Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 2, 2024 - Brother Nathanael

01:17:48

Episode 45: "All The Cards Of The Election" w/ Infowars' Harrison Smith!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	music music
	music music Well, hello.
	It's me again, your number one noticer, and Harrison Smith of InfoWars, the American Journal.
	Ain't too far behind, but we'll bring him up to speed.
	No problem there.
	You know, I'm good at that kind of thing.
	All right, now, let's get Harrison on here.
	Let me press my button here.
	Oh, look at him.
	Oh, you're not in your suit and tie.
	Man, you look cool.
	I like the look.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, we're going casual mode this Saturday afternoon.
	Thanks for having me on, man.
	I like that hair look.
	That's cool.
	Run for office.
	We'll make you senator, man.
	We'll talk about that.
	Now, here's my little intro.
	Harrison Smith is the host of American Journal on Infowars.
	Look out.
	This guy's famous.
	He's more famous than me.
	And I'm jealous.
	Now, he's an 8th generation Texan.
	Okay, that's big stuff.
	He's 8th generation.
	I'm 12th generation Jew.
	He's 8th generation Texan.
	And how does a Jew and a Texan get together?
	Well, we're both members of the church.
	That's how.
	See?
	Okay.
	Now, he has dedicated his life to Wow, I love that.
	For freedom against the globalist technocracy.
	Oh, I've got to talk about that.
	I never heard of that one.
	Globalist technocracy.
	We'll get into that, Harrison.
	Okay, let me finish my spiel here.
	Everybody gotta follow this guy.
	I've been following him for a long time.
	Ever since I started tweeting back in January, I've been following Harrison Smith.
	And go to, it's very simple, at, that's that at sign, that A with a circle around it, Harrison H. Smith.
	Okay?
	Get that H in there.
	That means give him hell, Harrison.
	That's what that means, okay?
	That's right.
	And not to be confused with the linebacker from the Minnesota Vikings, I think, who has my name and is a lot more famous than either one of us combined.
	No, no, you're famous.
	You're doing much more than throwing a ball around, man.
	Okay.
	So my dad had a line about that.
	He said, we Jews don't watch football.
	We don't watch a bunch of shucks.
	That's the way Jews call them, Negroes.
	Throwing a ball around.
	Okay, but anyways, I had to get to that.
	I don't know, Rockwell, I'm seeing him right in front of my face.
	Is that something I should be doing here, Rockwell?
	It's kind of bothering me.
	Can't do anything about that.
	Okay.
	That's alright, but no one else can see it.
	They can see me.
	Alright, we're gonna go at it about the upcoming election between Donald Trump and Kamala Harrison.
	Now maybe Harrison likes Kamala.
	I don't know.
	Some people do.
	Robert Spencer, who's supposed to be a cool dude, just came out saying he's voting for her.
	And so we're gonna talk about this in a way that I think is kind of intriguing.
	The upcoming election, all the cards on the table or off the table or chaotically strewn all over the table, that's what we're going to talk about.
	Up the sleeve, some of them are up the sleeve.
	Okay, let me begin with this, okay?
	We have an election coming up.
	It's on November 5th.
	Are we in for trouble?
	Is there going to be...
	A false flag to kind of disrupt this thing and to create division, chaos, problems?
	What's your take on that, Harrison?
	My take is, frankly, I'm surprised.
	But, yeah, I wouldn't put that past him.
	Yeah, we were talking about what...
	What we want to talk about today, and that's what's on my mind, is I think the danger begins at the election.
	No matter who wins, I think we're in for a very, very chaotic couple of months, one way or another.
	What's the chaos?
	Does the chaos begin election night?
	Does the chaos begin the night before the election?
	I'm thinking they're going to blow up some kind of mail-in ballot depot, and then they're blaming on the Trumpsters.
	Yeah, major false flag, destroy a bunch of ballots, say we can't have a result of the election.
	That's definitely possible.
	You know, I really don't know.
	It's so up in the air right now because you just – there's nothing to rely on.
	There's no reliable information to go on.
	You know, I want to say I'm really looking forward to Tuesday because I feel like Trump has to win.
	I mean I feel like the energy that we're seeing, all the evidence I'm seeing shows that he's way far ahead.
	But you know how much they're cheating, you know how much they've been cheating, how much they've already been caught, what they're able to pull off.
	So I'm very anxious about what happens on Tuesday.
	What do you mean by they?
	Who is they?
	This is kind of, you know, abstruse, you know, amorphous.
	Who is they?
	They is different in every context.
	In this case, they would be the democratic machine, the democratic operatives carrying this off, who, to be fair, for the most part, from my observation, are heavyset black women from inner cities.
	So that would be the they who are currently rigging the elections that I know about.
	All right, let me go with this.
	You just said, here's where I'm going to be a little contrary, okay?
	Forgive me, okay?
	I know I like you and all that, and I want you to be a future leader.
	I want you to be a senator someday, man.
	But you say that Trump has to win, and I... Cringe a little bit that he has to win, like he's some kind of savior, that he's really going to make a real big difference, that he has to win?
	I don't go there, but why do you go there?
	He has to win.
	Trump has to win.
	Well, for the sake of anybody having faith in our democracy, he wins this one.
	It's just...
	I'm very worried that that's a possibility.
	What is Trump going to do for democracy?
	How is either of them going to do anything different for democracy, which is basically voting.
	You know, everyone can vote.
	That's the way I see democracy.
	Everybody has a vote.
	I don't see how Trump would do anything more for democracy than Kamala would do for democracy.
	I don't get it, Harrison.
	And I'm backing up a little bit here, man.
	Well, again, I guess it depends on the situation, which definition you're using.
	I don't like democracy.
	I don't think democracy is a good thing.
	I'm a Republican.
	I think the Republic was the right way to do things.
	I think we need less democracy in this country.
	I think we can do things like abolish the 17th Amendment where we directly vote for our Senate.
	I think we should send that back to the state legislatures to get people interested in local politics again.
	That's a whole different story.
	No, that's a good story, but let's go with what you're going with.
	Yeah, no, I think that Trump is a...
	I don't think he's a savior.
	I always use the illustration of a beachhead.
	He's a beachhead.
	So, you know, it's like for the...
	And not to get into these weeds, but for the Allies to win the Second World War, they had to land at Normandy.
	They had to get the beachhead.
	They didn't win the war.
	It wasn't like, oh, if we get this beachhead...
	It's over.
	Hitler's lost.
	But if you don't get that beachhead, you really are—you're not going to win.
	You have lost at that point if you can't even get the beachhead.
	Trump was in 2016 a beachhead.
	We did not take advantage of it.
	We did not use it to its fullest extent.
	I blame a lot of things for that that I'm sure everybody knows.
	Obviously, COVID was a giant interruption.
	I think the Q PSYOP was a big one telling people not to get involved, not to go out and do things because the White Hats were in control.
	I mean, the list is really innumerable.
	But that's how I felt in 2016.
	I feel it again in 2024 that if we don't get this beachhead, What is the beachhead, man?
	What is the beachhead that Trump is going to land on?
	Well, the beachhead is putting a stop to, and hopefully, and actually we have to, again, another necessary thing, reversing the last four years of illegal immigration.
	I mean, you know, if that was it, if it was just, you get Trump and you get an extreme diminishing of illegal crossings, or you get Kamala and you get another four years, I mean, we can't handle another four years of several million people a year.
	Stop there.
	I saw you on an American Journal show, and I was me.
	Ha!
	You showed a clip from CBS that for Trump, of course they're attacking Trump, for Trump to deport all the, they call them immigrants, not illegals, it's going to cost so much money that this is not practical.
	Then you came back with a great reputation of that.
	Let me hear that.
	What did you say?
	Yeah, well, I mean, the obvious refutation is it's way more expensive to keep them here by, you know, a factor of 10.
	But no, I said that we don't have to deport anybody.
