March 10, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:36
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Sorry to be the messenger, but there's more bad news at the pump this morning. | |
| Another record high. | ||
| According to AAA, the average price per gallon of gas has gone from $4.17 yesterday to $4.25 today. | ||
| And the impact is even broader, of course, on trucks transporting goods across the country, airfares likely higher just in time for summer vacation. | ||
| Some Uber and Lyft drivers say they're changing routes they're driving and the amount of hours that they're behind the wheel. | ||
| There's also a risk to restaurants, shopping malls, small businesses, if Americans decide to stay home because they can't afford to fill up their tanks for non-essential activities. | ||
| And the impact of higher prices goes far beyond what you're paying or they're paying to fill up. | ||
| Because while 60% of global oil consumption is fuel, the other 40% goes to a staggering array of products and household goods. | ||
| Look, Everything made out of, or packed in, plastic, like smartphones, computers, TVs. | ||
| Grocery prices are impacted because industrial fertilizer contains fossil fuels, which means higher prices on grain, impacting the price of meat, eggs, and dairy products. | ||
| Medicine from asthma to cholesterol to blood pressure medications, in some cases up 200% or more, because petrochemicals are often involved in production. | ||
| It's so hard to tell a patient, especially with groceries going up, gas prices going up, to tell them, hey, now your medication that you need on a day-to-day basis to survive is going up as well. | ||
| With that, a great panel of experts joins us now. | ||
| NBC Correspondent Jolene Kent is in Los Angeles. | ||
| Steve Leesman, CNBC's Senior Economics Reporter. | ||
| So, just to break it down, the U.S. | ||
| position while we're watching allegedly the Russians bombing this maternity and children's hospital is No, Zelensky, we're not going to participate in a no-fly zone, and we're not even going to support the transfer to Ukraine by the U.S. | ||
| so that you can have your own no-fly zone. | ||
| What's your reaction? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look, I think we all are watching these scenes unfold. | |
| As I said, I was just there. | ||
| We have provided $350 million just in the last two weeks. | ||
| We'll approve $14 billion today. | ||
| I think judgments have to be made about the best way to provide that security assistance that doesn't create greater danger for the Ukrainian people And I'm certain that the judgments that the Ukrainian president is making is being considered by our military leadership But they're trying to balance how do we avoid a more dangerous reaction by Vladimir Putin that will cost more lives in Ukraine Escalate this into a greater conflict So that's the balance and those are military leaders that have lots of intelligence that that that inform that decision | ||
| that judgment and continuing to support the Ukrainians in every way that we can. | ||
| I know those discussions are ongoing about their air defense. | ||
| I think there's bipartisan support to do everything that we can to support the Ukrainians in a way that doesn't make it worse for them or make it so that the situation on the ground is even more devastating. | ||
| So I know it's hard to watch. | ||
| I watched it, as you did, in horror. | ||
| But again, principally, airstrikes have not been the principal challenge. | ||
| That may change. | ||
| And again, I know we're going to do everything we can as the United States to provide assistance, but in a way that doesn't make it worse for the Ukrainians and more dangerous for NATO and for our country. | ||
| Watching these images, what makes anybody sure that Putin's going to not attack NATO countries? | ||
| I mean, that's the calculation being made here. | ||
| We've drawn our lines. | ||
| We will protect NATO countries. | ||
| Ukraine is not a NATO country. | ||
| Therefore, we're not going to engage. | ||
| We don't want to risk World War III because Putin has nukes and who knows what he'll do. | ||
| I get all that, but I mean, he's killing civilians! | ||
| What makes anybody think, well he's not going to do that to Poland, he's not going to do that to Finland? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well look, we have a treaty obligation under NATO, under Article 5, so if he does in fact do that, we have an obligation to act immediately. | |
| And I think, you know, it's very clear that we are making a tremendous effort to support the Ukrainians. | ||
| As I said, we're going to vote on $14 billion in just a few hours of both security and humanitarian assistance. | ||
| All of our NATO allies are also pitching in and providing lethal assistance to the Ukrainians and many of our NATO European allies. | ||
| So this is going to be, you know, a continuing responsibility. | ||
| And I expect that our military leaders are going to listen very carefully to the Ukrainian military leadership on what they see as their priorities. | ||
| OK, a total and complete fiasco in this city, the imperial capital, Washington, D.C. | ||
| It's Wednesday, 9 March, Year of Our Lord 2022. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| I want to bring in Russ. | ||
| Listen, one thing you don't have any clear thinking about exactly where we are. | ||
| It's all in emotions. | ||
| It's people running around acting like schoolchildren. | ||
| And this is a very dangerous situation that level heads have to kind of think through exactly what's going on, what's in the best interest This is far more chaotic and crazy than when we went to war in Iraq and we know how that turned out. | ||
| in American citizens, okay, in American citizens. | ||
| And you're seeing, this is far more chaotic and crazy than when we went to war in Iraq and we know how that turned out, okay? | ||
| So we have committed to you that we're gonna be the center in the storm to provide you information, analysis, data that you can use to make up your own decisions and do it consciously. | ||
| I want to bring in Russ Vogt. | ||
| The one thing they can do in the city continually, because they don't have, there's no discipline since we're the prime reserve currency. | ||
| They just continue to print money, which are just IOUs. | ||
| On you and your family, and essentially devalue the dollar constantly. | ||
| This is what it is. | ||
| And today they announced, remember there's no conspiracy but no coincidences, they just announced a whole new set of potential regulations on crypto. | ||
