March 11, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Just moments ago, brand new numbers on inflation. | |
| So let's get straight to CNN Chief Business Correspondent Christine Romans. | ||
| All right, what do they say, Christine? | ||
| They say that inflation is accelerating. | ||
| These are pre-war numbers as well. | ||
| So many people have thought we'd see a peak in inflation in March, maybe. | ||
| Well, now we have a war in Russia not captured, a war in Ukraine not captured here. | ||
| Year over year, 7.9 percent is the inflation number. | ||
| That is a 40-year high. | ||
| Month over month, up eight-tenths of a percent. | ||
| That shows that even month-to-month inflation is accelerating. | ||
| It is gas, it is shelter, it is food, groceries, all these things you basically can't live without are rising here. | ||
| So when you dig into these numbers, you can see just why so many Americans are so sour on the economy on those opinion polls. | ||
| It's because they're paying more for just about everything. | ||
| Used cars, look at that, Brianna, up 41% from last year. | ||
| Gasoline, up 38%. | ||
| And again, these numbers don't capture the big disruption in the economy from Putin's war in Ukraine. | ||
| We'll continue to watch these numbers. | ||
| Protected most Americans from severe financial crisis consequences of the pandemic so that they're, by and large, in good financial shape. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's something you want to point to that's what the White House is doing to provide short-term relief. | |
| Immediate relief to the rising costs? | ||
| I would say that a huge part of what we've done has had an impact already. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A chemical attack as a further pretext to step up the violence. | |
| Take a listen to what CIA Director Burns said today about the possibility of the Russians using chemical weapons. | ||
| This is something, as all of you know very well, is very much a part of Russia's playbook. | ||
| They've used those weapons against their own citizens. | ||
| They've at least encouraged the use in Syria and elsewhere, so it's something we take very seriously. | ||
| U.S. | ||
| intelligence officials also pushed back today, Garrett, on what they said was Russian propaganda about another type of banned weapon. | ||
| Contrary to what the Russians have asserted, DNI Avril Haines said there are no biological weapons labs in Ukraine. | ||
| There was some confusion after a State Department official, Victoria Nuland, talked about biological research facilities. | ||
| And some right-wing pundits distorted that to echo Russian propaganda, but Haynes was clear that the U.S. | ||
| believes there are no biological weapons labs in Ukraine. | ||
| And the military is saying that we can do it, that they can get control of the airspace through stingers, through other means, not with fighter jets that would engage NATO. | ||
| I want to ask you also about an exchange that took place today between Senator Rubio, of course the ranking Republican former chairman of Intel, And the head of national intelligence, Avril Haines, at this morning's worldwide threats hearing about the whole question of chemical and biological warfare, which the White House says is a Russian false flag. | ||
| Russia has been laying out this argument for a number of months now about how there are these labs in Ukraine that are developing chemical and biological weapons, that the U.S. | ||
| is involved, that they've discovered it, and they've been making that argument for a period of time, and it's the argument they usually make before they use that kind of stuff themselves. | ||
| Does Ukraine have any biological weapons research facilities? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, let me be clear. | |
| We do not assess that Ukraine is pursuing either biological weapons or nuclear weapons, which have been some of the, basically, the propaganda that Russia is putting out. | ||
| So Senator, the State Department is warning that they think Russia is planning a biological or a chemical attack. | ||
| So, Andrea, if we look at the history of Russian action in Syria, in Chechnya, they haven't hesitated to be brutal, to escalate, and to use increasingly lethal weapons, including chemical weapons that were used in Syria against civilians. | ||
| This is yet another step where our intelligence community, and Avril Haines is the very capable Director of National Intelligence, is proactively sharing with the world what we are picking up through our intelligence sources are the intended next steps of escalation by Russia. | ||
| So how do you stop it? | ||
| Are you prepared to do a deal? | ||
| You've said you're happy to talk. | ||
| We can't stop alone all this. | ||
| How do you think it's stopped? | ||
| How is it going to stop? | ||
| Only if the world will unite around Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They are not uniting around Ukraine. | |
| They are not, they are still, it's still very slowly, it's still very slowly. | ||
| You can feel it only when you are here because the people from Europe or USA, it's far from Ukraine, it's far from the heart of this tragedy and you can't understand the details because you are not fighting here. | ||
| And I understand why. | ||
| And I don't want them to fight, but these countries can help, can unite. | ||
| Because we can't speak about the close... I'm sorry that I'm speaking again and again about this problem, We spoke about children's hospitals, etc. | ||
| And you know the number of these child deaths. | ||
| So, we are speaking about closing the sky. | ||
| You can't decide to close or not to close. | ||
| You can't decide. | ||
| If you are united against the Nazism and this terror, you have to close. | ||
| Not me. | ||
| Don't wait me asking you several times, a million times, close the sky. | ||
| No, you have to phone us to our people. | ||
| Who lost their children and say, sorry, we didn't do it yesterday, one week ago. | ||
