Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 30, 2023 - Blood Money

01:39:00

Blood Money Episode 43 w/ Stanford Graham “Prosecuting Monsters for Crimes Against Humanity”

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	♪♪♪
	Blood Money Episode 43 with Stanford Graham.
	Prosecuting monsters for crimes against humanity.
	Alright, we're on the next episode here of Blood Money and we have a very special guest today, Stanford Graham.
	Stanford's background is, he does a whole bunch of things.
	You're an attorney, correct, Stanford?
	That's correct. That's correct, Ben.
	Awesome. And you also have a company called Cardio Miracle that's, I guess, an alternative supplement to help with the cardiovascular system?
	Yeah. Actually, the name of the company is Santa Cora International.
	We make a product called the Cardio Miracle, which is a nitric oxide vitamin D nutraceutical.
	Actually, the premier nitric oxide vitamin D nutraceutical in the world.
	We have absolutely fabulous third-party peer-reviewed research Yeah, it's quite remarkable, particularly in the context of what has been happening over the last three years.
	Yeah, yeah. I mean, you seem very involved in this whole freedom movement, alternative medicine.
	Really, it seems like you're not really going with the narrative of what they're telling us to do out there.
	Well, you know, one of the challenges of this life And it's become more acute over the last few years.
	It's always been to discern the truth from the deception, right?
	Reality from illusion.
	And we've certainly served up a steaming hot pile of illusion over the last three years.
	Ironically, perhaps we've just become aware of the steaming hot pile because actually that's been served up to us on...
	Low-grade, I don't know, lead platters, I don't know, for hundreds of years, but now it's the opposition.
	Those folks that consider human life disposable are out.
	They're not trying to hide anymore.
	They're definitely not trying to hide.
	That's for sure. Now, Cardio Miracle is awesome, by the way, and we should definitely do an episode full episode on Cardio Miracle.
	But what I really wanted to chat with you about is your website, ProsecuteNow.io and the work that you are doing to help bring essentially these criminal scumbags to justice, which is really brave of you.
	Can you tell us a little bit about what you guys are doing with ProsecuteNow.io?
	Yeah, thanks, man. It is a work of Righteous passion we consider.
	I work very closely with Dr.
	David E. Martin and have been for close to two years now.
	Our purpose, ma'am, is singular.
	It is to facilitate and direct the criminal investigations and subsequent criminal prosecutions of The creator and designer of what everybody is now familiar with, a coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which is actually a bioweapon.
	It's a bioweapon with the DoD.
	It ironically happens to also be a significant component in the Pfizer and Moderna gene therapy injections.
	So our purpose at Prosecute Now is to pursue and facilitate the criminal investigations and prosecutions of one Mr.
	Ralph Baric, who is the individual which we'll see in our conversation, whose name is on the patents that developed the SARS coronavirus itself, as well that the chimeric version, which was both a blend of both natural occurring and synthetic A man-made chimeric animal.
	And then he also participated from his ivory tower at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Alabama at Birmingham to develop remdesivir, which is used in human clinical trials between 2018 and 2019.
	We'll touch on that as well with lethal effect.
	And the combination of those two Treatments, shall we call air quotes, injections in remdesivir leads to a statistical certainty of death.
	And so we're pursuing the, like I say, the criminal investigations and prosecutions of Mr.
	Ralph Baric for homicide, for reckless homicide and negligent homicide.
	Yeah. I mean, when we interviewed attorney Thomas Renz, some of the information he gave us was pretty mind blowing.
	Well, firstly, that this COVID virus was created before they told us they had created or, you know, had come about.
	That it was really funded partially by our intelligence services with the involvement of Fauci and various others that frankly I think are guilty of crimes against humanity.
	And when you're talking about remdesivir, really Thomas Renz refers that to as the hospital killing camps.
	Which is you bring in people, you give them remdesivir.
	The studies have already proven remdesivir kills people.
	And hence, this is essentially the killing fields, essentially modern day killing fields.
	What do you think about all that? Well, the patent history is quite clear.
	David Martin has been doing forensic patent research on the development of the SARS, the coronavirus clade Vaccines,
	again, air quotes, as well as the development of the coronavirus as a malleable virus that could be populated with specific elements that would then be deliverable.
	I mean, you can manage and manipulate the coronavirus, for example, to, which really started out, I got to tell you that coronavirus is Something that afflicts originally dogs and pigs.
	It's an intestinal, causes intestinal problems.
	You get small dogs, young pigs, young canines that die as a function, diarrhea, as a function of the coronavirus clade or family of coronaviruses.
	That has been repurposed as part of the Part of the spooky engineering that Ralph Barrett has completed at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill is to repurpose and redirect the coronaviruses from affecting the digestive system to destroying the heart and the circulatory system.
	So we'll see that in some of the patents, but I was just saying David Martin's been doing forensic patent work on this Development of this virus and associated vaccines and gene therapies for over 20 years.
	Wow. So, you know, the whole warp speed story was a lie.
	It's more like I refer to it as a warped speed story because the patents go back on this VIM over 20 years.
	Wow. So there's no surprise here.
	This has been in development for a long, long time.
	And it's been known, for those who have been looking and aware, and I would say David Martin is one of the more singular humans on the planet, has been keenly aware because he just happens to have a business that's based on the monetization of intellectual property, the underwriting of intellectual property.
	Well, so Warp Speed, you know, Trump, who seems like a lot of people on the freedom side of things are a big fan of, and he was touting Warp Speed as a huge success.
	Do you think he was part of the fraud, or do you think they kept him out of the know, or what do you think happened there?
	I think he was set up.
	Yep. I think it was set up.
	I mean, you would think so.
	Well, here's the fact. Here are a couple of facts.
	Number one, we know that there was an emergency use authorization document drafted.
	So one question is, who drafted that document?
	And for what purpose?
	Because when it was drafted and signed, there was, we didn't have a coronavirus.
	We didn't have a pandemic.
	He signed it.
	Why did he sign it?
	I mean, the Health and Human Services Secretary, who I shall not name, was under criminal investigation.
	Who gave him that document to sign was under criminal investigation.
	Federal criminal investigation for price fixing insulin in Mexico.
	Wow. If we say he's under criminal investigation, that means he hasn't been convicted.
	But being under federal criminal investigation, while sitting as a cabinet member over Health and Human Services, and you're handing the president an emergency use authorization prior to there being in need for one, you know, it just doesn't smell good.
	And of course, he's the Health and Human Services Secretary at the time, and he was a former big pharma CEO. So you connect those dots.
	Unfortunately, Trump signed that document.
	That's irrefutable.
	And that launched what's become a global tragedy of incomparable scale.
	Yeah, I mean, so in the signing of that document, again, I know we're just speculating here, but is the theory that he was basically, you know, not tricked necessarily, but he thought, hey, you know, it sounds like the right thing to do if there is a pandemic, you know, a lot of hypotheticals, hence, I will sign it.
	Do you think it was that sort of thing?
	And I'm talking specifically about Trump, not necessarily the people that might have tried to trick him.
	Right, well, It's a relevant question.
	I'd be speculating on an answer.
	It's hard to understand how the highest level of government leadership in the executive branch, whether at the cabinet level or higher in the Oval Office, can be uninformed about basic facts.
	As I say, the patent history on this isn't Isn't hidden.
	It isn't a public record.
	You know, we have intelligence agencies that spend time doing ostensibly intelligent things, I don't know, looking at intellectual property, understanding how it's being used around the world, how it's being implemented, who owns it, who's selling it to whom, when, under what kind of contracts.
	So You'd think that somebody would be watching that ball.
	There's no question. The creation of a SARS coronavirus was just a follow-through on a jump shot that started in the 1990s.
	How many attempts to create a pandemic, Ben?
	We had the H1N1 virus.
