All Episodes
Previous Next
April 1, 2007 - Art Bell
02:36:25
Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell - Remote Viewing Update - Major Ed Dames
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
From the high desert and the great American Southwest, I bid you all good evening, good morning, good afternoon, wherever you may be in the world's time zones, each and every one covered like a blanket by this program, Coast to Coast AM, the very largest program of its type in the world.
Wow, that's really something to be able to say that, isn't it?
Very good evening to you.
I'm Art Bell, and I'm here now for the second part of my weekend, sharing my weekend with you.
And a fascinating one, indeed it is.
There has been a large earthquake, folks, and an accompanying tsunami.
Now, the reports are early.
This occurred in the Solomon Islands.
Actually, a pair of powerful earthquakes.
Undersea, one 8.0, and then a 6-point-something or another following that.
A tsunami, several yards high, crashed into the Solomon Islands.
Now I'm getting late word, early word on this is always very difficult.
We know of some dead.
The Associated Press was talking to a guy on the phone, then it cut out abruptly before he could give his name or any further information.
But we're now learning that several villages in the Solomon Islands were completely destroyed by a tsunami in the west of the South Pacific nation on Monday.
That's according to the chairman of the National Disaster Council.
Some villages, he said, are completely wiped out.
So that's the latest word we have.
This sort of thing always comes slowly to the news, particularly when it occurs on the other side of the world.
So kind of keep your eyes open as the evening goes on for more news, but an eight-point earthquake is big no matter how you crack it up.
We'll get to more of the Never to be disappointed by how depressing it is, World News, in a moment.
But there is one.
I'm going to put a picture of Erin up, oh I don't know, in the next month or so.
She's already kind of looking like a walking basketball.
She's only 4'8", and she's always telling me I think I'm going to blow up.
So tonight, being April 1st, I looked at her with solemn eyes.
She knows I was preparing for the show, and I said, hey, I wasn't going to tell you about this, but there is a gal in New Mexico earlier in the evening, and she's only eight months old, about five feet tall, and she blew up.
And she paused for a moment and looked at me and laughed.
She's getting to know me, so it didn't work.
She keeps saying she's gonna blow up.
A volunteer search team, this is a very sad story, found the bodies of two young brothers encased in ice on the Red Lake Indian Reservation Sunday, more than four months after they had disappeared.
Tristan Anthony White, four years of age.
Avery Lee Stately, just two years of age, and had been missing since November 22nd.
The two boys who lived on the reservation near the Canadian border disappeared while playing outside their home.
Iranian state TV has done it again, a new video showing two of the 15 captured British sailors pointing to a spot on the map of the Persian Gulf where they were seized.
Acknowledging it was Iranian territorial waters, British Foreign Office immediately denounced the video saying it was completely unacceptable for these pictures to be shown on TV at all, and that is true.
Two Democratic presidential candidates broke previous fundraising records during the first three months of the year.
Any guesses out there who it might be?
First would be Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton setting the bar high at $26 million in new contributions for the quarter.
Former Senator John Edwards, more than $14 million since the beginning of the year.
Clinton also transferred $10 million additional from her Senate campaign, bringing her total receipts for the quarter to $36 million.
That's a lot of money.
So we're going to have a woman, and with Obama I guess, a black man.
Running for president, and it should be quite... Boy, it's going to be interesting, isn't it?
Very, very interesting.
As six U.S.
troops die, McCain as McCain tours Baghdad after a heavily guarded trip to a Baghdad market.
Senator McCain insisted Sunday that a U.S.-Iraqi security crackdown on the capital was working, and he said Americans lacked a, quote, full picture, end quote, of the progress.
U.S.
military later reported six soldiers were killed in roadside bombing southwest of Baghdad.
Four soldiers killed responding to the blast that killed the first two.
And from the Philippines.
Bowls of piping hot barracuda soup were the much-anticipated treat when the Roa family gathered for a casual, relaxing Sunday meal.
Within hours, all six fell deathly ill.
So did two dozen others from the same neighborhood.
Some complained of body-wide numbness.
Others had weakness in their legs.
Several couldn't speak or even open their mouths.
Seafood poisoning because of warming seawater.
Oh, and speaking of seawater, unnamed sources Now how this got through without our knowing about it is just astounding to me.
But Death Valley will be Death Valley no more if this continues.
And then sources say that piping has already been installed from an undisclosed location at the Pacific Ocean.
Now Death Valley as you know is below sea level.
So what they're going to do is pump seawater Well, actually, they don't even have to pump it.
I mean, if they had somebody with a big enough mouth, they'd just suck, and it would come automatically, because remember, Death Valley is below sea level, so they're going to fill Death Valley with seawater, and it's going to be Death Valley Lake!
It's going to be a big, sucking sea siphon.
And what used to be the lowest area on land will be a giant lake.
A chimpanzee capable of doing simple tasks such as repetitive factory work
has been created in the laboratory by modifying the brain of a chimpanzee embryo with human DNA.
My God!
This chimp has got a measurable IQ of 68!
68!
Well within the range necessary to accomplish simple tasks like Janitorial, some factory work, stoop labor.
For example, on a farm.
Corporate sponsors, military and governments worldwide are all interested in the new animal.
It'll not be subject to laws governing work hours and safety in factory environments.
Would be considered expendable on the battlefield and can be bought and sold on the open markets.
Expected the first super chimps will be available for sale to selected corporations and entities and government agencies within about two years.
A polar ice expert said on Wednesday that a Texas-sized piece of the Antarctic ice sheet is thinning.
Possibly due to global warming could cause the world's oceans to rise significantly.
They said, surprisingly rapid changes were occurring in Antarctica's Amundsen Sea Embayment, that's what it's called, Embayment, which faces the Southern Pacific Ocean, but that more study was needed to know how fast it was melting and how much it caused the sea to actually rise.
Warning came in a joint statement issued at the end of a conference of U.S.
and European polar ice experts at the University of Texas in Austin.
The scientists blamed the melting ice on changing winds around Antarctica and said they were causing warmer waters to flow beneath the ice shelves.
Not good.
The wind change, they said, appeared to be the result of several factors, including global warming, ozone depletion in the atmosphere, and natural variability.
Now I read to you a little bit yesterday of a report that's going to be released next week.
On climate change, let me read you just a little bit more.
The report says global warming has already degraded conditions for many species, coastal areas, and poor people.
With a more than 90% level of confidence, scientists say the draft report Say, man-made global warming over the next three decades has a discernible influence on many physical and biological systems.
But as the world's average temperature warms from 1990 levels, the projections get more dire.
Add, let's say, 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit, 1 degree Celsius, is the calculation scientists use, and between 400 million and 1.7 billion extra people cannot get enough water.
Some infectious diseases and allergenic pollens rise.
Gosh, we've seen some of that already.
And some amphibians go extinct.
But the world's food supply, especially in northern areas, actually could increase.
That's a likely outcome around 2020.
So this is not just your children, it's you.
Add another 1.8 degrees, and as many as 2 billion people could be without water.
That's, let's see, two billion people.
That's what, about a third of what we have here now on the world?
20 to 30 percent of the world's species near extinction.
Also, more people begin dying because of malnutrition, disease, heat waves, floods, and droughts, all caused by global warming.
And again, as I told you yesterday, the scientist says, from Harvard, that the worst stuff is not going to happen.
He says, because we can't be that stupid.
Again, he says, not that I think the projections aren't that good, but because we just can't be that stupid.
China announced Wednesday it's going to launch a joint mission with Russia to Mars in 2009, marking an important milestone in space cooperation between those two countries.
Small Chinese satellite will take off on a Russian rocket, According to the agreement signed Monday between the China National Space Administration and the Russia Federal Space Agency, the agreement signed during an ongoing three-day visit to Russia by the Chinese President follows pledges by Moscow in recent months to work closely with Beijing on exploration of both Mars and the Moon.
I wonder if we'll get involved in some kind of race with them.
Sure you heard about this one.
Pilots of a Chilean commercial jetliner spotted a flaming object falling past their plane as it was headed for a landing in New Zealand.
U.S.
experts suggested the objects were likely meteors burning up in the Earth's atmosphere, but indeed it looks as though it was part of a Russian satellite coming back home slightly off course, according to what the Russians said they thought would happen.
Can you imagine being in an airplane looking out and seeing a flaming object more or less headed toward you from above?
On October 1st of 2002, while vacationing in the southern Chilean city of Concepcion, a group of family members found what appeared to be a small humanoid creature.
Minuscule being, measured about 7.2 centimeters long.
That's very, very, very, very small.
It has a relatively large head, two arms with long fingers and two legs.
The discovery first reported by Mega News Service, which is a local news service in the Santiago area.
According to previously gathered evidence and interviews conducted by journalist Rodrigo Ugarte, the bizarre creature was found among bushes by one of the children during an outdoor trip the child allegedly Picked it up, wrapped it with a piece of paper, child claims it stayed alive, get this, for about eight days, and in some instances even opened its eyes.
Yikes!
Nevertheless, after supposedly being dead for a few days, the small creature displays signs of advanced decomposition, even appears to be in a strange state of mummification.
You wouldn't think that would occur in just a very few days.
What would our world be like without a moon?
Well, a lot of people have asked that question.
Here are a few answers on a daily basis.
If we didn't have the moon, we'd still have large breakers on the continental west coast because of the rotation speed of Earth.
So we'd still have big waves.
And, of course, the existence of storms out at sea.
Sloping beaches, the waves we're most familiar with from minute to minute are caused by small ripples out at sea caused by storms.
That's like the butterfly effect, right?
Which get amplified then into majestic breakers by their motion up a sloping beach in the rotation of the earth from west to east, which gives them added momentum.
Without the moon though, Well, look, we'd still have high and low tides due to the sun, but these would be only half as tall as lunar high and lunar low tides.
There would be, however, No neap or spring tides, which occur when the Sun and the Moon are on opposite sides of the Earth, or on the same side.
So, far as anyone can tell, there'd be no impact on the issue of life on Earth, because if ocean tides were important in getting life started, for example, mixing up the so-called primordial soup, solar tides ought to have been more than adequate to do the job three and a half to four billion years ago.
Without the Moon, There would have been no necessity for breaking the calendar year into 12 months.
A large body of music titles would have also, of course, never occurred.
The tidal stress upon the Earth due to gravity from the Moon would have vanished, and some feel this might have had an impact on how active the crust of the Earth would be in terms of volcanism and continental drift.
It is possible that the Earth would have been slightly less geologically active And when the Earth's atmosphere was first being formed via volcanic outgassing, perhaps it would have taken a bit longer for the atmosphere to have reached high enough concentrations necessary for synthesizing life.
Seems, however, that the physics of the interior of the Earth, the rate of convection of the mantle, is far more under the control of non-lunar influences intrinsic to the Earth itself.
So, no big deal if we didn't have the Moon.
I guess without the Moon, There would be no 26,000 precession of the equinoxes, which is due to the torquing of the Earth by the Moon.
This would be replaced by a much slower precession caused by the influence of the Sun, Venus and Mars.
The axis of the Earth's rotation in space would point toward the same spot in the sky for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years.
Recent computer simulations suggest that without the Moon, the Earth's axis tilt might have been very different than it is today.
This would have caused very different seasons on the Earth.
And the impact that this could have had on the developing biosphere ranges from moderate to catastrophic.
The Moon actually seems to stabilize the tilt of the Earth's rotation axis over the course of billions of years.
So, I guess it is a good thing that we have the Moon, right?
Besides, it's pretty to look at.
All right, let's do some unscreened open lines.
What do you say?
Let me give you the appropriate numbers to call, and we'll get you on the air and see if you've got something of great interest to relate to everybody else.
Here are the numbers.
West of the Rockies, if that's where you be.
1-800-618-8255.
That's one.
800-618-8255.
East of the Rockies.
Everybody way back there.
1-800-825-5033.
That's 1-800-825-5033.
8255 East of the Rockies.
Everybody way back there 1-800-825-5033 That's 1-800-825-5033
If you are a first-time caller It's area code 8255
That's area code 818-501-4721.
Wildcard line would be area code 818-501-4109.
And finally, outside the country, 800-893-0903.
800-893-0903.
We will be right back.
818-501-4721 wildcard line would be area code 818-501-4109.
And finally, outside the country, 800-893-0903.
800-893-0903.
We will be right back.
Well, alrighty then.
Since this is April 1, now one of the news stories that I read you was complete BS.
I don't know what that means.
I ran it past my producer back there, you know, my board op back there, and he got it all right.
Second guess, not the first one.
Which one of those stories do you think was complete BS?
First time caller line, you're on the air.
Hello.
Hi Art, this is Dorothy from California?
Oh, I thought you were going to say Kansas.
No, California.
I was wondering, do you ever hear from the fellow that died, was it Damon Brinkley or Danion Brinkley or something like that?
Danion is very much alive.
Oh, great.
How's he doing?
Far, just as far as I know he's fine.
Living, I think for the most part, in the Las Vegas area, just over the hill from me.
Oh, great.
Are you ever going to have him on the show again?
Oh, it's entirely possible, sure.
Daniel, as he knows, he's welcome any time.
Okay, great.
Thank you.
Oh, you're very welcome.
Hey, by the way, before you go, did you hear the first 30 minutes of the program?
No, I didn't.
I was out walking my dogs.
Oh, all right.
All right, then.
All right, thank you, and take care.
West of the Rockies, you are on the air.
Wow, really?
You're kidding me.
No, I don't joke about such things.
I might.
But no, you're way on the air.
This is Justin, just outside of Payette, Idaho, somewhere.
Trucking along.
Yes, sir.
Yeah, I heard that.
