghanistan is the largest state sponsor of terror. | ||
Al Qaeda, all those groups that are there. | ||
And anybody coming out of Afghanistan should have to go through the SIV process and they should do it in a safe third country, Qatar, Tajikistan, someplace like that. | ||
Make sure that they go through the SIV process before they come into the United States. | ||
If someone meets those conditions and they actually helped America in a real manner, then we should let them in, but not until they go through the SIV process. | ||
What would be your recommendation on the border right now? | ||
You've seen the disaster we have there. | ||
How would Tom Tiffany stop the invasion? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, I think you just go back to what President Trump was doing. | |
Look at the numbers going back to what was it, December of 2020? | ||
Lowest numbers that we saw in a long time. | ||
You need to complete the wall, restart, remain in Mexico, and you need to stop, catch, and release. | ||
Allow the Border Patrol to do their job. | ||
Those Border Patrol agents, they are so ground down at this point because they're not protecting America, and that's what they would really like to do. | ||
It's not hard. | ||
This stuff is not hard, Steve. | ||
Right. | ||
Just got to have the will to do it. | ||
Last question. | ||
You're going to sit on you're going to sit on one of the most powerful committees under Jim Jordan, one of the most powerful chairman of judiciary. | ||
What what what what's on? | ||
We've got about a minute and a half. | ||
What are the two or three things Tom Tiffany wants to accomplish on judiciary after we take power? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, we certainly have to have investigations. | |
If no other committee takes up an investigation of Anthony Fauci, judiciary should. | ||
We need to find out what happened in that lab in Wuhan, China. | ||
And I believe Anthony Fauci and his cohorts know that. | ||
He's certainly one that needs to come before us. | ||
I think also the FBI director needs to come before the committee and needs to answer in regards to, in particular, the FISA process, Steve. | ||
I believe the FISA process needs to be significantly reformed. | ||
I lived through the John Doe in Wisconsin. | ||
If you remember that, and any of our listeners know about it, it's very similar to what happened to President Trump with Russia collusion. | ||
I saw it. | ||
We reformed the law in Wisconsin. | ||
We need to do the same thing here at the federal level. | ||
FISA reform should be on the table. | ||
Congressman Tiffany, how do people follow you? | ||
How do they get to know more about you? | ||
unidentified
|
Just go to at Tom Tiffany and you'll find me there. | |
Tiffany.house.gov. | ||
You can find us there, and of course you can search anytime and find us. | ||
It's just a real pleasure to be on your show, Steve. | ||
Congressman, I want to thank you. | ||
People in Wisconsin, I hope they realize when a guy like Tom Tiffany goes all the way down to the Darien Gap, that is really setting a great example. | ||
And the people down there, really, it had a big impact. | ||
So thank you very much for doing that, sir. | ||
I really appreciate it. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, really good to be with you. | |
Every state's a border state, and we need to treat it that way. | ||
Amen. | ||
That's leadership right there. | ||
Tiffany and Burgess Owens had the guts to go all the way down to the core basis of what the problem is in the frontline nations. | ||
Okay, short commercial break. | ||
We're going to come back. | ||
unidentified
|
We're going to talk a little bit J6 Boris Epstein some polling some politics next in the world War room Pandemic with Stephen K Bannon the epidemic is a demon and | |
we cannot let this demon hide war room Pandemic here's your host Stephen K Bannon I'll see you next time. | ||
Okay, welcome back. | ||
We were supposed to have a cold open. | ||
When are we going to have it? | ||
I don't know. | ||
Okay, thank you Denver. | ||
I always love a well-produced show. | ||
Boris, J6 just announced that they're not going to, that they're not going to, they're going to cancel. | ||
I guess they're not going to be in primetime on Friday night. | ||
They're not going to meet next week, and that's a big tell when people know that they're going to have Roe v. Wade, I think, is going to be announced Monday or sometime early next week. | ||
And the lead investigator quit. | ||
What's happening with J6? | ||
I thought it was supposed to be so mesmerizing. | ||
We're going to be in tenterhooks. | ||
That's all they talk about on MSNBC and CNN all day long. | ||
Is this living up to the hype, sir? | ||
Absolutely not. | ||
Absolutely not. | ||
And Morning Consult came out with a poll today that says that only 28% of independents have been following the hearings in primetime a lot, and only 19% in daytime. | ||
