My name is Adam King and I am joined by my guest Matt Belinsky today.
Unfortunately, we are having some technical difficulties by our associate producer Rock Breath.
And so we are going to substitute the meme portion of today And get into some offensive memes with Matt, I guess we'll do.
You know, just like free-flowing off the cuff.
You know, every setback is really an opportunity.
Just how off the cuff, Adam, what are we looking at here?
You know, I'll tell you, Matt, before we get started, I gotta ask you, are you an MMA fan?
Not really. Never really landed with me.
It never was? No.
Not my thing. Did you hear that Andrew Tate and Paul Logan are about to go head-to-head?
You mean Logan Paul?
That's how much I know about it, too.
Yeah. I think, actually, is it Jake Paul or is it Logan Paul?
I think it is Jake Paul, actually.
It shows you how much I actually know about this.
But I think this is such a cool thing.
It's like, you know...
Listen, I'm not an MMA guy.
I've watched a couple of them that I enjoy that I say, okay, I can see why people are into this.
I'm not particularly, but I also can acknowledge the excitement that what the Paul brothers have done in making fighting Interesting again, because people have lost a ton.
I mean, no one had interest in professional boxing any longer, and a lot of that had shifted to MMA, with the Paul brothers in becoming legitimate fighters, because they're legitimate.
They might not be world-class, but they're pretty good, right?
And bringing their kind of...
It's like the colorful influencer dynamic meets the fighting dynamic, and that is actually...
You know, generated a lot of interest.
So I respect that. And Tate, similarly, like, dude said some interesting things.
Dude said some stuff that makes me roll my eyes.
But I get that he is an intriguing character.
And I think he was also a victim of this ridiculous mustering of the entire media, social media, and corporate apparatus to try to deperson someone, which I think is awesome.
You're talking about Andrew Tate?
Yeah, I think is nearly never justified.
I mean, unless someone is a violent criminal, only in that case could I see it.
So, all right, he's interesting to me in that vein.
So sure, why not? This is interesting.
So, I'm super, like, I really, I dig the vibe, and, like, I think it's also cool when, like, influencers kind of step out of their role, and the only reason I brought it up is because I was watching the Instagram square off earlier, and I want to show you this, because it's just, like, it's just, it's badass, dude.
It's such badass stuff.
Here, let's see if I can get this on.
It's just badass, dude, seeing them, like, square up like that, right?
Sure. I mean, they're, like, straight up going in the octagon to put their money where their mouth is.
Andrew Tate, who's constantly talking about masculinity, is really going up.
And honestly, I think, what's his name?
Paul Logan? Logan Jake?
Jake Paul. Jake Paul, whatever his name is.
They're the Paul brothers, so Jake Paul. He's fought before, right?
And he's won. Yeah, I know.
And he's won. Yeah. I think it's to Andrew Tate's credit is what it really is about to me.
Sure. Anyway, so let's get into some offensive memes because our audience loves the meme segment.
They just really get into it and let's get this up.
I have a special file for you called Bolinski memes.
Can you imagine what surprises that has in store for us?
So the elections just came, obviously.
Donald Trump Jr.
with the win. Congratulations, Pennsylvania, on John Fetterman.
Can you believe this John Fetterman shit?
Sure, but Donald Trump Jr.
is playing himself pretty well, just like he played himself when he tweeted out far too preliminarily a bloodbath in regards to the midterms, and it turned out to be nothing of the sort.
And it's like, okay, It's cute Donald Trump Jr., but you seem to be...
When you lose elections and you peddle these types of memes, you just look like a sore loser.
Sorry, you've got to win if you want to really dump on the other side.
All right, well, let's talk about it.
Let's just jump straight into the real subject of today.
Is there voter fraud going on in this country?
Are you one of these people that still believe that voter fraud is like this...
Taboo. It matters what you consider to be fraud, right?
If there's fraud as in people are falsifying votes and ballots, much like someone would forge a signature and utilizing an apparatus to be counting votes and then You know, coming up with these forged fake ballots and counting them in contravention of the law as they need to.
I'm a little skeptical of that.
Is there manipulation of rules and ballot collection in terms of ballot harvesting?
Absolutely. What do you think about Arizona?
Have you ever been paying attention? Yeah.
Paying attention. Yeah, I'm paying attention.
And I also know some Democrats don't have to show up to debate.
They don't have to even fill an auditorium with any sort of rally.
Republicans are making these banging rallies left and right.
The things that you were saying are not evidence.
That's not evidence. I'm not suggesting evidence.
I'm not producing evidence.
Here's the thing. I'm showing abnormalities in the process that are producing astronomical results.
Let's focus on L.A. Let's take it off of Arizona for a second.
You can't change the topic.
I'm not changing the topic. I'm using a different example to prove that.
No, no, no. We'll get to that example in a minute.
Okay. I know some pretty high-status Republicans who've been deeply involved in the Arizona elections, and that includes lawyers, people who are running oversight organizations who have their nose, all the way up what's going on in Maricopa.
Okay? So, they're there.
Then you have to assume, you have to believe that there is voter fraud, right?
Not as opposed to manipulation and unethical end around some rules that are not good rules.
Well, in Maricopa County, there's both.
There's voter fraud and there's voter suppression.
So somebody, no, it's not voter suppression.
When they reject 25% of the ballots, and they say that the tabulator machines in specifically Republican areas are not working, that's voter suppression.
That's a felony. The Maricopa County recorder, the register on Maricopa County, is a Republican.
So you have to explain to me why that Republican's in on it.
Well, let's understand one thing.
I'll give you a greater example, is that the Secretary of State is Katie Hobbs, running for governor, who's committing the vote.
The Secretary of State should have recused herself.
Why didn't she recuse herself from the- You have to show.
You have to show.
What is she doing?
With a registrar in that county who has more direct- Oversight of the election.
Explain to me beyond the circumstantial motive of her being in this position.
You have to explain to me what the Republican registrar in that county is or is not doing.
Until you can do that, All this stuff about voter fraud sounds like just the most vague, unproven sour grapes.
So if you want to go and prove that, if you want to go and show me, okay, what this Republican registrar is or is not doing, who runs the election in this county, right, then I'm happy to believe you.
Until you do that, you have a big gap in your claims that you need to fill in.
And I'm tired of people leaving these gaps in their claims and then expecting me just to ignore them.
That could be true. There could be absolute abject fraud as opposed to what I do believe is happening, that the Democrats have a far better machine to go ahead and collect mail-in ballots that are sloppily and recklessly distributed around a state and manipulate the system in that manner.
By all means, I do think that's happening.
In fact, I want to address one point because you're making several points at once and making it really hard to respond.
I want to address one point.
There's no reason to respond.
I want to address one point. Well, it's a talk show, so we respond to each other and we further conversation.
We illuminate ideas.
The idea is to share ideas, not to debate.
I know, but Adam, just real quick.
If you continue with a direct question, and this is not you, this is a lot of people, and this is where this conversation so often does not go anywhere.
When people suggest, and you say, we're building a case, and everyone said, this isn't a criminal courtroom, well, if you want to build a case for anything, even rhetorically, you have to treat it like a courtroom.
Okay, so when someone says there's a gap in the logic or a big gap in the evidentiary record in making this claim, you can't just divert from it.
Okay, and the libs do this.
Republicans do this. So if there is a claim that is required to be filled in for a claim to be deemed accurate, I just don't see the point of people keep on diverting.
Okay, we get it. We get it. You don't like it when people can say there's voter fraud.
Now I'm going to address your claim.
You made like four or five claims.
I know for our audience, I'd like to let everybody know that Matt is a lawyer and this is the type of behavior you want in hiring a good lawyer, someone who will talk over everybody if they have to and just steamroll their way to the finish line.
