Nov. 17, 2020 - Bannon's War Room
48:11
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well, the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens, War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| For all you veterans out there, we got a gutless coward, the Stolen Valor guy, Blumenthal. | ||
| I don't even call him a senator, which is also President Trump's favorite guy to pound on. | ||
| Blumenthal's in the Senate right now, in full meltdown about our show. | ||
| In the United States Senate, with the greatest deliberative body in the world, Blumenthal's sitting there lying. | ||
| Constantly lying. | ||
| Blumenthal, you can have the biggest meltdown you have. | ||
| We're not going anywhere. | ||
| Here's why they're freaked out. | ||
| They know we're the platform and the voice for the deplorables. | ||
| And they know that we caught them. | ||
| We caught them in this lie. | ||
| We caught them in trying to steal this election. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And they lost. | ||
| And now we're 14 days into that loss. | ||
| This is the second week of the anniversary of your loss. | ||
| You lost. | ||
| You're illegitimate. | ||
| You're illegal. | ||
| We will never, ever, ever, ever agree or consent. | ||
| You need the consent of the government. | ||
| You will never have our consent to try to steal this election. | ||
| Ever. | ||
| You saw the million that came, or the 500,000 to a million that came on Saturday. | ||
| That's just the beginning. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And you saw the joy. | ||
| You saw the resolve. | ||
| Of the American people, of American working class people. | ||
| Not the negativity you bring at night with the burnings and the beatings and all that. | ||
| No. | ||
| Positive energy. | ||
| It's only going to build. | ||
| And yes, Media Matters, we own the streets. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
| We own the streets with working class Americans of every race and gender and sexual preference and ethnicity. | ||
| In a force of positivity, as citizens, that are taking their country back, as you are running dogs for the globalists, who are in business with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We will never back down on this. | ||
| And Richard Blumenthal can stay in the U.S. | ||
| Senate, and he can try to beat up Mark Zuckerberg, who's a tech oligarch, no friend of ours and no friend of this show, right? | ||
| But we're relentless. | ||
| We don't care and we're not going to back down one inch. | ||
| And the reason we're not going to back down one inch, our audience is not going to back down one inch. | ||
| You want to jump in here, Maggie? | ||
| I'm just cracking up because I can't believe that I'm sitting here watching a, you know, kind of half-watching this hearing against tech censorship and this senator is basically trying to pressure Mark Zuckerberg into censoring you! | ||
|
unidentified
|
It kind of makes our case for us, does it not? | |
| And I have to say, I mean, good for Mark Zuckerberg. | ||
| He actually stood up for you and said he would not commit to taking down your Facebook page even though Because the guys at Facebook know it was a figure of speech, that's 100%. | ||
| And by the way, Christopher Wray, President Trump should start to act like it's his second term, and that is not bombing Iran. | ||
| Iran is a junior partner of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Hammer the Chinese Communist Party, cut them off from the dollar, and the mullahs go away. | ||
| Don't let the neocons around you talk you into going into a shooting war. | ||
| We don't need a shooting war. | ||
| You can break these guys with economic warfare, but act like it's your second term. | ||
| Start with firing Wray and firing Fauci. | ||
| You should investigate Fauci. | ||
| All of Fauci's phone records, all of his text messages, everything he leaked to the media to contradict what was going on in the task force should come out immediately. | ||
| There should be an investigation of Fauci. | ||
| Once again, this guy always moves the goalposts. | ||
| Now he's talking about we need to be shut down to the third quarter of 2021. | ||
| Oh, until you get the vaccine, right? | ||
| At which they're going to have two classes of citizenships here, the vaccinated and the non-vaccinated. | ||
| So, and everybody's got to get back to this vaccine and figure the whole thing out, right? | ||
| What's being spun and what's reality. | ||
| But now you've got Fauci just throwing out, no Thanksgiving, no Christmas, except for the elites, right? | ||
| They're having parties and, you know, the governor of California is having a big party and, you know, Nancy Pelosi is having a big dinner. | ||
| Why is she having a big dinner? | ||
| Nancy, you just... Nancy, remember, I'm the one promoting you all the time as a master of political strategies. | ||
| You've got to help me out here. | ||
| Get a little something for the effort. | ||
| You're getting smoked by Kevin McCarthy and guys, and you're having a big dinner over here? | ||
| What, for the walking wounded that came back off the Hustings? | ||
| They're still ten seats up! | ||
| She may not be speaker! | ||
| Maybe that's why she's doing the big thing. | ||
| So I want to go now, and I realize today's show is granularity, but we got to get down to the numbers. | ||
| I realize a lot of folks at homes are not numbers oriented, but you got to understand there's a math Back up to this. | ||
| Rahim, you've done an incredible job of crowdsourcing with top statistical people. | ||
| We're breaking this here today. | ||
| It's going to be all over national polls. | ||
| Walk through first what you actually did. | ||
| Then I want to get the report up there and tell us what your initial conclusions from this report are. | ||
| Well, the first thing I have to say is I am not taking any credit for this. | ||
| The only thing I had to do with this is that on the day after the election, I put out a call on Twitter to say, hey, statistical experts, PhDs, people who know analysis, we need you. | ||
| A ton of people responded to that call. | ||
| I put all of those in one place and I handed that off for somebody else to manage. | ||
| And they've kind of been self-managing themselves, these data scientists, since that, and been constantly churning out reports. | ||
