Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
France, Australia, Canada, the U.S., Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the U.S. | ||
Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, we're so jammed for time today. | ||
No cold opens. | ||
We've got the killer elite now officially here. | ||
Dave Ramaswamy, Darren Beatty, Raheem Kassam, we're going to be joined by Lee Smith. | ||
Lee Smith has an amazing piece we're going to put up in the live chat over at Tablet Magazine, great magazine, 30 Tyrants. | ||
Absolutely brilliant. | ||
We're going to talk to Lee about this in a moment, but I want to go back to, I wanted to go with Darren. | ||
I'm going to go Rahim and then Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
Darren, just real quickly, you called this when you said about color revolutions and at first our audience was a little confused. | ||
What's he talking about? | ||
That's what happens in these other countries that we're involved in, you know, the CIA and the intelligence apparatus, the military. | ||
How does this article reinforce everything you told us, even about individuals, about a color revolution that was done here in the United States? | ||
And they brag about it. | ||
Right, no, that's a fascinating question because it certainly reinforces the dimensions of color revolution, controlling communication, controlling narrative, controlling mass protests, leveraging labor groups, and so forth. | ||
And the article itself quotes triumphant Norm Eisen, who is the hitherto unknown subject of Revolver News' coverage, which just exploded the issue of the color revolution. | ||
I think additionally, it's interesting to note that in this long expose, it's actually quite curious and instructive that the actual role of the national security establishment itself is conveniently elided, conveniently left out. | ||
unidentified
|
And so really, the full punch of the color revolution thesis is even kind of papered over here. | |
And that is that the national security establishment itself was a key participant in all of the coordination described in this piece. | ||
Well, I'm sure we're going to see that. | ||
I want to thank you so much. | ||
Revolvers does such an amazing job, and I know we're going to go over there and see the analysis, and I understand that the National Security Intelligence Apparatus, hang on a second, Darien wants to say something, is going to be in there, Raheem. | ||
Darien, I just wanted to say to you live on air, you know, there was a point in time I thought you and I had just lost it. | ||
No, I thought we had gone mad and had just, you know, gone down this thing that just wasn't true. | ||
I never did, boys. | ||
Now that I had you back, I kind of got the direction we were going, although it did seem in detail a little mad at the time. | ||
I was so concerned that maybe something was off target, and actually it was pinpoints. | ||
So credit to you, credit to all your work. | ||
And I'm going to get one of these for you as well. | ||
I think we can share this title. | ||
No, but it's important because this shows you how important Revolver and National Pulse have been in framing this narrative. | ||
Raheem Kassam, your part in this. | ||
Look, and Darren makes such a great point about the coordination. | ||
Now in this article, Molly Ball writes about how all of these different entities kind of came together by a shoestring and whatever, but actually what's really clear to me, especially in the past where she's talking about the coordination between the AFL-CIO The US Chamber of Commerce is all of this public back and forth you see between these so-called left and right organizations is actually kabuki theater. | ||
They're very happy to work with one another, they're very happy to work in Molly Ball's words as a shadow campaign so long as nobody knows. | ||
You know it actually lays out a really interesting story about how the AFL-CIO political director and the head of the US Chamber of Commerce communicated but Through a third party, and that third party shall not be named. | ||
Well, Molly, I mean, you know, do a reporter's job and report the news. | ||
That third party will, of course, be of massive interest to the public, and we'll try and run down more details on that as well. | ||
This is what I said about institutions with Rabbi Sparrow, is that you have the Chamber of Commerce supposed to represent entrepreneurs, and you've got the AFL-CIO supposed to represent Democracy off the technocrat, by the bureaucrat, for the plutocrat, shall not perish from this earth. | ||
from Revolver News. Fantastic. Dave Ramaswamy, give me again your rework of the Gettysburg Address. Very important for people to understand this. Give it to us. | ||
Democracy off the technocrat, by the bureaucrat, for the plutocrat, shall not perish from this earth. | ||
unidentified
|
How does this... | |
President Lincoln would be turning in his grave. | ||
When you first saw this, I just want to close in comments from you. | ||
What should people think about and meditate on when they read this today and see what's happened to our country? | ||
See, I think what people should meditate on is echoing some of the things Rabbi Sparrow said as well as what Darren said. | ||
One, it's like we can't allow our agency to be hijacked by intermediate principles. | ||
And, you know, that's like, essentially, the rabbi's contention. | ||
We can have a direct relationship with God, we should be able to have a direct relationship with our vote and elected officials. | ||
Right now, that's being hijacked, or there are a bunch of intermediaries. | ||
And to Darren's point, there's an asymmetric warfare underway, where the vast majority of citizens have to bear the brunt of the economic pain arising out of the pandemic. | ||
And the Managerial complex across academia, the bureaucracy and the corporate sector don't. | ||
You know, these people get to work at home and still get their salary, while the average working citizen, like a plumber, an auto mechanic, a handyman, have to lose 50 to 100% of their revenue, and they have no economic safety net. | ||
So I think going forward, the battle is between what I call the office space of America and the field space of America, and the field space needs to kind of realign and reorganize to get their agency back. | ||
