LIVE with Juan O Savin! - 5th Generational Warfare - Blood Money Episode 160
|
Time
Text
♪♪♪
All right, welcome to the latest episode of Blood Money TV.
Today we have a very special guest, Juan 07.
How are you doing, sir? Hey, beautiful, bro.
So glad to have you on the Blood Money Podcast.
So, you know, we titled this episode Fifth Generational Warfare because that's obviously what's going on.
But, you know, why don't you give us really the state of the nation right now?
What's going on? Where do things stand in terms of the freedom fight, the tyranny, all this nonsense that's happening around us?
Well, you know, it's interesting.
I was just thinking...
Kind of a disconnected thought, but your show being Blood Money, I and a few of the other folks from the January 6th stuff did the movie Bloody Hill.
And, you know, Capitol Hill, Bloody Hill.
There's so many angles where we've uncovered the corrupted acts of members of Congress and the policing agencies.
In what they've done to misconstrue January 6th as some kind of a insurrection by the people, when it was really a staged coup by people within these policing agencies,
literally entities funded and paid for by senior executive service and other government agents and agencies, Involved in crafting an illusion,
a magic act for the American people as though it was President Trump trying to stage a coup to hold power and retain power in the presidency, when it was actually about people stealing power through a fraudulent election.
My friend Patrick Byrne just filed a suit today concerning some of the vote machines and stuff there, which I haven't had a chance to read yet, but we've talked about it and should be out in the press right now.
The fight back is really only just barely starting to get rolling in pushing back against the wave of fraud related to the 2020 election.
In fact, I kid about it, but I'm not actually kidding.
Jennifer and I sing a song.
We've sung it with some folks here and there over time.
2020, it's not over yet.
And because think of all the things going on in our country right now that wouldn't be happening had Trump continued as the president.
You know, blood money.
Think of the blood money.
That has been spent that came out of the American taxpayers' pocket to wage this war in Central Europe.
And the number of people dead as a result of that, the fraud, the lying, the money laundering going through the Ukraine, I'm no fan of the Azov Battalion, these people that portray themselves as Nazis and Heil Hitler and all this stuff, you know, in this futile, stupid-ass war with Russia.
They were baited into it.
They were willing participants.
In many ways, I think of how they portray stuff and, you know, Maybe the world's better off without them.
But the other side of the coin is, who egged everybody on?
You know, World Economic Council, Forum, spent $10 million Or $10 billion, I should say, trying to egg that war on and get it going.
You had all sorts of U.S. money.
Shoot, we got, you know, now $113 or $15 billion headed for $200 billion that's gone into the Ukraine to keep this thing going.
And then a lot of the money's disappeared, by the way.
So whose pocket did that go in?
War's a racket.
But with that in mind, all this money's gone into Ukraine to do a fight.
Casualty figures are running around to half a million dead.
There's not blood on somebody's hands here over this.
Russia, you know, tens of thousands dead.
You know, 100,000 plus injured.
You know, that's blood money.
That got egged on.
And then now, you know, as if that's not enough.
I don't know if your listeners are aware of this or paying attention.
It's not covered well in the Western press.
But just in the last couple weeks, the Biden administration, the powers behind Biden, because you're only seeing the image of Biden at this point in time, He's not actually the one doing whatever's being done.
Somebody else is pulling the strings on all those puppets in Washington.
But for the last several years...
We had refused to give longer-range aircraft-launched and ground-launched missiles to the Ukrainians that could strike deeper into the Soviet Union, or excuse me, my old history coming out, into Russia.
Soviet Union's dead, we won World War III, and we won, they lost.
But these longer-range missiles, not quite an intermediate-range missile, but they're longer-range missiles, were not given to the Ukrainians because we didn't want to take a chance on sparking World War IV. Specifically,
it was said that if the Ukrainians had these missiles and they hit sites further into Western Russia, that it could trigger a nuclear response out of Russia, tactical nukes or something like that.
And so we didn't allow the Ukrainians to have...
Now that even this spring offensive 50,000 troops, the last of the last of the last of anything representing a real Ukrainian army, has been decimated.
All of a sudden, the Western powers, NATO, France, Britain, the U.S., have gone ahead and given the Ukrainian military these weapons.
And here last week, this last weekend, they sent a dozen of these missiles into military sites inside of Russia, beyond the Crimean area a bit.
And nine of the twelve that were sent were destroyed by their version of a patriot-type missile system, anti-missile system.
But three got through and did some pretty good damage, killed quite a few Russians.
Putin, because of his own electorate's position, The people of Russia are already pissed off that Putin has not reacted more harshly to protect Russian soldiers' lives.
The consensus inside Russia, and you have to understand, even there, they're sensitive to what the people are thinking.
The consensus inside the Russian people It's becoming more and more firm that rather than fight a war in the Ukraine, that Putin should just send over missiles and turn Kiev to glass, tactical nukes, instead of fighting some of these regional You know, conflicts within the Ukraine.
He should just go destroy, you know, whole sectors and no Russian life should be lost.
That Putin's playing patty cakes.
Putin's perspective has been he didn't want to trigger a NATO response.
It's one thing when they send arms supplies into Ukraine.
Putin initially went fairly deep into Ukraine, got the bio labs.
There was 54 bio labs run by the West there that were doing research on Slavic targeted genetic weapons that literally came at the Russian people, like a James Bond movie, a bad James Bond movie.
And so then he's fallen back You know, fairly carefully to allow the Ukrainians to blow up everything.
On the way back, and then anything, stations, equipment, bridges, infrastructure, then the Russians took it out so that you've created a no-man's land, a militarized zone, if you will, buffer for Russia.
But as they've fallen back, now with the introduction of these longer-range missiles, To strike into Western Russia at military targets.
Putin's going to be challenged.
Will he react?
And what will his reaction be?
Will he strike further out to Western Ukraine where these aircraft are...
Kept shooting these off and then diving back to cover.
He hasn't gone that far west because they didn't want to trigger a NATO response.
If he does so, you're getting very very close to something that could Become far more catastrophic.
And I've said all the way along, we're headed for some type of a Cuban missile type of crisis, some kind of a standoff with Russia, which, you know, anybody passes gas at the wrong instant, you could have World War IV. And so for all these years, the last several years, the logic was we can't give Ukraine these weapons because it could trigger nuclear war.
What changed?
In the last few weeks that all of a sudden it's okay to put these weapons in the Ukrainians' hands and deploy them.
It won't trigger a regional nuclear war or the use of tactical nuclear weapons then, but now it won't.
All of a sudden has something changed?
No, it's probably even more intense.
Yeah, it could trigger that.
Belarus has tactical nukes.
Russia's given them the keys.
You guys feel threatened, go ahead and use them.
And this is in the center of Europe.
One wrong move and, you know, could trigger, you know, worldwide war is kind of the concern.
And I don't think that's actually going to happen.
But the threat is certainly there.
And then we come back to why is it there?
Because of a stolen election.
The Biden people did not win this election 2020.
In numerous locations, we have more and more evidence by the day, in multiple ways, where there was fraud in a number of states.
At the very least, those states Their votes should be, their electoral college votes should be withdrawn from the total.
And then, of course, Trump is the winner because those states' votes are not valid as counted.
And so when the electoral college count happened on January 6th, the acceptance of the votes from the Electoral College from each state were to be voted on yes or no should we accept those votes and that was what was just begun in the counting process when with military precision on January 6th the doors on the congressional building were opened They're
very heavy doors.
They have huge magnetic locks.
No rioters, no protesters.
Nobody there opened those doors.
They were opened by security services inside the Capitol.
Not actually even them.
They're at a remote location outside the Capitol building.
They were released. And then those people were allowed into the Capitol.
It was a planned thing to interrupt the vote.
And then when the congressman came back into session, by then the horror of what had happened with this, you know, staged events during the course of the next few hours, so shocked and upset that they didn't proceed with any objections to receiving those votes.
And as a result, Joe Biden was inaugurated as President of the United States, and then the rest has happened in the meantime, which is a funding Of a war in Central Europe,
allowing also unimaginable numbers of people to come over our borders and the dissolving, in many ways, of key portions of our relationship With China that have, you know, created a situation that could escalate and again cause massive bloodshed there.
But then let's switch gears.
It's not just physical death, human life.
It's also going to be blood in the streets financially.
Look at what's going on with gas.
Gas has gone up. 25% in the last two and a half months.
And it's headed way higher.
Our petroleum reserves were bled down to next to nothing to get through the 2022 election cycle by the Biden image of Biden people to keep fuel prices low.
And now you're seeing the situation coming unglued in Western Africa where we get a lot of oil out of the events in Libya with the Dam's being breached.
This is going to get a lot worse.
And so it's going to be a bloody situation.
You know, energy prices go up.
Places don't work right.
People go to war over energy.
It's a bloody mess.
I don't know if that sounded right to you as far as kind of hitting some of the high spots.
The other thing, let me just add this, Vim.
And that is just like the events.
I'm over in Hawaii right now.
I haven't wiggled my toes in the sand yet.
