All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 18, 2001 - Bill Cooper
53:13
Tax Seminar #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Paul Shappel asks, is there a copy of Dorothy Rose's paper available for printout?
Is everyone available for call traffic?
I'm on my way.
Okay, we've got a few times more than we're going to get to traffic.
We've got a microphone right here.
Okay.
How's everybody?
Hi.
Hi.
This is Steve Blossom.
I really haven't prepared much of a speech, but I just wanted to let you know how gratified I am that there are so
many great people out there.
The people, especially up on the stage, but all of you, are people that helped me when I was struggling.
I'm contemplating speaking up about this, that no one would stand with me.
And I believe differently.
And I'm glad that my beliefs were not shattered.
I appreciate it very much.
I'm very thankful for the growth of the people at John Merriman for being here.
Recently, John Turner has spent ten years directing us in the collections of the United Arab Emirates, and shortly after I resigned, he drove all night long from Las Vegas to Southern California for the U.K.
meeting and told me how about the same time that I heard D.B.
that he had come across the information in his diary and came to the same conclusion
that I did.
And it was tough for John because his father-in-law had spent, I believe, about the third year
as a chief in the collection division of the IRS.
And John could not tell the people around him why he was resigning.
I really felt for that man because I knew that the IRS, that I was willing to do the
possible to close, actually right now, the first sentence of course around this point,
I know I can say that I can testify to the fact that that person was dead.
Mike said, you're talking about Toto in the movie, that Toto was dead some day.
Now, Toto is like a catalyst in the movie, but Toto was always running underfoot and
you don't really notice that that's always there, right?
Whereas the dog is the catalyst, the dog that helps to pull back the curtains to what's
going on.
And Toto was like a little skull fighter.
The dog was there and he can only be depended on to move things forward.
And I just encourage each and every one of you to be a skull fighter about this.
Take the knowledge that you gain here and gain through your meditating selves and spread
it around, spread it to other people.
And let them go off the better route.
I think that's really about it, but again, I'm very proud to stand with all of you, and I feel like I'm my own friend, and I really wish, I so wish, The Commissioner and all these people in the Internal Revenue Service, we have been in a dialogue because I cannot, I am personally concerned.
I need to investigate fact sheets.
I think I have a reasonable basis for knowing what a fact sheet is.
And I have yet to meet one in this room.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
And, uh, take care.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Um, you know, my question was, in a sense, just because they seem to not allow you to testify in court,
and I understand that Mr. Chappelle, in the tax attorney, and a former tax court judge, who certainly would be
someone who, you know, if you were in that dialogue with him and see if
he agrees with your theory of the process, he would be the one who would be able to justify putting
back something that he's worked out so that our people won't be defenseless and without someone
to testify on their behalf.
Well, one of the excuses that the judge used was that something would be in fact,
I don't want the amnesty to talk about the loss.
And, you know, of course, you come back to the census framework,
well, the amnesty is not going to talk about the loss.
He was going to talk about a little investigation that he did, and what he ran up against.
And we know that a jury hearing, that, to me, it would really, really affect the decision.
But I don't know.
They didn't say how possible it was going to be.
But, just so you know, when they came to court, There is no way that the court can make the decisions that they make and the jury can make the decisions that they make.
It doesn't necessarily mean that what's written in the law is passed by our Congress and passed by the legislature.
It's not going to be any different than what it says.
What it just tells you is that this rhetoric you see in front of your face is really bad.
You know, I hate to say it, I'm not an attorney, but I think that would cause some significant process problems.
because you're supposed to obey the law, but you can't keep track of what the law is.
But, please, Mr. Chicala testified in a very profound fashion.
I would imagine that he could, but you may have understood the same problem.
The government was not watching over a thousand lives without listening to him.
One other thing I was going to tell you is that when everybody makes sacrifices,
or when everybody does those two things, you're not prepared to listen to those who are not going to
push it over your head.
I recently got my own transcript, not all of it, but a portion of it,
and there's a little notation on there that says, T-D-T.
Does everyone know what T-D-T stands for?
You are referred to be told that your master, courtesy of the Internal Revenue Service,
has been labeled a potentially dangerous tax payer.
Applause Robert Coler named, collaborating with George Sandridge in
response to the question, the courts deal with issues of tax and issues of law.
What the court will allow is a courtroom of rules and arguments and facts.
