All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 1, 2023 - Blood Money
59:40
The Halderman Report and Our Fraudulent Elections w/ Joe Oltmann (Eps112)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, let's get started. Let's go.
So,
How are you doing, sir? So great.
Thanks for having me. Thanks for being on the Blood Money Podcast.
We're very excited to have you on.
You know, let's just dive right into it.
I mean, you know, you're a Christian conservative.
You've been fighting all things tyranny.
Before this interview, we were talking about how, you know, we're in this state of whether you want to call it a battle, whether you want to call it war, I prefer to call it a war, against all things tyranny, right?
We've seen the Trump indictments the last few days.
It seems It seems as though, you know, there's really, you know, two kind of justice systems out there.
One that persecutes people they want to persecute, and another one that protects them.
So, let's kind of talk about the State of the Union.
Where are we at today? You know, as of now, mid-June 2023, and the state of tyranny coming upon our country.
You know, they're really trying to do anything and everything that they can to claw back on what we already know, which is the media, the technology companies.
We have this technocracy that's been created across the country that has minced and melded in with the government structure, the government apparatus.
And so that is allowing them to get away with the things that they're doing in this captured environment.
We saw what happened in 2020.
Forget everything else out that we learned over the last three years.
We saw with our own eyes what actually happened in 2020.
And they wanted to tell us that there's nothing to see here, safest, most secure election in U.S. history.
But this was planned way back when.
They've been stealing elections for a long time, and those stolen elections have created the environment we're in today where we did not elect.
They selected people on both sides of the aisle.
That could follow this kind of establishment rule of law.
And so I think as a State of the Union, we're not in a terrible place because the emperor has no clothes.
But now we're at a fork in the road where we're going to have to make some hard decisions and sacrifices are going to have to be made.
And the evil never crawled back into the hole it came from without force.
And that's not violence.
I didn't say violence. I said force.
And there's a difference between the two.
Otherwise, there'd be no such thing as excessive force.
But we have to apply force to that evil and push it back.
But with a compromised judiciary, a compromised legislative group, obviously we have a compromised executive branch.
And at many levels, we have that same problem on a state level as well.
We are going to have to become the answer to this kind of kabuki theater, this clown world that we're living in in the United States.
All right. I want to throw something out here because you'd mentioned that we have a compromise.
I compromise everything. Let's just say that, right?
It's like pretty much every branch of government's compromise.
Our laws, our statutory laws, there's so much that is compromised, right?
But I bring this up because the fact is we have three branches of government that is supposed to have checks and balances, one against the other, right?
But We have two branches of government, the judiciary and the legislature, that are essentially controlled more or less by the legal societies, aka the Bar Association, right?
We know that the founders of this country wanted to get rid of titles of nobility from the legislature in order for there not to be that conflict of interest, meaning he got rid of the Esquires, aka attorneys, And so you had true checks and balances.
But the fact is right now you have two branches of government, lawyers making laws for lawyers to profit for the bar in these privatized courts and whatever.
So isn't it impossible to have what you're talking about before, and I'm talking about true freedom, true constitutional rights, before that immense conflict of interest that's really crippled our government for, you know, one could argue for the last hundred years or so, In terms of our power, the we the people's power, I mean, how could this problem be solved without solving that problem first?
Well, it's cart horse, chicken egg, right?
We put ourselves in this position by allowing, having that apathy, that apathetic environment where we were comfortable.
And you could talk about that comfort dating back, you know, 100 years, 120 years, 130 years, because the amount of opportunity that we had in this nation has been, it's been unbelievable.
But if we look at it through the lens of Of what we're allowed to do as people.
One of the reasons why we find ourselves in the place that we're in today is that we keep asking permission.
We keep going back to the well and saying, we're going to ask the courts for permission.
I don't ask the courts for anything.
I ask them for nothing. I stay within what the law states I have to do, not what some sort of person in some obscure position of power tells me.
And by the way, I've done this throughout my entire life.
They've always put these rails on me to say, that's not possible.
You're not allowed to do this. You can't do that.
And I'm always like, why? Why can't I? And as people, we're always saying that we go to teachers, what is it called?
School board meetings. And we plead with them to do the right thing.
No, no, no. We don't have to plead with anybody.
We don't have to plead with anybody.
We have to set a standard and say, as the people, that we have a voice.
And that is an applied action.
And we don't do that. We're still trying to figure out how we maneuver through some of the things that they build as far as they have this Law that they create or this standard that they create, and you have to apply that, right?
We don't own our own homes.
I mean, let's just get down to the bottom.
We don't own anything. You don't own anything.
You have to pay property tax, so you don't own your house.
You rent it from the government. We've allowed that to happen.
We've allowed them to put their hooks in everything that we are, creating, in essence, servitude, slavery.
Yeah. And so the only way to get past that is to learn the power of the word no, number one.
And number two, apply action, apply force to them.
I will constantly always talk about force.
What is force? Force is the ability to walk in and say that we were going to be so disruptive in the schools with our children, we're going to allow our children to have a voice.
Now, we've told of the kids up to this point, ah, you know what?
I'll let you wear the shirt, Johnny.
But when you're done wearing the shirt and they kick you out of school, I'm going to come home.
I'm going to get on the news. I'm going to talk about it.
And then that's the end. We stood up.
We did our part. Well, children today feel like they've been abandoned by adults, right?
Because we keep trying to play by their rules and expecting that somewhere along the line, we're going to be able to break down the constructs of the Bar Association, break down the constructs of the unity or the collaboration that's happening between the legislative branch and the judiciary.
But you can't do that without forced intervention.
Forced intervention does not mean, again, we have to be really careful because they'll say, oh, you're being violent.
