Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, welcome back to the War Room. | ||
There's so much going on today, we're jammed. | ||
Maggie, you were at the march. | ||
You've got writers, you have members of Congress accusing the Trump movement, accusing elected officials now from Georgia to Texas to Pennsylvania of sedition and disloyalty to the country. | ||
Where do you think that Trump, you've done as good a job as any being you're an influencer, of keeping your hand on the pulse of the Trump base. | ||
Where is the base right now as far as this fight goes? | ||
unidentified
|
They're in the fight. | |
They are in this fight. | ||
And I think if anything, there is more intensity and more people coming over and recognizing that what happened in the hours following, you know, November 3rd and the early hours of November 4th, Something very wrong happened, and that the future of our republic is at stake. | ||
If we don't stand up now, we might not ever be able to trust our election process again. | ||
So people are in this fight, and I'm going to have some great videos coming out that I got. | ||
I got some amazing interviews on Saturday, so everyone can look forward to that over the next couple days. | ||
They're in this fight. | ||
Are they backing down an inch on this? | ||
unidentified
|
I don't think so. | |
It was a smaller crowd this time. | ||
I think it was cold. | ||
You know, I think a lot of people, you know, they don't want to stand outside all day in the cold listening to speeches. | ||
And so many people came out for the first one. | ||
But the people that were there are absolutely in this fight and they are not backing down. | ||
And do you get on your social media and other things that the size and intensity only grows, although the march was clearly smaller than the first one, it was intense, but do you get a sense, you see these polling numbers, clearly things are coming our way overall, but for the Trump deplorables and for the base, do you see the increased level of intensity or do you think they're starting to listen to the Karl Rose of the world? | ||
unidentified
|
No, I think they're listening to us. | |
I think they're listening to War Room. | ||
And it's difficult to get a handle on because the censorship is out of control. | ||
What we're seeing now on Facebook and Instagram, as well as YouTube with the show, it's worse than it's ever been. | ||
And so it's really difficult to actually reach people and to have these conversations on a wide level because there is such censorship. | ||
But I think that the people are waking up and if anything, it proves to them that what we've been saying all along is in fact true. | ||
Rahim, we talk about, you know, we do these shows, and Jack Max is going to join us in a minute, we did these shows on the weekend, week in and week out, during the height of the pandemic, bringing in Chinese voices about suppression in China, particularly talking about the Great Firewall, built by American companies, but really to keep information from the Chinese people so they can't see reality. | ||
The firewall here is pretty intense, too, in the United States. | ||
But I've got to tell you, this reports over the weekend of the mass infiltration of British companies, international companies, and American companies by the Chinese Communist Party is, we've been saying this for a long time, but now to finally have it come out and see the level of how people are stunned by these revelations, particularly in the UK. | ||
What were your initial thoughts when you saw this? | ||
Well, look, as it pertains to Westminster, you can't move in Westminster without coming across somebody that's obviously working for a foreign government in some way, shape or form, similar to Washington DC, but kind of much more, much more concentrated. | ||
So the Westminster stuff, I mean, really doesn't surprise me. | ||
We've had very little in terms of counterintelligence operations in the United Kingdom for the past decade or so, maybe two decades or so is the complete sort of uh... shrugging of the shoulders from the entire british political establishment over the chinese communist party and of course over russian and saudi influence in the capital as well because hey guess what they buy all of our buildings and uh... and and they make them all pretty again and they spend money in harrods and and and and fortman mason and so on and so forth | ||
and so the the kind of the entire british political uh... establishment has has communally shrugged its shoulders to this is a it's good for business you know uh... the power is already declined what else do you have to lose but it's it's it's broader that i think is more worrying specifically as it pertains to major corporations such as boeing and all common flies are you've seen uh... obviously uh... in embassies this leak uh... pertains to people that chinese communist party twice being found | ||
in embassies in Shanghai specifically, but of course around the world as well. | ||
And I don't think it should come as a shock to many people that a country the size and with as nefarious motivations as the Chinese Communist Party has managed to do this. We've just broken another story this morning at the National Pulse showing that Swalwell, Eric Swalwell, actually took Chinese Communist Party money in the form of donations from Air China employees, which is a state-owned Chinese Communist Party run company. | ||
And more and more of this will come out. | ||
So this is, for me, totally, totally, completely, I mean this is what we've been saying for weeks, months and years, predictable, but it is also just the tip of the iceberg. | ||
As the more details come out of this thing, more and more people will be implicated. | ||
You know, Clive Hamilton who did the book Silent Invasion that really turned the Australian political establishment on its head about the infiltration in Australia a number of years ago, he wrote this book called Hidden Hand that was trying to be suppressed in the UK when it came out and then what they tried to do was just avoid it. | ||