	We offer as a gift, as a free gift from the United States government, free trips back to their home country for everybody that's arrived in the last five years.
	We tell them, look, you arrived under false pretenses.
	The last government did not have the right to give you citizenship or allow you in under these false asylum claims.
	So we're sorry you came here under false pretenses, but we will send you back all expenses paid.
	We aren't going to take anything.
	We aren't going to punish you.
	Just you get to go home, first class flight, just show up at your local registration office.
	And if you don't, then it is a felony and you will be doing hard labor for 10 years.
	So then you have a time period.
	You have six months or three months or however long.
	And you say, you have this long to come register with us, get your plane ticket and go home.
	And if not, now you're a criminal fugitive in the United States and you are not going to be sent home.
	And cleaning up our roads, and we'll have a wonderful road system from then on out.
	All right, here's the problem with that.
	You're not president.
	I have not heard Donald Trump specify how he's going to deport them all.
	All he does is just blab away with his blabbing way, okay?
	He's good at speeches, okay, USA, USA, and all that, but he has not nailed it down.
	He just says he's going to deport them.
	Okay, that's easy to say.
	Now, once he gets in, he can have all kind of excuses, and there's all going to be all kind of legal entities, run by Jews, basically, that will fight whatever he wants to do.
	But you give, say again, how you would...
	Get these illegals out of here.
	I want to hear that again.
	And maybe you need to write to Donald Trump.
	Very kind, you say.
	Because that's the thing.
	What would interrupt the deportation process are the images of soldiers kicking down the door and dragging kids out.
	Nobody wants to see that.
	So you make it a volunteer thing.
	You say, we will give you a free trip back.
	You have this long.
	And at that point, you know, you make it wide known.
	Nobody has an excuse.
	Nobody can go, oh, I didn't realize, you know, I'm just here.
	No, you make it.
	You do a huge public, you know, relations campaign.
	You make sure everybody knows you have to register for your trip home within six months.
	And then, you know, we're happy to return you home.
	We're happy to.
	It's our gift to you.
	We're very generous people, the United States.
	How about we offer them some money, too?
	Would that be practical?
	I don't like the offer.
	We're spending all these money to bomb innocent children, alright?
	Yeah.
	So, could we offer some money?
	Is that part of your program?
	Which I like, really.
	You know, I know Sweden and France and other places do that and have done that in the past, and I'm totally against that because I think it's a ridiculous policy because they also still have open borders.
	So you're essentially just paying people to leave the country for a week and then come back with a different name.
	So that's just going to be scammed over and over again, and that's not actually going to work.
	No, I think they're given the choice.
	is they can either accept the free first class ticket back to their home country where they're citizens and they belong and they grew up and, you know, their families live or they can be arrested and not sent back and spend a couple of years digging ditches and, you know, helping to lay fiber.
	You know, it's up to them.
	It's purely them.
	And, you know, there's other options to the real threat is the citizenship is them becoming citizens and birthright citizenship and asylum claims.
	I mean, these things should not exist and we got to do away with them.
	And so I know Trump is not doesn't get into specifics, but man, the other option is Kamala Harris.
	So So it's like one of these people is going to be president.
	I know which one I want in charge of immigration.
	You're getting the gears in my brain moving, man.
	I like it, okay?
	You're stimulating the DNA cells up here.
	I didn't take the claw shot, so it's not going to interfere or anything here, okay?
	Good.
	Because Alex Jones was the first one, too, and I did, too, really, before Alex.
	I showed you this mRNA is deadly.
	Okay, if it's worth paying people to leave...
	You're inspiring me.
	If it's worth paying people to leave, Harrison, does it?
	Get out of here.
	I mean, I'm thinking we would rather have this expense of paying them something to leave rather than keeping them here for them to live off of our paychecks because that's what it really is.
	So it's going to cost more, like you said, on that show you did last week.
	It's going to cost us more to keep them here.
	It's costing us tons to bring them here, and it's causing the price of eggs to go up because I know the Weinberg family that runs Goldman Sachs has loaded up debit cards and given it to them.
	Where does the money come from?
	It comes out of thin air that the Jews of the Fed can just make a bulk entry and there's the money.
	You and I got to work for it.
	Go ahead.
	I want to hear your take on that.
	Yeah, the Fed and the fake money system is definitely the heart of the issue.
	And if you want to talk about, you know, is it worth it keeping them here or stuff, think about the fact that you have organizations like the Tint Program that Tyson Foods and all these big name brands are a part of and, you know, rely on and contribute to.
	They will bring in – they'll pay for an illegal immigrant to come into the country.
	They'll pay for their transportation.
	They'll pay for their housing.
	They'll give them a stipend for childcare.
	They will pay for lawyers for them to go to court and argue that they should be asylum seekers.
	They're willing to pay all of this.
	how much are they saving on their salary?
	I mean, how much are they spending on every single illegal immigrant if they're providing all of these things for free, but they're doing it because it financially makes sense, more sense than just hiring an American who you don't have to provide any of that stuff for, but you do have to pay a fair or living wage for them to consider the job.
	So it's almost impossible to quantify what a gigantic drain on American resources illegal immigration is.
	And it's being driven by these gigantic corporations that are doing it for the sake of free labor.
	I want to get back to this immigration thing and Trump's thing about bringing in the best people.
	We need the best people.
	Let me hold that thought.
	But let me get to Kamala Harris.
	Okay, now some people...
	I thought this guy, Robert Spencer, was a pretty sound thinking says.
	Some people say he is, I don't know, but he kind of sounded fegalish to me and scared really.
	I don't know what the heck.
	Did someone put a gun to his head?
	He says, I'm voting for Kamala and it didn't make sense, he says, because I want to help.
	I want to keep the Ukraine war going.
	I don't know if that's a reason to vote for Kamala, but if you see Kamala coming in, what is the danger that she could cause that would be any different than what's already been done?
	It would just be a continuation of Biden and Obama.
	And it seemed to continue with Trump when he got caught in the crosshairs with a clutch shot.
	And then nothing happened for the last two years of his administration.
	So it's just a continuum, and we've seemed to be able to survive somewhat.
	Why is she a danger?
	Well, this is – so the game that the people in power are playing, the globalists, them, they, whoever they are – I call them the enemy just as a – As a singular title for all of them, what the enemy is doing, the game they're playing, is trying to lure the tiger into the cage, lure humanity into this technocratic, permanent, dystopian slavery.
	What do you mean by technocratic?
	We began with your bio that you are dedicated for the freedom from globalist technocracy.
	So I want you to stop there and tell me.
	What do you mean by this technocratic, this technocracy?
	I don't understand this term.
	It's the world government, the one world government that would rely on AI algorithms to essentially make their decisions unquestionable because they basically say, well, it's just this calculator that tells us the best answer and we have no right to, but they're the ones that program it and will program it to achieve certain ends.
	So it's not a democracy because they're unelected.
	It's not a monarchy because it's not passed down through blood.
	Well, you're talking about deep state.
	Yeah, well, it has a bunch of manifestations.
	Give me some manifestations.
	I'm sorry?
	Give me some manifestations of this globalist technocracy.
	Sure, the World Economic Forum is like the organizing body of it.
	The deep state is what we use to describe the elements in the United States, the permanent, again, technocratic, because they're...
	Because, you know, I don't know how to explain it necessarily.
	Yeah, why are they technocratic?
	That's the part I don't get.
	What do you mean by technocratic?
	Technology, and it will be technology as the prison bars of the human race.
	Okay, yeah, I think I get it.
	Would be this.
	I'm just thinking at the top of my head, because you're getting my brain moving, man.
	And that's good early in the morning here in northern Idaho.
	Could these technocrats use AI... Artificial intelligence, which is coming on strong, to enforce their will more effectively than the secret police have done so in the past.
	I think they already are.
	I think they very much already are.
	Yeah, for sure.
	I think already they are running simulations through AI and changing the inputs to determine what course of action they should take.
