July 20, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:56
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| So you don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | |
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the U.S., Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the U.S. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens, War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Dr. Fauci, as you are aware, it is a crime to lie to Congress. | ||
| Section 1001 of the U.S. | ||
| Criminal Code creates a felony and a five-year penalty for lying to Congress. | ||
| On your last trip to our committee on May 11th, you stated that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| And yet, Gain-of-function research was done entirely in the Wuhan Institute by Dr. Xi and was funded by the NIH. | ||
| I'd like to ask unanimous consent to insert into the record the Wuhan virology paper entitled, Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-related Coronaviruses. | ||
| Please deliver a copy of the journal article to Dr. Fauci. | ||
| In this paper, Dr. Xi credits the NIH and lists the actual number of the grant that she was given by the NIH. | ||
| In this paper, she took two bat coronavirus genes, spike genes, and combined them with a SARS-related backbone to create new viruses that are not found in nature. | ||
| These lab-created viruses were then shown to replicate in humans. | ||
| These experiments combine genetic information from different coronaviruses that infect animals, but not humans, to create novel artificial viruses able to infect human cells. | ||
| Viruses that in nature only infect animals were manipulated in the Wuhan lab to gain the function of infecting humans. | ||
| This research fits the definition of the research that the NIH said was subject to the pause in 2014 to 2017, a pause in funding on gain of function. | ||
| But the NIH failed to recognize this, defines it away, and it never came under any scrutiny. | ||
| Dr. Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist from Rutgers, described this research in Wuhan as the Wuhan lab used NIH funding to construct novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses able to infect human cells and laboratory animals. | ||
| This is high-risk research that creates new potential pandemic pathogens. | ||
| Potential pandemic pathogens that exist only in the lab, not in nature. | ||
| This research matches, these are Dr. Ebright's words, this research matches indeed epitomizes the definition of gain-of-function research done entirely in Wuhan. | ||
| for which there was supposed to be a federal pause. | ||
| Dr. Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Microphone. | |
| Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress, and I do not retract that statement. | ||
| This paper that you're referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain of function. | ||
| You're saying when you take an animal virus and you increase its transmissibility to humans, you're saying that's not gain-of-function? | ||
| That is correct. | ||
| And Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. | ||
| And I want to say that officially. | ||
| You do not know what you are talking about. | ||
| Let's read from the NIH definition of gain of function. | ||
| This is your definition that you guys wrote. | ||
| It says that scientific research that increases the transmissibility among animals is gain of function. | ||
| They took animal viruses that only occur in animals and they increased their transmissibility to humans. | ||
| How you can say that is not gain of function? | ||
| It is not. | ||
| It's a dance and you're dancing around this because you're trying to obscure responsibility for four million people dying around the world from a pandemic. | ||
| And let's let Dr. Fauci... I have to... Well, now you're getting into something. | ||
| If the point that you are making Is that the grant that was funded as a sub-award from EcoHealth to Wuhan created SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| That's where you are getting. | ||
| Let me finish. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| We don't know if it did come from the lab, but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab, and there will be responsibility for those who funded the lab, including yourself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This committee will allow the witness to respond. | |
| I totally resent the lie that you are now propagating, Senator. | ||
| Because if you look at the viruses that were used in the experiments that were given in the annual reports that were published in the literature, it is molecularly impossible No one's saying those viruses caused it. | ||
| No one is alleging that those viruses caused the pandemic. | ||
| What we're alleging is that gain-of-function research was going on in that lab and NIH funded it. | ||
| Get away from it. | ||
| It meets your definition and you are obfuscating the truth. | ||
| I'm not obfuscating the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You are the one. | |
| Let me just finish. | ||
| I want everyone to understand that if you look at those viruses, and that's judged by qualified virologists and evolutionary biologists, Those viruses are molecularly impossible to result in SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| No one's saying they are. | ||
| No one's saying those viruses caused the pandemic. | ||
| We're saying they are gain-of-function viruses because they were animal viruses that became more transmissible in human and you funded it. | ||
| And you don't admit the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you are implying... Senator Paul, your time has expired and I will allow witnesses who come before this committee to respond. | |
| And you are implying... | ||
| That what we did was responsible for the deaths of individuals? | ||
| I totally resent that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It could have been. | |