Bottom line is, the American people don't care about this. | ||
The American people care about the state of our country. | ||
They care about the lack of a southern border, the disaster in Afghanistan, the gas prices. | ||
They care about the lack of baby formula in the stores. | ||
The American people are not, are not buying what the Democrats are selling. | ||
And now I believe that not only did they move Thursday from primetime to daytime, they have now canceled, as far as I understand, any hearings moving forward. | ||
And they're now saying that, well, you know, maybe we'll pick them up sometime in July, because quote-unquote, new information has come out. | ||
But the reality of it is, Steve, as I'm looking through this year, there's just, it's not that there's new information, it's that there's no interest. | ||
And Steve, it's not that it's after Friday. | ||
They have now canceled Friday altogether, and Friday was supposed to be the big finale for this week in primetime. | ||
So you were supposed to have Thursday primetime, Friday primetime. | ||
And now instead you have Thursday daytime and Friday's totally closed. | ||
So, you know, good luck to the Democrats trying to sell something to the American people on Thursday at 3 o'clock and saying, hey, tune in in the next couple of weeks. | ||
And now with the lead investigator leaving, just like that happened, You know, in the New York investigation and that fake investigation against President Trump, when the lead investigator leaves, what that suggests usually is that not so much is happening. | ||
Is that they haven't found anything and the lead investigator is saying, you know what, I've done what I can and I'm punching out. | ||
Or the lead investigator is saying, well, you know what, people above me Talk about this lead investigator. | ||
further because they realize nothing is there so I'm punching out either way a major loss today for the J6 charade both on the cancellations and on the lead investigator leaving. Talk about this lead investigator. | ||
Also the lead investigator is leaving without any statement. He failed to comment. | ||
Well it caught everybody by surprise didn't it? | ||
Totally. | ||
At least the way the write-ups went. | ||
Totally caught people by surprise. | ||
Let's go back to the TV coverage, because they haven't gotten the ratings, and everybody knows it's an open secret in town that the networks just said, hey, we're not doing this again. | ||
You know, if it's going to be in prime time, it's going to be on cable news, right? | ||
That they weren't going to do it. | ||
But I just want to go back. | ||
So the schedule now has been that tomorrow is a daytime event. | ||
There's no Friday. | ||
They've canceled all the final. | ||
Are they canceling? | ||
They can't cancel. | ||
They have to have it before the 4th of July because these guys are all taken off. | ||
The town's gone for two or three weeks from 4th of July. | ||
Later in July. | ||
Later in July. | ||
So these primetime, you know, big news hearings. | ||
Absolute overwhelming coverage they were expecting. | ||
Now it's going to be just a whimper of, well, maybe just, maybe we could talk a little bit about it on a Thursday afternoon in June, and then we'll see, you know, we'll see you when we see you, as they say. | ||
That's what it comes down to. | ||
And yes, Stephen, it's because the American people have not tuned in. | ||
And by the way, the numbers I'm giving you that include the independents, you know, those are including that first prime time. | ||
Since then, it's, you know, in the 13, 14 percent. | ||
According to Morning Consult of Americans who are paying attention. | ||
So, you've got some rabid people on the left. | ||
And let's be honest, I hate watchers on the right who disdain the J6 committee. | ||
But overall, this big spectacle has been nothing but a debacle. | ||
Let's play. | ||
I'll tell you what, they're obsessed with it on MSNBC and CNN. | ||
Go ahead, let's go. | ||
We got this booted up. | ||
Denver, go ahead and play it. | ||
unidentified
|
What are your thoughts on this? | |
Are there Democrats who are pushing, or not necessarily pushing or promoting, but certainly wanting to see these far-right Republicans win? | ||
Are they playing with fire? | ||
First of all, Aiden, are there non-far-right Republicans that I don't know about? | ||
They're gone. | ||
Good point. | ||
They should be running ads against the entire GOP and branding them what they are, folks. | ||
Today's GOP is no longer a political party. | ||
It's a white nationalist fascist movement that wants to turn its religious beliefs into the law of the land. | ||
When I say fascist, I mean academically, because they've embraced violence. | ||
And I wish more in the media. | ||
And Democrats would talk about recent polls showing nearly 60% of Republicans view January 6th, the CBS poll, not as an act of terrorism, but as an act defending freedom. | ||
Over 100 election deniers have won the GOP primaries this year. | ||