But for scholarly topics about voter fraud and stuff like this, We have a problem in our country and the country is actually people like you.
And I'll tell you why.
It's because you take this position You don't even want to hear the word voter fraud unless people come with substantial evidence.
Let me ask you a question. Did you see Dinesh D'Souza?
No, I don't want to hear anything without substantial evidence.
You have to, Matt.
You go out with a girl.
She's going to give you substantial evidence when you're talking to some girl that you're going out on a date with.
No, you're like, what do you do?
Oh, I'm a doctor.
You're not coming up and saying, I'm a phlebotomist.
You know what I mean? It's like, yeah, you gotta let there be some room for a conversation here.
No, no, if you're making a claim...
Well, here's the thing. When you make your claims, I'm trying my best to let you...
I'm trying my best to let you say your whole point.
When I make my claims...
I'm better than normal.
I mean, I'm getting like 20, 25 words in, but then you're kind of like storming over.
Let me finish my point, please.
It's not at all what I said. Okay, let me finish my point, please, and then we'll move on to a different subject.
Sure.
The claim that I have to provide substantiated proof in order to just get you to admit that there is vast irregularities that are happening in the election is where the problem is, because just the just the illumination of such irregularities should have a good man like you saying, wow, this really needs to be investigated.
It's not Adam King's job to provide Matt Belinsky with all this evidence.
It's us as Americans, our responsibility to say, hey, something funky is clearly going down in front of everybody.
We don't know what it is.
They did come out.
I don't know if you saw the movie Dinesh D'Souza.
I actually hosted Dinesh D'Souza the night before his theatrical release.
I got to do a show with Dinesh about 2,000 Mules.
Did you happen to see 2,000 Mules?
I saw a little bit of it.
Basically, 2,000 Mules.
It was amazing that Dinesh gave us the night before his movie release.
But... 2,000 Mules, essentially, they follow...
They geotrack specific phone numbers to specific Dropbox locations and ping the same phone number going on this route in the five battleground states.
And they say the movie's titled 2,000 Mules because all it took was 2,000 phone numbers worth of dumping and they calculated the ballots and they even have video footage of the same person coming at multiple times dumping at specific ballot boxes exactly when the geospatial tracking on the cell phones tracks them going from Dropbox to Dropbox.
Also stopping off at several nonprofit Democrat headquarters And this is the movie.
I encourage you and all my listeners to watch.
I haven't watched the entire movie, so I can't imagine it's going to be a productive use of our time to go over that.
However, if you want to actually use that as evidence, once again, it's not that hard.
It's not that hard to prove through an election audit, of which there were numerous ones, that The votes that were eventually tallied either tracked back to people who were living in the state and validly registered or not,
okay? So if they were, if they were validly registered, you can, through an audit, which they were allowed to do, and track back the people, and this was a person who was alive, a registered voter, and they filled in their ballot and signed it, and if they signed it, is there reason to believe or not believe That the signature was proper.
This is all doable stuff.
So if all you have is the geotagging, then you don't have much because you have to continue with building the evidentiary record.
And if you do, and by all means, with mail-in voting, there's a lot, absolutely, there's a lot of reason for suspicion.
So you're basically saying that people shouldn't even be alarmed, they shouldn't even care, until one person comes up and stands on a soapbox and says, here's the evidence, I got the evidence!
I literally just said the opposite.
And yet you didn't even watch 2,000 Mules.
No, I literally just said the opposite because I literally said if you're saying, I'm saying that you should just throw your hands up and say there's no irregularities.
I'm literally saying that irregularities are suspicious as is mail-in voting and need to be followed up and need to be investigated and an evidentiary record builds.
I literally said the exact opposite of what you accused me of saying.
So I want to pivot and go to LA elections.
Let's do it. Karen Bass She obviously comes out of nowhere.
She didn't come out of nowhere.
Well, Rick Caruso was up for the whole week.
Rick Caruso had a commanding lead.
Commanding lead.
And then slowly, slowly, slowly, as the elections get extended, Karen Bass keeps getting up and up and up and up.
Finally, she surpasses him by 5,000 votes.
And then they're like, oh, the election's over.
Karen Bass is the winner. No, they didn't do that.
I literally- All right, so what did they do?
Because from my perspective, that's what it looks like.
That's what it looks like they did.
See, here's your problem, is that you're not doing any investigation past these surface trends and whatnot to understand.
I literally speak with Rick Rousseau's campaign manager, okay?
And who happens to be- Are they saying anything about voter fraud?
Are they saying- No, they're saying exactly what I said.
It is ballot harvesting.
The Democrats absolutely 1,000% engage in bullshit Mickey Mouse ballot harvesting to emphasize the collection of ballots over same-day in-person votes, which is how it should be in-person same-day votes.
That's how it should be.
That's how it should be. However, unfortunately, the rules do not support that right now.
So, do the Democrats take total advantage of those rules?
Abso-fucking-lutely.
Let me ask you something. You're a lawyer.
This is something I don't know.
You asked the dynamic of why?
Yeah, go for it. Okay. The people who voted day of, in person, absolutely favored Rick, as expected.
People who mailed in their ballots earlier in the cycle, which was the next batch, which is the batch that has taken Karen ahead of Rick in the race, were expected to be pro-Karen because more progressives vote via mail, which is obviously the less valid.
You and I know it's less valid.
However, the rules still allow for it.
So absolutely 1,000%.
They are gaming the system and taking advantage of the rules.
Once again, unfortunately, those are the rules.
And you want to know how I know, because Rick is not unaware of this.
Rick Caruso just spent $100 million on this election.
Well, that's what I was going to bring up next, was actually, I'm very impressed that you know that, because that's an impressive amount of money to spend on a mayoral ship compared to her.
Here's what we're going to find out over this next week, okay?
Rick, when he lost in June, when he was way ahead at the end of counting the in-person votes.
Right, I remember the primaries, and the votes kept coming in and coming in, and then finally she won, and they're like, oh, that's all the votes!
Yeah, yeah, it is all the votes.
You know why? Because the local Democratic Party is very good at ballot harvesting and going around and trying to collect ballots from low-propensity voters.
Do you think that there's more voter fraud in Democrat versus Democrat races than there are versus Democrat versus Republican races?
There's voter fraud. That's too broad.
I'm telling you exactly how it works.
They literally go around and collect ballots from apartment buildings and centers and homeless encampments.
And so you know what Rick did?
Right. They do the homeless encampments.
Yeah. Yeah. So I'm telling you.
You're saying fraud, fraud, fraud.
I'm telling you exactly what happens that you are suspicious of.
Okay? So maybe listen.
I don't think it's a combination of D, all of the above, with the extra cheat in there?
There could be, but once again, the idea that this is something that you cannot reveal.
Who do you think Rick's campaign manager is?
Do you think he got a Republican? Do you think he got a Republican?
I don't know who he is. He got a Democrat, okay?
He ran as a Democrat, I imagine.
Yeah, yeah. But she's like a part of the machine, dude.
She was chosen by, what's her name?
Wilson. What's her name?
Congresswoman Wilson. Sure.
So, Rick, in response to that, admitted after June, and he'd admit to, not in the press, oh shit, I didn't know about ballot harvesting.
I'm going to have to go and fight ballot harvesting pound for pound.
So, what we're going to find out this next week...
Did Rick game the system better than they did, or did they game the system better than he did?
Because he went and he put up a totally technically legal ballot harvesting operation, and those votes get dropped off day of, and those are the votes that are going to be counted this week.
So what we're going to find out this week, did he ballot harvest better than they did?
See, I know that this is a conversation that's going around America.
I watch an insane amount of talk shows, Republican talk shows.
And there is a lot of people who are saying that the Republicans just didn't put out.
