The video discusses the ongoing conflict in Syria and potential involvement of foreign powers. It
interviews Leanne McAdoo about the situation on the ground, propaganda's role in shaping public
opinion, OPCW's importance in investigating chemical weapon use, and calls for impartial
investigation before taking any action that could escalate tensions further. The video also touches
upon Assyrian Christians being disarmed by Kurds, Turkey smuggling chemical weapons into Syria with
approval from Hillary Clinton, regime change plans pushed by politicians like John McCain, false
flag attacks staged to justify US intervention in Syria, and concerns about Donald Trump's recent
actions. It criticizes selective reporting in mainstream media regarding events happening around the
world such as bombings and civil wars; promotes various health supplement products available at
InfowarsLife.com; discusses political news topics like Obamacare repeal, Neil Gorsuch's confirmation
hearing for Supreme Court Justice, recent events involving Syria and China's leader meeting with
President Trump at Mar-a-Lago; encourages listeners to stay vigilant against deep state actors
pushing globalist agendas; highlights concerns about Donald Trump’s administration and influence of
different political factions within it; discusses Philippine President Duterte wanting his military
to occupy some islands in the South China Sea during their Independence Day celebrations while
addressing currency manipulation, unfair trade practices, and North Korea's nuclear program with
Chinese President Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago. It also covers issues like transgender bathroom issue
being used as part of an agenda moving away from consenting adults; personal touches between US
presidents and Chinese leaders not working effectively in diplomacy; Trump’s recent actions on Syria
and Obamacare repeal; Islamophobia and xenophobia within the US with callers expressing concerns
about hate crimes against Muslims; immigration policy regarding people coming into the United States
illegally; various products available at Infoworkstore.com including MycoZX, Secret 12, Survival
Shield X2 etc., all of which have five-star ratings due to their effectiveness in improving overall
health and wellbeing while also funding the operation with hardcore truthful information."
And this week is the exact reason why I have not owned a television for about 15 years now because of just the amount of propaganda that they pump at us.
And it's the same thing.
Wag the dog.
You know, it's like Groundhog's Day.
Did we not learn anything from the babies in the incubator?
They would not learn anything from what Bill Clinton did when he would go and bomb Iraq, when there would be revelations that would be damaging to him politically.
With Monica Lewinsky, the very next day after the House comes up with articles of impeachment, he goes and bombs Iraq.
And so now we have these damaging revelations about Susan Rice, and this comes up right away.
At the same time, they push out Bannon, who has spoken against foreign policy that's based on regime change.
That's what Donald Trump And if we go back four years ago, as I said, this is deja vu all over again.
This is what we have seen and we saw it before.
Let me read you four years ago to our very foolish leader.
Do not attack Syria.
If you do, many very bad things will happen.
And from that fight, the U.S. gets nothing.
That was Donald Trump, September 2013, when this exact same scenario was created for us.
Then again, he says, President, Fill in the blank.
Do not attack Syria.
There is no upside.
Tremendous downside.
Save our powder for another more important day.
Another one.
The only reason the president wants to attack Syria is to save face over our very dumb red line statement.
Do not attack Syria.
Fix the USA. That's what we had an election for.
We wanted to fix the USA, not get involved in this disastrous policy of regime change.
Now we have Donald Trump Agreeing with Lindsey Graham and John McCain with another set up and that's what we want to talk to Syrian girl about.
I mean in just a day before where he was saying that he hadn't changed his mind on how he wanted to deal with Assad.
We've got Tulsi Gabbard who was kind of like the Democratic darling.
She went, took this secret trip to Syria where she actually met with Assad.
She got the opportunity and she said, you know what, I was not going to turn down the opportunity to meet with him.
And she really got lambasted for that.
People were so angry with her for doing that.
But she said, listen, I visited Syria.
I met with the people there.
And our counterproductive regime change war does not serve America's interests.
And it certainly is in the interest of the Syrian people.
So now after this latest attack, she is tweeting out saying, you know, anyone who's responsible must be held accountable, whether it be Assad or ISIS or Al-Qaeda or anyone who...
Is in that area who is going to have access to chemical weapons.
So she's not necessarily changing her tune from what she brought back from that initial visit.
But she is also saying, you know, she's not making it as abrupt of a flip-flop.
We had had gas attacks before in the area that they had found had been done by rebels.
There was an investigation that was eventually done, and we had not only the U.N. and Russia, but also U.S. investigators who said this is not – there's no proof that this was done by the Syrian government.
So we had this discussion before, and the thing that concerns me, and as we're talking about essentially the civil war that's going on in the White House, which they say is not happening, but we can see the signs of this.
We know that there are different advisor groups there.
This really does have consequences.
They had to get rid of General Flynn Who had explained to everybody, who understood that we had created armed and trained ISIS, that we were funding them for regime change.
We've seen this happen, the disasters that have happened in Libya, creating more problems than they've solved, solving absolutely nothing.
But let's go to Syrian girl now.
Syrian girl, tell us, from your perspective, what you're seeing there with this false narrative.
Last time in 2013, I actually told Alex Jones that this false flag attack would result not in an invasion of Syria, but Basically, disarmament.
This was before Putin even said anything about disarmament.
And the reason I know that is because I know that the US would never invade a nation that they know possesses chemical weapons or any sort of weapon of mass destruction.
And they had to remove those weapons in order to enter the Syrian sphere.
And that is exactly what I said would happen, that a few years down the line, they would come back and claim that Syria didn't, in fact, get rid of its chemical weapons and they would use it as it causes Belli to invade.
And we've seen that happen with Iraq.
It's exactly the same thing.
In 1991, Iraq got rid of its chemical weapons.
In 2003, in spite of the OPCW saying that Iraq no longer has chemical weapons, The Iraq war still happened, and we end up with ISIS. We end up with terrorism around the world.
unidentified
We end up with chaos, and we end up on the brink of World War III. You mentioned, hang on a second, you mentioned OPCW. Let's put that out.
Most people are not paying attention to that kind of detail.
That's the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
This is an organization that is tasked by the Security Council of the UN to go around and examine whether or not these people had these weapons.
And as this happened, The response from the Russian spokesman, Zaharova, said it is crucial to call upon an OPCW fact-finding mission in charge of investigating the use of chemical weapons in Syria to collect evidence of the incident after the following condition.
Composition of the fact-finding mission will be submitted to the UN Security Council for approval.
It will be balanced in terms of geographical representation.
So if we're going to go to war, if we're going to set the area on fire, if we're going to escalate this, can't we at least have a reasonable investigation and hope that there are going to be people from both sides taking a look at this and presenting forensic evidence before we just run off half-cocked and start shooting the world up?
I mean, the responses that I've seen from that is that if it's weaponized, that they would need to have full hazmat materials, or they would die from that if it's fully weaponized, as you would expect a state to be using.
Everyone has seen the photos and the videos of the white helmets using their bare hands.
Siren can be absorbed through the skin and it will kill you.
Weaponized siren will kill thousands.
The Tokyo siren attack resulted in 12 dead, but 4,000 injuries, and that was homemade siren alone.
If it was weaponized siren, we would be looking at a completely different scenario.
Obviously, it's very interesting that Turkey would come out and say that it is, in fact, sarin, because we've seen the narrative shift so many different times.
At first they said it was sarin, then they said it was chlorine.
They can't quite decide on the narrative because If they say it's sarin, people then say, well, Syria got rid of its sarin, so how could it be Syrian sarin?
So then it comes back to the fact that there's been multiple reports that the rebels have chemical weapons, that they have sarin, that Hillary Clinton brought Libya's chemical weapons To the Syrian rebels.
This is a Seymour Hersh article.
And in fact, the United Nations said that they suspected the attack that happened in 2013 was behind what the rebels were behind.
This was Carly Del Ponte.
You can also look that up.
So we have a lot of evidence that this is a false flag.
In fact, more evidence than last time.
Last time it was very Well-timed because the OPCW had arrived in Damascus the same exact day as the chemical attack happened.
And that was because they were brought to Damascus by the Syrian government to investigate a chemical attack that was conducted by the rebels in Aleppo a month earlier.
And now we have also, again, perfect timing.
Trump says Assad is no longer a priority.
The next day, you know, two days later, you get this false flag attack and suddenly Trump is changing his tune.
But before we leave the Michael Flynn thing, it's very clear that not only did they want Michael Flynn removed, but they have tried to purge people that he brought in.
The CIA made it very clear.
We've had a lot of media reporting, both for and against Trump, reporting that the CIA has said that these individuals that Flynn brought in were unacceptable to them.
Why?
Because they want to do this false flag.
So let's talk about the evidence that this particular attack was a false flag.
Well, you know, putting aside the perfect timing that this happened, where the State Department just made a statement that they no longer see removing Assad as a priority, and that the Syrian people must decide their own president.
Aside from that, a lot of the reports are coming from the so-called White Helmets NGO, which is George Soros-funded.
It's receiving UK and US tax dollars, and they've been filmed carrying al-Qaeda flags around Taking part in executions, hanging out with the child beheaders of the Nur al-Zinqi group, one of the rebel groups that the CIA vetted and gave weapons to, which ended up beheading a child.
Channel 4 News featured a video of those child beheaders hanging out with the White Helmets.
I, on one of my channels, Syrian Girl War, have a video of two white helmet members torturing a Syrian soldier.
The white helmets, as we now know very clearly, are the same individuals that are with Al-Qaeda.
They just put on a white helmet and suddenly they're no longer Al-Qaeda.
And prior to this attack, a week before, in a Christian town in Hama, near Hama, there were actually 250 people that were kidnapped.
So it's very clear that these rebels do not care about civilians and they do not care about children.
They behead children.
So why would they care?
And in the past, they've used children as tools, pawns for this political agenda.
Well, you know, he was actually one of the people who was arrested on terrorism charges for kidnapping two British journalists in Syria.
And while they didn't have enough evidence on him, because the journalists couldn't testify, and he ran back away to Syria, he was actually removed from the medical board because of this incident.
And another interesting thing that was happening at the time is one of these Al-Qaeda-linked journalists posted on his Facebook that tomorrow we're going to begin a campaign about chlorine gas attacks.