We're so afraid to actually unify on the street because they'll use the word insurrection.
So they are literally tying us with a string to a fence that's not even on the ground to our ankle saying we can't do anything because they'll get on the news and say that we're insurrectionists.
Well, who the hell cares?
Who cares if they call us insurrectionists?
It's not true. All you gotta do is call them what they are, liars.
But at the end of the day, we have to empower people in positions where they can get out there and say, no, no, no, we're not doing it.
And that does not mean take your kids out of school.
That means create an environment where the kids can fight back.
By the way, you saw that strategy that I'm talking about right now that has played out in one of the middle schools.
A middle school! They had 70% of the schools say we're not wearing pride.
They'd show up in black shirts and or American flag shirts, and they were taking the stickers, throwing them on the ground, stepping on them, saying, I'm not doing this pride stuff.
No. You want to have pride?
Great. But this is school.
Math, science, English, social studies, history, civics.
That's what we should be learning in school.
Half of these people can't even learn, but they're being told that a pride flag is what we have to worship.
Uh-uh. It's crazy.
It's crazy. Yeah, totally.
I mean, you know, what do you think about the state of where we are currently going after a lot of resistance?
There are a lot of people like you and, you know, us independent media folks, independent voices going out there, you know, telling the truth.
I mean, we've been at it for like three years at this point.
I mean, is the work that we have done thus far and we continue Continue to do in terms of trying to inform people out there about what's really going on.
Is that bearing fruit at this point?
Is there a turning of the tide, you think, coming down the pipeline?
All right. So the thing that leads us to a place of violence in history, no matter if you're talking about in the Roman times, if you're talking about even back in the, if you go to 3000 BC over in Indochina, right? The thing that breaks down and gets people to a place of absolute violence is hopelessness.
Do you believe we're at a place of hopelessness?
I think we're getting there.
It depends on, you know, society's so fractured that I think if you're on probably our side of the aisle, you know, and what I mean by our side of the aisle is not necessarily right or republic, and I'm talking about in terms of our knowledge about how bad it is out there.
Arizona, what happened, you know, what's happening to Tina Peters, you know, in Colorado, like, you know, the extent of the tyranny, you can become hopeless if you have the degree of information that you and I have.
Yeah, so let's talk about hopelessness as a describer of where we are, though.
I mean, as far as, are we to the point of no return?
I mean, have they really taken away everything from us?
Or are they in the permissive use stage?
I mean, remember, pre-2020, we couldn't see a lot of the things that they were doing.
We didn't see what they were doing in our schools, couldn't figure out why our kids were coming home radically left.
But we sent them to school and we told them this.
Here's what we said. Listen to your teachers.
Follow what your teachers tell you to do.
We did that. So we created this conflict in the minds of our children and then we didn't check up on them.
I'm not saying that everyone didn't.
My kids didn't. Because my kids came home and said, hey, Dad, we got this new thing called Common Core Math.
Can you help me with it? And I looked at it and I was like, no, we're not doing this.
I went into the school and I was like, we're not doing Common Core Math.
This is absurd. This is ridiculous.
And I was able to get rid of Common Core Math inside of my kids' school.
Why? Because I cared enough to say that we're not doing this.
If any of these parents can actually show me why this math of rounding up, rounding down, running around, tapping on your chest, rubbing on you, doing all that stuff is somehow going to lead to a more intelligent child that when they get into their adulthood, then I'm in for it. But they couldn't.
So we got rid of it. So we allowed all this stuff to happen.
We allowed it to happen, but in three years' time, now they're asking permission and we're fighting back.
Drag shows weren't like a norm.
They did that over the last three years.
It wasn't something that happened in schools and in churches.
Churches have showed their true color, too.
You have people that are putting up all sorts of monikers towards stuff that statistically and or from a fact basis doesn't exist.
Systemic racism does not exist.
And that's from a guy, by the way, that's, my dad's black, my mom's white, my whole family's interracial, right?
I've seen racism.
It's not systemic, right?
It's individualistic.
It does happen in pockets.
It does happen in positions of power.
It happens mostly on the white liberal side as they try to do what I call Margaret Sangerisms.
Yeah, exactly. Where they come in and try to do everything they can to hold them down.
Yeah. I could go on for hours.
Oh, no, no. I was hoping you would.
But, you know, you have this beautiful term, American Spring, that I've heard you say, which obviously, you know, harkens back to the Arab Spring, you know, a peaceful revolution of sorts.
I mean, do you think that's actually possible in this country?
I mean, being kind of realistic here, you know, we do have an epidemic of laziness.
We do have an epidemic of apathy.
Could something like that really happen in the United States?
I think it is happening.
You think so? Oh wow. I believe right now That there is an immense amount of fear.
First of all, people are waking up to the idea that the radical left ideology and this ideology that they're pressing on us with World Economic Forum and some of the things that we're hearing from, even the WHO, it's nuts what they're talking about.
And it's not factually based on anything.
So what they did is they skipped over all the facts and went straight to a conclusion.
And they can't back it up with facts because there are no facts that support it.
Support insanity, yep.
So what we have to be able to do in order to win is continue to speak truth, but speak truth in such a way.
And I am a Christian conservative, right?
But by the way, I was in the Middle East during the Arab Spring.
I was in Syria.
I was in Egypt. I was in Saudi Arabia.
I was in Bahrain. I was in Sudan.
I was in Libya.
I was in Somalia.
I was in Kenya. I was in all of these different North African countries and Middle Eastern countries.
And You know what happened where there was violence?
Guess who else was there?
Americans? I hate to say it.
CIA. Yeah, I mean, yeah, yeah, totally.
Infiltrators and stuff, yeah.
Totally. So if we want to have an American spring, we have to work the problem.