| And if anybody is lying here, Senator, it is you! | ||
| It is Tuesday, the 20th of July, the Year of Our Lord 2021. | ||
| Mr. Fauci showed his fangs today in this Senate hearing. | ||
| The stakes could not be higher, the drama more compelling. | ||
| And the results of this are going to have such a major, major, major impact on the accountability of what went on in the Wuhan lab under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party, the Transnational Criminal Organization, and the People's Liberation Army and their bioweapons program. | ||
| I want to bring in now Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| Dr. Navarro, we've got Rahim Ghassan. | ||
| I think we're tracking down Jack Posobiec. | ||
| We've got Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| The whole hour is going to be turned to this. | ||
| We wanted to start with you because you saw Fauci. | ||
| The very first moment Fauci entered the stage into this drama was with you when you had a throwdown in the Situation Room in the basement of the West Wing in the early days. | ||
| I think it was January 24th, 25th, in the early days of this pandemic, a couple of days after we started this broadcast, after we shift from impeachment to pandemic. | ||
| I want your assessment today of the prosecutorial drive of Senator Rand Paul and also Dr. or Mr. Fauci tripled down today on this. | ||
| Didn't really back up an inch. | ||
| Dr. Navarro. | ||
| We know Rand Paul's a good prosecutor, but today I saw him as being a good tailor. | ||
| What he was doing was very carefully fitting Anthony Fauci for an orange jumpsuit. | ||
| Fauci will be charged criminally by Congress as soon as the Republicans regain control. | ||
| Here's why what happened today was so important. | ||
| Rand Paul was very patient as a prosecutor. | ||
| He did the most important thing he could do with Fauci, which was give Fauci the opportunity to correct his lie to Congress. | ||
| If Fauci had retracted that lie when Paul gave him the opportunity to do so, it could have been, well, I was mistaken, sir. | ||
| I wasn't really lying to Congress. | ||
| What Rand Paul got him to do was, as you said, triple down on the big lie. | ||
| Because what Rand Paul did was clearly, if you basically take a virus that can't transmit to humans, And in the Wuhan lab, you use the tools that Fauci paid for with American taxpayer money to basically make it transmissible to humans. | ||
| That is gain-of-function. | ||
| There's no way. | ||
| It's not ambiguous. | ||
| And what I love about Rand Paul is that every time Fauci tries to dissemble Or go away from things, Paul brings him right back to the bullseye. | ||
| It's like when Fauci tried to shift the conversation to say, no, no, no, that virus that was gain of function was not responsible for the pandemic. | ||
| No, no, that's not what Rand Paul said. | ||
| He said, no, that was gain of function. | ||
| Bottom line, Steve, the tailor and the lawyer, Rand Paul, Fit Anthony Fauci for an orange jumpsuit today. | ||
| Fauci, the big lie here, Fauci is lying to Congress. | ||
| He's lying to the American people. | ||
| He knows at a minimum that virus came from the lab. | ||
| He knows at a minimum that taxpayer money funded the research that led to it. | ||
| It may not have been the ones that appeared in the journals, okay? | ||
| It could have been the one in the basement with the Chinese People's Liberation Army working on bioweapons. | ||
| But, be that as it may, it was Fauci's money, and it was Fauci's gain-of-function experimentation research that created this, and Fauci will be held accountable. | ||
| We also know, and you've tangled with this guy for a while, but we also know through Sherry Markson in Australia, at Sky News, and also at The Australian, her great reporting, and she's coming out with a book in the fall about what really went on in the Wuhan lab. | ||
| She's the one and Rand Paul goes back and gives the date of 2014 when the Obama National Security Council stopped, put a halt to all gain-of-function experiments in the United States with Barrack down in North Carolina and what Fauci was financing at Galveston and throughout the world, put a stop | ||
| Fauci then, and we still don't have clarity until her book comes out, went to the White House, we understand it's to the Office of Science and Technology, which is not even in the West Wing, it's over in the EOB, and actually met with a junior staffer to basically promulgate under NIH and his department, which is underneath NIH, to promulgate that you go back and start doing these gain-of-function experiments again. | ||
| Typical backdoor. | ||
| Let me do this, Steve. | ||
| Well, I've got the Wuhan lab right behind me. | ||
| Let me walk through for your listeners and viewers. | ||
| What we got here, this is the lab. | ||
| The pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, basically popped up within hundreds of yards of this lab, okay? | ||
| There was a wet market nearby, but we know now That the wet market wasn't responsible because there's no what they call direct progenitor. | ||
| This virus came from this lab. | ||
| There's no question about it. | ||
| Here in the Fauci wing, right, the taxpayer money went to fund the research in this lab. | ||
| Okay, so American taxpayer money funded the research. | ||
| We know that Fauci backdoored the Trump administration. | ||
| By basically re-allowing this gain-of-function experimentation. | ||
| Rand Paul absolutely nailed it. | ||
| The key thing is to take a virus that can only go from animal to animal and make it be able to go to animal to human. | ||
| And then you can make it even more deadly. | ||
| So Fauci did that. | ||
| His money and his gain-of-function experimentation did it in this building, Steve. | ||
| He cannot escape this building. | ||
| He is the father of the pandemic, if the virus came from the building, and we are getting there to 99.9% that it did. | ||