| Hey, just throwing that out there, just a random event that happened today. | ||
| I want to bring in Russ Vogt now, Center for Renewing America, the last director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Trump, and one of the most important jobs in the government, and a guy who really could get to the numbers. | ||
| Russ, you've been around this town a lot longer than I have, but I've been around this town for over a decade now. | ||
| The gimmicks, the tricks, the lies, the spin that is coming out of here To cover up what is going on financially and economically. | ||
| You called it the other day on the show, and they came out with a $1.5 trillion appropriations bill, on top of the $3.5 trillion transfer payments. | ||
| So remember, that's over $5 trillion, significantly over $5 trillion, and you count in the interest, it's $6 trillion. | ||
| You've got this $14 billion Ukrainian thing, and now they're doing all kinds of gimmicks of one side votes for one. | ||
| Vote, what in the hell is happening here? | ||
| Yeah, last night they finally unveiled the package that they have been working on for months. | ||
| And it is a 1.5 bill. | ||
| We are assessing right now how big of an increase it is depending on what is in and what is out of that 1.5 trillion dollar bill. | ||
| But this is something that is over 2,700 pages and they have concocted a way to pass it to ensure that only the defense bill is voted on and the non-defense bill is voted on. | ||
| And then after those two votes happen, they will then They will merge them together. | ||
| They call them a MIRV. | ||
| They will merge them together and then send it to the Senate. | ||
| But you understand the gimmick there. | ||
| They are not letting the people who oppose one or the other have a totality package to vote on other than a procedural rule that is often a partisan vote. | ||
| And that is right now is what is being held up right now because both parties have issues with it who are not the decision makers within each party. | ||
| And so that's what's unfolding right now. | ||
| We have reams of lists of earmarks in this bill. | ||
| Things like $605,000 for a greenhouse in New York City. | ||
| $2 million for restoring equity in access to solar power. | ||
| We have $475,000 for a social equity and race and inclusion institute at Ohio State. | ||
| On and on. | ||
| This is the first time we've had earmarks in a bill at this level of specificity, congressionally directed, each one of them. | ||
| in about 10 years. And so this is something that in the dead of night, they're trying to use the situation in Ukraine and use that to be able to matador this thing through in a record amount of time. To not have... And $14 billion for the Ukraine and not one penny for the wall on the southern border. Not one penny. You're going to go through all 3,000 or 2,700 pages, you won't find one nickel for southern border security. Except all this phony, | ||
| oh, they're going to put in invisible wire and, you know, technology, it's all crap. | ||
| No wall. | ||
| You're going to spend $14 billion in Ukraine, and any Republican that votes for that and doesn't say we have to have equal money for the wall, the bum ought to be thrown out. | ||
| Russ, vote. | ||
| Yeah, they're trying to do this and get this thing through, and as a result, people on this call, this program, need to rise up and call their congressmen and say, we oppose the omnibus bill, it spends too much, it's reckless, we're opposed to the earmarks, we're opposed to the charades, and we need it to go down in both the House and the Senate. | ||
| And that is going to happen. | ||
| The House vote will be today, but we've got some time in the Senate because it looks like they're going to have a hard time processing this, which means they will kick the can down an additional four days. | ||
| So the CR is going to be put together, and so the final vote will be Monday or Tuesday or next week, so we'll have three or four days to actually work this? | ||
| Yeah, I think so. | ||
| Once again, it's 1.5 trillion deficit that's not paid for, and it's going to add to the total debt, and they got a gimmick. | ||
| The Republicans are going to vote for the defense spending, the supplemental, and it's going to be $200 billion, you think, total increase from what it was going to be? | ||
| Right now, we're trying to figure out, are they doing any games? | ||
| But if you take their numbers, and I'm not going to take their numbers just yet, because I want to score on it, but if you take their numbers, It's about an $88 billion increase, which is at least a 6%. | ||
| I think it could go as high as 10% based on what is counted towards that number or not. | ||
| Okay, perfect. | ||
| But the total number will get to be $1.5 trillion, you think? | ||
| Yep, that's what it's at. | ||
| Russ, we're going to have you back on tomorrow. | ||
| Okay, we're going to get all the numbers up there so you can start calling and tell the Republicans you don't want any gimmicks. | ||
| These voting things are gimmicks. | ||
| Russ, how can people get you on social media and how do they get to your great center? | ||
| Great. | ||
| AmericaRenewing.com and at RussVote, at Getter, and at Twitter, same handle, and we will be updating it as we have the information. | ||
| Right now, if you go to those, you will see an active list of people retweeting all of the earmarks that we have found already. | ||
| The only victory we got out of the Tea Party movement was to kill the earmarks, because that's the gateway drug to uncontrolled spending. | ||
| That's now gone. | ||
| In the dead of night, they've reversed that. | ||
| You're going to see it on Living Color and Russ Photo Show. | ||
| Russ, you're a patriot and a hero. | ||
| Thank you for being on here, sir. | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Okay, we're going to get all that information out there and maybe tomorrow morning we'll get a little more organized. | ||
| This is breaking news. | ||
| We've also got other breaking news. | ||
| Tina Peters indicted on 10 counts. | ||
| I think seven felonies. | ||
| We're going to have a Verona Bishop in next hour. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| We got, we have, we still have, we still have a couple of minutes? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Do we have O'Keefe? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Can I get, can I get James up? | ||
| James, you there? | ||
| I'm here. | ||
| Can you hear me? | ||
