In this video, conservative radio host Alex Jones discusses targeting of Americans by FBI and CIA,
mentioning that himself, Rudolph Giuliani, Tucker Carlson, and others have been targeted. He also
talks about a recent undercover video in which a CIA agent revealed the federal government wanted to
bankrupt him and shares information on PR firms bragging about their role in taking down Alex Jones.
Jones emphasizes that this is not just an attack on him but a wider attempt to weaponize the DOJ
against Trump supporters and the American people in general. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discusses new
calls for criminal investigation hearings, with congressmen subpoenaing Gavin Oblivious in the
ongoing discussion of potential government spying on political opposition. He also addresses
concerns over the recent reauthorization of FISA and its implications for American citizens'
privacy. In addition to this, Kennedy Jr. touched upon the Whitmer kidnapping case, speculating on
whether future terrorist attacks may be staged by government agencies in order to maintain control
or increase surveillance capabilities. The speaker discusses the possibility of a false flag attack
orchestrated by Russia and questions whether Iran is involved in recent events. They mention how big
governments use false flags as a standard play, citing WikiLeaks documents on secret training in
false flags for Green Berets and Delta Force members. The speaker speculates that there may be
backroom deals between Iran and the West, with limited Western response strengthening both sides
while causing unrest within their respective countries. They also touch upon historical examples of
false flag attacks used to create crises leading to a solution. In a recent conversation, Alex
Jones addressed the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. He argued that if the attack was
orchestrated by Israel, it doesn't make sense that they would kill their own people during the
operation. He also mentioned that he has been critical of both Communist China and Israeli
governments, but he does not blame Jews as a monolithic group for the world's problems. Jones
clarified that his opposition is towards corrupt elites, regardless of their ethnicity or
nationality. This video features InfoWars host Alex Jones discussing the Deep State with legal
expert Brian Blem. They discuss the surveillance of Americans by intelligence agencies such as the
FBI and CIA, and the potential consequences for those involved in spying on citizens without
warrants. The conversation touches on the power dynamics between different factions within the
Republican Party, as well as the influence of the National Security State on American politics and
global affairs. Jones and Blem also explore the connections between political forces promoting a one
world government and the censorship of conservative politicians and journalists by intelligence
agencies in both the US and Europe. The world is on the brink of a potential nuclear disaster as
Israel faces extreme pressure from Iran. A Samsung directive has sparked concerns about an Israeli
strike that could lead to war. Drone attacks have been launched towards Israel, with reports of Iraq
declaring war on them and Iran preparing to launch cruise missiles. The US is closely monitoring the
situation, while Iran warns that any country allowing an attack on them will face consequences.
There are fears that if Iran retaliates, they may block strategic waterways in an attempt to halt
world trade. This has already had a significant impact on markets with Bitcoin value dropping
instantly by 9% when news of the attack broke. The situation is further complicated by Putin's
threat to enter the battle if the US attacks or supports Israel. The potential for World War 3 looms
over us as we watch events unfold in the Middle East.
It's 108 Central Standard Time, and they've just launched, tomorrow to follow this crew, a X Spaces with a lot of great guests like Jack Posobiec and others that are going to be joining us here today to discuss the FBI and CIA targeting Americans, censoring Americans, surveilling Americans, persecuting Americans, including President Trump.
Myself, Rudolph Giuliani, Tucker Carlson.
Navarro, the list goes on and on.
This is evil.
This is illegal.
This is out of control.
This is beyond election theft.
This is a globalist corporate coup against the people.
And I believe any minute now, the Spaces on X is going to be live.
As soon as it is, I'm going to go to that feed because Mario Nafalo does a great job, reaches tens of millions of people a day.
Did an amazing interview with him and Elon Musk for two and a half hours previously.
I'm going to let him host the spaces and be in control of the transmission.
But while we're waiting for him to join and fire up his system, here is a clip of Congressman Representative Troy Nels talking about the fact that we do need congressional subpoenas and hearings about this coming out, and we do need Alex Jones, yours truly, to sue these people.
So obviously the topic of conversation today It's something that we kind of already knew, that the FBI, the CIA, the Deep State, going after people like you for speaking your mind and telling the truth and exposing things they don't want exposed.
Tell us a little bit about that video and how you felt after you saw it finally be said by somebody, a card-carrying member of the Deep State.
It would take an hour to give all the details and all the facts, but the FBI in Connecticut and their chief counsel initiated the suit and ran the suit through the Democrat party law firm in Connecticut, one of the biggest in the country.
And he bragged about it on the stand that he went to them and got them to do all this, that organized the family.
So the FBI Chief Counsel in Connecticut, and then when he was on the stand, my lawyer said, did Mr. Jones ever say your name?
No.
Did Mr. Jones' host ever say your name?
No.
Did you ever appear on his website?
No.
Didn't know who he was until he sued me.
He won $94 million that doesn't exist.
In that kangaroo court where the judge already found me guilty.
So, we knew then, the law firm suing me, the lead lawyer, former federal prosecutor, Chris Manning, whose specialty is suing Republican governors and putting them in jail and we look him up.
And the whole thing, I never said these things, I never did these things they said, I hardly ever talked about it, didn't send people to their houses, thousands of news articles, hundreds of TV programs conservatively, lying about what I did, never showing evidence.
I knew it was Deep State to set the precedent for this lawfare.
This is direct tax to the FBI where they can initiate lawsuits through law firms.
They can then get the money.
And so we also, you know, about major PR firms that after they won the fake suits, because the judges found me guilty, and that's a report that I filed that's on my ex account yesterday, where I explained the new revelations.
The PR firms, after they won the rigged cases, like in Gladiator where, you know, they stab Gladiator so he thinks he can win, but he actually loses in the end, even though they tried to rig it.
They're all right there with PR firms saying, this is how we took down Alex Jones, this is how we did it.
Now there's the headline breaking, new revelations in FBI CIA plan to destroy Alex Jones revealed.
I show them bragging, that's always the supervillains' failure is they love to brag.
So this whole thing, it's like saying Trump said, all Mexicans are criminals.
There is no video.
He didn't say most Mexicans are criminals.
He didn't say Mexicans are bad.
He said, we've got a lot of good people coming across the border that just want to work.
We've also got a lot of really bad people.
Well, that's not all Mexicans are criminals and evil.
So it's the same.
or I mean I see it all the time where they call Elon Musk a white
supremacist that it's just it's not true or Donald Trump that but they hammer it
and they hammer and if they can silence you and he platform you like I was for
five years I was still on talk radio and have my own audience but I was suppressed
they could then make up anything they wanted in the straw man argument so when
I saw this this this former FBI current CIA guy I knew it was true and real because
I have experienced it I mean, if you've been run over by a car and tasted the treads as it runs over your face, you know what hit you.
And so now we know they're trying to fully weaponize it against the American people in general, saying all Trump supporters are white supremacist and criminals and we need re-education camps for them.
That's MSNBC.
This is a dying elite that are corrupt, warmongering criminals that have dissolved our borders,
devalued our currency, did all those horrible things, now trying to then declare
the largest political opposition in the country, the largest political bloc in the country,
is MAGA Republicans, a populist movement that's taken over the Republican Party.
They're trying to list the largest group in the country as terrorists.
The dog isn't going to hunt.
But this is a historical moment.
We saw the Frank Church Committee hearings of the 70s that almost brought down the FBI and CIA.
Put them back in their box until 9-11, where they used that for a big power grab 22 years ago, 23 years ago.
We need new Frank Church Committee hearings and we've got, now it's like 10 congressmen and women are calling for criminal investigation hearings, the subpoenaing of Gavin Oblivious.
So this is a big deal and I'm very thankful to Mario and to Nick and everybody that are covering this.
I'm very thankful for Elon saying it's disturbing.
I'm very thankful for all the congresspeople that are concerned.
I'm very thankful this has been the top story.
One of the top stories the last five days since this broke.
Because look, it's not about me.
It's about all of us.
If they can do this to me or Trump, they can do it to anybody.
Yeah, so Alex, you know, talking about news that we've seen over the past few days, this FISA reauthorization that they passed yesterday, again, and would not pass the amendment to require a warrant to spy on Americans.
Your thoughts on that and are the American people finally waking up to what is going on in Washington and you know seeing through these Congress people that are pretty much just lie to your face and say you know and you know we're not going to we're gonna fight against the the deep state and fight against government spying on Americans and such when they go ahead and vote to reauthorize FISA.
He says, oh, I helped pass yesterday the warrantless wiretapping of Americans en masse because of fentanyl.
When that's offshore, they're able to do that already.
Okay, so this unmasking of citizens is done to spy on Congress, to spy on their political opposition, like they did Donald Trump, like they did myself.
And Mangino's released the classified documents months ago that I was on that list, along with Trump's top supporters, to be surveilled.
So they want to make it legal what they're already doing.
They've already got access to all of this without going to a court.
It's already in the NSA database that the CIA and 16 other agencies Have full access to.
So this claim they've reauthorized FISA to protect us is boulder dash.
It's the globalists that ordered the border dissolved.
Now the FBI director says brace for Moscow style attacks are imminent.
Well, who opened the border up?
Who let all these folks into the country?
So we're headed into a very, very dangerous period of time.
And FISA is used to spy on their political opponents.
So you're saying that there is a likelihood when the FBI released statements such as there being a possible terror attack through the borders that this likely would be something that is conducted possibly by Either them or the three-letter agencies or even foreign agencies such as Mossad or someone else.
They can promote it and know it's going to happen and let it happen and nudge people and entrap them and let it happen.
Or bust a group they've entrapped and stop it to be the heroes.
Or they can purely stage it.
Operation Gladio declassified in the 90s.
Hundreds of terror attacks in Europe to be blamed on Russia.
Again, this has been done, so I don't know what form it will take, but when the FBI director says, we think there's going to be terror attacks, well then you're the ones that open the borders up.
Biden's the one that said immediately surge the border and the borders open.
So what I'm saying is, the logic's dead here.
When there's a terror attack, I hope there isn't one, I think that's a probability now.
They will take our rights and search us and surveil us and have FISA against us in the name of stopping the terror attack.
They either allowed it to happen or they did it themselves.
That's the historical direction.
Previous activity, previous behavior is the greatest indicator of future behavior.
