Jeffrey Epstein leveraged connections with figures like Ehud Barak, Noam Chomsky, and John Brockman to fund the "intellectual dark web," hosting dinners where tech billionaires discussed eugenics and anti-transgender sentiment. Despite Lawrence Krauss defending him, Epstein financed Robert Trivers' pseudoscientific gender absolutism while ignoring Ava Cordero's 2007 abuse lawsuit. His correspondence with Steve Bannon reveals plans to hack voting booths, exposing how these networks promoted dangerous ideologies under the guise of free speech, suggesting his influence extended far beyond sex trafficking into shaping modern political and scientific discourse. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
The Final Epstein Update00:06:39
Cool zone media.
Welcome back for the last time today, I guess, or this week, behind the bastards.
We're done with the Epstein update episodes for now.
This episode will be our last.
Andrew T, welcome back to the show.
Oh, thanks, sir.
Thanks.
Thanks and scare quotes for having me.
Yeah.
Thanks and scare quotes.
The only thanks we get here.
I realize what your show is.
You're sort of like just like a low mimetic version of the ring where after having been on the show or listening to it, you know, in seven days you will want to die.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's that's the that's the that's what we go for here at Behind the Bastards is to make all of our listeners want to die.
Just a little bit.
God.
No.
You know what?
This has been less grim than I thought it was going to be.
I will say not that it's not grim, but the nice thing, that's weird saying the nice thing.
It's pretty grim, Andrew.
Doing these Epstein episodes is that we already did the ones where we talked.
There's a lot more detail out now.
And we probably should at some point go back.
But we talked at length in the previous like four episodes about all of the horrible sex trafficking crimes.
So the fact that we're just kind of focusing mostly on other stuff here makes it less nightmarish than if we were just going over all of the evidence of child molestation.
Not that we don't want to be highlighting that, but we did and everyone knows that stuff.
And I think this is also important.
So we're getting into it.
Of course.
I'm still pretty scowly.
Yeah.
I know.
There's a lot that makes me sad.
As I said, an earlier episode, it's like even without that shit, he would be one of the worst people ever.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And this, it's one of those things, if it weren't for the fact that he was also the giant pedophile guy, I probably wouldn't be writing about just Jeffrey Epstein's because for one thing, we just don't know.
There's a lot of like, did he actually get moot to create poll or no?
Like, right?
We just will never know.
But because of the other stuff, like, I feel like we do have to talk about how deeply tied he is to all of these massively important things that are happening in society, that he's talking to the major players and trying to convince them of things, right?
It's weird because this is kind of the only behind the bastards where for the most part, I'm saying like, well, we know he was trying to do something with this bad thing, but we don't know how he influenced this bad thing, which we don't normally do here, but I don't know how else to handle Epstein right now, right?
We also don't know the history of everything that, you know, this bad thing, which is in progress.
Brian Broderick says, you know, Michael Wolf probably connected Epstein and Bannon in 2017, but there's evidence from earlier that they would have known about each other and were traveling in similar circles, but I can't prove they were in contact earlier.
But also millions of documents haven't been released yet.
So like, who knows what else there is, right?
Right.
Or did Bannon used to have a different email, right?
When it wasn't under his name, I don't know.
It may be, there may be early emails for them under different emails in the files that we just haven't found because it's not immediately clear that it's Bannon yet.
There's stuff like that.
People have talked about like J.K. Rowling, how like, well, she definitely, he was on the invite list for, you know, the Harry Potter play when it opened, but she says they had no direct connection.
There's not really hard evidence of a direct connection, but there is an email with a sender redacted where it's signed the way J.K. Rowling sometimes signs stuff, but that's not conclusive.
So I don't know.
Right.
And hopefully as more stuff comes out, maybe there is even more about her in the current files that just hasn't been found yet because people, we haven't, no one knows everything that's in these files yet.
Stuff's being found every day, right?
So that's one of the issues with this is that I decided there was enough, obviously, for four episodes now, but in a year, people will probably be angry at you.
Well, you left this out.
Well, because people hadn't found it yet.
I don't know, man.
Or there's stuff I know I'm leaving out now that I did find that was on my research doc that I was just like, well, this is 42 pages long.
We got to call it somewhere, huh?
Yeah.
And you know what?
That's the beauty of podcasting.
There's always more podcasts.
That's the beauty of podcasting.
You can always say good enough.
This is an iHeart podcast.
Guaranteed human.
When a group of women discover they've all dated the same prolific con artist, they take matters into their own hands.
I vowed I will be his last target.
He is not going to get away with this.
He's going to get what he deserves.
We always say, trust your girlfriends.
Listen to the girlfriends.
Trust me, babe.
On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I got you.
I got you.
What's up, everyone?
I'm Ago Modern.
My next guest, it's Will Farrell.
My dad gave me the best advice ever.
He goes, just give it a shot.
But if you ever reach a point where you're banging your head against the wall and it doesn't feel fun anymore, it's okay to quit.
If you saw it written down, it would not be an inspiration.
It would not be on a calendar of, you know, the cat just hang in there.
Yeah, it would not be.
Right, it wouldn't be that.
There's a lot of life.
Listen to Thanks Dad on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
10-10 shots fired in the City Hall building.
How did this ever happen in City Hall?
Somebody tell me that.
A shocking public murder.
This is one of the most dramatic events that really ever happened in New York City politics.
They screamed, get down, get down.
Those are shots.
A tragedy that's now forgotten.
And a mystery that may or may not have been political, that may have been about sex.
Listen to Rorschach, murder at City Hall on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Laurie Siegel, and this is Mostly Human, a tech podcast through a human lens.
This week, an interview with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
I think society is going to decide that creators of AI products bear a tremendous amount of responsibility to the products we put out in the world.
An in-depth conversation with a man who's shaping our future.
My highest order bit is to not destroy the world with AI.
Listen to Mostly Human on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Ferguson and the Epstein Link00:15:10
You know who else said good enough?
Nope, that's a bad way to talk about the Ferguson.
I will say that you're surely not doing that.
Nope.
But we are starting with Ferguson in this episode because it's very relevant to Jeffrey Epstein's intellectual journey.
Because I've been talking about, ah, well, obviously the fact that he got arrested and in trouble has an impact on him because a lot of his behavior seems to shift.
He gets more into right-wing stuff.
But that's also happening to his whole community.
All these tech billionaires and rich finance guys are getting more pilled in the 2000s about this stuff anyway.
So maybe it would have happened if he hadn't gotten convicted of anything.
But there's a definite moment that we can fairly easily say had a big impact on how Jeffrey Epstein thought about the world.
And it's Ferguson.
On August 10th, 2014, Ferguson, Missouri police officer Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown and killed him.
There were protests immediately, and some people used the opportunity of the protests to loot and engage in other criminal activity.
The police are included in the criminal activity that occurs after this shooting because their violence and the fact that they all looked like fucking soldiers kicked off further unrest and a national debate.
You all probably lived through pieces of this.
I'm not going to re-litigate everything that happened in Ferguson, but the basics of it are very relevant to the Jeffrey Epstein story because Ferguson wasn't just a tragedy in its own right.
It was a prelude to mass protests in the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020.
But it also helped to inspire the fascist backlash that first made itself obvious when Mr. Donald Trump announced his presidency on June 16th, 2015.
I don't think it's focused on enough how close Ferguson is in time to Trump announcing the start of his campaign and how many older white people with money see the videos from Ferguson of the protests of these crowds of mostly black people who are very rightfully angry and get fucking terrified, right?
Because they see this as stirrings of the kind of race riots that they've never stopped fearing.
Now, we know that Epstein began donating to far-right content creators and talking very openly about race science in 2015 and 2016, not long after Ferguson.
And we know that he paid close attention on what was happening in Ferguson from an early point and that he talked about his predictions for what might happen next with one of his good friends, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak.
No fucking way.
No fucking way.
It's always, and then he talked about it with his friend, this influential monster.
I'm just saying, he's the where's Waldo fad guys?
He's fucking everywhere.
He really fucking is.
Now, in ways that don't even always make sense, too.
It's just like, it feels like the writer's just cramming in Mont Villains.
Man, I guess he hasn't shown up in the show for a while.
Bring Ehud Barak in, right?
How'd that friendship start?
Do we know?
You know, I'm sure it's, there's information about that one because he's one of the guys we knew was an Epstein friend way before the releases started, right?
They've been very like publicly buddies.
So what happens here is Michael Brown gets shot in Ferguson and protests start, right?
Yeah.
And Jeffrey, at some point, probably pretty soon after that, is talking with Ehud Barak and says, here's what I think is going to happen next, right?
And like lays out a prediction for what's going to happen to Ferguson.
And we don't know exactly what that prediction was or what he said, but we do know that on November 24th, a grand jury fails to indict Wilson for killing Michael Brown.
