Feb. 2, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, it is Groundhog Day, the 2nd of February, the year of our Lord, 2021. | ||
| We're on a snowy and cold and gray Capitol Hill. | ||
| Still military occupation. | ||
| Raheem Kassam, looks like you're hot on the trigger or something? | ||
| Lots of things. | ||
| But just to riff off that for a second, it still irks me deeply that it's 20-watt degrees outside, snowing, and we've still got National Guard members having to stand outside in the freezing cold, night after night after night. | ||
| I just think it's a disgrace. | ||
| It's a disgrace. | ||
| I've talked to some of the governors, they're demanding to hear, they want to hear the intelligence. | ||
| Why are there still National Guard troops here in Washington, D.C.? ? | ||
| I want to turn now back to, by the way, we've got so much to go through this hour. | ||
| The White House right now is talking about Burma. | ||
| We've got Pasovic. | ||
| We've got Dr. Thayer from University of Texas, San Antonio. | ||
| The China expert. | ||
| We've got Natalie Winters going to talk about Jake Sullivan and guys, their ties to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| His National Security Advisor that'll be one of the guys making this announcement. | ||
| And others, the Belford Center up there at Harvard about the involvement of the CCP and all of this. | ||
| Okay, we're going to turn now to Matt. | ||
| So Matt, you've nailed it. | ||
| I think it's a great term. | ||
| Right now we're fighting an asymmetric war. | ||
| That is an absolutely brilliant way to frame this. | ||
| They're coming with everything, with the kitchen sink. | ||
| And I think some of this is triggered, Raheem, by what the National Pulse did on putting together the actual timeline until you guys did it and the New York Times confirmed it. | ||
| Nobody really realized that, hey, this thing had been, so a lot of this was pre-planned. | ||
| 1.1 million views on that page, on that story alone. | ||
| On that story. | ||
| That, and that I think also triggered, hey, they have to broaden it. | ||
| They got to go back to November 4th. | ||
| They're going to make their case. | ||
| They got to, they just can't do it that day, which they wanted to do. | ||
| They had to broaden it out. | ||
| Brainerd's nailed it. | ||
| It's asymmetric warfare. | ||
| They're coming with everything. | ||
| And we've got in the live chat now, we're putting up on the sites the actual complaint. | ||
| Please just don't read the political stories. | ||
| You've got to read the complaint. | ||
| Go to the receipts and read this and embrace it. | ||
| Matt, I want to talk about also that day you actually came to us with, I think, a very interesting concept. | ||
| Walk through what your problem is with how this is being played out now. | ||
| And I got to tell you, I want to get what you have to say out today because it's going to get so emotional over the next week as you're in when the trial starts because the Democrats are coming in with an emotional argument. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Well, the letter I wrote to the Attorney General and the Director of the FBI is asking them to drop their charges against nonviolent protesters who were at the Capitol. | ||
| I think the case is very clear legally that the vast majority of the people have so far been arrested and are being targeted, as many as 800. | ||
| Okay, but the Democrats right now, in the impeachment trial, Matt, they're calling them not protesters, certainly not peaceful, they're calling them insurrectionists. | ||
| And that President Trump goaded and basically fired up insurrectionists with his 77 days of, first off, his violent language over his entire political career, then his 77 days of the big lie that got him worked up, and that day at the Ellipse, This whole thing of getting them worked up more. | ||
| So are they insurrectionists or are they peaceful protesters? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're peaceful protesters by and large. | |
| Overwhelmingly peaceful protesters who thought even entering the Capitol was an extension of the peaceful protest happening outside because they saw police officers opening the doors and gates for them. | ||
| I don't know what kind of insurrection you could have in this country where we're swimming in rifles and firearms and an attempt at an insurrection where you've got Peaceful protesters completely unarmed. | ||
| What kind of insurrection is that to happen in the United States? | ||
| Where, you know, I imagine that almost everybody protesting there probably has a firearm that they left at home because they came for a peaceful rally, a peaceful protest, with no intent to cause trouble. | ||
| In fact, I got an email today from somebody who's not yet been arrested by the FBI, but is terrified, saying that they were outside and they saw that people with ropes, Antifa, were going to go into the building and pull down statues and say, you know, let's tear this down and that compelled him to go in to try to defend the Capitol building from this destruction and they raised the issue to the police that were there and there was no response. | ||
| So I think that overwhelmingly the number of people who have been picked up by the FBI and have the numbers, 142 of them have been charged with not violence or not destruction of property but merely being in the wrong place at the wrong time. | ||
| And remember, these charges require... Hold on, hold on. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| That 142, the charge in 142 is what? | ||
| Entering property without permission? | ||
| Is that the charge they've been charged with? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Exactly. | |
| And that's all they're charged with. | ||
| Not with violence or assaulting police officers, but basically walking through an open door of a public building. | ||
| And it's important to note that. | ||
| Matt, you do understand, you're going to get, because the left, in this charging document, or what they're pointing forward, you're trying to narrow it down to the people that were violent, the people that got out of control, and you're saying, hey, the other 42, or the 600 or 700 they're looking at, you're all going to see that it's just going past the bicycle racks and they thought the cops were letting them in. | ||
| And they stayed inside the ropes inside. | ||
| The left is brought out to say, hey look, if you're a MAGA supporter, if you're a Trump supporter, if you've worn a red hat or ever gone to a Trump rally, you're part of this insurrection. | ||
