The Alex Jones Show and The War Room with Owen Schreier discuss concerns over governments imposing
permanent lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations, leading to a tattletale society where people inform
on their neighbors. The owner of a store debates with a customer about mask effectiveness and
vaccine safety. The speaker criticizes the media for not accurately reporting on COVID-19
restrictions, vaccine side effects, and the potential dangers of mRNA gene therapy in vaccines. Alex
Jones discusses controversies surrounding COVID-19, including vaccine side effects, mask
effectiveness, and misinformation. Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes critiques the impeachment
trial of former President Trump, highlighting constitutional issues with the process. The speaker
discusses how some individuals are exploiting events at the Capitol to associate them with all Trump
supporters, and criticizes Bill Gates and Fauci for promoting permanent lockdowns. Mathematician
Edward Solomon claims that algorithms were used to manipulate election results in key jurisdictions
in the 2020 US presidential election, specifically in Atlanta.
Everything that we endured, everything that we complied with, In order to get back to normal has now apparently gone out of the window because the experts say we're never getting back to normal.
They're now suggesting Covid restrictions will never be lifted.
UK government medical officer says masks should be worn for years.
Biden's 100 day mask challenge is now wear masks for the rest of the year.
And the UK government promised no vaccine passports.
Now they're about to implement them.
Some restrictions should last until all adults have been vaccinated, senior health official says.
First it was back to normal when the elderly and vulnerable are vaccinated.
Then it was when the over 50s were vaccinated.
Now apparently it's only when everyone is vaccinated.
They move the goalposts every single day.
Newsflash!
All adults are never going to be vaccinated.
Bloomberg, when will life return to normal?
In seven years at today's vaccine rates.
Seven years.
That's 2028.
But now they're telling us that even after the majority of the world's population is vaccinated, the restrictions will still remain in place because of new mutant variants and new viruses.
We were also assured by governments that they wouldn't impose mandatory vaccinations.
Now they're saying, well, they're not going to be mandatory.
You just won't be able to have a job, travel or buy things without one.
First it's international travel, then it's public transport, then it's to get into a sports stadium or a cinema, then it's to get into a grocery store.
Where does it end?
We don't even have to imagine where this might lead.
We need only look at China.
Just as it pioneered lockdown, it is now blazing ahead with digital identification.
A health colour code exists.
Green allows a person to move around freely, enter offices and shops, and take public transport.
Yellow or red will deny them entry.
The code is based on location data taken from individuals' phones, as well as self-reported information.
Data is also shared with the police.
We need to further harmonise policies and standards and establish fast tracks to facilitate the orderly flow of people, said President Xi Jinping, as he called for a global mechanism to enable international travel.
Rolling lockdowns are also here to stay.
That's the precedent that we allow to be created.
Every time there's a single COVID case in the entire state of Victoria, Australia, they lock down the entire territory for days.
This is part of a new approach called Zero COVID, where instead of learning to live with the virus as humans with functioning immune systems have done for our entire biological history, It now must be eliminated completely.
But that's only feasibly possible in remote places like New Zealand, where they can impose strict border controls.
They're never going to close the borders in Europe, so we're never going to reach zero COVID.
And that's the point.
By setting the standard of zero Covid, that enshrines the necessity of rolling lockdowns.
Whenever the state decides to impose them, on a whim, at the drop of a hat.
The codifying and normalisation of lockdown powers will now be abused by governments, particularly in authoritarian countries like China, as an excuse to crack down on unrest and silence dissent for years.
And decades into the future.
This will also entrench a tattletale society where people are rewarded with social credit score points for snitching on their neighbours.
We'd be naive to think that this isn't going to happen here.
The second impeachment trial of the President is a farce, is a fraud.
It's not carried out by the Supreme Court Justice.
It's not in the Constitution.
And you see his lawyer stabbing him in the back.
It's all part of the systematic fraud, the takeover of this country, but also the world.
But now it's official.
What I've said on air, more than anything I've said in 27 years, probably said it 5,000 times, that it's just like Ted Bundy, the famous serial killer that had the little yellow Volkswagen that was non-threatening.
And he'd say, hey, let's go have a beer, let's have an ice cream, let's go for a walk.
As soon as he'd get them in the car, he'd put a .357 Magnum to their head and say, put these handcuffs on and you're not going to get hurt.
And almost all the women but one who got away, that's how he got caught, would say, yes, sir, and put the handcuffs on.
They would end up being taken to a farmhouse, into a dungeon and tortured over several days, him biting giant chunks out of their body after he would rape them severely.
I told you back in March, you put on the mask, you accept the lockdown, handcuffs are on, you're in the car.
One woman went that far, but she jumped out of the car and got away before she got taken to the basement.
You accept the World ID, you accept the poisonous vaccines, you accept the global tracking system, you are now letting him lead you into the farmhouse where he's gonna tie you up and torture you to death.
Now they've already gone after the folks they've got in their dungeons.
Whether it's Australia, or whether it's Germany, or whether it's Russia.
It's all global government.
Or whether it's Venezuela.
The UN snapped their dirty fingers.
The head of the WTO, and they said, last April, you don't see your parents in the nursing home, and Americans and Brits saluted, and now the numbers have exponentially begun to die, not just of COVID, but other diseases, where they just saved 600 million pounds in the last year in the UK, not paying for pensioners because of the massive death toll.
Not of COVID, they're murdering them.
Most of the deaths happen in certain government-connected facilities here in the UK and Australia.
This is a diabolical mass test of mass execution.
I have a giant stack of news on that front that I will cover.
Next segment, as they announce the lockdown, is permanent.
The handcuffs are on.
You're in the Volkswagen going to the farmhouse.
It's a 10-minute ride.
You gotta hit that lever with your elbow, you gotta roll out at that red light, and start running.
You may have a broken leg, hop, scream, yell, do what you gotta do.
But man, Fauci gets you in that basement, he's gonna go to work on your ass.
There's a very powerful report, it's at Band.Video, our crew is there in Naples, Florida.
They are talking to Alfie Oaks, who's a great patriot, who's saying, you know, you don't have to wear a mask in a store, and We're interviewing him, and a lady comes over and confronts him, and the level of double-think from this crazy Karen is just totally insane.
It's all about, she's official, she's powerful, you're bad.
And it's so sad to see the level of slavery.
She's like, oh, I've had two shots, I'm good.
Oh, really?
No, you gotta keep wearing that mask, because they don't protect you, lady.
So, here it is, the full video's on InfoWars.com, hope you share it.
unidentified
I want to know what you have against masks.
I mean, I'm double-shotted.
I'm totally safe.
I'm nothing against masks.
So just tell people to come in wearing their masks.
Come in wearing your mask.
I do.
I don't need it because I've got two shots.
But if other people are scared, I'm wearing it for them.
Well, you're allowed to wear your mask.
Yeah, but everyone thinks that you are against them.
No, no.
Because of that sign out there.
No, I'm not.
Well, then clear that up.
Because I thought that!
I thought that!
Because of that sign, which literally gives permission to people who can wear the mask to walk in here pretending they can't wear the mask.
So everyone thinks you're against them.
So anybody that thinks that I'm against the mask, that's the farthest thing from truth.
Then take that sign down.
Absolutely not.
We're not!
I would never take that sign down.
That sign doesn't say that we're against the mask.
Well, it really kind of gives permission for people to sneak in there without it on.
But the law says they have to wear them.
No, the law doesn't say that.
Yeah, it does.
No, the law doesn't say that, ma'am.
With the most respect, I love that you're wearing your mask.
I don't have to.
I'm doing it because other people get nervous when they see people without them.
That's a sad thing.
It's a sad thing, and I'm sorry to say that, but I don't want to make other people nervous.
Well, I'm so glad that you can come here and shop with your mask on.
Yeah!
I don't feel intimidated.
You've never done that to me.
I would never intimidate anybody.
I believe in individual liberty.
No one's ever felt intimidated coming in here with a mask on.
It's all great.
But you need to tell the public that you're in favor of people who want to wear it.
So if you're really afraid of the virus, then come in with a full virus suit like they wear in the virus lab.
Don't make a joke of it.
That's no joke, because a mask does not protect us from the virus.
Well, you're making a joke.
I'm not making a joke.
I think that's what people get turned off to.
I'm sorry, but if you want to... The people in the virology laboratories don't wear a mask in there because they know that they're going to get the virus.
The doctors clearly said that the mask doesn't... that particles of the virus... Okay, here's the problem.
People don't know that 99.9% of the masks in this store don't do it.
Right.
You need this.
And 95.
I do realize this, you know.
Thankfully, under our liberties and rights, we can go to any grocery store we want.
There are 42 grocery stores in Naples, right?
Yeah.
But who's got the best food?
We got the best food.
But the point is, no one's wearing it correctly.
Why don't you put a thing out there saying how to wear your mask?
Because nobody's doing it.
And they don't work.
Maybe 20%.
It's up to the individual.
No, no, no.
My husband's a doctor, so he's explained it all to me.
Two people wearing a lousy mask are better than somebody wearing no mask.
If someone comes in here and they're really, really afraid of bumping their head, and there's actually people that have head injuries and they wear a football helmet, I have no problem with that.
That's their, that's their right.
I'm not going to tell them that they're not allowed to wear a football helmet in the store.
I'm not going to, I'm actually, Thankful that they want to come in and protect themselves and everyone can come in and I actually had a guy come in with a full body suit in early on and I thought that you know he was actually seemed like one of the most intelligent guys out there because he was at least going to extra effort but he was protecting himself from catching the virus.
Yeah but I mean the only reason that people are wearing the masks if the masks really work There's a lot more of this.
It's at Infowars.com and we're just interviewing him and she just butts in.
Alright, tighten this down. There's a lot more of this. It's at Infowars.com.
And we're just interviewing him and she just butts in. Okay.
And we just went up this morning. But notice she goes, "Well, why hasn't the government
given us a mask that works?"
Because no masks work with viruses unless it's a full spacesuit or a full system covering you up, dummy.
You've got to go into a decontamination chamber with ultraviolet light for 10 minutes, then they spray you with chemicals and they spray you with water.
But guess what?
The level 4 labs in China and the US, they don't even do that anymore.
So you better read the fine print, ladies and gentlemen.
But like I told you, you're not going to have to listen to me anymore.
Nobody's going to be on the fence.
It's going to get real bad.
The global depression is unstoppable now.
And I'm going to tell you, coming up, what's coming next.
They have taken tens of millions In the U.S.
alone, of all these college deadbeats, they got two or three degrees that are worthless, and they're training them right now to be the contact tracers under the Clinton Foundation, and they are coming to your house to shake your ass down, grab you, and put you in a frickin' van.