| We didn't push Putin. | ||
| We didn't speak with him a lot. | ||
| We didn't find the dialogue with him. | ||
| We did nothing. | ||
| And it's true. | ||
| Yesterday. | ||
| The world did nothing. | ||
| I'm sorry, but it's true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boris Johnson, the British Prime Minister, as a number of other world leaders, say if they do that, if they close the sky, that could exacerbate and make the situation even worse. | |
| If they allow Poland to provide you jets and station it on NATO land, that will make it worse. | ||
| What would you say to them? | ||
| What does it mean worse? | ||
| For whom? | ||
| So the first question is rhetoric. | ||
| And we don't need rhetoric questions and answers. | ||
| We have to have contradict things. | ||
| So it would be worse for whom? | ||
| For our families? | ||
| No. | ||
| For whom? | ||
| For them? | ||
| No. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Nobody knows. | ||
| But we know exactly that now is very bad. | ||
| And in future it will be too late. | ||
| And believe me, believe me, if it's prolonged this way, yes, you will see, they will close the sky. | ||
| But we'll lose millions of people. | ||
| Wow, Thursday, 10 March, Year of the Lord 2022. | ||
| What's the half-life of Zelensky wearing out his welcome? | ||
| That's not goading the West anymore. | ||
| It's lecturing the West in a way that it's all your fault. | ||
| Now, we understand he was dumb enough, and let's say he's dumb enough to buy the apparatuses, promises, and commitments that were never on paper, never negotiated, and more importantly, never approved by anybody. | ||
| He just took the apparatuses, he took the EU, he took all the NATO, he took all the leaders, took Macron, he took all the Biden apparatus, all the foreign, Victoria Nuland, all these people tell me, yeah, we're there, we got your back, go ahead, be aggressive, you know, let's join the EU, say you're going to be a member of NATO, get up in Putin's grill relentlessly, and now he's just lecturing you. | ||
| There's so much in there to unpack, as they say, but I'm here with another right-wing pundit. | ||
| I'm actually not a pundit. | ||
| I'm just a schmendrick that does the show, but I got one of the great pundits, right-wing pundits, which is Darren Beattie of Revolver News. | ||
| Darren, I think the way to go through this, and one thing, Steve Ratner, if Denver can do me a favor and put up the tweet of Ratner, I just want to get to one thing first on the economy. | ||
| Biden's out there all day today. | ||
| He said, yeah, this is bad, but this is a result of Putin's war. | ||
| He knows he's saying we're at war. | ||
| The pre-war. | ||
| Heck, the young guys that work for me think they're the greatest generation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pre-war? | |
| What do you mean? | ||
|
unidentified
|
World War I? | |
| They think pre-war is like World War II. | ||
| Pre-war. | ||
| Steve Ratner wants to be Secretary Treasurer. | ||
| He comes out and tweets out, he says, hey, the inflation today has nothing to do with Putin's war, nothing to do with this war, zero, nothing. | ||
| And this is a big league Democratic hitter on the economy, a guy that was talked about being Secretary of Treasury under Obama or the head of the National Economic Council. | ||
| A heavy guy. Says nothing to do with it. | ||
| It's accelerating at an accelerating rate. | ||
| They're spinning it now trying to say it's wag the dog. | ||
| No, that's just out. | ||
| So you haven't even hit. | ||
| You haven't even gotten the impact of what's happening with this fiasco. | ||
| But I want to go to the fiasco. | ||
| I think the way to do it first, Darren, is talk about the overall... I've never seen information warfare like this to really overwhelm people. | ||
| To be among the virtuous, you've got to be ready to close the sky. | ||
| You've got to be able to close the sky over Ukraine and get into a shooting war with Russia. | ||
| Darren Beattie, Revolver News. | ||
| Yes, we cover this phenomenon in great detail in the latest piece on revolver.news title. | ||
| Let me see if I can pull up the title here. | ||
| It's globalists are using the George Floyd playbook to cancel Russia and you're next. | ||
| So what does that mean? | ||
| It's a bit of a provocative title there, but it points to something deeply serious that we need to understand. | ||
| In order to fully grasp what's going on with the propaganda war with Ukraine, and that is that the full machinery, the comprehensive full spectrum, robust machinery that we saw deployed domestically in the aftermath of the George Floyd issue, where every single corporation was paying fealty to it with some kind of performative gesture. | ||
| Every financial institution, every outlet in the media, anyone who wanted to signal that they're a right thinking person on social media, the whole calculus, the whole dynamic of the mass psychology of the social media environment, driving things to a point of irrational excess. | ||
| We see all of that deployed for the very first time in a foreign policy context. | ||
| It's the same machinery we saw, just different inputs. | ||
| Now you see Ukraine as the input. | ||
| And it's, I think, a very new and very dangerous development in terms of how foreign policy is conducted. | ||
| Because to a large degree, this is a organic process that takes on a life of its own, and really leads to a dangerous escalatory effect that we're seeing reflected in a lot of Ignorant and careless leaders' statements on the issue. | ||
| Look, we got Mike Pence, the gutless coward Mike Pence, is virtue-signaling over today. | ||
| He's greeting refugees coming in from Ukraine to Poland, giving them a fresh bottle of water, an apple. | ||
| You know, good old Mike Pence, the choir boys over there, virtue-signaling, right? | ||
| A champion of freedom. | ||
| Give me the specifics. | ||
| Give me the receipts. | ||