| If you ever went to a rally, if you ever talked to your friends about, hey I think this is illegal, if you ever put a Facebook post up or said anything, if you're ever taken down by Twitter, you're actually an insurrectionist. | ||
| Right? | ||
| You're going to a definition of the criminal code and criminality. | ||
| They're sitting there going, hey Matt, asymmetric this dude. | ||
| Of the 74 million people who voted for Trump, there's at least 50 million insurrectionists. | ||
| And they're guilty of treason, because insurrection is treason, and you know, and Brainerd, you're one of the worst guys, because you went around and came up with all this data, all this phony data and everything like that, and misled these people, so you're one of the head insurrectionists, arguing for a narrow definition of the criminality of the worst insurrectionists, and your argument is, hey, they could have all brought guns, but gosh, they left their guns home, so how can you charge them with being violent? | ||
| What say you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the overwhelming majority of the people who were at the Capitol were completely peaceful. | |
| And here's what I actually, what I have to say is kind of a question, because I've got, you're helping us raise the issue of these people being overcharged, given that, you know, this happened repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings where senators were intimidated, the buildings of the Capitol were stormed over and over again to prevent his confirmation. | ||
| And yet those people walked away with at worst a fine of $50. | ||
| or President Trump's inauguration where the riots destroyed property, six police officers were assaulted, and yet over 200 individuals who were charged with real violence had those charges dropped. | ||
| So here's really my question. I do want to ask this question. | ||
| You're kind of— You're asking in fairness, but hang on, hang on a second. | ||
| I understand that. | ||
| It's like Hannity arguing in his thing, oh we ought to get, you know, Walters up there and all these people and Democrats. | ||
| I said this. | ||
| It's not relevant. | ||
| It's just not. | ||
| I understand it's another argument, but I just want to go. | ||
| They're actually saying something different. | ||
| The Republicans are saying this and they're inside of President Trump's head. | ||
| If you bring up Matt Brainerd's name, If you bring up his name in any of his work, not presented, if his name crosses your lips, because he's one of the guys that sat there and said election fraud and voter fraud and ballot fraud immediately. | ||
| We will find you guilty. | ||
| So my point is, I hear your arguments, but you're living in a different reality right now. | ||
| I'm not saying you're a great guy, but the reality is the spirit of the times as driven by the progressive left in the kowtowing and cowardice of the Republican establishments on full display. | ||
| You're making an argument that, hey, these guys did it before. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're kind of making my, you're making my point that I want to get out with this question, is that, so Michelle Malkin talked about this issue yesterday, of basically innocent people being charged. | |
| You're covering it, Posobiec and some others at OAN, Chanel Ryan covered it, but why am I the guy raising the issue of these 142, and many more, because more are being arrested every day, For basically attending a peaceful protest, not meeting any of the requirements to truly be charged with even trespassing, because that requires a state of mind knowing what you're doing is wrong. | ||
| Why am I, a voter registration guy running a nonprofit, the one having to write the letter? | ||
| Where's our leadership on this who should be carrying this forward? | ||
| Why am I alone in this apart from the people that I've mentioned? | ||
| We will leave that hanging out there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where's the courage? | |
| The answer's obvious. | ||
| Courage is contagious, and right now we've got courage among the grassroots and the Trump movement, but it has not seeped up. | ||
| I mean, you know, the thing with Jake, Mitch McConnell's calling it a cancer, right? | ||
| He's supporting Cheney. | ||
| Who went against her people, but wants to cut out Congressman Greene. | ||
| A cancer. | ||
| Okay, Matt, how do people get to you? | ||
| Particularly how do they get to your website? | ||
| I want everybody to see the letter and they can come to the conclusion they can come to. | ||
| But give us your coordinates so people can get to this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Lookaheadamerica.org. | |
| You can find us there. | ||
| And you want people, by the way, if you agree with Matt Brainerd, you ought to push this letter out. | ||
| You ought to talk to your congressman, talk to your representatives, read the letter. | ||
| If you've got questions of Matt, I'm sure they can go on the website and do it. | ||
| Matt, thank you for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I think Brainerd's name is the name you're going to hear in the coming weeks because I don't think President Trump's going to see this charge and say, hey, I told the last set of guys I fired that somebody's got to get focused on this. | ||
| You didn't focus on this and I told you they're going to drop a ton of bricks on me. | ||
| Brainerd gave a great framing. | ||
| It's asymmetric warfare right now. | ||
| Right. | ||
| They're coming hard. | ||
| OK. | ||
| We got to get to the Burma things. | ||
| The White House is talking about the very important, particularly regarding the CCP's geopolitical endeavors to cut off our ally, India, and also to take to start to really, I think, bring the South China Sea. | ||
| You know, a guy on a radio show called Breitbart News Saturday. | ||
| I think it was, sorry, it may have been the weekday show, five years ago, six years ago, so within five to ten years we'll be in the shooting war in the South China Sea. | ||
| That was a former naval officer that had sailed the South China Sea as a young naval officer back in the 70s. | ||
| So the Chinese are making a big move. | ||
| Hang on, very quickly. | ||
| Because I've got to get to vaccines here, I've got to get to Fauci. | ||
| The biggest story of the day. | ||
| You talk about, what is it, weeks in which decades happen? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| There are now hours in which decades are happening. | ||
| Right, the breakneck speed of all of this. | ||