And then this happens.
So once again, the media is unsure whether it's chlorine or it's sarin, they can't settle on it.
But there's been uncanny, they can't possibly be psychic.
You know, indicators that they've been pre-planning this false flag attack.
And in fact, they've been receiving hazmat suits and gas masks days before the attack happened.
So they must have known that they were going to use them.
The thing is that With Trump, there were signs that he maybe swayed early on.
He talked about safe zones.
People convinced him that safe zones were going to stop refugees, basically.
But safe zones were, in fact, just another word for no-fly zones.
It's just a rehash of that, which in its entirety is the plan to balkanize Syria.
They were saying we need to ground Syria's air force and so forth and so on.
And at the time, if you remember when we were talking about the false flag aspects, which were identical to this at the time, we were saying we're not going to be al-Qaeda's air force because we knew that we had ISIS, al-Qaeda, the White Helmets, whatever.
They rebrand them as they wish.
As people discover who they are, they come up with a new name.
But we knew what was going on there.
We had people like Flynn at the time telling us what was going on.
It was eventually exposed, what they had been trying to do, but they wanted us to essentially be their Air Force, and the purpose was regime change.
And if we're concerned about the deaths that are happening there, and we should all be concerned about that.
I mean, people really die.
That's the issue.
It's not that this is a fake incident there.
People really died.
They died horrific deaths.
That's why chemical weapons are banned.
So we're not saying that nothing happened.
We're not saying that this isn't a horrible situation.
What we're saying is, is that this policy of regime change that's been pushed by people like John McCain and Lindsey Graham is really what is responsible for this.
And we need to back off of that aspect of it, and we need to understand the telltale signs, as you're pointing out, you know, the fact that this happens immediately after some significant political events that are happening here, but also the fact That they immediately know who did this without any kind of investigation.
They've already got the solution in place just as we see when there's a mass shooting and immediately they want to roll out their agenda of gun control.
We know that that is a hallmark of a false flag operation when they immediately start selling their agenda that has been in place.
But we have seen this exact pattern four years ago.
And whoever planned this, perhaps they were also the ones that planned a meeting with Trump and the Jordanian king prior to the chemical attack.
So the meeting happened the day after, but the planning for the meeting happened before.
And Jordan is a key player, because some are saying that the US wants to, well, the deep state, in fact, wants to invade through Jordan and balkanize Syria and divide it in that way.
I hear a lot of people sometimes say, well, what's the problem with balkanization, especially in terms of the Kurdish issue?
The Kurds have been receiving very, very positive media from all sides.
You never hear anything bad about them.
They're supposedly fighting ISIS in the north, and they're hanging out with the US military.
The real fact is, however, is that they've been ethnically cleansing the Christian population in the northeast of Syria and Iraq because they are of the Assyrian ethnicity, and they do not want anyone in their region to be of an ethnicity other than Kurdish.
The regions that they're trying to take is filled with oil and agricultural resources, but Kurds are not a majority in those areas.
They only make up 40%.
To become a majority, there's been basically continuous ethnic cleansing campaigns.
They actually assassinated one and tried to assassinate a second Christian Assyrian leader, and then tried to pin it on ISIS. But because one of the people they tried to kill survived, he was able to go and tell his story and say, actually, it was the Kurds that tried to kill me.
They've been disarming the Christians in Iraq and confiscating their land.
Just look up the Assyrian Christians in Iraq and see the kind of things that they're saying.
Basically, creating a Kurdish state is going to expedite the end of the Christians in the Middle East because ISIS is just, you know, the excuse that...
To create these separate states.
It's basically an enzyme.
It was always made as a target.
And at the end of the day, the target is balkanization.
And they can't do balkanization unless they get rid of Assad, they get a UN Security Council Resolution 7, just like Iraq was under, so that they can be legally in there to legally change the Syrian constitution.
Because the Syrians refuse to put Anything that is religious or ethnically sectarian or racist inside our constitution.
So, unfortunately, the people who are in the deep state who refuse to give up on this idea are prepared to take us to World War III. And you see them threatening Iran, threatening North Korea, threatening Russia, threatening China in the South Sea.
Maybe they know that if this is really going to happen, it's going to happen on all fronts.
And that's what's concerning because we see people like John McCain.
Who seems to only get excited when the possibility of massive war and bloodshed is involved.
And that's the thing that concerns me, is the fact that we now have Donald Trump who campaigned and won on the idea that we are not going to set the world on fire with regime change.
We saw what happened in Libya.
Omar Gaddafi was not a great guy.
He was not a good guy.
Nobody is saying he was a good guy.
But things are fairly stable there.
We didn't have the kind of situation that we have now, which is an arms bazaar for terrorism.
Total chaos in the area.
And we started that.
And we're reaping the whirlwind after that.
And they're doing the same thing.
ISIS was created.
It's a rebranding of Al-Qaeda.
People need to understand what it represents.
The Islamic State in Iran and Syria.
That is the goal of what we have John McCain involved in.
And this is what is really concerning as I watch this.
As you're talking about the fact they set up this summit with the Jordanian king and so forth, they're very cleverly isolating Donald Trump from his voters, from the people, from the agenda that he ran on and won with.
That's why he needs to hear our voices.
People in America, We need to wake up and understand that it's not just the Syrian lives that are on the line.
It is our lives as well.
This chaos, this death, this destruction, this enabling and equipping and training of terrorists is going to blow back on us.
It already is in many places in the West.
That is what is so concerning about this.
We're not talking about increasing our safety and security by continuing these regime policies.
We're actually making it worse for Americans.
We're not going to be safer by spreading this kind of war and chaos throughout the Middle East.
It's a very complicated situation.
As you were pointing out, Syrian girl, we have different ethnic groups, we have different religious groups, we have different political groups.
They're all after resources in that area.
That is why the CIA is involved in this kind of divide and conquer policy.
And we need to push back against this deep state narrative that appears to be taking Donald Trump.
They couldn't defeat him in the election.
They couldn't defeat these ideas.
But now it appears that they're going to surround him and isolate him.
I always said that was the real issue that we're going to have.
They were going to, if there was a massive The groundswell of Americans who would push for this, push for Trump, push for this type of change, they would wait, let that happen, and then isolate the individual that was elected, and that's precisely what it appears they're successfully doing now.
Yeah, and I would like to know, what do you really want people to understand?
Because, you know, here we have...
Representative Tulsi Gabbard making that surprise trip to Syria, and she says she spoke with Syrian people all over the country who were saying that the regime change does not, that they don't want that there.
It's not in the interest of the Syrian people.
They want the West to keep to themselves.
But the only thing that we are being bombarded with is this seven-year-old Syrian girl and her heartbreaking plea, and she's blasted all over CNN. Seven-year-old Syrian refugee, Banna Alabad, and she was the one that was tweeting, famously, this seven-year-old tweeting from the war zone.
And now she's in Turkey with her family and making this plea to Assad.
And that's the only side of the Syrian people that we are given access to in the West are the people who want to fight Assad.
But people don't understand that it's a huge country.
So what can you help us understand about the Syrian people and what's in their interests?
Well, you know, this poor little girl is actually exploited by her parents.
Her father is a fighter.
He's a terrorist.
And her mother is the one making all the tweets.
And one of her most famous tweets is that, you know, We need a war in Syria, even if it means World War III. This is the humanitarian voice that we're supposed to follow.
She and her family, they're alive.
They weren't beheaded by US-backed moderate rebels.
They suddenly, you know, ended up from having the last message coming out of Aleppo and where I'm injured, I'm dead, I'm alive again.
Suddenly she ends up on Erdogan's lap in Turkey.
You know, I have photographs which I will release of their entire family inside Turkey in a playground.
It's claimed that this was before the war.
However, Banna appears to be the same exact age as she is now and not three years old, which would happen before the war.
So it's a ruse.
And there's another one.
Her name is Shami, I believe, another one of these voices that were supposed to represent the Syrian people.
And she, in her videos of Aleppo, would try to avoid showing you all the militants with guns.
The most famous one, though, is Bilal.
CNN reported him all the time.
He's an American in Syria and he's supposed to be the voice of Syria.
He was one of the people who had a last message for Syria.
A few days ago, he ends up on the US kill list of terrorists.
So CNN wants us to believe the guy who is now on the terrorist kill list.
It's an atrocious thing.
The Syrian people want the war to end, and they don't want terrorism.
They don't want to see the kind of horrific things that we saw this last week.
And that's what we need to understand.
I want to focus for a second here on Turkey.
Because you talked about the fact that this young girl winds up on Erdogan's lap.
When Seymour Hersh, who Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, exposed this a few years ago, he was talking about how rebels had smuggled in chemical weapons through Turkey.
There's a Turkish connection again, with the approval of Hillary Clinton, and you mentioned that earlier.
And then, of course, we now have the Turkish government saying, we have looked at these bodies, and this is sarin gas, and it only could have come from the Assad regime.
All of these things are bogus.
They're lies.
And so this is the key thing, I think.
When we look at this, when we look at the people who are pushing this narrative, and it is exactly what we saw four years ago.
We see Turkey pushing this.
We see John McCain and Lindsey Graham pushing this, who are the political arm of the CIA, if you will, and the Senate.
This is the thing that I find so obvious, and yet I'm very disturbed by the fact that Donald Trump seems to have been isolated from not only his campaign, but also from the voice of voters, from the voice of reason by the removal of Michael Flynn.
And others, and now with Bannon being pushed off of the National Security Council, there is no vote there to speak against this insane policy of regime change throughout the world.
And it appears to be working.
It appears that Donald Trump is going to follow Lindsey Graham and John McCain and goose-step off into World War III. Your comment, Syrian girl.
Well, Turkey, you know, the entire legion of ISIS enters Syria through Turkey.
They have been arming the insurgents, the Islamists, since the start.
Erdogan's government is Muslim Brotherhood.
A few weeks ago, the US was talking about putting the Muslim Brotherhood on the banned organizations list.
They are the reason that terrorism has spread throughout the world.
I don't know if he's been threatened, bribed or brainwashed, but he is completely different to the Trump we saw in 2013, who was saying that the stupidest thing you could do is attack Syria.
Yeah.
