Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Where are you going? | |
I'm going to kill you! | ||
I'm going to kill you! | ||
You're going to kill me! | ||
You're going to kill me! | ||
I'm going to kill you! | ||
I'm going to kill you! | ||
Get him up! | ||
No, you can't kill me! | ||
Kill me! | ||
that you don't size this guy here. | ||
Yeah. | ||
I'm going to be doing a video of this. | ||
Okay, Monday, 4 April, Yorba Lora 2022. | ||
You just saw that was in Tapachula the other day. | ||
This is what's heading up toward the United States of America. | ||
There's two invasions going on. | ||
One on the eastern Russian-speaking provinces of Ukraine. | ||
And the other is in the southern border of the United States of America. | ||
We care about one, and that would be the southern border of the United States. | ||
Don't care so much about the eastern border of Ukraine. | ||
That's something for the European countries, Ukraine and the Russians to work out. | ||
And the sooner they work it out, the less suffering for the Ukrainian people, of which our prayers are always with, to hopefully that whole thing gets sorted out. | ||
Or is the mainstream media constantly wants to non-stop that? | ||
We're going to talk about as we have and finally force the mainstream media to cover it. | ||
The invasion that's coming with the lifting of Title 42. | ||
Of course, all the left-wing groups, NGOs, the Catholic Charities, another left-wing Marxist group, they're all cheerleading. | ||
This is the greatest thing that ever happened. | ||
Well, you've got an invasion heading up to the southern border that is going to overwhelm the hard-working Hispanic Americans at the southern border and blow through and make every town literally a border town. | ||
I want to go to Ben Burquam and Oscar Blue from Real America's Voice. | ||
They're in Yuma, Arizona. | ||
Actually, they're across in Sonora. | ||
On the other side of the border from Yuma. | ||
Ben, I'll start with you and you bring in Oscar. | ||
Tell us what the preparations are like down there. | ||
It's constant. | ||
Border Patrol's already overwhelmed. | ||
We were talking to a couple of the agents just down the road down in San Luis and now we're back in Algodones and they're already overwhelmed. | ||
We've seen at this location right here, we obviously saw the footage last night as soon as we got into town. | ||
Hundreds of illegals that were there. | ||
Border Patrol didn't have the resources to deal with them. | ||
This morning we came over on the Mexico side and there was just group after group after group right where we're standing here just running in and now there's no Border Patrol. | ||
We've been in this location for about a half an hour now. | ||
Haven't seen a single Border Patrol agent on the U.S. | ||
side. | ||
They've basically all been stretched to their maximum capacity and this is even before Title IV. | ||
42 goes away and just to show you what's coming in on this on this side they're still dumping the documents we found dozens from Senegal and this is this is just a small little portion of what we're finding it's 151 different countries they've all gotten the word America is free for the taking if you can get here and the worst part is we have people here locals that have been trying to do it the right way we've been talking to that said they've been trying they've been denied while people are simply walking into America | ||
Oscar, give us your assessment, your appraisal of the situation. | ||
Well, it's going to get worse. | ||
You know, they already released a banner in Honduras that a new caravan is coming on the 15th of April, and they already know about Title 42 that is going to be lifted. | ||
And in Tapachula, you got 60,000 that they're in a bottleneck, that they're scattered all over the state of Chiapas. | ||
You already saw, Mr. Bannon, the stampede that happened on Friday. | ||
And on Sunday, these people stitched their lips and their mouths as a hunger strike to send a message directly to the Institute of National Immigration that they want their humanitarian visas and their visas of transit. | ||
And they already gave them. | ||
They already bent the knee and gave them those documents so they can move freely all the way to the north border. | ||
So this is not becoming a protest. | ||
It is a strategy. | ||
For them to send a message to the International Immigration of Mexico so they can bend the knee and get the documents and transport themselves. | ||
This is going to happen at a massive flow. | ||
As soon as the Title 42 been lifted, more people are going to come in and it's already on the banner that 15th of April a new caravan is going to come out of Honduras and it's not going to be two to three thousand. | ||
It's going to be much more. | ||
Democratic senators, particularly Hassan in New Hampshire and Mark Kelly, interestingly enough, in Arizona and Sinema, have said there's no plan, the government's not ready for this, and they're asking the Biden administration to rethink this lifting of Title 42 on 23 May. | ||
Ben, what are you hearing down there on the border? | ||
Is there any preparation at all or any discussion about actually delaying the lifting of Title 42 past the 23rd of May of this year? | ||
No, and you mentioned it. | ||
It's these radical leftist communist groups, the activist groups in America. | ||
It's the base of the Democratic Party that are pushing for this. | ||
This is not enough for them. | ||
They've been demanding this since Joe Biden took office, since 2020 and 2021 when he took office. | ||
They've been demanding this. | ||
This is not enough for them. | ||
So there's very little in the political realm that would get Joe Biden to shift gears now. | ||
But the Sane Democrats, the few that still exist, are realizing this is political suicide for them. | ||
This is ultimately, it's waking up people on both Democrats and Republicans, but it's the radical left fringe of the Democrats that are pushing for this. | ||
And again, it's not enough. | ||