What people I think need to do is the message that they thought that others had left with us.
With the research, with the reactionary, but get the information.
Ask questions.
File.
Thank you.
you Let's do it.
Doctor?
Yes?
Go, go, go.
Hello.
Hey.
Hi.
Yeah, I'm David.
How are you?
I've been working here for about a year or so.
I'm here about two hours post-op education.
I think you can tell I'm really...
My father had a serious leaking problem.
And he was a five-year-old.
He was at first in the hospital.
But, later that year, the regimen I tried to do,
the chief occurred from the tip of the ball to the...
to the third.
He made me the doctor here.
And I was working in security and in the judge's office to drive him off to the back of the cage.
What people have to do is get into the evidence, their attention,
their pay wages, their submission of their logic,
how they lie to them, the decisions they make.
They have to live, you know, through IRS,
through the case of Willford Berry and Carlson.
And then, as like we have, is how long that can last before the jury.
And that's the jury's...
that the defendant has time and time again asked the IRS
and the state tax service that they show him the law
that requires him to file a case.
Okay.
Sherry Jackson, are you here?
Hi, Sherry.
Would you like to say a few words?
Good afternoon, everybody.
Can you hear me okay?
I'm a little bit, but I'm still here.
I did talk about yesterday that I was supposed to speak, so I did write something up because I don't like to ramble,
and I have some points that I need to get across to you, okay?
and it's such a...
First of all, since most of you just found out about me yesterday in paper, I wanted to tell you a little bit about myself and my story, and who I am.
I'm the wife of 13 to 14 years.
I have two children, eight coming of age.
I'm a wife of 31 working years, from Huston.
I have two children, 8-10 years old.
I am an HR agent and a TBA.
I was working in some residence for 7 1⁄2 years.
And I'm like John and Joe.
I left before I found out about this issue.
I left for family reasons.
My children were one of three, and it became a three-way cross-reference to Roe and Gingrich, Appleton, and Tenderloin Households.
So, I went out of my trajectory.
I started doing religious dissonance and healing.
From 95 up until 99, things just went on.
In 99, I started hearing from different tax clients and different people, hey, I heard that you don't have a tax law.
And instead of jumping off the truck and saying, oh, that couldn't be true, I said, hmm.
In the back of my mind, no one said at some point or another I'd have to do the research.
But in 2000, I had an overwhelming amount of people come and ask me about this.
Even pastors.
And I felt obligated So, along around July or August 2000, I started doing research, and being quantified by an $50,000 award by William Kaufman, I started researching.
And I looked, and I looked, and I looked, and I looked.
And I could not find a law that states that American citizens are liable for the income tax.
And there I am now.
I found out about weird people and their work.
I found out that the government did not respond.
It was a simple question.
Where is the law?
So I must go out and tell the people.
I am their dad to go out and tell the people.
Now, being that I'm a Christian and being that I'm black, I'm going to talk to you a little bit from those two perspectives.
From a Christian standpoint, do you realize that without the income tax,
thousands of mothers could leave the workforce and work from home
or home schools producing intelligent, moral children?
Music Without the income tax, do you realize how many industries
could develop and thrive?
poverty, drug addiction, homelessness, and teen pregnancy without government's green tax.
I'm very much in favor of that.
Now I can always guarantee you, based on the track record of faith-based programs,
that these ministries would not only be more successful than their government-funded counterparts,
but they also would mean an increase in the crime rate, the drug trade, in pregnancy.
So I'm glad you all stand up.
Black people in a not so distant past finally were freed from slavery.
We began to incorporate as productive and challenging American citizens only to realize that we have an invisible threat of shackles on our hands and our wrists.
I mean, I don't know the language.
But, you know, that.
Applause And right now, I challenge the quality and improvement of
the ENAHC, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Terracon, the Concern Black Pursuit, the Congressional Black Caucus,
Joseph Lowry, and Martin Luther King, the Service, the SELT.
So stop concentrating on racial division and get your CDAs, your attorneys, and your membership to research the legality of this invisible chapter.
I thank you, people.
Unless you respond to this, our people will continue to be enslaved.
I challenge you to stop living in the 60s.
This is 2001, and the income tax is devastating our people.
There was just a four-fold line of freedom fighting.
As I was in the airport, the marchers couldn't step out on the front of somebody's house.
This is devastating.
