April 19, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:45
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Jen, happy Monday. | |
| Two-minute subject areas. | ||
| First, a federal judge in Florida says the CDC exceeded its authority with the mask mandate in airports. | ||
| What's the White House position? | ||
| The CDC recommended continuing the order for additional time, two weeks, to be able to assess the latest science in keeping with its responsibility to protect the American people. | ||
| So this is obviously a disappointing decision. | ||
| The CDC continues recommending wearing a mask in public transit. | ||
| As you know, this just came out this afternoon. | ||
| So right now, the Department of Homeland Security, who would be implementing, and the CDC are reviewing the decision. | ||
| And, of course, the Department of Justice would make any determinations about litigation. | ||
| Okay, welcome. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| It's East of Monday, 18 April, Year of Our Lord 2022. | ||
| Let's go to Mike Davis, Article 3. | ||
| Mike, tell us about this ruling today, and particularly about Judge Catherine Kimball Mizell, who made this ruling, a federal judge down in Florida. | ||
| Yeah, this is a very, very powerful ruling, and it is a major setback. | ||
| To COVIDians, to people who think the administrative state has all these powers, legislative, executive powers, judicial powers, all wrapped up into one. | ||
| The people who don't understand that there are separation of powers in our Constitution. | ||
| Congress writes the laws, the executive branch executes the laws, and the judiciary interprets these laws. | ||
| And so what Judge Mizell has done here is she has vacated the CDC's mask mandate for travel. | ||
| Judge Mizell has declared that not only does the CDC lack the authority To issue this mandate, even if it did have this authority, the CDC didn't follow the Administrative Procedures Act. | ||
| So it violated the law in two ways, both that it didn't have the legal authority to do it under the statute, and then even if it did, it violated the APA, a separate statute. | ||
| So it's a, it is a huge setback for the Biden administration. | ||
| So you could tell Jen Psaki was not even ready to take the To take the incoming on that what's what's the walk me through again the implication for this about the administrative state and actually our freedom because this thing's been so confusing going forward and what's the what's the CD saying what did the judge actually say and why did you say it's such a big setback for the administrative state? | ||
| So what the what the CDC is relying on is a statute That says the CDC can essentially keep out from the United States people who are going to infect us with contagious infectious diseases. | ||
| The problem is that the statute does not give the CDC the power to require travelers to wear masks for indefinite periods of time. | ||
| We've had to wear these masks now for nearly two years. | ||
| We know that cloth masks don't stop the spread of COVID. | ||
| The masks that work are the N95 masks, and we know that if you're scared of COVID, you wear your own N95 mask. | ||
| And it is very unlikely that you're going to get COVID from someone else, even if they're infected, right? | ||
| And so this is just the federal government's overstepping its power. | ||
| We have specific and enumerated powers granted to the federal government under our U.S. | ||
| Constitution, and those powers are divided. | ||
| They're divided among the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. | ||
| And starting You know, too many decades ago, we have what's called this administrative state, the CDC, the FDA, all these three-letter agencies, and we think that we can just give them all this power, and then they get to decide what's best for us. | ||
| Tony Fauci, the CDC director, and they get to make all the rules for us, and we just have to abide by those rules. | ||
| We just have to defer to these administrative agencies. | ||
| And what Judge Mizell has said here is, no, that's not right. | ||
| These administrative agencies, like the CDC, only get to act When they have specific grants of power by Congress, right? | ||
| And Congress never granted the CDC this power to issue mask mandates for travelers. | ||
| And so what she held then was because the CDC did not have this power to issue this rule, the rule is null and void. | ||
| And then she also held that even if Congress gave the CDC this power to issue these mask mandates. | ||
| You still have to follow the Administrative Procedures Act. | ||
| You still need to follow through with fair notice and comment from the American people to make sure that their rule is appropriate, and the CDC never did that. | ||
| So they lost on two grounds, and this is a major setback for the administrative state. | ||
| And I presume that the 11th Circuit would uphold this, and probably even the Supreme Court. | ||
| Okay, as you know, we're the center of deconstructing the administrative state. | ||
| This is the great plague we have in this country. | ||
| It's not the bureaucracy. | ||
| It's not the people of the executive branch. | ||
| This is something far more sinister. | ||
| Some people call it the deep state. | ||
| It's not a deep state. | ||
| It's up in your grill. | ||
| I want to go back in time. | ||
| Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. | ||
| The reason that they are selected on the court by President Trump is that they are very focused on the deconstruction of the administrative state. | ||
| Because the administrative state, you said, we granted them these powers. | ||
| We actually didn't grant them these powers. | ||
| The administrative state, I want to take a second to explain to people, this is like a fourth branch of government. | ||
| That's now become all-encompassing. | ||
| It's bigger than the legislature. | ||
| It's really bigger than the executive branch. | ||
| Right now, part of it's the embedded bureaucracy of the executive branch, but it's even bigger with these alphabet agencies. | ||
| It's something that the founders, the framers, never had in mind, and even people back in the 40s, 50s, and 60s never, ever envisioned. | ||