| Hey. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Hey James, we're going to play, when we get back from the break, we're going to play the, we're going to play your, your tape. | ||
| Walk through this major hit, which I think of all the ones you've had, this may be one of the biggest of all, of the New York Times, of the New York Times reporter. | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Yeah, this was a pretty gratifying one for me, having done a number of stories in the media. | ||
| This New York Times reporter says that January 6th media coverage was a quote, overreaction, saying that the event was not organized despite the narrative. | ||
| New York Times reporter saying FBI informants among the people there. | ||
| Now, he did say that in the newspaper, but to hear him say it out loud was quite a shock. | ||
| He said he was having fun. | ||
| At January 6th. | ||
| And he said the people inside the Capitol building, the other New York Times reporters, who he mentions by name, he called them effing bitches. | ||
| These effing little dweebs who go on about their trauma. | ||
| There's a direct quote from New York Times reporter Matt Rosenberg. | ||
| He says they need to shut the eff up. | ||
| This is a New York Times, a Pulitzer Prize winning national security reporter for the New York Times saying people at the New York Times need to quote, man up, Steve. | ||
| Here's the thing, we're going to take a break. | ||
| big of a deal about January 6, quote, they were making this an organized thing that it wasn't. I confronted him, Steve, yesterday in D.C. I sat down with him at a restaurant. | ||
| He first said he stood by his comments. Then when I quoted him again, he said that I'd caught him in a private place. And I said, well, which is it? And he ran out of the restaurant. | ||
| I followed him and he hid in a pharmacy. | ||
| Here's the thing. We're take a break. The great Jim, James O'Keefe and Veritas of the stunning thing he also talked about government agent I mean, this is just not any schmendrick. | ||
| You agree, this was the lead reporter and the guy that's revered in the New York Times for leading the coverage of 6 January, correct, James O'Keefe? | ||
| That's correct. | ||
| This was the guy. | ||
| He's a national security reporter, he has sources inside the CIA, NSA, and FBI, and he has now contradicted his own journalism at the New York Times. | ||
| Okay, the great James O'Keefe and Project Veritas. | ||
| I gotta tell you something, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The hits just keep on coming with O'Keefe. | ||
| Each one's better than the last. | ||
| You're starting to perfect the model, James. | ||
| It's pretty impressive. | ||
| And these are big gets, not small gets. | ||
| Big gets. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| We'll be back with James O'Keefe and Project Veritas. | ||
| We got Darren Beatty from Revolver. | ||
| We're jammed up. | ||
| We're gonna get our clock right. | ||
| I'm gonna get kind of sorted. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| Had too much coffee here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| James O'Keefe and Veritas next. | ||
| The left's overreaction, the left's reaction to it in some places was so over the top. | ||
| It was like me and two other colleagues who were there, who were outside. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we were just like, dude, come on, buddy. | |
| We were not in any danger. | ||
| Matthew Rosenberg is a Pulitzer Prize-winning national security correspondent for the New York Times. | ||
| In multiple meetings with one of our undercover journalists, Rosenberg reveals a lot about the inner workings and inner turmoil at the Times. | ||
| For starters, he doesn't hesitate to undermine his own paper's coverage of the events that took place in our nation's capital on January 6, 2021, and chides corporate media's reaction, or in his own words, overreaction. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Like, I think you could tell how much fun we had on January 6th. | |
| Oh, that's great. | ||
| Are you allowed to have that much fun on January 6th? | ||
| Are you supposed to be mourning? | ||
| I know, I know. | ||
| It's also if you're traumatized. | ||
| But, like, all those colleagues who were in the building, little younger, they were like, oh my god, this is so scary. | ||
| I'm like, oh, f*** off. | ||
| Is that really the vibe? | ||
| From them. | ||
| I'm like, come on. | ||
| It's not the kind of place I can sit and tell somebody to man up, but I kind of want to. | ||
| You're like, dude, come on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're not anything. | |
| These clips are amazing. | ||
| We've got them up on the site. | ||
| The link back to Veritas. | ||
| I don't know how you do this. | ||
| I don't know how you get these undercover, O'Keefe, but you've perfected the model. | ||
| I just want to make sure everybody understands something. | ||
| This guy is as big as they get. | ||
| He's a Pulitzer Prize winning national security. | ||
| He's dialed in deep every... You're talking about the deep state, the administrative state. | ||
| This guy is the press officer. | ||
| This is where the leaks come through. | ||
| This guy's almost got a security clearance. | ||
| He doesn't technically, but he does because they're leaking to him all the time. | ||
| The biggest reveal of all the stuff there is that there were... His thing, yeah, the FBI... This is like, they're feds at this. | ||
| James O'Keefe. | ||
| Steve, I mean, yeah, the quote was, there are a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol. | ||
| This is a national security reporter for the New York Times. | ||
| Is he a spook? | ||
| Well, he's a, I call it a stool pigeon for the spooks. | ||
| They use him. | ||
| Usually it's people in power manipulating the journalists, not the other way around. | ||
| And he says that January 6th was, quote, no big deal. | ||
| Steve, now this video has gone viral. | ||
| It had Close to a million views. | ||
| Twitter took the video down. | ||
| I'm not sure why they took my video down. | ||
| I'm quoting the New York Times reporter. | ||
| He did not know he was being recorded, but he knew he was being spoken to. | ||
| He said, quote, I was, and two other colleagues were outside of the Capitol building on January 6th having fun. | ||
| And he minimizes the trauma that apparently other New York Times reporters have felt about January 6th. | ||
| He calls them, his words, quote, effing bitches. | ||
| And Steve, I can report to you that a lot of people in the New York Times are not happy about what this man, Matthew Goldstein, has said. | ||