So, look, saying the reasonable Republican isn't saying the reasonable Taliban member. | ||
They're all extremists. | ||
Let's be blunt about it. | ||
I think the GOP should, the Democrats should be spending money to brand the GOP across the nation as the party of white nationalism and fascism. | ||
Joan, let's play devil's advocate here for a moment. | ||
Is this the best way for Democrats to win in a year that sees inflation so high and Biden's approval, you know, struggling to say the least? | ||
Yeah, I agree with Dean that most Republicans are fascists and that we are dealing, not most, but many are fascists and we're dealing with a white nationalist party increasingly. | ||
But I don't think this is the best use of resources. | ||
You know, I think partly it's what you said, people are worried about inflation, there are other issues. | ||
I also think it is playing with fire, as you said before. | ||
I mean, we don't know. | ||
Who can't be elected? | ||
Who's the most extreme? | ||
You know, the Clinton campaign was reportedly looking forward to running against Donald Trump because they thought they could beat him. | ||
And we know that didn't happen. | ||
I don't feel like I can say, for example, that, you know, Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania can't be elected governor. | ||
I hope he's not. | ||
But, you know, he went to the January 6th insurrection. | ||
He seems way too extreme. | ||
But I think in a year like this, we really can't take the risk. | ||
And as you say, Democrats have a lot more stuff to do than figure out who is the most extreme in the Republican Party. | ||
So, Joan brings up, Tim, she brings up the case of Doug Mastriano. | ||
Let me ask you about that. | ||
You got Pennsylvania's Democratic Party. | ||
They actually singled out Doug Mastriano during his primary race for governor in Pennsylvania. | ||
Mastriano, of course, is infamously known for lying about the 2020 election. | ||
He attended the January 6th insurrection, the rally before, I should say. | ||
These are dangerous candidates to be elevating. | ||
Are they playing with fire? | ||
Yeah, Eamon, I think they are. | ||
I think it's bad karma. | ||
I think it's also just incorrect for Dean to say that every Republican is all Taliban and fascist. | ||
I think it's both an unhelpful rhetoric and just not true. | ||
Look, people can be bad and not be the Taliban. | ||
I think that if you looked at the Pennsylvania governor's race, for example, Doug Mastriano, it fits explicitly the definition of a Christian nationalist. | ||
He was there on January 6th Trying to storm the Capitol. | ||
Having him versus having somebody who kind of pretends to go along with MAGA, there's two bad choices. | ||
But I think that Mastriano is clearly a worse choice. | ||
And right now, polls only have him down by four points to Josh Shapiro, who's a center-left Democrat, a totally reasonable guy. | ||
He's running a good campaign. | ||
But in a wave year, Who knows with the Fed rates going up, with inflation, in a wave year with a bad economy, to have Doug Mastriano's in office all over the country is extremely dangerous. | ||
And so, you know, look, I think the Democrat strategists obviously need to do what they think is best to win these races. | ||
But I do think that they're playing with fire in some of these cases. | ||
I think that it's bad karma. | ||
And I think that we need to learn from 2016. | ||
Okay, Heidi Knopf is going to be on. | ||
She's next hour going to be on from Colorado, where they've done this. | ||
They put two million dollars in trying to kill her candidacy. | ||
Boris, this is where They've gotten so worked up over these hearings, they're now raising money, and some of the Democrats are trying to come in and mess into the races. | ||
You might have seen a little bit of this in Georgia, where they're trying to get involved in the races to try to pick who they think are the worst candidates. | ||
My point is, bring that on, because I think these candidates are fantastic. | ||
If they're going to give resources to promote their brands, Boris Epstein, you're a strategist. | ||
Tell me which way you would go. | ||
First of all, Steve, you know, it's hilarious. | ||
Dino Abdalla has been around since, like, my early days of doing, you know, 4 a.m. | ||
hits on CNN and MSNBC. | ||
This poor guy, he just can't catch a break. | ||
Nobody likes anything he's saying. | ||
Joan Walsh also, you know, back when I was starting out in the, you know, in the mid to late 2000s, They've got the same cast of characters, and they're throwing poor Tim Miller over there to the wolves. | ||
Same cast of characters. | ||
They have nothing to say. | ||
They just, you know, start crying at the camera, and, you know, we're all fascists. | ||
First of all, Dean, my grandfather fought the Nazis for four years, okay? | ||
I'm a proud Jew. | ||
You call me a fascist? | ||
You ought to be ashamed of yourself, okay? | ||