| But this one that came out, that was sent to me yesterday afternoon, is truly outstanding. | ||
| And I mean it's outstanding work, considering how much data these people have had to play with and how much time. | ||
| These people have had to play with so it's here on your screens. | ||
| Let's put it up on the screens. | ||
| It's here right here in front of me as well. | ||
| It's called the Pennsylvania 2020 voting analysis report. | ||
| I want to go through this a little bit here. | ||
| Now if we can scroll to page 14 and 15 to start off on this on this. | ||
| Report. | ||
| It states, we seek to estimate the fraction of registered Democratic voters that voted among the outlier counties. | ||
| We want an unbiased estimate so we removed Allegheny and Philadelphia counties as they are rather unique. | ||
| Ten counties were used for simple linear regression. | ||
| The data are fit well with a simple line and it concludes on this point. | ||
| This means that the number of Biden votes in 10 of the outlier counties was 101% plus of registered Democratic voters versus the majority of other Pennsylvania counties where it was 70% plus. | ||
| An extraordinary statistical difference. | ||
| That is not logical or reasonably explainable legally. | ||
| The most likely explanation is that Excess votes were added to the Biden total that did not come from voters. | ||
| Now I want to be very clear about this as well when we look at this and we go over these forty pages that they're talking about this report is a scientific analysis of the Pennsylvania presidential voting results and is a non-partisan effort by unpaid citizens and volunteers and they say the statistical analysis do not prove fraud but rather provide scientific evidence that reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens voted. | ||
| So we can then move on to page 18 on this and in the executive summary of a testable hypothesis of fraud using a predictive model for Montgomery County states quote these facts suggest a mathematically extraordinary event occurring in multiple counties simultaneously at a magnitude well above what is needed to change which candidate won Pennsylvania's electoral votes. | ||
| That is what Steve Cortez was talking about, right? | ||
| That's, I mean, you guys are making your sports metaphors that I don't understand. | ||
| Four games, four perfect games. | ||
| Perfect games, yeah. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| That is the part that you guys and that Steve Cortez has previously reflected on. | ||
| Predictive models in the report reveal tens of thousands of potentially fraudulent votes across Pennsylvania leading the statisticians collaborating on the report to conclude that quote a singular or small set of actors in a position to intercept and modify all precincts data may have participated in a vote fraud scheme to increase Biden's votes in Democrat heavy districts Therefore it will be undetected by workers at the precincts and exceedingly, they say, exceedingly trivial to detect. | ||
| Page 19 is also interesting because it says the Biden vote change over Hillary Clinton's vote in 2016 in Montgomery County shows a mathematically fraudulent result that is adding votes unnaturally to the tail of the distribution. | ||
| High turnout or massive changes in voter preferences cannot statistically create this result in any reasonable probability. | ||
| The signature is mathematical evidence of a classical form of fraud called stuffing the curve. | ||
| The 2008 subprime mortgage risk management meltdown is a recent example of this kind of fraud. | ||
| And they then go in and you can see on your screens there, you've got that stuffing the curve, you have that stuffing the curve image up there from I think it's page 19. | ||
| Now that actually goes to show that in that circumstance it's called stuffing the tail. | ||
| The data shows a mathematically fraudulent result that is adding votes unnaturally to the tail of the distribution. | ||
| Then they talk about an astonishing 16 point increase in the take of new votes favoring Biden. | ||
| Quote, not only a match turnout of supporters to keep pace with Trump turnout at higher required multiple, but anomalous amounts of additional new turnout on top. | ||
| It carries on in large set of precincts. | ||
| The gains by Biden alone exceed 100% of the precincts new registrations. | ||
| And remember guys, when I was in Uh, Philadelphia very recently. | ||
| I got on the phone to you for one of the evening shows and I said, watch Allegheny County. | ||
| Everybody knows about Allegheny County. | ||
| So let's get on to page 22, Allegheny County. | ||
| Quote, a predictive model hypothesizes up to 30,500 plus fraudulent votes in Allegheny County alone. | ||
| With the model able to expand to other counties with more time, Biden's votes alone are being inflated. | ||
| The hypothesis suggests a singular or small set of actors in a position to intercept and modify all precincts data applied a stuffing the Gaussian. | ||
| It's a different variant on what happened in Montgomery County. | ||
| It indicates a possibility of a different actor. | ||
| It's a votes fraud scheme to increase Biden's vote in Democrat heavy districts. | ||
| That again would be undetected by workers at the precincts and exceedingly trivial to detect | ||
| In a Gaussian differential on page 23 they continue talking about Allegheny County and they say initial analysis was a bit of a surprise as instead of a stuffing the tail attack as in Montgomery County there seems to have been a stuffing the everything kind of behavior in Allegheny County with all precincts game for adding Biden counts the visualization again this is page 23 as you can see on your screens there the visualization | ||
| Point 1. | ||
| There are major statistical aberrations in the PA voting records that are extremely unlikely to occur in a normal, i.e. | ||
| unmanipulated setting. | ||
| Number 2. | ||
| The anomalies almost exclusively happened with Biden votes, time and again using a variety of techniques. | ||
| The Trump votes look statistically normal. | ||
| Number 3. | ||
| 11 out of 67 Pennsylvania counties stood out from all of the rest. | ||
| These counties showed distinctive signs of voting abnormalities. | ||
| Again, all for Biden. | ||
| Next point, the total number of suspicious votes in these counties is 300,000. | ||