| I've reached out to some of those folks. | ||
| My colleagues have gotten some reactions. | ||
| They're very unhappy about this at the New York Times. | ||
| And one of the things they're most unhappy about is that we caught him talking about his sources at the CIA. | ||
| Matthew Rosenberg says that he gets around the polygraph tests. | ||
| Now, sure. | ||
| Dude, this is a blockbuster. | ||
| sources talk to intermediaries who talk to Rosenberg, to which I asked Rosenberg in person yesterday, doesn't that taint the information you're getting when you go through all these intermediaries? | ||
| I don't report anything unless I can see it come out of the person's mouth. | ||
| You're getting hearsay accounts from individuals speaking as intermediaries with your CIA sources. | ||
| Pretty extraordinary recording, Steve. | ||
| Now, sure, dude, this is a blockbuster. | ||
| When I saw this, my jaw dropped. | ||
| Of all the great work you've done, and your work is great and it gets greater every time, I said, this one's a bombshell about the national security reporting, about their number. | ||
| And as usual, O'Keefe's timing is exquisite. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Yesterday, one of the individuals got 20 years in a federal prison. | ||
| He was sentenced to 20 years in a federal prison, right? | ||
| Found guilty. | ||
| Up to 20 years in a federal prison for this, the same day O'Keefe drops this. | ||
| O'Keefe, the guy admits they're federal agents, informants all over the place, federal assets all over the place. | ||
| He's talking about, hey, it wasn't that big a deal, we're laughing. | ||
| Tell me, where are you going to take this story? | ||
| I understand the Times, I'm sure, is a meltdown. | ||
| Where is James O'Keefe going to drive this story? | ||
| Well, it's a constant struggle, Steve. | ||
| Inch by inch, distribution by proxy on all the platforms. | ||
| Twitter, we're not even on Twitter, and the story was trending on Twitter this morning. | ||
| We have another installment, which I'll give you a tease, exclusive to The War Room here. | ||
| Tonight, at 7.30 or so, we're gonna release the next tape where this man, Rosenberg, talks about the, quote, internal tug of war at the New York Times between, I'm quoting him now. | ||
| This is his quote. | ||
| This is pretty extraordinary that he said this, not me. | ||
| Some of the crazier leftist SHIT that's worked its way at the New York Times. | ||
| And he talks about the irrationality in this leftist ideology. | ||
| He talks about his lawsuit with Project Veritas. | ||
| Again, he's secretly recorded saying this. | ||
| He said, we effed up with Project Veritas. | ||
| And he talks about the P tape. | ||
| and his sources at the NSA that this P-tape was made up and he called it ridiculous. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| So this is part two tonight coming out. | ||
| You have video tape that's happening. | ||
| And this is really important, Steve. | ||
| You and I have known each other for 11 years. | ||
| To see the way the media works with these administrative agencies and how they make this stuff up and they brag about it, it's pretty extraordinary to get these confessions from a national security reporter. | ||
| No, he's the press officer. | ||
| He's the press officer for the Administrator for the Deep State. | ||
| He told you CIA and how they get around the lie detector test of the CIA? | ||
| This is all thought through. | ||
| It's not random. | ||
| Okay, so it's 7.30 tonight and people should go to Veritas? | ||
| I guess you can't tweet it out. | ||
| James, I think I understand now why the FBI battered down your door and dragged you out in your skivvies. | ||
| I think I'm getting the picture now why the FBI would want to do that. | ||
| I hope they're watching. | ||
| I hope the FBI and all these groups are watching this because what we're doing now is we're showing the whole world, Matthew Rosenberg, Mark Mazzetti, I confronted Mark Mazzetti, and now maybe they'll think twice. | ||
| These federal agencies will think twice about going to these folks and see their unethical behavior. | ||
| We're exposing them. | ||
| We're shining a light on all of them. | ||
| And yes, Steve, they were trying to intimidate you, but we're not going to be intimidated. | ||
| We have part two tonight. | ||
| We're going to release the confrontation with these individuals and you're going to see him talk about his sources at the National Security Agency, a first in American history. | ||
| You're going to see how it works between the press office at the New York Times and the NSA. | ||
| Wow, the puzzle palace. | ||
| James, heroic work. | ||
| Part two out tonight. | ||
| You know what I think? | ||
| And I would say everybody, because we know the FBI and the CIA, they watch the show. | ||
| We want all patriots and whistleblowers to contact Project Veritas and talk to the man, James O'Keefe. | ||
| Tell your story. | ||
| Come forward and tell your story to James O'Keefe. | ||
| That's what we need to see. | ||
| We need to see patriots start to come forward. | ||
| O'Keefe? | ||
| There are tips. | ||
| V-E-R-I-T-A-S tips at Protonmail.com. | ||
| If you're watching this, I know you are, and you work for these agencies like the DOJ. | ||
| I mean, talk to us. | ||
| Send us an encrypted message. | ||
| Be brave. | ||
| We need people to speak up. | ||
| Accountability. | ||
| People say, what's going to happen to these people? | ||
| Well, information is the accountability that you seek. | ||
| It's sunlight. | ||
| We either have to have informed consent. | ||
| We need to show people what's happening in this country. | ||
| Well, we have to use coercion. | ||
| And I don't believe in that. | ||
| I don't believe in violence or coercive. | ||
| We have to educate people and shine a light. | ||
| And these stories that we're doing tonight and yesterday on New York Times national security reporters telling you how they manufacture consent and lie to you in conjunction with these agencies. | ||
| This is everything. | ||
| This is the reason why we have all the problems in our country. | ||
| And I think it will deter them, Steve Bannon. | ||
| I think it will deter The New York Times from doing these games. | ||
| And I can tell you right now, I can report to you that there is a civil war inside the New York Times, a tug of war, according to this man. | ||
| You'll see more about that tonight. | ||
| Tonight, 7.30 in Veritas. | ||
| We'll be pushing it out all over. | ||
