Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 30, 2023 - Blood Money

01:29:32

Blood Money Episode 55 w/ Austin Steinbart "World War III is coming and it will destroy America"

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Today we have a very special guest, Mr.
	Austin Steinbart. And this is actually a redo of episode 55 because we had some audio issues.
	It's funny how when you're revealing certain pieces of information, you have these audio issues.
	But it seems like our audio is working fine today.
	So how are you doing, Mr.
	Steinbart? I'm doing great.
	How about you, Veb? I'm doing great.
	I'm doing great. I'm very excited about this episode.
	I know we're going to break down what's happening in the country and in the world right now with this pending potential World War III. And you've provided us with this awesome outline for this episode where you break down how this is a historic recurring theme when, you know, oligarchs start to fall apart.
	They start to encourage these wars.
	So let's just, you know, dive right into it.
	Set us up with, you know, How this all began with World War I, World War II and the financial collapse.
	So I'm trying to help everybody appreciate the geopolitical moment that we're in and the gravity of that geopolitical moment.
	And as a lot of people can see, but not everybody's quite awake to yet, we are at the end of the line as a country.
	And I don't mean to like bum everybody out when I say that, I'm just trying to be realistic here.
	And so if you look at our financial system, we have these banks starting to collapse here, right?
	The Fed with their whiplash rate raising, as has happened in the past, They're going to cause a lot of banks to fail.
	And, you know, the first bank that failed, Silicon Valley Bank, the Fed, the FDIC, the people that are supposed to be insuring, backing that up, don't even have enough money to make those people whole.
	So, this is going to be a giant disaster for us.
	They're going to resort to money printing.
	And it's really bad timing for that because, as a lot of people can see, Many countries are starting to move away from the dollar.
	They don't like what we've been doing in Ukraine.
	And in the past, We have traditionally shook everybody down into doing their national trade, selling, buying their oil in dollars.
	And if anybody tried to step out of line, the CIA would go overthrow their government, do some crazy stuff, kill people.
	And at the moment, so many people are deciding that they're getting away from the dollar that we can't get everybody, right?
	They're kind of deciding, let's all do this at once.
	And nothing has galvanized their results to do that more than this war in Ukraine situation.
	And the reason that's a problem is because if you think about our currency, it's based on nothing, right?
	It's kind of like cryptocurrency in the sense that the value is very arbitrary and that the more people that use it, just like in the same way that when more people started using Bitcoin, the value went up.
	We have that same kind of thing going on with the dollar.
	And so after World War II, we were the winners, we were the big dogs on the block, and we shook everybody down around the world into using the dollars as their reserve currency.
	And what that means is that they buy all of their oil and all of their major goods, and they sell it in dollars.
	So everybody converts to dollars to do that.
	So this artificially boosts the circulation of our money.
	And it's the reason that when our government just prints, you know, these mountains and mountains of cash here, you know, trillions of dollars out of control completely, that we don't have this runaway inflation kind of Weimar Germany or Zimbabwe style.
	But as these other countries move away from the dollar, that will destroy our ability to just print money unlimited without facing, without feeling the consequences of that.
	Wow. Is part of this intentional?
	Because it seems like a no-brainer that you print all this money and you're just belligerent with your financial system that it's going to ultimately lead to a collapse of some kind.
	Yep, so this collapse has been predicted for a while.
	And, you know, if you look at our government, they know that this country is essentially like a dead country walking.
	So a lot of them are there just trying to milk as much corruption out of this dead carcass as they can before shit really hits the fan.
	past how they've dealt with that. And one of the things we talk about on QAtel Pro and throughout some of our stuff is in the past when empires are reaching their end, they make these moves where they try to intentionally pop off a world war because the world war is the only way that they could possibly zero out their debt and reset the financial system without collapsing. So they are actively trying to do this right now.
	They say that, you know, we're supporting Ukraine to fight against Russia.
	But really, we are sending armies of private mercenaries.
	We're sending tons of weapons.
	So, in reality, we are actually at war with Russia.
	And we are barreling towards World War III here, right?
	With all this Russiagate stuff, with all this hatred towards Russia spun up, we have really pushed Russia into better China, right?
	They are much closer allies now than they ever have been in history.
	And they both have areas that they would like to take that the United States does not approve of.
	So, we got ourselves in a situation here where Russia has not been throwing their full effort after Ukraine as of yet.
	And they have been building up now and they're about to start this spring offensive here that's really going to ramp things up and really going to make things on a hair trigger here.
	And it wouldn't be as much of a problem if we didn't have leaders who were going to intentionally try to escalate and try to pop things off here to save themselves financially.
	But I am here to tell you, unfortunately, that is the case.
	And if you look at World War I, same kind of thing happened, right?
	They wanted to reset the board.
	They want to shuffle some countries around.
	And so they set up this war, reset the financial system, the world order after they cleared this thing called the League of Nations.
	And the way they did it was a little too heavy-handed.
	And so they ended up doing another world war.
	And one of the things we talk about is Germany was destroyed after World War I. They had all these crazy terms of their surrender there.
	And there's no way that they could have built themselves up into this industrial powerhouse and been, you know, had way better weapons, been way ahead of everybody without some malicious oligarchs and intelligence agencies putting their fingers on the scale there.
	And if you look at detailed histories of FDR, even stuff that's not conspiracy stuff, stuff that's hard-set history, It would appear, it would be showing that they were building up for a war and essentially expecting that to pop off, despite the fact that that was nowhere near our shores.
	And you'll see that they ignored intelligence about Pearl Harbor and that they kind of allowed this thing to go off because once it did, we were in a position to win it and we were able to reset the world order afterwards with things like the UN, with things like the World Bank, with things like the IMF. And essentially, you know, restructure the economic world order.
	Because, you know, economics is what a lot of these wars are about.
	And you control the economic resources, you control the Borg.
	So, they are barreling us towards this, and it's a big problem because a lot of our dinosaur leaders, they are still operating in a psychological paradigm here of 40 years ago, where China's just a paper tiger.
	They have no ability to threaten us.
	You know, Russia, we're going to beat them, and we're going to wrap things up, and we're going to force themselves to spend themselves in oblivion.
	But this time they're playing with fire and it's not going to work out like they say it is this time.
	And they're being very stupid.
	And so what we're going to do in this show is we are going to give you a DIA style analysis of the players of the lineup of how the board is stacked and be showing you guys How this is, how unbelievably stupid our leaders are being right now and how they are pushing us to the brink of Armageddon as a country.
	And then we're going to talk a little bit about what exactly we could do about that to save ourselves here.
	Yeah, I mean, in a situation like this, obviously, if they're going to try to pop off a world war, they're going to try to get allies, they're going to get people to join the United States in this insane world war.
	I mean, what does that look like?
	So I've provided some maps here.
	And so the first map I want to pull up is BRICS. So this is BRICS before the Ukraine situation.
	BRICS stands for Brazil, India, Russia, China, and South Africa.
	So essentially, these are countries that are major countries, solid populations, solid natural resources, and they are trying to create a competing economic block, a competing economic world order to the United States and Britain-centered one that we have right now.
	And so, you know, as we can see, like the two biggest, most formidable militaries, China and Russia, are now on the same side.
	India, which has a massive, massive population, is on their side.
	And the biggest country in South America that is plush with natural resources is also on their side.
	Wow. So, a lot of people say, oh, the world is united against Russia and this Ukraine thing, and we're just going to get them.
	And they talk about, oh, if China tries to take one, the world will sanction them.
	And, you know, they will just be crushed and they'll have, you know, uprising in their country because they'll get so bad economically.
	I'm here to show you the real facts of that and just how much this war in Ukraine has not united the world in our favor, it's actually aligned them against us.
	So this map you're seeing here, bricks before Ukraine, and now this is bricks after Ukraine.
	Wow. Wow.
	So as you can see, this is quite a change and a bunch of other key, very important countries to the geostrategic picture of the United States are now falling into, they're getting brought into the Chinese and Russia world order orbit.
	And that includes countries such as Saudi Arabia, which is the pillar of our petrodollar, right?
	The fact that they force everyone to buy their oil in dollars is really what helps prop up our money.
	There's countries like Egypt that host the most important geopolitical choke point in the world called the Suez Canal.
	Most of the trade going back and forth between the East and the West goes through that Suez Canal.
	And so controlling Egypt throughout history has been a prime directive of every single empire.
	Every single empire wants to control Egypt because that's like the gateway between the East and the West.
	And controlling that trade is the economic engine that can power empires.
	Wow. We see Turkey on that list.
	We see even Mexico on that list.
	Oh no, right? So a lot of people in the world, a lot of countries in the world, they are very sick of our nonsense and they are moving faster than ever towards a new world order led by China and Russia.
	So huge problem for us.
	So as the spring offensive ramps up, right, I personally am not super worried about China or Russia.
