June 2, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:15
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, and the worst happens... War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The administration also wants an investigation into the origins of the coronavirus now that we're hearing more and more that it could have been a leak from a lab. | ||
| China hitting back, obviously not cooperating, saying this is all a conspiracy theory. | ||
| What's your take? | ||
| And why do we need to know? | ||
| Well, we need to know because it's going to affect policy going forward. | ||
| If there's a high likelihood or even a possibility that this came out of a laboratory, it's going to affect how we try to provide better security around BSL-4 labs, labs doing this kind of research. | ||
| In fact, coronavirus research in China and in the Wuhan Institute of Virology was being done in a BSL-2 lab, a lower security lab. | ||
| So we probably should be doing research with dangerous respiratory pathogens in higher security labs. | ||
| I think if we assess that there's a probability that this came out of a lab, we're going to have to come together as an international community and provide better governance, better oversight of what's going on inside these laboratories. | ||
| So it really does matter from a policy standpoint. | ||
| If we assess that this was likely a zoonotic source for this virus, then we have to focus more on spillover events from nature. | ||
| I think trying to get the probability that this came out of a lab is going to be important going forward. | ||
| And at the end of the day, we might not have a definitive answer here. | ||
| Unless we get lucky and we either find the zoonotic source, or we have a whistleblower come forward from China, we're likely just to end up with an assessment of probabilities in terms of where this likely came from. | ||
| Scott, you're going to win a prize for using the word zoonotic twice in our show today. | ||
| And we should remind our audience, China is not going to cooperate with us. | ||
| Stephanie Rule is too smart. | ||
| Okay, I just want to make sure everybody understands. | ||
| Let's give you some signal because they're spinning noise just like they did in the vote. | ||
| Oh yeah, we're going to get it. | ||
| We're going to take care of it in 2020, 2024. | ||
| We're going to change all these laws. | ||
| It's all going to be different. | ||
| This is the Republican establishment running around trying to get money from you. | ||
| Oh yeah, we really want to do it. | ||
| We want to pass all these laws. | ||
| We've got to pass these laws. | ||
| We've got to do it. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| The 3 November movement is to get to the bottom of what happened on the 3rd of November and actually count the legitimate chain of custody legal votes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
OK? | |
| We're going to get to the bottom of that. | ||
| And then when we get to the bottom of it, we're going to find out who's responsible, hold them accountable, and we're going to go from there. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Gotta get to Bob. | ||
| Right here, the spin. | ||
| Oh, we need it for policy going forward. | ||
| That's policy. | ||
| It ain't nothing about policy going forward. | ||
| That's all spin and misdirection. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Forget that, Scott Gottlieb. | ||
| And there are defectors. | ||
| Dr. Li Min Yan's a defector. | ||
| She's not the only defector. | ||
| They're defectors from mainland China. | ||
| They're defectors from the lab. | ||
| I told you that back in spring. | ||
| They're defectors. | ||
| We know what happened. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| We know what happened. | ||
| MSNBC's still playing the game. | ||
| Oh, maybe this, maybe that. | ||
| No, no, no, no. | ||
| We know what happened. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| We know what happened. | ||
| And all the lies and misrepresentation. | ||
| And here's a new one. | ||
| Oh yeah, we've got to do it because we've got to come together as a world and pass new policies. | ||
| No. | ||
| That's why Anthony Fauci, he's the high priest of scientism, does not want you in the temple that is the research facilities, right? | ||
| Wuhan being the number one temple they don't want you in. | ||
| That game's over. | ||
| We're getting to the bottom of what happened in Wuhan because the Chinese Communist Party is going to pay. | ||
| We're going to seize their assets. | ||
| The Nuremberg trials that we called for back in February of what they've done to the Chinese people. | ||
| What they've done to the Chinese people in Wuhan, in Hubei Province, all throughout China, and then what they did to the people in the world. | ||
| The reparations, the accountability, Right? | ||
| The German, the great German lawyer is talking about Nuremberg trials. | ||
| We're getting to the bottom of what happened. | ||
| It's not about policy going forward. | ||
| Obviously we're going to change the policies. | ||
| Or basically just to, not even change them, just to enforce what's on the books now. | ||
| That's the problem in Wuhan. | ||
| So forget the spin. | ||
| Forget the happy talk. | ||
| Forget all that. | ||
| Stephanie Ruhle, you're smarter than that. | ||
| That's an embarrassing segment. | ||
| Just letting Scott Gottlieb yammer on, yammer on, yammer on. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| That's yammering. | ||
| And it ain't gonna happen. | ||
| We're getting to the bottom of this. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| We're getting to the bottom of it. | ||
| You guys are selling all the Chinese nationals working with him, the whistleblower movement, the New Federalist, all of it. | ||
| You've got hundreds of thousands of Chinese nationals now working on this to expose the transnational criminal organization. | ||
| That is the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| But I gotta tell you Rahim, you had the call shot on Fauci. | ||
| National Pulse is doing amazing work. | ||
| My phone, people are blowing up in Europe, which is not reporting this. | ||
| They are all, because your name is pretty big in Europe, they're all over your reporting of the National Pulse on this issue. | ||
| So walk us through Fauci and his emails. | ||
| All right, so look, I mean, I am not as good as a researcher as Natalie Winters is. | ||
| I'm not as good as a showman as Stephen K. Bannon is. | ||
| But what I'm good at is, you know, I call it editor's eye. | ||
| It's why I have my, you know, best editor ever mug. | ||
| You can see where decisions are being taken in the news. | ||