| When you say they're pulling the George Floyd strategy, they're all over this on the cancel culture. | ||
| Hey, and not to Putin. | ||
| Putin's got to answer for himself with his actions, right? | ||
| But what do you mean? | ||
| And what do you mean it's driving foreign policy? | ||
| Well, I think to some degree, the whole machinery that we saw activated in the aftermath of George Floyd, it's partially coordinated, partially developed organically, but it is a full spectrum machinery of psychological warfare. | ||
| Going from financial institutions to corporations to law firms performatively. | ||
| Marking their support for a certain cause and you see the precise same mechanisms going on Ukraine It's like there's this new weapon and it's deployed for the first time in a foreign policy context This is you're getting the Russia is getting the full-scale George Floyd BLM treatment. | ||
| only applied to this geopolitical conflict. That's the first time I think the world's ever seen it in just this fashion. It's really dangerous territory because it leads to this irrational, escalatory effect that plays into pre-existing tendencies toward warmongering and saber-rattling and so forth. Just recently, Facebook came out with a | ||
| policy saying their longstanding policy against violence is going to be temporarily suspended as a carve-out for those calling for violence against rations. | ||
| So, this is a very dangerous trend that's happening, and it's the same machinery that you see on the domestic context. | ||
| We have Dr. Robert Malone. | ||
| We're going to get to the bioweapons lab and everything in the Ukraine. | ||
| Darren Beatty's going to hang with us for a second. | ||
| Another big drop with Veritas last night. | ||
| I'm going to ask Beatty on this side, but I want the answer on the other side. | ||
| He's the expert on the color revolutions, doing a color revolution. | ||
| The same apparatus here to put down the Trump movement. | ||
| He's all over the color revolution that took place about the same actors in Ukraine. | ||
| Are they using the economic warfare? | ||
| Because clearly they're looking for regime change in Russia. | ||
| Are the same actors trying to have a color revolution in Russia right now? | ||
| Bringing technology, capital, information warfare, all of it to bear to remove Putin and his entourage. | ||
| All next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there's no more, let's take down the CTE! | |
| War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, from the ever crack, from the ever crack of War Room, a production team just got pulled in, uh, We talked about Versailles today about as all this is going on and they're trying to negotiate a at least a cease fire or some sort of peace arrangement at Versailles. | ||
| They're at the place where they, you know, signed the got the League of Nations rolling. | ||
| They guaranteed in the treaty, they guaranteed that World War Two would come because of the economic consequences of what they did. | ||
| Today they had a gathering to try to expedite membership in the EU for Ukraine, like that wouldn't be throwing napalm on a prairie fire. | ||
| But, Washington Post are just reporting, it's become, and I'm quoting from the story, it's become clear, the EU nations are divided on what to do about Ukraine's request, and seem to be seeking a way to say no, or at least not yet. | ||
| Now Zelensky and these guys are pushing it. | ||
| You're giving them $15 billion, right? | ||
| So what's his responsibility for this stuff? | ||
| What's his response? | ||
| I understand Putin's doing the shelling. | ||
| But there's all types of off-rands here, many off-rands. | ||
| The guys, because of people like Victoria Nuland and these out-of-control globalists in the American government, in the American government, the same guys that overthrew a democratically elected government in 2014. | ||
| Hey, was it a perfect government? | ||
| No, it was not. | ||
| Was it aligned with Putin? | ||
| Yes, it was. | ||
| Did Putin maybe have his thumb on a scale? | ||
| Hey, yes, maybe so. | ||
| But those countries should argue that out. | ||
| But these guys fomented a color revolution, as Raheem Kassam and Darren Beatty have gone through for months. | ||
| And Raheem was over there when it happened, back in 14, in the modern color revolution. | ||
| They like democracy so much, only when they cheat and they win. | ||
| And so now, in the insanity of all this, And you just heard all the financial capital markets saying, hey, the biggest inflation in 40 years, out of control, no plan. | ||
| And Biden's always saying, Putin's saying, they said, no, these numbers have nothing to do with your Putin war. | ||
| Right? | ||
| In the middle of that, you've got Zelensky. | ||
| And hey, put me in the column of, I've already had a belly full of this guy. | ||
| I understand he's going around like a Marvel hero with a gun and he's showing personal bravery. | ||
| I got that. | ||
| And Valor, got that. | ||
| But I don't need him lecturing at least us. | ||
| He can lecture the guys that committed to him and promised him that are not showing up with an iron dome, or with no fly, or with jets, or with combat troops to help to stop the kinetic war. | ||
| But he's sitting there pushing to come into the EU. | ||
| That is a non-starter with the guys that happen to be shelling into all these cities. | ||
| Into the maternity hospitals. | ||
| That's a non-starter. | ||
| I don't know if now would be the time I would push that. | ||
| And you've got guys here, upon further review, and these diplomats are all very diplomatic. | ||
| Yeah, you know what? | ||
| Maybe we slow this down. | ||
| Maybe we shouldn't accelerate it. | ||
| So we've got to find out who in these governments is doing this. | ||
| This is my point. | ||
| We can show all the heart-rendering footage of the refugees and the dead. | ||
| Yes, we can do that all day long because, trust me, there's enough footage there that will make you heart sick. | ||