And Steve, if I can conclude, we don't vote every two years or four years. | ||
I think we vote every day. | ||
We vote with our time, we vote with our attention, we vote with our wallets. | ||
So, each American citizen or each resident in America needs to decide, hey, where do I spend my time? | ||
Where do I give my attention? | ||
Where do I spend my money? | ||
So, in my life, my friends and family, I say, read the label, check the tag. | ||
If you care about American welfare and that companies here, And the employees here survive and thrive by American, you know, or by products made by the Alliance of Liberty countries. | ||
Don't support organizations and institutions that take your money and then subvert you. | ||
Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
Dave, how can people follow you on social media during the day? | ||
I'm so glad to have you back on the show. | ||
Tell us how people can follow you. | ||
No, glad to be back, Stephen Rahim. | ||
Happy to be on anytime. | ||
So, I'm on Parler. | ||
Of course, there was a temporary off connection, Dave Ramaswamy, and I'm also on Gab, Dave Ramaswamy. | ||
Brother, thank you so much. | ||
Brilliant analysis, great piece. | ||
I want to now bring in Lee Smith, another brilliant piece. | ||
Up in Tablet Magazine, a great journal. | ||
Everybody should read it. | ||
I don't agree with everything that's in Tablet, but they've got some amazing pieces. | ||
And this one absolutely blew me out of the water. | ||
I had so many people send this to me and said, hey, you're going to love this. | ||
Lee Smith, the great Lee Smith of the plot against the president. | ||
Just an amazing investigative reporter and writer. | ||
The piece is 30 Tyrants, and if we can introduce Dave and then get the piece up, or Lee Smith. | ||
Lee, walk us through your concept of the 30 Tyrants, and then what does the piece tell us? | ||
Yeah, the concept of the 30 Tyrants is this is what happened after Athens lost the Peloponnesian War to Sparta. | ||
I thought it was important to frame this so people understand there is a Historical context for what we're watching right now. | ||
And what that is, we're watching a an adversarial faction that is in charge right now, not only of the U.S. | ||
government, meaning the Biden administration, but that is in charge of the U.S. | ||
corporate, political and cultural elite. | ||
This is the anti it's the anti-democratic faction. | ||
The 30 Tyrants was the anti-democratic faction. | ||
That ran the government of Athens on behalf of Sparta, the victor in the Peloponnesian War. | ||
And that's what we're seeing right now. | ||
We're seeing the pro-China faction of the American elite, which is the vast majority of the American elite. | ||
These are the people who are now running America. | ||
It is an anti-democratic faction that is ruling, not governing the country, against the interests Of ordinary Americans. | ||
You've studied this for a long time, and of course, Molly Bald, kind of in concert with your piece, essentially comes out and says, Lee Smith's right, and let me tell you how we did it. | ||
I mean, it's pretty stunning. | ||
That's why you've got to read both of them together, because Lee gives you the historical context, and Molly gives you up in your grill. | ||
What's your analysis of the Molly piece? | ||
How it forms a foundation for your historical analysis? | ||
Yeah, well, the way that I read that piece is it says, like, here's what we did. | ||
And my piece explains and here's why they did it. | ||
Right. | ||
Because Donald Trump and the America First movement recognized what was going on. | ||
And I mean, I explain I don't even think I think that most people until the last four years have not even real did not even realize the extent to which these people are are in bed with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
And that's the major reason for the pushback. | ||
So Molly Ball explains, that article explains, well, it does two things, right? | ||
It explains what they did and rationalize it. | ||
And here's why it's a good thing. | ||
And my article explains, like, yeah, and this is why they did it. | ||
Because these people are no longer tied to the United States of America. | ||
And that's what globalism means. | ||
And that's what the pro-China faction means. | ||
That's why they did it. | ||
Lee, also in the 30 Tyrants, I think there was also a plague at that time, and didn't the 30 Tyrants ultimately put to death? | ||
Wasn't Socrates put to death at the hands of the 30 Tyrants? | ||
No, Socrates was actually saved by Critias, who was the head of the 30 Tyrants. | ||
It was afterwards, it was when the pro-democratic Athenians took over again, that Socrates was put to death, and one of the reasons appears to be Because of the influence, because of the negative influence he had over the 30 tyrants, including Critias. | ||
I mean, there's some speculation there, but there's also some sense that we, I mean, Socrates didn't want, it appears Socrates did not want the 30 tyrants to destroy Athens, but it was, that's what they mean by the phrase, corrupting Athens' youth. | ||
Their nihilism was encouraged. | ||
Talk about that for a second. | ||
How do they, particularly in this current context, because right now we've had guys, we've had a representative from North Dakota is trying to stop on a legislative basis, these executive orders being implemented in North Dakota. | ||
How is the Biden administration, like they're going to overplay their hand? | ||
How do you see the resistance building to that and the fight back that the people have to do? | ||
Well, I mean, they're moving so quickly and they're rolling through so many things. | ||
I mean, I am optimistic that they're moving so quickly. | ||
and that people will stand up and realize that there are very bad things happening here. | ||
What I don't see, however, is, and this is very distressing, I see very little preparation from our side, people preparing the ground for what they've said they're going to do. | ||
I think most dangerously now, the idea that they're going to try to redefine 74 million Americans as domestic terror, as domestic terrorists, is extremely dangerous. | ||