| And as an editor, You know, I consider every headline, every comma, every preposition, every, you know, every capitalization, all of that, and you can see where those decisions are taken, and why, and you have to ask the question in your mind, why has that decision been taken? | ||
| So I started to come to this analysis a couple of weeks ago, and I started to see, okay, Dasik's being mentioned a lot more, maybe they're trying to feed Dasik to the wolves a little bit here, that means that something's going on with Fauci, because Fauci's ultimately the one that they want to defend. | ||
| Fast forward, you know, three, four weeks from when I said that on air, we have this trove of Fauci emails that comes out. | ||
| Now, the Washington Post released these in an incredibly hagiographical manner. | ||
| They wanted people to think very well of Fauci. | ||
| They strategically released very few emails. | ||
| How we come together in the world, and Dr. Fauci was so worried, how we come together in the world and work through this? | ||
| And how taken aback he was that he was the core celebrity now, you know? | ||
| A man called to service for the good of mankind. | ||
| He said, I hope it ends as he booked himself on shows every single day. | ||
| He said, oh, I can't handle the celebrity. | ||
| Now, I mean, I've seen even CNN people criticizing him in the last 24 hours on social media for that, and for that line in the Washington Post. | ||
| But it's actually, funnily enough, some of the BuzzFeed emails and the BuzzFeed staff reporting on this that goes way more into detail. | ||
| And I was gratified by the fact that so many people last night, when this thing fully leaked in its 3,000-page format, actually started crowdsourcing this stuff. | ||
| I have, you know, viewers of this show who are contacting me in the middle of the night saying, have you seen page 2200? | ||
| Have you seen page 2019? | ||
| Have you seen page 150? | ||
| And they were helping us pass through this information that otherwise I would have literally just been like, Page one. | ||
| Nah, it's nothing there. | ||
| Page two. | ||
| Alright, so the team came together last night in a big way. | ||
| Team Truth came together in a big way last night. | ||
| And here are just some of the things that became abundantly clear to us as we went through this last night. | ||
| So there's an email that was received by Dr. Fauci from somebody called Eric Nilsson at a company called Biosignal. | ||
| And Nilsson warns on March the 18th, 2020, in very long form, and you know, we both get these emails, very long form, that Quote, I'm confident that China stopped counting dead COVID-19 infected bodies since January the 7th, 2020. | ||
| They've been adding fabricated data daily to show, to save face, the world, and their own people, an impressive flattening of China outbreak curve. | ||
| It's easy to prove this via data analysis because, for example, improbable coincidences incurred in much of the data. | ||
| And it goes on and it's detailed, right? | ||
| Now, it may be true, it may be false, but it goes on and it's detailed and it's from somebody who's emailing with Fauci directly. | ||
| Fauci's response to this is to forward this on to somebody else and say, too long for me to read. | ||
| Fundamentally unconcerned is what Dr. Fauci is with the idea that China is fabricating data. | ||
| Now, listen, there may be an element of plausible deniability in there. | ||
| Hey, I never read it. | ||
| I didn't know. | ||
| My hands are clean. | ||
| But that's one of the things. | ||
| Another thing that's really interesting is that Fauci advised the Obama-era Health and Human Services Secretary, Sylvia Burwell, against wearing a mask. | ||
| So, Sylvia writes to him and says, I'm traveling to Redacted. | ||
| Folks are suggesting I take a mask for the airport. | ||
| Is this something I should do? | ||
| Uh, please see below. | ||
| Do the Chinese have needs for support right now? | ||
| Would money be better spent on diagnostics or vaccine work? | ||
| Effectively, what she's trying to do is raise money to send to China, uh, to quote-unquote aid them in their response to this, right? | ||
| I-I-I would have just thought an Obama-era health secretary might have wanted to help raise money for America, uh, in defense about this, but she was more interested in raising money for China. | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| Park that. | ||
| The response from Dr. Fauci was, Sylvia, masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. | ||
| The typical mask you buy in the drugstore is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material. | ||
| It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keeping out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you. | ||
| I do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are going to a very low risk location. | ||
| Your instincts are correct. | ||
| Money is best spent on medical countermeasures such as diagnostics and vaccines. | ||
| So again, that is Dr. Fauci on February the 5th, 2020. | ||
| He's already past therapeutics. | ||
| He doesn't even want to talk about therapeutics. | ||
| Does not want to talk about therapy. | ||
| Also, Fauci came out here recently and said, oh, when I went to the public, when I went on 60 Minutes and said that, we knew you had to wear a mask, but we didn't want that. | ||
| We don't pee pee. | ||
| This is just another stone cold. | ||
| How many times has he perjured himself in front of the Senate, do you think, after going through these emails? | ||
| Oh, that brings me to the next email. | ||
| Perfect layout. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So Fauci has denied repeatedly... Someone's like, we planned this. | |
| And we didn't, but that's the best part of it. | ||
| Fauci has denied being involved in gain-of-function research. | ||
| He's gone adamant. | ||
| He's adamant about it. | ||
| He said it to Rand Paul. | ||
| There was no gain-of-function. | ||
| It never happened. | ||
| And now we have this email. | ||
| That says, from Fauci, to his deputy director, Hugh Auchincloss, I'm gonna say? | ||
| Yes, yes, yes, yes. | ||
| That's the administrative guy. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He says, Hugh, it is essential that we speak this AM. | ||
| Keep your cell phone on. | ||
| I have a conference call at 7.45 AM with Azar. | ||
| It will likely be over by 8.45 AM. | ||
| Read this paper, as well as the email that I will forward you now. | ||
| You have tasks today that must be done. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| Tony. | ||
| Well, the paper that was attached to that email was specifically gain-of-function paper. | ||
| It is the gain-of-function paper that Barrick and the Bat Lady are involved in, and they are talking about this in February. | ||
