March 14, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:44
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| We've got a packed second hour. | ||
| Let's get to it. | ||
| I've got Steve Cortez. | ||
| Any concluding thoughts? | ||
| I know you've got to get off and start doing your thing today, start pulling in more information about us. | ||
| We'll be seeing a lot more of Cortez on The War Room. | ||
| What are your concluding thoughts after the first hour? | ||
| Steve, listening to your discussion with Michael Patrick Leahy about Senator Hagerty from Tennessee, it makes me happy, first of all, that I have moved to the state of Tennessee. | ||
| I'm a refugee from blue America, largely for exactly this kind of reason, to be represented by America First advocates, by people who have bravery like Senator Hagerty did here in rejecting the prevailing supposed wisdom, the conventional wisdom of the Washington establishment, which wants to escalate, needlessly escalate, This war in which America has no vital national interest. | ||
| Here would be my concluding thought for my appearance today, Steve, is let's look at the supposed conventional wisdom. | ||
| Let's look at the narratives, the lies, the terrible policy failures that have been pushed regularly by that very same establishment, by these very same people like Mitt Romney, like George Soros, like Joe Biden for two decades. | ||
| And I list some of them in my newest, some of the worst, the most pernicious lies and failures. | ||
| I list them in my new article, but my sub stack. | ||
| Iraq and WMD, China's inclusion into the World Trade Organization, the housing bubble, the Afghanistan occupation, the Russia collusion hoax, the lockdowns, all of these massive, grand, consequential lies that were pushed with near unanimity by the establishment, by the ruling class of America. | ||
| Now, the ruling class wants us to believe that That we have some existential systemic interest in this war in the Black Sea, in what is a regional border skirmish and should remain as that. | ||
| I stand with Hagerty, who thankfully stands with America First, a foreign policy of realism and restraint. | ||
| We have issues to cater to and solve here at home. | ||
| There is a border issue, but it sure isn't five or six thousand miles away. | ||
| It's our southern border. | ||
| Let's focus there. | ||
| Okay, I want to put this in perspective, okay? | ||
| On the same week that they passed a discretionary budget of $1.3 trillion, that when you add the interest will be over $2 trillion, that we can't pay for. | ||
| We're just going to print money because we're the prime reserve currency. | ||
| So let's go and abuse that while we can still do it, before China and Russia come up with another alternative that turns us into Argentina. | ||
| But let's go and do that. | ||
| The systemic structural deficit is over a trillion dollars in perpetuity. | ||
| Not Steve Bannon that says that, that's the Congressional Budget Office that says that. | ||
| The same time CNBC comes out with their analysis, 64% of the American people, 64% of your fellow citizens live paycheck to paycheck. | ||
| 80% can't take, can't miss a month of wages, miss a month of wages, gone. | ||
| BK, 80% of your fellow citizens, okay? | ||
| In that, we just added, we have $30 trillion face amount, we're about to add another, what, trillion and a half for what they just did the other night, and didn't have enough respect for you to read it. | ||
| But at the same time, because of a regional conflict in the heart, over in Eurasia, a border conflict, that's supposed to be the self-determination, sovereignty, Right? | ||
| The self-determination, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Eastern Ukraine. | ||
| It is supposed to be more paramount than all of that and the invasion on the southern border. | ||
| All of it. | ||
| And they don't have enough common decency to even read the bill. | ||
| They don't have enough respect for you. | ||
| Understand, they have no respect for you whatsoever. | ||
| They think you're morons. | ||
| They think they can just continue to spin and send you false information and frame it in a false way. | ||
| They're not prepared to address you and tell you what the systemic problems in this nation are and how we're going to get out of this. | ||
| They certainly don't think of you enough as adults. | ||
| They're going to come forward and say, hey, we're going to take some pain here. | ||
| And we, the ruling class and the financial and economic elites with our political and cultural elites, we're prepared to take more pain than you, the working class and middle class. | ||
| But here's what the program has to be. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. | ||
| All they continue to do is keep the presses running. | ||
| This is infantile, and it is dangerous, and we are now on the road to perdition, okay? | ||
| Because of what we've allowed these people to continually do. | ||
| And just look out there who's got the pom-poms. | ||
| Who's talking to you straight, and who's got the pom-poms on? | ||
| Who's out there is like a cheerleader? | ||
| We are hurtling towards something that can't be unwound. | ||
| Look at this inflation. | ||
| If it's 9% in March, that's pre-Ukraine war and pre-what's happening in China and Shenzhen. | ||
| In Shenzhen, the beating heart of the supply chain, the railhead of the supply chain, is now in total and complete lockdown. | ||
| Why? | ||
| The CCP virus. | ||
| Oh, you mean the one we never held China accountable to? | ||
| I would respectfully submit that in the fullness of time, People will look back and see why all the 42 senators that want to send MIGs into Ukraine, and demanding it happen, where were they to get to the bottom of the CCP virus? | ||
| Now that we're two years into this, and tens of trillions of dollars, and six million dead worldwide. | ||
| Steve Cortez, how do people get to you, sir? | ||
| Please reach me on Getter, I'm just at Steve, very simple there. | ||
| Still on Twitter for now, at Cortez Steve, Cortez with an S. Thank you sir, appreciate it. | ||
| Steve Cortez, the great Steve Cortez. | ||
| Okay, we've got a lot jammed up. | ||
