All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 6, 2023 - Blood Money
01:41:14
Choosing Winning Freedom Candidates (vs. Choosing Candidates that Lose) w/ Stephanie Phillips
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪♪
All right, we're on the latest episode of Blood Money.
Today I have a very special guest, Mrs.
Stephanie Phillips. How are you doing?
I'm good, Ben. Thanks for having me.
I appreciate it. It's always a pleasure to speak with you.
So, I just wanted to preface this episode by saying that, firstly, Stephanie is running for Senate seat one, correct, in Nevada?
U.S. Senate against the incumbent Jackie Rosen.
Awesome, awesome. And the reason we wanted to have Stephanie on this episode is, you know, frankly, I was watching an episode of Veterans in Politics over the weekend, and I saw something that really opened my eyes to the brilliance of Stephanie Phillips.
Steve Sanson, who's the host of that show, had his 15-year-old daughter.
And the way Steve Sanson describes his 15-year-old daughter is that he has four children, and he describes three of them as having escaped the woke propaganda.
But his 15 year old is all in on the woke propaganda, including this idea of sexualizing children, including talking about gender topics before a child has completed puberty.
All things that I think if you watch the Blood Money series, things that do not make full sense to us that children before they are sexually developed are being posed with these insane life altering questions, being given a choice to essentially be sterile for the rest of their lives.
Because once you examine what these sex change surgeries are, you're really sterilizing a person for life.
So there's a lot of calamity involved in what they say is sex change.
And if you actually research what sex change are, there is no such thing as a sex change.
You cannot change your sex in terms of what they try to sell to us, right?
And what I saw in that particular episode was Stephanie in a very mature, well-measured style talking to this child.
And believe it or not, by the end of the episode, it seems like this child's viewpoint was completely changed.
Or at least she was questioning things that she never did prior to that interview with Stephanie.
And Stephanie, I gotta tell you, that blew my mind.
It blew my mind how you handled that situation.
It showed a level of political maturity that I don't think I've even seen in anybody in Congress right now.
There's a lot of people attacking.
There's a lot of people throwing out harsh words.
I have yet to see somebody, a politician, sit down with a child, have a logical conversation over the course of two hours, And actually alter that child's mindset to come closer to our belief system.
So tell us a little bit about that, Stephanie.
Before we get into an introduction, your bio and stuff, we'll get into all of that.
But first, tell us about that interaction with that 15-year-old child.
You know, that was a really interesting conversation.
And of course, I know his daughter and my mother instincts kicked in.
And so I was talking with her like I would talk with...
You know, to my own children.
So that's the lens I was looking through.
And also as a political candidate, these issues that we discussed are extremely controversial.
Most candidates, if not all, especially in my race, would never come on a podcast like that and talk about those things.
But I believe with discussion, regardless of opinion, You can get a whole lot of things accomplished when you talk and when you discuss things.
And that's what we did.
And having that 15 year old perspective about what's going on in schools and with this gender ideology and all of this, it was very interesting to hear her viewpoint and her perspective at her age.
And then also we talked about what really I am...
Standing for. And I am against the sexualization of children.
And so we talked about the ways that they're being sexualized now.
And we talked about the drag queen shows where, you know, they're dressed in thongs and g-strings and Just very revealing clothes and they're dancing in front of three-year-olds, four-year-olds, eight-year-olds, whatever it is, you know, these little kids. But the parents of those kids are bringing them to these shows.
So it's not only the performer, it's the parent in that situation.
And there is no need for a grown man dressed in drag to be dancing In front of kids and gyrating and all of these things that they do, the only reason for that is to sexualize them.
We talked about all kinds of things and it was eye-opening because she hadn't seen that happen.
And of course, we see a lot on social media.
We see videos. There's all kinds of stuff that are out there because the parents are...
I mean, just look at the school board meetings where a parent will get up.
This happened in Clark County.
They have books that they're reading from that are taken from a sexual education course that they're giving to our kids of many ages.
And when they're reading excerpts from these books, Their mic is cut off because the words they're saying, the school board says, you know, you can't say that in public.
You can't say that in this forum.
Why not? The newspaper, the news media won't print or put that stuff on the six o'clock news.
As word for word of what's in that book.
Why? If it's too vulgar to go on the 6 o'clock news and too vulgar for the newspaper and too vulgar to say in public at a school board meeting, then why in the world are these books being put before our students to be read?
So those things we talked about, and some of those things that she hadn't seen or heard of, and it was...
It was a great discussion all the way through.
And at the end, when Steve said, Faith, would you vote for Stephanie?
And she said yes. I thought that was...
You know, it was one of the most mind-blowing things I've seen.
Because it was very clear that this child has been fed propaganda.
And what was very interesting about this dialogue is that she's been fed propaganda.
Propaganda with a lot of information missing, right?
They're saying, oh, we need to reveal these things to these children because if they don't know their options, they might get depressed and commit suicide.
We're actually saving lives, right?
But what they're not telling us is that they're giving very Partial information.
They are withholding information.
Which, by the way, is the same thing as lying.
In a court of law, if you're withholding information, you're basically lying to the court.
You're committing perjury. And that's exactly what's going on.
And the information you reveal to this child, which was really mind-blowing, is the damage that these, quote-unquote, gender-affirming surgeries do.
For example, making you sterile for life.
Not giving you the option whether you want to be just gay or you want to be trans.
Seems like an adult decision, right?
So once she was given that information of, wait a minute, like, they're going to cut off a piece of your body, create this, you know, fake penis, that's probably not going to be functional.
You're going to need a pump. You're never going to experience sex the way a person with a natural penis experiences.
You're probably going to be sterile for the rest of your life.
Once she was fed this information, it seems to have altered her point of view.
I think so. It was eye-opening because a lot of these kids, they feel like they're trapped in another body, right?
And the only alternative is this transition surgery.
But when we talked through, and I showed her these medical pictures of What really happens?
I never knew until I looked this stuff up and I had seen some of this stuff on the internet.
And I thought, my gosh, no wonder why they're calling it child mutilation.
Because if you look at these pictures and the chunks of skin that they take off of your thighs to create what they need to create...
It's very eye-opening and disturbing.
And there's a lot of side effects that go along with that.
And yes, you are sterile because from a female to a male, they would take the uterus.
And so you would never be able to have kids.
So when we were talking about the different scenarios...
That sometimes kids don't think about because they only know what they know at their young age.
So it's not their fault.
But the adults and the doctors and the parents that are older, we understand a lot more.
So it's our responsibility to tell them and educate them, here's the pitfalls, here's what can happen.
You're right. It may not be functioning.
I didn't get really graphic too much in that, but from a female to a male, for that to even function properly, you have to put an implant in there.
It's not only the cosmetic look of it, it's the functionality.
We could have gone further, but I didn't think that it needed to go further in that situation.
So I asked her, what if kids that are sitting there with their parents and the doctors, should they go through a certain class or videos and watch and see all of the things that could possibly go wrong?
Should they be educated before they even think about that kind of a surgery at such a young age?
And she agreed that that would be a good solution.
Yeah, yeah. You know, what's fascinating about all this is that these children, again, are being given partial information, and based upon that partial information, they are establishing certain viewpoints that affects the viewpoint of the other side.
So it's very easy if your point of view becomes, hey, you know, these people are a bunch of Nazis, anti-gay, anti-trans, whatever, it becomes very easy to establish a certain point of But it seems as though when you're given this additional information,
it almost makes it seem like all these crazies on the right side as they try to make the people on the right side to be, it's almost like they are truly the most altruistic out of all of the individuals out there because they are actually fighting for the truth.
