March 12, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:50
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
He had the hope that the world managed to get rid itself of at least those biological threats which are created by men, because everyone who signed this understood the huge risks of using biological weapons and decided to forgo any plans to develop it. | |
| Unfortunately, we have reason to believe that these hopes have not been fully fulfilled. | ||
| We convene the meeting today because as Russia is conducting a special military operation in Ukraine, we discovered a truly shocking fact of emergency cleanup by the Kiev regime of the traces of a military biological program which is being implemented by Kiev with support by the United States Ministry of Defense. | ||
| Our Ministry of Defence, Russian Ministry of Defence, now has documents which confirms that on the territory of Ukraine there was a network consisting of at least 30 biological laboratories in which very dangerous biological experiments were being conducted aimed at strengthening the pathogenic qualities of the plague, anthrax, tularemia, | ||
| of cholera and other lethal diseases using synthetic biology. | ||
| This work is being done and funded and supervised by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the United States, including in the interest of the National Center for Medical Intelligence of the United States, Minister of Defense. | ||
| I want to ask the Security Council for today's meeting for the sole purpose of lying and spreading disinformation, and that is exactly what you have heard from the Russian PR this morning. | ||
| You also heard from Ms. Nakamitsu that the UN is not aware of any biological or chemical weapons programs in Ukraine. | ||
| We'll see you next time. | ||
| Last month, Secretary Blinken laid out with tragic accuracy what Russia was about to do. | ||
| He specifically warned that Russia would manufacture a pretext for attack, and even cautioned that Russia would fabricate allegations about chemical or biological weapons to justify its own violent attacks against the Ukrainian people. | ||
| Today the world is watching Russia do exactly what we warned it would. | ||
| Russia is attempting to use the Security Council to legitimize disinformation and deceive people to justify President Putin's war of choice against the Ukrainian people. | ||
| Hey folks, so I just had the pleasure of joining a White House briefing with a senior official from the National Security Council, and I want to talk to you about what America is doing to help Ukraine. | ||
| Because it's important to spread accurate information here. | ||
| And let me just quickly say, as someone who has family in Ukraine, I am very grateful for what America has done thus far. | ||
| Here are the three most important bits of the White House briefing that me and a bunch of other creators just attended. | ||
| First, if Russia uses chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons in Ukraine, the United States will take escalatory steps. | ||
| We don't know exactly what that means, but it won't be good for Russia. | ||
| Second, Russian troops are not happy with their own invasion, and it's really impacting Russia's ability to make progress in this war. | ||
| Third, Russia is not going to win in Ukraine. | ||
| Things have gone so badly for them that it's just not possible anymore. | ||
| This point here was also conducted by research centers in other cities of Ukraine, in Kiev, in Lvov, in Kharkov, in Dnepr, in Kherson, in Ternopil, in Uzhgorod, and Vinnitsa. | ||
| The results of this work were being sent to military biological centers in the United States, including into the U.S. | ||
| Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, into the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, into the Naval Medical Research of the U.S. | ||
| Navy, and into the U.S. | ||
| Army Biological Warfare Laboratories in Fort Detrick. | ||
| Russia has broken its commitments under the Charter. | ||
| American program to develop biological weapons. All of these materials are available on the website of our Ministry of Defense and our Ministry of Defense is describing them in the course of their daily briefings. Let me just dwell on the more salient examples. | ||
| Russia has broken its commitments under the Charter. But we must not let it subvert the multilateral system itself. As the UN said today, Russia is now putting at threat the global framework for peace and security. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Bye! | ||
| The Security Council is responsible for addressing many serious conflicts around the world. | ||
| We have important work to do. | ||
| We do not sit in this chamber to be an audience for Russia's domestic propaganda. | ||
| And we should not allow Russia to abuse its permanent seat to spread disinformation and lies and pervert the purpose of the Security Council. | ||
| Russia's allegations are, in our opinion, part of the information warfare, false, unsubstantiated, part of the usual propaganda and the disinformation coming from Russia, conspiracy theories not worth our time. | ||
| So I just got off of a Zoom call with the White House about the situation in Ukraine. | ||
| A number of other content creators on social media and myself were invited to this event, which was on background, meaning that we couldn't record or take pictures, but we can discuss what we learned from it. | ||
| Now there was definitely a lot discussed, but in this video, I'm going to go over the specific question that I got to ask, the answer to it, and my thoughts on their response. | ||
| And as a quick piece of context, a lot of the people there ask questions based off of the content they create and what they feel their audience might want to know. | ||
| So that informs the question that I personally asked. | ||
| So this was my question. | ||
| Many people from marginalized communities in the United States have become dejected regarding this situation because there is an imbalance of coverage and assistance given to the Ukraine-Russia crisis compared to other occupations, invasions, and attacks throughout the world, some of which have US involvement. | ||