| That is not the thing itself. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| That's when a great power cannot operate like that. | ||
| Yes, you can have sympathy and empathy and send money over personally and do that and help, and maybe the government sends some as long as they match it with the wall money. | ||
| But Mike Pence over there, virtuously handing out the waters here, have a water and an apple? | ||
| That's not what we need. | ||
| That's not leadership. | ||
| That's playing to the worst elements, not of American generosity. | ||
| I'm talking about how a great power has to think about your vital national security interests. | ||
| And this is why this whole thing on the bio, on the bio research labs we're going to get into with Malone and and Darren Beeney in a second. | ||
| But Darren, just last thing. | ||
| I have a thesis that we're now at an offensive war, which we weren't with the Nazis or Or Tojo, and the imperial family in Japan, or Mussolini, or the Soviets, or anybody. | ||
| We never shut, Switzerland never shut itself down, we never went after a central bank, we never tried to destroy their currency, yet we're doing it now. | ||
| And we're doing it for regime change. | ||
| Do you believe we're trying to install a color revolution in Russia? | ||
| That that is what they're actually trying to do, not just by their acts, sir? | ||
| Well, we've definitely crossed a major Rubicon. | ||
| Even if there is an imminent solution or medium-term solution to the issue in Ukraine itself, it's hard to see how you undo what we've done economically. | ||
| And so from our standpoint, it really does seem like It's total war against the Russian economy, which has an intended effect of collapsing the regime, which I doubt will happen. | ||
| But what's more likely to happen is simply that we've used the economic nuclear bomb that can only be used once. | ||
| We used it here against Russia for an issue that is arguably not really in our interest, and we've already spent it. | ||
| And you can't undo what we've done. | ||
| The rest of the world has seen how precarious they are for relying on entanglements with the US economy. | ||
| Even a country like India That needs to play a lot of angles, has a very delicate position geopolitically. | ||
| He's going to see there's a lot of risk that comes from putting all of your eggs in the US basket. | ||
| Every country has seen what happens when you do that now. | ||
| And so there's no way out of a total realignment of the global order. | ||
| In terms of multipolarity generally, and in terms of Russia coming onto the fold of China more specifically. | ||
| I think that's already baked into the cake, and all of these high-grade economic nuclear weapons that we've used against Russia, I don't know if they're going to be as effective against China if the situation should come that we would need them. | ||
| I want to go to, I've got a few minutes here and then Dr. Malone's going to come in. | ||
| The whole situation with the laundering of what Nuland said yesterday, which they took, Marco, little Marco was not ready for that answer. | ||
| They scrambled all night, Fox had it, everybody to launder what the Pentagon wanted to have to say. | ||
| And I'm not talking about the Russian, forget the Russian misinformation, because they're putting misinformation all the time. | ||
| But to get to the bottom of exactly what's happening in Ukraine, what's been happening since 2005, and why these things even exist, what are your thoughts on this whole bio? | ||
| The bio research facilities with the biological research material, and I'm quoting Victoria Nuland. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Well, it just underscores how duplicitous and untrustworthy our own government officials are, because they've effectively been caught in a lie. | ||
| And it was clear that Rubio wasn't expecting to inadvertently catch Nuland in a lie. | ||
| And when he did, he had this really bizarre effort at damage control, where he kind of preemptively attributed any use of those weapons to Russia. | ||
| But I think it also underscores the degree to which We've used Ukraine as a kind of a playground for all kinds of reckless and dangerous political operations, which is precisely the reason that Russia's found it to be such a threat. | ||
| No, let's say what it was, because the Clintons just stood up the Clinton Global Initiative. | ||
| They've been stealing from over there for years. | ||
| The Bidens and the drug addict kids have been over there stealing for years. | ||
| The crime family, the Bidens have been stealing for years. | ||
| It's an American colony, let's call it what it is. | ||
| It's an American colony. | ||
| And now the colonists are sitting there going, you promised you were going to protect us, part of our deal! | ||
| And part of the thing of letting you come in here and basically skim off the top is you're supposed to protect us. | ||
| That's what Zelensky's telling you every day. | ||
| Did you in this audience, did anybody in this audience commit to Ukraine? | ||
| We're going to defend them militarily, economically. | ||
| Did anybody, are they an ally? | ||
| Is there any alliance with Ukraine? | ||
| The answer is no, there is not. | ||
| Well, somebody put that in Zelensky's head. | ||
| He's not a fool. | ||
| He's sitting there on TV guilt tripping you every day. | ||
| And for us, what's this guy talking about? | ||
| Somebody put it in his head. | ||
| Ukraine has been a colony of the United States. | ||
| Let's get it on the table. | ||
| That's what it is. | ||
| This is the same group of thieves in the apparatus that want to go in and run these places like colonies. | ||
| Darren Beattie. | ||
| Precisely right. | ||
| It's been a playground for U.S. | ||
| government-backed operations. | ||
| That gets to the national security interests, that it's not in Russia's national security interests to have a country right next door to it that is arguably ground zero for American government operations in Europe. | ||