| We've got to get to Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Pfizer tells us over the weekend, guess what, it's going to take four, four shots, four boosters. | ||
| I think Naomi Wolf, Dr. Naomi Wolf's got something to say about it, but I want to start with a magnificent, can we play the Carrie Lake introduction? | ||
| Are we up and ready to play that? | ||
| No, no, keep going. | ||
| Kerry, why don't you come on and, well, we blew that one too. | ||
| We're on a roll today on a Monday. | ||
| You know what, here's what we've got to do. | ||
| We retrain the staff every Monday when we come in and give them a weekend off. | ||
| Maybe this is why we shouldn't give them a day off. | ||
| Kerry Lake, you had this, do we play it now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, let's go ahead and play it. | |
| I'm counting you as... Well, that's not true at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's not true at all. | |
| No, you've called our election... Let's be fair on this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's be fair on this. | |
| Your man Donald... You've called our election the big lie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your man Donald brought it up. | |
| Your man Donald said... Why would you say that, sir? | ||
| Your man Donald? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, he is. | |
| I mean, he's endorsed you personally. | ||
| He said a few days ago that those people at the Capitol should be pardoned. | ||
| They should all be pardoned. | ||
| Do you think they should be pardoned? | ||
| I'm still amazed that you say your man Donald. | ||
| That's just so disrespectful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why would it be? | |
| He's endorsed you. | ||
| You have his personal endorsement. | ||
| It's just the flippin' attitude. | ||
| It's obvious that you've come into this. | ||
| It's obvious you've come into this interview and you don't like President Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Kari. | |
| It's obvious. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you think they should be pardoned? | |
| Do you think they should be pardoned? | ||
| I have no say in that. | ||
| I'm running for governor. | ||
| This isn't something a governor does. | ||
| You're trying to twist this interview and trying to make me look bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're a Republican. | |
| He's the Republican leader. | ||
| What I don't like is that people are being held in prison without being charged. | ||
| That's un-American. | ||
| Maybe they get away with that stuff in Australia. | ||
| Perhaps in Australia, because you've given your rights away, you melted down all of your guns, and you guys have no freedom, that you find that okay. | ||
| But here in America, we do things differently. | ||
| We have something called the U.S. | ||
| Constitution, and we have rights. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we'd be better off having more guns here? | |
| I mean, what, you'd be better off... | ||
| Yeah, you would. | ||
| You absolutely would, sir. | ||
| You absolutely would. | ||
| I feel so sorry for the people in Australia. | ||
| Have no power. | ||
| The only thing keeping us from being Australia right now is our Second Amendment. | ||
| And we will never, ever let that go. | ||
| Mark my words. | ||
| What we saw happening in Australia, where you have internment camps and people are being forced, if they've encountered anybody with COVID, to be locked into a quarantine camp, is the most horrifying thing I think I've ever seen a government do. | ||
| It's frightening. | ||
| And if you can't see that, I feel sorry for you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would it have been better? | |
| This is our last question, Liam. | ||
| We have to run, but thank you for your time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just answer me this one question. | |
| One more question, Kari. | ||
| No, I already told you we're done. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you so much. | |
| That guy's a complete nut. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Seriously, a complete insane person. | |
| That is the Australian version of 60 Minutes. | ||
| That's, I think, their biggest news show. | ||
| The great Carrie Lake. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Tell us about that. | ||
| Tell us what happened. | ||
| I've done a lot of interviews, Steve, and not everyone's as fair as you are. | ||
| You want to get to the truth and you just ask honest questions. | ||
| This guy came into it with a raging case, stage four Trump derangement syndrome. | ||
| And I did answer his question. | ||
| I answered it three times. | ||
| He didn't like the answer I gave him because he couldn't cut it and splice it the way he wanted. | ||
| So he kept asking the same question. | ||
| If you want to see the full interview unedited, go to my Rumble page, Kari Lake Rumble, K-A-R-I-L-A-K-E. | ||
| It is the craziest interview. | ||
| I think he's a complete lunatic. | ||
| It shows me that the global media is just as bad, if not worse, than the corrupt corporate media here. | ||
| You're going to start, here's what, you're so good at doing this because you're a pro, you've been doing this for what, 20 years, 25 years? | ||
| That's why the Arizona Republic, when you publish, when you give them an editorial, they're not going to publish it. | ||
| Because reporters are going to understand they can't go toe-to-toe with Carrie Lake, right? | ||
| Because you can blow these folks up. | ||
| I mean it, you can blow, I don't know if there's a news person out there that would come in and go mono-a-mono with you in a ring. | ||
| You're that good. | ||
| You're that good. | ||
| I've only got a couple minutes, but I've got to get something. | ||
| You are running for governor of Arizona, and you've got the situation in Ukraine. | ||
| In Arizona, just get us up to date on the invasion of the southern border. | ||
| The border that we should be maniacally focused on, and we are here at the War Room, is the southern border of our beloved Republic. | ||
| What's the current status there, Carrie Lake? | ||
| That was a perfect way of saying it. | ||
| This is our country. | ||
| We're being invaded, and it pains me to see All of the attention that our lawmakers are putting on a border half a world away. | ||