| We're expecting the statement out on Burma very, very shortly and more details on that. | ||
| We've just put up on the National Pulse the full legal brief, the whole 80 pages, so that people can go through it themselves and go through the whole thing. | ||
| We'll be going through this today as well. | ||
| We'll have more at five o'clock this afternoon. | ||
| Do we have, Natalie? | ||
| Yeah, I gotta do vaccines before we get there. | ||
| Okay, so here's the thing, and this is by the way, even with the President's, signal not noise, the biggest story of the night came out last night on Yahoo News, I think it was Associated Press, I think it was Associated Press, came out, headline, Tony Fauci thinks children, vaccinating children, school children, or children, is the key to herd immunity. | ||
| I go, wow, you know, I kind of follow Tony pretty closely, right? | ||
| Right. | ||
| And I said, I haven't seen this. | ||
| And so I want to get that article, if we can. | ||
| I want everybody in this audience. | ||
| And remember, this is Stephen K. Bannon, the pandemic guy. | ||
| It's a bioweapon. | ||
| And Bill Maher, they're actually saying, yeah, he was right from the very beginning. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Wrong guy to say it, but he was right. | ||
| OK. | ||
| So we follow this very closely. | ||
| I'm not an anti-vaxxer. | ||
| Although I hear the arguments from some of the anti-vaxxers and some of those arguments I think have to be addressed. | ||
| However... | ||
| In this, and we've talked to Dr. Jan for the moment, I have no faith, I have limited faith and confidence of where actually we are in this vaccine program, not just as distribution, but the actual vaccine itself and the different types of being done. | ||
| I think there's a lot of questions that people can legitimately ask now that 63, 66 percent effective or all that, that either need better arguments and more data put forward or need additional research. | ||
| OK, but here's what I find interesting. | ||
| I saw that and I go, wow, what have I been saying? | ||
| I said this vaccination distribution, the subtext and the buried lead you always see is with is with either the National Guard or Army Reserve at some point in time is going to have to help, quote unquote, with the distribution. | ||
| And I've said, hey, come spring and summer, With the schools, et cetera, you're going to see some sort, you're going to have a digital passport first, and they're going to say, no, that hasn't gotten us to herd immunity. | ||
| So you're not going to be able to get on a plane, not going to be able to get in a restaurant, don't even know if the kids go to school. | ||
| They're going to come a time, digital passport's not good enough. | ||
| It's going to be Klaus Schwab. | ||
| Until everybody's vaccinated, nobody's vaccinated. | ||
| And then from the heavens drops this story and this is called, this is the way the system works ladies and gentlemen, no conspiracy but no coincidence. | ||
| This is a trial balloon. | ||
| They are running this up the flagpole right now. | ||
| Now here's the interesting thing. | ||
| Up until that story came out last night, total crickets on this effort. | ||
| We're going to get into the details. | ||
| We're going to show you the receipts next about what's coming. | ||
| To your school, your children, herd immunity in the vaccine, courtesy of Tony Fauci. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, it's Groundhog Day, the 2nd of February, the year of our Lord 2021. | ||
| Now I want to turn, I've got to go back to the vaccines for a second. | ||
| We've got a lot happening on Burma. | ||
| The White House just announced it's a coup that has big implications about American funding and what's going on. | ||
| This is a fight for the Indo-Pacific. | ||
| They're trying to surround our ally in India. | ||
| They're also trying to make incursions down to the South China Sea and to cut off the Malacca Straits. | ||
| We'll talk all about that. | ||
| I think they have a lot of arguments. | ||
| will have a big implication because this is the CCP rolling. | ||
| OK, they're moving. | ||
| Want to go back to vaccines. | ||
| So and remember, I'm not an anti-vaxxer, right? | ||
| But I think some of the arguments I've met with Robert Kennedy, with the president in the first couple of weeks of the administration, I think they have a lot of arguments that have to be reviewed. And look, this is science and data based. | ||
| And we've been science and data based, not the spin of Tony Fauci. | ||
| That's where that article I just gotten off of, by the way, talking to a group in Texas late at night on a conference call to talk about the issues related to, as I see downrange, right, as I see downrange this vaccination thing and herd immunity and particularly with kids. | ||
| In this show, we try to give you nomenclature. | ||
| We talk about process. | ||
| We talk about statics and dynamics of how things happen. | ||
| We talk about process. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| We talk about statics and dynamics of how things happen. | ||
| Right. And then we talk about critical path. | ||
| I said, this is interesting because Fauci is now, you know, the herald of the pandemic, the herald of the pandemic, the herald of the pandemic. | ||
| And he's going to be the first to say, you know, we're going to be the first to say, you know, we're going to be the first to say, you know, we're going to be the first to say, you know, we're going to be the first to say, you know, we're going to be the first to say, you know, we're going to be the first You know, the herd immunity is everything. | ||
| That's the new golden calf, right? | ||
| And herd immunity started at 60% and then he immediately lied about it because the American people weren't ready for that, right? | ||
| He lied about it being 60% and now it's up to I think 80, 85, 90%, okay? | ||
| But De Holt's concept of herd immunity, a concept with Stephen Hatfield, sat right in that chair on the first episode and talked about herd immunity and how you get it and what the importance of it is. | ||
| OK. | ||
| Back in the day when we said this thing came of a biological weapons program out of the Wuhan laboratory that's run by the People's Liberation Army and the Batwoman is absolutely a A sycophant and should not be trusted right that now proves all to be true and we were mocked and ridiculed by the Washington Post and others and Bill Gertz came on here and he was mocked and ridiculed. | ||