They're trying to reveal the truth despite the insane amount of attacks and the insults that they are constantly subject to.
My whole thing is this.
When a kid is a kid, Especially before puberty.
I just believe you need to let a child grow up.
Let them learn these things on their own.
And when they become of age, let them make those decisions.
But when they are so young, they can't possibly comprehend all of the things.
And we even talked about that because I have seen kids in their 20s now Look back and they have told their stories about that they regret the decisions that they made when they were a child, but they are looking to their parents and the doctors and the adults in the situation and they're like, why did you let me do this?
You were the adult.
You had the knowledge.
Why did you let me?
Because all of the...
They're sterile.
Things don't work properly.
You can't reverse this stuff.
So there's a lot of people coming out that are not happy with what happened.
And again, it's up to us to protect our children.
And we talked about the gender thing because this is another thing that I don't like that they're pushing on these kids.
They're teaching them you can be however many genders, whatever gender, whatever identity.
And they're missing the fact that you're either a boy or you're a girl.
And there is a lot of controversy when it comes to that.
And so what I had said was, when you go into a doctor's office, a doctor is going to examine you based on what kind of plumbing you have, whether you're male or female.
A doctor does not play into that you're non-binary, that you're not either one, or all this nonsense that they want to play.
They figure out what plumbing you have so they can help you.
And that's just science.
That's plain, simple the way it is.
There is no...
A doctor does not discuss, you know, anything beyond that.
They know what the science is.
So I don't like the fact that they're teaching these kids that men can have babies.
But what they're saying is just because a female now looks male on the outside, you know, All cosmetically, she still has her uterus and her womb.
And she's still biologically a female.
That's how she can have a child.
But they're calling her a man because she looks male on the outside.
But these kids, they don't know.
They just look at a person and say to themselves, oh, it looks like a man.
But they're pregnant and they're having kids.
They don't know the details unless we teach them.
I don't want kids to be taught lies because that's what that is.
That's a lie. And men cannot menstruate, lactate, or have a child.
They're a biological female.
So we talked about those things too so that it would be clear the things that I am standing for and the things I'm standing against.
And I've been called every name in the book, you know, transphobe, homophobe.
Racist. All these things that I am clearly not.
So we went through specifically the things that I'm talking about and what I'm standing against.
Wow, wow. I mean, your temperament, Stephanie, is so amazing.
Anybody that wants to learn, you know, really what Stephanie Phillips is all about, the mild temperament, but through which comes really a protection of our constitutional values and all of our rights, especially the children's rights.
Please check out that interview on Veterans in Politics and watch how Stephanie dealt with a 15-year-old that has a completely different perspective You weren't trying to put her down.
You were as gracious as one could possibly be.
Tell me about how that temperament makes you the best possible candidate that we currently have running for that seat in the Senate in Nevada.
Well, in that situation, since I know her, and with any child, I'm a mom first before anything and being a mom and being nurturing and just having that patience and understanding and things like that that just comes naturally to me so that part of me came out more than anything during that interview and I wanted to hear What she
was challenged with at school and with her peers.
And I wanted to hear her opinions.
And I want to hear the other side, not only from her, but I say this too, with voters.
I want to hear what people think and what their concerns are.
Even if we don't agree, I still want to hear because that's how we learn.
And having the kind of temperament, and I have to do this every day of my life.
Because what I've done for a career for 30 years, which has been the real estate business, I'm constantly dealing with a diverse set of people, different personalities, religions, backgrounds, culture, male, female.
I deal with all kinds of people from all walks of life.
So you have to learn how to deal with people and Considering where they came from, what's important to them, what their values are.
And then you have to learn to communicate to where they hear what you're saying.
And it's different for different people.
So being able to be that chameleon that you can deal with people and then also stay calm in a very, you know, when you're buying a home, I've had husband and wife Fighting and yelling at each other in my car before.
And so you kind of have to navigate these things and kind of play referee and mediate and get everything settled down.
And so these skills, interpersonal skills, negotiating skills, being calm and being able to talk out all the scenarios, good, bad and indifferent, Those are extremely helpful in the Senate when we are talking about bills, spending packages, all the things that we see Congress do.
Those things are going to be very, very useful and I will use those to the benefit of the Nevada people.
That's amazing. That's amazing.
Now, this is the kind of diplomacy that we need in these times because it's very easy for somebody, you know, frankly, excuse the French, but to lose their shit and really hold strong to their beliefs as opposed to having a dialogue because as insane as some of these ideas seem to people like us,
and they are insane, once you dissect them, Having a child have a sex change operation prior to them completing puberty, okay, is absolutely insane, and you don't have to take my word for that.
Look at the country of Sweden that's been doing this sort of thing for much longer, and look at the conclusions that they have come to now, which is that sexualizing children before they have completed puberty is a road to calamity, right?
For those watching the stats, a lot of these individuals that change their gender, We're good to go.
Some of us approach it in that way, where, you know, we attack the people that are coming out with the crazy ideas, which is not your approach.
Your approach is to talk to them with logic and bring them to our side, which you have successfully done on multiple accounts, including with this 15 year old.
Now, is that an approach that you think most people in Congress and the Senate have to adopt of, through dialogue, converting people as opposed to trying to go in there with this, you know, hammer, so to speak, and trying to force people into your beliefs?
Yeah, see, you can do a whole lot with sugar rather than, you know, vinegar.
And love goes a lot farther than hatred.
And when you are dealing with people, because people are emotional, people have different backgrounds and belief systems, you can't expect, and you're one person out of a hundred senators, you're not going to go in there and just be that trailblazer and think you're going to Burn the place down.
That is not the right attitude.
That's not the right tactic.
The tactic to me is to be diplomatic and to be able to use those interpersonal skills and bring two sides together for a common goal.
And that common goal is the best for the American people.
And I think a lot of times what happens is there's a lot lost on accountability in D.C., and they are not representing us to the best of their ability because of all kinds of things.
You know, there's money, there's corruption, there's the establishment club, and they forget about us back here at home, who they are there supposed to be representing.
So I would hope when I'm there someday that I would be able to rally people together, that we would look at the American people first above all, because those are the people that put us there.
And the power resides in the people.
Not in the government.
And I believe the federal government has gotten way too big for their britches.
And they have completely lost sight that we have bestowed the power given them.
We the people.
This is not we the government.
So I think people really need to think about the power rests in us.
And not the government. And we need to take back some of that power because they have gotten way too big.
They want to be involved in every aspect of our lives.
And there is no such thing as privacy anymore.
And I believe that some of that needs to be rolled back.
It was never intended to be like that, I don't believe, on the federal level.
Wow, wow. Okay.
I'm going to ask you a tough one here, okay?
And I'm not trying to upset any other candidates right now, right?
But you're running against Jim Marchant.
Jim Marchant is, I guess, the person that they say has the most chance of winning the primary other than yourself.
Would you agree to that?
I hear it is...
Sam, Jim, and myself.
Okay. I don't know much about Sam, but I could tell you, and I've tried to be as upfront as possible in these Blood Money episodes.
We did a series on the last Clark County election.
I was very transparent about my relationship with Jesse Law, since a lot of the attacks were against Jesse Law.
And in a similar fashion, I'd like to say that Jim Marchand, I actually really like on a personal level.