	Swine flu. We had the bird flu, avian flu, right?
	Neither of those panned out to create any significant problem, whatever.
	AIDS, Fauci tried that to create some kind of a global problem that could be solved with injections.
	We had MERS, the Middle East retrovirus.
	That turned out to Be it nothing of any consequence.
	So if you look over a brief history of time, you know, since basically the 80s, you'll see many, many attempts by the NIH really to create epidemics and pandemics.
	So that the end product, the end of the plan, or just the interim end of the plan could be achieved, which was to establish a global platform, a global vaccine platform, to which the global population was compliant.
	Comply. And ultimately, it seems like all of these agendas, whether it's AIDS, COVID, swine food, it's really just, I mean, let's say, like, you know, killing people, right?
	Population control. I mean, am I a conspiracy theorist for speculating that?
	No, there's not a lot of speculation there.
	The fact is that these folks operate in plain sight.
	You can read the World Health Organization and the World Health Assembly, which is a Department of the World Health Organization have been very clear about creating a surveillance state.
	This is well published.
	Their publications include statements such as, so these go back to 2005 and even previously, but in 2005, the documents that are very clear that state that the 20th century was the century of And the 21st century is going to be the century of the vaccine.
	So that's the methodology that the World Health Organization has been pushing for decades to establish a global vaccine platform by which medicine could be administered to global populations that were compliant.
	Because you need compliance.
	If you're going to stick a needle into somebody, Against their will, that constitutes trespass and battery.
	Those crimes, those are both civil actions and criminal actions.
	And if I go out and start swinging a bat at somebody against their will and without their informed consent, you know, I'll get written up and charged.
	But if I have an MD behind my name and wear a white coat and a stethoscope and stick a needle in somebody Without their informed consent, without advising them of the risk of the solution I'm putting into their body, under the 1986 Act, I'm totally protected from any liability that that injection might cause.
	So when you back up and take a look at the arc of the last four years, you say, gosh, here it comes.
	And even before that, from the 1940s, In the 1960s, when fat started, you know, in terms of the mere diet, fat got a bad name, that fat was unhealthy in our foods, and as a consequence, it was taken out of our foods and replaced with sugar.
	And, you know, the story is well known.
	We have a couple of Harvard doctors who were paid off to write research articles that get published around the world saying fat is bad and sugar is good.
	And so we get...
	Low-fat foods that are chock full of sugars.
	We have how many sugar substitutes now?
	We have natural sugars, baked sugars, sugar substitutes, all kinds of weird things that people are ingesting as a function of highly refined foods that don't have much fat in them.
	They've got a lot of high fructose corn syrup.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You know, sugar that goes by 68 other names that the body has no idea what to do with.
	Creating a massive problem, right?
	Heart disease, you know, leading cause of death in this country.
	Obesity, really a pandemic of obesity and diabetes, growing at warp speed.
	We were interviewing a doctor, by the way.
	Non-alcoholic liver disease, which is one of the fastest chronic diseases growing in America.
	You know, how do you get non-alcoholic liver disease?
	Well, you know, look at the beverages that were sold, that we are sold every day.
	And the amount of sugar, you know, alcohol is sugar.
	You can put a bunch of corn syrup and put some fizzy bubbles in it.
	People down that, no surprise.
	We've got exploding health problems.
	And the way that we want to address those health problems, according to our government authorities and world authorities, is, oh, let's inject people's stuff.
	Hmm. Yeah.
	So we're targeting, yeah, we're looking, Dr.
	Martin and I, we're looking at and working with counties.
	We're working with county law enforcement officials, sheriffs, and district attorneys to initiate investigations for crimes, capital homicide, negligent homicide, reckless homicide, and indictments and prosecutions against Mr.
	Barrick. And we can go through some slides to show some preliminary evidence about why we're getting that vector.
	Definitely. Quick thing about the sugar.
	I interviewed a doctor recently that was saying that the whole sugar versus fat, that actually fat helps with the brain function.
	It actually is something that helps with the brain and body function, right?
	And we've been lied to. Whereas sugar actually helps to dumb down people.
	And not to mention lead to diabetes, lead to heart disease, you know, early death and that sort of thing.
	Again, you know, it seems like you're just like the COVID situation.
	It seems like they're giving information and selling us something that ultimately leads to our demise as opposed to good health.
	And I'm sorry, I can't look at all these elements and say there's not either they're idiots or there's a conspiracy to harm us.
	I tend to think there's a conspiracy to harm us, but...
	Yeah, using that term, to conspire, it's a great verb.
	It means to work with, to think and work with, which requires more than one person.
	People can conspire to do good things as well.
	In this case, we've got a lot of working together to To create very negative outcomes.
	Yeah. And before we dive into the slides, there's another thing I want to point out.
	You were talking about local action, right?
	And we spoke about this when we met.
	Local versus federal.
	And I think the theory there is Federal is way too corrupt.
	You could actually affect change locally and have significant change come about by operating on the local level through sheriffs.
	Can you tell us a little bit more about that process and the vision behind that?
	Yeah, well, first, yeah, I would say we can go through a, you know, a constitutional 101 or maybe in Constitution 99 class on the structure of our government as a Really a three-prong approach built for the purpose of creating checks and balances between these three branches of government.
	We have a legislative branch, which is no longer representing the will of the people.
	That's obvious.
	Our representatives in the legislative branch are not representing the will of the people.
	That's a problem. The legislative branch is also Actively, over the course of many years, given away its legislative authority to the executive branch.
	So instead of legislation, instead of the Senate and the House producing legislation for which the voted and elected representatives are responsible to draft and for which they're responsible for passing or not passing,
	So much of that legislative authority has been passed off from the legislature to the executive branch in the form of the administrative state.
	You know, what we typically call the ABC agencies, right?
	The EPA. The FAA, the FTC, the FCC, and the list goes on and on and on.
	These are federal agencies under the executive branch, as people know, that are run by not elected but appointed officials.
	They draft regulations.
	They don't draft laws.
	They draft regulations that have the effect of law.
	That's one of the massive challenges that we have in this country in terms of being a constitutional democratic republic is Is that there is no representation for the people in the laws that govern this country that show up in the form of regulations.
	The amount of regulation is grotesque.
	The FDA prevents you and me from talking about our health and what we can do to improve it without any constraints.
	Put another way, they put very significant constraints on what we can and cannot say because if you say the wrong thing, then that's illegal.
	You can be fined with that, yet you can be charged with a crime for that.
	So the freedom of speech issue is a problem.
	So we have the legislative branch and we have, like I say, the executive branch and legislation has been passed off in large part to the executive branch, which was never its function.
	The administrator was not contemplated.
	By the Constitution, yet there it is.
	And then thirdly, we have the judicial branch, which is supposed to enforce the laws of the legislature.
	That's its purpose. There is no contemplation in the Constitution about the judicial branch's ability to enforce a bureaucratic behemoth grown under the auspices of a department of one man, the president. The executive branch of the country.
	So we've lost, in fact, we were involved in a lawsuit last year, filed in March, in the federal district court in Utah, filed in March 2022, with the purpose of terminating the mask, the injection mandates against healthcare workers.
	Oral argument was on July 6th of last year, and it took more than 90 days for us to get a decision from the federal judge in Utah on that case.
	And his decision was, we asked one question.
	The only factual question to be determined in that lawsuit is, is the injection gene therapy or is it an immune tool?
	Is it a vaccine under the definition of vaccine of the 1986 Act, which is supposed to provide immunity, which is supposed to prevent transmissibility and give immunity to the population that is injected?
	Well, it didn't either. So it didn't qualify as a vaccine under any kind of term of art at all.
	So that was the question that we posed to the court.
	Is this a gene therapy, which Moderna admitted that it was, Or is it a vaccine that provides immunity against this infection in perpetuity?