	They already have bragged about this.
	Alex Karp is the co-founder and I believe current CEO of Palantir.
	Peter Thiel's company that he co-founded.
	And he bragged at the World Economic Forum that single-handedly their program called Gotham stopped the rise of the far right in Europe.
	So this could just be them being braggadocious, but according to them, they are using these surveillance AI information control systems to alter the political outcome of an entire continent.
	Let me ask you this, because I haven't really studied this AI thing in depth.
	Hardly at all, really.
	I guess I need to.
	Could, and you know more about this than me, Harrison, AI, could it monitor each and every citizen in Jumerica?
	Could insurance companies, which are big and huge and everyone's got some kind of insurance for their cars or life insurance for their family, all kinds of insurance, could insurance companies, these are big boys and they're connected to the big banks,
	the insurance companies, a lot of people don't realize that, Could an insurance company use the data of even our driving habits and share it with the globalist technocrats, AI, with CIA, FBI, NSA? I'm just thinking on the top of my head now.
	The insurance company is already doing that.
	They'll monitor your driving and then, you know, change your rate based on whether you follow the speed limit or stuff like that.
	So that's sort of a soft introduction of like a social credit score.
	But it'll go far beyond that where you'll have...
	You won't be able to own anything anymore.
	That's one of their goals.
	Their stated goals is you'll have no private property.
	You'll be able to buy consumables.
	You'll be able to buy things that wear out like shirts or clothes.
	A couple times a year, you'll be able to buy that stuff.
	But cars, phones, houses aren't going to belong to you.
	They're going to belong to a corporation and you're going to be a renter.
	Well, they belong to a bank anyways.
	Everyone finances their cars.
	Then once they finally pay it off, they buy a new one and they're back in the same seat again.
	Go ahead.
	That's true.
	And it does rely on debt because it's about them being able to set your debt limit and change that arbitrarily depending on whether you serve them or don't serve them, you know, your access to everything, to goods, to travel, because it's the same thing that's happening in China.
	They've already sort of implemented this system in China.
	They want to exploit it to, you know, the rest of the world, but they have to change our basic philosophy in order to pull that off because, again, they're trying to They're trying to get us trapped willingly before we realize we're under attack.
	So not only will they be doing that but they already are using the private corporations as a workaround of things like the United States Constitution that is supposed to erect barriers between The government and the individual.
	Well, if you don't own your house, you don't own your car, you don't own your phone, you know, you don't own the drives, the cloud drive that your information is on, then they don't have to get a warrant to search your property.
	They just have to go to the corporation and use the, you know, corporate government portal that they've set up to request information, thereby circumventing, you know, constitutionally protected rights.
	You got my blood flowing, dude.
	Okay.
	How will they, I don't think it's the Chinese, I think it's the Jew cabal that runs the Fed, which is a consortium of banks.
	The CIA, which is really run by Daniel Cohen, it's not run by Burns.
	But that's my point of view, and we're not going to get into that.
	We can.
	I like that topic.
	Yeah, yeah.
	How will they, well, if you like it, stop, I'll say more.
	But how will they, okay, the they, I say it's the Jew cabal, entice the population we be gone along with because, think of the clot shot, COVID, okay, the vax, They actually got the populace, and still today, I see it in my travels, to beg for the Jew jab lining up.
	I just met a guy in San Francisco, and he said, Brother Nathaniel, I watch you.
	And I said, Why are you holding your arm?
	He says, Oh, I just got another booster, because this COVID is coming back in San Francisco.
	And, like, he loves my videos.
	Yeah, no, it is...
	There's something wrong with these people, man.
	There really is.
	It's mostly Americans, isn't it?
	Yeah, we are apparently particularly susceptible to this type of stuff, but the devious nature of this scheme is that you don't have to actually go along with it.
	They want you to and they have designs in order to get you to go along with it, either by embracing communism, by constantly demonizing capitalism and thinking private property is evil and everything should be shared.
	So you'll have people that think it's a moral good that this is happening, but the rest of us just have to deal with it.
	I mean BlackRock is buying up entire neighborhoods of houses.
	They aren't asking permission before doing that, right?
	They're just doing it.
	They have banned internal combustion engines in California, meaning they're all going to be electric, meaning that the grid's not going to be able to handle it, meaning that you're not going to be able to own a car because not everybody can own a car because the grid can't handle it, so you're going to have to just do a rideshare type of thing.
	So these things are already being put into place piece by piece at the local, international, and national level.
	But eating meat, like They're going to try to convince you to stop eating meat by telling you it's bad, telling you you're killing the earth by eating it, but they're also just buying up the farming companies and shutting them down, and they're putting insect material in foodstuffs already and labeling it something different.
	I think they're doing that in Canada now, at least in Alberta.
	A friend of mine who lives in Alberta was telling me about that, but go ahead.
	Yeah, so they're just doing it.
	They're kind of just doing it, and we can stop them.
	You can make laws to prevent this.
	But it has to be at a multi-level because they're a taxonomic forum.
	But then the New Orleans mayor signs an agreement with some Agenda 21-2030 UN agreement to stop providing meat in all government-controlled cafeterias.
	So it's being implemented everywhere, and you have to confront it everywhere.
	Yeah.
	Alright, it gets overwhelming, but we'll talk about this more, how we can resist that, refute it, and overturn it, and get people to think otherwise.
	We got a big job ahead of us, Harrison, but I'm optimistic.
	I really am.
	Now, I've got some notes up here, and I'm not sure where I want to start here in the notes, but let me get to this before I get to my notes, okay?
	What is the danger of Kamala Harris?
	Give me three things, one, two, three, that could be disastrous for America if she wins on the 5th.
	Yeah, only three, huh?
	I have to narrow it down to three.
	Narrow it down to three, okay?
	That's kind of the way I like my brain works, okay?
	I like to categorize, okay?
	You know, and be specific.
	That's me.
	Yeah, I think the first category would be immigration.
	Obviously, she has presided over the open border.
	She will continue to.
	And all of the people that have come over, they'll fast-track in one way or another.
	By some hook or crook, they will get citizenship for everybody who's already here.
	So I think that is a massive danger.
	That's basically like the end of the United States as we know it.
	I mean, I... Everything.
	I mean, I don't know what to tell you.
	Everything, everything.
	Well, that's one.
	Give me two more things.
	Okay.
	Censorship, disinformation, obviously they're laying the groundwork.
	Yeah, censorship, I think.
	This to me is the top of the food chain because I'm the most censored person living today.
	I can give you facts for it, but I don't even brag about it because it bothers me.
	That's nothing to brag about.
	But go ahead.
	Censorship.
	Number one, the immigration will continue.
	The illegals will continue to come in.
	Okay.
	And be legalized.
	If Kamala, it'll be legalized and more will come in.
	If Kamala comes in, because she'll probably set the stage for all future elections, that the Democrats will always be in power.
	Okay, that's number one.
	Number two, you went to the censorship.
	Tell me about that.
	How will Kamala ramp up the censorship, which is already there?
	How will it get worse?
	And how would this be a danger, maybe to even you and me?
	Yeah, no, it...
	Yeah, definitely already a danger to both of us.
	Definitely has made us, you know, both of our jobs a lot harder.
	It's just a variety of different ways.
	I mean, they'll probably try another sort of disinformation board.
	They had a failed aborted attempt at that, you know, in the beginning of Biden's campaign.
	They'll probably just come up with a different name for it and try to do it quietly in the background.
	Well, it was the, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	It was under DHS for sure.
	And it was that weird woman who would sing and she went off to join some UK censorship group.
	As well as, you know, pushing the line of hate speech.
	I mean, Tim Wallace himself said in the debate, like, hate speech is not free speech, and we know hate speech is just whatever they don't like.
	It literally has no definition other than They don't like it.
	I mean, you can actually call anything hate speech.
	So even true stuff.
	So truth can be hate speech.
	Religious conviction can be hate speech.