| O'Keefe, I got to tell you, you are taking, by the way, and now they're trying to do manufactured consent on this war. | ||
| O'Keefe is more central now than he's ever been. | ||
| James, thank you. | ||
| You're a hero and a patriot and you really are. | ||
| What's the over and under? | ||
| Who goes to prison first, O'Keefe or Bannon? | ||
| That's a question out there. | ||
| Just toss it out there. | ||
| I just say the only thing I hear about jail is that I won't have my pillow, my special pillow. | ||
| What do you fear? | ||
| What are you afraid of? | ||
| Well, I'm usually a fearless guy, but I like my particular type of pillow I sleep with at night, Steve. | ||
| But I will be innocent, falsely accused if they ever cross that Rubicon with me, but we have to be willing to be falsely accused in this business. | ||
| Well, you have no fear. | ||
| They've been after you for years, brother, and you're still breaking massive stories like this. | ||
| O'Keefe, you're a hero. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Talk to you soon. | ||
| I gotta talk to Mike Lindell if I get him a special pillow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's talk about that. | |
| Okay, I want to bring in Darren Beatty, Revolver. | ||
| Darren, give us your assessment of this blockbuster from the, you've been all over the New York Times, particularly your reporting, Raheem Kassam's reporting over the National Pulse about this very incident, and tell me what you, when you saw this, what you saw, The head national security guy say, yeah, the FBI informants all over it. | ||
| Boom! | ||
| That's where they got that one quip. | ||
| Remember that one story? | ||
| They said, oh, yeah, there were several. | ||
| That's that's where they got it from. | ||
| Correct? | ||
| Yes, well, actually, that was I believe that one was from separate reporters. | ||
| So it's interesting to see we get independent confirmation here from their one of their senior national security reporters. | ||
| It is really amazing to see the discrepancy between the public and private version of these individuals. | ||
| In private, you have this guy presumably on a date trying to impress some girl, telling her, January 6th, nothing like what we've said. | ||
| It's not a big deal. | ||
| I don't understand how my colleagues, my younger, perhaps more delicate colleagues, could be so scandalized by what amounts to really a nothing event. | ||
| And oh, by the way, January 6th was littered with FBI informants. | ||
| That, coming from a New York Times national security reporter, would be bombshell enough. | ||
| But as it turns out, the gods of irony have delivered still more. | ||
| And that is that this individual, this exact person, wrote a long, extensive, comprehensive piece in a genre that the regime media has come to love, the debunking genre. | ||
| He wrote a long piece debunking Those conspiracy theorists who dare suggest that there could be federal involvement in January 6. | ||
| He goes on to mention Tucker Carlson's Patriot Purge documentary in which I feature quite prominently. | ||
| He mentions you, Steve. | ||
| Quite extensively, as a purveyor of disinformation. | ||
| And of course he mentions revolver.news, which pretty much started this whole narrative, and he mentions the Ray Epps stuff, which of course there's still no answers to. | ||
| But this guy, who's writing this debunking piece, in private, on a date, is speaking candidly to some girl, says, you know what? | ||
| They're right, we're wrong. | ||
| You just can't make it up. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Darren Beatty revolver going to join us on the other side Come on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
♪ Feel it, feel it, feel it, feel it, feel it, feel it, feel it ♪ That is Biggie Smalls. | |
| 25 years ago today, not far from our offices at the time in Beverly Hills, down off of Wilshire Boulevard. | ||
| Okay, that is Biggie Smalls. | ||
| 25 years ago today, not far from our offices at the time in Beverly Hills down off of Wilshire Boulevard at the Peter, I think it was outside the Peterson Automotive, approximately I think 12, 31 o'clock in the morning, Biggie Smalls, gunned down in cold blood. | ||
| It's the 25th anniversary of his of his in Los Angeles. | ||
| I want to go back to Darren Beatty Darren one more time the mainstream media because we're in the March. | ||
| To war here, right? | ||
| You know, Morning Joe saying we're at war, we're at war. | ||
| They're trying to wag the dog and wag the markets at the same time and cover up. | ||
| This is the new thing. | ||
| The COVID mysteriously disappeared. | ||
| Masks are off. | ||
| Vaccine mandates all run away from that. | ||
| But they got to have something else. | ||
| And so the New York Times, the drumbeat of the New York Times, MSNBC, CNN. | ||
| Remember, folks, if the New York Times did not publish every morning, CNN and MSNBC would be a test pattern. | ||
| They take it right from the railhead. | ||
| How big a deal is this National Security Pulitzer Prize winner and what he tried to do and the bald-faced lies we now know he told? | ||
| Well, it's a big deal because an underreported aspect of this remarkable expose by Project Veritas is a little aside he had with his interlocutor saying that, you know, We are so well sourced within the national security community, but we can't talk directly to people inside. | ||
| He explained this whole mechanism of how they launder information from the national security establishment. | ||
| So the New York Times is getting its information directly from the national security establishment. | ||
| That's where it's coming from. | ||
| And that's why it's so significant. | ||
| For this person to, in private, unbeknownst to him being recorded, to make this admission against interest, contra-narrative, saying, yes, I, the guy who's the big national security reporter, whose job is essentially a stenographer for the national security establishment, know that January 6th was absolutely littered with informants. | ||
| Okay, a couple things before we get to this next tape. | ||
| 7.30 tonight Veritas drops the second block of that. | ||
| You just go to Revolver, you'll catch all the analysis for the great team at revolver.news. | ||
| So Veritas drops the second part of this blockbuster about 6 January in the New York Times. | ||
| Royce White, the one and only, is going to be on Tucker tonight. | ||
| Royce White, running for Congress against Omar, is going to be on Tucker. | ||