That book is also damning but it reinforces, this leak reinforces what Hamilton says and what he said on Hidden Hand. | ||
In the book that the UK and the United States, the infiltration by Chinese Communist Party money, what they call honeypotting, And influence peddling is essentially out of control, in that they control major elements of the City of London, which is the UK's Wall Street. | ||
When we say City of London, that's basically the term of art for their Wall Street. | ||
Also our Wall Street, and corporations. | ||
And this leak, and we're going to have one of the leakers from Hong Kong live at the bottom of the hour. | ||
It shows you this is not thousands of people, this is not tens of thousands of people, this is millions that throughout the world that they're trying to put into place to make sure that the CCP, and remember there's no conspiracy here, this is the way that the Globalist Party of Davos business model works. | ||
It's predicated upon the slave labor in China that is delivered by the totalitarian state capitalist System that is the CCP so Rahim. | ||
What do you think bring a jack on here in a second? | ||
What do you think ought to happen off of this report? | ||
What what would you say the first now as people are still in shock and more revelation is going to come out? | ||
What should be the official response? | ||
unidentified
|
Look, they are in a war of conquer, right? | |
That is the aim of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
unidentified
|
There can be no doubt about it at this point. | |
Their stated aim is to support Western civilization and to replace the United States as the major global superpower. | ||
I mean, this lady from Axios, an Axios reporter, was tweeting this weekend, complaining that, oh, China isn't gonna be the kind and fair power that I thought it was gonna be, and we really hope that it would replace the United States. | ||
Wait a minute, what are you saying? | ||
A US-based reporter is saying that she wants China to replace the United States as a superpower, and she's their China correspondent? | ||
These are the people we're relying on bringing us reporting for this sort of thing? | ||
I mean, it's extraordinary. | ||
Now, look, maybe I'll go a little too far for some people's taste, but I really do believe that there is cause for a House Un-American Activities Committee for this stuff, and I think it requires the full apparatus of government to root out foreign enemies in our midst, in the Western world writ large. | ||
This crisis we have, this constitutional crisis, do you believe that President Trump should designate a special prosecutor on the entire Biden situation as a national security issue regarding their financial relationship with the Chinese Communist Party? | ||
No, I think the President should appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the entirety of the Democratic Party of the United States of America for their links with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
So you think it'll be broader than just the Biden family? | ||
Why do you say the Democratic Party? | ||
Because we have seen plenty of evidence now. | ||
You can see plenty of evidence if you just walk around Washington, D.C., but we've seen plenty of evidence now that members of the Democratic Party Now you have a so-called president-elect who is clearly compromised. | ||
You have other people who ran for president, such as Eric Swalwell, clearly compromised. | ||
You have the big tech organizations, which are clearly compromised, which all vote Democrat and donate Democrat and even run as Democrats. | ||
So the entire thing is now compromised. | ||
And if you don't have a special counsel for the entire thing and you just focus in on one person and one thing, you don't root out the problem. | ||
And Biden will be replaced by a Swalwell, the Swalwell replaced by another. | ||
You're gonna get to the bottom of every single one of them. | ||
Take down the DNC. | ||
We're Rahim, Rahim, that'll be the new theme song. | ||
Thank you very much, Rahim. | ||
I appreciate you coming in today with these thoughts. | ||
I want to go to Jack Maxey. | ||
Jack has done more than anybody except for the lawyer Bob Costello, who's done an extraordinary job. | ||
Bob was quoted in the article NBC News did on Friday about getting out this email that Hunter Biden's partner is saying, hey dude, you forgot $400,000 from Burisma. | ||
It might be nice if you put that in your tax returns because you're avoiding taxes. | ||
That kind of triggered a lot of this investigation into the CCP in Russia. | ||
Jack, you've done more than any living human, maybe other than the Costello father-son team. | ||
I've got to ask you, what do you think about a special prosecutor? | ||
I mean, you've drilled down on SEC violations, you've drilled down on FINRA violations, because you're a former finance guy, Wall Street guy. | ||
Where do you think we stand on the special prosecutor, and how urgent is it that we appoint this rapidly? | ||
Well, something has to happen, Steve. | ||
I'm a little bit like Rudy Giuliani. | ||
I'm not a huge fan of the special prosecutor statute, but I think one of the things that I just can't believe, we can say the Department of Justice and the FBI are biding their time, but there is no reason for the SEC to bide their time. | ||
When you look at the fraud, which I believe is Bohai Harvest, this includes systemic risk across Wall Street. | ||
Some of the biggest names on the street are invested in this scam. | ||
But I'd like to go to what you were talking about earlier with these thousands and thousands of CCP members in corporations around the world. | ||
Many of our viewers who are from the Vietnam era will remember the three-man cadres that the Viet Cong put together down in South Vietnam. | ||
And this is exactly the same thing. | ||
It's actually required under Chinese law. | ||
If three Chinese Communist Party members find themselves in the same organization, They are required by law to create a secret cell to define comms in three-man groups throughout that organization. | ||