| Correct me if I'm wrong, but if Barrick isn't involved in Gain of Function, which were literally the words out of Fauci's mouth in the Senate when Rand Paul was here, then why is Fauci panicked emailing Orkin Kloss saying, we need to discuss Barrick's paper on Gain of Function? | ||
| Here's the other smoking gun in this. | ||
| Navarro will tell you, the entire time at these meetings in the Situation Room, Fauci never, ever, ever mentioned the potential of anything that had gone on in any experimentation. | ||
| Never gave anybody a heads-up of what Barak and Dasik, all of them, were up to, about his involvement, about his deep understanding of the Chinese colleagues and what they were doing. | ||
| Fauci, I've got to tell you, I know, and let's talk about it real quickly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I've just got two more things on the emails, real quick. | |
| Number one is where he says, no, there's no asymptomatic spread. | ||
| He says that on February the 4th, 2020. | ||
| He says most transmissions occur from somebody who is symptomatic, not asymptomatic. | ||
| He also says, I'm really tired, not much sleep these days. | ||
| And then there's another one from Christian G. Anderson. | ||
| Now, Christian G. Anderson is a scientist out at the Anderson Lab at the Scripps Research Institute in California. | ||
| He wrote that paper, the paper about the natural. | ||
| Right. | ||
| He's a bad guy. | ||
| Yeah, he's the one that's in back of the cover up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bad dude. | |
| But on January the 31st, 2020, Anderson writes to Fauci and he says on a phylogenic phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggests that bats serve as the reservoir the Unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome So one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features Potentially look engineered exactly now at the best That proves that there was no cons. It's not a conspiracy | ||
| theory to talk about the engineering of this virus I mean, he's a government-funded scientist, by the way, at Scripps. | ||
| The NIH-funded scientists were talking about engineering the virus. | ||
| At worst, it's a massive cover-up the likes of which the world has never seen. | ||
| Okay, we're going to come back in a second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to pivot now to the vaccines. | |
| Dr. Mike Yadin from Pfizer is going to join us. | ||
| Rahim, we're going to talk about Jack Posobiec's tweet here momentarily about what's happening with the White House. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Be back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, whether you think it's a bioweapon or a hoax, the one thing, and by the way, debated, it'll be, you know, the evidence will come out, that's all to be decided. | ||
| What we do know is your immune system, you need to boost it, only you can do it, you need to take responsibility, no government agency, no family, no loved ones, it's got to be you. | ||
| This show is about human agency, action, action, action. | ||
| So take action today, go to warmbedefense.com, get the free vitamin D3 and the zinc Got to pay shipping and handling, but you also get access to information about your immune system and how you can boost it. | ||
| So take action today. | ||
| The work on oneself begins with oneself. | ||
| Pretty explosive tweet coming from the one and only Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Make sure you get his Antifobug. | ||
| I think it's already sold out the first couple of runs, but go to Amazon or go to the Jack Posobiec site. | ||
| Make sure you line up that book as your head will blow up and support Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Posobiec is pretty well sourced at the White House. | ||
| What did he tweet out? | ||
| So he tweeted an hour ago. | ||
| He said White House staff are actively discussing an exit strategy for Dr. Anthony Fauci following the release of his emails yesterday per White House official. | ||
| Now, I want people to understand that just because the staff in the building Mostly changed. | ||
| That doesn't mean that Jack still doesn't have good sourcing in there. | ||
| He's had a couple of stories from the Biden White House already bang on the money. | ||
| And when he tweets something like this, I think people should take it very seriously. | ||
| I wouldn't be surprised if there are conversations about Fauci being way, way over time for retirement. | ||
| But he's not, he's not on, you don't see him on the primetime shows anymore. | ||
| They're not kowtowing to him anymore. | ||
| I mean, they're going to try to defend him. | ||
| There's no, they got to defend him. | ||
| Let me ask you this question. | ||
| Okay, if Fauci had done everything the same as he has done to this point, but he were a Trump voting Republican, you think he'd still be in his position right now? | ||
| He'd be long, long gone. | ||
| And this is why the television behind you is not talking about these emails, they're not talking about anything coronavirus related this morning, nothing like that because they don't want people going online and cross-referencing things and finding out what's really going on with these emails. | ||
| This, you know, this is bombshell stuff that we're seeing being released in real time here. | ||
| We've got another story going up on the national polls in just moments from this trove and of course MSNBC, CNN, nowhere to be seen. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| That shows they're scared. | ||
| That's good news. | ||
| That's because they don't cover it. | ||
| Don't think it's bad news. | ||
| It's good news. | ||
| They don't want to, just like they don't touch anything. | ||
| If you watch at night, it's all anti-democratic, Trump's fascist, all that. | ||
| And they were scared to death of the Maggie Haberman story, right? | ||
| They're already criticizing her about Trump coming back in August. | ||
| But you never see about Biden's economy. | ||
| You never see anything he's doing. | ||
| You never see any action he's actually taking, unless it's tied up with some sort of issue about racism. | ||
| OK, I want to go now to Dr. Mike Yeadon. | ||
| He was at Pfizer for many, many decades, one of the top researchers and scientists. | ||
| He's been, I guess, technically a whistleblower because he's come forward with what the truth is. | ||
| So, Mike, given all the Fauci Lies and misrepresentations, and now it's all coming out about what these guys knew about Wuhan and the financing of gain-of-function and all the lies he's been telling Congress and all the spin, everything like that. | ||