I challenge you, when you find the truth behind the income tax, don't sit on the fence.
The income tax is destroyed on people.
Don't hide behind your positions or your critiques.
Take a stand.
And close now, say this.
It appears to me that this is a black and white issue, but there are those that are hiding behind shades of gray.
They're calling us taxis.
They're calling us fanatics.
They're calling us widows.
Now you can call me fanatic, you can call me a weirdo, you can call me a kooky, you can call me fat, you can call me dingy, you can call me bozo clown.
I don't care what you call me.
But I have one question.
And I challenge the media to act it along with me and stop this poorly rhetoric.
Where is the law?
I'm so sorry.
I'm so sorry.
it to use it�s not a regular C++.
Thank you all.
Thank you all. And Flat Tigers, Larry and Peter. For that, they gave us some directions.
And we're going to go through a couple of them. And as time goes on, I've got one or two I forgot to mention. Larry Petraeus
is here with us. Larry is an attorney specializing in constitutional law, I guess you could say that.
And has been very active at the point in the tax on us he did for many years. Works closely with both the court and
Bill Benson.
And has been working with the United States, I suppose in some ways. And in other ways, he's been working with the
mid-state. And in many ways, I don't know if any of us would be here today if it hadn't been for you here.
Thank you all.
As a talk show host back in 1999, 1999, I think for all of you, you have changed.
You start hating again.
First of all, you drive an hour there, you train three hours, and you talk.
And certainly, in accomplishing it, you can just talk.
And then you drive home and talk to your parents.
But he's getting ready for the show in the morning.
Something came across the computer screen.
Something about this guy, this guy from the position of special agents and criminal investigations
in the IRS, in the San Jose office, that they're recruiting at the same time,
that there was a person, a person of the sort of understanding that they'd taken with the patient.
This person's real famous.
But he had, he would not have looked into these issues had it not been for the fact that he was
cruising around in his car with his dad and his dad and his mother through death and his son.
And he was listening to, he was listening to the radio about the issues.
He didn't know what it was.
But anyway, he was wonderful.
And you can see it.
You heard it.
Okay.
And a couple of other people have seen it.
Remember the kid on the block who died in the American Red Cross in the best of defense?
So there's this whole herd of media out there that have come to learn.
The White House, the New American, the Spotlight, the New York Daily, other alternative media.
And I learned not too long ago that they have forms and associations, the American Media Association.
And they had their first convention.
That's a number.
They have over 100 members.
And they had some parts, still parts of media that's been reporting on the disease for some time.
But unfortunately, the past has not been used.
And the American has gone on to their meeting at the Science Center, Dr. Goldman's conference.
So you'll have a lot as well.
And the executive director, the president of the association, took a train ride, a 3,000-mile train ride to
be here today.
And he brought some pamphlets.
He described the New American Media Association, which is a vice-institute.
And he also has on his table, I think it says he's over here on the left, he has some application forms.
I would ask that board representatives from each table approach the president of the American Media Association to
his earliest job.
You know our laptop over there.
He's preparing a report that is electronically going out to all of the members as we speak.
That's one person who's going to speak to you in a minute.
Go to that table and pick up 10 copies of the pamphlet and 2 copies of the application form.
Would you like to do that in a rush of leaps for me American?
Are they in the back?
I'm sorry.
Those pamphlets and the forms are at the back here for Joe's bad assistant at that table.
That's not easy to wrap the correspondence books.
But again, this has been a treat.
I'm sorry.
I have a few forms.
I've asked for the final form for the committee to go ahead and get it.
Scott, I don't know where it was, but it was just behind me.
That's here from Bernard.
Bernard, if you can reach little Max for a minute or two, then please go back.
And that is my Anthony Bernard page.
If anyone has an outfit to make, So, brief comment, that's the secret. We're timing it. We're
not even going to get to one minute. We're only two microphones, so we can get another microphone. We're going
to say a few announcements after the microphone. And good luck. See you.
Well, it sounds like I'm going to be the last speaker.
Thank you.
That act is still on the books.
It's never been repealed, even though the dollar has been all but obliterated, except for a main element.
So, continue your questions.
I was going to talk to you.
Okay.
Are you concerned on your house?
I am the senior counsel for North Bend, which is after them, for the National Organization for the Repeal of Federal
Reserve Acts and Internal Revenue Code.
Thank you.