| It's really that simple. | ||
| And that's why it's a non-starter for them that there should even be in the conversation that it might join NATO. | ||
| Darren, how do people get to Revolver? | ||
| You're the right-wing pundit they were talking about on one of them. | ||
| How do they get to Revolver? | ||
| How do they get to you personally? | ||
| Revolver.News, as always, we have really hot pieces up right now. | ||
| Read the whole thing exploring the Ukraine situation and Revolver is on Getter at Revolver News and I'm on Twitter at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| Darren, thank you so much for covering Time Out today to come with us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| We're going to pick up, by the way, in the second hour, we're going to get to Tina Peters being arraigned in Colorado. | ||
| We're going to get to that, and we'll put up some things, if Denver can get it ready, about her defense fund. | ||
| In a second, we'll go to Dr. Malone. | ||
| Dr. Malone, we only got a minute here, but hold you through the break, and you're going to join down. | ||
| But on this thing, in 2005, What it turns out, which is what, 15 years after the Soviets left or the Russians left, we now get into a situation that we're going to go in and clean up biological research facilities. | ||
| So that's 17 years ago, if I do the math correctly. | ||
| 17 years. | ||
| And yet they're still not somehow cleaned up. | ||
| Give me 30 seconds. | ||
| What is actually over there in Ukraine, sir, to the best of your understanding? | ||
| At a minimum, we have what are termed biological labs. | ||
| That could be anything from benchtop to BSL-4. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| We do have clear statements supported by Andy Weber, who used to be, until he retired, head of DTRA for the Threat Mitigation Branch, acknowledging that one of the activities there is collection of viruses and toxins. | ||
| Hang on one second. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Dr. Maloney on the other side. | ||
| hemorrhagic fever virus, Hanta virus and other agents. So at a very minimum, we're funding the collection and archiving of these. And I think from a Russian perspective, I would have to assume if I was one of their analysts, that we were just doing it for hang on one second, short break, | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dr. Malone on the other side, head down. War Room, pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K Banham. | ||
| Okay, MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM. | ||
| We got the towels. | ||
| Six-piece towel set. | ||
| Normally $109.99, now $39.99. | ||
| It's not going to last forever. | ||
| This is one of these special deals up on our, what they call the Square. | ||
| So just go to MyPillow.com, punch that in. | ||
| We've also got the sleep sale. | ||
| We've got overstocks. | ||
| We've still got some sheets left. | ||
| It's all there. | ||
| Take action. | ||
| Take agency. | ||
| Use your agency. | ||
| Also, for Tina Peters, it turns out that the fund they put up last night is for a campaign to help her in this situation with her lawyers. | ||
| She's got 10 charges, 7 felonies. | ||
| We're going to go live there in the political hour next, the War Room Battleground. | ||
| Go to I think we put the Lindale Offense Fund, the Lindale Offense Fund, which funds all these going on offense with all these lawyers around the country for 3 November, the Lindale Offense Fund. | ||
| So let's get that up and put that on the Chiron and let's get it up into all the chat rooms. | ||
| A couple of breaking news items in Cardiff, Wales. | ||
| They've canceled all Tchaikovsky. | ||
| I wonder if New York City, is Radio City Music Hall announcing that is the Nutcracker going to be cancelled for Christmas next year? | ||
| Is that what we're going to do? | ||
| Is that where we are? | ||
| There's a lot of other news out, a lot of other insanity. | ||
| By the way, in Italy they said all Ukrainian refugees arriving in Italy either agree to Get a swab every 48 hours or get, wait for it, vaccinated. | ||
| What a better guy to bring in, Dr. Robert Malone. | ||
| He's been fighting the good fight. | ||
| Dr. Malone, since 2005, and I don't know why it took him 12 years to get it sorted or 10 years to get it sorted, but in 2005 he worked out this agreement, supposedly to help take over the old labs and to wind them down or at least to clean them up. | ||
| And supposedly there's a lot of anthrax near Odessa. | ||
| Does it make sense that it takes, if your purpose, the purpose as stated was to take down these old Soviet labs and to unwind them and to clean them up and to move on? | ||
| Is 17 years later at Victoria Nuland's in a hearing and you could tell she's nervous and she says very, you know, she's tippy-toeing to it that my official goes, there's certain biological research facilities that have certain biological research material. | ||
| That we are quite concerned could fall into the hands of the Russians and we are working with our Ukrainian partners to make sure that the biological research material is secured. | ||
| As a professional that does this for a living, what does that signal to Dr. Robert Malone? | ||
| That means that there are infectious materials and they could be samples. | ||
| That's the official party line from Andy Weber and DITRA. | ||
| Is that what we funded these bio labs, quote unquote, cause they're not necessarily the old labs. | ||
| We've funded these bio labs through the DITRA threat mitigation group to collect samples, including toxins and, and infectious agents from Ukraine and archive them in some way. | ||
| So they are not acknowledging that there was any expansion or modification of these. | ||
| They're asserting that only collection and archiving was performed. | ||
| The statements suggest that there's something more than that. | ||