Yeah. And apathy is a problem.
It is absolutely a problem. Comfort is a problem.
Selfishness is a problem.
But we don't need a large group of people in order to be successful.
We just have to recognize that those of us that are parents, look, over 50% of our population in the United States did not get a second jab.
Yeah. Over 30% of the population in the United States did not even get jab, period.
Yeah. Which means that we don't lack intelligence.
We just lack the ability to have courage and act in that courage.
But they want to divide us by Democrats and Republicans and independents.
Well, I'm gonna tell you this.
The reason why an American Spring will work is because there is unification happening.
Look, Democrats are not my problem.
Captured apparatuses of government.
That's my problem. That's my enemy.
If it's not pro-American and you stand on the side that's not pro-American, it's pretty easy.
I don't need to have a conversation with you about social issues.
I don't need to have a conversation with you about abortion.
Why? Because I'm a Christian conservative.
I'm always going to fight for the unborn.
Always. Always.
If you feel that abortion is your right, You're welcome to feel that way, but let's not step over bodies trying to figure out if fundamentally we want to protect the interests of Americans.
And they are making everyone in America single-issue voters for a reason, because they don't want to have people have conversations about the complexity of relationships, complexities of community, complexities of what people really want, which is life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
I've never met anybody that doesn't want to have an opportunity at success.
Never met anybody. There's a formula that's happening here, though, that frankly is making our country stupider, right?
And when I say a formula, there's a variety of factors where our IQs are 10 points less than what you're seeing in China.
Our TikToks are basically a brothel, I mean, more or less.
It's like, what is that called?
OnlyFans, you know, part two is what TikTok is.
Their TikTok is doing some really intelligent science experiments, people getting together, figuring out solutions to problems.
How do we fix this?
How do we get out of this mess? How do we raise the intelligence of this country?
Well, you have to start by keeping stuff out of your blood.
You have to stop by. Look, one of the things that I always say is that anti-vaxxers were right long before we even thought they were right.
We thought they were nuts. I thought they were nuts.
And then as I started doing the research, by the way, sorry, I just I'd love to mention Jenny McCarthy and Tom Cruise because they took so much shit for their anti-pharm stances like a decade and a half ago.
I mean, really, like whatever you think about Tom Cruise on some levels, you know, Kudos to him for having had the courage when they're attacking people and trying to destroy people's careers for daring to utter something anti-pharma.
Yeah, and we can trace a lot of things back to pharma and big government.
We can trace a lot of the degradation we have in our society back to what we're putting in our bodies.
I mean, the autism rate is up nearly 2,000%.
And that's just in the last 10 years.
If you go back before that, now you get 20,000%.
It was, you know, two in 100,000.
Now it's 2,000 in every 100,000.
It's a ridiculous number.
Look at MS. Right?
Look at the rate of getting MS and the states by which you get MS, and then you tie that back to consumption of certain vaccines and or certain drugs.
Psychotropic drugs. They've been feeding our kids, trying to get them under control, turning them into zombies.
So that, hey, he's completely out of control.
He has ADHD. They give it a name.
They give it a drug. They alter the mind.
And then they wonder later, as they try to wean them off, why they went crazy.
I can tell you why they went crazy. And we have become one big experiment for our government and for Big Pharma.
And if we want to break that cycle, we've got to stop by getting the drugs out of the hands of our children.
And if we're not willing to do that, then there is no hope.
But if you want to break the cycle, if you want to take away Big Pharma and the government's ability to make us more stupid and more under control, you have to stop the psyops.
And the psyops starts with weakening Just the institution of your mind.
And I believe that that's what they're doing.
And it's not hard to see when people believe in some of the things that they believe in or lack the intelligence to look past the institution or the apparatus of government and not go, they're lying to me.
All you have to do is scratch the surface just below it and you see it.
Mm-hmm. Yeah, yeah.
I mean, if someone were to come to you and say, hey, you know, I realize I've been doing everything wrong and seems like you have better understanding in terms of what to do to better one's condition on all levels.
I mean, what are the steps that you give that person that's really coming out of the darkness looking to you saying, hey, like, how do I how do I change this indoctrination?
How do I get on the right path?
You know, I'm a little bit more patient with people who are what I call basic indoctrination, just don't understand, right?
And a lot of it has to do with, you know, things when they talk about institutional racism or they talk about fascism, when they talk about any of that stuff.
But I have to go back in time and look at what I was when I was 25 years old.
I mean, at 25 years old, I thought Muslims were terrorists.
Why? 9-11.
Pretty simple. On 9-11, they told us that That Muslims are terrorists.
And they followed it up with weapons of mass destruction.
We find out that was false. And then we went over there and we bombed and killed a bunch of people.
And there's things that I didn't fundamentally know.
I didn't know that we went into Iraq in 1996.
We killed over a half a million babies, kids, children.
And Madeline Albright got on TV on 60 Minutes and said it was worth it.
When asked if the casualties, the loss of life prior to 2001 were worth it, she was asking, I think it was.
Killing half a million children now is an acceptable casualty to make sure that the United States has their interests met.
So I thought that through 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, I made comments to people who were Muslim.
I didn't have relationships with people that were Muslim.
I, in essence, was a racist.
Against Muslims. Right?
I mean, Middle Eastern people?
Nope. They were terrorists in my mind.
It took me going to Middle East, spending time in Israel, spending time in these other countries, and understanding that I had a paradigm crash.
And I was like, wait a minute, so everyone's not a terrorist?
And Israelis just want to have peace, but so do all the other countries, but they're not allowed to because you've got people that are stepping right in the middle of it and causing all these wars and conflicts.
And it always better to the betterment of the guy that's sitting in the legislative seat or sitting in the executive seat.