And I just spoke to a Customs and Border Protection officer in San Diego just to give you an idea. | ||
He said that they're being asked now. | ||
They're coming to them. | ||
They're being asked to be the ones that are going to be the arbiters of who's allowed to come in and who's not because they're so overwhelmed. | ||
The asylum judges are so overwhelmed. | ||
They're talking about doing this new program where they actually adjudicate it on the spot. | ||
And now we're talking about using Customs and Border Protection agents who are already overwhelmed to be the guys to do this. | ||
And they don't, you know, and he told me he refuses to do it. | ||
We'll see what ends up happening. | ||
It's going to be We're saying it now, but it's going to be an absolute disaster, unlike we've ever seen in this country. | ||
People have to understand this new rules. | ||
This is what Todd Bensman, we broke on the show. | ||
Todd Bensman going through the details. | ||
They've had a rules change. | ||
And the rules change is that you don't even need to go to an asylum court. | ||
You don't need to do it. | ||
They're going to have, actually, officials on the border that can just sign off. | ||
And you remember, 90% of these people never show back up for their hearing. | ||
They're just going to the United States forever. | ||
Todd Benson is going to be on at 6 o'clock. | ||
He's got all the most up-to-date statistics. | ||
I think March was the biggest number in American history. | ||
He's going to get into all that. | ||
So it's out of control right now, even for the lifting of 23. | ||
I want to go to the asylum rules. | ||
The asylum rules are actually very tight. | ||
About a political suppression, a political oppression. | ||
It is not economic migrants, right? | ||
It's not just people looking for a better life. | ||
I understand that that upsets the left, but it's not because if you wanted a better life, obviously all 7 billion people on the planet want to come live in America. | ||
So it's not about a better life, yet the media just plays that up over and over again. | ||
We don't have an asylum system for economic Migrants. | ||
Is that fully understood down there? | ||
Or they just understand that Biden has basically, and this is why he's going to get impeached, he's just essentially waived the rules and allowing anybody in here that wants a better life? | ||
Ben Burquham? | ||
Yeah, no, that's it, and that's the message that's going out to the world, that all you have to do is come here, you claim asylum, you get in, you get the piece of paper, and I've seen them multiple times where it just says, show up to a Border Patrol agent or a Customs Enforcement agent within 60 days, turn yourself in, and start the process. | ||
We know the vast majority of them will never do that, and they simply just Blend into the society. | ||
That's why they're doing it, because they know these people aren't going to show up. | ||
And ultimately, these are just more democratic voters and more drains on the system. | ||
The people that are supporting this open borders, the destruction of America, truly believe in the destruction of this country. | ||
They want to see America fall. | ||
They want to see it rebuilt in their communist utopian vision. | ||
And ultimately, the only way you do that is if you collapse it from within. | ||
That's what this is all about. | ||
But the people that are coming in, they believe they're just all getting in. | ||
They're all just walking on in, and for the vast majority of them, they're right. | ||
Oscar Blue, Mexican officials and the hard-working good folks in northern Mexico that are being stampeded, this is all going over. | ||
Walk us through that. | ||
Are the Mexican officials working to tamp this down, or are they just saying, hey, get up to the north as quickly as possible and get through Mexico? | ||
And what impact is it having on the Mexican people? | ||
It is a full-on corruption and it's not only just, as we are seeing right here, there's no Mexican officials, there's no National Guard, there's no Institute of National Immigration. | ||
They know what is going on and they know what is happening. | ||
They're all in cahoots. | ||
The only thing that it had the government of Mexico under control, it was not only the stay in Mexico policy, it was what Donald Trump did. | ||
He put a threat on a tariff. | ||
And that directly affected the directions of the government of AMLO and he immediately he put all National Guard officials to stop every caravan from coming in from the south border. | ||
It directed a message to the Guatemala government. | ||
the Guatemala government was doing exactly the same and it was under control because there was a threat of a tariff and it was going to have a huge impact economically and the people in the south border of Tapachula, a lot of them and also in the north border, they feel that in a way they're going to be replaced because of all the benefits that they're coming. | ||
Remember, the globalist compact of immigration says that they have to come in documented peacefully in an orderly fashion and none of them, they're respecting that. | ||
So all of that is being violated and also the citizens think that way. | ||
Ben, you were down the other day, we had footage, I think from Oscar Auden, had the Ukrainians that were coming in. | ||
Are Ukrainians, those Ukrainians can't, there's no direct flight from Kiev to Mexico City, so they had to come through another country, so therefore they're not eligible for asylum down there. | ||
Did the Border Patrol understand that, or are they just waving the Ukrainians in? | ||
I spoke to the same CBP officer I spoke to in San Diego, said they're under orders to simply let them in. | ||
If they say the right words and they come through the port of entry, they're being told that all of the Ukrainians are being let in. | ||
Regardless if they flew into Brazil and then went to Cancun for a week. | ||
And vacation there and then came to Tijuana. | ||
And that's what we're seeing. | ||
It's not just Ukraine. | ||