	So these are the things that they're saying openly now.
	So they're going to act on that.
	They're going to continue the cooperation between big tech.
	And they're also going to weaponize all of the branches of government like they're doing against Elon Musk, where they go after SpaceX and they go after Starlink and they go after all these other companies.
	As punishment for him allowing free speech on X. And I'm sure there are conversations in the background going, you know, if you just do these controls on X, then we will stop.
	You will drop this over here.
	Did Kamala...
	You know, we're just so bombarded.
	Every second, it's just some new, you know, crap coming up.
	Tell me about it.
	It's hard to keep our peace, isn't it?
	But I work on that.
	But...
	I think.
	She did come out recently saying, Twitter, there has to be some regulatory things going on here because Twitter is crossing the border, I think she says, between free speech and hate speech.
	And I think she brought up about the movie theater thing, which is really not an issue of First Amendment.
	It's an issue of who owns that movie theater.
	Are you yelling fire in a crowded theater?
	If you yell out fire, now that owner of that movie theater can prosecute him for endangering people.
	It has nothing to do with hate speech, free speech, First Amendment.
	It has to do with a violation of his property.
	That's what that is.
	But the Jews aren't going to go there.
	They use that, if someone yells out fire.
	No, no, that's a property issue.
	It's a violation.
	It's a trespass of property rights.
	That's what that is.
	Well, you know, I think, like, all of these things, we have to learn to just, like, stop, they say, but, like, you just look at what they do, you look at what their policy is, and you see what they care about.
	You're talking about the Democrats, which is they, huh?
	Democrats.
	The Democrats, yeah, yeah, the Democrats.
	Do you know who the biggest funders for the Democrat Party is, and per Kamala?
	Say it again?
	Do you know the two biggest funders, donors?
	For the Democrats, it always has been, and especially for Kamala now.
	Do you know who the three biggest donors are?
	I do.
	I don't.
	I don't.
	Who are they?
	The guy who used to be the mayor of New York, Bloomberg.
	Yeah, I believe that.
	Oh, yeah.
	Tons, tons of money with all kind of hidden LLCs, all kind of packs.
	Oh, big.
	Yeah, yeah.
	All right.
	Grigori Schwartz, George Soros.
	Oh, yeah.
	And the third biggest, and then the fourth biggest, but the third biggest is Steven Spielberg and the tribe there in Hollywood.
	Oh, is that right?
	Well, then there's ActBlue, where they just funnel millions, fund millions of dollars in.
	Yeah, it's absurd.
	Okay, the fourth is the San Francisco Jews that put Governor Hare doing power.
	Yeah, I know who they are.
	Well, San Francisco is her power base, so yeah, that all makes perfect sense.
	Yeah, it's the Jews that are doing it.
	A big funder there is the Isaac...
	Perlmuter family.
	I know all these people.
	My dad kind of showed me all this kind of influence, not in a pejorative or not in a bad way, but he just wanted to show me who's really running the show.
	My dad showed me this as a kid.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	No, there's a very good documentary from Al Jazeera called The Lobby, and there's two versions of it.
	I think there's multiple versions of those versions, but there's a UK lobby and a US lobby, and they do an amazing job of showing the way that the ADL or APAC funnel money and use workarounds.
	Like ActBlue, where they take $10,000, but then they package it as a whole bunch of little donations because that's too much.
	They explain how ADL's been doing that for years with prepaid credit cards.
	You know who's bigger than 8-pack in the Jew lobbies?
	The biggest of all.
	No one ever talks about it except me.
	Uh...
	I do know it.
	I can't think of it right now, but is it not Friends of Israel?
	...of the major Jewish organizations.
	That's the big umbrella.
	And it's really run and funded by World Jewish Congress.
	And the guy ahead of that is the one who created Oste Lauder, a Jew, okay?
	And B'nai B'rith.
	These are the big boys, the presidents of major Jewish organizations, okay?
	Those are the big boys.
	No one ever talks about them, but me.
	Yeah, is that the guy?
	There's one guy that, I mean, he just looks like a literal zombie.
	The president of the World Jewish Congress, he's always out there yelling, this is Jew hate, this is Jew hate.
	He's like insane.
	Well, he brings it on.
	He just talks, and people say, I hate this guy.
	Yeah.
	All right, let's get back to this.
	You gave us two dangers of Kamala Harris getting in.
	The first one is the mass immigration, the illegals, will increase and be legalized.
	Two is that censorship will be ramped up, and there very possibly could be another disinformation committee run by Homeland Security, which is run by Mayorkas, and a guy over him actually is Michael Chertoff.
	When Jews get in power, they don't give it up.
	He's still running it, okay?
	Now, give me number three.
	I ask you for three things that are dangerous for you and me and all Americans, if they want to face it, if Kamala gets in.
	Give me number three.
	Okay, again, I think we do a lot more than three, but I guess if it was top three, I would say...
	I mean, just the sheer fact that she is a functionary and pretty much an admitted puppet, like nobody really expects...
	Like, I've talked to Congress...
	Just regular people out there.
	And this is actually with Biden.
	This was before Kamalov.
	I know their answer would be the same, where With Biden, I was saying, he's so, he's stupid.
	He can't think.
	He can't put two sentences together.
	And they say, well, you know, when you vote for president, you're really voting for the team that's behind them.
	And I really trust his team that's working behind him.
	So at this point, because they really feel a warm, fuzzy feeling with a faceless bureaucracy in charge of things.
	And so in that, I think Kamala being a complete functionary and being incapable of wielding influence, having no gravitas and having no Say in her own administration, I think that means that control would be completely handed over to the deep state, permanent, bureaucratic, spy state actors like the Anthony Blinkens, the Jake Sullivan's, the Alejandro Mayorkas.
	Can Trump counter that kind of deep state consensus?
	Can he really do anything to counter that?
	Yes, he can.
	I mean, isn't he already pointing at his staff?
	The same old, same old.
	They're talking about Pompeo again, the wormonger.
	They got already...
	Jared is back, you know...
	Not so much behind the scenes, trying to put together his cabinet, and now you have the transition dude, the head of the transition committee, Howard Lotnick, okay?
	Okay, it's not Howard O'Leary, okay?
	It's not some Irish Catholic, okay?
	It's a Jew.
	Okay, so we're seeing Jewed Up everywhere here, okay?
	Can Trump really counter that when we're always seeing Jewed Up going into November 5th?
	Yeah, well, the difference is that Kamala, again, would be a functionary of the people that she would choose, which would be no different than who Trump would choose.
	But Trump has a record of demanding loyalty, of wanting things that are contrary to what the deep state wants, and if the people that he puts in power don't do what he says, then he fires them.
	Yeah.
	It's not about the people that he chooses then setting his policy.
	It's about him choosing people to carry out his own policy.
	And if they don't, then he fires them.
	And the example I have been bringing up recently because I've been talking about Trump and Israel is the fact that Trump wanted to withdraw troops from Syria.
	And his secretary of defense at the time was Jim Mattis, who refused and didn't want to remove troops from Syria.
	And Trump said, all right, I'll have your resignation on Monday and replaced him with somebody who would start the withdrawal.
	But he still didn't remove the troops.
	He still didn't do it.
	So he fires one guy, fires the next guy, and everything stays the same.
	No, he did.
	He removed a lot of troops from Syria.
	He didn't get 100%, but he did a major, major withdraw, drawdown of troops in Syria.
	And he very, very deftly avoided the increase in war with Syria with the fake chemical weapons attack.
	I don't know what drawdown did.
	What the hell did drawdown do?
	The Israelis bombed.
	Sent missiles.
	It's like, let's have a temporary ceasefire.
	Or like Kamala says, there's too many have died.
	Well, how many do you want dying?
	Is 100,000 a good limit instead of 200,000?
	I don't get into this drawdown or this we've done something.
	It just doesn't change anything on the ground, so to speak.
	Go ahead.