Hey, A, you have got to be kidding about the monkey, man.
You've got to be.
It's April Fool's Day.
It's got to be a joke.
So you think the story about the monkey with the IQ in the 60s somewhere was baloney, huh?
Yeah, it's got to be.
Wrong.
Wrong.
That comes from Whitley Strieber's Unknown Country.
It's absolutely correct.
I'll be.
I will be.
That was not the BS story.
Huh.
I am just dumbfounded.
Hey, and on the moon, you know, from the point of view of a lot of the people you've got on the show, That would be a particularly insidious thing for an alien culture to do, to put a base up there and observe us and mess with our gravity.
Our population would be a lot less right now if we didn't have that.
You're right about that.
Well, I guess it might be.
All right, sir, I've got to run.
Sorry, we're at a break.
I'm Art Bell.
Well, indeed, here I am.
Listen, everybody, in case you missed it yesterday, little Asia is due to make her appearance right about noontime on June 1st.
And you might wonder, how can we know that for sure?
Well, we know it because we set the date.
It's going to be by C-section.
And so, June 1st, along comes Asia Reign.
Well, since nobody has gotten it, it shows you how strange and weird The normal news is, you can make a story up out of whole cloth, like for example, filling Death Valley up with siphoned seawater from the Pacific Ocean, because it's below sea level, and turning it into a lake.
You can make that up out of whole cloth, drop it in, and it just sort of floats right on by, and people go, oh cool, gonna fill up Death Valley, hmm, not a bad idea.
Unbelievable.
A wild card line, you're on the air.
Hello.
Hello, Art.
How are you doing?
All right.
I was hoping that the monkey story was the false one, but obviously it wasn't.
Nonetheless, Whitley's messing with us, and he ran a story saying he wasn't going to do any more April Fool's jokes, so I don't think it's baloney.
It's entitled, Human Genes Used to Create Super Chimp.
Uh, and you can see it on Whitley Streber's Unknown Country website, so I'm afraid it's real.
Well, basically, the story of Land and Planet of the Apes was the same scenario, uh, indirectly.
I mean, there was time travel involved and all that, but, you know, they started out as being our pets.
Well, you know, they're starting to mix human DNA, what, 15% into a sheep, now more into a super chimp, and I'm not so sure of this human DNA going into animals thing.
Is it a good idea or not?
Maybe not.
No, and I think, you know, the scenario is pretty ghastly, and basically we're talking about how if they wouldn't, if they, you know, make them into workers, they wouldn't be subjected to the labor laws and all that stuff.
Right?
I think, well, preferably, they should just go ahead and clone humans, because it's the far more worthless species than any other animal.
But, hey, Art, I think, honestly, you're going to have, what, much more than one child to carry on.
I hope so, anyway.
Well, you never know, but certainly... Maybe Cornelius.
Cornelius would be a good name.
Cornelius?
I wouldn't lay that on any poor soul, Cornelius.
Hey, I think, you know, better than Planet of the Apes, how about Planet of the Cats?
Alright, Planet of the Cats, why not?
Asia Rainbell, her middle name is going to be Rain.
R-A-Y-N-E, by the way.
And why Rain?
Well, two reasons.
One, she was conceived in Hong Kong during a big rainstorm.
And two, because that was my wife's nickname, Rain, in college.
So, seems to fit, Asia Rainbell.
Asia Rainbell, it shall be.
West of the Rockies, you're on the air.
Good morning.
Hello, my name's Chris.
I'm calling from Oregon.
Yes, Chris.
Yeah, I have a question.
There's this star that's in the sky.
It's the brightest thing I've ever seen and I can't figure out what it is.
How about Venus?
Is that what it is?
I'm taking a stab in the dark here.
Yeah, I've just never seen it before.
Venus would be the brightest star in the sky.
Oh, okay.
Unless the Second Coming is on the way and we're being pointed toward it.
I mean, otherwise, it's probably Venus.
Yes, I was thinking that.
Thank you.
I was thinking it might have something to do with the Second Coming.
Uh-huh.
Well, it might.
What part of the sky are you seeing this star in?
I don't know.
It's like, I'm looking up to the west side and I can see it, and it's huge.
Sounds a lot like Venus.
You're in Oregon, right?
Yeah, I'm in Oregon.
Okay, well, we'll have some others go out and take a look and see what they see.
Anything huge, untoward, in your western sky?
Up there in Oregon, folks.
Northern California, I suppose, you'd see it as well.
For that matter, I'm sure I would here.
Let's go to a wildcard line and say, hello, you are on the air.
Hello, this is James.
Hey, James.
Uh, me and my fiancé had some questions about draconians.
We, uh, think that... Wait a minute.
You have questions about what?
Draconians?
Draconians.
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Um, I've heard the topic come up on your show a couple times about draconians, and I was wondering where we could get some more information on that.
Um, I don't have the slightest idea.
I really don't know what draconians are, to be honest with you.
What are they?
You know, like lizard-type men.
Uh-huh.
Reptilians.
Ah, reptilians.
Yeah.
What is it you really, what do you really want to know about them?
Um, just like their general habits and stuff.
We actually think we've seen one before around our house.
We live out in the country in Tennessee.
Mm-hmm.
And probably this wintertime, like late at night, we'd be outside and I actually thought I seen one in our driveway, and my fiancé seen it too, so.
Kind of freaked us out.
I can imagine.
Two of you seeing it, yes.
Yeah, like weird stuff would start happening around and going on, you know, like, trash cans all spilt over, but like, like, we have like this huge trash can gate type thing, so it's really hard to get into, like, no animals could get into it.
All kinds of stuff going on.
But the draconian did get in?
Yeah.
You know, for some reason or another, I have in my mind that if a reptilian creature managed to come all the way to Earth from wherever, you know, light years, hundreds perhaps of light years away, it wouldn't have to be rummaging through trash cans for whatever it could find for sustenance or what have you.
One never knows.
Perhaps it came slithering up from under the earth.
A likely spot, I guess, for something with scales.
First time caller line, you are on the air.
Hello.
Art Bell, several weeks ago in the Molten House with George Norian, you and I had the same thought about the chemtrails affecting the honeybees.
And I'm glad to see that you concur.
I wondered in the Idaho Observer, the article you were talking about, if they mentioned that they found barium in the chemtrails.
And believe it or not, I've been listening to you since I was about 10 years old, and I'm now 21 years old in college, and this is my first time being able to speak to you, and it is an honor and a pleasure, sir.
Well, congratulations.
Now, you know that what I said about the honeybees and chemtrails is pure speculation.
That's all it is.
On my behalf as well, obviously, and so far that's all we have.
But is it barium, which is, you know, rat poisoning, if I'm not mistaken?
I'm trying to recall, sir, and I'll have to get that story again.
Somebody will send it to me.
I'm not sure if barium was part of the sad little mixture that they came up with.
I mean, there were all kinds of horrible things in it.
Viruses and just all human DNA was in there and all kinds of awful things.
Much worse.
So I'll try and get the list again and see if Barium was on that list.
I don't recall.
It was a long and sad list.
Wildcard Line, you're on the air.
Hello.
Yes, sir.
How are you?
I wish you the best, sir.
Thank you.
Yeah, my name is Blake.
I'm calling out here in the Phoenix area.
And I just thought it was a tremendous coincidence that we have April Fool's Day at the same time the Iranians have a New Year.
And the fact that Ahmadinejad seems to be on a fool's errand to develop nuclear bombs Which even if he didn't use it against the hated Great Satan and Little Satan, somebody else that had a particular agenda that would want to make it look like he did, could wreak the entire annihilation of the Iranian people because he prompted a hostility towards us that made it look like he was the offer of all the damage that would be incurred.
Let me ask you a question.
If the United States comes to be in possession of information, the Iranians are indeed about to produce an atomic bomb, or getting very close to it, or whatever, are we, in your opinion, morally justified in bombing the hell out of their infrastructure So that they don't get an atomic bomb and then pass it on to somebody who would use it, which is probably how it would occur.
I mean, are we justified in war-like inacts?
It would be an act of war, of course.
Yeah, we wouldn't have to take it to that extreme.
What we would have to do is to see that there was a more intelligent regime that was in place there.
By and large, the Iranian people don't want any part of it.
But unfortunately, we're faced with the dilemma and we don't need an underhanded Under dealing of nuclear devices proliferating, the free western world and all the upset and cataclysm that could come about them delivering it clandestinely.
They don't need advanced missile systems or anything like that.
We've got to be aware of that.
We want to make sure that the people that have control of devices of such great energy outbursts, that they are responsible people, and that in turn You know, they're not working their own agenda secretly behind our backs.
Okay, well, I'll take that as a yes, that you would say we should act.
And I suppose in our own self-defense there may not be a whole lot of choice in the end, if they do obtain something like that.
There's actually quite Quite an interesting... Among the young people in Iran, there's quite a democratic movement underway.
Unfortunately, not chaired by the government of Iran.
So, my feeling is, if they did become in possession of a weapon of that magnitude, they would get it to somebody who would use it against us.
And, so based on that, Even though it's the last thing in the world I want to see, I really do think we would almost have to act, or the Israelis would have to act, or the British, or somebody.
And it really kind of looks like we're headed in that direction.
I think the U.S.
is beginning to mass some forces.
You know, this is according to a Russian report on the Iranian border.
And it wouldn't surprise me that we do something.
We'll see.
Amis to the Rockies, you are on the air.
Good morning.
Oh, hey, Art.
Gary in San Antonio.
Thanks for taking my call.
You're very welcome.
I know you have a lot of Christians that listen in to Coast to Coast, so I'd like to set the record straight on something really important.
Last Sunday, a guy calls in to Coast to Coast and shouts something about the Antichrist would be killed by a sword wound to his head, and said, well, that's Jesus Christ.
The truth is, Jesus wasn't killed by a sword wound to his head.
He was crucified to death.
Well, he was telling us that the Antichrist was Jesus, basically.
Yeah, that's what he said, but he also mentioned about a sword wound killing him to the head.
But Jesus was crucified, and a spear was run through his chest.
He wasn't hit over the head with a sword.
Now, I know George occasionally asks his guests who the Antichrist is.
The answer is, the Bible says he'll be revealed in the yet-to-be-built Jewish temple.
When he commits an abominable act of erecting an idol of himself, demanding everybody in the world take his mark in their forehead or their right hand.
But as for the spirit of Antichrist, which the Bible says is already at work in the world, the Bible says that that spirit can be identified by anyone who denies that Jesus is the Christ, or denies that the Lord Jesus Christ came in the flesh, manifested in the flesh, and that that person, in essence, is denying it, says both the Father So, when Jesus said, I am the resurrection from the dead, and I am the truth, if someone would deny the resurrection from the dead, that's who he says he is, then they are in fact denying who he is.
Alright, I'm going to leave it there.
I don't want you to give me a name.
People, they do really tend to get upset when you name them as the Antichrist, and I'm sure you were working up to that.
So, they just get all upset, and understandably so.
Usually it's a public figure, somebody like that, but even at that, you know, it's not nice to name somebody as the Antichrist, unless you know for sure, and of course there is no way we can be positive.
Wildcard Line, you're on the air, hello.
Yeah, hello Art, how you doing?
I'm alright, sir.
Hey, that star, this is Dave, by the way, probably a third time caller, and congratulations on Asia, by the way.
Yes.
And that star that that gentleman was referring to, I'm pretty sure it's called Arcturus, and it's 113 times more luminous than the sun.
It's a great big star.
It's approximately, from us, it's about 36 light years away, and it's visible now near the moon.
Uh, but yeah, and it's a bright sucker too, you know, so I just wanted to call you up and, uh, and, uh, so you'd know, you know, just so you know, yeah, Venus is, is bright, you know, it's, you know, close planet to us, but, uh, but that star, it, there is a bright star up there and it's, it's, it's Arcturus, I'm pretty sure, because it's invisible this time of year.
Well, if it's actually, okay, if it's actually a star, as in a sun, we all know, I think most of us know that, uh, uh, what we, sorry, you know, we tend to refer to everything that shines brightly As a star, and of course that's not the case.
Venus, for example, is a planet.
A star would be a sun.
So, in that strict context, that could be absolutely correct, if it is strictly that.
First time caller line, you're on the air.
Hello.
Hello, Art.
Yes, sir.
How are you?
I had a question regarding the human race coming from another planet.
Okay.
And I heard from... I recently moved to Georgia, and I met this interesting... Okay, I'm going to approach this a different way, if you don't mind, actually.
I've heard a few times, even the other night, someone talking about the possibility of the human race, or at least humans, coming to this Earth that we live on from another planet, or another... Well, yes, another planet.
But I've also heard variations in which someone told me that Caucasians were the only ones who came to this planet from some other planet.
And that African Americans are the original inhabitants of the Earth.
Sir, you're on a cell phone that became unstable.
You know, I hate to... I'll avoid it.
I hate cell phones.
And I have one, by the way.
Nobody should be without one.
They really save lives, but... Boy, I'll tell you what.
Using them to call in talk shows, I don't know.
But I realize it's easy and tempting and probably unavoidable, but they have degraded the quality of audio on talk radio programs across the world.
Wildcard Line, you're on the air!
Hello.
Hi, this is Bill from RKO in Boston.
Yes, sir.
Is this hot?
It is.
Oh, my word.
My brother turned me on to you, and I love you very, very much.
And you sound so happy that you're back in the United States.
I was worried about you.
Well, thank you.
Listen, everybody has said that, and I still don't fully grasp I mean, I had a lot of fun in the Philippines.
I was really enjoying myself in Manila, but for some reason that I truly don't understand, there was this... I had to have had thousands of emails, sir, saying, my God, thank God you're back in the United States.