I mean, these people want power.
They just want to jerk Americans out of their houses.
It's already happening all over Australia, all over Spain.
And so the war is on, man, they are.
They got the CIA on TV saying we're gonna arrest 75 million Americans.
Good luck, you sons of bitches!
Burn in hell!
I don't want a lot of the listeners that just started tuning in to hear me sound so happy about all this and think that I actually like it.
But I guess you could call it the joy of battle, a berserker creed.
I didn't ask for any of this, but if the fight's coming, let's just get it done.
And the American people are spoiling for a war.
This needs to be coordinated right, ladies and gentlemen.
And don't worry, the enemy has a desire to destroy you.
They're coming after you, but you need to be smart.
You need to protect yourself and your families, but this is the big assault.
Now, I could get depressed and upset about all this and let the enemy steal my will, but that's not going to happen.
Because I know the God of the universe is real, and I know the devil's real.
I know the devil's a loser.
And so I'm very honored to be here on air with you today.
You know, I noticed a phenomenon, and we know there's bots on the website, and I very rarely talk to IT and have them check stuff.
But when we have, and it's my instinct, I'm always right, it's very obvious.
I mean, you see what, on comments on Bandot Video, or Info Wars, or News Wars, when it's like, oh, Google's hiring for this, or, you know, sex ads, or whatever, you know that spam.
I mean, you know spam when you see it.
It's everywhere.
But you'll also see these comments like, Jones needs to show the links under this video or article.
He's not showing us the proof.
That's discrediting.
This isn't true.
And you see it spammed in every article.
Well, I mean, I got three or four folks uploading videos and they're doing a great job.
They put a few links under it, but I cover sometimes 50 articles a segment, 20 articles a segment.
They're not going to put the links to all those in.
Anybody can type that in and find it themselves.
So we put out the articles from the CDC's own website and the VAERS subsection vaccine damage reporting system.
I've got it right here.
I'll show it to you.
And they're like, oh, that's not true.
Jones is making that up.
And I just saw the comment in every vaccine video, the same person saying it, the same bot.
Absolutely incredible.
So let me give you the sources here for everybody.
But do I have a crew that can put all of these 30, 40 articles in the links?
No.
But you can look these up for yourself.
So let's just go right through.
Overhead shot, please.
COVID restrictions could remain until all adults vaccinated.
UK health official says.
We have video of it.
We have a link.
It's all right there.
Obviously, when they say, oh, even the vaccine's not enough.
Sorry, there's new variants.
You have to wear a mask over your face.
Be controlled forever.
Oh, where's the proof?
Oh, where's the proof?
That's a game to try to manipulate people in the comments to think it's not true.
That's gaslighting.
CBS declares you'll need a COVID vaccine passport to travel by summer 2021.
The National File article, it's also on InfoWars, has the video where they say it.
Let's see, they play this game where, oh, you didn't show me.
Notice when you read articles in the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal about me, they'll say I said something, but they won't link to it.
Because they're lying.
We link to it.
So the idea that, oh, you know, go watch it yourself.
There's none of them.
Canada's vaccine rollout stalls, confining seniors to their homes for months to come as massive numbers die of depression and suicide.
You're locked in there.
Who said you had a law?
Why don't their families go get them?
Does the state own them?
Do they commit a crime?
Oh, we're protecting them.
You can't come in, but we're putting COVID patients in with you.
That's your all-precious CNN.
Biden's 100 days of masks transforms into masks through the next year?
And then his actual Fauci says, well, seven years, well, forever.
And he says, I got that from Bill Gates.
That's in the news.
He goes, I meet with Bill Gates, he tells me what to do.
It's actually, I mean, hell, Boris Johnson said that he's gonna head up the G8 this year, it's rotating, and that his shadow minister will be Bill Gates.
Now, any less you're hearing that, just search it yourself.
Guys, type it in.
Boris Johnson says when he heads up G8, Bill Gates will advise him.
Let's continue.
But he just watched it all happen.
Experts suggest, they don't suggest, COVID restrictions could last forever.
They're already telling you.
CDC now says Americans should wear masks indoors and when you have, in your own private home.
Andrew Cuomo's aide admits New York hid COVID-19 nursing home deaths to avoid federal investigation.
What did I say 10, 11 months ago when this broke?
I said they ordered them from the U.N.
to do this.
Trump's been cut out of it.
They're going to use this to frame all these states that followed orders and killed all these old people to frame them and control them further.
And now they've done it.
I just know the enemy's operation.
Oh, White House denies considering Florida travel restrictions.
Miami Herald talked to the administration and said they're preparing it.
It's like he said, I promise only 100 days of the mass and it's all over.
Now he says, oh, it's at least another year.
Every promise given is broken.
Unless it's tripling drug prices and ending Trump's executive order, because we pay triple what anybody else does.
Trump found out.
He killed it.
Now folks who are paying $50 for their insulin every week pay $2,000.
That's more than triple.
That's the worst case example.
But it's liberal to do that.
It's liberal to run death camps in China, too.
It's so liberal.
Seniors who already beat COVID-19 are dying after taking the vaccine.
This was the big article at Band.Video and Infowars.com that in every post they just had people saying, this isn't true, where's your proof, it's not there, show your facts, because they knew it was all real.
It's a Kellan McBrain article that basically just reprints the Epoch Times with all the specific links to the CDC.
But they go, oh, where's your link?
We don't see it.
Oh, we don't see that link.
It's all right there in it with the citing the VAERS reports with direct links of the deaths all over the country.
10, 15, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2, 3, 4, 1 at nursing homes.
Just massive death.
Like, my God, we have 100 people shot and 5 dying in like an hour.
Oh, but it gets worse.
Here, let me just keep showing you this.
Authorities probe rare blood disorder among some COVID-19 vaccine recipients.
Direct links to the federal government FDA website.
The blood disorder was listed by the FDA last year as a possible adverse outcome for getting COVID-19 vaccine.
Oh!
Alongside other serious adverse events such as Guillain-Barré and death.
And they link in the Epoch Times to the insert.
Death!
Death!
Oh, it's not real!
The government wouldn't kill me!
I'm a Karen!
I trust big multinational corporations that run death camps.
Oh, let's just show some more.
Deaths of elderly who recovered from COVID-19 but died after vaccines raised questions.
Oh, here's the InfoWars article.
Here's another one out of the journal Star Mainstream News.
CDC investigating deaths of Nebraska men who received COVID-19 vaccine.
Doctors death of recovered vaccine is being investigated.
23 die in Norway after receiving Pfizer COVID vaccine death in one facility.
White House asked CDC to study how many have died from COVID vaccine.
Oh my God!
That's the Daily Beast!
I mean, nobody died!
You're not allowed to criticize it on any major platform!
It doesn't exist!
Jeff Zuckerberg or Mark Zuckerberg said so!
What to know about post-vaccine deaths and allergies?
Bloomberg!
Oh, that was months ago!
Fine print!
Fact check!
Oh, Snopes says none of it's happening!
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, no trials, no supply commitment, major drawback.
Business Daily.
Oh my god, they didn't even do any testing and waive the law?
AstraZeneca's Pfizer asked India for emergency use.
India bans it saying no studies.
Human experimentation illegal.
Ah, we found the enemy engaged in a little bit of deception.
That's right, the major mRNA Gene therapy reprogramming systems say in the inserts they can cause death, and so a major news publication was saying don't worry about side effects like death, and they actually removed it.
There's the Sunday Express, big paper out of the UK, vaccine side effects, how the body responds and why being ill after a jab is good.
And it says vaccine side effects.
Many people are concerned with growing reports of people falling ill and even death.
Can you imagine the guys running the bots on InfoWars that come and spam our site?
I wouldn't want to be you when God has his time with you.
Like, you're literally spamming a site trying to warn people that something's got cancer viruses and liquid death in it, and kills people, and doesn't even protect them from COVID-19, and you're all day trying to hurt us and shut us down.
That's why I love AP called up today.
And they're like, yeah, they're looking at arresting you anytime.
What do you think about that?
"Oh, I just went in the corner and crapped my britches."
India wants Pfizer to do local studies before approval.
Reuters!
But they didn't do it, so it's kicked out of the country.
But I mean, Mark Zuckerberg said no one got sick.
Mark Zuckerberg says if you criticize it in any way, and you're Robert Kennedy Jr., and you file a huge report shelling all these top scientists, well, you can't do that!
I always seem to win those sporting events when I would listen to this where I went.
Alright, that's enough of that kill-em-all music.
I want to politically kill ideas that are fraudulent.
But I don't want to do it through censorship.
I can do it through being able to meet them on the field.
But they don't want to face that.
Because they're weak.
That's why they thought they would join with evil to get power, but instead they just got more weakness and more enslavement.
All right, here's what's going on.
I hit the big code stack, only part of it.
And I mean, I knew all this was coming.
I knew they dropped the hammer.
I knew they go into world government sometime around 2020.
They said they would.
They always follow their operations.
And now we're just in cuckoo land.
I mean.
I mean, 10 million plus people starved to death last year because of what they did.
They're imploding the third world.
I'm not even against all these poor people flooding in because the globalists shut them down.
The problem is they're going to use them as a weapon against us to bankrupt us.
I mean, this is just biblical.
I mean, we are like, it's kind of like, you're not scared once you're in a really rough fight, you're just in the fight.
Or like you're in a really bad car wreck and you're rolling a car.
And it's like, holy hell, I'm in a car, it's rolling down a cliff, you know?
One time I, it doesn't matter.
I mean, it's all insane.
And we're just, we're in it now.
It's not like the new order's coming and we're warning about it.
We're in it.
And you know, I have some globalists come by and some people, they're emissaries.
I'm like, Jones, you know, you're a smart guy.
Why don't you join us and help guide things from the inside?
You know, you'll do a better job if you just work with us.
And I'm like, give me a break.
That's not how this works.
I look at these people and I say, you got kids.
You got children.
You really think you're going to protect them going along with this?
And then they look at you with that scared face because you're not going to protect your family going along with this.
Everybody knows.
Yes, the coronavirus lockdown is killing the global economy.
Not coronavirus.
It's all a hoax.
The same number of people roughly died last year, died the year before.
Tell people that.
Speak up at the grocery store.
Stand up like the grocery store owner in Florida, in Naples.
If you don't, we lose everything.
I have family ask me, why do you talk to your buddy at the restaurant or a grocery store or at the mall?
And I'm like, because the enemy wants to silence us.
The enemy wants us to not talk.
So when I talk to somebody in a restaurant or a grocery store or a park or on the street or the greenbelt or at church, that's more important.