| This thing would get as powerful it is. | ||
| It's really the progressives thought about this as making something that is impervious to elections and election cycles. | ||
| This is why the biggest battle that Donald Trump had in his administration was not with the Chinese Communist Party, as big as that was, not with the mullahs in Iran, as big as that was, right? | ||
| Not with Putin, putting Putin in his place, right? | ||
| As big as that was. | ||
| His biggest fights were against the administrative state. | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I clerked for Justice Gorsuch, both on the 10th Circuit And on this Supreme Court, I was the staff leader in the Senate for Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation. | ||
| Trump did an amazing job of transforming the federal judiciary, including the five to four John Roberts courts of the five to four Clarence Thomas Court. | ||
| And for the first time in 90 years, you're starting to see constitutionalist majorities across the federal circuit courts of appeals. | ||
| How this works is these cases start at the district court level and more than 99% of federal appeals Land at the federal circuit courts, the courts of appeals, and only the Supreme Court only takes about 100 cases a year, less than 100 cases a year for discretionary review. | ||
| So these lower court vacancies that President Trump filled with judges like Judge Mizell down in Tampa, Florida are critically important, and they know that their job is to follow the law, and it is to follow the Constitution first and foremost, We, the people, lend the federal government very limited and specific enumerated powers in exchange for the federal government's promise to protect our rights and our liberties. | ||
| Somehow, with the administrative state, these administrative agencies have assumed for themselves all powers, and then they've assumed for themselves all the powers that were supposed to be divided among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. | ||
| We've truly created a monster with the administrative state. | ||
| It is the very definition of tyranny, and there are judges like Judge Mizell today who have come out with courageous rulings. | ||
| She's taken a lot of heat from the media and from the left. | ||
| Fortunately, she has lifetime tenure, she has pay protection, and most importantly, she has a backbone, and so she's going to rule what the law requires and not what Tony Fauci and the Covidians are demanding. | ||
| This is what's important. | ||
| And wasn't she criticized or they criticized her age during the process of when she was appointed and her confirmation? | ||
| Didn't they give a lot of grief about how young she was? | ||
| Yeah, so the American Bar Association, which is a liberal partisan group, rated her not qualified to serve because she had not been a lawyer for 12 years. | ||
| She had been a lawyer for eight years. | ||
| And during those eight years, she was a law clerk for a judge on the court on which she now serves. | ||
| She was a law clerk for Judge Pryor on the 11th Circuit, which is the appellate court that oversees the court on which she now serves. | ||
| She was a law clerk for Judge Katz's on the DC Circuit, which is the second highest court in the land, and it's responsible for overseeing the administrative state. And then she was a law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court of the United States, the court that oversees all other courts. She is clearly qualified Democrats pretend like they care about diversity. | ||
| Here we have this young, brilliant woman with these elite, stellar credentials, and Democrats, including their, you know, their partisan hacks at the American Bar Association, say that she's somehow not qualified to serve because she didn't hit a magic number of 12 years of legal service. | ||
| She's clearly smart. | ||
| Look at her opinions. | ||
| Look at her record. | ||
| Let's go back about walking through the appeals process into the Supreme Court. | ||
| Why is this such a important decision? | ||
| And the way she wrote it was important. | ||
| What's the path for this decision now? | ||
| Because clearly the the Biden administration, the illegitimate Biden regime is going to tell Merrick Garland. | ||
| To go fight this tooth and nail, right? | ||
| They can't... First off, they're defenders of the administrative state, even of the topic which is so close to their hearts, right? | ||
| The ability of the administrative state just to deem mandates. | ||
| But anything to do with the administrative state is close to their hearts. | ||
| So they will fight this tooth and nail, do you believe, Mike Davis? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, this goes to the very heart of the left. | ||
| I mean, they know they can't win elections on the fact that they're Marxist, right? | ||
| That doesn't sell. | ||
| And so they have to get these actors in the administrative state to do their bidding for them. | ||
| The Tony Fauci's of the world, the unelected CDC director, the unelected FDA director. | ||
| And look what they're doing with this COVID madness. | ||
| They're saying that people We have to defer to Tony Fauci and the people at the CDC for all of our decisions, whether we can go to school, whether we can go to church, whether we can associate with our neighbors, whether we can travel. | ||
| Every aspect of our life is controlled by arbitrary and capricious decisions by Tony Fauci and the CDC, science-free. | ||
| decisions oftentimes. And what Judge Mizell has said here is, is look, if you want a mask mandate on airplanes, if you want a mask mandate on trains, if you want to continue this, this Covidian madness, this science-free Covidian madness, go to Congress and get it passed. | ||
| Get it passed through the House. | ||
| Get 60 votes in the Senate. | ||
| Present it to the President. | ||
| Get it signed into the law. | ||
| These COVID mandates are so popular, then COVIDians shouldn't have a problem getting it passed through Congress and enacted into law through the democratic process. | ||
| They know they can't do that because they know these mandates are madness and so they go to the deep state. | ||
| They go to the administrative state to do their bidding for. | ||