| What incentivizes these Americans to be in strong support of the US, giving high levels of attention and direct aid against the Russian invasion, as we feel there isn't enough attention on related issues in other places throughout the world and right here in the United States? | ||
| First I'll try to give a direct summary of what they said, which can be divided into four different points. | ||
| According to them, one reason that this crisis is specifically notable is because of the size of the invasion which is the largest since World War II. | ||
| Second, they acknowledge that this coverage imbalance exists for crises throughout the world, and encourage us as content creators to use our platforms to highlight different issues as they arise, especially when mainstream media fails to do so. | ||
| Don't have access to electricity for heat or drinking water to stay alive. | ||
| Russia is the aggressor here. | ||
| And despite Russia's best efforts, the media and everyday Ukrainians are documenting this truth on the ground. | ||
| Russia can't paint over the front page of the New York Times, which on Monday featured the bodies of a Ukrainian mother and her two children, who died while trying to cross a bridge outside Kyiv in their attempt to flee to safety. | ||
| Russia cannot cover up the work of AP news reporters who captured a doctor attempting to resuscitate an 18-month-old girl who died from Russian shelling in Maripol. | ||
| Russia cannot suppress the social media posts confirmed and amplified by CBS News that told the story of the 11-year-old Ukrainian boy who fled to Slovakia by himself with only a passport, a plastic bag, and a phone number scrawled on his hands. | ||
| It's going to continue to stand together with our allies in Europe and send unmistakable message. | ||
| We'll defend every single inch of NATO territory with the full might of the united and galvanized NATO. | ||
| We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine. | ||
| The direct confrontation between NATO and Russia is World War III. | ||
| Welcome to World War Three, and you heard the information warfare part of this in many different aspects today. | ||
| The TikTok influencers at the White House, you heard up at the National Security Council. | ||
| And I would just ask this audience that's getting trained up. | ||
| What are your thoughts? | ||
| It's Friday, the 11th of March, Year of the Lord 2022, and we're deep into it now, as you can tell. | ||
| Every second of every day, it's spin, misdirection plays from every side. | ||
| So the important thing here is to make sure you have information and make sure that you can make your own judgments. | ||
| And that's what we try to provide here at The War Room. | ||
| A still point, and not a turning world, a spinning out of control world. | ||
| I want to thank our producer, our producer team here did an amazing job on that cold open. | ||
| I don't think anybody could have done that in the afternoon because it really highlighted everything. | ||
| I think one of the most disturbing parts of the entire day was the American ambassador to the United Nations sitting there and just citing the mainstream media as like, I mean, just calling out the kind of information warfare part of this. | ||
| Right as as totally interconnected with the United States government if somebody makes charges and assertions if those charges and assertions are absurd. | ||
| I think you got to sit there take the assumptions and say they're absurd and say why but not sit there and cite the mainstream media for its coverage. | ||
| Of this conflict, because we know that this coverage of the conflict is to escalate the emotional part of it, and it is obviously very emotional. | ||
| Defenseless women and children are being bombarded constantly. | ||
| And the question we continue to ask is, this can come to an end, and it could come to an end relatively quickly if adults just stepped into the situation, but you're not seeing this. | ||
| And I think a perfect example today is the propaganda war. | ||
| With the tick tock influences, you know, you sit there and you say, this is so ridiculous. | ||
| It's so stupid. | ||
| We showed the last one, which was the I think the influence are showing what it's like in a bomb shelter actually in Ukraine itself. | ||
| But this is all part of information warfare and that is to basically. | ||
| You know, influence a voting population, particularly young people, although I do like what the content of what the young person said, said, hey, a lot of marginalized communities, a lot of the minority communities are wondering why you're spending all this time in Ukraine and you're not talking about conflicts throughout the rest of the world, which I think is a very, I think is a question needs to be answered. | ||
| It's one I ask all the time about Hong Kong. | ||
| Why do the United States not lift a finger in Hong Kong? | ||
| Why do they not pressure Hong Kong? | ||
| Why do we, we had, we had, we actually had a treaty there that we were the guarantor of. | ||
| We were a guarantor of, when they turned it back over to China, we were the guarantor of that. | ||
| Great Britain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, which we both essentially kind of walked away from. | ||
| So I want to get into all of it. | ||
| We have Ben Harnwell in Rome. | ||
| We got Matthew Tierman is back. | ||
| Brian Kennedy. | ||
| We're going to go through a lot of this details. | ||
| Ben, you've followed this. | ||
| Give me your assessment of the Security Council today, because Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, Newsmax, nobody covered it except for War Room and Real America's Voice. | ||
| Talk to us about your assessment. | ||
| Good afternoon, Steve. | ||
| Well, you know, I basically will take my remarks from exactly what you just said in your opening monologue. | ||
| The Russians made some very serious and specific accusations. | ||
| They claim that they have the documentary proof that backs this up and that they're going to be releasing that imminently. | ||
| So I think what we need to do is sit back, wait for that evidence to be presented, and then ask questions on the basis of the analysis of that evidence. | ||
| Yeah, you know, I spent two days, most of the audience from the morning show, Dr. Hatfield, who I kind of revere, and I didn't think the answers were great. | ||