People feel safer.
I mean, were you in the Air Force at one time?
I was, yes.
Yeah, I was in the Air Force for four years.
I was in Maine, and I was up there when they had the UFO thing, but I did not see nothing up there.
I see.
But I have one little story for you.
Very quickly.
We're at the end of the hour here.
Okay.
I take pictures, and I took a picture of a tree in the Boston Common, and my stepson came over there, and he goes, there's a man in that picture.
I blew it up to 16 by 20, and it was Lee Harvey Oswald with a gun.
Really?
That's like Elvis, you know, sweating a stain of Elvis or something on your shirt.
But there he was, Lee Harvey Oswald.
You blow something up big enough and you can nearly pick anything out, whether it's Elvis or Lee Harvey or Whatever.
Coming up after the break, Major Ed Dames.
And you better prepare yourself.
In fact, I'll make my normal little warning announcement.
I'm Art Bell.
All right, here's my warning, everybody.
And I do have a warning for you.
Coming up is Major Ed Dames.
Now listen to me closely.
Major Ed Dames is perhaps the world's foremost remote-viewing teacher.
And he is a remote viewer.
Now, the things that he sees tend to be a little, or even a lot, on the negative side for mankind, for the world.
And so, if you are upset by hearing negative information, upset by hearing forecasts of doom and gloom, then you're going to want to tune out right now.
Just reach over and go click, and turn me off.
I'm actually very serious about that.
There are people who get very, very upset about this sort of thing.
Actually, Major Dames is the single most loved and hated guest that I have on the air.
And that's because of the kind of things that he talks about.
On the other hand, I really must tell you that quite a bit of what he's had to say has come true, particularly those things he's said about Our ecology.
And, uh, what's happening?
Look at the bees!
Look at what's happening with the bees!
And yes, he will talk about the honey bees.
Tonight, the world's foremost remote-viewing teacher, Edward A. Dames, Major U.S.
Army, retired, is a decorated military intelligence officer, and an original member of the U.S.
Army Prototype Remote-Viewing Training Program, Which was run by the CIA.
He served as a training and operations officer for the Defense Intelligence Agency's Psychic Intelligence, or PSIINT, collection unit.
Currently serves as executive director for the Matrix Intelligence Agency, a private consulting group.
The technical consultant for the feature film Suspect Zero.
I wonder how many of you saw that.
If not, it's running on the, you know, making the circuit right now on HBO and Showtime and such.
It was a Tom Cruise, Paul Wagner production.
Ed coached Sir Ben Kingsley and played a role of an FBI remote viewing instructor as well in the movie.
Really was a damn good movie, actually.
Ed Dames, welcome back to the program.
Thank you, Ed.
There you are.
Where do I find you this night, Ed?
Four hours closer to Ukraine by air.
I'm near the Great Lakes.
That's right.
You are engaged to a Ukrainian gal, right?
Correct.
Not yet married?
Not yet.
When does that happen?
Probably October.
October?
Alright, so actually being up there does get you that much closer.
Are you talking about over-the-pole flights to get to Ukraine?
Negative.
Usually through Warsaw or Kiev from Detroit.
Alright.
Well, anyway, it's always great having you back, and I wasn't kidding about the loved and hated part.
Boy, there really are people who do not like the bearer of bad news, which of course you are.
You know, I never told you this, but there's been times in my military career where I've met violence on the part of commanders, but the worst incident And you know, let me hit you with this because it's the one thing that I've never been able to rationalize in my mind.
will not mention, when I brought up a very serious problem to him that he was already
under stress, two-star general, and committed suicide.
So I...
God.
Yeah.
Ed, you know, let me hit you with this because it's the one thing that I've never been able
to rationalize in my mind.
I know that you and others who did what you did, well, you've always said that, A, without
any shadow of any doubt, remote viewing works.
Thank you.
Yes?
Correct.
Okay.
You can identify things, people, find hidden bombs.
Find lost children.
In other words, remotely find things that would be dangerous to the United States security.
National security.
Correct?
With a lot of work, yes.
Correct.
Yeah.
A lot of work.
But a lot of things are a lot of work.
So you could find things that would threaten our life and our security.
And yet the program ended because it embarrassed people.
So that doesn't make sense to me.
It never has.
If on the one hand it works and it would protect life and property and our nation, it wouldn't end just because somebody's embarrassed.
It wasn't simple embarrassment.
As I've mentioned before, we were sort of the red light district.
I mean, people in government and in the military We're loathe to be seen associating with us in the light of day.
Maybe so.
But even if it's complex embarrassment, if it works, it would still be going on.
And you will tell me it's not, right?
Or to the best of your knowledge, it is not?
It is not.
Not in this country, no.
All right, Ed, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we'll dive in again.
A warning, everybody, if you don't like hearing negative news, now would be the time to tune out.
We'll be right back.
All right, Lynn in St.
Paul, Minnesota, kind of up there in that part of the world, Ed, sends the following.
Hey, there's an article in Science Magazine.
Page 1786, 30 March 2007.
Headline, Deadly Wheat Fungus Threatens World Bread Baskets.
You said something about something like that, didn't you, Ed?
Let's see.
Clavicet purpurea, yes.
A mutation on the clavicet's mold will do worldwide damage to grasses, all grasses, not just wheat.
I'm looking ahead.
That's one of the things that we do over the horizon radar.
I know.
I know, I know.
The things you say are really terrifying.
Many of them really terrifying.
And many of them, unfortunately, have really started to become true now.
You also forecast a very scary thing about frogs, right?
Correct.
It happened.
Right?
It happened.
Now we've got this honeybee.
I have never had so many emails as I've had in the last few days about...
The colony collapse of honeybees.
Honeybees are not just dying.
In fact, we don't know what the hell is happening to them.
They're just flat disappearing.
No little bee bodies.
The honeybees across the country, now even into the last few states that didn't have the problem, they're now having the problem all across America.
The honeybees are just flat gone.
Somebody called on the show the other day, Ed, and they said it's like they're being raptured.
They'll be extinct very soon, Art.
Very soon, indeed.
They'll be extinct?
Very soon, uh-huh.
Can you reach back and recall what you said, how many years ago now, about honeybees?
There was a problem in New Zealand with flowers changing color, and you asked me about that, and I used remote viewing to look into the source of that.
What was happening is that the high levels of UV radiation because of ozone loss, I'm going to get into this technically in a moment, but the bees could not find the flowers.
And the flowers were having to adapt to these high levels of UV in an attempt for Mother Nature to lure back the bees.
I'll get into that systematically in a moment, but it was because of intense UV radiation, shortwave UVB was blinding the bees, essentially.
They couldn't find it.
We'll be talking a lot about that momentarily.
All right.
Well, the people who dislike you, Ed, consistently point out what they think that you have gotten wrong.
Now, you've talked, of course, a great deal about the sun.
I've really got to point out to my audience that the scientists lately, and I'm talking about the ones at NASA, you know the very best we can respect are saying that we are about to have between now and Well, we're about to have the biggest, strongest monster of a sun cycle that anybody's ever seen.
Potentially bigger than anything ever seen by man.
Not that we've been around on Earth that long, but they're saying we're going to have giant flares, Ed.
Now, you said a thing or two about sun, too, right?
Oh, I did.
And I don't want you to construe anything I say tonight as reflecting any promise of hope, because we're going down.
We're facing a barren planet in about 50 years.
50 years.
And that's the long and the short of it.
We are going down.
It's not just ecocide.
It's outside forces as well, geophysical forces that have nothing to do with man-made causes.
But we are going down.
I've seen stories saying that in 50 years, since you mentioned that figure, Without some major change, all the fish in the ocean will be dead.
All the fish in the ocean will be dead in 50 years.
There's a reason for that that I'll get into this evening.
So, a lot of what you've said in past years that sounded like the most horrific science fiction, whether people like it or not, is beginning to manifest itself now.
Well, there's one nice thing I have to say tonight about remote viewing, and it has nothing to do with the condition.
It's something of being able to see at a distance.
Ten and a half years ago, on your program, I said that my team had discovered seas on Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, that had vast seas.
Just this month, the Cassini mission photographed those seas through the clouds of methane.
So that was a nice validation of work.
But you need the technology to confirm it, to validate it, and it took 10 years to get the feedback.
Well, yeah, and you also need time, and a lot of the things that you said, again, sounding like they were out of a really bad science fiction novel of some sort, or a horror novel of some sort, are manifesting themselves now, actually beginning to come true, with scientists saying, yes, in this period of time, expect to see all the fish die, expect to see Weather changes that will affect billions and billions of people and now the honeybees and the frogs and all the rest of it is beginning to coalesce and I understand that it scares people and it damn well ought to scare people.
Is there anything we can do?
And then here comes the sun, that stuff.
Is there anything we can do to head off any of this?
Nobody wants to see a barren planet in 50 years, Andy.
There's nothing we can do to head it off.
The only thing that people can do to survive and have any quality of life is to start thinking about self-contained habitats or living underground and weather this storm until the planet re-establishes equilibrium.
That's about all there is, but we're not going to be able to stop or delay The degradation of the ozone layer and other things.
I think we should start talking about the bees though.
The bees are symptomatic of something that's much, much more serious.
Even though, without bees, we stand to lose billions and billions of dollars in agriculture and pollination problems because of pollination problems.
But still, it's just the tip of an iceberg I'd like to talk about.
Alright, let's talk bees.
Everybody wants to know about the bees.
The colony collapse stories began, Ed.
Have you done any additional remote viewing, or are you just simply able to fill us in based on what you knew prior?
No, no.
I've turned it into a project and completed the project, so I'll give you the full results this evening.
Lay it on us.
Okay.
One of the hypotheses that has been put forward about what may be happening to the bees in the colonies when they're opened back up and the bees are dead is that they're malnourished.
That is, in fact, correct.
The bees have starved to death.
And the reason they're starving to death is the following.
I'll try not to get too technical here, okay?
Sure.
All right.
The bee, about one-third of the bee's vision is in the ultraviolet.
The other, the colored part of the vision and the rest of the vision, discerns form and motion.
They can see other bees and it can determine whether something is a tree or an animal or whatever.
But one-third, one-third of the cells in the bees' complex eyes are dedicated to the ultraviolet spectrum.
Two-thirds of those cells are devoted to finding flowers and to getting to the center of the flower where the nectar is.
The other one-third of the UV receptors are for navigation when the sun is not visible in the sky.
So, they use the polarized ultraviolet light that comes through the clouds to navigate.
Right.
Okay, so a full one-third of the vision of the bee is dedicated to UV.
The bees are getting a double whammy.
I'll tell you about the first one first.
The first one first is that The UV levels, the ultraviolet levels, because of ozone depletion, are so heavy worldwide that the bees are being blinded and they cannot find flowers.
And when they do land on a flower, because they detected it using olfactory mechanisms, their antennae can smell fragrances and things like that, they still have to see the center of the flower using UV reflection.
So they waste time.
It's difficult to find the flower.
And it's difficult to navigate, because they're blinded in the UV's range.
So if they're lucky enough to find the flower, then they have to find the nectar, which requires UV vision.
Okay?
Sure.
And they're blind, and bees don't have sunglasses, and they're in the sun all day long.
So they have a problem navigating to the flower, and a problem finding flowers, and a problem finding the nectar in the flower.
That's one of the damn-dams.
The other one is this.
The heavy ultraviolet radiation as a result of this metastasis that's happening in the ozone layer is degrading the quality of pollen in all flowers.
It's degrading the quality of pollen.
And the pollen is where the bees get their protein so they can overwinter in the hives.
So when the hives are opened back up, what you're finding is dead bees because they've starved to death.
One, they've expended so much energy for so little nectar.
And because they don't have enough protein to make it through the winter, all because of these increased levels of ultraviolet radiation, which are causing many, many other problems, not just with bees.
Okay.
I had heard, Ed, that they had virtually disappeared, that there weren't that many bee bodies, that most of them were just sort of, almost like a caller said, they were raptured or something, just sort of gone.
Well, if you can't navigate to the flowers, then you can't navigate back to your hive, either.
Because, again, they're depending upon polarized UV to navigate, and because the UV is so strong, it would be like you out hunting, where the sun is so strong and you have no sunglasses, and you try to draw a bead on your prey, but you can't see it, because your eyes are watering and the sun's so bright.
You can't hunt, and you can't bring food home.
Okay, so this is really, you see this as just sort of a first major sign of what's coming.
Actually, no, it was the frogs.
The frogs were the first one.
Years ago, we talked about this.
Oh, yes.
I looked into why the frogs were dying, and it was because in the neonate stage, when frogs lay their eggs in ponds, the eggs can't go anywhere.
They can't hide in the shade or whatever.
They're exposed to very, very increasingly greater levels of UVB.
Of ultraviolet radiation.
And that is what was causing the mutations.
And now it's even worse.
The ozone layer in this last winter was the largest in history.
And what scientists are not realizing is that not only is the ozone hole in the southern hemisphere larger, but the metastasis that's going on in the stratosphere is even greater.
I did a contract once for the Human Potential Foundation, sponsored by Lawrence Rockefeller,
called, let's see, Atmospheric Ozone Depletion, Projected Consequences and Remedial Technologies.
And in that contract, my remote viewing team looked out to see that there were no remedial
technologies, that this problem was not going to be solved.
It would only get worse until the point it reached where we would have a barren planet,
because the increased UV also affects plants.
And it's doing so now.
There's a report coming out next week, Ed, and I've got kind of a preview of that report, saying that with the increasing temperatures, with all the changes that are occurring in ecology, about 3.2 billion people, if nothing is done, Are going to be affected.
Now that's half the people on earth, at least, are going to be affected.