| Won't they try to go to, the process for people to pay attention to, won't they try to go to get this, some injunction against this immediately while they're trying to go to an appellate court? | ||
| Well, what they'll try to, so this is at the middle, or this is in the, this is in the federal court in Tampa, Florida. | ||
| So they'll try to go to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, a three-judge panel there. | ||
| Fortunately, there, of all the federal circuits around the country, the regional courts of appeals around the country, There are 12 of these circuits, and President Trump was able to flip three of these, the 2nd, 3rd, and 11th, 11th being where Florida sits, from majority Democrat-appointed judges to majority Republican-appointed judges. | ||
| And that means it's much more likely that these judges are going to follow the law instead of the politics, and they're going to uphold what Judge Mizell has done here. | ||
| So we can go up to the three-judge panel on the 11th circuit, Depending on what panel you draw, it could come out one way or the other. | ||
| It could then go en banc on the 11th Circuit, which means all the sitting active judges on the 11th Circuit would decide. | ||
| And or it could go to the Supreme Court for a decision on the Supreme Court. | ||
| I hope judges understand by now. | ||
| I hope they're getting the joke on this COVID madness that it's oftentimes politics instead of science. | ||
| And the harm, the cure is so much worse than the disease with many of these COVID measures. | ||
| And we have vaccines now. | ||
| We have public awareness. | ||
| If people are still scared of COVID, they should stay home. | ||
| They should wear a mask. | ||
| Maybe they should wrap themselves in plastic bubble and stay home because we put up with our liberties, with our treasure, with our lives being destroyed for two years. | ||
| And I think the American people have had enough of this. | ||
| Is this, because it's with airlines and transportation, does this have a broader reading for schools? | ||
| Because Philadelphia has put an indoor mandate for masks, you've got the school systems, I think in New York still want the five-year-old kids to have the masks. | ||
| Will this have broader interpretation or is this limited right now to the transportation area? | ||
| Well, it's a big blow right now to the CDC's power, and the CDC has so much sway over all of these other areas, right? | ||
| These schools, these state and local governments, they point to the CDC and say, well, this is the expert recommendation. | ||
| We have to do it, right? | ||
| We have to do this because the experts at the CDC are doing it, which is nonsense. | ||
| The CDC, they'll cherry pick the science. | ||
| They'll ignore the science. | ||
| They'll ignore their expert panels. | ||
| They're going to get to the result that they want, and they've, you know, throughout this COVID process, we've really seen that the federal scientific agencies that are supposed to be looking out for our best interest are oftentimes politicized. | ||
| We saw this with the CDC colluding with Randy Weingartner, the head of the teachers union, to keep schools closed longer than they needed to be, which caused a heck of a lot more harm to kids, particularly poor minority kids, than COVID ever would have, right? | ||
| So, you know, What I think is important here is now these federal agencies are on notice that these federal judges are no longer going to put up with this lawlessness. | ||
| Mike, can you hang on? | ||
| Mike from Article 3. | ||
| Mike Davis from Article 3. | ||
| We got Matt Buckman in from the American Accountability Foundation. | ||
| Jane Timpkin. | ||
| Vernon Jones. | ||
| It's packed. | ||
| Be back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the CTD! | ||
| War Room Wario! | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Remember to go to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| You've got the sheets, Giza Dream Sheets, up to 60% off, as low as $39.99. | ||
| Of course, the pillow is as low as $19.99, but That's just the start of the Spring Sale. | ||
| Go there. | ||
| We have literally hundreds of items on sale. | ||
| Just go to our Square. | ||
| MyPillow.com, promo code WORM. | ||
| We're going to have more specifics on individual items that they're going to put on one-time only sales starting tomorrow. | ||
| We're going to get back to you. | ||
| But MyPillow.com, promo code WORM. | ||
| Sheets, pillows, all of it. | ||
| Remember, you've got to get a great night's sleep to man the ramparts. | ||
| and we're manning the ramparts for the next, what, 200 plus days? | ||
| Or 200 days until November 8th and then beyond. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Speaking of November 8th, that is the general election here, where we destroy the Democratic Party at the ballot box, root and branch, to make sure we destroy it as a national political institution. | ||
| All the way from the school boards all the way up. | ||
| There's three articles or four articles. | ||
| The Guardian's got a huge article. | ||
| There are two articles in Politico and an article on The Hill. | ||
| Four articles within a couple of hours of each other about the effort of the Trump movement to put its shoulder to the wheel to make sure that we elect people on these election boards. | ||
| That we have just not poll workers. | ||
| We actually have people in the election boards themselves. | ||
| That is called Democracy with a capital D. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And so the left is in complete meltdown in the talking. | ||
| They've already raised $80 million to try to thwart that, the Democratic Party, and there's all kinds of other stories out there. | ||
| It shows you how we've put the fear of God in them about what's to happen. | ||
| And when they say $80 million, I say bring it. | ||
| You can put all the money in the world up there. | ||
| People understand what you're doing. | ||
| We understand your playbook and the righteous indignation of the American people. | ||
| That's why people are volunteering. | ||
| To go to go run for these election boards. | ||