So if there's a hundred employees at Goldman Sachs, there's what, thirty three-man cells in there. | ||
This is quite frightening, really. | ||
But when we go to the hard drive what is so frightening for me there's a wonderful story you'll find it on my Twitter feed and it's been very difficult because we have to take out every single number every single wiring account Because we don't want to get taken down like we were the last time, so I've been redacting these documents one by one. | ||
There's some communication between a woman named Jackie Bao, or G.K. | ||
Bao, but I think she goes by Jackie, and she was the comms director at Hudson West. | ||
She basically contacts Hunter in the fall. | ||
Okay, okay, but you got to tell people what Hudson West is. | ||
Nobody knows it. | ||
What's Hudson West? | ||
Hudson West was an LLC that was created so that the Chinese, CEFC, a Chinese oil company, could essentially buy American oil assets using the cover of an LLC with Hunter Biden And his uncle, Jim Biden, as the heads of it, right? | ||
So essentially, they would be the straw purchasers for the Chinese Communists. | ||
They don't think they really ever got to where they actually purchased one, but they went to the altar with a company down in Louisiana. | ||
This woman, Jackie Bao, she was the communications person with the law firm down in Biloxi, Mississippi, that created the Plausible deniability. | ||
I mean you had this lawyer in Mississippi negotiating for the deal on behalf of of Hunter, Jim and Jonathan Yee and Patrick Ho, but they're never really connected. | ||
They actually do have a secret meeting down in Atlanta. | ||
We have all of the receipts. | ||
Hunter, Jim are there, the whole nine yards. | ||
But why I think this woman, Jackie Bowers, is interesting is she tells Hunter, take every single dollar that is left in the Hudson West account that was left there by Patrick Ho and Jonathan Yee after they disappeared. | ||
She tells him to do this. | ||
She mentions Uncle Jim, the whole nine yards. | ||
She lays it out. | ||
It's almost like she's trying to entrap Hunter. | ||
unidentified
|
Sweep the account. | |
Jack, we're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
We've got Miranda Devine. | ||
We're going to come back to you right after that. | ||
Jack Maxson, the hard drive from hell. | ||
Miranda Devine, New York Post, next. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
with Stephen K. Bannon. The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. Pandemic. Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
This is all inextricably linked. | ||
We've been saying for years about the infiltration of the Chinese Communist Party in the West. | ||
Remember, our problem here is not just the CCP, it's the people that are actively working with and for the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
And now you see this whole thing with Biden. | ||
And the question gets to be, the question gets to be, why? | ||
Why did Ray and why did Barr not move on this immediately when they got this hard drive back in December of 2019? | ||
It did not take That much effort, as Jack Maxey knows, to get deep into this and to see what was there. | ||
And you could very quickly ascertain, as the New York Post, as the great technology team over there and lawyers over there, understanding what the risk was, got into this and understood that this was the real deal. | ||
These were the receipts, as we say. | ||
It was the liars Right, in the national security apparatus, saying people lied about President Trump and Russia, that crowd, came up and had a, I think they took an ad out in the Wall Street Journal, said it's a Russian disinformation campaign. | ||
That is a lie! | ||
That's not like a mistake. | ||
That's a lie. | ||
That's a bald-faced lie, and the people that signed that are liars. | ||
And they're a danger to the national security of the United States. | ||
Why? | ||
Because Brennan and his crowd has always looked the other way. | ||
Look, here's my beef. | ||
I'm a former naval officer, right? | ||
I believe in national security. | ||
Here's my beef with the national security intelligence apparatus. | ||
They're always wrong. | ||
They got 9-11 wrong. | ||
Yeah, there were a couple of guys in there saying, but they essentially got 9-11 wrong, right? | ||
They got the Iraq War big league wrong. | ||
They've gotten everything in Afghanistan wrong. | ||
And they've gotten the rise of the Chinese Communist Party, the biggest existential threat we've had in the history of this republic, dead wrong. | ||
Show me a win. | ||
Show me where they've been right on anything. | ||
Show me they've been right on anything important. | ||
You know what I used to do to upset them when they come into the security briefings? | ||
Why is this classified? | ||
That drives them nuts. | ||
Why is this classified? | ||
Why is this classified? | ||
They got stuff. | ||
If you read the Financial Times, The Economist, a couple of the defense sites, right? | ||
Besides some gossip and some photos of some interesting stuff, There's not a lot of sophisticated, smart analysis ahead of the wheel. | ||
They've been wrong about everything. | ||
They were wrong about what led up to 9-11. | ||
A couple of voices were in there. | ||
I'm talking about institutions. | ||
They were wrong. | ||
We were caught by surprise in a Pearl Harbor-type attack. | ||
They were dead wrong and actually lied and misrepresented on the on the Iraq war. | ||
By the way, YouTube will add that one to this one. | ||
The official version of what the intelligence apparatus said were lies and misrepresentation and incompetence. | ||
Right. | ||
Just like the Kennedy assassination, just like the Warren Commission, just like Vietnam, just like the Afghan war. | ||
Don't take that from Steve Bannon. | ||
Read the Washington Post Afghan War Report that everybody suppressed after the Washington Post came in. | ||
I think it was nine stories in a row, the modern version of the Pentagon Papers, right? | ||