More protests follow and some people respond to a man getting away with murder by rioting.
Police cars are burned.
There's a murder of a man in a parked car.
It's really unclear.
I think still who does that and why that happens, but it's a big deal, right?
But what happens in Ferguson in November of that year is like hugely influential all across the country.
On November 26th, two days after the grand jury fails to indict Wilson, Ehud Barak sends this email to Jeffrey Epstein that you're seeing on your screen right now.
Jeff, you've accurately predicted the eruption.
And together, we'd predicted the mistakes which will follow.
Let's hope it won't get worse.
R.E., light and strong.
I'll call you tomorrow morning, your time.
Best EB.
And then he's linked there a CNN article called Ferguson Braces for More Unrest, right?
So I want to really emphasize what's happening here.
Jeffrey is concerned enough about the potential of like race riots in the United States that he's like looking for them.
So as soon as Ferguson happens, he is concerned and he reaches out to his friend who he thinks would be the best friend to talk to about his fear that a racial minority in his country is getting violent.
The former prime minister of Israel.
Israel, okay?
There's a lot, a lot you can read into this conversation, right?
Boy, howdy.
I hate them all.
So I think Ferguson has a lot to do with why the next year Epstein sends $25,000 to a white nationalist YouTuber.
Nope.
Right.
I think it has a lot to do with a lot of shit that follows.
I think it has a lot to do with why he starts reading Breitbart.
Now, I've talked in other episodes.
We've known for a while that Epstein had a weird obsession with seeding his own DNA into the human race.
In our previous episodes, we talked about how he had discussed with his friends that he wanted to have a stud ranch where women would raise his babies and the babies of other genius men.
He talked about this both: I want to have, I need to have a lot of babies for the good of mankind.
And also, obviously, smart people should be the ones having, but he's a eugenicist, right?
He's talking, this is Elon Musk shit.
He's friends with Elon Musk, you know, disgusting.
But he's interested in the same kind of stuff.
And absent other information, when I first covered this, I chalked it up as more classic rich guy narcissism.
My immediate thing was like, oh, this guy wants a bunch of kids because he's a narcissist.
And I didn't really see, oh, no, no, this guy is also very specifically a white nationalist, right?
Yeah.
A budding white nationalist at the very least, which Epstein is by this point.
The releases have made this different picture very clear.
And I think it makes the most sense when you look at it through the prism of Ferguson.
An article on futurism.com describes how Jeff's interests evolved after Ferguson.
In 2016, Epstein emailed German cognitive scientist and then MIT professor Joshua Bach, indicating that he was interested in the idea of genetically modifying black people to make them smarter.
The Telegraph found.
Bach had received a roughly $400,000 donation from Epstein.
Those are tied.
Like that's tied to his interpretation of Ferguson.
And that's not a small donation.
He's just a fucking freaky little race science Nazi.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He's just a race scientist.
Yeah.
I mean, but that's like conservatives, right?
That is like the extent.
This is also the other way to look at it: this is cutting-edge conservative thought, and it has been for the last however many thousands of years.
This is as good as it gets for these people.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And, you know, it's one of those things.
Obviously, he's afraid of black Americans, and this fear was heightened by Ferguson.
But also, just given his social life, he's social a lot with wealthy and influential and famous black people, right?
So he's not the kind of racist who can't be friendly to some black people, right?
He obviously can, but his conversations with his fellow white intellectuals, or at least he saw himself as an intellectual, made it clear that he saw successful and intelligent black people as outliers.
And when you really want to get into how racist Jeff Epstein is by 2016, there's no better place to go.
Huh?
Hate when you call him Jeff.
Jeffy, there's no better way to talk about how fucking racist Jeffrey Epstein has become by 2016 than to look at his emails with Noam Chomsky.
Oh, Noam.
Oh, Noam.
On Sunday, February 7th, 2016, Jeff emailed Noam after apparently hanging out together.
So he had been hanging out with Noam and I guess Noam's partner that night because he says, Thank you both for tonight.
And then he tells Noam Chomsky that, hey, man, if you want, I can have my private jet, the Lolita Express, pick you up in Boston and take you to my private island and return whenever you like, right?
And Noam calls this invitation eight years after Epstein had been exposed for child sex trafficking tempting.
Now, maybe he's just blowing Jeffrey off here.
But Epstein doesn't read it that way.
Epstein takes Noam Chomsky's response as an invitation to keep chatting, this time about racism.
So he continues after inviting him to his sex island.
He says, on a different note, you have encouraged me to look at data.
No holds barred.
Mortgages, inequalities, opportunities.
I have seen some things through your eyes.
And for that, I am grateful.
The test score gap amongst African Americans is well documented.
20 years of, and then he spells testing, testsing, many, which might be said to like, if you can't spell the word testing right, maybe your complaints about other people aren't as smart as you are kind of bullshit.
But he continues: many countries, James Watson, who's the racist guy who helped or arguably helped figure out the structure of DNA and was also like a DNA show.
Like, black people aren't as smart as white people guy, like James Watson, big racist, right?
Um, so Epstein continues, James Watson had some of his private views made public and hence his dismissal from society.
He told me that after one sentence, he became an unperson.
Making things, and he spells the word things wrong better might require accepting some uncomfortable facts.
You told me that.
So, this is Epstein broaching a conversation with Chomsky.
Hey, you know, you told me to look at the data.
Well, it's convinced me that racism's right.
How do you think about that, Noam Chomsky?
And does Noam and I get as Noam like you're yeah, yeah, brother.
No, I no, Noam pushes back.
I will say that, okay.
Right, Noam pushes back and he points out that, like, obviously, outcomes for some a kid like me when I was a kid are going to be different from a kid that, quote, is part of a group that for 400 years had a chance for about two or three decades to enter the mainstream society and then with a constant legacy of miserable racism.
He's being like, Yeah, of course, test scores skills will be lower because, like, our society hurts these people their entire lives, and that impacts test scores, right?
That's what Chomsky's saying, right?
He says that Epstein's data has no scientific interest, but he also says the greater issue is for later discussion, which I find interesting.
Chomsky knows this is bullshit.
He knows what his friend is saying is offensive, and he says kind of that, but then he's like, But we can talk about this later.
You know, you want to keep talking.
I'm always down to talk about race science with you, Jeffrey.
Epstein, though, doesn't take the hint and he keeps the conversation going.
He admits that he's aware of the potential for abuse with genetic engineering and eugenics.
However, imagine that a set of genes could be used for working memory, like the ones for Tay-Sachs disease, could be found and adjusted.
Not looking seems cruel.
And he's bringing up the argument that anyone makes if you're trying to convince a hostile source that you need to accept the initial tenets of eugenicist thinking.
Well, look, obviously, there's problems with this, but look at this horrible disease that happens to kids when they're in the womb.
If you could knock that out, wouldn't that be good, right?
Wouldn't that be good?
You gotta know.
You gotta ask.
Do you hate kids?
And like, anyone's gonna say, like, yeah, what if we could make kids who have their lungs born on the outside of their bodies have their lungs on the inside of their bodies?
Great.
But then the conversation goes from there to like, what if we want to make sure that people aren't born with a certain skin color?
Right?
Um, and one of the one of the things that's interesting to me is that, like, if you are a eugenicist and you're trying to like corrupt someone, right, and get them to agree with you, you'll start the way that Jeffrey ends here, which is weird, right?
You don't start with, hey, I've been looking at the numbers and it looks like black people aren't as smart as white people.
That's not how you start that conversation.
And Epstein does.
And then Chomsky smacks him down.
And so Epstein pivots and he ends where the conversation normally starts, where he's like, well, what about these kids with Tay-Sachs disease?
Shouldn't we be fixing that?
Right?
Yeah.
Chomsky calls Jeff's proposition almost inconceivable and then says, but if it could be done, I think there would be far more important uses, like changing the genes for dedicated savagery and lack of concern for the welfare or even security of the population on the part of that sector of educated elites that reaches positions of power.
And I'd love to appreciate that response more if he wasn't sending it to his friend Jeffrey Epstein, who he continued to communicate with for years after his arrest for sexual trafficking.
I mean, but I think the thing is, in the frat house version of it, this is just like ribbing because, you know, this, oh, oh, that's Jeff's foibble.
He's a fucking pedophile fascist.
We can all joke about that.
Yeah.
Like it's the chumminess that's like it's the friendliness.
It's all revolting, I guess.
But it's the, you could, yeah, it's the chom, the fact that he's so willing to continue this relationship, right?
Yeah.
I mean, you could, I guess, if you wanted to, feel good that Chomsky pushes back, but he keeps hanging out with Epstein repeatedly in person.
They hang out in person a lot.
That's fucked up.
I mean, it's also the like, like not a real pushback.
If you're like, don't, yeah.
No.
And it's what we see here.
And one of the reasons why this is really interesting to me, not just to like shit on Noam Chomsky.