	Well, the court responded that it was not its province to question the opinions of expert health authorities.
	What? What? What?
	Like, seriously, that sounds like the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
	In fact, it seems like all these election lawsuits being tossed out because of standing, same trick, that they just don't want to adjudicate upon.
	Am I a layman stating this incorrectly or what?
	It certainly appears that way.
	There are a number of judges at the trial level, both in the federal courts and state courts, Judges at the trial level where evidence gets introduced and where you have a trier of fact making a decision, a jury or a judge, making a decision about the facts that come into evidence, what facts come into evidence, and then making findings and conclusions based on those facts as the law applies to them.
	Well, and this particular federal judge here in Utah said it's not his province to question the You know, the specific knowledge of the health authorities of the country.
	So you toss out Article III of the Constitution, which is really that three-pronged approach to our government, where you have, like I said, the legislature had conceded its legislative authority to the administrative state in the executive branch, and here you have a An agent of the judicial branch, a judge saying, well, I can't judge the authorities speaking on behalf of public health from the executive branch.
	I can't do that. I'm just a judge.
	I'm not a health authority.
	Now we have one branch government, in effect.
	We have an executive branch that acts like a monarch that says, well, I can sign executive orders.
	I'm sorry. I have to mention this.
	The judicial branch is repugnant, in my opinion.
	And nobody talks about it.
	This is literally...
	They have abdicated their duty.
	They're just not doing what they're supposed to be doing in these courts.
	I don't know. Is that right?
	Or am I saying the right thing there?
	Is that incorrect? Are they letting us down?
	I don't know. We certainly felt let down when we received, finally, after more than 90 days, a written opinion, something that should have taken 45 to 60 days max, and 90 days later we get a written opinion that was not a product of 90 days at work.
	Yeah, we were let down severely, not by the decision to begin with, because we were looking for a restraining order, a temporary restraining order to Stop the forced injection of gene therapy into healthcare workers or, you know, telling them to pound sand and leave.
	I mean, one day that they're national heroes and then the next day they're villains because they won't be injected.
	So we tell them to, you know, see you later.
	Don't need you. You're fired.
	So, no, the judiciary has been, there's, it's been a problem.
	We've seen a dearth of decisions.
	The argument can be made that the judiciary has failed on a significant level.
	Not to say that all judges are bad.
	One of the things that happened last year on a positive note, Ben, was that our team was associated with the group that won the case out of the Central District of Florida that deep-sixed the mask The mask mandates, the travel mask mandates for planes and trains and automobiles, right?
	So in April of last year, that decision came out.
	That was the sixth.
	You probably recall the day when the FAA had to announce that, well, you don't have to wear masks anymore.
	And people were exceptionally happy about that, you know?
	So that judge wrote a 56-page opinion.
	I think it was a 56 or 59-page opinion.
	And it was the right decision.
	So there are still very good judges and we have to work within that system.
	We can't throw away a system that's based on the Constitution of our country because it can work.
	But we certainly do need to be vigilant about bringing the right kinds of cases.
	I'll tell you, if you hand the judge a bad set of facts and a poorly played case, Without proper form and substance and without being very good at the procedure of that case, you handcuff the judge.
	The judges have to operate based on facts that you bring, how you present them, how they get admitted into evidence, and judge is relevant, all those things, Vim.
	And there has been, I can tell you, from the guys on the good side of this fight, there have been plenty of Plenty of folks on the good side that have brought some really poor legal cases.
	And the fact that they lose shouldn't surprise anybody.
	So that's actually one of the challenges that we've had in this fight for liberty is a lot of cases have, so many cases have been filed that have been poorly thought out, not well prepared, and so on, that result in losses that create precedent.
	And so That isn't necessarily a judge problem.
	So I just want to be fair about the perspective that we have relative to the judiciary.
	No question that judges can't be problematic and not want to hear the evidence or disregard it.
	But there's also the fact that much of that depends on the quality of the case, how well prepared and how well it's argued and so on by the legal teams that bring them.
	Well, it's nice hearing your point of view.
	I mean, definitely much more balanced than my point of view because I'm a bit of an outsider.
	I'm not an attorney. I just look at these judges tossing out cases based upon things like standing and like what you just said.
	I have a lot of confidence that the case that you guys presented in Utah was pretty buttoned up and just sounds like they don't want to deal with it from a layman's point of view.
	Yeah, and you certainly have those cases.
	So those things happen.
	We knew that was a possible outcome just because of the environment we were arguing.
	But yeah, it's It's not always just as simple as it appears.
	Yeah. On the FDA tip, I just wanted to mention this before we go into the slides here.
	We actually reviewed a case.
	It's interesting. The FDA really seems to become an enemy of the people.
	There was one instance where there was somebody that was whistleblowing on a company that was polluting waterways in Los Angeles, right?
	Called the FDA to whistleblow.
	This turned out it was true because these guys apparently dumped chemicals in the tune of tens of millions into a waterway in Culver City.
	And this individual, after reporting this to the FDA as a confidential informant, they started to investigate this individual and his company.
	And he actually had a confidential informant designation, which they just tossed out the door and really just started to basically make a mess of this individual's company, even though he's a confidential informant.
	So hearing that story, I'm just like, what Are they going to be up to next?
	I mean, there's no honor in that.
	There's no moral value.
	Imagine you're a mafia informant, you know, going into that RICO lock, and then they tell you, oh, that's that guy's address, and they point you out.
	I mean, it just seems unconscionable, that kind of behavior.
	Well, yeah, I would agree.
	We see in the last few years as well, we've seen during the Trump administration, Uh, a number of members on, uh, committees in, uh, in house committees,
	the house of representatives that have disregarded, completely disregarded whistleblowers, or in the case of, uh, you know, some political parties protecting whistleblowers, uh, to Adam Schiff.
	I would point out Mr.
	Adam Schiff has a flamboyant record of on the one hand, Given whatever issue he's trying to protect, not being absolutely sanguine and overbearing to protect the name of a whistleblower,
	whereas he'll take a diametrically opposed position regarding a whistleblower on an issue that he wants exposed.
	So you're right, there is not equal treatment.
	Of those folks who have the courage to come forward in that whistleblowing capacity, and it should be that there are specific statutes regarding the protection of those folks.
	Well, we have an unequal application of the law.
	There's no question about that.
	Yeah. So diving into some of these slides, Stanford, which, by the way, I got to say, I've been in entertainment my whole life.
	If I was doing a casting, if I was going to central casting, the person that's taking on these powers that be, like, you're the image, brother.
	You even have the name. I mean, Stanford Graham is, I mean, it just sounds dignified.
	It sounds like you're ready to bust up some stuff.
	And It's amazing that you're going after these individuals on a level of homicide, which is really what they did, right?
	So we have these slides here.
	I don't know if you want to guide me through them.
	Tell me which ones to turn on, and we'll just talk through them.
	Yeah, let's start. Why don't we just talk?
	We can start with...
	How about at the beginning with slide number one?
	Sure, sure. I'll pop this up right here.
	You can see here the slide number one.
	This is the title of the...
	This is what we're going to be taking a look at.
	This is the Ralph Baric Criminal Evidentiary dossier.
	We've heard a lot about dossiers since 2014, 2015, and so on.
	Well, here's a very relevant dossier that we've developed with information from the public record.
	We haven't paid anybody for this information.
	Let me make that disclosure and disclaimer that we haven't paid anybody for this information.
	This is public. And for information, it's available in the public media.
	And of course, ProsecuteNow is our purpose to pursue these prosecutions.
	So let's go to slide number two. All right.
	So slide number two here, we have a patent, one of the most relevant patents associated with the SARS-CoV virus and its development.
	And of course, When I mentioned the name Ralph Barrick, again, at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, where he is a virologist and has been for many years.