Guys, if the space does crash, I believe we're going to restart IHAS and move from Saudi Arabia.
I guess, let's come back on to Pfizer, the question that Nick asked you.
What is the reason, just for our audience, what is the reason why the intelligence agencies, both local, both within the United States and foreign agencies, want to basically surveil Americans?
Well, I've interviewed Dr. William Binney, who was the technical head of the NSA, not the director, but the second in command.
He actually ran things.
I've interviewed many other whistleblowers.
The NSA system records almost all emails, all text messages, all phone recordings.
It records broadcast TV, it records radio, it records everything with incredible servers they've got in, you know, in regionally hundreds of facilities around the country.
And then they're not listening to everything, but they're recording everything.
When they want, they can go in and listen to it.
And so we know that they've used FISA to spy on the Senate, to spy on political opposition, to spy on President Trump.
And so its main tool is domestic control, also corporate espionage.
Because reports are provided to select corporations and members of Congress so they can insider trade off of the information they're given on companies that they're not fully invested in or controlling.
It's really an economic and social weapon.
And then the Islamic quote threat or right-wing threat or white supremacist threat that they basically gin up in most cases is used as a pretext for that domestic spy grid.
Well, that's the $64 quadrillion question, and I don't know exactly what's happening, but past behavior, again, is the most indicative of future behavior, so let's talk about that.
Usually the CIA and the FBI and the State Department lie.
But I will remember two and a half years ago or two years and three months ago, they came out and said, Russia is preparing to invade Ukraine.
They're going to invade the next week.
They're amassing troops and blood and ambulances.
And it was true.
And I have Japanese, British TV, Russian on.
I had Russian TV come on and they were deliberately lying.
You could see it in their faces.
No, no, we're not invading.
No, no.
And the next day they invaded.
And I said, I think you're lying.
I think you're invading.
And if you remember, the Reuters reporter confronted the State Department CIA spokesman when the CIA spokesman said, no, they're getting ready to invade.
I think they're going to blow up some government buildings and say, we did it as a pretext.
And that did happen because the CIA had caught that chatter.
I think the Russians did do that as a pretext.
That's what big governments do.
It's a false flag is a standard play.
And then the Reuters reporter said, you're Alex Jones.
False flags don't exist.
Well, the hell they don't.
They're one of the main tools.
WikiLeaks released documents over a decade ago of Green Beret captains and above are given a secret Two-week course in false flags and how if you're overmanned and you're being outgunned, say in Vietnam, and the village elders are on your side, you make a decision with the village elders to go ahead and set a booby trap and blow up some of the rice farmers because then they'll all get on your side.
And that's an example in the Pentagon training of you kill a few people to save a thousand.
That's the sick Machiavellian The Delta Force, when they pass their final test, are given two days to read the prints by Machiavelli and then write a paper.
And if you believe the unjustified is the means, they go, OK, you're now in Delta Force.
If you say that's immoral, I'm not going to do this.
So they're taught false flags at the special operations level.
So let's stop denying they exist.
The Russians do them.
We do them.
We're not perfect.
They're not perfect.
The point is, this goes on.
And so, I'm not exactly sure what's happening or if this is a false flag in Iran, but here's the answer.
Iran's never been controlled by America.
But Iran has done backroom deals since the late 1970s when the CIA tacitly backed the Ayatollah Khomeini to come in because the Shah was going to build nuclear reactors, empower the entire Middle East.
He was a Persian.
He wanted peace.
They got rid of him, let the Ayatollah come in, made a deal to then double-cross Jimmy Carter, hold the American hostages.
The day Reagan wins, They released them.
So ever since then, there's been a back and forth.
Then the West funded Iraq to attack Iran and double-crossed them in the Iran-Iraq War for seven years in the 1980s.
And so now you get $6 billion given before October 7th, back in August of last year.
They give them that money.
And then suddenly we know Hezbollah was working with Hamas, and then suddenly they launched this attack.
Israel magically stands down to start this larger war.
And I believe, this is speculation, but this is what I think happened, I think I know it, that there's backroom channels.
Remember, the left, the so-called left, and Biden are buddies with Iran.
The right isn't.
So there's a larger jockeying where Iran will launch attacks.
There'll be a limited Western response.
The Mullahs, who are super unpopular, They will be made stronger in Iran.
Netanyahu will be made stronger in Israel.
The West will be made stronger over here.
And that we're about to see some limited war happen.
But behind the scenes, it's already basically had guardrails put on it and has been determined.
This is the final level of false flags.
You can go back Six hundred years ago, five hundred years ago, where you had Norman Kings, who were Vikings that conquered France a thousand years ago, and England nine hundred years ago, writing letters to each other that are in the Royal Archives in the National Museum in England.
I've seen them.
You might have searched these.
But they're like, we're having uprisings by the people north of us.
By the Welsh.
Or we have the Iris Uprising.
Or we have the Scott Uprising.
Time for a war, cousin.
And then a war starts between two cousins.
One's Norman French.
One's British French.
Or British Norman.
They're all Norman.
They now have a two-year war, a ten-year war, a hundred-year war, in some cases, to make everyone unify in the country.
It's like that movie, "The King" that came out five years ago
that's actually based on history.
They say, "Sir, we need to launch a war, you're unpopular.
"Let's invade France."
So that's the level that we're at in real history.
And if people don't know with the new global currency coming in and an election coming in and all of this,
that I believe there's been a backroom deal made between Israel, the US and Iran to create this big crisis
and out of this is gonna become some solution.
That's what I see happening.
I mean, you know, the CIA says three days ago, Iran's going to start attacking.
Then they seize a ship.
Now they're readying missiles.
I believe the CIA is telling the truth this time, just like they did days before Russia invaded Ukraine.
So the first thing is, I personally think that when we're seeing the mainstream media, when we're seeing the deep state, when we're seeing the CIA and the intelligence agencies and Mossad all making the claim, and as Nick said, they've done it for a week or so, if not longer, It's actually the other way around.
They're trying to pressure Iran into making a move in order to not seem weak, and when they don't make a huge move, which is what they want, to escalate things to create a world war.
That seems more plausible to me, the reason for it, as opposed to all three of them colluding.
So just on the other side though, like if you're right, they're basically a part, Israel a part of it, they've orchestrated it, but then how does that explain the fact that when they came they literally killed so many of their own people?
So why would they, if this was planned and orchestrated, why would they, why would the, why would the operation be I'm not denying Israel killed a bunch of their people and probably the majority of dead were from that.
well? When there's a stand down we're not sure of Netanyahu or the general staff did it
We don't know if he gave the order, they followed it, or they did it without him, although it benefited him.
And he said, we don't want an investigation until the war's over.
Now he says the war's never going to end.
It doesn't mean the helicopter pilots and the armored vehicle drivers are in on it.
They're told, they're not given an order until later, a bunch of them mutiny and just go themselves and then don't know what targets to hit.
So I'm not saying the average Israeli soldier, it's like when I said there were bombs in the towers on 9-11, which the seismographs show, and the witnesses show, and Building 7, they said on the news, we're going to blow it up, 47 story building.
And the media said, Alex Jones says the police and firefighters blew it up.
It was the police and firefighters I interviewed that told me they heard a countdown to blow up Building 7.
So I'm not saying the average Israeli, when they got held back and then acted on their own, was highly coordinated or part of it.
The people on top stood down.
That's why when the Israelis took matters into their own hands, which is now coming out, it was so badly coordinated.
So Alex, I forgot to ask you a question because we have got some form of cross-pollination in terms of the people who support me and the people who support you.
But in terms of initially, when you came back on Twitter, initially when you were speaking, you kind of refrained from blaming Israel or the control of certain aspects of society and for that reason a lot of people thought you maybe had sold out what's your reasoning for that kind of gap and I'm only asking the question this is not to like try and do you over anything but like a lot of people we've got like a lot of people who are who are fans of both of us and some people so but one of the questions a lot of us had was and a lot of them had was where it's like Alex Jones was always on it but it seems like he might have sold out he's not talking about a lot of things he's blaming other entities who are not really part of it
China owns, didn't say controls, four of the six Hollywood production houses.
So that's why I addressed...
One of the memes up front that they're saying, there are people that literally say Jews run everything, and if I slip on a banana pill today, or if I eat too much food, a Jew made me do it.
And I don't think Jews are one monolithic group.
I don't blame Jews for all the world's problems.
I'm very critical of what different Israeli governments do.
I'm critical of the, I made films.
15, 16 years ago, multiple films about the USS Liberty and Israel trying to sink our ship to blame it on Egypt.
They show videos of me the day of 9-11 and the day after criticizing Israel.
They go, oh, we love the old Alex Jones.
Who's this new one that works for the Mossad?
And it's not real.
People are just paying attention.
To what I say, different Israeli administrations are different.
I don't support the Biden administration.
I supported the Trump administration.
They were pro-Israel, but the pro-peace way.
It doesn't mean Trump's perfect.
So, I've been on air 30 years.
Two days from now is the anniversary of 30 years.
April 15, 1994.
I don't look at America and our politicians as America.
I don't look at Xi Jinping as representative of the Chinese or Kim Jong-un as representative of the North Koreans or Lula as representation of the Brazilians.
And so people take things out of context.
I mean, here's a great example.
A couple days after October 7th, I'm on with Eric Prince of former Blackwater, now Xi.
And I'm on with Steve Bannon.
And if you watch the whole hour interview, I say Israel shouldn't go in.
It's a trap.
I think Israel stood down.
I think it's a globalist setup, with Biden working with Iran behind the scenes.
And then Bannon's like, well, how could Israel not get big casualties and actually get Hamas?
And I said, they're going to hide the civilians.
You'd have to start bombing on one end or the other.
It would cause carpet bombing.
It would create massive civilian casualties.
That's how you do it.
My enemies took a 17-second clip out, cut me off saying, don't do it, banned saying, don't do it, and said, Jones wants to carpet bomb the Gazans.
And then they hear me a day later saying, don't do it.
They go, why is he saying two different messages?
Because I do long-form discussions.
I war game.
I talk about what goes on.
Yeah, Ken Paxson was on the same show.
You go watch the whole hour, me and Bannon say don't go in.
Israel is the victim now.
