Jan. 12, 2022 - Bannon's War Room
48:46
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| The idea that a government official like yourself would claim unilaterally to represent science, that any criticism of you would be considered a criticism of science itself, is quite dangerous. | ||
| Central planning, whether it be of the economy or of science, is risky because of the fallibility of the planner. | ||
| It would not be so catastrophic if the planner were simply one physician in Peoria Then the mistakes would only affect that physician's patients, the people who chose that physician. | ||
| But when the planner is a government official, like yourself, who rules by mandate, the errors are compounded and become much more harmful. | ||
| planner who believes he is the science, leads to an arrogance that justifies in his mind using government resources to smear and to destroy the reputations of other scientists who disagree with him. In an email exchange with Dr. Collins, you conspire, and I quote here directly from the email, to create a quick and devastating published takedown of three prominent epidemiologists from Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford. | ||
| Apparently there's a lot of fringe epidemiologists at Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford. | ||
| And you quote in the email that they were from Dr. Collins, and you agree that they are fringe. | ||
| And immediately there's this takedown effort. | ||
| A published takedown, though, you know, doesn't exactly conjure up the image of a dispassionate scientist. | ||
| Instead of engaging them on the merits, you and Dr. Collins sought to smear them as fringe and take them down. | ||
| And not in journals, in lay press. | ||
| This is not only antithetical to the scientific method, it's the epitome of cheap politics and it's reprehensible, Dr. Fauci. | ||
| Do you really think it's appropriate to use your $420,000 salary to attack scientists that disagree with you? | ||
| The email you're referring to was an email of Dr. Collins to me. | ||
| If you look at the email... That you responded to and hurried up and said, I can do it, I can do it, we got something in wired magazine. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| I think in usual fashion... | ||
| Senator, you are distorting everything about me. | ||
| Did you ever object to Dr. Collins' characterization of them as fringe? | ||
| Did you write back to Dr. Collins and say, no, they're not fringe, they're esteemed scientists, and it would be beneath me to do that? | ||
| I did not. | ||
| You responded to him that you would do it, and you immediately got an article in Wired, and you sent it back to him and said, hey, look, I've got them, I nailed them in Wired of all scientific publications. | ||
| That's not what went on. | ||
| There you go again. | ||
| You just do the same thing every hearing. | ||
| That was your response. | ||
| And this wasn't the only time. | ||
| So your desire to take down people... You're absolutely incorrect. | ||
| As usual, Senator, you are incorrect almost everything you say. | ||
| Well, no, you deny, you deny, but the emails tell the truth of this. | ||
| No. | ||
| This wasn't the only time. | ||
| Your desire to take down those who disagree with you didn't stop with Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford. | ||
| You conspired with Peter Daszak, who you communicated with privately, and other members of the scientific community that wrote opinion pieces for Nature, Five of them signed a paper for Nature, an opinion piece. | ||
| Seventeen signed a paper that called it conspiracy theory. | ||
| The idea that the virus could have originated in the lab. | ||
| Do you think words like conspiracy theory should be in a scientific paper? | ||
| Senator, I never used that word when I was referring to it. | ||
| You're distorting virtually everything. | ||
| Did you communicate with the five scientists who wrote the opinion piece in Nature, where they were describing, oh, there's no way this could have come from the lab? | ||
| That was not me. | ||
| Well, let me explain. | ||
| any of those scientists privately. | ||
| You keep distorting the truth. | ||
| It is stunning how you do that. | ||
| Did you talk to any of the scientists privately? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| You wrote the opinion. You did. | ||
| What were they telling you privately? | ||
| Well, let me explain. You know you're going back to that original discussion when I brought together a group of people to look at every possibility with an open mind. | ||
| So not only are you distorting it, you are completely turning it around, as you usually do. | ||
| For most of the scientists that came to you privately, did they come to you privately and say, no way, this came from the lab? | ||
| Or was their initial impression, Dr. Gary and others that were involved, was their initial impression actually that it looked very suspicious for a virus that came from a lab? | ||
| Senator, we are here at a committee. | ||
| To look at a virus now that has killed almost 900,000 people and the purpose of the committee was to try and get things out how we can help to get the American public and you keep coming back to personal attacks on me that have absolutely no relevance to reality. | ||
| Do you think anybody has had more influence over our response to this than you? | ||
| Do you think it's a great success? | ||
| Do you think it's a great success what's happened so far? | ||
| Do you think lockdowns are good for our kids? | ||
| Do you think we slowed down the death rate? | ||
| More people have died now under President Biden than did under President Trump. | ||
| You are the one responsible. | ||
| You are the architect. | ||
| You are the lead architect for the response from the government. | ||
| And now 800,000 people have died. | ||
| Do you think it's a winning success what you've advocated for government? | ||
| Senator, first of all, if you look at everything that I said, you accuse me of, in a monolithic way, telling people what they need to do. | ||
| Everything that I've said has been in support of the CDC guidelines. | ||
| Wear a mask. | ||
| Get boosted. | ||
| And you've advocated to make it coercive. | ||
| Take a look at everything that I said. | ||
| You've advocated to be done by mandate. | ||
| You've advocated that your infallible opinion be dictated by law. | ||