I don't really care about that one way or the other.
What this is evidence of is an active attempt by Epstein to influence Noam Chomsky, who is himself very influential on the American left to try and further mainstream scientific racism.
That's what he's doing here.
He is trying to get Chomsky to start going down the road he's going down because he knows Chomsky can influence even a large chunk of the country and maybe make them more amenable to scientific racism.
That's what he's trying to do because that's how Jeffrey thinks about everyone who's his quote-unquote friend, right?
He thinks about them in terms of what can I get out of them.
And that's how he's thinking about Chomsky during this conference.
There's other stuff he gets from Chomsky, obviously, but this is one thing he's trying to get and that he doesn't seem to get out of him.
It's the same playbook we saw Epstein deploy with Bobby Kotik, right?
This is how he operates.
What these new files reveal is that Jeffrey Epstein was an active and influential part of the reactionary wave, often just called the alt-right, that struck from 2015 to 2017 and brought us all the authoritarian bullshit we're living with today.
He's a part of that and he's trying to bring Chomsky into it, right?
A huge part, well, Chomsky doesn't, a huge part of the class that he's a part of follows him down this road.
And part of why they do is because Epstein works on them one by one to encourage them to think differently and to ask uncomfortable questions.
He's not the only one doing this, right?
He's not the leading one doing this.
Part of why all of these Silicon Valley guys go fash is that a core of them start by saying like, well, as the brain trust in America is the really, is the only ones who are really intelligent, who really know what's going on because of all the money we've made.
The Brockman Connection Revealed00:14:52
It's incumbent on us to ask uncomfortable questions and, you know, to consider things that less intelligent people might consider forbidden, you know?
So let's look into it.
Right.
And that always just means racism.
That's the only thing that means, right?
Yeah.
Well, sometimes it's a little bit of gender science and massage.
And sometimes pedophilia.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You know, there's other lines, Robert.
Come on.
There are.
There are.
And I can remember as a kid, there was this big book called Disinfo that I read that was like, it was a bunch of essays about uncomfortable questions, challenging traditional logic and ethics, right?
And I found parts of it very interesting.
And then I got to an essay that was like, oh, this guy's just arguing about fucking kids.
Oh, that's what this is about.
This is a check.
Well, but it's the same thing.
It's why Arn Rand is appealing when you're like fucking 14 because you don't know anything.
But once you learn something, most people at least pull themselves out of it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And it's not something that they do not.
These fuckers talk all the time about uncomfortable questions and challenging orthodoxy.
And not one of them will be like, hey, what if we just didn't have billionaires and money?
Like, what if we, what if we didn't do that?
What if you couldn't like just throw a bunch of money into a thing and then own thousands of people's livelihoods because you were born rich?
What if that was not a thing we could do?
Like, that's not the dangerous questions.
It's all like, what if black people aren't people?
Like, that's the dangerous question.
Or what if 15-year-olds are fine to have sex with?
Those are the dangerous questions that the intellectuals are always talking about when they say dangerous questions.
And Jeffrey's shift here, his interest in this shit, that's what I'm trying to say.
It's like all he is not novel.
He's not, he has more influence than most, but a lot of these guys are thinking the same way, and he's using his money to support and encourage them to continue this shift.
And I want to tell a story that kind of makes this point for me.
And the story starts with a guy named John Brockman.
Brockman is a major figure in the New York art scene starting in the 1960s.
He is a peer of Andy Warhol, and he eventually becomes one of the most powerful literary agents in the city.
His specialty is books about science and futurism, and he works with big-name academics and thinkers, which means that he makes a lot of money.
Brockman describes himself as a cultural impresario, right?
Sure, man.
Cool.
Cool.
I already don't like you, my guy.
In 1996, he creates the Edge Foundation.
This is an informal association of intellectuals who meet primarily online.
And this is seen as a digital evolution from an older, similar group that met in person called the Reality Club.
The Reality Club, we're getting back in American intellectual tradition by a few decades here, but the Reality Club, per an article on their own website, I'm going to talk about like what this group was.
Reality club members presented their work with the understanding that they will be challenged.
The hallmark of the reality club has been rigorous and sometimes impolite discourse.
The motto of the club was inspired by the late artist philosopher James Lee Byers to arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves.
And that's a great idea.
It's a beautiful idea.
We've hit the edge of the world's knowledge.
Let's get the smartest people together to see if we can extend that edge.
But what happens, James Lee Byers' whole ability is that this will let us accomplish the extraordinary, right?
But what actually happens is when these guys get together, primarily they talk about like, what if people couldn't vote if they were poor?
What if we had more money?
What if I could fuck teenage girls?
Those are like the three big issues at the edge of human knowledge that these guys are really interested in.
It's like, as you said, the idea of the club seems cool.
Like with the additional caveat that like anytime anything like that has ever existed in all of human history, it's always self-proclaiming that you fit these attributes is pretty much the main reason you should not ever be part of a discussion like this.
I think one of the things Einstein would have pointed out to these people is that if you have locked yourself out as being the absolute smartest in society and are isolating yourself from everybody else, it's probably evidence that you're not the smartest people in society.
Yeah.
But Brockman really loves this idea.
He considers some people always love this shit.
Yeah.
And he's, you know, I don't know much about him, but he other than that, but he considers these scientists and these other thinkers in the empirical space, the guys that Epstein is hanging out with, these philosophers and Bitcoin nerds and whatnot.
He calls them the third culture.
That's his term for these people, right?
Because they're separate from the culture everyone else lives in because their minds are so far ahead of everyone else, right?
Brockman is close with Jeffrey Epstein, and he considers him to be one of these third culture members who, through their unusual insight and brilliance, are making the future.
Brockman is such an Epstein believer that he attends a dinner at Jeff's mansion after he was released from prison.
In the New Republic, Evgeny Morazov describes Brockman as the intellectual enabler of Epstein.
Brockman bragged that the Edge Foundation, this salon of his, was redefining who and what we are.
And he connected Epstein to important people because he wanted his friend Jeff to have a chance to change the world.
Now, one of Brockman's clients is Joy Ito of MIT.
And in fact, Brockman may have been how Epstein and Ito met.
He may have at least helped to encourage them to become friends.
We know many other prominent intellectuals like Steven Pinker were first connected to Epstein by Brockman.
So in a way, Brockman has been with us this whole story, helping to put up-and-coming technologists, thinkers, and researchers in a room with a pedophile sex trafficker.
When all of this dropped, author Evgeny Morozov found himself shocked.
His books were represented by Brockman's agency, and he decided to look through his emails with Brockman to see, like, are there any signs that like something bad was going on here?
And he found an email from 2013 that really gives you an idea of how Brockman and Epstein baited the hook when they're trying to get these intellectuals interested in them, right?
And I'm going to quote from Morozov's article in the New Republic here.
It was very laconic.
J-E-F-Y-I-J-B, followed by my short bio and some media clippings.
Strangely, it was sent to me and had no other contacts in CC.
Perhaps he wanted to send it to J-E, but put my email there by mistake.
When I commented on the meaning of this cryptic message, he responded with the following message, reproduced here in full.
I missed that one.
Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire scientist philanthropist, showed up at this weekend's event by helicopter with his beautiful young assistant from Belarus.
He'll be in Cambridge in a couple of weeks and asked me who he should meet.
You are one of the people I suggested, and I told him I would send some links.
He's the guy who gave Harvard $30 million to set up Martin Nowak.
He's been incredibly generous in funding projects of many of our friends and clients.
He also got into trouble and spent a year in jail in Florida.
Crazy way to say.
He's a registered child sex offender.
He got into trouble.
Spent a year in jail in Florida.
Spent a year in jail in Florida.
We've lost the plot, guys.
Come on.
Come on.
Yeah.
It's a whole lot of men to bring young, young assistant is like.
I mean, obviously that's how they would do it, but like, Jesus, like, what's wrong with you?
I hate these people.
If you wrote dialogue this heavy-handed, you would absolutely be run out of Hollywood.
Absolutely.
Well, in a heartbeat.
Or the good part of Hollywood.
Yeah.
Anyway, that's all nuts.
But Brockman suggests that if Epstein reached out to Morozov, it's probably worth your time to respond to him.
Right.
So he's basically being like, and I don't even know if this missed email is intentional or not, if he's like trying to, whatever.
He is sending Epstein information about this guy.
And he's telling Morozov, I know he's, you know, he's a controversial figure, but you should meet with him.
He's really interesting.
And obviously he's got a lot of money that he can put towards your work.
Right.
And then after saying it's probably worth your time, Brockman tells this story about Epstein.
Last time I visited his house, the largest private residence in New York City, I walked in to find him in a sweatsuit and a British guy in a suit with suspenders getting foot massages from two young, well-dressed Russian women.