| Jim Marchant, who's running for Secretary of State out in Nevada, and is actually organizing all this group of Secretary of State. | ||
| I think he's got 20 now that are running and kind of on the same platform, obviously tailored to their individual states. | ||
| He's going to be able to talk about everything about the election boards, whatever, because we know we've triggered the left four articles. | ||
| In major publications in a couple hours to go through this. | ||
| Okay, I want to go to Jane. | ||
| Jane, big news on Good Friday was the endorsement of President Trump of J.D. | ||
| Vance in this highly competitive race in the state of Ohio. | ||
| in Ohio is really not just MAGA country, but kind of been the leader in MAGA country, given President Trump's success there in 16 and in 20. | ||
| Today trending, we had J.D. | ||
| on this morning, gave him an opportunity to talk. | ||
| There's obviously a lot of people that are very hardcore Trump movement that are not there yet. | ||
| Give him every opportunity to kind of walk through why the endorsement took place and why people should consider him and his candidacy. | ||
| There has been, I think people have been telling me, trending on social media still some of the stuff that J.D. | ||
| has said in the past about the president back in 16 and 15 and other times. | ||
| So where do you stand right now in this race? | ||
| Are you going to drop out? | ||
| Are you going to drop out and endorse J.D. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Vance? | |
| Are you going to go along with President Trump's endorsement and also endorse J.D. | ||
| Vance, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I am not. | |
| I'm not quitting. | ||
| I'm in this race to win. | ||
| Look, President Trump's endorsement of J.D. | ||
| Vance was disappointing, but it doesn't change the fact that he supported me to become chair of the Republican Party. | ||
| I took on the Kasich establishment and I turned Ohio into the Trump Conservative stronghold that it is today. | ||
| I'm the one that was in the trenches fighting for the America First agenda and fighting for President Trump delivered Ohio by eight and a half points. | ||
| While JD Vance was in Silicon Valley and he was saying he was going to hold his nose and vote for Hillary Clinton. | ||
| The most important thing, though, is that JD Vance was calling Ohio Trump supporters racist. | ||
| Uneducated and all sorts of terrible things. | ||
| And now he's going out and asking for those same voters to support him. | ||
| It has riled up the base. | ||
| They are not happy. | ||
| My voters are sticking with me. | ||
| We are going to be out campaigning every single day. | ||
| We've announced about 35 events in the next two weeks. | ||
| That's how you win these races. | ||
| And, you know, J.D. | ||
| Vance likes to spend a lot of time outside of Ohio. | ||
| My race is being fueled by Ohioans, and I'm going to win this race. | ||
| We have the best ground game. | ||
| We have the most Ohio donor support. | ||
| And look, this is all about who can beat Tim Ryan and take back the Senate. | ||
| And I know how to defeat Democrats because I have a history of doing it. | ||
| And talk about election integrity. | ||
| I'm the one that was working with the Trump campaign to make sure we had poll observers and attorneys and a whole war room on election day to make sure the Democrats couldn't get up to any shenanigans in Ohio. | ||
| And look at the results. | ||
| Donald Trump won Ohio by more than eight points. | ||
| And if people are looking at this race, it's who do you trust? | ||
| And when they see what J.D. | ||
| Vance has said about Donald Trump, I guess it's trending on Twitter that he called Donald Trump America's Hitler back in 2016. | ||
| People are not going to get over that. | ||
| And they do not trust... When you say get over it, do you think that if somebody says something like that, that over a period of time, particularly if he says, hey, I see the error in my ways and now... | ||
| I understand that Trump was serious about the MAGA policies you want to put in. | ||
| Is that not enough for forgiveness or for looking the other way or do you just think that cuts to the core of character and it's it's just not you're just not gonna be able to be dependent upon once you're in the Senate if you actually said the stuff before? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well the question is how is he going to govern? | |
| Is he going to be sort of in the position of Mitt Romney where he was in 2016 or is he going to be With Donald Trump supporters. | ||
| And I got to tell you, Ohioans remember what JD Vance said. | ||
| And I know when I put 150,000 miles on my car, traveling Ohio, sticking my neck out for Donald Trump, recruiting volunteers, making sure we had to get out the vote, championing those America First policies that were working for Ohio families when we had record low unemployment, a booming economy. | ||
| We had peace through strength. | ||
| All of those things I've been fighting for. | ||
| J.D. | ||
| Vance was nowhere to be found and Ohio voters know it. | ||
| Let's talk about one of the issues about you and we said Trump supported you for the Republican Party chair. The Republican Party of Ohio not the national RNC but the Republican Party of Ohio? | ||
| Correct yes Ohio GOP. Okay fine. You're endorsed by Rob Portman. | ||
| I would say that there's probably not a lot of senators that are worse as far as MAGA goes as Rob Portman. | ||
| He's been probably your biggest endorsement. | ||
| So get the audience also comfortable with that. | ||
| If you're the MAGA candidate, you're the one that's going to defend the MAGA policies, you're going to beat Ryan, but more importantly, go to the Senate and fight every day as you know you have to in Mitch McConnell land. | ||
| How does Portman endorse somebody that's MAGA? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, well, he knows who I am. | |
| He knows that I am MAGA. | ||
| He knows that I was a strong supporter and am a strong supporter of President Trump. | ||
| Look, Rob Portman has said, he took a look at the field and he said, who's the best person to keep my seat? | ||
| Who's the best person who will lead for Ohio and the best representative for Ohio in the U.S. | ||