| And it's not that I don't feel for the people of Ukraine. | ||
| But damn it, I feel for the people of Arizona. | ||
| And we have people pouring across this border, unvetted. | ||
| We have drug CCP fentanyl that comes from the CCP up through the narco-terrorist cartels into Arizona. | ||
| We have child trafficking happening. | ||
| And our crime is spiking here in Arizona. | ||
| And we're not going to sit around and take it. | ||
| And that's why my border policy, my border plan, called Defend Arizona, has us doing exactly that. | ||
| We, the people of Arizona, will defend our state. | ||
| And it's right there in the Constitution. | ||
| We're able to do that. | ||
| Article 1, Section 10. | ||
| When the federal government fails us, if we have an invasion, we can protect ourselves. | ||
| And that's what I'm going to do on day one when I'm elected as governor here in Arizona. | ||
| But they're trying to keep us away from what's really happening. | ||
| You know, our elections are a complete nightmare. | ||
| We are going into another election and we still have a problem down here in Arizona and other states. | ||
| And that's why I filed this amicus brief last week, Steve, because I want to make sure that our Supreme Court takes a look at our elections before we go into this next round. | ||
| Right now, the way we're voting in Arizona, we believe is unconstitutional. | ||
| It does not line up with what our founders in Arizona put into our constitution. | ||
| Carrie, real quickly, what activities can people catch you on this week? | ||
| Are you giving any big speeches? | ||
| Where can people find you? | ||
| Well, I've got a lot going on this week. | ||
| Today I'm doing a roundtable on the fentanyl crisis. | ||
| Of course, this is all heading up from China. | ||
| China's bringing it into Mexico. | ||
| It's flowing through Arizona in an attempt to weaken and destroy this country. | ||
| So we have that. | ||
| That's with Congressman Gosar's office, and that's in Goodyear. | ||
| I've got so much going on this week, I'm going to be actually out of town as well. | ||
| I'll put some stuff on my website. | ||
| Go to CarrieLake.com. | ||
| You can find it all there. | ||
| And how do people find out more about your campaign? | ||
| Right there. | ||
| CarrieLake.com. | ||
| Of course, you can follow me. | ||
| I'm on Truth Social. | ||
| I'm on Twitter. | ||
| I'm on Facebook. | ||
| And I've got a new app. | ||
| You know, I worked with some of the good guys in tech to get a new app because I know that eventually Twitter, Facebook, they're all probably going to take people like me and cancel us like they did with President Trump. | ||
| So you can find my new app at the App Store or the Google Play Store. | ||
| Just look it up under Kari Lake. | ||
| K-A-R-I-L-A-K-E. | ||
| Okay, now we're going to put up and make sure the entire interview goes up with 60 Minutes Australia. | ||
| It's incredible and I want to share that. | ||
| Carrie, thank you so much. | ||
| By the way, rumor has it there are folks reaching out in Australia who want you to run for Prime Minister down there on your Second Amendment platform. | ||
| They loved it. | ||
| I woke up to a lot of messages in my mailbox from Australia. | ||
| Most of them loved me, but a few of them had some choice words. | ||
| Kerry, I think you can take choice words. | ||
| Kerry Lake, runner for governor of Arizona in a very tough primary down there, and then it looks like Katie Hobbs in the general. | ||
| Kerry Lake, thank you for coming to the War Room. | ||
| We're going to go to Pfizer next. | ||
| Four boosters, but 55,000 pages of documents. | ||
| 55,000 pages of documents. | ||
| Next, Dr. Wolf. | ||
|
unidentified
|
♪ Day of all life for two ♪ When you and your colleagues were trying to decide which route to go down, the traditional vaccine route or the mRNA route, you write that it was quote, most counterintuitive to go the mRNA route. | |
| And yet you went that route. | ||
| Explain why. | ||
| It was counterintuitive because Pfizer, I was mastering, or let's say we had very good experience and expertise with multiple technologies that could give a vaccine. | ||
| Adenoviruses, like some of the other vaccines are. | ||
| We were very good in doing that. | ||
| Protein vaccines, we were very good in doing that, and plus many other technologies. | ||
| mRNA was the technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this. | ||
| And actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day. | ||
| Not vaccine, not any other medicine. | ||
| So it was very counterintuitive. | ||
| And I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go. | ||
| And I questioned it. | ||
| And I asked them to justify it. | ||
| How can you say something like that? | ||
| But they came and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go. | ||
| They felt that the two years of work on mRNA since 2018, together with BioNTech, to develop a flu vaccine, made them believe that the technology is mature and we are at the cusp of delivering a product. | ||
| So they convinced me. | ||
| I followed my instinct that they know what they're saying. | ||
| They're very good. | ||
| And we made this very difficult decision. | ||
| Okay, I want to bring in now Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, did my ears hear me correctly? | ||
| Is he disavowing? | ||
| That's the CEO of Pfizer. | ||
| You're deep into the 55,000 pages with the war room posse and lawyers that are volunteer. | ||
| We're going to get all up there on that. | ||
| He just came in today and didn't say fourth booster, but is he disavowing the path that they took? | ||
| You know this better than I do. | ||
| This is not my line of country. | ||
| What did we just hear? | ||
| There for all to see and hear, and that was the Washington Post quickly doing what I think is damage control related to the work that Ed Dowd and you and your amazing 12 or 1300 volunteers going through the Pfizer documents. | ||
| I think this is a response. | ||
| Honestly, he basically said, I, you know, they told me it was going to work. | ||
| They told me it was OK, but we have no real experience with it except for, you know, the last two years and they've never made a product with it before. | ||