	You'll see here on this document, this is a screen capture.
	You'll see all of these at the bottom of each of these slides.
	You'll see, in effect, the footnote, the citation for the authority of the content or the slide capture.
	So all this information fact checkers have at it.
	So you see that Ralph Baric's name as an inventor and that the priority date on this particular patent goes back to 2001.
	April of 2001.
	And it was granted in October 2007.
	The relevant language here is it says this patent has to do with producing an infectious Replication defective coronavirus.
	Well, that's in fact exactly what we have.
	If you wanted to describe the SARS-CoV-2 virus, that's exactly what you've got.
	It is infectious, but it's replication defective.
	There's very little risk of it passing between people.
	It wasn't built to do that, which makes It's replication defective, which means that it calls into question the need for an injection.
	Wow. Would it be accurate to say right now we are seeing the receipts of a conspiracy to harm the public?
	Is that an accurate statement?
	Yeah, in real time.
	This is what it's for.
	So for people that are like, oh, that's a right-wing conspiracy.
	I mean, we're seeing it in front of us right now.
	This is not a right-wing conspiracy.
	This is actually their intent.
	Yeah, actually invite people to read the patent.
	Read the patent. We have the patent number here.
	It's available on this slide, folks.
	Read the patent. Read the whole patent and you'll find out that this was developed to be used on humans.
	Wow. The patent actually says so.
	So, again, note the date.
	This is 2001.
	It's the priority date on the patent application.
	Wow. So long time planning.
	That's 20 years ago. Wow.
	We're talking 22 years ago.
	So this is not the whole argument for the necessity of warp speed and how great the pharmacological industry worked to create a vaccine in record time, and it's baloney.
	It's baloney, yep. Let's go to the next slide, because the next slide will show us that Anthony Fauci sat in front of Congress and Senate committees denying that he had funded gain of research.
	Well, here's some evidence that shows he's lying.
	The NIH funded Ralph Baric's research of this coronavirus and the weaponization of protein.
	This is a small sample of those funding of those grants.
	You can see Ralph Baric's name is highlighted, and you can see, for example, NIH grant ROR01 GM, in 2003, the reverse genetics with the coronavirus infectious construct, or the susceptibility and protective immunity of noroviruses.
	Again, you can dig into these grants and find very specifically what they're being funded for.
	So this is just an example of some of the funding when Mr.
	Fauci says, well, we never funded any of that.
	Well, that's a bald-faced lie.
	Let's go to the next slide.
	The next slide shows us an accumulation of the number of grants that were given to Mr.
	Barrick. We're talking Ralph Barrick.
	Not just general grants given to the general academic population to do research on coronaviruses.
	This is just Ralph Barrick.
	Associated with coronavirus and this spike protein.
	You have over 161 studies supported by over $44 million in funding between 1997 and 2021 to develop the coronavirus, the spike protein, and some of these are associated with remdesivir.
	The list is actually more expansive than this.
	Again, this is...
	Very available information to anybody that actually wants to find it to determine that, in fact, Mr.
	Fauci was funding, the government was funding bioweapon development to use against the population.
	That's exactly what happened.
	Wow. Wow.
	So should I turn on the next slide?
	Yeah, let's go to the next slide and we'll take a look at the in our prior In this dialogue, we were talking about Ralph Barrick's involvement.
	The reason we're pursuing him for a criminal activity, I should say alleged criminal activity, is because he developed the spike protein in the coronavirus, the chimeric version of this strange SARS-CoV-2 virus, and then this drug called Remdesivir.
	The remdesivir was funded by these parties, the Department of Defense, the University of North Carolina, the CDC, the NIH, and Gilead.
	Funds came from all those organizations to create and patent this drug remdesivir and then to provide this drug actually in a human clinical trial to see actually what would happen using this in a trial stage Let's give this a shot, see what happens. What's its functionality in the human system?
	So let's go to the next slide.
	Got that. It's number six.
	Here we go. Thank you.
	So here we have some funding evidence, right?
	Here we have the funding, for example, that the NIH was contributing money for the development of remdesivir again.
	Mr. Barrick at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
	You can see that the highlighted language here, this had to do with the development of GS5734. So this guy, Ralph Baric, he's behind the actual vaccine, but he's also behind the killing tool, which is Remdesivir. Yes.
	Shocker. So here's one grant.
	Here's the record of one particular grant.
	You have the grant record.
	uh the identification of that grant right there and this is a broad spectrum antiviral research to gs5734 which is remdesivir to treat mares cov that's middle east right retrovirus and related emerging covid viruses coronaviruses i shouldn't say covid that's a covid's a brand name that's not a thing But emerging coronaviruses,
	well, what emerging coronaviruses were there in 2017?
	Wow. Wow, that's pretty insane.
	Just to give you some perspective on that, Anthony Fauci said at the time that Trump was inaugurated in 2016, I'm sorry.
	2017. 2017, the 2016 election, 2017 January, Fauci says, I can promise this administration one thing.
	It will face a pandemic.
	Yep. Well, is he a prophet?
	Yeah. Or an operator, or a simple operator?
	He's a simple operator.
	That sounds like a threat to me, actually.
	That sounds like a threat to the Trump administration.
	Yeah. Like I said, these folks will tell you what they're going to do.
	There's been some cognitive dissonance, significant cognitive dissonance among the population over the last three years because they think, well, how could it possibly be that our government leaders, those who are charged with our care, are actually this evil?
	Is that really possible?
	A lot of people have accused others of being conspiracy theorists because they can't wrap their head around, the folks making that accusation can't wrap their head around the fact that humans in leadership capacities charged in protection of the country and its population are actually in the business of killing the people.
	That is a difficult thing to wrap your head around until the evidence becomes overwhelming if you're watching and you want to know And now, even now, the evidence is becoming public.
	It can't be hidden anymore.
	And so, yeah, more and more people that chose to be injected with a gene therapy are now having buyer's remorse.
	Like, I've made a bad decision.
	I understand now that I was lied to.
	So that's the dynamic that's going on here.
	So let's go to the next slide.
	I think it's slide eight. Oh, is this the right one?
	I'm sorry, I'm not directing you through these very well.
	So I pulled up slide seven because I think that was the next one, but I could go to eight.
	Let's go to eight. Yeah, this slide eight.
	So here's, this is the, represents the human clinical trials that were conducted, organized by the World Health Organization with involvement by Anthony Fauci and Ralph Baric.
	Direct involvement in planning, establishing, orchestrating, and effectuating The human clinical trials on these experimental drugs, four experimental drugs, one of which were remdesivir.
	These were conducted in the Democratic Republic of the Congo because we were told that there was an outbreak of Ebola because we never learned about how that outbreak actually happened or the degree to which it happened or why it happened.
	But apparently there was an Ebola outbreak.
	And so this team from the NIH and Mr.
	Barrick, the World Health Organization, hustle over to the public of the Congo to try to figure out, hey, why don't we use a remdesivir, which if you look back at the grant, it's an antiviral to treat Middle East Respiratory Syndrome and other emerging coronaviruses.
	It wasn't made.
	To treat Ebola.
	But they use it under those auspices.
	And so the outcome, as most people know, that the outcome of those experimental trials, Remdesivir, had to be dropped from the trial because of its lethality.
	The kill rate that it effectuated ranged from 53 to 86 percent of the people that it was given to.
	Insane. Absolutely insane.
	Yeah. 53 to 86% of the people that received remdesivir died as a consequence of being given remdesivir.
	Wow. Not as a reaction of, not as a consequence of having Ebola.
	And so this is known. Consider this.
	So this is between November of 2018 and August of 2019.
	That our health authorities here in the United States, including Mr.
	Barrick, who helped develop this drug, and Mr.
	Fauci, who helped design and carry out this human clinical trial, and the World Health Organization also involved in this human clinical trial.