They're not going to be able to get water.
Food is going to get scarce.
And he goes on to say at the end, this Harvard University oceanographer, James McCarthy, that the worst is not going to happen, he says, because we can't be that stupid.
Not, he says, yeah, he says, not that I think the projections aren't that good.
They are good.
But because we just can't be that stupid and you're saying... Like Daryl Hannah said in Blade Runner, then we're stupid and we're gonna die.
And on that note, we're gonna take a break.
From the High Desert and the Great American Southwest, I'm Art Bell.
Here I am.
Listen, one of the reasons I continue to have Ed Dames on is because about a lot of the larger, scarier things he's had to say He's been right.
And the signs are all around us of his being right on a whole bunch of different major predictions.
Certainly one of them, the Sun.
Remember the big flare we had?
Scientists said it was so big their instruments, their satellite measuring instruments, all pegged out.
Then they started saying, well, that flare was so big it might have been an X-48 or bigger.
So big, we don't even know how big it really was.
And if it had been pointed at Earth, it would have been an event on the surface of the Earth.
And that's with the current configuration of our atmosphere, which is quickly deteriorating.
So, over the next X number of years, if something really major, no pun intended, occurs on the Sun, it could indeed be a surface event.
Living underground?
No.
Do I want to live, and if my life depends on living underground, do I really want to make that choice?
I'm not at all sure about that.
We'll be right back.
Let me tell you something.
If in, let's say, the year 1958, the year 1960, we had been talking about the kinds of things that we're not talking about tonight, just the kinds of things that the mainstream press is now talking about.
All the fish in the sea being dead, the collapse of honeybees nationwide just gone, major eruptions from the sun so large nobody could have imagined or even guessed at, or the current or the North Pole melting due to become a sea shortly, or all of these other things that are going on.
If we'd talked about that 58 or 60, it would have been laughed at.
It would have been a horror movie.
But now it's mainstream science talking about all of these things.
I assure you, had we talked about the men, it would have been an absolute horror movie.
It would have been laughed at.
Ed, welcome back.
Thank you.
You know, what I just said really is true.
If we'd said these things in 58 or 60, way back then, it would have been looked at, laughed at, and...
It just would have been, you know, some horror movie.
People couldn't even imagine it, and here we are in our lifetimes, not Ed Dame saying it now, but the scientists are saying it, and it's upsetting people, and I'm one of them.
So in 50 years, Ed, you're saying that what we're seeing now is nothing compared to what is going to be then, and the only way to survive what's going to happen then is going to be underground.
Or, what we need is habitat.
On your first show, ten and a half years ago, I said that as a result of that project that my team did, with regard to ozone depletion, we were looking at hemispherical domes that were first used to grow plants, because of the vicissitudes of geophysics and the weather.
No more seasons, etc., and the ultraviolet problem that stresses the immune system of plants and mammals tremendously.
We're just not going to be able to grow food crops the way we used to grow them.
So they're going to have to be put in sealed environments, either underground or in domed arenas, that will become the template for human habitats.
Humans will start to migrate into These crop production facilities.
But that stuff has to mature in terms of technology, and there's not going to be enough room for everybody.
So you can imagine how many people, after the plankton start to die in the ocean, which is going to be quite soon, you can imagine how many people on Earth are not going to survive.
If the plankton dies, what's the chain?
What happens?
Plankton produce most of the oxygen that we breathe.
That really is true, isn't it?
People have said trees convert to oxygen, right?
To some degree?
That's correct.
But plankton, predominantly plankton.
And the plankton, if they're dying, because plankton can only take so much, again, everything.
Life did not form on Earth until the ozone layer formed two and a half billion years ago.
Life was not possible because the high energy photons break amino acids and any potential peptide bonds.
They're broken.
So until we had that protective layer, which is very thin, it's not thick, it's very thin, until we had that established life could, as we know it on Earth, could really not develop on the surface of the Earth.
I'm not sure I would want to live underground, Ed.
Wouldn't be forever.
Well, for how long?
Oh, I don't know.
Possibly a few decades or more.
A few decades or more.
Neither one of us has that many decades left.
You're the one who sees all of this and has predicted all of this, and yet off you go eventually to Ukraine to begin a life there.
In an area, by the way, where you're seeing all kinds of nuclear problems directly ahead in Russia, right?
Oh, terrible pollution, radioactive pollution, yes.
But I mean, we still have life ahead of us, and while we have it, the quality of life is important.
You know, any degree of joy or happiness that we can extract is worth its weight in gold.
And that's not selfish, or not altruistic.
I mean, it's still a quality of life issue, regardless of what's up ahead or what's happening now.
For you and I both.
By what year would you say that people will have to be either in domes or underground?
I know the timelines are the toughest part of remote viewing.
I'd say a full 40 to 50 years in order to actually survive.
40 to 50 years in order to actually survive, probably 40 to 50 years.
But prior to that, we're going to lose a lot of our population.
The planet's probably overpopulated now, so that will mitigate some of the food problems.
Okay, there's a picture right now on CostaCoastAM.com, and that picture you'll do very well, folks, to go up there, take a look at it.
It's the Earth, and it shows the radiation pattern.
Following the Chernobyl accident here on Earth, go ahead and blow it up, click on it, blow it up, and take a look at what happened after Chernobyl and how much of the Earth was affected.
And of course, that'll go on and on and on and on for our lifetimes and much, much more.
But Ed is saying now that a brewing nuclear reactor incident in Russia is ahead of us.
You want to tell us about that, Ed?
Well, what we've been doing in the past decade, particularly as a result of your listenership and your show, is looking very far ahead at some of the worst, worst things that we see.
The worst disasters, the worst environmental catastrophes, geophysical catastrophes and everything.
And we've been reporting those to the people.
In media, but things are happening so rapidly now.
There's such a confluence of big things that it's better to actually look at the next up disaster, the next danger ahead.
And then the next one, the next one.
To have a radar screen that just reports the blips that appear on the local screen.
In other words, within a month or so or a couple of months.
And that allows people to prepare mentally and perhaps physically Geographically, you know, to take steps to protect themselves.
So the next blip that we're seeing, and this is what we're doing now, is we're going into what we call the matrix, the global mind.
It's not the collective unconscious, it's bigger than that.
It's a mind, there's only one mind, and we're all plugged into it.
We have consciousness, but each of our consciousnesses is a part of this mind.
We go into that mind, we look ahead.
And so the next thing up, and it's adjudicated by mind, is an accident, an incident, a release of radioactivity, which is the greatest man-made environmental disaster of all, really, when you think of it.
I mean, Chernobyl released 30 to 40 times the amount of radiation, radioactive fallout, that all the bombs did in World War II in Japan.
That's a lot of radiation, and I won't go into the casualties that are still being produced by Chernobyl.
It took 15 years to cap that thing, the reactor that exploded.
I live in Ukraine, not very far from Chernobyl, but the fallout, the thyroid cancers were in Belarus, which was 90 miles away.
And they're still experiencing thyroid cancers, and the long-term radiation effects are cumulative.
I won't go into radiation physics, but you know what I mean.
Do you have any idea of the sarcophagus that is over that reactor?
It's said to be rather unstable.
I think 60 Minutes did a big piece on it, and it's not stable.
Or have they now stabilized it?
There's not enough money to stabilize it, to make matters worse.
What Russia is doing is doing something terrible.
One thing, it's got all this valuable natural gas that it's selling to Europe and to the rest of the world.
At the same time, it's not going to use that gas for themselves because they're making too much money on it.
What they're doing is taking a lot of their old reactors, and this is actually illegal.
It's against Russian law, but they're doing it anyway.
They're extending the lifespan of those Chernobyl-like reactors, which cannot safely be extended.
So you're going to have some more accidents.
If you look at the classified reports, you can't look at the classified reports, obviously, but if you knew about them, there have been hundreds and hundreds of accidents or releases of radiation on the part of the Russians.
I'm part of Russian reactors, as opposed to Western reactors, are very safe.
They're very safe.
How many Chernobyl-like reactors remain in service?
Do you know?
Six.
And they are being renovated and extended another 15 years, which is against Russian law, but Putin said go ahead and do it.
And some of the safety, there's no safety measures.
They say that there are, but there aren't.
These are graphite core reactors, like the reactor at Chernobyl, Reactor 1.
And they cannot be safely renovated.
And nuclear physicists know this, but the Russians don't care, because it's cheap.
Well, if it were a safe reactor, it would be clean energy.
But it's cheap, and they make all the money off of gas, because... But that's a situation that's changing, too.
Because now, the Western world is saying, well, CO2 emissions are causing global warming, it's time to rev back up.
Even some of the green supporters are saying, Maybe we should re-look at nuclear reactors.
And indeed, much of the Western world is starting to rethink and redesign reactors.
And now uranium is going through the roof.
Six times more expensive than it was a few years ago.
Almost $100 a pound.
People are gearing up for uranium.
The demand for uranium is huge because of global warming.
So we're backing ourselves into a corner here.
At the same time, Scientists are not looking straight up at this thinning ozone layer, which is really going to hit us harder than global warming.
Much harder.
With regard to the nuclear accident that you see coming fairly soon, I guess I would like to know, of course, how soon everybody would.
But another major accident.
With respect to what happened at Chernobyl, how big?
No, we don't know how big it is.
What we could do with another four, probably three weeks worth of work, is actually pinpoint the actual reactor itself.
But that wouldn't do anything to stop the event, because the Russians wouldn't listen to us.
Right now we know that the reactor is within a grid of east 40 degrees to east 45 degrees.
North 55 degrees to north 60 degrees.
Within that grid there are three reactors.
It would take us about another three weeks using remote viewing geofix work, which is very accurate.
We're using it to find more gold in the Prescott, Arizona area now.
We use the same techniques to home in on the actual reactor that will release the radioactivity.
At this juncture, we don't know how big it will be, but we know it will be significant enough to be reported.
Alright, well, I guess we all want to know how big, and we certainly all want to know which one, if it's possible to know.
And then, of course, maybe there's a way, Ed.
By the way, let me say this.
Everybody, not everybody, but a lot of people think that remote viewing is like psychic work.
In other words, they will fast blast me or send me an email and say, give Ed a test during a break.
Have him remote view this or that.
Well, it doesn't, remote viewing does not Work that way and I really don't want to have to go back and explain remote viewing but it's done by a team of people and almost always now in Ed's case, right Ed?
People, we've trained so many thousands of students, they're trained to do this, to solve a problem by themselves, with no other, with no help.
When you work as a team, you can solve the problem faster.
That's the long and the short of it.
And more accurately.
Far more accurately, far faster, because you have, you can eliminate the error rates.
You know, you have the, it's not like the Tom Cruise movie, What was that?
But what I'm trying to say is, Ed, the point I was trying to make is, you can't say, hey, Ed Dames, you know, during this next break, take a look at this or that and report back to us very quickly and give us an answer.
You cannot do that.
No, no, we're not psychics.
We avail ourselves of the same faculty that psychics use, but we do this very, very systematically and very, very rigorously.
That's how we train.
Then that's what I do for half of my living.
That frustrates Americans.
They want instant answers, you know.
Oh, yeah.
In fact, I don't know if you've ever heard the term, associative remote viewing, ARV.
It's a shortcut that people try to take.
I have a workshop next month in Las Vegas.
In fact, you're welcome to drop in and see how people off the streets learn this.
and we use we use the techniques in class to do sports betting we we we can
identify a winning team of a number the way we do that is to identify the the
winning teams of a game that's going to be played the winning teams home city's
most unique feature and then people sketch that draw and describe it and
then they go down and bet on that game okay Well, there's shortcuts to do that, but the shortcuts are iffy, and they don't work however Americans like the easy way out, so it's not a sure thing.
Well, the other thing that people, of course, say is, well, if you can remote view, then remote view a lottery number!
And you're claiming, or you have claimed on this program, and you've said, you've documented on your website, that you've done exactly that, remote viewed a winning lottery number, and people have made a lot of money doing that.
Well, you can go over to my forum where I teach.
I teach advanced methods for free.
I have basic courses of instructions that people pay tuition for, whether it's a DVD or whether it's a workshop, but I teach all the advanced methods myself every day in this forum.
In that forum, you can see all the winning lottery tickets, and then you can see the sports betting parlays where my team has won tens of thousands, or in one case, $100,000.
On sports parlays in Vegas.
But that stuff gets boring.
It's a lot more fun to find gold in the field or to find a meteorite or a dinosaur skeleton that nobody has ever found using our work.
That's fun.
Where's my gold?
You all get it?
What we did was we used significant gold as a search term.
And now we have two gold mines.
We went into the gold mining business because we had to change the actual search term.
Remote viewing, you have to specify.
And we didn't specify gold coins.
We said significant gold in a particular area.
So now we have two sites in Arizona that we actually have stakes on with a lot of gold in the soil.
So we're working, what we did was change the search term to gold coins, and then we can go after
stagecoach robberies and get a strong box, then I'll bring you your gold, especially
since you're back in the States.
That's right.
I mean, I am here, so I expect to look out one day and see Ed Dames at my gate with something
shiny.
Roger that.
All right, timeline-wise on this Russian accident, nuclear accident, any, you want to stick your
neck out on a time?
Yeah, my colleagues and my marketing folks would not like me to do this, but I'm going to do it.
I would say a month to two months outside.
Outside two months.
God, that is sticking your neck out.
That's very, very soon.
Outside would be two months.
Yeah, I'd say no more than two months.
And you're not at all concerned going to Ukraine?
I am concerned.
But, you know, life is life.
You play the game and you take your chances.
Yeah, that's right.
Life is a constant gamble, isn't it?
All right.