And I should be demanding to get up in front of the church and speak.
I should be calling in to talk radio.
I should be exhausting every element I've got before war.
Because they're already at war with you.
I mean, let me tell you, we've looked at these mRNA vaccines, and they go from horrible to absolutely nightmarish.
I mean, that's why all the scientists that are top scientists go, we don't know what they're doing, but it looks like it sterilizes you.
It looks like it gives you cancer.
It looks like it shuts down your immune system at the same time, jacking it all up and screwing you up.
This is a haunted house of bad side effects, because they're not side effects.
They are primary weapons.
That are binary in that when your normal body goes through different fluctuations, it then manipulates and triggers different events.
Cytokine storms, you name it.
And boys and girls, if you don't know what these things mean, you better learn, because they say, you're not getting on a bus, or having a car, or on an airplane, or having a job when they're done.
And they're just like, oh don't worry, you know, we're just phasing it in.
And look at that creepy-looking, weird Surgeon General injecting Elmo with the fake vaccine, just like they do at the Golden Globes and all the rough stuff where they come up with the needles.
I mean, this is a corrupt, globalist, corporate government that wants an excuse to put untested things in your body, and then they use peer pressure to try to get everybody to accept it.
GABA, chamomile flower extract, hops flower extract, and L-theanine.
Now, this is a very strong sleep aid, So I would not take more than one pill.
Over the years, you take it a long time, it takes more than one pill.
That's how I am.
Rocket Rest is sold out, it's even stronger, but I can't even take Rocket Rest, I can't even get up.
When I was younger, remember when you were a kid, you can't get out of bed, the bed felt so good?
You take this, it's kind of, you can still get out, but you don't want to get out of bed.
Rocket Rest is sold out, it's so damn strong, I can't get out of bed, so I don't even take it.
I take Knockout, but that'll be back in.
I'm just being honest, it's even stronger.
Is amazing, and plus if you subscribe to our free newsletter so when they shut down our satellites and everything else, hopefully we can still send you an email.
Subscribers can get an additional discount with the promo code SLEEP.
Kind of just gave it away.
To get Knockout at an unprecedented 60% off.
But it's 40% off for everybody else.
So go sign up at InfoWars.com forward slash newsletter.
InfoWars.com forward slash newsletter.
You won't just get that promo code.
You'll get all the promo codes that go out four or five days a week for the biggest discounts, period.
Something might be 25% on the website.
It's 50% or 60% or 40% on the newsletter.
And in the newsletter, you get the promo code, which I'll tell everybody right now is sleep hell.
S-L-E-E-P.
S-L-E-E-P.
Sixty percent off knockout.
And I can tell you to make about five bucks on that, but that's fine, because it is an amazing product and been sold out for months.
I didn't know it was sold out.
Again, I'm just so busy covering news, I don't know what the hell's going on.
For six months, I'm saying, we've got the ProPure Pro Best Gravity-Fed System in PaulWarStore.com.
It's sold out!
Just came back in.
Restocked for the first time in six months, Alexa Pure Pro Water Filtration System in stock.
$50 off.
You cannot beat this filter and you cannot beat this deal.
And the small amount of funding we get funds the operation.
So I got to sell a lot of these.
So you need to filter your water for yourself and your children.
Start fighting back today by purifying your water.
Get Alexa Pure Pro Water Filtration System for $119.
I was selling gravity-fed filters 25 years ago for 300 bucks a piece that were okay, but not as good as this.
That price is insane.
I think I'm going to talk to him and jack the price up.
So instead of me making $50, I make $100.
I've got to fund this place.
That is a damn good deal.
You should get it.
Infowarstore.com.
Whatever you do, knockout, back in stock.
40% off for everybody on the site.
Sign up for the newsletter.
You get the promo code to get 60% off.
And Winter Sun Vitamin D3 or Vitamin K for your immune system is back in stock.
About to sell out.
25% off as well.
Hour number two straight ahead.
unidentified
There's a lot of confusion among people and misinformation surrounding face masks.
Right now, people should not be walking, there's no reason to be walking around with a mask.
When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.
unidentified
As new and more contagious variants of the coronavirus spread around the country, people are taking extra precautions, one of which is looking at the quality of face masks and whether two is better than one.
Could wearing two masks... Double masking.
Wearing two masks... Layering two cloth masks... Double up and wear two.
And then Trump hiring lawyers that had sued him before, hiring lawyers that had called him a GD crook, an effing crook.
I know Robert Barnes advised the President.
I wish he could have been there.
I literally tried to push that forward.
But he couldn't get Dershowitz.
Dershowitz said it's the worst defense he's ever seen.
He would have been a great lawyer.
Say what you want about Dershowitz.
He's, you know, one of the best lawyers in the world.
So is Barnes.
And so witnessing this is bigger than just the trial.
The trial's a diversion.
We know Trump didn't do what they say.
To me, it just shows the cowardice of the legal class.
Because, man, I've read Oliver Wendell Holmes.
I've read the famous cases.
Some of the greatest people that founded this country were lawyers.
They loved America.
They believed in freedom, you know.
Thomas Jefferson was a great researcher.
Today, I look at the legal class and I cut Barnes out of this because he's not a coward.
But they are just a pack of scum.
And so this is an illustration of why Trump couldn't get anything done, because he was pulling from this pool of trash.
So maybe there's a better defense going on today.
Barnes can take it wherever he wants.
We appreciate Robert Barnes, constitutional lawyer, one of my great lawyers, one of Trump's lawyers, here to talk about what the hell are we watching right now, Barnes.
It's a reflection of a constant refrain with the Trump administration and Trump's tenure, which was, you can't be an outside change agent and limit your hires to establishment insiders.
And it was one of his fundamental weaknesses, and it's one, unfortunately, he has not yet corrected.
Now, I think he's seeing the disastrous consequences in the presentation in the Senate.
Today is better than the complete debacle that was the initial day.
But what happened was there was a bunch of people that promoted myself, Dershowitz, Turley, a range of people were given to him that were willing to help and to assist and present a real vibrant defense.
And he only went with the people that Lindsey Graham would approve.
And of course, Lindsey Graham would only go with establishment insiders who are sort of weak-kneed and don't have a strong backbone and aren't even that skilled.
And that was the quid pro quo, and Trump went with that.
And the promise has been that as long as he went with Lindsey Graham's lawyers, Lindsey Graham would guarantee his acquittal in the Senate.
As long as he lets them have the political victory and politically, in the court of public opinion, convict him of launching the attack, they won't actually convict him physically.
And the problem was, Trump underappreciated all the way through that he had the leverage, not the Senate.
The Senate was never going to vote to convict.
It would be political suicide for the Republican Party.
And so that's why he'd never see, but it was always a weakness in the whole four years he was there.
You go all the way back to when he folded General Flynn, to when he could have put Robert Kennedy in in charge of a vaccine task force, and then he backed off at the last minute.
Decision after decision after decision like that.
You were warning about this.
Roger Stone was warning about this.
A wide range of people were warning about this.
People like me behind the scenes warning about this.
People, other major Trump supporters.
All the Trump supporters that are part of the White House that are now in the private sector told him to hire other people.
He was told by Lindsey Graham that it had to be off of his list or he would be at risk.
And so he went with Lindsey Graham's list, and we're seeing some of the worst legal presentation I've ever witnessed in a high-profile case.
He just sees that as weakened capitulation and more motivation for them to accelerate, which is exactly what they did.
I mean, they spent three days, basically, they don't have the facts on their side, they don't have the law on their side, this is the most constitutionally abusive impeachment in the history of democracies, period, in not only the United States, but any comparable democracy.
I mean, we have a trial that constitutionally can't be held.
The Constitution says if the President is on trial, and their theory is that it can be any President at any time, not just the current President, the Chief Justice of the U.S.
Exactly, it's like that scene from High Plains Drifter where Clint Eastwood puts the little midget up and he says, I'm the mayor, I'm the sheriff, I'm the mayor.
That's what Leahy is.
Leahy's the mayor, Leahy's the sheriff, Leahy's all of it combined.
And it makes a mockery of the Senate.
What this impeachment really is, is an indictment and an impeachment of the Congress itself.
An impeachment and indictment of the Senate itself.
I mean, you have Swalwell going up there and lying about people getting the word, getting basic language confused, lying about what's in a basic tweet and a basic statement about the president.
I think it's to attack, it's to justify, to rewrite the history, number one.
Number two, to justify the assault on people's civil liberties that's coming.
To justify the domestic terror legislation, the mass surveillance legislation, the censorship, the flight restrictions, all the things that are coming down the pipeline.
This is meant to be the narrative to justify that, to rationalize that, to excuse that.
This isn't really about Trump, this is about Trump supporters and the uncomfortable political Diding us and saying we're terrorists, which they're openly announcing.
Exactly, and it's a precedent they want to set that they could apply to any American, anywhere, anyplace, anytime, because look, they did it to President Trump.
They're talking about impeaching citizens now, I don't know, and members of Congress.
We'll talk about it when we come back.
That's crazy.
Alright, constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes joins us.
Really smart guy.
And I'm jumping in a lot because I've studied history.
I've never seen anything like this.
And now they're saying they want to censure him if this doesn't work.
It's a distraction from their power grab.
Now they're announcing permanent lockdowns.
Now they're saying the vaccine doesn't work.
Now they're admitting the vaccine's killing a bunch of people.
I've studied a lot of history and talked to a lot of folks who were in World War II, and they said, listen, Hitler could have won if he wasn't so obsessed with killing certain groups of people in Russia and in Poland, not just Jews, but other groups as well.
He would spend all his energy doing that, because for him, killing a bunch of people was the mission, not winning and building his Third Reich, a thousand years and all this.
And that's what I see with these globalists is they go out of their way to destroy themselves.
They just do horrible things.
They start fights.
They lie.
They sabotage.
It's like Biden runs America.
Why would he want to get rid of the borders and shut the pipelines down and triple drug prices?
Because he didn't win the election.
He stole it.
And he is an operative under war to shut us down.
So I don't see how The system gets away with this, Robert Barnes, but we'll
talk about that next segment.
In this one, I'm going to try to just sit back and relax and listen to you about this trial and
where you see this going and what it says. Because when I watch Democrats that are prosecuting the
president that called for harassing and attacking people and Rand Paul deserved to have his ribs
broken and Scalise deserved to be shot.
You know, when you burn down neighborhoods, well, people are people.
And then Trump did none of this, and they know that, and they're saying he's guilty, and this is not even a real trial.
I'm like, what the hell's coming next from these people?
I mean, what you see is if they can try the President of the United States without evidence, what can they do to you, ordinary people?