| You know, I told him I didn't think the answers were great. | ||
| I thought that they were not great answers. | ||
| I think there's a lot of questions here. | ||
| And there's a tweet out mocking Tucker Carlson for Tucker Show saying, oh, people know that what Ukraine has is biological defense. | ||
| Uh, labs, not biological weapons labs. | ||
| Well, hey, I don't know that. | ||
| Do you know that? | ||
| I mean, where's the documentation? | ||
| Maybe it is, but I think that's what in the U.N. | ||
| ambassador, the United States U.N. | ||
| ambassador didn't touch on any of that. | ||
| It would just say more. | ||
| This is all propaganda. | ||
| Maybe it is, but I believe it needs to be answered because these are serious Accusations that were put out there, and they say they're gonna present the documentation if they don't that I think goes a long way to say Maybe there's not that serious Ben also a breaking news as you said the other day That Israel there was a tweet out. | ||
| I think Jack Prasovic had it somebody else retweeted about Bennett the Israeli Prime Minister is actually very involved in here as much as Erdogan and maybe more and Walk us through what that tweet said about progress they're making on the peace talks. | ||
| We've got about 30 seconds before we go to break. | ||
| Yeah, basically it's the deputy Ukrainian prime minister who said that Volodymyr Zelensky is ready to sit down and have discussions with President Putin whenever the Russians are ready. | ||
| And that's the latest development on that score. | ||
| So I think we need to sit back now and wait for that to take place. | ||
| I'll come back after. | ||
| Let's take a short break. | ||
| We'll come right back. | ||
| We're going to come back after a short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, pandemic, with Stephen K. Bannum. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K Banham. | ||
| Okay, MyPillow.com Promo Code War Room. | ||
| We've got the towels on sale. | ||
| Six-pack of towels normally $109.99, now $39.99. | ||
| This is not going to last forever, so make sure you go to MyPillow.com Promo Code War Room. | ||
| We've got the Sleep Sale. | ||
| You've got a 50% off virtually everything it takes to sleep. | ||
| You've got the Overstock Sale, 50% off. | ||
| You've got everything to keep you warm, the slippers, the moccasins, the bathrobes, plus all the down comforters. | ||
| Here's the point, we've got a whole square when you go to MyPillow.com, promo code WORM, the whole thing comes up. | ||
| Sales all over the place, but particularly these towels are not going to be forever. | ||
| $109.99, now $39.99. | ||
| Make sure you go there today. | ||
| So Ben Harnwell, by the way, so the tweet is actually, Posobic picked it up and retweeted, it's Bennett told the Prime Minister of Israel, Told Zelensky take the Putin deal with the four points that we've talked about take the Putin deal Zelensky is quoted as saying I hear you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I hear you. | ||
| Thank you So there's clearly in Putin earlier today. | ||
| We're just picked it up said He thinks there's some progress going on the markets responded to that at least temporarily Ben any more thoughts on that or the or the UN before we go to Versailles I want you to give us an update on that | ||
| I think there was a 60 point jump within the opening seconds of the stock markets opening at about six o'clock this morning, based on the positive news that the president of Belarus had reported on Putin's feedback, which is exactly what you were just saying. | ||
| I mean, here's the situation that Naftali Bennett is trusted by both sides. | ||
| He's been speaking to both sides constantly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that I think advice to Zelensky should be taken as being neutral impartial advice And I actually think Zelensky will take it in that in that in that vein as well Might not be what about I think you would take it Yeah, you wouldn't hear that from here in the United States because all here is the is though everybody's on the warpath Including the Senate that passed the bill in the middle of night to 1.3 trillion dollar unfunded | |
| Discretionary spending unfunded discretionary spending because we had to get the 14 billion dollars We had to do that immediately get the 14 billion dollars to Ukraine of the world. | ||
| Versailles, the EU. | ||
| Somebody's pushing, Zelensky's definitely pushing this, membership in the EU, which is obviously one of the points that Putin will never allow. | ||
| Talk to me quickly about Versailles. | ||
| Steve, this is so important, and it is incredible. | ||
| I can only find one article on this, on the decisive upshot of this two-day meeting with all the European Union leaders. | ||
| Basically, they've said no. | ||
| They won't even give, one of the leaders, I think it might have been the Lithuanian head of state, was complaining that they wouldn't even give Ukraine candidate status, which is the case. | ||
| So they've said no, clearly and firmly. | ||
| And I can only speculate, because yesterday when we were talking about this, Steve, I'd That whilst perhaps the Turks and Israel and possibly even Germany might be trying to use their weight to push Ukraine and Russia into a substantial peace discussion, there are other parties, including the European Union more generally, that were trying to push for war. | ||
| And I said that if they're meeting together in Versailles to come out with this announcement that they're going to allow Ukraine to fast-track itself into the European Union, This is this Putin will simply level the country because there's no way that he's going to let that happen. | ||
| And I had assumed because of the PR that we've been subjected to over the last 16 days that that's what the European Union was agitating for. | ||
| Instead, they came out with a statement. | ||
| That was so shocking. | ||
| It really did take me by surprise. | ||
| It's basically no. | ||
| Perhaps one day in the future, but no. | ||
| So I think that is the European Union now sending a signal after the Russian terms are now publicly known and publicly available. | ||