| I've got to ask you, you dedicated a big part of your life to Pfizer. | ||
| What I don't understand, because I've watched all your YouTubes and I've seen your interviews, is I take it you wouldn't have given your life's work to an organization that you felt at the time was either misleading people or trying to harm people or not doing something that was to the greater good. | ||
| You're a scientist for that reason. | ||
| Why is it today? | ||
| That you've kind of said, no, this whole thing's false. | ||
| It's misinterpreted. | ||
| They're giving you false information. | ||
| Why the shift? | ||
| And why the shift in an organization that you dedicate your life to, sir? | ||
| Yeah, that's a great question. | ||
| So yeah, a PhD researcher, I had 32 years in the industry, left Pfizer 10 years ago as Vice President, Head of Research for Respiratory, and I've been an entrepreneur since. | ||
| I don't recognise my former employer. | ||
| I love working there, but I don't think what they're producing at the moment is the sort of thing that I would have heard of previously. | ||
| But the reason I've spoken out, and I'm the only senior former pharmaceutical company person speaking out, is that everything that our governments are telling us about the virus, treatments, vaccines and measures to take, they're all wrong. | ||
| Now normally we talk courteously when we disagree, mistaken, we'll use words like that, and I'm afraid the people who are advising my government and yours are clever. | ||
| And I know that they know that what they're telling you is wrong. | ||
| In other words, it's lies. | ||
| They're actually lying. | ||
| And I think the objective in lying is to frighten people and to frighten people to accept these really strange gene-based vaccines. | ||
| And I think the purpose of that ultimately is to force us to have an electronic vaccine passport, which is really a digital ID. | ||
| That's the long and short of it. | ||
| And that's why I'm speaking out. | ||
| Okay, so I want to go back there, because, you know, we're not, we pride ourselves on not being conspiracy theories, and as approved on November 3rd, now you're seeing the receipts about what happened, as approved in Wuhan, which we kept saying at the beginning, this is all done by the PLA, coming out of that lab. | ||
| But we also believe there are no coincidences. | ||
| What facts And evidence, do you put forward to basically back up your case that all these people are lying? | ||
| Because that's a pretty bold statement. | ||
| You're a research guy, you make your life on data-based, evidence-based, show me the data, show me your evidence. | ||
| I will certainly do that. | ||
| First off, I can step through, I would say there are about six, seven, eight main narrative points that all governments tell their people. | ||
| Now, I won't take long. | ||
| Novel virus emerged from China, You'll have no immunity and it's unusually lethal. | ||
| Those things are not correct. | ||
| It's actually closely related to four common cold-causing coronaviruses. | ||
| Lots of people had immunity, that's in the literature, and it's not unusually lethal according to John Ioannidis, the most cited epidemiologist. | ||
| So that was an exaggerated pressure. | ||
| No treatment. | ||
| That's not true. | ||
| Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, You can find them on the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons website. | ||
| That stuff's been hidden and anyone who's raised those treatments has been smeared and as a result people I think have died where they could have been treated. | ||
| Dr. Eden, hang on one second. | ||
| I just want to go back, before we go into the next one, about the therapeutics. | ||
| We've been a big name in therapeutics. | ||
| But can you cite Brazil, India, Europe, Africa? | ||
| You pick it. | ||
| Anywhere in the world right now that you've seen that you think the evidence shows that these therapeutics, I would call them, treatments or therapeutics, not vaccines. | ||
| Can you cite any example right now where you think that they, on some sort of mass basis, have actually worked to make sure that this thing did not either spread to the population or was not as lethal as the governments and the media and the pharmaceutical companies are saying? | ||
| Can you cite something? | ||
| Yeah, there's two things. | ||
| One, as you say, this kind of regional, there were areas of India where the governments were handing out ivermectin just routinely. | ||
| And this was no big deal. | ||
| It's a cheap, generic, safe drug they use for treating parasites. | ||
| So they had huge supplies of it already. | ||
| And in those territories in which they were handing it out, they had very, very low illness and mortality. | ||
| But in addition to that, there are four more studies. | ||
| They're not the normal placebo-controlled trials that normally pharmaceutical industries have, but nevertheless, there have been totals of thousands of patients treated or not with each of the drugs I mentioned, and I would say definitely passes the standard of these drugs that you really ought to use, rather than the position that lots of regulators have taken to say well the evidence isn't sufficient. | ||
| So they actually then suppress or smear the drug. | ||
| But there are some really good scientists like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Corey and others. | ||
| These are top notch people in their fields and it's their work that I'm citing. | ||
| Okay, so go ahead with your other elements of your argument. | ||
| Continue on. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| I won't waste anyone's time with PCR. | ||
| I think we know that if it's over amplified and you don't take account of the false positive rate, you can just get misleading numbers of cases and death attribution. | ||
| But here's the three I think that go together. | ||
| That we have been persuaded that even though you have no symptoms, you can spread this infection to other people. | ||
| You can be a respiratory health threat to others even though you have no symptoms. | ||
| This is simply not, it's not true. | ||
| And I can explain why it's not true. | ||
| To be a good source of infection, you need to have an airway full of virus. | ||
| If you do, you will have symptoms because the virus is destroying your airway lining and your immune system is fighting back. | ||
| Those two things, without any question, produce symptoms. | ||
| You can't be a good source if you're not symptomatic. | ||
| So, if you're symptom-free, you're not going to be spreading this virus. | ||
| That's what was also found in formal studies. | ||
| So, it's both what your mother would have told you, And also what the empirical data tells you. | ||