If they can try the President with a conflicted judge, what can they do to you?
If they can try the President with conflicted jurors, what can they do to you?
If they can try the President based on a clear violation of the First Amendment and ignore his free speech rights, what does that mean for your free speech rights?
If they can try the President without any due process at all in either the investigatory stage, the indictment stage, or the trial stage, what can they do to you as a private citizen?
If they can do bills of attainder against the President of the United States, what can the legislative branches do to you directly in the future?
If they can misuse and abuse 14th Amendment power to claim they can bar their political adversaries from office on whatever bogus grounds they trump up, what can they do to you as an individual?
If they can have such a disparate double set of standards, such a two-tiered system of justice, so public, that the President of the United States can be a victim to it, then what can they do to you?
In the same way, Alex Jones and Infowars was supposed to be the precedent for what they could do to people in terms of blacklisting them and ghosting them in the world of social media.
Stefan Molyneux calls it a prelude to genocide because it's the kind of thing that can happen when we justify ghosting people entirely.
Well, I mean, the first step to any dangerous path, any perilous path of taking that kind of severe, or seeing that kind of severe thing happen, is the dehumanization of a group of people.
And that's what we're witnessing.
We're witnessing the complete demonization and dehumanization of an entire group of people.
In this case, 75 million Americans.
They're trying to take what happened at the Capitol and amongst the very few small minority of people at the Capitol who did something wrong and say that represents 75 million Americans.
Because the way in how do you get people accustomed and okay with seeing their neighbors dragged away and their kids dragged away to some camp and their property seized and stolen.
That's over many years of dehumanizing people based on their status.
And what the natural instinct for someone in his position is to defer to the establishment insiders because that's who seems to have the power.
And so it's unfortunate.
People like us have been trying to convince him for the last four years.
That's a mistake.
That's the wrong place to go.
Those are the people that betray you.
But he has to, unfortunately, he has to keep re-experiencing the betrayal to fully recognize it.
I mean, hopefully he does.
I mean, at least partially, he complained to plenty of people that this was a complete debacle, and he regretted going with the people that Lindsey Graham recommended.
But, you know, that ship has sailed at this point.
I think what it reinforces is we, the people, have to continue to seize power.
Just as they tried to use the attack on Alex Jones and Infowars as a template for what they wanted to do
to everyone else, the counter has to be how you and Infowars and the audience was able
to successfully fight back is how the people have to successfully fight back.
Not only the Redditor GameStop type revolutions, but also all the other means by which people can seize
power back in their ordinary everyday lives.
Just as, I mean, here how it happens is they independently supported, no corporate requirements,
just the audience going to Infowarsstore.com, buying products that they like,
that support their everyday health and wellbeing, also keeping the Infowars online and available
using independent technology of people who are willing to resist the oppressive state.
You're seeing new political allies come on in a wide range of spaces, in the lockdown space,
in the vaccine space, in the mass space, like Robert Kennedy Jr.
He was getting so popular and successful at challenging it.
That's why Instagram, which was one of the first people to come after you for exposing that Joe Biden had clear mental issues, is now the first one to go after Robert Kennedy Jr.
Brown folks know you don't take the doctor's vaccines, unless you want to die or have your
baby die or get a disease.
Big article up on Infowars.com report, UK government could grant vaccine exemptions to ethnic minorities.
And I saw that about a month ago in the US.
Oh, major universities are going to make white students take the vaccines, but minorities don't because there's a history of secret testing.
I mean, this is such a fever dream of bizarreness in his standings.
Let's tackle COVID-19 right now, Barnes, because you're one of the smartest guys I know on that topic as well, and where this is going and what we knew.
Permanent lockdowns, permanent domestic checkpoints that Biden did float but now walked back.
Now not a 100-day mask, now he says a couple more years of mask.
I mean, this is really their rubric for total takeover.
Give us your take on the latest on that and how you think it's going for the globalists.
I mean, there's no question that it succeeded to a degree they never imagined.
I don't think they even imagined possible or conceivable.
I mean, Bill Gates has aggregated more power in a shorter period of time than maybe any single individual in world history.
And while he's doing so, not only is his wealth dramatically expanded, of course, but he was able to dictate the public health agenda in almost the entire world.
Where people were willing to agree with sort of North Korean style policies and willing to voluntarily assent to these and consent to them.
I mean, I see the Robert Kennedy case as a classic example of this, and here you have the scion of the most prominent liberal Democratic family in American history, arguably, being targeted for complete censorship and suppression just by sharing government-sourced information about issues related to vaccines, while he's also raised questions about the lockdowns and the attack on free speech.
Just several days ago, wrote an article for the Defender of the Children's Health Defense Fund, where he details all of the Bill Gates' role in this, and how he's aggregating control over the food supply, while he's aggregating control over public health, while he has other influence in other economic spheres and spaces.
And that this is the great challenge.
Are we going to have a Gates-driven, Chinese social credit-driven society for the rest of the world and the globe?
Or are we going to have the American 1776 style democratic experiment be the future of the world?
And we know that for those that don't know, look it up, it's not even hidden, Gates and his protege Mark Zuckerberg are literally in lockstep with Xi Jinping.
Oh, I mean, Gates, I mean, think about how many times Gates has come to Chinese defense during all of this.
And Gates' wife repeatedly come to Chinese defense.
The Chinese model is the model he wanted.
And given the Time article, you have to, you look at the context of what the Time article detailed about the secret cabal to influence influence in the election and shape the outcome of the
election, you have to wonder at some level whether some part or piece of that was
what happened in terms of the entire pandemic being released in the first
place. And the latest effort of China with the World Health Organization
to cover up whether or not that was a lab-based leak, as more and more
scientists start to document in detail, including people like Brett Weinstein
and others, that the lab leak hypothesis has a lot more legitimacy than the
Well, I mean, what's extraordinary is I don't think any of these cases would meet the test of a jury.
Because if you had real evidence being applied, I mean, that's what's extraordinary.
That's what Judge Dickman's decision in the Western District of Pennsylvania last year made clear.
When you look at the actual evidence, it doesn't support or substantiate any of this.
Even if you think the government legally could have the power to do some of these lockdowns, to do the mask mandates, to do the forced vaccines, Even if you conceded that, under the terms and conditions that our Constitution compels, even according to those individuals, the evidence does not stack up in support of it.
You dig into it, that's why they've never gone through the legislative procedures, that's why they didn't go through the notice and comment procedures.
It's all color of law, hysteria, peer pressure, will of the people, but they're manipulating that.
So when you look at that, you've had federal and state courts, you've had Swedish courts, German courts, Dutch courts say the lockdowns are illegal, but they just continue!
It's because not enough courts are stepping up to the plate.
And so you have the sporadic court taking action, and then you have some other court ameliorating its effect or mitigating its impact.
And that's been the course of the problem.
And it goes back to what you were talking about all the way back involving Trump's impeachment, which is the legal class as a class, as part of the professional class, is overwhelmingly biased towards statism.
When you combine black robes and white lab coats running the world, it's one of the worst and ugliest methods of running the world.
Exactly, and just recently, it didn't even support, she said maybe the governor of California, without even legislative approval in process, can ban people from singing in church.
That's the part she remanded.
She was the key vote that didn't say right out of the gate.
Exactly, and he, she was sold to him that she would stand up for him in the election contest especially, and she completely hid when it came to election time.
So the, and we were trying to warn him, and it's just, his fundamental limitation was that, and that's why we the people have to seize power ourselves, democratically and constitutionally, by recognizing how much power and control we really have.
Well Robert, I always love having you on, you're on fire even more than usual.
When we come back in a ten and a half minute segment, I'm going to try to give you the floor to shut up.
I'm going to give you four minutes during the break to think about this.
What would you have done if you were Trump's lawyers?
Because obviously that wasn't a bad performance.
That was stabbing in the back, lawyers scared, took the job, told just, you know, admit that Trump lost the election.
He said that repeatedly.
What would you have done if you were speaking to the U.S.
Senate, if you were there during the sham trial, what you would have said?
We're going to come back from break with Robert Barnes, constitutional lawyer.
I get his take on that.
And we have a major mathematician that's confirmed a lot of other mathematicians about the impossibility in these states of the exact same ratios at key times coming in to manipulate the election and more.
Because we're not going to let loose of this election fraud, even though we're told not to.
Separately, sold out for months, our great SleepAid Knockout is 40% off back in stock.
It has eight different ingredients for your sleep aid.
It's all there.
It's got so many different items.
I don't have time to list them all to you.
It's got L-tryptophan, melatonin, valerian root, and so much more at InfoWarsStore.com.
And if you go to InfoWars.com forward slash newsletter, it's not a free newsletter, we'll send you a promo code to get 60% off eight natural ingredients that aid in restful deep sleep.
Who knows how long Barnes will still be on Twitter, but you can find him at VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com as well.
Okay, let me give you my best thinking on this.
I'm going to turn the baton over to him to give his defense to Trump.
And when he thinks of the trial, what he would have said, because again, he's not an establishment hack.
There's been a lot of corrupt technologies that PR firms and intelligence agencies have that they've beta tested, but governments weren't really ready to use them.
Trump getting in, Bolsonaro getting in, other things getting in made him accelerate all that.
And so now there's a cascade or a domino effect of governments and corporations just committing crime, going wild.
It's like a crime spree.
And it's going to burn through things, it's going to cause a lot of ripples and waves back the other way.
But we're in a very explosive moment in history.
The last thing we want is a bunch of mob psychology to trigger a civil war.
That's what Communist China wants.
The idea that Trump wanted a civil war, he wanted big crowds to show that he was popular and to show that he really won and that Biden couldn't have a crowd.
That's what he wanted.
But people think, well screw Trump, he's not in there anymore, he didn't do a good job.
Let's just not care about him.
No.
His indictment is our indictment, and it's this war on terror on us now, so we need to defend President Trump.
Trump wasn't a failure.
He did an overall great job.
He was the man in the arena.
But he's gone now, so we don't have Trump to kick around anymore.
This case is not a case of the former president really being on trial, nor is it a case of what happened or didn't happen on January 6th.
This is a case in which the country which the Constitution is on trial, in which Congress is on trial, in which America is on trial, and the question is whether we're going to adhere to our constitutional precepts and principles, protect those constitutional rights and remedies, and recognize the legitimate concerns of ordinary Americans, and address them in the manner that the Constitution requires.
Or whether we're going to go down a path in which we decide to use and weaponize every political tool that we have, contaminate and corrupt every principle that we have, in order to use these political tools and to weaponize those political tools against our political and ideological adversaries.
And that's the real core question of the case.
That's what the legacy of the case is going to be.