| Senate? | ||
| We have talked about this. | ||
| We don't always agree on everything. | ||
| I'm going to be my own person in the U.S. | ||
| Senate. | ||
| Uh, and I will make my decisions based on those America first policies. | ||
| And so Senator Portman understands where I am in this, but he's supporting me because he knows I'm the best candidate to defeat Tim Ryan and keep the seat. | ||
| He was one of the leaders and driving forces of the infrastructure bill, right? | ||
| And so just because I don't think he aligns with he fought Trump on the trade policies. | ||
| He fought Trump on China. | ||
| I'm not so sure how tough he was on the border. | ||
| If you look at him, he's he is the personification of Bush. | ||
| So just make people comfortable with a guy like that who's so prominent, and I'm not saying he's not, and he's quite beloved by a big segment of the Republican Party and the voters in Ohio, right? | ||
| There's no doubt about that. | ||
| But as far as MAGA goes, as far as the Trump, particularly the hardline Trump policies, Rob Portman is not a supporter of that. | ||
| So how do you circle that? | ||
| How do you square that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Senator Portman has worked with Donald Trump on a lot of issues, especially the opioid epidemic, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. | |
| They were hand in hand in a lot of these issues. | ||
| Look, I understand these border issues as a national security issue. | ||
| The drug and opioid epidemic is affecting Ohioans right here. | ||
| We need, I believe we need to build that wall. | ||
| We need to remain in Mexico. | ||
| I'm a big supporter of Donald Trump's trade policies. | ||
| I've seen it firsthand. | ||
| The fact that they were, the Chinese and others were dumping steel products into our country and taking away Ohio jobs. | ||
| I'm a big supporter of President Trump's energy independence. | ||
| Look what we have going on right now. | ||
| The Biden-Democrat policies are failing this country. | ||
| And I understand more than most what policies should be working in Washington, D.C. | ||
| to help Ohio families. | ||
| OK, 3 May is the primary. | ||
| That hasn't been changed by a judge yet. | ||
| So in the run-up to that, I don't think you have more debates. | ||
| We've got a minute. | ||
| How do you close the gap? | ||
| What's your closing argument and where are you going to make it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Well, like I said, we're out. | ||
| We're going to be doing two or three, four events a day. | ||
| We have the best ground game out there. | ||
| We've talked to 1.4 million Republican primary voters. | ||
| I've got the best ground game to get our voters out. | ||
| This is all going to be about a turnout election, and I'm going to be talking to Ohio voters and reminding them who was there for them, who helped deliver Ohio for President Trump, who's been in the trenches fighting for Ohio's families, and who has spent the most time with you in Ohio. And so I'm going to ask them for their vote. They know me. They trust me. Not only do I have Senator Portman's endorsement, but I have the endorsement of over 200 elected officials in the state of Ohio. So the leaders in Ohio have | ||
| taken a look at this race and they say, who do they trust? Who do they think is the best person in the United States Senate? And that's me. | ||
| And I'm looking forward to winning on November, on May 3rd. | ||
| Jane Temkin, how do people find out more about you and your campaign? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep, JaneTemkin4Ohio.com or JaneTemkinOH on social. | |
| Jane Temkin, thank you very much for joining us today. | ||
| A real honor here. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Okay, this Ohio race is the premier race right now. | ||
| There's a lot of important ones and a lot of showtime ones. | ||
| Alabama, Georgia, Pennsylvania, obviously Missouri, but this Ohio one is a whole different level, particularly given the importance of having a MAGA senator from the great state of Ohio. | ||
| Okay, make sure you go check it out. | ||
| This is all to be decided. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to talk about accountability. | ||
| of the illegitimate Biden regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All next in The War Room. | |
| War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| It's Easter Monday. | ||
| Don't forget about the joint venture and the partnership we did with Lee Greenwood. | ||
| When he couldn't get his Bible published, he decided to do it himself. | ||
| Go to GodBlessTheUSABible.com. | ||
| This is the Bible that Lee Greenwood put together, the King James Version of the Old and New Testament, plus The divinely inspired founding documents of our nation. | ||
| His publisher turned him down. | ||
| Later they published the Satanic Bible. | ||
| I think your family needs this one a lot more. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| God bless the USA Bible dot com. | ||
| This is Lee Greenwood's project. | ||
| Go there. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| If you're so inclined and it's something that you think would help you and your family. | ||
| Make sure you put in promo code WORM, you get free shipping and handling. | ||
| So go there today on Easter Monday, 18 April, Year of the Lord 2022. | ||
| Let's bring in Mike Davis back. | ||
| Mike Davis, we're going to get to Matt Buckham in a moment. | ||
| Davis, Article 3, big decision today. | ||
| This also, sir, and I got to know you on the Gorsuch situation. | ||
| This shows you the importance of winning elections because these are Trump judges. | ||
| Are they not, sir? | ||
| They are. | ||
| President Trump's biggest accomplishment as president was the transformation of the federal judiciary. | ||
| That included, I'm looking at the numbers here at JudiciaryTracker.com. | ||
| It's enormous. | ||
| He did 234 Article 3 judges, 54 judges to the critically important federal courts of appeals. | ||
| The last stop For more than 99% of these appeals, and he transformed the 5-4 John Roberts Court to the 5-4 Clarence Thomas Court. | ||