And I don't see anyone preparing the groundwork for that. | ||
Do we have, are there lawyers out there? | ||
Are there policy makers who are talking about that? | ||
Do we have national security establishment veterans on our side who are saying this is preposterous? | ||
We see them pushing this through NPR. | ||
We see them pushing it through the Washington Examiner even. | ||
We see him pushing it through a whole bunch of different venues. | ||
What about the national security experts from our side who are saying that this is monstrous? | ||
This is obscene. | ||
The idea of trying to turn The American intelligence services on 74 million Americans because they didn't vote for Joe Biden. | ||
So where's the preparation on on our side? | ||
Because that's going to be very important. | ||
It's not just the mistakes they're making. | ||
It's how well prepared we are. | ||
Lee, a couple things. | ||
I want to make sure people get to your social media accordance. | ||
The article is 30 Tyrants by the great Lee Smith. | ||
It's in Tablet Magazine, another journal that you should be all over all the time. | ||
How do they get to your books? | ||
How do they get you on social media? | ||
Walk us through how people keep in contact with your thinking. | ||
Yeah, the Plot Against the President and Permanent Coup, I mean, they're both available at independent booksellers, both published by Center Street Books. | ||
You can order them directly from Center Street Books and there's all sorts of places where they can be ordered online. | ||
I also want to mention, I believe that you had her on the show, but the producer and director of the documentary version of Plot Against the President, Amanda Milius, I'm very I'm very happy that her movie has gotten all the attention it has. | ||
It's a huge honor that they made a movie. | ||
And she's an amazing filmmaker, like her father. | ||
Okay, we're going to take a short break. | ||
Lee Smith, thank you very much. | ||
30 Tyrants. | ||
We're going to turn action happening in London. | ||
and we're gonna come right back to it. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room, Pandemic, with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
What a day. | ||
Do we have any in the live chat? | ||
I'm not getting my normal feedback in real time, but this is a very important day. | ||
The cover story in Time Magazine lays it all out, how the election was essentially stolen. | ||
It's the big steal. | ||
They lay it out right there, right in your grill. | ||
And they've got a sign, they've got a great collage, artwork. | ||
At the top of the story. | ||
It's actually very beautifully put together. | ||
But they've got right in the middle, it's a rendering of real photographs, then done in color and like art. | ||
Very powerful. | ||
But right in the middle of it, they've got a young person holding up a sign, let all votes, or count all votes. | ||
We understand that's the bid and the ask. | ||
Theirs is count all votes, ours is count all legal votes, all certifiable votes, all chain of title votes. | ||
That's the difference. | ||
That's the bid and the ask, as we would say on Wall Street. | ||
That is what has to be argued next week in the well of the Senate. | ||
We know what the ask is. | ||
They're going to come out. | ||
You know, we've got to put up the bid. | ||
Right. | ||
So they've got we've got the receipts for all legal votes, certifiable votes. | ||
And then you've got to read Lee Smith's piece, which gives you the historical subtext of the 30 tyrants, which puts into exactly how the Biden as Rahim Kassam would call it regime is running in that 30 times was a regime. | ||
And Lee Smith ties it back to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
Mike Lindell, very controversial film running on one America. | ||
They've already slapped a disclaimer on it, right? As it runs. | ||
Mike Lindell will try to get Mike Lindell on here before the show ends to talk about why he made the film, how he made the film. | ||
We've reached out to the Dominion guys. | ||
We want to hear their reaction to the film because this looks like, you know, he's throwing napalm on the fire. | ||
But I want to go back to this piece where he, particularly National Pulse and Revolver.News, Really, we're on this. | ||
I think in July, in the July time frame, July-August, I think it was mid-July, you guys started getting on here, started talking about color revolutions, you were deconstructing it, the great Natalie Winters, our newest piece of this. | ||
I want to go back to you for a reset on that. | ||
Before we go to the United Kingdom, you've got another major story. | ||
We're going to have Dr. Ming from GTV London is going to be on to join us. | ||
Walk us through the reset so we can close up about the Time Magazine piece. | ||
And I want this audience as well to remember to make sure that they are not just in the live chats on whether it's on Telegram or the America's Voice website and all that I get you know that the instant gratification of all of this but the the wider job of this audience is to share this out with more people make sure you are subscribed across all platforms because again and again whether it's | ||
The Wuhan P4 Lab, whether it's the Transition Integrity Project, whether it's the CGTN stuff that we're about to discuss with Natalie Winters, we are telling you the news six months to a year in advance, and I want other people to get the benefit of what's coming out of this war room right now as well, so make sure you are subscribed and are sharing, critically, sharing every single thing. | ||
I want to say how important this audience is. | ||
Roberta at 11.15, the final live chat is being fed to me. | ||
Well, this article proves what Trump did and said is right. | ||
They should hand out, at the beginning of the trial next week, a copy of Time Magazine to every senator. | ||
Amen. | ||
That's brilliant. | ||
They should hand them Peter Navarro's The Immaculate Deception and his new combined copy with Cortez's introduction and Time Magazine. | ||
Mitt Romney, just read it before you start trashing the deplorables. | ||
Read it before you start trashing what President Trump stood for. | ||