| Literally, that was the CEO of Pfizer saying that in the same 48 hour period that he then said of this mystery product of which he has no knowledge and takes no responsibility. | ||
| You need a fourth booster, a fourth dose. | ||
| So it's it's surreal. | ||
| It's terrifying. | ||
| And, you know, I suspect there's a lot behind the scenes that we don't know about some kind of obligation that I don't even understand to push a fourth dose, but at the same time try to lay down, like all the main evil doers are doing right now, a nominal paper trail saying, wasn't me. | ||
| Rochelle Walensky's doing the same thing. | ||
| You know, it was just guidance. | ||
| You know, it's like asking for fries at Shake Shack. | ||
| You know, I didn't have, I didn't tell people what to do. | ||
| I didn't have any knowledge of, you know, what was in this stuff. | ||
| It's extraordinary. | ||
| OK, so one thing you've become in with the daily clout and going after the states and we've tried to be here in this Ukraine war and other things. | ||
| The CCP virus is the still point in the turning world that you can actually have people like build their own intellectual frameworks, their own mental maps, and then they can kind of see all this disparate information come with them. | ||
| The 55,000 pages of documentation, you now have a volunteer team, your team put this great site together, this volunteer team of 12 or 1300 folks from the war room, what, almost 200 lawyers, 165 lawyers going through this in detail. | ||
| And that is, those documents were negotiated, besides there are no liabilities, it was negotiated that it would be, I don't know, 70 years. | ||
| Somebody told me that you wouldn't see these. | ||
| It's bigger than the Kennedy assassination, right? | ||
| Not in your life. | ||
| Remember they said that, Earl Warren said, not in your lifetime. | ||
| Not in your lifetime. | ||
| And hey, he's dead right. | ||
| A lot of people's lifetime, we still haven't released him, but this was going to be another 70 years. | ||
| Where do we stand right now with your project to let the American people crowdsource a knowledge program to get to the bottom of what happened? | ||
| So this, you know, this model, as I said before, I'm going to say it even more so, is proving out to be quite revolutionary. | ||
| Every day, the research teams find and surface important new documentation, and then that goes over To the lawyers and we're going to have a webinar on the 23rd about how to file criminal charges so that it's not just civil actions that these people are facing but criminal. | ||
| But can I just I'm a little bit in shock today like every time the research team brings me what they found my level of trying to tolerate shock has to go higher and higher. | ||
| I would like to share with your community a finding that reached reached me from the research team yesterday which is Pretty terrifying, and I think people need to know about it. | ||
| Yes, ma'am. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| So, this was leaked to me. | ||
| It's directly from the AMA, but it's also replicated in the documents. | ||
| It's Appendix Q, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus COVID-19 Vaccines. | ||
| And what it is, is a table that goes to doctors With vaccine codes and dosages. | ||
| And many people have said, and this was one thing that led me not to want to take, there you go, not to want to take the vaccine. | ||
| Many people who are nurses and pharmacists have been whistleblowing and saying, you know, the ingredients are not in the sheet that goes with the package, it's blank. | ||
| And that's been correct. | ||
| But here, if you're a doctor, you can get, or a medical insider, you can get this table. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So this table is pretty terrifying because there's been work that's been done that I thought was preliminary, but this confirms it, that there are different batches, essentially, with different codes, you know, serial numbers, basically, and that they are having different effects. | ||
| There's a website called HowBadIsMyBatch.com, I believe, that is looking at symptoms from the VAERS database that relate to different kinds of serial numbers. | ||
| Well, this is the other side of that. | ||
| It would appear, and again, this is over to the doctors, over to the lawyers to validate, but it would appear, and you can see for yourself, that it lists a series of codes. | ||
| They all start with 913, but they end in 00, 05, 07, and they do appear to be different batches. | ||
| There's a whole series that are left out, and you can find them elsewhere, which is concerning. | ||
| And that series is called Vaccines Slash Toxoids and Vaccines Slash Toxoids Guidelines. | ||
| But look, just looking at this series, which is about 12 batches, they have different dosages. | ||
| They have different dosages. | ||
| It says mRNA LNP, which is the lipid nanoparticle spike protein preservative free. | ||
| And then the first one is 30 micrograms. | ||
| The second one is Also 30 micrograms. | ||
| These are Pfizer. | ||
| But then there's 10 micrograms, also Pfizer. | ||
| And then Moderna has 100 micrograms. | ||
| And then Pfizer has 3 micrograms. | ||
| And these are different batches. | ||
| And then Moderna has 50 micrograms. | ||
| And another Moderna has 50 micrograms. | ||
| And then you go, so just in those, those, Those like eight or nine batches that I've just read that end in 00, 05, 07, 01, 08, different people are getting different dosages of the active and possibly the dangerous ingredients. | ||
| And the reason I find this so important, especially with the work that you've been doing to showcase Edward Dowd's colleagues' charts, where they've broken down deaths and plotted them on a timeline with With boosters and with the first and second injections, there was a huge spike, as I recall, of millennial deaths right around the time the boosters were rolled out. | ||
| And if you look at this table, it would appear that some batches could have more of the spike protein, more of the lipid nanoparticles, which I'm persuaded are so problematic, you know, than others. | ||
| And so this is truly shocking and they're not adjusted for weight or size, right? | ||