| And so he can dissemble any way he wants, but the big lie here, it'll be interesting to see if MSNBC and CNN Even goes there. | ||
| The big lie here is Fauci, okay? | ||
| Because he funded gain of research experimentation, which in all probability led to the virus created here that escaped and killed, as Rand Paul said, over 4 million people worldwide, over 600,000 Americans. | ||
| There is blood on that Brooklyn gentleman's hands, and no matter Yeah, last thing, Steve, really kind of interesting. | ||
| Whenever he was cornered like the rat he is, he started the name-calling, right? | ||
| He'd go, Senator, you don't know what you're talking about. | ||
| You can't win an argument by telling the other person they don't know what they're talking about. | ||
| Because every time he did that, Rand Paul looked at his notes and said, hey, here's the last thing I want to say to you. | ||
| What we need to do now is subpoena everybody that Fauci referenced in that chain who signed off on that memo that said there was no gain of function. | ||
| Get their emails, because I can bet you there was pressure on them, and there's people inside Fauci's own house that are very uncomfortable and don't want to go to jail with him. | ||
| Okay, hang on. | ||
| We're going to ask you to stay over for a few minutes into the next segment. | ||
| We've got Raheem Dasan. | ||
| We're trying to track down Jack Bassone. | ||
| We've got Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Everybody's going to be jumping in here, analyzing, commenting upon the testimony today. | ||
| Electrifying testimony at Capitol Hill. | ||
| Be back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I think it's one of the longest cold opens we've had, played over six minutes, which was the entire exchange between Senator Rand Paul, who I might want to just correct, Dr. Navarro is not a lawyer, he's actually an eye doctor, but his prosecutorial technique today was like a lawyer's, like a prosecutor, because the stakes were so high. | ||
| Extraordinary. | ||
| And one of the reasons we wanted to play it, as Dr. Navarro mentioned, all afternoon as we monitor MSNBC and CNN, they would not touch that. | ||
| They would not touch that. | ||
| And the reason that Fauci tripled down is he thinks the apparatus has got his back, but as you start to peel this back layer by layer by layer, it's going to become increasingly difficult. | ||
| Listen, I want everybody to go to MyPillow.com. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| We've got our own square up on the site. | ||
| You've got 2-for-1 sheets. | ||
| You've got the towels, 6-pack of towels, $109, now $39.99. | ||
| You've got the 2-inch topper, 50% off. | ||
| $39.99. You've got the 2-inch topper, 50% off. Okay, 2-inch topper, 50% off. As low as $99.99. And you've got the one I love, is the small pillows for the children, the Bible pillows. You've got the Daniel and the Lions, Noah's Ark, the story of the baby Jesus, all of it $19.99. There are five different pillows, $19.99 each. You can pass it on to the children, tell the stories of the Old and New Testament. | ||
| Okay, I want to go back to, we've got Rahim lined up after this, the reporting of National Pulse of Rahim Kassam. | ||
| And Naomi, Natalie Wonders has been incredible. | ||
| We've got Dr. Naomi Wolf, we're trying to get Jack Posobiec. | ||
| This is a huge day for this. | ||
| Remember, you've got to get to the bottom of 3 November. | ||
| You've got to get to the bottom of the Wuhan lab. | ||
| I just want to make sure for our audience, I understand our audience is up to speed more than anybody else in all media, in particular in nomenclature. | ||
| We talked about gain of function actually in the very first... | ||
| Episode back there with Dr. Stephen Hadfield. | ||
| I just want to make sure, Dr. Navarro, we're very clear about this. | ||
| Gain-of-function is kind of a term of art, and we've used it. | ||
| It's a little bit jargon for the science community, but it means what the scientists will tell you that, hey, they're taking these viruses and they're powering them up. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And combinations are powering them up in things that are not really found in nature, gaining function as they power up in these kind of dangerous experiments. | ||
| Because what they're trying to do is find vaccines or therapeutics, but particularly vaccines in case these mega viruses hit. | ||
| Now they haven't found actually a vaccine for SARS-1 yet, or even for MERS, where both hit, or really for the swine flu that cuts through China all the time, as an old China hen like Dr. Peter Navarro knows. | ||
| In fact, one that cut through in the summer, August, September, and October of 19, right before the CCP virus hit. | ||
| But in a practical sense, if you talk to the intel community, if you talk to the national security community, Dr. Navarro, you spend so much time with Matt Pottinger and Mike Pompeo, and others. | ||
| In that world, it's looked at as how you really make bioweapons. | ||
| Is that not correct, Dr. Peter Navarro? | ||
| Yes, and it's important to understand that this building behind me, the Wuhan Lab, is a bioweapons lab. | ||
| There's research done with The People's Liberation Army on bioweapons. | ||
| So let me give you two scenarios as to how gain-of-function might work. | ||
| Let me give you the malign scenario first. | ||
| Suppose you're the Chinese CCP government and you've got a rebellion in Hong Kong and you've got a United States with a president who's cracking down on you, right? | ||
| So in Hong Kong, what you want to do is make sure that all those protesters who are out on the street, you can somehow get them back in their buildings and neutralize them, and then while they're in those buildings, you can basically take over Hong Kong, okay? | ||