	They knew the lethality of remdesivir.
	They knew it had to be dropped from those trials because it was so deadly.
	I mean, there's no, I've said this before, Multiple times to a number of sheriffs.
	This is the evidence that we present to sheriffs as just a taste of the kinds of evidence that we have.
	Thousands of pages of documentary evidence.
	So let me ask you here, like this is, you know, when the Nazis were using doctors to experiment and kill off massive numbers of people, I mean, they were guilty of crimes against humanity, a Holocaust.
	How is Ralph Baric and Anthony Fauci any different from, you know, really some of those, you know, scummiest people that have ever lived?
	That's a relevant question and I don't take it lightly.
	I've spent the last week reviewing and watching Nuremberg trial videos and the kinds of evidence that was brought to bear against the Third Reich's regime and the human behavior that was not just tolerated but celebrated.
	That of course resulted in that trial and the conviction and hanging of many of those perpetrators.
	What's sad to understand is that in real time, as those experiments were being conducted in Germany in the death camps on human beings that were treated like animals,
	that information was being real-time It's a more sad fact as well that many of the scientists that developed the conclusions from all these human torture chambers,
	the United States actually got them out of Germany and brought them to the United States and gave them prestigious academic Wow.
	So that we could glean all the information that they had learned and all the technology that they had developed.
	It was arguably a great leap forward for the United States to secure a brain trust from Germany.
	It just so happened that the individuals themselves were intolerables.
	I mean, these were unhuman humans.
	The next the next few slides will show something about the character of Mr.
	Barrick and Mr. Fauci because here they know right them here they know the lethality of remdesivir and here's the statement that Ralph Barrick makes in April of 2020.
	On April 29th 2020 he states about remdesivir quote this is a game changer for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.
	Remdesivir provides an effective treatment strategy for the many individuals around the globe.
	Ladies and gentlemen, you're looking at a Nazi-level scumbag over here.
	I mean, I don't know what else to call this man.
	Well, it's difficult to reconcile, isn't it?
	It's almost categorically impossible to reconcile How an individual with his knowledge, knowing that from the mid-1990s, early 2000s, he's working to develop and weaponize a spike protein as well as an antiviral treatment Both of which are built to kill people because the spike protein,
	I mean, if you take a look at all the patents, the patent that we looked at at the beginning of this conversation is not the only patent associated with spike protein.
	There are many.
	I'll just leave it at that. There are many patents associated with the development of this in the weaponization and patenting of that spike protein as a bioweapon, as a bioweapon, using that in the military term of art.
	And then the development of remdesivir that was misused as it was applied to Ebola, really what I think it was an exercise to determine and to confirm its lethality.
	That's what I think. I think it was built for the purpose of determining, confirming its lethality.
	They knew that it would be lethal and it was a practice and it protected Framework within which to establish that lethality and to confirm it so that they could then, within a year, make it the demand from the CDC that it be the treatment of choice,
	the only treatment, the required protocol to be given to folks, you know, who show up at the hospital with a, you know, a respiratory problem or cold, maybe some challenges breathing, you know, that kind of thing.
	Or to people who have been given a gene therapy with a spike protein, which has turned their bodies into a bioweapon manufacturing facility that compromises the cardiovascular system.
	If you read the spike protein patents carefully, you understand that the purpose of that spike protein is very specific design, which is different than the coronavirus.
	It is built as an agent to destroy endothelial cells.
	That's the endothelial cells are the interior lining of our cardiovascular system, the interior of our heart, as well as every blood vessel in your body, as well as the lymph vessels in your body.
	Wow. Wow. So that's the purpose of the spike protein as disclosed in the past.
	And you take that type of bioweapon and you combine it with remdesivir, where you have an exercise You know, so thanks again, Africa, for being the trial, you know, for being the launchpad of killer drugs that the U.S. has developed and wants to stay around the globe and the phycology companies want to profit by.
	Well, putting those two together, Vim, there was no safety protocol ever developed to determine what would happen inside of a human system that was injected with gene therapy, spiked proteins, Compromising the endothelial, basically the endocrine system and the circulatory system, and then feeding that remdesivir into that compromised system.
	Wow. Well, we'll take a look at some CICP numbers here in a minute that show that it was a statistical certainty that those people would die.
	It was a statistical certainty that they would die.
	So here's what Dr.
	Fauci said about remdesivir on April 29th.
	He says, whenever you have...
	Clear-cut evidence that a drug works.
	You have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people from the placebo group know so they can have access.
	Well, what he doesn't make clear here, and the same thing that Mr.
	Barrett's quote doesn't make clear, is because these aren't necessarily lies, Vim.
	These are actually truths, right?
	You can argue that these two gentlemen, speaking with full knowledge about the substance that they're addressing, are telling the truth.
	Whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation.
	Well, he didn't say what the drug works so good at.
	The clear-cut evidence was that it kills people.
	If you slow down and read this at the speed of consciousness, the clear-cut evidence regarding remdesivir, which is the drug about which he's speaking, the clear-cut evidence from the trials was that it kills people.
	And that's their, I mean, basically, for him, he's trying to say it's working for their purposes, more or less.
	Well, he can say that, but everybody reading this will just read right past that and think that it works to heal people, that it works to help, because that's what they're supposed to do.
	They're supposed to be healing people, helping people.
	I mean, it's the National Institute of Health, not the National Institute of Death.
	Yeah. But if you slow down and you actually read what they say, listen to the exact words that come out of their mouths, you hear exactly what their plans are.
	I mean, it's obvious.
	You have to slow down and read at the speed of consciousness and hear at the speed of consciousness and say, well, here we have, he says, whenever, whenever.
	Mm-hmm. Whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works.
	Well, that begs the question, under what auspices do you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works?
	When does that kind of clear-cut evidence come to the fore?
	In clinical trials.
	That's when clear-cut evidence appears Under the rubric of the FDA, under the development of drugs, that's what has to happen.
	There is a blue ribbon, gold standard protocol that the FDA requires for a drug to make it to market so that claims can be made about healing, treatment, structure claims, etc., as well as all the negative consequences that they're going to cause.
	You only get those through human clinical trials of a very specific variety with very specific standards and requirements.
	So here he's saying, whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works, well, that's human clinical trials.
	You have an obligation to immediately let the people know.
	They can have access.
	Well, they told everybody that they could have access to this drug.
	They told everybody they can have access to this drug.
	Not only did they tell them, they told them that they had to have it.
	It was mandatory throughout the entire hospital system, healthcare system in the United States.
	This was the mandatory treatment.
	Rendesivir was the mandatory treatment.
	You show up and you get tested.
	We won't even start talking about the application of the PCR tests, which are a joke.
	Remdesivir is the required protocol.
	It's not even a question of letting people know that they can have it.
	They can have access. It's mandating access to a drug that they know that kills as a function of clear-cut evidence derived from a human clinical trial.
	Yeah, and we're seeing here how they're going to an African nation, which makes you wonder, where are all the woke people since, I mean, it seems like they're targeting Africans, black folks?
	Yeah, you certainly weren't going to do this in Akron, Ohio.
	Yeah, but where are all these woke people going, hey, wait a minute, you're literally targeting these poor black folks, murdering them, and that's how you're basing your trials.
	I mean, nobody says a thing, I guess.
	Yeah, it's shocking if you slow down and look at it.
	It's been paraded.
	Let's go, what is it?
	I think we're at...
	Number 11 here.
	11, yes. I think so.
	Let me double check. Number 10, my bad.
	Yeah, thank you. Number 10.
	Just the prior one.
	I'm sorry, are we at nine?
	Oh, sorry. That might be actually nine.
	One sec here. Almost there.
	Thanks. Yeah, I think we're at slide 10.
	No, that was 9 and then this is 10.