I said kill the Hamas leaders, they're billionaires, that are living in palatial palaces in the Middle East and Europe.
Don't kill the Palestinians.
But then they turned it around with, oh, he said carpet bomb, 72nd clip.
I'm not an enemy of Israel.
I've never been against Israel.
But it is a highly politicized, out-of-control, corrupt country that sells our secrets to Communist China and tries to manipulate U.S.
policy.
I've been against the Israel lobby controlling our policy for decades.
The ADL says I'm the number one enemy and calls for my arrest.
think a lot of people when they say about people running, they don't say Jews,
it's about the Zionists. So you don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, but
there is this strong influence, which is the argument that's made against you
that you don't, you maybe blame other entities rather than the Zionist control
of a large part of US and UK politics and you see the financial funding and so
on and so forth of that. In terms of like you Alex, I do want to move on in terms of
the Hamas leaders, you know, in terms of the financial, that they're well off.
I think there's no evidence for that, but I've heard it.
I've looked into it.
I haven't found any evidence to prove that they actually are financially wealthy.
I think more that they've been given sanctuary in Qatar.
Moving the conversation back to Pfizer, and then we'll ask you about a few other things.
When you've got a scenario, like for example, now we saw the Speaker of the House, Speaker Johnson, he voted and he had the vote that basically decided it.
And before that, he always made the claim I mean, I think Johnson's a slime ball.
Yes, so Alex, there was a report that came out the other day, and Tucker Carlson has actually been talking about this for a while, where the NSA actually admitted to spying on his signal messages And while Carlson was actually in Russia, he met with Edward Snowden and told nobody about that planned meeting, but the U.S.
intel agencies leaked that info from his signal messages to Semaphore and the New York Times.
What is the justification?
For the NSA, how are they excusing themselves from doing things like that?
How are they able to do that without a warrant?
And is it all just to drive a narrative?
Are they really leaking things to the media like that?
Well, yeah, let me answer the question, but let's go back to this.
Remember James Comey, the FBI director, testified more than 10 times to Congress.
There's old compilations of it.
Type in, Comey testifies that he didn't leak.
And then later when it comes out that he leaked, he goes, well, I didn't leak.
I gave it to a head dean of a journalism department so he could leak.
Well, that's like a mafia chief saying, I didn't kill the person.
I just ordered one of my guys to go kill him.
And so it's the same thing.
Tucker Carlson, three plus years ago at Fox, gets told by a high level government source who saw the reports that all his text messages and private communications were being spied on by the NSA.
And then the New York Times and the Washington Post come out a month later and go, you bet we got your text messages.
Here they are.
Totally illegal.
An American journalist being spied on.
Tucker later got threatened and told, you better not interview Putin or bad things will happen to you.
I know that when I was going to go to Russia, like four years ago, just as a stunt, because they're calling me a Russian agent, I thought, well, I might as well go there.
Nothing to do with Russia.
I got serious threats behind the scenes.
I'll just leave it at that from sources.
So this is how they do it, and they claim, that's why they say Trump supporters are all Russian agents, so they can then turn the apparatus of the NSA and the FBI inward upon the American people.
You've been tweeting a lot about this over the past several days, especially when it comes to that video that came out showing that CIA agent actually admitting that the feds were going after people like Alex Jones, even in the attempt to bankrupt him.
What people fail to see is that After they take down Donald Trump, which they're doing, and his children, and then the loudest voices in the room, which are people like Alex Jones, which are people like Tucker Carlson, the whole gamut of truth-telling people that have not been wrong.
These people are batting at 99 out of 100.
They pose as this threat, therefore they must be taken out by any means.
I was actually more disgusted out of everything that I did here on those videos, which I listened to several times because they really just are that unbelievable.
They admitted they didn't have anything criminal on Alex or his family.
They just didn't.
So what did they do?
They used lawfare to bankrupt him.
Now, if nobody understands how sinister That is, when you steal somebody's livelihood for fraudulent reasons, and you don't stop.
And then you go for their parents!
Their parents!
Their aging parents!
People!
This is how evil they are, and they will do it to you!
Yes, they've sued my wife, they've sued my parents, they have harassed our families.
The Southern Poverty Law Center actually got a person hired into the operation that was here for a year and tried to set us up but couldn't, but hacked into the surveillance cameras, and oh my God, showed me, you know, drinking vodka, and then leaked all that and then lied about us.
I mean, it's been the CIA.
They use the Southern Poverty Law Center, the ADL, these groups, as cutouts.
And then in their report, it's like, well, we're targeting a white supremacist.
And we have nothing to do with white supremacy.
We're totally pro-human.
We love everybody.
And it's been incredible.
But Liz is right.
This hungry machine, all this money to do this, picks somebody like Trump or Alex Jones to train and give the dog a taste of blood.
And that's what the Nazis called it, was the cement of blood.
That's why they would have SS officers raise a German shepherd for a year, love it, and then in front of their officers slit its throat.
And that's a dog you love, but they get him to go out and do horrible crimes against somebody that's first demonized, and then they roll it out systematically against everybody, and that's now happening.
I don't want to hear another negative thing about Alex Jones, his wife, his staff members, or his parents going forward because he has been vindicated.
This is big news, people.
They have admitted to setting him up.
Now, personally, I'm happy for you because, in my opinion, you just won the lottery.
You can sue these fuckers into an oblivion times ten.
So, with saying that, I'm happy that the truth has come out and I think that it's also part of a larger picture in regards to what's going on.
Well, Liz, I want you to continue, I don't want to interrupt you, but let me ask you this question.
We're talking to law firms, we're going to sue them, the system is so rigged, who knows what will happen, but the real thing is the Frank Church Committee 2.0.
Well, they do, and when you do that, you're going to see a number of other people come forward as well, because they will not want to admit what they have been doing to you for a very long time.
And so this is your moment of vindication and I really hope that you sue them so much that they will finally have to lock their doors because this is not sustainable the way this is going on.
Yeah, and we also have, he just came back up here.
Let's see here, Brian.
Brian Blem, I hope I'm pronouncing your name right, I'm not really sure, but you know, we've been talking about the lengths that the FBI and CIA and such have gone to spy on people like Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson and such and leaking their text messages without any sort of warrants.
Correct me if I'm wrong, Alex, but they never had any sort of warrants to be spying on you or anything, right?
So Brian, I kind of want your legal take on that a little bit.
What sort of recourse could Americans like Alex Jones have for this sort of stuff finally being exposed?
What sort of legal remedies and will there ever be any sort of accountability that we can force through the legal process?
What are your thoughts on that, Brian?
Brian, bottom left-hand corner got on mute.
unidentified
Yeah, that's a really good question, but I'm gonna have to tell you that's not my forte.
And so, you know, you would have to ask, you know, somebody that Practices, I guess, in the area of constitutional law and national security issues.
You know, but part of the problem is, and you know, I listen to a lot of your show, I believe it was yesterday, and you know, people were talking about the difference between the establishment and what's going on with the Republicans.
You know, and the way I've already done it, if I can diverge a little bit, And I'm getting back to the topic of the press, is that, you know, the Republican Party was the party that led McCarthy.
Yeah, Brian, you were saying we're seeing the old Republican Party taking place right now.
unidentified
Yeah, I think what you're seeing is this split to the Republican Party.
You have the, and I divide the Republican Party up now into the MAGA wing, and then you have the National Security Wing.
And, you know, it's the national security wing that's really aligned with the Democrats right now who are vehemently anti-MAGA.
And so that's part of the problem we're seeing.
And, you know, getting back to what Alex was talking about with respect to war, what is the national security state like, right?
You're talking about Netanyahu supporting sort of these attacks to pull him out of a political hole.
But the national security state likes war because war gives it power, right?
And this is where the national security state and this neo-McCarthyism comes into play, is it becomes a huge, huge, you know, conflict for Americans because, you know, you gotta support the Ukraine or you're not patriotic, right?
You're not a flag-waving American if you don't support the Ukraine.
And so that's part and parcel of what, you know, at least our war in the Ukraine is.
Because, you know, I think if you look at it, we played a pretty significant hand in the run-up to Russia's invasion of the Ukraine when we deposed the pro-Russian president under Obama.
And then the CIA established their, what, 12 or 14 secret bases on the Ukraine-Russia war and began waging war against Russia from the Ukraine.
And so I think that's a lot of what we're seeing.
But if you take it to its totality, you know, we know we have all of these political forces throughout the world that are deeply, deeply in bed with the one world government people, right?
And so what's taking place, if you look at, you know, news stories are now coming out about the national security agencies in Europe.
Doing the exact same thing CISA does in the United States, and that is censor conservative politicians because they want to, you know, move this one-world government forward.
And so all of this is sort of related.
How does it relate to people in the news media?
I think it relates the exact same way it relates to attorneys, right?
What's one thing they've been doing with attorneys, you know, since Trump was elected to the office?
They've been seizing their case files, right?
What do you learn when you seize an attorney's case files?
A whole lot of shit, right?
And the same thing is happening with journalism.
I don't think it's per se as much You know, just on one hand, you know, to make Tucker Carlson look bad.
I mean, if you recall, he went to Russia, they all started calling him a, you know, a traitor and all of this wonderful stuff when he interviewed Putin.
But what else, what else do you get when you spy on journalists, right?
What do journalists, you know, and I'm going to use Katherine Harrod as an example.
And, you know, Catherine Herridge was fired by NBC.
They're really at this point no different than the CIA.
CISA, a four-letter agency, and personally I think CISA is sort of the centerpiece, the one that sort of aligns all of the foreign national security agencies with the domestic national security agencies like the FBI.
And so You know, NBC is really no different than the CIA.
They push all of their stuff, and that's basically the way national journalism works.
And speaking of other journalists that are being pursued by various governments and such, we do have Alan dos Santos up here on stage, who was mentioned as Brazil's Alex Jones in the Twitter files.
Alan, I'd like to welcome you to the stage.
I want to see if you can kind of give any sort of Parallels to what's going on in Brazil versus what we're seeing with the Feds going after Alex Jones here in the United States.
And I think you have a question for Alex as well.
Go ahead with that.
unidentified
Thank you, Nick.
Thank you all.
I'm proud to be compared with Alex Jones.
It means I have a lot of enemies and these enemies are crap.