It never benefits the people.
And then I got to see under the covers.
And so I had paradigm crashes.
I had crashes where I understood the complexities of what was happening in many of the countries in Africa.
But nobody knows that because they didn't spend any time there.
I spent six and a half years there.
Solving really big problems and building relationships with people within that region, only to come back to the United States and still have to then be a talking head and talk to people about what was really happening in the Middle East.
Why were we in Syria? Why were we in Egypt?
Why are we in messing up what's happening in Libya?
Why do we do what we did in Iraq or Afghanistan?
Why do we kill and hurt so many people in so many different countries or across the world?
So, and again, I'm not anti-American.
I just don't think as people, I think we're very naive.
We're naive as people.
We like to look at the greater good.
We think that we're pursuing the greater good while people in positions of power are wreaking havoc with impunity all over the world.
And so I think that there is a place where people can get out of that kind of fixation into some of the idiocies that we've experienced today.
But it's going to take us having dialogue and, frankly, hard conversations.
But it's happening. People are waking up.
No. I mean, if you look at it like from a media perspective, I find it very interesting because in the 1970s, and this stuff's not really hard to access, right?
Look at any newscast in the 1970s.
They're very adamant in terms of the anchors via Mockingbird Media to report about foreigners and the threat of foreigners.
And without distinguishing what a foreigner meant, there was definitely extreme, extreme Energy put into making sure that that foreigner word was out there.
I remember because I was watching some archival footage of the 1970s news broadcast for a documentary I was working on and saw that to be a through line, right?
Then in the 80s, it was the Arabs.
Arabs terrorists. They started using those together.
You see the movies coming out of during, you know, any time between like the early 80s all the way to the late 90s.
Arabs are always terrorists.
True lies is the one that comes to mind.
But they were, you know, making sure that you understood.
Like, Arab, Middle Eastern equals terrorists, right?
And then 9-11 happens.
And you look at the buildup to this, the propaganda to that moment, and it just makes you really wonder, you know?
It makes you wonder, how are these things?
What is the coincidence there?
There is no coincidence, right?
They wanted to make enemies.
They wanted us... To think, oh, those guys are the enemy, so we could be cool with them going to their wars.
And now, crazy enough, you see those kind of things.
I mean, 10 years after they stopped propagandizing that sort of thing, and you're called a racist.
It's like the culture's quickly turned because now it doesn't fit their benefit to have us all be racists, essentially.
Well, keep in mind, people got stuck in that paradigm of hating Muslims, hating Middle Eastern, hating Arabs.
They got that into their mind.
And so now you're trying to call them racist and they're looking at being, and am I racist?
So there is an internal struggle that is happening with people all over the nation because they fully bake that into the minds of many people about what happened in 9-11.
And then when you get people that stand up there and talk about something happened on 9-11, And now we find out that the CIA was actively involved in the hijackers that ran airplanes into buildings.
You look at it and you go, our government is our enemy.
Our government, this apparatus is out of control.
There's no one at the wheel of the car.
No one. It literally is running itself right into the ground.
And you can see it with the debt.
You can see it with the border. You can see it with the nonsensical decisions that are being made all over the country.
We are being driven into a place where decisions don't make sense.
How do you conceal what most people see?
I'm talking about 9-11, for example.
Building 7, Pentagon.
I've talked to various people that actually know that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, but hundreds of people were there.
There was cleanup crews, but none of this necessarily has really gotten out unless you're really paying attention to certain sources.
Yeah, so, and it's not something that I've spent...
I lost friends in 9-11.
So, and my family's all on the East Coast.
I grew up in Washington, D.C. So, I... It had a more impactful meaning to me when what happened in 9-11.
But, you know, as far as did a rocket hit the Pentagon, did an airplane hit the Pentagon...
Even though I know that our government is so evil, as I read and see all these different stories and I try to make sense of it, like how did Building 7 fall?
It looks like it was controlled detonation.
And I say to myself, man, I hope it's not true.
I hope it's not true. I hope it's not true.
I hope that they would not actually kill 3,300 Americans or people Because they wanted to create private wars all over the world.
I hope it's not true. I hope it's not true.
But you look at what happened with JFK. You look at what happened with our big pharma and the things that they've swept under the rug.
You look at what's happened inside of the apparatus of our government and how much money that they've actually sent to foreign entities around the world in order to fund these black operations.
You look at what happened in Benghazi and nothing is off the table anymore.
Yeah, everything is possible.
Where do you tend to lean towards?
On the building falling down?
On the idea that our government, you know, and I hate to say the word government, by the way, because legal friends always remind me government is an inanimate object, right?
You can't overthrow government.
Government can't have emotions.
You know what I mean? It's the people within government.
So would there be individuals so callous enough to do something like that within our government?
You think that's an actual possibility?
Man, I think it's not only a possibility, they do it every single day.
Every day, they think of ways that they can create chaos and hurt and kill with impunity people around the world.
If that's not true, why did they...
Why did they fund gain and function over in a lab in Wuhan, China?
Why was our election systems actually run out of a Serbian systems built by Serbian coders?
Why couldn't they be American? Why is the data center that runs Dominion Voting Systems the main data center over in a foreign country?
I mean, I could keep going.
I mean, I could literally go on and on and on and on and on.
Why is our border open? Why is there 86,000 children that have disappeared that they can't track that went into the United States?
86,000 children since the start of the Biden administration that have disappeared.
How does that happen?
We're talking to Troy Brewer yesterday.
He said he's been down in a border, and the cheapest child he's ever been offered, I think, was $50 or $60 for a girl, and the person, an eight-year-old girl, and the person selling the girl said that, oh, you could make movies with this child.
Movies, right? Eight-year-old child, you know, $60.