| And then our 6 o'clock show, we're going to have Judge Gableman from Wisconsin, Tina Peters has got 10, I think 7 felony charges, but 10 counts of indictment, $500,000 cash bond. | ||
| We're going to have Sharona Bishop. | ||
| And I think Mike Lindell is going to join us about that. | ||
| Boris is on with a bunch of analysis. | ||
| We've got a lot going on in that hour. | ||
| Also about this anti-grooming bill in Florida and tons of information on the day-to-day nitty-gritty of the politics. | ||
| Can we play, I want to play this tape again for, and we're going to play, we can play the whole thing. | ||
| I want to play the thing with Rubio's response. | ||
| Let's play the whole thing. | ||
| Well, I only have a minute left. | ||
| Let me ask you. | ||
| Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? | ||
| Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. | ||
| So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach I'm sure you're aware that the Russian propaganda Groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they've uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country and with NATO's coordination | ||
| If there's a biological or chemical weapon incident or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it? | ||
| There is no doubt in my mind, Senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves. | ||
| OK, this is a real piece of work. | ||
| Oh, what a piece of work man is. | ||
| Was that Shakespeare? | ||
| Um... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Darren Beatty. | |
| First off, Victoria Nuland, and then I want you to break down between part one, which is they're trying to get out ahead of this, and then Rubio coming in and obviously taking the DIA and CIA's part in trying to reverse the spin. | ||
| Who's Victoria Nuland? | ||
| Why is she such a prominent part of Revolver's coverage of all this? | ||
| Victoria Nuland is, we might describe her as neocon royalty. | ||
| I think it's a great demonstration of how impoverished our political discourse is, that so many more people have heard of and complain about AOC, and they have no idea who Victoria Nuland is. | ||
| She was, among other things, Obama's secretary in the State Department under Obama covering Europe and Eurasian affairs. | ||
| She played a key role, some would say she was even one of the principal architects of the color revolution in Ukraine. | ||
| Before Revolver.News was famous for covering January 6th, we were known for covering the color revolution putting that phrase back on the map. | ||
| And she was instrumental on this. | ||
| There's video of her in Kiev, calling for the overthrow, effectively, of the Government at the time. | ||
| And so she's been involved with all of these things. | ||
| It's unknown whether they already had had those biological labs or whether those were established after Newland's successful Color Revolution operation, but she's been in it. | ||
| She's connected. | ||
| Her husband, incidentally, is part of neocon royalty on the Bush side. | ||
| He's a Kagan. | ||
| He was architect of the project for New American Century, so it's very much what you would call the deep state, except it's out in the open. | ||
| This is a ruling class family, and that's why it's so interesting to see the dynamic between her and Rubio, because Rubio's so clearly out of his depth with her. | ||
| Like, whatever you can say about her, she's kind of part of the, you know, the architect You don't know if Rubio's gonna bring her a towel or bring her a justification for a war. | ||
| Either way, maybe they bring both, depending on the mood. | ||
| Come on, let's cut to the chase, Republicans. | ||
| These guys are sitting there in short pants. | ||
| He's got the little propellant gun in the hand. | ||
| It's a school toy. | ||
| You don't know if Rubio's going to bring her a towel or bring her a justification for a war. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Either way, maybe you bring both, depending on the mood. | |
| But I have to comment on a really bizarre feature of that exchange, which is that it seems like he's not expecting her to acknowledge that they're these bioweapons lab. | ||
| And then in this bizarre sort of impromptu effort to do damage control for her, he just like blurts out of the blue, oh by the way, if there's any kind of attack, we already know it was the rush. | ||
| But here's, listen, she's a heavyweight. | ||
| She's a heavyweight. | ||
| She's a player. | ||
| When you talk about deep state or administrative state, She's one of the principal, I mean, she's high command. | ||
| She's a field grade officer, okay? | ||
| And Kagan, the husband, he's got what, the institute, they're starting institutes, they're doing institutes of war, these guys are the warmongers. | ||
| And this is interesting, the Democratic Party is now the warmonger party. | ||
| And MSNBC and CNN are the warmonger channels. | ||
| I never thought I'd see the day Steve Bannon's a peacenik, okay? | ||
| But hey, be that as it may, I guess rationality finally catches up with you. | ||
| Victoria Nguyen. | ||
| First of all, one thing about her... Go ahead, go ahead. | ||
| Just really quickly, the unfortunate thing is it's bipartisan. | ||
| Fox News is largely, you know, with the exception of Tucker, just all in on the war. | ||
| And Newland's own family illustrates this problem in our country is that she was Obama's person, her husband was Bush's person, but they're the same, you know, they have the same agenda advocating for the same wars. | ||
| It's just the uniparty phenomenon. | ||
| And the only administration that didn't accommodate this was Donald Trump's. | ||
| Trump. | ||
| It's the neoliberal neocon. | ||
| Neoliberal neocon. | ||
| And you're getting the neoliberal part with the massive budget deficits. | ||
| You got that coming to you in the next couple, you know, in the full economic war. | ||
| You got the neocon part with with the warmongers. | ||
| And they are the warmongers. | ||
| The other thing is interesting. | ||
| Vindman is from, I think, Ukraine. | ||
| And Victoria Nuland, I think her dad's from Ukraine. | ||
| Her dad's from Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| So you got it's all these connections. | ||
| And people have to understand, today there's a lot of, you know, Russians standing up, you got the Chinese, you got all, hey, there's information and disinformation coming at you fast. | ||
| We try to, hey, the Fog of War. | ||
| My point is that I don't need some guy in Russia telling us what they got there. | ||
| What we need is to haul her back like tomorrow morning at like 9 a.m. | ||