	Especially China, intentionally trying to pop off a war.
	But if we remember back to the Gulf of Tonkin, if we remember a lot of the false flag bases for a lot of the times these other wars have been started, the United States will pretend that they attacked us and that will be such a green light that allows things to go hot.
	And so China, I think they are on a trajectory to surpass us.
	They are drawing tons of people into their economic orbit.
	They have everything to gain by just letting things play out, keeping the peace, letting the United States descend into chaos and kind of like rule itself out on its own.
	But if they are attacked, if there's a false flag, if things go really south in Russia, They will defend themselves, right?
	And we got to not kid ourselves about that.
	And in this presentation, we're going to show you just how much in a good position they are to defend themselves.
	So if things do pop off, if things do go hot, if, say, like what happened in Poland where they said, oh, a missile flew out of the battlefield and went into Poland and now Poland is, you know, hopped up.
	Poland's getting bucked. Poland's trying to declare war.
	Or any other country that is on the borders there.
	That could dramatically escalate things.
	So if we look at the European map here and our NATO allies, We have to be realistic about history, right?
	Before World War II, there was a lot of agreements in writing, right?
	And there was a lot of, oh, I'm your ally, I'm this.
	But the truth is, when the bullets start flying, everything on paper is out the window and countries are operating ruthlessly in their own pragmatic self-interest there.
	So, if we look at this and we're like, oh, all our NATO allies would be on our side.
	Think about it. If you're a country like Latvia, Estonia, Bulgaria, one of these tiny countries right on the border of Eastern Europe, are you really going to be down to have your country be the host of the front lines of the next World War?
	Do you really want your entire country to be flattened in that World War?
	Absolutely not. So a lot of these countries, they joined with NATO because they felt like, oh, you know, this is the big dog on the block, and, you know, worst case scenario, they'll protect us.
	In this case, they would look at the calculus we're about to show here, and they would be like, uh, I know this says this on paper, I know we're supposed to be on your side, but yeah, right, dude, we're out.
	We are out. We're not getting flattened into a world war, and this is not our beef.
	We're not going to do this, right?
	We have no ability to wage this war.
	So a lot of these countries in Eastern Europe, Would surrender or declare neutrality?
	They'd be like, no way.
	We're out. Not going to happen.
	Absolutely not. So, as you can see, the line would go behind Turkey, right?
	So Turkey is completely surrounded in this situation.
	And even if it wasn't this security self-interest, Turkey has been drifting towards bricks already.
	As this war in Ukraine broke out, Turkey's not happy about how things are going down.
	Turkey's not happy about these sanctions.
	And Turkey is aggressively moving to get out of NATO and to move towards bricks.
	Obviously, all the countries around Turkey would be on the other side.
	Turkey's economic self-interest at this point is with BRICS. They're tired of the CIA messing with their currency.
	They're tired of being treated as a little pawn on the front lines against our enemies here.
	And they want their independence.
	And one of the reasons they contributed to the war in Syria was they, Erdogan, He campaigns, he tries to stoke this nostalgia of the great late Ottoman Empire, right?
	He wants to rebuild that to the degree possible.
	And so they got Turkey into Syria, got them to go arm a bunch of terrorists and got them to do a bunch of stuff that they wouldn't normally do.
	By promising them, hey, you could have the top piece of Syria where the Kurds are at if you back us up here.
	And that was a pretty compelling offer to them.
	But as we see, as the board is shifting, as China goes in and negotiates a deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia, what if on the table here was, hey, Turkey, tell you what, if you leave NATO and you join BRICS in this situation, you will get along better with your neighbors of Saudi Arabia.
	In Iran. And, tell you what, Iraq was created after World War I. It's a totally arbitrary, like, made-up thing by the West.
	The people in this country, they have these competing groups that never get along.
	So this country was a bad idea in the first place.
	These borders don't make sense.
	And so tell you what, Turkey, we will chop off the top part of Syria, or top part of Iraq, excuse me.
	The part with a lot of oil, where Mosul is, that is held by the Kurds here that you guys really don't like, and we'll give that to you.
	The southwestern part of Iraq, the Sunni tribal regions, we'll give that to you, Saudi Arabia.
	And tell you what, Iran, Baghdad and the Shia parts of southeastern Iraq, we'll break that off and give that to you.
	Every single one of those countries will be like, oh, Deal, right?
	So, they are all moving.
	Really important people to us, like Turkey and Saudi Arabia, are moving actively into this orbit over here, this competing economic world orbit.
	So, next we look at Africa.
	And if you look at Africa, if you look at their trade, they do way more trade with China and Africa than they do with us.
	So if you were, you know, running a small business and you had one customer that you got 80% of your money from and one customer that you got 20% of your money from and those customers are fighting, And you have to pick a side.
	Whose side are you going to pick? It's very clear, right?
	It's a very clear economic self-interest here.
	Another aspect is that a lot of countries in North Africa, many of them are the ex-French colonies, or I should say current French colonies, they still have these crazy rules where they have this colonialism light thing.
	This thing where they are legally required to hold the gold and precious metal reserves backing their currencies in the French central bank.
	They are legally required to give French state companies priority access to their minerals and their oil and their natural resources.
	So they have been bristling about this for a long time and they just haven't been powerful enough because the French will send the foreign legion to come kill their leaders if they try to get away from this.
	So for them, perfect opportunity to reset the rules, to rewrite the game here, and to move into a separate economic orbit that's not going to abuse them as much.
	If we look at the whole of Africa and look at some of the infrastructure being built by China there in the past few years, China has been really helping them develop their continent, right?
	They have tons of people, they have tons of natural resources, and they've kind of been crushed under the boot of this Western colonialism here for a long time.
	So China's helping them.
	Get out of that. Loading them the money they need for these projects.
	And, you know, I think they have no delusions that China is not seeking to draw everybody to their economic orbit.
	But they look at it, if you listen to African Union leaders, they look at it as like, okay, we got the USA over here.
	They'll help us, but their help comes with super high interest rates that choke us out over time.
	And it comes with a bunch of meddling in our affairs.
	They'll give us money, but they say, okay, now you have to essentially act as our little pawns in the great game of this world order here.
	And they don't like that, right?
	They want to be self-determining.
	And so while China is coming in and doing the same kind of economic hitman thing that the United States and Britain have been doing for a long time, They are not imposing as many political terms and conditions on these countries, and they like that way better.
	So this is the African Union conveying that sentiment.
	They are very sick of being told what to do.
	They're very sick of not being listened to.
	And this is the far and away prevailing sentiment on the continent, and this is what would lead them towards the opposing economic world orders of the United States, should a hot situation break out there.
	So that's a huge problem.
	If we look at some other points of leverage here, if we look at water, a lot of wars in history have been fought over water resources.
	And China in Tibet, they have the mountains in Tibet, and the mountains in Tibet are the sources of the rivers, the primary source of fresh water for like half the world's population.
	And I think we have a little thing here demonstrating that.
	Let's check this out.
	Go ahead, I don't know if we can hear that.
	Don't seem to be audio.
	...has constructed more than 87,000 dams at a rate unmatched in human history.
	Collectively, they generate 352 gigawatts of electricity, which is more than the capacities of Brazil, Canada, and the United States combined.
	Now, however, after damming most of its internal rivers, China is looking to dam the major international rivers flowing out from Tibet.
	Nearly half of the world's human population depends on the Tibetan rivers, and as China taps into the water supply, it is increasingly able to dictate terms to the downstream periphery.
	So, as we see here, if you are a smaller, poorer country, if you do most of your trade with China, if they're getting into a war and they're right on your border, and if they can shut off the water if you don't go their way, what are you going to do?
	It's a very clear choice, both economically and geostrategically, to choose the BRICS, the alternative world economic order to the United States, should things start to go south.
	And a lot of people, they'd be looking at this analysis we're about to show you and they'd see the writing on the wall and they, you know, they're like flags.
	They blow each other way the wind does, all else aside.
	And they say, hey, look, who do we think is going to win this?
	And that's who probably we're going to want to cozy up to because that's who's going to get better terms after this all shakes out here.
	And I think a good conveyor of this sentiment is we had a clip of Duterte in the Philippines.
	And he's talking about this.
	And so we'll see if we can put that up there.
	...expected some tough policy.
	Do you expect me to fight China?
	And what? Do I have the cruise missiles to get them?
	Do I have the missiles to launch from the Eastern?
	So what will happen?
	It's going to be a massacre. Powerful.
	So, and that's why I like Duterte.
	He's kind of like a Trump character. He just says whatever is on his mind.
	And that's him essentially saying, look, you're trying to turn us into your little attack dogs here against China and we're not going to do it.
	We can't do it. We're going to get destroyed.
	And I think Indonesia and a lot of these other people that are surrounding China that are right in the line of fire there, they feel the same way.