| On 12 of these regional circuit courts of appeals, the 2nd, 3rd, and 11th, he switched it from a majority Democrat appointed to a majority Republican appointed. | ||
| He was number two of all presidents for the number of Article III judges he appointed, and the only reason that President Carter beat him is because Congress created 152 new judgeships for Carter to fill. | ||
| Otherwise, Trump would have been clearly number one. | ||
| These are outstanding constitutionalist judges like Judge Mizell down in Tampa, Florida, who are standing up for the Constitution, standing up for the separation of powers, and standing up for all of us against a leftist mob who want to censor, silence, de-platform, cancel us, throw us in prison, want to eliminate us from America, want to destroy America. | ||
| And these judges are the last line of defense. | ||
| And I'll tell you, I worked with Mitch McConnell and my former boss, Chuck Grassley, on the judicial fight for the first two years of the Trump presidency. | ||
| If Republicans win back the Senate, those two guys are going to make sure that that President Biden's radical judge confirmation conveyor belt comes to a screeching halt. | ||
| So it is critically important that Republicans, that you get out there and vote for Republican Senate candidates so we can stop this train wreck of radical judicial nominees from Biden. | ||
| When you said Carter, did you mean Biden? | ||
| I didn't catch the Carter reference. | ||
| So Carter was number one for the number of judges he filled. | ||
| Yes, yes, got it. | ||
| Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. | ||
| The only reason is because Congress gave him 152 slots to fill. | ||
| I remember that. | ||
| I want to go, this is what Lindsey Graham said during our favorite confirmation hearing for Judge Brown Jackson, where he said, when we take back the Senate, you're not going to see any more nominees like that. | ||
| Take a second to explain to the American people why it's so important. | ||
| That's what we just had Jane Timpkin on here. | ||
| Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia. | ||
| Missouri. | ||
| The seats to hold and the seats to win are vital. | ||
| Arizona and in Nevada. | ||
| Those two are in play because of what Mike Davis is going to do in this very smart program he's got coming forward about making sure everybody in Arizona and Nevada understand exactly the full record of Judge, or now Justice, Brown-Jackson. | ||
| Mike, but that's what Lindsey Graham was talking about, right? | ||
| We got to win these because you're not going to see any more radicals like her come up for confirmation? | ||
| So, yeah, exactly. | ||
| When Republicans control the Senate, it doesn't matter what these squish Republicans like Mitt Romney do. | ||
| If you're the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chuck Grassley, my former boss, will be the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he gets to decide what nominees Get to get out of committee or die in committee. | ||
| Merrick Garland did not get through Chuck Grassley's Senate Judiciary Committee and radical nominees will not get through Chuck Grassley's Senate Judiciary Committee if Republicans win back the Senate this year. | ||
| And then even if they somehow get out of the committee, they'll go to the graveyard because Mitch McConnell, you may have disagreements with Mitch McConnell on a lot of things, but he is rock solid on judges. | ||
| And there is no chance that between Mitch McConnell and Chuck Grassley, my old boss, that any of these radical judicial nominees will get confirmed. | ||
| And Judge Jackson, with her horrific disqualifying record eight of eight times Giving extreme rock-bottom leniency for people who who peddle in these child sex torture and rape videos. | ||
| There's no chance she would have been confirmed if Republicans controlled the Senate. | ||
| So that's why it was we need to keep our eye on the prize here and we need to win back the Senate and not get sidetracked like we did in Georgia where we lost those two Senate seats, lost control of the Senate and therefore lost control of the Supreme Court and lower court judicial confirmation process. | ||
| Okay, Mike, how do people get to you at Article 3, and how do they find you on social media? | ||
| Yeah, it's article3project.org, article number 3project.org, and it's at MRDDMIA, at MRDDMIA on Twitter and Getter, and thank you again, Steve, for having me back on. | ||
| Always, Mike. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Okay, just like you met Mike Davis a couple of months ago, and now he's one of the stalwarts, Matt Buckham. | ||
| Matt, tell me why places like the New Yorker are calling you part of the MAGA slime machine, American Accountability Foundation. | ||
| Sounds like a pretty good deal. | ||
| So why is the progressive left and our bettors in the elites hating on you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| They're hating on us. | ||
| My organization founded right after I left the Trump White House with a dear partner of mine here in D.C. | ||
| because we fight back. | ||
| One of our core tenets is we got to fight the battle today. | ||
| As much as we'd love to see conservatives take over, as much as we'd love to see the Congress shift right now and represent the American people, we understand the swamp feeds his own. | ||
| And we have to push back today in order to stop Biden's agenda. | ||
| People take over. | ||
| They're upset because we've been digging into the appointees that Biden has been putting up there, and we know that they're radical, extreme, racist. | ||
| We know that they have an agenda to take away our constitutional rights, our freedom to attack Americans, to use the full force of government to come down upon them. | ||
| It's not enough for them to have big tech. | ||
| It's not enough for them to have the mainstream lying media. | ||
| They need the power and the force of government, the full weight to bear against the American people. | ||
| And we see that in nominees like Gigi Sohn. | ||
| We see it in And the nominees that we actually, uh, our research took down, uh, David Chipman, who wants to take away, who wanted to take away second amendment rights, uh, gun owners, uh, to confiscate their firearms. | ||
