Feb. 16, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Elections so that American voters can have their voice heard and choose their elected officials. | |
| So just so I'm clear on this what you're saying is is the elect people close to election machines or entrusted by the public whether as civil servants or elected to some position you know coming under the sway of the big lie and essentially mucking with the machines in pursuit of uncovering it. | ||
| So we are seeing extremists like Steve Bannon recruit people into local election administration. | ||
| I don't think it's a coincidence that Tina Peters announced on his show. | ||
| The Washington Post has reported that election deniers have been recruited into civil servant positions both in my office and the Pennsylvania Secretary of State office. | ||
| We are seeing attacks on election infrastructure. | ||
| That includes, by the way, the vitriol aimed at both Republican and Democratic election workers to try to get them to step down and backfill those offices with election deniers. | ||
| So it's something the country has to be aware of. | ||
| Luckily, Colorado has some of the best election security in the nation. | ||
| And I'm running legislation, working with our legislature to make sure that we're guarding even further against insider threats. | ||
| But it underlines the need of that oversight position, the Secretary of State position, to make sure that the great county clerks get the support they deserve in the voters in counties like in Mesa County, where the election official is not doing her job, that there's oversight to make sure those elections still function really well. | ||
| So that they stand out. | ||
| Let's remember the three C's here, Donnie. | ||
| COVID, crime, cost of living. | ||
| Those are the three issues. | ||
| Democrats, COVID, crime, cost of living. | ||
| Write it down on your blackboard. | ||
| Write it down on your hand. | ||
| COVID, crime, cost of living. | ||
| Those are the three issues, Donnie, that people are going to be talking about. | ||
| And when they step into the voting booth, That's what's going to drive the voters who are going to determine whether Republicans control the House and Senate or Democrats control the House and Senate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is because those are about the voters. | |
| It's about me, not about you. | ||
| People are selfish. | ||
| I don't mean in the bad sense of the word. | ||
| They care about their well-being. | ||
| And those three things have to do with their daily well-being. | ||
| Let's just say this. | ||
| Let me build on that. | ||
| I used to see people go in in voting boots. | ||
| And when I was running, it scared the hell out of me. | ||
| And so I had to drive away. | ||
| I couldn't figure out exactly what they were doing. | ||
| But I figured out pretty quickly they were voting for their best interest. | ||
| For their kids' best interest. | ||
| For their parents' best interest. | ||
| For their school's best interest. | ||
| It was all self-interest. | ||
| Let's just face it. | ||
| It's the wealthy. | ||
| It's the elites. | ||
| It's the people in the ivory towers. | ||
| It's those of us around the table. | ||
| We can go, well, you know, I'm really concerned, really, just generally about where the Repub- I mean, we have the luxury Of being philosophical when we go in to vote. | ||
| The majority of Americans, they're trying to get by. | ||
| They want their kids, who are having emotional problems, to be able to go back to school. | ||
| They want to be, they're small businesses, they want people to start coming into the stores again. | ||
| We elites, Republican elites, Democratic elites, Independent elites, have the luxury of sort of looking at it from 30,000 feet. | ||
| Most Americans don't. | ||
| So you're right. | ||
| They vote for their family's best interest and they should. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And what Donald Trump understood was that Americans hate elitism. | |
| They hate it. | ||
| The average person... He understood resentment. | ||
| That's the only hate they resent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They resent elites. | |
| It was about race, it was about elitism, and he understood that, and we can't give that back to Republicans. | ||
| It's really... We really are... | ||
| We are on the precipice. | ||
| If we don't get this right this time, thank you. | ||
| We don't get this right this time, it's over. | ||
| You put McCarthy back in, you put Trump back in, our democracy is over. | ||
| I'm not overstating it. | ||
| That's where we're at. | ||
| It's the Democratic Party that's over. | ||
| Welcome. | ||
| It is Wednesday, 16 February, Year of Our Lord 2022. | ||
| We have a packed show today. | ||
| The great James O'Keefe is going to be joining us on Project Veritas. | ||
| We've got Dr. Robert Malone who's actually going to be in studio. | ||
| We've got the convoy of truckers that are gathering, the gathering of eagles in Barstow, California. | ||
| We're going to try to get to that. | ||
| We've got a lot going on. | ||
| We've got Joe Kent, Russ Vogt, Peter Navarro. | ||
| Right there, ladies and gentlemen, that's a hundred seats and run the country for a hundred years. | ||
| Right there, Morning Joe, the conventional wisdom. | ||
| This is called populism. | ||
| The Democrats are not a populist party. | ||
| If you got to run on covid crime and cost of living it's over right now But we got to keep our shoulder to the wheel because we just don't want a tiny victory We want to shatter the democratic party see right there. Oh, you know Trump hate these. Oh, no, he's a racist. No, no, no, no the american hate. This is called populism The democrats are not a populist party. They're a party of elites That have somehow convinced working-class people in the working poor the proletariat | ||
| Right to just have the crumbs off the table and they continue to bribe them with the crumbs. That's all shattering From the Rio Grande Valley to South Texas, to the great heartland of this country, actually in San Francisco, the recalling, we've got a lot to go through, the recalling of school boards. | ||
| Remember, hyper locality. | ||
| The precincts committee strategy, the school board strategy, the election official strategy, hyper, hyper, hyper locality. | ||