The Pentagon Papers, New York Times, back in the days when they were crusaders. | ||
Last I looked, YouTube, the official party lines that we were winning in Vietnam, it took the Pentagon Papers to say, hey, guess what? | ||
They lied for that entire time. | ||
They lied for that entire time. | ||
The official version. | ||
And now you get in the official version of, Joe Biden looked the American people in the eye on the evening of the 14th of October, looked the American people in the eye after he was called out. | ||
He was called out by Donald Trump after the New York Post, after the New York Post presented their evidence, after the New York Post presented it, broke the story. | ||
Emma Jo Harris and Miranda Devine had a great column. | ||
He called Biden out on a stage on global television, in front of the world, who was trying to weigh and measure who's going to be the leader of the free world. | ||
And Joe Biden looked at the camera and he lied. | ||
He lied. | ||
And Bill Barr and Chris Wray and others knew that. | ||
They didn't come out and just say something. | ||
Oh, yeah, actually, there's been an investigation on this thing going on from spring of the previous year. | ||
You know, President Trump saying, hey, my call was perfect. | ||
And people laughed at that, mocked that. | ||
My call to the guy was perfect. | ||
I was impeached over. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, it turns out pretty perfect. | |
He warned him about the corruption of the Biden family. | ||
Right. | ||
Now we know Biden's own partners has said, hey, dude, I think you missed. | ||
I think you missed a number like four hundred thousand dollars just for showing up. | ||
Didn't put it on your taxes. | ||
And then the mainstream media, this is, you know, Stelter and all you clowns over CNN. | ||
Oh, it's about his taxes. | ||
It's not about his taxes. | ||
That's just the way they get to it. | ||
It's about money laundering. | ||
And it's about being compromised by influence peddling. | ||
And with Hunter Biden, the reason that all the pornography and all the drugs, all that stuff went out there is because that's called BGY. | ||
That's how they capture you. | ||
They capture him through the drugs and the women and all that, and also the money. | ||
They're totally compromised, completely. | ||
It's not even a question. | ||
Joe Biden today could not get a confidential clearance for confidential, the lowest rung of the ladder for intel. | ||
And this investigation, President of the United States is going to name a special prosecutor and Barr is just going to have to suck on that. | ||
Okay? | ||
He's just going to have to take that. | ||
If he wants to resign, resign. | ||
I keep saying, Bernie and the guys ought to get all 2,000 affidavits, right, signed by American citizens under penalty of perjury, penalty of perjury, and line them up in the Oval Office and have him come over. | ||
Okay, we've got Miranda Devine has now been able to join us. | ||
Jack, I want you to hang on. | ||
I'll get off my soapbox. | ||
I want to bring in Miranda Devine, the great columnist. | ||
For the New York Post. | ||
First off, Miranda, I want to get your piece today, but what's happened over the last, now, 24, 48 hours on this whole Biden situation, do you believe that, because you're the first one to call this out, and it was really kind of your column that the president was using, and Emma Jo Morris and the team's reporting on the 14th to call Biden out on a global stage where he lied to the American people, do you believe Absolutely. | ||
prosecutor is needed now. And I think your other comments, I think Goodwin, Michael Goodwin, I think has come said this today, but what does Miranda Devine think? | ||
Absolutely. I mean, I don't see any other way of airing what problems there are in the Biden family and what kind of compromises have been made and showing the American people exactly how China has its claws into the man who is sensibly going to be in the White House next month. | ||
It is a very, very important thing. | ||
You have to have someone who's going to be at least quasi-independent of whatever Attorney General Joe Biden appoints. | ||
I mean, there's rumors that it's going to be Governor Cuomo from New York. | ||
You're going to have someone ruthless and completely on the side of Joe Biden, who's appointed to that position, who's going to try and crush any ability that the American people has to get to the bottom of Exactly what the Biden family has been doing in China and what does China have on them? | ||
What kind of extortion and blackmail opportunities are there for them? | ||
Listen, as a columnist for the New York Post, I know professionally it's tough to shock you, but you're very familiar with what's going on in Australia in the last 10 years, the Clive Hamiltons reporting, others. | ||
As you saw in your column today, were you shocked by the revelations from these whistleblowers and the scale of the Chinese Communist Party's infiltration of global corporations? | ||
Look, I was shocked by the scale. | ||
I mean, we're talking about dozens, sometimes hundreds of CCP members, Communist Party members who have sworn an oath to fight for communism for the rest of their life, to be loyal to the party, do whatever it takes to further the Communist Party cause. | ||
Now, these people are working in companies, American companies that are crucial to national security. | ||
For instance, Qualcomm, has almost 250 CCP members working for them in Shanghai alone. | ||
Qualcomm is a company that's involved in the 5G wireless technology and also makes semiconductor chips and in fact was awarded a contract by the Defense Department in 2018 to do the multi-factor authentication for their security systems for all military computers. | ||
You don't get any more crucial than that. | ||
And then, of course, there's Pfizer, which is just rolling out this vaccine. | ||
They have almost 100 CCP members working for them in Shanghai. | ||
And you also have Boeing. | ||