| which greatly exceeds the reported margin of Biden votes over Trump. We don't know how many of these are artificial votes or votes switched from Trump to Biden. | ||
| Those are two distinct differences that are worth considering. And then finally, the statistic analysis do not prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens voted. And in the interest of transparency, we have the full report up as a lead item on the National Pulse. Wow. So summarize maybe for our audience, and we told folks today we're going to get into the granularity. | ||
| We're going to have Richard Barris on this evening's show for an hour to go through the same things. | ||
| You have to know the math. | ||
| You have to be comfortable with your understanding of the math to understand how they're trying to steal this. | ||
| I had a very prominent lawyer, one of the most prominent constitutional lawyers in Washington, D.C. | ||
| that told me today says they, it says it's absolutely, it's not even a question that they stole this. They said the question now is do we have enough time to actually back the statistical anomalies up with data and what he said is that the reason he has hope is that they had planned and plotted. | ||
| He said they spent $200 million in lawsuits and in legislative activity. | ||
| Perkins Coy and others, Elias, as we said, remember Rahim, setting this up since spring. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| have it gamed out, but they were overwhelmed by the scale of Trump's votes. | ||
| That's why you're probably going to have some of this coming in by the van full with they never intended to have so many just Biden only votes. | ||
| That is a little bit of the panic that set in given the scale of Trump's victory. | ||
| So absolutely, it's a lie. | ||
| He's not legitimate. | ||
| He's not legal. | ||
| The consent of the governed, the governed 72 million Trump voters will never ever consent to a legal theft of this by Joe Biden. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| Blumenthal and Sacha Baron Cohen and Selena Gomez, you can cry and whine and everything you want. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are not going to stop. | |
| OK, you're trying to steal this. | ||
| We will not allow it. | ||
| The deplorables will not allow it. | ||
| OK, we're going to return in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Let me ask about Facebook community standards, which ban language that, quote, incites or facilitates serious violence. | ||
| As you know, on November 5, Steve Bannon, in a Facebook Live video called for beheadings of Dr. Fauci and FBI Director Wray for not acting more favorably toward President Trump. | ||
| Twitter banned Bannon for these remarks. | ||
| You removed the video, Mr. Zuckerberg, but on Thursday you reportedly told Facebook employees that Bannon had not violated enough policies that he should be banned from Facebook. | ||
| My question to you is, how many times has Steve Bannon allowed the call for the murder of government officials before Facebook suspends his account? | ||
| Senator, as you say, the content in question did violate our policies and we took it down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Having a content violation does not automatically mean your account gets taken down. | |
| And the number of strikes varies depending on the type of offense. | ||
| So if people are posting terrorist content or child exploitation content, then the first time that they do it, then we will take down their account. | ||
| For other things, it's multiple. | ||
| I'd be happy to follow up afterwards. | ||
| We try not to disclose his... Will you close his account? | ||
| Sorry, I didn't hear that. | ||
| Will you commit to taking down that account, Steve Bannon's account? | ||
| Senator, no, that's not what our policies would suggest that we should do in this case. | ||
| Boom! | ||
| Hey, Blumenthal, how about taking down, or how about putting on your account Truth in Advertising, you gutless coward, of how you've stolen valor and you tried to steal the valor of our Vietnam veterans, right? | ||
| With your lies about your service in Vietnam. | ||
| You're a disgrace. | ||
| You're a total and complete disgrace. | ||
| And I love the fact that we got you worked up. | ||
| Joe Biden's illegitimate. | ||
| Joe Biden is illegal. | ||
| You're trying to steal a massive victory by Donald J. Trump, and we're not going to allow it to happen. | ||
| You can sit there in all your Senate hearings, you can do everything you want, you can whine and cry, and do it all. | ||
| You do not have the consent of the governed. | ||
| And every day we peel this thing back, it stinks more to high heaven. | ||
| The audacity and gall, the way that you're trying to steal it. | ||
| So I want to go to comments. | ||
| Maggie, you're a social media person. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| Well, I have to highlight a couple other great quotes from Senator Blumenthal. | ||
| These just made me laugh. | ||
| He also said, has Facebook avoided penalizing conservative pages based on fear of accusations of political bias? | ||
| What? | ||
| And another one, Facebook has a record of caving to conservative pressure. | ||
| We've got to jump. | ||
| Okay, we're going to come back. | ||
| We've got Boris Epstein just got off the plane with the legal team up in Williamsport, Pennsylvania to argue. | ||
| We're going to come back to Maggie in a second. | ||
| Boris, do we have Boris on the phone? | ||
| Rahim Ghassan has just put out a statistical analysis. | ||
| We had Steve Cortez on for 30 minutes walking through the over-the-top improbability that Biden mathematically could win here with these phony ballots. | ||
| Give us the sense of what you guys are going to argue today, what are the two broad strokes on the cases, and who's actually going to be in the room, because there's all kinds of rumors out there that the lead attorney quit, you've got other guys, and that Rudy's going to do the argument. | ||
| You're going to be there. | ||
| Walk us through the team, and walk us through the strategy, and walk us through the argument. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, Steve. | |
| Good to be with you. | ||
| I'm in beautiful, gorgeous Williamsport, Pennsylvania this morning with the one and only America's Mayor Rudy Giuliani. | ||
| We're on the way. | ||