And there is that infighting.
And Mitch McConnell did really fuck up and screw the pooch and really not invest anywhere in the whole system.
But when you see in a place like L.A., When the anti-police candidates are winning in a time where literally they smash the window.
I don't even know a progressive that doesn't think that crime isn't a problem.
Oh yeah, I do. I know lots of them.
You know progressives in LA that think that crime is not a problem?
Yes. That's impressive.
Can you get one of those on my show?
I want to meet one of those.
This is a cold reality I'm going to have to work with.
You're going to have to wake up to it.
You think that there has to be fraud because there's no way that the voter base could actually be this stupid.
I'm sorry to break it to you.
They are. I know that's an unfortunate and demoralizing reality to accept.
If you had any idea how many people in this city, they don't hang out where you hang out.
They're not in your social groups.
They do not believe that the current progressives that run LA bear any responsibility.
I know a ton of Democrats, man.
I know a ton of Democrat leadership.
I'm all over the city. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You know the leadership.
You're right. I don't know the pink-haired pussy riot.
Yeah, you don't know.
You don't know. Here's who you don't know.
I don't know those people. Yeah, you don't know.
I don't know the gender pronoun queers.
Well, unfortunately, they exist, and there's more than a couple of them here.
I'm sorry to break it to you. That's true.
Yeah. That's a very valid point.
Yes, and until you...
I'm sorry. I'm not trying to go after you personally.
This is why God probably ended up destroying Stam and Amora.
Yeah. Because there was really stupid people that lived there.
Your perspective is unfortunately skewed because you are unwilling to accept that there are people who will stare at the facts as you know them to be true and completely disregard them entirely.
That there are a massive...
Do you know how many women in LA are voting for mayor based purely on abortion despite the fact that the mayor of LA... Okay, so...
That's a big deal.
I know it sucks.
It's unfortunate. There are like a single voting issue is abortion and they don't even realize that Proposition 1 is really...
Partial birth abortions.
Regardless, they...
Like, it was so worded. Did you see it when you went in to vote?
How they make abortion a constitutional amendment.
But really, like, the bill is allowing for partial birth abortions.
Like, the baby's coming out of the vagina and they're like, I don't want it anymore.
Let's kill it. How many people that voted do you think read the bill?
Nobody. There you go.
There you go. So stop disregarding stupidity as an explanation.
Well, I think it's D, all of the above.
I think that the campaign to dumb people down is a part of it.
I think the monoculture university education system is a part of it.
And it all bleeds into this kind of like...
Even if there's a valid contract and someone doesn't deal in the contract in good faith, you know there's a good faith clause in every contract?
There's not a good faith clause in every contract.
There's a good faith clause in many contracts.
There's an implied covenants of fair dealing in good faith that exists outside of that that can be utilized if there's something that's not clear from contractual interpretations.
I still think that there is an element of voter fraud that goes into this grand equation.
And I think that the system is so complex and there are people who are paid to know it so well.
And they hope, they hope to God that they can cheat, barely cheat, if not not cheat at all.
But like when you have... In that case, in Arizona...
But I do think in Arizona, it's DAFCA cheating.
And I think also Maricopa, because you remember like when the new guy, I forget his name, the guy, it was like six or seven months ago, they had a special election and he like, he came in, the Republican guy that you were talking about, what was his name?
He ended the investigations into Maricopa County.
He pulled the plug on the investigations.
He said it was like budgetary issues, why they were stopping.
No, but it's not true.
They did a full audit. They did multiple full audits.
I'm not talking about the audit.
I'm talking about the investigation.
The audits happened before the elections were certified.
I'm talking about the investigations that proceeded in Maricopa County for years afterwards.
There was an audit of Arizona that was completed earlier this year in 2022.
So by Arizona law, they have five days to report their findings.
They have five days to report all their votes.
All their votes have to be reported five days after elections.
And that's why they say that they have this right to go pull out.
Today is the sixth day.
They also, for the 2020 election, they conducted an audit.
It did not reveal the things that you claim would have been revealed in Arizona.
Arizona is not some Democratic-dominated state.
Maricopa County is a Republican registrar.
So, once again, they could have missed something.
There could be a reason that that audit did not turn out the way it was supposed to be.
If you want to say that Donald Trump, for instance, lost Arizona because...
We're not on Donald Trump, but let's talk about this election.
Okay, this election. There is a massive...
Harmeet Dillon... Carrie Lake, Katie Hobbs.
Yeah, okay. So...
And Blake Masters.
I was shocked at the Blake Masters thing.
I couldn't believe it. I don't...
Once again, I don't know why you're shocked because he polled very badly both in the polls and internally in the Republican Party.
The reason that the Republican...
He polled poorly with rhinos.
Okay. This dude was filling stadiums with people.
I don't know what to tell you, man.
I know in the world that you want to live in, there wouldn't be any rhinos, but there are a lot.
So you can just accept the reality that...
I got one for you.
No, no, no. Let's just finish Arizona real quick.
Because he polled so badly internally amongst the Republican pollsters, Mitch McConnell did not direct funds towards that race.
Was that smart? No, it was not.
It was an absolute mistake.
Nevertheless, that's what happened.
Had Mitch McConnell properly directed the money from Alaska, where he wasted a bunch, to Lisa Murkowski, to Blake Masters, You know, it's a counterexample.
There's a counterfactual. We don't know.
But I think we can both acknowledge that was a mistake.
Would you agree with that? I think that Mitch McConnell has produced mistake after mistake after mistake.
You're correct. That is a big mistake.
Lisa Murzkowski is a big mistake.
I would never give her a dime to begin with.
The Republican Party wants to shoot itself in the foot regardless.
The Republican Party wants to separate and distance itself from Trump.
They don't like Trump. They are very unhappy.
And it's not really about Trump.
It's about populism.
They don't want populism.
It could be any populist candidate.
But it just so happened that Trump was the galvanizing populist candidate, and they want a controllable demographic like the Democrats have.
Americans in power are envious of the Democrats and how they have such a control over their voter base.
So you're correct. Now, what do you do about it?
Before we focus on that, I have one more topic on voter fraud that I want to bring up, and that's FTX. Are you familiar with all the FTX stuff going on?
Yeah. So FTX for the voters – I'm sorry, for the listeners.
I have a – basically is a cryptocurrency exchange, and – They were pulling in billions and billions of dollars from all over.
I actually invested heavily in crypto, never into FTX. But they put in billions and billions of dollars from their cryptos.
And they were skimming the top.
But the real story that's breaking is that government was sending billions of dollars to Ukraine.
The Ukrainian government was investing, taking a sovereign position in FTX. Do you know how countries do these sovereign positions in Bitcoin and stuff like that, like Venezuela and North Korea and all those countries?
Those wonderful vacation spots, right?
So Ukraine, this wonderful vacation spot, invests so heavily into FTX. And then FTX, Sam Freed, the CEO of FTX, ends up being the second largest Democrat donor in the 2022 cycle.
Let's unpack that one, Matt.
Yeah, no. The CEO of FTX, his family was wrapped up with the Democratic Party.
And in all likelihood, not in all likelihood, there were funds that were donated that were supposed to go to the Ukraine that were then cycled back from the Ukraine into FTX. And those funds, some of what, you know, the guy had billions of dollars at his height, you know, a certain portion of them.
Went to the Democratic Party.
So, yeah, that's dirty money.
And when we're talking about his height, I mean, we're talking about, like, how old is this kid?
Like 20-something? 29.
He's 29. And you know the story about his girlfriend, right?
And the whole MIT scandal with Gary Gensler?
Yeah. What's up with the Gary Gensler stuff?
I don't even know if it caught enough people's attention to become a scandal or controversy, but it should have been.