| We're taking this back one village at a time. | ||
| A populist revolt. | ||
| Okay, we've got a lot to get to. | ||
| And I'm burning daylight already, so let's go to, I want to go to Rome and Ben Harnwell to set the context of what is going on in Canada that is spread throughout the world, these heroic, patriotic Canadian truckers. | ||
| Ben, come and contextualize this. | ||
| I've got David Menzies from the Star News Network, Michael Patrick Leigh, who's actually in Canada today, that we're going to jump to in a second. | ||
| But give, contextualize what's going on here from your position in occupied Europe. | ||
| Good morning, Steve. | ||
| Well, basically, the story is that as Covid mandates start to be relaxed in the rest of the world, Justin Castro is doubling down with a brutal use of emergency war powers. | ||
| And not only that, Steve, I think it's worth dwelling on the fact that he's using these emergency war powers on ordinary workers, on the ordinary guy. | ||
| He's using them on the ordinary guy Because he considers them to be enemies of the state and political opponents. | ||
| And what that power play has been today is that they've instructed banks, the Canadian government, the Canadian federal government has instructed banks to now freeze the assets, the bank accounts of both private individuals and companies that the banks may have a suspicion of being involved in supporting The truckers, which the Canadian government continues to call an illegal protest. | ||
| Now, that's what's happening in Canada and I would like to illustrate the fact that this isn't simply a government which is saying we are following the science and this is basically an objective path which we are required by science to take. | ||
| This is a decision, a personal decision, because there are other options. | ||
| And to give just a very brief illustration of what is taking place in the rest of the world now, I'm just going to cite three examples. | ||
| Firstly, the WHO, which isn't by any means our friend in this crisis, has stated that last week the COVID statistics are that cases globally have fallen by 19%. | ||
| And that the number of deaths remain stable. | ||
| If you're interested in the precise figures, we're talking about 16 million new COVID infections last week and 75,000 deaths which they're reporting. | ||
| And then contrast Canada to Barcelona, for example, because thousands of people have just been gathering in Barcelona's historic downtown to celebrate their It's a three-day patronal festival, which is St Eulalia, a feast that goes back to the 1600s. | ||
| It hasn't been celebrated for two years because of Covid, and yet here they are, thousands of people, happy Spaniards, smiling and laughing and taking photographs of the processions, maskless. | ||
| And then in Cyprus, for example, they're also lifting all of their Covid-19 restrictions on access for the unvaccinated to bars, restaurants. | ||
| Nightclubs, soccer stadiums, theatres, hotels and cinemas, all starting from February the 21st, as long as being unvaccinated they can show a valid COVID-19 rapid test within the last 24 hours. | ||
| And even here in Italy, which this week has enacted a measure requiring everyone over 50, every worker over 50, to have the third booster shot, The Deputy Health Minister has said that he believes by March 31st the government will not be renewing its state of emergency. | ||
| So that's the situation here in Europe and elsewhere on the back of the good news from the WHO and yet the Canadian government is tripling down. | ||
| Well, I think probably provinces have already lifted the mandates. | ||
| In Washington, D.C., miraculously, the signs changed overnight. | ||
| Ben, real quickly, how do people get to your Getter account? | ||
| Because you're posting stuff all day. | ||
| It's at Harnwell, which is my surname, Steve. | ||
| Getter at Harnwell. | ||
| And it might be just a very quick, if I may, 10 seconds, that this is not universally popular in Canada, because a number of provinces, led by their respective premiers, have all said that they're opposed to the imposition of emergency war powers. | ||
| And just very briefly, that's Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec, Ontario, and I believe also I saw Saskatchewan in the list. | ||
| So this is... That's correct. | ||
| They're also lifting the mandates. | ||
| Ben, thank you very much. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Let's go to Toronto. | ||
| Let's go to Canada. | ||
| David Menzies from the Star News Network, Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
| David, give us a reset today of what's going on. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Good morning, Mr. Bannon. | ||
| I reached out to my colleagues Alexa Lavoie and Lincoln Jay. | ||
| They are in Ottawa and some other members of the Rebel News team. | ||
| And basically, it's the status quo. | ||
| Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister, has invoked the Emergencies Act. | ||
| This was something that replaced the War Measures Act, which his father, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, invoked back in 1970. | ||
| But you can make an argument there was a reason for invoking the War Measures Act, now the Emergencies Act. | ||
| Back then, there was a terrorist organization, the FLQ, the Front de Libération du Québec. | ||
| And they had kidnapped people. | ||
| They had murdered a politician. | ||
| So you could argue that was a genuine state of emergency. | ||
| Here, it's a peaceful protest. | ||
| There's no reason to invoke the Emergency Services Act. | ||
| I don't care where you are on the political spectrum. | ||
| And it was very odd, Steve, that when you saw Justin Trudeau speaking yesterday, He was talking about the economic impact Ottawa's facing. | ||
| He was talking about the job impact Ottawa residents were facing. | ||
| Well, that's kind of rich, isn't it? | ||
| Because these truckers who have been described as economic terrorists, what about going back two years when various levels of governments put in the COVID restrictions? | ||
| Of course, if you were a big box store like Costco or Walmart, you're exempt. | ||
| They have lobbyists that protect them that way. | ||