| I think this is the European Union sending its signal to President Zelensky to basically think very heavily on these on these terms that President Putin is offering. | ||
| Because material support, and by material I mean substantial support that could change the direction of this war, is not going to be coming from the European Union. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Justin Castro denied... Is all the justification for it. | |
| Ben, how do people get to your, what's your Getter account so they can keep up with you during the day? | ||
| It's, I'm on Getter, and my profile is Hanwell, which is my surname, Hanwell, and I'll be updating this Ben, great job. | ||
| Matthew Tierman, just back from the region. | ||
| Talk to me about, first, Israel. | ||
| I think you were one of the guys that were most suspect about Israel's involvement here, ongoing involvement. | ||
| What about these new developments about the Prime Minister of Israel, Bennett? | ||
| It looks like being quite involved here, Matthew. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Look, I love Ben Harnwell, especially when he's wearing the hat. | ||
| Without the hat, it just doesn't seem the same. | ||
| But I disagree. | ||
| This is not somebody who is a totally neutral actor. | ||
| Israel, no matter what side, left or right, you know, right-wing Likud, Bibi Netanyahu, left-wing Labor, Israel cannily, for decades, focuses on Israeli-first politics. | ||
| And right now, the bigger threat to Israel is that they piss off Russia and Russia starts working that much more tightly with Iran. | ||
| They lose their credibility to move forward their agenda with Russia. | ||
| He is scared like hell that Russia is going to be forced into Iran and China's hands and they will be a triumvirate making Israel's life much more difficult. | ||
| But hang on, but hang on. | ||
| I think that's what Ben and I are saying. | ||
| I think what we're saying is that Israel is actually working here. | ||
| He's a very neutral, neutral, good faith, you know, mediator. | ||
| I don't think... Oh, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Yes, I think they're in trying to get a deal, which I... Yeah, this is the same as we talked about the other day. | ||
| But hang on, people that are actually trying to get people to the actual peace table to negotiate around these demands, I consider to be good faith actors, no matter what their own self-interest is. | ||
| The bad faith actors, I think, are the people like in the EU, NATO, etc. | ||
| And on the Russian side, they continue to talk about, you have an escalatory group and you have a de-escalatory group. | ||
| Israel, I think, just like Erdogan, I'm no fan of Erdogan, Israel I think is doing it very smartly, and you just laid out the strategic case of why it's a necessity for them to do it, are being engaged here as a member of the de-escalatory. | ||
| Do you agree with that? | ||
| I agree with that, and the parallels are rife. | ||
| We're in a global realpolitik moment, to paraphrase Kissinger. | ||
| India, same thing. | ||
| Why is India abstaining? | ||
| From condemning Russia. | ||
| Well, Russia is a huge supplier of weaponry to Pakistan, India's number one geopolitical foe. | ||
| So they do not want to raise the ire of Russia geopolitically either. | ||
| So they're staying further away and they're trying to maintain some level of neutrality and de-escalate it so they can focus on their more pressing issues without risking Some you know greater risk to them that Russia and Pakistan aligned that much more tightly You know the geopolitics the era as well as anybody because you've been obviously you have deep relations there You spent a lot of time there. | ||
| I know you work with the Polish government Polish politicians You know the whole region and I know you're not a fan of the UN, but the UN Security Council day What is that is that all theater? | ||
| Is it just a nest of misinformation? | ||
| What what happened there? | ||
| How does it play out? | ||
| It's a lot of misinformation. | ||
| This is a pretext, you know. | ||
| I believe the Russians, when they say, you know, bio weapons labs, as much as when they run out in their different media outlets that they control the information flow on, that, you know, they just liberated a bunch of child sex trafficking victims that the Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian military are running. | ||
| That was a narrative they were pushing last week. | ||
| It was so ridiculous that they did not, you know, take it to the next inning with it. | ||
| But they are disinformation masters. | ||
| I see it all day long on social media, what they're pushing. | ||
| Some subtle, some heavy handed. | ||
| And that's the point, is they come at you from all angles. | ||
| We know that there are biological facilities, research facilities, whatever they're doing research into. | ||
| America has been building them all over the world. | ||
| We've got, you know, FOIA documents on this. | ||
| Not, you know, this is not like breaking news. | ||
| This has been decently well known. | ||
| They've got, they're saying there are 30 of them. | ||
| The federal documents that have been FOIA'd out of the Pentagon that have been released. | ||
| in months ago, show there's like a dozen of them. | ||
| So the truth is always somewhere in the middle. | ||
| But this is a pretext. | ||
| If, you know, Putin was so concerned about bioweapons facilities creating weapons, he might have said something the last 24 months about Wuhan and maybe American engagement there, given that that story has been broken wide open for the better part of a year, a Adam Andrzejewski from Open the Books did work on this. | ||
| We have tons of people who've done work on this. | ||
| So, you know, this is very pretextual. | ||
| The UN is as rump a parliament as a rump parliament that exists. | ||
| So the fact that they're airing this So waste of time. | ||
| I mean, this is just allows them. | ||
| It's the same disinformation is when they say they're going to open up humanitarian corridors to get people out of cities like Mariupol or Kharkiv. | ||
| And then they just use them as an opportunity to retrench, buy more time and shell civilians. | ||