| If you, you know, and I think that's transparent to any of us. | ||
| And this is somebody who would know, as you know. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| Hang on one second. | ||
| Hang on one second. | ||
| I just want to say, I want to make sure we're not taking anything the Chinese said, because we play those spots. | ||
| We're not taking anything the Russians said. | ||
| I know that's all been over all over media. | ||
| You got the Russian woman saying this. | ||
| We got these labs. | ||
| You got the Chinese saying they got 336 throughout the world, including about 30. | ||
| And forget all that. | ||
| That has no relevance here. | ||
| I'm just saying, on their own statements, knowing how people talk in Washington, D.C., Dr. Malone, that causes you a level of concern, sir? | ||
| Yeah, I'm trying to disambiguate what the language is that's being used. | ||
| The language implies that there is some collection of agents, and they could be small samples, laboratory quantities, or they could have been expanded, or they could have been modified. | ||
| information there. | ||
| What we do have is information, again, going from what our own folks have been saying, like Andy Weber, speaking to factcheck.org, in which he gave quotes saying that, acknowledging that these labs exist, that there has been this funding, and that he is stating that it's there for these benign purposes of sample collection, training, And archiving. | ||
| He's not going any further than that. | ||
| But the statements from the undersecretary suggest that there is some material there that poses a threat risk. | ||
| But if it's an infectious agent, it could be a very small amount. | ||
| I'm right in the middle of writing a substack where I try to give everybody the benefit of the doubt and think of what the most benign explanation could be here. | ||
| And I think that each That there's no question in my mind that if I was an analyst working for the Russian state, I would see these facilities that clearly by our own statements from our own embassy in Ukraine, we have been funding to collect these agents and have been partnering with within Ukraine. | ||
| I can't see if I was a Russian analyst how I wouldn't see that as a threat. | ||
| Let me, let me, before I go there, we got to wrap this up. | ||
| I got doubt and I got to get into this situation with both you guys that's so explosive. | ||
| What would be the one or two questions you would want the guys on our side of the football, the Americans, to answer to make you feel better that there is no type of activity of these were not, like in Wuhan, these have not been turned into weapons labs, they were not doing anything outside of any of these conventions. | ||
| What are the one or two questions you would ask and demand to be answered to make you feel better about this? | ||
| For starters, this language, bio labs, is imprecise and quite misleading. | ||
| There needs to be clear, unambiguous statement about the characteristics of these facilities that we've partnered and helped capitalize. | ||
| Are they BSL 2, as some press suggests, which is basically benchtop like you would have at any college? | ||
| Or are they BSL 3 or 4 facilities? | ||
| That in and of itself will speak volumes. | ||
| Then there's, we, I don't think we're ever going to be able to get a straight answer out of the intelligence community in DITRA about whether or not there is dual purpose research going on in these laboratories. | ||
| We should ask at least what the agents are that have been collected. | ||
| And last question, would it take us 17 years, you would think, and I'm talking about the lab in Odessa, which is one they've been, I think, singled out that had been involved in anthrax. | ||
| Would it take you 17 years to square away and clean up something that had had some residue of anthrax that they had? | ||
| Would it take you that long? | ||
| So the answer, Steve, is yes. | ||
| Anthrax spores are pernicious. | ||
| You cannot get rid of them. | ||
| There was a building at USAMRIID that had become contaminated with anthrax spores, and all they could do was brick it up. | ||
| It was standing as a great big bricked up tower for decades because there is no way to decontaminate functionally anthrax spores once they're present in the environment. | ||
| You just have to kind of cover it up somehow. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be drilling down this every day going forward. | ||
| This is a very big issue. | ||
| I want to turn now to Ed Dowd, the portfolio manager at BlackRock and a retired portfolio manager, a very smart Wall Street guy. | ||
| He's got a very precise, yet not exactly optimistic outlook for the economy, but he's been doing work. | ||
| The CDC information that's come out, everything about the vaccines and potentially these deaths associated with the vaccines. | ||
| Ed, I invited Dr. Mullen to join us today, but walk through Your theory of the case, you call it democide. | ||
| And that kind of this morning blew people's heads up, right? | ||
| Went viral in the gutter. | ||
| People were like, whoa, walk us through your theory of the case from the data that you and your and your partner who does the analytics with you, right, have seen given. | ||
| I mean, you dropped a bomb. | ||
| You said the millennials in 2021 had essentially a 10 year Vietnam. | ||
| We were in Vietnam 10 or 12 years, killed 50, I think, thousand. | ||
| Young men and women troops you're saying 61,000. | ||
| I think it is Millennials in one year alone We had a Vietnam for Millennials in that year from the evidence you've seen and you call a democide because it was by government action Can you walk us through and back that up, sir? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Well, it's actually 61,000 in the second half of 2021 not the full year so and that's when we saw the acceleration in the chart for that we call it the money chart which shows a The coincident acceleration in excess deaths from vaccines and boosters, in our humble opinion. | ||