Let's bring Natalie in quickly because she was a big driver of this, particularly of a lot of the investigative reporting and analysis you guys did. | ||
Yeah, Natalie, on this specific thing, which is Ian Bassett, and Ian Bassett gets a very early mention in this Time magazine piece, just remind the audience, Ian Bassett, I think we reported on October, who was he and what role did he play in all of this? | ||
Sure, so Ian Bassin is part of the Protect Democracy Project. | ||
He founded that group, which is comprised of majority Obama administration alums. | ||
Really, it's a secret cabal of former people who've worked in the Obama administration, who've since day one of the Trump administration worked to undermine his presidency. | ||
They can be tied to the Russia collusion hoax. | ||
Tied to impeachment, tied to whistleblowers. | ||
The list goes on, and interestingly enough, as you say, within the first few paragraphs, Ian Bassin is mentioned by name in this 6,500 word Time article, and they've identified him as one of the key architects and key players in really the subversion of the 2020 election, ensuring that mail-in ballots would proliferate amongst the country, that George Floyd's death would be weaponized and politicized, that tech and social media censorship would be used explicitly against conservatives, | ||
and most critically, that big business and labor would partner together, they'd fuse together to ensure a victory for Joe Biden. | ||
Do you know I just went back and I look at you guys I gotta tell you Natalie this is why I say you're absolutely brilliant You're one of the top, if not the top in your generation, of not just getting it, but doing the work. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen... The gold standard. | ||
The gold standard. | ||
I'm telling you, what Revolver and National Pulse did on this months ago, and laid it out before the nation, that this is going to happen, and now it's been codified, memorialized in Molly Balls, and I've got to say, it's a great piece in Time Magazine. | ||
It must be read. | ||
Darren Beatty has laid it out. | ||
If we want to take this country back and the fight for this republic is all identified now, it's all becoming clear, we're having a moment of clarity, right? | ||
Which happens in fourth turnings, right? | ||
And you can see in the definition of this and what's been on National Pulse and Revolver and really Lee Smith's 30 Tyrants, We're going to be one thing or the other on the other side of this fourth turning. | ||
We're either going to be the republic that was bequeathed to us from, what, 12, 13, 14 generations, or we're going to be this. | ||
We're going to be this. | ||
And it couldn't be clearer now, Mr. Rahim. | ||
Right. | ||
No, that's exactly right. | ||
Or we're going to be a civilization, and in America's case, a nation whose elections are decided by the AFL-CIO and the U.S. | ||
Chamber of Commerce. | ||
unidentified
|
Right? | |
That's what this article actually comes down to. | ||
And all of these other players around it, Ian Bassin and Norm Eisen, yes, they are critical to how this happens, but the infrastructure that they're trying to build... If those institutions represented, if they really represented the deplorables, the working class people, and if the Chamber of Commerce actually represent the entrepreneur spirit, you might be able to even get away with the institutions doing that. | ||
The problem is they're part of the globalist system, right? | ||
They don't represent that. | ||
That is the key point. | ||
That is what this fight's about. | ||
That's why we had Rabbi Sparrow with us about the individual lead this off, and our rights have come directly from God with no intermediary. | ||
This is the whole concept of human agency. | ||
Your agency is being taken from you. | ||
That is the fight of the next hundred years, right? | ||
But you can't put it off. | ||
It's got to be confronted today, Mr. Rahim Kassam. | ||
Yeah, rights that come from God without the requirement of the AFL-CIO to tick the box. | ||
And what, the guy that makes $8 million a year over the Chamber of Commerce? | ||
My headline, August the 3rd, 2020, was exclusive. | ||
Soros-Gates linked election integrity group falsifies bipartisan claims while wargaming how Biden could seize power even if Trump wins. | ||
It sees power, even if Trump wins. | ||
That's what the trial is about next week. | ||
Sean Hannity, love you. | ||
You're a great guy. | ||
You're dead wrong in this. | ||
Fox is playing the McConnell-Lindsey Graham game. | ||
It's not going to work. | ||
We're going to get blown out on this. | ||
No, he's not going to be found guilty. | ||
It's a free option. | ||
He can't be found guilty. | ||
Senators already said it's unconstitutional. | ||
We got that part. | ||
That part's over. | ||
Go to where's the beef? | ||
Okay, Natalie. | ||
By the way, people are fighting back in the United Kingdom. | ||
A major development over there about the CCP and the information war being run against the Judeo-Christian West. | ||
Natalie Winters, what is going on? | ||
Well, it's no secret that the Chinese Communist Party relies on media outlets like CGTN, China Daily, the Global Times to spread propaganda, attack President Trump, attack the West, attack democracy. | ||
But the United Kingdom actually took a fight, took a step against that in restricting the broadcasting license of China Global Television Network, which really is the paramount Chinese Communist Party-backed media outlet within the landscape of state-run media outlets in | ||
So the Ofcom, which is the Office of Communications, as I said, is the British government's top regulator against media outlets, revoked the broadcasting license, which for CGTN, it's held by a company called China Star Media. | ||
So this is not specifically tied to CGTN. | ||
It just holds the broadcasting license. | ||
Months long review, Ofcom decided to revoke this broadcasting license for two main reasons. | ||
One, that China Star Media didn't have any, quote, editorial control over CGTN, and therefore CGTN, if it were to acquire and kind of in-house own the broadcasting license, that that would violate UK law, and that CGTN is ultimately owned, run, administrated, and funded by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