Well, stay right where you are.
Major Ed Dames is my guest.
Remote viewing is what we're talking about.
And this is pretty scary stuff.
So be warned.
From the high desert, I'm Art Bell.
Here I am indeed.
My guest is Major Ed Dames.
A very good question would be why other remote viewers, and there certainly are other remote viewers, ones that were in the program, same ones that were in the program with Ed, and when you talk to them, they don't say anything about Some of these incredible disasters, many that Ed has actually called, some that have not yet occurred, but they don't say a word about it, and they're all remote viewers, and the question is, surely they see these things as they look outward.
Why are they not saying anything?
We'll be right back.
Now, Ed, I know you've got to be looking for some things to see them.
In other words, you've got to pick a target.
But some of these things that you're talking about out, say, 50 years or so, are so profound.
I mean, people living underground or under glass domes or whatever it is they'll do to survive in the rest of the Earth.
Half of humanity or more gone.
These kinds of things are so profound that the other remote viewers couldn't help but bump into them one way or the other.
So either they're not talking about it, or they're not seeing it, and only you are and your team, or how do you account for that?
They're not looking, Art.
They're not looking.
Number one, they're 15 years behind the protocols.
At least 15 years.
They worked for me in the military and they worked for me in a civilian corporation, and when I left them, they stopped working and they started writing books.
So they're not looking out at anything that could be a danger.
They're busy writing books, literally.
Yeah, but Ed, if you looked out for anything else, I mean, anything else at all, you would see this.
I mean, no matter what you looked out, out 40 or 50 years, you couldn't help but... I am telling you that the only time we looked in the military unit is when I, as the training officer, gave blind targets.
That means that the viewers did not know what the target was.
To the viewers as training targets.
That's how we discovered all of the very, very terrible things over the horizon.
But that was because I forced the issue.
And I did that under the rubric of advanced training at your taxpayer's expense.
But the rest of the viewers, they were not interested in looking over the horizon at all.
And so they didn't.
So they're not going to pick up anything because they're not looking that way.
I'm serious about that.
Okay.
But they wrote books.
They're busy writing lots of books.
Oh, sure.
Sure they are.
And I can't really blame them for that.
No.
People are on my case all the time.
They write a book.
I tell them I don't have time.
I teach.
Yeah, you know, Joey Drew, you haven't written a book yet, have you?
No, I'm not going to.
I take hits for that.
People want me to write a book, but I have to take time off from work.
My work is to look over the horizon and see where are the bad guys, where's the bad stuff, that kind of thing.
And I teach, and teaching is important because I'm not going to be around forever, and I may want to retire someday.
I have thousands of students who are becoming very good.
In fact, I'll move on Mutual UFO Network past one of their really Big conundrums to a bunch of my students, and the students solved it themselves without my help.
I'm very proud of them for that.
This was an alleged UFO incident over Lake Michigan many years ago.
Oh, yes.
The Kinross incident.
And my students solved that for the Mutual UFO Network, and MUFON was very, very happy.
These were my students that did that, so I'm proud of them.
You know, really, Ed, I think that anybody who's been listening to you now for years, in the early years of the dire predictions you made, there was really almost no hint.
But if you reflect now on those things that you said, and you reflect on today's news and today's science, the signs are all around us.
They're undeniable now, that these things are upon us.
Enough of it is now upon us to make what you're saying, unfortunately, sound legitimate.
Well, the stuff's coming on the roost.
And we still, even though we have location techniques down, which we did not have in the military days, we could be given a geographic coordinate and our minds could go right there without any problem whatsoever.
We could not do it the other way around, the resection problem.
If we found, let's say, a stolen nuclear weapon or whatever, somebody's missing cat, we could be immediately on the target.
There's no problem with mind-finding the target.
But consciousness could not determine where the target was in terms of latitude and longitude.
We couldn't do it the other way around.
Now we've solved that problem, but it took 25 years to do it.
But we still have not been able... The big bugbear now is time.
We're still trying to work that out, how to pinpoint something in time as well as space.
Right.
Ed, with respect to terrorism, since 9-11 it has been strangely quiet.
It's kind of like, I don't know, the guys at the CIA and All the other lettered agencies either have been doing their job very well or something's on the horizon that we don't see coming.
Have you looked at terrorism and where the next event will likely occur or is it eclipsed by all the rest of this?
It's eclipsed by all the rest of this.
We actually, we've looked out on using our search terms.
We're looking ahead.
For specifically, for the Sum of All Fears type of things, in fact I have a project called Firefly, and that code word is a name for the project but for looking for nuclear weapons and dirty bombs, those kinds of things like that.
We have not, that idea has indeed been eclipsed by geophysical events and incidents.
Which I mean, some people could say it's a good thing, Yeah, isn't there something that could come along, Ed, that would change all of this?
the Gary Larson cartoon where the goldfish are standing outside their bowl and their
house is on fire inside the bowl and the common is well, that was close, but we're equally
screwed.
Yeah.
Isn't there something that could come along, Ed, that would change all of this?
What you see ahead as inevitable in the next 40 or 50 years, it seems like if man suddenly
woke up, if there was some great realization and it seems as though they're going to have
to do it pretty soon, this is story after story after story, these are world class events
that are beginning to happen all around us.
How can we ignore them, and for how much longer can we ignore them?
Can we be that stupid, I guess?
Because there's no we, Art.
There's no we.
We doesn't exist on this planet.
We're too divisive.
The Montreal Agreement on the ozone layer was supposed to... Yeah, I mean, if that really was implemented and the world was united as one, we could stop the production of the chlorofluorocarbons and the destruction of the ozone atoms, but it's not going to happen.
Nor is... I mean, I think you and I both agree it's not going to happen.
Certainly, I would agree that it is not happening.
I don't know about that it will not happen.
The scientists from Harvard could be right.
We may not be that stupid.
Eventually, there may be a sudden realization, even here in the West, and we seem to be lagging behind the rest of the world, incredibly, on this issue.
We could wake up all of a sudden.
There could be a change of administrations in Washington.
That's inevitably going to occur.
And there could be an entire new direction, so... Not gonna happen.
I mean, it's not all in stone, is it?
I say it is.
I say it is.
Say it is.
We would not be seeing it if it were not in stone.
That's one thing we've learned in this business.
If we're seeing something in the future, it's the same thing as the prophets of old.
They were looking 3,000 years ahead and could see the same thing we're seeing.
So the events were that big in terms of mankind that it was visible You know, 3000 years in the past.
We're seeing the same thing, only we can put it into contemporary vernacular, and the prophets of old could not do that.
We can qualify it.
Maybe you could give the audience some sense Of how you remote view something as big as, for example, the kill shot.
This is something from the sun that will be so big in the next, what, between now and 2012, whenever it's going to happen.
It's going to be so big that it's going to literally fry the earth.
It's going to do that.
So, I mean, how do you come up with that, Ed?
And is there any room for error?
Well, yeah, there's plenty of room for error on something that big.
And we have made mistakes before in terms of trying to... First of all, when we first... We did not know... We were looking at future catastrophes on Earth.
Global catastrophes.
The next catastrophe, the next... Those kinds of things.
And we were describing something that was geophysical in nature and we didn't know if it was...
At the time, a meteorite or a gamma-ray burster from another star, something like that, it took a long time to ascertain that it was our sun and what was going on with our sun.
We thought it was a single flare at first, and then we realized, no, it's a series of flares.
It just takes a lot of work.
We're very specific in terms of targeting these days and times, but for instance, let's Let's say we're looking for a particular... Let's say we're looking for Osama Bin Laden's present location.
First we have to determine whether or not Osama Bin Laden is alive.
And then we have to go for the location.
That's two different targets.
Him and the location are two different targets.
So we teach our students how to actually target.
We call this in the business, cueing.
And that's pretty easy compared to trying to Suss out these big huge events, geophysical in nature, when we ourselves are not geophysicists.
We're trained observers.
Alright, well I guess that's what I'm asking.
In other words, for example, with respect to the kill shot, how do you actually come up with that, Ed?
Do you see a singed earth?
Do you see a sun erupting?
Do you see things physically affected on the earth?
Do you get pictures that people draw of things physically affected?
How do you come up with the whole thing?
Yes, we have to use a search term.
In this case, it would be something like, it would be open-ended.
Earth, and we qualify that with future catastrophes, okay?
And we allow the global mind to adjudicate that search term.
So we come up with a list, after a couple of weeks, of things that are happening in the future, at the undetermined future.
Again, where time is a problem for us.
And then we look to see what the most common frequent event is
produced by a number of viewers or by a single viewer working a number of sessions.
In this case, specifically, it turns out that we're sketching what appears to be a large space
body with plasma-like vectors coming out of it, directed toward our own planet.
So we know that the planet is Earth, because that's part of the queue.
That's part of the search term, like an internet search term.
Now we have to determine two things.
What is this other sphere?
What is that?
Is it the Klingons attacking us?
Is it a star in another solar system?
Is it Neptune or whatever?
And then what is this stuff that's emanating from it, coming towards Earth, and causing all this damage?
Because that's the other thing that we look at.
What's this event actually doing on Earth?
So it becomes a very big project.
And then we're still, even after we finish all the detail work, we still don't know how far in the future we're looking at.
And that becomes a problem in and of itself.
Right.
Right.
And you're admitting that still is a bit of a problem.
In other words, the timelines.
Yes, it is.
Yes it is, but we can use the word next rather than future catastrophes.
We can use the search term next global catastrophe and that will give us things like a broken reactor that's releasing fallout or something like that.
The term catastrophe is adjudicated by the global mind.
We don't know How, what the definition in the global mind of catastrophe is, so we have to experiment with those kinds of things.
Okay, well, with respect to the kill shot, what precedes it, if you're using the next term, what precedes it?
When we work that, the nearest preceding event, in other words, the harbinger of the kill shot, was a space shuttle being forced to the ground.
Oh, yes.
And was that... Okay, you missed that one, right?
In other words, you thought at one point that a shuttle mission, which we discussed here on the show, was going to be forced to the ground.
That one was not, right?
A shuttle mission being forced to the ground by a meteor shower.
Right.
That has not happened.
However, in the same vein, In terms of what I term the kill shot, that's not the term we use in the matrix search term.
We knew that there would be a very large preceding solar flare that I call a shot across the bow.
And then two weeks prior to that happening on your show, I said, Dave, it's coming.
It's coming.
And then that's when a huge flare happened.
It happened indeed.
It sure did.
And you confirmed that was the shot across the bow.
Now, the following event and this event that we're waiting for, the shuttle being forced to the ground by a meteor shower, is still ahead of us somewhere, right?
Correct.
Correct.
As far as we're concerned, that's correct.
So you really haven't... Can you...
Can you document for us the errors that you've made?
I think the first one I ever made, well I have to go back to the military unit where I was operations and training officer, the only one who wore that little hat in the history of the unit.
One of the first errors I made, actually it wasn't, it was during my, when I formed a company, a civilian company.
We were hired by a large automobile company to look at what might happen in the Mideast, and Desert Shield was about to happen.
They wanted to know what would happen, because for every dollar that a barrel of oil goes up, they would lose some gut off 100,000 units of sales or something like that.
So we were looking at sketching mushroom clouds.
And I made the mistaken analysis of thinking that those were tactical nuclear weapons when in fact they were fuel air explosives that produce a similar symmetry.
It looks like it is a mushroom cloud when you drop a fuel air explosive, a daisy cutter on something.
So that was one of my first analytical mistakes on an actual report to a customer.
So that happens.
Alright, what about things that you've predicted on air, things that you've done on the program?
What would you consider errors?
I think the short notice on Claviceps purpurea, the royal fungus, saying that that would infect Africa and then blow across to South America about four years ago.
And in fact, it's only happening now.
So, again, the timeline problem is the biggest thing, and I'm very leery about that.
In fact, down here where the rubber meets the road, I actually got a call during the break by my marketing folks saying, we're going to wring your neck for saying a month or two months out I feel strongly that next does mean one to two months in this case, but I could be wrong again.
Okay, but not about the event itself?
Correct.
Not about any remote viewer that's trained.
It doesn't have to be me, Art.
Any of my thousands of students are trained using that same search term, the same search term.
In fact, the search term is the next event with significant impact upon human activities.
Using that particular input will produce the same result because that's what everybody's trained to do, produce the same data in the same input term, just like an internet search, database search.
So it's kind of like going to Google, the Google of the mind, as it were.
It is.
It is indeed.
But that's where errors can occur because, oh, for example, I can go to Google and be searching for something and if I don't put in just the right word, I get scattered, meaningless results.
That's correct.
That's why we're so... This is called queuing in our business.
Remote queuing is a three-part process.
The skill itself is fairly easy to teach.
But setting up the search terms requires a lot of thought and this requires advanced training.
The workshops that I do, the second workshop that I do concentrates upon that.
And you better get the search terms right or you'll waste a lot of time and you won't be able to analyze the data because it'll be junk.
Junk in, junk out.
It'll be all equivocal, all ambiguous because your search term was not tight.
Okay, and you've got a, after the break we'll tell everybody about it, but you've got a workshop, is that what you would call it, coming up in Las Vegas?
I have a workshop coming up in Vegas, and I teach online at my website.
Alright, alright.
Hold it right there, and we'll also get the website out to you, I believe it's up on coasttocoastam.com, but we'll get it here on the air as well.
Workshop coming in Las Vegas, we'll tell you all about it.
I'm Art Bell.
So he's not going to write a book!
Andrea Dames is not going to write a book, just about everybody else has, that's true.
But he is going to have a workshop in Las Vegas, of all places, just over the hill from me.
And he does have a website that instructs you to do what he does, and that's Remote View.