When I started Tercer Livery, I was inspired by Alex and I said that to him on the CPAC.
They are afraid when we give voice for the people.
I cannot say anything about the United States because I'm still learning it, but about Brazil, Alex, they did the same against my wife and kids and my family.
They went to my house, they invaded my house with guns, pointing to me and my wife, pregnant with nine months.
And they shut down my company in Brazil.
I needed to move to the United States to make a reborn of Terça Livre.
And when I see these similarities, I need to remember that human actions are made by humans.
Political actions are made by politicians and judicial actions are made by people in a judicial branch.
When we have a crime, they are criminal.
So what they are doing against me, and I see a lot of similarities here in the United States, are not political actions against the right wing.
I see criminal actions.
These people are criminals.
What they are doing is crime against journalism and freedom of speech.
As I said, I'm talking about Brazil.
What they are doing against journalists in Brazil are crime made by criminals.
You see Lula da Silva together with all the criminals of the world, all these dictators, and he is aligned with all these people in destroying the truly journalism made by independent people, because independent people do not want to receive money from them.
And by the way, Mr. DeSantos, I want you to continue, but I want to get you on my show.
I saw you on with Owen, and I've seen you on with Steven Crowder and others, and I followed you and I remember meeting you at CPAC.
But absolutely, we act like it's the government.
It's criminals in government committing crimes.
These are all crimes.
As President Trump said yesterday, they're committing crimes against us and they're just normalizing that that's just what they do.
No.
All of this is a massive crime.
It's all illegal.
As Congressman Troy Nell said about me the other day, he said I should sue, Congress should have investigations.
This is the reality.
And if we didn't have a half decent Supreme Court, we'd be right where Brazil is, where their Supreme Court agreed to take Bolsonaro off of the ballot.
They're trying that here.
And we know the State Department was involved advising them on what to do.
So we're all interconnected, ladies and gentlemen.
It's the same globalist forces.
You notice Bolsonaro would not give liability protection for the poison COVID shots
and didn't tell the people to take it.
So now they wanna charge him with war crimes against humanity, the UN does.
And then this judge that dresses up like Count Dracula, I mean, imagine taking a photo of yourself
and putting it out like that's cool.
These guys are megalomaniacs.
They're establishing a totalitarian system.
And it's all the same globalist party attacking Brazil, Australia, Germany, Canada, America.
We have to have solidarity worldwide against these people.
Go ahead, sir.
I'll stop interrupting.
unidentified
Yeah, no, I agree with that, Alex.
And I just give you all with that.
What happens in the United States is being copied by all the governments and they look at the United States saying, oh look at that, this is the first world country and they defend freedom and they are going after these people they call, they nickname us, you know, like a white supremacist.
Look at my lips!
How can you use, how can someone say I'm a white supremacist?
My dad is black!
Come on!
So they really portrayed us with these ridiculous categories because if that is okay in the United States, they do 100% more in other countries.
So pay attention on what happened in the United States against journalism, independent journalism and freedom of speech, because if that falls here, Guys, sorry, but there is no other place in the world that we could stand for.
It's not just that America loses the high ground by being run by totalitarians that oppress the people in the press and persecute people.
The rest of the world, just like we were an example for the Bill of Rights and Constitution, we're now an example of evil.
We're now exporting evil.
unidentified
Exactly, and I mentioned Alex another day to American audience that even the United States decision in court is being quoted in Brazil several times, not now, for years, so the influence of United States and the whole world is stronger than you guys think.
It's not about money, it's not about capitalism, it's not about this, it's about culture.
So Alex, following up on that, I do have another audience question for you.
The audience is really engaged today.
They love the fact that you're willing to just sit here and answer whatever questions.
You know, we don't script any of this stuff at all.
We just kind of like launch the show and start it, and Alex will debate with anybody who we bring up on stage.
That's why we love having you, Alex.
You know, when it comes to talking about the globalists and such, and these people that are trying to undermine our, you know, the people that are actually trying to undermine our democracy, they accuse you of doing that, but in reality, it's them.
If you actually read what BlackRock and the UN and the big corporations won, They want to destroy all cultures, they want to destroy all independence, they want to make everybody be in debt, and they want to replace whether it's Buddhism or Islam or Christianity or Catholicism with a global, woke,
guilt that humans are bad for the earth and humans are racist and humans are bad.
So you've got to follow this global social credit score with a world currency,
vaccine ID cards, social credit score to track and trace everything you do.
A global corporate tyranny that will then slowly cut off the resources
and push worldwide depopulation, the end of civilization as we know it.
What Elon Musk has warned about an anti-human systems.
We have to have a pro team humanity system to counter all of this.
So it really is eugenics and a transhumanist model that once they get full control,
they call the majority of us, use the rest of us for guinea pigs,
and then create this new Superman or Uber mention that replaces us at all.
So it's really Hitler 2.0, wrapped in a neoliberal packaging
that it has the moral high ground, and it's liberal because classical liberalism
of Thomas Jefferson challenges this corporate transhumanist fascist model.
then wrap themselves as the moral authority, turn us all against each other in the name
of equality to then make sure that we're all isolated so they can pick us off one to one.
I'm going to call it Zionism, but anyway, coming back to it, right?
So, coming back to the point Alex Jones, you forced that on me, I wasn't going to say.
Because I'm meant to be a moderator.
But coming back to the question at hand Alex, you talked about how journalism is being censored, how journalism is being stopped, how it's being stifled.
But isn't it the case, and we spoke about this with Alan actually on the first Brazilian show, isn't it the case that whoever is in power That is their main modus operandi.
They want to silence opposition.
They want to silence dissent.
So you mentioned Donald Trump, but again, even when it came to Assange, Donald Trump didn't pardon him.
He even had reports where he wasn't basically amiable to Julian Assange.
So isn't it that whoever's in power wants to control journalism, wants to control those in power.
Well, I mean, there's no doubt throughout history elites want to control speech and dominate people, and any open society doesn't do that.
And I just posted on X yesterday, and I've said it probably a thousand times in the last seven years, that Trump's biggest failure is not pardoning Assange.
So I never said Trump was perfect.
I don't agree with him in Warp Speed.
I don't agree with him still backing the poison vaccine.
I'm holding my nose to support Trump because the people elected him, and he's better than Biden.
So my issue is that the good news is there's so much political pressure now that even Biden's talking about doing it.
Assange is a hero.
Edward Stone's a hero.
And we should have ticker tape parades for them, but they hurt the deep state, so they're being targeted.
But please don't have... I'm not mad at you, but I'm just saying, there's this straw man, and then you earlier...
Almost fetishize the word Zionist.
I'm not here to defend Zionists.
I don't think about Zionists very much.
And I think to claim that Israel and Zionists are the world power of globalism.
I think Israel supports globalism.
I think Israel is heavily involved in globalism.
But a lot of their population is against it, just like Americans are against globalism.
But we're the main engine of globalism worldwide.
You could easily blame America for the New World Order, but we've just been hijacked and being used.
I see Israel's the same.
I say, hey, globalism's bad as a policy, so that everybody... Let me finish.
Whether you're Muslim or Jew or Christian or whatever it is, I want to give everybody a chance to be against the New World Order.
And I'm going to tell you, you said you call the New World Order Globalist Zionist.
Well, Putin doesn't call the world government, the Anglo-American establishment, Zionist.
He calls it the Anglo-American establishment.
Now, a new listener will think I'm saying white people.
No, Putin is giving it properly, the historic name of a Norman tribe that conquered France and then conquered England and then conquered Ireland and conquered Scotland.
It is not about white people.
The globalists call themselves Anglo-American.
Anglo-American oil, Anglo-American all of that.
That's the British-US merged empire.
That's what Winston Churchill called it in his three-part series,
A History of the English-Speaking Peoples.
And by the way, he was for it.
So there's the global American-British empire merger.
That's the dominant force.
There's the Chinese, the Russians, and the EU is kind of in the middle of it.
And so Putin calls the New World Order the Anglo-American establishment, the globalist.
The CFR calls themselves globalists.
Mega-corporations, are the Rothschilds on a bunch of it?
Yes.
Are they Jewish?
Yes.
I'm not saying that's not part of it.
Is Israel the leadership behind it and one of the worst groups running it?
Damn right.
I say all that.
I just don't then sit there and say Zionism Who runs it, because that's ridiculous.
The Communist Chinese until 12 years ago, 13 years ago, were the main engine.
The West set them up, gave them all the jobs, transferred all the power, and China was allowed to take over.
They double-crossed the Anglo-American establishment, now China is on the outs.
Now there's a fight between the two groups.
So people say, why is Alex talking about Communist China?
They control 97% of rare earth minerals.
They control much of Congress.
They enslave their own people.
3 million Uyghurs.
You can be against Zionism and be against Xi Jinping.
I can be against MS-13.
And not support Israel bombing Gaza.
It's this dumbing down, I'm not saying you're dumb, but some people are, where I can literally talk about how I don't like Lula arresting his political opposition.
People go, why don't you talk about the Zionists?
It's like this one thing they can talk about and they think they're smart and it's dumbed down.
Hold on, I'm not playing defense, I have the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ADL and law firms they control literally blowing my building up politically.
I am literally, but I will not give them what they...
I'm saying some people thought that, hence why I asked the question at the beginning.
But let me come to you about the point.
It's a false dichotomy to make the argument that when one says Zionism, they solely mean the State of Israel.
No, most people do not mean that.
What they mean is, when you look at it, for example, you're talking about the US.
I'm from the UK.
When you look at the level of control that the politicians have through AIPAC, through Friends of Labour, through the Friends of Conservatives, and then comparing that, that's an example.
Listen to me for a second.
where for example social media companies either have to be behooven to exist or
banning procedures and whereas on the other hand the CCP you talked about but
what about CCP? TikTok is being banned like politic if they control the
politicians why is TikTok being banned? So again when you're making the argument
that they have this that the control of the CCP is much more whatever it's not
that simple when you look at it when you've got basically AIPAC electing 95%
of politicians when you've got the... Listen to me for a second, you're making a good point.
The Mossad is involved with telecommunications and has the contract for all Qalorani, and
the Mossad actually has an interlocking system along with the British in the NSA.
So the NSA is Israeli, is MI6, is US and they're all working against national sovereignty for every country except basically Israel.