	Can Trump counter the deep state?
	Yeah, no, I think it does.
	I think it does change things on the ground.
	I think that, you know, what happened with Trump is that there was a four-year pause in the schemes, right?
	Ukraine war was being teed up to kick off.
	Probably the war in the Middle East was being teed up to kick off.
	They invented the term fake news in order to start a disinformation campaign on the assumption that Hillary Clinton was going to get in.
	She didn't get in.
	Trump turned that on them.
	But they came up with that because they were laying the groundwork for fake news is a threat to democracy.
	Alex Jones and everybody else is fake news.
	We have to go after them.
	So all of these things were being teed up.
	Trump came into office and put a stop to a lot of them.
	ISIS was primarily attacking Bashar al-Assad.
	They were the rebels, you know, whatever, the moderate rebels that we funded.
	And they came out of the bases where the CIA had training camps set up and they were armed by the Iraqi army that we armed and then gave instructions to leave all their weapons and leave, just like we did in Afghanistan.
	So, you know, ISIS was in a lot of ways the foot soldiers for this globalist faction in the Middle East because one of their main primary goals is getting rid of Bashar al-Assad.
	Trump came in and Hillary Clinton's suggestion, her proposal before getting in office, she said, we're going to do a no-fly zone in Syria if I'm elected.
	A no-fly zone in Syria means that ISIS wins because the overwhelming superiority that Syria had was in their air defenses and Russia was helping them with their air defenses.
	If they do a no-fly zone in Syria, that means that ISIS gets to act basically with impunity as total freedom of movement.
	It's very insightful.
	I mean, you've got your hand on the pulse, man, okay?
	I'm just asking this question, and coming up to November 5th, I'm a little nervous about them, where I'm almost at the point maybe Kamala should get in because things will get so bad that maybe finally the American boob will wake up.
	So I'm now kind of in a 60-40 kind of a thing here.
	Can Trump actually counter the deep state?
	Does he have the balls?
	Does he have the personality to say, hell, I'm not going to go into Iran.
	I'm going to stop this damn escalation.
	I'm not going to let it happen.
	Is he going to stop the Ukraine thing?
	Because we just sent more money yesterday ahead of the election to Zelensky and his regime so they can go stash it somewhere under their mattresses or take a vacation in the Bahamas.
	Is he really going to do that?
	I think he is.
	I mean, he did do that during his first administration as much as he was able to.
	I think he'll be in a better position to do that now.
	I mean, the problem is that, you know, I don't expect Trump to be a savior.
	I don't expect him to do it single-handedly.
	He needs backup in Senate and Congress.
	He needs to really be setting the stage for what comes after him, which hopefully will be able to take more power and actually set things right.
	I don't think he's going to be able to do it as a single person, but...
	In terms of resisting, putting a stop to, not contributing to their plans, he's already shown that he has been able to do that, has done that, and has said over and over again in this campaign that he doesn't want regime change in Iran.
	J.D. Vance has said multiple times, no invasion of Iran, no war in Iran.
	And so Trump will say on the phone to Bibi Netanyahu, like, yeah, go do whatever you want.
	Hit him really hard.
	But he's not going to send troops overseas.
	It's been, if anything, this is like The number one constant of Trump's political career is he hated the Iraq War.
	He destroyed the Bushes, you know, over the Iraq War.
	He hates when America sends its sons overseas to die for some pointless bullshit.
	And he's been consistent in that rhetorically, and his actions have shown that.
	And even the big scandal today of Liz Cheney, Warhawk, what was he saying?
	He was saying it's easy for you to send these boys overseas when you're not the one being hired on.
	He actually genuinely feels for the American servicemen and are not going to send them to die for Israel.
	He's just not going to do it.
	It's not what he does.
	He's never done it.
	Okay, so I asked you, what is the danger of Kamala Harris becoming president?
	What did I say?
	Censorship, illegal immigration, and...
	Basically, she would be a functionary of the deep state, and in particular, the war in the Middle East, I think, will be handed over to zealots.
	Can Trump counter the deep state?
	And you seem to think he can, given his very strong personality, his very strong will.
	And I look at him sometimes as a bull in a china shop, and he decides, this is what I want, and I don't give a damn who doesn't want it.
	I'm going to do everything to get it done.
	And I see, too, he's not running for a third term, so he's going to try to do something.
	This just came to my mind.
	Do you think Trump recognizes With all Jewed Up he is, Miriam Adelson, Bill Ackman, and Steve Schwarzman came out in front of them.
	He's Blackstone.
	He's also buying up tons of foreclosures, okay?
	New neighborhoods, okay?
	He's also doing that.
	Yeah, Blackstone is the one behind that, not BlackRock.
	Yeah, Steve Schwarzman, okay?
	They're donating to him, and they're coming right out supporting him.
	And Trump, fine.
	Okay.
	He needs the Jew vote.
	He needs the money.
	Okay.
	Do you think he recognizes, like you and me, and I know you do, but you are very diplomatic about it and discreet about it, Do you think Trump recognizes the true nature of these Jews who are influential with their money and their political cabal?
	Do you think Trump recognizes the true nature of the Jew?
	That's a loaded question, but let me see what you think, okay?
	Yeah, I can't speak to him.
	I would like to imagine that he probably knows as much, if not More than I do.
	And I have the feeling that he thinks of them like he thinks of any organized block of people.
	He thinks they want something.
	They're going to try to get it.
	I mean, he says over and over, you know, not about Jews, but just about like business people that he's worked with and, you know, Xi Jinping, anybody, you know, he has like respect for his enemies where he goes, these people are killers.
	These people are smart, work with people that he is not on the side of, I guess you could say.
	Yeah.
	And so I The sense I get is that he knows.
	He's like, yeah, they want something, and so they're going to give me stuff.
	I want to make a deal.
	He's not ideologically motivated one way or the other, I don't think.
	He's a statesman.
	He's a dealmaker.
	He does things like— Art of the deal.
	It's the art of the deal, and if they want to give him $100 million for his war chest— And he can sign over a symbolic transfer of the U.S. Embassy from one city to another that costs nothing and doesn't actually change anything on the ground and doesn't break any treaties.
	Then he's like, that's an amazing deal.
	I get $100 million and I move a building one place to the other.
	Of course I'm going to do that.
	He doesn't really care about… And so you have some people that are like, oh, Trump is the Messiah.
	He's our savior because he's fulfilling the prophecy by moving.
	He doesn't give a shit.
	He's just like, yeah, okay, I can sign this paper and I get $100 million for nothing?
	Okay, let's do that.
	All right, you're getting my brain moving in all kinds of directions here, man.
	Okay, this is very exciting for me.
	Can Trump, maybe I should put it because I'm interviewing you, should Trump Find a happy balance between the pernicious, slanted, I call it Jew power, but you want to call it a particular lobby, a particular block, a particular block of self-interest.
	Can he find a happy balance between these blocks, I call it the Jew block, and what the majority of Americans want?
	And I see...
	First, let me ask you, what do the majority of Americans want?
	You've been following this probably closer than me on your Infowars American Journal every day for three hours every day.
	What do you see?
	Talking to people, and I know you're with people, and you hear people.
	What does the average American want out of these elections or for America?
	I think everybody is voting for peace.
	I think...
	Everybody's voting for their own version or vision of what peace is.
	So I think leftist, people on the left, liberals are voting to be left alone about Donald Trump.
	I think they want Donald Trump just to go away because they're sick of hearing about him because every day for the last eight years they have been placed they have been hypnotized into a state of anxiety over nonexistent scandals about Donald Trump.
	And they are just sick of hearing about it, and they basically blame him for all the shit people talk about him.
	So they just want him to go away so they can go back to trusting and loving and believing in the system and feeling like everything is going right.
	In other words, they want a mamala.
	They want joy.
	They want Yes, exactly.
	What didn't happen?
	Are we divided in half in this country?
	Between left and right?