| And start asking the 2,000 questions people ought to ask as she tippy-toed through that minefield of, they have biological research facilities and there may be some research material that our guys are trying to help them secure. | ||
| Hello, what do you mean biological research facilities? | ||
| Like, how many? | ||
| Who paid for it? | ||
| Who's there? | ||
| What programs? | ||
| At what level? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| What do you mean, material? | ||
| Define that. | ||
| We need nomenclature. | ||
| That's one of the things we pride ourselves on in the War Room. | ||
| You know, let's get some facts around here. | ||
| I don't need all the guys saying, oh, this is a Russia disinformation campaign. | ||
| Forget it. | ||
| Don't take anything from Russia. | ||
| Don't take anything from any third party. | ||
| Get them back up here. | ||
| And if you have to do it in a classified setting, do it in a classified setting. | ||
| Start there, and then you get to declass. | ||
| The American people have to know what's going on here. | ||
| Nobody, everybody, they got the emotion, they got the showing. | ||
| Yes, it's horrible, it's horrific. | ||
| But we need to, now they're going to send $14 billion and not one penny for your wall. | ||
| The only border we should be caring about is the southern border of your own country. | ||
| No, we're worried about the eastern border of Ukraine. | ||
| That's what we're fighting for. | ||
| Fiona Hill tells us, the self-determination and territorial integrity of Ukraine. | ||
| Okay, baby. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| Got that. | ||
| How about the territorial integrity? | ||
| Because the Rio Grande Valley is controlled by the cartels. | ||
| How about the territorial integrity and the self-determination of the American citizens? | ||
| With the Hispanic Americans that had a belly full of you. | ||
| That's the party. | ||
| You're going to have the Green Progressive Party over with the squad after we shatter the Democrats. | ||
| You're going to have this neocon neoliberal party in the middle. | ||
| Darren Beatty, you're closing Thoughts Analysis Revolver. | ||
| You've been amazing. | ||
| Tucker, and by the way, outside of Tucker, they've got the pom-poms over on Fox. | ||
| They're neocon central. | ||
| They're worse than the Iraq War. | ||
| Darren Beatty, Thoughts Analysis. | ||
| It's a propaganda wave like we haven't seen. | ||
| Rumors are the Veritas fellow is working on a piece right now debunking the existence of the biological lab, so we should stay tuned for that. | ||
| I encourage everyone, go to revolver.news. | ||
| We have two extremely edgy, controversial pieces. | ||
| People have said this is a little bit on the edgy side, but I think people will find one extremely informative and one extremely amusing, if not partially scandalous. | ||
| So go check those out, if you dare. | ||
| And as always, we have the top of the line, cutting edge coverage on the Ukraine. | ||
| And you're also on Getter? | ||
| things so keep checking out revolver.news I'm on twitter at Darren J Beattie. | ||
| And you're also on getter what's your getters revolver news? | ||
| Getter is at revolver news. | ||
| Since most have been kicked off Twitter. | ||
| I am so shocked there's gambling in this establishment and that revolvers get edgy content. | ||
| I am stunned that there's edgy content on revolver. | ||
| I'm stunned! | ||
| Okay, Darren Beatty, thank you. | ||
| God bless you. | ||
| Keep fighting. | ||
| Great to be here. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Remember, order of battle tonight, 7.30. | ||
| Veritas puts up part two. | ||
| I'm sure you'll get it on, go to Veritas and the revolver guys will have it right away. | ||
| Royce White on Tucker tonight. | ||
| THE Royce White on Tucker. | ||
| And our 6 o'clock show is just going to be amazing. | ||
| We've got Tina Peters, the Gold Star mother, 10 charges by a grand jury, 7 felonies. | ||
| And wait until you see what they are. | ||
| You don't think they think Tina Peters is a threat? | ||
| Watch what they're trying to do. | ||
| Gina Griswold and the team out there in Colorado are trying to do to her. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, make sure at 6 o'clock, stay on Rumble, getter, warham.org, all of it. | ||
| We've got a power show at 6 o'clock. | ||
| We're going to get to the bottom of what happened to Tina, the great Tina Peters today. | ||
| They're unloading on here because they fear her. | ||
| We've got Judge Gableman about Wisconsin. | ||
| We've got a ton of stuff going on. | ||
| We've actually reorganized to get Joe Kent on now to give more time. | ||
| Joe Kent's got a new ad up. | ||
| Joe's ready. | ||
| A couple things. | ||
| I really appreciate it. | ||
| Good feedback on the Biggie Smalls. | ||
| Remember, the 25th anniversary. | ||
| If you've got a chance, say a prayer. | ||
| For the soul of Biggie Smalls today, 25 years ago on Wilshire Boulevard, gunned down in cold blood. | ||
| We've got, okay, we've got a lot to get to. | ||
| Let's get Joe Kent in first. | ||
| Joe Kent joins us, he's running in Washington 3. | ||
| Joe, you've served your country, I forget, 10, 12 tours. | ||
| Your wife gave her life for a country in combat in Syria. | ||
| Give me your perspective as a man that served his country in harm's way of this, not march, it's a rush to war by every network, every paper. | ||
| Give us your assessment. | ||
| You know, frankly, I'm disgusted. | ||
| I feel like we've learned nothing from our post 9-11 wars, from the lead up to the Iraq War, the lies from the Iraq War. | ||
| Nothing from all the lies that we saw come unfolding in the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. | ||
| I mean, there's big geostrategic things to look at, like the historic context behind Ukraine, how it's always been a buffer state. | ||
| We're completely ignoring that. | ||
| We're ignoring the U.S.' 's role in the Maidan revolution in 2014. | ||
| But we're also really taking our eye off the ball with the Chinese Communist Party and how they stand to benefit from this and how they could undermine our status as a prime reserve currency holder. | ||
| And then we just have all this reckless talk coming from the war machine GOP establishment, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, Adam Kissinger. | ||
| And then we have all the silent complacency coming from the GOP as well. | ||
| There's just so many that are willing to go out there and put on a little Ukraine lapel pin and allow Joe Biden to march us towards war. | ||