After grilling me for a while about cybersecurity, the Brit named Andy was commenting on the Swedish authorities and the charges against Julian Assange.
We think they're liberal in Sweden, but it's more like northern England as opposed to southern Europe, he said.
In Monaco, Albert works 12 hours a day, but at 9 p.m. when he goes out, he does whatever he wants and nobody cares.
But if I do it, I'm in big trouble.
At that point, I realized the recipient of Arena's foot massage was his Royal Highness Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.
Now, Brockman is telling this story because he thinks it's cool.
He thinks it'll convince Morozov he's just gotta meet Epstein.
Whoa.
I walked in on him in the largest residence in New York and he was getting, he was clearly hanging out with two prostitutes and the fucking Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.
That's, I gotta get in on that myself.
You know, that's what, why Brockman tells this story, right?
And I guess there is like a hindsight lens that like, obviously we know, but yeah.
I mean, I will, yeah, there's a high, who knows what Brockman was entirely aware of.
But I will say, in terms of the people who knew this was fucked up at the time, Morozov gets this email and is like, absolutely not.
I don't want any part of this shit.
And he says that five is already.
Fuck that stuff, man.
That sounds weird.
And then Brockman changes his attitude and is like, yeah, okay.
So Morazov's conclusion is that Brockman was acted basically as Epstein's PR man.
And he does this because he needs Epstein.
Epstein is funding the whole Edge Foundation.
Jeffrey's assorted donations provided $638,000 of the $857,000 in funding the organization received from 2001 to 2017.
Epstein was, per BuzzFeed News, by far the largest donor.
In fact, one could argue the Edge Foundation and all its billionaire dinners seem to have existed largely to connect Jeffrey Epstein to tech billionaires and public intellectuals, right?
Because one of the things they start doing in the aughts is Brockman starts putting together dinners with billionaires.
Like that's they call it the billionaire dinners, and Epstein's nearly always there, right?
Given the private nature of these events, we don't fully know what he used his influence to do, but he wouldn't have put more than $600,000 into this foundation if it wasn't worth it to him.
One regular tradition was that Brockman would send out a list of questions for the members of the Edge Foundation to answer each year.
Like, what is your dangerous idea?
The answers would be published on their website, which The Guardian called the world's smartest.
So, again, everyone's sucking these people off in the odds.
Brockman also used his influence to host annual billionaires' dinners, as I mentioned, and Epstein was a common feature.
This is how some major tech billionaires wind up connected to Epstein via email.
Via Mandy Castigan's article: quote: Email threads, which sometimes included Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk, later turned into private conferences at Epstein and Brockman's properties, as well as public events and debates.
Brockman once bragged to Epstein that the net worth of the 40 guests at my 2014 billionaires dinner was equal to the combined wealth of 60% of all Americans.
Yeah.
Honestly, that seems lower than I thought.
Yeah.
Isn't the dangerous idea that that's bad?
I just like to think they're like, all right, guys, let's do an icebreaker so everybody gets to know each other.
What's your dangerous idea?
Yeah.
My dangerous idea is that all of you should be fucking taken out by a drone strike.
Like one in that dinner would have saved the world some problems.
My God.
So juvenile.
It's so juvenile and dangerous idea.
That's like a bad fucking like Tinder message.
Like fuck off.
And again, fuck off.
All the billionaires at these billionaires' dinners hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein, emailing with Jeffrey Epstein, can see that he's going to be there, can see that he's in the email threads, are talking to him sometimes on the email threads.
And this is years after his arrest and his conviction, right?
Oh, my God.
Most of Jeffrey's donations to Edge start after his arrest, and he attends his first billionaires' dinner in 2011, right?
But we know these dinners go back further, and we know that in earlier years, like 2003, his close associate, Sarah Kellen, was one of the few women present at this dinner.
To give a brief summary of what exactly Sarah's role was in Epstein's operation, here's a paragraph from an article about her divorce from NASCAR star Brian Vickers.
Court documents accused her of helping to arrange illegal massage sessions with underage girls.
In 2022, a federal judge said she shared criminal responsibility while sentencing Gillen Maxwell.
However, authorities never filed criminal charges against Kellen.
Kellen, who worked with Jeffrey, connecting people to illegal massage sessions, is at the billionaires' dinner in 2003 before Jeffrey, as far as we know, is even at these.
Huh.
Huh.
Interesting.
I mean, interesting.
I imagine some, this is somewhat like the rhetorical path you've been leading us down, but it is like shocking how much pedophilia is like an integral part of this whole power structure, everything, these guys' intellectualism, like it's always that.
It's somehow always that.
Once you get this kind of rich, the most painful and annoying thing in the world is anyone telling you you can't do something.
And I think that that has something to do with it.
Some of these guys, I'm sure, would always have, you know, gone after underage, you know, kids and stuff.
But I do think some of it might just be like the sense of impunity they have that like nothing should be illegal for me.
Nothing should be beyond me, right?
I don't know.
And I don't know who else, maybe no one made, maybe Sarah didn't connect anyone with illegal massages at the billionaire's dinner.
Maybe she was just a great conversationalist who happened to, as a judge said, also be deeply complicit in Jeffrey Epstein's illegal sex trafficking.
Who knows?
So that 2011 dinner Epstein attended featured Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin, and Elon Musk, all of whom deny doing anything but briefly meeting Epstein at this event.
This was not the only dinner he had with some of these folks, though.
In August of 2015, billionaire Tom Pritzker, cousin of J.B. Pritzker, asked Epstein if he was available to hang out.
Zuckerberg's Secret Circle00:05:40
Jeff replied, not sure yet.
I had dinner with Zuckerberg, Musk, Thiel, Hoffman, Wilde.
And then he sends a photo of this event, and it looks so as shady as you'd guess.
They're at like a dark table.
You can see Elon in one corner.
Whoever took the photo is sitting right next to Mark fucking Zuckerberg.
Like, it is just the shadiest looking dinner.
But it's also like a moron's idea of what power looks like.
It's like fucking the Dr. Evil setup.
It's the Dr. Evil setup.
It does look like the Dr. Evil setup.
And Mark Zuckerberg looks like he's rethinking being there.
Like, maybe it's just sitting across from Elon Musk as annoying as shit.
I don't know.
Yeah.
Oh, my God.
Oh, man.
The photo.
That must have been Epstein taking it from right.
Maybe.
I don't know.
But he's right.
If so, then he was right next to Mark Zuckerberg.
Is that Zuckerberg's wife?
I can't tell.
That may be Priscilla Chan right next to him.
Yeah.
I can't tell.
But I can't tell.
I don't know everyone in the photo, but you can, I mean, he says Bezos is there.
That's definitely Musk and Zuckerberg, right?
Speaking of people who went to dinners with Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein, none of them support this podcast.
Maybe.
It's impossible to say.
Yeah, this is your least accurate ad throw I've heard.
Yep.
Yeah.
What's up, everyone?
I'm Ego Modem.
My next guest, you know, from Step Brothers, Anchorman, Saturday Night Live, and the Big Money Players Network.
It's Will Farrell.
My dad gave me the best advice ever.
I went and had lunch with him one day, and I was like, and dad, I think I want to really give this a shot.
I don't know what that means, but I just know the groundlings.
I'm working my way up through and I know it's a place they come look for up and coming talent.
He said, if it was based solely on talent, I wouldn't worry about you, which is really sweet.
Yeah.
He goes, but there's so much luck involved.
And he's like, just give it a shot.
He goes, but if you ever reach a point where you're banging your head against the wall and it doesn't feel fun anymore, it's okay to quit.
If you saw it written down, it would not be an inspiration.
It would not be on a calendar of, you know, the cat just hang in there.
Yeah, it would not be.
Right, it wouldn't be that.
There's a lot of luck.
Listen to Thanks Dad on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
10-10 shots fired in the city hall building.
A silver .40 caliber handgun was recovered at the scene.
From iHeart Podcasts and Best Case Studios, this is Rorschach, murder at City Hall.
How could this have happened in City Hall?
Somebody tell me that!
Jeffrey Hood did.
July 2003.
Councilman James E. Davis arrives at New York City Hall with a guest.
Both men are carrying concealed weapons.
And in less than 30 minutes, both of them will be dead.
Everybody in the chamber's ducks.
A shocking public murder.
I screamed, get down, get down.
Those are shots.
Those are shots.
Get down.
A charismatic politician.
You know, he just bent the rules all the time.
I still have a weapon.
And I could shoot you.
And an outsider with a secret.
He alleged he was a victim of flat down.
That may or may not have been political.
That may have been about sex.
Listen to Rorschach, murder at City Hall on the iHeartRadio app.
Apple Podcasts are wherever you get your podcasts.
There's two golden rules that any man should live by.
Rule one, never mess with a country girl.
You play stupid games, you get stupid prizes.
And rule two, never mess with her friends either.