| So if you're a hundred pound woman or a teenager, you're not getting any less in these high LNP, high spike protein dosages than a 300 pound, six foot man. | ||
| And then lastly, over to the right, the table shows, first of all, it shows this is an undated document, but it shows that they already planned a fourth dose and a booster. | ||
| But also, when it says second dose to third dose, CDC-recommended populations is, for example, immunocompromised. | ||
| This is not supposed to be for everyone, according to this internal document. | ||
| It's targeted to frail populations, vulnerable populations, where the risk-benefit equation is going to make more sense to take what Birla has now called a risky injection. | ||
| So to me, this is You know, quite terrifying. | ||
| The other thing that comes up is that there are two different solutions. | ||
| This may or may not be relevant, but I mean, literally, this is an experiment. | ||
| You don't know what you're getting. | ||
| And I guess the last thing I want to say, and again, I am not a medical doctor. | ||
| So, you know, this is now over to the doctors, over to the lawyers for, you know, triple and quadruple review and explication. | ||
| But what's scary to me is that doctors would have known this. | ||
| Doctors would have seen these codes Seeing these different dosages, being able to look at the vial and know, oh, this is a 50-microgram dose, this is a 100-microgram dose, this is a 3-microgram dose, and didn't alert people that there are different batches with different levels of the active ingredients in this vaccine. | ||
| So this is all pretty shocking. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, we've got about a minute. | ||
| How do people join up and assist you? | ||
| You've got, what, 1,200 or 1,300 volunteers now. | ||
| How do people go to this site and find out more about you and the work that's being done? | ||
| Yeah, please come to research at dailycloud.io and then you'll get assigned one of six different groups and also go to dailycloud.io campaigns over there on the right. | ||
| choose the Pfizer campaign and sign up and you'll get an email and a form and you can go ahead and get to work. But please support each other emotionally and including you know all of us who are learning this because this is truly truly disturbing. Dr. Wolf, great work. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
| We'll be having you on a lot during the next, this week to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We're going to be talking about two borders in the remaining time we got. | ||
| One, the Southern border of the United States with a live report with Ben Burquham of Real America's Voice. | ||
| And the other, the Eastern border of Ukraine. | ||
| We'll let you weigh and measure next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| We have the towels on sale $109.99 normally. | ||
| Now it's $39.99. | ||
| This is not going to last forever. | ||
| MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Of course, we've still got the sleep sale going on. | ||
| You've got the Giza sheets that are in overstock. | ||
| Hit that bid. | ||
| You've got everything to keep you warm. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| The slippers, the moccasins, the bathrobes, all of that, plus the down comforters. | ||
| And you've got the, don't forget, the biblical pillows for the kids and grandkids. | ||
| And of course, now they've got the biblical throw blanket. | ||
| So check it all out. | ||
| MyPillow.com. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| Action, action, action. | ||
| Use your agency. | ||
| These are one-time good deals. | ||
| You don't want to miss them. | ||
| Okay, we're going to try to get Ben Berquam up a little bit later about the southern border. | ||
| That's the one we're focused on, the invasion there. | ||
| I just want to say something before I bring in Captain Fennell and Frank Gaffney. | ||
| And I know this is totally random, because remember, our watchword here is there's no conspiracies, but there's also no coincidences. | ||
| Isn't it odd, ever since the 55,000 pages came out and the courts ruled they've got to be put forward, and now you've got Tiger teams all over there going through it in detail? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't see a lot of, I don't see Tony Fauci, I don't see, I don't see a lot of folks on TV. | |
| I just don't see him on TV. | ||
| I understand the Ukraine wars 24-7, the war point in Ukraine 24-7, that he's got to do that. | ||
| Don't see him. | ||
| And with the fact that Shenzhen has now been in lockdown. | ||
| It's what, 17 million people? | ||
| Another what, 3 or 4 million in Hong Kong in total lockdown? | ||
| You would think maybe I'd have the FDA or the CDC or some voice reason MSNBC or CNN's always rubbing our nose in. | ||
| Where are they? | ||
| Where is everybody? | ||
| Put the band back together. | ||
| Let's hear them. | ||
| I'm missing me some Tony Fauci. | ||
| Let's go to Frank Gaffney. | ||
| Frank, we said and we got such tremendous response from Saturday's show. | ||
| We took an entire hour to go through the real war we got to be focused on, which is the war that's coming. | ||
| Look, we're already in economic war with the Chinese Communist Party, but the coming kinetic war. | ||
| If we don't watch it. | ||
| The unrestricted war, they're already at us with information war, cyber war, where they just deal with $600 billion a year in intellectual property from us every year, right? | ||
| in 600 billion dollars a year in intellectual property from us every year, right? | ||
| I think it's three trillion dollars total they've stolen from us. | ||
| So walk us through. | ||
| Why is the media not focused on that? | ||
| Although we were live in Rome today about the meeting with Tiger Yang and Jake Sullivan. | ||
| Think about that match-up. | ||
| Tiger Yang, who was the interpreter for Deng Xiaoping. | ||
| He's been there at the side of these guys for 50 years. | ||
| He's mean as a junkyard dog against a soy boy pencil neck like Jake Sullivan. | ||
| That's a good matchup. | ||
| I feel very comfortable the United States position is being put forward. | ||