I think that there is a part of the US government who really doesn't want World War III, and they've been pushed out.
You have now Ted Postol, who's come out again since this attack, to mention the fact that the missile shield in Israel is not going to work, the Iron Dome, that it doesn't work.
And I feel that some of these individuals in power think that they can protect themselves or save themselves from a nuclear war But that everybody else can pretty much go to hell and that they're fine with that as long as they get full domination, full control, cut up countries as they like and redraw maps.
Doesn't matter how many people it kills, whether it's American soldiers or American people or European people or Syrian people, they don't give a crap.
And I guess the thing that is really concerning is this article we had at Infowars.com yesterday and the title was Report, Soros-linked group behind chemical attack in Syria.
Of course, we're talking about the White Helmets, the al-Qaeda-affiliated group, and you talked about that earlier.
But they conclude the article with this.
They say, NATO governments are unhappy with the Trump administration's recent statements that they no longer see regime change in Syria as a priority.
And in response to that, British Prime Minister Theresa May made a statement that Britain was still fully committed to regime change in Syria.
And so he makes that statement and then immediately After this happens, we see a complete about-turn.
And I guess that's the thing that really has us all so concerned.
That he not only campaigned and won on the issue that we weren't going to be fooled again by another false flag attack like we saw four years ago.
He was not fooled by it four years ago.
But then after he gets into office and the people who got him there get removed and it's very clear that he's being isolated.
Flynn is removed.
Bannon is removed from the Security Council.
And then all of a sudden this happens just as all that is going on.
The headline from Zero Hedge says it all.
On the same day Bannon removed from the NSC, Trump saber rattles war with Syria.
The people who surround the president really makes a difference.
And that's why I was so concerned with so many of his appointments early on.
Everybody said, just give him time.
He wants to have all these different voices at the table.
And it's like, they're going to isolate him from reality.
They're going to isolate him from the public opinion that got him elected.
And that's the very disturbing thing that I see is this isolation that is happening and the abrupt 180 that Donald Trump did this week on the basis of this attack.
I don't know.
Clearly, from your standpoint, you have a lot of insights as to what's going on in Turkey, and I think it's very important for Americans to understand exactly how that is being spun against us.
But it's also the NATO people that are there, and it's also the different wings within the Trump White House that are now coming to bear in this political move.
I want to ask you...
unidentified
I wrote that article, so thank you for reading it for me.
And in one of those, you were talking about the tweets.
Let's talk about this a bit.
Sarah Abdallah, who said, tomorrow a media campaign will begin to cover intense air raids on the Hama countryside and the use of chlorine against civilians.
Tipping that this was going to happen the next day.
Sarah Abdullah was tweeting a Facebook post by this individual from Orient TV. He's a journalist for Orient TV, who made that post on his Facebook the day before the chemical attack.
And again, it was a campaign.
So it's very interesting that he should know.
It's very interesting that they receive these gas masks.
And if you have a look through my Yes.
So I don't see how gas could cause that.
But, you know, it's certainly interesting.
Trump is being isolated.
The question is, though, what are the U.S. public going to do?
Because for a short time, I never believed that the US had a democracy that was alive.
I really believed that the deep state was completely in control.
We had a Clinton and a Bush and a Clinton and a Bush.
And with Trump's victory, with all of his rhetoric, we really thought that there was a chance that the world could change, that there could be some peace and that we weren't headed for this all-out war.
And now those hopes have been dashed.
So the question is, what is the US public going to do?
Because this is all unfolding before our very eyes.
We have to understand that now Donald Trump, who wrote these tweets that I read at the beginning of the hour, Saying, do not attack Syria.
There's no upside.
Tremendous downside.
Mr. President, you want to attack Syria to save face over a very dumb red line statement.
And now he's putting out his own red line statements.
He's sounding like Jeb, and he's sounding like Hillary, and he's sounding like McCain and Graham.
And this is very, very troubling.
And I want to say one more thing, too, when we talk about the false flag aspects of this.
We've had other situations where not only did it happen at a politically significant time, not only did they have the solution, quote unquote, already lined up that coincided with their political goals, but we would have a tip-off the day before that something was happening.
There would be information that would be on social media.
Typically, people would push back against that.
and say well that has to do with differences and time stamps and so forth and so on and yet in this particular social media posting the guy said tomorrow and he did it the day before so this is not some kind of a time stamp discrepancy this is a clear prediction of what was going to happen and we didn't just we weren't just told this is going to happen a day before We were told that this was going to happen four years ago because they did exactly the same thing four
years ago.
Why would Donald Trump not fall for it four years ago but now appears to be falling for it today?
And of course there is still a little bit of hope because they're saying they have not Decided on a course of action yet, and yet there is so much saber rattling coming from the tweets and from the administration.
It sounds like they have decided that they're going to do precisely what he spoke against Barack Obama doing four years ago with exactly the same scenario.
It's very bizarre for Trump to suddenly say that he has, you know, the emotional aspect of watching these videos have swayed his foreign policy.
When last month, apparently, the U.S. had higher civilian deaths than Russia or Syria airstrikes.
And this is from the same people, the same organizations like the Syrian HR organization that's run by a guy in a two bedroom apartment in Coventry that makes all of these statements.
Trump is believing this source who at the same time, you know, said that the U.S. killed more civilians than anyone in March.
So why these civilians are more important than those civilians, it doesn't make any logical sense.
And why did the 2013 civilians not affect him in the same way?
Why is he suddenly now just all emotion and no logic?
I said that last night when I started to read this news.
I started out with a story about what happened in Tikrit, Iraq, the dozens of people that were killed there.
And I said, oh wait a minute, I thought this happened in Syria.
It's like, oh yeah, these are two separate stories.
You heard about the one story, but you didn't hear about the other story.
You haven't heard about the bombings in Yemen and the civil war that Saudi Arabia started there and that we are supporting.
You haven't heard about the attacks on hospitals in Afghanistan that went on for a very prolonged period of time that went back to Obama's military.
So we have to understand this is being very selectively done.
We're told that the Russians bear responsibility for this, that they need to do something about it because they are dominating Assad there, and yet do we not bear responsibility for what is going on in Iraq?
Don't we dominate Iraq in the same way that Russia dominates Syria?
And if they supposedly had stashed away some of the gas secretly, you would think that they wouldn't expose that fact by using it on a random small town and would have kept it in the case that there's an invasion or something to save their lives.
But we're supposed to pause, abandon reality here and accept this false logic and just believe this without any sort of thinking.
And if you try to think, they'll just push the photographs of dead babies in front of you to...
Push for an emotional response.
And it doesn't matter who are the people who actually kill these kids.
It doesn't matter how much evidence we have, because if you try to get any logical argument into it, they'll call you inhuman and as if you don't care about children.
But it's the rebels, it's the terrorists, it's the deep state who have been killing kids for the last 15, 20 years across the entire Middle East and the globe that don't care about children.
As Madeleine Albright, when she was asked if the sanctions against Iraq were worth the death of a half million children, she didn't say, we didn't kill a half million children.
She said, no, it was worth it.
She had no problem with it.
And as you pointed out, Leanne, talking about the children dying, the babies that we were told is why we had to get in the first Iraq war.
That was a totally created script.
It was totally false.
And that's why I said...
We now have the Trump administration sounding like Jeb and Hillary.
This is so obvious to everyone, I think, who has paid any attention to it.
It's just beyond belief that the OPCW, the Organization for a Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, would go there, would do inspections, would say that they have removed their weapons, would have an inspection four years ago.
As we were able to delay this, immediately when it happened, we were told we have to go right away.
We have to go right away.
And that's the push They want to make sure that this is going to happen immediately because if people take the time and start to look at the evidence as we did four years ago, you find out that the narrative that were sold immediately after the event is not really what happened.
And the longer we can stall this, the better the chance that we can get the truth out there talking to people like you, Syrian girl, and just going back and looking at the evidence that we've seen in the past.
Your final comments here about where you would like to see this happen and what you think is the best way to push against this and where we can get more information from you as you discover what's going on there.
Well, you know, the heartening thing is to see Infowars and basically all of the people who were against war not follow Trump blindly just because they voted for him.
It's good to see that People are standing up for what they voted for, which is an end to regime change, and an end to these wars, and an end to the funding of terrorists.
And the sad thing is, these white helmets, they, just a few days ago, when the US struck a Mosque, which was an Al-Qaeda meeting spot inside Syria, it was the white helmets that were helping Al-Qaeda dig up Al-Qaeda from under the rubble.
And those white helmets called Trump a war criminal.
So it's interesting that He now believes these terrorists.
He now is giving them his ear, and he's supposedly the one who's against terrorists.
The US is already inside Syria.
They've already invaded the north of Syria.
It's under the pretext of fighting ISIS, but the deep state doesn't care about that, and it's still the case.
Their objective is balkanization, and to get that balkanization, they might have to end up Causing World War III. And how do we stop that?
It would be great to show Trump that his constituents will not stand for this.
Maybe it's going to take going onto the street and protesting.
Maybe it's going to take calling up congressmen.
But the frightening thing is it doesn't even seem like they're Willing to speak to Congress about this or do anything in a remotely legal way, because they're even talking about bypassing the United Nations.
But I hope that we can all stand up against world war.
Well, I think people have to, as you point out, we have to stand up as we did four years ago.
And we have to stand not only, we're not really standing against Trump, we're standing with him.
These people who are pushing regime change in Syria, people like John McCain who went to Syria The beginning of the Trump administration, he went on his own.
He's conducting his own foreign policy, meeting with ISIS in Syria.
And he said, these people don't know anything about it, I've met with ISIS many times.
He even talks about that.
So here's this guy who is pushing for regime change in Syria, working with ISIS, He is doing the same thing here, pushing this phony Russian narrative and if we don't push back against the deep state that wants to have this continuous war here in America, they will do regime change here.
They will do regime change against Donald Trump.
And they're already isolating him and taking over in terms of the only advisors that he hears from are these people.
Thank you so much, Syrian Girl.
And people can find you on Twitter, at Partisan Girl.
And do you have any other social media contacts or websites that you want to give out?
Syrian Girl Partizan is my YouTube and Partizan Girl is my Facebook.