I've been too busy on the stuff related to Maui and some other things.
But third trip, you know, on last year or something, I still haven't got my toes wiggled in the sand.
But, you know, this Maui situation is another example of something that's very serious.
Way before the event there in Maui where Lahaina got burned down, There was all sorts of mischief politically that was occurring here in the state to set the stage for a It's kind of a handover of these properties for some type of a Global East project,
a demonstrator.
Hawaii's always been one of these states where there's demonstrations of, you know, how things can be done in other places because it's an island location.
We used it Within our intelligence operations and stuff for years.
So the education system, things like that.
When you get into the details of what was going on in various locations around Hawaii, they were getting the laws set up.
So that the state and the feds and then globalists could all kind of do a little handshake between each other and do their 15-minute cities projects and ideas.
And a lot of the politicians, mayors and governors from several states were tied into these UN green projects and going to the stuff trying to You know, get things set up to begin their grain projects around the country, around the world, really.
And Hawaii is one of those places that they want to do that.
So, if you look at...
Oh, thank you. If you look at Lahaina, something bloody happened.
Some people were sacrificed for somebody else's globalist ambitions, ideas.
And I guarantee you those people that started that day there in Lahaina that day, none of them expected what happened.
They were as innocent as can be, never saw it coming.
But there were people that had a plan Before that ever happened, as much a plan as what happened in 9-11.
And we see the same types of residue from very advanced weapons in 9-11.
And in the Paradise Fires out near Neck of the Woods and right here in Lahaina.
The reason that I also mention that is because from a political side, from a military side, those types of weapons are not deployed without seeing and understanding exactly where they were directed from and how they were used.
So did we just see some modern variation of a Pearl Harbor, yet nobody is really having an honest conversation about what actually happened, what the origins were, or what the objectives are by the global east behind them?
And that's the conversation that has to be had at some point here.
We can see a single missile lift off through the ocean waves anywhere in the world from our satellites and detect it within moments and then do a very rapid assessment.
Is it a certain throw weight?
What's its range?
Probably who the origin of it is based on thermal temperatures, etc.
And we see that from satellites.
In just moments.
And then begin to work a plan to prepare for it.
Hawaii is where we had this missile alert five years ago, six years ago, that scared the living daylights out of people.
And it was because of satellite detection of a missile launch.
Somebody said, oh, it was a light switch.
It wasn't a light switch. You can't fool those systems quite that easily, and that was just a cover.
So that same technology has the ability to see how and where from this directed energy weapon was fielded here and why.
And, you know, you start looking at who benefits And it wasn't the people of Hawaii, and it wasn't some military.
It's a globalist operation, and they had an objective right here in this town.
But it could have been anywhere in America.
It could have been Alaska.
It could have been another inland site.
It could be Kansas, Chicago, anywhere they chose, because those types of weapons are very easy to target.
Anywhere on the globe. We've got to get that under control.
And why is right now the place in the sights?
You brought up 9-11 and similarities and stuff.
Are you saying that similar type of weapons might have been used?
Almost certainly. And the reason is because 9-11, the one thing people have to remember about 9-11 is because of the criticality to these Global East objectives of having the event go off flawlessly on that date at that location and it had been planned for a very long time.
This wasn't something that was planned you know a few months in advance or something like that.
The building itself was designed to fail in this particular event, this type of an event.
The building had coatings that were put on it after the earlier terrorist event several years earlier on some of the beams and things like that inside the building.
The area around the building, you know, in New York itself, all the gods of the Romans and Greek Parthenon are represented in the buildings around that area symbolically, you know, the easiest one.
For most people, it recognizes Taurus the Bull, the Bull of Wall Street.
Of course, I kid with Jen and myself about the deep state bull, and that's what Trump and the people who invited Trump to run.
Remember, you think Trump, he's the visible side of a much larger group.
Trump says frequently he was invited to run.
Who invited him? That's the guys going after the deep state.
Commonly represented is Taurus the bull, which is Baal and Moloch and all that sort of thing.
It is a religious war, if you want to get right down to a spiritual war that we're in.
But around this site on 9-11 are all these gods, and then that was a ritual sacrifice on that date.
In the heavens above, Virgo, in that celestial star system zodiac, Virgo was birthing.
Symbolically at that exact moment.
And so in that window, when the buildings were hit and then came down, that was this birthing ceremony that was being played out as above, so below in the occult.
And so it had to happen with exacting precision right then.
They had to come down.
There could be no failure because the other thing, of course, 9-11 had been encoded to our emergency code system several decades earlier, at the same time that the buildings were being built.
The date 9-11, September 11th, 3 BC, is the true birth date of Christ.
And so they had to villainize that date.
You know, Christ wasn't born at Christmas time.
That was the winter solstice.
It was an occult ceremony, and people decided to do the winter solstice thing, you know, Christianity, to try and steal the holiday back, whatever you think about that.
It's not the true birth date of Christ.
It was 911, 3 BC. So what they had to do is they had to villainize that date at the same time doing their own little birth thing for their own purposes in the occult.
With that in mind...
Multiple different methods were all in play on 9-11, so that no matter what, the buildings absolutely had to come down.
Now, one of the ways that the building was attacked was with direct energy weapons.
And in fact, it's interesting.
Very few people are aware of this, but 100 miles to the east of New York was a very large storm system at the same time.
Huge storm system.
And within some of the ways that these things can work, energy from that storm system may, in that particular time period, Have been in fact part of the energy that was used towards New York and with the weather control systems that we have could have been brought in to even wipe out New York further had there been any mistake or something didn't go right in bringing those buildings down.
No matter what, the buildings had to go down on 9-11 in that window and that was just in order for their occult magic to work.
Wow. Wow.
Wow. That's intense.
Now, let me ask you, like, where do you think with the way things stand right now?
I mean, it's we're talking about a pretty bleak picture.
I mean, where do you think everything is heading?
We're talking, you know, we're heading into the, you know, 24 election.
People think, you know, all the same shenanigans are going to happen.
And, you know, a lot of people aren't very optimistic.
What do you have to say about that?
Well, okay. I want people to understand I'm not pessimistic.
We're in a great position here right now.
More and more information is coming out now daily about the fraud in the 2020 election.
For example, Wisconsin, in the courts just a couple days ago, the courts determined that the drop boxes were always illegal in Wisconsin.
They should never have been used in 2020 or 2022.
They violate election laws in Wisconsin.
Therefore, they can't be used and they should never have been used before.
When you look at the vote counts, The fraudulent votes, the fake votes, the votes that should never have been put into the electoral count easily are way more by a factor of like 8 or 10.
than what was necessary to have Wisconsin go to Trump, if you will.
From a legal standpoint, those votes should have been challenged at the Joint Session of Congress on January 6th and not been allowed to be counted because Wisconsin conducted its election in an illegal way.
And therefore their votes should not have been included.
Pennsylvania, another example.
Pennsylvania in 58 of the 67 counties in Pennsylvania, they have 67 counties in the state, 58 of the counties had in excess of 100 percent of the voters who are registered to vote, supposedly voting. In other words, these counties had 110, 115.
In one case, I believe it was 130 percent of all the potential registered voters had 130 percent of the vote count of what they could have actually had.
So in other words, if you could have had 100,000 people vote in the county, they had 130,000.
Well, there isn't 130,000 registered voters.
Where did the other votes come from?
Had to be criminally fraudulent Not just an accident, not just a mistake, criminally fraudulent.
So Pennsylvania's vote, because it couldn't possibly be correct, should have been challenged and not allowed in until the electors from Pennsylvania went back and checked what was wrong.
So voting than they had registered voters, it should not have been allowed into the Electoral College.
They did not conduct an honest, fair election.
And even, let me just add one thing, Ben.
In most presidential races, you usually get more voters in a presidential election than you do in the other elections throughout the year.
In a presidential election, Usually you get 65% of the registered voters showing up to vote.
So when you say it's 100% of the vote, that would be an obvious sign of some type of fraud.
It couldn't have happened.
Somebody's playing with you. But when you get 110 or 120 or 30% Ballots of the potential voters, you know it's not just that.
You're really talking, in some of those counties' cases, you might have twice as many votes as were actually cast legitimately.
And then when you look at how close those states were between Trump and Biden, It's impossible.
Trump won. It's a cake.
By huge numbers, because they're pretty much doubling the vote.
But, I mean, we've been hearing about a lot of things coming out.
I mean, there's multiple documentaries.
There seems to be multiple ways that they're committing fraud.
I mean, how much has to be discovered?
What's the threshold where all of a sudden we're going to see this sea change and 24 is not going to suffer from all the nonsense that 20 and 22 suffered from?
Well, okay. I mean, that's a really important question.
A lot of people are trying to figure this out right now.
The reality is that we can't fix the vote fast enough to change the way that all of these counties would vote in 2024.
That's the real You won't get it fixed fast enough.
So people's concern there is absolutely, absolutely valid.
How are we going to do it in that time?
Now I'll leave the reservation a little bit.
I've said all along for several years now that we won't have the vote on time in 2024.