Well, that's why we have shows like this, because most shows have talking points.
Avoid this subject as much as possible.
It's like Epstein's Island type of a situation.
I think that this story, this FTX story, has tremendous, tremendous deeper wells than even the public.
Even just on the surface, that it's like this kind of triangle, like Democrats using actual war to get money to come back to finance candidates.
Yeah, I mean, but then his number two, I think his name's Adam Salome, I mean, donated not as much to the Democrats as he donated, but he donated about $20 million to Republicans.
So, I mean, it's super dirty, and given the CEO's connections to the Democratic Party, I mean, yeah.
Yeah, like Liz Cheney?
Maybe it's Liz Cheney.
I'd like to know what Republicans they gave money to.
I'd like to know what Republicans took money from them.
Either way, yeah. I bet you it's, what's his name, Eyepatch McGee?
That's what Alex Stein calls him.
Dan Crenshaw, they call him Eyepatch McGee.
Yeah, I mean perhaps. The Warhawk.
That guy was like dripping blood from his teeth.
He's a Republican. He was like dripping blood from his teeth wanting to sink them into Ukraine.
I'd like to know if he got any FTX money.
Not difficult to find.
I mean, let's take a look right now.
I know. That should be very easy stuff to find out.
That's why I think this is one of those smoking-barreled type of situations.
Ryan Salomon, not Adam Salomon.
I think this is one of these big...
And the fact is, it collapsed the Bitcoin market.
So another thought that I had that's also being discussed on the internet is that...
You know, Gary Gensler and all these regulatory agencies, they wanted any reason to make a poster child out of a crypto thing so that they could come in and regulate and centralize the decentralized platforms.
So the question is, is there any kind of like, was this FTX thing like a setup, meaning that they knew they were going to pull the plug on it all along, pumped it up, With billions and billions of dollars of Ukrainian money, made it into this huge, huge thing, just so they could come back later and say, see, this is why we've got to regulate the cryptocurrency space.
The amount of money cycled through in terms of the Ukraine through FTX was a significant amount of money to me and you.
It was nothing even close to their entire market cap or the entire amount of deposits.
How much was it? Their market cap was, what, $10 billion they took in?
$26 billion. $26 billion was their market cap.
Yeah. At the height.
Was that in, like, 2021?
Or was that... Because remember, like, the last fall, how everything kind of...
It was in 2021. Right.
50 to 100 million out of, even if it was 10 billion.
That was when Bitcoin was at 62,000, you're saying.
That's not going to sink it.
I mean, there's been 50 other drivers driving down the price of Bitcoin.
I mean, Bitcoin's gone down about...
20 to 25% since the FTX news.
So, I mean, it was tanked. Yeah, I know.
Listen, I've been predicting that our first episode, we did a show on cryptocurrencies, and I've been predicting from the very beginning Bitcoin's going to $1,000.
Long position shorts are the best play on BTC. Long positions.
You've got to be in it for months.
Also, Bitcoin took a big hit on the night of elections.
Did you see that? Dropped $2,000 from $20,000 to $18,000 on the night of the elections.
And then the FTX news broke.
It already dropped $47,000.
I mean, that's not... Yeah, I'm saying on its path down to zero.
Then I'm not quite clear on what you're claiming is to be the long position on Bitcoin if you think it's going to zero.
So you can long or you could short a crypto like you could long or you could short a stock.
So in the leveraged markets, if you put a long position, like a put on a crypto, you're betting that the price is going to go up.
And you could have a leveraged multiplier effect as the price goes up so that you can make more money.
So shorting BTC now is the only play to make.
Shorting Bitcoin, basically when you short, you're putting a bet that the price is going to go down and you're making the spread from the people who are betting that the price is going to go up.
It's like you're taking their money.
So you're not suggesting a long position on Bitcoin?
I'm suggesting a short position over a long period of time.
Sorry, I see where you're headed.
There we go. Short position over a long period of time.
I think Bitcoin by 2023, February is going to be worthless.
A thousand bucks. Everything is getting hit.
Also, they're making way for like XRP and like there's all these new world order plans with the World Economic Forum and all sorts of weird shit.
I'm glad we got to cover that FTX portion because, you know...
It's such a complex story, and most people are so adverse to crypto because of its complexities that people don't want to talk about it.
But behind it is really massive, massive corruption, dirty money, and foul play, especially when you're talking about- There's a ton of people trying to walk.
Maybe they might not be any longer, but yeah, over the last two years, a ton of people have been trying to wash money through that.
And, you know, when you look at the Ukraine, we have $110 billion that have been sent to the Ukraine.
$110 billion, Matt.
And out of $110 billion, they say that 30% has made it to the front in Russia, a front against Russia.
That leaves $70 billion to go to FTX and FTX-like companies.
It's going somewhere and it's probably not going to any worthy costs.
Right, exactly.
And this is what they want.
But for our viewers at home, it's important to understand that what is at stake in these elections?
And at stake is the war in Ukraine and keeping the front open against Russia as long as possible.
Winter's coming in Ukraine.
Do you pay attention to the war in Ukraine?
I have. I mean, depending on where I fall on the scale of how much...
It's my favorite football game I've been watching.
Yeah. And this is, I think, the real bubble.
And when it pops, it could pop in several ways.
I think that Zelensky could be killed by this winter.
Winter's coming. There's no electricity.
Putin's got 500,000 fresh troops ready to pour in.
Tons of money from Saudi Arabia and China with these oil deals that he's been closing left and right.
This dude is like set to conquer.
When's that going to happen?
What's that? When is or is that not going to happen?
I imagine it's going to happen over winter.
The colder it gets in Ukraine, you know, like it gets so cold that if you punch somebody wrong, you could break your fist and shatter all the bones in your fist because it's so freezing.
I've been to Ukraine four times.
It's one of the coldest places I've ever been in my life.
Ever been in my life.
Why does that benefit Russia instead of the Ukraine?
Well, Russia is just sending these troops in.
They just were sitting in their...
You know, heated buildings, and then they go to the front.
These Ukrainians have been on this cold front for a long time.
Bitterness sets in.
Desperation sets in.
People give up the fight.
And Ukraine doesn't have the steam the way that Russia's got the steam.
You know, Russia's got money.
They got way better weaponry.
They got 500,000 fresh troops.
And Ukraine's exhausted.
And they got no way to keep the lights on for the winter in their towns.
And so that money and those weapons that were manifesting itself seemingly over the summer that all of a sudden did not yield the results over the past few months that they were expecting, what happened?
What happened to the weapons?
No, what happened?
I mean, Russia's performance and Russia's advancements over the last few months have not been particularly strong.
So what's been happening? I think Russia's been waiting for winter.
They've just been playing the long game.
He's so smart. He doesn't need to end the war now.
He can let this war go on for five years before he feels it.
Ukraine is like...
You see Zelensky on TV. He's like...
I saw this meme.
Let's see if I can find it really quick.
It's really funny. It's from the last episode, I think.
So it's probably in that folder.
But... It was the Powerball winner, and it has the mustache, and it's pictured Zelensky's face with the mustache, and it says, you know, Vladimir Trotsky or something like that.
But that's where we're at, you know?
That's where we're at with, you know, like, he's so desperate for money, and nobody's willing to give it to him, you know?
Certainly seems...
Well, wait, square the circle.
You just got to talking about how so much of this money is being given to the Ukraine and cycled through that, yet you're now saying that he's so desperate for money and nobody's giving it to him.
So which one is it? Well, we just sent $400 million last week over there.
Those are a lot different.
The $400 million is a lot different than the $53 billion of payments that we were sending over.
There he is. He's like a lot of money.
I don't know. I guess the claim that nobody's been willing to give him money, I don't know about that claim.