| So again, Madam Chair, I would like just a couple of minutes because this happens all the time. | ||
| You personally attack me and with absolutely not a shred of evidence of anything you say. | ||
| So I would like to make something clear to the committee. | ||
| He's doing this for political reasons. | ||
| What you need to do is... He said in front of this committee... You think your takedown of three prominent epidemiologists was not political? | ||
| You don't want me to finish because you know what I'm going to say. | ||
| That was the question. | ||
| Were you political in taking down these three prominent epidemiologists? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator Paul, if you would please, I'm going to allow Dr. Fauci to respond. | |
| We have a number of senators who would like to ask questions and I would like him to be able to respond. | ||
| Please do so. | ||
| The last time we had a committee of the time before, he was accusing me of being responsible for the death of four to five million people, which is really irresponsible. | ||
| And I say, why is he doing that? | ||
| There are two reasons why that's really bad. | ||
| The first is, it distracts from what we're all trying to do here today, is get our arms around the epidemic and the pandemic that we're dealing with, not something imaginary. | ||
| Number two, what happens when he gets out and accuses me of things that are completely untrue, is that all of a sudden that kindles the crazies out there, and I have life, threats upon my life, Harassment of my family and my children with obscene phone calls because people are lying about me. | ||
| Now, you know, I guess you could say, well, that's the way it goes. | ||
| I can take the hit. | ||
| Well, it makes a difference, because as some of you may know, just about three or four weeks ago, on December 21st, a person was arrested who was on their way from Sacramento to Washington D.C. | ||
| at a speed stop in Iowa. | ||
| And the police asked him where he was going, and he was going to Washington D.C. | ||
| to kill Dr. Fauci. | ||
| And they found in his car an AR-15 and multiple magazines of ammunition. | ||
| Because he thinks that maybe I'm killing people. | ||
| So I ask myself, why would Senator want to do this? | ||
| So go to Rand Paul website, and you see, fire Dr. Fauci with a little box that says, contribute here. | ||
| You can do $5, $10, $20, $100. | ||
| dollars, ten dollars, twenty dollars, a hundred dollars. So you are making a catastrophic epidemic for your political gain. So the only thing... | ||
| You have politically attacked your colleagues and in a politically reprehensible way attacked their reputation. | ||
| You won't defend it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You won't argue it. | |
| You'll just simply turn around the attack. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to continue this hearing. | |
| We have a number of questions from other Senators. | ||
| Just one more minute, please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dr. Fauci, I really appreciate your response, but we do have a number of questions from senators and we do have a second round and I'm being asked to make sure that everybody has their time. | |
| So first of all, I want to ask you about the questioning of the CDC and of course Dr. Fauci by the senators. | ||
| And even from some senators who are not, you know, typically they're not Rand Paul, some who are more moderate senators who have not been this hostile in their questioning before. | ||
| There's a real credibility gap now with the CDC because of a lot of the confusing guidance. | ||
| Well there is some credibility gap from the CDC, but I think, you know, it's important not to conflate that with the... | ||
| The attacks on prominent U.S. | ||
| scientists. | ||
| I mean, let's let's break it down into components. | ||
| Component one is the fact that the far-right anti-vaccine aggression has caused 200,000 Americans since June to last June to lose their lives. | ||
| Because they were defiant of vaccines. | ||
| So there is, and this is coming right out of the CPAC conference, vaccines are political instruments of control or first they'll vaccinate you, then they'll take your guns and Bibles away. | ||
| Quotes from members of the United States Congress. | ||
| So, the attack on Tony and Dr. Fauci today, it's not all just Tony, it's myself and a few other key U.S. | ||
| scientists, is all part of that. | ||
| And it's not random, it's intentional. | ||
| It's meant to discredit science and to discredit scientists and sow doubt in the American people for political gain. | ||
| So, Dr. Fauci was absolutely right in the way he responded. | ||
| Yeah, the way he responded, you're in the war room. | ||
| We had to play the entire Rand Paul thing. | ||
| That was the Great Barrington Declaration, by the way. | ||
| The three of the top epidemiologists in the world. | ||
| One at Oxford, one at Harvard, one at Stanford, where the head of that pulled it together. | ||
| Okay, we've talked about it many times on here. | ||
| Fauci and Collins, who's now been forced out, right? | ||
| Another devil. | ||
| Went to Fauci right away in that email exchange and said, we have to discredit these guys rapidly. | ||
| We have to do this immediately. | ||
| And Fauci goes, I'm on it. | ||
| And instead of going to Nature or Lancer or something like that, not that those guys wouldn't publish it, they went to Wired and I think he had a article from The Nation, these left-wing, Wired's a left-wing technology magazine. | ||
| And Salon, I think it was Salon or The Nation was the other. | ||
| Fauci will not answer the question. | ||
| And this is, the reason I'm going to do this, we got, we got, uh, Ted Cruz is going to be open with a cold open in the next block. | ||
| We got Darren Beattie to come in about Ray Epps and the FBI. | ||
| We've got the domestic terrorism piece at the bottom of the hour. | ||
| Today on Capitol Hill, we hit an inflection point. | ||
| We are ascendant. | ||
| And The Democrats should be demoralized. | ||
| Every member of the administrative state, what you saw Fauci in, and you're gonna see these other DOJ and FBI people, this is your life going forward. | ||
| Every, it's like in basketball, every shot's going to be contested. | ||