| The mayor is going to be participating. | ||
| He filed Pro Hoc Vitae. | ||
| We expect that to be granted and for Mayor Giuliani to be a key part of the proceedings today. | ||
| In terms of the lead attorney, she did not quit. | ||
| She's still handling the state case. | ||
| in Pennsylvania Supreme Court for President Trump. | ||
| We have a great law firm of Mark Scoringi that's going to be involved with us in the federal case here in Pennsylvania. A lot of fake news out there that's, oh, Scoringi wrote something in terms of President Barack Obama. | ||
| I think we've lost him. We're going to see if we get Boris back. | ||
| Let's try to reconnect with Boris. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just didn't read enough of it off of the screen. | |
| Nah, I think we're good. | ||
| What he's talking about is Mark's, he's a radio talk show host. | ||
| He said some things a couple of days afterwards that are not relevant today, particularly when we see the mathematical analysis and everything like that. | ||
| Why don't we wait and just see when we can get him, he's got a clear signal, there's no need to rush this, it's very important. | ||
| Let's go back to social media to your analysis and other comments. | ||
| Yeah, so the comments being made by the Senator in front of this hearing to Mark Zuckerberg are insane, right? | ||
| He's sitting there, and as I pointed out before, this whole Senate hearing is supposed to be about unfair bias towards conservatives, particularly around these election issues, and yet we've got the Senator who's trying to pressure Mark Zuckerberg into banning your Facebook account. | ||
| It's pretty unbelievable, and it's pretty awesome, though, because I'm watching in the live chat the things that people are saying in response, and people are saying what I've been saying, which is, yeah, but what about Kathy Griffin? | ||
| What about the people who actually, you know, put up violent images of her holding up a bloodied head of the President of the United States, and yet somehow that is acceptable, but you making a kind of analogy or metaphor A figure of speech. | ||
| Let's go back to Boris. | ||
| I think we've got Boris. | ||
| Let's try to get Boris again. | ||
| So Boris, you had us on... We lost it? | ||
| Okay, let's just take our time. | ||
| I don't want to jump back and forth here. | ||
| Let's see if we can get him when they actually get to a location. | ||
| Boris Epstein is with the legal team today in Williamsport. | ||
| breaking news is that Rudy is not only going to be in the room, I think Rudy is going to actually be the, is actually going to argue the case and they're going to argue two sides of this case. A little bit of a misunderstanding about what happened the other night, right? So the ballot situation and particularly the ability to witness these naked ballots and it's caused a statistical anomaly where I think there's only been 951 ballots that have been rejected of | ||
| the 2.6 million, particularly was it the 682,000 in Philadelphia and and then there's Allegheny County. | ||
| I mean, Jack, you're a Pennsylvania guy, right? | ||
| You know how they roll in Philadelphia. | ||
| You've seen Raheem's statistical analysis. | ||
| You've heard Steve Cortez. | ||
| What's your sense of things? | ||
| Listen, I mean, Philadelphia has been playing this game for years and I had some direct experience of it back in 2000 when we had the Corzine election and they bused everybody from West Philly over to New Jersey to vote for him to turn that. | ||
| This has been going on for decades in Philadelphia. | ||
| The difference now is now that we have the mail-in ballots, now that we have the scandemic That the Democrats have been able to hide behind so as to ensure that they could manufacture as many votes as they wanted to while pretending that they were saving lives. | ||
| Just as they're trying to increase the fear now. | ||
| The most troubling thing for me though when we talk about this guy Blumenthal and he's there talking about why isn't Facebook shutting down Steve Bannon's page or any other page that he doesn't like. | ||
| This should be a huge tell for our audience because the left always defaults to a totalitarian response to your ability to communicate, your ability to travel, your ability to go to school, have a job, forcing you on vaccinations now. | ||
| It is on and on. | ||
| This whole scenario that we have witnessed over the last two weeks is day by day becoming more terrifying for me because It really describes the future should we ever allow these people to have control of our program. | ||
| They are anti-liberty. | ||
| They are anti-freedom. | ||
| The Constitution is just an old document with some words on it that they have never read and that they callously put their hands on Bibles that they don't believe in and swear an oath to. | ||
| It is time for the hardcore American patriots to say enough. | ||
| Blumenthal is showing you what the future is. | ||
| The future is the suppression of your voice, the suppression of your faith, and the suppression of freedom. | ||
| And don't think they're not going to move heaven and earth to also take your weapons, to take your guns, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, heck yes! | |
| They're going to take your freedom of speech, and they want to take your ability to defend yourself. | ||
| There's no doubt what's coming, right? | ||
| They're blatant. | ||
| This steal is so galling and so ridiculous on the face of it, of what they're trying to do, and suppress their own information. | ||
| Let's go back to Maggie. | ||
| We've got a couple of minutes here. | ||
| Maggie, go into some of the comments on what you were talking about. | ||
| Yeah, mostly people are just calling out, you know, calling out this guy, you know, and it's funny because most of the people who are in the chat, they cannot stand these guys. | ||
| They're sitting there just ripping on Zuckerberg and ripping on Jack Dorsey, yet they hate this guy even more. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're calling him out and then they're also saying good for Zuckerberg, at least for standing up and saying, you know... I think his lawyers, I think Zuckerberg's lawyers, they understand what, you know, what's coming. | |
| Rahim, who's the lead on the team that did the analysis? | ||
| Well, I don't know if any of the statisticians actually want their names out there. | ||