Thank you so much for having me on and I do agree that at the end they're going to take out Trump because he's made too many statements that they can't live with.
I just want to remind people that we do have our new toothpaste.
I've got it right here, super blue, even though it is pink.
Pink because it's bubblegum.
That's right.
We do have this in stock at InfoWarsStore.com.
It has a different taste, one that is not as strong.
We put a bubblegum taste in there so you can get your children will love this.
It still has the essential ingredients like iodine and nano-silver that will fight bacteria in your gums.
Other toothpastes don't have and it doesn't have fluoride.
Instead it has iodine.
So it's very important to have those bacteria-fighting elements in there and not have something that is going to impact IQ, going to be harmful for your children.
And again, the importance of fighting gum disease, not only for bad breath, but also for losing your teeth and heart disease, as we need to be aware of that as we get older and the likelihood of those things increases.
Also, we now have Caveman finally back in stock at InfoWarsStar.com.
We have 33% off retail for a limited time.
You can see that at InfoWarsStore.com.
We're going to take a quick break, and we're going to be right back with more of our 3 to 5 live broadcast.
Dr. Group, the new product, MycoZX, supports normal, fungal, and yeast, a balanced proprietary blend of herbs and enzymes made with high-quality ingredients.
unidentified
Yeah, fungus is a growing epidemic, and I've been testing this formula and making changes to this formula for over 10 years.
Electrify your day with Secret 12. It's like lightning in a bottle.
We all have days in which we just can't seem to perform at the level we'd like to.
InfoWars Live Secret 12 is designed to naturally energize your body and mind with two great tasting and super high quality forms of vitamin B12. Proper vitamin and nutrient intake is essential to keep your body functioning at optimum levels.
The reality is, it's hard to take in the proper amount of vitamins we need each day with our modern diets.
Secret 12 by Infowars Live is an easy way to naturally upgrade your vitamin B12 intake and support your body's natural systems.
It pairs two forms of vitamin B12 into one explosive formula.
Vitamin B12 supports healthy energy levels through red blood cell formation and aiding in the body's natural processes.
But it also assists with many other functions of the body.
Electrify your mind and body and take your health to the next level.
Experience the power of Secret 12 at Infowarslife.com.
Survival Shield X2. If there's one product that I would say is life-changing that I would suggest, it's Nascent Iodine Survival Shield X2. It's got a five-star rating.
And of course, if you've got the stream, you can find that on Facebook or YouTube.
If you are watching us, you know that you've got it on one of those places.
We've got a lot to talk about.
We're going to talk about the Gorsuch nomination and the things that changed there.
Of course, we now have some talk of Obamacare.
I would call it Obamacare maybe 2.2 because they're just changing the little details.
We're going to talk a little bit about that.
We're also going to talk about the summit with China's leader at Mar-a-Lago.
We're going to talk about Devin Nunes stepping aside.
We're going to take your phone calls.
All that's going to be coming up.
But let's go first to the Gorsuch nomination because I think Breitbart's article got it right.
We hear all this information about how this is absolutely unprecedented that we would go nuclear, that they would have just a straight-up majority vote on a Supreme Court judge.
Well, what they're doing is they shut down the filibuster.
And what is unprecedented is the fact that we even have a filibuster.
The Senate has never done that before.
Never before have we descended to that level of partisanship that tries to block a president's Supreme Court justice.
And we don't even have an ideological shift here in question.
And so what is unprecedented is what the Democrats are doing, not the Republican response to it.
We've never had this happen before.
And joining us right now in the studio is Alex Jones.
I want to say that it's awesome watching you guys do the live show.
So we'll be putting you guys up on satellite.
A lot more probably working with GCN.
But we are setting up to probably go live at least 10 hours a day just because news demands it.
But the reason I'm barging in here is I've just been in my office the last hour and 30 minutes.
that can almost get no work done because what you guys are saying is so hardcore, so on target.
That's why I'm glad we're doing a lot more live, because it gets everybody ready to just put all the data out, because the discussions Leanne and you and the rest of the crew have behind the scenes is even better than what happens on air.
It's so on target.
Look, Trump's starting to go sideways, and we have to admit he's going sideways, and I want the whole crew to know, because I've never told you, hey, you better support Trump or else.
I just want to consciously say, everything you guys have been saying has been dead on.
And Trump is surrounded.
He is trying to do good for the economy.
That's why they're still going to destroy him.
But he's just being, you know, pushed into this whole thing with this false flag.
The good news is, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, all these other big problem people, I don't have to say false flag anymore and, you know, get all the attacks.
It actually feels good to sit back here today and go...
Well, they did false flags before, but I don't know.
And then, you know, now even the UN's coming out and saying not that the UN's perfect.
They just know what happened.
So I'm not going to take over anymore.
Just really exciting to see, you know, the team and reporters.
Reporters are going to try to get in different regions of the country so they can be a correspondent and set up bureaus there.
A lot of exciting things happening.
And this nerve gas attack was real.
We'll probably hear the news say we said it didn't happen.
No, I mean, it's like the one thing we'll bring down Assad right when Tillerson says, okay, We're kicking Al-Qaeda and ISIS out.
Now we can have an election and see what happens with Assad.
He'll have a place in the new government.
But in an election, boom, this happens.
McCain and all of them said, big international crisis coming.
They're going to use it.
But the good news is, false flag is now in the vernacular.
And the good news is, we're here covering it.
And more and more, even though the swamp's training Trump, This is going to be an ebb and flow.
It doesn't matter because the movement worldwide for nationalism is exploding.
As long as we preserve free speech, we're going to win this thing.
And again, I'm not saying Trump's a bad guy.
He's done so much good on the economy and fighting globalism.
It's just that I think they cut off his access to Infowars.
So we could see how he went in 2013 and he immediately was like, what the heck, false flag, don't do it Obama, just to, you know, save face on the red line that you drew.
So I think, you know, after this election and all the pushback, I think that they cut off his access to Infowars and these outlets that are Where he gets his information.
But he was right as well, because after they did an investigation, and that's the key.
If we can delay this until they can actually do an investigation, then he'll see that the solution that's being offered by McCain and Lindsey Graham and the deep state is not real.
This is something that they had set up.
So we have a better chance with Donald Trump than we did with Barack Obama.
And we were able to stop Barack Obama from going into Syria.
He's got to know, though, compromising with him is weakness.
They want to destroy him because of the populism and the things he's said and done.
But clearly, CNN, little kids reading off teleprompters that are PR folks, this is all confirmed.
You've got that.
This is a big deal, but we can't get totally disillusioned.
That's not what we're talking about here.
It's just we can't expect to win everything on one person.
I think Trump needs to go.
Fireside chats.
He needs to use his charisma.
But I'm going to get out of here.
I just wanted to say that best of times, worst of times right now, and it's just exciting to see the listeners, the viewers, everybody else being such big participants in this because, like you said, I think we should push right now.
Like three and a half years ago, where the military and everybody says, we're not going to fight in Syria for al-Qaeda slash ISIS. I think it's time for that right now.
We cannot hobble this, but we're going to try to fool the voters and not even have a vote.
That's what he said.
I want to play this second clip because in it, he says, we have used the nuclear option to get what we wanted.
And of course, that was something that Harry Reid was famous for shutting down the idea that you can have a filibuster be conducted within the Senate.
That was one of the things that was very different about the Senate.
They said, no, we're going to be able to shut down a filibuster whenever we want to for whatever issues.
But he points out when he's talking to Huffington Post one month before the election, he points out that they had never done this yet on a Senate confirmation, but he said they would.
The Democrats would.
If they'd had the votes to win the Senate, they would have been doing exactly what's happening today.
Here's what he said one month before the election.
I was in the Senate when the Republicans stonewalling around appointments caused Senate Democratic majority to switch the vote threshold on appointments from 60 to 51. And we did it on everything but a Supreme Court Justice.
If these guys think they're going to stonewall the filling of that vacancy or other vacancies, then a Democratic Senate majority will say, we're not going to let you thwart the law.
And so we will change the Senate rules to uphold the law, that the court will be nine members.
If you guys think it's just the partisan shoe is on the other foot.
If you guys think that you're going to stonewall this, that you're going to keep the Supreme Court from moving on with nine members and do this as a partisan filibuster, then we're not going to let that happen.
And so that's what they said today.
Today they said they're going to have the vote.
And they said this at the beginning of the week.
This is all going out Like some kind of a dance, Leanne.
They said on Monday, they said, we're going to have an up or down vote.
We're going to get Gorsuch confirmed by midnight Friday.
We know they're going to play this game with a filibuster.
We're going to shut it down just as Tim Kaine said they would if they had the levers of power.
See, they didn't win the election.
That's what they're so upset about.
They didn't win the election.
And so what they're going to try to do is win public opinion with the mainstream media.
But you have to understand that that's exactly what they were going to do.
And what is unprecedented in all of this is not...
That they're shutting down the filibuster, but that there would be a filibuster that they would have to shut down.
I got so triggered watching all the different news programs that we have on out there because it's all, I just can't believe that they would choose the nuclear option, you know, normally.
You know, when Obama was not, we would reach across the aisle and work together.
And that's how things are usually done here in D.C. is we work together to get things done.
And it's like, are you kidding me?
Do you really think the American people are that stupid that, Mr. I've got my pen and my phone and I've signed more executive orders?
Reached across the table to work together to get things done.
I mean, they are just the victims, and they're just dealing with this regime that's on their way to be in this authoritarian, totalitarian government.
All of the mainstream media outlets out there are pushing this narrative that this is so unprecedented that they would change this rule.
Now, what I think is something to kind of pay attention to as well, we saw the Democrats...
When they thought that they had it in the bag, that the Democrats would be our rulers from here on out, they changed the rules so that there was no way you could filibuster any of the president's picks coming in.
And then that came back to bite them when Clinton didn't win.
So then they weren't able to filibuster any of Trump's picks for his cabinet.
So this, you know, where they're changing this rule where you can no longer filibuster a Supreme Court Their issue is that the narrative they're putting out is, well, now they can put someone in there with these extreme ideologies if more people, Supreme Court justices, pass away, which they will.