| At the same time, With the United States of America and the American president in the middle of an election year, what you want to do is disrupt their economy, kill people in America, and have the people of America blame the president so he loses the election. | ||
| So how would you go about doing that, Steve? | ||
| What you do is you take these bat viruses, for example, which have certain characteristics Where, from animal to animal, they can harm animals. | ||
| And what you do, using this gain-of-function, and we've heard Peter Daszak actually describe this in a TV interview, you basically inject the backbone of one of these bat viruses, and you begin to play around with that kind of thing. | ||
| So, you create a virus which, first of all, as Rand Paul said today, can jump from the animal to human immediately. | ||
| Usually that takes Decades, right? | ||
| You do that, but then you can also do other things. | ||
| You can maybe design it so it does asymptomatic spread, so it spreads like maliciously through. | ||
| You can make it impervious to heat and humidity, so instead of it going away in the summer, it stays. | ||
| And then you can do it so that there's a lot of mutations. | ||
| Now what I've described to you is exactly, exactly what we're observing from the virus that in all likelihood escaped or was released from this lab. | ||
| The peaceful version of this, Steve, and it's hubris, is, and this is the Fauci-Dasik mindset, it's like, okay, we're going to create these really dangerous viruses that can kill humans on the assumption that at some point in nature, nature will create them, but by the time nature creates them, we'll have a vaccine ready to do it. | ||
| Here's the problem. | ||
| First of all, nature likely wouldn't do what they did because these things are more deadly than nature has ever created in a coronavirus. | ||
| But more importantly, Steve, the hubris of this, the underlying assumption, hear me out here, is that these P4 weapons labs, a place like this, never, ever has a leak, okay? | ||
| Fauci and Collins wrote an op-ed in 2011, which basically stated that in support of gain of function, right? | ||
| But it's hubris, particularly with this thing, because our own State Department went there and reviewed the Wuhan lab In 2018. | ||
| and found it to be a clown show. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So, gain of function, you know, take the malign thing, okay, it was done to take over Hong Kong and screw the American president, or it was hubris and the thing escaped and Fauci never thought it would. | ||
| But he knew it came from there. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| He tripled down today. | ||
| He can't walk it back now. | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| How do people get you on social media? | ||
| I take it this is going to be covered in your book that's going to come out in the fall. | ||
| More about that later, but what social media, how do they get to you? | ||
| Two-step shop here. | ||
| Real P. Navarro. | ||
| I want everybody to get Getter. | ||
| G-E-T-T-R. | ||
| That's the Twitter killer. | ||
| And you won't be censored on that. | ||
| We really need to spread that even as you're on Twitter. | ||
| So Real P. Navarro, Twitter, and Getter. | ||
| I'm gradually transitioning, but that's how to reach me. | ||
| PeterNavarro.com. | ||
| The website has all sorts of stuff on it about election fraud, the border, and the virus. | ||
| The count out there in Arizona is still going, about 20% of the way through. | ||
| Dr. Navarro, thank you very much. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| Raheem Kassam, it's your reporting and Natalie Winter's reporting, your young investigative reporter, that given Ray and Paul a lot of the substance today to go after Fauci. | ||
| Give us your assessment and analysis of exactly what went down today. | ||
| Well first I just want to make a comment on Peter Navarro announcing on The War Room that he's gradually transitioning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that was from Twitter to Getter, just to be clear. | |
| Look, I think Dr Rand Paul and his team have done an incredible job. | ||
| I don't even know that he needed the National Pulse, but I agree. | ||
| I think some of the reporting, especially that Natalie Winters has been doing, has seriously augmented the arguments. | ||
| And I have them up in front of me. | ||
| So just bear with me a moment here, because there are so many things that are yet to be covered And I know Dr. Rand Paul was sort of honing in on one of those things, but there's a complete There's a total litany of gain-of-function reporting on our website right now I've actually just registered the domain liarfauci.com Which I hope will be going live in just a short amount of time and that URL will redirect people to 10 critical pieces of information 10 stories that we have done | ||
| on the national pulse that are specifically about Mr. Fauci and gain-of-function Of course, there are other actors who are implicated in all of this as well. | ||
| Ralph Baric over at UNC Chapel Hill. | ||
| There are a couple of others. | ||
| I think this Professor Saif As well. | ||
| But if you go through these, you can not only see a very, very clear narrative amongst the scientism community here defending gain of function, but you also can hear it in their own words. | ||
| We've dug up audio. | ||
| Some comes from 2017 as recently as 2017 of Ralph Baric defending gain of function. | ||
| Obviously, he was funded by Mr. Fauci and NIH and NIAID. | ||
| You've also got Peter Daszak, who worked with Xi Jinping at the Wuhan Lab, very close with Dr. Fauci. | ||
| They've been pictured together. | ||
| He discusses pandemic potential viruses in clips that we've pulled out. | ||
| You've then got the Zuckerberg Group, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, who have also been funding Wuhan Lab partners. | ||
| It goes on and on and on, Steve. | ||
| And I think now After what Rand Paul did today, and by the way, he was the only one using science up there today. | ||