And I think that there's one interesting takeaway from this with regards to China Star Media, and it really is that All roads lead to Article 7 of China's National Intelligence Law in the sense that any privately owned company in China, which China Star Media purports to be, can at any moment be requisitioned by the Chinese Communist Party to help fulfill and accomplish the goals of the state in a secret manner. | ||
And they have to oblige with whatever the Chinese Communist Party demands that they do. | ||
And I think that that is what you're seeing here. | ||
with CGTN that this media company had no editorial control over CGTN because at the end of the day what the Chinese Communist Party wanted to produce on the network was what was shown. | ||
Okay, I want to, Natalie, if you please hold. | ||
We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
We'll bring Dr. Ming in, live from the United Kingdom. | ||
She runs, she's got a show on GTV, the international network of Miles Guo and for the diaspora, diaspora of the Chinese people. | ||
A voice of freedom. | ||
We're going to have her comments on this. | ||
Everybody's got to go up, you got to get the Time Magazine article, at least miss 30 tyrants. | ||
There's an explosive documentary right now that's playing on One American News. | ||
I think it's going to play in a loop for the next couple of days and we're going to have, hopefully if we can How do I say this? | ||
The ultimate honey badger, Mike Lindell. | ||
They've been sued all over the place. | ||
He's got Dominion up in his grill. | ||
He just more than tripled down, throwing napalm all on this. | ||
We're going to try to get Mike Lindell on the show and actually explain to us Why he did this, given all the lawsuits, who he pulled together, what's the thesis of it, and we've reached out to the Dominion guys. | ||
We want to make sure the Dominion people get a full opportunity to answer, because it's pretty explosive. | ||
They're making this as much more, not so much about the machine so much, or the software, as about the Chinese Communist Party and what the CCP and China did in our election. | ||
Okay, short commercial break. | ||
We're in turn with Natalie Winters and Dr. Ming from GTV. | ||
Rahim Ghassan, Stephen K. Bennett in the War Room. | ||
Hopefully get Mike Lindell also. | ||
unidentified
|
All next, War Room Pandemic. | |
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, very – another crazy day here in the world. | ||
We've got One America News is playing in a loop I think. | ||
They're playing Michael and Dale's new film. | ||
Was it Absolute Proof? | ||
I think it's Absolute Proof. | ||
Already pretty controversial. | ||
It supposedly says that the villain here is actually – The Chinese Communist Party and China's had a direct influence and Director of National Intelligence said China had a role in the 2020 election. | ||
Of course, that's been buried in the one of the I think Mike told a religious network last night in the middle of the night. | ||
He was doing this film and they quoted Barr. | ||
One I think was Huffington Post or maybe I shouldn't disparage Huffington Post. | ||
One of the news sites came out. | ||
And said there's been no, in fact it was categorized, there's been no direction towards China in the election. | ||
I said well hang on, the DNI that by executive order owes the President of the United States 45 days after the election report, that was delayed. | ||
Up until the last days of the administration, in fact, I think it was the Friday before the inauguration, the last week in the administration, Radcliffe delivered the DNI report and said it had been kind of suppressed by activity over the CIA, didn't want to come forward. | ||
And he sat in there, talked about involvement of the Chinese Communist Party in the 2020 election. | ||
Now, a lot of people were heamed, jumped in and said, oh, that's the Wu Mao 50 cent army and different social media, things that we've been following and been attacking us nonstop. | ||
And remember, you know, I'm sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party, directly sanctioned as an individual. | ||
Four minutes into the Biden administration, four minutes afternoon, you know, 12 or 4 p.m. on. | ||
on Inauguration Day, they sanctioned, I think, 28 individuals, including Matt Pottinger, Peter Navarro, Mike Pompeo and myself. | ||
And I've been out of the administration since August of 2017. | ||
And I take pride in I was one of the architects that worked for President Trump that came up with the plan to confront the Chinese Communist Party across a broad range of activity. | ||
And quite frankly, my knowledge of the detail of the Chinese Communist Party and how insidious they are and how infiltrated they are into the West came from the great Miles Guo, which people say, that's crazy. | ||
Miles Guo is always saying bad stuff about the Chinese Communist Party and Wall Street and the city of London and all that. | ||
Turns out, Miles Guo, everything he's told has turned out to be correct. | ||
Right? | ||
H&A is now in bankruptcy. | ||
You know, all the infiltration. | ||
He was the first one to talk about, was it the CGTN? | ||
About it being a propaganda arm of CCTV and it was out there to make the West to start to information warfare on the West. | ||
British government today or yesterday pulls the plug on the on the broadcast rights. | ||
Now, Rahim's of the opinion that actually could make them more powerful, because now it takes them off of the requirements of broadcasting, but at least they're not up on TV. | ||
Regulation. | ||
One of the most brilliant people I've met, Dr. Ming, I want to bring her in now, she's got a show on GTV out of London, absolutely brilliant. | ||
I do an exclusive interview with her and her team every Wednesday, and I've got to tell you, they ask better questions I get from the media here or the media overseas. | ||
Detailed, analytical questions that demand smart responses. | ||
And every week I go on there on Wednesday, I got to be on my game. | ||
I actually make sure I study up before I go on because the show's live. | ||