| So I said this is interesting we just had a presidential campaign that the report put out last night leaked last night from internally from the Trump campaign we haven't had time to go through. | ||
| We're going to go through that either this evening with Rahim and Jack Posobiec or get to it tomorrow. | ||
| They put out a 30 page document internal polling That showed that Trump won six to one, six to one on the economy, but he lost on COVID-19, on the CCP virus. | ||
| And this is where he lost the election. | ||
| Trustworthiness about the virus. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So I said, hmm, that's a pretty important topic for November 3rd. | ||
| And in fact, that's where we have war and pandemic. | ||
| Everybody said, you got to drop pandemics. | ||
| I said, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| This is the framing device for the world right now. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And I said, you know, it's interesting, Biden put out a plan in March, a strategic plan, He then talked about it at his convention, the digital convention. | ||
| In fact, we mocked and ridiculed on this show that day that, hey, the learning curve, so much has changed since March, how can he give the same thing? | ||
| He kept saying the thing in March. | ||
| Remember that, Rahim? | ||
| We were mocking and ridiculing him. | ||
| They sent Kamala Harris backer on a plane and had her show up on that before Trump had his day on his convention and actually had an update. | ||
| They knew they got called out so they had an update. | ||
| Because you're right, they thought about it and said, hey, whoever came up with the March idea, we've gone up the learning curve, we've got to update it. | ||
| So you've got March, you've got then I think July, you've got Kamala Harris, and then you've got Biden in the Oval Office, he's waving around, takes his mask off, he's waving around this thing, he's got a 30-page report that's a summary of a 200-page report. | ||
| A 200-page report they just print last week. | ||
| Right? | ||
| This is the thinking of the guys that have staked his presidency. | ||
| He won it or stole it on this topic and then this is going to be the driving force and they've said everything up there and they got Sanjay Gupta and Anderson Cooper. | ||
| The handling in the first 100 days of the COVID virus, the distribution of the vaccine, all of it is of paramount importance and everything else pales in comparison, right? | ||
| Even the financial package. | ||
| This is everything. | ||
| And he puts out a 200 page, and he's waving around the summary. | ||
| Hey, I got the summary here, and you gotta see it's a strategy. | ||
| So we go look, it's been no comment about children, herd immunity, and vaccines. | ||
| I said, let's go look at the 200 page report. | ||
| Can we pull that up? | ||
| 200 page report, they mention it, here's what they say. | ||
| You need further research about vaccines in adolescents. | ||
| I think they may even show children. | ||
| Further research. | ||
| The ink ain't dry on this thing. | ||
| It's not dry. | ||
| Tony Fauci is his senior medical advisor. | ||
| It's not dry on something. | ||
| They print it last week and he's waving it around. | ||
| Donald Trump's incompetent. | ||
| The MAGA people are crazy. | ||
| They're QAnon nutcases. | ||
| They're antifax fanatics. | ||
| But I got something. | ||
| I got a 200 page report and he says in there, further research. | ||
| I think the poll, what does it say? | ||
| Read it. | ||
| I don't have my glass on. | ||
| Further research. | ||
| The federal government will continue to support research into the use of vaccines for adolescents and children and in the development of vaccines, formulations and delivery of the administration. | ||
| Goodness, I can't even read that. | ||
| Keep it up there and read it again. | ||
| I don't want to repeat that. | ||
| For our audience, radio audience, we've got it up on screen. | ||
| Read it again. | ||
| The federal government will continue to support research into the use of vaccines for adolescents and children. | ||
| We're a science database. | ||
| I don't have a problem with that. | ||
| Okay, research is good. | ||
| Research is a good thing. | ||
| The scientific process, particularly in vaccines, we need research because it came from a bioweapons program in Wuhan. | ||
| And we know that. | ||
| And the intelligence services know it. | ||
| The government knows it. | ||
| So I'm all for it. | ||
| That's a nice phrase. | ||
| Where does that say The key to herd immunity is the vaccination of children. | ||
| Where does it say that? | ||
| You know where it says it? | ||
| It doesn't say it. | ||
| And that came out three or four days ago, five days ago. | ||
| But Tony Fauci, got Dr. Fauci, the beloved Dr. Fauci, he's coming out now. | ||
| The key to herd immunity resides in the vaccination of children. | ||
| You tie it back to what I said the other day. | ||
| I'm not an anti-vax guy, but I can read this and I say, here's where it's going. | ||
| I can see this. | ||
| Got a digital passport first. | ||
| Going to ghettoize everybody, but I see where it's going. | ||
| In this spring and summer, because they're talking about now, we think we need the National Guard or the Army Reserve, somehow the distribution systems got a lot more formal. | ||
| The question is, and I hope they ask, Jen, why don't you circle back on this already, because I know you're going to circle back. | ||
| Why is Fauci now out the key to herd immunity? | ||
| And herd immunity is now everything. | ||
| That's the new golden calf, right? | ||
| Herd immunity at 90% or higher. | ||
| Fauci said at first 60%. | ||
| That's not a miss. | ||
| A miss is like 60% to 63%. | ||
| 60% to 90%. | ||
| He lied to your face. | ||
| Like he lied about the mask. | ||
| He lied about Wuhan, he came on in March and, no, no, banning these guys, I've talked to my Chinese colleagues, colleagues, colleagues, that's what he called them, because he's underwriting it, my colleagues, and they told me, no, it's no, you know, nothing to worry about, didn't come out of the lab, oh yeah, and the guy said, can they be believed? | ||
| Oh yeah, they can be believed. | ||
| Tony Fauci, the key to herd immunity is the vaccination of children. | ||
| So when we get to the spring and summer, And we ain't got herd immunity, right? | ||
| We ain't got herd immunity. | ||
| The problem of herd immunity is these kids. | ||
| And the solution is a vaccine. | ||
| And what's the problem? | ||
| The problem is the parents. | ||
| Now I'm going to connect some dots to you. | ||