I mean, it's like... This is what's going on.
This is what's going on out there.
I mean, it's pretty bad. And the crazy thing is there's people in our government that are very well aware this is happening.
There's people in our society that are sick enough to buy that child.
And I got to tell you something else.
You want to drive me to violence?
Hurt a child. I mean, that person is selling that child for $60.
And look, they say it all the time.
They're like, Joe is super serious.
Here's what I'm serious about.
I'm serious about the fact that if you're sick enough to hurt a child, everything is off the table.
There's no morals, no ethics.
You have nothing that you can stand on.
You can't even talk. You can't even have a conversation with me about the fact that you know the difference between right and wrong.
Because you've already started the conversation with the devil.
And I'm not interested. Yeah.
That's the person I would just drag behind the car to a body parts fell off.
And you can say, Joe, that's violent.
It's it's a this is a child.
Mm hmm. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. There's a it's funny.
As you're talking, I'm remembering that movie.
You remember Matt on the fire with Denzel Washington?
Oh, yeah, yeah. Where he sticks the dynamite up the guy's butt.
I mean, I don't know, dude.
Yeah, you think about some crazy, it's funny because I was even watching something about Chris Pratt talking about like, there's crazy thoughts when you think about child abuse and child, you know, the horrible things, especially if it's your children.
You know, some crazy thoughts come to mind, even to very sane people, you know.
Dominion Voting Machine, you've been involved in that whole mess of a situation.
I saw an interview with you talking about how even though these lawsuits haven't necessarily been going the way we want them to go, there's a lot that's come out that has been an evolution and allowed us to essentially get to a point where maybe we could see the forest through the trees in terms of reversing all this madness and getting our voting machines to be trustworthy again.
Well, on our podcast, Conservative Daily Podcast, we took a USB drive and were able to reverse votes without even touching the machine.
Wow. Without even touching it.
The Holderman Report, which has been tied up in the curling lawsuit down in Georgia.
Should I bring that up, by the way, or should I bring that up as your call?
Yeah, absolutely. This is Coalition for Good Governance has a good overview on that.
And then we actually have the actual document.
So that's the actual findings.
And what's interesting if you look at this and you look at the principal findings in this is that 1.1 says this.
I show that the ICX suffers from critical vulnerabilities that can be exploited to subvert all of its security mechanisms, including user authentication, data integrity protection, access control, privilege separation, audit logs, protective counters, hash validation, and external firmware validation.
I demonstrate these vulnerabilities provide multiple routes by which attackers can install malicious software on Georgia's BMDs.
Either with temporary physical access or remote from electronic management systems, EMS. I explain how such malware can alter votes while subverting all the procedural protections practiced by the state, including accepting testing, hash validation, logic and accuracy testing, external firmware validation, and risk-limited audits.
The most serious vulnerabilities discovered include the following.
Attackers can alter the QR codes.
They can update the Georgia, the software updated that Georgia installed in October 2020, left Georgia's BMDs in a state where anyone can install malware with only brief physical access to the machines.
I show the problem could potentially be exploited in the polling place by even non-technical voters.
I mean, this is crazy.
Attacks can forge or manipulate the smart cards that the ICX uses to authenticate technicians, poll workers and voters.
Basically, from the laundry list that you've just read, it's kind of like you could do whatever the fuck you want with these machines.
Excuse me. Whatever you want. Whatever you want, guys.
And look, they told us for the last three years, safest, most secure election in U.S. history.
They did fact checks on the guy that drove ballots from New York down into on voting night.
Down into Pennsylvania.
They lied and said there's no evidence to show that that even exists.
They had a pipe that they said burst in Georgia, so they had to shut down voting, not recognizing that that same strategy was being used in multiple states across the country.
And we found out it was a leaky toilet.
We saw people put votes through machines over and over and over again.
And as you go through it, It starts talking about the ICP scanners.
And look, all the things that we saw, we know for a fact that they were not just compromised.
They were compromised and they had a coup in 2020.
And there are not just illegitimate people that are elected at the highest office.
We're talking about illegitimate people on the state level because of these systems.
And I was on that call.
I'm going to say this again. I'll keep saying it.
My opinion is not the opinion of you because I know they like to attack people and sue people.
Eric Coomer was on that call with Antifa saying, hey, look, look, don't worry about it.
Trump's not going to win. I made sure of it.
He used the F word, F-ing sure of it.
Listen, this was on the 6th of November.
That was in September.
I had that in October before the election.
I was on a video.
I was on a video literally saying I infiltrated Antifa.
I'm coming for the journalist.
And to make matters worse, Eric Coomer was one of the people that was giving statements to the media.
Back pre-2020 election and post-2020 election, and he took all of those down.
He had the AP News take down his comments.
Everyone took down everything related to Eric Coomer.
Everyone took it all down.
So why do you do that if you're telling the truth?
You don't. You don't change history.
You don't remove things.
Eric Coomer at Dominion Voting Systems, this just says right here, these are all the things that can be done.
You don't need any of that if you got a guy on the inside that's willing to make, who's also a radical leftist, who's willing to take it upon himself to make sure that President Trump does not win that election.
And all this stuff that you see in this, This is embarrassing that we're even at the place right now where we're even having a conversation on whether or not there was legitimacy in 2020, 2022, or possibly 2024, because this proves without a doubt that we do not have a system that allows for legitimate elections to happen in our government and in our country.
Yeah. And I'm scrolling through this just so the viewer could see the depth of this Halderman report, right?
So this Halderman report is obviously to inspect, you know, talk about these Dominion voting machines.
And we saw picture after picture of ways that somebody could easily break into these systems.
And we're just glancing through the 96-page report we're on.
Page 58, and we've already seen so many things that, like, bring in the question that these machines are not safe, you know?