A lot of them are, you know, at that age, kind of, where they're getting there.
And so that...
If indeed Trump is out in four years and it goes back to the Democrats and they now have the chance to put in their Supreme Court judges, I mean, it's like...
They're just removing the filibuster for everything because they're abusing it.
If you go back to 1991 and you look, there's an interesting graphic.
Pull up this graphic that the Washington Post had out yesterday, guys.
There's an interesting graphic and they show, they break down the votes for the different Supreme Court justices going all the way back to Scalia in 1986. And in that, you can see how it breaks down the red and blue for Republicans and Democrats and the purple for independence, okay?
Now, interestingly enough, look at the one in 1991 for Clarence Thomas.
Remember how vicious that fight was for Clarence Thomas.
Remember all of the amazing charges between Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas and so forth.
That was a very dirty fight that the Democrats put up.
But even then...
They did not try to filibuster that.
Not even in 1991. Not even against Clarence Thomas.
That's what I'm talking about.
That's what's unprecedented.
Is that even when they had that partisan rancor about Clarence Thomas and all these made-up charges, I believe, about him...
Even then they didn't invoke the filibuster.
So they invoked the filibuster.
They abused that power and now they're losing it.
I wish that it was possible for us to remove power when it's abused like that by the federal bureaucracy or by other issues like that.
I'm glad to see that they're removing the potential to abuse that power.
And when you go back and you look at even in 2010, the last one Put in was Elena Kagan.
Now, she passed with 63 votes, almost all of them Democrat.
If you look at that, very few Republicans voted for Elena Kagan.
One of the problems with her was that she was not going to recuse herself and did not recuse herself from the Obamacare vote that was coming along.
She had been part of the Obama administration in terms of pushing that.
She had been in that fight.
She should not have been voting on Obamacare.
So she had a real clear conflict of interest.
That's one of the reasons why she was very unpopular with Republicans and yet there wasn't a filibuster.
There wasn't a filibuster by those Republicans who opposed her.
So we have never seen this, even in the controversial cases like Kagan or Clarence Thomas.
We've never seen the filibuster used before.
That's the story, folks.
That's the story.
The abuse of the filibuster, and that is what has been shut down.
All right, we're coming up to the top of the hour.
We're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we're going to talk about the summit in China.
We're going to talk about the other thing that has everybody scratching their head after the removal of Bannon from the National Security Council yesterday.
We now have Devin Nunes stepping aside, and they're training the guns on him with an ethics charge.
And we're also going to talk about what's happening with Obamacare lite.
We're going to be talking about those three things coming up, and we're going to take your phone calls after the break.
We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
Electrify your day with Secret 12. It's like lightning in a bottle.
We all have days in which we just can't seem to perform at the level we'd like to.
InfoWars Live Secret 12 is designed to naturally energize your body and mind with two great tasting and super high quality forms of vitamin B12. Proper vitamin and nutrient intake is essential to keep your body functioning at optimum levels.
The reality is it's hard to take in the proper amount of vitamins we need each day with our modern diets.
Secret 12 by InfoWars Live is an easy way to naturally upgrade your vitamin B12 intake and support your body's natural systems.
It pairs two forms of vitamin B12 into one explosive formula.
Vitamin B12 supports healthy energy levels through red blood cell formation and aiding in the body's natural processes, but it also assists with many other functions of the body.
Electrify your mind and body and take your health to the next level.
Experience the power of Secret 12 at Infowarslife.com.
My fellow InfoWarriors, I am very excited to be able to announce to you the introduction at InfoWarsLife.com of a new way to save time and money when you stock up on InfoWarsLife formulations like Survival Shield X2 and Super Metal Vitality.
Just go to InfoWarsLife.com today, select your favorite product, click on Auto Ship before adding to cart, and choose how often you want us to send you another order.
Every time you choose AutoShip at InfoWarsLife.com, you get 10% off and you won't have to worry about running out and having to reorder next time.
And of course, you can cancel with one click anytime.
As you know, I'm all about the idea of a 360 win.
And the new AutoShip feature at InfoWarsLife.com is a sure win for everybody.
A win for liberty, a win for health, and a win when it comes to big savings.
Visit InfoWarsLife.com today and save 10% on your next InfoWarsLife order by selecting Auto Ship at checkout.
That's InfoWarsLife.com or call 888-253-3139.
The reason InfoWarsLife has five-star ratings on major third-party sites is because I want products I'm going to use for my family.
I take this.
My family takes this.
And then it funds the operation with the most hardcore, truthful information you're going to find anywhere.
So what you find in our news is the same thing you find in our products at InfoWarsLife.com.
Survival Shield X2. If there's one product that I would say is life-changing that I would suggest, it's Nascent Iodine Survival Shield X2. It's got a five-star rating.
We're going to go to your phone calls in a moment.
Before we do, we want to cover a couple of quick news items, and we'll get your comments on that as well.
And as we're looking at what's going on in Syria and the abrupt change of Donald Trump and what many of us are concerned about him being isolated.
We understand that there's these different wings that are being represented in the Trump administration right now.
And we can see from the people that were there that were supporting him on the agenda that we all voted for, we have people like Bannon, Miller, Sessions.
And Sessions is still there.
Take a look at what he's been able to do here.
We've seen Twelve and a half thousand people that were caught crossing the border last month down from 43,000 in February.
That's the lowest monthly figure of border crossings that we've had in 17 years.
So we can see that when we have the people with Trump that supported him, that believe in his agenda, we're getting things done.
We've seen that TPP was shut down immediately.
That's great.
The problem is, then we got Gary Cohen of Goldman Sachs come in, who has allied with Jared Kushner, and he's part of the Wall Street Banker Globalist Democrats.
And then we have the other wing that is also there.
That's the Wall Street Globalist Banker Neocons, the GOP. And those people would be people like Pence and Priebus, Ryan and Nikki Haley.
But on the other side, we've got Gary Cohen and Jared Kushner, the Democrats.
They brought in, when we're talking about Obamacare, they brought in Zeke Emanuel, who was Obama's architect of Obamacare.
They also then brought in Andrew Quinn when they were talking about trade.
So even though Donald Trump shuts down TPP... Then Gary Cohen brings in this other guy, Andrew Quinn, who was one of the architects of TPP, and now they're working to try to moderate any pushback against NAFTA. Maybe put in another TPP. Who knows?
That's why the advisors matter.
That's why the people that are there matter.
This is why I was concerned when I saw so many of these advisors coming in, because you know there's going to be this political infighting That's going on.
They're going to be pushing out people that were loyal to Trump and his agenda, loyal to the Trump voters, and that's what we're concerned about.
We can see that there's been a real sea change.
We've got an attorney general who is now more concerned about law enforcement and justice than he is about social engineering.
He's not going to dictate what our bathrooms are going to be, for example.
And the left is absolutely furious about that.
The Urban League is saying, this is outrageous that he would be...
Focused on these types of issues.
But that's why, folks, the fight has not ended.
We got Trump elected, but we have to help him and the American people still have a voice.
We're going to have to shout very loudly for him to hear us over the advisers that are surrounding him.
But we can do that.
And we have to keep this going.
That's why it's important to keep the Infowars and other alternative media outlets going.
That's why they're trying to still shut us down.
They're moving on with the same agenda, the shutdown alternative media that Matt Drudge warned us about.
They're moving on with their agenda to go to war with Syria, to create a larger world war.
That's why it is so important for us to continue and not fall asleep and just say, well, Trump got elected and everything is fine.
They haven't given up.
They haven't given up the fight.
They are fighting now inside the White House trying to turn him around in different ways.
Let me give out this number for you to call in.
And I wrote it down.
Here it is.
512-646-4426.
512-646-4426.
We've got the lines open now.
We're going to talk about a couple of phone calls and we'll start taking numbers.
Yeah, I mean, I just think it's important for everyone to understand that, you know, we have all these never Trumpers and these people that have been there on the Hill for decades.
They are career politicians.
And so they're saying, join us or die, basically.
Everything that you want to put forward is dead.
We will kill you.
We might not kill your family or kill you actually, but we will kill your brand, your identity.
Just with Nunez, he's had to step aside because now they're coming after him.
Not only did we see Michael Flynn taken out in record time, because he understood what was going on in Syria, he understood how ISIS was being used as a surrogate for regime change, a surrogate for the dark state, the deep state.
So he was taken out very quickly.
Then as soon as Bannon leaves, we've got this radical turnaround, and clearly this was put in place.
We had people that were saying, well, tomorrow we're going to have an attack.
They get the equipment, the gas masks, the suits, or whatever.
All of this was pre-planned.
It wasn't even, can't be argued, that this was some kind of a time-date stamp discrepancy.
He said tomorrow, and it was the day before it happened.
So this is clearly a false flag.
We've seen all this happen before.
So they're working with all this, but then today we have another shoe drop, and that is they have gone after Devin Nunes, and they have now gotten him to step down from this investigation.
They have sent him to the House Ethics Committee.
They announced today that they're investigating whether or not Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes made unauthorized disclosures of classified information While overseeing his panel's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
So what they're saying is because he went to the White House and he talked to Donald Trump because he exposed what now appears to be criminal action by Susan Rice, the whistleblower.
Will be taken down.
And we have seen this over and over again.
So even when the whistleblower is a setting congressman, a chair of a committee, they take him down instead of going after the criminals that he exposes.
And, of course, he wasn't going to take it up the chain of command.
And who was in control of that committee?
Adam Schiff.
Because he would have shut this down.
He would have killed the story.
So he said, I can't go up my chain of command.
I've got to go to the White House and I've got to tell the president and I'm going to tell the American people because I already know how this is going to work.
They're going to shut it down.
So then he goes and he should be being hailed as a hero here.
But instead, he's being attacked.
Now, did he commit the ethics violation?
I don't see anyone opening up the ethics violation committee there with Susan Rice.
Everyone's just circling around her saying, Well, she was just doing her job.
Of course she wouldn't have been doing it for political reasons.
We had Mitch McConnell say, well, I would support it if the Senate wants to do an investigation of what happened with Susan Rice.
But they didn't do it, did they?
They came after Devin Nunes.