Boeing has almost 250 CCP members scattered across several branches, 30-something branches in Shanghai alone in their maintenance workshops, you know, everywhere. | ||
And these people You know, there's no evidence that these CCP members are actually spies. | ||
But on the other hand, when you swear an allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party, you really owned lock, stock and barrel by them and you abide by their directives. | ||
So that's dangerous enough. | ||
And then we find out that there are actually three consular officials in the American consulate in Shanghai. | ||
All three of the members of the CCP, all females. | ||
We have their names. | ||
We haven't published them. | ||
You know, I reached out to the State Department. | ||
They wouldn't talk about it. | ||
You know, the same situation is happening with the UK and with Australia. | ||
My colleague from The Daily Telegraph, formerly Sherry Marks, and now at The Australian, and The Daily Mail in the UK, also ran their version of this CCP Communist Party member database and there's a former Tory chief in Duncan Smith in the UK who said that there should be no CCP members working for any UK consulate anywhere in the world. He said you can either be loyal to the | ||
Communist Party of China or you can be loyal to Great Britain. You can't be both. | ||
And I think we're at that stage here in the United States. | ||
I do not understand how those three women could be working at the U.S. | ||
consulate in Shanghai today after these revelations. | ||
Miranda, we've got about 20 seconds. | ||
What's your Twitter handle so people can follow you? | ||
We're going to push this story out hard today. | ||
Twitter is at Miranda Devine. | ||
Same on Parler. | ||
Miranda, your intrepid reporting has done so much to put this story into the mainstream media's face. | ||
Don't stop. | ||
Miranda Devine from the New York Post. | ||
unidentified
|
The ever-intrepid Miranda Devine. | |
Short commercial break. | ||
We'll be back with The Whistleblower from Hong Kong Live next. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Really want to thank Miranda Devine for making time on her busy schedule to fit us in today on the show. | ||
Just on a programming note, Sherry Markson, her former colleague, the great intrepid reporter in Australia, will join us live tomorrow. | ||
She's been at the forefront of breaking news on this massive scandal of CCP members working for American companies and consulates all over the world. | ||
One of the most important people in this story has now joined us, Jack Long. | ||
Jack is in, joins us from London, just recently arrived from Hong Kong. | ||
Jack, walk us through, how did this, look, it's something, for our audience that listened to the Saturday shows back in the spring, you remember Jack, would be on, on a fairly regular basis as we brought voices from mainland China and voices from Hong Kong. | ||
On the shutdown of Hong Kong and the pandemic and all that. | ||
So Jack's someone that most of the audience members would be quite familiar with. | ||
Jack, the United States and I know my people in London, people I know that have been shocked by these revelations in the last couple of days coming out about the scale of the Chinese Communist Party's infiltration of global corporations and infiltration into governments. | ||
Walk us through how this came about and where is the story going to go? | ||
unidentified
|
So yeah, just to be clear, it's a list of 1.95 million CCP members from Shanghai. | |
Now, the list has actually been sort of rumored for quite a long time, like actually years. | ||
It's a few years old. | ||
And then suddenly in August, it surfaced. | ||
Some people started posting it online and literally just sharing it on social media. | ||
But nobody actually did any kind of forensic analysis on this, like nobody manually searched for, because one of the columns in the document has like party branches in the companies and residential areas, so you can search like banks and financial institutions You can see on screen, so AstraZeneca, who are making one of the coronavirus vaccines, HSBC. | ||
And one of the most interesting things is about an American company called Qualcomm. | ||
Now, Qualcomm is one of the top suppliers to Huawei. | ||
It's an American company, and it received a special dispensation license from the US government to continue to sell 4G chips to Huawei. | ||
And basically, they have literally dozens of engineers and senior engineers and some senior management in China who are CCP members. | ||
And that's not to say these people are all terrible people or bad people. | ||
But it's just so compromised the whole, you know, the the fact that you know, this is a company which has been specially licensed by the UK government to sell to Huawei to continue after they have been basically banned and sanctioned from us. | ||
And they have a China arm stacked full of party members, basically. | ||
Jack, how would this information actually get out from the party being fairly close hold about this stuff? | ||
How do you think this actually initially got out? | ||
Do you think this is someone inside the CCP? | ||
Is this a separate faction? | ||
I mean, what's in your view driving this? | ||
unidentified
|
That's a really good question, and I have absolutely no idea as to the origin story. | |
You say it could be a sort of factional thing within the party. | ||
Someone could have hacked it from a database. | ||
It could be a sort of a whistleblower, if you like. | ||
It's really very difficult to say. | ||
But yeah, the origin is kind of unknown, which is the curious thing about it. | ||
But the way I verified it in the first instance is around 20% of the people have their phone numbers on. | ||
And I literally rang up about 100 or 150 people, and I asked them various pieces of personal information that are on the list, and they all confirmed literally every single one that didn't just hang up on me immediately. | ||
They all confirmed, like, so I said, like, what are the last three digits of your ID card? | ||