| But if you're a mom-pa operation, you're bankrupt. | ||
| If you were just a joblo worker, depending on independent businesses, you've been out of a job for a couple of years. | ||
| So suddenly, in Justin Trudeau's speech, you didn't hear words like coronavirus or COVID-19. | ||
| You heard about jobs and the economy. | ||
| Suddenly, he's like a fiscal conservative overnight. | ||
| And by the way, For your audience, Steve, who might not know this, when you defame these truckers who are completely peaceful, much to the chagrin of the mainstream media that want to see a so-called insurrection on Parliament Hill, which has not happened, a la January 6th, when this government deals with real terrorists, a different picture emerges. | ||
| For example, Omar Kotter, Our homegrown Al Qaeda terrorist went over to Afghanistan several years ago, threw a hand grenade, killed an American serviceman, partially blinded another. | ||
| He was patched up by an American paramedic. | ||
| So he survived his takedown. | ||
| And eventually when he got out of Gitmo, this liberal government cut Omar Khadr a check in 2016 David, David, hang on for one second. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Just hang with us. | ||
| David Menzies from Rebel News. | ||
| Just hang on. | ||
| We're up in Canada. | ||
| We're going to come back. | ||
| We've got the great James O'Keefe breaking investigative report of Project Veritas. | ||
| I'm going to blow your head off. | ||
| We've got Dr. Robert Malone joining us to analyze it all. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Be back in the War Room in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will have freedom to live, we will win, you'll surrender. | |
| Let the bullets fly a little longer. | ||
| Let the bullets fly a little longer. | ||
| I play with as many people as possible. | ||
| So you have to get an annual shot. | ||
| I mean it hasn't been formally announced yet. | ||
| They don't want to like rile everyone up. | ||
| The drug companies, the food companies, the vaccine companies, they pay us hundreds of millions of dollars a year to hire and keep the reviewers to approve their products. | ||
| If they can get every person required at an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of money going into their company. | ||
| So how do you know it's already getting approved? | ||
| Well, they're not going to, I mean just from everything I've heard, they're not going to not approve it. | ||
| Meet Christopher Cole, an executive officer at the FDA with over 20 years experience who claims to be directly involved in the approval process of the various COVID vaccines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think what's going to happen is it's going to be a gradual thing. | |
| Schools are going to mandate it. | ||
| Why do they need the third one? | ||
| For the same reason that you or I would need a third one. | ||
| So the three will bolster your system. | ||
| And then there will be an annual, eventually an annual, just like the flu shot. | ||
| For the toddlers? | ||
| Well, for everyone. | ||
| Okay, so the toddlers too, then. | ||
| We'll have to get annually. | ||
| Probably. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I don't completely agree with their, the process. | ||
| What do you mean you don't agree with the process? | ||
| Well, I mean, they don't have all the, all the tests aren't there. | ||
| So I agree with the thing that it is important to inoculate them, but you can't provide the parent as much assurity as you normally want to. | ||
| It's an EUA for all All age groups, all designations, and then you have to get approved by specific age groups based on the study. | ||
| Do you think that's really an emergency for the toddlers? | ||
| Well they're all approved under an emergency. | ||
| The efficacy data doesn't have to be as high. | ||
| The standard is on emergency use authorizations is that it does more benefit than harm. | ||
| I thought their cases weren't that high for six-month to four-year-olds. | ||
| They're not, but because it's related to COVID, it's under that approval process. | ||
| Having been in this business now, I don't know, 10, 12 years, right? | ||
| I can't emphasize enough How magnificent these investigative reports are and these videos are. | ||
| I mean, James O'Keefe, and I was honored through Andrew to really meet James when he was a very young man just coming out of college and doing this for the first big ACORN takedown. | ||
| But that was kind of a blunt force instrument. | ||
| These are exquisite and they're so powerful. | ||
| We've actually, actually Dr. Malone, who's going to be up here, we'll talk about what Dr. Malone is doing later today on Capitol Hill, but he's joined us. | ||
| And the reason we asked Dr. Malone, reached out for him to schlep in from being a gentleman farmer to get back to work today is because of the power of what James O'Keefe has just done. | ||
| So let me just go to James O'Keefe. | ||
| O'Keefe, Brother, you are nailing it, but I've got to tell you, for the moment we're in, for this global revolt from Ottawa to Australia to Brussels to Barstow, California, you guys hit there and absolutely nailed it when they were going to have the Emergency Use Authorization on the 15th, on Tuesday. | ||
| For you guys to have this is magnificent. | ||
| Sir, walk us through what we have here, what we just saw. | ||
| Well, Steve, this is an executive at the FDA who we had five meetings with this man. | ||
| And there you have him on video saying they're not going to not approve this executive authorization for toddlers with the vaccine. | ||
| He also talks about the money flow, you know, the money to the FDA from the pharmaceutical companies. | ||
| None of these things are shocking. | ||
| Now, Steve, we did get a comment from the FDA. | ||
| Which is the first time I think a federal agency's ever really given Project Veritas a comment, so they're certainly taking this seriously. | ||
| And the comment from the FDA read in part that this person does not speak for us, and is not involved in vaccines. | ||
| However, I reached back out to the guy, Christopher Cole is his name, he's an executive officer at the FDA, and he said that he does in fact work on the executive approvals for the vaccine, that he does work on the emergency approvals. | ||