You don't see Israel bringing in masses of foreigners.
And so I agree with you on that, and I've said that.
And people do this weird thing where they go, "Look, Jones just said Israel's doing bad stuff to America.
"My God, he's getting woke.
"He's with us now."
And I say it every day.
All I say is, is that I got a big tent for everybody.
And so I'm trying to make it about issues and policies, not about, let me tell you something.
When the ADL goes out and says all Christians are white supremacists, or basically all Trump supporters are white supremacists, they know it's going to create anti-Semitism, which then gives them more power when Jews get scared and run and give them money.
I'm trying to recruit Jews and Muslims and Christians and Hindus and Buddhists and agnostics and atheists and gay and straight to saying, let's get rid of the private federal reserve.
Let's get rid of these giant wars and getting past the identity Politics.
I'm about issues and killing policies of carbon taxes and open borders and world government and vaccine IDs and central bank digital currencies.
And then I just don't sit there and say Zionist, Zionist on it, just like Well, I'm against open borders.
I love Mexicans.
They're great people.
Half the people in Texas are Mexican.
They're American as I am.
They're pissed off by open borders.
When I talk about borders, I don't go, these damn Mexicans, because it's not about Mexicans.
It's about illegals and unvetted and criminals and traveling humans.
So you can say, well, the majority are still Mexican.
You're covering up as Mexicans.
It's not Mexicans.
It's people illegally coming across.
And so I don't make it about a group of people to shut down the border.
Okay, I make it about it's open, they're smuggling kids, it's wrong.
Sure, the majority is still Mexicans.
Actually, not now, it used to be a few months ago.
Now the majority is other groups of Mexicans.
So I just leave the Mexicans out of it.
And just like, leave the Jews out of it, and just oppose vaccine passports.
Just oppose war with Russia.
Just oppose open borders.
Just oppose fentanyl.
When I criticize Xi Jinping, I don't say it's the Chinese, it's the Communist Party China.
I'm trying to unify, that's why they want me off the air, because I have a big tent approach.
unidentified
Alex, I would like to add something to this.
Lula da Silva created the Ford St.
Paul's Forum, okay?
Professor Olavo always was correcting a Brazilian audience when people say United States did that or Russia did this or China did that or other countries.
When you use countries as historical agents or people that are operating Using countries is a figure of speech, because who does anything?
People or groups, not race, not religion.
For example, the tariqas are made by Muslims, are not the Muslims.
And even if some group has Jewish, they're not representing the Jewish.
For example, Leonard Boff, who is a Catholic, I am Catholic, Leonard Boff, He used to be kind of a priest in Brazil and he was together with Lula da Silva.
Who can say that the Catholic Church was doing it?
No, it wasn't the Catholic Church.
It was Leonhard Boff.
So using countries, religion, and race as historical agents is a figure of speech and doing that, We are not categorizing things correctly, so we need to understand which kind of people in that country is operating.
For example, I have a question for you all.
Why, after losing elections, losing people's voice on media, People that want to control the world started to attack their enemies through judiciary.
This is one question.
Second question, why Israel was attacked after proposing a reform in its judiciary power?
You know, he said on multiple occasions that the Federal Reserve is bad and that the global, you know, a global society is also bad.
I just want to know, how is it bad that the world is interconnected on a global level where all countries are integrated into one system, where all are beneficial to the other?
And how is the Federal Reserve bad?
I just want to hear what your thoughts are regarding that, because I have heard you said that multiple times, but I haven't heard any substantive material regarding why you would Can I take a shot at this?
Brian, I want you to talk, but let me just jump in here as he asks me the question.
You're answering it great.
Look, there was something they kind of promoted in the 50s, 60s, and 70s, the international man.
I would like a system through collaboration and governments working together with peoples where you can live anywhere you want and things can be standardized through free market.
What the other commenter was saying is totally true.
You have a global corporate government-backed system for globalism, where they create the UN, IMF, World Bank, WEF regulations, and then they come in and say, we're going to shut down half the farms in Ireland or Brazil or Sri Lanka, and we're going to make you live in a 200 square foot apartment, and we're going to ban carbon dioxide, and we're going to shut your power off.
The globalists are a Predatory central IMF, World Bank.
unidentified
They're the ones... Are you saying IMF is going into these countries and telling them to shut down their industries?
The IMF in Europe, the World Bank in the United States, they're all interconnected.
They're national mega settlements.
They went in in the 60s and 70s.
Take Nigeria.
Then give them a $500 million loan, pay off the politicians not to pay it back.
And today Nigeria owns like 60 something billion and just on interest payments.
And then the IMF and World Bank told those countries do lockdowns or we'll pull back your loan
forgiveness.
They use it for control.
They're de-industrializing those nations.
And we're facing a corporate world government, a fascist world government that uses communist
tactics to control people.
And that's what WEF and Klaus Schwab, the New World Order is.
So the idea of, oh, freedom and international love and all this crap, they're not bringing that.
It's UN peacekeepers going into African countries and murdering thousands to take their property and turn it into a lithium mine.
The big threat is the global corporations.
They're in every country.
The Fortune 500 with BlackRock at the center of it, with all the big central bank money.
The Federal Reserve was set up in 1913.
It has seven private shareholders.
It hasn't been audited since.
It's totally secret.
It stands apart from the other branches of government, even though it's privately owned.
It's never been audited.
It does whatever it wants.
Anybody can type it.
In fact, we have the clip.
I'm going to ask my crew to do this.
Guys, pull up.
It's only a minute long.
This is the outgoing head of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, 15 years ago on Laird NewsHour.
Is the crew in there?
Are you guys in there?
Get it ready.
He was asked, what is the government's relationship with the Federal Reserve?
He said, none.
There is no oversight.
Well, there's no oversight.
There's oversight of the other branches, at least partially.
So this is a financial dictatorship that has created quadrillions of dollars of money they give themselves.
They then loan out to everybody else.
And we've gone from America, America in 1951, look this up, it's astonishing.
America in 1951 was 4% of the world's population and had over 50% of the world's wealth that they created.
It wasn't taken.
Now we've got 20% of the world's wealth and we're 5% of the world's population.
It is free market and open society that creates the innovation and creates the wealth.
Under the Federal Reserve, we've gone from the biggest middle class in the world with half the world's wealth in that middle class To 80 plus percent of the world's currency and money and assets controlled by one-tenth of one-tenth of percent.
It is not one percent, tens of millions of people, that has 80 percent of the wealth.
It is a few hundred families and a few hundred corporations that have 80 plus percent of the wealth and they're vertically integrating it and that's the Federal Reserve and it's copied everywhere with these central banks.
unidentified
What is the proper relationship, what should be the proper relationship between a Chairman of the Fed and a President of the United States?
Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take.
So long as that is in place and there is no evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don't frankly matter.
And I've had very good relationships with presidents.
Well, by getting rid of the Fourth Amendment, you have no right to legal search and seizure anymore, now that the FBI, CIA can just come in.
unidentified
That is not true.
I mean, listen, FISA, for you to be, you know, for your file to get a rise to the level of FISA, you, they have to be really, really, not only just articulable proof, but they have to have substantive proof of you.
They have the guy being interviewed and he's basically saying that they destroyed interest rates just to hurt Donald Trump, knowing that it would hurt the entire economy of the country.
unidentified
That's not true, Ben.
That's not true.
Yeah, it came out, bro.
Let me explain it to you.
They raised interest rates to control inflation.
When they started, inflation was at 9.1%.
They had to raise interest rates, otherwise the money would be worth nothing.
Let me finish, let me finish.
You think that the economy is bad now?
You do not want to know an economy that has 9, 10, 11, 12% inflation.
It's not capitalism to have the private Federal Reserve.
It's crony capitalism.
It's fascism.
To claim that I'm Cuban or I'm a communist because I'm against the secret Federal Reserve controlling monetary policy to consolidate wealth and power into the hands of the elites while they push build back better communism on the general economy is a lie.
unidentified
I know, but my point is, for me as a Brazilian here in the United States, I see people wanting the government being bigger and bigger.
Go to other countries and try to apply that over there.
And we need to follow the Constitution of the United States where it says the government needs to get away from private life and not destroy the economy.
Well, what did I say an hour and 30 minutes ago or an hour and 20 minutes ago?
I said, since when do you hear about a war's details before it begins?
We're told three days ago by the CIA that Iran's going to attack.
Then Iran seizes a ship and the Strait of Hormuz are outside of it.
And then now we're told drones are going to attack.
With missiles, and now it's reportedly happening.
Again, why was money given to Iran?
Why did Hezbollah help Hamas?
Why did Israel stand down?
This is part of a bigger global financial crisis.
If there's a war and the Strait of Hormuz and the Suez Canal get shut down, you are going to see price explosions you've never seen before.
That'll be the perfect political distraction for Israel, for Iran, for the NATO countries, for the West that are all in trouble.
When global elites get in trouble, they decide to have wars.
And the real default of Israel, who's been wanting to hit Iran first for decades, is that if they don't hit Iran, if they're hit with heavy attacks, and I would expect nuclear, which has been the Israeli doctrine, then you know the fix is in behind the scenes.
And this is how Netanyahu intends to stay in power.
This is incredibly dangerous.
And I've asked the crew to search engine this.
I can do it myself, or go to Drudge, or go to, you know, because this will be all over the news if it started.
Two Axios and it's Baruch Rabid and I think he's a very pro-Israeli guy so just want to be clear just to so people understand the situation just in case it's not Accra we always want to make sure we do have just just want to just want to also mention there's a lot of it was developing very fast like I was behind the scenes tweeting with the team Indian Airlines have routed the airlines around Iran we have Iran and Israel have closed their airspace.
It's based on Channel 12 and Al Mayadeen, so both sides.
Jordan closes airspace as Iranian strike on Israel fears rise.
Okay, well let's hope that's a false report because...
This could lead to nuclear war, this could lead to absolutely a regional war, the collapse of the global economy.
This is horrible news and the question is why would Iran just decide magically to do this when it's surrounded by US aircraft carriers with nuclear cruise missiles?
Just on that, again, because I just think it's important, the source of this is Barak Ravid, and like I said, he is very much extremely pro-Israel, so it doesn't... It could be true.