	Between those who want the woke and those who want traditional conservative social scenario?
	Are we divided in half?
	We're like a kaleidoscope, man.
	We are divided in half, but how that breaks down is very interesting.
	And I think one of the most fascinating things about October 7th has been this second dividing line.
	So it's almost like you can divide the country in left and right, and then you can divide it again by pro-Israel, anti-Israel.
	And half the leftists are on the one side and half the leftists are on the other, half the rightists are on the one.
	So we have strange bedfellows these days and we are seeing some interesting cross-pollination of political parties.
	So I have trouble seeing it as like, but here's the thing.
	The lefties are right about Israel for the same reason they're wrong about everything else, right?
	So they see the world in a very simple black and white, literally, like white people versus black and brown people dichotomy.
	And so when they look at Israel, they see white settlers oppressing poor indigenous brown people.
	So in that case, they happen to oppose the imperialistic, tyrannical, expansionist power, right?
	see as brown people.
	And so I happen to be on the same side, but I approach it from a nationalistic standpoint as a freedom of association or just people being able to choose their own path and have a right to self-defense.
	So I'm on the side of the Palestinians for moral and principled reasons.
	I see it.
	I happen to fall in line with the leftists who just think it's white people versus brown So, you know, it's like, am I on their side or not?
	I don't really know.
	We just agree on this topic.
	So I don't think it's that easy to divide this population.
	What do the other half, let's call it the Republican, the Patriots, the right, what do they want out of this election?
	What is their major issues?
	You know what?
	Almost the same thing as the left, but just for the other side.
	They just want to be left for the team and in their locker room and having to constantly fight back the flood of transgenderism and indoctrination in the children and taxes going up.
	They want to stop the illegal immigrations coming in, stop their money being spent.
	I think both sides just want peace and calm and normal stuff.
	Everybody can agree on that, I would think, and I think people do agree on it.
	The real dividing line is between the informed and the uninformed because for the uninformed, I talked about this yesterday on my show for a long time about how if you just look at the last week, if you're a mainstream media viewer, you were in the belief that Trump held a Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden where you were in the belief that Trump held a Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden where And then he said, all women are stupid.
	And then he said, I'm going to do whatever I want, whether women like it or not.
	And then he threatened to kill Liz Cheney.
	So it's like to these people.
	OK, that's how the media spun it.
	OK, yeah.
	None of these things are even remotely true.
	Right.
	None of them.
	Or even, like, tangentially related to reality.
	But, like, they are living in this world where there's this, like, psychopath just barnstorming around the country.
	Because recently I was on an airplane.
	I actually got kicked up to first class because I travel a lot.
	And here I'm sitting next to a guy...
	Suit and tie.
	He looked like a CEO, and he was, of some medical company, okay, that was still making something here, medical instruments.
	He looks at me, okay, in my cassock.
	He says, are you in the church?
	I said, yes.
	He said, what church is it?
	He said, are you an umpire?
	No.
	It wasn't Halloween.
	So he said, I said, the Russian Orthodox Church.
	She said, oh, the Russian?
	Do you know Putin is poisoning his own people?
	He's in a suit and tie.
	He's very well dressed.
	It wasn't some suit that he picked up at Walgreens or Walmart.
	Brooks Brothers.
	I said, where did you see that?
	He said, I saw it on CNN. He said it with a straight face.
	I know, man.
	These people, I legitimately, I have trouble, like I don't understand it.
	It is very baffling to me.
	I had one conversation early on in the pandemic.
	It was like the first, look, you have to have this certain type of mask because the masks that you guys are wearing, it's like trying to stop a mosquito with a chain link fence.
	The holes are too big, the germ gets in, it doesn't.
	It goes, we talk about it for an hour.
	They won't believe me.
	Trust the science.
	Just do it.
	And then, like, a year and a half later, the person I was having that argument with turns to me and goes, you know, I saw on CNN, literally, they said, I saw on CNN that, you know, they have to be N95 masks or else the holes are too big and it doesn't stop the virus.
	And I just – I had to just look at her and go, oh, really?
	Huh.
	That's interesting.
	That's fascinating.
	I'm just going – I literally told you that a year ago.
	Do they not remember?
	Do they not know?
	There's a hypnotic effect that the news media has and the way it presents things that people believe it and they only believe that.
	Okay, it's hypnotic.
	You're right.
	It is hypnotic.
	You're on that screen.
	And a fellow invited me when I was in San Francisco for dinner, okay?
	And I go into his house, and right there in the living room is the biggest screen for the internet I've ever seen in my life.
	I thought I was walking into a movie theater.
	And what did he have playing?
	Well, this one was Fox News, but they're propaganda too.
	But you talk about hypnosis, right?
	All right, this is really triggering all kind of brain cells in my mind with you today, Harrison.
	And I need to get back to you about Thomas Massey and your career in politics, which isn't, but we'll talk about that here, live stream.
	But what I want to get to this is there already Behind the scenes from the they, some kind of psychological component, some kind of hypnotic component to the media, to the screen, to the cell phone screen, to the internet screen.
	Also with content, with buzzwords, with memes.
	Are we dealing with psychological warfare coming up this election and continuing through the election?
	Because you were telling me at the beginning of this about all the cards.
	There's all the cards we have to discuss about.
	It's almost, in reality, it's chemical warfare against the population.
	And they've talked about this explicitly.
	One of the early guys on Facebook, who's the guy that founded Napster, I can never remember his name, Sean something.
	He talked about the fact that they were manipulating dopamine in people's heads.
	So they're doing it through stimulus, through images or likes or certain noises that are hyper-programmed to provide a dopamine rush.
	So they're hacking your brain and they're forcing it to release chemicals at certain times and on certain stimuli.
	So it's chemical warfare, hormonal warfare, and it's happening in a variety of different ways, everywhere from like, you know, the gay frogs because of the atrazine in the water to the way and the sounds and the noises and the feeling of your phone on the screen.
	And part of it is by design and part of it is just natural, I believe.
	And I believe this because I have a kid, I have a three-year-old kid And about a month ago, he had a bad dream or something.
	He woke up screaming, and he's just screaming his head off, going insane, like just – and for like 30 minutes, I'm just doing everything I can to try to be harsh, try to be nice, try to give himself, try to – and nothing helps.
	And finally, my wife goes, show him your phone.
	And literally, I go, whoop, and I put my phone up, and it just goes – And he's just looking at the phone.
	And it doesn't, you know, there's something about the lights and the motion.
	There is something that just, I think, is naturally hypnotic in this.
	And it's been taken and sort of weaponized against us.
	But I don't think it was designed to be hypnotic necessarily, but it is.
	Well, that's fascinating.
	It reminds me, too, when I was a kid, we used to go to the drive-in movies.
	I don't think they even have them anymore.
	In some places, they do.
	We love going to drive-in movies.
	But my dad would say, watch the movie and watch throughout, maybe three or four times, you'll see a flash of a commercial real quick.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	But we never saw it before.
	My dad wanted to point it out to us.
	And yeah, we saw a flash, Coca-Cola.
	And then what's going on?
	Well, so you know what they learned?
	What they learned was product placement, so they don't have to do that anymore, right?
	Because that's the thing.
	I joke about this a lot, too.
	When I was growing up, the sort of conspiracy theories about movies and subliminal messaging would be like, all right, you have to freeze-frame The Little Mermaid at just the right time, and you'll see the word sex spelled out if you twist your screen and see subliminal messaging.
	And now you turn on a kid's show, and it's just like...
	I'm trans.
	That means I'm a man and I'm a woman.
	It's like, okay, they don't do this.
	I want to open this up.
	Rockwell, do we have a super chat or a live chat or a side chat?
	I want people to ask Harrison Smith questions, okay?
	And if we get any money in, we'll split it.
	I'll give you 60-40.
	But I wanted to say this at the beginning of our interview.
	Anybody want to ask Harrison Smith or challenge him?