Dr. Ming, you're very familiar with the propaganda arm of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
You're one of the freedom fighters. | ||
On the diaspora, throughout the world, of the great Chinese people that have left mainland China are fighting with the new federal state, the whistleblower movement, Miles Guo, GTV, GNews, all of it, to fight to bring the truth, not just to the Chinese people overseas, but to the West, and to warn the West of what's going on. | ||
And this thing of GTV, and people should understand, this was looked at as the BBC of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
That's why I was in London. | ||
And by the way, it is staffed Rahim, as you know, by many former high rollers of BBC and other major British broadcasters, and they're paying these guys top dollar, and the facilities are top class. | ||
They have not spared a penny. | ||
They understand the power of information warfare. | ||
And we've still got to get to the bottom. | ||
I'm not saying Mike Lindell's solved the equation. | ||
We don't know. | ||
Remember, I'm still a guy who says, hey, I think it's going to take years of investigation of the apparatus of Dominion. | ||
And clearly Dominion is not shy about it. | ||
They're suing Fox News for $2.7 billion. | ||
And that's the smart lawyers over there. | ||
I'm no Murdoch fan, but his lawyers... Remember, The Hard Drive from Hell was released by the New York Post. | ||
Why? | ||
It's owned by Rupert Murdoch. | ||
He's got very tough lawyers. | ||
He knows how to take potential lawsuits. | ||
As Raheem Kassam pointed out yesterday, not one thing has been challenged that came out of The Hard Drive from Hell. | ||
That's the quality of work that was done by the Murdoch team. | ||
But here you've got the Chinese all over the place, and now the British government has pulled the broadcast license, which in England is a massive deal. | ||
Huge humiliation for CGTN, which is the BBC, the essentially international broadcast arm of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
Dr. Ming, how big a deal is this, and what should the West be warned about this insidious propaganda arm of the Chinese Communist Party? | ||
unidentified
|
Hello, hello, Mr. Bannon. | |
Can you hear me? | ||
Yeah, I can hear you perfectly. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, of course. | |
Yeah, that is that that is very significant. | ||
And I think this is could be considered as a landmark of the regulatory progress against the Communist Party in the UK. | ||
And and we have been aware that the CCP's propaganda apparatus is very powerful. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And actually, CCP considers propaganda is one of the obvious vital weapons against the West, against the democracy. | ||
And the one is propaganda. | ||
The other one is the is the military weapon. | ||
So as long as it holds the military weapon, as long as it holds, take control of the propaganda, it can win. | ||
It has won that in the Chinese civil war in the 1940s. | ||
And now it has won And one say like it has one, it has one getting successful to achieve its goal to dominate the world, of course, to beat the USA and beat the Western democracies. | ||
So this is a very, very significant. | ||
I consider it's a regulatory success for the US, UK government. | ||
So the UK government has been very, very appeasing to Beijing. | ||
It has been very, extremely soft. | ||
And but this is a really good sign and applaud for that. | ||
And I also feel very pleased that days ago, the House of Lords have also stood up to make an amendment to the Boris Johnson's post Brexit trade bill to say that the UK should be stopped from making deals with countries that abuse human rights. | ||
Particularly the Chinese Communist regime, that is also grateful. | ||
And hopefully, yeah, and the House of Commons will also get this amendment passed. | ||
So and that's a great achievement. | ||
And we prove that. | ||
And I think that's really a great step to combat the CCP. | ||
And also, I would like to see that Biden administration To be tough as well and take the right actions against the CCP. | ||
And I really listened to his foreign policies, especially I pay special attention to his policy of China. | ||
I feel very disappointed because it's really it's it's unbelievably and it's dangerously soft. | ||
I think it's really too vague to be workable, and it's too general to be effective and efficient. | ||
So, and yeah, that's really terrible. | ||
Hang on, Dr. Ming, I want to slow you down for a second. | ||
I just got this question. | ||
You said the UK, up to they got tough with CGTN and pulled the broadcast license, particularly in the trade deal, they hadn't really made human rights, and particularly against CCP, an integral part of it. | ||
It was actually Lourdes, which is so stunning, stood up and said, hey, this thing's got to be rethought. | ||
But you used the word soft and appeasing up until now. | ||
I want to ask you, I want to go back to the Biden speech. | ||
You've seen the confrontation that the Trump administration, in fact 28 of us, myself included, Peter Navarro, Matt Pottinger, Mike Pompeo, the people at the cutting edge of this, and Pompeo was on Maria yesterday, said we wear this as a badge of honor. | ||
Look, I'm sanctioned personally by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
It is one of the great achievements of my life to do that. | ||
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
as I stand and fight for Lao Bajing every day. | ||
But from a Chinese perspective, and also you've been in the UK, you're a major part of GTV, you've got a huge show over there. | ||
When you heard Biden's speech that had one line, I think, about China in there, when you talk about soft and appeasement, what was your immediate reaction when you heard the Biden speech? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I think our impression, okay, I just to say, I have three major impressions. | |
First of all, of course, it's dangerously soft. | ||
Let me explain that. | ||
So by dangerously soft, I mean that it's not right for Biden administration to define the Chinese regime as a serious competitor, most serious competitor. | ||
No, it's not a competitor. | ||
It's an enemy. | ||