I think the work that he has done in terms of election integrity, there's very few individuals that have done that kind of work, and I commend him on that.
I commend him, you know, for...
He's been generally like a...
Good person in my eyes, including when I first started getting involved with the party.
He was very friendly.
He had almost like a Jesse Law-like demeanor, which, as I've explained, was very inviting.
And, you know, I felt like, hey, this guy's been in politics.
He's treating me with a lot of respect.
I actually genuinely really like Jim Marchand, right?
The problem I see in this particular race is going up against Rosen, you need a specific kind of candidate to beat Rosen, right?
And I personally...
Don't think, and this is very unfortunate, but I personally don't think a white guy is the perfect guy to go against...
Rosen. I just don't think that is going to be a race.
I think that's going to be a race where they're going to use all the stereotypes, all the BS you hear in the mainstream media about toxic masculinity against him.
Hence and therefore, I just do not instinctually feel like he's the right candidate.
In full transparency, you are an incredible candidate when it comes to going up against Rosen because of your demeanor, because of how you approach things.
Firstly, what are your comments about the current status of the race?
And the second question I would ask on that tip is that you were around in the 2022 election.
You saw how the primaries went, right?
Is there inherent mistakes that we are making in the primary process that is putting candidates forward that really don't have a chance of being victorious?
Okay, there's a lot there.
So let me start with...
I adore Jim.
He knows it.
We talk.
We have a great relationship.
I supported him in the last cycle.
And what I hear is, and I will not talk ill of any of my opponents or anything like that.
However, what I hear along the campaign trail is a lot.
And I hear people's opinion.
I don't solicit it.
I don't ask for it.
But of course, people are gonna, they tell you all kinds of things.
And I've been traveling around this state a lot.
And I talked to a lot of people.
And, you know, you hear the thing about recycled candidates.
I hear that a lot.
I hear, you know, failed campaigns, multiple ones in a row.
I have women come up to me and tell me, thank God you're running and there's a female in this race.
I have people tell me it's going to take a woman to beat Jackie Rosen.
I hear all kinds of things.
I hear exactly what you said about the white guy.
I hear that scenario a lot from voters.
So there's a lot of things to consider.
In this race in particular, because if you take each one of the candidates and you match them up against Jackie, I think from a strategic standpoint, you really have to look at my campaign and look at me as a candidate because of the political climate that is out there right now.
And it's a lot of what we were just talking about.
It's what parents are facing.
It's parental rights.
It's our kids.
These are mama bear issues.
I am a fierce mama bear over my kids and all kids.
There is the war on women and they're trying to erase us and call us birthing persons instead of moms and females.
I mean, we have a Supreme Court justice that can't even define What a woman is.
There are these things that are happening across this country.
And these are social issues.
And they are going to run on abortion again.
What else do they have to run on?
So we're going to be faced with abortion.
And the last cycle, the messaging on abortion was poor.
And we did not win a lot of seats.
And I believe that a lot of that was in part with that messaging.
So we need to be clear on abortion.
We need to talk about abortion.
And when you have a female talking about these issues, I mean, one or two of the candidates, they don't have children at all.
And none of the candidates raised their children here.
Mine was born and raised here.
And I've been here for 30 years.
And if we look at These matchups against some of these social issues that we're going to have to be tackling in this election, when you have a mom standpoint, one who I have given birth, I can talk about these things.
I can talk to or talk about how it feels.
To be erased and to be called a birthing person is so highly offensive and it's also offensive when the First Lady brings in a biological man looking like a female and celebrating that female on International Women's Day.
That's offensive to me as a woman.
If we look, and these topics that we're talking about, they are nationwide.
Parents are up in arms about all of these things that we talked about.
And I really think from a strategic standpoint, we need to look at these things and we need to put the best candidate forth through the primary that's going to actually be successful to win against Jackie Rosen.
And I believe that presents me.
Yes, yes. Frankly, I believe so too.
We try not to endorse candidates, but the way we are looking at it this time around, and this is purely based upon our experiences in 2022, is that it's not hard to decipher that major mistakes are made in the primary process that doesn't put the best candidates forward, right? And then we wonder why these candidates lose, right?
Me, the solution to this is choosing the right candidates right from the start, making sure that the wrong candidates don't go out up there.
And like we said, Jim Marchant, I mean, incredible person on a historic level.
They should write stories about Jim Marchant.
Jim Marchant is a heroic character.
Is he a person that could win this Senate seat?
Frankly, I highly doubt it.
I hear that a lot.
And everybody has an opinion about each one of the candidates in this race.
And I'm not here to down anybody.
I don't expect any special treatment.
I don't expect anyone to do me favors.
I expect a fair shot.
And I expect the Republican Party in this state to actually look at that matchup from a strategic standpoint.
And truly look at the background of each one of us and think to themselves, how are we going to win this?
Because they want to keep pushing, you know, the same old candidate through.
But guess what? Look at our record.
We keep losing. Why are we losing?
We have to look at those things.
So we need to do something different here in Nevada if we expect to win.
And I cannot say that enough.
I have said that so many times.
I've said that to leadership all over this state.
And I just ask that they truly look at this instead of pushing through who the D.C. swamp is.
Has chosen or endorsed or who, what is, they don't know what's good for Nevada.
We do. The voters in Nevada, the residents of Nevada, who are they in D.C. to tell us who our candidate is going to be?
So those kinds of things, and you know as well as I do, when the establishment puts somebody up, they want something from them.
That person is probably going to be a puppet for them.
And they're going to toe the line for whatever they want them to do.
And we need to get somebody in there that's doing it for the right reasons, that is not bought and paid for, that will not be a puppet, and that is actually going to be successful at beating Jackie Rosen.
Throughout the 2022 primary, I saw you heavily involved in everything that was going on in terms of the Republican Party.
I saw you at all the events.
Frankly, one of the things that was most impressive is that you have what seems like a great curiosity about what's happening out there.
Now, I see two different kinds of candidates.
I see the kind of candidates that you're talking about that are bought and sold and you know how you know Those people are bought and sold you invite them on to a podcast like blood money that asks real questions that ask hard-hitting questions And they are too scared to come on. They are scared to talk about topics. That might be a little bit Uncomfortable for them for example election integrity election fraud, you know, they try to stay away Oh January 6 is another one They try to stay away from that topic even though one could
argue with evidence that there's a bunch of people in jail right now That have not seen due process that don't belong in jail That did nothing wrong other than show up to the Capitol not with weapons for an insurrection But just a protest the fact that they thought this was a sole election which we're now finding out that Their goal is to basically criminalize anybody that says anything about a potentially stolen election.
Like, we're not even allowed to talk about the topic, which is, I mean, that is communism 101 when they try to prevent your speech that way.
And it also signifies that they're trying to cover up something.
I've seen an intellectual curiosity that I haven't seen in a lot of other candidates that are too busy playing politics, too busy trying to attain power at all costs.
And lo and behold, once they have power, guess what?
They're not going to go against anything that's against the grain, even if it is for the benefit of we the people.
Now, what gives you that courage to do that?
Aren't you worried that they're going to try to prevent your candidacy because you are open to talk about any ideas, discuss any ideas, and you're not necessarily going by their rules and you're not being boxed in?
You know, they can do whatever they want to me.
We were just launching to talk about something new that no candidate is doing.
We're launching virtual town hall meetings.
And this is for the sole purpose of being able to reach every voter in this state and anyone outside the state who wants to join the discussion.