| So, you know, Russian talk is cheaper than most other talk. | ||
| What do you think about the U.N. | ||
| ambassador not addressing it? | ||
| You don't think it's worthy of being addressed? | ||
| You don't think we have to go back and counter? | ||
| These were very specific accusations. | ||
| You don't believe they need to be addressed? | ||
| No, I think they should. | ||
|
unidentified
|
U.N. | |
| ambassadors are not known. | ||
| The last U.N. | ||
| ambassador who actually spoke the truth about what goes on in the U.N. | ||
| was John Bolton, believe it or not. | ||
| We're not huge Bolton fans after the last 36, 48 months, but when he was ambassador to the UN, he made some noise there, actually being transparent about how bad the UN was. | ||
| They do not air real, transparent fact patterns in the UN. | ||
| It's global politicking at its worst. | ||
| I mean, you've got a multilateralist, globalist body. | ||
| And it's basically, I would like to use an unpleasant word, but I won't on live air, but it's a circle. | ||
| And they just, you know, it's all puffery. | ||
| It's all geopolitical noise. | ||
| The real interesting stuff going on in the discussion points between world leaders is, for instance, Macron being ordained as the lead point person. | ||
| For the multinational euros to try and de-escalate with Russia. | ||
| I mean, the credibility there is below zero, but still more credible than Olaf Schultz out of Germany. | ||
| And the reason Macron has been anointed as the lead, you know, he went to Moscow. | ||
| There's this great photo of him sitting across this wide table with, you know, an Alice in Wonderland characters in between him. | ||
| But the reason he's been anointed is because he's up for re-election and it was actually looking kind of bad for him. | ||
| Zamora was coming on strong. | ||
| He's consolidating the right. | ||
| And now, with Macron doing JFK shots from the Cuban Missile Crisis in black and white, they are trying to push the electorate to make this election a referendum. | ||
| Just hang on for a second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're going to join us after the break. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, the world is spinning towards a bigger conflict as it's being pushed by all parties and it's getting very, very dangerous. | ||
| It's actually expanded. | ||
| The military situation has actually gotten, I think, a little groomer today over the last 24 hours. | ||
| Matthew Tierman, the historic part that's not Russian of Ukraine or has the deep relationship with Russia, the western part of Ukraine, the Russians are now starting to make at least the logistical moves to include that in the conflict now, sir? | ||
| Yeah, so this is a development that I don't think many people expected or saw coming over the last week or so, given how quagmired they are and the amount of capacity deployed to Mariupol, Kharkiv and Kiev. | ||
| But they've moved some forces into place in the western city of Lutsk, which is about an hour south of the Belarusian border. | ||
| an hour east of the Polish border. | ||
| It's an hour north of Lviv, which has been the main city for getting people out, for processing refugees and moving transports to Poland, to Hungary, to Slovakia. | ||
| So Lviv is like this major population center, and you've got this smaller city, and now they're moving on Lutsk up from Belarus and moving some of their capacity from Kiev. | ||
| And I think this is, you know, for Putin's calculus, this is another way that he can add another chess piece to the board. | ||
| He can concede later to get what he really wants, which is the Crimean land bridge. | ||
| The Crimean land bridge is existential for this adventure, for this imperial move. | ||
| He needs it. | ||
| This is why he did this, is to connect Russia and Crimea, this militarily strategic peninsula. | ||
| He's going to want Mykolaiv, the city on the west side of Crimea. | ||
| He bombed the airfield there day one. | ||
| It showed how much he prioritizes this and the importance of that place on the Dnieper River, where it divides the historical Ukraine and more areas in dispute. | ||
| And Mariupol, the city that's the anchor of the Crimean land bridge, they thought they were going to roll over, but the Ukrainians are putting up a hell of a fight, and he's going to have to get more aggressive to take that city, which is going to be obviously very ugly and lead to a lot of civilian deaths and casualties. | ||
| But then once he has, and I think he will get it because this is the whole reason he's going there, he will then, you know, offer the Ukrainians there an exit like he did with Sevastopol when he took Crimea in 1415, and then hold the referendum and say it's now Russia. | ||
| But that's sort of, I think, the way it's going to play out over the coming weeks. | ||
| No, he's too bad of a liar. | ||
| He's too quagmired. | ||
| You know, you know, the big mistake here was on his part. | ||
| Of course, he has a sickle fancy. | ||
| Yes, men generals who he's now, you know, calling to accountability around him in this sort of ivory tower cloister Kremlin Politburo structure. | ||
| But invading Ukraine in late winter when the snow melts and the ground gets soft and it's not a grip, there's no Eisenhower interstate system or EU funded, you know, German taxpayer highways. | ||
| So it's he's got a lot of tanks stuck in the mud and they're really at risk. | ||
| So he does not have, in my view, the capacity to continue. | ||
| He wants Nikolaev to, you know, protect the western flank of Crimea, but he would need to move a lot of assets, people and equipment to continue moving down the waterfront, take Odessa, make a play from Moldova and then go up against the Romanian-NATO border, which is if that was what if he really wanted to sabre rattle with NATO successfully, you'd go to Romania because they're super weak relative to Poland, which has upgraded its defensive capabilities with billions and billions of dollars last few years. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| But now he realizes he can't do that, so he's making this play in Lutsk, coming from the north in Belarus, and trying to freak NATO out a little further to get them to the table to concede. | ||