It's Russia. | ||
It's the entire world. | ||
This is a global travel agency through the cartels that ultimately come through, but specifically the Ukrainians. | ||
I was told that every single one of them are just being let in. | ||
Oscar, even the government's projecting it could be up to 18,000 a day, which would be, I think, 6 million a year, if my math's correct. | ||
Is that the sense you get? | ||
You've done more... I mean, we almost lost you a couple of weeks ago to cartels down in Tapachula. | ||
Is the sense that you get that it could be up to 18,000-20,000 per day? | ||
Absolutely, and that is almost accurate, but it can be a little bit more further than that, a little bit more stronger than that. | ||
As we already asked the Director of Immigration in Tapachula, and she's saying that the number that they're speculating, if Title 42 is being lifted, from right now, from the mass migration that is happening to March, All the way to November, it can be holding up into 2.5, 3 million, up to 5 million people that it can come in. | ||
All of Central America, South America, parts of Europe, and also Middle East people get to know that a lot of Pakistan, Yemen, Iran people are coming into this. | ||
Masses of influxes through the north border, and also officials. | ||
The number one thing, Mr. Bannon, that is going to happen right here, it is that the Mexican government is going to collapse in the borders. | ||
We don't have enough resources to take care of this. | ||
Just recently, they just put up a shelter where the 2018 caravan, 6,000 caravan of Central Americans, was just relocated in Tijuana, and they just reopened it for Ukrainians, and it's already packed. | ||
It has capacity for 500. | ||
So, it is not, it's going to collapse every border as it is going to be a domino effect all the way to the United States. | ||
We're going to report at six o'clock with Todd Bensman that Brnovich, the AG in Arizona, is trying to get this compact with three states to do it. | ||
Ben Berquam, do you see the Governor Ducey of Arizona or do you see Governor Abbott in Texas really taking any direct action to stop this invasion of their states? | ||
Definitely Abbott has done more than Doocy. | ||
Doocy, from what I've seen, has done virtually nothing. | ||
And at some point, you know, we'll see. | ||
I mean, Abbott just won the primary, so he feels like he's pretty comfortable. | ||
I sure pray he does, because at this point, you're basically allowing your states to be destroyed from within. | ||
He has every constitutional right to do it. | ||
He should stand up, and every state in the nation should do the same. | ||
They have the right to secure their borders from an invasion, and they should do that. | ||
At this point, though, most of what we've seen has been optics, but I do have to give a shout-out to Texas DPS. | ||
Those guys, they are putting their lives on the line every single day. | ||
They want to be able to do their job. | ||
They just, you know, they're just not allowed to. | ||
And Border Patrol, unfortunately, isn't allowed to either. | ||
It's up to the American people. | ||
The American people have to demand that this changes. | ||
Ben, we've got about 15 seconds. | ||
Need social media for you and Oscar. | ||
FrontlineAmerica.com, AmericasVoice.news, and at Ben Berquam for me. | ||
OscarBlueRingers.com, Getter Oscar at Blue, and also YouTube Oscar at Blue, sir. | ||
Okay, we're going to have it all up. | ||
We'll see you guys tomorrow. | ||
You stay safe. | ||
Godspeed. | ||
Pedro Gonzalez, Darren Beattie, next in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Billionaire assault on election integrity we've ever seen. | |
It was a partial takeover of the election system. | ||
You had an entire Democratic Party petrified. | ||
We can look straight in the eye at Mark Zuckerberg. | ||
That's why Joe Biden won. | ||
He's putting money under the guise that he's going to open up the election. | ||
That's all crap. | ||
It was a rigged election. | ||
People have to find out what happened. | ||
People do have to find out what happened. | ||
Mr. President, you're absolutely correct. | ||
That premieres tomorrow in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
We're gonna have a bunch of coverage beforehand and then a lot to say. | ||
We're gonna have a lot of the people that are in the film throughout the week to get to. | ||
But this is all Zuckerberg's helping, assisting, stealing the 2020 election to put this illegitimate regime. | ||
And remember, elections have consequences. | ||
As the Democratic Party is going to find out on November 8th. | ||
Stolen elections have catastrophic consequences. | ||
And that's what this nation is going through right now. | ||
So make sure you go to RIGG. | ||
We're going to push that out everywhere, the bunch of spots and clips and all that. | ||
So a lot going on tomorrow. | ||
President Trump is going to be at the screening of this film at Mar-a-Lago and a lot of other folks that you know, a lot of contributors. | ||
So we'll have tons of people on. | ||
Let's go to Pedro Gonzalez now from Chronicles Magazine. | ||
Pedro, I know you had a chance to view, and by the way, for our podcast and radio audience, that's where you gotta go to warren.org and get the newsletter and get all the footage. | ||
The footage here, we pride ourselves with the Real America's Voice team at Bed Birquam, Oscar Blue Ramirez, Auden Cabrero, Todd Bensman, Michael Yan, all of it. | ||
The best wall-to-wall coverage of the invasion of the United States of America. | ||
Pedro, why are our political elites, and particularly conservative media and the Republican Party, spending so much time focused on this border dispute that's obviously a tragedy in eastern Ukraine and not focused on the invasion of the United States of America with maybe 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 million illegal aliens this year, sir? | ||
Well, I think asking the question is answering the question, and it's exactly that. | ||
This is a crisis. | ||