| Okay, fine, fine, fine. | ||
| You didn't put those on the report? | ||
| They're in the report because they've left their own names in the report, but I'm not going to read their names out on national television in case they don't want to. | ||
| If people want to find their names deep in the report, they can. | ||
| Here's what we would like to do, if they're open to it. | ||
| We'd like to break up and have these guys on for a big section of time. | ||
| I think it's very important For the American people. | ||
| We're going to be relentless about going through... Because remember, CNN rubs your nose in it every day on the pandemic. | ||
| You're not evidence-based, you're not science-based, you're not data-based, right? | ||
| We're all of those. | ||
| And that's where we want to get to the math. | ||
| The problem with a lot of this is that, I mean, these are not partisan people. | ||
| They're people who are doing this because they want American elections to happen. | ||
| Math is not partisan. | ||
| Right, but the driving factor for them is they want to know whether or not American elections have integrity about them. | ||
| And that's what's driving them to do these reports. | ||
| And you can tell what's going to happen when the establishment media picks up on this. | ||
| They're going to muddy their names and sully their names. | ||
| And these are people who work at some of the highest level institutions in the country. | ||
| And that's what, you know, they're putting themselves on the front lines here about. | ||
| So, you know, we'll try and get them on. | ||
| I just wouldn't be surprised if these people, you know, are fearful of the... I mean, you look, just put it into context. | ||
| You have a senator, I don't call him a senator, of the United States trying to force a big tech CEO to take down an individual's Facebook presence because it's politics he doesn't like. | ||
| A figure of speech. | ||
| Actually, he's forcing these people to violate 230. | ||
| We've got to jump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we want to go back to Williamsport, Pennsylvania with the team that's going to argue the case in federal court today for the Trump campaign, Boris Epstein. | ||
| Boris, walk us through what's the plan, what's the strategy, who are the players? | ||
| Do we not? Okay, we did. Check that. Okay, we're going to try to get our... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll tell you that. | |
| right here i'm right here yeah we we got we got a great bourse start from the top of the good uh... it's going to be in beautiful williamsburg pennsylvania this morning i'll tell you that it's a gorgeous gorgeous morning uh... and uh... open the home of the uh... the little league world series So, here's what's going on. | ||
| I'm here with Mayor Rudy Giuliani. | ||
| He's entered a Pro Hoc Vici motion, and he will be a major part of today's hearing. | ||
| We've got Mark Sparingi, who will be here as well. | ||
| Linda Kearns, who was our prior lead counsel in this case, is continuing to work on behalf of President Trump. | ||
| She'll be leading the state Supreme Court case in Pennsylvania. | ||
| And the key issue today, if this is a motion to dismiss on the law, all the facts are to be presumed in the favor of the plaintiffs, which obviously we are representing, which is President Trump, as well as other plaintiffs here in the case, who are actual voters who were denied due process and equal protection. | ||
| And that's what this is all about, making sure that American voters in Pennsylvania and all across the country are treated equally, fairly, and with due process. | ||
| And that's what the president stands for and his continued call to make sure that every legal vote is counted. | ||
| Your equal protection argument is in what regard? | ||
| What are the facts that back your argument up for the equal protection part? | ||
| I don't want to get ahead of today's argument, which will obviously get out there, but you'll see this in the filings that have been made. | ||
| The equal protection argument hinges on the fact. | ||
| that a voter in particular counties in Pennsylvania, and specifically Democrat counties in Pennsylvania, may have had his or her ballot cured outside of the process that it's supposed to be, while a voter in Republican counties may have not had it cured. | ||
| So that is unequal protection under the law, under the Constitution, because you're living in a Democrat county, Allegheny or Philadelphia county, and the Democrat poll watchers are curing ballots inappropriately. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But in Republican counties, you know, pick a county, or something like that. | |
| The way our poll watchers are not curing ballots inappropriately, which is in accordance with court orders, there's a lack of equal protection under the law under the Constitution. | ||
| And in terms of due process, the due process question hinges on the the watchers issue here in Pennsylvania. | ||
| That's what observers, inspectors are referred to as watchers. | ||
| If watchers are not allowed to actually observe the counting of absentee ballots, that is a lack of due process. So that is a continued argument that the president has made and Rudy Giuliani has pointed to all across the country, in not just Pennsylvania, but in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and so on and so forth. | ||
| In the due process argument, we've had Steve Cortez, your colleague over at the campaign, walk through this amazing, and Rahim's done it with an outside group, two sets of analysis that just show that these mathematical anomalies are so improbable, close to zero, they could happen in Pennsylvania, particularly where they happen in Pennsylvania. | ||
| And evidence on the issues that we've laid out. | ||
| Boris, thank you. | ||
| We'll let you get back to the team. | ||
| Thank you very much for taking time away. | ||
| Glad to see you're up there on location. | ||
| From Arizona to Williamsport, Pennsylvania. | ||
| From Maricopa County to the heart of where this case is, Boris Epstein is on it. | ||
| So thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| God bless you and the listeners, Steve. | ||
| Thanks so much. | ||
| Since yesterday, we did Boris to Boris. | ||
| I just want to mention Boris Johnson has now tested negative, having tested positive just a couple of days ago. | ||