| That's the whole reason they're coming at this emotional thing, and this is why President Trump has to defend this, okay? | ||
| He's obligated, he's obligated to defend this, because what they're doing here is they're not just putting Trump on trial, they're putting all you guys. | ||
| Everybody went to a rally, everybody read a report, everybody sat there and goes, you know, I think there's some moisture. | ||
| The 81% of the Republican Party, you're insurrectionists, you're domestic terrorists, you cannot be trusted. | ||
| And you certainly cannot be entrusted with the health of the Republic. | ||
| Because the Republic demands, we need, the Republic needs to have herd immunity. | ||
| And the key to herd immunity, as I read it, the key to herd immunity, as the beloved Dr. Fauci says, is the children. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Remember, I'm not an anti-vax guy. | ||
| Not at all. | ||
| But I told you where this was going to go. | ||
| And last night, they ran it up the flagpole. | ||
| Dr. Fauci, can I ask something? | ||
| As Chief Medical Officer, did you review the 200-page document? | ||
| Oh, you did review it. | ||
| In fact, you were one of the authors. | ||
| Okay, I got that. | ||
| And the CDC and everybody, all the new task force with Fauci presented, paraded out there in all his glory, now on the Rachel Maddow Show. | ||
| Hey, Rachel, can you ask him a question? | ||
| Can you get Fauci on tonight? | ||
| Can you ask him a question? | ||
| Hey, Doc, the report came out 200 pages, and you said further research. | ||
| How do we go in five days from further research to the key to herd immunity is the vaccination of children? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okey dokey. | |
| Just sayin'. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amen. | |
| They ran up the flagpole last night and guess what? | ||
| The war room did not salute. | ||
| Okay? | ||
|
unidentified
|
These guys, this is a con. | |
| And this is a dangerous con. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| They're playing with fire now. | ||
| They got to watch it. | ||
| This is not acceptable. | ||
| If they have a plan, they have to respect the American people enough to lay out the plan. | ||
| Come forward to the American people and say, OK, here's where we are. | ||
| Here's where we need to go. | ||
| Here's what the problem with this virus is. | ||
| Here's these different mutations are coming everywhere. | ||
| Here's to fully unlock or whatever. | ||
| Treat the American people like adults. | ||
| You have to come forward and you have to make the case. | ||
| Just lay it out. | ||
| Lay it out. | ||
| That's all people are asking for. | ||
| Just lay it out. | ||
| But don't do this thing of give me the 200 page report with the research. | ||
| Further research for adolescents and then five days later, drop the key to herd immunity is the vaccination of children. | ||
| Okay, we're going to turn a second. | ||
| We backed up now because I went on one of my tirades. | ||
| Okay, we're backed up. | ||
| We've got so much to get to. | ||
| We're going to return in a second. | ||
| The Biden administration has now formally called it a coup. | ||
| It's got a lot of implications. | ||
| We've got Natalie Winner, we've got Jack Passova, we've got Dr. Bradley Thayer, Thayer and Beatty. | ||
| Somehow we're going to get all this in because it's too important to miss. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to return in a moment on War Room Pandemic. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The key to her. | ||
| OK, that's enough of that. | ||
| We're going to get back to you. | ||
| You're going to get a lot of that in the days and weeks ahead. | ||
| I want to go to Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Very important news over at the White House. | ||
| Jack, what happened? | ||
| What did Biden and his team say on Burma? | ||
| Well, it's interesting, Steve. | ||
| So Biden has now come out and released a statement on Burma stating that what took place is, as is obvious to everyone who's watching, was a military coup. | ||
| Now that, of course, is a legal definition. | ||
| So for the State Department, that means they were going to freeze all humanitarian assistance, all aid to Burma. | ||
| However, what's really interesting to me is the fact that Tony Blinken, who we were told all through his confirmation process, was this elder statesman, was this brilliant genius. | ||
| He's nowhere to be found on this. | ||
| I don't know if he has stage fright or what. | ||
| But why isn't he giving a press conference? | ||
| Why is there a week? | ||
| You know, of course we know it's a coup. | ||
| We can look at the videos and see that it's a coup with the girl dancing her aerobics while the military trucks are going around backstage. | ||
| Why isn't Tony Blinken out there? | ||
| Where's Jen Psaki? | ||
| Where's Joe Biden? | ||
| This is a very weak statement. | ||
| It's really just a statement of fact that everyone already agreed to. | ||
| And the fact of the matter is that Biden is afraid of standing up to China. | ||
| He's afraid of getting involved in something that is literally, of course, the backdoor to China as, of course, General Stillwell knew in World War Two, right? | ||
| This is the Burma road. | ||
| This is where the CCP has invested. | ||
| Billions and billions of dollars through their Belt and Road Initiative, oil pipelines, they want rail, they want a deep water port there on the coast, and that's why the Burmese military, headed by General Min Aung Hlaing, has been committing a campaign of ethnic cleansing genocide against the Rohingya Muslims that live in that coastal region of Rakhine State there. | ||
| That is what this is all tied together with CCP and the fact that Biden and Tony Blinken I guess they have stage fright. | ||
| I guess Tony Blinken has stage fright because he's not sure what he wants to do. | ||
| The CCP, Wang Wenbin, came out last night. | ||
| They said, oh, this is just a cabinet reshuffle. | ||
| Just a cabinet reshuffle. | ||
| And Biden is sticking back. | ||
| You know, I guess he's, what do they say, standing back and standing by. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, Jack, you nailed it. | ||
| You know, Burma in World War II was the, as we came across the Pacific, the back door, and this is why Stilwell, one of our greatest generals, was assigned there. | ||
| The Burma Road, in fact, they couldn't build it fast enough through that jungle with so much resistance that they actually went over the hump. | ||