And, like, you know, they confirmed. | ||
It's like, it's impossible for it to be fake, you see what I mean? | ||
Everything is just coordinated and cross-checked perfectly, so I knew it was real. | ||
Look, you've been talking about this, and people in the whistleblower movement have been talking about this for years. | ||
Of course now, for America, particularly a story like this starts to break through to the mainstream media. | ||
People are shocked at the scale of this. | ||
Should this be something people should be shocked about, or is this just the way the CCP rolls? | ||
And do these people, these individuals, and look, we continually say the CCP is the biggest threat To the Chinese people, both in the mainland and Hong Kong and throughout the world. | ||
They're the single biggest threat to the Chinese people. | ||
Are these people, I know they take an oath to the CCP, but do you believe in these roles they're active, at least intelligence assets or information gatherers, loyal to the CCP more so than to the companies they work for and more so to even the governments that would employ them in the consulates? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, yeah, so you're right. | |
I'll be very quick with this. | ||
So basically, one of the discoveries, someone got hold of a full staff list at the British Consulate in Shanghai. | ||
And basically, there is a senior staff member there. | ||
Occupation Unknown, who is a party member. | ||
And there was a brilliant quote in the Daily Mail from an anonymous British intelligence source who basically said, look, there are Secret Service MI6 officers who are working in, in that consulate, and they will literally be like a couple of desks away. | ||
But in terms of your wider question, like, I would just like to say so the main sort of motivation for us working hard on this kind of document is Basically, we're trying to make an argument specifically with HSBC and Standard Chartered that these banks are totally doing the bidding of the Chinese government, freezing the accounts of Hong Kongers who are pro-democracy. | ||
publicly supporting national security law. | ||
And the big argument we're trying to say is, look, the US and the UK governments need to step up, step up to the plate on this and need to sanction these banks, because they are complicit, totally complicit and actively engaging in the crackdown in Hong Kong of human rights or freedom and a fading democracy. | ||
So that is the big argument we're saying. | ||
So yo, Mr. Navarro and You know, Wilbur Ross and all these people, like, were saying, like, regardless of what happens with the election and everything, sanction HSBC, sanction Standard Chartered. | ||
They have hundreds of senior executives, vice presidents of the banks, everything. | ||
This is not just, like, the clerks of the bank. | ||
These are senior executives. | ||
One of them, he was praised by Xi Jinping himself. | ||
He said, great party building in the company, like, personally praised by President Xi Jinping. | ||
They are totally compromised, and we want to make the Western government say to go and sanction these banks. | ||
Jack, the last question, because I know you've got to bounce. | ||
You couldn't get this level of infiltration unless people were either by acts of commission or omission. | ||
Either allowing it to happen or actually knew it was happening. | ||
I mean, it couldn't have been that difficult in the background checks to find out if these people were members of the Chinese Communist Party if you had done, given all the talent that you've got in Shanghai and all the talent you've got in these various places, that you could have done very systematic due diligence. | ||
I think what's so stunning is the scale of it. | ||
Were companies looking the other way or do you think they've already been infiltrated by people that are either pro-CCP or through some sort of financial relationship understand that it benefits them to get CCP members in? | ||
Whether at the consulate, at these companies, this just couldn't happen at that scale unless there was some sort of active program to either recruit and or look the other way. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, very good point again. | |
And one of the things in the mail that they uncovered was there is a special government agency that is kind of working to place, not just party members, but Chinese citizens within foreign missions and diplomatic missions and stuff. | ||
And of course, like, as the educated elites, and you're 15% of Chinese citizens, adult Chinese citizens are CCP members anyway, and that kind of increases with the level of education and stuff. | ||
So you know, It's just, as you say, the potential for compromise. | ||
These people, even if they're not bad people, even if they're not really truly communist, they're in no position to refuse if they are approached by someone from the Public Security Bureau or the Secret Police or some shady state intelligence agency. | ||
They're in no position to say, no, I'm not going to spy for you. | ||
So it's not even the people themselves that we're trying to expose the nature of the You know, the nature of the problem here and the extent of it. | ||
And as we say, you know, it is an extraordinary sort of document leak. | ||
I don't know if we'll ever see anything like this ever again. | ||
But this has got to be acted upon. | ||
You know, it's got to be acted upon. | ||
So we want to see better security at these, you know, consulates and everything else. | ||
But the most important thing we say is sanction these banks that we have proof now, massive, you know, massive involvement of senior executives who are CCP members, who actively encouraged the party branches to take a role in the company affairs. | ||
And it's just, you know, this is like such shocking sort of revelations and stuff. | ||
And we are basically that's the argument we're trying to make and for the US and UK governments to sanction these institutions, primarily HSBC and Standard Chartered. | ||
Well, we will become a platform for that. | ||