And if Americans knew exactly what was happening at the southern border, if they knew what was happening in their own country, they wouldn't care about what is happening between Ukraine and Russia. | ||
And on the one hand, I think that's why there has been such an aggressive push to make Americans care, to tell them that they can't look away. | ||
And if they do look away, then they are essentially accomplices in the new Holocaust. | ||
That's why you don't push this hard to morally blackmail people to emotionally Manipulate them unless you're also trying to distract them from something that's happening in their own backyard Um how would you uh given previous american crises like the financial crisis of 2008 the the 9 11 Other crises we've had in uh in the last 20 30 40 years | ||
Where would you rank this invasion of the southern border that is upon us, sir? | ||
It's difficult to tell because we haven't really, based on the conversations that you just had and on the information that we have at hand, we actually don't really know How catastrophic this is going to be. | ||
So with what we do know, we already know that this is kind of charting us into unprecedented waters. | ||
But even there we kind of have to hedge because we really don't understand the full scope of it. | ||
I mean, the only situation, the only thing that we have that we can kind of look back to, for an example, is the failure of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act under the Reagan administration, which was actually intended to stop illegal immigration, but actually incentivized it. | ||
And at the time, a formerly slightly saner New York Times denounced the failure of the IRCA as the greatest immigration fraud ever perpetrated on American soil. | ||
And I think the total number of people that benefited from immigration fraud under the IRCA was about 3 million. | ||
We're already talking about dwarfing that as a result of the policies. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, there's been a Biden's policy. | |
Biden's policy in the first year has allowed a million, there's a million illegal aliens. | ||
Under the guise of asylum wandering around in the country right now, unescorted, let me say. | ||
I'm going to pivot. | ||
I got Darren Beattie on deck. | ||
I got to pivot. | ||
You had a great piece, I think it was in Substack, and we've put it up to the agreed people to get to your Substack, because I think you've got to actually subscribe. | ||
But essentially the piece said, they're coming for your children. | ||
We can't look away on this anymore. | ||
You can put it in different contexts, but what they want to do is break the American family and do it through children. | ||
What did you mean by that? | ||
Yeah. | ||
Right. | ||
So the context of my article is this war that's happening in Utah, where last month, Utah lawmakers presented the Republican governor, Spencer Cox, with a proposal to outright ban transgender athletes from competing on girls teams. | ||
Cox was appalled to discover that there are still conservative lawmakers on the state level And so on the one hand, independent of motive, to be clear, I think Cox actually probably is a true believer. | ||
in his state, but fortunately lawmakers were able to override his veto and push it through his opposition. | ||
And so on the one hand, independent of motive, to be clear, I think Cox actually probably is a true believer. | ||
I think that there is an element of cynicism there, and I can get into what we find when we look at his financial disclosures and things like that. | ||
But I think that with Cox, he has probably talked himself into believing this stuff, into believing the, let's call it the LGBT agenda, to a certain degree, where he can't even tell, you know, am I just in this for the donations anymore? | ||
And regardless of whether you're motivated by cynicism or idealism, you're an ideologue, the result is the same. | ||
A radical change in the relationship between children and their bodies, literally, girls become boys, boys become girls, But also between parents and kids, where the role of parents is not to protect children anymore, to draw them back from things that could harm them, but to just affirm their gender confusion that was inculcated in them by educators, by media influencers, by celebrities. | ||
The parents' job isn't to protect the child. | ||
It's actually just to affirm them in what is essentially mental illness. | ||
And so how, um, I want to be specific because you had this warning that we can't, you said you can't spin it anymore. | ||
You can't, uh, put a nice marketing campaign. | ||
They're coming for the children. | ||
What did you mean by that? | ||
Well, again, I think the, the crux of this is regardless of motive, because you know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. | ||
So even that goes out the window. | ||
What the result of this is, is separating children from parents. | ||
Either literally, I've spoken to parents in other states who have had run-ins with CPS when they try to pull their kids out of public schools after they find out that educators, that staff at public schools have encouraged them to transition behind the backs of the parents, but also in another way that's not necessarily tangible on a kind of emotional, psychological level. | ||
These people basically attach themselves to your kids, the ideologues, the purveyors of whether you want to call it social emotional learning curriculum or LGBT ideology. | ||
The way that this works is they present themselves to children as the only people that they can trust. | ||
We're the only ones that understand what's happening to you. | ||
And those, you know, The confusion that you feel about being a boy or about being a girl, it's not a passing thing. | ||
It's actually an indicator that you were born in the wrong body. | ||
And I'm going to help you affirm it, even if your parents won't. | ||
And again, regardless of intention, you know, someone might actually be doing this stuff because they're just delusional. | ||