| Yet, we've been told that is happening, and as a result, you have to wear masks, which don't work and are not necessary. | ||
| And we've been also told, this is the really big one, I need to emphasize... Hold on, hang on, but hang on one second, but hang on, before you get to the lockdowns, I just want to put it together, we're going to go to break, but Rahim, What Dr. Yeadon's saying in those last two absolutely conforms... Yeah, they track exactly what he says. | ||
| They track exactly... This is the... Ladies and gentlemen, this is the payoff. | ||
| What Dr. Yeadon just said, we've got studies and everything like that, but even better, we've got Dr. Anthony Fauci. | ||
| Anthony Fauci both agrees, in writing, in an email, early on, that it can't spread by asymmetric, if you're asymmetric, asymptomatic, excuse me, asymptomatic, and he also says that the masks don't work. | ||
| Completely backs up what Dr. Yeadon says. | ||
| And Fauci knew this from the beginning, right? | ||
| Presumably this will be in his book. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| Dr. Yeadon, hang on for a second. | ||
| We need to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We have to pay some bills here. | ||
| Rahim, this is the beauty of what Yeadon and these people have been saying. | ||
| They've been smeared as wingnuts. | ||
| They've been smeared as kooks. | ||
| Okay, let's just go to the receipts. | ||
| We now have the receipts. | ||
| I didn't see this in the Washington Post right up yesterday. | ||
| I didn't see this in the New York Times or the BuzzFeed right up yesterday. | ||
| I didn't see how it backed up what many people have been saying, Raheem Kassam. | ||
| What did I say? | ||
| I think it was like the second week after we launched the show, I said you cannot have political reporters asking these questions. | ||
| Amen. | ||
| Right? | ||
| In the White House. | ||
| And it did, they did, and everything got politicized as a result. | ||
| That's brilliant. | ||
| You said they said you need this right here with Jason. | ||
| He said that we need the science and technology heavy hitters who are beyond bond question. | ||
| They look for the data evidence in science. | ||
| Back in a minute. | ||
| Dr. Mike Yeadon, formerly of Pfizer, and the emails of Dr. Tony Fauci. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, go to MyPillow.com right now, type in promo code WAROOM, you got the toppers 30% off, pillows $29.98, $40 off, throw in another five bucks, get the king size. | ||
| These sales are not going to last forever, so get on top of them right now. | ||
| You haven't slept, you slept on Giza sheets, not called Giza dream sheets for nothing. | ||
| Okay, so make sure you go. | ||
| And if you want to pretend like you're Raheem Kassam, get yourself a pair of slippers or moccasins, okay? | ||
| So Rahim, anything else before I go back to Dr. Yeadon? | ||
| This is why Fauci's email trove is so important and why it's guys like Gateway Pundit and National Pulse and others are doing the grinding work. | ||
| And by the way, to know it's crowdsourced from this audience is absolutely unbelievable because It reinforces what people like Dr. Mike Yeadon have been saying for a while. | ||
| They've been ostracized from colleagues who have revered their reputations for decades, but now they're coming out with this, oh no, these guys are cranks, these guys are wingnuts, these guys are conspiracy theory. | ||
| Then you see where Tony Fauci, from the very beginning, is saying the exact thing Dr. Yeadon is saying. | ||
| So we just put up another story. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is about the one that I talked about. | |
| Christian Anderson and the Scripps Lab out in California. | ||
| But I want to tease something else here. | ||
| Nathalie has found something extraordinarily interesting, which dates back to 2011. | ||
| This is a National Institutes of Health conference that was taking place. | ||
| And what we found Discussed in that conference was how the manipulation of back corona viruses could pose a quote significant threat to human health and That the deputy director of the Wuhan lab at the time Asserted that the lab had quote no regulation on this type of research We will be showing the receipts on that very shortly again, you know more Smoke is becoming fire. | ||
| Put it that way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's fire. | |
| It's not even smoke. | ||
| It's a smoking gun. | ||
| It's a firing gun. | ||
| I'm just trying to be... It's a dumpster fire over there. | ||
| For the Washington Post reporters watching this, smoke is becoming fire. | ||
| You're blowing these guys away. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| You're punching way above your weight today, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I fashioned myself on the British Empire. | |
| I want to go back to Dr. Michael Yeadon. | ||
| Today we're being schooled by the British. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Got Dr. Michael Yeadon, got Raheem Kassam. | ||
| Dr. Yeadon, continue on. | ||
| We just wanted to clarify that and show that Tony Fauci has supported you, Dr. Yeadon, from the very beginning, although you wouldn't know that publicly. | ||
| So, sir, continue on with your punch list. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Dr. Fauci had said, as I am saying, that people without symptoms are not the drivers of epidemics. | ||
| I think he said exactly that phrase. | ||
| So here's something we have all been required to do in pretty much every country. | ||
| Lockdowns, business closures, stay at home. | ||
| Why? | ||
| The idea was this is a disease transmitted between human beings, so if you reduce contacts between human beings you're slowly epidemic, right? | ||
| No, that's not true. | ||
| Let's take a step back. | ||
| Fauci just said you need to be symptomatic in order to drive transmission. | ||
| Let me just take you back to that. | ||
| If you're symptomatic, we had a word for that, it's called ill. | ||
| If you've got flu or coronavirus and you have symptoms, you're very unlikely to be wandering around outside going to work, buying gas, walking on the sidewalk. | ||
| What I'm saying is that transmission generally didn't occur outside in the ambulatory community because generally people who were good sources of infection were symptomatic and ill and stayed at home. | ||
| So when we locked down the economy for months, smashed civil society, We obtained no benefit. | ||
| That is true. | ||
| That's not my speculation. | ||
| There are over 30 peer-reviewed journal articles comparing whether there was lockdown or not and its stringency on spreading of transmission in various countries. | ||
| No effect whatsoever. | ||