So Jack, thank you very much and God bless and be safe. | ||
All of you, all the whistleblower movement, everybody associated with this, you are heroes. | ||
You're heroes of what you did in Hong Kong and you're heroes today. | ||
So take care of yourself. | ||
Jack Lung. | ||
By the way, they're arguing on Capitol Hill about this stimulus program. | ||
They're shutting down all the restaurants in New York. | ||
Virginia's got another curfew. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, it's all inextricably linked. | ||
The Chinese Communist Party either inadvertently had the virus leak out because of illegal operations they were doing about a bioweapons program, or according to Miles Guo and Dr. Yan, they put it out on purpose. | ||
Either way, to destroy Trump and the counterattack against their economic and information warfare. | ||
The whole thing with the ballots, the whole thing with the mail-in votes, all comes from a common source. | ||
That's the CCP virus. | ||
Now it's obvious, and we've been saying this forever, Biden is totally compromised and his family is totally compromised by the Chinese Communist Party, in the old-fashioned way they do it, honeypot them and buy them off. | ||
And now you're seeing to the depths of the corporations it's in, the governments it's in, and this is just the surface. | ||
You know, old crazy Miles Gro, oh Miles Gro is crazy, well go back and look at what he's been saying since he arrived in America to warn us about this. | ||
This is what's so amazing is that the biggest issue, the signal is never discussed. | ||
The signal is never discussed. | ||
People chase rabbits and focus on the noise. | ||
This is the signal. | ||
We're in an existential struggle with a different, totally different system than liberty is based upon. | ||
And many of our elites want that system. | ||
They want state capitalism and authoritarian control. | ||
That's what this fight is about. | ||
That's why this fight's larger than Donald Trump, and Donald Trump knows it's larger than him. | ||
Okay, we've got breaking news. | ||
I want to bring in an individual who's at the forefront, former Attorney General of Kansas, Phil Kline, with breaking news about what they're working on. | ||
Phil, we've got a couple minutes for you, then we're going to bring you back. | ||
What's the breaking news we got from Phil Kline this morning? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, first, and it's not breaking. | |
You're absolutely right, Steve. | ||
We have a corporate oligarchy that's trying to control this election process. | ||
And in Antrim County, forensics have been done on the machines there, the Dominion machines, and it shows a 68% error rate and an adjudication over an 80% error rate, where the federal government guidelines provide for less than 1%. | ||
Now that forensic information is trying to be stifled by the Secretary of State. | ||
She's trying to bury that evidence. | ||
In fact, she's been doing it for some time. | ||
This is an order she issued on December 1st to start deleting e-poll books in Michigan, demanding that they must be deleted at the local level despite all of this controversy around this election. | ||
You've got the Attorney General threatening lawmakers with exercising their constitutional responsibility. | ||
that if they do not certify or agree to the electors that she believes ought to be seated, they'll be investigated criminally by the state. And then you have a governor that is shutting down the people's house. So these legislators cannot meet. | ||
They have officers and troopers in, in SWAT gear surrounding the people's house, the Capitol of the state of Michigan, not letting people enter to try to foist this election on top of the American people. | ||
This ought to frighten everybody. | ||
Phil, can you hang on one second? | ||
A short commercial break. | ||
We're going to return with Phil Kline from the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society. | ||
I've got to tell you one guy that would be very proud of what Phil Kline and his team is doing, and that is St. | ||
Thomas More. | ||
We're going to take a short break. | ||
We'll return with Phil Kline in the report from Michigan that is going to blow your head up next on War Room Pandemic. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Phil Klein joins us. | ||
He is head of the Amistad Project of the Thomas Moore Society, former Attorney General of Kansas, and been a complete hammer in this entire process. | ||
Phil, a couple of questions. | ||
Number one, I believe the Federal Election Commission has a standard of 0.0008% on And we believe what they were doing is pushing these ballots into adjudication. | ||
How could that pop? People's heads are blowing up. | ||
How could it be that far outside? | ||
That can't be an act of omission. | ||
Doesn't that have to almost be an act of commission? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, it does. | |
And we believe what they were doing is pushing these ballots into adjudication. | ||
And the other thing that happened, Steve, that we've spoken about previously, with this half a billion dollar flow of Zuckerberg money plus Google money and so forth into the management of the elections, They created warehouses and other sites to actually manage this adjudication process without Republicans being present. | ||
Which the law requires. | ||
And so the adjudication of the ballots was not overseen. | ||
There's not been any opportunity to verify whether those were actual ballots that were cast by citizens, or ballots injected into the system fraudulently. | ||
And that's part of the problem. | ||
And when you grab those ballots, by the way, in this one instance, in this one county, and compare them to the machine count, the error rate goes up to 82%, or 81.94%. | ||
And I need to be specific, because the Attorney General and the Secretary of State are threatening everybody with criminal investigation, as well as ethics complaints, if you disagree with them. | ||
That is frightening. | ||