| Everything you do is going to be contested. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Never again are we allowing this administrative state just to run wild. | ||
| And when we control the House, and we control the Senate, You're going to see investigation after investigation after investigation. | ||
| Every committee is going to be like an oversight committee. | ||
| So I want every whistleblower, everybody that's in this apparatus, that understands what they've done. | ||
| You had a massive, massive revelation today from a whistleblower over in DoD that Veritas got. | ||
| We're going to have more on that tomorrow morning. | ||
| We're going to have Dr. Peter Navarro and hopefully Dr. Steven Hatfield. | ||
| I'm trying to get Dr. Harvey Risch, who went through the information and told me all this is blockbuster. | ||
| We dealt with it this morning. | ||
| Every day, you're going to have more massive revelations of how this illegitimate regime, and I say that because in Wisconsin, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and in Georgia, and in Arizona, we're contesting the certification of the electors. | ||
| Not Steve Bannon saying that, not the Worms saying that, that's happening in the States, and it's the Associated Press saying that. | ||
| So all you guys said about fake news or misinformation, deal with it. | ||
| And we are not backing off an inch. | ||
| Tony Fauci is a liar. | ||
| Tony Fauci has purged himself, but that's the least of it. | ||
| What Tony Fauci has done with gain-of-function, what Tony Fauci has done in collaboration with the PLA and their bioweapons lab at Wuhan, which we talked about on January 20th on the very first day of this show. 2020. | ||
| We're going to get to all of it. | ||
| I want to thank Rand Paul. | ||
| By the way, Roger Marshall. | ||
| If we had time, we'd play Senator Marshall from Kansas, who's no fire breather. | ||
| He was all over Fauci. | ||
| Everybody. | ||
| That's where Andrew Mishra's got the big crocodile tears coming down. | ||
| Oh, this attack on science. | ||
| No, this attack on scientism. | ||
| On the cult of scientism. | ||
| We want facts. | ||
| We want data. | ||
| We want evidence. | ||
| And Fauci's got to be brought back in and answered. | ||
| Right there, he spun out and lied. | ||
| He called, bald-faced lie. | ||
| And the Democrats understand this. | ||
| The media's starting to understand this. | ||
| I'm glad you're getting dispirited. | ||
| You're going to get the tables run on you, and then you're going to have hell to pay. | ||
| Because you're going to be held accountable for everything you've done in this regime. | ||
| And Joe Biden's down there, another thing for you to suck on, he's down there trying to be tough guy in his speech. | ||
| Nobody's there. | ||
| No Stacey Abrams, no NAACP, no Black Voters Matter, no Democracy Project. | ||
| They're all out getting their tires rotated, having their nails done. | ||
| They won't even be on the stage with him because they realize one, he didn't win in Georgia and they don't want to be stuck with that. | ||
| And number two, he's getting blown out in 2022 because we're going to first have a first order of business is to impeach him. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The first order of business is to bring charges of impeachment against Joe Biden. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| You're here from Ted Cruz next with Darren Beattie's analysis in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In 2020, you signed a public letter attacking the Trump administration for using Department of Homeland Security officers to help protect the federal courthouse in Portland from violent rioters. | |
| That letter stated, quote, plainclothes officers and unmarked vehicles should be used only in limited capacities and clearly identified circumstances. | ||
| Crowd control is not among those circumstances. | ||
| Mr. Olson, on January 6, 2021, did the Department of Justice or FBI have any plainclothes officers among the crowd at the Capitol? | ||
| Senator, I'm not aware of whether or not there were plainclothes officers among the crowd at the Capitol on January 6. | ||
| Did any plainclothes officers enter the Capitol on January 6? | ||
| I don't know the answer to that, Senator. | ||
| Mr. Olson, I got to say your answers to many questions today are disappointing because they boil down to essentially, I don't know. Did you prepare for this hearing? Did you know this hearing was happening before this morning? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The direct answer, yes, I prepared extensively, Senator. | |
| Many of the questions are about specific facts that I don't have. | ||
| One of the most important points that I would emphasize is, again, as a general matter, it's not appropriate to comment on ongoing investigations. | ||
| I want to turn to the FBI. | ||
| How many FBI agents Sir, I'm sure you can appreciate that I can't go into the specifics of sources and methods. | ||
| Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of January 6th? | ||
| Yes or no? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sir, I can't answer that. | |
| Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't answer that, sir. | |
| Did any FBI agents or FBI informants actively encourage and incite crimes of violence on January 6th? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sir, I can't answer that. | |
| Ms. | ||
| Sadburn, who is Ray Epps? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm aware of the individual, sir. | |
| I don't have the specific background to him. | ||
| Well, there are a lot of people who are understandably very concerned about Mr. Epps. | ||
| On the night of January 5th, 2021, Epps wandered around the crowd that had gathered, and there's video out there of him chanting, Tomorrow, we need to get into the Capitol! | ||
| Into the Capitol! | ||
| This was strange behavior, so strange that the crowd began chanting, Fed! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fed! | |
| Ms. | ||
| Sanborn, was Ray Epps a Fed? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sir, I cannot answer that question. | |
| The next day, on January 6th, Mr. Epps is seen whispering to a person and five seconds later, five seconds after he's whispering to a person, that same person begins to forcibly tear down the barricades. | ||