But I'm putting myself out there in that face-to-face situation to people that may not be able to get out of their home or come to a meet and greet.
And we're giving them the opportunity we're going to do to a month.
And they can ask me the questions.
They can tell me what they think, their concerns.
I've not seen a candidate that makes themselves that available to the voter.
And I take all kinds of questions.
And I take the controversial ones.
And I don't mind talking about any and all of it.
And I think that you should be real and genuine.
Voters aren't stupid. People are not dumb.
When they see you and they talk to you, they can feel whether you're lying, whether you're just giving them a line of nonsense, or whether you're being genuine and real.
And being at least virtually on a town hall where someone wouldn't be able to come see me in person, I think that that is a great opportunity for both of us, for me to learn, to hear from that voter, And for them to ask me how I feel about A, B, C, D, E, F, whatever it is.
So I welcome anybody who wants me to come on their show.
I go on the show and some people have said, hey, we're going to talk about such and such.
And I said, you don't have to tell me what you want to talk about because you can ask me anything.
I'm an open book. I'll talk about whatever subject.
But being involved in the 22 cycle and the last few years of politics, I joined every club I could.
I went to all the events.
I supported a lot of candidates.
In the last cycle, I organized meet and greets and dinners and I had a podcast and I interviewed candidates.
I did everything I could to get involved because I wanted to learn.
I was planning this run for a long time.
Which, by the way, if I could just chime in there real quick.
You know, it's funny. I knew that you were planning this run for a real long time.
But the way you did it was just so, like, classy.
Because I remember you being at events.
I remember you being a sponge for information.
I always knew in the back of my head that this lady's planning a run, you know?
But... But the way you did it was just, I mean, talk about, you know, I jumped into the race like two weeks after deciding and with like three months left to the election, right?
You were prepping this like years ago, which seems, I mean, that's the kind of war general that I would want that is thinking eight steps ahead.
That is the kind of politician that I would want that is thinking eight steps ahead, which is incredibly just impressive to me that you had this long-term plan and you were willing to take the steps We're good to
go. I call it the choose-your-own-adventure, where you're like, okay, if I go down this road, if I pass this bridge, X, Y, you know, it's awful.
Yeah, and I'm going to pass and go and collect $200.
Yeah. So I think about things, and I wanted to learn, and the way I learn is by doing.
So when I was involved and went to all these things, and I listened very carefully, and I observed.
I've always learned that way, even from a small child.
And to me, when your mouth is closed and your ears are open, that's why we have two ears and one mouth, you learn a lot more.
And I met so many people, people that I needed to know, people in certain positions.
And I watched these candidates.
I was involved in their campaigns.
You know how many. I was going to multiple events every week.
And you become like this family.
And you are supporting this one and that one.
And it was wonderful.
And I loved it. I loved everything about it.
And I thought, okay, I'm going to do when I'm a candidate.
I want to do this and this and this, and I want to be like this.
And so I just picked up a lot of things.
And the most important thing to me is you've got to be genuine and real with those voters.
I noticed that the politicians that just have rhetoric, you know, they say what people want to hear.
And you can tell that it's just not, it's not coming from their heart or they're reading a piece of paper and When they're speaking in public.
I just speak from the heart when I talk to people because I think that resonates so much more.
There's a lot of things that I learned along the way, and I'm glad to be in the place that I'm in now.
What are the mistakes of 2022 that you realized that was made either on a party level, on a national level, on a regional level, that you would want to fix in 2024?
Sometimes the wrong person is endorsed.
Sometimes it's not the people's choice, but it's the establishment's choice.
Sometimes the messaging is wrong.
We definitely did not message well against abortion the last time.
I can't tell you how many people told me they had no idea that abortion was protected in the Nevada Constitution.
And they said, well, I would have voted for this person if they weren't going to ban abortion.
And I said, there's no elected official in our state that can ban abortion.
That's not the way it works.
So when you explain the facts to the voter and their eyes are opened, all they did was believe what the TV told them and the media lied to them.
Multiple times these candidates came up with these commercials that, you know, so-and-so was going to ban abortion.
No, they're not. They can't do anything about it.
No one can.
And what cracks me up is when I hear our senators in D.C. saying they're fighting for women's rights back home in Nevada.
They can't change it either.
They can't do any of that.
That's a fallacy. So it's already protected.
And if it were to change, it would go on the ballot.
But there's all kinds of things that I want to do differently than others and get to that voter and get that message out.
And the ballot harvesting as well, thinking about all those things.
People have a list of reasons why we lost, but they ballot harvested and we didn't.
And now we're putting a team together to be able to do that this time.
People voted on election day and the weather happened to be terrible that day, so a lot of people didn't show up.
There's a whole myriad of reasons.
But I think if we look at the candidate, instead of putting these, you know, an opportunist through that just happens to have a bunch of money and can pay for a campaign, but knows nothing about Nevada, may not have even ever voted in Nevada.
Putting the establishment candidate forward who's been backed by the D.C. establishment and has bought and paid for.
The recycled candidate.
I mean, just go on down the list.
We need to strategically and tactically be different this time.
Yeah, yeah. I mean, you brought up the weather bad on the day of election.
Look, what I'm about to say is going to sound like a conspiracy theory.
I guarantee you it's not.
If you look at the Chinese, they've already admitted that they can geoengineer the weather.
If you actually look at the patents by our own government, they have the technology to geoengineer the weather.
The Mexican government has actually been very upset at the American government because of the geoengineering that is affecting them across the border.
Out of all the days on November 4, I believe it was, Election Day, there was a downpour of rain, and I'm not asking you to say you believe in these theories or not, but it's very interesting that on that day there was a downpour of rain, and nothing months before and nothing months after, just on that particular day when Republicans are supposed to be voting in person.
So when you're talking about ballot harvesting, it just seems like something that's, I mean, we're not, you know, ballot harvesting to many shouldn't be done.
But since it's being done right now, it seems like the kind of correct avenue at this point, at least until these election laws are fixed.
Well, it's legal in our state now.
And I think that Republicans didn't do it last go around because from an ethical standpoint, they don't think it should be legal.
So they wanted to shy away from the process because inherently they don't believe in it, which I understand.
However, if you're going to beat someone at their own game, you've got to use the rules and you've got to use the laws in your favor to beat them.
So in this instance, we don't have a choice.
We're going to have to do that.
And as far as the weather goes, I realized that day it was really bad.
There were big snowstorms up north and people couldn't get to the poles, some of them.
And I acknowledge and have read, and it is a fact that they can manipulate.
I've read a lot of stuff about that.
And they can engineer things.
Whether that day in particular, whether it was, I don't know.
I can't even say whether those were related or not.
But there's things that go on in our elections that need to be acknowledged and brought forward.
And we need to stop What's happening in our elections.
We know that there's cheating in elections.
And this isn't just the last election before.
This has gone on for decades.
And it's both sides.
You hear people are always saying how, you know, 2020, they were, the Republicans were voicing their opinions and, you know, in Congress.
Well, look at 2016.
Because the Democrats did the same thing.
So they want to come against the Republicans for standing up when they thought there was fraud, but when the Democrats thought there was fraud, oh, that's okay.
Yeah. And look at 2000.
2000 is one that I bring up because, frankly, and I wasn't very heavily politically affiliate at the time, but I was kicking and screaming during 2000 and, frankly, kicking and screaming on the behalf of Al Gore, who lost by 537 votes, and then you have the Iraq war, you have 9-11, you have George Bush ignoring.