| Fauci was talking pure rhetoric, you know, arguing that, oh, you know, I never murdered anyone. | ||
| You're saying I murdered somebody. | ||
| Nobody actually said that. | ||
| What they said was his funding went either directly or indirectly to the people creating killer viruses. | ||
| And that is absolutely true. | ||
| The 10 stories will be up at LiarFauci.com. | ||
| We also want to get those into the live chat. | ||
| This is very important. | ||
| This is research that Natalie Winters and Rahim have been doing since, really, February of 2020. | ||
| Rahim, I actually want to stay over, but the question, we've got about a minute before we go to break. | ||
| Why would he, when he had every opportunity to back off and say, I didn't really understand it from the May 11th thing, why did he triple down today, sir? | ||
| He's got nowhere else to go. | ||
| I mean, the implications for him now, if you go through some of these stories and what they actually, you know, what the signal really is from all of this, when Dashik himself uses the word killer, killer viruses, when they're talking about gain of function. | ||
| You know, Fauci now must, he must double down, he must triple down to save his own skin and indeed the people around him. | ||
| Remember, Fauci will be under enormous pressure from all of these very, very high-profile, long-serving, important people to keep his big mouth shut. | ||
| And that's what he did today, or tried to do. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to turn, we're going to keep Rahim over. | ||
| We've got Jack Posobiec is going to join us. | ||
| We've got Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| The full and complete coverage. | ||
| A big day. | ||
| Dr. Rand Paul really cornered Mr. Fauci and, you know, got him to triple down and commit to his lies, the continual lies about the Wuhan lab and his funding of gain of function. | ||
| Be back in a second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| And then do you on a very frequent basis consult with him either via email or do you have his cell phone number for instance? | ||
| I have exchanged a few emails. | ||
| You probably know that because you're asking the question. | ||
| About 10,000 pages of my email have been FOIAed. | ||
| And in fact, there is an email exchange or two between myself and Mr. Zuckerberg. | ||
| I don't recall. | ||
| I can look it up right now and see if I have a cell phone number. | ||
| I'm not sure I do. | ||
| OK, that's Senator Mike Braun in Indiana questioning Fauci about the cell phone number of someone that advises him a lot, which is Zuckerberg of Facebook. | ||
| I want to go to Rahim. | ||
| Do you believe the fact he doesn't know if he has the cell phone number of Zuckerberg, Rahim Kassam? | ||
| Well, if he didn't have it, I mean, I think you'd know if you had Mark Zuckerberg's cell phone number. | ||
| If he didn't have it, he would have said, no, I don't have it. | ||
| And he's like, oh, well, let me grab my phone and check. | ||
| It's a nonsense. | ||
| I think, you know, he has become so accustomed to lying and he shows it in his face. | ||
| He wears it in his voice. | ||
| He reflects it in his body language. | ||
| And I want to just I know you're pressed for time, but this is real pressing. | ||
| I just want to make mention of this one story in particular, which goes right to the heart of all of this. | ||
| And how you know that Mr. Fauci up there was lying today is a story that we published on May the 28th, 2021. | ||
| And it references This specific article by Mr. Anthony Fauci in the American Society for Microbiology back in October 2012, and he is specifically talking about gain of function. | ||
| That is the abstract. | ||
| He talks about the voluntary moratorium on gain of function, and he says the following, quote, in an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, What if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? | ||
| Those are his own words that he wrote, and now he's standing in the Senate saying to Rand Paul, oh, you know, we don't do that. | ||
| We never did that. | ||
| We never sponsored that. | ||
| That can never happen. | ||
| I'm sorry, but it's clear in black and white, and we have it all up at www.liarfauci.com. | ||
| Okay, let's get that link and put it in the live chat. | ||
| Last question. | ||
| You, probably more than any editor, National Pulse, more than any site, and Natalie Winters, your chief investigative reporter, more than any reporter, has covered this now for over a year. | ||
| Is there any doubt in your mind, sir, that Mr. Fauci perjured himself again today in front of the Senate? | ||
| No doubt at all. | ||
| No doubt at all. | ||
| and multiple times on multiple occasions, no doubt at all. | ||
| There is no single ability for what he said in there to be true, given the fact that we have and hold all of the receipts on all of the gain-of-function stuff that has been out there for years and years and years that nobody's bothered to look at, nobody's bothered to report on, and we've got it all there in one place for people. | ||
| Rahim Ghassan, thank you very much. | ||
| We'll put up all your social media so people can get to you. | ||
| And the website, you've got to go. | ||
| We're going to put the link into all the different live chats that are going on. | ||
| MyPillow.com, Promo Code War Room, sales on sheets, sales on towels, sales on toppers, and particularly the pillows for the small children. | ||
| Biblical stories, $19.99 each. | ||
| Get all these while they last. | ||
| These sales are not going to be on the sheets, on the towels, and on the toppers. | ||
| Not going to be through forever. | ||
| Take action, action, action. | ||
| Use your agency. | ||
| I want to go to Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Jack, you're a Naval Intelligence Officer. | ||
| You speak perfect Mandarin. | ||
| You've been on the story with us since January of 2020. | ||