Does the First Amendment matter, or does the President of the United States no longer have it?
Does the Fifth Amendment due process rights matter, or does even the former President of the United States not have it?
Does the Bill of Attender limitations on congressional action matter, or can they even apply it to the former President of the United States?
Does the impeachment clause have the limitations our founders put on it, or does it no longer mean anything and Congress can do whatever they want to whomever they want, including even the President of the United States?
The entire proceeding is a joke.
They have relied entirely not upon admissible evidence.
If this was a real trial, we would have a real judge.
If it was a real trial, we wouldn't have conflicted jurors.
If this was a real trial, we wouldn't have fraudulent evidence.
If this was a real trial, we would have a real criminal complaint.
If this was a real trial, it would comport with the Constitution, not make a joke of the Constitution.
The only person they ever even thought about trying was a former defense secretary who resigned rather than lose office position.
And the Senate ultimately confirmed in their acquittal, which is the constitutionally precedential vote, that they did not have even jurisdiction or authority to have the trial in the first place.
So there's been nothing like this in our history.
Not only that, there's never been a time where we've used someone's speech as the sole basis to call it an impeachable offense.
This is also the only time in which we have said that, other than the Ukrainian nonsense, also against Trump, that we've said that you can impeach someone for something that doesn't fit a statutory crime.
They don't even allege a crime here.
At least in the Ukraine case, they kind of tried to allege a crime.
They don't even allege a crime here.
They want to say that we, the Congress, can punish and disbar anyone we want, anytime we want, anywhere we want, by any means.
Not only is there incredible duplicity and incredible hypocrisy in the two-tiered system that they're trying to promote and the standards that everybody can witness for everybody to watch, but the other component of all of this is that they're also falsifying what the president did!
I mean, they took the president's speech out of context.
Which you can't do under the rules of evidence if the rules of evidence would apply.
They falsified tweets that didn't even exist.
They lied about what Senator Lee even said.
They're willing to lie about what people that are in the jury pool said.
That is the degree to which they're willing to go.
And they said that Trump supporters at his direction burned down the church, that the Democrats publicly burned down and made a huge deal on June 1st that Trump went to the church with a damn Bible.
I mean, it's like literally saying that Jesus crucified Satan 2,000 years ago.
Or that Lex Luthor's the good guy and Superman's the bad guy.
It's just to see how much gaslighting they can get away with.
Increasingly, it's a statist mindset.
It's a Stasi mindset.
It's a Soviet mindset.
It's like what they have in North Korea, where most North Koreans still to this day believe that certain prior leaders actually came or were born on that land.
I mean, it's just the level of nuts with this is just off the charts.
But it reflects sort of a broader mindset and a broader mentality.
And the impeachment is about how much can they get away with?
Can they violate the Constitution?
And every concept we have of a fair trial, every concept we have of free speech, every concept we have of constitutional constraint, can they violate it?
They want to see how much they can get away with because they want to set a precedent that they want to continue to do this on a much broader scale moving forward.
And see how much gaslighting they can get away with.
I mean, just blatantly falsifying evidence that's provably false within minutes to the whole world.
I mean, when you confuse basic things like cavalry and calvary, right?
Someone talking about, you know, praying in recognition of Jesus versus praying for some sort of cavalry to raid something.
They're doing basic confusions like that, deliberately lying and gaslighting about that.
But it's what the media has been doing for the last four years.
And you think about it, they have been warning us for the last four years that someone would seek the presidency to enrich his family on behalf of being bribed by a foreign government and going to be in collusion with a foreign government.
Yes, it's confession through accusation, confession through projection.
And that's what they're doing.
Like, if you listen to their speech, there's a good video up today about the showing that if you take the words that the Democrats are using, they apply particularly to other Democrats, including the Democrats using those exact words, like Congressman Raskin.
You know, saying that if you contest an election, that's illicit incitement.
It's Raskin himself who contested the 2016 election in the House in 2017.
So you look at a sort of broad scale, what happened in the background of Kenosha was Democrats greenlighting violence, encouraging violence, and really inciting violence, if you look at some of the language they used, rewarding it, protecting it.
Our current vice president, Uh, calling for the bailout of all the people that committed that mass scale violence in Minneapolis, and that put into motion the things that happened in Kenosha, where a lot of outsiders came into the city and were burning down people's businesses, assaulting individuals that were local, and most of the people doing these crimes against the community were from outside the community.
And so you have someone like Kyle Rittenhouse who ends up just defending his life that day, trying to help defend his friends and other people he knew, and was assaulted for doing so, effectively.
And yet he is the one that they hold up and try to gaslight everybody that all that happened in Kenosha is all somehow Kyle Rittenhouse's fault.
It's not the fault of the politicians who failed to sit in the National Guard, and particularly the governor.
It's not the fault of the local political apparatus that failed to have the policing adequately present.
It's not the fault of the Democratic politicians nationwide who greenlit this violence.
It's not the fault of the celebrities and social media influencers who incentivized it and encouraged it.
It's not the fault of woke corporate America who helped fund it and pay for it.
Somehow it's the fault of a poor kid from Antioch.
So it's a perfect microcosm of them launching attacks all over the country for years, and then a million people show up and a few hundred break into the Capitol with government aid, and then everybody's bad, and every conservative should be put in a FEMA camp.
In fact, I saw a National File article, I don't have it in front of me anymore, you're representing another fellow that got attacked by anti-fund, pulled a gun, that's going to the Supreme Court.
There it is, Robert Barnes takes case, a man convicted for defending against BLM, the Supreme Court.
He'd been previously beat up and assaulted in Portland.
He has a little site about laugh at liberals.
He just sort of documented some of the crazy things that happened in these riotous type settings.
Because he'd been previously beat up, he went and got his training.
He learned how to do it.
He's maybe 5'6", 5'7", small guy.
He's on the spectrum.
Uh, and so he learned, okay, how do I defend myself so this doesn't happen in the future?
And he gets his training, he gets his, uh, his right to carry his, his right to carry.
And on that day, a huge group of big, mean, nasty looking folks decide they're going to beat him up again just for filming a political activity in public protest.
And all he does is, while backing up, he pulls out, shows his gun, consistent to his training, then puts it away.
Nobody's hurt, nobody's harmed, because he takes self-defense action.
And what do the web-politicized prosecutors in Oregon do?
They charge him with 17 crimes.
And so they end up, he ends up not even getting a jury trial, all kinds of crazy things happen through the judicial process, and now they've redefined self-defense in Oregon, that your state of mind and your life experience, you're not even allowed to introduce that into evidence.
So, if you had a bunch of human beings that were trying to rig an election, and you said, hey, listen, I want you to give Trump 15% over here, and I want you to give Trump 13.5% over here, and 5.5% over here, even human beings trying to replicate this wouldn't get it this perfect.
You can use the binomial probability formula, and the chance of that event happening is 1 over 10 to an exponent so large, there's not enough stars in the universe.
There's not enough atoms in the universe to explain the number.
The numbers produced by this election result can't happen naturally and humans trying to replicate the results would not be able to produce them this perfectly.
This evidence requires election officials to take a closer look and audit their results with real forensic experts.
I'm Christina Bobb, One America News, Phoenix, Arizona.
Mathematician says Biden electoral win, a statistical impossibility.
But I didn't just believe him.
There's other mathematicians that have found the same anomalies.
I went to the websites he talked about, the state websites, and saw it there.
The same exact algorithm, the same number, over and over again.
Impossible.
And we've even got cases where they split votes for Trump and Biden.
I mean, this is insane.
So, Edward Solomon, and I think one of his associates online was as well, is a number theory specialist and focused on elementary number theory and counting arguments.
He's dedicated his life to the study of numbers, fractions, and numbers that are pairwise, co-prime, and common.
Mobilus.
Edward has been compared to the character Will Hunting from Good Will Hunting.
He's a well-known guy.
I didn't know he was on the show.
I looked him up in the 19th Century Appetition.
And it goes on, he has completed what he believes to be proof of America's conjecture and awaits confirmation of the 2300 page document defending his work.
Edward is an appetitical savant and at least, but more likely, a mathematical genius.
And he's, again, Edward Solomon.
So Edward, I can go look at these numbers.
I'm not a mathematical genius, but I know how numbers work with numbers this long.
You don't have, magically, on multiple voting systems and counties, the exact same numbers popping up again in these weird fractions.
That shows, obviously, it's being applied by a computer program.
And, of course, the numbers were applied, if you look at it, against Trump for Joe Biden.
And we see it in the spikes and the rest of it.
So, good to have you here with us.
I appreciate you.
Good afternoon, Alex.
Well, first I want to start with what you guys just talked about with the gaslighting in the media.
A lot of the things that you hear, right?
Just a little comment I want to say there.
interview so thanks for joining us. Good afternoon Alex.
Good to have you here brother so where do you want to start you're the expert.
Well first I want to start with what you guys just talked about with the gaslighting
in the media a lot of the things that you hear right that's a little
comment I want to say there.
There's a scene from the Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare and the
suitor Petruchio insists that the Sun is the Moon And he forces Catherine to concede that the sun is the moon.
And then when she concedes the point, because even though she knows the moon is not the sun, or the sun is not the moon, then they say, you're a liar, it actually is the sun.
It's absolutely, the gaslighting is really out of control.
I just wanted to say that as I was listening before we started.
So if this was, let's say hypothetically, this was a natural result, then it should be happening everywhere in Atlanta, not just in Fulton and Day Camp.
But that being said, we see here that we have 16 precincts starting at 1 in the morning on November 4th.
And this data comes with the New York Times Edison series.
So if there's anything wrong with the data, then it's an issue with the New York Times and Citel and Edison.
But that being said, this starts at 1 o'clock in the morning on November 4th, and ends at around 11 o'clock a.m.
on November 5th.
And each of these precincts, they assume a 5.55% percentage for Trump, meaning Trump gets 5.5% of the vote that comes in.
Exactly though, so that's a 1 to 18 ratio, meaning Trump gets one vote out of every 18 total that comes through these precincts.
And what happens here is that when this precinct abandons this ratio on the next update in the series, two more precincts come forward, and it's as if they inherit the ratio.
And then they abandon it, and then this precinct picks it up, and so on and so forth throughout this time series.
Now, this isn't the only ratio for which this occurs.
It occurs for several, including very bizarre ones, like Trump gets five votes out of every 113.
So when you have a large prime number in one of the parts of the ratio, it's very bizarre indeed.
So what's really happening is this entire strip in front of us is actually acting as one large precinct algorithmically.