| But he's still going to quarantine for 14 days, by the way. | ||
| How can you have it and then, as he had it, didn't he build up antibodies or are the antibodies already worn off? | ||
| Jack? | ||
| Well, I mean, this is a startling problem. | ||
| We can get into it. | ||
| I mean, they talk about the vaccines. | ||
| They don't know if the vaccine will last more than four or six months. | ||
| They've seen multiple cases, particularly in China. | ||
| We had an early case in Nevada in April where a kid caught it for a second time after being completely cured. | ||
| This is why I've been saying for a long time, this is something that we need to live with. | ||
| There was some irony in the fact that Rudy Giuliani is up in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, because they canceled the Little League World Series this year because of the fear. | ||
| Now, I'd like some enterprising reporter out there to go out and get the number of Little Leaguers that died of the COVID-19 this year, because I guarantee you it's under 10, if possible. | ||
| And if that was the case, they probably had some other serious problems. | ||
| But isn't the argument you're going to give it to granddad? | ||
| Isn't that the argument with the COVID? | ||
| Look, my dad is in his mid-80s. | ||
| Every time I talk to him, I say, Dad, how's your day going? | ||
| He goes, it's great. | ||
| I woke up this morning. | ||
| These guys are being robbed of the last days on planet Earth because the Democrats want to promote fear. | ||
| We cannot live in a state of fear forever. | ||
| I think the American people, I think our audience, I think this is globally true. | ||
| We're looking around and going, really? | ||
| I just don't see people dropping in the streets here. | ||
| You look at the hospitalizations in Chicago. | ||
| They're no different than they were a year ago today. | ||
| But somehow we're in absolute fear. | ||
| This is becoming nonsense, people, and it's all part and parcel of a program to obscure the big grift, the big steal that is going on right now, and they have been using, they've been planning to use this pandemic all the way since the spring as they plan for mail-in voting. | ||
| You don't think that this thing was part of a grand scheme? | ||
| They traumatized their base with the mass hysteria that they counted. | ||
| They weren't listening to War Room Pandemic, where you know targeted interventions, comorbidities are a thing. | ||
| Maggie, you had a very quizzical look when Jack, you haven't heard, see Maggie, you really haven't seen the War Room when we're in pandemic mode, right? | ||
| Then it's our first rule here is no fighting in the War Room. | ||
| Jack's got his ideas, I've got mine. | ||
| Unfortunately, I guess fortunately, I guess it is, the audience backs Jack 1000%. | ||
| I know I've been saying this stuff since January when we first got the analysis of who were likely to die. | ||
| I said, hey people, there's some good news and there's some bad news. | ||
| Good news is if you're under 65 and healthy, you've really got nothing to worry about. | ||
| Bad news is if you're diabetic or you've got heart disease or lung disease, you've got some problems. | ||
| Nothing has changed except the ratcheting up of fear, turning the bravest people on planet Earth into cowering fools. | ||
| People, it's time to say enough. | ||
| I also noticed, by the way, just quickly that nobody's talking about the comorbidities really. | ||
| You know, we keep talking about the numbers and the testing and all of that, but the talking heads on television who are trying to scare us all into new lockdowns aren't actually speaking About what would make America healthier and make America more resilient to this thing. | ||
| Which is, guess what? | ||
| Not shutting yourself in your house eating canned foods from Amazon. | ||
| It's actually going out, getting some exercise, getting some fresh air, getting some vitamin D, and making yourself a healthier person. | ||
| Well, the other thing is, let's face it, obesity is probably the singular comorbidity here, right? | ||
| And while they tell you you can't have a bar, you can't have a picnic, you can't have Thanksgiving, guess what restaurants were allowed to stay open the entire time? | ||
| The fast food restaurants. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| I mean, if we're really going to be serious about taking this thing head-on, then we should be taking on, head-on, the underlying comorbidities that make this lethal. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And start attacking those habits that have put significant portions of the population in the kill zone, not because they're innately necessarily going to die of this disease, but because they've been stuffing McDonald's down their throat for 40 years. | ||
| This is a big problem, but you haven't heard the left say anything about this. | ||
| Not a single word. | ||
| This is the thing with Fauci, why I think he ought to be fired and investigated, is that it upsets me that he goes out of his way to say how President Trump hasn't been on top of the task force, yet he's been moving the goalposts. | ||
| I mean, our whole thing with Fauci from day one is about how you're moving the goalposts all over. | ||
| Now, this bomb that he drops two days ago, this bombshell that, oh, well, we're really going to have to be locked down Under these type of restrictions, even harsher restrictions, until the end of the third quarter. | ||
| That's essentially just where we were, right? | ||
| It's a couple weeks back, a year from now, essentially. | ||
| And there's no plan. | ||
| I mean, the U.S. | ||
| economy, Biden's coming through with a, not that it'll be implemented because he's not president and will not be president, a $7 trillion, you know, $7 trillion bailout package. | ||
| This is where, we've come up the learning curve of this thing. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And now we know about targeted interventions and about being savvier and about, you know, where you have to have to take care of the ICU units and all the capacity utilizations. | ||
| This is why this edict about Thanksgiving and now Christmas is just is just over the top. | ||
| There's something else here that's more insidious than them. | ||