	There you go, slide 10.
	Thank you. So here's some records from the Health Resources and Services Administration, which nobody has ever heard of.
	This is under the FDA. The Health Resources and Services Administration.
	They actually offer a compensation program called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, which again, very few people have ever heard of.
	I would say that Dr.
	Martin actually published a program yesterday on his Butterflies of the Week.
	You can find that on YouTube, Butterflies of the Week, with Dr.
	Martin, where he demonstrates that the argument about VAERS providing accurate data on all things COVID is that accurate reporting is required under VAERS by the doctors who are administering the shots, not the people that are injured by them.
	I would suggest everybody take a look at Dr.
	Martin's presentation on YouTube, Butterflies of the Week, where he discusses with great specificity The VAERS program, as well as this program, the Counter Measures Injury Compensation Program, which is built very specifically for the COVID injuries.
	So if you'll take a look, this was at last I accessed this a few months ago.
	We can update this as far as February, but for our purposes, you can see as of August 1, 2022, the total Claims filed were 9,657 and those the claims that were eligible for review were 9,557 so they had somebody had managed to review 100 cases okay of all between 2010 and
	20 august of 2022 100 cases have been reviewed and we got 9,557 pending.
	Of all those reviewed, there's 41 that were eligible for compensation and 29 that were compensated.
	So you see the numbers are not in favor of those seeking compensation.
	Wow, wow.
	So there's really like, for people that have been injured, there's really very little recourse.
	Yeah, very little recourse.
	Now, let's go to slide number 11.
	If you dig down into these numbers and take a look at this database, here's one of the things that you find.
	That of all those claims, we have 294 claims for COVID-19 injuries or deaths, and 98 Out of 100 of those CICB cases where remdesivir was used for COVID injuries, associated with COVID injuries and death, 98 out of 100 cases resulted in death where remdesivir was used as a countermeasure.
	Wow. So the point is this, is that, and again, anybody can go search the database, And draw these numbers out where we have 294 claims for COVID-19 injuries and deaths.
	100 of those cases where remdesivir was used as a treatment.
	So one third. Of those 100 cases where remdesivir was used, 98% of the people died.
	98 people. Wow.
	That is insane numbers.
	Wow. Almost certain death.
	Well, that's statistical certainty.
	I mean, if you get within one or two points of margin of error, that's statistical certainty.
	Wow. Insane.
	Again, this is just information in plain sight.
	But it's varied.
	People don't have time.
	They have their jobs. They have their families.
	They have the stresses of life.
	You don't see any public service announcements.
	About the CICP program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, and the timeframes within which you have to provide information and all the information that you have to provide.
	I mean, the whole thing, you know, applying so that you might even be considered to have your case reviewed.
	Slide number 12.
	So the point with that is, yes, we have a statistical certainty of death.
	Peter Daszak here, he's on the left, and Mr.
	Fauci, Peter Daszak is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, which is deeply involved in establishing the global vaccine platform and effectuating it, working closely with the Wealth Organization, the Gates Foundation, and others.
	So this is a statement right out of the public record.
	Daszak reiterated that until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at the emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored.
	Here's his quote.
	To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine.
	He makes this statement in 2014.
	2014, right? We can't get enough funding to establish a global vaccine platform because nobody's paying attention to these health crises that are not health crises.
	The H1N1 flu, the avian flu.
	We can't get anybody's attention.
	Danger, danger, but nobody buys it, and they turn out to be ineffectual.
	Attempts by these folks to get the attention of the world to say, hey, you need vaccines to avoid these dangerous viruses that can evolve into a pandemic.
	They never do, and they fizzle out.
	Nobody pays attention to them.
	So that's the point that Dad's been making here.
	In order to get the funding we need to develop a vaccine platform and the vaccines behind them so we can compel injection to sustain the funding based beyond the crisis, we need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, i.e. vaccines.
	We need something like a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.
	Because then we can create a pandemic, a vaccine ready to address it.
	Specifically, a pan-coronavirus vaccine, he says in 2014.
	And we're not even looking at the patents that are leading up to 2014, which are very compelling, on the very point of the development of the vaccine.
	So he says a key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype.
	We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.
	Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
	So what have we seen?
	We've seen the media doing the very best they can to spread misinformation and to incite fear and trembling into the hearts of the people.
	Wow. Third Reich level conspiracy against the people, basically.
	Third Reich level propaganda.
	Absolutely. This is a setup.
	The key driver is the media.
	And the economics follow the hype.
	Yep. Yep. The enemies are here.
	We'll use the hype to our advantage to get to the real issues, which is making money and killing people.
	That's what you do.
	This is bio-warfare.
	It's... You don't need to shoot bullets to kill people anymore.
	You just need to shoot them, you know, with injections.
	Wow. This is really the Third World War type.
	This is, well, not even type.
	This is the Third World War technology that's being deployed.
	We're right in the middle of it. They say, well, it was developed in China.
	It was developed, yes, there was collaboration with China, but from here at home, from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
	The development of this fight approaching.
	We made it. Read the patents. Yeah.
	Some of these next few slides are going to be quite disturbing because they actually show the damages inflicted onto regular human beings by this conspiracy to murder regular citizens.
	Is it okay if I switch to slide number 13?
	Yeah, go ahead.
	This is Rodney Brooks.
	I've spoken often with his wife and secured her permission.
	You know, to use these images.
	This is Rodney, your husband, who, you know, in his everyday clothes, which would be a red bandana on his head, riding a big hog Harley, you know, with a black leather jacket.
	I mean, this guy was an iron worker, welder, a big, strong guy.
	And this is the first day in the hospital.
	His oxygen was a little low, and he had some challenges breathing.
	So they've got him on some oxygen here, and within three days, they give him a protocol of remdesivir.
	And we'll see. He's 58 years old, and he's admitted on August 21 of 2021.
	We'll see what happens when remdesivir is given to a body.
	Now, he wasn't injected when he went to the hospital, but we learned through evaluation of his medical records that they did inject him when he was hospitalized.
	At some point in time during his torture, because the records say that he is allergic to COVID-19 vaccines.
	Yeah. And as a layman, you could look at this and go, oh my God, look what COVID did to this pure human being.
	I mean, the guy literally looks like he's on his deathbed from AIDS, highly developed AIDS. That's what this looks like.
	And it looks like this man has less than 24 hours to live because the AIDS virus is destroying his body.
	Yeah. Yeah, this happens over the course of months.
	Let's take a look at the next slide.
	We just roll through these, Ben. Oops, let's see here.
	Oh, that's number...
	Sorry, give me a sec to...
	I think we're number 13.
	Yeah, almost there.
	I apologize. All right, this is the next one.
	Yeah. So you can see the circulation, you can see his body is yellow.
	This means his liver is shut down, his kidneys are shut down.
	You can see the circulatory system is shutting down.
	Next slide. Wow.
	Here's his torso.
	We'll take the next slide, I think, as a closer look at his toes and his hands.
	So you can see at the extremities what is happening here.
	I mean, it looks like I've heard of scurvy back, or not scurvy, actually.
	What was it? Leprosy.
	Leprosy. I've seen images of leprosy and I don't know.
	This looks like somebody has leprosy.
	This is a little different because you don't have...
	It's a little different. It looks...
	But this is a...
	This is functional necrosis.
	I mean, this is necrosis, where the flesh is falling off.
	You have a toe that looks like it's been broken, but that left image is his right foot.
	That's a toenail of a large toe.
	The circle, you know, the toe, his second toe, circled there, looks like it's pointing, it's perpendicular to the foot.
	Why? On the right image, you see his hand.
	You can see the tips of his fingers.
	It looks like they've been frostbitten.
	They're reduced to the bone.
	The flesh is dead.
	And these are shots taken when he's alive.