| We're kind of going back and forth with the FDA and we also have a part two that we're launching tonight with more information, more videos, more hidden camera footage from inside the FDA. | ||
| So just to go back and reset, in fact, let me go to Dr. Malone. | ||
| How important is what Project Veritas has laid out here for the nation and the world to see, sir? | ||
| Well, what James has given us is a kind of a first-person front row account of what those of us that do this for a living know is the status quo, is the norm. | ||
| The power of what he has is that this is coming directly from the gentleman's lips in the first person. | ||
| It's totally consistent with information that I received from David Gortler the other day who runs the FDA accountability project and used to report, I believe, to the Commissioner. | ||
| What we have is an agency that has been completely distorted by the huge amounts of capital that await all their employees once they leave the agency. | ||
| They have a strong incentive to behave in these ways, to do whatever is necessary to comport with the interests of Big Pharma, and now you've got a smoking gun, thanks to Project Veritas. | ||
| James, to Dr. Milne's point, we talk theoretically about regulatory capture. | ||
| Look, I've said we've got to nationalize the Big Pharma because they've got all the benefits of big government and the benefits of state capitalism, and they're lying about everything. | ||
| Is that what we're seeing here? | ||
| Is what we're seeing here is the regulatory capture of Big Pharma through the individual of Christopher Cole, who's just being, who's giving you unexpurgated truth in these hidden cameras that you did? | ||
| Yeah, when I spoke to him, Steve, last night for 35 minutes, I spoke to him on the record after I reached out for comment. | ||
| And I asked him, what did he mean by this? | ||
| And he was sort of caught fumbling and mumbling, saying, well, I was in a private place. | ||
| I didn't mean to say that. | ||
| I said, well, do you stand by what you said? | ||
| And we'll publish some of that comment. | ||
| But I'm going to read some of these quotes, which I think are the most powerful from this expose. | ||
| This is Christopher Cole, executive officer at FDA on pharmaceutical companies, quote, There's a money incentive for Pfizer and the drug companies to promote additional vaccinations. | ||
| Quote, it'll be recurring fountain of revenue, Steve. | ||
| It might not be that much initially, but it'll be recurring if they can get every person required an annual vaccine. | ||
| That's money going into their company. | ||
| And you'll have to get an annual COVID shot. | ||
| It hasn't been formally announced yet. | ||
| So it's not, I wouldn't say it's technically illegal, what he's talking about. | ||
| And is it technically corruption? | ||
| But it is wrong. | ||
| It is wrong for companies to give money to this agency so they can rubber stamp. | ||
| These are, again, his lips moving, not my claim. | ||
| James, you've caught him, and it absolutely is wrong. | ||
| He's essentially saying they set up a situation here to get a free option to put an annual booster in you, and they just announced, Pfizer just announced $55 billion of revenues off of this, and the margins are massive. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| This is the con. | ||
| This is the scam. | ||
| I think you guys have nailed it. | ||
| On crucifixion, I just want to go back because we've got about four minutes left. | ||
| The FDA came back to you in an official response and they said, oh, hey, Cole doesn't represent anything. | ||
| I mean, how did they position Cole, who you said and verified through a 35-minute on-the-record interview afterwards, is an executive that deals in the regulatory process of vaccines? | ||
| What did the FDA formally tell you, James O'Keefe? | ||
| This was on the record from the Office of Media Affairs at U.S. | ||
| Food and Drug Administration, a woman named Abby Capo Bianco, on the record, quote, the person purportedly in the video. | ||
| So they're saying that it's a purported video. | ||
| It's not an actual video. | ||
| Does not work on vaccine matters and does not represent the views of the FDA. | ||
| However, we went back to Christopher Cole and he said he does indeed work on the emergency authorizations for the vaccine. | ||
| So there's a little bit of semantics here, but Steve, Clearly the FDA giving me, James O'Keefe, at Project Veritas an on-the-record statement last night means that they are really shaken by this. | ||
| They also gave me an on-the-background three paragraphs, which I'll publish here. | ||
| Okay, but here's why, before I let you go. | ||
| We had the Children's Health Defense League and Malone and all these guys on last week. | ||
| The target date was the 15th. | ||
| A national rally. | ||
| They were going to be from New York, all over the country. | ||
| Moms were going to be there, inundating them with red letters, emails. | ||
| And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, they cancelled. | ||
| They cancelled the 15th. | ||
| Did they cancel because they had any earthly idea that you had this hammer to drop? | ||
| For them to have come out and tried to approve it, and then you drop it afterwards would be devastating. | ||
| Do you think they had any inkling? | ||
| That's a phenomenal question. | ||
| of lethal material out there because dude if you had they had had it because nobody can make sense all of a sudden they said well the data is not there we gotta have a three shot you know and Fauci's doing his dance something didn't make sense there's no conspiracies but there's no coincidences James O'Keefe that's a phenomenal question if they had had that hearing and we released this footage last night it would have shook shook the world But I still think it's shaking the FDA. | ||
| And I think his statement that they're not, again, this is the most powerful part of our investigation. | ||
| Quote, we're not going to not approve the toddler vaccine. | ||
| What does he mean by that? | ||
| They're gonna rubber stamp it? | ||
| So this is a pretty significant thing. | ||
| And by the way, another piece of information, Steve, when I reached out to Christopher Cole last night, the FDA did not even talk to him. | ||