Look ahead.
So, in a moment, we'll tell you all about the workshop.
Stay right there.
Well, okay, let's cover it.
A workshop coming in Las Vegas.
What exactly, Ed, is a workshop?
I mean, you conduct this personally, right?
I conduct it personally.
The core of my instruction is a set of four DVDs.
And for people who do not want to learn this at home and want in-house instruction or both, this will be a basic workshop.
I just realized I'm scheduled to teach in Moscow next year.
I may put that on hold.
Depending on what happens, reactor-wise.
But the workshop is on Memorial Day Weekend, May 26th to 27th at the Tropicana Hotel, just over the hill from you.
And it is a basic course, and it covers everything that's covered in the LearnRB DVD set.
But, it's personalized instruction, and you will come out of that workshop with the skill.
That's guaranteed.
Typically how many people are in a workshop like that?
60 to 80.
60 to 80.
I have to cut it off at 80 because we can't, I and my assistant instructors, we can't manage any quality control after 80.
We just don't have the number of qualified instructors.
Okay.
All right.
And it goes on for how many days?
Two days.
Two days.
And the second day, we actually do sports betting.
So a lot of people pay for their course and their trip by sports betting.
It's fun.
And I invite you to drop in.
It is a lot of fun.
Well, you never know, Ed.
I just might.
So you can sign up.
There's a toll-free number to sign up for that.
Okay.
Or go to the DVDs.
If you want that, I can give it to you.
Fire away!
It's toll-free 1-866-607-8439.
Okay, that's 866-607-8439, correct?
Correct.
Or you can go to my website, LearnRV.com.
That's 866-607-8439.
Correct?
Correct.
Or you can go to my website, LearnRV.com.
LearnRV.com.
And that's where I teach also.
And I teach all the advanced techniques there for free.
I'm there every day teaching advanced techniques, including how to correctly queue, which means setting up the search terms for making sure that you get what you want.
Okay, Ed, here's a question for you.
Again, looking out 40 or 50 years to catastrophic events, isn't it possible That something major could change on the world that you haven't looked at yet.
For example, some major new source of energy would be discovered on our world that would just change the course of everything.
As far as we're concerned, and empirically are, based upon 25 years of working lots of different things and not writing books, no.
Because we would not have been able to see these scenarios if they didn't exist in time.
And yes, I am implying that time is locked.
If we can see it, it already exists in time.
It's out there.
We just haven't caught up with it yet, temporarily, in terms of the physical world as we know it.
Time has not gotten us there yet.
Have you ever actually looked at the nature of time itself, Ed?
I haven't looked at the nature of time.
I don't know how I would attack that, but I've been very, very concerned about this thing about locked events.
I don't like the idea of set futures and all of that, but apparently, as far as we're concerned empirically, it appears to be the case.
For instance, it doesn't seem fair to me That we can, as remote viewers, can pick the winner of a sports event, a basketball game or a baseball game, you know?
That doesn't seem fair in some ethical way to me, that we can be able to do that every time.
It's like, okay, no matter what these teams do, this team is going to win here.
And we found that to be the case without fail.
And yet that's the way it is.
I don't see how that could be, though.
Let's say, just as an example, that you were able to look ahead and see that Joe Blow is going to walk out into a street and get hit by a car on some certain date or at some certain time.
Now, with a warning, Joe Blow could avoid that highway, stay home, stay in bed all day, and conceivably change what cannot be changed.
Correct.
There's one thing, but the paradox is if we tell, we would not have been able to remote view the accident itself if it didn't actually exist in time.
That's our working hypothesis based upon.
Two and a half decades of doing this.
Things get really fuzzy.
For instance, if I attempt to remote view where you're going to eat dinner tonight, let's assume you're still going to be alive, which is a preconceived notion, that you're going to eat dinner, that kind of thing.
Let's say that those are givens, and there's any inkling whatsoever in my mind that I'm going to tell you, then I won't be able to see where you will eat dinner.
My remote view will be a mess.
Okay, so in other words, a paradox would not be allowed to occur.
Correct.
Empirically, as far as we know.
That's what we've learned in the business.
Okay, alright then.
What about free will?
I mean, that certainly dovetails with what I'm saying here.
Free will is free will.
If you decide that you If you want to pull the trigger on somebody, and you actually will in time, then a remote viewer can spot that up ahead in the future.
They're looking at you.
That's something we never even talked about.
You remember that movie about pre-crime?
You ever see that?
Was this the Tom Cruise movie?
Yeah, I can't remember what the name of it is now.
They have this unit put together about pre-crime.
Minority report.
Yeah, there you go.
That's it.
Minority report.
And they had these psychics in a tank, floating in a tank, and they could see crime before it occurred, and they were arresting people before the crime was committed.
Could RV be so accurate as to ever do something like that?
Well, from our perspective, again, empirically, If we were able to, we wouldn't be able to, the event wouldn't exist at all unless it was real, unless it really happened.
And so what that means essentially is we would not be able to prevent it.
Huh.
Too bad.
A lot of people would like to see you floating in a tank, Ed.
Yeah.
A lot of people would like to see me tank.
If you want to see me tank, come to Vegas.
Or after the second day, I'll be tank.
Oh boy.
It is an odd notion, Ed, when you think about it.
I mean, free will should be able to... and yet you're saying, no, that's not the way it'll occur, because you simply wouldn't be able to see it, which would prevent the paradox.
In some domain, in some type of domain, I think free will exists, but it's like it's predestination.
Like, you have free will, but it's predestination also, if you get the gist.
I don't, because free will implies that if you knew something was going to happen, that your free will would enable you to prevent it, or circumvent it, or in some way just ensure it didn't occur.
Well, the real conundrum here is that if you look at, in terms of remote viewing, mind is outside of time, and if you're looking from a mind perspective, you're looking at a broad panoply of events.
If I'm looking at you, if I'm a remote viewer and I want to remote view you for some aspect of your life, I have to really focus in on where I want you now, in the past, at your birth, at your death, because as a viewer you can see all of that.
It all exists in time at once.
What does remote viewing, as a general rule, Ed, tell us about physical death?
Does it ever look at physical death and Is it able to determine if there is anything that exists after physical death in terms of consciousness?
I'd like to say it does, but we can't do it because what we see so many times in terms of death, we see certain things happening.
We see the body being separated from what one might call a vital essence or soul.
We often see angels at the moment that the angels are real, but we can't follow this essence, because there's no common denominator to speak of between our physical existence and our experience, and this thing as it leaves.
So if it has consciousness, or if it has a mind, we can't relate to it at all, nor can we see where it goes.
However, having said that, We have to stumble across worlds out there that at first we thought might be just regular extraterrestrial worlds, and there's many of them as you might guess, but that there's something different about them, and we think that some of the dark matter in the universe is in another dimension, and that these essences might get reinstalled in another body, sort of like the way the Bible talks about after-death things, but we can't relate to it
In my business, let's say I remote view the Bolshoi Ballet as a training target, and it has a big red curtain.
If I've never experienced the color red before, there's nothing in my lexicon, in my thesaurus, in my memory, to be able to say that this particular pattern of information is the color red.
Because I have no experience there.
So your lexicon limits what you can objectify, even though you may be on the target.
You may not be able to objectify in terms of words what you're experiencing because you don't have a label for it.
All right.
Let me jump back to something you just said.
I don't want to skip over.
You just said angels are real.
They are very real.
You want to enlarge on that one a little bit?
Whoa.
Um.
Gee.
I, I...
How do you know angels are real?
The first real indication, the first real experience I had as a viewer was looking at the, we were doing some work for the FBI as a military team on the Lockerbie explosion.
Remember the terrorist blew the plane up?
And our task was to determine what device, if any, blew the plane up, right?
It turned out to be a Semtex explosive that was packed into a boom box that was placed aboard the plane.
But in doing that, we actually had the experience at the time, the explosion and all the people dying, being thrown up against the bulkhead and things like that.
And viewers were describing all these lights And these other things, intelligences, in the plane itself, just prior to people being burned alive in the air.
And we said, what the heck is this?
And it turned out to be entities.
So I did some research on the entities using the military team.
Again, you're tax dollars at work.
It turned out that the description of these things were everything the Church Fathers had described.
St.
Jerome, St.
Thomas Aquinas, and all the rest had described these particular things, while if it looked like a duck and it walked like a duck, quacked like a duck, it's an angel type of thing.
All the descriptions that the Church Fathers had of angels matched what popped up into the cabin just prior to everybody being burned alive and vaporized.
Okay, so these entities were there, and they were entities that had never been in human form.
Correct.
Correct.
And we had no experience with them as individuals, but when you read what the Church Fathers say about angels, it matched that, so we just started calling them angels.
Okay, but how could you differentiate You know, an entity of, well, heck, an expert for Israel!
Because we began, well, you know, let me put that on hold just for a moment.
All I'm saying is the way the Church Fathers described angels, not just the Church Fathers, but the Arabs, they described them to the Elohim and all that, and in Hebrew, Arabic, and all these other literatures, the way They described what they called angels that matched the descriptions of what we had here, too.
Now, in terms of aliens or extraterrestrials, I think that the Federation, a la Star Trek type of Federation, is actually made up of both material beings and created beings.
I think there's entities and intelligences out there They are beyond our comprehension, and so I don't know what to call them en masse.
All right.
Well, you had a project called Starman, remember?
I still do.
Very much alive.
Very much alive.
And with Starman, you expect to initiate contact, yes?
Yes, I do.
Yes, I do, with the Vanguard, because we know that after the stuff clears, after Earth becomes very barren and The air clears, so to speak.
There is another race here on Earth that helps us actually rebuild and regenerate the ozone layer.
We're using generators, actual generators.
We've sketched them.
In fact, we even turned this over to Lawrence Rockefeller privately.
Oh, you did?
Yes, we did.
And that's the race that we know is out there watching us.
These are physical beings, humanoid in nature with real Solid devices, not what angels have, that kind of thing.
Well, if regeneration of the ionosphere is possible, and you actually have sketches of machines that could accomplish this, why not begin now?
We are.
I want contact with this race, but all of our work suggests that they will not be here until after all this stuff happens.
All of our work suggests that.
That there can be a vanguard contact, in other words, like a tactical command post to just establish, to communicate with them, but they're not going to stop what happens.
They're not going to intervene as much as I would like them to.
Do you have any knowledge of why they're interested in us, what their motivations are?
If it can't be that good, if they're not going to intervene, if they see this catastrophic event ahead, I have two guesses.
It's just surmise.
It's just surmise.
Number one is the Prime Directive idea, where you have to allow things to run their course, because otherwise, everything's cross-level.
You intervene and, I mean, they land on the White House lawn, the first thing we do is ask them to help us with our deforestation problem, our AIDS problem, and if they don't help us, they must be our enemy.
That's number one.
Number two is, again, surmise.
I think in terms of a galaxy or a collection or a constellation, that you're only as strong as your weakest link.
I remember as a young infantryman, if somebody on the squad was just kind of stupid, you had to stay on line as you attack a target, because the stupid guy will shoot you in the back because he's too slow.
So you had to move at his speed, unless you kicked him in the derriere and sped him up.
Well, in terms of moving forward in evolution, material beings may need to wait for the more primitive races to reach some type of a threshold in terms of evolution for the higher races to be able to move forward, too.
That's a guess I have.
Have you ever had an impression, Ed, of whether they're friend or foe?
In other words, they're keeping hands off, perhaps for the reasons you just articulated, but beyond that, would you consider them to be concerned with us as a friend would be concerned?
No, it's more like a UN assistance project.
It's very, very similar to that.
When we look ahead at what they're doing, it looks very much like a UN support project to a third world or undeveloped nation.
It's like that, somewhere between mentorship and altruism.
If you want to call out a friend, I guess you could, but that's not quite how I define a friend.
It's more like an assistance project on the part of the UN.
Yeah.
Eventually, one country or the other, I would hope it would be us, but I have my doubts, will get to Mars.
And you once said you sensed something, perhaps machine-like, if I'm remembering correctly, moving beneath the surface of Mars.
We're not going to get to Mars.
The Russians, the Chinese, the Japanese, and the Germans, they'll get to Mars.
But we've looked at this way back when, and the military team looked ahead, The people that are landing on Mars and the outer planets are not Americans.
Americans are finger-pointing in Congress because our country is broke.
We're bankrupt.
Totally bankrupt.
We don't have the money to go on these missions.
But we're just not allocating the money.
We have the money.
We're the richest nation on earth.
We're just not allocating it.
Ed, hold on when we come back.
We're going to open the phone lines and that should be a raucous session indeed.
So if you've got a question about something Ed said, or just plain a question for Ed, now would be the time.
You know the portal numbers.
If not, they'll be recited as we return.
From the high desert, I'm Art Bell.
Here I am.
My guest is Major Ed Dames, a very controversial fellow indeed.
Your opportunity to ask him any question you would like is coming right up.
Those are the numbers.
Don't miss out.
It's coming next.
Well, okay, Ed, just prior to going to the phones, is there anything you want to get in that you have not managed to squeeze in in this program thus far?
No, just one small thing about Titan.
What the Cassini mission hasn't photographed yet, and what it may not be able to photograph because of its technological limitations, is one of the deepest and most beautiful canyons in the solar system.
One side of the canyon is almost carved in what looks like green olivine stone.
Very deep and very beautiful.
So I'm hoping that someday we'll get a picture of that.
All right, here we go.
Wildcard Line, it would be Melissa in Windsor, California.
You're on with Major Ed Dames.
Hi, I had a comment and a question.