$400 million in a war isn't going to buy you a lot, Matt.
I mean, yeah, it's, you know, in a silo.
In addition to the $53 billion that we've given him before, it seems like we've given him...
I'd like to know where all that money went.
I'd like to know where...
I just, the claim that he needs money and nobody's giving it to him, I don't really see how that holds up.
Did you see that Sean Penn went and gave him his Grammy?
Uh, yeah, Sean Penn's an idiot.
That was so lame. He's like, after you win this, come and bring it back to me in Malibu.
Yeah, Sean Penn's a retard.
Yeah, dude. Exactly.
Which other elections do you think were interesting this year?
What's that? Which other elections do you think were interesting this year?
Well, I was very involved in the Mastriano campaign.
He came on my show twice.
Doug Mastriano. And I gotta tell you, man, I had some harsh words for the campaign after they lost.
It's hard for me, you know, like, it's hard for me...
I'll tell you something.
It's hard for me being so intimate with the Mastriano campaign.
I know that there's fraud in Pennsylvania, but it's hard for me to, like, be like, hey, you...
It's not because of just fraud.
Like, if he just showed up...
I'll tell you, you know who Maj Tour is?
I heard the name, but I don't...
The head of Black Guns Matter.
Okay. Okay. So he's a good buddy of mine.
And this dude goes on stage with Don Trump Jr.
And he's a super famous guy.
And we also had him on the show.
And I set up Mastriano with Maj because Maj is in Philly.
And I said Maj is like a street prince in Philly because he is.
He's, like, has got this organization called Black Guns Matter.
He teaches black people in the inner cities how to buy guns and shoot.
Dude has, like, blocks locked up in Philly of tremendous respect.
I connect Mastriano with Maj Tour.
Does nothing with Maj Tour.
How could you not even...
You know, it took me, like, a month to get him to call Maj.
It did not seem to be a particularly astute campaign.
If you watch our videos that we did with The World According to Ben Stein with Mastriano The guy is so smart.
He's so smart. He's talking about the Civil War and the Battle of Gettysburg and this and that.
And you're like, wow, if this guy gets elected, he's going to know the Constitution.
He's going to fight for it.
And he was a Navy commander and all this shit.
It's all bullshit.
They hit me up after the campaign asking me to raise them funds so that they could go challenge the voter booth.
And you know what I said to them?
I said Doug Mastriano is better off as a history teacher than a general on the battlefield.
Because this dude lost.
He used to be. He lost, right?
Yeah. Oz beat him.
Oz would have been a better governor candidate.
Then at least Oz showed up for the fight.
So why did you think that Mastriano was even...
You know, there was a lot of claims about him being an anti-Semite.
And I'll drop the news here first.
I'm not going to claim that he is or isn't an anti-Semite.
But he was going up against Josh Shapiro.
And he had like this thing with Gabber, the CEO of Gabber.
And... I was like really intimate with the Mastriano campaign.
There was a period of time we were speaking like every single day.
Every single day. And he came on the show twice.
And he came on for me, not for Ben.
And so...
When we were doing the shows, you know...
We kept saying stuff like, you know, like, oh, we know you're not an alien.
He came on the show. I'm almost like to be token and say like, and Judah Friedman suggested, he said, take Adam and go through Pennsylvania with Adam.
Adam will hook you up with all the Jewish people in Pennsylvania.
That's a great idea. And he's saying this on, these are live shows.
He's saying this on live television.
Thumbs follow up.
Dude doesn't do shit.
Starts getting called an anti-Semite.
They start coming out with pieces and newspaper articles about Mastriano.
And I'm sitting here calling them out there.
I'm like, yo, I'm your Jewish guy.
I'm rolling with Maj, you know, who's like got black Philly locked up.
Like, give us some attention.
The dude would like always talk to us.
He would always talk to me.
The campaign was always in communication with me, but they never would accept a single one of my proposals.
I tried to set them up with very famous Jewish leaders in Philadelphia and throughout Pennsylvania.
They did not take a single introduction.
Ben Stein pledged a max donation to Mastriano, and the campaign didn't even follow up to collect the check.
So it seems to me...
And that's first-hand evidential witness testimony right there.
Yeah, it seems to me the takeaway is that these guys who are good at your traditional talk radio, at getting things kind of heated on talk radio, or high attendance for red meat servings at campaign events, don't really seem to have a skill set that translates more broadly.
He was also a career veteran.
And to his service, it's amazing that he stood in the battle so long and that he was in the service for so long.
I thank him for his service, but I didn't even go into the military.
I read Sun Tzu's Art of War, and it's like, you know, common strategy is when you're being called an anti-Semite, you call your Jewish friends.
He didn't even have any other Jewish friends.
Yeah. So do you acknowledge that the strategic blunders continue to be made in the effort to explain to the voter base or to the electorate at large that strategic mishaps continue to be made in trying to explain fraud and irregularities in the voting record to people in general?
Do you acknowledge that or not?
That there are these parallel stories that exist that kind of disprove the voter fraud narrative?
No, that's not at all. There's no way a person of your intelligence could have interpreted what I said just now as that.
Can you re-ask the question?
The strategic...
It's not just about saying, hey, here's fraud.
There's also about strategically explaining to people That there is fraud, that there are irregularities, what those irregularities are, and why they need to pay attention to them.
And it certainly seems that from a purely strategic attempt, purely analyzing this strategically, the attempt to make the case for voter fraud existing and the specifics about that are not being handled very well strategically.
Not at all. I'll tell you another thing.
Patricia Jackson is Dinesh D'Souza's publicity agent.
And Dinesh came on our show.
He dropped this film, right?
The film was incredible. I really highly encourage you to see 2,000 Mules because he basically interviews this company, True the Vote.
True the Vote is an elections investigation company.
And they use their geo-tracking evidence to solve murders and to solve all sorts of things.
And they say that their proprietary technology should be applicable to elections by tracing these mules who go from and are dumping these These ballot harvests or these fake ballots or whatever, and some of them were driving, they caught them driving from Pennsylvania to New Jersey and back and forth multiple times a day on the same bridge.
You know, it was pretty substantial.
But the follow through on 2000 Mules, he went on like a speaking tour for like, I don't know, a month?
If I made that movie, I'd still be talking about it.
Did you see my movie 2,000 Mules?
Did you see my movie 2,000 Mules?
He's not on TV anymore about it.
It's like a thing that happened in June and it's now over.
There seem to be continued repeating major failures to make the case for voter fraud.
Why do you think that is when they have real good arguments at stake?
Because they don't. Because they do.
I'm not trying to dump on you.
They're doing what you did earlier, which is say, oh, oh, you're just enough.
Oh, so you're just there's irregularities and I don't have to prove it any further.
OK, is voter suppression and is voter suppression fraud?
Which type of voter suppression is many different types.
Turning people away from the voter booth.
Yeah. Well, that's breaking the law, right?
Okay. 25% of the people in Maricopa County were turned away from the voter booth.
Yeah. Yeah. So.
That's fraud. Why were they turned away?
Based on what? So there was all the...
Okay. So I read a study about it.
There was these paper ballots.
They were 20 inches long.
Right before the elections, they shrunk the ballots to 19 inches long.
Now, in other counties in the United States, they also changed the size of the ballots too.
Like in Texas, in Clarkson County or something like this, they changed the size of the ballots.
But they had additional ballots.
Because of this, they overcompensated and made sure they had extra ballots.
So because they changed the size of the ballots so close to elections, it's like It's like Democrats like to put...
Democrats like to toe the line of gross negligence.
No, no, no. But stick to the evidentiary record.
Why were these people turned away?
I'm asking. Because they ran out of ballots.
Okay. And in another case, the printers ran out of ink to print on the ballots.