Now that sounds absolutely crazy.
That's the dumbest thing in the world.
But the reality is, I think that's absolutely exactly where we're at.
We are not going to have an election on time in 2024.
Trump has alluded to that with the pause.
And he said, yeah, you know, we're going to have to have a four-year pause here.
And there's so much, you know, essentially saying that.
Then we've had, you know, people that have flipped on, said it, oh my gosh, the people that, you know, stripped the gear over that I said that.
But now we've got a number of people who've come out publicly and said, yeah, I don't see how we're going to have the election on time, and we're not going to have the election on time out here come 2024.
I think there's more and more understanding that we're going to have to have a pause to protect the vote.
And it's, let me just say it this way.
I haven't actually talked about this publicly, but you're as good a spot to start here, Vem.
Awesome. We're getting ready for phase two on the Brunson case.
Before, we sent letters in asking for people to write a letter to the Supreme Court, asking them to hear the Brunson case and to deliberate on it, which relates to January 6th.
The Brunson case, which was docketed at the Supreme Court now four different times, And then denied.
This latest time it was denied here a few weeks ago, we questioned whether that was legitimately denied because the court wasn't in session.
We think there was an administrative thing that happened.
But it doesn't matter.
We have another thing coming here.
The reality is the Supreme Court, just like the Texas case that Paxton brought with 17 other states, 18 states total back in 2020, challenging four states on the way they conducted their vote because they didn't conduct the vote according to their own election laws legally.
So challenging whether the electoral vote counts could be included in the Electoral College until those states removed the votes which came through those systems, which of course they couldn't do.
It was too messed up, so you'd have to not count those votes in the Electoral College.
The Supreme Court said there was no standing by Texas In the case that the Supreme Court couldn't hear the case state to state, which is completely crazy because there is no other court to go to within the triad of legislative Senate Executive
Office and Supreme Court as the three legs of the stool on how our government operates, except that's not actually the correct answer.
We don't have a three-legged stool within the governmental system here in the United States.
It's a four-legged stool.
And the fourth leg is military justice.
Now the reason is because if you're attacked by an enemy, if they get inside the wire, inside the gate, if somehow in a nuclear, based on the 1954 decisions within the military about Continuity in government, the way it works in a nuclear era, aliens, etc.
That in that kind of a continuity in government scenario, the military can and must step in first to restore order and lawful elections so that elected representatives of the people are actually in charge of their country and their affairs.
And if in fact the normal processes within the country have been damaged or violated, the military takes control until such time as lawful fair elections can be conducted again.
So an argument is if the court Doesn't see that it has jurisdiction, can't intercede, in part because of public pressure.
It would be so highly charged politically that they can't make that maneuver without seeing civil unrest.
Then it defers to a military court.
And the military having to oversee and conduct the circumstances of an election.
And if you've got...
Machines that can't be trusted, etc., etc., etc.
Whatever the system is that's screwed up, the military has to be able to step in and conduct an electoral situation where the outcome can be determinatively the people's will, including, by the way, into whatever is allowed to go into the people's ear.
You know, for our concern right now, I'm less concerned at this point about the machine fraud or the paper ballot counter like that.
The next phase that we actually have to be concerned about is what impact are the social media monsters, the biggest of which is Google, going to have on your next election.
If you're being canceled from having an honest discussion Within the country, then you can't have the person that the people would really elect in a normal sense get to power because they can twist and Pervert the conversation so much that you
don't even know if what you're hearing is real.
I'll use an example.
Dr. Epstein, not to be confused with Epstein and Epstein Island.
Dr. Epstein, who's been doing research on Google and the votes and has testified before Congress, testified in Arizona the other day, It says that in the last election in 2020, Google at a minimum was responsible,
according to their own internal tabulations, for something between 5 and 15 million votes, which they were able to sway lots easily.
You know, many, many, many times the difference between Trump or Biden winning.
But next time around, next year, they believe they will be able to sway 25 million votes just based on how they set up the search engines.
Within Google to report certain stories and not report others.
Let me use a different example.
My buddy Mac Warner, he's a member of our coalition of candidates.
He's running for governor of West Virginia.
He's secretary of state there now.
He just did another letter to A couple of folks in the finance committees asking them to turn off the spigot, any money going to Homeland Security,
until they literally defund Homeland Security, until they take out Brennan and a couple of other people who signed a letter With 51 intelligence officers, a very interesting number, you know, by the way, on the numbers, these are really critical within these cults.
17's number of victory.
17 is the number of Q, the highest intelligence or the highest clearance in the military related to handling and transfer of nuclear weapons and beyond.
And that's a Q clearance.
And both sides want to own 17.
The 17th book of the Bible is Esther.
And it's all about the flip, the reversal of victory.
And so both sides want to own the same number.
And by the way, just so that people understand, the numbers are critical.
It's the hidden language of D.C. Five within the Christian, Muslim, Jewish world is the number of grace.
Five in the occult and the secret societies, secret handshake groups, the demonic, satanic.
Five is the number of death to enemies and defense.
Well, how many sides are on the Pentagon?
Five. It's a five-sided building.
What in the world? Why a five-sided building?
What's it all about? What does the Pentagon do?
Death to enemies And defense.
It's that big.
It's right in your face, okay?
So 17 is a critical number in the occult.
The most you could magnify a spell, a witch, a warlock, in their way of doing things goes back to the greater and lesser keys of Solomon, upper and lower keys of Solomon, depending on which translation you're using.
How to control demons and spirit powers and like that.
When Solomon of the Bible went off his rocker, this was because he had all these foreign wives and was smart enough to figure out how to do it.
So the understanding is within the witch's brew, the maximum magnification of a spell is three times.
So three times the witch turns in the circle, three times they knock on the door, blah, blah, blah.
So, this magic powerful number 17, 3 times 17 is what?
51? 51, yeah.
So, what's the most magical advanced site for our technology here in the continental US? Area 51.
Why isn't it 50? Why isn't it 49?
Why has it got to be 51?
Because it has to be sealed with the magic spell number.
Why did 51 people In the intelligence community, sign a letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, classic Russian disinformation, before the 2020 election.
Because they needed to have the magic power strength within the intelligence community attached to that letter.
And what did it do?
Google search engines and all the other search engines push that out to the max everywhere.
That 51 intelligence officials, officers, said that the Hunter Biden laptop was classic Russian disinformation, and it wasn't true, and the Bidens hadn't been laundering any money, and Hunter hadn't done all the things that are shown in the videos.
It's all a lie.
So those people that pushed that, led by Brennan, Led by Brennan, who himself knew with absolute certainty that it was a legitimate, the laptop was Hunter's, that the information on there was legitimate.
Brennan led the way in getting that letter out with false disinformation that affected a presidential election.
Many Democrats I've said, and it's like, you know, people in the 10% range.
I've said, had they known that what was on the 100 byte and laptop that was known to the public at that time was true, They probably wouldn't have voted for Biden because they didn't want to vote for the corruption.
So when you say, okay, Brennan helped lead that, and it was done just a day or two before the debate between Trump and Biden to screw up Trump on the talking points in this national debate between the two of them.
They tried to twist the election.
Brennan was in on it all the way in.
Should he have a role now as a high paid advisor with access to all the top secret intelligence Within Homeland Security?
Or should he be kept from any government position from here on and defunded and maybe even prosecuted?
Should he have all his clearances removed?
I mean, isn't that, when you're changing the course of an election, isn't that treason?
Well, I would say so.
And so part of the issue here is that we need to think about...
What we're doing here, letting Brennan and others in on These secure positions moving forward.
He should never be allowed to hold any kind of a government office again because he was a participant in a fraud that he knew.
See, there's no question.
FBI knew that it was a legitimate laptop.
It already determined that.
Brennan was in on that whole thing.
This was done not There was no other purpose, even in the communications between the various players, including Brendan.
It was clear they were doing this to affect The psyche of the American voters and to affect the debate and to affect the election.
So Brennan knowingly became political.
Look, he's supposed to be apolitical within that position.
So he should never be allowed into a position ever again where he's supposed to have the public trust.
And yet he just got a high paying contractor job Over at Homeland Security, along with a couple of other guys that should never hold public office again.
And so Mack Warner is saying that Homeland Security should be defunded.
If they're going to hire guys like that back in, no more money should go from the power of the purse, should be yanked to Homeland Security, because they're the threat to America.
Look, how much was Homeland Security involved in January 6th?
And on and on. And by the way, again, what we talked about in Bloody Hill, four people died.
On January 6th, and all of them died at the hands of the policing agencies that were there on that date.
So when you talk about, you know, blood on somebody's hands, you know, and us as citizens, That's our money that funded that.
It may have been without our direct knowledge, understanding permission, but we still have a certain responsibility to yard in our politicians if they're out of control.
Yard in our policing agencies if they're out of control.
The American people showed up on January 6th to make a point that something was wrong, and now these judicial and policing agencies are on a witch hunt to villainize the very people that were there doing what citizens do.
So, I mean, it sounds like what you're saying is that this is all going to climax into a pause in elections.