| Frank Gaffney, the important war here, the war against the Chinese Communist Party, particularly in the South China Sea and Taiwan, where do we stand in that given everything that's going on today about China's rearming them, their underwriting the entire war? | ||
| What are your thoughts, sir? | ||
| I think the Soy Boy's statement over the weekend that there were going to be consequences for the Chinese engineering, essentially a safety net for their Russian allies, is an interesting point to begin this conversation, Steve. | ||
| I don't know whether he'll be up to Wang or not, but what we know for sure is if something isn't done about China, Not only will Russia be able to continue what it's doing to Ukraine, but you will see China inevitably moving in the nature of a kinetic war with certainly Taiwan and probably with us, maybe with India as well. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| But the piece of this that I think is particularly important, as you've said over the weekend, and I think probably why that response was so strong was in part | ||
| Your very clear statement, Steve, that China is our enemy, not the Chinese people, not China as a nation per se, but the Chinese Communist Party, which misrules those people and is abusing that country absolutely indisputably is our mortal adversary. | ||
| And we have to, you know, sort of start with that and deal accordingly with the other piece of this, which I think we also | ||
| Illuminated and really can't say enough about, and that is that people who aid and abet our enemy in the name of engaging with China, as we've been told for decades we must do, are actually engaging in the enabling, the empowering, the emboldening of this mortal adversary to act aggressively and violently. | ||
| And so it's unrestricted warfare with that piece that's not fortunately to this point come into play, but is about to, I think. | ||
| And Captain Fennell is one of the world's leaders in terms of diagnosing how far along the Chinese are to having the capability to add to the mix, the economic warfare, the political warfare, the information operations, the version, all the rest of it. | ||
| The kinetic piece, and I'm very proud to be on the show with him today. | ||
| Captain Finnell, so where do we stand in all this, and what should people be looking for in the fog of war here? | ||
| Where should our focus be, sir? | ||
| We should be very focused on, you know, we're watching death and destruction in the Ukraine, and a lot of people in America and the China hands community do not believe that the PRC and the Chinese Communist Party would ever use the same kind of violence against the people of Taiwan or anybody else. | ||
| And that's simply not true. | ||
| And so we need to be upping our game in terms of indications and warning, watching what China's military is doing, being postured ahead of time, moving forces, preparing our forces for the contingency that an invasion of Taiwan could happen. | ||
| And it could happen this year. | ||
| And so we need to have... | ||
| People that are ready and not so much, you know, let the diplomats talk. | ||
| I don't think that's going to change anything but the military and the DoD and our, you know, Space Force and the capabilities that we're going to need to be able to sink that invasion fleet. | ||
| and defend Taiwan from rockets, short range ballistic missiles, anti-ship cruise missiles, anti-ship ballistic missiles, all of those things that they built for their counter-invasion or counter anti-access area denial strategy that we've worked on, that the Chinese have built up, that we've got to get through that. We've got to be able to fight and win inside that | ||
| to defend Taiwan. I think probably the folks out in Indo-Pecan are prepared, but they're prepared in a mindset that still, it's It's not really prepared in the sense that it's going to happen, and that real bad things are going to happen, and that our ships, and our carriers, and our amphibious ships are going to be sunk. | ||
| This is the point I want to get. | ||
| You're a Seventh Fleet sailor, and so am I. The historic Seventh Fleet that won the war against the, or the major component that won the war in the Pacific in World War II. | ||
| Are we a little bit like before Pearl Harbor, where you had people, yeah, we're doing readiness drills, but they didn't have the imagination to understand what the Japanese were prepared to do? | ||
| Is the 7th Fleet, sir, prepared to defend Taiwan by defeating the PLA and the Chinese Communist Party in the South China Sea in defense of Taiwan? | ||
| I would say that the shipmates that are out there in their hearts want to do that, but I do not think they've been given the equipment, the materials. | ||
| They don't have anti-ship cruise missiles that can sink Chinese ships. | ||
| They're just not equipped across the board in an overwhelming way to be able to sink that fleet. | ||
| So they train, they practice, they're aware of China's philosophy and their war plans, but the idea that they're going to do this with the existing tools that they've been given After 30 years of a DoD that's been focused on the Middle East, and not focused on winning a naval battle at sea, it's just ludicrous. | ||
| And so we need a strong wake-up call. | ||
| You know, before World War II, we had the people at Newport that were doing war planning, and that were preparing to fight the Japanese. | ||
| They intellectually understood it, but the nation had not prepared. | ||
| Not prepared then. | ||
| Had not given them enough, you know, ships and submarines and effective torpedoes and all that we know about from history. | ||
| And we are in the same kind of position today. | ||
| There are people in Newport, there are people in Camp Smith and Indo-Pekong that know the Chinese, understand it. | ||
| They're planning and they're doing planning. | ||
| They're doing tabletop exercises, but their force forward and the force in reserve in the continental United States that takes three weeks to get there, they're not prepared. | ||
| They're not equipped. | ||
| They don't have the number of munitions that they're going to need for a sustained fight to sink that Chinese fleet and to be able to survive the strategic rocket force that's going to come raining down on them from, you know, missiles launched from submarines, from ships, from aircraft, and now hypersonics. | ||