And so, you know, they said that there's several left-wing activist groups that have filed accusations against him with the Office of Congressional Ethics, so he'll stand aside until they can clear this.
He says this process will be a distraction for the House Intelligence Committee's investigation, so we're going to have him step aside.
Well, I tell you what, you're losing bigly when you do that.
This is not the way to proceed.
They need to get stronger with this.
They need to not cave on this.
I frankly am very disappointed to see what's happened both yesterday and today, but it is what we have continued to see, and that is if you expose criminal action, they will come after you.
They will not go after the people who commit the crime.
And you mentioned earlier just about how they set up the solution to the problem before it actually happens and how they're always kind of planning ahead for certain things that they know.
I mean, let's not forget, we had Obama setting up his residency there in D.C., getting his house right there.
Because he knew that he wasn't going to go away quietly.
It was setting up for this future coup that would be happening.
Unprecedented the way the Democrats have politicized this whole process.
We've never seen a president before, Democrat or Republican, stick around and essentially create a shadow government that is going to continue to fight.
And as he pointed out, he's got Eric Holder there because they're going to fight in the states They have taken such a shellacking under Obama losing over a thousand seats at state level that what they could not win at the ballot box, they want to win in the courtroom.
And so they're going to start all of these harassing lawsuits.
And then at the same time, you've got the Senate Democrats who have never used a filibuster before.
On a Supreme Court justice, as I pointed out, not even on the ones that they fought the hardest on, fought very dirty against Clarence Thomas.
Even then, they didn't use the filibuster.
And so now they're going to pull out every stop.
But then when the Republicans show a little bit of strength and say, we're not going to let you do that, we're going to have a straight up and down vote, they say, that's unprecedented.
And the mainstream media goes along with them, never talking about what the real source of this is.
All right, we've got some callers that are lining up there.
We're going to go to the callers in just a moment again.
If you want to call in, 512-646-4426.
One more story I want to get to before we go to the callers, and of course that is the Chinese summit that is happening at Mar-a-Lago, and Trump is welcoming the Chinese president, Xi.
Are they trying to insult him then by implying that he's transgender?
I don't know.
I mean, we had a president who, and now we've got a president she.
I guess who was on first and she is on second.
So we could call this the Abbott-Costello summit.
All right.
But now, here are the issues that they're going to be talking about.
Of course, that's going to be coming out.
We'll be talking about trade.
We'll be talking about currency manipulation.
That had been on the menu before, but now they're going to be talking about what's going on in the South China Sea as well.
Will anything happen with this?
We'll have to just wait and see.
But as this is beginning, we see this report from RT that the president of the Philippines, Duterte, is ordering occupation of the South China Sea Islands.
Just for your understanding, just because they say it's the South China Sea doesn't mean that it belongs to China any more than the Gulf of Mexico belongs to Mexico.
And these islands are very, very close geographically to the Philippines, not to China.
Nevertheless, they went down to where there were a few islands, and the Chinese government began building artificial islands off of these reefs and heavily fortifying them.
And threatening to shut down international shipping.
So this has become a flashpoint as well.
And to add to this flashpoint, we now have the Philippine president, Duterte, saying that he wants his military to occupy and fortify some of these islands in the South China Sea.
He says it looks like everyone is making a grab for the islands there, so we better live on those that are still unoccupied.
What's ours now?
We claim it and we make a strong point for there.
And he points out that when they come up to their Independence Day in June, he wants to visit Pagasa Island.
He said, coming Independence Day, I may go to Pagasa Island and raise the flag there.
They say that's close to the Subi Reef, one of the numerous man-made islands that China built in the Spratly chain.
And to give you an idea how confused this whole thing is, we've got not only China and Philippines, the Philippines laying claims to the Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands.
They're also claimed by Vietnam.
By Taiwan, by Malaysia, by Brunei.
So everybody wants a piece of those islands.
But the Chinese have gone in and built a lot of artificial islands, put runways on them, surfaced air missiles, heavily fortified these.
So that's going to be one of the other issues that is coming up.
And one other thing about the Chinese summit, and that is the American Enterprise Institute has pointed out that at the beginning of the Obama administration, Barack Obama held a summit in Sunnylands, California.
And it was an informal summit.
It was in 2013. And so it wasn't actually the beginning of his administration, but right after he was re-elected, And as he points out, the American Enterprise Institute, this is Michael Oslin.
He's an Asian expert.
He says, our presidents should stop trying to use a personal touch with the Chinese leaders.
It doesn't work.
He said it was a failure when Barack Obama did it.
Let's hope that this is not a failure.
Let's hope that we have some movement on currency manipulation, on unfair trade, and also on what is going on with North Korea and with the South China Sea.
It's a very complicated situation, and it remains to be seen if he's going to get anything from it.
Let's go to our callers now.
Let's go to Chuck.
Go ahead, Chuck.
We got you on the line.
Go ahead.
unidentified
Let me turn something down here.
Hey, I wanted to call in yesterday to talk about the pedophile rings and all that.
A crazy thing is, a couple of years ago, out here in San Bernardino, there was an arrest made from a municipal worker who was in charge of kids, who was actually pimping and tandering the kids.
The crazy thing about it is, it was right under my notes.
And that kind of stuff never gets past me.
But I kind of started figuring things out.
These kids never came out of the house until this guy showed up.
And then when he left, they go back in the house.
And when he got busted, my friend and I was like, man, how did that happen right under our nose?
The key is here, pay attention to what's going on around you.
It doesn't matter if someone's your friend or associate or whatever.
If you see something weird, it is weird.
And I really feel bad because I could have stopped way before it got out of hand.
Well, so what, I'm sorry, what was the weird scenario that you guys noticed, but you didn't really recognize?
Say that again for us.
unidentified
It's pretty much, the kids wouldn't come out or be around anybody unless he was there kind of kingpin and kind of watching what they said and what they did.
Yeah, that's one of the things that makes it difficult in this day and age is that it used to be when we were growing up, you would play outside.
You'd be allowed to go down the street and play.
And now they've created such fear with everybody that in many cases you allow your, in most cases, if you allow your children to do that, they call child protected services on you for child neglect or whatever, because your kids are playing sometimes when they're playing in your own yard.
We now have kids who are locked up in the houses all the time, so you're there in San Bernardino and you see these kids are locked up, even though he's kind of, he looks a little bit suspicious.
Still, they're always in the house, which is one of the things that makes it difficult to understand, you know, what's really going on, the dynamic with these kids.
Yeah, or is he just, you know, concerned that he can't let his kids exercise a little bit of independence like we used to?
I used to go wherever I wanted to.
As soon as I got a bicycle when I was in elementary school, I was everywhere, all over Tampa.
But today, if I were to do that, my parents would have gotten a visit or a knock on the door from CPS for doing that.
So it's hard to really understand.
I wouldn't blame yourself that much, but yeah, we do need to understand That this is widespread, that it is right amongst us.
And we also need to understand, I think, that this is part of an agenda that is being sold to us.
I think this whole thing, as I've said before, this whole thing about tranny bathrooms and pushing the transgender issues on kids at a very young age is to say, look, they can make these decisions when they're in elementary school.
So we need to start, they're weaning us off of this idea that we should have Consenting adults.
And they want to start pushing that away and moving the Overton window away from consenting adults.
And I think this whole thing about the transgender issues, the young children in elementary school where they can't really make those types of determinations.
Why do we have to have government at the federal level, or even government at the state or city level, why do we have to have them dictate what our bathrooms are going to be like?
Can't we make that decision on our own?
Can't businesses and churches and other institutions make that decision on their own and then let the market decide whether they want to go to that business or not?
Why can't we do that sort of thing?
Why do we have to have this dictated to us one way or the other?
I think that's where they made the mistake in North Carolina.
First you had an individual in Charlotte who had been convicted of child sex crimes and was a transgender individual pushed to mandate these transgender bathrooms and so then they came back and they pushed to say well you're not gonna do it we're gonna mandate it the other way and it's like let's just push against mandates Let's just repeal the idea that the government is going to manage every aspect of our life.
Let's take the libertarian position on this, rather than saying, you know, when the Democrats are in power, we're going to have these kind of bathrooms, and when the Republicans are in power, we're going to tell you, you've got to have that kind of bathroom.
Let us decide.
How humiliating for us that we can't even go to the bathroom in the way that we wish to without having that dictated to us by our governments at every level.
unidentified
Well, I'll tell you, out here in California, like I said, I know a lot of people online in California.
I love my state, but I just got back from a town right outside of Houston.
I have cousins out there in Texas.
It's totally different.
The only things you guys have that we have out here that stupid is the chance we're back in the store.
But other than that, out here in California, it's like I hate to talk about my state, but it's like zombies out here.
A lot of my friends, they fight against me on the Trump thing.
You and I listen to you every day.
You know what's going on with Trump.
It's like going sideways.
I don't care what his advisor says.
You make the last decision, partner.
But as far as out here in California, it's zombies.
Hey, it's a pleasure to be on with both of you, Leanne and David.
Listen, I've wargamed all of this out.
Trump needs to take a lesson from Pablo Escobar, the famous kingpin.
Why was it so difficult for the entire country of Colombia to take down Pablo Escobar?
I'll tell you why.
He was a man of the people.
He went into villages.
He was handing out dollar bills like it was candy.
He was taking care of people's everyday needs.
You cannot take down a person like that.
In my opinion, that is precisely the biggest mistake that Trump is making right now.
He's not hitting people where they live.
He's not lifting them up where they live.
Perfect case in point.
Where I'm from in Oregon, practically the entire timber industry got shut down because of a bird.
Now, under whatever administration that took place, I can guarantee you the people that had that happen to them still have a terrible bitterness in their hearts for that happening to them.
You take the people in Flint, Michigan.
Nobody's taken care of them yet.
I guarantee you, if Trump went into any of those situations personally or sent an envoy or whatever, he said, look, I'm going to take care of this right now.
You guys are not going to have to suffer under this anymore.
And you know he could go to a place where there is an issue going on like that and he could pull a crowd of 20,000 people and he could talk about that issue.
I was happy to see him pull these last couple rallies to show that he's still very popular with people and it's good but he was still talking about general issues in the same way that he did before he won the presidency.