	If things go hot, they are out and they are not going to be on our side.
	So, let's talk about why that's a problem.
	Let's talk about the raw numbers here.
	The military comparisons?
	Yes. So, a lot of our military leaders, they like to lead us to believe that, oh, we would just destroy anybody under war, and it's no big deal, and we're so powerful.
	But the fact is, how the board is stacked against us now, if this went down, we would not win.
	We would not be in a good position.
	And I'm going to show you here just how outnumbered we would be.
	So if we look at the armies, the world's top armies here, we got China, India, United States, North Korea, Russia, Pakistan.
	And I asked people, how many of the people on this list would be on our side if shit really did pop off?
	And they would look on it and they'd say, oh, maybe South Korea.
	And it's like, well, South Korea, as we'll see in a minute, is right in the line of fire.
	South Korea has no chance of winning.
	South Korea has North Korean artillery aimed right on the city of Seoul.
	So they cannot afford to take our side in this war.
	They would have to declare neutrality.
	They would have to surrender.
	There is no chance in hell that if they wanted to survive, doesn't matter how many US troops are there, there is no chance that they could be on our side here.
	So as we see, all of these numbers out of all of this pretty much would be us versus all of these other people.
	And so we would be, from an army standpoint, from a mere men's standpoint, we'd be outnumbered like 10 to 1.
	If we move into navies, world's top navies, including ships and submarines, China has a bigger navy than us.
	So does Russia. North Korea would be in there, and I'm sure North Korea would get used as kind of like the cannon fodder to draw our fire so that they could come get us.
	But how many of the people in the top navies of the world would be on our side?
	It would be pretty much us versus everyone else.
	It would be us versus most of them, and some of them would abstain.
	And as we've seen, if you just Google this, like world's top navies, Google China Navy, and you'll see the military leaders talking about, hey, the people with the biggest navy, like the most ships, usually wins.
	And in this case, we are vastly outnumbered.
	If you move into the submarines, They have way more submarines.
	Our ability to project power onto the Chinese mainland and to fight back should a war break out relies on our carriers and our submarines.
	And if you look at this, the people that would be against us, they have way more submarines than us if you combine them.
	We have a lot, but This would not be a good situation.
	This would not be a walk in the park here.
	If we look at air forces, right?
	Oh, we dominate the skies, which is true.
	We do. But if you look at our air forces versus the other countries' air forces, right?
	Those other countries combined, they could take our air force, right?
	And again, you can have better things.
	And that's what we like to say is like, oh, our technology is way better than China's.
	But here's the deal, and here's what I've been proving the last few years.
	China has stolen pretty much all of our technologies.
	The schematic for the F-35, right?
	The newest, latest, greatest fighter jet that we've spent all this time and effort developing, that was stolen in like two weeks.
	So they have exactly, exactly the schematics they need to build their own fifth generation fighters.
	And if we saw in that Top Gun movie, They have their own very legit fifth generation fighters and they have the manufacturing ability, as we'll talk about, to essentially make way more of those than us.
	So if you think about in World War II, Germany was way ahead of us.
	They had better weapons. They had more weapons.
	And what allowed us to eventually beat them was our manufacturing capacity.
	If you look at satellites, military-only satellites, right?
	Oh, US dominates space.
	We aren't dominating space enough to vastly outnumber them, right?
	And if you combine the people that would be on our side with people that wouldn't, it's about even when it comes to military satellites.
	So, this is very troubling and people gotta understand, we are nowhere near as ahead as we think we are.
	Our leaders have been asleep at the wheel for decades and they are steering us towards a war that is impossible to win.
	Wow. So this is just the traditional military comparisons, just with the numbers.
	And so let's talk about some new things, some new dynamics added to the picture here that would also be changing the game, that would be revolutionizing the battlefield for us.
	And the first thing is these Russian nuclear ice breaking ships.
	And so for people who don't know, Hillary Clinton and her Corrupt Cephas Board, they sold Russia like 20% of the United States uranium supply, the thing you need to make nukes and nuclear reactors.
	And what Russia did with that was they went and they used it to build this gigantic fleet of these massive nuclear powered ice breaking ships.
	So Russia, for a long time, has been constrained to just a small sliver in the Far East and their access to the ocean, to the Black Sea, because a lot of times, most of the year, the North Sea and the Arctic Ocean is frozen over and ships can't get through there.
	But with this uranium that they got from our corrupt government, they have built up a fleet to where that is no longer a geostrategic hurdle.
	And they can just, no matter how thick the ice is, truck straight through these ships and have freedom of navigation in a way and possess this capability to operate in the North Sea that the United States fundamentally does not have.
	So check out this clip of what these things are.
	Again, battleship size, nuclear ice breaking ships here.
	Crushing up the ice for those polar bears.
	I love to tell those lefties, hey, yeah, you know, you've seen all those satin polar bear videos, right?
	Well, you have Hillary Clinton to thank for that.
	Who's breaking up the ice in the North Sea on purpose?
	It's not that climate change is just magically, you know, so much worse than it always was as of, like, two years.
	It's that there's all these ships actively going and breaking up the ice there, because climate change would be in Russia's interests, right?
	Russia has plenty of land.
	It's just cold, and it would be nice to them if they had...
	It's a little bit warmer.
	So this gives Russia the capability to come over the North Sea and all of Northern Canada and the center of the North American continent is these flat plains that you could just march troops straight down through the middle of the country and divide us.
	If you so chose. And they have those ice breaking ships that they could be leading an armada through the ice in a way that we couldn't to make this happen.
	So if we look at the paradigm of China, how their missile defense systems have developed over the years and their ability to protect their shores and to project power here in the South China Sea, let's look at what it was in the 90s up until now in this next clip.
	China's current naval policy is sea denial by means of anti-access area denial systems.
	These are a variety of missiles, air defenses, and electronic capabilities that can neutralize hostile forces and assets.
	The PLA Navy has invested vigorously in its anti-access area denial systems.
	While doing so, it has also developed lethal, conventional forces that can exploit the openings their area denial weapons would create.
	By comparison, in 1996, during the Taiwan Strait crisis, China's area denial weapons weren't even capable of defending its coastline.
	The PLA Navy's missile arsenal could only reach as far as Taiwan and the US bases in South Korea.
	By 2003, however, China had expanded its infantry to hundreds of missiles, enough to deter foreign powers away from its coastline.
	By 2010, its inventory had grown to over 1000 conventional short-range ballistic missiles.
	At the same time, it had developed more sophisticated missiles like the DF-21C with an estimated range of 1,700 kilometers capable of reaching targets in Japan and the Philippines.
	By 2017, China had built thousands of conventional medium-range ballistic missiles and hundreds of conventional intermediate-range ballistic missiles capable of reaching as far as Guam.
	Today, Chinese firepower at sea, complemented by its missile umbrella, is turning the scale in the Pacific.
	Wow, seems like we're in big trouble there.
	Yep, so if we look at that last little ring of what those missiles actually were, the ones that shot the farthest, they are these new type of hypersonic weapons.
	And what are these hypersonic weapons?
	They are missiles that fly like five to ten times the speed of sound.
	Meaning they don't even need a warhead.
	They don't even need explosive ordnance at the end of it to be able to destroy an aircraft carrier because it could just hit it so hard that the kinetic energy alone could take out these carriers.
	So they fly so fast, our missile defenses can't track them well.
	China's way ahead of everybody, even acknowledged by our military in the hypersonic development, and we currently have no way to shoot them down.
	So we have six aircraft carriers that, you know, if we try to do that thing and go patrol off their coast as things are heating up here, we have six aircraft carriers.
	They have thousands of hypersonic missiles that we can't stop.
	Who wins? Who wins?
	So, the other aspect of this war that I really want people to get through their heads, they've seen this movie called All Quiet on the Western Front lately.
	It's a very great depiction of how much of a bloodbath World War I was.
	And World War I was a bloodbath because the advent of new technology, of machine guns, of artillery, the armies were not prepared to fight against that kind of stuff, and they just essentially got absolutely lit up and mowed down in every way possible.
	That kind of a dynamic of new technology changing the battlefield would exist in World War III, too, with the advent of this drone war technology.
	The idea of these drone swarms, these kamikaze drone swarms with a bunch of little bombs attached to them.
	And I grab this clip here from this movie.
	And this shows these drone swarms, ones that aren't even flying that fast, and how they have the ability to just go target and take people out.
	And it's really hard to stop, right?
	Because you could shoot a few of these things down, but how do you stop all of them?
	So they could take out boats, they could take out planes, they could take out troops spread out, they could take out equipment, right?
	And China makes all these drones, right?
	Most of the drones in the world come from China.
	And so how would we even stop this, right?
	Our carriers already got lit up by these hypersonics.