| The first time he ever heard about this was from me. | ||
| Before the FDA. | ||
| And then the FDA gave a statement to us before I spoke to him. | ||
| So that means that the FDA isn't even talking to this man. | ||
| They're trying to throw him under the bus. | ||
| And a note to Christopher Cole. | ||
| Hire a food taster immediately, okay? | ||
| And make sure you don't be driving any cars and watch where you cross the street. | ||
| Just saying. | ||
| Just throwing it out there. | ||
| O'Keefe, how do people... You're gonna drop excerpts from your 35-minute... Yes, we have another installment tonight. | ||
| We have another installment tonight in the FDA and you'll see that at 7 or 8 o'clock Eastern Time tonight. | ||
| When can people get the 35-minute, the interview you did with Cole, the details of that, when are you going to put that out? | ||
| That'll be going out in the next couple of hours, Steve, and the video has got over a million views on Twitter, and it was taken down by Twitter, and again, due to The doctor's point. | ||
| We're just quoting him. | ||
| We're quoting the FDA. | ||
| These are your government people, Bobby. | ||
| These are not my claims. | ||
| We're going to have it on Getter. | ||
| We're getting this everywhere. | ||
| Keith, how do people get to Project Veritas? | ||
| How do they follow you personally? | ||
| I've got 30 seconds. | ||
| Well, you have the book American Muckraker. | ||
| You know, go to AmericanMuckraker.com. | ||
| You can buy our book and all proceeds go to Project Veritas. | ||
| And you can go to our Telegram page, Steve. | ||
| Download the clips and upload them individually to your Instagram, Twitter, Getter, Rumble, whatever. | ||
| You can download our Telegram page is the best way for you to get these two-minute video reports that you can upload yourself. | ||
| By the way, you're an American hero and a patriot. | ||
| I gotta tell you, you guys get better. | ||
| I can't believe you get better every day. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| James O'Keefe, thank you. | ||
| Honored to have you here. | ||
| We're gonna get Dr. Malone's analysis. | ||
| Russ Vogt, we got David Menzies in Canada, Peter Navarro talking about Axios is trying to run cover for Biden about inflation. | ||
| All of it within this hour in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War room pandemic with Stephen K. | |
| Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide war room pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. | ||
| Bannon. | ||
| I'm going to send you the org chart. | ||
| You want it? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| We'll take anything you've got, Dr. Malone. | ||
| By the way, what we want is MyPillow.com, promo code WARROOM, the annual bedding sale. | ||
| 50% off everything to do with your sleep, except for Giza jean sheets, 60% off as low as $39.99. | ||
| That is a one-time good deal. | ||
| Make sure you go to promo code WARROOM at MyPillow.com. | ||
| Also, 50% off all overstock items, 50% everything on the Saskatchewan Screamer. | ||
| Not only does Saskatchewan disagree with Castro Trudeau, About beating up on the truckers. | ||
| They also disagree on the mandates too. | ||
| And when the cold weather comes down from there, at MyPillow.com, promo code war room, down comforters, down blankets, the slippers, the moccasins, the bathrobes, all at 50% off. | ||
| MyPillow.com, promo code War. | ||
| Remember, Tina Peters had Chris Hayes and the team at Joy Ann Reed and Chris Hayes were in total meltdown about good old Tina Peters announcing on the War and running for Secretary of State. | ||
| We're going to get more on that later. | ||
| Dr. Monroe, is Christopher Cole, and by the way, everybody, please, the team, let's get this all up on Getter. | ||
| Let's get it on all our platforms. | ||
| I want everybody in the posse watching this right now because what O'Keefe did is heroic. | ||
| Is Kola Grundon, is he like some guy that just kind of wanders in and out, or is he a player? | ||
| He's a player within his niche. | ||
| So he sits within the office of the Commissioner. | ||
| So that's the one that Janet Woodcock recently vacated. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| And within that, he's in the office of the Chief Scientist. | ||
| And within the office of the Chief Scientist, he's in the office of, let's see, what is it? | ||
| Counterterrorism and Emerging Threats. | ||
| So that would be CCP virus. | ||
| That would be a vaccine for a CCP virus. | ||
| That would be Wuhan lab guy. | ||
| It totally fits with what he's saying. | ||
| It checks out. | ||
| So when the FDA gets back and says, purported video, and we don't know really who this guy is, and he's given 30, that's not... That is not sustainable, let's say. | ||
| We got Navarro coming on in a little while. | ||
| He's going to talk to us about Janet Woodcock. | ||
| I want to go to Russ Vogt. | ||
| We got Russ on to talk about this fiasco up here with the spending and what they're going to try to do to jam through this continued resolution. | ||
| But Russ Vogt, Was the last director of OMB for President Trump. | ||
| Dr. Malone knows what a heavy job that is. | ||
| One of the most important jobs in the, I think the most important job in the administration. | ||
| Ex the president and ex the chief of staff. | ||
| Russ, you've tried to herd these cats over there at NIH, at Fauci, and FDA. | ||
| Tell our audience, it ain't that easy, is it? | ||
| No, it's not. | ||
| It's not because they have the presumption of believing themselves to be independent. | ||
| So anytime you question anything that they have from a policy perspective, it's like you're arguing with the platonic ideal of what science constitutes. | ||
| And then there's these structural issues, so basically the way that they get the funding from the Congress, all they care about is the appropriators. | ||
| And you do have statutory tools to be able to force them to do something, but you have to know what they're up to be able to put something like that in place. | ||
| And if you don't know, then you really are in a situation where you can't use the statutory tools at OMB to ensure that they are doing what the president wants them to. | ||