| Your analysis, we only got a couple of minutes here. | ||
| Glad you could break away to join us. | ||
| Your analysis of Dr. Fauci today in the United States Senate, sir. | ||
| Steve, roses are red, Fauci can't dab. | ||
| Everyone knows he funded that lab. | ||
| Look, we've got stories all across humanevents.com talking, number one, about the emails between Fauci's agency and the Wuhan lab directly, talking about containment of pathogens, decontamination processes. | ||
| They knew that that lab was not as safe and secure as they wanted. | ||
| And secondly, we also have the video at humanevents.com of Dr. Ralph Baric The partner on this entire thing talking about how you can manufacture gain-of-function viruses in these labs without leaving a trace. | ||
| He left what he called signature mutations in the viruses that he made back in 2015 in North Carolina, but he taught that process to Wuhan. | ||
| Look, what Rand Paul is doing here, and is so smart, is that he's getting Fauci to push further and further back. | ||
| And every time he does, he comes with more receipts. | ||
| And Fauci is forced to use this tactic that you see bureaucrats do this, you see intelligence agents do this, it's called peeling back the layer. | ||
| So don't just watch this video of Fauci and Rand Paul, you've got to watch the last video. | ||
| Because in the last video, Fauci denied any type of gain-of-function experiments being done in Wuhan. | ||
| Yet now in this video, and that's actually what Rand asked the question about, but in this video, Fauci immediately starts attacking the messenger using ad hominem attacks, rhetoric attacks, And then immediately says, well, we may have done that, but we didn't kill anybody. | ||
| So you notice he's moving the goalposts. | ||
| He's peeling back one layer of the onion. | ||
| It's like a limited hangout. | ||
| I'll give you this, but I won't give you that. | ||
| Endless Mott and Bailey. | ||
| Mott and Bailey. | ||
| Uh, real quickly, is it, um, does he do this triple down today because he knows that the apparatus has to have his back? | ||
| They're so far, the media, the, the, the, uh, the administrative state, not the deep state, the administrative state, they're so far in on this. | ||
| They can't back up. | ||
| They've got to have his back, right? | ||
| They'll never let Fauci just hang out there in the wind. | ||
| As much as they've cut his time in primetime, as much as he's not over the White House all the time, they've got to back him. | ||
| And that's why he's arrogant enough to triple down today and essentially perjure himself again. | ||
| Look, he knows that he's protected. | ||
| He's the highest paid federal bureaucrat in our entire system. | ||
| You don't get to that point without having multiple insurance policies and multiple layers to your fiefdoms. | ||
| I know you know From your understanding of government, how these fiefdoms work, Fauci is protected. | ||
| He is a made man in the system and his role and the role of his agency to what I call the overstate, the access of the elites between the 1% of the U.S. | ||
| and the 1% in the CCP, the 1% of China, is so important that both sides cannot risk letting him go. | ||
| Jack, I know you're at Human Events, the Senior Editor. | ||
| How do people follow you on Twitter? | ||
| How do they follow you at Human Events? | ||
| You follow HumanEvents, humanevents.com, Twitter, Jack Posobiec, J-C-K-P-O-S-O-B-I-E-C-U, and we are fully up and launched on Getter, and I gotta say, Getter is working really well right now. | ||
| We've got the tweets loaded directly there. | ||
| We're getting thousands and thousands of hits on Getter. | ||
| I'm seeing people in there. | ||
| I'm seeing the engagement. | ||
| It's a real thing. | ||
| This is actually happening. | ||
| So go check out Getter, G-E-T-T-R, as well. | ||
| By the way, go to Human Events now. | ||
| Just like National Polls, they both have special editions, special sections. | ||
| Get the facts. | ||
| This is all about the facts, the data's in the receipts. | ||
| Jack Posobiec, thank you very much. | ||
| Dr. Naomi Wolf, you've warned us about the vaccine passports, you've warned us about the vaccines for children. | ||
| I know you've been all over this Fauci situation. | ||
| Give us your impressions and analysis of his performance today in the Senate, ma'am. | ||
| Sure thing, and thank you for covering this most important story of our time. | ||
| It's shocking to see most news outlets avoiding it. | ||
| I also want to, just before I answer, give a real thank you to the National Pulse team, Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters, and she's a very young reporter for such distinction. | ||
| They're breaking story after story around this issue, and they've been doing it for a long time. | ||
| You can see a direct line between their reporting and Senator Paul's really impressive tour de force today. | ||
| I want to say right before we get to that, I want to say for this audience, and this is about this young vanguard of killers that are coming up. | ||
| Natalie Winters was 19 years old and a sophomore at the University of Chicago when she started working at National Pulse during the pandemic and the beginning of this reporting. | ||
| A 19-year-old college student has gotten to the bottom of this. | ||
| Naomi Wolf, continue please. | ||
| Yeah, it's beautiful to watch. | ||
| She's a killer as an investigative reporter and unstoppable. | ||
| But what I felt when I was watching Dr. Fauci is shocked that he would, as you're saying, triple down on, I hate to say lie because that's so harsh, but there's no other way to say it. | ||
| I've been reading deeply into Dr. Barak's work and what the NIH funded. | ||
| Those of us who have read the publications, read the CV, which by the way, for which I was de-platformed by Twitter, as you may recall, 74,000 people had watched a video in which my husband was reading Dr. Barak's CV, identifying gain-of-function research. | ||