What does that look like?
Is it that the evidence that the election is all wrong, that everything's corrupted, crescendos at that point, it climaxes at that point, hence there's a pause?
Or is it a pause because the elections start happening and it's just a mess and a lot of things are being caught?
I mean, what does that look like?
There's several scenarios that all come to that same conclusion.
Exactly which one ends up playing out, that's open to some discussion interpretation.
But at the end of the day, maybe the easiest way to address it is just to say that if you can't Trust the systems.
If it's shown so completely that the election processes are cooked, captured, unreliable, as they currently exist, and you're going to have to pause and get it right, then that would be the basis for a pause until we can set up a proper way to do it.
If you come to the conclusion that the people that are in power right now got there through fraud, And that it was with the assistance of foreign countries, entities, businesses, in a treasonous or traitorous way, and it's done decisively, conclusively.
You might very well have to pause because the people in power aren't there legitimately.
As crazy as it sounds, there's mechanisms in play right now to make that happen.
If you conclude that several of the states, Their Electoral College votes were invalid for various reasons and have to be withdrawn from the total count that was done on January 6, 2021.
And it flips who then goes to power.
And by the way, that's a very real legal possibility.
Then you might not say, because all the states weren't included then in the count, You might instead say that the outcome of the election is unknowable with absolute certainty, so the 2020 election would therefore have to be nullified.
In which case, if the determination is that it was foreign interference that caused the vote not to be reliable, then that's an act of war.
In which case, power could not be transferred to...
A Biden regime.
And therefore, it's as though the election didn't happen.
The existing commander-in-chief remains the commander-in-chief because you're in a wartime setting.
It's not about who's president, it's about who's commander-in-chief.
And retroactively, you would say, okay, can I put Joe Biden as commander-in-chief?
Well, he got there by benefit of a crooked election.
Do you say that it should be run by the military?
Well, who's going to head the military?
Excuse me, if the election's nullified, The only legitimate person was the then commander-in-chief.
That's part of the Continental Government determinations within the 54 code.
Now, that would be Trump.
And remember, Trump never conceded that he lost the election in 2000.
So... Do you have to acknowledge that publicly or has that even been acknowledged privately already?
Yes, March 11th of 2021, there was a military determination that Biden was not the person that won the election for military purposes only within the confines of the nuclear and beyond arsenals.
And essentially the briefcase and like that.
So behind the scenes, there's been this huge back and forth, in and out, up and down, everybody arguing, is Trump technically the commander in chief?
And probably not framed quite properly.
The real question is, within that very narrow section, Of military operations that revolve around nuclear weapons and beyond, do they answer the call from Biden?
Or is Trump there all the time?
No, no, no. In the case of a need to deploy or use, they would look for a handshake from the legitimate commander-in-chief.
If the legitimate commander-in-chief is unavailable or unwilling for some reason at all, then the military personnel involved in those particular areas have total authority to proceed without any outside authorization.
But if the representative of the American people...
Is able to be verified and then reached.
That person is the handshake for proceeding forward based on the codes.
And by the way, the whole scaffold down there at Mar-a-Lago related to, you know, The documents that were stored down there and what's there.
What were they really looking for?
They were looking for what's called the biscuit.
The biscuit is the card that the commander-in-chief carries with them at all times that gives the launch code options and authorizations.
For different scenarios.
And it's actually fairly complex.
It's not just, you know, five or ten numbers or whatever.
There's varying things there.
So when they, when Trump went on January 20th, 2021, when Trump left Washington, D.C., he left before the inauguration that morning.
He was still president. The suitcase followed him.
It has to be within two doors of the president or the commander-in-chief at all times.
Got on Marine One, went over to Air Force One, flew down to Palm Beach, got off the plane, went over to Mar-a-Lago.
All the way to Mar-a-Lago, Trump was still president slash commander-in-chief.
When the inauguration happened, which Trump did not attend, Biden left the podium, went out of sight for a period of time.
That's when they did the communication.
Yes, sir, we recognize it's you.
That's verified.
And pending review of We recognize that you are the President of the United States as certified by Congress.
And the Constitution says the President of the United States is Commander-in-Chief.
The problem is that Commander-in-Chief is a slightly different role.
That's the military. And the military has to...
Have the baton passed.
If one commander in chief doesn't pass it to the next, that's a separate hat.
And if he does it for cause, as was done in this case, question, and then the military does a review like it did, which I've talked about before, but it's a little bit involved.
If they do that and determine that there's any question about conveying power, the existing commander-in-chief doesn't have to or is not appropriate to convey power over to another person where their legitimacy as the true representative of the American people is in question.
And that's based on the 54 code.
So there was enough questions, even though Congress didn't address them, the military still had a legal requirement In a continuity of government situation, an attack on the election is an act of war.
If there's information that the electoral process was attacked and flipped by an enemy, you know, external, not a policing action,
an act of war, Then you can't convey power under those circumstances to the next person because you get somebody that is a shill, a representative for the space aliens, whatever you want to do.
When that happened, then the military recognizes the previous person who has the baton, who's been verified as having to continue in power Until that situation can be resolved.
There's a lot of minutia. Anybody that says it's just cut and dried, it's just this and this and this and this, most of the areas of law that deal with that particular circumstance and the transition of power are classified within those operations.
The broader NORAD system, strategic command system, There are two groups fighting for control of the country.
And senior executive service, which is where Cheney was going every time he had a fake heart attack, and that was put in place when George Bush was director of CIA and was recommended to Carter.
It became an item 2019, or 2019.
Excuse me, 1979, under the Carter administration, and they've been building out ever since.
All these FBI agents that are getting extra money for going after the January 6th defendants, that extra money is coming out of senior executive service.
One of my friends, Trennis Evans, Who is a January 6th defendant.
FBI agent offered him $35,000 a month.
Think about that. $35,000 a month to work as an informant.
And none of the money he was going to get of that $35,000 was going to be trackable or knowable by anyone else in the FBI except for that FBI officer.
Wow. Who offered him the money.
That was what that officer told Trennis Evans.
And as far as public record, this isn't just Twitter talk or something like that.
Trennis actually made that part of a filing in his legal stuff related to his...
A case as a January 6th defendant.
And the judge has put stuff in where the FBI needs to answer those questions.
What the hell's going on here?
And where was that money going to come from?
Well, I'll just cut you to the chase.
It was going to come out of the SES system.
And the FBI agents, you can go look at, there's a former FBI agent, Mr.
Friend, and that's how his actual name is Friend.
Who's discussed this, that senior FBI officials get this extra money out of SES. I've been talking about this for a decade.
When you look at where's the money coming from for some of these false flags and some of the personnel involved, that's SES operations to manage and control the public's understanding and attitudes concerning certain things, including gun use, gun control, gun ownership.
You have literally an out-of-control federal agency that's the highest paid federal employees in the system.
And most people have no idea who they are.
Go Wikipedia, SES, Senior Executive Service.
It's a very, very serious, dangerous attack on America from the inside out.
And that's what the contest is that we're facing right now today.
The military Cheyenne Mountain It's representative of something much larger than that.
System, NORAD, etc., and nuclear command versus the SES system, which is newer and purports to have control of the nuclear arsenal and beyond.
But in reality, the military involved have not handed power over and will not.
And that's the fight we're in right now.
Wow, wow. So let me ask you something that we've heard during our podcast is that essentially there's people within the government that are tracking public opinion via social media and that once public opinion hits a certain threshold in terms of people being Disgusted with what's happening within the government,
people feeling that everything is corrupt and people agreeing on certain aspects of what things are corrupt, then the military is going to move in.
They're going to arrest all these people that are, you know, that have committed treason, including congressional members.
I mean, is there any truth to that sort of claim as to, you know, what's come down the pipeline?
Well, you're talking about the work that Jan Helper has been doing.
And others.
So let me see if I can say this correctly for most of your audience.
Within the DOD operations, one of the things that they do is they monitor public opinion regarding all sorts of things.
Because in a wartime setting, If you don't have the public behind you, you can lose a war based on public opinion.
So let's go back, say, to World War I or II. One of the things that was done by the Department of Defense was they would employ Hollywood stars.
They would fund certain types of movies to help people emotionally, mentally, spiritually, do the mental gymnastics that let them go to war, fight to be heroes, take care of mom and apple pie, etc.
We do all sorts of propaganda, you know, war bonds.
War bonds, for example, are only partially about getting money for the war effort.
The war bonds, in part, were people make a sacrifice.
They invest in the country in a bond that if we lose, the bond's going to be worthless, but they believe that we're going to win.
They get a nominal amount of interest.
But they're, you know, they could put it in the stock market.
They could plant, buy a field and plant, you know, crops and make money, etc.
But they put it in the war bonds.
It was like a vote, not just of confidence, but ownership.
And so people would buy a war bond and now they're vested.
They have a piece of the pie.
They have a piece of it mentally, and they're going to go all the way.
You know, sometimes, you know, beyond just that you have a relative, a spouse, a child who's in the war effort, and so you're worried that they're going to make it.