| So there's a lot of structure that causes them to create this facade of independence. | ||
| And of course, anytime you question the independence, it's like a meltdown politically. | ||
| And that's what President Trump was always trying to push through. | ||
| So you've seen what this guy's telling you, the emergency use authorization, they're going to do it, they're going to have annual, everything like that. | ||
| In a second term, since your first job will probably be back to OMB before you go to Secretary of Treasury, in a second term, what is Russ Vought going to do to hammer on these guys and make sure that they're working for the benefit of the American people and not Big Pharma, sir? | ||
| Yeah, I think it's going to be requiring the information to be run through a central place like Office of Management Budget, that you've got to have people like Peter Navarro asking the questions in the agencies, digging deep, saying, what are you doing? | ||
| You're not going forward with this until we have a clear understanding of what you're up to. | ||
| And this notion that you're going to be created these independent agencies is just not going to be the case. | ||
| And that has to be done at the front end when you're hiring for these positions. | ||
| You work for the President of the United States. | ||
| You work for the Secretary of Health and Human Services. | ||
| You will be accountable to the American people that put the administration in office. | ||
| And from there, you have the ability to use those statutory tools to get your arms around the problem. | ||
| Russ, we're going to get Navarro next. | ||
| I'm going to go back to Malone because Malone is going to be HHS. | ||
| Here's the question for you about the games. | ||
| We want to make sure the Posse, the Posse is lighting up Missouri on this redistricting. | ||
| They're all over the precinct strategy. | ||
| They're putting the show to the will. | ||
| MSNBC is in complete meltdown. | ||
| What do people need to do, Russ, now of this fiasco? | ||
| You've got Shelby and Leahy. | ||
| Every day I'm seeing a thing in the New York Times. | ||
| It's bipartisanship. | ||
| This is showing how the country works together. | ||
| They're going to increase the crazy budget. | ||
| I hear they're going to increase it almost a quarter of a trillion dollars over and above the 1.25% deficit we're going to have. | ||
| What's the latest, Russ, and how can our audience help you stop this? | ||
| Yeah, we're up against another deadline this week. | ||
| They are doing a short term CR, continuing resolution. | ||
| There is basically no fight on it at all. | ||
| There's a few senators that are trying to pick a fight and make sure that there's just a vote on not having the vaccine mandate as it pertains to health care workers and the military. | ||
| And maybe it passes, but probably not because it's attached to the continuing resolution. | ||
| And so we need folks to continue to call and say, look, you're a Republican senator. | ||
| You can stop the continuing resolution in March. | ||
| You can stop the final deal. | ||
| We need you to stand up and we need you to reject what the Biden administration is doing. | ||
| If you care about what's going on in any area of any agency, the FDA, CDC, CIA, with news of what they're now doing or have been doing in terms of spying on the American people, This is your way to leverage back against the administrative state. | ||
| If you don't use it because you're afraid of a shutdown, you are useless. | ||
| And this is the place that they have to begin to fight. | ||
| And it can't just be on one issue. | ||
| It has to be on a host of issues. | ||
| And it has to include a fiscal plan to be able to stop the madness that we're seeing in the economy with 7% inflation. | ||
| What's the latest that you're hearing? | ||
| You were Trump's last OMB, so I know you got inside baseball. | ||
| What's the last you're hearing of what the scale of what the Republicans are going to agree to with the final appropriations? | ||
| Let's say we've lost the thing of the short-term, but in March, what are they going to present to the American people as a fait accompli, Mr. Russ Vought? | ||
| Your numbers were pretty close, Steve. | ||
| They're trying to go from about $1.3 trillion to $1.5 trillion. | ||
| That's a $200 billion increase. | ||
| When you include interest costs, it's about $2.5 trillion over 10 years. | ||
| What that doesn't include is the fact that on an inflationary basis, when you're dealing with a lot of these autopilot spending programs, it's going to be even more than that. | ||
| They're looking at essentially a $2.5 trillion bill over 10 years coming at us in March. | ||
| The only thing they're really fighting over right now is the Is whether defense is going to get the same amount of increase as non-defense spending, which is kind of an age-old way to have a shiny object fight from the real one. | ||
| I just want to make sure, with the transfer of payments with Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, it was $3.5 trillion. | ||
| This is over $5 trillion, significantly over a $5 trillion annual budget, passed halfway through the years. | ||
| I think everybody forgets about it. | ||
| And Russ Vogt, as you look at it now, and I'm asking Navarra the same question, how is this going to, this deficit of $1.5 trillion is just an annual deficit. | ||
| We already have almost $40 trillion on our books, a face amount, right? | ||
| We also have, excuse me, $30 trillion on face amount. | ||
| We also have nine trillion dollars on the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Right now, as you see it, Russ Vogt, how are they going to finance this? | ||
| They're going to continue to finance it by trying to print money and continue to have a large asset portfolio at the Federal Reserve. | ||
| They're going to continue to do it by deficit spending. | ||
| There is no talk whatsoever about trying to get the arms around the fiscal uh... parameters of the country and and deal with this so it there is no there is no policy change as of right now by the way i just wanna make note they have not increased any that interest rates one basis point and they have stopped quantitative uh... | ||
| easy there's still juice in the system Listen, this audience, you're supposed to do the deplorables and breathe through your mouth. | ||