| They flew over the Himalayas to reinforce Shanghai Shack, to make sure they held down the bulk of the Japanese army in mainland China. | ||
| Burma has always been one of the keys to pick the lock. | ||
| It's very sensitive to the CCP. | ||
| This is Biden's first. | ||
| And look, they're testing him. | ||
| They're testing him in Taiwan with the bombers. | ||
| They're testing him in the South China Sea, where he's saying, I want all those carrier battle groups out of there. | ||
| They're testing now in the littoral nations around the South China Sea. | ||
| And remember, you got Pakistan on one side, the whole fiasco up on the Tibet border up north, and then you got Burma to its east. | ||
| They're surrounding our great ally in India, right? | ||
| This is all Chinese Communist Party, all associated with CCP. | ||
| This is a major geopolitical, and they're testing. | ||
| You think they would have done this on Donald Trump's watch? | ||
| You are sadly mistaken. | ||
| They know now they've got somebody to press forward. | ||
| Jack, what's your Twitter handle? | ||
| I want everybody to start following you. | ||
| You've got great updates on everything during the day. | ||
| Jack Posobiec of One American News. | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| Look, we're breaking it through. | ||
| We're posting the maps. | ||
| As I always say, maps cut through the rhetoric. | ||
| It's at Jack Posobiec. | ||
| J-A-C-K-P-O-S-O-B-I-E-C. | ||
| Okay, Jack, fantastic. | ||
| Well, now I want to bring in National Pulse once again, always ahead of a story they were working on, and it's so prescient that you're dropping it this morning. | ||
| Natalie Winters joins us. | ||
| Raheem, take it from here, because this is a key guy. | ||
| You don't see Blinken up there, but this guy's hands are all over it. | ||
| Jake Sullivan. | ||
| Yeah, I think sometimes Natalie gets frustrated with me, because I hold the stories and I hold the stories. | ||
| She says, why aren't you publishing this story about Harvard and the Belfer Center? | ||
| I said, wait, wait, there's going to be a moment. | ||
| And today is that moment. | ||
| And the reason is because you have this situation unfolding in Burma right now. | ||
| You have Tony Blinken effectively in hiding right now over this. | ||
| I mean, I think we might need a Proof of Life podcast out of Tony Blinken, right? | ||
| And you have everything else from the Politico stories and that talking about this fracas in the White House about whether or not to label this as a coup. | ||
| Nathalie, why don't you tell us more about your story and what may be pulling people in certain CCP directions while all this is going on? | ||
| Sure, so Jake Sullivan may be the National Security Advisor to Joe Biden at the moment, but he's previously affiliated with Harvard's Belfer Center, which really is a de facto advisor to the Chinese Communist Party on matters of both national security and cyber security. | ||
| Specifically, between 2018 and 2019, this institute, which is embedded within Harvard Kennedy School, hosted various Chinese Communist Party officials People's Liberation Army leaders to have a cyber security conference where they talked about artificial intelligence, IP theft, Huawei, the list goes on. | ||
| But most concerningly, they talked about what both countries would do in the case of a cyber security attack. | ||
| In other words, American officials sitting shoulder to shoulder with Chinese Communist Party officials essentially told China, told these officials what the American playbook would be in response to a cyber security attack. | ||
| which overwhelmingly comes from the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And Jake Sullivan has served as a senior fellow at this institute, which as I said is part of Harvard, since 2017, just 10 days after the Trump administration came to power, which I think is really interesting when you take into consideration the fact that... | ||
| Hold on, that's it, yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Just wait, that's something really revealing. | ||
| You're saying right after the Trump inauguration, the people who are now in the White House advising Joe Biden basically ran off to the Chinese Communist Party to get jobs? | ||
| Yes, on January 30th, he became a senior fellow. | ||
| So he was lecturing students at the Institute Putting out research papers, going on podcasts, and this is something that I think you and I have talked about before, Rahim, but it's really concerning when the Chinese Communist Party wants to work with people out of the Obama administration once they're no longer constrained by being in federal government because it really makes you wonder what kind of policies did they push when they were working in government. | ||
| Obviously, the Chinese Communist Party thinks they're amenable, if not advantageous, to the interests that they seek to see play out with regards to American foreign policy. | ||
| And also, the Belfer Center has worked on a letter encouraging the United States to work with China on developing a vaccine and rely on Chinese PPE within America. | ||
| And Jake Sullivan, along with none other than Blinken and Avril Haines, as co-signing on that letter, urging for a collaboration on nothing more dangerous than the vaccine. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| This is incredible because you'd think this would be the front page instead of the 77 days. | ||
| You'd think this might be the front page of the New York Times. | ||
| Biden's top foreign policy officials and national security officials have worked hand in hand with the Chinese Communist Party and indeed the PLA, especially as it regards the coronavirus, the pandemic and critical PPE. | ||
| Natalie, What do we know from every single day you send me links from the DOJ? | ||
| What do we know about a lot of this Chinese PPE, the KN95 masks and such? | ||
| It's always faulty. | ||
| It seems that every other day there's a new press release from Customs and Border Protection about hundreds of thousands of masks teeming into the country, which have efficacy rates that are well below FDA standards. | ||
| Even yesterday, China had over 3,000 fake vaccines circulating within their country that they had to crack down on. | ||
| So certainly we should not be relying on Chinese Communist Party produced PPE, let alone vaccines, when they can't even open their country and let World Health Organization officials in to really figure out where this virus came from. | ||