| You know, and you see people now saying, hey, I'm not going to do it. | ||
| I think the sheriffs in New York in New York state are telling Cuomo, we're not going to force your Thanksgiving thing. | ||
| We're not going to force your Christmas deal. | ||
| They actually had a federal court up in Buffalo this morning. | ||
| Some regular musician, you know, he has a gig where he plays the guitar at a local bar, and this is how he made his living. | ||
| And they said that restaurants that were advertising live music could no longer do this because it encouraged irresponsible behavior or some such nonsense. | ||
| Well, he won the appeal. | ||
| So I think you're going to see this coming. | ||
| The courts may save us. | ||
| The courts actually may be what save us because so much of what has gone on is unconstitutional. | ||
| You're watching Governor Whitmer in Michigan right now. | ||
| She was already told three weeks ago that she was well beyond her constitutional rights to keep extending this lockdown beyond what she was given permission for the legislature in the spring. | ||
| And yet, you know, nothing is stopping her. | ||
| She's going to lock it down again. | ||
| She does not care. | ||
| This is the danger of the totalitarian left. | ||
| They know what's better for you, and it doesn't matter if it's how you should dress, what books you should read, what vaccinations you need, who your friends can be, and where you can socialize. | ||
| They want to control every aspect of your life and they're using this crisis to accelerate that. | ||
| And the point that you're making, Rahim, is about your natural immune system. | ||
| That people got out of the thing of focusing on the natural immune system and went right to it. | ||
| Can we put up, I want to put the Economist, if we get the guys in Denver to put up that Economist cover. | ||
| I think the two covers of magazines that have People should focus on that are mouthpieces for the party of Davos. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Remember, no conspiracy, but no coincidences. | ||
| Or the Time Magazine, from the guy that, Salesforce, that guy, a huge globalist, has the great reset, right? | ||
| The great reset cover from about two or three weeks ago. | ||
| And then, I think, the starkest, and I'm not an anti-vaxxer, right? | ||
| But I know some anti-vaxxers. | ||
| You look at that, and that, to me, So graphically sums up what the globalist party of Davos, right? | ||
| The dark tunnel that we're in, right? | ||
| And the light at the end of the tunnel, that bright light, is the needle with the vaccine in it. | ||
| Every totalitarian system needs a boogeyman. | ||
| They do. | ||
| You know, you had the Nazis, the Jews were responsible for everything. | ||
| You know, you had the Soviets, they had kids walking around the field trying to find potato bugs that the evil Americans had put in their fields. | ||
| This totalitarian system that they want to impose on us through a giant election fraud. | ||
| Is the same. | ||
| And they are using the virus in the same way that totalitarian regimes in the past have used these false boogeymen to create fear for control. | ||
| Okay, we're going to come back and we're going to let Maggie speak. | ||
| There's a poem about Maggie. | ||
| There's a poem about Maggie in the live chat. | ||
| It says, Maggie, Maggie, she's so fine, make Pelosi spill her wine, hey Maggie. | ||
| Okay, we're going to come back when we return. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Banham. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Okay, Maggie, you get to speak. | ||
| Oh, thank you. | ||
| You're too polite. | ||
| In the warm, you've just got to grab the mic. | ||
| Just got to jump in there. | ||
| Well, I wanted to piggyback on what Rahim was saying, that nobody is talking about these comorbidities. | ||
| I think the CDC came out over the summer and said that they found that, I guess, the people with 2.6 or higher comorbidities on average or something are the people that are most likely dying from this. | ||
| You know, and so it doesn't make any sense. | ||
| Like, why are we closing gyms? | ||
| Why are we closing, you know, smaller restaurants that can provide healthier food options? | ||
| And, you know, I think they came out with something like people that had died just from coronavirus was something like nine or ten thousand people at that time of that count, and that study came out. | ||
| But I just have to question, like, I think 480,000 people per year die of smoking in the United States. | ||
| That's a really high number, but yet we never talk about that. | ||
| That's not a massive focus. | ||
| But we don't go off and we don't ban smoking, we don't ban cigarettes, we don't ban vaping. | ||
| Not that I think we ever should, but my point is, why are our freedoms being stripped away in this specific way because of a virus that is very targeted at selected people? | ||
| The President's solution The solution we talked about here was targeted interventions. | ||
| Targeted interventions in high comorbidities. | ||
| That would be diabetics, obesity, minority communities, the elderly. | ||
| Strategies will come up that, hey, and look, we've gone up a learning curve on this. | ||
| Maybe you don't congregate, you know, this whole thing with the nursing homes, the situation in New Jersey and the situation in New York, and particularly New York City, where you had such a high death rate from the, not just the nursing homes, but the care facilities for the elderly. | ||
| Do you think that a plan has actually been laid out that is cohesive, that you could have, and we talked about the liability, but that you could actually have some modicum of societal function But you had the targeted interventions that Blix and you talked about back in April and May, as the administration laid out a case for how you handle those targeted interventions. | ||
| Well, first of all, we have to get the FDA to approve these vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer, right? | ||
| I don't want to talk about the vaccines. | ||
| The vaccines are different. | ||
| I'm saying the targeted interventions in communities. | ||
| I think the vaccine at this point has to be the key to the targeted intervention, right? | ||
| They say that we're going to have 25 minutes. | ||
| Not therapeutics? | ||
| Not hydroxychloroquine? | ||