	They have an army of subs behind our submarines and now they could send these drone swarms after us.
	This would be, like I said, pure chaos.
	One of these swarms could wipe out entire battalions of Marines quickly and cheaply.
	And so in that movie, right, that was an artistic rendition of it.
	But think about In that movie, if there was 10 times or 100 times more of those drones, they're flying at you 10 times as fast.
	If we look at this little racing drone clip, see what I mean?
	Damn.
	So, that is, yeah, imagine like tens of thousands of those things trapped with bombs flying at you that fast, closing on you that fast.
	You physically don't have the time to respond, and it would just be a gigantic massacre in the same way that those battlefields were in World War I. And so our illustrious military leaders, they tell us, oh, don't worry, we have stuff to handle this.
	We've been preparing for this. We know what we're doing.
	Trust us. And to that I say, as people know, my father is part of the military industrial complex here.
	He would be selling Raytheon the software they used to design the computer chips that would go inside some of these weapons.
	So this is what we would be fielding to try to stop those massive swarms of drones should a conflict break out.
	This is from Raytheon. So this shows These lasers, direct energy weapons, right?
	And they can shoot down these drones, they can target and shoot them down relatively quickly.
	But there's scenarios here, they are simulating for the idea that there's gonna be not that many drones, right?
	If there's like a handful of these, and if they're flying really slow, then our weapons are effective.
	And they're like, okay, well now we got this microwave weapon here that could take out a whole group of them.
	It works more like a shotgun than a sniper rifle, right?
	It spreads out. But the point is, it still doesn't spread out enough to effectively kill a lot of these drones if they're everywhere, and they still have to be in small groups for that to be effective.
	Furthermore, every single ship, every single base would have to be outfitted with hundreds and hundreds of these things in order for us to have a flying chance against those drones.
	And they're just not right now.
	They are just not. So, what we have to try to stop that, try to push back on that, is wholly inadequate for the massive swarms that would be flying at us, you know, at those racing speeds there.
	So, disastrous, disastrous prospects in the United States.
	So again, a big part of their calculus in popping stuff off with China hinges on the fact that they think a bunch of the world would be on our side and would sanction China and that China's economy would collapse and that that would essentially put enough pressure on China to capitulate eventually.
	But if we look at the war in Ukraine situation, let's look at how many of these countries, when things are actually getting hot, would be on our side.
	This is how many countries here, this map of countries that were on our side as the war in Ukraine was popping off.
	So they say the world is united against Russia in this aggression towards Ukraine.
	But it's like, is it?
	If you look at this map, is that the world united against Russia and China?
	I don't think so. That looks like most of the world is not going along with this BS anymore.
	And if you look at our eastern flank there, Turkey is not happy about this.
	Turkey's thinking about breaking ranks.
	They're throwing Ukraine in there as if that's some kind of serious thing.
	But pretty much it would be, after the defections of these tiny Eastern European countries, it would be the United States and Western Europe versus everybody else.
	They would not be on our side.
	So their fundamental foundation for their calculus here, their war calculus, is flawed, fatally flawed.
	So, we have this massive Pacific Fleet, right?
	Our ability to project power is largely in our Navy here.
	And so our Pacific Fleet, as things heat up in Ukraine and things escalate to a much more belligerent level, China, they want Taiwan, right?
	They see Taiwan as theirs, they see this as an illegitimate thing, and they are waiting for the perfect opportunity to move on that.
	And additionally, A lot of people don't know this, but as the war in Syria is breaking out, it wasn't just Russia that was helping Assad in Syria.
	China was sending them a bunch of weapons and supplies to keep them going, too.
	So China is actively against us in a lot of these situations.
	And think about the timing right now.
	So everyone in the West has just depleted tons of their ammo, tons of their missile stocks, tons of their other weapons, sending these things to Ukraine, right?
	So we're low on ammo.
	The other thing is, as the gas prices went really high because of sanctions, Joe Biden depleted a lot of our strategic oil reserves, right?
	The gas, essentially, we need to power the military in case of an emergency.
	A lot of that's depleted so that the Democrats could fluff their numbers in this midterm election.
	So we are low on ammo and low on gas, and things are about to ramp up.
	And what could we do about it, right?
	So they would go to take Taiwan as we're weak.
	And we would send the Pacific Fleet over there.
	If you look at the Pacific Fleet, it's one of the biggest outfits in our military.
	Probably over half of our Navy is in the Pacific Fleet.
	And that contains about six carriers and a bunch of other things.
	But those carriers would be wiped out by those hypersonics very quickly, as would the rest of our stuff.
	And we would essentially be crippled and it would be left to the hypersonics.
	The only thing they couldn't get is the submarines.
	But how we fight our submarine warfare is we rely on these signals intelligence bases in Australia.
	And I have a little clip about that here.
	So that's Pine Gap.
	They use that for signals intelligence throughout that region of the world.
	There's this other one as well.
	Called the Holt. And this is what they use to track Chinese submarines, right?
	This is essentially our eyes and ears in that region.
	And both of these bases are right within striking distance of China could hit them with missiles from the mainland.
	So they could do two missile barrages and essentially take out our eyes and ears in this entire region as they are annihilating our Pacific fleet.
	And all of a sudden, We are totally pinned back to our shores, right?
	If we called for help, they're like, oh, what about our allies?
	So this thing starts to go south.
	They try to pop this off.
	And guess what? Our allies from Western Europe, even if they scrambled ships to come help us, guess what?
	The Suez Canal is closed.
	The way you would get over there in any kind of reasonable amount of time frame is through the Suez Canal, and guess what?
	Egypt's on their side, so that would be closed.
	We would be choked off, and we would get totally wiped out in that region.
	Furthermore, if they tried to come around, around the Horn of Africa, South Africa's on their side, and they could...
	Shoot at us from there, too.
	And South Africa is very irritated with the West because, as we can see, nonstop for the past few decades, the West has been trying to destabilize South Africa and ramping up tensions.
	And South Africa is just a very crazy place right now.
	So they're really looking to get out of this.
	If you look at our allies, our staging bases, like Japan, right?
	We have those big bases in Okinawa.
	In South Korea, we have those big bases there.
	In Taiwan and in the Philippines, we're trying to build military bases.
	All of those people would have to surrender very quickly because they would get annihilated if they didn't.
	And so if their choice is keep our promise to the United States or get completely flattened as a country, what are they going to choose?
	It's an obvious choice.
	Australia and New Zealand, they would be maroon from the rest of the world.
	And China, after they did destroy our Pacific Fleet, after they completely destroyed our Pacific Fleet, they would not want to allow these mass violence to be staging bases as what happened in World War II against Japan.
	They would not want to allow these islands to be giant staging bases to come regroup and come out there again.
	So they would make damn sure that they made them capitulate as well.
	And it's funny, I see people like Kim.com, right?
	He's down there in New Zealand. And he's like, oh, no, the war's about to pop off.
	You know, move to New Zealand.
	It's the only place you're going to be safe.
	And I chuckle at that because apparently these guys, they don't realize, like, dude, the commander in chief of the New Zealand military and of all the Australian military, It's now King Charles, right?
	So essentially, the leader of your military is someone that they are openly at war with, and by some kind of magical, fantastical thinking, you think that you're not gonna be a target if your military is run by somebody they are openly at war with.
	That is very wishful thinking.
	And these guys would be occupied very quickly to deny us the ability to go back there and regroup.
	So, also, as all this is happening, Right?
	Because the spring offensive is what's the catalyst here in Russia.
	Our banking system would be going through pure chaos, right?
	So our ability to spend money to rebuild our military here after our Pacific fleet gets wiped out would be dramatically, dramatically degraded.
	So they would be forced to print a bunch of money, a bunch of people getting away from the dollar, and now we have runaway inflation and chaos going into the United States.
	So again, I talked earlier About the economics of this thing, right?
	And how we did not win World War II because we were so much better, badder, tougher.
	We did not have as good of weapons.
	We did not have as many of weapons when the war started out.
	We did not spend anywhere near as much on our military as the other countries that were belligerents about war did either.
	What allowed us to win was our manufacturing capacity.
	They had better stuff, and we were able to just keep producing so many more things than them, even though they weren't as good, that we were able to eventually just overwhelm them with numbers.
	So let's look at the manufacturing picture here.
	If we look at it, these are the world's manufacturing power.
	So China has, at the moment, double our manufacturing capacity.
	And if you look at what manufacturing capacity we do have, Predicated on the fact that we need raw materials from other places, right?
	So even this 16% that we do have, if we don't have the raw materials we need, that would go way down.
	China has way more manufacturing workers, if you look at where all the manufacturing workers in the world are.
	China outnumbers us vastly, right?
	Then Russia combined would be about 10 times our size.
	And many of the other industrial manufacturing kind of bases with people or places with big populations in manufacturing sector would not be on our side.