You're a disgusting human being, and I'm sure you right now are doing some other nonsense, but the producers of all the MSNBC shows watch this. | ||
So to the producers for whatever that show was that nobody actually tunes into, to the producers for Chris Hayes, for the producers for Ari Melber, you let Dean Abdallah know that he wants to call me a fascist. | ||
Come to my face, and you call me a fascist to my face, okay? | ||
You're disgusting. | ||
Piece of garbage, okay? | ||
So that's that. | ||
In terms of, you know, their attack, great. | ||
They want to attack our candidates. | ||
They want to go and attack Eric Greitens for the awesome ad. | ||
They want to attack Doug Mastriano for loving America. | ||
They want to attack President Trump for saying the truth that the presidential election was stolen. | ||
Go ahead and do it. | ||
Give us the earned media, please. | ||
We will take it all day and day. | ||
I mean, look at Greitens in Missouri. | ||
Obviously somebody I'm supporting. | ||
She put this ad out. | ||
Yes, it's controversial. | ||
But hey, it's a clear metaphor. | ||
If you don't get it, you're either lying or stupid. | ||
And they play it over and over and over and over again. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you for the free order. | |
Dean Obadiah doing that on the 81st anniversary of Barbarossa, the Vermont coming for the Russians. | ||
Not good timing to call Boris Epstein a fascist. | ||
Short break. | ||
Back next with Capital Markets. | ||
unidentified
|
How we got here. | |
Putin invaded Ukraine. | ||
Putin invaded Ukraine with 100,000 forces. | ||
unidentified
|
I realize there are a number of factors that play a role in the historic inflation that we're experiencing. | |
Supply chain disruptions, regulations that constrain supply. | ||
We've got rising inflation expectations and excessive physical spending. | ||
But the problem hasn't sprung out of nowhere. | ||
And in January of 2021, inflation was at 1.4%. | ||
By December of 2021, it had risen to 7%, a five-fold increase. | ||
Now, since the war in Ukraine began in late February, the rate of inflation has risen incrementally, another 1.6%, to a current level of 8.6%. | ||
So again, from 7% to 8.6%. | ||
Given how inflation has escalated over the past 18 months, would you say that the war in Ukraine is the primary driver of inflation in America? | ||
No, inflation was high before, certainly before the war in Ukraine broke out. | ||
I'm glad to hear you say that. | ||
The Biden administration seems to be intent on deflecting blame and as recently as just this past Sunday spread the misinformation that Putin's invasion of Ukraine is the quote biggest single driver of inflation. | ||
I'm glad you agree with me that that is not the truth. | ||
You know, I'm just going to say this, and if I get binged for it, I don't care. | ||
There is a great deal of Americans where it is uncomfortable that they're spending more, but they are not going to go under. | ||
You know, you got to stop complaining when there's so many people who literally the inflation rate means they may only have two meals instead of three. | ||
There are Americans who did extremely well in the last two years in the market. | ||
You still have your job. | ||
And yeah, it's costing you more for gas, but guess what? | ||
You're still going to take that holiday, that Fourth of July vacation. | ||
You can still eat out. | ||
So I'm going to need you to calm down and back off, because it feeds into this fear, and then this fear feeds into people making decisions that creates the very thing that they're fearful of. | ||
I don't know if that's the pitch. | ||
I don't know if that's the pitch they want to make. | ||
Here's the beauty. | ||
I actually want them to have the hearings in prime time. | ||
I want the American people to say, and I want the networks to put it up there. | ||
Because I want to see what they're focused on, what MSNBC and CNN, they're all lathered up, they've got this, they've got that, they've got the phony electorate, they've got this, they've got this other thing. | ||
I want to see, and then I want to have her make the pitch afterwards that you've got to quit bellyaching because you've got to skip a meal, right? | ||
Or the price of gasoline is up five-fold, it's a brutal unfair tax, but you're still going to try to drive to the beach on Fourth of July, so shut up and enjoy it. | ||
And then Boris Epstein, pal, he just blew up Biden and the White House's total narrative. | ||
It's the Putin price hike. | ||
It's the Putin price hike. | ||
And I think it was Josh Hawley walks him right through it. | ||
Of course, he says, no, you're right. | ||
Putin had nothing to do with it. | ||
Boris Epstein. | ||
Sorry, not sorry, Joe Biden. | ||
You know, because, let's be honest, Biden and his team have been throwing Powell under the bus so much, so now Powell's like, hey, it's my moment, so I'm gonna go and boo! | ||
He literally tees up. | ||