| Did Mr. Epps urge them to tear down the barricades? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sir, similar to the other answers, I cannot answer that. | |
| Shortly thereafter, the FBI put out a public post listing, seeking information on individuals connected with violent crimes on January 6th. | ||
| Among those individuals, in the bottom there, is Mr. Epps. | ||
| The FBI publicly asked for information, identifying, offering cash rewards leading to information leading to, for information leading to the arrest. | ||
| This was posted and then, sometime later, magically, Mr. Epps disappeared from the public posting. | ||
| According to public records, Mr. Epps has not been charged with anything. | ||
| No one's explained why a person videoed urging people to go to the Capitol, a person whose conduct was so suspect the crowd believed he was a Fed, would magically disappear from the list of people the FBI was looking at. | ||
| Ms. | ||
| Sanborn, a lot of Americans are concerned that the federal government deliberately encouraged illegal and violent conduct. | ||
| Not to my knowledge, sir. | ||
| My question to you, and this is not an ordinary law enforcement question, this is a question of a public accountability. | ||
| Did federal agents or those in service of federal agent actively encourage violent and criminal conduct on January 6th? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not to my knowledge, sir. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ali, I have less than 30 seconds left, but tell me about some of this new reporting that you're doing on a guy named Ray Epps, with the committee seeming to try to knock down this conspiracy theory around him. | |
| Yeah, trying to knock down this conspiracy theory and showing that they even went down this rabbit hole, so to speak, in talking to this man, Ray Epps, who says that he was never an FBI informant or someone who worked for the FBI. | ||
| But again, this is one of those conspiracy theories being popularized in the right-wing networks, including Fox News. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Um, Ms. | ||
| Sanborn just perjured herself there. | ||
| It is zero possible. | ||
| She says, do you know who Ray Epps is? | ||
| Yeah, I know who he is. | ||
| Is he federal? | ||
| You're telling me a senior member of the Department of Justice knows who a guy is? | ||
| She admitted, yeah, I know who he is. | ||
| It doesn't know if he's a federal agent or not. | ||
| Can't answer that. | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Right there. | ||
| That's perjury. | ||
| That's perjuring something. | ||
| We're at an inflection point today. | ||
| This is a very important day. | ||
| 11 January, the year of our Lord 2022. | ||
| Institutionally, this is a day that you see that we are ascendant and powerful and assertive because of this audience. | ||
| You've had the back. | ||
| Of these people now in the Senate. | ||
| You've had the back of the people in the House. | ||
| They know we're going to win sweeping victories. | ||
| They can taste and feel the power coming their way. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They can feel it. | ||
| And Joe Biden's down there and nobody will stand on the stage with him that's all in for this voter, you know, stealing the votes at the federal level. | ||
| Stacey Abrams won't do it. | ||
| The NAACP won't do it. | ||
| Black Voters Matter won't do it. | ||
| The Democracy Project won't do it. | ||
| He's old and feckless and weak. | ||
| And here you have power and assertion and not letting these apparatuses get away with what they've always been getting away with. | ||
| Rand Paul, Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Roger Marshall. | ||
| Bang, bang, bang, bang. | ||
| By the way, breaking news out of Fox, we're going to have Terry Schilling on in a few minutes. | ||
| The letter that went to DOJ from that National Association of School Boards? | ||
| It was requested by the sitting Secretary of Education. | ||
| They've lied about this. | ||
| He's got to go. | ||
| He's got to go. | ||
| He requested that letter be sent to DOJ that referred to you, the parents, as domestic terrorists. | ||
| The Washington Post got a big story out there. | ||
| We're going to have a clip at the bottom of the hour about now you're all domestic terrorists. | ||
| And they got a special unit inside DOJ that's watching this. | ||
| And we know they watch your show every day. | ||
| So how about this? | ||
| We don't care what you're doing. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| If you're doing after extremists, hey, that's your deal. | ||
| This is the American people, and these are mom and dads, these are parents, these are people signed to be election officials, and we dare you, we dare you to do anything about it, because you're not going to do anything about it. | ||
| You're going to talk a lot. | ||
| The old pencil neck Merrick Garland. | ||
| You're not going to do anything about it because we're ascendant and you could see it today. | ||
| You could see it today. | ||
| And by the way, Sanborn lied. | ||
| She admitted she knew who Ray Epps was. | ||
| And then she sits there and doesn't know if he's a federal agent or not. | ||
| You either know he is or he's not. | ||
| Nothing in between. | ||
| I want to bring in now Darren Beatty, who's the one that's been driving this story. | ||
| Darren, you saw this today. | ||
| Give us your assessment. | ||
| Well, it's pretty amazing all around. | ||
| It's incredible to see Ray Epps, who goes from just some obscure person known only to the handful of researchers who are actually interested in getting to the bottom of 1-6, elevating this individual to the household name, which, frankly, he should be, given his significance on January 6. | ||
| And so I have to give credit to Ted Cruz. | ||
| I think this is a testament to the fact that Um, constructive bullying does work. | ||
| And, uh, you know, I commend Ted Cruz for doing the right thing and drawing attention to this issue, especially in light of, um, his, his previous statements. | ||
| I think that's a massive improvement. | ||
| Tom Cotton did a great job. | ||
| Clearly, there's still a lot to be done. | ||
| The committee's claiming that Ray Epps talked to them and said that he wasn't an informant. | ||
| Um, I'm very, uh, I'm skeptical of this charade here, and I think there's much more to get to the bottom of. | ||