The evidence that 9-11 is coming in August of 2001, flat out ignored.
You know, 9-11 happens.
Oh, by the way, lo and behold, before he even becomes president, they got this thing called the Project for a New American Century, which involves essentially attacking all the Arab countries.
Lo and behold, 9-11 happens, giving the perfect justification.
I mean, you look at those confluence of events and you just got to wonder what happened over there.
Would that same thing have happened under Al Gore?
I'm not saying by any means that he should have been necessarily the president at that time, but 537 votes, hanging chads, all this nonsense seems like that wasn't a fair election either.
Right. And it goes back beyond that.
And it happens on both sides.
I believe, not just one side.
I think some years are a lot worse than others.
And we've seen a lot of events be brought forward.
So regardless of where people stand on that issue and regardless of what they believe, what happened in America, if we do not have free and fair elections, then we lose our country.
Because our vote is our voice and it's our power.
So what happens, all these things we hear that these machines can be hooked up to the internet and when that happens, that can be an avenue for manipulation.
There's a ton of ways and we really need to get it.
Election integrity is extremely important.
And we need to clean up our voter rolls.
We need to have a national voter ID law because you have to give your ID for everything that you do.
Why not this? Why are they pushing against that so hard?
They know why.
They know why. There's a double standard in this country.
There's a two-tiered justice system.
And we see that when they target conservatives and just with President Trump, what they're doing against him.
Justice is supposed to be equal and blind.
And we have a lot of political bias.
We have unjust things that are happening, and we need to get a handle on that.
And we need to get a handle on it quickly.
And not to mention the weaponization of the DOJ and the FBI. And what's going on there.
These things are going to cause a war in our country, I believe, if left unchecked.
And if we do not have an equal set of justice for both sides.
Exactly, exactly. Let's talk about...
First, let's talk about the trans topic really quick because, you know, with this whole movement of 72 sexes and all this crazy kind of nonsense, what is the solution?
It seems as though, you know, you have your biological male, you have your biological female, but there seems to be this other category, the trans category.
You know, I don't know if...
72 sexes, but certainly there's a potential trans category there.
Is that the solution to all this turmoil in terms of gender and sex of having a third category and having a third category where you could have your beauty pageants, you could have your, you know, swimming competitions, your whatever, your Olympics or whatever, that there is now a third category where Or maybe even a fourth category.
You have your trans male, trans female.
Maybe there's two other categories.
I guess my question being, what is the solution to giving people that are trans their own category, but not infringing upon, these are not full biological males, not full biological females.
Is there a solution there that makes sense to you?
Of course there is.
And it's very simple.
And we talked about this in that podcast, actually.
With the bathrooms.
At school, she brought up bathrooms at a high school, right?
So instead of forcing that biological boy into the girls' private spaces, you have a family bathroom.
It doesn't have to say non-binary or trans.
The label can just be family.
And those who feel like they're not...
They don't want to go in the girls' bathroom or the boys' bathroom.
They can use the family bathroom because these girls, they're protecting the rights of one at the detriment of all the girls in the school.
So when you have a situation like that, you cannot put all those girls at risk.
You can't make them change in front of a boy with all boy parts.
That just doesn't even make sense.
But that's their only option.
So when I say that they're shoving this down our throats, and they're shoving it down the kids' throats, that's what I'm talking about.
Because when you only have one solution, and that solution is putting all these other girls at risk to protect one person, that's not a solution.
That does not work.
And you can put that to the sports or anything.
So the sports...
They have their own sport program.
So no one is ostracized.
Everyone has the opportunity.
And you are protecting the rights of all.
So it's a simple solution.
But they're trying to push that narrative and that agenda so hard that in their eyes, they're only providing one solution.
So... Yeah, there's a need to fix for that.
It's just they don't want to hear it.
Let's talk about abortion. So this is just from my personal experience, frankly, just dating, right?
One of the things that they don't talk about is the emotional and mental health implications of abortion.
What my conversations have revealed, personal conversations, is that most people that go through an abortion Actually suffer from regret, mental health issues.
Years later, they're still thinking about it.
Now, if you read the mainstream media's narrative, they try to make it seem like individuals that take abortion are so brave and they're so graceful.
Whoever does abortions, it was so brave of them to do it.
Rarely or never do they talk about the decades-long Psychological and mental and emotional implications of having said abortion.
Just wondering what you think about that topic.
You know, that's very true what you bring up and I know that because I have friends who I helped and I was there for and they made the choice of getting an abortion and you can't tell me that a woman is sitting there and just happy and You know, go lucky and just excited about having an abortion.
Whether they're Republican or Democrat, I just, I can't see that at all.
So it's a decision that is difficult for most, I would say.
And either they're scared, they're young, they're a teenager, they were raped, or there's a mom that her health is at risk or the baby's health.
There's a whole mirror.
They made a mistake. There's a whole myriad of reasons.
Everyone's situation is different.
And having to make that decision and knowing that you have a life inside you and when you have that first ultrasound and you see that little flutter on the monitor and you see that heartbeat, that heartbeat is there.
And I don't think that that would ever go out of the mind of a woman.
That's the first thing you see.
And so I have said many times, we need to have a little bit more compassion and not be so judgmental.
I mean, these are tough decisions that people are making.
And I realize there are those that abuse it and they use it as a birth control.
And I understand that there's that.
But there's a lot of situations where these women, and they do think about it, Years, decades later, and they never forget it.
And there's some people really difficult to come to terms with that.
They beat themselves up.
And they never forget it.
I mean, what you see in that particular example is that, all right, let's compare it to COVID, right?
So you have this COVID jab that at this point, we're finding out that this neither deals with COVID nor does anything really good for your body.
Most of the time, it's doing bad things for your body.
Most of the time you're creating essentially tons of spike proteins that will ultimately harm your health That's the facts that we are finding out about this covid vaccine. Nonetheless. You saw the mainstream media talk about this Propaganda is over the last three years about what a great thing it was right on the same token you see Abortion what a great thing it is, you know You know, Elisa Milano, she's had two abortions.
She's such a hero. Talking about her like, you know, this is somebody that went out there and got a purple heart or something, was so brave, you know?
And it seems like the propaganda is the inherent issue.
And so, my question is, whether abortion is legal or not, and we've acknowledged that there is no way to make it illegal in Nevada.
How do you address the propagandizing that is directly causing women damage?
Because a lot of women go into this thinking, I'm going to be brave like Alyssa Milano.
You know, they're telling me about how brave and excellent I am.
Then they go have this.
And then for the rest of their lives, they feel a sense of regret.
They feel a sense of emotional suffering.
they think about that child that they aborted.
How do we address the media's propaganda about this topic, considering that it is completely untrue in terms of what the emotional and mental health outcomes are for the ladies that do get abortions?
Well, see, that's the fallacy about the media.
People believe the media so much.
There's social media.
There's Hollywood. There's all these influences out there.
There's TikTok. You name it, people can find all kinds of information on that subject out there.
And unfortunately, the young people in this country They've grown up with the internet.
They don't know any different.
You know, people my age, we didn't have that back then.
So kids and young folks these days are going to go to the internet and get their information from these people.
And they look to celebrities and they look to the media.
And to me, people that have that kind of influence, it is their responsibility.
And it's their duty to say, you got to say the truth.
You can't just make this all propaganda, especially when it comes to something that emotional and that important.