	Go ahead.
	You know, I'm a free speech dude, okay?
	Let's open up for questions as we go along, but I need to talk about something here.
	Why can't you, with your huge platform, you're an Infowars dude, and we all know that the biggest is Infowars for alternative media.
	Everyone knows that, okay?
	Why can't you begin with getting Thomas Massey on your show?
	Because I know he wants to reach the youth.
	I know he wants to do something, America.
	And as I see it, I don't see any other hack on Capitol Hill.
	I'm not going to call him a hack, okay?
	Because he says everybody has an AIPAC babysitter in every voting realm, locally, state-wise, federally, except him.
	He told Tucker Carlson that.
	Can you get him on your show?
	And what is your feeling about Thomas Massey?
	Is he up and coming?
	I love Thomas Massey more than any other current sitting politician.
	His interview with Tucker Carlson should be like mandatory viewing for everybody in America.
	It was absolutely amazing.
	So I love that guy.
	He does follow me on X. I don't know if I've ever messaged him before.
	Infowars is funny.
	It's a name that means a lot of people.
	I could get a lot of guests that I couldn't get With the name Harrison Smith, right?
	It's a big brand and people want to get on it, but it also drives a lot of people away.
	And usually people sitting in office are not brave enough to come on.
	I don't see it.
	He might.
	I saw Steve Manon on with Alex yesterday.
	That's true.
	And I would think anybody who wants to have a voice to get out there would want to be on Infowars.
	Whether it's Alex.
	I would suggest you to reach out to him.
	And maybe it'll take a couple of times.
	And one way you can do it is through Ron Paul, because he's very close to Ron Paul, and who I'm friendly with, at least I once was, I don't know if I am anymore, because I've been critical of him, and that would be Ron Paul's assistant, Daniel McAdams.
	Daniel McAdams.
	Yeah, I know Daniel, and we have emailed us back and forth now on that.
	Yeah, yeah.
	No, he's great.
	I've talked to him fairly recently.
	Who?
	To Daniel, yeah.
	Yeah, and my dad is pretty involved in, like, libertarian freedom stuff in Houston, which is...
	Ron Paul's just outside of Houston.
	But, yeah, no, I'd love...
	Get Daniel on your show.
	Get Daniel McAdams on your show.
	I'll tell you why.
	Because he knows the whole political realm, okay?
	Because he was very much involved in Ron Paul's campaign, twice.
	Yep.
	Yeah, very much involved.
	No, he's fantastic.
	I love him, and he actually reached out to me probably a week ago about this...
	But we never made it happen, so I'm glad you reminded me because I do need to reach out to him.
	I'll tell you why you've got to make it happen.
	This is your doorway into your own political career.
	Now, whether you want that or not, sometimes there has to be the position within us that it has to be what I want.
	You said at the beginning of this interview that Trump has to be president.
	I challenge you on that.
	So sometimes we have to say what we have to do and not whether we want to do it or not.
	That's what it comes down to.
	Now, in your bio that you sent to me, you say you are dedicated, and I believe you, You are dedicated.
	You have dedicated your life.
	That's big.
	When you dedicate your life to something, here's what you have dedicated your life to, which you told me from your own mouth.
	You have dedicated your life to freedom against, you're specific here, freedom against the globalist technocracy.
	What's the best way to fight it?
	I grew up as a Jew.
	It's always been get into the levers of power.
	Politics.
	That's where you fight it.
	I told Owen Schroer the same thing.
	And he was listening to me.
	At first he got, you know, oh, that's not my thing.
	It has to be in those areas.
	Areas of influence.
	That's politics.
	And you've got to be thinking about that, Harrison.
	You've got to be praying about that.
	I know you're a very strong member of the Eilichen Episcopalian High Church.
	So this is something which is very close to the Orthodox Church, actually.
	And that was my stepping stone into the Orthodox Church.
	You have to be thinking about that.
	So I would start with Daniel McAdams.
	If he's already reached out to you, man, grab it.
	Have him on because he can help you in the political realm if that's where you want to go.
	But I'm saying you have to say, I have to.
	Now, someone has a question for you, Harrison.
	This is from DBZ Bennett.
	What do you think Israel has to do with BRICS? I don't quite understand that question.
	Rockwell, do you know what he means?
	He's one of my staff guys here.
	Alright, let me put it this way.
	We have BRICS coming up.
	We just had this major thing in Kazan, and you had some major people there.
	I mean, really major guys, alright?
	You had the President of Iran there.
	You had an emissary from Saudi Arabia.
	It wasn't, you know, Ben Salman, okay?
	You had Xi Jinping.
	How do you say his name?
	Xi Jinping, yeah.
	You had him there, okay?
	And you actually had the UN representative, okay, there.
	And they're hugging each other, toasting each other, and they're all saying this is going to be the counterpart to Western hegemony.
	So that's the way I want to phrase this.
	What can Trump do?
	To maintain at least the dollar, because they're already talking about we are going to replace the dollar with another world currency or a group of different world currencies.
	What can Trump do?
	Has he even addressed this issue?
	Is he even looking at this kind of thing?
	Yeah, no, I think he's definitely, man, and there are so many aspects to this, because the question is about, you know, what role does Israel play?
	And Israel plays an outsized role because the American dollar and our prowess, especially in the Middle East, and being able to protect, you know, oil reserves and impose our will on oil supplying countries there.
	So, you know, obviously, when you talk about Middle East, Israel is the predominant Let's get to BRICS. Is Trump coming up with something to counter BRICS or to say, hey, we're in danger here.
	We need to maintain the dollar as reserve currency.
	We need to bring in some of these people from the global south.
	I think he did say recently that he's going to break up the alliance between Russia and China.
	I don't know how the hell he's going to do that.
	Is he just blabbing away again?
	He's got a lot of levers to pull.
	And again, I think Trump just – he sees the weakness of America allowing our enemies not just get stronger but form alliances.
	I think he could make an agreement with Russia and go, hey, we'll stop supplying arms to Ukraine if you stop participating in nuclear – I think that's smart.
	That Congress wouldn't confirm, because of all the chaos and the possible fraudulent rigging, that Congress would not confirm a Trump election, which is going to get back to all the cards, huh?
	It's too late for that.
	They did what they always do.
	The Democrats had a knee-jerk, ill-advised, and hastily executed solution to a problem that they had, and they've screwed themselves over.
	Wow.
	Wait, wait.
	Tell me.
	What was that?
	What was that?
	So, January 6th is supposed to be the certification or non-certification of the election with the vice president presiding over because it almost didn't go as planned.
	They almost objected, oh dear, and previously it only took one congressman or senator to object and the whole thing would have to be investigated.
	You'd have a 10-day pause.
	They eliminated that.
	So now you have to get a fifth of both houses, I think.
	I think you have to get a fifth of both houses of Congress to object, and then you can have the pause in the investigation.
	So they took that power away.
	Pence had on January 6, 2021, the ability to call the election, and that's not going to happen.
	Okay.
	Two last things, and we're going to close it up.
	I want to get back to this Trump saying he's going to deport.
	And you have a very specific, pragmatic way, well, let's offer to help them to leave, and I brought up, let's give them some money, because it's going to cost, which you said, taking the words out of your own mouth, it costs more money to keep them.
	Texas.
	When we talk about my presidential campaigns, it is president or higher authority, perhaps emperor of Texas.
	That is my goal.
	You get Daniel McAdams.
	He's...
	There you go.
	Eighth generation Texan.
	That's right.
	I'm 12th generation Jew.
	Okay.
	Racial, but I'm with the Orthodox Church.
	Okay.
	You get Daniel McAdams on your show.
	He's a Texan.
	I think he's an East Coast boy.
	I've met him.
	I've had lunch with him, yeah.
	Well, you know him.
	He knows all the inroads of local politics, state politics, federal politics.
	He knows, man.
	Get tight with him.
	When you talk about cards to play, you talk about the cards they have to play.