	They would either abstain or they would be on Brick's side here.
	So, our entire Pacific Fleet gets wiped out in this opening skirmish, kicked off by this United States false flag, and so now we have to go rebuild our navy.
	And to build the navy, obviously you need tons of steel.
	Where does the steel come from?
	It appears, if you look at the top 10 steel piece of countries, that we have near enough steel to rebuild the navy, let alone sustain our country, if all these other sources were chopped off from us, right?
	It's not even close.
	So to build tanks, to build weapons, to build ships, you need a lot of steel.
	We wouldn't have a lot of steel.
	If you think about our ammo, right?
	Because we've given so much ammo to Ukraine.
	Our ammo is depleted. So what do you need for ammo?
	You need lead.
	Where does lead come from in the world?
	And again, in this situation, Australia's already capitulated, right?
	They would have to. So, we don't have access to the lead we need to replenish our ammo stocks.
	Huge problem, right?
	Doesn't matter how many factories we have, if they don't have the lead to make bullets, good luck.
	The next thing, rubber, right?
	Industrial machines require rubber.
	For tires, for pipe fittings, for everything you need, you need a crap load of rubber to fight a war, and where does all the rubber in the world come from?
	It appears it comes from places that would not be on our side, so it would be completely choked off of rubber.
	Finally, aluminum, right?
	What you need to make planes.
	As planes get shot down, right?
	Where does the aluminum in the world come from?
	If you 86 Australia out of there, because they would be forced to capitulate, what is our aluminum, our ability to procure aluminum?
	It looks pretty bleak here.
	So essentially, our leaders are trying to say, hey, let's go fight a war where we'd be outnumbered 10 to 1, and let's do it in a way that while we're trying to fight this war, we have no steel, no rubber, no lead, and no aluminum.
	Good luck building an army.
	Good luck sustaining the war without any of those natural resources.
	It's impossible. So it is absolutely preposterous for them to think that this would go well for us in any way, right?
	And we are already deeply divided as a country, and this would be pure chaos.
	So a lot of people, and this is kind of the thinking that has been conditioned here into us as a population, Is we view these wars, these foreign wars, based on our experience over time here, as like this abstract thing that's far away.
	It doesn't really affect our day to day life much.
	But this would be completely different, right?
	This would be, look, all of the clothes that we get That's cut off.
	So no new clothes for a while.
	All of the semiconductors come from Japan, South Korea.
	They come from Taiwan, right?
	And our electronics a lot of times are manufactured in China.
	So think about no new clothes, no new electronics.
	The automobile factories are converted into war factories, so no new cars.
	We would have food rations, right?
	This would be a crazy situation like we have never, ever dealt with before.
	In the United States here.
	And it would cause tons and tons of social unrest.
	Or how about this? In World War II, during World War II, they had to raise tax rates to 90%.
	The TOPS tax bracket was 90%.
	And taxes were due four times a year, right?
	How would that go over here?
	And this is the thing. Everyone sees them hiring 87,000 IRS agents.
	Is that because they just want to raise taxes slightly?
	Do you need 87,000 armed agents to just do a slight tax raise?
	Or do you need that to prepare for a war where you're planning on burying everyone in tax that you know they will be absolutely outraged at paying?
	So if you look at some of the other factors, Our electric grid would get lit up.
	Our electric grid is very soft, very centralized, and very sketchy.
	And we would have rolling power outages everywhere constantly if this thing pops off.
	Our food supply has been getting squeezed.
	So during wars, if you go back and look at some of those videos during World War II, especially in Britain, There's food rations, right?
	So you have a family of four.
	Okay, this week, family of four, that means you get eight eggs, you get this many pounds of meat, you get one stick of butter, you get this.
	Like, that is how it would go, because our supply chains would be everything directed towards fighting this full-scale war right here.
	So it would be conditions like we have never, ever seen before in the United States here.
	The other thing, As this situation has ramped up in Ukraine, I believe it was a few months ago, there was a bunch of papers running these headlines.
	You know, they think they're so tough and cool.
	CIA is going to activate these sleeper cells inside Russia to conduct these sabotage operations against food, against factories, against all this stuff.
	And for a lot of people that don't know, the precursor to the CIA, OSS, they were not much about gathering intelligence.
	They were about blowing shit up, sabotaging things, and killing people, right?
	Because during a total war, your intelligence agencies are operationalized more to cloak and dagger paramilitary forces than they are just doing intelligence over here.
	So, as we said that, as we said, hey, we're going to go do these sleeper cells, activate them and go after Russia, guess what started happening?
	What started happening was, trade started derailing, food factories started burning down, all this chaos and man, there's been hundreds, look it up.
	And so people don't get like, this is not Iraq or Afghanistan that you're threatening here, right?
	These are serious countries.
	And if you guys send agents to go do this to them, they're going to send agents to come do this to us.
	And it's going to be easy to get in because our borders are wide open.
	So the flip side of that, if we try to go do that to China, try to degrade out some of their manufacturing advantage here on us, how are we going to do that?
	They have this massive surveillance system where they can see every single nook and cranny of something that's happening.
	They are about as hardened and ready for battle as you could possibly be in that country.
	And so a lot of people look at the social credit system and the mass surveillance apparatus As like, oh, this is an ideological thing of social control because they're communists.
	And they don't get like, no, dude, this is them preparing for a war where they're expecting a bunch of agents to be active in their country to come try and sabotage them.
	So they're ready.
	They're completely ready for it.
	Good luck with that. Right?
	So we are in a very, very dicey situation here.
	Our country is collapsing and our leaders are trying to get us into a world war.
	So what can we do about that?
	What are the options here?
	And so we have very limited options.
	The way things are going, it does not appear we are going to even make it to the next election before things are really going down.
	And so if you think about it from a military standpoint, We got this guy Joe Biden in there, and we would be trying to draft a bunch of people to go fight for our country, right?
	And as we discussed, a lot of people, they wouldn't want to fight for this country, right?
	They think this country is corrupt, they think these leaders are terrible, and they'd be out, right?
	Would you want to go sign up to fight toward them?
	No, no, no. I have a feeling after all this kind of betrayal of the public trust, there's not going to be many people that are going to want to do that.
	Absolutely. And I've been talking, when I was in prison, I made a lot of friends there, friends that are going to help us spread the word here.
	And I was asking them, even some of the guys still in prison, I said, hey, so you got however many years.
	If they made you a deal that said, hey, you could get out of prison and have your record exonerated if you go fight in the war, would you choose to stay there or would you go to war?
	They were like, hell no, I would not go to war.
	I would stay right here in this prison, because at least in this prison, I know I'll eventually get out.
	In that war, it's just going to be used like cannon fodder, right?
	Then you go look at the right, right?
	All those Trump supporters, all those cisgendered males, as they like to call them, all those people that everyone's been hating on lately.
	Are they going to be willing to go sign up, right?
	A primarily right leading group of straight men.
	Are they going to be willing to go sign up to fight for this president who has just been caught multiple times essentially selling us out to the very enemy that we would be fighting?
	Does that work as a country?
	Absolutely not. So our military, it would be, given the figures here, and given that that is the case, they would need Joe Biden out of there.
	There's no way we could fight a war with Joe Biden as president.
	So we are in this very interesting territory here as a country, and I don't think people quite see it, but based on the precedents that have been set in the past, where you could label a president a national security threat and try to get rid of him with the full force of your law enforcement and your military intelligence apparatus,
	as what happened with JFK, as what happened with Nixon, as what they started to do with Trump, I'm saying that the case could be made Based on the military laws of the book, that a coup is necessary.
	And I'm not necessarily advocating for that coup.
	I'm not saying like, oh yeah, let's go do a coup.
	I'm saying that based on the historical precedence, based on this analysis of the future, and based on what it would take to actually get in a position to fight that war, they absolutely could twist the Supreme Court's arm into being okay with a coup, and they could get rid of Joe Biden.
	And probably the way they would do that, should this happen, They would get somebody like Donald Trump in as Speaker of the House, and they could do that by executing this thing.
	As we saw, as the Speaker of the House battle was raging, Kevin McCarthy had to make this deal.
	It was Section Q, I believe, where with one vote, they can essentially initiate proceedings to remove him and replace him as Speaker.
	If the military intelligence was trying to do this, hypothetically speaking, they have that mechanism right there where they could remove them, get him in as speaker, and then they have Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, super duper corrupt people that they could essentially just force to resign over their corruption, right? So they could do what they did with Ford and essentially seat a new president without there being an election whatsoever.
	And based on the very bleak prognosis here, they would be legally, based on our crazy laws and based on the crazy press precedents, they would be legally justified in doing that, at least according to them.
	Right? So...
	It's a pretty scary situation.
	I don't think a lot of the people that have been cheering the stuff on realize that that is like a very viable path at this point.