We always say, trust your girlfriends.
I'm Anna Sinfield.
And in this new season of The Girlfriends...
Oh my God, this is the same man.
A group of women discover they've all dated the same prolific con artist.
I felt like I got hit by a truck.
I thought, how could this happen to me?
The cops didn't seem to care.
So they take matters into their own hands.
They said, oh, hell no.
I vowed I will be his last target.
He's going to get what he deserves.
Listen to the girlfriends.
Trust me, babe.
On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, I'm Nora Jones, and I love playing music with people so much that my podcast called Playing Along is back.
I sit down with musicians from all musical styles to play songs together in an intimate setting.
Every episode's a little different, but it all involves music and conversation with some of my favorite musicians.
Over the past two seasons, I've had special guests like Dave Grohl, Leve, Mavis Staples, Remy Wolf, Jeff Tweedy, really too many to name.
And this season, I've sat down with Alessia Cara, Sarah McLaughlin, John Legend, and more.
Check out my new episode with Josh Grobin.
You related to the Phantom at that point.
Yeah, it was definitely the Phantom in that.
That's so funny.
Surely stay with me each night, each morning.
Krauss and the Apartment Theory00:15:06
Say you love me.
You know I.
So come hang out with us in the studio and listen to Playing Along on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Ah, and we're back.
So the Edge Foundation is interesting to me because it's of what it is a precursor for.
This is like the more exclusive version for actual powerful people.
But the basic idea that like we're going to ask hard questions and come up with the future is going to come like that's going to basically be the operating principle for another group of annoying rich guys who are going to come a few years later, right?
In a write-up for the Trans News Network, Maddie Castigan more accurately describes the Edge Foundation as, quote, a loose predecessor for the far-right intellectual dark web.
And I think she's right on the money there, right?
Or at least I think it's accurate to say the intellectual dark web is taking some of these ideas, but being like, look, number one, billionaires don't have time to write this bullshit.
They're not thinking up stuff.
They're living out on their yachts.
They're surfing.
We got to find some guys who aren't quite as rich who will start thinking dangerous ideas and writing about, you know, maybe we should be racist.
Maybe it is okay to have sex with children, right?
Like we need our intellectual dark web to get that information out to the plebs, right?
So I think there's some value in sort of looking at it that way, right?
To continue from her article.
A gang of people whose main, like, main skill is somehow convincing at least some number of people that the basic pervasive ideas of like your average KKK member is somehow interesting and like verbodin and like worth exploring.
It's playing on one of the worst things about the American psyche, which is our like deeply ingrained sense of oppositional defiant disorder.
Because if you just say, hey, you know, the things that everyone else says are good, what if they're bad?
And then a bunch of people will give you money and let you write for The Atlantic.
Yeah.
The Atlantic, which is run by a friend of Jeffrey Epstein's.
Anyway, whatever.
So is the New York Times.
Whatever.
Yeah.
So to continue from Mandy Castigan's article for the Trans News Network, during the research for this article, Trans News Network uncovered at least eight prominent anti-trans figures affiliated with Edge or with the IDW who received support from Epstein or even visited his island, often through connections with Brockman or physicist Lawrence Krauss.
Now, it's noteworthy that so many super smart Edge people, as well as the IDW folks, picked hating trans people as their dangerous intellectual idea.
One of the most noteworthy members of this crew is Epstein's good friend Lawrence Krauss, as was stated in that quote above.
Krauss is a famous physicist and right-wing crank who taught at Arizona State University, where only the best scientists work.
In 2006, he hosted a conference on Epstein's Island with Stephen Hawking.
So that's he's responsible for all the pictures of Hawking that we have to think about now, which don't necessarily implicate Hawking any again.
Hawking may have just heard this is a science conference because all of these scientists are showing up at this island from this guy who donates to science.
It's 2006.
Epstein hadn't been arrested yet.
That said, for a lot of these guys, there's a follow-up conference in 2010, after which point they knew who Epstein was.
Krauss is so close with Jeffrey that he becomes one of the first guys to face public consequences for his relationship with Epstein.
In 2011, Rebecca Watson attacked him for continuing to associate with Epstein and justifying it by claiming science.
Krauss defended his friend and said, I don't feel lowered by my association with Jeffrey.
I feel raised by my friendship with Jeffrey.
And also, he never raped any kids.
Yeah.
Good call, Krauss.
Just PR, just a PR gene.
You know, I guess what else are you going to say?
But yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And per that piece in the Trans News Network, Epstein clearly noticed Krauss's vigorous defense and rewarded him for his loyalty.
He pledged $100,000 to Krauss's project at ASU between 2014 and 2018.
And Epstein's billionaire benefactor and alleged child rapist Leon Black subsequently pledged a whopping $2 million in 2015.
Krauss claimed he raised a total of $4 million for the project in 2018, meaning that a large portion of his funding came from billionaires accused of child rape.
And my only correction to that would be that, like, again, Epstein wasn't really a billionaire.
Not a billionaire.
This does goes to show when I say that like you can't just look at what Epstein gives.
You have to look at like what Leon Black is giving because Epstein told him to, right?
Yeah, it creates a culture and some cover and just like a crowd to hide yourself in.
Sure.
Now, Krauss more recently had to step down from Arizona State during the Me Too movement after he was accused six separate times of sexual misbehavior.
Work.
I'm so shocked to hear that.
Lawrence Krauss, everybody.
Wow.
He became crazy.
And after he gets in trouble, he becomes one of the first prominent men who were, you know, brought low by Me Too to reach out to Jeffrey Epstein for advice.
We'll talk a little bit more about that later.
But Jeff goes so far, he's not just given Krauss advice, he's helping him like craft his response, like the open letter that he writes about the allegations, which Krauss denied.
But now we know because we have this information, Epstein was giving him like notes on it.
Natty Cast again continues.
While he has long denied many of the allegations from his time at ASU, Krauss admitted to and even tried to justify gratuitous sexual comments about trans women he made around coworkers in one later removed section of his retirement letter.
He also helpfully included a grade school sketch of a light bulb that he drew in front of colleagues.
Since Krauss's retirement from academia and hopefully sketch art, Epstein continued to advise and fund him as he pivoted to building an anti-trans podcast on his YouTube channel and accompanying Substack, where he's interviewed a large number of TERFs and other anti-trans figures, including other Epstein associates like Richard Dawkins.
And for a note, that light bulb sketch Jeff drew, I know this because of a fucking Dilbert book I read as a kid.
If you like draw a light bulb in a certain way and turn it upside down, it looks like a woman who's bending over with her underpants.
That's what Krauss is doing.
One of our greatest minds.
Truly a master, master of physics.
Just a genius.
All these men, just the, they are good at one thing, probably, or okay at one thing.
Yeah.
It's the problem.
Most of them were.
Or not.
Is the problem.
Yeah.
Just hate them all.
I don't know how good Krauss was, but yeah.
So we've got Epstein funding a white nationalist YouTuber in 2015.
And then in 2019, one of his last actions is helping to fund Krauss's anti-trans propaganda.
That's interesting, right?
And it gets worse.
Epstein is also closely tied to an evolutionary biologist named Robert Trivers.
Now, I had not heard of this guy, but Dr. Ev Nichols wrote a great piece on this for her website, Queer Science Lab.
She started by just searching the Epstein files for the word transsexual, right?
Now, today that is widely, although I have known some trans people who still use that term for themselves, but it is an outdated and offensive term as a general rule.
That's like you're not, you shouldn't be using that, referring to someone wants to take that, whatever.
I'm not for me to speak about, right?
But the reason why Dr. Nichols uses that term is because most of the men in the Epstein files are older men.
They're around Jeffrey's age.
And that term was, even if you weren't trying to be offensive, the term you would have used 20 or 30 years ago, right?
That's why she's searching for it because these guys use outdated terms for things.
You know, I just needed to explain that.
So she looks into Jeffrey and his friends talking about trans issues.
And she points out something that gets left out a lot, including in my earlier coverage of Epstein, which is that, and I should have found this information, but I didn't because it was out at this point in time.
So I want to correct that now.
The first woman to publicly accuse Jeffrey Epstein of abuse was a transgender Latina woman named Ava Cordero.
She sued Epstein in October of 2007, claiming that he forced her into bizarre and unnatural sex when she was 16 years old.
Per an article in LGBTQ Nation, quote, in her lawsuit, Cordero alleged that in 1999, Epstein lured her to his mansion, undressed, and requested a massage.
Cordero said she felt frightened but agreed, at which point Epstein suddenly began violently touching her genitals, pushing her head downward and demanding oral sex.
She alleged Epstein had lured her to his mansion in 1999 when she was 16, right?
So, again, I just really need to emphasize that, right?
She agrees initially when he asks her to undress because she's scared.
And once he starts, he begins violently grabbing her genitals and then grabs her head and forces her to perform oral sex.