	They can release diseases.
	They can launch world wars.
	They can do false flags.
	One card we have to play is...
	It's a secession of the states, and that could be much more viable in the near future.
	That could be.
	It could be, but I think it's going to be very difficult because there's such an intertwining of federal funding with state money, with local money.
	The intertwining is the Gordian knot, and we're going to slice right through it.
	If anyone can, you can.
	All right, now I want to get to two more things, and then we're going to close it up.
	But this has been fascinating for me.
	I could go on for another hour, but we're going to close it up.
	We've barely scratched the surface.
	I feel like we could do 10 hours like this.
	We'll do more with you, dude, okay?
	Because you're an up-and-coming guy.
	All right, everybody got to follow him at Harrison H. Give him hell.
	Harrison, give him hell, Smith.
	Harrison H. Smith.
	H-H-S. Yeah, Harrison H. Smith.
	Okay, Harrison H. It's H-H or just H? H-H. Oh, it's Harrison H. H. Smith.
	No, Harrison Hill Smith is my name.
	My ex-account is Harrison H. Smith.
	Okay, go and follow him there, because he has all his streams.
	He has his American Journal show, okay?
	And this man gets right to it.
	I talk about it a lot.
	Yeah, he's very savvy, and he knows his history, which you've got to know.
	You have to understand everything in context, or else you don't know you're blowing smoke.
	Let me get to this, and then one more.
	Trump wants to deport, but then I have a clip and I showed it many times from overseas to run our AI, and he was alluding to the Hindus, which he wants to give them citizenship and green cards and everything for the Hindus, because he got a lot of money from a Hindu with David Sachs.
	They put together, I think, 60 million.
	So now he's playing the Hindu card, okay?
	So he wants to deport, yet he wants to bring more Hindus in.
	How do you respond to that?
	I have my own answer to that, but what's your response to that?
	Do we need more of these?
	No, yeah, definitely not.
	I'm absolutely against that, too.
	No, I'm against most legal immigration as well, especially the high-skilled H-1B visas.
	I think that's ridiculous.
	I think the way that we educate foreigners in this country and give them positions in our university just to either send them back home or give them a high-paying job here, I think it's disgraceful.
	I think that's wrong.
	I think Trump's better than nobody, right?
	He's better at immigration than just about anybody else, but He does still have this mindset that, again, I think it's honest.
	I don't think he's being dishonest.
	I don't think he's being underhanded when he's like, oh, but we love legal immigration.
	I think most elite executive-style leaders in America today are genuinely like, why would we cut ourselves off from this gigantic talent pool?
	I think they genuinely think If the best person for this job is an Indian, then I'm going to get him because we're going to win if we have the best people.
	And I think that's how Trump sees it.
	I think it's still motivated by like a genuine desire to see America on top.
	And he wants to like steal the best people from other countries, bring them here.
	Do we need to steal anybody?
	Don't we already have them here?
	I see every kid is born with an AI or a cell phone in his crib already.
	100%.
	No, I don't agree with this.
	I'm trying to kind of rationalize why I believe Trump thinks this, but I don't agree with it.
	I think absolutely we should be prioritizing American people, the American youth.
	We should be reinforcing the system.
	We once had a system where everybody went to public school and high achievers were identified and they were sort of funneled into the Ivy League colleges, which had our beliefs and our morality and You know, pumped out the best, greatest minds of all time.
	Percentage of this race and this percentage of that, I think that's outrageous.
	I think if you just remove all of that, the American people and especially the European-American people will start to thrive again.
	We just need to remove all of these Harrison Bergeron chains on ourselves and that'll be enough.
	We don't need any extra benefits or extra privileges.
	We just need Freedom and total equality.
	You got it, man.
	And literal equality.
	Last question and then we wrap it up.
	But we gotta do more of this.
	You and I gotta put our brains together.
	Yeah, it's great.
	But you got me thinking, man.
	And I like to think.
	Now, will, on November 5th, the election be rigged for Kamala?
	That's my last question.
	It is, yes.
	Absolutely.
	100% it is being rigged.
	It is rigged like a thousand, ten million percent It is.
	It is rigged.
	And I can tell you it's rigged because there is no system of control.
	There is no chain of custody for hundreds of thousands of ballots in cities all over the United States.
	So it's like even – treat it like a murder case, okay?
	If you have a murder case and you're going to trial and half of the evidence – there's no chain of custody and there's no way of knowing where it came from and there's no experts to testify that it's the actual knife from the crime – There's no case.
	The case is over.
	The guy, you have to let him free because there's no chain of custody and you can't verify anything about anything.
	So it's over, right?
	That's what's happening with our election is there's no chain of custody.
	There is no way before, during, or after the election to verify there are hundreds of thousands of ballots.
	Totally unverifiable.
	Totally impossible to audit or determine what the accurate count is.
	So our election has been rigged.
	It was rigged before it ever started.
	The only possibility to me is that the Trump victory is so overwhelming.
	There is such a thing as too big to rig.
	There is such a thing as it actually being impossible for them to fabricate enough votes without it being totally ridiculous and completely obvious.
	And there is such a thing as too big to rig.
	That is our only hope.
	And so it seems like we're on our way there.
	Knock on wood and pray to God.
	I hope that we're on our way.
	Shenanigans.
	Last question.
	And I promise it'll be the last question, though I have a hundred more.
	But we'll do it more.
	Do we run the risk of a Trump victory of a tremendous divisiveness and fragmentation in this country?
	Do we run that risk with a Trump victory where we would not run that risk as much with a Camilla victory?
	What's your response to that?
	I don't know which is the higher risk.
	I think the risk is extremely high in either situation.
	In either regard, there was a very, very, very powerful story about, I think it was called, Soros organizes 175 experts.
	But essentially, they've already done the war games.
	They've already done the simulation planning for the event of a Trump victory in which they activate all of their leftist foot soldiers and make 2020 and the George Floyd riots look like nothing.
	And so the time between the election and the inauguration, no matter who wins, is going to, I think, be extremely tumultuous and potentially extremely dangerous because if there's one thing we know about the enemy, it's that they do not give up quietly.
	They do not recognize and concede defeat and gracefully bow out of the competition.
	They will claw your eyes out and burn the whole house down before they give up power.
	So it's a dangerous time.
	But thank God for Trump.
	Thank God for the awakening.
	I mean, just the fact that you've got RFK Jr., that seed oils is a regular talking point in this presidential candidacy.
	Like, what the hell?
	Seed oils and big pharma corruption and transgender kids being sterilized?
	It's like the change is on, man.
	The revolution is on.
	Is the snowball is rolling downhill and it's only going to get bigger and go faster.
	So exciting time.
	I can't get into, but my main concern of these transgender operations.
	And by the way, Jews are the head of these surgeries.
	It's just a fact.
	But that's my take on things.
	Your take is brilliant.
	Go ahead.
	You probably know this fact, but one of my favorite bizarre, strange coincidences from history is the fact that the guy who opened the first transgender popularized the modern usage of the term racist.
	He wrote a book called Racism, where he defined what racism is, and he just so happened to be the same person who did the first transgender operation in Germany.
	Isn't that a crazy coincidence?
	Some people, they have an outsized contribution to the modern world, wouldn't you say?
	Well, that's why I say we can't be living in the present, okay?
	We are part of the past, and we move into the future, okay?
	But we have to see the whole picture of where we came from, where we are now, and where we're going.
	You're going places, guy, okay?
	Follow him at Harrison H. Smith.
	He's on Infowars, American Journal, and whatever happens there, I don't know.
	He's going to continue to this man, and I'm going to see him as a senator.
	I want him to be president someday.
	Harrison Smith, you're great.
	Thank you very much.
	This has been so much fun, man.
	Thank you for having me on.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	Before I close, this is my me, man.
	I'm your number one.
	He ain't far behind.
	Noticer.
	Noticer, thank you.

▲