But of course, people are fallible.
And some of these people want to push an agenda.
So they're only going to say a certain opinion and a certain narrative.
And it's unfortunate because a lot of these people, their words matter.
And they don't realize the people that are listening to them and then the consequences after that.
Yeah, I mean, you look at somebody like Jennifer Aniston, for example, I mean, she famously has story after story about how she's tried to do the in vitro, you know, because she's, you know, past a certain age, she's been trying to have babies.
One of the things they don't talk about too much is every single abortion diminishes your chances of having a child.
That is not something that is talked about, especially in this day and age where there is an infertility issue, Women over 40 are increasingly having a hard time having kids.
And in fact, one could argue, based upon the research, that these COVID jabs, whether you took them or not, the fact that you're ingesting all these spike proteins further diminishes your chance.
So I'll give you an example.
I was talking about a 42-year-old lady that is trying to become pregnant.
I talked to one of my doctor friends, because we interview them so much on this Blood Money podcast.
He said that in normal times, a 42-year-old woman has about 5% chance of becoming pregnant.
But in today's day and age, because of all these chemicals, spike proteins, loss of fertility, that chance is diminished to basically close to zero, unless they are getting some kind of fertility treatment.
So, you know, how does that overall, you know, I guess...
Bear upon these particular topics.
You know, it's really tough.
I talk to a lot of women and women are waiting now till later on in life to have kids.
And of course, anything beyond 35, it comes with its risks.
And when you're over 40, even more so.
And I just, it's challenging to say the least.
And to add in all of the other things with this experimental drug that they put on people, we saw those statistics after that, their miscarriages were up by 400%.
Why is that?
There is the issue of shedding that we saw after they pushed out this experimental drug.
And I don't call it a vaccine because it wasn't and it's not it's an experimental drug is what it was and is and There's a lot of things that go against, you know, that are tough for women to have kids sometimes.
A lot of women actually talk about making the process of adoption easier and more streamlined.
I've had a lot of people come up to me and talk to me about that and wish that I would do something about that on the federal level because adoption, it's so cumbersome and it takes so long.
And there are people out there that want to adopt children.
And some of these kids that are where the woman chooses to have the child and put them up for adoption.
Why is that process so difficult?
Why does it take so long?
So those are some things that I'm also going to be looking at.
Yeah, and one of the things I would mention in there, you know, topic that we've delved into quite a bit on this particular series is that, you know, you have CPS essentially, you know, some would say kidnapping and trafficking children in the service of adopting them because there's a lot of people that wouldn't want to have children right now.
There's Title IV funding for that process of what I state is kidnapping and trafficking children via CPS. They get rewarded for that, which ultimately sometimes leads to children being adopted.
Sometimes it leads to children growing up in foster homes.
That's a whole different topic because all kinds of crazy, abusive things happen in foster homes.
But let's say, should there be financial incentives via federal government, just like they do their Title IV funding or Title IV funding, essentially to kidnap and traffic children via CPS, shouldn't there be certain incentives for that potential mother to have the child, but to allow them for adoption versus an automatic abortion?
You know, there's definitely something to be looked at and discussed.
Because being able to have that child on a mental health standpoint for the mother versus that choice to abort the child, I believe that that would be better for the mother.
Obviously, the child can be put up for adoption and be taken in by a loving family.
Now, when we come to that in the CPS, I've heard You know, all of these things across the country that go on and I understand the dangers and the pitfalls and things that happen, right?
Those things need to be addressed.
There needs to be some serious checks and balances in not only the vetting process, but also the CPS system around this country needs to be looked at.
The judicial system with these judges.
Qualified immunity.
These attorneys. Guardianship.
Abuses. There are so many things where abuse happens.
Not only with children, but with the elderly.
And through the corruption in the judicial system.
And attorney. We need to take a look at a whole lot of things.
Because a lot of things happen...
Around this country and people know it.
And it's there.
We just need to follow the money.
Those things need to be investigated.
Those things need to be looked into.
We need to look at qualified immunity for judges.
Because there is definite bias out there.
There's corruption.
There's collusion. And those are things on my list that I would like to take a look at.
I love the way you say corruption and collusion, because when I'm saying those things, my ears turn red.
My tone gets a little more frantic, but you said it in such a calm demeanor.
I mean, you talked about all the evils of the world right now.
In this last two minutes that we are facing, what is destroying our country, the inherent issues, you know, they say a two-tiered justice system, I say there's no justice system for some.
There's justice system for an elite that wants to prosecute individuals because they don't like what they're saying or doing, But there doesn't seem to be a justice system for we the people.
So you have, in a very kind way, in a very measured way, essentially exposed a lot of the inherent problems that are destroying this country and making us look like a banana republic to the rest of the world.
And I just wanted to say that.
I mean, there's not many people that could expose what you're talking about and do it so in such a measured, calm fashion.
Well, we all know that it's out there.
People see it. It's just who is going to be courageous enough to really put these people's feet to the fire and investigate this stuff.
I've seen all kinds of stories about these guardianships and these judges award guardianship to family members and it seems to all be about the money, right?
And there's a lot that goes on in our justice system that Is horrible.
And these judges have qualified immunity.
And I think that that needs to be looked at, honestly, and with sincerity, because they sometimes are getting away with, I mean, it's criminal.
Yeah, yeah. I mean, I have to reference an episode that we just shot.
Sorry to interrupt you, Stephanie, but real quickly, I need to reference this episode because, you know, in fact, I mean, the title says it all.
So episode 136 for the viewers out there, Blood Money episode 136, not hard to find on our Rumble channel.
It's titled, Scumbag Nevada Judges That Murder For Profit, with our guests being Katherine Hine and Steve Sanson.
Steve Sanson was very clear that he thinks a lot of these judges that are essentially corrupting the system in order to destroy lives for their own financial benefit are essentially treasonous.
And I don't think he was too kind about them.
I think he wanted to hang them all.
Because he sees it as treason.
What do you think in terms of what you have been witnessing in this state that signifies that essentially our judicial industrial complex is way out of hand?
Well, the things that I see across the country are the politically biased.
Those prosecutors, those DAs, those judges.
And we can look at the Michael Flynn case.
Look at the judge. When he was getting Direct orders, so to speak, from the Attorney General at the time, Bill Barr.
And he's ignoring him because of his own political bias, in my opinion.
That's what it was.
And if you followed some of those towards the end of the trial, if you followed those orders and what he was doing, that should never happen.
That should never happen. And I think that there's a lot of judges that cannot look at things from a nonpolitical way.
Their politics, depending on who appointed them, those things come into play.
And also, look at the jurisdiction that they have President Trump in these indictments in Washington, D.C. Do you think for one minute he's going to get a fair trial?
Absolutely not.
Not there.
No. So when they target conservatives for certain things and they let others go with more horrific crimes, and we see this in Democrat-run cities, it's completely backwards what is happening.
And they've been doing this slowly over years and years.
But until we take over and we say, all right, we've had enough.
We're not going to do this anymore.
We're going to call these people on the carpet.
We're going to make them accountable for the decisions that they're making.
And the only way you do that is with the immunity.
Because if they're immune to prosecution, they can do whatever they want.
And we've seen a lot of that.
And some of these kids with family court, look at the times that they put these children back into the parent's home that that's the abusive parent.
And they take the child away from the good parent and put them into the abuser's home.
Those types of things I don't understand.
Doesn't that signify that, you know, we talk about these Antifa kids, right?