| But here's the interesting thing. | ||
| They've got to run to NBC News and work it through. | ||
| It's got to be processed through NBC and MSNBC. | ||
| These Democrats work directly with them to leak information, so they're going to try to now smooth over re-ups. | ||
| Listen, if Ray Epps is not a federal agent, why is he not rolled up by instigating this? | ||
| He's an instigator. | ||
| He was instigating innocent Americans. | ||
| He's one of the instigators of this, whether he's on the federal government payroll or not. | ||
| We've got to find out whose payroll he's on, because he's got to prove he's not a federal agent. | ||
| Go ahead, Darren. | ||
| There are all kinds of technicalities. | ||
| Maybe he was an employee of the FBI. | ||
| Maybe he was an employee of some other agency. | ||
| I think the relevant question for them to answer is not whether Ray Epps says he's working for any particular agency. | ||
| The relevant question is that the federal government, the Department of Justice, needs to answer why they're peculiarly uninterested in Ray Epps, who's the only person in the mountains of video footage caught stating in advance the mission to go into the Capitol, and why | ||
| All of his evident, apparent accomplices, who are cutting down the fencing, doing all the stuff that's laid out in tremendous detail in the Revolver.News report, why is the government uninterested in them? | ||
| Why is the government uninterested in Stuart Rhodes? | ||
| Those are the questions that they need to provide plausible answers for, and so far they're very, very far from doing that. | ||
| So I think they think that they're doing themselves favors by saying, oh, Ray Epps says he's not a Fed, They're just creating more questions and damning themselves even more. | ||
| No, because a lot of guys said, hey, I wasn't this. | ||
| Okay, hang with us through the break. | ||
| Also, this whole thing of not being prepared. | ||
| They prepare for days and days and weeks. | ||
| This was Tom Cotton. | ||
| He says, this is on your calendar. | ||
| Were you prepared? | ||
| I said, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| They are liars. | ||
| They know they're liars. | ||
| Liars. | ||
| Back with Terry Schilling in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
More than doubled, doubled in the past year alone, according to a top official from the Justice Department, Matthew Olson, testifying today. | |
| You see him there in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. | ||
| The FBI saying the biggest threat, people who radicalized online alone and then went on to join militias or white supremacist groups. | ||
| I want to bring in NBC News Justice Correspondent Pete Williams. | ||
| Pete, this is interesting stuff. | ||
| Tell us about this new unit, right? | ||
| What does it look like? | ||
| What does it do? | ||
| What are its concrete goals? | ||
| Well, it's concrete goals are fighting domestic terrorism. | ||
| It's a new group of lawyers within the National Security Division. | ||
| You know, the National Security Division was formed at a time when the big threat to America was the external terror threat from overseas groups. | ||
| That threat hasn't gone away, but as you heard from the government today, from the Justice Department and the FBI, They're much more focused now on the domestic terror threat, and they say, Hallie, that it's basically two things that are driving the increase. | ||
| People motivated by ethnic or racial hatred, and people motivated by strong anti-government sentiment. | ||
| And that's what, if you look at the data, is driving a lot of these crimes of people attacking churches, or large groups of folks that are in public places, or attacking government facilities. | ||
| Well, they say those are the two main drivers, the things that they're most concerned about. | ||
| That's what they told the Senate Judiciary Committee in a hearing today. | ||
| Important, I think, for the context. | ||
| You're right. | ||
| There is no federal domestic terrorism statute. | ||
| Yes, and you know, several times senators asked Matthew Olson, who's now the head of the National Security Division at Justice, whether he needs more money or more tools, and the government said no. | ||
| It hasn't, for example, charged any of the January 6th defendants with that kind of offense. | ||
| Of course, there is, as you point out, no crime of domestic terrorism. | ||
| But what the government could be doing is seeking a domestic terrorism enhancement when it comes time for sentencing. | ||
| And so far in the 150 or so guilty pleas that have led to sentences, they haven't done that. | ||
| And asked today why, by several Democrats, why the government hasn't done that yet, Olson basically said, well, every case is different and we're not done yet. | ||
| Remember this on 11, remember this day, 11 January, the River Lord 2022. | ||
| This is an inflection point, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is an inflection point. | ||
| And duly note, the war on posse, duly note, the first charge of impeachment against Joe Biden. | ||
| Did you hear what he just said? | ||
| That, oh yeah, in the old days it used to be the foreign threats, but this is really a much higher priority. | ||
| Domestic terrorism is not even a federal statute. | ||
| Just a tiny, tiny detail. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party has infiltrated every aspect of the city, of Wall Street, of the universities, everywhere, with their money and their spies. | ||
| And yet, DOJ and the FBI, it's more important to get the mothers and fathers going to school boards. | ||
| It's more important to get you that are volunteering to be election officials. | ||
| It's more important to get you that are trying to be precinct commandment. | ||
| That's a higher priority in Biden's America. | ||
| That's a higher priority. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party's everywhere. | ||
| Their money, their infiltration, their spies. | ||
| And yet, Pete Williams just says, yeah, that's in the old days used to be that this is a much higher priority. | ||
| Keep all your documents, keep all your emails, keep all your text messages, keep all the minutes from all your meetings, domestic terrorism unit. | ||