You know what was the smoking gun for me, Joe?
Was watching the documentary Selection Code, right?
One of the individuals brought up a question saying that if you really wanted to create accurate voting software or accurate voting algorithm, it would be the most simplest thing that a six-year-old programmer could do because all you're doing is you're looking for the easiest and most accurate way of acknowledging that somebody's filled in a box.
Right. And the fact that they made it so complex that there's this and that and updates and this, I mean, where there's so many places that fraud could happen, fraudulent updates could be inserted, that alone shows that their intent is not to do something clean and effective because if they wanted to do that, that would be the most simplest algorithm that one could write.
Well, and let me ask you a question.
What is this system responsible for doing?
Doing what exactly? Mm-hmm.
It's counting. Counting.
Yep, exactly. All right. And they're like, well, we have multiple races.
It's you're counting multiple things.
And I'm like, all right, but what is it doing?
Fundamentally, what is it supposed to do?
It's supposed to count.
It's doing something that, to be honest with you, like a VIC-20 from 1982 could do.
Counting is the most simplest thing for a computer to do, really.
And as you look through this, you can't...
There's demonstrations in here.
This is a redacted version. So you don't even have access to the whole thing.
They've redacted so many things related to Dominion voting systems.
Now, this is the same guy, by the way, who now because the radical left has used all these apparatuses and all of these tools in order to secure and steal elections.
This is a guy that then comes out and says, ah, there's no way Coomer could have been on that call.
There's no way. And now is an expert in every field across the board when it comes to anything having to do with voting machines.
And so he's standing on one side, wrote this report, and now he has to stand on the other side and be like, I need to be quiet.
Because as I speak, I am literally breaking down fundamentally every argument that the radical left has that we are in a safe and secure election.
And by the way, you know that they have captured on the establishment and that the radical left are two wings of the same bird.
You know that's the case when they parrot the same words.
Yeah, yeah, totally.
There's this other document here.
Do you want me to show this, the Halderman report on voting systems, vulnerabilities unsealed by federal court?
Yeah, so that is the press release.
And this goes through, and this is the Coalition for Good Governance organization plaintiff has a long-running voting rights lawsuit for which Dr.
Halderman's expert report was prepared for the curling plaintiffs.
As it goes through it, it actually, if you get a chance to read this, it's unbelievable.
It was a previously sealed technical report and supplemented by Dr.
Haldeman's reader-friendly overview, which explains how would-be attackers can plant, vote, stealing, or election-disrupting malware.
Listen, the part of this report that is not in this report, sources have told me that the stuff that's not in here goes through the fundamental ability of dominion itself.
to make fundamental changes to the voting.
As this moves from those USB drives up to CITL, up to Edison, and then reported to the American people, I would ask you the one question is, why do I need four people to run through four systems in order for it to tell me what the vote is?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, totally.
Again, we get to the fact that in the complexity, and we see this across all of our industrial complexes, right?
The law is very simple, but in complexity is where they introduce the fraud.
The idea of paying your taxes and the tax code should be very simple, but the fraud is introduced through the complexity of it all.
And it's the same thing over here.
This should be the most simplest Software simplest execution?
I mean, it's counting stuff.
It's counting stuff. It ain't figuring out nuclear calculations and stuff.
It's just counting boxes.
How hard could it be? Well, I think that's the thing that we have to look at, right?
I mean, don't we don't we have to look at with a and can't the reason why, you know, that they're stealing everything is because they can't have a conversation.
Yeah, they won't discuss it.
They won't debate it. They go straight to dog whistles.
They go to, you know, conspiracy theorists and election deniers and just make up.
And I'm a hateful guy because I want to take pedophiles and put them in a wood chipper.
No, I'm not. I'm a guy that believes in accountability.
Put one guy in a wood chipper.
Guess what? All the rest might decide to toe the line and not go after children.
You talk about, you know, having compassion for people at the at the border and doing all those things.
I can have compassion for people at the border and still want to protect my brothers and sisters, American brothers and sisters.
Right? Exactly. Yeah.
We know that they don't have a fundamental Argument.
Because they bypass all the facts to get to a conclusion, and then they just use dog whistles.
That's it. Yeah. Is this, I mean, do you think this is that they've been trained this way?
This has been how they taught to behave?
Do you think this is another option I want to throw out?
Do you think this is indicative of the, you know, falling apart of the family, right?
People that, you know, come from broken homes, Having, you know, different mindsets about society.
Definitely there seems to be a big attack on masculinity, attack on fathers.
That seems to be part of, you know, people that come from that kind of, you know, experience seem to also, you know, think men are bad and, you know, toxic and that sort of thing.
I mean, where do you think all this is stemming from?
Well, it's a fundamental breakdown of community, right?
And you can say that that fundamental breakdown happens at the family level.
Well, we know that that's the case because, and again, I like to look at symptoms and problems.
We always try to service the symptom and not the problem because it elongates our ability to create chaos.
Chaos favors the op, does not favor the people.
It's fundamental. It's fundamental to everything the government does.
They want to make sure that there's chaos so that they can create the narrative in everything.
It doesn't matter what it is. It could be eating beef or eating crickets.
They want to create enough chaos that they're fundamentally you're always out here trying to figure out what truth is.
Yeah, yeah. But when you look at what happened with the family structure first, you know, a friend of mine used to say this to me.
He goes, Joe, what they try on us first, they will eventually try on you.
Yeah. What he's saying is, is they came to the inner city.
They convinced black and minorities that you have a fundamental right to abortion.
Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood for a reason.
Planned Parenthood was designed to destroy minorities and do it under the guise that we're trying to help you.
What are they doing right now again?
And then you had the school to prison pipeline.