| These are supposed to be the sophisticated... This is gross recklessness. | ||
| Recklessness. | ||
| And we're not going to let them hide the football. | ||
| Russ Vogt, Center for Renewing America. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| You're on fire, particularly your getter and Twitter, because you're updating it 24-7. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| AmericaRenewing.com and on Twitter and getter, it's at Russ Vogt. | ||
| We really appreciate the help from all your viewers. | ||
| They love you, Russ. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| Good thing. | ||
| Shoulder to the wheel. | ||
| America First. | ||
| SuperMAGA. | ||
| Okay, thanks, Russ. | ||
| I'm going to bring in Navarro. | ||
| I've got Malone here. | ||
| Okay, Peter, we're going to get to the deficits and all that next, but I've got to get to something. | ||
| A name was dropped that's still ringing in my ears. | ||
| Janet Woodcock. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| The infamous Janet Woodcock. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Tell us about Cole reports to her and he's on the counterterrorism. | ||
| He's the Wuhan bug guy, right? | ||
| That's why he's on the vaccine committee. | ||
| That's why he knows what's happening on the vaccines. | ||
| Who's Janet Woodcock and why is she a demoness? | ||
| Steve, when I was in the White House, I had Woodcock in my office a number of times on a number of issues. | ||
| Next to Fauci, she's probably the most evil person in the bureaucracy, in the pockets of big pharma. | ||
| I'll give you a couple of examples. | ||
| She single-handedly killed hydroxychloroquine inside the FDA when she went totally against what President Trump asked for, which was early treatment used by a physician for outpatients, right? | ||
| And she came up with a doctrine that said you could only administer it to people dying in hospitals. | ||
| So she killed that. | ||
| And I didn't understand it at the time, but I understand it now as part of the pro-vaccine strategy. | ||
| The other thing she did, and boy did I lock horns with her on this. | ||
| I had this beautiful Essential Medicines by American Executive Order that the President finally signed. | ||
| And what Woodcock did was use the FDA process to whittle down the number of drugs which would actually be covered. | ||
| And she was doing it effectively on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party because that's where we get all these drugs. | ||
| And so it's the big pharma wanted to offshore their supply chains. | ||
| So she is a tool of big pharma. | ||
| She's one of these people who got appointed to acting head of the FDA when Biden took over. | ||
| But boy, she should be on everybody's radar screen because next to Fauci, she is killing Americans on behalf of big pharma. | ||
| That's Janet Woodcock. | ||
| And by the way, she's pretty damn stupid as well. | ||
| Clever, but stupid. | ||
| Dr. Malone, thoughts, analysis? | ||
| So she's also attributed with the opioid crisis. | ||
| She played a key role in authorizing those drugs and making them available and quashing regulatory oversight. | ||
| Now she's just moved out of her position. | ||
| We have a new commissioner. | ||
| But what I understand, I've read, I haven't sourced this, is that she claimed that she was not able to oversee vaccines because she had a financial or some other conflict of interest. | ||
| And so that's why she focused on drugs during OWS. | ||
| But she clearly acted on behalf of the vaccine agenda. | ||
| all the way through this. And by the way, it wasn't just Janet. | ||
| The videotape from Rick Bright clearly documents that it was Janet conspiring with Rick to countermand and circumvent the direct orders of the President of the United States. | ||
| Whatever you think about Donald Trump, there is no question that it's inappropriate and it validates everything that we've just discussed about the behavior of HHS and the FDA. | ||
| They believe that they're above the rules, above the law, independent and the statement before that Tony and NIAID, NIH, gets its money directly from Congress. | ||
| That's his constituency. | ||
| He plays to them, and he basically does the same kind of a game that used to be played by the politicians, where he places capital. | ||
| He gives awards to regions in order to influence the senators and congressmen within those regions. | ||
| Randomly, like the University of North Carolina and Baraka case. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| We've got the Touchdown Twins here. | ||
| You know them from their op-eds in the Washington Times. | ||
| It's Dr. Robert Malone. | ||
| It's Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Okay, we're going to talk about the vaccine agenda when we return in the war room So i'm Monitors us Censors us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Deplatforms us. | |
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it. | ||
| Until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| Getter is the fastest growing social media platform in history, with 3 million users, including prominent conservatives like Mike Pompeo, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| We've got a hot one right here, and it's going to get hotter. | ||
| We've still got David Menzies in Canada. | ||
| I've got Navar on here for this Axios story about buying American, and they're trying to hide behind the American workers on inflation. | ||
| Jonathan Swan. | ||
| Great piece, but maybe got an angle on it, but we've got other wood we have to chop right now. | ||
| I've got Dr. Malone, and Dr. Malone's over here to talk, you know, visiting with Senators, let's say that. | ||
| What are you hearing on the, before I go back to, on the Senate, this situation in New Mexico, and ladies and gentlemen, understand, when a U.S. | ||
| Senator all of a sudden is missing for like four or five days, and I talk about it, and he finds out, oh, he had a stroke, and he went into a hospital, this is on that Tuesday, and it was about Friday, and he just had, you know, a little operation to relieve some pressure on his brain. | ||
| Right, that's like Bob Saget. | ||