| Hey, one more thing, Natalie, in our article that lays this all out, it appears Harvard Belford Center's already started removing links from its website. | ||
| No way. | ||
| Oh yeah. | ||
| No way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh yeah. | |
| You guys got it in the article? | ||
| Yep. | ||
| That's a tell. | ||
| What are the links? | ||
| Jake Sullivan. | ||
| Are you kidding me? | ||
| Jake Sullivan's profile link at the Belfer Center has just gone down. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Natalie Winters nails it again. | ||
| She's a rock star. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Unbelievable. | ||
| Natalie, you're fantastic. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| We've got to get this thing up. | ||
| They've taken down the links. | ||
| Looks like it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| Natalie, I hope this is one that we've archived. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| If you had Twitter, they'll be taking you down. | ||
| You're still on suspension on Twitter? | ||
| No, I'm alive. | ||
| Okay, they'll take it down soon as that. | ||
| Natalie Winters. | ||
| What's her handle? | ||
| What's her coordinates? | ||
| At Natalie G. Winters, I believe. | ||
| One of the young rising superstars in this movement and one of the best reporters out there. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| I want to now turn to Dr. Bradley Thayer. | ||
| So, Dr. Thayer, put it in context. | ||
| What is happening in Burma? | ||
| This is the first time the Biden administration has come face to face with the Chinese Communist Party in their grill. | ||
| They didn't respond to Xi's speech at all. | ||
| So now they're rolling. | ||
| What's the context of this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, Steve. | |
| Well, it's wonderful to be with you today. | ||
| The context here really is that there was obviously a coup in Myanmar or Burma, and a civilian government was overthrown. | ||
| A democratically elected civilian government was overthrown by the Burmese military. | ||
| Now, this event should be seen, I argue, through the lens of great power competition. | ||
| It shouldn't, in first blush, be seen through the lens of ideology, necessarily a democracy being overthrown by the military. | ||
| It should be seen through the lens of the United States and India and their interests on one hand versus the interests of China, the People's Republic of China, on the other hand. | ||
| And we see in Burma that the U.S. | ||
| and India have a variety of mixed interests. | ||
| Whereas China is willing to support any side. | ||
| They work very closely with the civilian government, the Suu Kyi, regularly, as well as we should expect they're going to work to advance their interests with the Burmese military. | ||
| Their interests are to gain control over Burma, in order to surround India, but also to gain access to the Indian Ocean, as they're doing really in a reciprocal fashion in Pakistan. | ||
| to surround India, but also to gain access to the West, so that they're able to access out of China to the rest of the world. | ||
| Now, this coup, of course, is problematic for the U.S. and India at one level, because a civilian government has been overthrown, a democratically elected civilian government has been overthrown. | ||
| When we look down in terms of what our interests are, we should recognize that it may be in our interest to work with this government, with the military government. | ||
| The fundamental question is, how can we control, supplant, counter China's influence in Burma, and maximize our, as well as Indian, influence in Burma? | ||
| And it may be that we have to work with the military in this instance, or it may be that if the military is pulled further into the into China's orbit, we're going to have to balance against it. | ||
| Dr. Thayer, we've got about a minute left. | ||
| Just real quickly, is this the payoff you get from strategic patience? | ||
| You know, the Biden administration has not responded to Xi's speech in Dallas. | ||
| They haven't done anything yet. | ||
| They say they're doing an interagency review in 60 seconds. | ||
| Is this the response to strategic patience? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is at a fundamental level. | |
| What we have done is we have been asleep at the switch, Steve, around the world. | ||
| And we've seen China's influence grow in Thailand, for example, in Bangladesh, in Burma. | ||
| And we did not combat it for decades. | ||
| And at one level, we're essentially subjected to the fruits of that effort. | ||
| But with respect to the present administration, the Biden administration, patience is not what we need here. | ||
| What we need is action to ensure that China's influence is checked and is countered in Southeast Asia. | ||
| Dr. Thayer, we've got to bounce. | ||
| We're going to put your social media up on the other side of the thing. | ||
| Great analysis. | ||
| Dr. Bradley Thayer, University of Texas, San Antonio. | ||
| We'll have the links to all his sites so you can get more information. | ||
| Back in a minute with Darren Beatty. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Welcome back. | ||
| We've got so much breaking today, so much for the 5 o'clock show. | ||
| Raheem's going to have his podcast later. | ||
| There's an immense amount of information. | ||
| Another historic day. | ||
| Raheem said there are days now in which years happen, and weeks where decades happen. | ||
| You're in the middle of it. | ||
| This is where the fourth turning is. | ||
| By the way, in Florida, I think there's APs reporting two FBI agents have been gunned down and I think killed, serving a warrant about violence against children. | ||
| We don't know many details of that. | ||
| We're going to get more of that as we come up. | ||
| Also, you got an update on our story on Jake Sullivan and the Chinese Communist Party? | ||
| Yeah, and by the way, there was a shooting on Capitol Hill just about an hour ago. | ||
| We're still waiting for more details on that. | ||
| Not far from the Capitol building and this studio at all. | ||
| We, in the break, went through because, as I mentioned, the Harvard Belfer Center had removed the link for Jake Sullivan. | ||
| We found a secondary link, so we're putting that one up now and archiving everything. | ||
| But they took down one and put up another. | ||
| Took down one. | ||
| Okay, fine, fine. | ||
| The key is they took down one. | ||
| I want to make sure we grab that link and get to it. | ||
| Jake Sullivan, he's got a much bigger role than Blinken, the guy that we've got to make famous. | ||