| This is pretty stunning. | ||
| I think this is the first time, I'll be honest, I think a broad swath of the American people have heard this. | ||
| Correct me if I'm wrong, Captain Finnell, we just passed approximately $900 billion, and I say it's a trillion when you add everything in, a trillion dollar defense budget the other day. | ||
| In that defense budget, there's not the tools, the weapons that you believe are needed to defend the South China Sea and Taiwan, which is Silicon Valley West, sir. | ||
| No, I do not believe that that defense bill provides the things that are required to defeat a PRC invasion of Taiwan. | ||
| You know, in the first few years of the Trump administration, I happened to talk to some people in the Defense Department and they said that You know, what they essentially got, even though the president had said, I want to focus on, you know, getting prepared for China. | ||
| What they were getting was essentially the same budget submissions from the services that they had done for the previous 30 years in the war in the desert. | ||
| And all they did was they erased CENTCOM and they put in PACOM and they said, here's my submission. | ||
| That's a gross over-exaggeration, but that was a verbatim quote that I got from somebody in the Defense Department. | ||
| And I think that we're nibbling around the edges instead of saying, this is an existential threat, they are our declared enemy, and as such, we're going to totally revamp the Defense Department's budget. | ||
| You saw in this budget submission in FY22, The number of ships that we're going to produce is not adequate. | ||
| We're not even scratching 350 in 30 years. | ||
| And China's already over 350, and they're going to be a 600-ship Navy in 2040, or 550. | ||
| to be a 600 ship Navy in 2040, so 550. | ||
| So I think we need to really reassess what we're spending our money on and why are we spending on things that are still focused on the desert and on army maneuvers and ground warfare. | ||
| We're not going to fight China in a war on land. | ||
| We have to defeat them in the air and at sea and in space. | ||
| And those are the areas that need to be really dramatically plussed up. | ||
| And we need to get away from this, you know, The Army, the Air Force and the Navy and Marine Corps each get a third of the budget. | ||
| That's retarded. | ||
| We need to get to a place where we're prioritizing what's really important and increasing the spending there. | ||
| Steve, could I just add? | ||
| Yeah, jump in, Frank. | ||
| Real quick. | ||
| One of the other things that needs to happen here is we need to end the Biden administration's war on the U.S. | ||
| military. | ||
| This is going on in the background of when you've got people who aren't training for warfighting, they're training for white supremacism and critical race theory and all that nonsense or transgenderism. | ||
| When you have People being driven out of the services because they're too conservative or because they won't take the vaccine, even though they're absolutely critical to our warfighting capabilities. | ||
| They've got the skills, they've got the training, they've got the unit cohesion that's needed to prevail in the kind of circumstances the captains just talked about. | ||
| In addition, we have to stop funding our enemy. | ||
| We've talked about this a lot, Steve, but honestly, this is the single most important thing, it seems to me. | ||
| We've got to be taking the steps Jim is talking about to rebuild our military, but we've got to stop funding theirs, for heaven's sake. | ||
| Hang on a second, we're going to take a short break. | ||
| I've been saying this for years. | ||
| In hybrid warfare and modern warfare and unrestricted warfare, if you're losing the information war and the cyber war and the economic war, where Frank Gaffney was talking about, we're financing our enemies. | ||
| Then you're going to be drawn into a kinetic war. | ||
| What Captain Fennell is telling you is that the hour is late. | ||
| The hour is late. | ||
| We can't fool ourselves anymore. | ||
| You can't sleepwalk into this. | ||
| Remember the sleepwalkers in 1914. | ||
| Sleepwalkers walked right into it. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Captain Fennell, Frank Gaffney, next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we've partnered with Lee Greenwood and the team there in Tennessee to do God Bless the USA Bible. | ||
| This is the King James Version of the Bible, plus our divinely inspired founding documents, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and of course, the Pledge of Allegiance, all in one leather-bound source for the family. | ||
| And I'll tell you, in times like this, More than ever. | ||
| God bless the USA. | ||
| Bible.com. | ||
| Go there. | ||
| You put in the promo code Wormy. | ||
| You get free shipping and handling. | ||
| So make sure you do it today. | ||
| Check out what Lee Greenwood's done. | ||
| Remember, his publisher turned him down. | ||
| Wouldn't let him conclude the documents, the founding documents. | ||
| Turned him down. | ||
| A major publisher. | ||
| That's why he's done it on his own, and we're helping him out. | ||
| Tonight, we're going to proudly announce a Real America's Voice. | ||
| We're going to have Ben Burquam, by the way, couldn't hook it up. | ||
| We're going to have Burquam that is down on the border. | ||
| We're going to have him on the 5 o'clock show today, the Real America's Voice investigative reporter. | ||
| At 11 o'clock tonight, and it couldn't be more timely in this time of an expanding war in the Eurasian landmass, Frank Gaffney. | ||
| He's going to premiere a new show at 11 p.m. | ||
| tonight, Securing Freedom on Real America's Voice, so make sure you tune in, and if it's a little too late for you, make sure you set the timer. | ||
| Let's record it and watch it in the morning. | ||
| Frank, congratulations on the show. | ||
| I want to, well, I've got Captain Finnell, because it's tough to track him down. | ||
| I've got a question. | ||
| Captain Finnell, explain to the American people, in your belief, as somebody who's dedicated his life to this, is defense of the South China Sea I believe it is, Steve. | ||