And by the way, when either Rafferty or Hawley, when they say, Yeah, Hagerty or Hawley, when they say, yeah, I don't, you know, this is wrong, notice Powell doesn't disagree. | ||
He's like, no, no, no, no, no, let me jump in and defend Biden. | ||
No, he's like, yeah, you know, Russia and Ukraine have nothing to do with inflation. | ||
They have nothing to do with gas prices. | ||
And yes, MSNBC, please, more Dino Badala, OK, more of that lady. | ||
By the way, I didn't see the screen. | ||
Was that Haggard? | ||
He's a smart guy. | ||
He's a former McKinsey, Booz Allen, McKinsey partner. | ||
I think it was Haggard. | ||
Yeah, because he hammered him. | ||
Here's the thing. | ||
They don't have a policy. | ||
You know, Biden has been depending on the Fed just to do all the heavy lifting and inflation. | ||
As we know, the tools they have are such blunt force instruments. | ||
Of course. | ||
It's actually got to have both the fiscal side, we talked about that this morning, and the monetary side. | ||
They can handle the monetary side, but as long as you got the fiscal side and all they're doing up here is talking about spending, spending, spending, you're still gonna be throwing gasoline onto the fire. | ||
So this inflation is not going anywhere but up anywhere in the near term. | ||
You're looking at stagflation, Steve, because as you rise interest rates, right, and you've got inflation at the same time, you're gonna have the worst economic soup you could really imagine. | ||
We are staring at an economic disaster, and why do you think, you know, MSNBC and the now officially failed J6 hearings, since they had to cancel their meet, right? | ||
Why do you think they're trying for this misdirection play, which is not working, right? | ||
Because they are, even Democrats, and they're not awful bright, but even Democrats, and you know, some of the old school Democrats, definitely the Mark Pence, the Doug Jones, they realize That they're staring into a political abyss that is not, that is not a cycle or two cycles. | ||
That is the end of the Democrat Party. | ||
Which is exactly what we can achieve as long as we are running on the MAGA issues and we're running MAGA candidates. | ||
Okay, okay. | ||
Hang on, how are we going to do that? | ||
Hang on, how are we going to do that? | ||
When you've got these collaborationists up there that are getting involved in the gun rights situation. | ||
Everybody's all pumped up, everybody's working. | ||
President Trump lit them up today. | ||
I think you've got that memorized. | ||
Tell us what President Trump said on Truth Social about this, Boris, and then expound upon the numbers 202-224-3121. | ||
I need you to call now, that's the Senate switchboard, and let them know what you're thinking. | ||
Boris, how could McConnell bail out the Biden administration again? | ||
Here's what President Trump said. | ||
The deal on gun control, in quotes, currently being structured and pushed to the Senate by the Radical Left Democrats with the help of Mitch McConnell, RINO Senator John Cornyn of Texas, and others, will go down in history as the first step in the movement to take your guns away. | ||
Republicans, be careful what you wish for! | ||
Exclamation, exclamation, exclamation. | ||
President Trump is calling it like he sees it. | ||
Right? | ||
He's on social media. | ||
He's connected with the American public through truth. | ||
He's authentic and he's direct. | ||
And what he's saying is the Republicans are making a huge mistake. | ||
And again, just like on infrastructure, right? | ||
Just like on opening up the government. | ||
You've got the senators up there, they have no idea what they're doing. | ||
And Cornyn turns to Padilla, the Democrat from California, and goes, oh yeah, immigration's next. | ||
What? | ||
What? | ||
This is John Cornyn of Texas? | ||
No wonder he got booed off the stage, you know, at the Texas GOP. | ||
The same Texas GOP that voted to declare the 2020 election illegitimate. | ||
We have a choice, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
We have a choice. | ||
Do we deal with these establishment swamp creatures who are just Democrats? | ||
Honestly, they're not even rhinos anymore. | ||
Once you start voting for nonsense like that. | ||
And by the way, way too many Republicans voted for $40 billion to the Ukraine. | ||
unidentified
|
We need to be vigilant. | |
We need to be consistent. | ||
And we've got to offer a choice and an option to the American people of strength, of opportunity, and of America first. | ||
That's what President Trump stood and stands for. | ||
That's how he won in 16. | ||
Yes, that's how he won in 20. | ||
And as I hope, and we all expect, that's how he will win in 2024. | ||
Because we are the movement. | ||
We are the movement of America first. | ||
That is not a slogan. | ||
It is an action call. | ||
Action, action, action. | ||
And that action can be, oh yeah, let's go hang out with Crying Chuck Schumer and Padilla and Coons and all these guys. | ||