| We don't think it's a coincidence, and the mandates were the driver of that, we believe. | ||
| This data, again, set the frame, is the CDC's own data. | ||
| This data is from their website. | ||
| They did not break it down by age, and my partner, who has actuarial training, created baselines for each age group for which we could compare. | ||
| So, this is the CDC's own data. | ||
| It puts with what the insurance companies were saying they saw in the second half of 2021, which is an acceleration of young people dying faster than older people. | ||
| So, and I gave your producer another chart we were going to drop tomorrow, but I thought we should drop it today because it's important. | ||
| It's the Gen X chart. | ||
| Gen X did not fare any better than the Millennials. | ||
| You can see that Once the mandates hit, the acceleration into the excess into the fall, you saw the excess death spike. | ||
| And from August of last year till around mid-February, 101,000 excess deaths occurred in the Gen X age group. | ||
| So that's two Vietnam Wars. | ||
| Now, granted, Gen X is a little older than Millennials. | ||
| We thought the Millennials were the smoking gun because they're the The youngest of the cohort. | ||
| The data gets even worse when you break it down. | ||
| So, there's been 1.1 million total excess deaths since the pandemic started. | ||
| About 500,000 this year and 500,000 last year. | ||
| Now, in the first year of the pandemic, it was generally older people who died from COVID. | ||
| There were no vaccines yet, and you can make the case that the prevention of early treatment really did that. | ||
| We brought forward a lot of older people's deaths in that first year. | ||
| The second half, the second year was 500,000. | ||
| On Wall Street, we call it a mix shift. | ||
| So the mix shift happened with the younger generation, the millennials and Gen X. So they started dying at an accelerated rate, which coincides with vaccines and mandates. | ||
| So the evidence is pretty clear. | ||
| Something happened. | ||
| You know, we can Recreate this data. | ||
| Anybody wants to recreate this data can do it, and we can sit down and have, you know, debates and discussions. | ||
| I suspect the CDC and other people won't want to talk about this. | ||
| Are you going to bring this forward? | ||
| I asked you today about a murder board. | ||
| How are you going to, and I realize your other research person hasn't come forward yet, they will. | ||
| How are you going to come forward and get this out where it can be debated? | ||
| I know you're going to make it available to people who are going to attack it, but how are you going to try to engage the apparatus, engage, for instance, CDC or the Biden administration in a, not a debate, but a walking through this data? | ||
| Well, if they want to talk To us about the data and bring us up for testimony. | ||
| We were more than happy to do that. | ||
| I don't think that's going to happen. | ||
| So what's going to happen is you have to understand the man who prepared this. | ||
| It's an ex Wall Street analyst. | ||
| This is Wall Street quality research that if he was on the in his old job, he would have to defend with people with lots of money and show them the data if they asked for it. | ||
| So this this data isn't going to sit on getter isn't going to sit on a couple of videos on the war room this data. | ||
| Is going to be presented to a very serious group of people who will definitely go through the data and want to see how it was calculated. | ||
| And they're just as smart as my partner. | ||
| And this is going to get serious soon. | ||
| Because they're going to drive back to the actual coming stuff. | ||
| Okay, I'm gonna take a short commercial break. | ||
| The question I've got for Dr. Malone, when we come back to the other side of the break, given that CDC's seen this data too and they're not idiots, understanding that there's going to be an Ed Dowd out there and his partner that are going to get to the bottom of it, why has no one in the government come forward and kind of walked us through and made this case? | ||
| Next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When there's no more, let's take down the T.C.P.! | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| I knew this was going to happen. | ||
| Dowd and Malone have so rattled me that it's time now. | ||
| your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I knew this was going to happen. | ||
| Dowd and Malone have so rattled me that it's time now. | ||
| I want to go to God Bless the USA Bible, which is the Lee Greenwood Partnership. | ||
| We've got the Bible that he put together with the King James Version of the Bible, plus all the founding documents, divinely inspired, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and we threw in the Pledge of Allegiance also, that you have it in one entity, one leather-bound entity to share with you and your family and use it as a teaching device. | ||
| For the children and grandchildren. | ||
| God bless the USA Bible dot com. | ||
| You put in a war room, you get free shipping and handling. | ||
| But go check it out today. | ||
| And after what you just heard with Dowd and Malone, I mean, you've got to reach for a Bible, right? | ||
| This is extraordinary. | ||
| OK, Dr. Martin, we're pressed for time, but I've got to have this. | ||
| This is what Dowd is saying. | ||
| He says it's democide. | ||
| This is because of direct government action. | ||
| And he had the liability waiver. | ||
| So the liability waiver goes off, you prove that all these people died because of government action. | ||
| There's smart people over there. | ||
| Somebody has to know, hey, they've done this analysis internally. | ||
| What Dowd has done is derived it from the data externally, but internally, somebody has done this set of math. | ||
| And so therefore, if it's true, if Dowd's right, therefore, they know they got a, as Dowd calls it, one of the greatest scandals in the history of our government. | ||