I call it a virtual precinct, like in the cloud.
and they're diverting the initial ballots from these precincts into a container, a virtual container that's preset to a 1
The type of audit that I'm looking for, and that is the type of audit that Pulitzer was looking for, and I'm hoping that I could present a case that gives probable cause to allow Pulitzer to go ahead and do an actual audit, not just of what the ballots say, but the quality of the ballot itself.
Is it authentic?
Was it filled out by a computer?
Or was it filled out by a human being?
Does it belong to a registered voter?
Does it belong to a registered voter that is actually living in the state and things like that?
These are the questions that I want answered as well.
The down ballot is often missing on a lot of these ballots.
And from Bobby Biden's testimony in Georgia, there's actually a correlation between the first and last names of the people who voted in Pennsylvania and Georgia.
Which is interesting because I believe they used the same algorithm in Pennsylvania and Georgia.
Now, the way these algorithms work is they don't choose the winner.
They choose the loser.
So if they don't want you to win, if they want you to lose, they're gonna make sure you lose.
They don't choose it, they don't care who wins, they care who loses.
And if you're not part of the swamp, they're going to make sure that you lose.
And if this is not corrected and brought to light, what I have right in front of me, I have formulas that capture the probabilities of events, and not from some arcane research of my own, using well-established mathematics, then this is going to continue to happen for the remainder of this nation.
Well, I mean, and I think I've tried to communicate with people on the far left, the grassroots left, trying to show them how they cheated Bernie out of the primaries.
They're saying the sun is the moon and you have to agree, just like in the Taming of the Shrew.
That we are the deplorables, which is, you can replace the word taming of the shrew with the taming of the deplorables.
And as far as they're concerned, anybody who's authentically on the right or the left, you and me, or some real Bernie bros that I've talked about in Discord to get the information from for their primaries, we're all deplorables.
All right, so here is one of the ratios, 1 to 18, that I talked about previously, where Trump is getting one vote out of every 18 votes in a precinct.
And there's a total of 16 precincts in front of us.
And as you can see over this timeline in the slide, from midnight November 4th until afternoon of November 5th, you have a series of, I call them ratio transfers, and in the formal document that I'm writing, I call them ratio collisions.
And on each of these timestamps, so you see the first one is Fulton Precinct 10J.
At, um, and Precinct RW and Precinct SC2.
All three of these have these ratio at the same time.
Uh, Precinct 10J picks it up a few minutes earlier.
But then simultaneously at 2.33 AM, all three of these precincts abandon this ratio, and then it gets picked up by Fulton Precinct O2S.
And then at 2.52 AM, Precinct O2S abandons the ratio and it gets picked up by O3S.
Who then abandons that at 324 a.m.
and it gets picked up by two more precincts SC15 and SC23B.
And this process continues up until the afternoon of November 5th.
And it's not just these precincts and this particular ratio of 1 to 18.
Go down one slide.
And you'll see the spreadsheet there for the 1 to 18 ratio.
And while we're going down one more slide.
And that's a picture of all these ratio transfers for all the precincts and ratios combined that were flagged for suspicion.
And as you can see, even though the print is very small, it's dominated by Fulton and DeKalb in the county identifier.
It's actually two-thirds of Fulton's counties are flagged for suspicion.
And about one-fourth of Des Camps counties.
And after that, everything else is pretty quiet in the other counties.
It's only Jonesboro Park and Clayton.
And that's about it.
So we'll go one more slide, and I'm going to explain to you how this algorithm works.
All right?
Do you see total expected votes equals one million?
So we're going to do a hypothetical example here and we're going to say it's the city of Gotham.
All right.
And Biden, they're expecting a total, they projected internally, the internal bean counters for the Democrat party or the unit party.
They're projecting that there's going to be 1 million votes in Gotham.
It's going to be 48% Biden.
It's going to be 52% Trump.
Now these bean counters, They do their job very well.
So when they release these suppression polls saying that Biden's going to win Florida with 10% or something, they already knew that wasn't true.
They're doing that for exactly what Trump says.
I just want to point that out.
It's to suppress donations and enthusiasm.
But anyway, they have their real internal numbers and they're expecting it to be 48 Biden, 52 Trump at 1 million.
They say, okay, we're going to separate these million votes into two batches.
The natural vote and the manipulation vote.
I call it the flip set.
So they're going to take 700,000 of these ballots of the million.
They're going to put them to the side and they're never going to touch them.
That's going to let them go 48% Biden, 52% Trump.
So they've already accounted for the aggregate across the county or across the city.
And what they're going to do then is they're going to take the other 300,000 votes and they're going to flip them at a very particular percentage in order to ensure a Biden victory, a razor thin margin.
So in this example, we're going to do 66% Biden and 33% Trump, instead of 73-27.
And instead of having 20-30-40 ratios that they use, we're going to go with 4.
And they're going to create 4 virtual precincts.
They're going to be, the first virtual precinct, Trump is going to get 1 out of 10 votes.
The second one, he's going to get 1 out of 5.
The third one, he'll get 1 out of 3.
And the fourth precinct, he'll get 2 out of 3 votes.
And they're going to set up a very simple linear system of equations here.
They're going to take the grand total there, 300,000.
It's the total amount they're going to play with.
And they're going to say that equals x, y, z, t. And they're going to take the amount of votes that Trump is supposed to get out of it, so 33% of that number is 100,000.
And they set that to x over 10, plus y over 5, plus z over 3, plus 2t over 3.
It's that simple.
And then they solve that, and there's many different solutions to this, and this is just one of them.
And they get about 90,000 for the first precinct and 40,000 for the second and 89,000 for the third and 79,000 for the fourth.
So what that means is they have to feed, if we look at the second virtual precinct that's 20% Trump, they have to feed 40,285 ballots into that precinct and flip them at a rate one to five Trump.
And if you do that for all these precincts, you're going to get exactly 300,000 ballots total and 100,000 for Trump.
So we'll go to the next precinct, the next slide.
This is a virtual precinct too, so we're going to walk how this algorithm works at the physical level now.
And we're going to have three elementary schools, A, B, and C. So elementary school Alice, Beth, and Kathy.
And between them, they have 10,000 votes.
So we have 3,000 votes in Alice and 4,000 votes in Beth and 3,000 votes in Kathy.
And the algorithm takes control of these three elementary schools and either resets or injects more ballots to achieve an aggregate of 20% Trump.
So Trump will get 2,000 votes out of this batch of 10,000.
So now they fed 10,000 out of the 40,000 ballots they need into this ratio.
Then they disband this ratio.
They release control of these elementary schools and they never use them again.
They never toy with them.
They never manipulate them again.
And they seize two more precincts.
So this will be your high school with 7,500 votes and another elementary school with 2,500.
And that will be a grand total of 20,000 with the precincts above it.
So now Trump is getting 4,000 votes out of this 20,000 combined.
Then the algorithm will release control of those and then simultaneously seize the last three precincts it needs.
And that will be another high school, X, with 8,000 votes.
That could be a stadium with 12,000.
And this could be a small church with 285.
And now they fed a total of 40,285 ballots into this virtual precinct, flipped at a ratio of 1 to 5 Trump.
And if you do that for all the other precincts in the above slide, you're going to get exactly
33% Trump and 66 or 67% Biden. And by doing that, because they're taking the aggregate state into
account before they run this algorithm, they know that that's what the result will be.
And Biden will manage to win by a razor thin margin.
They have, the bean counters have all these numbers and the algorithm has- And that's why what you're saying is so key, because I talked to Trump, I talked to the White House, I talked to his lawyers, they all knew, no, they're using ballots to manipulate, but it's still fraudulent, then everybody else gets diverted onto Dominion and all that, like as if the company was doing it, no, it was being done- No.
By the fake ballots fed in that were already in reserve, correct?
Instead, it covers what they actually did through the software.
Exactly.
Anybody can pick your lock, get in your house.
Doesn't mean Masherlock did it.
We'll be right back with our guest, he's really smart, Edward Solomon.
Wow, this is, he's breaking it all down with the real numbers, folks.
This is history, stay with us.
Welcome back, final segment of this hour.
I'll host a little bit of the next hour without Nick Beggins to take over.
Got some breaking news I'm gonna be hitting after our guest leaves us, but listen.
So many listeners are new, and so they tune in, they think.
Oh, Jones is criticizing Sidney Powell.
He must be jealous of her.
Like, I'm in a competition.
I'm not in a competition.
I want to beat the globalist.
Sidney Powell, I think, means well, but she's like, oh, Dominion is controlling it from their headquarters.
It's just like our guest just said, no.
Just because you have a Microsoft computer doesn't mean someone that hacks your computer is Microsoft.
It was the ballots, and I had that from good White House lawyers that got sidelined.
Robert Barnes was working for Trump.
He told me, like two days after the election, he said, they're going to claim it's all about Dominion, they're all going to get sued, and that's a globalist group manipulating them.
Powell's not bad.
The other lawyers, he said, wasn't bad.
He was right.
I talked to other people at the State Department.
They said, no, it's fake ballots being fed in that they hold in a group they use to manipulate.
That's how they're doing it.
And it was local Democrats doing it in these six states.
And here's Edward Solomon laying that out.
And so that's why it's a red herring to say, oh, Dominion.
And I said this way before Dominion filed lawsuits.
I said this back in November.
I was like, OK, guys, you're all saying Smartmatic, Dominion.
Those are just the operating systems.
Anybody can hack a computer.
It's like saying, oh, well, an iPad got hacked.
It was Tim Cook did it.
No, Tim Cook runs death camps in China.
And thinks that's okay, and is an article saying it's okay.
That's Tim Cook.
He runs death camps.
Tim Cook, when your Apple iPhone gets hacked, it's not usually Tim Cook.
So, Edward Solomon, we really appreciate your time.
We've got about 10 minutes left.
Lay out for people more of this incredible evidence you're giving people from the state websites, from the Secretary of State, from their own numbers.
Impossible stuff, where all over at exact times, exact numbers happen that are just insane.
So, these, the voting machines, they have to have measures in place to actually correct
incorrect tabulations.
There's also older methods of voting that aren't implemented right now, such as ranked choice voting or the single transferable vote, that are built into these machines, but they're not activated.
They're not supposed to be active.
And it is possible for a small cabal, overseas even, if these machines are connected to the internet, which apparently they were, especially in Georgia, Uh, in Atlanta.
So yeah, they should have been putting these updates on these machines long before the election itself.
And another thing going on with Sydney is, this is another thing I disagree with, I don't believe that the turnout for Trump was so great that we had to shut down Uh, everything nationwide in the battleground states.
What I think they did instead was they let us vote to give them the information we needed, and then they shut everything down statewide to calculate their parameters to enter into the algorithm.