| I think that the hydroxychloroquine and all of that is totally necessary. | ||
| I don't think you're going to have a huge blowback in this vaccine. | ||
| I got Jack Maxine a trap here. | ||
| If you do that, you're going to have a two-tier society. | ||
| You're going to have the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen, there's going to be... No, no, no, I'm not saying that... Nobody puts Maxine in a corner. | |
| Nobody needs to be coerced to do this, but if you're going to give it to people first, it most definitely should go to the elderly. | ||
| We're going to have... We're kicking back... 25 million dosages by Christmas. | ||
| We have about 40 million people over 65 in this country. | ||
| They should get it first. | ||
| It doesn't mean we're going to force you to take it. | ||
| Right now, right now, right now. | ||
| Right now, Jack Maxey, they're in meltdown in the live stream because Jack Maxey is coming out for the vaccine. | ||
| I'm not going to take it. | ||
| I'll tell you, I'm not going to take it. | ||
| Can we play the fights on? | ||
| We want to defend Jack Maxey. | ||
| He's obviously a key part of this. | ||
| He ran the War Room in 18 when he was not really a public figure. | ||
| He stepped up to the show because so many of our guys left for the campaign. | ||
| Jack became a main part. | ||
| John Fredericks. | ||
| Actually, and John Frigg is the nicest guy in the world. | ||
| John Frigg actually goes after Jag Maxx today for what is one of our favorite shirts, right? | ||
| And I just want to make sure John understands this. | ||
| That shirt is the color of his alma mater. | ||
| Which is Yale. | ||
| And we now have the Whiffin' Poofs. | ||
| Were you a Whiffin' Poof? | ||
| No, no. | ||
| You are such a Whiffin' Poof! | ||
| Whiffin' Poof is the Great Choral Society of Yale. | ||
| Are you not a Whiffin' Poof? | ||
| Holy, Cole Porter was a Whiffin' Poof! | ||
| If there are any Whiffin' Poofs out there listening, the very fact that I might be associated with you is probably causing you to be in the fetal position right now, but great admiration for all of you, great voices, Great talent. | ||
| Cole Porter, the great author of the American Songbook, was it with him, Poof? | ||
| I believe it was. | ||
| Cole Porter, my dad, was a deke, which is no longer allowed at Yale. | ||
| I was a deke as well. | ||
| So was Kavanaugh. | ||
| My brother's a deke. | ||
| Kavanaugh was a deke as well. | ||
| My dekes were thrown out of VPI. | ||
| They're thrown out of everywhere. | ||
| Well, anyway, back in the 50s, Cole Porter's an elderly man and an alcoholic, and he used to come up to New Haven on Sundays and sit there and drink milk punch and play the piano in the fraternity house until about 6 o'clock when they'd take two young brothers and haul them back to New York arm-in-arm in the train, and this would go on every weekend until he died. | ||
| You're listening to the song of Yale. | ||
| One last question the audience wants to know. | ||
| It is rumored that you're Skull and Bones. | ||
| No, no, not Skull and Bones. | ||
| So you're not a whiffin' poofy and not Skull and Bones? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no, no. | |
| Were you Calhoun College? | ||
| What college were you in? | ||
| I was in Pearson College. | ||
| I lived in a lower courtyard whose name cannot be said on air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We had a society at my college, the University of Westminster. | |
| It was called Al-Qaeda. | ||
| No doubt, no doubt. | ||
| Hopefully British intelligence rolled you up. | ||
| What's on National Pulse for this afternoon? | ||
| So this afternoon we're going to be talking to Kevin Freeman from the Economic War Room. | ||
| Love that guy. | ||
| They're running the Every Legal Vote website right now, which is an incredible resource. | ||
| We had Frank Gaffney on the other day. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| How's that doing? | ||
| Oh yeah, incredibly well, and it's actually an incredibly well designed website that aggregates all the information about what's going on with this election. | ||
| So you can go to everylegalvote.com, it's got the breaking news, it's got the statistical breakdowns, all of it, and it's incredibly well thrown together. | ||
| So we'll have Kevin Freeman on this afternoon at 3 o'clock talking us through that. | ||
| We'll get into more of the detail in this voting analysis report as well. | ||
| And I have some good news for you, Stephen, for the War Room audience. | ||
| It does appear that we may be able to get you one of these statistical analysts to come on as well. | ||
| I think we've had a volunteer. | ||
| We want that. | ||
| Richard Barris is going to be on for an entire hour today to go through the numbers. | ||
| Richard Barris, the People's Pundit. | ||
| He was taken down. | ||
| 6pm. | ||
| The show starts at 5. | ||
| Maggie, I've gotten such positive feedback for the little films, interviews. | ||
| Are more coming out from the rally on Saturday? | ||
| Yeah, I'm going to cut together a long version on YouTube and post all of them there, and I'm just going to continue to post sort of the one-off short ones on my Instagram and my Twitter. | ||
| I haven't told you, but there's a big demand for you to show up in Georgia on Saturday, so I've got to talk to you about that later. | ||
| Maggie, how do they get your social media? | ||
| How do people find you right now? | ||
| They can find me at FogCityMidge, and that is my handle everywhere. | ||
| Okay, and thank God Blumenthal didn't try to take Maggie down out of the gram. | ||
| Yeah, he doesn't have his eye on me yet. | ||
| Don't take her out of the gram. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be back at five o'clock, a big show day. | ||
| We're going to have a live report from the team that's arguing in federal court in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, the President's case today, the first hearing. | ||
| There will be many more after this. | ||
| We're also going to have reports from Nevada, reports from Georgia, where the battle is. | ||
| The fight is from Wisconsin to Michigan to Nevada to Arizona. | ||
| We are not going to allow Joe Biden and the globalists to steal this massive victory of President Donald J. Trump and Richard Burrus being to show you the math at six o'clock tonight. | ||
| See you at five. |
Export Selection