	He's still alive. He's still alive.
	Wow. Wow.
	Could you imagine being the loved one of this individual watching his body literally decay in front of you?
	It's not enough that the person's dying.
	You need to go through these horrible images.
	I mean, things that you see in concentration camps at their worst.
	These are the consequences of being treated in a U.S. hospital by mandatory protocols.
	That's why I want everybody to understand this is what happens with mandatory treatment prescribed by the CEC. Whether it's the injections and remdesivir.
	The statistical probability of death is 98%.
	So for the viewer, especially the skeptical viewer, I want to ask you, when people go around that are upset at what has happened and they say that these war criminals, these people that are, you know, they're not necessarily war criminals, but we are in a war, so hence they're committing crimes against humanity, that these individuals need to be on the short end of a rope You know, some people say, oh, you're an extremist, you're a right-wing extremist.
	I mean, what's being an extremist?
	Saying that these people that are murderers need to be put under crimes against humanity, charges, and eliminated from this world, or the destruction of people thinking that they're being helped by these doctors, and nonetheless, they are literally being destroyed.
	We're seeing the effects of these drugs literally killing these people in the hospital killing fields.
	I mean, it's just absolutely mind-blowing that in modern-day We allowed these crimes against humanity to happen.
	Not only allowed, but required them.
	What you're saying is the general population pretty much being unaware.
	The media is contributing to this, Ben.
	The media is contributing to this because they won't publish these photographs.
	The media will not They will not expose these stories.
	They will not expose photographs like this.
	I mean, this is happening.
	This is why when we're having conversations with sheriffs in various counties throughout the country, this is the evidence that we show them to say, these are the kinds of crimes that are actually happening in your county.
	What happens when you show a sheriff these images?
	This man had died here, July 21, 2022.
	How do the sheriffs react to these images that clearly show evidence that nefarious evil is happening in this country?
	Well, it gets really quiet.
	I mean, there's a number of them Know that something's going on.
	A number of them were not participating in, uh, or enforcing mask mandates.
	You know, we have some really good people in sheriff's positions, not most, but some.
	Uh, so when we show them this evidence and you know, what we've seen here is just, is not, is, is the surface of the tip of a significant evidentiary iceberg, but it's simple.
	Straightforward evidence to demonstrate from the beginning the intention of this one man, Mr.
	Barrett, as he started developing coronavirus to switch out its use from being a killing machine of dogs and pigs and then rabbits due to digestive disorders causing digestive disorders Retargeting that virus to the human heart,
	and then developing a weaponized spike protein that would be conveyed by that virus as a vector to the heart, to the circulatory system at large.
	In the first forensic autopsies that were conducted in March of 2020, or I'm sorry, of 2021, No, I'm sorry, March of 2020, the first forensic autopsy was done in Sweden, and they found ubiquitous blood clots littering.
	That was the phrase they used, littering the blood, the vascular system.
	They found the permeability of the vascular system to be compromised.
	So that the homeostasis that's supposed to exist between the interior of blood vessels and the exterior of interstitial tissue was disrupted and you had fluids flowing wildly between those two, you know, between inside the blood vessel and outside of it, which really devolves into a septic system.
	You know, people will, you put your body into sepsis that way.
	You see the destruction of the gas membrane so that The body cannot exchange oxygen for carbon dioxide, meaning there's a disruption in our ability to breathe, and then shutting blood off to major organs.
	And of course you see that pronounced and emphasized in Rodney's case, where you can see obviously the liver is not functioning, obviously kidneys The pancreas is not functioning.
	I mean, you see all these things.
	The cardiovascular system is being shut down.
	Blood supply isn't getting to the extremities, and so it's actually you have flesh dying because of ischemia issues and hypoxia issues.
	No oxygen, no hydration, no nutrition.
	Of course, they weren't feeding him because you intubate people and you stop feeding them.
	Wow. Wow.
	You know, the people, I think, honestly, as somebody that ran for office, and this is when I was knocking on doors mid-2022, telling people that this is going on, and the apathy out there.
	I mean, 20%, 25%, maybe even 30% of voters are very well educated, and they really research, you know, everything that's going on.
	And they come at you with questions that are intelligent.
	But then... Unfortunately, you know, you got that 70% that is very uncurious, that gets all their news from the mainstream media, and, you know, really is on that Kool-Aid.
	And I think they're a part of the problem, because this is hard to ignore.
	I mean, this is Holocaust in front of our eyes.
	It's hard to ignore.
	How could, you know, how could we have fallen into this trap?
	Because, you know, just like Ralph Baric says, as long as we control the mainstream media, as long as we control those lies, we control the people.
	And that's a sad thing. That's a sad thing that people are so easily controlled by propaganda when we've seen the calamities of being controlled by propaganda over and over and over again throughout history.
	Yeah, we just don't We think the United States and our leaders are above the Third Reich.
	We think that they would not operate in a Stalin-esque manner or operate with the intentions of, say, for instance, and the killing pills, or Mao Zedong, or the glorious leaders in North Korea.
	You wouldn't Most people think, well, this is America.
	We have a constitution.
	We're a nation of laws, etc.
	We have representatives in government.
	This kind of thing cannot happen.
	Well, it is happening.
	It is happening, yep. We go back to this cognitive dissonance, this mental, the people's inability to conceive that it's possible that Americans actually feel that a small minority of Americans In positions of power actually feel that the gross,
	I should say, the lion's share of the American population are disposable.
	I mean, we need to go back to a Hillary Clinton statement, right?
	There's the baskets of deplorables.
	That's what they think.
	So what do you do with baskets of deplorables, man?
	You don't have any problem killing them because they're deplorable.
	That same kind of language weaponized against the Jews.
	In Europe. And Armenians.
	They always forget about Armenians.
	If you look at the Armenian genocide, it is literally the prototype to what's happening here.
	There's a book called Armenian Golgotha.
	I often recommend this to people.
	Read Armenian Golgotha.
	It is literally what is happening here.
	Governments put in power in the guise of liberalism.
	They're going to save everybody. Everybody's going to be free.
	It's going to be all great.
	You know, hands across America.
	That's what they sell you.
	The minute they get that happening, fascism comes in.
	You know, again, highly recommend that people read that book.
	There's a reason why they hide certain kinds of history from us.
	There's a reason why we haven't seen many movies about Stalin and Mao because you look at Stalin and Mao and that's a prototype to what is happening right now.
	Yeah, Stalin, you talk to Ukrainians about their relationship with, you know, Khrushchev.
	Mm-hmm. And how they shut down the supply of food.
	Stalin as well, you know, went on with Khrushchev, the amount of people that died from starvation, from intentional starvation imposed by the state, to take all of the agricultural yields that were produced in Ukraine and then distributed to non-Ukraine,
	you know, the non-Ukrainian Part of that union with just abject apathy towards the Ukrainians.
	I mean, they've left a massive population to starve to death, which is, I mean, you read that history, that part of the Russian history, it's terrible.
	It's starving to death. Well, it's absolutely terrible, and now we can see.
	We can see the formation, the formulation of the government and its arms weaponizing itself against the food production capacity of this country.
	Not only as it affects every other country in the world, because we're the largest food exporter in the world, but actually producing sufficient food to feed our own people.
	There's an intentional disruption Of agricultural yield, animal yield.
	It's going to be felt this year.
	We missed it last year because last year was actually an extremely productive year, but you have this Ukraine-Russia thing going on.
	Russia can't and won't get fertilizers out now.
	They produce 40% of the fertilizer Supply in terms of the the underlying raw materials.
	Well, so now that's that's been in place now for a year.
	So the so the fertilizer markets dry and we're not going to see yields this year that are typical that are expected use of that fertilizer.
	So yields are going to be down. So costs of foods are going to go up.
	Food supply is going to go down.
