Zuckerberg is being hauled into yet another hearing on big tech censorship.
We've been through this drill before, and both Zuckerberg's billions and censorship grows larger every day.
This time around, it's about Facebook censoring the New York Post story titled, Smoking Gun Email Reveals How Hunter Biden Introduced Ukrainian Businessman to VP Dad.
Some senators, like Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley, want leftist Zuckerberg to cough up yet another recital of Facebook's community policies before the Senate judiciary this week.
They're suggesting that Zuckerberg's latest censorship ploy is election interference.
I guarantee you it'll go nowhere.
Zuckerberg won't go to jail.
In other words, Jews don't end up in the slammer.
If a few Jews do, they're either used as passies, like Bernie Madoff, to distract the public from spotting huge globalized Jewish crime.
Or they're suicided like Jeffrey Epstein before he could implicate Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ehud Barak, and Les Wexner as guilty parties in Epstein's teenage sex ring.
Now, the issue of censorship at this point is whether Big Tech should be designated as
platforms or publishers.
Platforms allow users to contribute content to their sites, and since users are sending
in information, platforms are not liable for what their users say.
They're covered by Section 230, which prevents platforms from being sued.
Publishers, on the other hand, dictate what is posted on their sites.
They control the narrative, but are liable for the content they publish.
Big tech is misusing this paradigm to have platform protection while they institute publisher-style censorship.
They can't have it both ways, and they must choose.
But here's the kicker.
If Big Tech loses their Section 230 protections, then genuine platforms like Gab, like 4chan, like Vote, like BitChute and Brighteon will suffer.
They'll be hit with an avalanche of lawsuits from hundreds of Jewish organizations whose briberies, blackmailings, Israel-first agendas, abortion, homosexual advocacy, and transgender funding are exposed by these smaller, genuine platforms.
And with Section 230 gone, big tech will censor more than ever, and the smaller platforms will be Jewish law-suited out of business.
The immediate solution here is to shame Big Tech into changing its censorious ways.
Simply expose their censorship as a collective Jewish effort to kill free speech.
The names and the faces of the players display a communal Jewish exercise in subversion.
Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook.
Andy Stone, communications director of Facebook, who said he'd reduce distribution of the New York Post piece.
Susan Wyszycki, the devil's daughter of YouTube.
Yoel Roth, head of site integrity of Twitter, who is the Trump-hating censor designated to keep all tweets kosher for Jewish interests, including gay masculinity.
These are all Jews. The reported official flaggers of YouTube are Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL, Eileen Hershinov of the ADL, and a team of SPLC operatives under the oversight of its chief strategy officer, Seth Levy, are again all Jews.
Google has a Hindu shill as its head, Sander Bechai, so as the high that Aleph Bet, sold to the Goys' alphabet, is a shell company of the Mossad, Israel's CIA counterpart.
My fellow Americans, if we call out censorship as a Jewish ploy to trash the First Amendment, we have a fighting chance to turn the tables back on the perpetrators.
I mean, Jews have been kicked out of 109 countries.
110 is a good round number.
Okay, H2O. Okay, lubricate the tonsils.
I had them out anyways at six years old.
Wasn't a good idea.
Speaking of numbers, Facebook has 2.8 billion users.
Well, think about it. How big is that number?
Imagine every single American hopping in their cars and driving down every single highway all at the same time.
Then multiply all those cars by ten.
In this analogy, you have Facebook controlling all the roads and all the cars.
Yet Facebook says they're a private company.
Facebook thinks they're just a little shop on Main Street.
Yet they are every shop on every Main Street, in every town, in every city, in every country of the world.
Not too private, if you ask me.
It's time to quit screwing around with these hearings.
Let's cut to the chase.
Facebook is a public utility and must honor, at least here in America, our First Amendment.