He needs to now focus David, just like the saying says, you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, you teach him how to fish, he feeds himself for a lifetime.
What is Trump doing to empower everyday Americans like myself who struggle to live?
What is he doing to empower us right now?
We do not have time to wait for the long trickle down effects of the policies that he's implementing right now.
We don't have time for that.
They can take him out before any of those things affect us positively anyway.
And furthermore, just one last point if I may.
Everything that Trump has done so far can be easily politicized.
It can be argued about and debated forever.
What Trump needs to do is focus on things that put food in people's mouths, food on their table, clothe them, hallow them, bring up their quality of life immediately to bring those people over to his side.
And he's not doing that.
In my opinion, I feel like he's still playing the game straight up.
When he met with the police chief and he was told by one of the Texas police chiefs that there was a state rep who wanted to end civil asset forfeiture.
And Trump said, well, you know, I'm sure that they'll erect a statue to him with the drug cartels or whatever.
That's what's hurting them.
Legalized cannabis is really hurting the drug cartels.
And so he should understand where that is, but he should also understand what civil asset forfeiture is.
That is taking people's property that have never been convicted of a crime.
They were never even charged with a crime.
And most of these convictions are not being done.
These takings, I should say, because they're not convictions.
These takings under civil asset forfeiture are being done by bureaucracies Uh, against individuals' small amounts of money taking their cars or taking their homes or taking their boats or whatever.
This has been going on for decades.
There's no excuse not to know what this is.
And if you really want to hurt the drug cartels, then you do something like legalizing cannabis.
So, when Obama was running for president and also when Trump was running for president, they both seemed to signal during their campaigns that they believed cannabis should be a state's rights issue.
And yet, as soon as they got into office, poof, it was gone.
Now, what I'm wondering is, do you think the lobby groups like from Big Pharma and some of these other huge lobbying efforts Are actually sabotaging these behind the scenes?
Maybe they actually gave Trump what some people in the conspiracy world called the talk.
And they basically said, we'll let you meddle around in these things over here, but you dare not touch these sacred cows that fill our pockets.
I think in the case of Trump, Jeff Sessions, who generally does understand and support the Constitution, I think he's an honest guy, but I think he's misled on the drug issue.
Let's go ahead, and we're getting a lot of noise from Jason's call.
We're going to go to Nick in New Jersey.
Thank you, Nick.
But in the case of Trump, I think he's listening to Jeff Sessions, and I think Jeff Sessions is misled.
I think Jeff Sessions believes that we can, by force, stop the plague of drug abuse.
We haven't been able to do that in 46 years, and it's not working, and that's the definition of insanity.
And so when we talk about the pharmaceutical industry, we understand that the pharmaceutical industry sees, and rightfully so, sees cannabis as a real competitor to them.
Because we had, and again, people who have been talking about this, there's been a lot of talk about it in the press, the different wings, and the White House.
Competing.
We've got the Wall Street bankers, globalists, and we've got both the Republican and the Democrat sides of that.
And on the Republican side of that, we've got people like Pence, Priebus, and Ryan and Haley.
And then on the globalist Democrat side, we have people like Jared Kushner and Gary Cohen.
They have a lot of influence because he's family.
Jared Kushner is family.
And so what we saw happening with Obamacare Was that Jared Kushner brought in Zeke Emanuel three times to speak to senior policy advisors.
Zeke Emanuel was somebody at the beginning of January who said, you're never going to get rid of Obamacare.
You can't repeal it.
We're not going to let you.
You need to fix it around the edges a little bit, but we're not going to let you do anything else.
And he was one of the key architects of Obamacare.
He was a brother of Rahm Emanuel.
Heavy partisan Democrat brought in by Jared Kushner to advise people on it.
So when it went south and they came up with a policy where they didn't really want to repeal it, because understand the Republicans didn't really want to repeal it either.
Paul Ryan is a hand-picked guy that they had run with Mitt Romney because in the last election in 2012 they didn't want...
Take the chance that they were going to get somebody that wasn't going to push through something like Obamacare.
So they put in Mitt Romney, who had already put in Obamacare.
Exactly.
And then they picked Paul Ryan as his running mate, and Paul Ryan has done nothing, even though they have except campaigned to get rid of Obamacare.
He's blocked every attempt to do that.
And then I think what happened afterwards is even more significant because just as we see this really quick turnaround by Donald Trump on Syria, we saw the same thing when he attacked the House Freedom Caucus.
And I was very concerned about that.
And I think the timing is very significant when we look at what's going on with Jared Kushner.
The fact that Jared Kushner kind of saw this was going to go sideways, so he moves himself out so he doesn't look damaged by this politically.
He goes to Aspen for the week, and then he comes back, and within a couple of days, we see all of a sudden Trump has turned against House Freedom Caucus.
And we've been told by a lot of people who have been supporters of Donald Trump, people like Laura Ingraham, tweeted out, said...
It wasn't because of the House Freedom Caucus.
These people were simply doing what you were telling everybody you were going to do, which was repeal it.
They were standing firm for that.
But the people who cost you this, there were more people, Republicans, who turned away from this plan who were not in the House Freedom Caucus than there were in the House Freedom Caucus.
And yet we've got the BBC saying, these are 29 white men who rule the world in the House Freedom Caucus, demonizing them.
Yeah, so we see the press and we see people within the different wings pushing back against what Donald Trump was elected on, and we saw evidence of this with that.
That I thought was very disturbing.
The rancor, the bitterness of Donald Trump against the House Freedom Caucus for standing for repeal.
So we have to make sure that we, the people, get his ear.
Because there are advisors coming to him, telling him to do the exact opposite of what he campaigned on.
They're telling him to do exactly what the Republicans and Democrats, who worked for the bankers, who worked for the globalists, the neocons, they're telling him, do what we've always done, and we've got to not let them turn him into a Jeb or a Hillary.
unidentified
Right.
Yeah, I mean, that's it.
This is the first time And there are always moments where I've seen things or thought things, because like I said, I've been listening to you guys for a long time.
But this is the first time that I really ever actually felt like scared, like that now that he's suddenly flipping over and jumping into that pool and like does somebody have a gun at his head like right now?
Could he possibly be in danger like that or does he really believe these people?
Yeah, we'll have to wait and see, but we need to speak out.
I agree with what Jason said earlier.
Trump needs to very rapidly consolidate his base with the grassroots.
He needs to go over the heads of these Washington people.
Understand it is the district of corruption.
This is a swamp.
And instead of listening to these people, instead of aligning himself with Paul Ryan, he needs to align himself with the people who want repeal.
If you leave the structure of Obamacare in place, then that is the same as saying we're going to go ahead and pass TPP, but we're going to modify the terms of TPP.
No, he did the right thing.
He shut down TPP.
But he needs to shut down Obamacare because the only thing that can really make health care affordable is to have a marketplace.
I've got these stories here a couple of days ago.
Knoxville may be the first place that Obamacare is going to fail.
And they say that they're going to be leaving, Humana is going to be leaving the marketplace in 2018 next year.
Isn't that interesting?
They put it in 2013.
By 2018, the thing fails significantly.
Sounds like a five-year communist plan to run our life, doesn't it?
And that five-year plan has failed, and so they come up with a new five-year plan.
And now we've got a fight within the Republican Party.
They say, conservatives say, well, all right, we'd be open to a little bit of flexibility here.
If we appealed to Washington, maybe they will let us bypass some of these mandates that are coming out on Obamacare.
That's coming from the conservatives.
And to show you how bad it is, the centrists then come out and say, we're not going to do that.
We're not going to go there.
If we don't shut this thing down right now, I think there are already people in the Republican Party that are afraid to do the right thing because they think this has become a third rail like Social Security.
If we don't get this thing out of here now, it is going to be so firmly rooted that we will never get it out.
And if you leave the structure in place, Then the next president who comes along, whether it's Republican or Democrat, they can put everything in Obamacare right back in.
unidentified
Yeah, they can strengthen it right back up and everything would just be destroyed.
If they're going to say that because, you know, this is just phase one, but we're going to have phase two, phase three.
Phase two, we're going to use the Dictatorial powers of the health czar that we have created in Health and Human Services.
We've got a good guy in there now.
We've got Tom Price.
So we're going to use him to make some changes around the edge.
It's like you realize that if you leave that in place, if you accept the concept that we should have a health czar in place to dictate our health care, we'll never get away from this.
So my question was, well, I started watching you guys' show, and I'm out in California in Los Angeles.
And I was just wondering what your guys take on the rise of Islamophobia and xenophobia within the United States and what role you see that playing and what role maybe Trump or our leaders should be taking on it if they're not taking enough action already?
Are you talking about the rise of people being a, when you're talking about Islamophobia and homophobia, do you think that we need to worry about sexism, racism, homophobia?
I mean, that sounds like the chant that we hear from the left.
What is it that you're concerned about in terms of this?
When you say Islamophobia, what do you see as Islamophobia?
unidentified
Well, just the attacks on mosques.
Whether you want to say it's just throwing like a decapitated pig head at a mosque that happened in Philadelphia, or just people wearing Muslim garbs being attacked across the country.
Right as soon as Trump was elected, this started to happen, a rise of it, and with Judaism as well.
And I just, you know, I want to get your take on it.
I mean, I don't think it's a left or right thing.
I think as Americans, we all have a right to religious freedom.
And I see a lot of people are starting to lash out.
I mean, a lot of them that the mainstream media really reported on immediately without Fact-checking turned out to be hoax crimes.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen.
It absolutely does.
But there's this narrative that it's on the rise.
And then they never come back and issue a retraction to say, oh, we were duped.
That was a hoax.
And I think it was more than 30-something times that it turned out to be a fake story or someone was...
Throwing, you know, spray painting their own church and saying that they were a victim of a hate crime or, you know.
So I think those type of things really harm the communities that really are experiencing this sort of hate and, you know, torturing their mosques or some things.
I think that when people go out and they put these fake stories, that hurts their credibility when it actually does happen.
And then it also has people thinking that there's this rise in hate crimes in our country.
It depends on how much the mainstream media wants to focus on a particular story and how much they publicize.
And as you point out, some of them are fake.