	You're going to see I think it was I think there are predictions of 320 million deaths this year globally.
	Wow. My starvation as a result of the disruption of the food supply that has been both a function of the pandemic, the lockdowns, etc., as well as the disruption of the of the fertilizer industry and attempts, obviously, you know, by countries such as the Netherlands to stop production.
	It's interesting, you know, the Why was that small country in the news about the government shutting down their farmers growing crops?
	Well, it so happens that they're the second largest exporter of food in the world.
	Second only to the US. Wow.
	Nobody knows that because they're such a small country.
	They're up there bucking up against the Arctic Circle.
	How in the world could they be a second largest food supplier in the world?
	Well, they've mastered greenhouses and food production anyway.
	It's a tragic thing.
	And the Dutch are incredibly innovative.
	In fact, I worked in Amsterdam for a bit.
	That makes a lot of sense that they have such a large amount of the food supply.
	Their government, I guess, was infiltrated too by globalists and these world economic forum types.
	Yeah, you hear their plan.
	You will own nothing and be happy.
	You've heard, you know, Bill Gates is on record back in 2015 saying we need to reduce the population by 15%.
	He sent it in a TED Talk, said, you know, they put it in the context, we're going to do it with vaccines, giving vaccines to people in Africa to ostensibly, you know, shut down the birth rate.
	But it so happens that the injections, the Moderna and Pfizer injections, the spike protein, Agates, you know, in the system, it affects the gonads of humans.
	I mean, it affects the production capacity of humans.
	And so we're getting a lot of, you know, the stillbirth rate is up, what, 800%.
	Wow. Wow.
	You know, just starters.
	So if you do the math, then, if you do 15% of that global population at that time, you come up with about 720 million people.
	Wow. As a first cut.
	And he said it from a TED Talk stage, you know, saying, well, we're going to do a good thing.
	We're going to inject Africa and we're going to teach them about, you know, bring Planned Parenthood to Africa.
	Wow. Except we can just inject these moms, you know, we can inject these people so that they can't get pregnant.
	They can't bring more people into the world.
	That's actually what the...
	That's what we're learning Moderna and Pfizer injections do.
	They prevent...
	They prevent people from procreating and they kill children.
	Wow. I mean, when Yuval Harari, I guess Klaus Schwab's right-hand guy and chief medical officer, when he says things like he wishes, and by the way, he's an Israeli.
	So, I mean, he's an atheist, so I wouldn't call him a Jew.
	But, you know, this guy goes around saying that I wish Adolf Hitler would have had the technologies we had today because he would have been more successful.
	I mean, these are sociopaths.
	Yeah. Yeah. I would agree with that.
	They've kind of signed out. They intentionally signed off on their I'm No Longer Part of Humanity membership card.
	Well, hopefully we can help expedite that and get him on the short end of a rope because that's where they deserve to be, these evil Satanists.
	I'm sorry. That's what they are.
	Here's how we can use your folks that follow you, Vim, and the great work that you guys do.
	We need help.
	So here's how you can help us at Prosecute Now.
	You can reach out to us.
	You can go to the website and send us an email.
	Just contact us and send us an email.
	We need anybody that has a personal relationship with their sheriff, that has a long-term relationship of trust, With your sheriff where you can go and actually talk to your sheriff and say, you know what?
	I have something to show you.
	I'd like you to talk.
	I'd like to share it with you and I'd like you to talk to these two guys.
	David Martin and Stanford Graham.
	Give them some of your time.
	We'll take a half an hour to an hour of your time to basically show you some evidence of crimes that are being committed so that we can Have that transfer, that vicarious transfer of trash and talk with your sheriff so we can show them the evidence of what the crimes are being committed.
	And then when they make a decision, which the good folks do, the good sheriffs do, they say, well, our purpose, our reason, one of our purposes here in the sheriff's office is to investigate crimes.
	And that's all we're asking them to do.
	Investigate allegations of crime, not just car theft or, you know, Robbery, we're talking about capital homicide, investigate crimes, capital homicide, negligent, reckless homicide.
	So contact us with sheriffs that you know.
	I'll reach out to you.
	We'll give you questions to ask them.
	We can engage in a conversation with the sheriff, show them this evidence, and help persuade them, teach them what's actually happening in those hospitals in their counties, how people are dying.
	And teach them about who Ralph Baric is.
	And then secondarily, anybody who has friends or family that have died as a result of being injected with Moderna or Pfizer injections and then hospitalized and treated with remdesivir, we desperately need to talk to you.
	We desperately need to talk to you.
	That's the fact pattern that we need for our victims in order to prosecute these cases for murder.
	The people need to have been injected twice by Pfizer or Moderna bioweapon injection, and they need to have been given remdesivir after a subsequent hospitalization.
	We need those two factors in order to demonstrate the intention to kill that is evident in Mr.
	Fauci's plan, or in Mr.
	Barrick's plan as an operator.
	So please reach out to us at prosecutenow.io Just go to the contact us and send us emails.
	Send me emails. We'll reach out.
	And we desperately need to talk with more sheriffs.
	We have close to 30 now.
	We need more. And contact us about your loved ones, your friends and family who have died in these tragic ways by being injected and then given remdesivir.
	That would be very helpful then if we can get that message out.
	Yeah, I hope the viewer understands the sacrifice that people like Stanford Graham are making out there in bringing these cases together.
	It takes a lot of money.
	It takes a lot of resources.
	Don't be a coward.
	These people are Nazis.
	They are murdering women, children and men so they could get to whatever sick agenda that they have and they must be stopped.
	And the only way to stop them is for you to firstly contact, prosecute now, share this video, show what's happening in our hospitals.
	All the evidence is here, especially to share with your friends, your family, so they are all aware.
	Let's build up the public consciousness.
	Let's let them know.
	Let's let everyone know what is going on because these Nazis are getting away with crimes against humanity and that must be stopped and it must be stopped now.
	Anyway, that's my spiel.
	Wait, there is no savior.
	It's us. It's us.
	We have to do the work. Thank you.
	Mr. Graham, thank you so much for what you're doing.
	You are an amazing human being.
	Is there anything else that you'd like to mention that we did not touch upon?
	Well, I'd love to come back and talk to you about another solution.
	We've talked here about some legal solutions, but yeah, I'd love to come back and talk to you more about the Cardi Miracle product as a The science that we have there that demonstrates that it can reverse damage caused by the spike protein to the endothelial cells of the body.
	Oh wow, wow, wow.
	So not only are you trying to take these people down, you also have a solution for people that were unfortunate enough to take this vaccine.
	Yeah, I'll just make a disclaimer.
	I said, you know, the FDA says I can't say anything about treatment or healing or anything, but what we can tell you is that we have some phenomenal research in thousands and thousands of people.
	You know, research says that nitric oxide produced by the body heals the endothelium.
	There are plenty of studies that show that, and research that we have at the nutraceutical that Santicore makes, the Cardio Miracle, It causes the body to produce nitric oxide over an extended period of time that no other product does.
	You couple those things together, you can draw your own conclusions.
	We have tens of thousands of people that are experiencing some phenomenal work.
	You know Josh Yoder. This is a product that we're applying to pilots because pilots are suffering terribly from myocarditis issues.
	We're seeing great success in the The aviation professional industry.
	I'd love to come back and speak to you about that.
	Yeah, we'd love to have you back on.
	We'd love to have you back on. Deeply admire what you're doing, good sir, and thank you so much for coming on our Blood Money podcast.
	We'll definitely have you on very soon again to talk about Cardio Miracle, correct?
	That's right. Awesome.
	Awesome. Well, for the viewer out there, thank you so much for joining us on this episode.
	We will have all our new episodes published at americahappens.com.
	Share, follow, and definitely share this episode with those that you love because, frankly, it could save lives and not only save lives but save this country.

▲