But it gives you an ownership position in it.
Operations like what Jan Helper are involved in monitor public opinion.
Where are we?
With the public, are they good with us?
Do they understand the problem?
What are the numbers and what's the psychology?
Would they have their son or daughter enroll, you know, join one of the military branches and things like that?
Or are they disconnected, not wanting to back it, etc.?
And the reason is because you have to have the public On your side to win a war.
That's your biggest numbers.
And they've got to be mentally in the right place.
So now, the fourth leg, which I began talking about a few minutes ago, is if Congress, the House and the Senate, if the administration That aren't protecting the Constitution,
aren't protecting the people, aren't ready to go to war with an enemy who's inside the gate or they don't understand the situation.
If the Supreme Court doesn't believe that the public is enough on their side To back them in a wild, hard decision like the Brunson case, which would take two-thirds of Congress out of power, the members of Congress.
Because the Brunson case says that anyone that voted to certify the election 2020 was in violation of their oath of office to protect The Constitution Against All Enemies,
Foreign and Domestic. The sequence was that on January 6th, Ted Cruz, legislators We had asked for a 10-day pause to send all of the electors back to the various states to do an investigation to determine if the vote in each of those states was conducted lawfully
and whether there needed to be changes in the Electoral College vote from each state.
That investigation So asking for that investigation goes all the way back to the late 1800s when there was another election that was contested and then They appointed several
members of the House, the Senate, and the Supreme Court to do an investigation for 10 days to determine if, in fact, there had been fraud or something in the election that would change the outcome.
In that particular case, they decided there wasn't.
They proceeded with the Electoral College and put in the winner.
When Congress When other members proceeded to do a vote of the Electoral College without doing an investigation, they put the country at risk that someone, not the elected representative of the people, But someone through fraud in an election could get power and then do the will of somebody other than the people.
And therefore, they were in violation of their oath to protect the Constitution.
What's the Constitution? The Constitution is the contract between the American people and their government.
And so that was in violation of our contract with these governments.
When they say their oath.
When they didn't do that, they were in violation of the contract with the American people.
Now we have a situation where if none of those branches will protect the American people, the fourth leg of government kicks in.
That's the military, and that's the last line of defense.
In this case, even there, it's not the Pentagon, which is logistics.
It's just moving stuff around.
It's, for the purposes of nuclear and beyond, a very specific narrow window at this point in time.
It should be everything, but within the The continuity in government things related to total war, 1954, stuff like that.
It's for the use of nuclear weapons to deter, protect the people, and then to essentially rebuild whatever may have been taken down that allows us not to have confidence that the people in office, you know, the country's overrun somehow, even aliens. Clones.
Somebody not of the American people somehow gets into power.
We're in an occupied situation.
By the way, remember Trump up there in Ohio when he, it was Ohio or Michigan, I think it was Ohio, was walking off the stage and in the background you had a flag where the stars were blacked out.
That, in the language of flags, which is what Trump uses to communicate, by the way, in the language of flags, the blacked-out stars means it's a communication to all of the men in the field, women in the field.
The enemy occupies the land where you're on.
You're in occupied territory.
Might be your country, but it's occupied.
Trust no one To actually be who they say they are.
And then it is a license to operate independently at will.
If you do encounter the enemy, you are free to engage.
Okay? That's the meaning of that blacked out stars on the flag.
You're an occupied ground.
Don't trust anybody.
Engage at will. We are in that kind of a situation and there is this captured aspect of what's going on in America.
And so would a pause be appropriate?
Would it be necessary?
Yes. And what would the pause look like?
The pause would look like most likely of the various scenarios that could be put in play.
Not saying that Trump is president.
Not overturning the 2020 election the other direction.
But nullifying the 2020 election.
Saying that the outcome cannot be trusted.
It's too convoluted.
Therefore, it's as though it didn't happen.
The existing commander-in-chief coming into...
Oh no. I think we lost Juan.
Let me text him real quick and see if he's able to come back on here.
Hey Juan, we lost you.
I got you back. Oh, so we got you.
Did that sort of get yourself out?
Yeah, it's getting better now.
Yeah, it was hazy for a second. Here, let me call you right back.
Let's call right back. Let's get a good line here.
Let me call you right back. Okay, yeah, we'll log on to the same link.
Yep, yep, if you log on to the same link it'll be good.
All right, so just waiting for Juan to come back on here.
Bye.
We do it live, right?
All the little bumps in the road and everything.
All right. So, you know, great interview with Juan.
If you guys have any questions, by the way, I can see the chat's been pretty lively over here.
So feel free to drop any questions.
I'm kind of almost done.
I got maybe like, you know, one or two more questions for him.
So if you guys have any questions, feel free to drop it in there.
Just, yeah, I'll be checking it out.
it's on that monitor and we'll wait for Juan to come back on here.
I wish I had a video or something to play for you guys.
Let's see here. You know what?
While we're waiting for him, I'm going to roll...
Let's see here.
I'm going to roll this thing here.
We got this video clip of Zelensky talking about climate change.
Thought you'd be interested in checking this out.
Humanity is failing on its climate policy objectives.
This means that extreme weather will still impact the normal global life and some evil state will also weaponize its outcomes.
And when people in the streets of New York and other cities of the world went out on climate protests, we all have seen them.
And when people in Morocco and Libya and other countries die as a result of natural disasters, And when islands and countries disappear underwater, and when tornados and deserts are spreading into new territories, and when all of this is happening, one unnatural disaster in Moscow decided to launch a big war and kill tens of thousands of people.
We have to stop it.
We must act united to defeat the aggressor and focus all our capabilities and energy on addressing these challenges.
As nukes are restrained, likewise the aggressor must be restrained and all his tools and message of war.
Each war now can become final.
But it takes our unity to make sure that aggression will not break in again.
All right, all right.
So anyway, Mr.
Zielinski there. We got Juan back.
Juan, how you doing? Hey, I apologize there.
I had my chief of staff was calling in and I don't think he realized that a show there.
So it screwed with the whole thing and I apologize on it.
No worries, no worries.
I was trying to fill the time.
We played a clip of Zelensky talking about how...
I guess he went from the war in Russia to climate change and back and forth and tried to draw parallels between those two.
But it's funny how many times we talk about climate change, you know?
Vem, let me pick that right up right there.
It's important that you pick that exact clip.
On multiple levels, the crowd that we're fighting, which is really the Brits, we're still fighting the fucking Brits, is what it really comes down to.
They've decided that they can get control of the world over this climate change thing, and they can leverage everybody on that.
And then they've brought in all of their banking and finance and military and everybody else on that.
The shot, you know, jab stuff, that's essentially played through.
We understand most of that.
There's still some threats out there, but the reality is that they're in trouble on that.
They even want to portray what happened over here in Maui, for example, as a climate change thing.
What happened in Paradise is a climate change thing.
And then this whole war scenario is a climate change thing.
We're worried about energy and like that.
Stuff happening in West and North Africa right now is a climate change thing.
It couldn't be further from the truth.
It's a complete bullshit angle.
But it's the one they've got.
And everybody's pivoting to do that, UN and all that, you know, that we've got to allow for their 15-minute cities and all this other BS. So with that in mind, you're going to see a push.
And we knew this was coming.
Look, I was just talking to somebody the other day.
All the way back in the 60s, You know, back then it was global cooling, and then it became global warming, and now it's back to global change.
You know, our waterfront properties here, you know, across the islands are all going to be flooded 300 feet high, etc., etc.
It's all bullshit. So, But they get people to act and respond and do things in a certain way.
I have a friend, a very wealthy person, worth billions, and one of his big projects right now is with carbon credits.
So they have these huge projects to sequester carbon emissions.
You know, swaths of the ocean.
And they're going to be able to claim a carbon credit.
His biggest customer is going to be the airlines.
So that every aircraft that flies is going to have to have a certain number of carbon credits.
And he's already got airlines.
You just have to do the mental gymnastics on this.
Who, to get started as members in goodwill towards the direction we have to go, are already agreeing to purchase a certain amount of carbon credits as an act of goodwill.
For every gallon of fuel that they use.
And to get the process started.
And then the money that goes into this carbon credit stuff goes for all sorts of bullshit, mischief, politicians, little countries and like that to make hay.
So in this one person situation, they had several of the Key political leaders popped in on us.
We had nice long conversations.
I listened to all the bullshit.
And they're all going to make money generating carbon credits to sell into this global system.
And they're all going to become billionaires more.
Because of these huge swaths of territory that some of these small countries have that they can devote to their carbon credit scam.
It's a racket.
It's a complete racket.
And it's been going on for quite a while.
I had a New Year's Eve dinner several years ago with one of the key Democrat Supporters, monetary supporters by himself.
And, I don't know, this has been probably eight, ten years ago, it was during the Obama administration.
And he didn't understand that, you know, fully that I was, you know, really Republican-oriented, but beyond that, and he had another Republican there that was in on the whole scam with him.
But didn't understand that I wasn't buying into this.