| We've seen it with Saul Omarova, a communist that they wanted to use the financial sector to completely bankrupt oil and gas industries. | ||
| Uh, our research is based in fact, and they hate that, that, uh, we have, uh, Uh, evidence to back up our accusations. | ||
| We have evidence to back up the support of our investigations. | ||
| Our organization is a 501 c3 and we're going to constantly be pushing back. | ||
| I want to, uh, Matt, make sure everybody understands, as I say, as much as the, um, the, um. | ||
| The cabinet officials, the ones you see on media all the time, or the nominees, look like the couch at the animal house, no matter how hapless and feckless they look like. | ||
| If you go one notch down, this is the most radical people ever put forward. | ||
| Undersecretaries, assistant secretaries, the most radical group ever put forward to actually be part of the United States government. | ||
| Am I incorrect in making that statement? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, you're not incorrect. | |
| And that's why we're looking into them. | ||
| The cabinet heads are spokespersons. | ||
| They are figureheads that go out on media tours and use their talking points that their comms directors hand them. | ||
| The people that are engaging in the policies are activists. | ||
| These guys are extreme left, radically hardcore. | ||
| They've been, if they're not in government, using the powers of law and force and regulation and just authority to push their extreme ideas and opinions and agendas. | ||
| They are in actual dark money groups, which is what the New Yorker accused us of. | ||
| They called us the slime machine. | ||
| They accused of being like a nefarious, like crazy dark money group. | ||
| I wish we had the funds of the left. | ||
| I wish we had the tens of millions of dollars. | ||
| You spoke of $80 million they're throwing at one of their pet projects. | ||
| We have a mere budget of less than a million. | ||
| So if we can accomplish and take down these underlings, as I like to call them, the worker bees inside these agencies that are actually doing the harm, To our country, to our liberties, to our rights, to the American people. | ||
| Those are the individuals we're going to look after. | ||
| We're going to expose. | ||
| They're kind of like me. | ||
| I was a staffer inside politics trying to push back. | ||
| I wanted to be behind the scenes. | ||
| And after I saw 2020, 2021, the entire Trump presidency, they come against our way of life, our values and our norms, and they demonize them. | ||
| They gaslight us saying that we're racist. | ||
| If you attack a black woman, they say, You should be ashamed of yourself because the New Yorker called us the white, led by white males. | ||
| They're gaslighting their agenda. | ||
| They're trying to distract from the fact that they want full power. | ||
| They don't want their deeds exposed. | ||
| And when we come in to these individuals who like to be behind the scenes and expose them, that's when they start sweating. | ||
| And if you read the New Yorker article, even though it's an attack on us, we read it and we're just like, We're listening to, like, the liberal tears from individuals coming down. | ||
| I mean, it's non-stop. | ||
| All the nominees that we took off. | ||
| Yeah, no, Captain Bannon and our guys here, the team here, we're going to push it out on all our social media and all of our platforms. | ||
| It's the best advertisement you could ever have. | ||
| First of all, to be called the slime machine by these guys is the highest form of compliment. | ||
| Real quickly, Walkington, you've got a number of successes, and they're in the New Yorker article, and we're going to put out that, so everybody can just read the New Yorker. | ||
| Come to your own conclusion. | ||
| But tell us what you've got in the hopper right now. | ||
| What should our audience particularly be focused on when they come to your site? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Elections. | |
| We're always looking at how the Biden team is trying to use these positions of power to take over our elections. | ||
| If you think $300 million in Zuckerbucks, The big controversy back in 2020 was a big deal. | ||
| Biden and the left and all of their groups, Soros-backed groups that have been working forever, they're now in positions of power in the federal government using taxpayer dollars to get out the vote, to push their people, to make sure that they can control the elections any way possible. | ||
| I like to connect the dots by showing that one of their U.S. | ||
| Postal Service board members, He was the head of the National Vote at Home Institute and central figure in the entire Wisconsin Zuckerberg bucks in the 2020 election. | ||
| So they put these people into power. | ||
| We're looking at Dara Lindenbaum for the FEC. | ||
| We have pending FOIAs and getting ready for a massive lawsuit on Department of Justice and their voting rights section to show the connection between these actual dark money groups Controlling the elections with taxpayer funds and the Biden administration. | ||
| We're looking at individuals like Gigi Sohn, who actually want to cancel every conservative opinion out there, whether it's mainstream media, Fox News, whether it's One America News, killing mergers, ruining your business. | ||
| She wants to use the full power of the Federal Communications Commission to boycott conservatives. | ||
| Matt, we gotta bounce real quickly. | ||
| How do people get you on social media? | ||
| How do they get to your site? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can find our site at AmericanAccountabilityFoundation.com or BidenNoms.com. | |
| Check us out where we release new information on the nominees, and you can follow us on Twitter. | ||
| Our Twitter account is A-M-E-R, American Accountability Foundation. | ||
| Find us there, and you can follow us. | ||
| Matt Buckham, patriot and hero. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Joe Allen, Transhumanism is going to blow your head up in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there's no more, let's take down the T.C.P. | |
| It censors us, censors us, de-platforms us. | ||