Some of them are real.
And we should stand against the ones that are real.
We don't want to see hate crimes committed against anybody.
But let me ask you, Sam.
They just had a...
I want to see if you think that this is Islamophobic because there were a lot of people in Montana that thought that this was Islamophobic.
Islamophobic.
They had a referendum in Montana where they said we're not going to allow foreign law to be used in Montana and the Democrats opposed that and they said well you know you're doing this because you want to push back against Sharia law.
How do you feel about that?
What do you cite on that issue?
unidentified
Well of course I mean I don't think foreign law should, for lack of a better term, Trump, you know the United States Constitution, any state constitution, But at the same time, if someone wants to practice a certain religion, that's fine.
Of course, I don't side with Sharia law or any extremism.
But if someone wants to practice Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Catholicism, that's fine.
Do you think it's legitimate for us to criticize the way Islam has been expressed in other areas of the world and to be concerned about it turning that way here?
Yeah, if we open up our borders to a large migration of this country from Muslim countries, do you feel that it's a legitimate thing for us to be concerned about the consequences of that when we look at countries like Saudi Arabia?
Should we be concerned about that, or is that Islamophobic?
unidentified
I think we should be concerned, but at the same time, I think there's a balance, there's a tightrope.
And sometimes I felt as if on the campaign trail with Trump, he did not come out strongly enough against Islamophobia and that very hurtful rhetoric to the Muslim community that a lot of, I would say, his supporters pushed that they were for.
And I think it showed in this ban, the proposed ban, Yeah, let me ask you about that.
Because the countries that he banned, those countries are countries that Barack Obama went to war with.
Those are countries that Obama bombed.
Do you agree that Barack Obama should have bombed those countries?
Why do you think that the people who were fighting the immigration ban from those countries had nothing to say about the bombing of those countries?
unidentified
Well, in each case, I mean, Libya, that was, he was bombing, you know, he's been bombing ISIS and Qaddafi and, you know, the other countries he was targeting extremists.
But he didn't necessarily ban, outright ban people and the refugee program as well, which, I mean, we're...
I think they've turned Libya into an arms bazaar for Al-Qaeda.
And I think that they have set that area on fire.
They killed a lot of people.
And then they say, when we're concerned, because we see that the place has become a hotbed for terrorism, when we say, well, we now want to do extreme vetting for people coming into this country, Now we're told that's Islamophobic.
See, that's the cognitive dissonance that I'm trying to get you to address here.
That you would say that it is Islamophobia to say that we're not going to allow people that we think these countries are so bad, so dangerous, that we're going to go to war with them, but we should not have a vetting of the people who choose to come in from those countries.
They should be able to come in unrestricted.
And if we don't, we're Islamophobic.
unidentified
There are protocols and there were procedures in place under the Obama administration.
But my point is, the Islamophobia, I think those countries that he banned people from, there's tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of those people that are in this country already that are either legal citizens or born here.
And for Trump to ban people from there, I think it's It's counter-intuitive and counter-productive to do that because how would those people feel if now that their ancestors or people are being banned from the country that they call home now?
Well, we've already been told because we were told by people who are these representatives of these countries that we better change our tune or we're going to create terrorists.
And that's why people get afraid.
They're saying, well, wait a minute.
So are you saying that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism?
Or it does because people are going to become terrorists if you block and put a ban on certain countries.
So it makes no sense because that's like saying someone's going to get angry and if you disagree with what they're saying, then they're going to become a terrorist.
It makes no sense.
unidentified
No, what I'm saying is that we need to be inclusive of all religions in this country.
And that's one of our main, that's the First Amendment, is freedom of religion.
So then you would not suppose you're saying under the rules that we set then you would not agree that people who come here illegally as illegal aliens you would you would agree that they could be deported then right because you're saying that we do have the ability to make rules in the united states that are going to determine if they are um a detriment to our society or public and causing They shouldn't be here.
I'm about to move to Portugal right now, but guess what?
I've already done the paperwork.
I can only go there for three months, and then I gotta get the hell out, and if I overstay my visa, they can bar me for life from ever going into that whole Shenzhen zone.
So many countries in Europe I could be barred from if I overstay my visa, but that's not considered to be racist for whatever reason.
We've got some other people that are hanging on the line.
Thanks, Sam.
We're going to take a quick break here, and we're going to come right back.
And I just want to remind you that we have Caveman finally back at...
Oh, no break?
We're going to keep going.
All right.
Okay, we're going to go to five.
Alright, so we're not going to take a break.
We're going to keep going and we're going to take some more phone calls here.
But I will remind you that we do have Caveman that is 33% off retails back in stock at InfoWarsStore.com.
It sold out very quickly after our initial shipment and it is a great formulation to help you With your health, it has turmeric root, chaga mushroom, bee pollen, bone broth.
It's the ultimate in true paleo nutrition.
It's a great way to take all of those important supplements and a very easy way to get those, and it sold out very quickly.
Hey, I wanted to call in today and just ask about what did y'all think about A post that one of my former college friends had posted on their Facebook today saying, what if I told you that you could have saved those innocent children in Syria, but you wouldn't let them leave because you suspected they may be terrorists?
I think the person who has the most blood on his hands is John McCain, Lindsey Graham, people like that.
People who created the Civil War, people who armed and funded ISIS because they wanted regime change, they placed the value of regime change over stability, over A threat to us.
So yes, we do have blood on our hands, but not because we didn't bring everybody in from Syria.
It is not our responsibility to do that.
We can stop the war.
And you should tell your friends on Facebook, if they really are concerned about the welfare people, why don't they stop the war?
Why didn't they speak out against Obama setting the area on fire?
Why didn't they do that in Libya?
That's what I was just talking to Sam about.
You think these people think that they're better off With Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama's policies in Libya?
Stop the war and we don't have to bring, we cannot bring everyone in the world in the United States, but we can stop the wars that we've started.
Barack Obama was at war for the entire eight years of his presidency.
He inherited four conflict areas.
He increased that to seven.
And we need to stop that instead of making, adding another one in Syria.
Post a clip of John Lennon chanting that and say, let's give peace a chance.
Let's give peace a chance in Syria and let's shut down the warmongering neocons like John McCain who will use Al-Qaeda to do their political dirty deeds for them.
John McCain and the CIA, they're the ones with the blood on their hands, not the American people who say, we're not going to let you, the CIA, start a war in Syria and then import Let the conflict into America.
It seems like he was just mainly wanting to attack Trump's temporary travel ban and just really attack People that he didn't agree with or people that he may not have liked.
But you look at his timeline and it's just all anti-Trump, anti-Trump.
And everything that he shares is from these fake news outlets, the mainstream media.
And I was trying to tell him, Paul Watson referenced that 21% of these Syrian refugees support ISIS. Right.
They'll turn everything into a partisan issue, just as we're talking about the Supreme Court situation with Gorsuch.
What they're not saying is that this is the first time any political party, even the Democrats, when they didn't like Clarence Thomas, they didn't filibuster a Supreme Court nomination.
That was what was unprecedented.
And now we have a reaction to their unprecedented operations.
A reaction that Tim Kaine said he was going to do if they won at the ballot box.
They didn't win at the ballot box.
And that's the thing that really upsets them.
Thanks so much, Rick.
We've only got a couple of minutes left.
And so let's wrap this up.
We've got just one minute left.
Join us tonight for the Infowars Nightly News.
That's going to be at 7 Central.
You know, we're talking about Facebook.
Don't forget...
That we just had Angela Merkel in Germany say they're going to start leveling 50 million euro fines on people if they think that your posts are hateful or if they're fake.
And guess who's going to decide whether they're hateful or fake?
The same government that puts the 50 million dollar fines out there.
So again, it's a problem solution.
They worked with Zuckerberg at Facebook to shut this down.
And this is what Zuckerberg is going to say.
He said, look, they got a 50 million euro fine pointed at my head.
Dr. Group, the new product, MycoZX, supports normal, fungal, and yeast, a balanced proprietary blend of herbs and enzymes made with high-quality ingredients.
unidentified
Yeah, fungus is a growing epidemic, and I've been testing this formula and making changes to this formula for over 10 years.
Electrify your day with Secret 12. It's like lightning in a bottle.
We all have days in which we just can't seem to perform at the level we'd like to.
InfoWars Live Secret 12 is designed to naturally energize your body and mind with two great tasting and super high quality forms of vitamin B12. Proper vitamin and nutrient intake is essential to keep your body functioning at optimum levels.
The reality is it's hard to take in the proper amount of vitamins we need each day with our modern diets.
Secret 12 by Infowars Life is an easy way to naturally upgrade your vitamin B12 intake and support your body's natural systems.
It pairs two forms of vitamin B12 into one explosive formula.
Vitamin B12 supports healthy energy levels through red blood cell formation and aiding in the body's natural processes.
But it also assists with many other functions of the body.
Electrify your mind and body and take your health to the next level.
Experience the power of Secret 12 at Infowarslife.com.
My fellow InfoWars, I am very excited to be able to announce to you the introduction at InfoWarsLife.com of a new way to save time and money when you stock up on InfoWarsLife formulations like Survival Shield X2 and Super Metal Vitality.
Just go to InfoWarsLife.com today, select your favorite product, click on Auto Ship before adding to cart, and choose how often you want us to send you another word.
Every time you choose AutoShip at InfoWarsLife.com, you get 10% off and you won't have to worry about running out and having to reorder next time.
And of course, you can cancel with one click anytime.
As you know, I'm all about the idea of a 360 win.
And the new AutoShip feature at InfoWarsLife.com is a sure win for everybody.
A win for liberty, a win for health, and a win when it comes to big savings.
Visit InfoWarsLife.com today and save 10% on your next InfoWarsLife order by selecting AutoShip at The reason InfoWars Life has five-star ratings on major third-party sites is because I want products I'm going to use for my family.
I take this.
My family takes this.
And then it funds the operation with the most hardcore, truthful information you're going to find anywhere.
So what you find in our news is the same thing you find in our products at InfoWarsLife.com.
Survival Shield X2. If there's one product that I would say is life-changing that I would suggest, it's Nascent Iodine Survival Shield X2. It's got a five-star rating.