A quick show of hands of people that are aware of either NORFED or the American Library of Currency.
Holy cow!
I represent a pretty good job.
Basically, I have to thank you for Being aware of it, for people who are not aware of it, I'd like for you to become aware of it, because we offer a totally different solution than anybody else that brings to this forum, and that is, very simply, an alternate currency, which is 100% backed up by gold and silver, 100% in uniform gold and silver, 100% constitutional, and 100% legal.
Waffle.
Well, I know about waffles.
We can talk about that.
Because we're not a legal tendered issue.
In any case, I actually designed and developed this currency after twenty years of research, and actually launched this currency in answer to a personal question I had, and that was, what can I do?
After I learned this truth, I really wanted to do something.
I wanted to scream something or other.
And I looked at my debt reserve, contacted different unions since I had my ability.
And I decided that bringing out an alternate currency in line
with Ed Griffin's book, Creative Objective Items, and in response to your question, Bob,
in the 17th point about why we should reveal the debt reserve,
I agree with every single one of those with the pre-war of Numeridians in that book, 604 pages.
And anyone who is interested in the Federal Reserve, other than the public that was served up by the Attorney before me, then I would encourage them to read that book, because there is a sinister, fraudulent, deceptive, The poor old situation which astounds us in that institution known as the Federal Reserve and it must be repealed.
I'm not sure it's earlier than that year or so.
I think what we all need to realize is how much more vulnerable the government is to what they would let on.
They intimidate us.
They frighten us.
By being a bully when in reality we represent a lot more power here than what they would wildly ever think was possible.
Let us remember that there were a bunch of cowards that went off and murdered women and children in Oklahoma.
Don't ever forget about the deeds that they have done and our moral obligation to repulse what the government was doing.
I would like to answer a lot of questions about the currency.
I'm sure you have some, but it's late in the day.
I won't be here tonight.
If you're interested, seek me out.
I'd be happy to show you.
Thank you.
Website contact information.
Well, the website is really neat.
It's Norfair.
www.norfair.org.
www.norfpb.org It was founded by me as a philanthropic project of the Non-Prosperity
Movement.
We devote all of the money that we make to our mission, and we'll be ready to donate those to the American Liberty Charity for its repeal.
And in answer to the other different questions about how to deal with the government, we deal with the government by simply denying them the use of the money.
They do not deserve our money.
and just go sign, pretty well staggered.
Turn to the Federal Reserve, be a little bang, start these commercialized currencies,
and return America's values one dollar a time.
Thank you very much.
One last thing here, I know that you all thought yesterday's Q&A today, but I don't know if you thought the fee section
on money.
You should actually pay a little attention to this because we are now saying that there's going to be maybe 30 signs
of not good.
This remarks come from Ethan Harris, who just happens to be a senior economist, like myself.
He says that he works for Lehman Brothers, and Lehman Brothers was one of the founders of the Federal Reserve.
What an insidious situation we have here, when they create the policies, give it to the Federal Reserve, that's economics.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
I understand that the film taxed their lives.
I understand there's no tax law that would stop them from passing the constitution.
Congress, as it behaves in the state legislatures, are allowed to pass any amount of law
pass provided the law is not too thick for the current agreement.
And that's probably our discharge of the city.
That is probably the reason why the tax laws are so voluntary and so relevant.
Because otherwise, it would be a direct consequence of the tax commission.
So that's why the 16th Amendment, are you hearing this, becomes so important.
There's lawful standards that's got to be in our democracy.
And rules that's got to be in ours.
And according to the New York Times, there's the New York Times Land Act, 2001.
And there are some of those in town that are on front lines.
Are we going to say, we don't have a crystal?
So this is a copy of the cover of the New York Times Land Act,
2001.
It's a copy.
It wasn't restored.
There's an interesting piece on the Internal Revenue Service,
on page 151.
And it makes it very clear that the federal government uses the government's own intelligence,
and it's got its power, so it's almost a direct tax on our tax system.
So at least the New York Times thinks so.
OK.
So we have one more speaker.
And we do need to dedicate this morning by 4 30.
So we don't have a lot of time.
But no one of these conferences would be complete without hearing
from Joe Manchin.
Yeah, brother.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.
And as I always say, it's a pleasure to be here with Bob Fulch, because he always
puts on a fantastic program.
to me is an exception.
It's amazing how stupid and wrong that law has become.