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it, until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| What are you most worried about going wrong? | ||
| The dangers would be the artificial general intelligence or digital superintelligence decouples from a collective human world and goes in a direction that for some reason we don't like, whatever direction it might go. | ||
| The idea behind Neuralink is to try to more tightly couple a collective human world to digital superintelligence. | ||
| And also along the way solve a lot of brain injuries and spinal injuries and that kind of thing. | ||
| The issue that we face here is that we're already a cyborg if you think about it. | ||
| The computers are an extension of ourselves. | ||
| The way to think of the Neuralink device is kind of like a Fitbit or an Apple Watch, where we take out a small section of skull about the size of a quarter, replace that with what in many ways really is very much like a Fitbit, Apple Watch, or some kind of smartwatch thing. | ||
| People really want their phones and their computers, which are really the tertiary, the third part of your intelligence. | ||
| The rate of communication with that tertiary layer is slow. | ||
| It's just a very tiny straw to this tertiary layer, and we want to make that tiny straw a big highway. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I personally think you have shown that you are mostly driven by really quite a deep sense of moral purpose. | |
| Philanthropy is a topic that some people go to. | ||
| Philanthropy is a hard topic. | ||
| How do you think about that? | ||
| I think if you care about the reality of goodness instead of the perception of it, philanthropy is extremely difficult. | ||
| SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, and Warren Company are philanthropy. | ||
| If you say philanthropy is love of humanity, they are philanthropy. | ||
| Neuralink is to help solve brain injuries and existential risk with AI. | ||
| Love of humanity. | ||
| Neuralink, getting chipped is the deep sense of moral purpose. | ||
| Love for humanity. | ||
| Joe Allen, what say you, sir? | ||
| Well, you know, Steve, ever since Elon Musk attempted to purchase Twitter for $53 billion, and may still do so, we've heard a lot of people, especially conservatives, cheerleading him, which makes sense. | ||
| It's understandable. | ||
| But a lot of them are calling him a good man. | ||
| They're portraying him as a hero. | ||
| And probably most embarrassingly, comparing him to Tony Stark, Who I recently learned is a cartoon character who is also the son of Satan, for whatever that's worth. | ||
| I have a new article up, Elon Musk and the Transhuman Wing of Conservative Inc. | ||
| And it is a gentle reminder that if you think that Elon Musk is serious about free speech, if you take his philosophy seriously, | ||
| Then you also have to account for his ambition to hopefully turn every car into an autonomous vehicle, which is an inherent threat to human autonomy, that soon his largest customer, in his own words, will be China, and that he continually signals loyalty to his partners in China, That he hopes to see robots in every home. | ||
| That, I guess, if he's a real egalitarian, he hopes to see chips in every head to keep up with the artificial intelligence systems that he's working on. | ||
| And you also have to account for the fact that, you know, at his core, he is a transhumanist. | ||
| Meaning that you are handing the largest propaganda slash surveillance platform in the world To the world's wealthiest transhumanist. | ||
| Now, if you look really deeply at that philosophy, it's not like it begins with him. | ||
| This notion of human-AI symbiosis goes back really to the cybernetics movement after World War II, but also J.C.R. | ||
| Licklider, the DARPA-funded researcher who penned the article, Man-Computer Symbiosis. | ||
| So this is a long tradition coming to reality, possibly under him. | ||
| But if you take him seriously, then you have to take everything he says seriously. | ||
| And if you don't take him seriously on anything that benefits you, you really have to consider whether or not that's a wise position. | ||
| And if you think that he's just a con man, if you think that Elon Musk is just spinning yarns, then you should probably admit it now. | ||
| I mean, he wouldn't be the first car dealer to put a lemon on the market. | ||
| So, the article, Elon Musk and the Transhuman Wing of Conservative Inc., I hope, is a wake-up call to at least the more complex aspects of Elon Musk's nature, which will have to be confronted at some point or another. | ||
| We're going to have Joe back tomorrow morning. | ||
| I want everybody to read this article, to push it out, and to read it. | ||
| We're going to talk about Elon Musk and his Goals and objectives in transhumanism because I would say with Tesla, I think all these other things are side gigs. | ||
| I think when you really see in the interviews he does and how he's thought it through, these are not things off the top of his head. | ||
| He's got a very deep, not just understanding of transhumanism, he's got a very deep, not just philosophy, he's got an actual program and it centers around the chips, it centers around Neuralink and artificial intelligence and artificial general intelligence. | ||
| Okay, Joe Allen, real quickly, how do people get to the article? | ||
| How do they find you overnight until you come back tomorrow? | ||
| You can find the article right at the top of warroom.org or at the top of my social media at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z. | ||
| Also, joebot.xyz. | ||
| And you'll find a ton of other stuff about other interesting things happening at my social media right now. | ||
| So, again, thank you very much, Steve. | ||
| Okay, Joe. | ||
| We'll see you tomorrow morning. | ||
| Okay, stay tuned. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to be talking about the left is now complete and total meltdown. | ||
| Not just about election integrity. | ||
| But about the movement of the Trump movement of MAGA and the deplorables to take over the election apparatus in the United States of America. | ||
| From the deck plates all the way to the top. |
Export Selection