The scene from The Taming of the Shrew where Petruchio says to Catherine in the play, the sun is the moon, and she eventually Breaks down and concedes and submits and says, yes, my husband, the sun is the moon.
Oh my god, it's so, like, there's no way any person that's capable of rational thought believes it.
They just know they have to accept the narrative, otherwise they'll lose their jobs, they'll lose their bank accounts, and if you lose your job and your bank account, then you're going to lose your house, your car, and your marriage, and your kids while you're at it.
People are afraid to speak up.
So, like, I have all these documents in front of me, well-established mathematics concerning statistics and number theory, And I see other great minds have wrote these things.
That was the problem, because Giuliani was a guy who prosecuted big crime families.
He wanted something simple that people could understand and say, here's a group of people that are responsible for this treason and this crime against the United States.
That's not what the data is showing.
The data is showing me that it was a very small cabal of mathematicians and physicists.
I'm fighting somebody who has a degree in nuclear physics.
His name is Eric Coomer.
That's who I'm fighting.
Based on what I saw in Michigan, there were the equations of Brownian motion, which has to do with the motion of particles, popped up in the middle of election results in Michigan.
Why is there results from particles inside of a box, gas molecules?
You know, I'm not making as much of it as I should.
I'm deeply disappointed in the United States Senate.
Initially, I thought there was no constitutional warrant for bringing the case to trial.
After doing some research, including reading a wonderful book by a man named Frank Bowman called High Crimes and Misdemeanors, I'm persuaded there is a right to impeach Trump.
But I really don't understand the necessity to do so.
I think the United States Senate is missing the right questions, and the right questions is why did people feel so profoundly disaffected by the government, uninspired and untrustworthy of the government, that they appeared in Washington and on some of them did storm the Capitol?
I mean, it looks like a show trial.
I can't imagine anything like this that has ever taken place in American history, where actual witnesses and victims served as both judges and juries, speaking to the press, giving interviews during the presentation.
Well, it doesn't happen anywhere but in an impeachment, Alex.
And, you know, the fact is the Constitution gives the impeachment power to Congress.
It's one of our checks and balances.
And the law is that the House votes articles of impeachment and then Senate must try it.
No one else.
And so, you know, whether the founders contemplated a situation like what obtained on January 6th is an open question.
But the fact is that in no other proceeding Uh, would a person be able to sit as a juror in their own case?
And what I found particularly offensive about the Senate trial were the videos that were shown.
Um, it's not as though these folks needed to see videos.
They were there!
You know, the cheapest trick in the plaintiff lawyer's book is to show bloody photographs to a jury, getting them wound up hopefully to make a million dollars.
These guys needed to be reminded of what happened two weeks ago.
And so we've all been mesmerized by the impeachment trial.
We're still suffering the after effects of Trump derangement syndrome while Biden does exactly what Chuckie Schumer said would happen if the Democrats got a majority in the Senate.
They're going to change the country.
Well, they're going to try.
And I think they're not asking the fundamental question.
What were people so pissed off about, about January 6th, that this happened?
You've got, I have a seven and a half minute compilation video in game now, where it's former CIA director, current CIA Democrat saying, we want to arrest and drone and kill and have war with 75 million voters.
I don't want a war, but it doesn't intimidate me at the same time.
These people are like starting a fight with a 10,000 pound gorilla.
Jefferson said in a letter to John Adams' grandson, shortly after Shea's Rebellion, at about the time the Constitution was being debated, you know, a revolution every 20 years or so isn't bad, isn't a bad idea.
The people should push back.
And we need to refresh the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.
I'm not calling for violence.
I don't want violence.
I want a government that works.
But if it doesn't work, I'm not going to sit back and pray to the heavens for relief.
Well, you know, the legal team, he changed lawyers right on the eve of trial, and that's never a good idea.
And then apparently the House managers' opening statement caught his lawyers by surprise.
And candidly, the House managers kicked their butts, both in terms of the oral presentation and in terms of the brief.
Their brief was outstanding.
Trump's lawyers were caught flat-footed and gave a rambling, unfocused opening statement that led people to wonder who was in charge and what was going on.
I'd heard stories that the president himself was very upset.
They rebounded today, though, and his lawyers gave a good argument about the unconstitutionality of the proceedings.
It's one I would have rejected, candidly, but it was a good, solid argument, the best argument you can make.
And they also argued powerfully, and I think persuasively, that the President had a First Amendment right to say what he did, and his speech does not constitute incitement.
So I think, I suspect the president will win on the impeachment debate or the impeachment trial.
It'll be a close vote.
It may be five, six or seven senators will, Republicans will join the Democrats.
But it takes a two-thirds majority to convict and I simply don't see that happening.
I think in the end, the American people are going to have been left with a sense that this was a show trial, and they're going to wonder why the time, energy, and expense, and all it will really succeed in doing is keeping alive the partisan division that's destroying the country.
I've heard talk that Schumer is thinking about trying to use the 14th Amendment in a proceeding next to try to prevent or prohibit Trump from running again.
Well, yeah, in Reconstruction after the Civil War, if you were a Civil War officer and it had gauged an active insurrection, it took an act of Congress to make you eligible to sit for office again.
I think it's an imperfect fit for Mr. Trump and it's never been used before.
martial law decree that's discredited, and the fact that you can project something from a discredited time onto a president is bigger than a constitutional crisis.
I mean, it's just an announcement of total congressional hegemonic dictatorship.
I mean, look, Alex, you'll get no disagreement from me that the country is in a dysfunctional mess, and it's in what looks to me almost like a death spiral.
You know, Cicero, the orator, Roman orator, once said that a republic, a raised public, or a public thing isn't just any collection of people, it's people bound together by common interest and a common conception of right.
We don't have it anymore.
And big tech's part to blame.
I mean, they are strangling free speech by marginalizing By throwing people they don't agree with offline.
And where do they expect us to go if we disagree?
Do they really think they're going to strangle us and keep us silent?
No!
People will find other sources, other places to go.
There's a new online product this week called 74Million.com.
They always say, build your own thing, but then Big Tech and the banks and all of them, these globalists, they organize around defeating us trying to get our own system.
And people who are deprived of hope resort to desperate measures.
You know, John Locke, who wrote the classic on consent as the basis of government in the second treatise of government in the 17th century, wrote about a so-called appeal to heaven.
You know, and that is if you feel that your government has failed you, you have a right to revolt.
And there's a war going on, as you point out, that's why it's called InfoWars.
And there's a war against free speech right now.
I want to pivot quickly, if I may.
I see we've got just a couple minutes.
Since I spoke to you earlier today and agreed to come on, we have filed in the United States
Supreme Court for you today a petition for InfoWars, for you, for free speech systems,
a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a decision in a Connecticut court refusing
you the right to have a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against you on First Amendment grounds.
And we're going to watch carefully to see what the court does because in our view, what
happened to you is you used this forum, this very forum we're on right now to speak out
and to voice suspicions and concerns that you had every right to voice.
And then a court took away a right of yours as a litigant based on things that you said outside of a courtroom and in the absence of any order that prohibited you from speaking and in the absence of any finding that you violated the law.
So basically the court made the law up as it went along.
It's good to be here on this Friday afternoon in most of the country, just before noon here in Anchorage, Alaska.
And, you know, thinking about all of this stuff, the free speech issue, just as the last segment ended, I think is probably the most important issue in the country.
Not just about being banned from all the various platforms, but really the re-examination of the opportunity to have free speech.
I mean, this is really insane, what's been removed from us.
And the push polling, the way the mainstream media has been organized around really huge, huge interests that are not yours and mine.
And, you know, the press, the free press was always about keeping an informed electorate, an informed population so that we could have a vigorous public debate.
Which meant a lot of dissension, you know?
We used to have duels, too, but we don't do that anymore, you know?
But we have a lot of dissension, which is an appropriate way to develop public policy.
Not violent dissension, for sure.
We've decided that dueling is out of the order, out of order now, and a bunch of other things.
But the idea that our ability to speak in a digital world through the airwaves, In the most open way in the 21st century is ridiculous what's happened.
So I hope at some point we get the way in from the U.S.
Supreme Court to dial back what's happened with social media, the idea of banning people because you don't like what they say or their politics.
This is a fundamental error taking place within this republic right now.
And everyone in this fight, every one of you listening, Um, is in this fight because it's about us.
Um, it's about our grandchildren, our great grandchildren.
And no matter where you are, you know, in terms of your relations, your great, great, great grandchildren, and you don't even know yet, you know, we don't, we don't have any grudges against any of those people yet.
Um, what we do now is going to be for them.
All right.
For the people that are innocent of anything that we, we don't even know yet.
All right.
And it's this generation that's going to decide whether the digital world that's been created around us as we move into deeper into this century versus the material world that we functioned in with a set of values.
Should those values apply in the digital world of the 21st century?
I think most of you would agree they should.
And this is what's not being addressed by an archaic Congress, actually.
Because they don't have the technical knowledge.
They go into closed conferences where they can't take notes, they can't talk about what they heard, they can't do any of that.
And then they listen to these eggheads giving them the data, the BS on steroids, because there's no one there with enough technical knowledge to question what they're being told.
This is a scary time, ladies and gentlemen.
They can't even ask the right questions.
To the people that are in these closed conferences because they don't have the base of knowledge.
There's not enough technical people within the conference.
There's a bunch of lawyers.
There's a bunch of salesmen.
There's a bunch of people that shouldn't be there representing us for sure, but they're there and they got elected.
Most of them did anyway, legitimately, I think.
But the point is, they're at the national level.
They are all jerking our chain.
They are all feeding us fertilizer on steroids and you need to hold them accountable by making sure you're reaching in and demanding the right of free speech again.
And this, you have to do this.
This is fundamental to what's going on right now and everyone can take an action in support of this.
Whether you believe it or not, at least make the attempt.
You know, make the effort to do something.
And still within the Congress, a handwritten note matters.
Believe it or not, it still does.
Write them.
Tell them you want your privacy restored.
You want equal footing on the Internet for contrarian voices, whether they're politically correct or not.
People have a right to change the channel, not preempt someone's speech.
You can change your channel.
You don't have to listen.
But you don't have the right to shut anyone down.
Now, I got a very diverse family.
I mean, super liberal Democrats, moderate Democrats.
Independents, libertarians, conservatives, super conservatives, you know, we have the whole spectrum in my family.
And a bunch of undeclared, I mean everything.
And we get together and we have these debates that other people call holidays.
And yet we walk away, we still love each other, as the nation should, as we disagree with each other around the country.
But the thing that's happening now is it's about controlling your thoughts and controlling your speech and controlling your mind.