The comment kind of went along with you were asking about those events that are locked in time, and I just kind of thought that, you know, there's destiny and there's fate, and those things that are locked in time are destiny, and then the free will comes in, and the fate part of it.
There are certain things that can be changed.
Or you can see them, and they can be changed, but there are certain things that cannot be changed.
So it's not that everything is locked in.
I think that I would compare it, would like to compare it, to sort of a river, where the river's going to flow, and that's your life, and there are these eddies you can get stuck up in if you want to.
They're there.
And there's some wiggle room on the sides, but that may be akin to what you're saying, at least analogous to fate and destiny.
Yeah, and that kind of leads into my question, which is, um, how do you determine if you're in the right timeline or the right parallel, you know, as far as parallel universes are concerned, how do you know that you're actually within your, your timeline?
How do you determine that you are here?
I won't call it a parallel universe.
What we, in our business, we call an optimum trajectory.
Some people are already on their optimum trajectory.
They just know, they don't need to be a remote viewer to do that.
But people who are analytical types, like myself, who think we know it all consciously, we don't know anything, because we're not dealing with a higher mind.
So we turn to a higher mind, and we use the search term, our name, optimum trajectory.
And then that tells us, hey, you need to be over here.
You need to be doing this.
Because that's your superconscious telling you, and it's your superior mind, as opposed to your analytical mind.
And it knows what's best for you, and that's how we make the determination as viewers.
Okay.
Have you ever had an experience with remote viewing?
And I don't know if it's like maybe astral traveling, crossing over into remote viewing, but of going, of ever having any contact with anyone or speaking to anyone, I had that happen to me one time, and I both astral travel and remote view, but to where I actually Yes, and those are out-of-body experiences and astral travel, and that's not what we do in our profession.
Remote viewing is an information collection skill.
It's a skill.
And astral travel and out-of-body experiences are very real, but that's not what we're in the business to do.
And yes, I have had those experiences, and they're quite wonderful.
You actually remote viewed, of course, Satan, right?
Yes.
The idea of Satan and everything exists as a pattern of information.
I did not know whether that was a real entity, a real thing, or just an idea.
I found out what it was when I remote-viewed it.
Okay.
First Time Caller line, Greg in Los Angeles.
You're on with Major Ed Dames.
Hey guys, nice to talk with you.
My question is, once you start to learn remote-viewing, does that permanently change your brain?
And are there negative effects to You said other negative effects?
Are there negative effects of you starting to learn and study about remote viewing?
It changes your life, because you can't look at the world the same way anymore, because you know that you can know anything.
And that is a change right there.
Some people prefer to just stop right there, and they're satisfied with that, knowing that they can know anything.
Because, again, it's a skill.
It takes work.
Other than that, I don't know of any negative things, although I wish I would not have seen certain things that are coming ahead, if you call that negative.
Right, right.
But no, there isn't anything negative about it, but it does change you forever, because you know that you can know anything.
Well, that could conceivably be negative, right?
A change forever, who knows what kind of change?
I mean, knowing some of the things, for example, that you know, Ed, it seems to me could lead to, God, it could lead to deep depression, it could lead to all kinds of things.
It could.
It could.
I mean, for me, though, I mean, there's a lot of joy in my work.
I wouldn't have stuck with it for 25 years because I'm not easily entertained.
Even though I'm blonde.
Yes, there's some things that I wish I would not have seen.
I agree.
Okay, well there you are.
And couldn't those things, couldn't they lead to a person becoming depressed?
I mean, a lot of, after all, Ed, a lot of what you talk about is very depressing.
A lot of what's actually happening right now is very depressing.
Well, the truth is the truth.
I mean, we could put blinders on and prefer not to know and stay happy, you know, fiddle while Rome is burning.
It's just a matter of opinion.
All right.
John in Washington.
You're on with Major Ed Dames.
Hi.
Hi.
This is John from Bonny Lake, Washington.
Right.
Concerning predestination and the will of man, We're in the fight of our lives between good and evil.
I'm asking the question, as far as predestination goes, don't we have to submit to either the good or the bad, in the predestination order of things, to choose which side they will be on, so therefore they both have to be brought to clarification?
I don't know.
I mean, if you like the concept of a Creator, then part of creation is what you call the idea of good, and the other part is evil.
So the Creator has allowed for both of those ideas, both of those paradigms.
And other than that, I can't answer your question.
That really has to be, doesn't it, Ed?
I mean, you really can't have and can't understand Even the concept of evil without good or good without evil, right?
There's no context.
It would be, I mean, the creators of Monad, but out of that falls all this dichotomy and all these branches and things like that of creation and ideas, and good and evil are two of them, one juxtaposed to the other, at least in our minds.
Exactly.
Alright, Tim in Alberta, Canada, your turn with Major Ed Dames.
Hey gentlemen, how are you tonight?
Well, I'm okay.
Calling from Kolech, Alberta.
It's funny, I haven't been on the site, Coast to Coast AM, for about a month and a half, and I was just sitting here ready to go to bed, and for some reason I just said, hey, check our bell.
And lo and behold, it's Major Ed Dames on.
Yes.
What a treat.
Hey, I've got a question about this big seismic event.
I don't think you guys touched on that tonight.
We had a huge reporting at the 7.6 in the Solomons.
Actually, it was 8.0.
8.0, okay, they've downgraded it a bit then.
No, no, no, that's upgrading, sir, and 8.0 is not downgrading, it's upgrading.
Okay, I was just on the IRS site, that's the worldwide one, and they've got it, they keep changing it a bit, eh?
As the time goes on.
But they've gone out of 7.6 now.
That's what they're... Alright, well, whatever.
There were actually two earthquakes.
The first originally reported as 8.
CNN also reported it as 8.
And then there was a 6.7 or something like that that immediately almost followed it.
There's the aftershocks.
Boy, those are pretty large for... That's a big event.
I'm wondering, like, considering like the West Coast, there's all that Yeah.
Yes.
Nostradamus Quantrain, it talks about the abyss opening at Easter.
Now whether it's a geographical, geological event or maybe a social one, there's a good
possibility that at Easter, some year in the future, there could be a large earthquake
and here it is well, Easter's next week for crying out loud, I guess.
Hey, one thing about the honeybees.
You guys aware with the polar bears, what's going on up north there?
Yes.
There's been a lot of misreporting on that and I'm up in Northern Canada and a lot of
people are reporting that cubs are drowning and there's been some of that.
Some of the bears have drowned.
You know, they're not in condition to swim because they're weak, because their hunting skills have been more or less taken away from them, because what's going on with the polar bears is that, you know, they feed on the seals.
But what's happened is that, you know, when the months are cold and the ice is there, the way they feed is that they wait by the air holes that the seals have.
When the seals come up for air, they're right at the holes and they dive in with their head
and they haul them out and they feed on them.
And what's happening is there's so much open water, the seals aren't making holes.
They don't have to.
So the bears are waiting on the ice holes and the seals aren't even around.
They don't have to come through the ice anymore.
So it's actually a dollar a year death.
Do you have a question for Ed?
Yeah, it was just about the earthquake, if he's remote-viewed anything for this month.
That's it.
All right, all right.
Well, actually, I think not.
Obviously, Ed didn't say anything about the earthquake in Solomon Islands, but Ed, have you looked ahead at geologic events?
No, I don't qualify anymore.
The specific search term that we use and that I encourage my students to use are Sean, in New York, you're on with Major Ed Daines.
impact upon human activities. That appears to be a good one.
That search term is adjudicated by the global mind, and in this case it points to a radioactive leak. Next event with
significant impact.
It doesn't point to an earthquake, it doesn't point to anything else like that. Why that is, I don't know.
Alright, Sean in New York, you're on with Major Ed Daines.
Good morning Art and Major Daines. Major Daines, I wonder, have you ever, or would you possibly, remote view the
possibility that Mars' moons, Deimos and Phobos, Mars' twin moons, were once upon a time perhaps one large,
Okay, Sean, I can sort of start to answer for him.
That has to be something that would be a project he would undertake.
asteroid and perhaps that might have been what put Mars out of action as far
as a planet which might have been sustaining life at the time. Okay Sean I
can sort of start to answer for him that has to be something that would be a
project he would undertake so unless he's undertaken that in the past as a
project he's not going to be able to answer it Ed. Well I've done a lot of work
military team and civilian counterparts on Mars has passed It did have a civilization in the past, a distant past, and that civilization was and did meet its demise by a geophysical event, something coming in from the outside that destroyed the Martian atmosphere.
But other than that, I don't know the physics or the dynamics or the details of what that event was.
All right.
Jim, somewhere in Ohio, you're on with Major Ed Dames.
Hi.
Hi.
Art and Ed, this has to do with when you said that the honeybees were going downhill because of the UV radiation, or irradiation, however you want to word it.
In my town of Lakewood, Ohio, outside of Cleveland, they did the spraying of the West Nile virus And I took my family to a motel.
It was an instinctive thing to do it.
But when I came back after they did the spraying, because they thought the mosquitoes were going to kill us all, the honeybee population went down.
And I know that you were talking about UV radiation, but what about remote viewing, utilizing things where the, in other words, like We're working on a thing, like you said, about UV radiation, but what about what we're doing as mankind to cause a problem that we have a control over?
Why in the world do we spray for a West Nile virus and then, when I came back to my area to live, the honey bee population was No!
Oh, no, no.
There's no doubt.
What we use as a search term is the primary cause.
The primary cause is UV and the bees essentially being blinded.
I had to go into business selling sunglasses to the bees.
But that's not to say that they're not dying from pesticide poisoning and other things.
We're saying that the primary cause of this particular syndrome is the increased UV radiation, which is also causing High levels of melanomas and cataracts among mammals, including not just humans, but pets too, and livestock.
Well, eventually the scientists, I hope, will figure out what it is, and we'll know, and we'll see if it matches up.
Jim in Colorado, you're on with Major Ed Dames.
Thank you both, you gentlemen, for your life's work.
You guys are wonders.
Thank you.
Ed, I have a question about your course.
I bought your course and Paul Smith's course On your course, I got about three quarters of the way through it, and I got sick.
And I came off the course for about two months, and I need to get back in.
How do I get back in without goofing up everything?
Go back in where you started.
I mean, I'm sorry, where you finished.
Go right back there.
Okay.
Yeah.
There's no need to review.
Just start off where you left off.
And one other question about Paul Smith.
I know it's coming out very shortly.
I really look forward to the dowsing course.
I bought that when I bought your course through your website.
Dowsing.
Alright, we were talking about dowsing last night.
That's an interesting question, Ed.
Dowsers are real.
They really do find water.
How are they doing that, Ed?
Have any relationship to... It does have a relationship.
Your unconscious, what we call the unconscious party in mind, the thing that you have access to when you sleep in the moment of revelation, is directly hooked up to your autonomic nervous system, and it bypasses, it does a complete end run around the thinking mind.
In fact, in remote viewing, you're taught, one of the first things you're taught, is not to think.
You are not allowed to think, because that mucks up the purity of the information.
We have ways of teaching that that are quite easy to teach, believe it or not.
But that's what dowsers are doing.
They're allowing their unconscious to talk to their body without any thinking whatsoever.
And unconscious has access to all information.
It's that simple.
And certainly to water.
Gloria in New York, you're on with Major Ed Dames.
Hi, good morning.
Thanks for taking my call and thanks for another wonderful sleepless night here.
I was wondering, you very briefly said The US Day was bankrupt, and I was wondering if that was inside information from remote viewing, or just, you know, a cognitive feeling you had.
And then also, recording pre-destiny, I was wondering if you or anyone else had something like this happen.
Now, Art said that he had that thing where you felt the need to jump up and look at your car right before someone backed into it.
Right.
I had a few things that were kind of like big, big picture things.
They were very strange.
Like in my late 20s, right after I visited a sick uncle, I was telling someone about it and I just had this overwhelming urge to tell them.
Yeah, he had some medical emergency and I helped out by sharing some of my medication with him and saved the day.
And as it was coming out of my mouth, I was thinking, this is stupid.
Why am I saying this?
This didn't happen.
So I stopped myself and then, you know, found myself wanting to say that over and over.
And 25 years later, when my father was sick, that exact thing happened.
He had an emergency that I was able to, you know, help with.
And then, regarding even his death, I had, you know, a few years where I couldn't really afford to, you know, get home much, which always was distressing.
But I always thought, you know, well, don't worry, because before he, you know, does die, you will be able to spend a few months solid with him.
And there'll be two friends to help you out.
And this is what I've had, you know, 15, 20 years.
The way that we perceive time is not the way time really is.
The moment that Art answered your phone call, that moment is just as real as this moment right now.
Where did it go?
It didn't go anywhere.
It still exists.
But the way in which we process information is not the way time really is.
Time really doesn't flow that way.
It just is.
And in terms of the U.S.
being bankrupt, all I said was that we're not going to make it to the outer solar system because Congress is finger-pointing at each other and doesn't allocate funds for space travel.
And you said you saw many other countries on the Moon and Mars, but not us.
Mars and the outer planets, not us.
Boy, that's a sad one.
All right, Ed, hold tight.
We're at a break point.
My guest is Major Ed Dames.
Not all of what he says, or even a great majority, is all that cheerful to listen to.
But it certainly is interesting, and if you look back on many things he's said, I'm sorry to say, the scientists are beginning to agree.
I'm Art Bell.
Oh, we're all on a ride, all right.
Good morning, everybody, I'm Art Bell, and this is sort of the coming-to-a-close segment for the weekend.
It's my pleasure, my honor, to be escorting you through it.
Not all of it pleasant to be sure, but fascinating?
No doubt.
We'll be right back.
Here is a very interesting question.