| Those of us who follow Dr. Barak's work, which is funded by the NIH, funded by the NIAID, I'm looking at a grant for $10 million, he says that it's gain-of-function research. | ||
| He says that its intention is to create cross-species infectiousness and to make viruses more infectious. | ||
| So, and he's been doing that in North Carolina and I think actually with all the focus on Wuhan, it's been kind of concerning to me that people I think are not paying enough attention to the fact that very similar research to make viruses more infectious with bat coronaviruses was going on right on US soil in Dr. Barak's lab, which his lab assistant called in his own CV a highly risky place for experiments | ||
| or highly risky experiments were being done in that lab. | ||
| And also that they were going to Maryland to locate a nest of bats. | ||
| I mean, we're lucky. | ||
| I mean, we're not lucky, God knows, but it's very concerning that such similar research for making viruses more infectious was being done on U.S. | ||
| soil. | ||
| But what is really striking when you follow kind of the timeline is that by about 2015, these scientists who are getting funded by NIH, getting funded by NIAID, Fauci's team, right, knew that the language was a problem. | ||
| And so there's this conference With Gain of Function in its title, Gain of Function Research Background and Alternatives, in 2015, there's an official from the NIH, there's an official from NIAID, and this book is published, right? | ||
| And here you see scientists who are engaged in this work, and I quote, the field of virology widely relies on studies that involve gain or loss of function. | ||
| And they're basically saying this language, this terminology, gain of function, is going to get us in trouble. | ||
| We need to find another way to do this research. | ||
| And we need and keep going. | ||
| And we need to find other language. | ||
| And I think this is important because that's the play that I think that Dr. Fauci was relying on a nomenclature kind of loophole. | ||
| Well, we're not going to call it gain of function. | ||
| And that policy is clear in this 2015 workshop, we're going to call it something else. | ||
| And so you can't send me to prison. | ||
| But in this workshop, And in Dr. Barak's research, it is absolutely clear that they are making pathogens more infectious. | ||
| And, you know, he refers to it as gain of function. | ||
| From the MIT Technology Review, his Dr. Barak's 2015 paper, and I'll skip the long title, was a tour de force utilizing bleeding edge genetic technology to alert the civilized world to a dangerous periphery. | ||
| It also revived concerns about gain of function experiments. | ||
| Which Barrick had known it would. | ||
| In the paper, he spelled out the extra precautions he'd taken and held up the research as a test case. | ||
| Quote, the potential to prepare and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens. | ||
| Barrick wrote, Fauci's fundee wrote, quote, scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue. | ||
| End quote. | ||
| The NIH decided the risk was worth it in a potentially fateful decision. | ||
| It funded work similar to Barrick's at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which soon used its own reverse genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras, end quote. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boom! | |
| There you see, I think, the whole bureaucratic political narrative. | ||
| By 2015, it was getting too hot politically. | ||
| There was a pause. | ||
| People didn't want to stop doing what they were doing. | ||
| There was millions and millions and millions of dollars coming from the NIH, the NIAID. | ||
| They talked about how problematic it was going to be to use that language, and then they shifted. | ||
| Dr. Wolfe, just hang on one second. | ||
| We're going to bring you back after the break and finish this very important discussion. | ||
| Be back in the War Room in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K Banham. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K Banham. | ||
| Okay, over at MyPillow.com, you've got the 6-pack of towels. | ||
| $109 now, $39.99. | ||
| That sale's not going to last forever. | ||
| You've also got the 2-inch topper. | ||
| You haven't had a night's sleep until you've slept on the 2-inch topper. | ||
| Okay, 50% off. | ||
| Make sure you go to MyPillow.com, promo code War Room. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| Use your agency. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, I want to talk about vaccine passports, but I've got to say, here's what's disappointing. | ||
| The powerful, the way you ended that segment by literally reading the evidence against Fauci and Barak and these others. I only wish that other that U.S. senators besides Rand Paul that their staffs had prepped them so they could face Fauci and read that into the record so they make a more even a more compelling case against Dr. Fauci. Is there any doubt in your mind that Fauci has perjured himself now multiple times in front of the Senate | ||
| when he's been given every opportunity to back off ma'am? | ||
| There's no doubt at all sadly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Dr. Wolf, you've been the first one to really bring up this whole situation of vaccine passports. | ||
| Over the last week, there's been so much conflicting news throughout the nation about children going back to school, what's going to happen, universities demanding that everybody that comes back has to be vaccinated, sports leagues doing it, LA County is now saying all kids have got to be masked. | ||
| Can you just give us a situation report of where do you think we stand right now with the imposition of vaccines? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, you're right that it's really a battlefield in which there are some wins and some losses, and it's a global battlefield. | ||