And the techniques I've lectured on for over 30 years that are being applied right now to the very technologies that most people are dialed into without constraint.
And even more so now, the level of monitoring, the penetration of personal privacy, the kicking in of your digital doorway.
Every single moment, everything that you're doing digitally is tracked and monitored.
All of your emails, all of your everything.
Say, oh, not my emails.
Yes, your emails.
Take a look at that 2018 budget.
They hooked a little thing on the budget Take a look at all international emails.
Well, that's a lot when they go through servers scattered around the world.
Among other things, you know, just one more layer, one more layer, one more layer of transparency for every private citizen as they kick in our digital doorways, as they limit our public speech, as they limit where we can travel, whether we can move about the country.
This is the hour, ladies and gentlemen, that we've all been talking about for decades.
And this is the hour.
This is the time that we have to wake up to what we are and begin taking specific action.
And I'm not talking about anything violent.
Don't give them an excuse to kick in your physical doorway, for God's sake.
But start Talking, writing, use the mail system.
For goodness sake, take actions that you can take.
And that's what we've been talking about in the time I have at the end of each week for the last several months.
You know, do something.
Take your power back.
Don't let these guys tell you what to think and tell you what to say.
Because here's the first dictate in controlling you, is to get you to first stop speaking your truth.
And then to get you to start repeating theirs, even if you don't believe it.
And when you do this, you shut down aspects of your conscience, the part that connects you to the universal.
When you begin to lie by withholding your truth and then begin to lie deeper by repeating theirs.
This is the first step, the absolute necessary ingredient for taking control of your mind and your behavior.
Is for you to cede, for you to give up.
To give up your truth.
In favor of what?
No, we need to turn the cameras around.
We need to turn the microphones around.
They need to look at every aspect of government at the local, the state, the national level.
The cameras should be in those rooms.
They should be in your kid's classroom with code so you can dial up and see whether the teacher's doing the job that you think they ought to be doing.
Or whether your kid is goofing off, maybe needs your attention.
How come it's always the other way around?
Why don't we get to look at what our public employees are doing on the coffee break or not?
Because there's a lot of dedicated people out there doing a lot of good work all over this country.
And then there's some that don't.
And we're paying the bill.
And these people, you know, we need whistleblower laws.
We need ways to screw this down.
We have all kinds of regulation, but not in the right order.
And not to protect you and me as individual citizens, to guarantee those constitutional rights that we value still as American citizens.
This is Dr. Nick Begich.
We're here on a Friday afternoon.
We'll be right back.
And welcome back.
You know, it's always good to be here on a Friday afternoon.
And I always forget to mention my website, earthpulse.com, E-A-R-T-H-P-U-L-S-E, earthpulse.com.
And you're welcome to go there, check out our stuff.
It all links you back to the InfoWars store, which is exclusively distributing most of my books and videos.
And so I really appreciate that.
The other thing I want to say is on the supplement side.
There's nothing better, you know, than what is offered through the InfoWars store.
The line, the entire line, high quality, top of the line products, things you can use, and again, the twofer.
You get to help the network.
Uh, and, uh, take care of your health.
And there's nothing that will piss off the left more, uh, than living to be a hundred, right?
I mean, so, uh, be healthy, uh, piss off the left, live to be a hundred years old, uh, and do things that are beneficial to your, uh, overall health.
You know, getting back into this, um, topic, you know, today thinking about just Just what's happened in terms of privacy, speech, basic liberties, and over the decades now, talking about this issue of controlling the human mind.
And that's one of my books, one of my videos out there.
And I talk a lot about this, you know, in the course of describing consciousness and aspects of it, you kind of weave in and out of the physics and the science.
But I want to talk about a A couple of things of that that are really fundamental to this and first in the last segment, some of the basic kind of stuff about getting you to agree to certain things, but then there's ways to entrain to sort of get the mind to sort of follow a narrative.
And the way this is done is through electromagnetic fields being manipulated in specific ways.
And so you can create a pulsation, a pulse rate, you can flicker lights, you can create an electromagnetic field that creates a certain pulsed signal.
And the key is, it has to be kind of like a, like a little bit of a hammering, you know?
And so what it does in various modalities, you can create where the brain locks onto these external signals.
And then you begin to follow it or begin to mirror that.
So you can change an emotional state relatively easy.
You can jack a person up, get them fearful and riotous even.
Or you can calm them down and get them to be very passive.
And you won't affect everyone, but you'll affect a big enough percentage to matter, okay?
Now, where does it go from here?
It goes a lot deeper, in fact.
One of the concepts I talked about over a decade ago now, longer than that even, it was a PBS special and it was called The World Wide Mind.
And it was a concept that would be operating like the internet, except it would link us, biologically link all of our brains together.
And the thought is that this would be done without any implanted technology.
In fact, research was started over eight years ago now at the University of California, where they were looking at brain activity to see what a person was specifically thinking.
So moving from just emotional state, which has been a long time easily to do.
So you could walk through airports, for instance, and tell who's nervous, who's fearful.
No, whether you're the hijacker or whether you're just a guy who doesn't like flying, you know, but this is already being deployed in various places to detect what your emotional state is.
You know, one of the other things I mentioned you hear talked about, you know, in terms of personal privacy, so how about public urinals or toilets, which do a DNA analysis or a chemical analysis to tell what's in you, what medications you're on, blah, blah.
Well, they don't have cameras in the bathroom.
No, but they do when you come in, you go out.
I mean, What do they have?
You know, do we really know?
The point of the matter is, we are living in the most directed and controlled society that anyone has ever contemplated in the history of man.
The technologies that are being deployed to override thinking and mind and emotion are extreme.
And I've talked a lot about this in the past number of shows on Fridays.
And this method is to keep us in the materialistic view of the world Um, to keep our mind and emotions sort of locked into this fear mentality that activates the reptilian brain, that flight or fight response when the lion's jumping out at you, but it activates adrenals.
It does a lot of other things that really stress the system.
This is part of it.
Is that you maintain the population in a constant state of anxiety, low-level anxiety, and you'll never reach your higher states of awareness.
Now, I want to say that again.
If you can just keep the population in a constant state of low-level anxiety, you'll never reach your higher states of awareness.
Your brain will not reach those places easily for most people.
Where you make your best decisions, your best intellectual and emotional decisions that sort of pull down from the spiritual into the mind, into the brain and then work downward the way it's supposed to operate.
From a spiritual center into the mind and brain and then downward.
What's happening is artificial technologies to come from the bottom up and stop here and cut you off from your consciousness and feed into you an artificial layer.
A technical layer.
That's based on electromagnetic fields and what you can move through the airwaves.
Okay, this is a really basic concept that's being screwed with on the level that in 30 years we've been talking about it, documented in the four books that are available still, there's over 1,650 source documents cited.
And this is the old material, okay, ladies and gentlemen?
What's been happening over the last decade is phenomenal in terms of what's going on right now.
And look at what they've done to jack up the fear model to the point of absolute insanity.
And that's the point, is that's what it does.
It breaks your connection to consciousness, to that peace that brings it in a different way.
This is part of the mission, is to keep us locked into the flesh.
This is part of the programming that happens every day on the mainstream media.
When you plug into the mainstream media, you are plugging in to the biggest propaganda feed that has a layer of technology on it now and an understanding of what that technology does that is unprecedented.
It's, you know, this is not a theory.
This is the science of all of this.
And we've allowed our political system This republic, this democratic republic, this country is being hijacked by a technocracy that is run by corporate giants that are globalist at every level.
It's you're just a consumer.
You're just a piece of meat in a system.
And that is not what we are.
We are way more than that.
And they know this at a fundamental level.
And it scares the hell out of them.
Let me say it again.
The globalists know that we have this potential as we travel back to the garden and remember again what we are is created in the image and likeness of God and claim our birthright, which is not some synthetic internet connection.
It is so fundamental to what we are as human beings that for centuries they've been suppressing it, trying to tell us that we're nothing.
All right?
And this is the wrong message.
We are way more than that.
And I've talked about doubt in the framework of faith in the past, because we need to start to hang a different framework.
Faith is what we know we can do and we act in a certain way.
Doubt is what we think we can't do and we act in a certain way.
A mustard seed of doubt is equal to a mustard seed of faith.
Mustard seed of faith will move mountains and a mustard seed of doubt will keep that mountain from moving.
They're equally powerful.
What do you have in your life?
A seed of doubt or a seed of faith?
Start doing the possible every day.
Take an action, even an action, a friendly action in favor of what we are as human beings.
As we roll into the weekend, as we think about our family and our friends and the generations to come that we do not know.
Take a few minutes.
Make it a family project.
Write some handwritten notes to your congressional delegation, your U.S.
Senators in your Congress, or Congresswoman.
Do it.
Just do it.
Pick up the phone if you're not going to do that and call them on Monday morning.
Just do it!
Do something in favor of reclaiming our republic.
Support this network, one of the free speech places left on the planet, the InfoWars.
And you're part of that war.
You are the InfoWarriors.
And it's made this all possible for all these years, for now decades.
And what we have to look forward to is the reclaiming of this democratic republic.
The reclaiming of our birthrights.
The reclaiming of those rights that our founding fathers understood.
That we've lost sight of life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness.
Let's make sure we re-engage those birthrights.
And make sure that our government projects those basic values back into this system.
Let us see our government come back to be of the people, by the people, and for the people.
You are the InfoWarriors.
unidentified
This is Dr. Nick Feggis signing off on a Friday afternoon.
We test it four or five times before it actually leaves our facility.
So the minute the raws show up, it gets tested before it gets produced, it gets tested during production, it gets tested after production, and it gets tested before it gets put inside of the buckets.
Well, what this packaging is, it's a really thick mylar.
And one of the things that separates us from some of the other brands is going to be this built-in Ziploc right here.
Let's say, for instance, you're going to have your Maple Grove opener, but you're not going to eat the whole thing.
Pour out just the proportion that you want to have, Ziploc that, throw that back in the bucket, use it within the next 7 to 10 days, and you're going to be good to go.
But again, if you ever take it out of there, you're going to have to pull plenty back in because it's so full.
Right here is a 30-day food supply.
Bucket 1 and Bucket 2.
You got this, you are taken care of.
Whether you're out doing a survival trip or camping or whether the apocalypse comes during the Great Reset, One person is set with 2,000 calorie meals.
A lot of the competitors aren't just low quality, they're not even close to 2,000 calories.
So, this is great for beginners.
Stick your toe in the water at mforestore.com with the one month food supply, bucket one and bucket two.
Everybody should have this.
unidentified
I'm telling you, everybody needs high quality store bought foods.