And what Bob tells you about the things that are coming, he wants everybody to become a part of it and throw a light.
Because if people don't help, if people don't contribute, who's to say that whatever, the light's going to take a
little longer.
I'm going to tell you that here's a testifier.
They want me to testify and they do not want to abandon to testify.
But the amazing thing with this crazy federal government is I had a federal marshal knock
on my door and subpoenaed me to testify against an individual in the colony of Hawaii.
He said, are you going to be there?
So the United States attorney says, don't we want you to testify as to what that's on.
All right, there are many of you that have been here, sir.
If you want me to testify before the grand jury, I'm going to talk about the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
I said, but that's the only way I'm going to testify.
I said, remember one thing.
Let's assume that I go ahead and testify the way you want me to, but it's you with that guy.
And you're forgetting the defense.
When the defense starts to question me, they're going to say, Not the same government that Roberts bought in 1 and 2, or the world has ever watched?
Absolutely.
And I told the United States Attorney, here comes your 15th Amendment argument, and this guy is well watched.
He raised his fingers one over 10, smacked his forehead, said, Oh my God, I never thought about that.
That was five years ago.
They said, I've heard a lot of talk today about records, excursions.
Records, as those of us who go to court quite a bit, one of the things that judges will say is that documents speak for themselves.
And yes, they do.
Because when I traveled in 1984 to all 48 states, In the United States, capital of the region L1, I gather 17,000 certified, notarized documents such as this.
This is the state of Kentucky.
In a state of Kentucky on February the 8th of 1910, on page 487 of the Senate Bureau,
it is said that nine senators voted for the amendment and 22 voted against it.
Yeah.
Yes?
Well, I'm going to tell you it's not.
So on February the 25th of 1913, that the state of Kentucky was the second state to have ratified the 15th Amendment politically, correctly, and properly.
It never happened.
Does Dan Marino want me in court?
Deal with it.
The documents speak for itself.
There are 17,000 certified literary documents stuck as this.
Then we can go to Volume 1.
And in Volume 1, there's a very interesting document that I named the Golden Key.
In which documents are found in the National Archives of Washington.
And on page 10 of that document it says, In the certified copies of the resolutions passed by the
legislators of the several states ratifying the proposed 16th Amendment,
it appears that only two of those states, those ratifying the 16th Amendment,
while those submitted by Arizona, North Dakota, Tennessee, and New Mexico,
have supported absolutely accurately and correctly the 16th Amendment as proposed by Congress.
The other 33 resolutions all contain errors either of capitalization, punctuation, or wording.
Minnesota, it is to be remembered, did not transmit to the Department of Copy, such as I held up,
to the Philanthronotics Secretary of State.
The last page in that 16th Amendment is that the Secretary of the Governor has officially notified Washington, D.C.,
that they have ratified the 16th Amendment.
When does the Secretary to the Governor have that sort of power?
One of the things that will happen if I ever get another witness stand There will be an opportunity, I believe, that I'll be able to call a federal judge.
A federal judge who will assert my case.
Federal Judge Paul Trunkett said that if his thesis is correct, there is no loss of violence.
Remember, I took that $17,000 certifying nobody died.
17,000 documents that I had to produce to the court, to the prosecutors, and that takes about 34 to 38 reams of paper.
That's a pretty high set.
I wanted to get Paul Plunkett on the witness stand because he has said, I have read his book, The Law That Never Was.
We were on and off the plane, everything that I did, how I did it, and so forth.
Judge Plunkett teaches constitutional law at two universities in Chicago, so now you can understand why I want him on the witness stand.
He will be your witness, or mine, or anybody else's.
Paul Plunkett says, I believe that his book, The Law That Never Works, way got him wet.
That puts him on a wet stand.
It's the work of a man who investigated the 15th Amendment and came to certain conclusions about it
and wrote a book about it.
And I do not consider that this case is in the market against Mr. Benson.
I am ignoring that to the extent that I somehow suppose it reflects badly on him.
And if anything, it makes it hard to destroy him because free speech in this country is protected.
And whether they are right, whether they are wrong, I have the United States of America at least as you know it.
He is a person of our conviction, and believes, and stands up, and talks about them, and believes what he says.
And there isn't any question about that.
On July 2nd, 1999, we were in Washington, D.C., and you heard his questions here today.
Have you followed your income tax return?