	It's getting more viable by the day.
	I mean, does that do anything for the bankruptcy part of it?
	Or are we looking at the country going bankrupt regardless of regime change?
	I mean, is that really going to soften the blow?
	Well, I think whatever leader we get next, obviously we are big proponents of a pirate party style regime change, one that's not a military coup, one that's more an exercise in democracy here.
	But either way, whatever leader gets in there next, They will, on an emergency basis, have to get in there and do some things.
	They will have to immediately, and so actually before I talk about that, this is the Pirate Party model that we're talking about here, right?
	A group of internet activists and hackers showing the corruption and aligning people towards constitutional changes that would help us get rid of the corruption.
	So, and essentially like wiping the government out and starting a fresh one.
	So, that's the model.
	Obviously, it would be way better if we did that versus the military coup, but we really don't have many options and clock is ticking.
	Probably won't make it to the next election here.
	Well, when you say probably won't make it to the next election, I mean, are you talking about there's being such chaos that we're not going to even have an election because the country is breaking out the civil war or civil unrest?
	No, I'm talking about, like, our financial system collapsing and this war getting popped off before that.
	Wow. Right? They're just on the trajectory they're on.
	They're not on a trajectory to make it to having another normal presidential election.
	They just aren't, like by any objective standard here.
	So, whatever leader gets in there next has some very important things to do.
	One, They would need to do something to unite the country here, to make them proud again, to make them want to fight for this flag and for this set of constitutional rights again.
	And right now, as we've talked about a lot on this show, our constitutional rights don't exist.
	So if you're getting sent over there to fight a war, what is motivating you, right?
	A lot of people, especially people from the inner city, They don't respect our flag anymore because, you know, while America may be a great country for a lot of people, it's not a great country for them at the moment, right?
	They have chaos, degeneracy, violence everywhere.
	People are getting locked in prison nonstop.
	So they would have to unite the country under a new flag, right?
	Essentially, because our system, our economic system, we feel like we're at the end of the line of the country anyways.
	Then they would have to throw everyone a bone here at all of the peasants, right?
	According to the people at the top, we're all peasants there.
	They would have to throw all of us peasants a bone to keep us from revolting, right?
	And I'm not saying that I'm going to be leading any kind of violent revolt, but again, if you want to be postured to fight a war, people got to be in line with what the country is here.
	And so that's where we got Internet Bill of Rights with universal passive income, right?
	The idea that you own all of your data and every time it gets sold, They got to pay your royalties.
	And so this would throw everybody some crumbs here to make people less likely to revolt, to make people kind of like want to rebuy into the system here.
	And again, it's not a handout from the government.
	It's a fair business exchange.
	These tech giants, they're worth trillions of dollars because they have all of our data right now and they're selling it ad infinitum and we're getting nothing.
	So another thing they'd have to do, they would have to immediately, at an emergency like national defense authorization level speed, claw back our supply chain.
	We are in no position to be getting into anything with anybody.
	And we're not saying this in the sense of like, we're trying to intentionally become stronger so that we can beat them in a war.
	We're trying to say peace through strength, The scales are not tipped in our favor right now, and we need to move them back to even if we want to maintain this peace through strength sort of a thing, right?
	So we need to get our natural resources.
	We need those back in our hemisphere immediately.
	And a lot of that's to do with mining.
	So this is the thing.
	We would need to go acquire Greenland.
	We would need to go shake down this queen of Denmark and say, hey, this BS colonial system is over.
	We need this area. And a lot of people that are upset like, oh, you would be like building mines and military bases in Greenland so that you could protect your north flank and so that you could have the resources you would need to sustain yourself as things did go south.
	The people that bristle at that, it's like, well, would you rather have these mines built in the middle of a luscious rainforest where it kills a bunch of animals and pollutes a bunch of water, right?
	And destroys some very beautiful natural resources here.
	Or would you like to go find somewhere about as far away from civilization as you could possibly get and go build these mines in the middle of a bunch of like rocks and ice, right?
	It's an absolute no brainer.
	If you're going to mine somewhere, you would definitely want to mine there.
	So get in Greenland, huge geostrategic priority of whoever's next, like very quickly, clawing back our supply chain, having natural resources here.
	Another thing we would need to do, and as you guys have seen, as Mexico announced they were joining BRICS, there's this little terrorism stunt stage there.
	And I actually, I talked to some of my amigos, Sicario amigos down there, recently about this.
	And they were all saying, like, hey, those guys that killed those Americans, right, that essentially caused the United States to try to, like, say, oh, we're gonna designate them terrorist groups.
	That was not authorized.
	So the United States, in preparation for potentially this war, we would need to secure our border and we would need to take a piece of North Mexico to make that happen.
	And so the way our leaders are going about that, they hired some random psychos to just go murder some random Americans so that they have the pretext to label these cartels as terrorist groups Because we still have that open-ended authorization for military force that anywhere in the world there's terrorists, we could send the military with no approval from Congress or the people.
	So they're trying to do it that way.
	We would need, after our Pacific Fleet got completely annihilated in the South China Sea, we would need a safe spot to be rebuilding, restaging our Pacific Fleet here.
	And we would need to do it in an area where they would be protectable, right?
	We're saying we need to make a purchase in Northern Sonora here so that we have access to the water and so that we have a spot to rebuild our navy.
	And instead of sending the military and invading them Iraq style, We should go, as I've already started doing, and start backchanneling with some of these cartels, right?
	A lot of these guys, at least they're telling me, they're sick of this lifestyle, they're ready to flip.
	And a lot of them own buildings on the coastline there, so they stand to gain a lot of money, the leaders of the cartels, with this purchase because it would dramatically appreciate the value of their properties there.
	Another thing, a lot of companies, as Trump was trying to get manufacturing back into our hemisphere, have been building factories in North Mexico, like in Nogales, for example.
	And so instead of invading them and just taking it and enraging everybody in Mexico and turning them against us in a very important moment in history, what if we made a deal with them and said, Similar to how the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was in the past.
	We're going to buy this from you and we're going to get the cartels to help us make this past semester democratically there.
	We're going to offer everybody, right?
	It's going to become the United States, but it's going to be a situation like in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, where if you are a Mexican citizen, Not Honduran, not Guatemalan, not all these other countries on the earth.
	But if you're Mexican, you could still have open access to this area here and you could come work because we're going to stack a lot of manufacturing and important jobs here for you.
	So it's a way for the Mexicans The poor Mexicans to have an economic lifeline to be feeding themselves there.
	It's a way to make it a more amicable situation with the people of Mexico there so that they wouldn't be insulted, so that they'd feel like they're part of the process.
	And it'd be a way to secure our borders and to secure this really important land that we would need to be in any sort of position to defend ourselves in this war that they're trying to pop up.
	Sounds like out there stuff, but again, when world wars pop off, borders move, and all traditional considerations are out the window.
	It's just pragmatic self-interest at that point.
	So, next thing.
	We would need to, whoever gets in there next, needs to decentralize our grid.
	Like, on an emergency basis, we need to release these new energy technologies that are ready to go now and decentralize our grid.
	Full stop, full emergency.
	And so we have a slide in there talking about how this energy debate for a long time has been centered around energy one versus energy two technologies.
	Energy one is like oil, gas, fossil fuels, that sort of thing.
	Energy two is like wind, solar renewables.
	And the problem with both these is that A lot of lefties want to move to energy too, but they don't realize it takes just as much greenhouse gases to be smelting all the metal and making these materials and then transporting them for these windmills as they would save by getting off of oil in the first place.
	Also, they're intermittent, right?
	So if the wind's not blowing, They are not producing power.
	They kill a bunch of birds.
	They cause the whales, the offshore wind farms have been causing these whales to, you know, get confused because they have kind of magnetic sensors, right?
	Their brain is such a compass.
	And the spinning metal of these wind farms has been confusing them so that they are beaching them, right?
	So this is, wind is not an environmentally practical thing.
	Wind is not a practical thing.
	So we're saying instead of these old school renewables, Instead of Energy 2, we got to move to Energy 3.
	And Energy 3 is these new technologies that can produce unlimited power at infinitive, and they can do that on a decentralized basis.
	So we have these companies here, right?
	We served it right up to our leaders on a silver platter.
	Hey, here's companies that are started, They are going.
	They have these working prototypes.
	And their biggest issue in getting rolled out right now is the fact that their competitors try to buy them and squash them to suppress this energy.
	And the government gets in their way and industrial partners to help them scale, right?
	Because they're small companies. So first thing, for our factories, modular low-energy nuclear fusion.
	These guys is a company out of Arizona, and these guys have a thing, a nuclear fusion reactor, way better than this BS that Joe Biden's friend sells, but that you could essentially fit it into a shipping container and drop that there on site.