The source of the live attack, because what I'm saying is, it could be true, but just in case people understand, because some of us do think that this is... Or it could be like what Zelensky tried last year and this year, saying, saying Russia had launched missiles into Poland, but it was
But remember how the Ukrainians would fire anti-missile missiles and a few went into Poland and Zelensky said, oh, we were just attacked.
By Russia we need to go to full war and it turned out it was anti-aircraft missiles fired by Ukraine.
I'm not saying this hasn't begun or happened but if groups start to hype this and everybody escalates into this and then you've even got that's why they shut down commercial flights because they could be seen as missiles when they're not and trigger a war.
I don't think this is confirmed yet.
I hope it's not confirmed because this is really, really bad news if this is the case.
footage right now a Middle East spectator put out Iranian drones heard
unidentified
flying over Iraq towards Israel I can hear the jets from here.
You've got multiple countries responding at once.
You've got the Iranians themselves shutting their own airspace.
You've got serious wire organizations like Axios, Reuters and others, you know, beginning to pick up on this very quickly.
If it's a wire organization...
If it's a wire organisation, it picks it up very quickly, right?
That's AFP, Reuters, AP, all these groups.
If you see these entities picking it up, that usually means it's true.
And the last point I just want to make very quickly is this is not going to lead to nuclear war, mainly because there's no other country in the region that has nuclear weapons other than the Israelis.
The Iranians don't have nuclear weapons and they have no... So Netanyahu just said four minutes ago, Netanyahu, Benjamin Netanyahu said, Prime Minister of Israel, we are preparing for an Iranian attack.
The Israelis must maintain their nerves.
And I urged them to listen to the directives of the Home Front Command.
Yeah, well to say this won't lead to World War 3, Iran has, from my sources, has secret atomic weapons.
They don't have good delivery systems.
But according to my military sources, they do have nuclear weapons.
So does Pakistan.
And this is a very dangerous situation.
So I was not denying it's happening.
I was simply saying I didn't want to jump the gun if it wasn't.
unidentified
I will help you guys organize it.
So, first of all, the UAV attacks, it will take several hours to actually appear where I'm at, so at the northern border of Israel.
So they are probably now, as according to your reports, and your team is doing a great job in the back channels, it seems like they're flying above Iraq right now, so it might take them like a couple of hours to get here.
Usually this is something that they do when they want to test the air defense systems because Israel have three different ones for UAVs or for certain missiles.
So this is what they're doing right now which would make sense.
All right, so I just want to say that there's no confirmation on what's exactly happening.
There are drones that are being heard and seen and there are reports from some Israeli semi-officials and reporters and also on Twitter saying that they already launched towards Israel and they're going to take nine hours for them to reach Nothing is confirmed.
I don't think this is like the actual Iranian retaliation.
Probably the beginning.
Probably they're testing something.
Probably they're just causing some psychological warfare.
It's too soon to actually say what's actually going on.
If I could chime in, because I'm seeing so, Speth here is talking about how the Iranian cyber warfare teams are hacking radars for the IDF.
I would also like to add that the origin of where the drones came from, if it was from a proxy or if there's another type of thing, it's not specified either.
So we have, again, reports of the drones that are being overhead, but not exactly as to which group and, of course, what responsibility Iran has in the whole thing.
So just also, yeah, some more updates I have here.
So the Middle East Spectator said Iranian cyber warfare teams have hacked radars belonging to the IDF that came in two minutes ago from the Middle East Spectator.
And we also have the sounds of suicide drums launched towards Israel can be heard in all parts of the western provinces of Iran that came in from Iran Observer.
So they're being heard over the western provinces of Iran from Iran Observer.
The team will be posting all these on my channel as well.
Let me just, in the meantime, as we pivot to discovering the potential drones fired from Iran towards Israel, I just want to give a massive thank you to Mr Alex Jones.
Nick, I'll let you wrap up the discussion with Mr Jones and thank him for his For coming on our space today, and I know we had to cut it short, Mr. Jones.
I apologize for that.
And I don't think any of us expected these drones.
Yeah, Alex, definitely appreciate the conversation.
We learned a lot today in a little, in a short period of time.
And actually, we had a little bit of this discussion talking about whether or not this would actually occur, some sort of strike on Israel by Iran, debated that a bit, got some great insight from you, as we always appreciate your time and like I said, we apologize for cutting it
short, but you know you being in the news business as well You kind of know how this works
So as soon as it starts, Voice, Zoom is just two seconds.
Voice, if you can live translate that, that would be great.
I'm going to look at my own channel for news updates.
And of course, Suli, Nick, anything you see, guys, just jump in and share it.
There's more footage.
Coming in here of drones that are on their way to, allegedly on their way to Israel.
So the team is posting that.
Obviously, I can't read out anything.
It's just footage with the source being mentioned there.
Go ahead, Exumus.
unidentified
Yeah, thank you.
I just want to echo what Hadi Nassallah was saying before when it comes to these drones.
I mean, these drones, if it is truly the Shaheed drones, as the reports we're receiving, that those are the drones that are fired, then they fly around with a speed of around 180 kilometers per hour.
The distance from south, that off to Israel, is around 900.
So it's going to take around five to six hours for them to reach Israel.
So the question, that is if Israel is the destination, because we don't know that yet.
Guys, let me just throw this in and then I'm going to leave.
But look, that's what I'm saying.
The U.S.
still has forces in Iraq.
We have forces everywhere.
Israel can fly jets that fly ten times faster than these slow drones and shoot them down in Iraq.
So why is Israel going to wait until they get there?
This whole thing sounds like a PSYOP to me.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
I'm done.
We're going to watch it here.
We're going to keep the spaces up on our streams.
But this sounds like PSYOP to me.
unidentified
I totally agree Alex Jones.
I mean the distance is known and if the true trajectory of these drones is towards Israel then there's five hours window that Israel has to intercept these drones.
So there's just a voice jumping when the statement begins.
Colonel, I want to get your thoughts on this and we haven't spoken for a while so maybe you're, were you expecting this?
Are you surprised?
What do you think that would lead to?
That's the first I think it's the first ever direct attack by Iran onto Israeli soil, if this is what's happening.
unidentified
Yeah, hey, thanks for pulling me up.
It's a little late here, but I'm happy to be on the show.
Look, I don't disagree with Alex.
I think that, look, 50 drones is not a lot.
I was hoping this would never happen, right?
I think we're past that.
But I want to caution everyone to just think that limiting this to 50 drones is the issue.
Right, if I was going to try and attack Israel, what I want to do is I want to overwhelm their air defense systems.
And I realize 50 drones don't do that.
Okay, I get that.
But the problem is drones take a really long time to fly there.
So what I want to do is I want to put 50 drones up in the air and then I want to time their arrival along with a bunch of long-range ballistic missile systems, right?
So if I shoot ballistic missiles and the drones all at the same time, it's not overwhelming because it's not a mass concentration.
So right now, yes, it's taking a long time for the drones to get there.
Let's see if they match the drones with any other type of strikes, creating a very difficult and complex targeting solution for the Israelis.
Colonel, the likelihood of this, like I'm in the camp that this is extremely unlikely, but what do you think is the strategy?
What's the purpose for Iran to escalate it to that level?
Is it just enough striking Iranian proxies in Iraq, for example?
unidentified
To be fair, I don't know what 50 drones do.
I mean, I'm with Alex on this.
This doesn't make any sense, right?
If it's only 50 drones, the Iron Dome and everything else can kind of take that on.
Could that be seen as a warning?
Yeah, it depends.
It could be a warning, but if you're the Iranian leadership and you want this to be a warning, then you would actually be, now that they're in the air, you would be calling a press conference saying, we've just launched these, this is a warning, everyone knock it off and let's cool it, but I mean at the end of the day, we'll see.
If you study the Iran Corporation's warfare threat ladder or warfare threat continuum that developed in the early 1960s and has been updated since then, it's currently U.S.
weapons doctrine, war doctrine.
It's the EU's doctrine.
Russia adopted a similar doctrine.
It goes 1 to 43.
43 is total nuclear war.
This is what you'd expect from Iran, whether it's some inside deal, you know, so both sides should clamp down domestically or whether it is just a warning to Israel.
If you don't want to start a full-scale war, you simply do a small incursion like this, but that's not really been Iranian doctrine.
They've always threatened a full assault.
I think we're going to find out very, very soon.
Beyond ribbiting, I mean, they say truth stranger than fiction, so we're about to find out, but I would challenge folks to look into the warfare threat ladder, or World War 3 threat ladder, or RAN Corporation warfare continuum, because that's where we are right now.
Unless they're being launched from Lebanon, yeah, because these ones were reported in Iraq, so basically the way to tackle air defense systems... So Netanyahu right now, hold on, Netanyahu right now speaking, our defense systems are deployed... No, no, not Netanyahu, the spokesman, the spokesman... Hold on, there's a video, I've got a video here, look in our groups, the speaker group... Can you roll that, or we can roll that if you need us to?
I'm saying from Lebanon, but the Times of Israel is actually quoting Axios.
No one is saying this is... I can't see any independent Israeli source, correct me if I'm wrong, voice, actually saying that they can confirm that they're all quoting... I'm sorry, no, you're not wrong.
My question to Colonel is, Colonel, Mario and various others have mentioned that there's 50 to 100 drones over Iraqi airspace.
It's going to take a while to get to even Israel.
The main source of this is Axios and then obviously many other people are reporting from it.
First, two questions.
One is, is Alex right that this could be some kind of like PSYOP?
And the second question is, If it is legitimate, why can't it just be shut down before it even gets to Israel or when it gets to Israel?
It's only like a 50 to 100 drones.
I'd like to know that.
Go ahead, Colonel.
unidentified
Yeah, so both are good questions, right?
I think it's too early to tell if Alex is right or wrong.
I can't answer that.
But what I can tell you is, if you want to shoot them down now, and you're Israel, you're going to waste some really long-range missiles, right?
And really capable and very expensive missiles on drones that are not very expensive, right?
So you have an Iron Dome system that actually has that is relatively inexpensive per cost of shot.
So you may as well start building your track solution, building your air defense picture, fusing all that together, and then use your lowest cost systems.
Because if, and I'm saying if, because I don't know, right?