| We begged for Tiger Teams to be put in and BLM and Antifa when they were burning Portland and Seattle and Chicago to the ground in June of 2020. | ||
| Tiger teams. | ||
| We had Liz Uron here. | ||
| About what DOJ had to do. | ||
| Nothing. | ||
| Nothing, because that was just, no, that's just normal course of business. | ||
| But the parents of America, and we're going to have the Secretary of Education requested the letter to DOJ from the School Board Association to call you domestic terrorists. | ||
| This is how they're going to think. | ||
| We're emboldened. | ||
| You see, today is power. | ||
| Today is Ascended. | ||
| Today is momentum. | ||
| And we're not going to be cowed by the lies. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I didn't get prepared. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I know who he is, but I don't know he's a federal agent. | ||
| No, Ms. | ||
| Sanborn, that's a lie. | ||
| You know who he is. | ||
| You either know he's a federal agent or you don't know he's a federal agent. | ||
| No person would hear Ray Epps and not ask, hey, is he a federal agent? | ||
| No. | ||
| You're not that incompetent. | ||
| You're a liar. | ||
| And now we're going to see what they requested. | ||
| They requested from the National Association of School Boards to send a letter that called every parent listening to this a domestic terrorist. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Because you went to school board meetings to want to see why they're masked, why there's forced vaccinations, and why poison's being put in your children's brain. | ||
| And for that, you're a domestic terrorist. | ||
| Keep your receipts. | ||
| Keep everything, the minutes of every meeting, every email, every text message. | ||
| Because if you see what happens today, wait till we run the place. | ||
| I want every bureaucrat over there to now become a whistleblower. | ||
| And I want everybody else, all you hardcores, go get another job. | ||
| You don't want to do this every day. | ||
| And this is what your life's going to be. | ||
| When Matt Gaetz said every committee's going to be an oversight committee, that's what we're talking about. | ||
| You see Tony Fauci? | ||
| You see that? | ||
| You see the CDC director? | ||
| You see Olsen? | ||
| You see Sanborn? | ||
| That's every day of your life. | ||
| No more lies. | ||
| No more misrepresentation. | ||
| And your leader, your hapless old man is down in Georgia and they won't even stand on the stage with him. | ||
| Stacey Abrams who made, this is her gig in her state where she's running for governor because she understands you're politically radioactive, you have zero political capital, negative political capital. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Elections have consequences and stolen elections have catastrophic consequences. | ||
| And you have gone out of your way to destroy this country by your actions on the southern border, by your actions in Afghanistan. | ||
| And now, for the world to see, for Pete Williams to tell us, with the Chinese Communist Party running the tables on you and your government, where your son took their money, right? | ||
| It was honeypotted by them, all on the laptop from hell. | ||
| Your compromises now, they're not that important. | ||
| The moms and dads that go to school boards, that's a bigger priority. | ||
| The people volunteering to be election officials, that's a bigger priority. | ||
| The people that want to become priests in commitment, that's a bigger priority. | ||
| Because they're domestic terrorists. | ||
| I want everybody to understand this. | ||
| We're not giving up an inch. | ||
| Today, you saw the muscle. | ||
| Darren Beatty, this domestic terrorism. | ||
| I'll get Terry Schilling in here in a second. | ||
| The domestic terrorism piece. | ||
| The Washington Post leaked to the Washington Post. | ||
| They go right to their outputs. | ||
| They got NBC. | ||
| NBC's now got a chop block. | ||
| Darren Beatty. | ||
| Ray Epps is nobody. | ||
| Ray Epps is just an old veteran. | ||
| He's just a guy wandering around. | ||
| Why isn't he rolled up then? | ||
| He's the instigator of this thing. | ||
| You can see it on video. | ||
| Why does it take Beattie to make this a deal? | ||
| Now NBC is going to run cover for him. | ||
| You see that happen. | ||
| Like, the Washington Post has got the big story on domestic terrorism. | ||
| Darren Beattie, your assessment? | ||
| Well, I think the domestic terrorism story provides really valuable context for understanding why the Ray Epps issue is important. | ||
| Ray Epps is important because The government, the regime, whatever you want to call it, is attempting to use the false narrative of what January 6th was to ram this idea down our throats that any potential Trump supporter, anyone who objects to the regime, is a de facto domestic terrorist. And effectively how this is going to work is it's going to be hate crime amplification, only the hate crime, the thought crime, is not liking Joe | ||
| Biden. The thought crime is not being pro-open borders. The thought crime is wanting fair trade deals for the United States. | ||
| The thought crime is not supporting Black Lives Matter destroying and burning down our cities. | ||
| That's what it means. | ||
| That's what the end goal and agenda is and that's exactly what they're trying to shove down our throats on the basis of this lie of January 6th. | ||
| So special unit of what they're setting up to combat domestic terrorists that their biggest threat is not any foreign enemies their biggest threat are Ordinary American citizens who dare to disagree with them and that's why they put people like Reyes That's why they set these things up because they need these pretexts in order to justify their war on the American people Terry Schilling, I want you to have this breaking news out of Fox. | ||
| And if we can put it up in Denver, I'd appreciate it, the story. | ||
| The Secretary of Education requested the letter, said they've lied and misrepresented, requested the letter from the School Board Association to go to Jess about domestic terrorism. | ||
| Tell us about this. | ||
| Steve, this was an inside job, right? | ||
| This was collusion at the highest level of our government. | ||
| And it wasn't just collusion against America, it was collusion against the American people. | ||
| Makes it so much worse. | ||