| And that tallies with what I just told you. | ||
| You wouldn't expect reductions in personal contact with people who are not symptomatic to do anything to reduce transmission. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, but the thing I wanted to say, Steve, you asked me... Okay, but hang on one second. | |
| I got to put a point in this. | ||
| This is, and to following the narrative along at home, ladies and gentlemen, Tony Fauci, who's now chief medical advisor to Joe Biden, although you haven't seen Joe Biden with many photo ops, was Tony Fauci here recently? | ||
| Have you? | ||
| That's not by chance, okay? | ||
| He was also the senior voice of the Trump administration in the councils of making these decisions. | ||
| Did Tony Fauci, when they talked about 30 days to suppress the spread because of the capacity utilization of the ICU units, when they talked about expanding it out to 45 days, when all these different state governors were making these decisions, did Tony Fauci, knowing what his email said, knowing what Dr. Yeadon just said, and Tony Fauci, according to his emails, being a believer in that, Did Tony Fauci, is there any set of emails where Tony Fauci actually argued and presented the evidence that's counter to what he just said there? | ||
| This is why Tony Fauci is a dangerous person and a bad guy, okay? | ||
| You're going to find out as you peel back layer by layer by layer, and you're going to have to peel it back, and also for Fauci and all these guys, understand something. | ||
| When we take power again in November of 2022, the investigations, if it's not done now, it's going to be done then, and it's going to be done in a level that gets to the bottom of everything they ever said. | ||
| I happen to think that you're going to see many more investigations. | ||
| There should be a commission on this immediately, even-handed, with a number of experts throughout the world. | ||
| Tony Fauci, for him to sit there, | ||
| Understanding what Yeadon just said, understanding what Tony Fauci put into these emails, to know that he sat there, the trillions of dollars of damage, the psychological damage, the years behind kids not having the education, everything that went on psychologically with people, the lack of confidence in the nation, all of it, to know you sat there, understanding what the truth was and didn't say it, hey, All bets are going to be off. | ||
| Dr. Yeadon, go back. | ||
| I'm sorry for interrupting, but I've got to make sure we reinforce Fauci's problem here. | ||
| You've asked me a bit of a strong statement to say people are lying and maybe a conspiracy, but here's my point. | ||
| I do a long form, normally, interviews and writing. | ||
| It's true what I've said, that these points are simply not correct. | ||
| And because the people saying it are smart, they know everything I know and more, that means they must be deliberately telling untruth. | ||
| But here's the killer observation, Steve, to your question. | ||
| All the countries around the world simultaneously adopted the same six, seven, eight falsehoods, all of them at the same time. | ||
| All of the Europeans, my country, UK, I saw it in America. | ||
| I just found that frightening because I recognized early on that some of them were just not right. | ||
| And now I'm at a point where I'm saying all of them are incorrect. | ||
| And I have one more, if I may, before we go to vaccines. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| Here's one that you'll recognize, I think. | ||
| that this virus mutates and the products of mutation we call them variants. | ||
| And that's true. | ||
| So it's one of these things that's adjacent to reality. | ||
| Yeah, when this virus replicates, it makes typographical errors. | ||
| But it's a huge virus genetically, and it makes just literally a handful of errors. | ||
| And so I went back to the databases and tried to work out what percentage of the virus had changed over 18 months. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is 0.3%. | |
| The most different variant is 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence. | ||
| And if you're thinking, well that doesn't sound very likely to escape my immune system, you are absolutely right. | ||
| Not only is it not likely to theoretically, for reasons I don't have time to explain, but it's actually proven not to escape people's immunity. | ||
| There's been people who've done wet immunology to take blood cells from people who've been exposed to the virus, and they throw all the different variants at these people's cells in test tubes. | ||
| All of them recognize all the variants because they're really the same. | ||
| And yet in my country, I cannot leave my country, Britain. | ||
| I can't leave Britain at the moment because the borders are closed to prevent these variants moving around. | ||
| Don't you find that terrifying? | ||
| What I've just told you is the literature evidence and really good immunologists have shown there is nothing to fear from these variants. | ||
| And yet the governments everywhere are telling you you might even need additional vaccines. | ||
| So that's what I'm saying they're telling you. | ||
| Okay hang on I got to put a pin in this because I talked in preparation for your Uh, visit with us today. | ||
| I actually talked to a number of people I know in the UK and people, quite frankly, Americans, hedge fund people, etc. | ||
| that have traveled there. | ||
| Rahim, this is what I don't understand about government policy. | ||
| You got to explain it to me. | ||
| It's about these variants. | ||
| There are people that actually took the vaccine. | ||
| I said, guys, you know, you really got to be think that through. | ||
| They were vaccine hesitant, but they eventually got it because these are business people feel like they have to travel. | ||
| They're in the UK right now, in quarantine, having taken the vaccine. | ||
| And they go, yeah, yeah. | ||
| He says, well, actually, if you're here in the UK, you can't even get into the United States. | ||
| I go, well, what's the policy if you have the vaccine? | ||
| They go, well, the Tory government kind of wants to open up. | ||
| But the Labor, and particularly the BBC, every day they put another two scientists nobody's ever heard of out there and they go, it's the variants, it's all these variants. | ||
| Now Dr. Yeadon just basically told us that that dog won't hunt. | ||
| Why is BBC and why is the British government have people that have the vaccine that are now in hotels and B&Bs for a week or two Having to go through quarantine before they can go out into the British public. | ||
| And can I just add a corollary question to that as well, Dr. Yeadon? | ||
| How many deaths were there yesterday in the UK? | ||