If Israel truly, excuse me, if Iran is intending to truly saturate their airspace with other ballistic missiles and other systems all at the same time, right?
The last thing that I wanted to say, and this is more a general thing, I'm getting comments from some of my friends who work in CENTCOM and AFCENT that are all getting recalled right now to come back into the headquarters.
So, I wouldn't say that this is, that we're, I think it's on, right?
I think it's fair to say at this point that it's on.
And I know we have people on the ground in Lebanon, in Israel, in Iraq, and obviously in Iran.
Amir is here as well.
Colonel, I want to take it a step further.
I know we're just focusing on news here, not too much speculation, but just a quick question.
How do you expect Israel to respond to this?
Again, this is the first time in history that Iran attacks Israeli soil, and correct me if I have this wrong.
unidentified
I can't answer the second part, right?
I'm not a very good historian guy on Israel.
I apologize about that.
It is the first time.
But to answer your first question, I think if you're Israel, right, I think the first thing you want to do is ensure that you survive that first wave of attack, right?
It would be foolish at this point to actually try and take the offensive Start scrambling jets, you know, start pushing things out, start shooting long-range things back.
So, Colonel, Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah, so this is Hezbollah in Iraq, not the Lebanese Hezbollah, has declared the start of operations against Israel.
This is by the Iraq Kataib of Hezbollah's Iraq's Kataib, or however you say, Iraq Resistance.
Oh, Iraq Resistance also, which is a different group as far as I understand.
Iraq Resistance also declared war against Israel.
There are two groups, aren't there?
Hala, the Hezbollah Kataib, Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah and Iraq Resistance.
Are they two separate groups?
Hala, Hadi?
unidentified
They're all under one umbrella called Iraqi Resistance, but Hezbollah and Iraq are part of them anyway.
There's different groups and they're all under one.
And just want to say that the Syrian army as well, their defense systems are now working on allowing any drone that passes to go towards Israeli positions, so they're not going to shoot them down.
You said the electricity is down in Tehran or just your house?
unidentified
Yes, yes, no, in our whole neighborhood, in our whole neighborhood.
I think it's some cyber thing.
Yes, that's why, yes, that's why I was asking for my voice.
Yeah, so basically For yesterday and the days before I think Hezbollah and Iran they are just testing the Israeli defense systems and I'm just seeing unconfirmed reports about like the Israeli defense systems being hacked so yeah it takes a couple of hours for the drones to reach Israel but actually Iran has attacked Israel before like in seven years ago when
General Soleimani ordered an attack after General Hamadani got killed in Syria.
He attacked the Golan Heights.
So, you know, Iran drone attacking Israel won't be a shock after October 7th.
And, you know, there's still no missile attacks.
So, you know, drones, I know they're effective and especially Iranian drones, the Shahad drones, we all saw what they did in Ukraine.
But right now, even at this point that everything is just so hyped up, I'm waiting for more things to happen and right now Iran is doing its retaliation step by step.
They started with some Hezbollah attacks and then they seized an Israeli ship and right now they are attacking Israel with drones and yes the Tehran airport is closed and airspaces are getting closed and we should wait for the targets of the drones you know because it just differs if they are... But Amir, Amir, just a quick question on that but what are they saying in Iranian news?
Cybernews, we do have a special speaker coming up, just two seconds guys, but Cybernews is just saying that a missile bash is expected to be launched shortly and minutes before the Iranian UAVs reach the target.
Not sure what their source is, but that just came in.
Let me go back to Amir, and then we do have a special guest to get his thoughts on the developments.
Amir, if you can tell us what's happening in Iran.
unidentified
Yes, yes, Saber News is totally legit.
I really have known the admin.
I totally know that guy.
Actually, the number of drones are 70 drones.
70 drones are right now despite getting both Israel and the attack.
We can talk about the drones and whether they'll be effective or not, but the fact the nation-state is directly attacking Israel and not using a proxy I think is massively symbolic and I wonder if it's kind of like the four-minute mile once it's been done once.
Once it's been cracked, especially now that people understand Israel's lost a lot of its public support in the West, it might be the beginning of something a lot larger.
And I guess my view on it all is how involved America's going to get.
Because if they don't get involved on the side of Israel, I'm not sure how long Israel's going to survive if they can be attacked like this and almost can get away with it, if that makes sense.
It doesn't, and the one thing that was a bit surprising that I was reading out earlier is that Turkey, Kuwait, I think Qatar, I'm not sure if any other countries, have publicly stated they will not allow the US to use their airspace in any strikes against Iran.
Considering this, do you think that support for the US is starting to diminish with the war in Israel and now with this escalation that we're seeing?
The only guarantee of power is that one day you're going to lose it.
And power is lost by overexertion.
It's the same in every single country in the world.
If you look at any revolution, what happened is there was a protest and the security forces ended up firing on the people to try and quell the protest.
And once they use too much power, civil war begins.
Israel overstepped the mark.
They went way too far.
That's the guarantee of power throughout the dawn of human time.
When you overstep the mark, eventually there's going to be massive repercussions.
And history shows that people who do that usually end up losing.
We have to see if the big brother America is going to come along and help them out.
But if not, now that this symbolic gesture has been made, a direct attack from a nation-state onto Israel, I think Israel has a lot of problems geopolitically going into the future if they survive.
Look, I'm just blessed to be here with your incredible group.
This is what Spaces is meant to do.
All these people from Iran to Israel to Lebanon.
We've got Andrew Tate here who just totally nailed it.
This is seen as symbolism of the weakness of America and Israel that Iran, for the first time in its history, has done this.
And I was saying 30 minutes ago, if this is a real attack, I would expect this to be a diversion
that Iran's gonna hit through its proxies in Lebanon and from other groups encircling Israel.
And this is so dangerous, because this is only gonna escalate
if Israel is in real danger, they're going to use nuclear weapons.
So we have a real expert, this colonel, who I've been in this space before,
a really smart guy, followed his work, saying they're already calling back people
to Central Command right now.
So this is a historic moment that we're here watching, and I would expect Iran, if this is real, which it is now,
to use this as a diversionary attack, and to use their ballistic missiles
that are hard to shoot down and other attacks.
So if this is happening, and it is, this may not be staged as some backroom deal for Iranian power and Israeli power.
If this is a real war, People better pray that this doesn't lead to nuclear war.
This is incredibly dangerous and it's only the weakness of Joe Biden and the weakness of the Israeli leadership and the actions of turning world opinion against Israel, carpet bombing Gaza, that has led to this.
Israel had the world's support six months ago, they'd have just gone after Hezbollah's leaders.
Instead, they engaged in those war crimes, and now this is totally backfiring.
So I'm gonna let Kim Dotcom and Andrew Tate and the Colonel elaborate, but if the Colonel can elaborate
and give us his take on now more drone attacks now coming in, what that means.
I think that signifies a full Iranian attack.
They have tens of thousands of ballistic missiles, tens of thousands of drones,
and the main supplier of Russia.
This is going to have me really concerned about nuclear war potentially in the next few weeks and months or even sooner.
I want to get the Colonel's take and then I want Andrew to elaborate.
I'm going to cut off here and keep streaming.
We're simulcasting this at InfoWars.com forward slash show on Rail Alex Jones.
I'm going to keep watching and listening and stay on and maybe in an hour.
I have a feeling you're going to go for six, seven hours probably.
50 million viewers, so I'll pop in, but I'm going to shut up for the next hour or two.
But I want Andrews to take... I just want Andrews to take... I want Andrews to take, in closing, I want the Colonels to take, and then I want Andrews to take on, does he agree with me, this signifies the weakness in the West, which they're going to double down, which only escalates, how could the West extricate itself?
What do you think Iran wants here?
Two questions, I'm done, thank you so much, and God bless you.
Just before we go to Tate and the Colonel, there is a massive, or is it, there's a coming in of a GPS jamming on a large scale.
This report just came in as well that we'll be posting about from various sources.
And I do want to point out, we do have a space that was planned in a couple of hours, in about three hours, with President Bolsonaro from Brazil, former President Bolsonaro from Brazil, and Elon could be joining that one.
That may be delayed as we cover this attack for anyone that will be watching our interview with the President and Elon.
Yeah, and here's what's interesting.
Let me go to the Colonel, just get your thoughts on what Alex was talking about,
and then we'll go back to Andrew.
Colonel?
I think he dropped out.
Colonel, we'll just bring you back up.
Andrew, any comments on what Alex just said as I read out more updates?
When you're a bully, and when I say a bully, I don't mean that in a negative term.
I mean, when you're the large sack at the poker table, when you're the world's only true superpower which can
project force, your answer is force.
And when you're a bully and you bully everybody, that works for a certain amount of time.
But once they start to check you, once people start to stand up to you and say, okay, do something, your only answer is more force.
There's nothing else you can do but come along and try and be more brutal and try and crush them harder than before.
And you have to look at the world and look how, it doesn't matter if you're talking about a country, it doesn't matter if you're talking about a drug gang, it doesn't matter if you're talking about a cartel.
Once they get into a certain level of force where people deem it unacceptable to tolerate, they no longer fear your last weapon.
If you're already committing war crimes and killing entire populations, and people are seeing it all over the news and all over the internet now, and the matrix is broken, you can't lie to people anymore.
They're going to sit here and say, well we don't care, we're not tolerating this and we don't care how much you beat your chest and try and be a bully.
We're uninterested.
America only has one answer.
And like I've said, the guarantee of power is that one day you're going to lose it.
This is the guarantee of power in every single romantic relationship and every single geopolitical relationship.
And it's lost via overuse of force.
I don't know what America or Israel can really do now besides Try and go harder than they've been going.
I would like to think optimistically what will happen is there'll be a meeting behind closed doors and democracy is deliberately instigated across all of these countries so that everything can be set up and scammed amongst the populace and they're gonna just change the government over and say sorry and say it's not us anymore everything's changed we'll be nicer now.
That's the optimistic view if they really get under the cosh Is that the government will change?
That will be instigated by power players behind.
They'll say sorry, say it's not us anymore and we'll all move on.
Perhaps the government inside of Israel or the people who are in charge will not agree to that.
And perhaps then, yes, it goes nuclear.