So it's all these things where it's like...
Like, you didn't have ink in your cartridges the night before a federal election?
No. And that's where gross negligence comes in, because a lot of Democrats use gross negligence like, oh, we were just idiots leaving $86 billion worth of military equipment in Afghanistan.
We were just idiots.
You know, they kind of try to tow this line of gross negligence as a way to say that they weren't doing something illegal.
Yeah, so someone who went and made a case and mustered a case Because you can absolutely gather eyewitnesses.
This isn't something that operated in the shadows like ballot harvesting.
You can go and get people who experienced this dynamic who went to vote and weren't able to vote and were not able to conduct their civic duty and exercise their constitutional rights to vote because there wasn't ink in the fucking printer.
You can gather those people and you can interview them and you can muster that evidence.
You can look into who was in charge of that.
You can look into who was supposed to handle the voting equipment and what that person's failings or malfeasance was.
Those are the types of things that persuade people, mustering that case, mustering that evidence.
The Donald Trump, hey, I won by a lot, shrieking on Twitter convinces nobody.
The, oh, there are a bunch of irregularities, oh, oh, you don't just believe there's a coincidence.
That argument, that trope, convinces nobody.
You interview a person who went to vote and was unable to because the printer ran out of ink, that is persuasion.
Right. So I actually, on election day, I was getting these videos left and right, and I was sharing them all on Instagram, and I got censored on Instagram.
They took all the videos down.
Instagram took every video down of this happening.
And I got shadowbans, and then my posts are going to like two to three people on Instagram on my stories and all that stuff.
So now you have a very friendly party at another major social media platform named Elon Musk.
Who is now being very accommodating to arguments that on other platforms and even on Twitter previously, you got censored.
Twitter is now becoming a place where you- Is that your preferred social media?
No, I have a bigger following on Instagram.
That's so censored.
I've been shadow banned.
It was very easy. I talked to my friend who's at Instagram and he said, oh yeah, you know, a couple people reported you for bullying.
I'll have them remove those strikes.
All of a sudden I wasn't shadow banned anymore.
You could sell that, dude.
You could sell that access.
You could sell that like a blue verified check mark five years ago.
I would have to sell it to the person who works at Facebook and Instagram would have to be on board with that.
I think he's been more accommodating to me because he knows that I've been unfairly targeted by the content moderation team as opposed to, you know, he agrees with me otherwise.
If you want to spread If the things that previously got you banned, whether it be information about the vaccine, about election irregularities, you now have a far more friendly voice of the top on Twitter and Elon Musk than you've ever had on any social media platform.
That's true. You think he's going to bring back Donald Trump and all those people?
I think he won't bring back Donald Trump because Trump has already communicated that he doesn't want it anyways.
How could you do that, though, to a sitting president, though?
Wouldn't it just be kind of like respect out of the office to at least make an account for him and reserve it?
To say, hey, we're not here to ban a federal...
I wouldn't be shocked. I would not be shocked...
If Elon allows Trump to have his account back, however, I think there's a strong case that he won't because Elon knows that he's going to take a lot of heat, right?
So if Trump has already said, I don't want it and screw you and I'm on truth social, then the cost benefit doesn't work out for Elon to take that heat to give an account back to a guy who already says he doesn't want to use it.
Even though if he gave it back, Trump would use it.
Trump wouldn't use it, but I think it would be for people like me.
Not just Trump, but also Alex Jones, Owen Troyer, all those type of people.
I would love to see, because then it would show people like me that he is coming here for free speech.
He is coming to kill the enslavers.
It's undeniable that he already has been, and it's undeniable that he is going to be...
He's definitely changed the conversation.
I think things like FTX and stuff like that are breaking headway because there's more of an ability to talk about them.
Well, you are not going to be able to, there's no way that you're going to stop the facts around the FTX thing.
I mean, it's just all over 50 different categories of Twitter communication funnel.
In terms of, will Elon Musk, in taking a major social media platform, and some might say...
The primary mode of communication where people get news, election information, where the political conversation is crafted, taking that platform and releasing it from the suffocating grasp of highly liberal and censorious employee base.
And putting it in the hands of Elon Musk, there's undoubtedly that that is going to be helpful to conservatives and to Republicans.
And I expect that to actually manifest itself at least a little bit by the next election.
I don't think it's too soon for that to manifest itself.
Are we fucked in the next two years?
I think so, because I think that Donald...
And how fucked do you think we are?
Well, I mean, over the next two years in terms of the operations of government, I mean, so listen, you know, obviously say what you want and lament the lack of a red wave, but the Republicans took the House.
They did. Well, we don't know.
It hasn't been called yet. Even the people who would be called?
Okay, let me ask you a question.
If they announce Democrats took the House, then are you going to start saying, okay.
No, I'm already suspicious.
I just know that without actual hard evidence, if you don't have that, nobody takes you seriously.
Yeah, but if we are suspicious, those of us who are suspicious can lean in and empower those who actually do want to do the footwork.
To get it done.
No, that should have already happened. Okay.
In Arizona, are you familiar with Harmeet Dillon?
I might be mispronouncing your name.
Okay. Yeah, the constitutional attorney, Harmeet Dillon.
She's always on Fox. Yeah.
You have her and a ton of lawyers with their nose deeply involved in those Arizona elections overlooking everything.
Yeah. If with that amount of focus and attention and the time and the money put towards keeping an incredibly watchful eye on what's going on in Maricopa County and the Arizona elections, if that doesn't yield any evidence, you've got problems.
If you're going to say, we know that there was fraud, okay?
And with that amount of oversight, with that many lawyers and with that many dollars put towards watching this, you better, instead of lamenting this and just saying, oh, fuck everyone who doesn't acknowledge that there's voter fraud, you better look internally and say, whoa, What are we seeing?
The lawyers that are beholden to us and loyal to us and we're paying, what are they not finding?
If they're supposed to be the watchful eyes here, what are they doing wrong?
So you got to do that.
Everyone's got to do that. And we can say, oh, well, you know they did it.
You know this happened.
There's no value to that.
There's value to installing the oversight mechanisms, using them to compile evidence, and if they're not compiling evidence, understanding why not.
Everything else is people just stroking each other off.
Everything else is people masturbating each other about how we're so smart and we're getting fucked.
That's my take. Well said.
I was a big fan of Upton Sinclair's The Jungle growing up.
And that was one of the books that shaped my early mind, high school mind on politics and how things get done in America.
Sure. And there was always this scene in the jungle that really shook me to my core.
And it's, you know, when the For the readers, it's a book on the industrial complex in America and people's rights, and it's almost like a call to unionize in a sense.
But it goes into the union lords, but there's a section in the book where it's election time.
And, like, it goes extensively into how they stuff the ballots, and I think it was like 1929 or something like that that the book came out.
And they go extensively into voter fraud of the 1920s.
And you're like, wow. It's so intricate in the book.
And when I was younger and very impressionable, that really stuck with me.
And so I think it only has become more sophisticated how people do cheat.
I think that in elections, for example, they still mail You know, mail-in ballots to every single American is like, you know, like...
But they don't.
They do that in certain states.
They do that in certain states.
In certain states that they need to lean a specific way.
Okay, so first off, if you go and look at Arizona, Arizona was Republican-controlled for God knows how long, okay?
The current laws in Arizona...
Around voting and why they emphasize mail-in voting were instituted under Republican governance, okay?
And it's because the McCain supporters, the McCain campaign wanted to be able to scoop ballots from elderly nursing home voters who it was tougher for them to get to the polls.
Right. I do think in Arizona we're fighting the ghost of John McCain.
Sure. If those rules are now being used to your detriment, you've got to figure out how and why.
If not, everything else is window dressing.
Everything else is a waste of time.