| All right, so let me take your question first. | ||
| It was zero. | ||
| Zero. | ||
| There were zero deaths attributed to coronavirus yesterday. | ||
| But Steve, so I don't have a good answer to your question. | ||
| It makes no sense to me whatsoever. | ||
| The 50% of the population have received two vaccines, and I think 75% have had one vaccine. | ||
| And the prevalence is tiny. | ||
| I mean, look, we're in June now. | ||
| It's beautiful and sunny. | ||
| And I have absolutely no idea why people are in Quarantine, having already been vaccinated, literally makes no scientific sense. | ||
| Hang on one second, just stay right there. | ||
| Rahim, how can you govern as a hard-headed, the Tories, and particularly the sweeping victory we just had with Brexit, and now we know 20% of the people that voted to remain would now vote to leave because they understand they're getting their sovereignty back. | ||
| How can you have that movement? | ||
| And really, as we keep saying, what's happened in Europe is always about six months ahead of us. | ||
| And you're sitting there with just the most basic fundamental things, and you're not the prime reserve currency anymore. | ||
| The economy in the UK is, I think, about to collapse, given everything they've put off with jobs and everything like that. | ||
| How can you govern? | ||
| How can Boris and these people govern? | ||
| If something so basic as this, and Dr. Yeadon, an expert in the world, says, hey, honestly, I have nowhere with the idea. | ||
| Well, I don't know, but I mean, Cary Simmons absolutely believes that this is the way to go, and Cary Simmons is a great... Cary Johnson, I should say, now, who married Boris Johnson in this, you know, secret ceremony... Catholic ceremony. | ||
| Yeah, secret Catholic ceremony at Westminster Abbey a couple of days ago. | ||
| He's got a worse track record than I do. | ||
| I gotta tell you, here's the deal. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Three months ago, I did a podcast called How Carrie Simmons Will Affect the G7 Summit, right? | ||
| This last weekend, they get married in order that she can be the quote, first lady at the G7 Summit. | ||
| Another cold shot. | ||
| There are no coincidences. | ||
| Three months ago, but you want to know who's really leading the charge on a lot of the lockdown measures and all of that. | ||
| It is that, you know, don't forget, she worked for the Clinton Global Initiative. | ||
| Big time. | ||
| Totally global. | ||
| And Boris, you know, I've always said it, we've all known it, that he doesn't have the, he doesn't have the stones to stand up to the people around him. | ||
| Also the intellect. | ||
| He's never been that guy. | ||
| He's not, he's not affirmed in his, you know, confidence in his support within the parliamentary party, within the, you know, broader government. | ||
| And that's why Britain finds itself in the situation it's in. | ||
| Zero leadership. | ||
| Look at the opposition leader. | ||
| You know, Sir Keir Starmer, absolutely feckless. | ||
| Connects zero with the public and the Labour Party is offering no opposite. | ||
| Frankly, I feel like Enoch Powell at this point when I wish the Labour Party would offer some good opposition up because the country needs it and yet in both major political parties in the United Kingdom right now you have no leadership on these issues and the bureaucrats are running the show. | ||
| By the way, it's the same thing here in the United States. | ||
| You can't tell one policy from another. | ||
| They won't come forward, and they're not going to put Tony Fauci up there in the Bradley press room to walk through a senior medical advisor. | ||
| The senior medical advisor is going to return with Dr. Mike Yeadon, formerly a Pfizer, from the United Kingdom. | ||
| We'll be back in The War Room in just a second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| 30% off toppers, $29.98 for the queen-size pillow. | ||
| Throw another five bucks in, get a king-size. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Type in promo code WORM. | ||
| Action, action, action! | ||
| Dr. Yeadon, we want to thank you for being with us. | ||
| We didn't even get to vaccines and vaccine passports. | ||
| And, you know, you're one of the experts who's had Dr. Naomi Wolf on here. | ||
| It's a massive topic. | ||
| You can see the workarounds they're trying to do right now. | ||
| We want to get you back hopefully tomorrow. | ||
| We've got a special broadcast tomorrow we're going to tell everybody about in the evening show today at five o'clock. | ||
| How do people follow you, though, in the interim before you come back on the War Room? | ||
| Social media, website, how do people get to you because you're a real hero in this whole event? | ||
| Well, seriously, I haven't got a website, but if you Google my name and don't use Google, use DuckDuckGo or other search engines and you'll find loads of stuff. | ||
| You do Google, I don't seem to exist. | ||
| Yeah, funny how that works. | ||
| Funny how that works. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is funny. | |
| Dr. Yeaton, you're a hero. | ||
| We look forward to having you back, hopefully tomorrow, but we'll give everybody a heads up before you come back on. | ||
| Thank you so much, sir, for joining us. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| All right, bye-bye. | ||
| Rahim, the British policy, it puts in highlight how absurd, there's no direction, there's no body being assertive here about what actually should happen, unless you're Ron DeSantis in Florida who's doing an amazing job, because Ron comes from Yale and he's following the data, he's following the evidence, he's following the science. | ||
| They hate him for it. | ||
| By the way, Epoch Times has got a great special made from the great team over at Epoch Times on Ron DeSantis and lockdowns in Florida. | ||
| You've got to watch it. | ||
| Go over to the Epoch Times. | ||
| The great team there. | ||
| Watch everything. | ||
| I want to bring in real quickly Larry Hattu who was with us last night about You're organizing this event for Brian Colfage down in Pensacola. | ||
| We only got a couple minutes, Larry. | ||
| You did great last night. | ||
| Just walk people through the logistics. | ||
| How did they get to you? | ||
| How did they get to your Facebook page? | ||
| Where are they organized? | ||
| Where do they come to and what should they bring? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good morning, Steve. | |
| What they can do, there's the Trump supporters of Gulf Breeze. | ||
| This is where all the information is there. | ||
| But basically, just show up downtown Pensacola. | ||
| I'm going to be there at 1pm. | ||
| We have our County Commissioner, James Calkins, who's going to be there. | ||