| What we saw during this last summer was a very normal democratic process of parents being outraged after finding out what their kids were learning in schools, and so they showed up. | ||
| And there was one instance where a father had an outrage and was arrested. | ||
| But guess what? | ||
| That father's daughter was raped in the bathroom, and the school board covered it up. | ||
| And that was the impetus for why Miguel Cardona Petitioned and solicited this letter from the National Association of School Boards to the Department of Justice to investigate these parents for domestic abuse. | ||
| A father who had his daughter be sexually assaulted in the bathroom getting arrested was the impetus for here. | ||
| This is a government that hates its people. | ||
| It despises us. | ||
| It views us as the enemy. | ||
| Steve, I'm kind of upset that you stopped, you know, With the rant there earlier, you were on point. | ||
| We have a government in place. | ||
| We have a regime in place that hates its very own people. | ||
| They view us as the enemy and not anyone else. | ||
| And this is, as Tucker Carlson pointed out, the War on Terror 2.0. | ||
| Real quickly, how did Cardi, I mean this is, and they've lied about this from the beginning. | ||
| Don't know how it showed up and then, you know, when Merrick Garland, oh we didn't mean to do this, we really didn't call people domestic terrorists, yes you did. | ||
| America, the American citizens, moms and dad, this is why we won in Virginia. | ||
| It's not some guy wandering around that you want to have a hot dog with in your backyard with a, with a, with a, what does he got the little fleece jacket on? | ||
| Right. | ||
| He reminds you of your accountant. | ||
| That's not why this is why this is why people came out and record numbers and knocked on doors. | ||
| Tell us about Cardona. | ||
| How did he get involved here? | ||
| What does the Fox article tell us? | ||
| Well, what the Fox article tells us is that. | ||
| They had received a request from Miguel Cardona, who is the Department of Education Secretary, to send this letter to the White House and to the Department of Justice. | ||
| That's the basics that we know right now, but Steve, this is enough for a full-fledged investigation. | ||
| And I'll tell you what, this is more than the Democrats ever had in the Russiagate and the collusion accusations. | ||
| Anything that they impeached Trump over, this makes that look like small potatoes. | ||
| This is a big deal. | ||
| This shows that at the highest levels of the Department of Education and our federal government, that this was a concoction. | ||
| This was a plan. | ||
| They wanted to shut these parents down, and they needed something to do it. | ||
| And this letter that was calling parents domestic terrorists and requesting the Department of Justice investigate these parents for domestic terrorists, that was the method. | ||
| That was the tool, the vehicle to get this stuff done and to squelch This uproar and this unrest that was happening across the country. | ||
| Terry, how do people follow you or American Principles? | ||
| You guys are on fire. | ||
| How do people get to you and how do they get to your social media? | ||
| Check us out at AmericanPrinciplesProject.org. | ||
| That's our website and you can follow me on social media. | ||
| We will be covering this extensively on my social media. | ||
| It's Schilling1776. | ||
| I'm on all the platforms, Skedder, Twitter, Instagram, you name it. | ||
| It's just Schilling1776. | ||
| Should anybody, should Ron Klain or anybody associated with this in the chain of command be fired immediately or tender the resignation? | ||
| Cardona, Ron Klain, whoever approved this letter, approved Cardona, should they all resign? | ||
| I think these people should be resigning immediately. | ||
| We've already sent out a statement calling on Cardona to resign. | ||
| We did that immediately after finding out this news, but I actually think that this would be grounds for impeachment from President Biden. | ||
| We need to do an investigation here, see just how much Biden knew, see just how much his team knew, and we need to get to the bottom of this because This is groundbreaking. | ||
| This is the federal government weaponizing our federal agencies against the American people for simply doing what is constitutionally protected. | ||
| Petitioning your government and making your voice heard and using your own freedom of speech. | ||
| Terry, thank you very much. | ||
| Darren, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| How do you get to Revolver? | ||
| You've been breaking everything on this story. | ||
| Revolver.News, as always, that is the place to go for the truthful coverage of January 6th. | ||
| You can find me at Twitter at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| D-A-R-R-E-N-J-B-E-A-T-T-I-E. | ||
| Yes or no, does Cardona have to resign tonight, sir? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Good. | ||
| Be back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
monitors us, censors us, de-platforms us. | |
| Conservatives have been helpless to do anything about it until now. | ||
| Join Getter, the social media platform that supports free speech and opposes cancel culture. | ||
| On Getter, you can express your political beliefs without fear of Silicon Valley liberals coming after you. | ||
| Getter is led by former Trump advisor and War Room co-host Jason Miller, who saw what big tech did to President Trump and decided to fight back. | ||
| is the fastest growing social media platform in history with 2 million users. | ||
| The first director of my office at DARPA was J.C.R. | ||
| Marjorie Taylor Greene and Steve Bannon. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's in the App Store, the Google Play Store, and at getter.com. | ||
| Longer posts, longer videos, sharper and clearer pictures. | ||
| And unlike the Silicon Valley oligarchs, Getter will never sell your data. | ||
| Send a message today. | ||
| Join Getter. | ||
| It's time to cancel, cancel culture. | ||
| The first director of my office at DARPA was J.C.R. | ||
| Turner, who said in 1960, human brains and computing machines will be coupled together very tightly. | ||
| And the resulting partnership will think as no human brain has ever thought. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| We are already collaborating with machines on data, information and knowledge processing tasks. | ||