| We will not allow Ukraine to ascend. | ||
| Ukraine's not going to the EU, by the way. | ||
| That's ridiculous. | ||
| They don't meet any of the standards. | ||
| If you think that Brussels was tough on Poland and Hungary on things like judicial reform, I mean, Ukraine's a mess. | ||
| There's no way. | ||
| By the way, all weekend you're going to hear about the Russian movement into the western Matthew, thank you. | ||
| On Twitter, on Getter, you're on fire. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| Matthew Terramon, T-Y-R-M-A-N-D is the surname, and I go to war with the St. | ||
| Petersburg trolls who are really active. | ||
| They're coming at me right now as I'm on this. | ||
| Steve, why do you keep having me? | ||
| I'm a neocon cock, apparently. | ||
| You must be in the live chat. | ||
| I want to get all opinions here. | ||
| That's what we do. | ||
| I'm part of the New World Order. | ||
| I work for Soros. | ||
| When I worked with you at Breitbart, I uncovered more stuff about Soros, but now I work for Soros, so go figure. | ||
| Soros, a running dog. | ||
| Let's bring in Brian Kennedy, American Strategy Group, former head of Claremont. | ||
| Brian, first off, give us your assessment today of what happened at the UN. | ||
| And I know you've kind of gotten this amazing article, putting this in kind of a classical structure of how to think about our current dilemma. | ||
| I want to get to that. | ||
| But what do you think of the UN today? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The UN looked like mostly theater and what the Russians were saying seemed mostly like disinformation. | |
| But as Matthew suggested, the US would have a lot more credibility. | ||
| If over the last two years we didn't find out that Anthony Fauci was funding all this research around the world, including the Wuhan Laboratory, why is it we have to fund all this biological research around the world? | ||
| Why can't we just do it here? | ||
| So when we hear, we Americans hear, that this is going on in Ukraine, we tend to think, sensible Americans think, Why? | ||
| Why are we doing that? | ||
| And, you know, we don't want to believe the Russians. | ||
| It does seem like disinformation. | ||
| But why can't we just do this kind of research here in the United States? | ||
| We must have the best biologists in the whole world. | ||
| And so that was not that was not a useful exchange, it seemed to me. | ||
| And when you heard these assertions, oh, they're just offensive labs, you sit there and go, well, we were told all this, you know, during the during the CCP virus crisis. | ||
| Walk us through the piece you have in The Federalist and how the audience started to start thinking about this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, my concern has been that America has gone through for the past two years, five years, six years, a political and information war where we've been made to think certain things which we later find out are not true. | |
| If you turn on Fox News right now, which ostensibly is going to be the most conservative or balanced news you're going to find out there, there is a mad rush for war on almost every front. | ||
| And they're appealing to the decency of the American people, so that when you see children and women who are killed by, you know, Russian missiles, Americans tend to want to help. | ||
| But in helping the Ukrainians, We may well lead to a much bigger war, and we keep acting like we're the superior power in the whole wide world in our military, though it's very good. | ||
| If we actually get into a war with the Russians, we may do the unfortunate thing. | ||
| The Russians may use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons, and we're going to be put in this awful position of having to engage a real first world military power, the Russians, and It seems that we shouldn't be doing that if the benefit is the Ukrainian people. | ||
| We care about humanity, but we care more about the American people. | ||
| We care about our children first. | ||
| And unfortunately, we've not built in the face of these Russian and Chinese nuclear weapons. | ||
| We've not built a national missile defense in this country to make sure we're defended from Russian missiles. | ||
| Now, people will say, well, you know, why would the Russians ever do that? | ||
| Well, this is how war start. | ||
| This is how mistakes start. | ||
| You keep pushing Putin far enough, and he may make the mistake of launching a nuclear weapon. | ||
| This may not be a calculation, but a mistake, but a mistake for which we are not defended. | ||
| We do not have a national missile defense today. | ||
| The Russians do have a national missile defense protecting Vladimir Putin and the Russian elite. | ||
| It'll protect Moscow and big parts of Russia. | ||
| Now, the fact that we don't have one is completely irresponsible. | ||
| Joe Biden and most of the Democrats today have been opposed to missile defense for the past 40 years. | ||
| We are now vulnerable to both Russia and China. | ||
| The Russians and the Chinese know that and they know that we're mostly bluffing when it comes to all the things we're saying. | ||
| They know we're in a vulnerable position. | ||
| And it strikes me that this is a bad place for the American people to be. | ||
| And I would feel much better if Fox News and Republican politicians were explaining to the American people that lack of vulnerability and the urgent need to get that right. | ||
| President Trump was doing that, but he didn't have enough time to get it done. | ||
| You talk about lack of vulnerability. | ||
| I'm not so sure we're bulletproof on the air. | ||
| This is hybrid war and you've got the classic where you're talking about the escalation into nuclear on the hybrid or unrestricted warfare on cyber. | ||
| I'm telling you we the offensive weapon capabilities of Russia are very impressive, right? | ||
| And as you know, we had, you know, Colonel Waller on this morning from the from Frank Gaffney's group talking about A Chernobyl-like situation. | ||
| 80,000 metric tons. | ||
| By the way, I asked 10 people I know who are pretty well-informed how many metric tons of spent fuel rods we have in the States. | ||
| The top answer was 5,000. | ||