You know, Chris Coons from Delaware. | ||
All these people. | ||
Let's just be nice to Joe Biden, even though he literally can't stand up on a bike. | ||
Okay? | ||
Biden felt like a sack of potatoes over the weekend. | ||
And no, it is not funny. | ||
And yes, it is tragic. | ||
Because that is what our country has become. | ||
We cannot be bailing them out. | ||
Shame on Mitch McConnell. | ||
Shame on Republicans in the Senate voting for this. | ||
And you know what? | ||
unidentified
|
I'll say right now, good for Kevin McCarthy for coming out and saying no. | |
Dead on arrival, no House Republicans are going to go for this. | ||
Because that's what we need. | ||
We need strength and unity. | ||
Because I think that the Democrats are going to have trouble getting this through the House. | ||
Any Democrat who is Spanberg or others, or who hopes to survive into the next Congress, hopes to continue to be elected, can't vote for this unless they're in AOC's district. | ||
So, this is where we separate. | ||
No, but this is where the issue is. | ||
McConnell and these guys are telling us they're pushing this because they've got to get the suburban mom. | ||
The suburban mom's with us on the schools, on the mask, on the vaccines, on everything. | ||
It's Spanberger's district. | ||
It's Virginia 7 they're talking about. | ||
That's what they think they're going to win in this. | ||
This is what's the insanity of it for us. | ||
The same 2000, the same 2004, you know, we talked about this the other day, right? | ||
The Karl Rove, oh yeah, the soccer moms, and that's what we've got to be dealing with. | ||
That's nonsense. | ||
This country is on fire, okay? | ||
There is no more undecideds. | ||
If you're voting, you're decided, okay? | ||
And it's all about making sure that we've got more decided than they've got. | ||
Making sure that our people come out to vote and their people maybe aren't feeling so good about themselves. | ||
That's what it's all about. | ||
And that's why we cannot be depressing our own base by passing nonsense like this. | ||
It is completely and utterly and totally unacceptable. | ||
And what's next? | ||
I'm hearing some rumblings that they're going to lift tariffs on China? | ||
Whatever is going on in the Senate, by the collaborations as you call them, is an absolute and total betrayal of the Republican base, of the Republican electorate. | ||
And that is why it's vital for us to be electing according to the Greitens rule, right? | ||
New leadership in the Senate starting in January of 2023 for Republicans. | ||
When I do think we're going to take the majority, but we've got to use the majority in the right way. | ||
Boris, what is your social media? | ||
How do people get to you? | ||
How do people follow you? | ||
How do they get this morning newsletter? | ||
We're coming in hot today, Steve. | ||
We're coming in hot. | ||
I'm getting texts right now. | ||
BorisCP.com is the website right now. | ||
Very hot. | ||
Hot on BorisCP.com. | ||
Hot on Getter at BorisCP. | ||
On Twitter at BorisCP. | ||
Hot on Truth Social at Boris. | ||
And of course, hottest on the gram, Boris underscore Epstein. | ||
Stay strong, God bless, and I'll see you tomorrow. | ||
Thank you very much, Boris Epstein. | ||
Okay, the number is 202-224-3121. | ||
Make sure you call. | ||
In fact, if you want to add an extra call, call Cornyn's office and say, hey, back off. | ||
This is absolutely absurd. | ||
They're going to try to vote on this tomorrow. | ||
Tomorrow morning on the show, we're going to put our shoulder to the wheel on all of this and identify those collaborators. | ||
We have Kelly Chebaka on who kicked off the show this morning. | ||
Tell you about what they thought in Alaska. | ||
By the way, the show that's going to follow us, we're going to have, there's a new thing, FDA next week votes on something called the Future Framework. | ||
You're going to have to hear this. | ||
We've got Toby Rogers from Brownstone Institute and Naomi Wolf on. | ||
We're also going to have Cat Comack. | ||
This is this fire-breathing young House member, a female from Florida, has been down at the border a number of times, got great, amazing footage of her, and she's going to tell us about this invasion on the southern border. | ||
By the way, you guys are getting a little blowback about people that played high school sports. | ||
Some of these people that are pushing the transgender thing about men playing in women's sports. | ||
They don't want to hear you guys whining about your high school experience. | ||
Who was that, ma'am? | ||
It was Megan Rapinoe. | ||
The female soccer player who's now, you know, retired. | ||
However, she said, I'm sorry, your kids' high school volleyball team just isn't that important. | ||
And she also stated that she doesn't believe that transgender women are taking scholarships away from biological females, that they're not dominating in female sports, and that they're not winning all the titles. | ||
And that will actually be proven wrong. | ||