| And technologies are emerging that will make it possible for machines to generate explanations essential to understanding by humans. | ||
| In parallel with the climb of machines up the data wisdom ladder, technologies are being developed to ensure trust, which will ultimately include the trust of the machine and its human partner, as well as the trust of the human in the machine. | ||
| We are excited about the next challenge of machines capable of common sense reasoning, sound judgment, and other levels of wisdom, as these are the keys to a true symbiosis between Homo sapiens and the emerging Machina sapiens. | ||
| Okay, before we get about the machines having trust in you, I want to make sure everybody goes to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| The betting sale has started, started early just for the War Room posse. | ||
| MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| Support the War Room apparatus. | ||
| Of course, Mike Lindell, the armor-piercing shield is Mike Lindell. | ||
| Also, I have breaking news that just broke. | ||
| We just got. | ||
| The January 6th committee. | ||
| The committee has interviewed Epps. | ||
| Epps informed us that he is not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency or January 5th or 6th or at any other time and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency. | ||
| If that's true and I'm a doubter, why is he not under arrest? | ||
| Why is he not down in the DC jail? | ||
| Why is he not in solitary confinement? | ||
| Look at the footage! | ||
| That's a lie. | ||
| Tell me then why Ray Epps is not rolled up if that's the case. | ||
| You got some of these other guys just wandering around. | ||
| Why then is Ray Epps not in custody? | ||
| Answer the question. | ||
| Why is Ray Epps not in custody? | ||
| You guys are liars. | ||
| You've got a domestic terrorism unit going after moms and dads in this country. | ||
| You're liars. | ||
| And we're going to get to the bottom of all of it and you're not going to be able to hide. | ||
| Save your receipts, preserve your documents. | ||
| You're coming after the American people, working men and women that are trying to raise families. | ||
| We're not going to let this happen. | ||
| Why is Epps not in jail? | ||
| Why are these other people in jail and Ray Epps is not? | ||
| Show me, match up any footage of any of these other guys that has a match up to Ray Epps. | ||
| You're liars. | ||
| Joe, take me through this thing. | ||
| The machine's got to sign off on the human being enough. | ||
| I don't know if the machine's going to sign off on Steve Bannon. | ||
| I think I'm going to be unsign-offable. | ||
| Joe Allen. | ||
| Well, you know, Steve, that would explain your war against the machine, because the machine is against you. | ||
| That was the director of DARPA's Information Innovation Office. | ||
| So, you know, we're talking about Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. | ||
| And this is really at the highest level of military technology innovation. | ||
| They fund everything from artificial intelligence programs to drone technologies. | ||
| And in particular, going as far back to the 60s with the doctor that was referenced at the beginning, Dr. Licklider, they have been working on trying to create and perfect brain-computer interfaces. | ||
| So, the last time I was on, we talked about an article. | ||
| It's up at warroom.org. | ||
| The article is, Beyond the Great Reset, 10 Official Documents on Human-Machine Hybrids. | ||
| I think that that presentation, which is in fact about an hour and a half long, from a DARPA director is a really good indication of the sort of mentality that we're talking about, right? | ||
| That they have these extremely powerful machines, especially artificial intelligence systems, And the idea, the philosophy underpinning it, is that human beings and machines should merge in a sort of symbiosis, much like in biology with lamprey, eels, and sharks. | ||
| And I guess the big question is, who's going to be the eel and who's going to be the shark? | ||
| If I could just point out two of the papers in there, both of those papers, they're augmented reality, I'm sorry, Human Augmentation, A New Paradigm, which was published by UK's Ministry of Defense. | ||
| There is an excerpt up right now also at warroom.org, kind of bite-sized that you can kind of get into before you look at it in detail. | ||
| And also, Exploring Bio-Digital Convergence that was published by Canada's Policy Horizons. | ||
| So, human augmentation, the dawn of a new paradigm, goes into exactly what the DARPA director was talking about, looking at merging human beings with machines in order to gain military superiority. | ||
| And this is trickling down from there into the civilian population. | ||
| And you can see that very clearly in the other paper I just mentioned, exploring bio-digital convergence. | ||
| Also up at War Room. | ||
| And you see the way in which this philosophy, up in the highest levels of government, with certain individuals, is beginning to permeate. | ||
| DARPA, you heard, this is the whole thing with Veritas, part of this whole gain-of-function had a DARPA aspect to it. | ||
| DARPA is your tax dollars. | ||
| This is you funding this, audience, you funding this. | ||
| DARPA. | ||
| We're going to get a lot more into it. | ||
| People ask me about transhumanism and the convergence of the five sectors, the five verticals. | ||
| This is what we've got Joe Allen kind of doing a primer on. | ||
| We've got to make sure you know the nomenclature, the critical path process, statics and dynamics of process. | ||
| Joe Allen's provided. | ||
| Go to warren.org. | ||
| Real quickly, on Getter and your Substack account, how do people get to you? | ||
| Yeah, you can find both of those snippets. | ||
| They should be right at the top of my social media, at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z, Twitter and Getter. | ||
| Also, my website, joebot.xyz. | ||
| Thank you very much, Steve. | ||
| If you think today the two shows were explosive, you ain't seen nothing yet. | ||
| Be back here at 10 o'clock tomorrow morning, okay? | ||
| We're going thermonuclear tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. | ||
| See you then in the War Room. |
Export Selection