| Like you said, it's really a sprint towards war, whether it's loose talk or it's sending more lethal aid over there to Ukraine and really potentially getting us involved. | ||
| In another war, I think all these members of Congress and all these senators that are willing to engage in this type of dialogue, but aren't back in their districts right now explaining to their people what the vital national security interest is for the United States of America, they're derelict in their duties. This should be something that the American people are talking about in the terms of, are we willing to send our sons and daughters over to go and fight? If not, then we have to stop all this rush towards war, start freezing the funding, say no more troop deployments. | ||
| Most certainly, you can't use Rammstein Air Base as a staging ground. | ||
| I just think we have to stop this as soon as possible and have the American people weigh in. | ||
| This is definitely time for a war powers debate on the floor of Congress. | ||
| And since you went in harm's way and your wife gave the ultimate sacrifice for her country and for the citizens of her country, you've got skin in the game. | ||
| They took $14 billion and they're jamming it now into this overall omnibus bill that's another embarrassment, humiliation, and dangers for the American people, this orgy of spending. | ||
| But I don't think we've seen right now one penny for the southern wall. | ||
| Of the good folks up in the third district, up in Washington, Where are their heads? | ||
| Is it that they want the security of the southern border? | ||
| Or are they more concerned about putting money and kids in harm's way and maybe triggering a third world war on the eastern border of these breakaway provinces, Russian-speaking provinces, on the eastern border of Ukraine? | ||
| Joe Kent? | ||
| No, we want our southern border secure. | ||
| Everywhere I go throughout the district, I-5 runs right through our district. | ||
| We are right between Portland, Oregon and Seattle and Olympia. | ||
| The I-5 corridor right between failing sanctuary cities, we've had an uptick in crime, uptick in narcotics. | ||
| People feel it every day, just the amount of petty crime that's plaguing our streets. | ||
| There's a direct correlation between that and the southern border wall. | ||
| And the woman I'm running against, who's supposed to be a Republican, she voted to stop construction of that southern border wall. | ||
| So people don't want a new endless war that could potentially turn out to be a third world war in a far off land in the breeding grounds, the bloodlands of the previous two world wars in Ukraine. | ||
| They're very concerned about that. | ||
| They're also very concerned with the out of control inflation, the price of the pump, the bare shelves at the grocery store. | ||
| They see our supply chain issues up in front of their face every single day. | ||
| They know the Chinese Communist Party and the economic war that they're waging on the American people and on their pocketbooks with the help of the Biden regime is doing nothing but holding them back. | ||
| And so people really aren't buying this march to war and they want to see more leadership from our elected officials. | ||
| That's all we're asking is Biden to come forward and make the case for war. | ||
| And let's take a vote. | ||
| It's a democracy. | ||
| Let's take a vote and see where people are as they get and be held accountable for that vote and get their constituents to weigh in. | ||
| I think it'll be far different than what you're seeing on cable TV, on Fox News, on The New York Times, in The Washington Post. | ||
| I think it'd be far different. | ||
| My bet is the American people will weigh and measure this and say, well, hang on for a second. | ||
| What are they actually fighting for? | ||
| What are the discussions? | ||
| What's the bid in the ass between the two parties right now? | ||
| In Crimea, these eastern provinces, all of that. | ||
| A neutral buffer. | ||
| It should be argued out and negotiated out. | ||
| Do we have Joe's spot? | ||
| Are we going to play that tomorrow? | ||
| Don't have Joe's spot. | ||
| We're going to play that tomorrow. | ||
| Joe Kent, how do people get to you? | ||
| How do people find out more about you and your campaign? | ||
| We're going to play your spot tomorrow morning. | ||
| Maybe we'll play it in the 6 o'clock show if I can get it up. | ||
| Joe Kent, how do people get to you, find out more about the campaign? | ||
| Yeah, please go to joekent4congress.com. | ||
| I'm running against one of the impeachment voter rhinos. | ||
| I'm in a hard fight against the establishment out here. | ||
| I'm endorsed by President Trump. | ||
| I'm also against the very far radical left, running on all small contributions. | ||
| So joekent4congress.com is the place to go to support our efforts to take back this country. | ||
| Joe Kent, hero, patriot, warrior. | ||
| Thank you, sir, for joining us. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Joe Kennedy, man, a few words, but very selected. | ||
| Okay, we couldn't get it. | ||
| We're trying to get Hugh, our partner here, on the Bible. | ||
| GodBlessTheUSA.com. | ||
| GodBlessTheUSABible.com is the Lee Greenwood partnership we've got for this Bible, King James Version of the Bible. | ||
| And you, right now, more than ever, we ought to be all over the Holy Word of God. | ||
| He also combines us with the founding documents, the divinely inspired founding documents. | ||
| of our country. | ||
| The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and now thrown in the Pledge of Allegiance. | ||
| All of them together so you can talk to the family about how providential this country is. | ||
| How this is the New Jerusalem. | ||
| And get into this Bible more than ever. | ||
| Because, ladies and gentlemen, it is spinning out of control every day. | ||
| You see that? | ||
| I know you come to the War Room for Stability Cake. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We'll be back with Battleground next. | ||
| We've got Judge Gableman From Wisconsin, we're going to have the Tina Peters story. | ||
| Tina Peters indicted today on seven counts, I think seven felon, ten counts, seven felonies. | ||
| We've got so much going on. | ||
| We're going to be in Florida to talk about this anti-grooming bill. | ||
| We've got Boris with some details. | ||
| We've got Captain Tarasso from yesterday. | ||
| We're going to pound it. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Join us for War Room Battleground next. |
Export Selection