They think that they're doing good, but obviously they're not. | ||
Regardless of intention, the result is that a wedge is placed between the child and the parent, because now that child believes that the person that really has their best interests in mind Is this educator, this influencer, whoever is telling them, you were born in the wrong body or your gender or your sexual orientation is actually this way instead of that way. | ||
Is there any doubt in your mind that this issue of parental rights is something that we have to take on and support full on? | ||
I mean, this is the cutting edge of the cultural wars right now, Pedro? | ||
Yeah. | ||
No, I think this is the most important issue. | ||
Ultimately, we're talking about the future. | ||
We're talking about the future of the country and whether or not it actually continues to exist in a way that resembles, you know, what we love about America. | ||
It's not a cliche to say that kids are the future and I've got to myself. | ||
I'm basically a new father. | ||
My oldest is not even two years old yet. | ||
I mean, I think about this stuff because on the one hand, it's obviously something that is political and I'm involved in the political arena as part of my profession. | ||
But on the other hand, it's personal. | ||
It absolutely is personal. | ||
These people want to do things to my kids that I believe are harmful. | ||
And if I don't go along with it, and they have the power to do so, then they will try to separate my kids from me. | ||
And we're seeing that all across America. | ||
It doesn't matter, actually, if you move to Texas. | ||
I've spoken to families in Texas that have dealt with this kind of stuff. | ||
It's happening from Texas to Wisconsin to Florida. | ||
Actually, in Florida, we're seeing probably the hub of resistance against this stuff under DeSantis. | ||
Thank God for that. | ||
Because I think this is actually, next to things like the immigration crisis, I think that this is actually the most important issue of our time, is the future of America and the sense of what happens to our kids. | ||
And whether or not we still even have control over their lives as parents, This is how they're trying to break the family, is using the children. | ||
Pedro's warning, they're coming for the children is absolutely correct. | ||
Pedro, how do people get to your Chronicles? | ||
What's your social media? | ||
How do people find you? | ||
So you can read this article in particular and you can dig into the financial disclosures that I found on Cox that kind of connects him to what I just call the LGBT complex at my newsletter at contra.substack.com. | ||
Go there and check it out. | ||
My columns are at ChroniclesMagazine.org and you can find me just about anywhere on social media under the handle Emereticus, E-M-E-R-I-T-I-C-U-S. | ||
Pedro Gonzalez, one of the thought leaders in the populist nationalist movement. | ||
Thank you for joining us today. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Okay, we're going to have one of the news leaders and thought leaders join us next. | ||
It's the great Darren Beattie from Revolver. | ||
Also, Mike Davis with an update on 11-11 committee tie vote. | ||
Where do we go from here? | ||
You guys have done your work for the first stage, now stage two. | ||
Also, Dolores Stallman on shocking news. | ||
I think this is why, this core judicial philosophy is why we see her doing things like apologizing to some of these offenders, just like she apologized to Wesley Hawkins. | ||
She said she was sorry for him. | ||
Now listen, I just have to say, I'm not sorry for him. | ||
I'm not sorry for these offenders. | ||
I am not sorry for the offenses they have committed and where they have gotten themselves to. | ||
They should go to jail. | ||
They should go to prison. | ||
And my fundamental disagreement with Judge Jackson is not based on her character or her integrity or her accomplishments. | ||
I think those things are beyond question. | ||
It's based on her policy and her philosophy. | ||
And I think on these core issues, she is just dead wrong. | ||
Now let me just say this, finally, in conclusion. | ||
We've heard, in Judge Jackson's defense, I don't know if it's really much of a defense. | ||
I know she didn't say these things, but in her defense by the White House and members of this committee, we've been told things like, that child pornography is actually all a conspiracy. | ||
It's not real. | ||
It's just a conspiracy. | ||
It's made up. | ||
Let me just say for the record, sex crimes against children are not fiction. | ||
They are not a conspiracy. | ||
There are 85 million images of children being exploited available on the internet. | ||
I'm a former prosecutor. | ||
These are real crimes. | ||
I'm a father of three young children. | ||
These are real children. | ||
And these aren't victimless crimes. | ||
Just because they're images doesn't mean real kids aren't involved. | ||
Again, as we heard testimony from prosecutors and experts just two weeks ago, child pornography creates a cycle of trafficking, of exploitation, of abuse. | ||
It is the children here who are the victims, not the criminals. | ||
On that core point, I disagree fundamentally with Judge Jackson. | ||
I wish her well, but I cannot support her nomination. | ||
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | ||
unidentified
|
If there are no further comments on favorably reporting the nomination of Katonji Brown-Jackson to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, the clerk will call the roll. | |
Mr. Laney. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mrs. Feinstein. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Whitehouse. | ||
Aye. | ||
Ms. | ||
Klobuchar. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Coons. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Blumenthal. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Rono. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Booker. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Padilla. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Ossoff. | ||