Great society. Right.
You had the welfare system that got implemented.
And then you tell them that the big bad wolf in all of this, the big bad wolf is the white person, right?
And fundamentally, it's always white people that are telling black people or brown people that they want to take away your ability to kill babies.
And then they want to tell you it's your right.
So yes, when you take young men, when you take black men, and you run them from The school, 18 years old, caught with a half ounce of marijuana, and then you make them serve a 10-year sentence.
What do they have?
Mm-hmm. Yeah, and the father's been taken out of the home because financial incentives were given to get rid of the father.
The same thing is happening in all the family courts right now where the mothers literally have financial incentives to lie to get rid of the father.
Sometimes we hear that they're literally told by organizations that you got to get rid of the father in order for X, Y, and Z to happen and there's always some kind of benefit involved.
There's always some kind of financial incentive involved and it's pretty sick.
There seems to be an overall agenda of destruction of the family that Frankly, our government, our courts, they all seem to be a part of it.
And the media. Media as well.
But we can see it.
If we can see it, why is it that we don't trust them at all until we do?
Why is it that they can tell me that this person's bad, this person's bad, right?
They can say all these things.
Guns are bad. They kill all these people.
They put a poster child up of someone killing nine people.
And they don't talk about the fundamental value of where the problem is.
The fact that the kid was on every mass killer who's gone to a school, was on psychotropic drugs.
Every single one of them.
Exactly. Exactly. Yeah. And most of them are coming from single mom homes.
Not every single one, but, you know, a really high percentage, like 90 plus percentage.
But then we feed them violence.
We feed them sexual gratification.
We feed them this thing that does not allow them to align with what natural...
Look, there's natural law for a reason.
We want them to change their gender.
Why do we do this gender fluidity thing?
I mean, think about it. We know that the average suicide rate is 41 times that of anyone else.
So why would we promote something that leads to a 41-time higher suicide rate?
Shouldn't we be trying to convince them that that's not the thing to do?
But they're feeding them psychotropic drugs and then telling them that you can go be a pink unicorn or you can be a cat.
And they're forcing schools to put litter boxes into schools to accommodate a cat.
See what I mean? We know, as people, how to solve the problem.
We don't have the courage.
We don't have the ability to withstand it and be willing to make the sacrifices that are necessary in order to learn the power of the word no.
And that's a very powerful word.
And when we learn it, when we finally get to the place where the hopelessness sets in, man, those that sit on the fence are going to be run over like bulls.
And those people that are on the radical left, man, I don't want to...
I pray it never gets to the point where it goes violent because they have a zero chance of being successful in this kind of reset of societal norms.
Yeah. To be somebody that lived through a civil war, I mean, I was born out in Toronto, grew up in L.A., but in the middle of that whole thing, I actually went to Lebanon and saw civil war for a couple of years as a really young man.
And I got to tell you, I mean, violence is, once it gets to that level, I'm just really scared because, That is not an optimal solution.
In my opinion, the optimal solution is really trying to change the system, get rid of, you know, the bad people, parallel systems, perhaps.
But it's a tough one because you actually, like you said, you know, you see the hopelessness out there.
And, you know, what happens if there is hopelessness plus food shortage?
In my experience, what happens, this is literal, by the way.
The entire world could flip like a coin within, you know, they say 24 hours.
Some people say 72 hours.
I say 12 hours.
You have the right criteria in there.
The entire world could flip in 12 hours.
You know, that's a fact. And that's something to be cognizant of because I don't know.
I mean, What does that look like?
What does that look like to you, Joe?
Do you think that is something that takes generations to overcome, years?
Is it a quick thing? What does that whole situation look like?
We've been testing war and destruction in that flip of 12 hours.
We've been testing it all over the world.
And it's not a mistake that we're at the lowest point in U.S. history for not only intelligence, but just the ability to decipher truth from a lie.
Like, we're the lowest point that we've ever been, right?
But we're not divided.
We just, we're actually, 90% of us probably think the same way.
But the media paints a picture.
You ever seen The Wizard of Oz? Yeah, yeah.
So the Wizard of Oz, it's always a wizard behind the curtain.
It's you must do this, right?
Well, that's the media.
The media is telling us what they think people, they have all these surveys.
You don't think that they know who's going to vote one way or another on a survey and have a thousand people that they can actually dictate what the survey is.
And if surveys were so great and so honest, And then how did President Trump win in 2016 when he had a 1% chance of winning?
It's all kabuki theater.
And I'm glad you said Lebanon because I met with Prime Minister Omert way back when, and I met with Mohammed Hussein Fallallah, the head of the Hezbollah.
I got a chance to sit in a room with him, and he's one of the top three, they said, terrorists around the world.
And, you know, I guess I see him differently.
I see him differently because I got to look into his eyes and have a conversation with a man that, frankly, is...
I mean, you might have a different opinion.
I'm just telling you, you might have a different opinion, but I'm going to tell you, we have caused more conflict amongst the Abrahamic faiths, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, by creating environments that don't exist than should ever be imaginable.
Yeah, yeah. You know, being of both, you know, Armenian and Greek descent, you know, there's that famous saying, one man's freedom fighter is another person's terrorist.
And that would qualify, you know, interestingly enough, you're not going to believe this, but Hezbollah once kidnapped my dad, let him go, by the way, let him go, which is very interesting, because the reason he was ultimately let go is one of his Students turned out to be one of his kidnappers and he didn't know like they thought, you know, he had a bunch of passports with him because we realized things were getting pretty bad.
So we're getting ready to, you know, escape back to the West and stuff, you know.
And, you know, they thought he was, like, essentially a Mossad spy, and then eventually he was let go and stuff.
But it's very interesting because it's really about your perspective on things, you know?