| vital national security interest of the United States of America? | ||
| I believe it is, Steve. | ||
| Five trillion dollars worth of goods that go to America, pass through in Europe, go through the South China Sea every year. | ||
| Five trillion, okay? | ||
| And that money and those businesses and the sales and the people that work to produce those goods affect the lives of Americans back home in the United States. | ||
| And if we cede that territory to China and Taiwan, then China will rule that and we'll be able to control who gets to buy and sell. | ||
| And that's what we have stood against since for many, many centuries. | ||
| And since World War II, we, the United States Navy, have patrolled those waters and made it a free and open Pacific and free access to markets, free access to ports so that anybody can buy and sell and trade and that nobody can control who can do that. | ||
| And China has plans to control that. | ||
| If they, like we've seen them do in economic coercion against Australia, South Korea, they will use their military and their Coast Guard and their maritime militia to stop the flow of goods if somebody doesn't follow what they say. | ||
| And Taiwan is Silicon Valley West, that's 80 or 90% of our advanced ships, so the American economy would collapse without it. | ||
| Real quickly, in the Chinese comments, they're in Rome meeting today, tapping us along as they always do. | ||
| In their mind, sir, they view the South China Sea as an internal sea of China, correct? | ||
| And they believe that Taiwan is just another province of China? | ||
| They believe that that is their territory? | ||
| Am I mistaken in that? | ||
| 100% correct. | ||
| Every Chinese child has been taught for the last 30 years that the South China Sea, everything inside the Nine-Dash Line for sure, is part of the PRC's territory. | ||
| and they actually teach their children that the place called James Shoal, which is just off the coast of Borneo, and it's a shoal, it doesn't even rise above the sea level at average mean tide, that that shoal is the southernmost point of China's territory. | ||
| 900 miles away from the mainland of China, it's taught that that is their territory. | ||
| And then when we criticize them on it, they say, well, you take the same approach to the Gulf of Mexico, which is another lie. | ||
| Real quickly, I said five years ago on Breitbart Radio, we've been within a shooting war five to seven years. | ||
| We're at the outer edge of that. | ||
| Do you believe, in talking to the American people now, that they should be concerned about the potential for a shooting war in the South China Sea and in Taiwan within this year, sir? | ||
| It's very possible. | ||
| It's possible that it could happen. | ||
| It's not impossible. | ||
| And given what they're seeing in the Ukraine and our response to that, it's inviting to them. | ||
| And, you know, sending our national security advisor over to Rome to go talk to China to help us solve the Ukraine problem is just another signal of weakness. | ||
| It's always about engagement. | ||
| Everything from the China Hands community, they just released something from UC San Diego, a statement about hard-headed diplomacy with China over Ukraine. | ||
| And their first recommendation is, seek diplomatic engagement with China. | ||
| It's always talk to China to help us solve world problems. | ||
| If China invades Taiwan, they're not going to talk to us. | ||
| They're going to invade and destroy Taiwan. | ||
| And they see the opportunity is very good right now. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead Frank, jump in. | ||
| Just real quick, one of the things that is implicit in what Jim has just talked about is It isn't just the waters of the South China Sea that the Chinese are intent on dominating. | ||
| They're intent on dominating the peoples of those areas as well. | ||
| The Philippines, Japan, Vietnam, of course, South Korea. | ||
| They have in mind getting their hands on that part of the world as they do the rest of it. | ||
| This Belt and Road Initiative is all about a colonial empire build out that will effectively, and in not too distant future, if they have their way, dominate the world. We mustn't let that happen, and we certainly mustn't be underwriting it. We have a mad as hell campaign that's aimed at trying to help people ensure that their money isn't going into the coffers of the Chinese Communist Party for this purpose. As you often said, it is a transnational criminal organization. | ||
| It must be treated as such. | ||
| People enabling it are traitors. | ||
| They must be treated as such as well. | ||
| Now, real quickly, how did they get to the Mad As Hell campaign over the Committee on the Present Danger in your organization? | ||
| Well, it's still a building. | ||
| We're going to have more and more coming out shortly there, but the Committee on the Present Danger's website is presentdangerchina.org. | ||
| Watch that spot. | ||
| And securingamerica.tv is the one I also want to drive them to. | ||
| Okay, so I want to thank Captain Fennell, and Frank, you and I are going to bring Captain Fennell back, hopefully maybe later this week or next week, because I think this is the first time the American people have heard, because I've preached the gospel of you've got to have information war, cyber war, and economic, and if you don't do those, you're going to have kinetic. | ||
| Captain Fennell's warning that, hey, if it is kinetic, Don't think that the 7th Fleet right now could win that. | ||
| I think it's pretty shocking. | ||
| Because I think most people just sit back and go, the 7th Fleet will deliver like they did in World War II. | ||
| Frank, Captain Finnell, I want to thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. | ||
| Frank, once again, 11 o'clock tonight on Real America's Voice, the show premieres. | ||
| Yes, it does. | ||
| Well, it's been around for a bit, but it's going weeknightly at 11 p.m., securing America, and we're delighted to have you there. | ||
| Thanks for plugging it, Steve. | ||
| Primer. | ||
| Captain Finnell, thank you very much. | ||
| We'll be back here at 5 o'clock, more about this expanding war on the Eurasian landmass and how it's going to impact you personally at 5 o'clock today. |
Export Selection