| You know, that's like the nonsense you're hearing about Bob Saget or the lies you're hearing out of Alec Baldwin. | ||
| There's something going on. | ||
| I'm hearing this guy's out indefinitely. | ||
| Is this what you're hearing? | ||
| We don't know for how long. | ||
| He has definitely had major damage. | ||
| There is a... | ||
| Significant possibility that this is vaccine-related. | ||
| He's fully jabbed. | ||
| Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. | ||
| Now we're dropping bombs. | ||
| Hold it. | ||
| What are you? | ||
| I knew you'd go there. | ||
| So what do you mean? | ||
| So he's had a stroke. | ||
| He's had a significant stroke. | ||
| He's a young guy. | ||
| 42 years old. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, this is not a normal thing. | ||
| This is Lujan out of Mexico. | ||
| of New Mexico. | ||
| Precisely. | ||
| Okay, so right now the situation is that the Senate is functionally 49-50 with the GOP on top. | ||
| That means that the tie-breaking vote from Kamala is really moot. | ||
| This is why, by the way, they're chucking little Jamie Raskin's radical wife, who, by the way, is also a crook. | ||
| She's hid the money that she had from the agency. | ||
| She got into the Fed. | ||
| She's lying about everything. | ||
| Little Jamie Raskin's lying. | ||
| You know, they're blaming everybody about why they didn't disclose this. | ||
| This is why Toomey shut her down. | ||
| The thing's shut down right now. | ||
| The Senate doesn't have to do anything, like approve an incredible, ridiculous appropriations bill. | ||
| But I want to go back, because I know I'm going to get my face ripped off for this. | ||
| How do you tie that back to the vaccines? | ||
| All I know is that the man has been fully vaccinated. | ||
| That's what I hear. | ||
| There's correlation causality here. | ||
| There's no way to know. | ||
| That's the thing, okay? | ||
| I want to talk about our new sponsor, Pfizer. | ||
| The vaccine agenda. | ||
| I want to go back to this. | ||
| The vaccine agenda, when you say that, that's a term of art. | ||
| What's the vaccine agenda in the U.S. | ||
| government? | ||
| So what we have is a situation that's really deep and layered and it's been developed over decades. | ||
| In the administrative state? | ||
| Yeah, as a kind of an incrementalism, particularly with the CDC. | ||
| So we have the Vaccines for Children program, which is basically a direct arterial pipeline into the federal budget. | ||
| Congress doesn't approve or disapprove any expenditures. | ||
| The CDC ACIP Together, basically has authority to incur expenses without congressional oversight on any vaccine that's approved for the Vaccines for Children program. | ||
| What this is really all about, if you want to go deep, is that since we provided this indemnification liability coverage for the vaccines industry, it flipped from being marginally profitable and high risk | ||
| to highly profitable and the lovely thing if you're a pharmaceutical executive is this is the gift that keeps giving because you have these obligated vaccinations whether they're annual in the case of flu or they're obligated as a series for the pediatrics and it's a cash cow you just get the cash it comes in it comes in it comes in So, Dr. Navarro, you knew all this when you started. | ||
| You sent the memo to Trump on the 9th of February saying, hey, and everything else we're looking at with with therapeutics and all this, if we start this program now and run it like something out of World War II, we might be able to get there. | ||
| But walk us through over the next couple of minutes. | ||
| We're going to hold you through. | ||
| We've got David Menzies in Canada we'll go back to. | ||
| Walk us through your thinking when Warp Speed initiated. | ||
| Well, Doc Malone used one word that explains it all, risk. | ||
| In order for us to get a vaccine in a third of the time that we actually did, what the government had to do was absorb the risk that the pharmaceutical industry would otherwise experience. | ||
| So what we did was we went to a simultaneous development process, basically created an ability to mass manufacture whatever was in the pipeline, not knowing what would succeed. | ||
| Okay. And that was the genius of Operation Warp Speed under President Trump's culture. | ||
| The downside to all of that, however, is we've created this monster downstream, basically a cash cow for Pfizer. And the vaccine agenda, from my point of view, is basically an anti-therapeutics agenda, okay? | ||
| You can't have it both ways. | ||
| If you can have cheap therapeutics that basically mean a vaccine is not appropriate for people who are otherwise healthy, Then that basically kills the vaccine. | ||
| So, it's crazy. | ||
| It's first do no harm. | ||
| It's like, instead, it's like, first do no harm to the prophets of Pfizer. | ||
| That's kind of the underlying thing. | ||
| But hang on, but even when you start the possibility of the gene therapies and everything like that, How aware were you guys that you're dealing with regulatory, and this is my point about Nationalized and Big Pharma, they've already captured, they control the regulatory apparatus that basically approves massive profit margins, as Dr. Mone says, drives huge revenues that nobody has a check and balance on. | ||
| When you guys went in there, did you understand what the beast really was, sir? | ||
| Well, I cut my teeth on regulatory capture. | ||
| I understood that at the time. | ||
| It's really important to understand that we had a comprehensive, synergistic strategy going back to Hatchfield and I sitting there on February 9th coming up with the grand plan. | ||
| It was like, we knew that a vaccine was a long shot, it would have problems, and that the ultimate solution was flood the zone with therapeutics. | ||
| I don't think anybody understood at the time that if you came up with cheap therapeutics, the vaccine industry would kill it. | ||
| I mean, that's what happened. | ||
| That's Janet Woodcock, that's that scurrilous CEO, Albert Borlau, Pfizer, Fauci, now everybody in between. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Awful. | |
| Okay, short break. | ||
| Malone's going to stay here. | ||
| We've got Navarro's going to stay here. | ||
| We're going to go back to Canada. |
Export Selection