Aye. | ||
Mr. Grassley. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Graham. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Corman. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Lee. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Cruz. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Sass. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Hawley. | ||
No. | ||
unidentified
|
Mr. Cotton. | |
No. | ||
Mr. Kennedy. | ||
No. | ||
Mr. Tillis. | ||
No. | ||
Mrs. Blackburn. | ||
Mr. Chair Durbin. | ||
Aye. | ||
Chair Durbin, the votes are 11 yeas, 11 nays. | ||
It's a tie vote. | ||
The committee has recorded a tie vote on Judge Jackson's nomination to be the Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. | ||
Pursuant to Section 3, Subsection 1A of Senate Resolution 27 of the 117th Congress, I'll transmit to the Secretary of the Senate a notice of this tie vote. | ||
Okay. | ||
The Warren Posse did its job in phase one. | ||
It's a tie vote. | ||
I want to go down to Mike Davis. | ||
Article three, without his work, we have, there would have been four or five Republican votes to vote that out of committee. | ||
Mike, tell us, is this a victory or not? | ||
And where do we go from here to stop this nomination? | ||
The Democrats, if you watch their, it's called a markup meeting today. | ||
If you watch their comments today, they were despondent. | ||
This should have been a political grand slam for Democrats. | ||
And instead, it is now a political loss for them. | ||
It's going to be an albatross around their necks going into November. | ||
And they know it. | ||
And you could see it. | ||
You could hear it in their voices. | ||
And it was not a good vote for them. | ||
It's not going to be a good vote for Democrats running for re-election in key states coming up this November, like New Hampshire, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia. | ||
It's not going to be a good year for Democrats because of this. | ||
What happens from here? | ||
They have to do backflips, right, to get this actually to the, if it had been, you know, if it had been a majority to say yes, it would have gone right to the Senate floor for confirmation. | ||
What happens now, and is there any way to delay this to after the Easter break, sir? | ||
Well, if there aren't 50 votes for her nomination, you can delay this until after the Easter break. | ||
So that's why it's so important that people call their home state senators. | ||
What we need to do, the next step is called a discharge petition that's set up because it's a 50-50 Senate. | ||
So the full Senate can discharge this out of the committee. | ||
The 11-11 vote generally fails, but because it's a 50-50 Senate, there's a power sharing agreement. | ||
There's four hours of debate. | ||
Then it goes to a cloture vote, which cuts off debate. | ||
Once there's the cloture vote, there's 30 hours of debate and then there's a confirmation vote. | ||
So we can see a confirmation sometime on Thursday, probably Thursday, maybe Friday. | ||
It is critical that people call both home state senators at 202-224-3121. | ||
And tell both home state senators, no matter where you are, Democrat, Republican, light them up and tell them to oppose this nomination. | ||
Even in deep blue states, this gets in their heads. | ||
As you can see from Chairman Dick Durbin from Illinois, he was not a happy camper today, and it's important that we keep lighting them up. | ||
And also, go to at Article 3 Project at Twitter and Getter. | ||
There are digital ads that we are putting out. | ||
Share those. | ||
Share those widely. | ||
Make those go viral. | ||
We will play those ads in both this hour and the next hour. | ||
Mike Caterpie. | ||
By the way, remember, there's still the possibility this can be stopped. | ||
I want everybody to know you're doing the Lord's work here. | ||
In addition, if it's not, it will be a vote by particularly senators in Arizona, Nevada, and New Hampshire that will be career-ending votes to vote to confirm someone like Judge Jackson, who is highly qualified But I disagree with Josh Hawley. | ||
Here, we do question her judgment, not policy. | ||
We question her judgment about this situation with the torture and rape of babies and small children and people that make money. | ||
I derive pleasure from that, and people make money for it. | ||
Mike, once again, how do people get to you on social media, on Twitter and Getter? | ||
MRDDMIA. | ||
Again, MRDDMIA, and it's article3project.org. | ||
Article3project.org. | ||
Mike Davis done an incredible job. | ||
Thank you so much. | ||
Thank you, Steve. | ||
You've been heroic on this. | ||
Just it's just it's just I'm simple guy. | ||
I'm just the traffic cop. | ||
You're the content. | ||
You're the content provided the audience does all the work. | ||
I definitely my producer here. | ||
I want to make sure we play that spot coming back in the D block. | ||
I want to go now to Darren Beatty at Revolver. | ||
Darren, I know you're here to talk about This amazing piece you wrote about Elon Musk, I think over the weekend, and Elon got jacked up and bought 10% of Twitter upon your recommendation. | ||
I want to go back to Pedro Gonzalez about the border and what you heard and watched in our opening segment. | ||
Why is the political class, including the Republicans, outside of the fact that we got them focused on Judge Jackson's problems with child pornography, why are they totally focused on having the pom-poms out about the eastern border of Ukraine, the Russian-speaking eastern border of Ukraine and these eastern provinces, and not this invasion of the southern border of the United States of America? | ||
Well, quite simply put, the people and institutions that control America have more of a stake in something like Ukraine than they do open borders. | ||
As has been well known, going back to the Trump candidacy, open borders means cheap labor, it means votes, it means all the things that only redound to the benefit of the institutions that dominate this country. | ||