| There are huge losses. | ||
| I mean, France, people are marching in the streets and being beaten by Macron's police forces. | ||
| You know, the land of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, you know, People are saying freedom, freedom, because they're having vaccine passports forced on them to even congregate in restaurants. | ||
| And they're trying to resist that. | ||
| I just got a text from a friend in Ireland, showing me the front page of a Northern Irish newspaper, which is read in the Republic of Ireland as well, saying vaccine passports are being launched. | ||
| And then this knocking on doors, this contingent That Jen Psaki has announced and that the Biden administration is deploying is a pretty terrifying way with, as you and I have discussed, so much pushback at the state level against vaccine passports. | ||
| This is really a way that whoever is turning the screws and, you know, brought the Biden administration into power is saying deliver that 70% vaccinated and deliver that database of who is vaccinated. | ||
| And so having given up persuading us with donuts and raffle tickets and you know, as the deaths mount in the VAERS record over 11,000 deaths subsequent to vaccinations in that record, they've launched hundreds of people at $30 an hour. | ||
| We found the contracts going door-to-door to, you know, coerce you or persuade you or overcome your hesitancy to get a vaccine. | ||
| And really what that is, is a database That is digital and it's so valuable, which will be a way effectively to be a vaccine passport. | ||
| So it is a fight. | ||
| You know, in a lot of states there was clear, strong pushback. | ||
| You all helped so well. | ||
| I want to thank this audience so much. | ||
| And they're real victories, like Michigan ended emergency law, which is extraordinary, you know, but New York State re-upped emergency law. | ||
| And so in California, as you say, you know, rolled out, you have to wear masks, even though the science for masking has fallen apart. | ||
| And now, as you mentioned, there's this plan, which is so horrific to me, like, as we are really no longer in a pandemic, as a pandemic is described, you know, in Webster's Dictionary, or the Oxford English Dictionary, it's over as a pandemic, right? | ||
| Our poor children are being prepared to be For no reason, really abused, you know, eight hours a day, systematically. | ||
| And I just want to say one last thing before I wrap up this riff, which is early on in your show, you talked about that 1% connector that Dr. Fauci is between our elite and China's elite, right? | ||
| And the elite of the rest of the world, I would say. | ||
| And I really see this kind of drive and intent Insistence on masking children and vaccinating teenagers, but really masking them as kind of killing the next generation's ability to be psychologically free, psychologically American. | ||
| And for that you really need to look at who is our adversary, who wants our kids to be suffering and subjected to something that has no reason and no science behind it, You know, other superpowers who want our kids not to be strong, to learn obedience, to be brought up like the Handmaid's Tale. | ||
| And also tech companies benefit the longer this pandemic hysteria is drawn out and inflicted on our children. | ||
| OK, DailyClout.io, your organization, it really helped at the state level to shut a lot of this down and actually had the states reverse. | ||
| We've got about two minutes. | ||
| What can our audience do? | ||
| And I know that you want to go DailyClout, but what can you do now that they've gotten more sophisticated? | ||
| We shut down the state level, but now the companies, now the companies are actually driving this with the social tech oligarchs. | ||
| What can our audience do, ma'am? | ||
| I mean, I hate to say it, but, you know, we have to change leadership. | ||
| Right. | ||
| We have to get people in power who are not wholly owned, you know, who are not chitchatting with Mark Zuckerberg and letting them censor voices that are critical of these things. | ||
| But leaving that aside, there are things that parents can do. | ||
| Children's Health Defense and allied grassroots organizations are going to have an action this fall in which parents go to school instead of kids. | ||
| They figured out that schools get their funding in the first 10 days of the semester. | ||
| And so if you keep your child at home for the first 10 days, I'm not advocating this, just describing what they're going to do, it puts pressure economically on the schools. | ||
| And then the parents are going to go in their stead day after day after day and say, I'm going to put my body between you and the abuse you are trying to inflict on my child by masking How do people get to Daily Clout? | ||
| other my child, you're not going to send my child off to be masked and social distanced as a teenager if they're not vaccinated. | ||
| That is, you know, Jim Crow type segregation. | ||
| You're not going to do it to my kid. | ||
| And so I hope that there is peaceful resistance of this kind because this cannot be allowed to happen to our nation's children. | ||
| Direct action. | ||
| How do people get to Daily Cloud? | ||
| How do they follow you? | ||
| Dailycloud.io. | ||
| And I did open, I just started, so there's not much there yet, but I'm going to get going. | ||
| Real Dr. Naomi R. Wolf at Getter and also on Telegram. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, thank you very much. | ||
| Look forward to having you back later in the week to discuss this. | ||
| Very insightful. | ||
| Okay, Dr. Fauci tripled down today. | ||
| You just heard from Navarro, Raheem Kassam, Jack Posobiec, and Dr. Wolf. | ||
| The lies that he continues to tell. | ||
| Remember, gotta get to the bottom of November 3rd, gotta get to the bottom of Wuhan. | ||
| Tomorrow, MTG, Mike Lindell, back-to-back, double-headed tomorrow morning, 10 o'clock. |
Export Selection