There seems to be, you know, gangster kids, right?
Kids that don't have a father and a mother in their home, that leads to bad things in life.
This is statistically sound in terms of if you have both parents in your home, You will become a better adult, less prone for drug addiction, less prone for failure, less prone for suicide.
You know, you name it. It's like, and it's not even like a fractionally better situation for those children.
It is an exponentially better situation for those children.
These courts, we've seen over and over again, they like to hand the child to the abusive parent.
They like to put the children in situations where their mental health, where their development is harmed.
How could you look at that kind of a situation and say that, you know what, this is purely intentional.
What they're doing is they're creating servants of the state in this communistic mindset, because if you actually want to raise healthy children, it's very obvious what healthy children need.
That is documented by 10,000 years of animal development, of anthropology, of seeing what works best in the animal kingdom, and what works best in the animal kingdom across Most animals is having both parents in their life.
But nonetheless, these courts seem to intentionally destroy that.
How could you look at that and say it's not intentional by ill-meaning individuals?
All you have to do is follow the money.
It's always about the money.
Look what they're doing with Biden and his son.
They're following the money.
There's always a money trail.
When you're able to get at those records and when those things have to be produced, whether you're a judge, an attorney, in these cases where there just doesn't seem to be any justice and they're making these decisions that don't make sense for the child, I would venture to say that there's money involved.
The fact that they don't have to answer to anyone, I don't agree with that.
I don't agree with that.
They should have to answer to people.
I mean, would you say that isn't theoretically our laws dictate that they should be answerable to us and that this idea of judicial immunity has gone too far because it does specifically state in the laws that if you do something that is repugnant to the Constitution, that is repugnant to the laws of the land, you lose your immunity.
Hence, and therefore, the issue is not so much that the laws aren't in place.
The issue is that the people that are supposed to be policing Those individuals are not doing their job.
And I'll add one more little wrench to the situation, right?
We are supposed to have checks and balances in our government, where the legislature is supposed to hold the judiciary, essentially, you know, they're supposed to hold them accountable for the wrong things that they do, including the loss of some judges' immunity, including the persecution of a judge that violates the laws of the land.
But how is one supposed to hold them accountable when essentially two branches of our government are filled with bar agents, a.k.a.
attorneys, a.k.a. esquires, and there seems to be a reason why they're not holding these individuals accountable because they're part of this, you know, same, you know, kind of elitist secret club.
Do you think that that's part of the issue is that we really don't have any checks and balances within our government because two branches of our government are controlled by bar agents?
Sure. Yeah, if you look at how many attorneys are in Congress, and I've said this before, a majority, I would say, there's a lot of them.
And when you look at the performance of our Congress and the decisions that they've made for this country, and especially the ones who have been there for decades, when you have an employee that performs poorly and is creating loss for the company, they get fired.
Why does that not hold up with our elected officials?
They keep getting elected over and over and over.
They need to be fired. And we need to overhaul the system.
As far as the immunity, I understand that just completely wiping that out for every single...
It would create a backlog in our court system because everyone would be suing and it would create a mess.
However... There should be a certain threshold and there should be a maybe a political citizens committee that are put together with the citizens in the community and they can look at if there's a certain case that is absolutely egregious or that meets a certain threshold that needs to be reviewed.
Have a citizen review board.
Don't have attorneys Because that's, you know, they're watching their own, right?
Like what you were just saying.
Have an outside citizen panel.
Some of these things.
And in certain instances, and not all, and I'm not saying that all judges are like, I know many judges here, and they're wonderful people.
And they do their job to the best of their ability, and they're fair, and they're impartial.
And I know many of them from the last election cycle.
And our community is benefiting from having them.
But there's always that one too.
There's always the few bad apples that ruin it for everyone else.
So of those few and the ones that are simply stepping over their bounds, Mm
-hmm.
You know, easily and be able to have them removed and have them account for these things.
We see political bias all over the place.
Look at New York, you know, the DA over there.
Look who he chooses to prosecute and who he lets go.
It's, you know, it's very clear.
Actions are very clear.
Yeah, yeah. I mean, how do we get across the, how do we get around the issue that two of our branches of government are controlled by our bar agents?
Are those bar agents in the legislature all of a sudden going to hold judges accountable when they haven't done so in the last 100, 150 years or so?
That's something that definitely needs to be looked at, and that is a reason why we need to overhaul the DC system.
Where are the farmers?
Where are the construction workers?
Where are the teachers? Where are the realtors?
Where are all of these average, ordinary American people in Washington?
Why is it mostly attorneys?
So I think if people...
Could I answer that question?
The reason why it's mostly attorneys is because attorneys have a lot of money.
They push their own. There's attorney organizations all around the country.
We've seen that, for example, with the attorney general race here, where there's a conglomerate of them across all the states helping each other out.
In fact, if you look at somebody's expense reports, like our current attorney general, what you find is that most of the money, I'm talking about 99% of the money.
This is not hard to find.
None of the money or very little of the money was coming from Nevada.
In fact, if you look at the opposition to him, she mostly received small donations from Nevada, while this individual was receiving big donations from out-of-state individuals, most of whom have...
No place in Nevada, have not lived in Nevada, and are completely out of state.
So how does one fix that problem when there seems to be an agenda to infiltrate these states?
And obviously those people doing the big donation funding, they're not going to be talking the talk that we're talking about, bar agents in the legislature.
Seems like we're in a bit of a quagmire.
Seems like there's no way out of this unless you remove...
So the bar from Congress and hence reestablish a true balance of power and checks and balances.
But what are your thoughts on that topic?
Well, if it were up to me, first of all, we would have term limits.
And we would have a turnover much quicker in our Congress.
And we would have new blood in there all the time.
Then the people that are in there for a long time, I think that lends itself to corruption.
And they line their pockets.
And the richer that they get, they forget, they can't even relate to the average American person that's struggling to make ends meet each month.
So if it were up to me, we would have term limits.
And we would take a look at all of the things that you're talking about, and we would have to sit down and seriously consider what's the best for our country and what's the best for the people.
And having some accountability when it comes to that is definitely beneficial to the people.
They don't want to do that, though, because they want to stay in power.
I would also look at age limits.
You know, look at some of these senators and people in the House that are elderly and some in the Supreme Court.
I mean, we can see some of these officials that once they get past a certain age, they're declining cognitively, physically.
And there has to be somewhere that there is a cutoff because it's a certain point and we can look at some in there right now in the Senate.
They're not effective and they have gone beyond and they need to retire.
They need to step down and there needs to be something in place.
And that just is beneficial to Americans.
So we need to look at that as well.
There's many things to look at.
Have you heard of the original 13th Amendment?
What is that? The original 13th Amendment was, I believe, late 1700s, early 1800s.
It was the Titles of Nobility Act, which removed anybody that's considered an esquire, which is a title of nobility.
Esquires, aka attorneys, aka lawyers or bar agents.
I wouldn't even call them lawyers because the correct The term is bar agents are prohibited from being in the legislature, which incidentally that original 13th Amendment, while being ratified by some states at the time, incidentally burned down in the White House from what I understand in 1812 and kind of disappeared after that, which is actually very good for the Bar Association, aka the British Accreditation Registry.
One would argue that if We won this revolutionary war.
The other way of being infiltrated was through the bar.
Just like today we're seeing fifth-generational warfare with these companies like TikTok supporting quote-unquote Americans that basically spread their propaganda.