Tomorrow at this rally, Our Bodies, Our Sports in D.C. | ||
It's at Freedom Plaza. | ||
It starts at 11. | ||
It goes from 11 to 1.30. | ||
And there's roughly about 40 speakers. | ||
And I'm honored to be one of those speakers. | ||
And I will be speaking around 1.07 tomorrow. | ||
Betting, close to betting cleanup. | ||
That's going to be intense. | ||
It starts at what time? | ||
11 o'clock. | ||
We're going to try to live stream it up on our Getter account. | ||
You'll be down there. | ||
We'll hopefully get some commentary from you first thing in the morning. | ||
Captain, hang on. | ||
We're going to take a short break. | ||
I've got Joe Allen, Captain Bannon, a lot to go through. | ||
Next hour, it's going to be more intensity. | ||
Invasion on the southern border with Congressman Kat Kamek. | ||
We're going to go out to Colorado. | ||
Heidi Ganolf. | ||
They're trying to mess with her out there in this governor's primary. | ||
A real powerhouse, particularly about school choice, helping minorities to make sure that the schools they go to are as good as anybody else's. | ||
A real firestorm out in Colorado. | ||
Also, this future framework of the FDA, you will be absolutely stunned. | ||
That's all in the next hour. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Captain Maureen Bannon and Joe Allen join me next. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay, MyPella.com. | |
Remember, Walmart has canceled Mike Lindell. | ||
So the way he gets sales is through shows like ours. | ||
Make sure you go to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
Type that in. | ||
You'll come to our square. | ||
The pillows that were rejected, the biggest profit center they had, the pillows they rejected, $19.88. | ||
Walmart threw him out. | ||
Kicked Mike Lindell out, all of his products. | ||
You can get the pillow today, $19.88, plus you get everything else. | ||
You got slippers, You've got to buy one, get one, free sales, all of it. | ||
You've got to go check it out. | ||
MyPillow.com, promo code WARREN. | ||
Do it today, have Mike Lindell's back. | ||
We're going to have Mike on in the next couple of days to talk about this, getting the machines out of these lawsuits he's got in Arizona and other places. | ||
Breaking News just came across. | ||
We're going to have Andrew Giuliani on tomorrow morning on the show. | ||
Breaking News, new poll out from SurveyUSA. | ||
Has it, and this is before, this poll was taken before this debate last night where Andrew Giuliani just dominated Lee Zeldin. | ||
It's a dead heat. | ||
25% for Zeldin, 3% for Andrew Giuliani. | ||
It's before last night's poll. | ||
Last night's poll was taken before the debate last night. | ||
So we're going to have Andrew on tomorrow morning. | ||
He has closed this thing like crazy and is really putting on an epic performance. | ||
We've got a cold open with Joe Allen. | ||
Let me play this and I'll bring in Joe about his new piece. | ||
Let's go ahead and play it. | ||
One of these things is putting implants in your body, implants in your brain, implants in your arms, as I have in my hand, and doing all sorts of things. | ||
We call this biohacking, where you actually put all sorts of stuff in yourself to monitor what's going on and also to help you do things that you wouldn't be able to do, like hear or see. | ||
So, the idea of brain plants is really complex. | ||
I was doing an interview earlier and they were asking about the future of work. | ||
And you know, where I'm from, Silicon Valley in Los Angeles, California area, there's a couple different companies now like Neuralink with Elon Musk that are working on basically brain implants in order to allow your brain to interface directly with machine intelligence. | ||
Now, why is this important? | ||
Well, machine intelligence is important because, you know, already like in Wall Street, for example, there's a bunch of mid-level traders that are being wiped off the floors. | ||
And the reason is, is because they can't compete with algorithms. | ||
So what a lot of kind of entrepreneurs want to do is in order to have humans keep up with machines, they want to merge our brains with machines so that we can start thinking in real time in the internet. | ||
So the thing you have in your pocket, cell phone, smartphone, basically can be put in through your head through an implant or a headset. | ||
You know, Elon Musk says there'll be a commercial device in five years. | ||
I don't know if that's the case, but definitely within 10 years, there's a good chance that there will be a commercial device on the market that will allow you to talk to your friend or give a speech in real time like I'm doing now, where people would actually hear it and listen and maybe answer back and you would hear it in your head. | ||
So, the question, are we going to get brain implants? | ||
It's almost 100% yes. | ||
Almost 100% yes. | ||
Brain implants and neurologic Elon Musk company. | ||