With regard to the nuclear accident that Ed sees coming in Russia, if you look at what's still going on at Chernobyl, the sarcophagus, I'm reading now from a Wikipedia story, Is not an effective permanent enclosure for the destroyed reactors.
Hasty construction in many cases conducted remotely with industrial robots is aging badly.
If it collapses, another cloud of radioactive dust could easily be released.
The sarcophagus is so badly damaged that even a small earthquake or even a severe wind Could cause the roof to collapse.
A number of plans have already been discussed for building a more permanent enclosure.
According to official estimates, 95% of the fuel in the reactor at the time of the accident remains inside the shelter with a total radioactivity of nearly 18 million curies.
The radioactive material consists of core fragments, dust, a lot of like fuel containing materials that flowed through the wrecked reactor building before hardening into a Ceramic form, and they say that's not stable.
So Ed, is there any chance that what you're seeing is just more from what's already happened?
Yeah, I thought about that, Art, because the geofix work was leading up toward northern Ukraine, but it ended up in Russia.
So it is in Chernobyl.
Now, Chernobyl is another problem, because one of the problems is that Ukraine is saying that the former Soviet Union, Russia, is responsible for providing the money to maintain the sarcophagus.
Because Ukraine doesn't have the money.
So when that thing does crack, we've got some real problems on our hands.
You can virtually see a repeat of what happened, or even worse.
Because Chernobyl is in Ukraine, present-day Ukraine.
And it could very well be worse.
Boy, all right.
Mike in Ohio, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
Good evening, Art and Major Dames.
Evening.
Two quick questions, guys.
Ed, quickly, is there a difference between the Matrix versus the Psyche?
And the fun question, Ed, was I believe remote viewing is done with your eyes closed?
Negative.
Eyes open is an intention management skill.
You have to have your eyes wide open.
Why don't you close your eyes and invite some imagination?
You learned that in Hour One of my course.
And the Matrix versus the Psyche?
The Psyche is an individual thing.
The Matrix is a global mind.
The Matrix is a universal mind.
It's all... and the Psyche is totally individual, and the Psyche disappears when you die.
The Matrix stays the same.
Mind never changes.
Mind doesn't change, the Psyche does.
Okay, Bob in Burbank, California, your turn with the Major.
Hello, it's Robert from California.
Hello, Ed Danes.
Hi.
Hi.
I was just wondering if you have access to people on the FBI.
We had an incident a few years ago, after the 9-11 terrorist attacks, where there was information about a WMD being placed in a library in LA.
Are you aware of that?
Negative.
No?
Okay.
Well, I'll go somewhere else then, because I was doing something with those FBI guys.
Number one, Mars, we know from all the surveillance pictures that we've taken about there's pyramids and there's ruins on the planet Mars, and most people in NASA try to laugh it off, but you can't really hide the fact that there's structures there.
So from my taking, from people I've spoken to, that that planet at one time had atmosphere like our planet and did in fact lose it, similar to how we're losing ours, and whoever Or whatever lived there is now living beneath the surface, like you were stating, that we would have to move beyond the surface of this planet.
You want to concur that what happened to Mars and how our future is going to be very similar to what they're experiencing?
I don't concur exactly because I don't know the details.
I know at least one structure, at least one structure that my team knows, a three-sided pyramid that is man-made.
It's an artificial structure that's there.
The race, there were three major races that lived on the planet that we're aware of.
It does not look like they're the ones under the planet right now, although that's difficult to ascertain.
We know there are machines, sentient machines that are moving below the planet and sometimes on the surface, but we don't know what the life forms are down there.
Are they the remnants of that civilization that are in hibernation?
We just don't know.
Well, I'll say this for you, Ed, you never deviate from what you say.
All the way to London, England, on the international line.
Nicholas, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
Hi Art, thanks for taking my call again.
I've got quite a brief question really for Mr. Dames.
Now, back in 1992, I was lying in bed one morning, and the whole of the bed and the whole of my body started to vibrate in a particularly fast manner.
It was quite remarkable.
And I then heard an American, and it was an American accent, you won't convince me otherwise, say, we're getting interference.
Moments later, the whole experience stopped.
My question for you, Mr. Dames, is this.
Have, or has, the U.S.
military ever experimented with a kind of real-time conscious remote viewing, as opposed to the remote viewing that I understand you talk about?
No.
Sorry.
No, absolutely not.
He says no.
And by the way, Collar, we don't have accents.
You do.
Well, okay.
I guess I can't win that one.
No, you can't.
I always wondered about that experience.
It sounds very much like the beginning of an OBE to me.
It does very much sound like the beginning of an OBE.
That's very similar to what does happen when you start to leave your body.
That did cross my mind, but the American accent, what appeared to be a third, or a second person rather, The only way that I could provide information on that is to actually remote view the experience itself and put together the pieces.
That's the only way that I would know what's what or not.
Thanks for taking my question anyway.
You're very welcome.
Thank you for the call from so far away in Los Angeles.
It would be Gail now for Major Ed Dames.
You mean Daryl?
Well, it says Gail, G-A-I-L.
No, I think you just heard me wrong.
Hello.
Hi.
It's Gail like a boy.
Okay.
I have a technical question.
I always understood remote viewing to be more of a geographical kind of remoteness.
That was coordinate remote viewing in the early days, where geographic coordinates were provided to A military operative, and the military operative would describe what's at the site.
That was at the beginning, called Project Scanny.
Go ahead.
So what you're doing then, is that different than what a precognitive psychic does?
It's as different as going into the internet on a database search, if you were to search Google for a specific term.
That's what we do.
Everything exists as a pattern of information.
And we go into specific patterns of information and download whatever is there.
Oh, okay.
Thank you very much.
You're very welcome, and have a good morning.
Ken in Rockford, Illinois.
You're on with Major Ed Dames.
Okay, my question is, has your guest seen anything about Iran's capability of striking us, especially with the missiles that are supposed to take the EMs out of the atmosphere?
No.
No.
Well, I think what he means is he hasn't looked at it.
Right, Ed?
Correct.
So many people think that, again, that a remote viewer is just like a psychic and these things can come to you and or you can consider it as a call and it just doesn't work that way.
We have to focus on specific things to know what's there.
If we're not looking in that direction, we will not see it, figuratively speaking.
And it takes an individual or a team a significant amount of time, i.e.
work, to come up with any answers to any, any, anything.
It's like putting together pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
You have to collect all the pieces and then put them together before you see what's what.
Okay, Burke is a first-time caller from Louisiana.
Burke, you're on the air.
Hi guys, how you doing?
Fine.
Alright, I have a question with regard to negative energy or negative entities, and I wondered if there's any kind of possibility where that kind of negative stuff can influence or distort any kind of remote viewing.
I haven't run into it in my business, but I know people that deal with out-of-bodies have, and that's all I know.
But I have not run into it, nor have any of my students.
So your organization is pretty free of it then?
Well, this isn't just my organization.
I've trained thousands of people to do this.
Well, you're students?
Yeah, because remember, it's a mind tool.
And the things you're talking about, we don't use the term energy or whatever or entities.
It's a horse of a different color.
Okay, I see.
I didn't know if that kind of thing could have an influence on it or not.
Negative.
No, we haven't experienced that.
But we do know it can have an influence on antibodies, yes.
Okay.
Have you ever remote-viewed out-of-body experiences as a search term?
I've done it myself.
Remember, we had to go to the Monroe Institute.
Bob Monroe, who wrote the book, you know, Journeys Out of Body, his institute was used to vet and assess our candidates for our program.
And so we all had to go through his program there and attempt out-of-bodies in the gateway course.
So, we've had that personal experience with that.
And, in the early days, we used altered states, laying down on a bed in an altered state, electrically, null valve, those kind of things, to collect intelligence before the advent of Ingo Swann's method of remote viewing.
Hey Ed, when you remote viewed Lucifer, can you remember, excuse me, Satan, can you remember, Ed, the impressions And put words to them that you felt in the presence of Satan?
Yes, as I mentioned before, I felt that it was a real entity and not just an idea.
It was a cold, extremely beautiful, crystalline, extremely beautiful, but it could suck the the vital essence right out of you and it's nowhere that
you wanted to be looking at because it knew that you were looking at it and it just
didn't feel good.
It's like you know this was not something I should have done.
Yeah, I certainly thought so if you recall at the time that you should not have done it.
Well you know fools go where angels fear to tread.
And it's April Fool's Day!
Yeah, where it was.
All right, Luke in Calgary, Canada, all the way up there, you're on with Major Ed Dames.
Good morning.
Hey, how you doing there, guys?
Now listen, I didn't really call to talk to the Ed guy there, but it's very cool to talk to you, Ed.
Nice to talk to you.
Listen, I've had lots of miracles all around me.
I've been on a spiritual journey since 1997.
And my big question is this.
Because it happened to me.
I had a gentleman in Ottawa take me, tell me all about myself, and then take me to a river right behind the Parliament buildings in Ottawa, told me to get out of my truck and go to the riverbank, and Jesus appeared right in front of me.
Well, we're mostly taking questions for Ed Dames.
That's certainly an intriguing story.
So, is there anything at all you want to ask?
Well, Ed, do you know anything about that?
Because, and I'll tell you this also, I know Satan or Lucifer, whatever you want to call it.
I've had many experiences with that character as well.
No, I'm an analytical man.
I just, uh, I have to, you know, I have to research something before I can digest it.
And, uh, otherwise it's, um, it's actually a scientific approach.
And, um, In a non-orthodox way, but without looking at that, I wouldn't know what to say.
I wouldn't have any comment.
What made you decide to remote-view Satan, Ed?
It was the Columbine incident, where it was the first time I could research it.
I knew about recorded history where children were killing other children.
I had forgotten.
And I thought maybe it had something to do with this idea of evil.
And so I started looking for You know, Satan's war room and those kinds of things.
That's what's out there.
Right.
First Time Caller line brings Dave in California.
Thanks for taking my call.
I just kind of had a question like the last caller.
I was wondering how the Church viewed remote viewing.
The Catholic Church does not like it at all.
In fact, there's a catechism that says you will not do that, you know, because priests are supposed to be interceding between you and God, and they're going to be the modem demodulated, they don't want you communicating directly
with anything.
The rest of the churches are fine with it, but not the Catholic Church.
Well, you may recall you spent some time on the air with Father Malachi Martin.
That's true. That's true. And I had great respect for him as well.
He asked me to help discern whether or not one of his victims was possessed,
whether it was a psychological problem or both, but I wasn't able to do that before he died.
He'll fade it.
Well, thank you.
Thank you.
He actually asked you to assist him in a situation?
He asked me on your program and then his secretary called me to set it up after the program was over.
No kidding.
No kidding.
Ed, you can, without respect to time, you can remote view incidents not just in the future but the past as well, correct?
The past is much easier.
Because we don't have to worry about any, it's set, it's locked and stone.
Whereas the future, we may not be, you know, there are things that if, for instance, if you were to attempt to try to remote view somebody that might be in an accident and they never were, you'd get no information.
Past is easy.
Did you look at the assassination of President Kennedy?
Absolutely.
Mel Riley and I did that together and the JFK was shot through, although he was hit by a high caliber round, he was also shot through the Adam's Apple by a flechette that was fired from a device in the dashboard of the car.
Which means that it was a conspiracy, which very, very greatly upset me at the time, because I didn't believe that it was a conspiracy.
So again, he was shot through the Adam's Apple with a flechette that went straight through, and that was fired from the inside of his car from a device in the dashboard.
Rick in Nashville, Tennessee.
You're on with Major Ed Dames.
Yeah, I was just wondering if for people that do not remote view, should we be concerned for our privacy, or is there some sort of moral or ethical code that you guys kind of go by to choose what?
I don't teach ethics.
I do not teach ethics.
I have personal ethics.
I will not remote view a person without their permission, but I have made exceptions.
And I'll take the hit if it's not right for terrorists and for people like Saddam Hussein when we were after him.
But I don't teach ethics in my course.
What somebody wants to do with this is up to them.
That's very interesting.
That's a very interesting answer.
So the ethics just don't even enter into it.
I personally feel that just because somebody has the ability to do something, you don't have the right.
But that's just me.
I can't impose that upon my students.
Have you ever refused to teach a student knowing beforehand that their intent was bad?
No, I haven't done that, but I did turn away a group of Arabs because I didn't trust them.
I just turned away a group of very wealthy Arabs who wanted me to train their Wow.
Their intelligence apparatus.
And I said, no.
But that was, I guess, I guess that is along those lines.
One quick one.
It's Denise in Palm Springs.
You're on with Major Ed Dames.
Hi.
Hi.
Thank you for taking my call.
Sure.
Um, Major Ed, um, what are, there are different realms of Earth.
Um, and I realized that you tapped into a certain realm.
Now, can you tap, tap into other realms as well or, or, I kind of know where you're going.
I kind of know where you're going in terms of the New Age movement here.
I know what you're saying, because I've been around New Agers, like yourself.
This is a mind tool, specifically mind, okay?
And other dimensions, other realms, other aspects of existence are real.
I know that they are, but this tool is a mind tool.
That's it.
And we only operate in the arena of mind.
Period.
All right, listen Ed, that's it.
We're out of time.
Clock rules.
We've got to go.
You've got your workshop coming up in Las Vegas.
What date?
May 26th, 27th.
Tropicana Hotel.
Go to LearnRV.com and you'll find the information.
All right, buddy.
Thanks so very much.
Until next time.
Good to talk to you, Art.
Good night, Ed.
Good night.
Alright, his toll-free number is 866-607-8439.
That's the weekend for me.
George will pick up the gauntlet and run with it tomorrow night.
From the High Desert, from the Great American Southwest, I'm Art Bell.
▲
Export Selection