	So if you're a computer chip factory, if you're a war chip factory, or if you're a war factory, you could have your power source there on site for you and not have to rely on this sketchy grid.
	The next thing, asymmetrical magnetic propulsion.
	So it's this magnet machine that essentially just keeps this thing spinning with magnets indefinitely.
	And so it's a generator that you could attach to a house or a smaller building that you could just have unlimited power generated.
	You buy the machine once and it generates power forever.
	You don't have to pay for power bill again, right?
	And now everybody's having their own 100% clean, zero emissions power generated right there at their house.
	So it's cheaper for everybody, It's better for everybody.
	You don't have to do this, like, Communist Green New Deal to force everybody to buy it.
	You gotta, like, persuade them that, like, hey, we gotta make this happen because our power grid might get kind of sketchy here as the geopolitical tensions ramp up.
	And it's gonna be way cheaper for me.
	You buy it once and you never have to pay again.
	Next thing, graphene harvesting energy.
	This is essentially computer chips.
	You could take advantage of the quantum characteristics of the material graphene as you build it into chips.
	And so you could essentially have a smartphone or a computer or an electronic device that just powers itself.
	You never have to plug it in.
	You never have to recharge it at any point, right?
	Again, for a lot of people, dream come true, wouldn't it?
	Next thing, nanodiamond batteries.
	And this is a big one, right? Well, right now we have these lithium ion battery cells and it takes a crap load of lithium, which we don't have in our country and we don't have a source close to us or in the country that would be on our side should things break out.
	And it's really toxic to the environment, and the cars don't drive for that long of a distance, right?
	So you see these people having to charge their electric cars with generators, right?
	And it's just not a super practical thing yet.
	If we could replace those lithium ion battery cells with these nanodion battery cells, now they would have electric cars.
	This would facilitate electric cars that would just have unlimited power.
	You could drive as far as you want for as long as you want, and you would never need to charge it.
	Additionally, these cars with this technology, you could come and plug them into your house when you're home and it could power your house.
	You would have no need for the grid.
	Or hypothetically speaking, if our power grid is getting attacked, volunteers could come and plug their cars in and they could be powering like a hospital, for example, with their combined energy and be kind of like crowdsourcing our efforts to keep our energy grid going here.
	So these are revolutionary, amazing technologies, ready to go now.
	And at this point, it's not just an environmental emergency that we're talking about.
	It's a national security emergency is the reason we have to roll this stuff out as quickly as possible.
	Wow. Wow. I mean, you've really thought about this.
	I mean, the whole 360 degrees, you've thought about all the possibilities, all the solutions.
	I mean, this is tremendous research, Austin.
	Well, thank you, sir.
	Yeah. Trying to show people this, right?
	This, it seems like a very abstract threat of World War III and a financial collapse, but people gotta understand.
	This is extremely real.
	This is happening now.
	And we need to act quickly.
	We probably don't have until the next election.
	I'm in favor, my group's in favor of the pirate party-style democratic regime change, but people gotta understand, with how the board sits right now, with how military leaders think, and with just ruthlessly pragmatic considerations, like, they legally could get away with doing a military coup right now, and that could pass muster because it's that dire of an emergency.
	Wow, wow. This is, you're really talking about reinventing the country.
	I mean, these energy sources, decentralizing, really putting power back in the hands of, it's almost like a city-state model, like the old Greek city-states, where you have regions that are basically running their own governments and not, you know, having an overarching federal government.
	Yes, absolutely.
	We need to create a situation where localized communities can have all the food, energy, Wi-Fi from space, resources that they need to function without having to rely on a centralized power of a federal government.
	Because with how the geopolitical borders is stacked at the time being, If we stay centralized, we will be conquered.
	Our only chance of doing this in a reasonable way is to decentralize everything.
	Decentralize finance.
	Decentralize media. Decentralize energy.
	Decentralize everything. That is how we can regain our military readiness.
	That is how we can regain our economic prosperity.
	And that is how we can claw back the future that we need to have instead of this dystopian nightmare of World War III and this financial collapse.
	And so I'm trying to tell people, listen, if I was the future DIA here, right?
	I'm doing this, like, tragic, like, knock, knock, future DIA calling.
	Hey, none of you were prepared, idiots.
	Look at the numbers, you know?
	Because the DIA-style analysis is, like, looking at the numbers of who has what and who has resources.
	And the CIA-style analysis is this really hot air rhetoric, emotions, BS. Oh, Pood is such a meanie, and so we got to get it now, right?
	Mm-hmm. We gotta start looking at the tangibles here.
	And we need to, on an emergency basis, make something happen quickly.
	We don't have a lot of time.
	And so, things are ramping up.
	Yep, yep. I mean, it seems like we're diving headfirst into World War III. And, you know, these are amazing solutions, Austin.
	Let me ask you, in closing, is there anything that you wanted to talk about at websites?
	Anything? The mic is yours.
	I want to talk about the Quantum Party of America and QIntelPro.
	So we have a website explaining from every angle our government is fundamentally corrupt and fundamentally selling us out.
	And essentially our only chance of survival as a country is to come together And to do a democratic regime change here and to get some people in there, to move our capital to Kansas, right?
	Not just for the practical, like making the politicians spend the money here and respect our constitutional rights, but for a military readiness standpoint, we can't allow our country to be able to be divided into two.
	We need to have an updated constitution, right, where our rights actually exist.
	How can you expect any men to want to go die to protect something That is a broken country, right?
	If your constitutional rights don't exist, then what's the point of dying for this country, right?
	This country is a big lie anyways.
	It's exploiting everyone anyways.
	Why would you die for a country that your constitutional rights don't exist?
	The thing that made America exceptional is our constitutional rights.
	And without those, how do you expect anyone to be willing to fight for that?
	We need to fix this criminal justice system and make a lot of things right.
	A lot of people have gotten railroaded, and so we need to start being pragmatic and making deals with people who aren't, you know, huge medicines to society, who aren't violent criminals that are repeat offenders, and do something to unite the country and to persuade a lot of these people who are done with this place to come back and give us another look and have this be a place that's worth fighting for again.
	Exactly. So we have, we feel, a unique, one of the only people out there talking about it.
	We're trying to create the quantum movement here to bring about a pirate party style regime change with some constitutional updates, fire this entire crap government, and rebuild it, right?
	Electing new people, like, starting from scratch would be easier at fixing our problems than trying to fight through the nonsense that we have now with our government.
	So, a lot of people, they look at what we're doing here, calling for regime change, as they're like, oh, that seems pretty radical.
	And it's like, no guys, what's radical is our current government, who's collapsing our financial system and trying to intentionally get us into a war that millions are going to die in.
	Radical would be keeping this government that we have now.
	Radical would not be coming together on issues that we agree with, uniting with the left, uniting with some of these other disaffected tribes, and actually making our country a place worth fighting for again and making our country a place where you could prosper economically and that your rights are protected and that we are maintaining this parity with other global world powers so that we can maintain that peace through strength that we need to be able to survive because it's a rough and tough world out there and I think a lot of the The
	deep-staters, quote-unquote.
	I think a lot of them have been misled into going along with a lot of this BS because they keep...
	And a great example is Steve Bannon, right?
	So Steve Bannon, people like Steve Bannon, are so locked in on this internal power struggle that they're completely taking their eyes off the external one.
	And so there's a lot of deep-staters putting their fingers on the scale against us because they feel like this is the only way that we're going to be able to maintain this external power-like struggle.
	You know, our thing is bad, but this is the priority externally here.
	What they don't realize is like, no, guys, you guys are facilitating a situation where we are going to get destroyed by external powers.
	So we hope that most of the deep-state, quote-unquote, will get their heads off their asses and get it on our side here.
	And actually do something to remove this president.
	How are we going to fight a war if our president is selling all of our military secrets to China?
	Who's going to be willing to go fight for a guy that just sold all of our enemy, all the stuff?
	No one, right? And it's out there.
	It's out there. They can pretend like it's not, but it's definitely out there.
	And when the rubber meets the road, people would definitely care about that and definitely not go fight for that.
	The other thing, we need to...
	It's a rough and tough world, right?
	And we need to be grateful. We don't always like people like Elon Musk.
	And this is one of my criticisms of Bannon.
	The reason I brought him up is he's saying, oh, Elon Musk is sold out to the Chinese Communist Party and he's just a fraud and whatever, whatever.
	But it's like, okay, Bannon, who can you name?
	Which oligarch out there can you name has done more to keep the United States in the game and this geostrategical great game of Shifting powers than Elon Musk.
	Elon Musk, with SpaceX alone, has put as much cargo into space militarily as the entire country of China.
	If we were relying on our traditional defense contractors, we'd be totally screwed right now.
	And they would be way ahead of us.
	Elon Musk is dramatically increasing, in the United States, our automobile manufacturing capacity.