| OK? | ||
| So somebody's got to see it and they've got to talk about it. | ||
| Dr. Malone. | ||
| First off, we know there is intentional withholding of a very large amount of data. | ||
| As Ed would say, that is a tell for fraud. | ||
| There is an intentional withholding of information because the ostensibly excuses, it would cause vaccine hesitancy. | ||
| I believe that what we have here is somebody who has worked in building contracts, managing contracts, for NIAID or CDC and worked for years and years and years in the Beltway. | ||
| I think we have willful ignorance. | ||
| I think that what may be happening, you're assuming that the data analysts that are capable of doing this type of statistics work reside within the CDC down in Atlanta. | ||
| That's not consistent with my experience. | ||
| All of this detail work is farmed out to basically to Beltway bandits. | ||
| And they don't work. | ||
| They don't do a task unless they're told to do that task. | ||
| Unless there's a task order in their author to do so. | ||
| And I don't think they've been told to do so. | ||
| Because anybody that did that, that issued that task order, would be at high risk for basically Being de-platformed, leaving the CDC. | ||
| But hang on, but hang on, but hang on. | ||
| Ed, on CNN and MSNBC, for over a year now, you've had every expert, every guy from Johns Hopkins, all these guys that come out, they got, they went to Harvard, they did this, the top in the field, bang, and what they're saying, it's safe, it's efficacy, it's safe, but boom, that's where we got the mandate, you got to do it, you got a vaccine, we're gonna get vaccines out of here, Fauci. | ||
| It's been, Relentless in a barrage, you know, it's been worse than that. | ||
| Let's go to war in Ukraine. | ||
| So how I understand what you did, but how could that possibly happen with the underlying set of numbers that you've been able to drive that for, sir? | ||
| Well, goes back to my original case. | ||
| The FDA was in on this fraud with Pfizer through institutional corruption and the institutional imperative, plus the rush to get this thing out there. | ||
| You know, a lot of people thought the FDA did the right thing and did the work, and they just wanted and hoped that it'd be OK. | ||
| And then we had, unfortunately, Pfizer corrupting the media with their own advertising dollars. | ||
| And then we find out this last weekend that the government has been paying the MSM to basically propagandize the populace. | ||
| So some sort of magical mass hypnosis took over and all those All those so-called experts you saw touting this were relying on the FDA. | ||
| They probably don't know what a clinical trial data study looks like and never looked at one, because a lot of doctors don't do that kind of work. | ||
| And they just went with it, and it just started rolling, and we got the momentum. | ||
| And sometime, I think, this summer, early fall, there was a big rut row, but they kept going anyways, and they just wanted to hope that it went away. | ||
| I've never seen anything quite like this. | ||
| It's mind-boggling to me. | ||
| And the fact that two ex-Wall Street guys had to figure this out, I just don't even understand how we're here. | ||
| I don't either, but what's the next big drop? | ||
| You gave us this other chart. | ||
| Where does this go? | ||
| We got about a minute and a half. | ||
| Where does this go with you and your research partner? | ||
| Well, my research partner, I don't want to speak for him. | ||
| He's going to come out on his own when he comes out, but it's going to come out in the next couple of weeks. | ||
| He's going to become public. | ||
| via what he's going to do. | ||
| And then there'll be other players who probably come public. | ||
| So if you're a Wall Street guy and you want to be negative on Pfizer and Moderna, these are what we call catalysts on the horizon that are going to be detrimental to the long thesis. | ||
| To interpret that for the audience, that means bad things could Bad things are going to likely happen in terms of news flow for these stocks and for the government and all sorts of players. | ||
| So, Dr. Malone, you've warned us, you were the guy that picked up the CDC briefings that were in the Washington Post story, etc. | ||
| How do you think, we've got about a minute, how do you think this plays out, sir, given how explosive it is, sir? | ||
| There will be a concerted effort to downplay or ignore this, and we've seen the first salvo in that in this Lancet article that recently came out. | ||
| It's basically propaganda pushed by the CDC. | ||
| It doesn't deserve to have been published. | ||
| It's a horrible manuscript, but we're going to see more of this, just like we've seen in nature, this revisionist history again pushing the thesis That the virus jumped from some other species into humans rather than coming from the Wuhan laboratory. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Ridiculous. | ||
| Dr. Malone, we've got about 20 seconds. | ||
| How do people get to your substack and all your social media? | ||
| Well, you know, Steve, it's Getter, thank God, at RWMaloneMD. | ||
| And we're just about to push another substack out in a few minutes that's going to be regarding the Ukraine laboratory situation. | ||
| Again, that's Substack, R.W. | ||
| Malone, M.D. | ||
| if you do the search, and we don't force anybody to pay. | ||
| The information's open to all, and thank you so much for the opportunity to be here. | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| Ed, real quickly, what's your social media? | ||
| People can follow you because you're breaking stuff all day long. | ||
| Getter, at Edward Dowd, D-O-W-D, and Twitter, at Dowd, Edward, D-O-W-D, Edward. | ||
| I'm going to drop most of my original content on Getter. | ||
| Twitter doesn't deserve it. | ||
| Okay, stay tuned. | ||
| We're going to the battleground next. |
Export Selection