| There's a lot of people calling me. | ||
| Uh, telling me that they're going to be there. | ||
| So basically show downtown, uh, at the federal courthouse. | ||
| Uh, that's the, uh, best way of showing support for, for Brian. | ||
| Uh, and also you, you can donate money online on this, on his, uh, on his page, uh, through that link on Facebook, uh, on the Trump supporters of Gulf Breeze. | ||
| So, show up in great numbers. | ||
| We need to show the media who we are and that our movement is still very strong. | ||
| And we're not just going to go away. | ||
| So, it's very important to show up downtown. | ||
| Not going away. | ||
| Going to fight every day. | ||
| And we're winning across the country, whether it's at school boards, whether it's on the deck plates in Arizona, whether it's at the convention in Georgia this week. | ||
| The Trump supporters of Gulf Breeze down there in the panhandle, I gotta tell ya, that is Trump country. | ||
| I couldn't be prouder of you guys. | ||
| My kid brother got his wings down in Pensacola as a Navy pilot, went back as an instructor after he came out of the fleet. | ||
| Absolutely great people. | ||
| Larry, you've done a great job. | ||
| Make sure everybody out there that has some time today, 1 o'clock, go to the federal courthouse down there. | ||
| Trump supporters of Gulf Breeze, go to the Facebook page, go to the website, go to all of it. | ||
| Larry will be guiding you into it. | ||
| James, who was the great County Commissioner, was on at the beginning of the show, jacked people up. | ||
| So Larry, thank you very much. | ||
| One last time, how do people get access to where they're supposed to go? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's on Palafox Street, downtown Pensacola, so I don't think you're going to be able to miss us because we're going to be out there with all of our MAGA gear, our Trump flags, so we're going to be very present. | |
| So it's on Palafox Street, downtown Pensacola. | ||
| We're going to be a large group, so it's very hard to miss. | ||
| If you want to have the exact address, the Trump supporters of Gulf Breeze is a great way to get all the information. | ||
| But just show up downtown and just look out for Trump flags and MAGA hats. | ||
| Remember, as Trump supported the MAGA thing, we don't leave anybody on the battlefield. | ||
| Okay, Larry, thank you so much. | ||
| Honored to be working with you guys. | ||
| Great, and good luck today. | ||
| We'll check back in. | ||
| Five o'clock today, Doug Mastriano, the great Senator from Pennsylvania, who's out doing an inspection tour, inspection tour out in Arizona. | ||
| He's talking to the people in the deck place right now. | ||
| He's already met with the Senators out there, Karen Fannin, these heroes in the Arizona Senate. | ||
| He's going to be on the show live. | ||
| I think we're going to kick off with him at five o'clock. | ||
| We're making sure he gets plenty of time to get all the information out there, but they have committed to 5 o'clock, maybe a little later. | ||
| We're going to play it by ear. | ||
| We've got that happening. | ||
| Also, Mike Lindell is going to come on today. | ||
| Bombshell news coming from Lindell. | ||
| I got to tell you, this guy is another American hero. | ||
| Raheem, the podcast yesterday was so great. | ||
| Maybe you ought to let this one breathe for a day. | ||
| I'm normally telling you to go do your podcast all the time, but this thing yesterday, you guys at the National Pulse are taking it to the next level. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, we went for a marathon, an hour and four minutes yesterday. | |
| Usually I try and keep them under 45 minutes. | ||
| We went for an hour and four minutes yesterday, Natalie and I, on the podcast. | ||
| The title of it was Fauci's Walls Closing In? | ||
| No, Crumbling Down. | ||
| And we walked through a lot of these things, the emails, everything else, the news that we've been breaking. | ||
| We're going to be breaking this other story on the NIH conference. | ||
| And the Wuhan lab and the lack of regulation, and they were boasting about the lack of regulation back in 2011. | ||
| We've got that story coming up today. | ||
| The lack of regulation at Wuhan. | ||
| The lack of regulation on, specifically, the research into the manipulation of bat coronaviruses. | ||
| Listen, this was telling you that the consulate in Wuhan, American consulate, and the embassy in Beijing sent a cable back And I think it was in 2018, in early January 2018, said, hey, we went down there. | ||
| This thing is totally unsupervised. | ||
| Totally unsupervised. | ||
| OK? | ||
| And Fauci and these guys knew that, right? | ||
| They knew this. | ||
| These guys weren't just random Foreign Service officers. | ||
| They were there for a reason. | ||
| Rahim Ghassan. | ||
| I mean, you know, Dr. Barak, what first attracted you to a total lack of transparency and accountability? | ||
| By the way, people down at the University of North Carolina in the system are taking action. | ||
| That's why the radical didn't get tenure. | ||
| You guys have got to get all over Barrick. | ||
| Another bad guy doing stuff behind the scenes. | ||
| Doing stuff he shouldn't have been doing. | ||
| Exposing, I think, people in North Carolina doing this gain-of-function experimentation. | ||
| Another rogue element's got to be looked at. | ||
| This guy is all over these emails. | ||
| He's all over this thing. | ||
| He gave all kind of big-shot interviews when it first started happening. | ||
| Then somebody said, hey, I think we ought to go quiet. | ||
| But he's being exposed by the National Pulse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll do a quick plug, shameless plug if I can. | |
| The website is fundrealnews.com. | ||
| That supports our work. | ||
| It helps us get to the bottom of these things. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know you all appreciate it and you can throw in five bucks, ten bucks. | |
| That wasn't so brazen. | ||
| We'll do it! | ||
| Five o'clock today. | ||
| We're gonna have a big announcement about tomorrow. | ||
| The show's tomorrow gonna be extraordinary. | ||
| A lot happening tomorrow. | ||
| Take down the CCP. | ||
| You're gonna see it all. | ||
| People are energized. | ||
| People are working together. | ||
| This is not a community. | ||
| It's a cadre. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| We'll see you at five o'clock today. | ||
| Explosive news. | ||
| Don't miss it. | ||
| In the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Spread the word all through Hong Kong. | |
| We will fight till they're all gone. | ||
| We rejoice when there's no more. |
Export Selection