And he was weighing through all the details of how he was setting up a carbon credit exchange system, kind of like the stock market, and how it was going to work, and how much money they were going to make, and percentage-wise and like that, and how soon it would be implemented.
And they had spent literally tens and tens of millions working through all the details of how this was going to be implemented.
We're now there. We're there.
Those things that have been in play for decades getting us ready for this are now coming to a head.
And things like what just happened in Maui are pieces of the puzzle in their scam to have their 15-minute cities because the people are a threat.
To Mother Earth, Gaia, whatever you want to call it, with their carbon emissions.
And so we need to, you know, shut down the Earth, shut down the humans, cut us down to, you know, 13 out of 14 humans need to not exist anymore.
The carrying capacity of the Earth is a half a billion.
It's all bullshit. Yeah.
And that's the next phase of the...
We lost them again.
That was getting juicy.
That was really getting juicy there, the next phase.
If you guys have any questions, please feel free to drop him in the chat.
You know, I'm going to call or I'm going to text him, see if he's able to get back on.
Oh no, it's not answering.
I hope you didn't. His battery didn't run out or something.
Please leave your message.
Alright, we'll wait for him.
You know what I'll do?
I got a few other clips here.
I'll play another clip.
And we'll wait for him to come back and hopefully he makes it back.
But this has been a fantastic interview.
You know, Juan, we could talk to for hours.
He's got such great information.
And it's funny because I had two questions last time we got cut off and now I have four questions.
So that shows you how interesting this information is.
Anyway, I'm going to play this James O'Keefe clip here about Maui, I believe, and then hopefully we'll have Juan back soon.
I'm here in front of the State of Hawaii Department, Land and Natural Resources.
I just said you asking some questions.
Did you just say f*** you to him?
I did. And then another official said she's gonna call the police.
You're gonna call the police?
I told you to turn it off.
I've been arrested in Taste, so I'm a little bit on it.
Emergency Proclamation is a soft term for martial law.
And they're saying we can't take pictures or video from the highway.
Oh, they'll arrest you if you don't get out of there, and they'll retaliate.
I'm a boat on fire in the harbor.
That's your boat on fire? Someone lit your boat on fire, basically.
If I had hidden cameras, he would've full-on hit me.
There may be a way for me to help you with the hidden camera thing.
You have a soft. I'm gonna remove myself from being upset.
Okay. Before worse things happen.
If I give you some equipment, you think you can do it today or tomorrow?
Oh, yeah. The Undercover cameras you've seen us use in the past, both in these videos and in our masterclasses, are now available for sale.
Go to our website, O'KeefeMediaGroup.com, click on Covert Camera Store, and you can buy the Button Camera.
Buy it, go get the footage, send it to us, and we'll pay you for it.
Now enjoy O'Keefe Undercover in Lahaina, Part 2.
After we released part one of our undercover investigation in Lahaina showing how the emergency proclamation declared by the governor of Hawaii prohibited photography and journalism Alongside the burn zone, which resulted in a lawsuit between OMG and the governor of Hawaii, we received tips and messages from hundreds of locals in Hawaii looking for us to tell their stories about how this crisis is playing out on a variety of levels.
This included a lack of ability to get resources from the federal government locally, locals unable to get inside the burn zone, and a potential land grab by the state.
We'll be following up in a series of video reports on Lahaina in the coming weeks.
Today, we continue to report on the First Amendment and tensions that are deep-rooted in Hawaii as we track one man's interaction with local officials at the Department of Land and Natural Resources and how the state itself is struggling with the deep and long-standing issues regarding the Kingdom of Hawaii being under U.S. control.
While our reporters were speaking with members of the Red Cross and FEMA, we came across a local man whose boat was apparently lit on fire and who took issue with what he characterized as the martial law which was instituted under the governor's proclamation 127a.
The man said he's had some issues dealing with officials at DNLR, Department of Natural Land Resources in Malai Harbour in Walaku, just south of Lahaina.
You got arrested while salvaging a... who did that? A state trooper?
What is it?
It's DOCARS. They're in law enforcement division of DLNR.
They have the guns and the tasers.
The man, who we happen to be recording because we were wearing a hidden camera, told us he could potentially get some interesting conversations on tape if he had a hidden camera.
If I had hidden cameras, he would have full-on hit me. He's already pressed up his chest against me twice in public.
So I need to come in the office.
Not knowing if the man was credible, we offered to give him a camera and see what he's been seeing with our own eyes.
We showed up to the office and spoke with Paul Sansano, the district manager of the Maui County District Office of DNLR. Sure enough, Paul was not happy to see the citizen.
What is this about?
The seizure of my property.
Wait outside. Are you with him?
Yeah. Get outside.
Kicking us out? No.
Oh. Just that my staff shouldn't be involved.
Okay. All right.
Bullshit. Okay, what is it now?
I haven't had the forfeiture documents of any of my property, like the kayaks that were stolen off of my vessel.
My boat was never posted. The man said he lost his boat in the fire and was told that a lot of people lost their homes.
The DNR official, Paul Sensano, almost assaulted him for talking about his situation.
You have a stop.
We watched tensions rise between the two people as the Kingdom of Hawaii was brought up a couple times, and the two men discussed which one of them is truly Hawaiian.
You don't follow the rules, yeah, you think that you're an exception, then so be it.
This is the Kingdom of Hawaii. You act as an exception.
You know what? I got your Kingdom of Hawaii thing, yeah?
Are you Hawaiian? What does it matter if he's Hawaiian or not?
I'm just curious. Well, because he claims to be under the rules and regulations of the Kingdom of Hawaii.
This is a theme we heard a lot about on the ground in Hawaii, as many Americans just do not realize how deep-seated this tension is.
While Hawaii is an American state, Lahaina is and was the capital of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and many people feel strongly about their heritage and where they came from.
The district manager cursed off the man, apologized, and said if he didn't remove himself from the situation, worse could happen.
I don't care.
Did you just say f*** you to him?
I did. Do you work for the state?
Do you work for the state of Hawaii, sir?
Yes. Do you work for the Department of Land and Natural Resources, the state of Hawaii?
You just told a citizen f*** you?
That's because I'm upset, so that was why I'm going to need to say that.
Alright, we're back with 1.07.
Juan, I just played another video.
This one about what's going on in Hawaii that James O'Keefe was covering.
A lot of stuff like people being shut down, clear secrecy happening.
So yeah, thank you for logging back in, Juan.
Yeah, I apologize. I thought I was charged on my phone.
I wasn't charging, but changed to a different outlet.
Anyway, You know, I spent the last couple days here with BJ Penn who ran for governor and several of the other candidates in this last election.
A lot of weird anomalies in that election here in Hawaii.
One of the interesting things is they just bulldozed off a huge area, a parcel of land over in Pahoa near Hilo.
And suppose they're going to build buildings there, housing, for a bunch of the Maui residents and move them over to Hilo.
Now, you know, having a long history here in Hawaii personally, many, many decades, I do understand some of the dramas going on here in the islands.
But one of the things you've got to understand Maui is kind of an arid island for the most part, and the climate is a very specific type.
Hilo, on the other hand, is very, you know, it's almost half jungle over there because it's on the windward side of the island.
It gets lots of rain.
It's like they said, you know, people complain about the rain.
What are you talking about? It only rained two days this spring.
Two times, I should say.
Well, what two times did it rain?
All of January and all of February.
It rains a lot over there.
It's a lot windier.
It's just a different environment.
They want to move a bunch of people from Maui who have their relatives, their history in the Maui area.
You don't have a few hundred acres in Maui that you can plow under.
They waived all the environmental impact laws Just went and just plowed off this area and they're going to start building there.
You know, because an emergency exists.
And we have to move people from Maui over to Big Island.
Really? Yeah.
You don't have a few hundred acres that you can buy from one of the huge properties.
Oh, Oprah doesn't have a few hundred acres over there you can buy from her or she could donate to let people from Maui stay at Maui?
What kind of bullshit is that?
And they're claiming, you know, with all the climate stuff and everything else that they just gotta, you know, everybody's gotta be willing to do it.
No, they're gonna make a slum over there.
They're gonna put, you know, public housing in there, you know, and move a bunch of people over there to handle some of the farm issues that they have there.
Plus, the other things that we were talking to yesterday, they've heard that they're going to move people from the border coming into the states here to Hawaii.
Where are they going to put them? Right there?
Mix them in with the Maui refugees being moved island to island?
It defies Logic.
And the governor's good with it.
There's some other things that we're looking at.
We'll talk about it over the next few days and weeks going on over there in Maui that's, you know, related to Maui that's pretty bizarre.
But the reality is, it's another land grab.
And it's not for Hawaiians.
It's this Globalista class that wants to use Maui as a demonstrator for their perfect 15-minute city.
Electric buses will run you everywhere and you'll live in your little 20 by 20 apartment and you're going to be happy.
And you'll serve the, you know, tourists that come and go that are wealthy enough to visit your, you know, city.
And you'll be bussed back and forth to your little 20 by 20 unit.
Whatever. The ones that get to stay there.