| So we have 80,000. | ||
| You've got a potential Chernobyl here if somebody hits the grid. | ||
| The grid's very vulnerable. | ||
| We're vulnerable to cyber, to all of it, even biological and chemical. | ||
| And we're playing, and like I said, we're playing with fire right here. | ||
| But one thing before you go, you made a comment there, we care about the American people. | ||
| I know this audience cares about the American people because of the volunteer work they do and putting their shoulder to the wheel across the board everywhere. | ||
| But do you think our political elites put the American people first, sir, in any of these situations? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It really doesn't seem so, Steve. | |
| It really seems that they put the interests of the global Uh, some kind of global standard before the wellbeing of the American people. | ||
| When Mitt Romney gets up there and gets holier than thou about supplying aircraft to the Ukrainians, either he doesn't know what he's talking about, or he is just a child when it comes to international affairs. | ||
| What is good for us? | ||
| All policy has to be built on that. | ||
| What is good for the American people? | ||
| It may be good for the Ukrainians or the French or the English or anybody else. | ||
| But every calculation we make has to be for what's good for the American people. | ||
| And we need to rebuild our military today because that cyber war you're talking about, if you lose that cyber war, there will be a lot of calls to do something militarily, either with our military or with nuclear weapons or with some other form of warfare. | ||
| America, as strong as it is today, is mostly strong in the American people, your audience. | ||
| And all the things they do. | ||
| One thing I warned about in that piece as a close is people need to start preparing for their own defense of their own family, because the government today is not protecting us. | ||
| And so individual civil preparedness is a key thing for us to be focusing on. | ||
| Make sure that you can defend your family and feed your family right now, because right now in Washington, they don't seem to care much about that. | ||
| We're going to spend more time on this tomorrow. | ||
| We'll talk about the economics, the financial, what's going on, and also this war as it expands every day. | ||
| Brian, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
On Getter, it's at Brian T. Kennedy. | |
| That's where you can find me. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Always judicious and thoughtful. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Steve. | |
| We'll push it out tonight. | ||
| Let's go to Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Look, there's so much good news. | ||
| We've got Moms for Liberty in the second hour of the show, War Room, Battleground. | ||
| We've got so much great stuff going on. | ||
| Dan Schultz. | ||
| We're winning on so many fronts, but we do have to spend coverage on this, on the war and the financials of it, economics and actually the kinetic part of it. | ||
| Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Naomi, we've got a minute here and then we'll bring you over to the next block. | ||
| But walk through the group overwhelmingly supported your efforts. | ||
| How's the end of the first week going? | ||
| So huge leaps forward in terms of firepower. | ||
| We now have a hundred and sixty one attorneys and twelve hundred and forty five volunteers. | ||
| So there's six working groups and they're they're hurtling along. | ||
| But what some of the headlines that they're identifying some of the key documents are identifying Are pretty disturbing and so I don't know if you want me to go right into that or no, I think I think we're going to have like seven minutes on the other side. | ||
| I want to take time what I want to say about this audience is you're incredible. | ||
| It's one of the reasons people want to come on the show is to obviously get access to your thoughts and to your support, but I got to tell you in this one because this is hard work. | ||
| This is very hard work, very detailed work, very technical work, and Naomi's group stood that amazing website up over the weekend. | ||
| But then the call to action, to have over 1,200 volunteers, and what, over 150, 160 lawyers? | ||
| 161 attorneys. | ||
| That's just incredible. | ||
| So let's take a short break. | ||
| We're going to get back. | ||
| Naomi Wolf's got this Pfizer documents, 55,000, and remember, What the Russians ought to do is give us the information, let us go through it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll tell you what's right, wrong, spin, reality. | |
| We'll take it on. | ||
| For the Ambassador to the United States of the UN, bring it! | ||
| Next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, I want to make sure. | ||
| We're going to take the cold open. | ||
| It was almost nine minutes long at the beginning of the show. | ||
| We're going to put it out, and Captain Ben, I want to put it out in Getter and all the platforms in the live chat. | ||
| We did that, and the production team did it. | ||
| We tried to show you all the information warfare. | ||
| From the highest level, most serious to the TikTok, which by the way, the TikTok is very serious. | ||
| Don't dismiss how silly some of the stuff looks. | ||
| That is information warfare on your children, on this next generation, and it's incredibly powerful. | ||
| So please get a chance, watch the cold open again and share it. | ||
| I want that shared with people to show kind of the architectonics of this. | ||
| I want to go back to Dr. Naomi Wolf and this amazing turnout of the War Room Posse to get to work. | ||
| Walk us through the Pfizer documents. | ||
| What are the finds you've got so far as you've broken down to six working groups, Dr. Wolf? | ||
| Well, the biggest one I want to call everyone's attention to today, there's a great deal surfacing. | ||
| I mean, we need 161 lawyers because the crimes are of such an extraordinary scale as we're starting to See what was really done to the American people and to people around the world. | ||
| But I just want to kind of prepare people for what I'm about to say. | ||