You see, this is a regime that has committed genocide. | ||
It has committed anti-humanity crimes. | ||
It has violated international laws. | ||
It has endangered American national and private securities. | ||
It has committed IP theft of the American most advanced technology. | ||
So you can't really consider such a regime as your competitor. | ||
And also, that's exactly what the CCP desires. | ||
The CCP has made it very plain clear that the USA, the democratic systems and the CCP regime are simply fundamentally different. | ||
They are enemies. | ||
They must have conflict and they have prepared for decades for this. | ||
So if the Biden administration just views the How do people get to your show? | ||
How can they find your show on GTV? | ||
What time does it play over in the UK? | ||
loser and the CCP would win. That would be totally against the Americans' interest. I'm sorry for that. Yeah. | ||
Dr. Ming, how do people, how do people, we've got to jump on, how do people get to your, how do people get to your show? How can they find your show on GTV? What time does it play over in the UK? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. And we have actually programs in both Mandarin Chinese and English. And you can just go to GTV and find UK, GTV UK 1 and GTV UK 2. | |
And we also have a Himalaya Hawk station and the Go Library. | ||
So you can find us and there are programs in that. | ||
So are you up? | ||
Are you up? | ||
Are you up? | ||
Are you up on social media? | ||
Can people follow you on any of the social media? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, I think the Himalaya UK still has Twitter account, and also on Parler as well, but my Google library was shut down. | |
And also, yeah, we have our channels on YouTube as well. | ||
I'm so surprised. | ||
Yes, yes, they shut down because we have interviewed you, and we can't do live because YouTube gave us warnings and said, if you do that again, next time we will suspend your channel permanently. | ||
So we can't do that. | ||
We can only post videos. | ||
So that's the dominant shows how the big tech dominate abuse, how the big tech dominates its abuses dominance of the of the market. | ||
So this is really ridiculous. | ||
Dr. Ming, we've got to jump. | ||
I want to thank you. | ||
We're going to have you back on next week. | ||
Powerful, powerful statement about the Biden administration. | ||
Dangerous people. | ||
And she nailed it. | ||
Jake Sullivan came up into the Brady Room the other day and said, oh, what are we really going to be? | ||
Are we going to be a competitor? | ||
That is what Schmidt, that's what all these tech oligarchs, that's totally phony. | ||
Of course we're innovative. | ||
and competitive nation. The most innovative, most competitive on earth. | ||
That's not what this is about. Dr. Mainz has got to lay it out and say, hey, these guys are your mortal enemies. It's not about competing. | ||
We're not going to compete with Nazi Germany. What was Biden's speech called yesterday? | ||
Remarks by President Biden on America's place in the world. | ||
Okay. Your place. | ||
Know your place. | ||
Know your place. | ||
We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
The one, the only, Mike Lindell. | ||
The world's blown up right now. | ||
His new film, Absolute, was it Absolute Truth? | ||
Absolute Truth is now playing in a loop on One America News. | ||
We're going to have an interview with Mike Lindell as soon as we return after a short commercial break. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Dr. Ming from London tells us it's not about competition, it's about the Chinese Communist Party being the existential threat, the existential enemy of the Chinese people, of the American people, and of all mankind. | ||
We've seen this from the CCP virus that came out of Wuhan lab. | ||
We're now joined It looks like from a very exclusive club in somewhere in Palm Beach, Florida, been up all night, the great Mike Lindell. | ||
Mike Lindell has made a film, it looks like a two-hour movie, that's playing in a loop on One American News. | ||
I think it's up on Gab TV. | ||
It's called Absolute Proof. | ||
Mike, here's the first question. | ||
I'm going to get to the Chinese Communist Party in a second because I understand this film is very centric on CCP's involvement in the 2020 election. | ||
As the Director of National Intelligence, Radcliffe warned the nation and warned the President in mid-January of this year. | ||
But I want to go to, look, Dominion has called your guys bluff. | ||
They're suing Fox, which is Murdoch, with those tough lawyers over there. | ||
They're suing all operations. | ||
I think you've gotten letters or you're involved in naming these suits. | ||
This doesn't double down. | ||
It triples down to the 10th power. | ||
Throwing down on what they've said. | ||
Your movie absolute proof. | ||
You don't leave any questions about this. | ||
Why have you reached out to the Dominion executives and have you told them, hey, I am prepared to show you this film. | ||
I'm here to hear these questions. | ||
And why would you throw napalm on a burning brush fire and do it this weekend before the trial next week of President Trump? | ||
Well, the first question is, no, I don't respond to Dominion other than yes, please sue me. | ||
They sent me a letter yesterday because they heard about this documentary. | ||
They sent me an email. | ||
It wasn't from lawyers. | ||
It was from them going, Mike, look at all these people that we have here. | ||
They're all discredited. | ||
Well, the people I have in this are all people that weren't on that list. | ||
So, this is all the new evidence I've been telling everybody about. | ||
This is what they're so afraid of, Steve. | ||
Just today when this launched this morning, we've had over a million people view it and it's been taken down on It's been taken down. | ||
Other two sides crash it. | ||
They're trying to attack it from every angle. | ||
You know what? | ||
If Dominion and Smartmatic, don't forget Smartmatic, they're right in there. | ||
I think they're the ones that went after Fox. | ||
They're not coming after me because they know this movie's out. | ||
So, you know, I invite you guys, Dominion and that. | ||