It's really bad.
Like, this is a really terrible story.
That's a child.
As bad as any of the tales of people here.
But no one takes this seriously because Cordero is a trans woman and her life and I, well, trans child at the time of the abuse, but she's 19 when she, anyway, whatever.
Or older than that when she makes it.
Anyway, this is a trans woman, and that makes assholes consider her an unsympathetic victim.
The other thing, another thing that is used against her is that she's HIV positive, right?
She had admitted that she'd been admitted to a psychiatric hospital several times.
She's had mental health issues in the past, and she's admitted to illegal drug use in the past.
And all of this makes her a bad victim in the eyes of shitty people.
I want to emphasize she is being judged here.
Part of her credibility, why she's judged is not credible, is that she's admitted to having used drugs in the past.
Epstein is perfectly happy to use drugs.
In fact, we have evidence of this.
There's a 2013 email exchange between him and his fixer, Leslie Groff, where Groff is arranging for a friend.
So Epstein has an apartment complex that he owns, right?
And he lets people stay there.
Sometimes they're male friends of his, they can crash there.
Sometimes he lets people live there, usually very young women live there for periods of time, right?
In 2013, one of these apartments, a woman lives there, and she asks Leslie Groff, hey, my friend actor Will Forte is coming into town.
Can he crash with me for a few nights in this apartment Jeffrey Epstein owns?
Now, I don't know the relationship between Jeffrey and this woman.
I don't know the age at which she starts talking to Jeffrey.
I think she's an adult at this point, from everything that I know.
So there's a lot that I don't understand here.
But Epstein has this apartment that he sends women to and that he sends men to, and that there's some evidence he sends men to to have sex with young women, maybe young women that he's giving a free apartment to.
It's a little bit unclear.
That's not what this is, right?
Will Forte is not a friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
When Epstein is asked if he can stay at the apartment, Epstein does not appear to know the guy, right?
Now, would Will have been cool if he knew that he was staying in an apartment Jeffrey Epstein owned?
I don't know if he would have, but I don't know if he knew, right?
Does this woman tell her friend Will Forte, by the way, this apartment's owned by Jeffrey Epstein?
You know, this is one of those, because I'm bringing Will into it as a result of something else, I want to make it clear.
There's not evidence he did anything wrong, although maybe it should be looked into a little bit, right?
Yeah, who knows?
Just to make sure, but there's not, there's not evidence.
I want to make that really clear.
Anyway, the reason why this is relevant is because this woman asks, hey, can Will Forte crash with me?
And Leslie asks Jeff, hey, is this okay?
And Epstein responds, yes, but make sure there are no drugs or drink in the apartment, which means that there's drugs there a lot of the time.
Right.
This isn't the only evidence that Jeffrey Epstein used drugs or plied girls with drugs, right?
It just makes it very clear.
For what it's worth, I guess that that's a point in Will Forte's favor is he's hiding.
That he has, right?
That he had that Epstein wanted to hide stuff from him, right?
So again, there's not evidence Will did anything wrong.
But this is relevant because when this case comes out and when she makes claims against him, there are like websites put up, right?
Like social media sites claiming to be her social media sites where she talks about illegal drug use, right?
It's a smear campaign.
Now, she denies these are her social media accounts.
And we know Epstein hired people to fix his Wikipedia for him.
We know that he hired people to alter website.
And we know that he hired people to alter like Google results so that it wouldn't be obvious that he was a sex criminal.
He had somebody removing the fact that he was a convicted sex offender from his Wikipedia.
He had people altering Google results.
Wouldn't have been weird for him to have someone make a fake social media page for this woman who has charged him, who has alleged that he abused her, right?
And I just really wanted to emphasize how vile this is, really comprehensively.
Disgusting.
Her case is dismissed because it fell outside of the statute of limitation.
She waited more than five years.
And the fact that this all happens and that it like, it's not, not only is this dismissed, which maybe they didn't have a choice legally.
I'm not enough of a law expert to say if this is a good ruling or not, you know, but statutes of limitation exist.
I mean, good in the, is it a legally consistent ruling that they would have applied to anybody?
But what you do know here is that the media treats this like a joke.
These are serious allegations that Jeffrey Epstein raped a child that come out the year before he gets charged with molesting a child and convicted.
And it is not, it is treated like a joke forever, up to the present day.
And per an article in LGBTQ Nation, the New York Post's October 23rd, 2007 coverage included the headline, gender bend shocker, kinky sex suit gal is a man.
Like, this is a rape allegation by a child or somebody who was a child at the time, right?
It's just, it's, it's vile.
It's just like so comprehensively evil.
Anyway, this is Epstein's first recorded interaction with a trans person.
But from this point forward, so there's obviously a period at which he fetishizes trans people, right?
And that's deeply tied in with his anti-trans activism because that becomes an increasing thing to him in the audience.
And one person he expresses a lot of this to is evolutionary biologist Robert Trivers.
Now, Trivers was famous for back in the 70s creating what's called the theory of investment parenting.
And this theory suggests that parents invest in their kids to ensure their own multi-generational success.
Thus, it's natural for women to invest more in parenting because they invest more to create the child.
And it's natural for men to invest less in parenting because it's easy to come, right?
That's what Nichols is saying.
And then this is fine and right and good.
This theory has been discredited.
But as Dr. Nichols noted in her article, it is still widely cited.
Trivers, Identity, and Discredited Truths00:11:55
Travers started corresponding with Epstein in 2009, again after Epstein's guilty plea.
Per Nichols, quote, Epstein invited Trivers to his house in Florida to discuss his work and paid Trivers' travel and accommodations.
Trivers, like all researchers, needed money.
Research is expensive, salaries, materials, publishing fees, and more.
Over the years, Trivers frequented Epstein's Florida home.
Trivers is unsure how or when Epstein began funding his work, but by 2015, Epstein bragged to Noam Chomsky that he was Trivers' major funder.
Concurrently, Trivers publicly justified Epstein's pedophilia in no uncertain terms.
And she chooses not to reproduce that justification here.
I think I will reproduce them because it's important for knowing what a piece of shit Trivers is.
In a 2015 Reuters article, after a lot more stuff about Epstein started coming out, several scientists who had received donations from the Epstein Foundation were asked why they kept taking his money and associating with him after his conviction.
Kraus said, I'd be a coward if I abandoned Jeffrey over allegations I know nothing about, and that's gross.
But what Trivers says in this article is so much worse.
I can't believe he said this to Reuters.
Did he get an easy deal?
Did he buy himself a light sentence?
Well, yes, probably compared to what you or I would get, but he did get locked up, Trivers said.
Trivers says he also said he believes girls mature earlier than in the past.
By the time they're 14 or 15, they're like grown women were 60 years ago.
So I don't see these acts as so heinous.
Yeah.
Is this guy just like walking around still?
Probably.
I hope he's dead, but I think he probably is.
Well, it's also just like that, like branch of like bigot science is like you just like find the traffic of evolutionary like psychology to like justify what you already want to you can you know you can sort of backfill anything if you want yeah and you'll get money it's rewarding to be a bigot it's cool like be a racist pedophile whatever So that next year in 2016,
Trivers thanked Epstein for sending him extra money and making him an advisor on the Epstein Foundation.
Oh, yeah.
Good.
He talked about his medical research and added that he was moving forward on theoretical work Epstein had asked him to pursue.
We don't know what that was specifically, but Epstein's response to this was, I want to see your piece on transgender in the bio world, right?
So that suggests he wanted Travers to write a piece about transgender people and actual and like biology.
Like his, this is like a bioessentialist thing, right?
That's what he wants Dr. Travers to write.
And that's kind of his priority, right?
Is getting this guy to write about trans people rather than any of the other research that he's doing.
Dr. Nichols continues.
Two months later, Trivers contacted Epstein again and communicated that he is getting to the end of transsexuality.
Trivers goes on to pontificate about the benefits of fucking trans women, using dehumanizing language to refer to trans films like Organism and the New Morphs.
To that end, Trivers asks Epstein for more money to finish his research on the proposed topics.
So, but first off, Trivers, if you read his actual emails, he is a fetishist.
He fetishizes trans people.
And he also does not consider them, number one, to be the gender that they are, right?
He's a biological essentialist, but he also, and I think this is the same with Epstein, they're happy to fetishize these people.
When these people have an identity and are trying to get like treated as human beings, that makes him incredibly angry because they only exist for his sexual gratification.
I think that's a big thing for both Epstein and Trivers here and why they're both on the anti-trans stuff, right?
Is they're personally offended at the struggle for like dignity and civil rights by trans people as a community?
Because to them, they're not a community.
They're a fetish, right?
That's that's, I think, what's going on here.
That's my interpretation based on my reading.
In October of that year, 2016, Trivers held a talk in London titled An Evening on Evolutionary Biology: an overview covering feminism, transgender, homosexuality, and honor killings.