And, like, people say another thing, right?
They say, you know, white supremacy, this, that is an Armenian, right?
And Armenians are traditionally blonde hair, blue eyes, you know, through a lot of mixing and rape that changed.
You know, I'm more on the white side, you know?
We came from a part of the world where essentially the people that were the subjugators of the Armenian people, the Greek people, were brown people more or less, right?
They were from, they originated from the Mongol tribes, you know, mixing with a lot of races along the way.
And ultimately what they look like is very darker skin, almost Arabic features with, you know, Mongolian features.
Right? And so the point I'm trying to make is, as light-skinned individuals, right, our supremacists, our destroyers, we're brown supremacists.
So when you take this kind of global view of the world, as opposed to what happened in a very short period of time in the United States of America, it's very, like, the supremacists come in all shapes, sizes, forms, and in fact, Slavery in the Muslim-Arabic community is higher than it's ever been in history, you know, and much more higher than American slavery ever was, right?
And these are essentially brown people, and what are their slaves of choices?
If you really research it, they prefer to have white slaves and lighter-skinned slaves, right?
So, I mean, I don't know.
Just once you have a global perspective, it really changes your, you know, any viewpoint, just focus on America as a myopic viewpoint.
If you want to really have an umbrella viewpoint, it's hard to have, oh, this person's racist, white supremacy, whatever, because, yeah, maybe white supremacy here for a little drop of time, but, like, what about the ample amount of brown supremacy, Chinese supremacy, you know, you name it, you know?
Absolutely. And frankly, we look at things through, you know, I call it the hillbilly complex.
Because the radical left has a hillbilly complex.
They look at things much like the same way as hillbillies.
Hillbillies don't have any education on real events.
They just make stuff up.
And so does the left.
They're just a bunch of hillbillies.
I mean, they think education came from a book that they sat in some sort of gender studies class.
Somehow that's education.
When the reality of it is education comes when you see, when you hear, when you smell it, when you can actually experience it.
Then you can come back and talk to me and tell me what it is that life's all about or what the global view should be.
Because so often we don't have a global view because...
We have people that do have a global view that want to convince us that that's not the way it is, even though they have seen it, smelled it, and tasted it.
They know. Yeah, yeah, totally, totally.
And it's funny how they fall into these, like, facts are offensive to them, right?
You know, when you look at slavery, for example, there was a lot of African slave traders, there was a lot of black slave traders, you know, some, I've heard much more so than white slave traders, right?
But you tell that to somebody on the left, and they'll go berserk on you, they'll lose their shit, even though it's verifiable with history and documents.
Yeah, but see, facts don't matter.
That's why I said they skip past the facts, go straight to conclusion, because the conclusion is what causes chaos, not the facts.
There's no factual basis behind global warming either.
There's no factual basis.
Oh my gosh, we're going into a drought.
See, it's global warming. And then you have drought cycles.
Anyone that's been in Africa, they're like, oh, they're in a drought.
No. See, drought cycles happen like this because that's the cycle of an organism.
And the planet is an organism, right?
So it's going to react differently depending on what year it is.
But they created a story based on the last 100 years.
And this planet's been around a lot longer than the last 100 years.
And so they have no scientific data and they don't even have a scientific conclusion based on facts that lead them to believe it's really happening.
And if it did, if it was true, we wouldn't be mining cobalt out of mines with 11 year olds in Africa and many parts of the Middle East.
We wouldn't be doing that. And then having coal plants and other things that have to be creating power that then feed into this That's much more intrusive, these electric vehicles.
It's all about money, which means it has to be created in chaos.
Chaos breeds an opportunity, and opportunities do not favor the people.
They favor the ones that are in charge.
Exactly. Exactly. Joe, this has been awesome.
And most especially so with his Halderman report findings.
I think that's absolutely like, I mean, how could anybody say that these machines are safe?
You know, and one of the things I would also mention is you notice that Fox settlement, right?
You know, the trick behind that whole thing of why they did it that way.
Yeah, Vanguard owns BlackRock.
BlackRock owns part of Fox, which owns a part of Dominion.
So it's all one incestuous world and the money just, it basically is money laundering.
That's what it comes down to, money laundering.
So, I mean, that's the one thing I want, the point I want to make to the viewer, because I always try to make the point that news is created in, I mean, because I've seen behind the scenes 20 years and In an entertainment business.
News is traded in PR offices, in lawyer offices.
This is the way it happens.
And that is actually a perfect example of how they came out with a very clever scheme that, hey, we're going to settle.
And all they did is literally funnel money from one company they own to another company that they own.
And growing up in Hollywood, I know all about Hollywood accounting.
That money will just come right back through some kind of clever accounting scheme and nobody will ever know that it happened.
But what was the headline? The headline was they settle, right?
And the fact that they settle then gives them, hey, we're admitting to fault.
We did something wrong.
We defamed you, right?
That's a story they created.
Whereas the real story, which we see in this Halderman report, the news that you're not going to see on blast on CNN, is that, I mean, how would you describe it?
That these, like, these machines have more holes than, like, Billy the Kid victim or something?
Or, like, they look like Bonnie and Clyde after the feds.
I mean, it's literally, you could pretty much, could you play video games on these machines?
That's the question, right?
What else could you do with these machines?
It really is that bad.
It really is that bad.
But this has been a great conversation.
I enjoy being on here.
I'd love to have you on the show and I'd love to do it again.
Awesome. Awesome. Thank you so much.
Thank you so much, Joe. And for the viewers, thank you so much for joining us for this Blood Money episode.
Check out AmericaHappens.com for our latest episodes of all of our podcasts and shows.
And I will see you on the next episode of Blood Money.
▲
Export Selection