Come on, let's talk about, you know, show me what's wrong in this video because it's 100% proof. | ||
Okay, okay, hang on, hang on. | ||
I just want to slow down. | ||
You're saying all the people like the Patrick Burns, all these people have been discredited as being, you know, not having facts, etc. | ||
They're not in the film. | ||
You got a new cast of characters, experts, subject matter experts, but I just want to make sure this is clear. | ||
You're prepared to sit down and we could do it live. | ||
You're prepared to sit down with the Minion executives and their lawyers, have them go through this film with you live and tell you where you're defaming them, tell them where you're misrepresenting, tell them where you're just dead factually wrong. | ||
Is that what I'm hearing? | ||
Well yeah because you won't but I'm inviting them to they could come they could come uh I'll go on national tv with them and we'll go we'll go right down what I got you know what I put out in this uh documentary Steve is like one one thousandth of behalf it's 100 proof it was any car to lie you hold up here it is and they're gonna go oh we have video of them we have video of their ceo and their and their I want to do it for this election. It's in the video, so I | ||
don't think they'll show up But look whether they sharp or not is their decision They've already sued, I think, in federal courts all over the place. | ||
But I just want to make clear, you're that confident that you've got a new set of subject matter experts, and you tie this back to actually the CCP being involved in this, that you're that confident in what you're putting forward. | ||
Because you've told them before, you've got nothing and I'm going to get discovery. | ||
I just want to make sure, you're that confident that what people are going to see is absolute proof and it's only one one-hundredth of what you've got. | ||
That on a live show you would invite the executives of Dominion and their lawyers to challenge you frame by frame and that you could back up what you've got and you would take on any questions they have about how you defamed them and how you're essentially lying about them. | ||
Is that what I'm hearing? | ||
Well, first of all, you're not defaming or lying about anything that's not true. | ||
You know what? | ||
That is true. | ||
I will bring him on. | ||
I will do anything. | ||
All of them. | ||
The reason they're suppressing this and the reason they haven't sued me, by the way, a lot of those lawsuits are lies. | ||
They put it out there to scare networks, not to talk about it. | ||
OK, that's what they're doing, Steve. | ||
And it isn't just a different cast of experts. | ||
It's the evidence, the hard evidence in this In this documentary, these are the facts. | ||
There's nothing subjective. | ||
There's no subjectivity. | ||
It's all, here's the facts. | ||
Here's what happened on the first, second, third, fourth. | ||
Here's what happened each day, a print of what happened. | ||
So yeah, Dominion, Smartmatic, both of you, come on. | ||
Could we please include Smartmatic so they can sue me too? | ||
Sure, sure. | ||
Okay, we only got two minutes. | ||
I want to make sure that, how do people, you're saying it's being pulled down all over the place. | ||
I think One America's got it up, but One America has put a logo at the bottom about how they had nothing to do with it. | ||
They sold you the time. | ||
I think it's on Gab. | ||
How can people, you got two minutes, how can people see this and particularly how can the Dominion people see it so they can come back if they want and challenge you? | ||
How can people get access to this? | ||
Like you say, it's on OAN. | ||
It's going to be almost 24-7. | ||
You can go to michaeljlandell.com, michaeljlandell.com, or Google my name, or Google Absolute Proof. | ||
It all comes to that site, and we keep taking stuff down, and we keep putting it up. | ||
We pretty much got it now where you're going to be able to watch it. | ||
After we got through this morning, their big onslaught of attack. | ||
So, MichaelJLendale.com, Google it. | ||
People are putting it up everywhere, though, on social media now, so you shouldn't have any problem. | ||
And I want to say something. | ||
OAN, OAN just sold me that time, and here they took their Twitter down yesterday. | ||
I just got it, I got it from their, I heard it from one of their people. | ||
For no reason, they hadn't even posted anything. | ||
Dominion knew this was coming, or somebody did, and took their Twitter down. | ||
Jack Dorsey, you're the next one we'll talk about in the next documentary. | ||
Okay, one last thing, but no executive, they sent you a letter yesterday, we only got a minute left, no executive of Dominion has reached out to you today. | ||
This started playing on One America at 10 o'clock when our show came on. | ||
When we get off, it's on One America, running in a loop, it's on GabTV, it's other places. | ||
That's right, that's right. | ||
I would love them to come on. | ||
Let's do it. | ||
We should do it on your show, Steven. | ||
I'm open to any time. | ||
you've now put in this, what you say you've show nothing but evidence, you can back it up and you would have them come on live and actually deconstruct the film in front of the world. | ||
They have not reached out to you yet, correct? | ||
That's right, that's right. | ||
I would love them to come on, let's do it. | ||
We should do it on your show, Steven. | ||
I'm open to any time, let's get them on. | ||
We would welcome, in fact we've reached out to the many guys. | ||
I think Michael Stills is a new spokesman. | ||
We want to do this. | ||
I think it's one of the reasons, a way to put it to bed. | ||
Have Dominion. | ||
Come back and challenge. | ||
And by the way, take it apart. | ||
That's what the democracy is about. | ||
If you think Mike Lindell's a liar, if you think he's a crank, if you think he's a kook, then come on and let's do it live and let's go through it. | ||
I think it'd be fascinating. | ||
I think a billion people watch it. | ||
Mike, we've got to jump. | ||
You're doing God's work. | ||
I mean, unbelievable. | ||
Mike Lindell, ultimate honey badger. | ||
You got the podcast. | ||
The NationalPulse.com forward slash podcast. |