| I'm really happy about all the help we're getting, but I'm really sad about this finding. | ||
| And so this is what two different sets of documents have independently confirmed. | ||
| Pfizer did a study or studies with rats and mice, right? | ||
| And that's it's not humans, but that's how That's how trials are done when you're trying to figure out what's something going to do to mammals. | ||
| So they were looking at the lipid nanoparticles and where they go. | ||
| And I know that's a big word, but it's important to understand it. | ||
| Lipid means fatty, nano is tiny, and particle is just what it sounds like. | ||
| This is what biotech is so excited about. | ||
| These are the hard, fatty casings that are sent into your body with the mRNA vaccine. | ||
| And biotech is excited about this technology because they want to use it for other things like medicine delivery and, you know, getting data about your heart and so on. | ||
| But in this case, it's the mechanism whereby the mRNA vaccine kind of goes into you. | ||
| So you remember that you've been assured by the AMA, the CDC, the FDA, that it stays in your bicep, in your arm when you are injected with the vaccine. | ||
| But these studies show that that is categorically not the case. | ||
| At least when it comes to these mammals. | ||
| It enters, it leaves the muscle within 48 hours, it enters the bloodstream, and it enters the liver in a matter of hours. | ||
| And more specifically, so the CDC, you know, knew, and the FDA knew and lied when they said it stays in the bicep. | ||
| More specifically, Section 2.6.5.5B, and I mentioned the numeral so you know it's a real document, It's pharmacokinetics, organ distribution in rats. | ||
| The lipid nanoparticles at the site, when they inject the rat or mouse, is 24.6% of the administered dose at 48 hours. | ||
| That means most of it has left the injection site. | ||
| And within 48 hours, 16.2% of the dose is in the liver. | ||
| of the dose is in the liver and it's also in within 48 hours the adrenal glands, the spleen and the ovaries. | ||
| So, the maximum concentration is 8 to 48 hours past the time of the dose, and some of it is excreted, according to this study, in urine and feces, which explains why I was deplatformed on Twitter when I said, what happens to the spike protein? | ||
| Is it going into our waterways? | ||
| Is it going to our, you know, food system? | ||
| Where does it go? | ||
| Moving back to why this is so traumatic and shocking to read, so many of the harmful effects that we've seen, whether it's menstrual dysregulation, whether it's, you know, brain thrombosis, strokes, heart attacks, you know, all of the blood-related vascular problems that Dr. Alexander and Dr. Risch and Dr. McCullough have been pointing out, | ||
| This mechanism or this study, you know, raises serious questions about the nature of the lies that we're being told and the harms. | ||
| This dosage, according to these mammal studies, doesn't stay in your, you know, the equivalent of your arm. | ||
| It doesn't stay in your muscle. | ||
| It doesn't stay in your bicep. | ||
| It goes right into your bloodstream. | ||
| And these are hard, you know, particulates. | ||
| So, you know, I'm not a doctor, but to me, this is a sobering and shocking traumatic finding that they knew that this was going to go right into mammalian bloodstreams, liver, adrenal glands, ovaries, and they forged ahead anyway and said it was safe and effective. | ||
| That's. | ||
| We only got a couple of minutes and we got to go. | ||
| But I want to talk about having you back on tomorrow. | ||
| These are such kind of monumental findings, particularly given the fact that this information is out there. | ||
| And obviously, if this is true, if that continues to pan out, then people looked at people straight in the eye on national TV over and over and over and over again and said the exact opposite. | ||
| And so this is why the whole thing at the U.N. | ||
| today. | ||
| No offense. | ||
| We've kind of heard, you know, we've heard officials in the U.S. | ||
| government and these big companies look you in the eye and say the exact opposite of what you're finding. | ||
| Just real quickly, let's take a minute. | ||
| The team itself, they're on six. | ||
| What is your critical path? | ||
| Understanding going through these documents now is another two weeks of going through the documents, three weeks. | ||
| What do you anticipate right now? | ||
| Well, what we're doing is supporting these citizen leaders, right? | ||
| So they are organized into six working groups and we're hiring a project manager because the incoming is overwhelming and needs to be, as you identify rightly, organized and turned into deliverables and action items. | ||
| But to me, the main goal is to surface these kinds of documents, explain them, Get them out on our channel and get them out on social and get them out to you so that, you know, as journalistically people know, but also get them to the lawyers so the lawyers can start planning how they're going to make people pay essentially for having that. | ||
| Naomi, Naomi, we've got to bounce. | ||
| How do people, we've got 30 seconds, how do people get to you to volunteer and how they get to you guys to support you? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| So come to dailyclout.io. | ||
| Click on campaigns and there you'll find the War Room Pfizer review channel. | ||
| Sign up and you'll get instructions. | ||
| My team has done a fantastic job kind of prompting people. | ||
| And then if you're a lawyer or if you have other special skills like research, you're a physician, you're an analyst, identify those skills and we'll put you in the right group. | ||
| And if you're a lawyer, you'll go right to the lawyers channel, which is confidential and you can deliberate with your colleague there. | ||
| Okay, I'm going to talk to you later after the show about having you back on Amara. | ||
| Dr. Daniel Woolf, great job. | ||
| Okay, explosive show next. | ||
| Tina Powers, Dan Schultz, Moms for Liberty, Michael Patrick Leahy, the correctional candidate Jim Bognett. | ||
| Tons of information about battlegrounds, the states we've got to win, and what we've got to do to win on the issues in November 2022. |
Export Selection