That's bullshit. And the people in Hawaii recognize that.
This is a fight's on.
And whatever happened there in Maui, it Didn't happen the way it was said.
Something else occurred there, and it's similar to what happened at the Paradise Fires in California, 9-11, with the buildings there, and the way that the building was, you know, Disintegrated, imploded, justified, whatever term you want to use.
Yeah, disintegrate is a good, yeah, good term.
You were talking about, you're saying earlier that the Brits never stopped attacking us, you know?
One of the topics we talk a lot about is like the Barr, how Barr is like a monopoly and, you know, obviously we see the way our courts are functioning, the legislature is supposed to hold the judges accountable, especially if they're doing unconstitutional things.
Tell me, I mean, what do you think is going on there?
Well, you know, you can't get to justice in the Justice Department the way it's being run right now in America.
And the attorneys and the courts, it's a captured operation.
So, the Constitution is, you know, arguably not really in play, in force.
It's not being used as the guiding principle that people think it is.
It's being overlooked in so many ways.
We're not going to get that solved.
In the courts.
Why? Because it's a captured operation.
Even the Supreme Court.
Look, if you can't get them to hear a case like the Texas case, state versus state, and that's their whole entire job, and you can't get them to do that, where can you get justice anywhere in there?
And then you got the Brunson case, a matter of national security.
It was received as a Rule 11 case.
And as a Rule 11 case, in the...
In the 1970s, with the Pentagon Papers, they heard a Rule 11 case on an emergency basis.
In the 1800s, they heard a Rule 11 case.
But that's the only two times that we've found that a Rule 11 case has been heard.
There's no justice on the Supreme Court right now who has ever heard a Rule 11 case.
They all have been put in since the one in the 70s.
Knowing how the court should or can or would operate at this point in time, it's going to be an interesting way to see how this plays out.
But the other thing is that if they continue to decide not to hear a Rule 11 case, this case, Then the court, which it has to be switched to and is part of the next letter going from an ask to a demand of the court, if you can or will not hear it for any reason of intimidation, can't overthrow.
Did we lose you again?
No.
I think we lost one again.
Yeah, it sounds like...
Sounds like his phone ran out of batteries again.
Oh, no, it's working.
Yeah, me, I was one of the toughest ones for me to do the interviews on because if anybody calls it kicks me out.
Oh, it kicks you off. Gotcha, gotcha.
Okay. I apologize.
No worries, no worries. Do you want to log back on?
Yeah, I'll log back on and we can try to wrap it up for you.
I apologize on that. It's just so frustrating for your listeners, too.
No worries, brother. No worries.
Everybody's still hanging on.
So thank you for everyone for hanging on here.
You know, everybody seems to be holding tight for wanting to get back on here.
He'll get back on here. You know, probably one or two more questions and then we'll wrap up this interview.
Thank you so much, everyone, for joining us for this episode of Blood Money on the America Happens Network.
While we got a little gap in time here, definitely make sure you check out AmericaHappens.com.
All of our shows, including Conspiracy Truths with Mindy Robinson, we launched a new show called HN News Live about three months ago, where two times a week on Tuesdays and Thursdays, we go live with independent journalists all around the country.
And Corinne Clifford does that show.
She reports to us what's happening in the gulags in Washington, D.C. She's one of the few reporters that's covering this stuff in detail and does a fantastic job.
Has personal relationships with a lot of the, essentially, the political prisoners out in Washington, D.C. So we do that show.
Also, you know, Blood Money with yours truly.
The Daily Devotions with LW, our morning prayer series.
Make sure you check that out.
Great way to start the morning with prayer.
And it looks like Juan is back here.
Juan! I apologize to all your listeners there.
It's a pain in the neck, but your particular platform is one of those ones.
Yeah, everybody hung out.
It's everybody hung out. Nobody left.
So, in fact, it looks like we have five more people.
Well, then thank you to all of them for being gentlemen.
And so, yeah.
Anyway, you know, the important thing that I think people have to remember in all of these conversations is there's a political class That believes that we need to be managed by them.
And that we're the unwashed masses.
We didn't get the right education at the right school.
We don't have the right bloodline.
Whatever way you want to put it, they believe that they should be managing us.
And we have to push back against that elitism.
Uh, and let them know that, uh, that is absolutely not going to be the way it works.
Is it going to be simple?
No. Will they roll over easily just because of a little pushback?
No, because they are so, uh, have such a fetal feeling of entitlement, uh, that, uh, you know, you're going to have to kick them in the ass.
It's going to have to sting a bit.
It's going to have to leave a mark.
To get them to back off some of these positions and at this point in history the one that is the full court press that's coming and it's really being run out of those fucking Brits with all sorts of crowds around them and the banking operations there in the City of London the one square mile is going to be around this climate change initiative it's been in play for decades and decades and decades But it's all coming
to a head. And then everything that is dangerous and evil that your audience can imagine, including chipping children, is tied to that.
You know, one of the people that came back from this UN meeting the other day First thing he did is he's talking to the locals.
Well, and we're going to have to start putting the chips in the children so that nobody can abduct them and we can't find them.
Wow. Okay?
Really. But it's related to the climate change because we need to know where people are and how much resources they're using and what they might be emitting carbon-wise so that everybody can get their fair share.
Wow. And that's just the way it has to be, okay?
And everybody has to start to understand that.
And we start with the children.
Yeah, we'll start with your kid, buddy.
Yeah. Okay? You have got to understand the nature of the way these people think.
They want to manage everybody else.
They can't even manage their own life.
They're going to manage you? Yeah.
You kidding me? Yeah.
It's crazy. Let me ask you, in terms of, you know, what's happening in England, I'm not sure if you're paying attention to some of the stuff with, you know, people are tearing down these cameras that they're putting up all over the place.
Oh, yeah, I know all about that.
Oh, my God. I mean, that seems, that kind of, I guess, protest seems to be working really well because it seems to be slipping down their, you know, out of their fingertips right now in terms of what they want to do to London.
Well... At least they're resisting.
But, you know, I think that's an object lesson for us here.
The problem in England, you know, that's the most heavily surveilled country in the world.
City of London, oh my gosh, it's insane.
So you probably, a lot of your people saw the guy with the dump truck, decided that he'd had enough the other day.
And the police barricaded off the street so nobody would leave with their cars and no cars would come in.
to reduce carbon emissions because they have certain days that you just can't drive to keep the carbon emissions down in the city.
Now, here's part of the whole point.
They got emissions test stations all over the area there.
Anybody that lives in Southern California knows that if the air gets a little bit full of emissions and like that, a little rain comes through, it's all gone, and you're on with life.
No biggie. England is a kind of a rainy, foggy, misty, dewy place.
That stuff doesn't stay in the air very long, and it doesn't get time to build up.
Like we get in some of these other places.
And in London, it's not like it's sitting in some, you know, New Orleans or something like that, where it's a low-level, you know, area that just hunkers down.
They get an air inversion and it just stays there for days and days and days.
It just doesn't happen in England.
It's an excuse to control and choke down the population.
And they're trying to create a scenario where You don't want to have a car because it's just too expensive.
You know, I was in Germany the other day and talking with some folks.
It costs $4,000 for the permit to get a license in Germany.
Oh, wow. When you go to get your car and then get the insurance and then the gas, you know, we were kidding about it.
To fill up my truck here in the States might cost me $150.
To fill up my truck, you know, a 30-gallon gas tank or the Bentley or something with premium or something like that, to fill it up over in Germany, Would cost $1,500 or more dollars for the same vehicle.
Wow. Because they don't want you to drive.
Now they give breaks to businesses who have commercial vehicles and they're transporting goods, so they have to pay the price up front, but then they get all sorts of government tax breaks because of various things.
But it's all tax money.
That huge price isn't because the gas costs more there, the diesel costs more there.
It's because of the taxes, because they don't want you to drive.
And Europe is really not even comparable with the US. Look at California.
We drive long distances to go do basic things.
If you have farm country, one of the people that I know wanted to buy a Tesla truck to use on the farm.
But you have to have a second truck to go do any of the heavy lifting.
That was just a truck for lightweight stuff.
Even a few bales of hay and you got a problem if you're going more than just a few miles.
It just uses it up. They did a test with one of the electric trucks here last spring.
And they wanted to tow a light farm tractor, not a heavy tractor, just one of the light tractors, between a couple of locations where they have just farms.
A lot of times you'll have a piece of land here, a piece of land there, a piece of land somewhere else.
And you might have to drive 10, 15 miles between the different locations.
They had a circuit that was about 40 miles.
They needed to run with this light farm tractor to do some stuff.
And the electric truck, at the end of the 40 miles, it was going like 20 miles an hour.
It was almost out of juice. They couldn't get it back and didn't have a fuel gas variation.
It was just total electric, you know, an electric gas variation.
If you had an electric motor and you got the A gas motor and you can do both.
Well, you know, maybe you could make a case for it.
But even there, Toyota, I had a VP over at Toyota years ago, was willing to get me an insider deal on any of their vehicles that I wanted.