They're being literal... Financial and social value to having individuals that are supposed to be American citizens conduct fifth generational warfare with our citizens.
That's the kind of thing that they're trying to avoid in that original 13th Amendment because a bar agent versus somebody that swears an oath to the Constitution, two very separate things.
You can't, you know, be servant to two masters.
You're either a servant to the bar We're good to go.
Protecting the rights of we the people, our constitutional rights, we wouldn't be in the calamity we are right now.
So, is the answer to push something like the original 13th Amendment, do you think that's too radical of an idea?
What's your thoughts on the topic?
You know, it's certainly something to take a look at.
I don't think that something like that, you know, realistically would ever be passed.
However, two things.
If we had term limits in Congress.
That would fix a whole lot of things.
Just think about that. Two terms.
And you go back home.
You go back to your job.
You go back to your business. You don't get to this continue of decade after decade after decade.
Do you know how much corruption that would alleviate?
That would change the landscape forever.
And that would be huge, meaningful change.
The other thing...
An age limit on the Supreme Court or some time of term limits with the Supreme Court.
We need to take a look at some of these things and seriously consider the terms of these Justices and their positions and how it would benefit the American people by changing that.
Because if you look at that, the older they get, you know, you have views of people, the older they get, they look at things a certain way versus a younger person that may be 30 years younger.
They look at things differently.
When you have a higher turnover of people in there, Then you have fresh faces, fresh voices, fresh ideas.
It's not the same old people that are trying to rule the system and have power over people.
I think that would fix a lot of things in this country.
Wow, wow. Okay, now let me ask you, Stephanie, this might be my last question or second to last question.
What is it about you?
What would be your pitch to the people of why you are the best candidate, why America needs you, why Nevada needs you, and how you will be different than the other candidates in this race?
Well, I'm different because I am a true Nevadan.
I've lived here for 30 years.
My kids were born and raised here.
My business is here and was born here, so to speak.
I started a nonprofit here.
My home is here.
Everything is from this state.
I'm vested completely in this state.
And people ask me all the time, why vote for you?
And I say it's one word and it's trustworthy.
Because when you look at the candidates in this race and you look at who's bought and paid for, look at who has run multiple failed campaigns, look at the opportunists, look at the ones who have money just to throw around and run a campaign because they want a name for themselves or they want name ID. Look at where those donations are coming from and where those endorsements are coming from.
Are they Nevadans?
This is the issue, by the way, that I brought up with Aaron Ford and his race against Seagal Chata, that most of his donations came from out of state, obviously not Nevadans.
Well, there's ones in this race where there's a lot of outside funding.
So, I would say to the voter out there, match us up against Jackie Rosen and look at What candidate is going to be trustworthy?
Trust is the basis of all relationships, regardless whether it's a man and wife, whether it's an employer-employee, a constituent and politician.
Everything is based on trust when it comes to a relationship.
Which candidate is going to be trustworthy to actually represent you and not sell you down the river once they get to Washington?
Look at who's behind them.
Look who's going to match up best against Jackie.
And I am the female in this race.
And there's a lot of things that make me make me different.
And so I would just tell people, look at the ones doing it for the right reasons.
I don't need the name, the fame, the money, none of that.
I can stay here and operate my little real estate business and make just as much money.
I'm leaving and I'm choosing to do this and I'm doing this for the kids and I'm doing this for the people of this state.
I'm choosing to leave my home and my family and my business behind because I want to represent.
I want to have representation.
For we the people in this state.
Because we have not had any for a very long time.
I am doing this for the right reasons.
And I would challenge each voter out there.
Vet your candidate. Get to know their background.
Who's backing them. And who's doing this.
For what reason. And I would venture to say.
That they would come to the conclusion.
That I am the best choice for this seat.
And the best choice for this state.
Stephanie, this has been awesome.
Thank you so much for coming on to the Blood Money Podcast and giving us your time and telling us a little bit about yourself.
Is there anything we didn't touch upon that's important to mention in closing?
Well, we could go on forever and ever.
I can talk politics all day long.
So, you know, we didn't talk about the board or we didn't talk about health care.
There's a lot of things.
And our veterans today is purple.
And I just want to recognize all those veterans out there, the wounded and the ones that gave the ultimate sacrifice for us and for our freedoms.
And I appreciate all the veterans around this country and thank you so much for your service.
Stephanie, thank you so much for your time.
This is awesome. We're going to have you back on the Blood Money Podcast because, as you said, there are so many topics that we didn't touch upon.
This particular episode is coming off the heels of that incredible Veterans in Politics episode where you went toe-to-toe with a 15-year-old, frankly, in my opinion, indoctrinated individual.
And you change your heart and mind.
And that to me was one of the most impressive things I've seen because you did not have to get abrasive.
All you had to do is talk and ask the right questions.
And that's the kind of people we need because right now the way our politics is, I mean, it's a holy mess.
Nobody's getting along. There's nobody with your temperament that's out there.
And frankly, if we had a bunch of yous in Congress, it would make a whole sea change happen in our country.
Now, the one thing I would ask you in closing, last question, is how do we know that you're going to hold true to your word?
How do we know that you're not going to be one of those politicians that gets a bunch of money from people and then changes your tune and lives your beautiful life and makes $100 million in Congress, just like a lot of these other, you know, what I would call criminals?
How do we know that you're going to be different?
You're not going to be enticed by all the...
You know, temptations that seems to entice most 99% of individuals that make it into the Congress and Senate.
Well, actions speak louder than words, right?
So I would be a candidate that would support term limits, number one.
Also, I would support that Congress cannot buy and sell stocks in their families.
That, to me, it's insider trading, what they're doing, and that's how they make a lot of this money.
They already know what's going to happen.
They know what to buy and all that.
To me, that's insider trading.
So I would be opposed to that.
And also, all you have to do is look at my career, 30 years in real estate.
I have represented hundreds of people.
And what people say about me is that I keep my word.
I defend them.
They trust me and they trust me.
I do what I say I'm going to do.
And just the fact that all those testimonials are out there and all those clients are out there and what they say about me.
And it's so nice.
The first thing I do is gain their trust.
And they give it to me readily.
They give me their trust and they trust me.
And I would say that just a career and decades of that and walking the walk and talking the talk and having that confidence from people, why would I change now?
I'm going to do the same thing for the people of Nevada.
And I'm trustworthy and it all comes down to that one word is trust.
Thank you so much, Stephanie.
I really appreciate your presence on our podcast.
For the viewers out there, thank you so much for joining us for this Blood Money episode.
Please make sure to join us on AmericaHappens.com for all of our shows, including HN News Live, which we do Tuesdays and Thursdays at 2 p.m.
Pacific, 5 p.m. Eastern.
That's our live news show featuring correspondents from all around the country, including Washington, D.C., exposing what is really happening out there in our government. We also encourage you to check out the Blood Money podcast with yours truly. Joy Gilbert's Gloves Off is the State National University with Gianna Miscelli and our morning prayer show.
Every morning we're doing a prayer show called Daily Devotions, which is kind of like going to church five days a week, Monday to Friday, 4 a.m.
Pacific, 7 a.m. Eastern. Play throughout the day for people that want to connect with God first thing in the morning or throughout the day because you can watch those episodes anytime that you want.
Thank you so much for the viewers for joining us and I will see you on the next episode of Blood Money.
Take care. Thank
you. Thank
you. Check
out the America Happens Network.
▲
Export Selection