I can't believe this is happening in America. | ||
Phil, you're a former AG. | ||
I know you and I have talked before on the show about probable cause. | ||
Do you believe in your professional opinion that there's enough probable cause coming from, I think it was 21 machines in Antrim County, Michigan, probable cause that all the machines in the state of Michigan should be seized immediately to make sure that they can't be wiped clean? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, yes. | |
And I don't believe that we need to meet probable cause. | ||
And this is investigating an election. | ||
And elections must be transparent. | ||
Not opaque, or not behind curtains. | ||
And the law allows this evidence to be obtained, and I think reasonable suspicion is enough. | ||
Now, remarkably, the Secretary of State is arguing that her role is to protect the proprietary property of Dominion. | ||
In other words, the Secretary of State, whose job is on behalf of the people of Michigan, to run a transparent election, You're saying, don't look at this. | ||
We can't look at this. | ||
We've got to protect the property of the vendor. | ||
In other words, we can't look inside the machine that counts our votes? | ||
You've got to be kidding me. | ||
Phil, there's a judge, I thought DiPerno sued representing an individual voter. | ||
There's a judge looking at this. | ||
I've seen the report that's come out, it's been leaked out. | ||
Where do we actually stand technically in the process of how this judge is going to rule or what they're going to rule? | ||
Where are we in the process in Michigan as we speak, getting close to noon? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, this is what I understood this morning, is that the judge was going to release a redacted report that allowed, now I'm hearing this secondhand. | |
That allowed for the Secretary of State to redact specific information. | ||
I'm not sure what information the Secretary of State would need to redact from the report, but this report somehow it's leaked and been reported before the redaction. | ||
So, I don't know what repercussions that might hold, but I will say the report is damning as it relates to the results that have been reported in Michigan and calls into question the use of the Dominion machines. | ||
So, certainly, this is of concern to Michiganders, as well as most Americans, that the Dominion machine is showing an error rate up above 60% in all instances in counting the ballots. | ||
Phil, we got a couple of minutes and we're heading up to the time where the Electoral College will meet. | ||
Stephen Miller, the assistant to the president today, said on Fox & Friends that, hey, we're putting slates in every one of these battleground states. | ||
Donald Trump's electors are going to show up. | ||
Walk us through, is that a smart plan for the president's team, the president Rudy Giuliani and the team, to put forward their own slate of electors in these individual states today? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I believe they have every right to. | |
The Constitution vests the power in determining the electors with the state legislature. | ||
Not the governor, not local election officials, not any of those people, not the Congress of the United States. | ||
The electors are selected by the legislature. | ||
So I think it's very appropriate to send your group of electors and let them know who they are for the legislature to decide. | ||
Now, in response to that, what has happened in Michigan is the governor and certain apparently legislative leaders have shut down the Capitol, preventing the legislators from even gathering. | ||
There are police ringing the Capitol to prevent people from coming into their state Capitol to render this decision. | ||
That is stunning that we are shutting down democracy as we speak with police preventing legislators from coming in. | ||
And the Attorney General, the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the state of Michigan, has threatened them with criminal investigation. | ||
Folks, intimidation and fear is not something that works in a democracy. | ||
It only works in a tyranny. | ||
And what we're seeing is intimidation and fear. | ||
Phil, I take it you're going to fight on. | ||
Stephen Miller said today the only date that matters is noon on the 20th. | ||
Do you stop now because today is the Electoral College meet, or is the Amistad Project going to continue to be at the forefront of this fight? | ||
unidentified
|
We're filing litigation that those deadlines are arbitrary. | |
They're based on history. | ||
And you go all the way back, it's based on how long it takes you to ride a horse to Washington. | ||
That doesn't supersede the Constitution, which gives the responsibility to the legislature. | ||
We're arguing the legislature has a right to meet, has a right to act, has a right to review the election, while these executive officials, governors, secretaries of state, and attorneys general are trying to bury evidence. | ||
The legislature has a right to it, the people have a right to see it, so there is absolutely no way that we quit. | ||
Phil, how do people get access to you during the day? | ||
How do they get access to you on social media? | ||
unidentified
|
Best way to reach me is got-freedom.com, got-freedom, or hyphen-g-o-t hyphen-freedom.com, and also my Twitter, Phil, P-H-I-L-L-D, like David Klein, K-L-I-N-E, Phil D. Klein. | |
Phil Klein is the definition of hold the line. | ||
If you want to see the personification of it, look at the team at the Amistad Project. | ||
Phil, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
OK, we're going to return tonight at five o'clock. | ||
There's going to be breaking news all day long. | ||
Donald J. Trump is thrown down. | ||
Don't think he's backing up an inch. | ||
He does not care what the mainstream media says. | ||
He doesn't care what the Democratic Party says. | ||
He certainly doesn't care what the Republican establishment says. | ||
The fight will continue. | ||
Come back and be ringside at 5 p.m. |