And so I said, well, I'll take one of the high-end SUVs that's a hybrid.
And he says, well, you don't want to do that.
I said, why not? I mean, it's, you know, it's cool.
He says, no, no, no, no, no.
They're way more expensive to own.
They have to have way more maintenance than the regular gas.
And the mileage isn't as great because you're dragging all those batteries around everywhere.
If you want to get one, just get the gas one.
Let everybody else make a big show.
I says, even after you weigh in the tax credits, he says, oh yeah, even then, it doesn't make sense.
So, I mean, that was a VP at Toyota here in the U.S., down in Plano.
So, you figure it out.
If he knows that it doesn't pencil, he says, nobody here is doing that.
Don't waste your time. Yeah.
Think about that. Yeah, yeah, totally.
Juan, this has been amazing, man.
Thank you so much for coming down on our Blood Money Podcast.
Is there anything in closing that you want to talk about, mention?
You know, the mic is yours. Yeah.
Look, I know a lot of people are getting frustrated because they don't see Or believe that we're winning and they haven't seen what they think is the right punch back.
It doesn't seem like we're doing anything to win back the day or something.
That just isn't true.
We are gaining ground daily in the most important area of all.
You asked me about Jan Halper.
I didn't really finish that question earlier.
The thing about Jan and the work that she's doing, you have to have public opinion on your side.
You have to have the numbers to win in what we're doing.
This period of time, think of the last couple of years, how much has happened and how much the public has gotten the chance to see How the people behind Biden and others, these globalists, would govern if they were given free reign to just go all the way.
You may understand the problem.
And many of your listeners, I know, were talking to the choir.
But the reality is, they have friends, neighbors, relatives, etc., that are only just now...
Beginning to kind of grasp it.
One of the contacts I had just in the last couple days was a person that was very liberal and had relatives with property there in Lahaina.
And all of a sudden, literally, just in the last two weeks, this person's never voted anything but Democrat his whole life.
It was like the scales fell from his eyes.
And he said, you know, I've thought about this a bunch of times, I've seen it, but I just didn't want to believe it.
I can't unsee it now.
I see what's going on here.
And he said, you know, I never want to talk to any of these people again.
I'm so mad.
I'm so livid.
Because it's obvious that they're just totally opportunist.
They're here to steal anything that they can.
And they're disingenuous.
He was very eloquent in the way that he articulated his attitude.
You know, when people...
You know, not everybody wakes up at the same time.
If you're awake, if your audience is awake...
No.
No. Twice we've been cut off right when he's about to say something really cool and inspiring.
Let's see here if we can get him back one last time to wrap this up.
Now I'm going to voicemail.
I see you're right, Gypsy Spirit.
Oh, oh, yep. Oh, but no, this has all been really great information.
Again, thank you for the viewers out there for joining us for this episode.
And, you know, one of the things I highly recommend, actually, is some of the concepts that Juan has been talking about.
We've really covered well with some of the Blood Money episodes we've done with Lady by name of Catherine Hine.
Who talks about the legal aspect of all this, how legally we've all been conned into accepting certain things, accepting certain realities that are not supposed to be part of our Constitution, not supposed to be part of common law, and really teaches how to get out of that system, how to build alternate systems like building courts, common law courts, and that sort of thing.
Looks like Juan's back.
Alright, one sec here.
So anyway, highly recommend you guys check out the Blood Money episodes of Katherine Hine.
I think we've done three of them thus far.
Shouldn't be hard to search on our channel.
Just look for Katherine Hine.
That's H-I-N-E, Katherine with a K. Juan, how you doing?
Hey, I apologize on that.
The thing I was saying is just be willing to have some grace.
That God bless you if God woke you up early, you understand what's going on, people in your audience.
Just understand that not everybody wakes up at the same time, not everybody sees things in the same way.
We're not going to get to 100%.
Some people are just never going to get it, if you will.
But if you're one of those ones that understands the situation now, Let's leave room for others to come to the parade, grasp what's going on, and come to our side.
You know, that's just part of life, you know Yeah One that's awesome very wise words and And, you know, we can only hope that, you know, people start, you know, converting.
And, you know, people have, you know, I've seen a lot myself that are realizing what's been going on.
Unfortunately, a lot of them because of, you know, catastrophes and bad things that happen and bad things that happen, like getting myocarditis from these jabs or, you know, falling into depression because of lockdowns and things like that.
But, you know, fortunately, people are starting to come to our side.
But Juan, thank you so much for coming on to our Blood Money podcast.
We really appreciate it. And beautiful sunset, by the way, right there.
Oh, isn't that something else?
You know, I first came over here to the islands in the early 60s.
And I've lived here intermittently over the years many times.
And it's spectacular.
It's a beautiful place in the world.
The one thing I would leave maybe your audience with that I wasn't planning on, but you know what?
What happened here in Hawaii with the way that the federal operation came in and railroaded the islands through a number of things and the various native groups through stuff.
You heard people talking on that little thing you did earlier about the Kingdom of Hawaii.
The reality is that it was similarly done to most all of the western states with the federal lands and like that.
There's all sorts of mischief that was done and they came in and they didn't have equal standing with the eastern states.
But by the time they got to Alaska and Hawaii, they had so perfected the system That they knew what things they had to take out so that the people wouldn't even have a starting place to kind of hold their own.
And we'll be talking about that over the next weeks and months as we start to look at what's possible for Hawaiians, Alaskans, other western states with huge federal holdings in the state and the mischief they've done to make it so that entities That aren't even US government have weight and control over the direction of the lives of the people in these various states.
And then what we're going to have to do to reassert citizen ownership and control, not just of places like this here in Hawaii, but across the globe.
You mentioned the bar and all the mischief done in there.
Yes, because they You're fighting a war against people who use legal constructs, just like the devil himself, to maneuver you into a certain place where you've made agreements,
made concessions, allowed things to happen that If you understood what they were really doing, what the real value was, what the real intent was, you would never in your life agree to it.
And it's like when George Bush Sr.
said at a particular gathering, he said, if the American people ever figured out what we were really doing here, they'd hang us.
Okay? That's what's going on.
Your country's being stolen from you.
One crooked statute and law at a time.
You die in the death of a thousand razor slashes.
We're going to have to go back.
And that includes in the way we conduct our votes.
The way that we allow people to come in and manage our votes and then hold office.
You can't even, you know, remove somebody from office for high crimes and misdemeanors.
You gotta wait till they're done.
You can't even get a court to hear information on vote fraud and theft and stuff like that.
FBI is sitting on huge Files related to Michigan and a dozen other states where companies came in and fraudulently put in supposed voters.
And they have that information and it's being concealed.
You have the Tennessee error where Dominion had to actually put a patch in on the vote machines, but they only did it for five counties when it was nationwide.
Yeah. Okay.
We have lots and lots and lots of things that we need to address.
And your audience is going to be part of that.
We're going to have some fun in doing that.
And then, by the way, if you want to hang tight for just a moment.
Sure. As you see the sun setting there in this beautiful location, in just a moment, they'll be blowing the horn.
So, you know, on my boat...
We get out there in the harbors and like that.
We have a lot of fun. We'll all blow our horns at sunset.
And I always tried to make sure my horn was the loudest.
My business partner on that, we put in the biggest horns you could ever find off of a diesel train.
Air tanks and all that.
We'd have so much fun with that.
The kids would just go crazy across the harbor.
But here in Hawaii, a lot of the tourists and locals, the people that have moved over here from other places.
You little wow
So that's locals doing that every sunset?
uh...
Yes. So they turn to the north, then to the south, then to the east, and then to the west.
And that's part of the local custom that's been here for a thousand years.
Wow. Chill out.
Just seeing that scene, man.
So if we end up getting marooned on Gilligan's Island, they hollow out the seashells.
We'll have to do that so we can do our sunset every day and let everybody on the island know that it's sunset.
That's awesome, man.
This is great. I appreciate it.
I apologize to all of your audience for those breaks.
With this particular platform, I can't block the calls and I really apologize on that.
I hope that They'll overlook that.
But I enjoy, yours is a new audience for me.
I enjoy being here.
If folks have a few questions like that, the next time I'm glad to maybe field a couple of those for you if you want to pull them out.
Yeah. Look forward to doing this again with you, Dan.
Would love that. Would love that, Juan.
Thank you so much. And I appreciate you being willing to come on again.
We got so many more questions.
And, you know, let's try to do this again next month or two.
I will do that. Awesome, awesome.
And thank you for the viewers that showed up to this episode of Blood Money.
We really appreciate it. Make sure you check out AmericaHappens.com for all of our shows.
And make sure you consider donating to AmericaHappens.com because we're all crowdfunded.
We do this out of love to reveal the truth of what's going on out there.
There's so much information that the people have to know that we've been kept away from with this Mockingbird Media.
And we are the opposite of the Malkinburg Media.
We want to reveal the truth.
We want to have all conversations be open.
So if you support full freedom of speech, full freedom of press, definitely consider donating to America Happens.
Thank you so much for showing up to this episode of America Happens Blood Money.