And once a nuclear weapon is used, once again what I said about the four minute mile, truthfully at that point I'll be looking to live on a Polynesian island for the rest of my days because I think that'll be the beginning of something which is never going to end.
I think it's going to be A groundbreaking event which is going to break societal norms in nearly all ways.
The plan to counter the Iranian strike is to intercept most of the drones with the help of the United States and other countries across broadside Israeli airspace.
And Biden, according to the White House, will have a meeting with the Secretary of Defense and State, the Director of the CIA, and the National Security Advisor.
And of course, Iraq and Yemen have closed their airspace just now.
And this is all because, again, of the strike by Israel to the IRGC officials, which is, of course, on a consulate, which is on Iranian soil.
So this is, again, because Israel killed those seven IRGC officials.
Now we have this complete nightmare scenario.
So, yeah, cruise missiles are also being launched per Iranian media.
This afternoon, President Biden will meet with principals of the National Security Council to discuss events in the Middle East.
Nick, thanks for sending this.
The meeting will take place in the White House Situation Room.
Secretary Lloyd Austin, Secretary Anthony Blinken, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Charles blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah, all these different names.
Yeah, sorry about that.
I was out earlier.
President Harris and Chief of Staff Jeff Zients will attend by secure video.
Earlier today, the President was briefed on events in the Middle East by National Security
Advisor Sullivan and Principal Deputy National Security Advisor Finner.
So it just came in now as a White House press statement.
Piotr, is your mic working?
Do you have any updates?
You were talking about updates in Iran?
unidentified
Yeah, sorry about that.
I was out earlier.
No, just basically, look, this is, I just want to give a 50-foot zoom over very quickly.
The US probably knew this was going to happen.
We've seen a flurry of diplomacy in the past few days, like Omanis, Egyptians, Saudis, the Americans even pressuring the Chinese to try and talk to the Iranians to get them to do something.
That's how desperate the White House has been to try to avoid this situation.
Colonel, what you said earlier about 20 minutes ago seems to be exactly what's happening.
So we have the New York Times put out this statement.
Current and former American officials say it is likely that Iran will try to synchronize the drone attack with faster moving missiles, which is in line with reports from Israel and from Iran that cruise missiles are expected to be launched, which would be launched later.
The slow moving drones, a former official said, could be used to distract Israeli defenses.
Which is surprising, I wouldn't have expected this.
unidentified
They'll be used as a test of airspace, they're slower moving, they're easier targets, and then the Iranians may well try to get the Yemenis or the Iraqi militant groups to launch missile barrages, right?
How do you expect Israel to respond to this?
Well, there's a reason the Americans moved their Kereshtite group force closer to Israeli shores.
I'm not going to pretend that I know exactly IDF military doctrine, but what I would just say is that I think the Israelis have the ability to deal with these things independently but all at once from multiple
fronts that could be a challenge for the Iron Dome which is probably why the
Americans are going to this could be exactly what some of the militant groups have
wanted which is to draw the Americans into this war and again I still refrain
from using the term nuclear war because one side doesn't have nuclear
weapons I'm not playing down the seriousness of what is happening everyone
I just want to be very clear though that nuclear war is is a very specific
thing but you could and this is the last one I'll shut up which is the Israelis
have restrained from using tactical nukes
Could this be an instance where they decide to do that?
Because they are literally facing existential threats.
By the way, Eastern Voices said the same thing about coordinated attacks.
I do want to read another update.
Israel has evacuated certain military bases and launched aircraft and prepared air defenses to intercept what is believed are drones launched from Western Iran and Western Iraq, per three senior Israeli defense officials that just came out.
Go ahead, Colonel.
And then we'll go to Chief for any updates.
unidentified
Yeah, so it's interesting, right?
So the carrier strike group Eisenhower is being reported to move towards Israel, which is interesting, right?
Because actually moving towards Israel basically means it has to go through the Red Sea and then through the Suez Canal, which I'm not sure if we're on the brink of World War III that I want to be the carrier strike group commander that's, you know, going to put a carrier through a transit like that where it's really vulnerable.
The other thing that's interesting, and I'm just saying it's an interesting piece of information right now, right?
The Royal Air Force has clearly launched a bunch of typhoons who are now on its anchor out of Cyprus and I'm not saying it's tied to Israel but I will tell you it's a very odd time to be doing a in a training sortie out of Cyprus on a Saturday night.
Think about it, they've got Cyprus, right?
The Brits are very close, just strategically speaking, to Israel.
They would be a core part of any potential area of the Sepp.
Yeah, so I'm saying if you force put a gun to my head, I'd say it's part of it.
Again, if the space does crash within a minute, we'll be starting it again.
Let me go to Colonel and Chief Hoshyar.
I'm not sure if you got any updates.
You usually got a lot of updates for us.
Anything on your end, Hoshyar?
Anything from Iraq?
unidentified
Yes.
Hello, everyone.
Well, a couple of things just to look at the big picture.
The Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei just announced on his tweet around the last minute to the group that the Israeli regime would be punished, basically confirming that the attacks began.
And he said earlier that There will be a slap.
Usually he names these things, even the attacks when they carried them out after Qasem Soleimani was killed.
But I think there are three, four points that are important.
One, closing the airspace is natural because you have civilian airliners.
I remember the last time Iran launched those missile attacks, they shot down a civilian airliner.
The second is, it goes over these countries, it would be natural for some of these countries who have capabilities to shoot them down.
If we go back to the first few weeks of the war, Jordan asked for air defense systems from the U.S.
I remember we were discussing this, why would Jordan need an air defense system for something like this?
I expect this will be in waves, including, you know, missiles, but we see it from northern Iraq, Yes, I'm here.
Yes, I'm here. I couldn't leave. This is so riveting.
Here's the question for the colonel, who's the real expert here.
If Iran's launched a full-scale attack, which it's clear they have,
I can't believe they have for the first time ever, this is insanely dangerous,
then the main thing Iran's going to do is blow up ships, the Strait of Hormuz,
and the Suez Canal that will bring world trade to a standstill.
That's the real weapon.
So if Iran's going to full war, which is unbelievable, Then what's going to happen in these key waterways where half the energy of the world transits every month?
That's question number one.
And question number two that no one's asking.
Israel's already been wanting to attack Iran for decades.
They're going to attack Iran.
You can bet your bottom dollar.
So then what will Iran do when that happens?
Those are the two big questions.
Please answer them, Colonel, and then everybody else, because Colonel knows more than I do.
unidentified
I'd quite like to answer that after the Colonel.
Yeah, so it's a great point, right?
The strategic waterways and the strategic choke points of naval warfare are going to be critical and you're going to try and control those because you want to control warfare and unfortunately commerce takes a backseat to that, right?
So Alex is 100% correct.
Will they destroy them?
I don't know, but clearly things will slow down to a snail's pace through these things because ships will be inspected.
I'm saying blocking the waterways in, I've studied the war zones there, the war scenarios.
Blocking those waterways by either side are critical.
If Iran just blows up a ship in those waterways, they'll block it.
So I'm saying, will Iran do that?
That's my question for the Colonel.
unidentified
I don't know.
I don't really see what, because don't forget that the Iranians are still dependent on global trade.
The Chinese and the Russians would not be very happy if the Islamic Republic did that.
I'm not saying that they couldn't, but if they did that, that's an absolute loss for everybody.
There are relative losses and there are absolute losses.
And in this case, that would be an absolute loss Particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, I think that would be kind of crazy for the Iranians to do that.
Again, not saying that they couldn't, but because that is Iran's backyard.
If they block their own waterway, how are the Iranians going to get their own oil out to China and other things like that?
So, for me, I don't think it's impossible, but I don't think it's a priority for the Iranians.
Yeah, I don't think they're going to blow them up.
I think world perception is going to be a huge issue going forward, right?
Iran is still going to try and make itself look like, hey, we're doing this because we had no alternative.
If they truly turn out to be the bad guy, right, and they literally close these waterways to all traffic, it will affect a lot of countries who will actually turn a negative eye towards them.
To your second point, though, Alex, I think when you talk about What's the retaliation that Israel is going to have?
This is my take, right?
This is just my take.
I think that on October 7th, Hamas gave Netanyahu a gift, right?
It was the answer that he, or it was the example that he always wanted to be able to go in and take care of Hamas.
I think Iran, in his mind, maybe I'm wrong, I think that he's going to look at this as this is the gift from Iran that I now can finally go get rid of this cancer and this tumor that's been bothering me forever.
We have a lot of our regular speakers that were requesting earlier.
Our regular speakers in Lebanon, please request until Hadi's mic works so he can update us.
But I do have an update here from Channel 12.
There's a massive attack in the heart of Lebanon.
Iran confirms it's attacking Israel with dozens of drones and missiles.
That's been confirmed.
Axios receives information from Israel officials that hundreds of drones are heading towards Israel.
Iranian state TV, the Revolutionary Guards began intensive launching operations of drones towards targets in the occupied Palestinian territories, so Israel.
Egypt is closing its airspace, it just came in now as well.
And then we have, let me see if any speakers, so jump in with anyone that has updates.
I need, if anyone has that source, because it's just been sent through in a Telegram group, so the team has sent it through in our back channels, but it hasn't been confirmed.
Sirasha said US hits Iran, it will hit back.
I need the fucking source.
Sorry, I need the source, guys.
So anyone that has a source, because this is extremely, extremely concerning, if that's the case.
So what I really want to ask you to do is pray for myself and the crew and my family.
That's number one.
I want that.
I need that.
It's your prayer that's doing it.
That's why this surfaced.
That's why this happened.
I need the prayer that I need you to take the articles, the videos, the posts we make at Real Alex Jones, recopy them, share them, post them yourself, do whatever.
Just get it out there.
And I need you to go to InfoWarsStore.com and I need you to get great products you already need.
There's a bunch of sales going.
DNA Force Plus is so good for your entire body.
Flushes out your mitochondria and your cells with the PQQ, the CoQ10, the ELV ATP, the Organic Reishi, the Stragalus Membranos Root, and even more for 50% off.
I haven't done that in a while.
That's amazing.
Discover the power of Tri-Iodine, Deep Earth Crystal Iodine X3, 40% off.
Body's Ultimate Turmeric Formula 40% off and TurboForce 10-hour clean energy is 40% off at InfoWarsStore.com.