He invited Epstein to the talk and in an email where he laid out the details of the event wrote, wrote the title.
So as far back as 2016, Epstein is trying and giving his money to support the creation of an internet wave of coverage critical to trans identity.
Because Epstein's response is that basically, I think this will do a good job of getting in the news.
Like, great work on the conference.
Hopefully, people write about it.
You know, like he's really trying to get intellectuals to put out critical stuff about trans people that he can then get to go viral.
And he talks about this directly in his emails with Trivers.
In 2018, Epstein and Trivers again communicate about trans theories.
Trivers uses more really bad language.
He calls trans people novel phenotypes.
And then he describes an experiment that he wants to do to kind of test some of his theories, which, and this is how Dr. Nichols describes it.
He reiterates his attraction to trans women and explicitly erases trans men, all while using his porn algorithms as evidence.
Trivers ends the email by claiming that trans three-year-olds are receiving hormone treatments, a false anti-trans scaremonger.
So again, this mix of fetishization and scaremongering is really interesting.
These people are just disgusting.
I don't want to include too much of the texts of these emails.
They're gross enough that I don't really want to read them in detail.
But as Nichols notes, Epstein funds his anti-trans work over his other research, which is often also racist.
For example, Trivers wanted to find an evolutionary reason for why basically black people do honor killings and Middle Eastern, like Arab people do honor killings.
When the reality is that like honor killings are everywhere.
If a man gets angry that his wife slept with someone else or doesn't respect him enough and murders her, which happens all of the time in the U.S., that right there is an honor killing, my friend.
Yeah.
He's angry because a woman made him embarrassed and he murdered her.
Anyway, what's interesting, though, is that above all this stuff, above even the racial stuff, Epstein wants Trivers writing anti-trans propaganda.
Here's a March 2019 email where Epstein lays out directly that he considers the anti-trans stuff Trivers' main priority.
I can call you today if you like.
My recollection is that we sat together.
I thought that you might want to focus on transgender biology.
People would be interested and I would fund.
I am a true believer in your talents.
Yeah.
Right?
I mean, you know, to the extent that Epstein had a talent, it was like this, like, even if it's not like people will be interested, it's that like, the fucking like power brokers and information people down to like the New York Times and like, you know, quote unquote liberals or whatever will also buy the shed hook line and sinker.
Like, or at least buy the debate, perpetuate the debate.
That's right.
And it's the debate he wants to push out there first, right?
Because it starts with the debate.
It starts with, okay, let's have him have this talk and then see if we can get the Guardian or whoever to report on the fact that this biologist is talking about, you know, this is what he said about trans people.
People are starting to question, you know, some of these things that the community is putting out, right?
That's he's specific.
He's very specific about like, I want this to go viral.
I want this to get news coverage, right?
He expresses, and when he says in that last email that people will be interested about your anti-trans research, he's expressing confidence that he can brute force the public to care about Trivers' research, right?
That's what he's talking about, is forcing anti-trans talking points into the public sphere.
I could go on about the other people that may have played a role in this.
Epstein is very close to the Solzberger family who own the New York Times, who publish a lot of anti-trans bullshit.
Epstein knew them as far back as the 70s.
In one email chain, he jokes with Michael Wolf about the fact that former publisher Arthur Solzberger had a sex scandal that could have ruined him before he retired.
Solzberger's son now runs the New York Times.
And, you know, obviously, I'm not saying that Epstein convinced the New York Times to run a bunch of anti-trans propaganda, but it's interesting that Epstein is really pushing that and is friends with the people behind the Times and the Atlantic.
But that is also the thing.
It's like he doesn't have to.
That is sort of like both the useful idiocy of places like the New York Times and the Atlantic and like just that, I guess, class of people, which is like, he doesn't have to dictate how you should do this.
He knows that they are primed to support these ideas or again, support the debate.
And this class of people, which includes basically everyone who's ever written a pop science book that's been successful and includes a number of actual scientists, most of the billionaires, and a whole lot of like hereditary newspaper people, right?
People who get jobs at the Times or the Atlantic or the New Yorker because of who their dad or mom was, right?
A lot of these, all these people are desperate for money from rich assholes like Jeffrey Epstein and are willing, like especially the writers and the academics to kind of say anything if there's money in it.
All of these fucking guys, like the Fucking Barry Weiss crew or whatever talk about how they're like truth tellers.
And this is the same as like the honestly, the New York Times editorial board talk about how they care about the truth and good and getting information to people.
They give a shit about money and having rich friends and access, right?
And they're so desperate for it that the instant someone like Jeffrey Epstein starts saying, you know what I found about trans people, they'll start greenlighting articles because that's what the public wants to hear.
It's so shocking that the truth tellers just all in their like vast search for truth just happen to coalesce around the opinions of the right-wing power structure.
That is a coincidence.
It's interesting also that like the most dangerous thing to suggest isn't maybe all these assholes with all of the money shouldn't have it.
It's maybe these people with no money at all are bad and dangerous.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Maybe the poorest and most depressed group of people that I could think of pretty much here are secretly in charge.
Intellectual kings and queen.
This is good stuff.
Yeah.
Ultimately, the result of Epstein's investment in Trivers didn't reach fruition until two months before his death.
In 2020, Trivers published his universal theory of gender identity, which argued that the ratio of one's digit lengths, like fingers, revealed how much testosterone they'd received as a fetus and thus predicted gender identity and then thus proved gender absolutism, basically.
And he basically said that, like, by the way someone's fingers look, I can tell you if they're transgender.
This is wrong.
His work has been disproven, but it's cited regularly, including in a 2022 paper from an anti-trans group called Sex Matters.
Per Dr. Nichols, the group cites digit ratios and denying the autonomy of trans adolescents.
And this next bit that she writes is very important.
To recap, Epstein funds Trivers' research and suggests specific topics of study.
Trivers becomes obsessed with trans women as sexual objects and seeks a universal biological explanation of gender identity.
He asks for more money and publishes his findings.
Ultimately, Trivers' theory is easily falsifiable.
Despite this, hate groups pick up on the pseudoscience and use it as a justification for their regressive policies.
Yeah.
That is, in a nutshell, the Jeffrey Epstein story.
It is telling that, like, the best, most funded, absolutely cutting edge of right-wing thought is basically the same as on the playground when they said if your hand is bigger than your face, you're extraacted.
Yeah, whatever offensive, horrible thing follows.
Scream Shots and Obsession00:03:58
Like, that is literally the best these people can do.
And there it is.
Yeah.
I uh, let's, you know, Andrew, here's some ads.
I don't have a better pivot right now.
There's no pivot.
What's up, everyone?
I'm Ego Voda.
My next guest, you know, from Step Brothers, Anchorman, Saturday Night Live, and the Big Money Players Network.
It's Will Farrell.
My dad gave me the best advice ever.
I went and had lunch with him one day, and I was like, and dad, I think I want to really give this a shot.
I don't know what that means, but I just know the groundlings.
I'm working my way up through it.
I know it's a place they come look for up and coming talent.
He said, if it was based solely on talent, I wouldn't worry about you, which is really sweet.
Yeah.
He goes, but there's so much luck involved.
And he's like, just give it a shot.
He goes, but if you ever reach a point where you're banging your head against the wall and it doesn't feel fun anymore, it's okay to quit.
If you saw it written down, it would not be an inspiration.
It would not be on a calendar of, you know, the cat just hang in there.
Yeah, it would not be.
Right, it wouldn't be that.
There's a lot of luck.
Listen to Thanksgiving on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
10-10 shots fired in the city hall building.
A silver .40 caliber handgun was recovered at the scene.
From iHeart Podcasts and Best Case Studios, this is Rorschach, murder at City Hall.
How could this have happened in City Hall?
Somebody tell me that, Jeffrey Hood did.
July 2003, Councilman James E. Davis arrives at New York City Hall with a guest.
Both men are carrying concealed weapons.
And in less than 30 minutes, both of them will be dead.
Everybody in the chamber's ducks.
A shocking public murder.
I scream, get down, get down.
Those are shots.
Those are shots.
Get down.
A charismatic politician.
You know, you just bent the rules all the time, man.
I still have a weapon.
And I could shoot you.
And an outsider with a secret.
He alleged he was a victim of the flat down.
That may or may not have been political.
That may have been about sex.
Listen to Rorschach, murder at City Hall on the iHeartRadio app.
Apple Podcasts are wherever you get your podcasts.
There's two golden rules that any man should live by.
Rule one, never mess with a country girl.
You play stupid games, you get stupid prizes.
And rule two, never mess with her friends either.
We always say, trust your girlfriends.
I'm Anna Sinfield, and in this new season of The Girlfriends.
Oh my God, this is the same man.
A group of women discover they've all dated the same prolific con artist.
I felt like I got hit by a truck.