We told you, don't laugh this off. | ||
It's coming and it's a lot sooner than 10 years. | ||
Joe Allen. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, Steve, that was Zoltan Istvan, who we covered yesterday. | |
He was the transhumanist party presidential candidate in 2016. | ||
I think you had mentioned he got roughly three votes. | ||
That may have been a bit charitable. | ||
But at any rate, I should tell you in the audience now... Oh, but hold it, but hang on, hang on, but I didn't say it in a... I said, hey, people take these marginal parties and a marginal thing like, look, the populist nationalism, we first started 10 years ago or longer, you know, at the Tea Party, people laughed at us. | ||
I'd said, hey, he might have gotten three votes, but don't laugh at it. | ||
What this guy's talking about is dead serious. | ||
He's one of the leaders of saying we've got to go faster. | ||
We have to get to the Singularity quicker. | ||
We have to do this more rapidly. | ||
Joe Allen. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, absolutely. | |
So, but he is coming on the show. | ||
We haven't scheduled him yet. | ||
He just accepted the invitation, so we can hear directly from him why he thinks that a transhumanist war is coming, in which those humans who have been uploaded and merged with a god-like AI will be at war with the rest of us legacy humans within the next 50 years, and how he came to that conclusion, and perhaps he can hear from us as to why we oppose That viewpoint along with pretty much everything else that he stands for. | ||
Well, it'll be a conversation. | ||
It'd be nice enough to come on. | ||
We want to make sure that people, and people have to hear the other side. | ||
This is going to, I'd rather have it out there and start having a, what I keep arguing about, you have to have a policy debate and about where the dollars for your pension funds are going and where the dollars of your tax dollars are going to get, kind of, understand what exactly you're financing. | ||
That's going to be the end of the human race. | ||
It's going to be human race plus. | ||
Right now, nobody talks about it. | ||
It's all kind of in disparate pockets. | ||
To have him come on and explain his theory of the case, I think would go a long way just to make people think about this. | ||
There could be some people in our audience who agree with him. | ||
I hope not. | ||
There are a few. | ||
But we want to make sure you know this from your account. | ||
Now, you've got a big piece. | ||
I know you've been a little under the weather. | ||
You've got you've got a it's too much fresh air out there where you are. | ||
I that's what we got to get you back here to the corrupt capital so that we can we can put you to work and get you in harness better. | ||
What when is this piece coming up? | ||
Because I have to have you on here when that comes up and people have had a chance to read it so that we can walk through it. | ||
unidentified
|
First thing in the morning. | |
Yeah, I've been a little bit under the weather, as you say, but I think I'm back to my old self, for the most part, and should be polished up and up in the morning. | ||
So, the title is Zoltan Istvan Wants the Ultimate Race War, Legacy Humans vs. the Cyborg Swarm. | ||
And he's serious about this. | ||
I mean, he's not saying it tongue-in-cheek. | ||
People say, well, that's crazy. | ||
It'll never happen. | ||
If we go down this path, something like this is inevitable. | ||
It's just inevitable. | ||
And that's why people go, well, hold it. | ||
We've got to get to the machines here. | ||
We've got so much going on. | ||
Yes, we have so many problems, but we're organizing people to take those problems on. | ||
But this one you can't lose track of because this must be maybe the biggest problem we have. | ||
Joe Allen, how do people get to you on your social media? | ||
People are following you on Getter 24-7. | ||
How do they do that? | ||
unidentified
|
You can find me at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z or my website joebot.xyz and of course warroom.org, the Transhumanism tab. | |
Joe, thank you very much. | ||
I hope you feel better. | ||
I look forward to getting the piece up and getting you on here tomorrow to talk about it. | ||
Captain Banner, what's your social media one more time? | ||
You can find me on Getter and Twitter at Maureen underscore Bannon and also on Instagram at Real Maureen Bannon. | ||
Hey, if you started posting more on Getter, you'd have more followers. | ||
I'm just tossing that out there. | ||
As somebody that's like killing it on followers because I post so much. | ||
And it comes in a little hot. | ||
I'll work on posting as much as you do. | ||
Okay, kids. | ||
Hang around. | ||
We got a power pack next hour. | ||
Captain Bannon is going to co-host with me. | ||
Cat Kamik, the congressman, she's on fire on the border. | ||
Also, we're going to have this thing about the new framework and FDA is going to shock you. |