You know, we're running out of time here, and we're going a little bit over, and as long as you don't mind, I don't mind furthering the conversation.
I wanted to ask you if you paid attention to the Lexalt race in Nevada.
As soon as they overcame him, they called the race for the Democrat.
But the governor's race, the governor of Nevada was Republican and won.
I'm not saying this is evidence, Matt.
Don't quote me saying this is evidence because I know how you feel about that.
But this is definitely cause for speculation.
Cause for speculation?
In such a polarizing election that in specific races that you're going to tell me that down the ballot didn't happen when the more famous candidate was Lex Alt.
Yeah, I mean, that's a strange result.
And there's similarly strange results in New York where the Republicans, I mean, New York is a deep blue state top to bottom.
Why did Republicans do so well there?
And also, why did John Fetterman score higher than Josh Shapiro?
Yeah, you know, there's a lot of...
John Fetterman beat Josh Shapiro.
Yeah, yeah. And the weirdest stuff...
I forget the host on MSNBC. I don't watch this show so much.
I wouldn't waste any great sales watching any MSNBC. I don't know how you stomach that.
There's five of them at the table and they were saying, how about Fetterman for Biden's VP in 2024?
And they were talking about this like, are you fucking kidding me?
Yeah, well, Fetterman, one, I'm sure in Philadelphia, they did all the ballot harvesting that they were able to do.
I don't think there was any voter fraud in Fetterman?
Adam, here's where you go. You think they need the voter fraud.
You don't realize that they can win based on the ballot collection and harvesting.
You think they need to do more?
They don't. You think Karen Bass needs to go and actually...
No, they don't. And they take advantage...
This is their strategy.
Their strategy for elections is exclusively ballot harvesting.
They don't show up to debate.
They don't do a rally.
They do rallies from their basement with ten people.
They don't come out on the campaign trail at all.
They don't interact with the voters.
I mean, it's like this...
I know it's a clown show, but once again...
You're saying it's legal and it should be?
No, I'm saying that you need to...
But once they get control of the legislature, it's done.
There'll never be an election again.
How do you break the chain?
How do you break this chain when they control the legislature and they're like, if you don't like it, rewrite the rules.
But in order to rewrite the rules, you've got to win an election that we cheated on.
Yeah, you're going to have to go.
In Pennsylvania, if the Republicans want to win, they're going to have to figure out a way to ballot harvest themselves.
They're going to have to, instead of...
Pretending that it's still 2012 and that you just aim for the maximized, optimized turnout on Election Day.
They're going to have to go identify their voters, identify places where they can go and do ballot harvesting.
And they need to go fucking do it.
You think ballot harvesting could go to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court can intervene and say that ballot harvesting is not that hard?
I doubt it.
If it was going to, it would have already.
And sometimes, in some places, it's not going to be enough.
But if you're doing it just like the McCain Republicans did it to the Republicans' advantage with the elderly voters at nursing homes, okay, Republicans in places where there's very thin margins, like Arizona, need to go and do it better.
You might be cooked in a Pennsylvania.
The bottom line, the take-home is we need to investigate all these places.
Please somebody step up and investigate it for us because we're not going to do anything because we're too busy going to work.
The people who do this for a living, and it's a lot of people, okay, they don't seem to be doing it.
They have to, yes, they have to overwhelm inner-city urban Democrat machines that are very good at this.
We're going to find this out in LA this week.
We're going to find out if Rick Caruso, with his private funds in that time from June through September, was able to stand up a ballot harvesting operation good enough to counter the ballot harvesting operation that the Democrats did.
We're going to find that out this week.
And to anyone who wants to win a similar election in the future, you have to go and figure out how to ballot harvest, at least within a certain deviation as well as the other side.
I figured it out.
I figured it out.
You know how you get these stupid mailer ads?
They go directly to your mailbox.
You need to have a mailer ad, just a little flyer with a QR code that says...
Re-register to vote.
Click this box if you want voter harvesting.
I'm not entirely sure if that's legal or not, but possibly.
They click the box.
Well, if Republicans start doing that, you know damn well Democrats are going to come to the table and be like, we've got to end this voter harvesting.
This is not good. You get Donald Trump to give a campaign speech and sit there and register people to vote and do voter harvesting right there at a campaign speech, and voter harvesting will be over in the United States in 10 seconds.
That's probably the best plan that the Republicans have, is just to get Donald Trump behind voter harvesting.
Yeah. You're not incorrect.
They'll win. They'll win, because everybody will give them their votes.
And Democrats will want to end voter harvesting.
So it's a double win. There you go.
That's the soundbite for our audience.
Listen, this was a hot show.
I want to lighten the mood with some memes before we call it a...
Because I got this funny one that I just got to put up on the screen.
I just need my audience to see this meme.
Here we go.
My next song is called Please Don't Cut My Dick Off Because I Like the Color Pink.
Wait, who is this? It's a kid.
Oh, got it. Can you see it on your screen?
Now I can, yeah. That's unfortunately how things work these days.
Some little kid plays the doll and all of a sudden, time to take him to the gender dysphoria clinic.
I know, right? It's like, what is going on with our country?
And then I want to put up one more meme and we'll end the show on this meme.
This is probably one of the best memes I think I have seen.
In a long time. Do you follow Sister Shanti on Instagram?
No, I don't believe so. She's got the best memes, man.
What a fucking year this week.
Yeah, it's been a lot. Well, that's it. You know, what's his name?
Was it Lennon? There are, you know, decades where nothing happens and then there's weeks where decades happen.
Exactly. Exactly.
Matt, where can people find you?
They can find me primarily on Twitter and Instagram at Matt Bolinski, M-A-T-T-B-I-L-I-N-S-K-Y. And my podcast, The Prevailing Narrative, is available on...
I do one every Thursday?
I don't do one every Thursday.
You try to. Yeah, it's either each week or every.
Usually, it's about a three to two.
So, three every two. I appreciate you hopping on last minute to join us, Matt.
You know, in the podcast world, you know what it's like to lose a guest at the last minute.
But you have to come back because I like the...
For a minute, I felt like we were like Andrew Tate and Jake Paul, like stepping in the ring.
That's how you get to truth, bro.
You gotta fight. Yeah, you gotta fight.
I'll end on this. I'm going through the Matrix series again to get stupid high every night and sit there and watch the Matrix to entertain myself.
So, I'm watching The Matrix 2 last night, Reloaded.
And there's a scene where Neo goes and fights with Seraph, you know, when he's on his way to the Oracle.
And Seraph, and Neo's like, he's like, that's enough.
And Neo says, what was that for?
He said, I had to know that you were the one.
And Neo says, you could have just asked me.
And Seraph says, you do not truly know someone until you fight them.
There you go. So that is where truth comes from.
You fight for the truth, you argue, you put your belief in the battle of the arena of ideas, and the best ideas win, and that's what carries the public debate.
So thank you for... Rigorous analysis is how we do it.
Thank you for putting in your opinions.
Thank you to our audience for coming and tuning in every single Monday and Thursday.
You can find us at TheAdamKingShow.com on every single streaming platform at The Adam King Show.
We are on every social media at The Adam King Show.
Please reshare this video.
Join us again Thursday, and we will have Matt again soon.
Thank you, everybody. Stay tuned.
Bye, guys. All right, there we go.
I'm supposed to leave the recording on.
That was a good show.
I like it when it gets tight.
That was the most...
It was good.
Yeah, you know, we didn't get to that many elections, but whatever.
We had bigger... Well, there's like heavy...
Each election is heavy.
I really wanted to cover some other elections.
You know, if you want to talk, we do sometimes a post-show.
We're still recording. If there's anything you want to say, we could put it in like a...
Admittedly, I probably got to get to some other stuff.