I thought, how could this happen to me?
The cops didn't seem to care.
So they take matters into their own hands.
I said, oh, hell no.
I vowed I will be his last target.
He's going to get what he deserves.
Listen to the girlfriends.
Trust me, babe.
On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Laurie Siegel, and on Mostly Human, I go beyond the headlines with the people building our future.
This week, an interview with one of the most influential figures in Silicon Valley, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
I think society is going to decide that creators of AI products bear a tremendous amount of responsibility to products we put out in the world.
From power to parenthood.
Bannon as the Puppet Master00:05:48
Kids, teenagers, I think they will need a lot of guardrails around AI.
This is such a powerful and such a new thing.
From addiction to acceleration.
The world we live in is a competitive world, and I don't think that's going to stop, even if you did a lot of redistribution.
You know, we have a deep desire to excel and be competitive and gain status and be useful to others.
And it's a multiplayer game.
What does the man who has extraordinary influence over our lives have to say about the weight of that responsibility?
Find out on Mostly Human.
My highest order bit is to not destroy the world with AI.
Listen to Mostly Human on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
And we're back.
There's a lot that I feel bad about not including in these episodes that I want to.
We're not talking about Howard Lutnik, right?
Like the fucking Trump's commerce secretary, who's also the custodian of like the Tether Reserves and thus very tied to fucking and tied to Jeffrey Epstein, right?
We're not talking about a lot of stuff that is really important because there's just too much to talk about that we already have in these episodes.
But I would feel bad if I didn't end by coming back to the bromance between Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon, right?
No, sure.
Now, as I said earlier, both are in each other's orbit for years before they got connected, officially in 2017 by Michael Wolf, or at least that was, you know, the best estimate that I found previously.
But there is evidence that it goes back earlier.
And on Sunday, December 18th of 2016, Epstein emails Brock Pierce asking if he'd had a chance to meet with Bannon, right?
Epstein's asking, hey, did you meet with Bannon yet?
And Brock says yes.
And Epstein says Bannon seems like the pretty smart puppet master.
Brock vouches for Bannon and says like, yeah, I've relied on him for years.
And it's after this point that Steve and Jeffrey talk an awful lot.
So it may have been that, you know, in 2017, they start talking after, you know, this conversation, December of 2016.
But also the fact that Epstein's asking Brock if he'd had a chance to meet with Bannon suggests that he's aware of Bannon and is interested in what he's doing and saying, you know, maybe because they knew each other, maybe because they were kind of socially distant, but still somewhat, I don't exactly know, right?
But it's telling that he's like, Bannon seems like a pretty good puppet master in 2016.
Yeah.
Here's Politico's summary of their relationship.
The two texted frequently about everything from the TV show Chernobyl and a guessing game over who pinned the 2018 anonymous New York Times op-ed to their efforts to influence international geopolitics, including shaping Europe's governing coalitions, ramping up pressure on China, and forging business ties in the Middle East.
Bannon at one point took credit for convincing Trump in 2018 to impose massive tariffs on China, gabbed with Epstein about his We Build the Wall endeavor that would later end in a federal indictment and presidential pardon, and gossiped about the latest developments in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, in which Bannon was a subject.
They're talking about everything, especially their crimes.
And don't forget that HBO limited run show.
I mean, it is like largely an exercise of guilt by association, but it is like the most damning.
I mean, it's not even damning.
It's just like the evidence, it's like the pattern continues to build.
And it is like, you know, again, this goes back to my biggest thing has been like, the fuck was Trump thinking with release the Epstein files, really?
Like, what did he hope to accomplish?
I don't think he had much choice.
I don't think he's at his full powers, you know?
And unfortunately, when you get your whole base obsessed with the idea that these explain everything, you kind of have to.
But why start?
Why start on this?
You knew it was in this shit, man.
Arrogance.
I think it was a lot of other people.
Like, fucking Trump used it, but Trump wasn't the Trump left to his own devices.
He wouldn't have had the idea to hang Epstein on these guys because he talks about Clinton now as a friend, right?
Yeah.
So in their private correspondence, Epstein and Bannon are very open about their disdain for Donald Trump.
Epstein calls him a grifter, and Bannon repeatedly uses the term stable genius to mock his former boss.
The two got along because they both had a vested interest in destroying the establishment as it existed.
Bannon gave Epstein advice on rehabilitating his image after his arrest, even as Epstein himself acted as a free advice giver to all the famous men impacted by Me Too.
The two men were very direct about their plans to subvert democracy.
In July of 2018, they talked about hiring hackers or otherwise working to get them on our side.
Epstein included links to the website for hacking convention DEF CON as he pondered how they might influence these people.
And it's very clear from these emails, neither of these guys know much about hacking.
Although, one reveal from the Epstein files is that at least per Epstein's claims in the files, Epstein claims Peter Thiel was funding Nazi hacker Weave for years, which I do believe.
So Bannon asks, hey, do you know any of these guys?
And Epstein responds, some of the founders, organizers, they are the most dangerous force in today's society by far.
Bioweapons pale due to blowback.
Nuclear, a 60-year-old technology.
What other 60-year-old tech frightens you?
Space frontier can't operate without software.
So, basically, he's saying, like, hackers are scarier than nukes or bioweapons, which is also a dumb thing to say.
Cool, man.
Bannon asks if he thinks these kind of people can be bought.
And Epstein says yes.
And he excitedly explains you can buy hacks, you can buy zero-day exploits, right?
You see that in the email on here, too.
And he says in other emails that he's wrestling with the task of getting hackers who would work for Bannon and could maybe find a zero-day to target crypto wallets or voting booths, right?
Dangerous Forces and Zero-Day Exploits00:04:29
Yeah.
Now, there's no evidence they did this, certainly.
And Epstein is going to have other concerns very soon after these emails get sent.
This may have just been another example of him bloviating, but it shows how he and Bannon are thinking, right?
And that's meaningful.
At least they're a lot more.
At least they're dumb.
And I people still say script kitty.
I can't believe you know, Epstein's got your script kitty.
Oh, script.
I don't think it's super relevant these days.
Not anymore.
That's that's Epstein, though.
Oh, I could buy a buy an exploit.
Sure, man.
Carly Rage Epstein.
Yeah, good stuff.
He's, I don't know if this is what I've got.
I, there's an interview between him and Bannon, but like Bannon was trying to make a documentary on his friend that's really telling that I may break down later for you guys, but I think this is enough for now.
I'm tired.
Thanks, Robert.
I'm tapping out personally.
I love it.
Yeah, let's be done.
Oh my God.
But I think that's also like the trove is endless.
The trove is endless.
Endless content.
We could do many more parts than we might end up having to, but you know, I'd like to see that.
Maybe Jeffrey Epstein really just sacrificed himself for the global content minds, you know, to ensure that there were plenty of podcasts and YouTube videos.
Think about it.
I'd love to be done.
Think about it.
It hurts.
This was painful.
Okay.
All right.
I'm done.
Goodbye.
Are we done, done?
Done, done.
Yeah.
Okay.
Behind the Bastards is a production of CoolZone Media.
For more from CoolZone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Full video episodes of Behind the Bastards are now streaming on Netflix, dropping every Tuesday and Thursday.
Hit remind me on Netflix so you don't miss an episode.
For clips in our older episode catalog, continue to subscribe to our YouTube channel, youtube.com/slash at behind the bastards.
We love about 40% of you, statistically speaking.
When a group of women discover they've all dated the same prolific con artist, they take matters into their own hands.
I vowed I will be his last target.
He is not going to get away with this.
He's going to get what he deserves.
We always say: trust your girlfriends.
Listen to the girlfriends.
Trust me, babe.
On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
What's up, everyone?
I'm Ago Modern.
My next guest, it's Will Farrell.
My dad gave me the best advice ever.
He goes, just give it a shot.
But if you ever reach a point where you're banging your head against the wall and it doesn't feel fun anymore, it's okay to quit.
If you saw it written down, it would not be an inspiration.
It would not be on a calendar of, you know, the cat just hang in there.
Yeah, it would not be right.
It wouldn't be that.
There's a lot of life.
Listen to Thanks Dad on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
10-10 shots five, city hall building.
How could this ever happen in City Hall?
Somebody tell me that.
A shocking public murder.
This is one of the most dramatic events that really ever happened in New York City politics.
They screamed, get down, get down.
Those are shots.
A tragedy that's now forgotten.
And a mystery that may or may not have been political, that may have been about sex.
Listen to Rorschach, murder at City Hall on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Laurie Siegel, and this is Mostly Human, a tech podcast through a human lens.
This week, an interview with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
I think society is going to decide that creators of AI products bear a tremendous amount of responsibility to the products we put out in the world.
An in-depth conversation with the man who's shaping our future.
My highest order bit is to not destroy the world with AI.
Listen to Mostly Human on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.