So from an interest perspective, it makes complete sense that the institutions and people in power have far more interest in protecting their global resource loot in relation to geopolitics than they do in undermining their resource loot in relation to securing American borders. | ||
The American people, their livelihood, their well-being, their flourishing are not even secondary Considerations to the people that control this country. | ||
What is it going to take in the Republican Party for us to pivot and actually have, we should have every congressman, they don't need to, in fact they shouldn't even be showing up here, what they should be doing, since they're in the minority, Pelosi's going to do what she's going to do anyway. | ||
They should be at the southern border every day holding hearings, they should be at the border having press conferences, they should be going into Mexico, they should be hectoring the Republican governors of Texas and Arizona to do more. | ||
I mean, what would be your recommendation of what the Republican Party has to do now to get off the dime on this? | ||
It's a hard thing, because the structural conditions all point in the opposite direction. | ||
And even if we were to stop the influx today, a lot of the damage has already been done, in terms of demographic damage, in terms of economic damage, and so forth. | ||
It's just a very difficult situation, and from a politician's perspective, there's just far more upside than downside to Paying lip service to the issue and then doing nothing. | ||
I want to pivot now. | ||
You wrote this amazing piece about Elon Musk and Twitter and this announced that Elon Musk is owned up to 9.9 percent, I think. | ||
Why do you want Elon Musk? | ||
Why do you think it's a good thing to... I know you're not a fanboy of Elon Musk, but why do you believe it's a good thing for Elon Musk to take control of Twitter? | ||
First of all, I would encourage your audience, note the date. | ||
Not that it's April 1st. | ||
But this was published three days ago, a piece saying, here's what happens if Elon Musk buys Twitter. | ||
And sure enough, today, it's announced all over the world that Elon Musk buys a sizable stake in Twitter. | ||
So I'd say that's a hell of a good timing for a news organization to run that piece. | ||
Now, the piece wasn't simply saying that he should do it, although he should, and I'm glad that he did. | ||
The piece was saying, if he does it, which he should, he should know exactly what he's getting into. | ||
This isn't any ordinary economic transaction, because Twitter is no ordinary company. | ||
We point out in this piece, Home Depot, for instance, has a much larger market capitalization than Twitter. | ||
But who controls Home Depot is almost negligible in importance compared to who controls Twitter. | ||
That's because As in Elon's own words, Twitter is the de facto public global town square. | ||
If you control the discourse in the public town square, you control everything. | ||
And this is why I think Elon might not even understand how important Twitter is to the power structure generally, how important Twitter is to the American national security state. | ||
They run tons of their psychological warfare influence operations on Twitter. | ||
Twitter is now the space not only where journalists go, where people go to decide which narratives take off and become viral, which narratives are suppressed, what's the dominant mode of thinking on any particular issue. | ||
Twitter's also remarkably become a space of public diplomacy, of what the national security apparatus calls hybrid warfare. | ||
And you see the geopolitical aspect of Twitter playing out in the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine. | ||
And so Twitter is far more important than its relatively modest market cap would suggest. | ||
And so if someone like Elon buys Twitter and then goes the bold route, goes the big route, goes the route for glory, and decides I'm going to make Twitter great again and implement free speech, he needs to understand that instantaneously, Elon Musk becomes Putin, he becomes Derek Chauvin, and he becomes Trump 2016. | ||
In terms of how he'll be vilified in the media. | ||
And he needs to be ready for that and all of their dirty tricks. | ||
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
Darren, real quickly, how do people get to Revolver? | ||
How do they get to your social media so they can read this amazing piece that was written last week and published on Friday? | ||
We were trying to get Darren on, but we couldn't do it. | ||
That's why he's on today. | ||
He called shot. | ||
We got about 30 seconds. | ||
How do people get to this piece? | ||
Read the piece. | ||
It's white hot. | ||
I'm told Elon has read it. | ||
Revolver dot news. | ||
Battle of the century. | ||
Here's what happens if and now when Elon Musk buys twitter revolver dot news check it out share it read it and i met with her at derringer b and getter at revolver needs but my old goldman sachs emanate defense uh... rate defense i would say nine point nine percent He kinda is close to controlling Twitter. | ||
Don't have to buy it to control it. | ||
Not all of it, anyway. | ||
Thank you, Darren. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Deloise Stallman on the hideous nature of all this child porn. | ||
Next in the world. | ||
unidentified
|
...monitors us, censors us, deplatforms us. | |
Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it until now. | ||
Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with millions of users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Steve Cortez, and Steve Bannon. | ||
Join Getter. | ||
It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
Send a message today. | ||
Join Getter. | ||
It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
When Judge Katonji Brown-Jackson was asked why she sentenced a child sex offender to just three months instead of a recommended eight years, she blamed everyone but herself. | ||