But, you know, whatever. I just...
People... What were your top three?
While we have you. Of what necessarily?
Top three elections. Oh, I mean, the Arizona and the Nevada ones, you've got to keep, you know, you've got our significant interest.
Then, I don't know, I don't think it's elections, it's just, it's these dynamics, right?
I mean, there's so many dynamics where there's clearly a couple very Trumpian candidates who But, you know, and then the governors that he decided to shit talk all did super well.
But then, you know, you've got a J.D. Vance who still did very well, that he supported quite a bit.
You've got, you know, the weird dynamics with Mitch not supporting Blake Masters, and it probably would have been enough to get him over the top.
And then New York, where, yeah, you know, it's tough to say.
You got Lee Zeldin, got...
20 points closer than any Republicans gotten in a generation, but was that just because Hochul is such a fucking retard?
But then he zelled in his shows.
If you're a good candidate and you're smart and you are articulate and you have wide appeal, that appeals to a lot of people because he got good results in that state.
Republicans, congressionally, did very well in New York.
There's no denying it. Yeah, New York was, I get really suspicious when they just, the moment the election's over, they're like, they declare the candidate.
Which candidate? In any candidate.
California was like this. New York was like this.
They said immediately after the election ends, they declared...
They used to do that all the time.
That's how it should be. No, I mean at 801 when they...
They didn't announce that for Hochul.
No, at Newsom they did.
Yeah, because he's up 28 points and given the percentage of people who turned out...
Hochul was the most offensive to you.
Yeah. That was the most offensive election to you.
Interesting. Well, no, not most offensive.
I thought it was in spot what?
Lee Zeldin got 20 points closer than a Republican has in years.
I mean, it just shows you that in that state, if you run, even in a blue state, if you run a good candidate who's not...
We don't have a Lee Zeldin in California.
We don't have his analog.
I've heard... I heard this amazing thing on a podcast the other day.
Democrats, they are so good at accepting anyone into their tent.
If you join the Democrat tent, you could be pedophilia, tranny, anti-government, Black Lives Matter, everything under one tent.
Republicans, their tent, if you have one flaw, they don't want to be with you.
I mean, you could speak to some Democrats who would say the same thing, but these days, because of the Trump-non-Trump divide in the Republican Party, the split is more pronounced.
Split is very pronounced, and Republicans don't want to support anybody.
It's not Republicans.
It's establishment versus the party.
The party clearly is aligned with Donald Trump, without a doubt.
I mean, DeSantis got such huge backlash for all these moves that he was making with donors.
Like who? Backlash from whom?
You know, I'll tell you.
Roger Stone, Alex Jones, Steve Bannon.
From Trump people. So which people that are not in the Trump...
It causes a divide. DeSantis went after the Romney donors.
Okay, so once again, who is not...
Who that's not a Donald Trump layer one person got mad at DeSantis?
Who is not a Donald Trump layer one person?
Sean Hannity? It is not a layer one.
It is in layer one.
Who layer one? Which layer one person got mad at this?
Well, that's what I'm saying. Trump's layer one is all the...
Listen, Matt, if you're going for an election...
Alex Jones and Roger Stone aren't getting anybody elected, okay?
Are you kidding me? Alex Jones brought Donald Trump to the White House.
Yeah, that was 2016.
Alex Jones is the largest media person in all of America right now.
Yeah, and now he's done.
And now he's fucked, at least for a few years.
I don't think so. Yeah, he's absolutely fucked.
I think he's going to be worth...
I think his net worth is going to be...
I don't know how it could be.
I don't know how it could be.
Why are you not being rigorous in your dissection?
You go, I don't know how it could be.
Hold on. I don't know how it could be that he could get sued for $2.75 trillion.
Well, he did. He's going to go into bankruptcy.
Just accept it. He already did go into bankruptcy.
You might not like it. Free speech systems is already in bankruptcy.
You might not think it's legit.
No, but he's going to sue. They are appealing the case.
He's going to sue and he's going to win big.
The dynamics of 2016 that the Trump guys that you guys keep on wanting to hold on to, you might have to accept those dynamics are no longer at play.
No, they are. They're the only things at play.
Yeah, okay. I keep on going with that.
Look at the only people that talk about the war in Ukraine, Alex Jones.
Ben Shapiro finally comes out and says he was lied to about- That's not enough to win elections.
It's not. Sorry, you still- You're talking about winning elections.
I'm talking about the real issues that people care about.
But you say you can go about the real, what you consider to be the real issues, okay?
What it comes down to is who wins.
All the other shit is window dressing.
Sorry. I'm sorry that this is reality, but this is reality.
You can keep on lamenting that people don't care about the real stuff, okay?
They're not going to.
So on the stuff they do care about, how do you win?
That's all you got to be thinking about.
I'm sorry, Adam. I think you're wasting your time focusing so much on stuff that you know is the real stuff going on that does not make its way into the mainstream.
You need to be able to win on mainstream issues.
Abortion. You need to accept that voters are fucking not thinking about the abortion issue, and this hurts Republicans.
You have to accept that the Supreme Court decision hurt Republicans.
You might not think that's the right way for voters to react.
You might think that it's illegitimate.
There are a bunch of single women who wouldn't have cared to vote, but because of abortion, they went and voted.
That's not my opinion.
It's not how I want things to be.
That is reality.
That's a fair assessment.
My suggestion is that you play, not being a dick here, you need to go a little bit more towards the playing field of what reality actually is, as opposed to, here's how things actually are.
Here's the real story that 93.5% of the population is just not paying attention to.
They're not going to. You have to win on the stuff they're paying attention to.
Just do it. Something for you to chew on?
My constructive input.
You know what? I appreciate it.
It's definitely food for thought.
I do watch these videos where people go to Venice Beach and they interview random people and they say, how many states are in the United States?
And people can't answer the question.
And those people are voting in the elections.
You might have to win the type of woman who didn't really care that much about Kathy Hochul, who isn't much of a dem lib in general and was going to sit this election out, but was so spooked by the Supreme Court decision that they went and voted because of that.
You have to win those people.
So we need to be ballot harvesting.
All we have to do is ballot harvesting.
No, it's one of the things we need to do.
Rick, I'm telling you, Rick did not notice that he got ballot harvested out of a win in June.
He noticed. So either he did it himself, or he's going to lose.
But the elections are already showing, they're already calling it for her.
No, these were not, they're not calling it for her, okay?
There's 62% of the votes counted.
This is in the next, the next batch is going to go to her, okay?
His campaign manager told me, he's like, yeah, the next two, three batches are going to go to her.
Why can't they count all these in a day?
I don't know what you want me to tell you.
Once again, ain't how the world, I want the world to be.
I get that, but how am I supposed to sit here and take anybody's word for it that I should have faith in these systems?
You know, like city council races are still not called.
City council races.
Yeah, listen. There's like 150,000 votes to count.
Why can't they just count them?
Whatever they're doing, they're not going to be defrauded enough for Tracy Park to lose in Venice.
She's going to win. Will they do it?
Will they do it to Rick?
What do you think about Luna? It's over?
Oh, he crushed Villanueva.
It's not even close.
It's going to be a dark day for LA, man.
If Rick doesn't pull it out, oh, we're in trouble.
He's the only...
Will you leave LA? Not anytime soon, but, you know, it's not looking good.
Tracy? I left LA. Did I tell you?
No. Where are you? I moved to Simi Valley.
Yeah, yeah. I got a huge, huge fucking house.
I live by a farm.
I'm farm to table. I've been farm to table since February.
I'm living the life, dude.
I can walk from my house to the equestrian center.
Yeah, no, I get it.
I got a one o'clock I got to get on, but let me know when this is out so I can tweet it, you know, give it some love.