| Okay, Darren Beatty, the great site revolver. | ||
| You see it's the high and the low. | ||
| You've got the broadsheet and the tabloid all in one. | ||
| A brilliant site. | ||
| You've got to go to it every day or multiple times a day. | ||
| Had an article that really got me last night. | ||
| The globalist American empire declares all-out war on the American people. | ||
| And now followed by another amazing piece. | ||
| With zero moral authority left, the globalist American empire is doomed to fail at home and abroad. | ||
| These are blockbuster analytical pieces. | ||
| Darren Beatty, walk us through. | ||
| Revolver once again at the cutting edge of all of this. | ||
| Walk us through what these two articles say and why people need to read them today. | ||
| Well, thank you very much. | ||
| And look, We all see this recent trend of basically the entire national security apparatus directing its eyes and its resources against the American people, labeling us domestic terrorists. | ||
| And these two pieces at revolver.news, which everyone should go to now, highly provocative, on the cutting edge, really explore in multiple dimensions the implications of this development. | ||
| And really where we are is we are in a transition phase from a persuasion model of control, that is a model of control in which our institutions are governed by what one might call pretty lies, pretty illusions. | ||
| Those illusions are being disintegrated before our very eyes and replaced by overt control mechanisms. | ||
| And there are various implications of that. | ||
| One of those implications is that the United States has completely lost its moral authority. | ||
| And the nature of patriotism in the United States is one that requires at least the illusion of moral authority, the illusion of America being a free society and so forth. | ||
| And so I think that what I call the globalist American regime will have a very difficult time making this transition into a coercion model. | ||
| Similarly, The way that the United States tends to project its interests abroad is very different from the way a country, a nation like China would. | ||
| We weaponize our supposed moral superiority in order to advance our geopolitical interests abroad. | ||
| We use terminology like human rights in order to interfere with elections. | ||
| to place favorable leaders and so forth. | ||
| What Professor Thayer was talking about, if we need to use the so-called pro-democracy forces in Myanmar, it helps to have at least an alleged moral authority in order to accomplish that. | ||
| That no longer exists. | ||
| And so both at home and abroad, there are severe implications to the fact that The globalist American empire, as I call it, has no moral authority. | ||
| And we're seeing that as every single institution in this country is being revealed as a scam and a fraud, and in most cases, actively hostile to the interests, the happiness, the freedom and the flourishing of the American people. | ||
| One thing I would just want to question right there, did I hear you correctly? | ||
| Because you've got to read both pieces, not do you just have to read them, you have to share them. | ||
| This is where you've got to become a force multiplier. | ||
| Even if you don't agree with everything in it, this is the type of provocative, cutting-edge thinking this movement's needed for a long time, and now we're getting it. | ||
| Did you say you think that this globalist American empire, the people that are now, the globalist, I do. | ||
| You did you just say you think they're gonna have a tough time Segwaying to the coercion model and implementing the coercion model. Did I hear that correctly? I Do I do and for various reasons? I think for instance in China I have great respect actually for the Chinese people, but they are different They don't require the same types of illusions that Westerners and particularly Americans do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do. | |
| And so even from the standpoint of domestic control, the fact that it's so overt at this point, they don't even pay lip service anymore, really, to the idea of America as a free society, with free elections, with free speech, with a free market, as we've recently seen with the GameStop fiasco. | ||
| And I think over time, and even now, it's going to be very difficult to control the American people through more or less an overt coercion model, rather than the kind of persuasion model built on pretty lies and illusions, if one wants to take the cynical route. | ||
| I just want to rant about Tony Fauci's now changed, radically changed this whole issue of vaccines. | ||
| They say now the key to the herd immunity is vaccinating children, which they didn't even have in the report a couple of days ago. | ||
| It seems to me that they feel that their coercion model is working. | ||
| This is how they won the election. | ||
| They're rolling. | ||
| They got people curled up in the fetal position, sucking their thumbs. | ||
| Oh, woe is me. | ||
| This is terrible. | ||
| We're never going to do it again. | ||
| And people are fighting back. | ||
| There's people saying it's over. | ||
| Why are you even doing this? | ||
| So don't you believe in their mind they think the coercion model is working and working just fine and they're going to get a little more coercive? | ||
| Yes, I mean I think they really have no choice. | ||
| I think one of the consequences of the Trump phenomenon is basically it put the corrupt ruling class of the globalist American empire On an accelerated timeline that they didn't necessarily want. | ||
| They had to move much more quickly from the persuasion model to the coercion model, because the persuasion model requires that most of the public basically buy into the legitimacy of the country's institutions. | ||
| And that's no longer the case. | ||
| Okay, we got about 15 seconds. | ||
| How did it get to Revolver? | ||
| How did it get to you? | ||
| People gotta read this. | ||
| They gotta push it out today. | ||
| We're going to be covering a lot of fascinating things in the near future. | ||
| Go to revolver.news, read these two pieces at the top, read the interview that you did, Steve, which was excellent. | ||
| That's also pinned at the top. | ||
| Share them all and talk about them. | ||
| A lot more explosive stuff coming out from revolver.news. | ||
| Go there now. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Brahim Kassam, Podcast Today. | ||
| We'll be back at 5 o'clock. | ||
| Brahim and Jack Vassovic, myself. |
Export Selection