Jackson has ordered lenient sentences in every child pornography case she could, eight out of eight times. | ||
Activist judges like Katonji Brown-Jackson are more concerned about the well-being of pedophiles than the safety of your children. | ||
And thanks to her, they may be living in your neighborhood. | ||
Call your senators today and tell them to vote no on Judge Jackson's nomination. | ||
2-0-2, 2-2-4, 3-1-2-1. | ||
There's plenty of time for you to call the Main Switchboard at the U.S. | ||
Senate. | ||
We've heard from, you know, so many staffers that they're in shock over there, the number of calls that are coming in. | ||
So keep pounding away. | ||
I want to bring in Deloitte Stallman, who is one of the Well, thank you for having me on, Steve. | ||
or the tip of the spear of trying to sort out the education mess in the Commonwealth of Virginia that led to Yunkin's victory. | ||
Talk to us about, Deloes, talk to us about child pornography. | ||
Is the worst thing just the pornography itself is also what happens in the rape and torture of these babies and small infants? | ||
Well, thank you for having me on, Steve. | ||
I think part of the problem that this judge is facing is that she's really telling people that these individuals are not, they're unfairly stigmatized because they weren't participating So they're unfairly stigmatized. | ||
And she really has a hard time using the words sex offender and even pedophile. | ||
She's claiming to take into account the victims as she sentences these individuals as well. | ||
As you've detailed, and it's really truly sad and horrifying, so many of these victims are infants and toddlers. | ||
It's really not possible to believe Judge Brown-Jackson when she says she's taken into account these victims. | ||
Many people who are purchasing these videos for order for their depravity are doing so on an international video market. | ||
So, there are victims, of course, here in the United States, but victims are being tortured, these young children, on an international scale for the stimulation of these perverts here in the United States. | ||
These small children, as you can imagine, they are permanently damaged. | ||
Psychologically traumatized some physically disabled and quite frankly some of these very small children They're just not there. | ||
It's not possible for them to live through the physical trauma and these children in third world countries who someone is Profiteering off of this disgusting behavior both here and there You know, it's well known that that a portion of these children just do not make it so I feel like when Judge Brown is | ||
Brown Jackson is trying to explain to the Senators how empathetic she is as a mother, that she's taken into account these victims. | ||
It's just, it strains credulity because it's not possible for her to even hear from, in a victim statement, from children who are nonverbal. | ||
Lindsey Graham said that she was an evasive witness. | ||
Did you believe she was evasive or spun or even lied in some regards or misdirected around Hawkins and some of these others? | ||
She didn't even bring up some of these other cases. | ||
Do you think she was an evasive witness? | ||
I think she was not only evasive, I think that they painted her into a corner and she sort of knew she was there. | ||
It's pretty much because her philosophy is that she does feel sorry for these individuals. | ||
Unlike a sex, a person who performs the sex act, rapists and whatnot, she views these people as lookers. | ||
You even heard her language. | ||
She referred to them in a less harsh way. | ||
She thinks that them being monitored for life and labeled sex offenders is unduly harsh. | ||
She really fails to connect the dots that there are certain types of criminals that you can, for example, teach not to steal a car or not to shoplift. | ||
But you don't then say you can't have contact with vehicles in the future. | ||
These are predators. | ||
They seek prey. | ||
That is what their motivation is. | ||
And there are reasons that neighbors are notified by sex registries of individuals in the neighborhood or nearby their children's, you know, T-ball area or whatever. | ||
You're putting the public on notice. | ||
These aren't people who you can rehabilitate, frankly. | ||
And that's what the mainstream parent believes. | ||
Gitanju Brown-Jackson does not believe that. | ||
She believes that they, in a way, are lookers. | ||
They aren't as culpable as someone who acts. | ||
And the depravity of these acts, especially on the small children, As Senator Hawley said, it's a cyclical problem. | ||
It creates an international market. | ||
We are driving further victims. | ||
And if you don't lay the hammer down on these people, then you're just creating more victims and more profiteering. | ||
And it's really, it's really, we heard it and I'm sure the war room covered that. | ||
Professor from Old Dominion University, Alan Walker was his or her name, who was talking about maps as minor attracted persons. | ||
These are individuals who seek, through the criminal justice system, to change definitions, to make things less criminal, or to make a perversion more mainstream. | ||
unidentified
|
So it does tell us what's going on in the schools. | |
We have a hard out. | ||
How do people follow you on social media? | ||
I'm on Getter at Deloes and I am posting quite a lot on not only legal stuff but also school boards because it's not enough to win the seat. | ||
We have to literally fight the administrative state that's running your local school board, which is not your school board. | ||
It's a larger web of bad actors. | ||
Stay tuned on the Getter page. | ||
We will get into all that. | ||
Your Getter page is on fire. | ||
Thank you, ma'am. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Okay, short break. | ||
War Room Battleground is next. | ||
We're going to have the woman running for Congress is taking it right to Disney in Orlando. | ||
Also, Todd Bensman and people from the Children's Health Defense. |