And I said, I've waited 15 years to get behind these microphones of Washington D.C.
And no, absolutely not.
I, Bill Benson, absolutely, completely refuse to file a 1040 tax return under our present
taxing system because I will not permit this federal government to make me a criminal.
Because of the documentation and information that I possess, and the documentation that I have sent
to the courts and to the judges and the Congress of the United States,
every member of the Congress of the United States in 1987 received a copy of Volume 1 and 2
with the names of Waltz and the Bonnefields, so I suppose it's all right.
And it was hand delivered by U.J.
and I did get some response from some of the Congressmen.
I had a Congressman that lived two hours from me, and I said, Marty,
and that was Martin T. Russo, what are you going to do about this situation?
He said, nothing.
I'm going to finally sit by and watch and see what happens, because the issue belongs in the Supreme Court.
Yeah.
Now, on July 2nd, when I made the statement that I did, I'll make that statement again today, because now we have not C-10, but we have PBS-2, as I understand it, and I want this to go out to federal government.
I challenge the good of men.
Ha ha.
Thank you.
I'm going to be doing this talk later.
What are you waiting for?
You know where I live.
You know my address.
You know my email address.
You know everything about me.
You're not going to lie.
I'm not going to be able to do that.
There'll be.
Come and get me.
Please incite.
Let's get this video out there.
I'm going to be doing this talk later.
I'm going to be able to do that.
I'm going to be able to do that.
Men, in your wildest dreams of comprehension, will none ever become greater than twenty-two.
If you could convince that jury of this, tell them to take me to jail again now.
Don't wait.
You can't.
There's 17,000 certified no-run stars.
There are two books.
There's any way that they can dispute this documentation.
Absolutely none.
So ladies and gentlemen, Bob says I have 30 seconds, so I think they're about up.
So once again, I'm Major General Cisnero Garza.
I'm Stevie S.
I don't want to be on the cutting room floor with this one.
I tell him, Bill Benson has once again made a challenge.
He's done it.
He's coming to get them.
He's not buying a package earner.
He is making money.
He is selling books.
And I'm proud of him.
I'm not going to be able to do that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
You've got to mention one more person I'm going to introduce.
So I think that's the way it is.
And I think that's the way it is.
Thank you.
We're presenting ourselves and all the friends that you work with, Craig, Jeff, and others,
Big thanks to Jeff Baldwin, who's here from Alaska.
Jeff and his providers.
Big thanks.
Big thanks to our technology and capability.
Thank you, Jeff.
So, you've done and done it.
Thank you for being here today and helping out.
I'll say a phrase that you would expect to drop in a tunnel.
We're really about to win.
Remember this.
Please know that people, some people, are heading the wrong way.
We're headed the wrong way.
So, when you know you're going to win, then come on.
Do it for our liberties, do it for our rights, do it for our dreams.
So, do it.
So, we've got to do a step.
She actually sent one of the other guys to us.
She got some good stuff, the microphone.
She really got to dedicate the room down to me.
I'll tell you what, she's great.
She's always got the quick analysis.
Thank you, Robert, we talked about this all day.
Our gracious, we gave you a week to make a quick announcement
and we'd like to everyone who is in the country to know.
My name is Jim Priestley.
I'm a medical doctor in Atlanta.
I'm also president of one of the finest law libraries in the country.
I'm pretty sure you guys are going to be playing later.
This is a request to everyone who is currently doing their own
primary personal legal research, just like I've been doing the last five years,
dusting off your old treasury decisions, reading through a short-off revenue cue,
or bulletin of pregnant and historical issues of the current federal regulations,
that kind of thing.
There's no reason for us to toil separately and frantically reinvent and unravel
the same wheel within wheel.
So, if anyone who is doing their own legal research could meet me over in this
floor area for reassurance and let's get an email and phone back with them
so we can start accelerating the work around research.
Also, anyone who is or thinks they might be in the den of a criminal lawsuit
or just considering this a little, fortunately, this file, Please see me also, I have some really good information that you'll want to pursue.
Thank you very much.
So right after we adjourn, right over here in this corner, I'll be able to kind of just wave my pad, because I want to network with other people doing their own legal research.
I appreciate it.
I'm glad you came to work.
I'm glad you're operating here.
Thank you.
I want to thank you for coming.
Hello, my name is Sal Salam.
▲
Export Selection