	And he's doing that in a way that is using a lot of robots and AI, where if we are short on people, that we can still keep those factories going, right?
	Because those car factories are what gets converted to war factories if things actually do pop off here.
	Elon Musk, would we even know about that there's banks collapsing if Elon Musk hadn't bought Twitter or would they just be censoring all that?
	Would we even know about the FBI, the CIA? Would we even know about a lot of this COVID stuff that's coming out?
	No, we would not. So, you know, he's not a perfect guy, but people like Steve Bannon, they get so caught up in this domestic fight that they lose sight of the geostrategic picture here.
	We gotta get rid of these evil guys while not getting conquered by these other evil guys, right?
	You gotta keep your eye on the ball.
	And no one is keeping us more in the game from a national security standpoint than Elon Musk, right?
	So is he a perfect guy?
	Absolutely not. Do we have to keep an eye on these oligarchs to make sure that they don't get a little too out of hand on us?
	Absolutely. But Elon Musk, he always talks about how he gave this technology to China.
	He didn't give them the nanodine battery technology.
	He gave them the lithium ion crap that isn't even what we need anyways.
	People gotta, like, when things get crazy, ruthlessly pragmatic self-interest prevails.
	And so we gotta start aligning ourselves.
	We gotta start appealing to these lefties and persuading them that, like, hey, we are all gonna get wiped out here.
	Financially and physically.
	Like, we're all gonna be broke and dead if we let these dinosaurs keep running our country into the ground.
	And now...
	We have no more runway.
	Things are happening fast.
	This whole situation is flying out like a missile and we can either put aside our differences and come together to do something dramatic now or we can descend into chaos and essentially cease to exist as a country.
	One of my biggest worries here is that Let's game this out.
	Say they do the military coup option with Johnny Boy over there, right?
	They have it all lined up.
	For people that don't know, that is super lined up, ready to go right now.
	But Don did this stuff with the vaccines, right?
	Where he essentially pushed us on people.
	And right in the middle of all this, we're going to have this COVID awakening here.
	And as more of these lefties realized that this was a deliberate effort to poison us here, that this was a very malicious underhanded thing.
	Mm-hmm. They're gonna get really bucked, right?
	They're very emotional and I'm very worried that they're gonna like, you think the BLM riots were bad?
	Like, it's gonna be way worse than that.
	They're gonna be like wanting heads on a plate and they're gonna be like burning stuff down.
	Don, if he wants to have any sort of viability here, he has to find a way to walk back this COVID stuff, right?
	He has to admit, I screwed up big time with this.
	And he has to essentially find some kind of an extremely, extremely compelling excuse for why he would do something like that in the first place.
	And so that's why we're suggesting here, why don't you just tell them the truth?
	Why don't you just tell them that you were getting blackmailed over this Vegas situation, and they essentially twisted your arm into doing that, right?
	That's the compelling excuse you need right now.
	That's the, like, brutal, ruthlessly pragmatic honesty you need right now to, if you do get back in there, whether it be in a coup or whether it be in a snap election here, That's what you need to essentially stop this chaos from ensuing when everybody's super mad about this COVID stuff.
	Because I don't think he's realizing, let's say there was a coup or an election.
	It did succeed. He gets back in there.
	We have this major war breaking out.
	And now all the lefties are going crazy, right?
	Then he would have to declare martial law.
	Then now he's the guy bringing about this surveillance police state, right?
	Because we're trying to harden ourselves versus China and everybody's going crazy.
	So if he doesn't admit his failures on the COVID thing, there's a good chance that he could end up being the guy that brings in the bad kind of martial law, the bad kind of surveillance state, and end up getting blamed for all of that stuff.
	And I think if he did, that would really take a wind out of the populist right movement for a long time.
	And when you're talking about, when you said, just to clarify for the viewers, you're talking about the Vegas shooting and the cover-up of the Vegas shooting and how behind the scenes, according to what you're saying, they twisted his arm, basically, to follow this COVID agenda in using the Vegas shooting and the cover-up of the Vegas shooting against him.
	Absolutely. I'm saying there was an assassination attempt against the Crown Prince, one of his key allies in the Middle East, and we won't get too much into it right now, but if you guys look at qintel.pro slash Vegas Strong, there's a whole description of this.
	That's October 1st 2017 shooting.
	Exactly. So essentially, People, I'm assuming, came into his office one night as this is going down and saying like, hey, shit's going down.
	They have set this up to where if you acknowledge it at all, then that's going to pick off one of your key allies in the Middle East.
	And the deep state that hates you is going to control Saudi Arabia again.
	Huge problem. So he probably had his advisor there saying, listen, Nothing you could do could bring back those dead people right now.
	That's horrible that happened. But you have to think about the future and you have to think about what is best for this country and this world on a long term, right?
	So he probably had a few minutes to decide because that all happened quick.
	And essentially gets persuaded into being like, okay, I will accept, I will authorize the same kind of D6 coverup.
	This massive cover-up that they did with the JFK shooting, right?
	Where the men of Black swoop in from all over town and just change all the facts and manipulate all the news.
	So I think he did that to try to keep his other foreign policy stuff on track, to keep his other shadow war on track.
	But he didn't realize the degree to which he was handed in the blackmail that they needed to force him into this sort of a COVID situation.
	He's got to understand, no matter how this works out, like for his legacy, the best thing for his legacy and for his future and for the future of this country is for him to stop hawking this vaccine like a cheap use car salesman.
	Admit you are wrong, right?
	People have dealt with you, your shenanigans in the past when you're honest about it.
	Admit you're wrong.
	Admit they're blackmailing you.
	And put yourself in a position to not punch this country into absolute chaos.
	That brings in an actual police state.
	Gotta happen. Gotta happen.
	Regardless of what happens.
	I would like to potentially see a situation.
	I think an interesting possibility here is, and I'm not gonna do it myself, but an interesting possibility would be This whole thing pops off.
	He gets put back in there.
	He does a few things to enhance our military, get Greenland, get Mexico, put the country into bankruptcy, which we desperately need.
	And then he steps down and hands power to somebody that's like a Tulsi Gabbard, right?
	So like a very rational constitutionalist lefty so that that can be more stomachable to our friends on the other side.
	And then in exchange he would get the contract for building the new capital or something like that.
	You can't be the last guy of the old country and the first guy of the new.
	It doesn't work like that. So I think he could, again, he's got to realize, listen, Don, your job for us right now was not to be Messiah, was not to be You know, the builder of Utopia.
	Your job was to be the giant slayer, right?
	And if you're going to be trying to do any of this stuff, you need to remember your job is to slay this giant.
	If you're not going to slay this giant, then we don't need you, right?
	Slay the giant. Get the contract to build a new capital and immortalize yourself into history as both the Slayer of the Giant and the architect, or the builder here, right?
	Because he's a builder, he understands how that works, his legacy.
	So it could be a stomachable situation to him.
	I think if they go that route, if they do try to pull his Mojareko, he's got to understand, like, you've got to get a few things done and you've got to get out of there and hand it over to some lefties.
	Otherwise, we are going to descend into absolute chaos in this country.
	Yeah, yeah. Austin, this is an amazing episode, man.
	Thank you so much for putting all this research into, putting this episode together.
	It's like a documentary film, man.
	It's so much detail, and you really covered all the bases.
	So, kudos to you, man.
	Great job. Well, thank you, sir.
	Thanks for hosting me today, and...
	We're looking to make America quantum.
	We're looking to have a new flag that everyone respects.
	And we're looking to have an awesome country again.
	And so we hope everybody out there will not necessarily be, you know, completely crippled by alarm when they see this video, but that they will realize that like, We got to move.
	We got to move. We are at the end of the line, right?
	Whether people realize it or not, we got to move.
	Otherwise, we are going to be heading into Armageddon here.
	Thank you for that message.
	And thank you for sharing that with the viewer, because everybody's got to be vigilant.
	We're seeing the world fall apart before our eyes.
	These banks are going down.
	And I mean, how much more information do we need to start making some wise choices here?
	Absolutely. The history of tomorrow is being written today.
	How will you be remembered?
	And that's my question to everybody out there.
	Will we be remembered as the people that withered into chaos and lost our position in the world?
	Or will we be the people that rose from our ashes and lived to find another day and turned our country into the greatest, most powerful country that the world has ever seen?
	For a second time. Exactly, exactly.
	So thank you very much, viewers, for checking out this Blood Money episode with Austin Steinbart.
	Tune into AmericaHappens.com for the latest episodes.
	We're producing a ton of new content.
	We have about 10 shows going, including Gloves Off with Joy Gilbert, the State National University with Gianna Michelli, Dismantling DC with Mindy Robinson, Conspiracy Truth with Mindy Robinson, Blood Money, and many more.
	So check us out at AmericaHappens.com and I will see you on the next episode of Blood Money.

▲