Art Bell welcomes retired U.S. Army Major Ed Dames, a remote viewing expert, who confirms his move to Ukraine amid classified predictions—including a 2.5–3.5 ft tall ET species (larval and omega stages) projecting energy tools from distant vessels, not physical ships, and dismissing claims of direct ET contact since Roswell. Dames also warns of a Seattle earthquake capable of tilting the Space Needle, black mold mycotoxins in hurricane zones, and China’s psychokinetic "mind warfare" targeting satellites via children or closed-minded adults. He denies lottery predictions but insists remote viewing—used to locate hidden gold, diagnose illnesses, and even thwart military tests—is rigorous science, not shamanism. The U.S. moon base, he argues, won’t be peaceful under current leadership, while Earth’s magnetic shifts may trigger water shortages. Dames’ work underscores humanity’s vulnerability to unseen threats, blending classified intel with speculative risks. [Automatically generated summary]
Tornadoes and thunderstorms ripped through eastern Kansas and Arkansas Sunday, killing a motorist, damaging homes.
There's going to be more and more of this.
The weather is turning on us.
Second time reporter to testify in leak case.
Washington is consuming itself with who said what when.
There, I'm done.
That's all the national news that I feel like I'm talking about.
Now, in a moment, I'm going to read a story to you that I think is really, really important.
First, though, I guess I should say the Bell family is well.
The webcam shot tonight, that's Dusty.
Now, you can see Dusty has grown a great deal, not only with her shiny fur coat, but in her interests.
Now, what's pictured in the webcam shot tonight is our bird, now an adult bird.
We raised that bird once it fell out of the tower there at 80 feet.
We raised that bird from baby-dom to what it is now, a full-grown bird.
Dusty can be seen looking with great passion intent, not good intent, at that bird.
Now, we have placed two desert cactuses between Dusty and the possibility of getting to the cage you see suspended from the ceiling.
However, Dusty is a smart cat.
And what she's been doing, recognizing after some painful exploration, that these cactus, this cacti is not to be trifled with, she has begun to remove the spurs, little spikes on the cactus, one by one.
It reminds me of a criminal trying to dig his way out of jail with a spoon and then getting caught just as he's about to surface.
Now, that's going to happen because we'll just go out and buy new cactus.
If she takes every one of the little stingers off, we'll just go get more cactus.
And she can go right on wishing.
Anyway, that's the webcam shot tonight worth taking a look at.
I snapped that last night.
Now, I'm sure that what I am about to read to you has been covered in previous shows.
At least it damn well better have been.
And I don't see how it could have been avoided, so certainly it has been dealt with.
But as far as I'm concerned, we could spend the entire night on this one story.
When, in fact, Ed Ames is due next hour.
No, we've got lots to talk to him about.
Assuming he's there, I put in a call to him earlier.
He hasn't returned that, so I don't know.
Might not get him.
If not, we'll talk about this all night.
The headline, it's from Yahoo News, by the way.
And the headline you should be familiar with as a listener to this program.
The headline is, former Canadian Minister of Defense asks Canadian Parliament to hold hearings on relations with alien ET civilizations.
Thursday, November 24th, so surely you've heard this or part of it at least.
I'm going to give you the whole thing.
Ottawa, Canada.
A former Canadian Minister of Defense and Deputy Prime Minister under Pierre Trudeau has joined forces with three non-governmental organizations to ask the Parliament of Canada to hold public hearings on exopolitics relations with ETs.
By ETs, Mr. Hellier, I believe it is.
These organizations mean ethical, advanced, extraterrestrial civilizations that now may be visiting Earth.
On September 25th of this year, in a startling speech at the University of Toronto that caught the attention of mainstream newspapers and magazines, Paul Hellier, Canada's defense minister from 1963 through seven under Nobel Peace Prize laureate Prime Minister Lester Pearson publicly stated,
quote, UFOs are as real as the airplanes that fly over your head, end quote.
Mr. Hellier went on to say, quote, I'm so concerned about what the consequences might be of starting an intergalactic war that I just think I have to say something, end quote.
Hellier revealed, again, quote, the secrecy involved in all matters pertaining to the Roswell incident was unparalleled.
The classification was, from the outset, above-top secret.
So the vast majority of U.S. officials and politicians, let alone a mere Allied Minister of Defense, were never in the loop.
Hellyer warned, the United States military are preparing weapons which could be used against the aliens, and they could get us into an intergalactic war without us ever having any warning.
He stated, the Bush administration has finally agreed to let the military build a forward base on the moon, which will put them in a better position to keep track of the goings and comings of the visitors from space and to shoot at them if they so decide.
Hellier's speech ended with a standing ovation.
He said, quote, the time has come to lift the veil of secrecy and let the truth emerge so there can be real and informed debate about one of the most important problems facing our planet today.
Three non-governmental organizations took Hellier's words to heart and approached Canada's Parliament in Ottawa, Canada's capital, to hold public hearings on a possible ET presence and what Canada should do.
The Canadian Senate, which is an appointed body, has held objective, well-regarded hearings and issued reports on controversial issues like same-sex marriage and medical marijuana.
On September 20th of 2005, the Institute for Cooperation in Space requested Canadian Senator Colin Kenney, Senator Chair of the Third Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defense, quote, schedule public hearings on the Canadian Exopolitics Initiative so that witnesses such as the Honorable Paul Hellier And Canadian-connected high-level military intelligence,
NORAD-connected, scientific and government witnesses, facilitated by the Disclosure Project and by the Toronto Exopolitics Symposium, can present compelling evidence, testimony, and public policy recommendations.
The non-governmental organizations seeking Parliament hearings include Canada-based Toronto Exopolitics Symposium, which organized the University of Toronto Symposium at which Mr. Hellyer spoke.
The Disclosure Project, you know about that, a U.S.-based organization that has assembled high-level military intelligence witnesses of possible ET presence.
It's also one of the organizations seeking Canadian Parliament hearings, by the way.
Vancouver-based Institute for Cooperation in Space, ICIS, whose international director headed a proposed 77 extraterrestrial communications study for the White House, a former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who himself has publicly, of course, reported 1969 very close encounter of the first kind with the UFO, filed the original request for Canadian Parliament hearings.
The Canadian Exopolitics Initiative, presented by the organizations to a Senate committee panel hearing in Winnipeg, Canada on March 10th, proposes that the government of Canada undertake a decade of contact.
That's a decade of contact.
The proposed decade of contact is a 10-year process of formal, funded public education, scientific research, educational curricula development and implementation, strategic planning, community activity, and public outreach concerning our terrestrial society's full cultural,
political, social, legal, and governmental communication and public interest diplomacy with advanced, ethical, off-planet cultures now visiting Earth.
Canada has a long history of opposing the basing of weapons in outer space.
On September 22nd, last year, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin declared to the UN General Assembly, quote, space is our final frontier.
It has always captured our imagination.
What a tragedy it would be if space became one big weapons arsenal and the scene of yet a new arms race.
Martin stated in 1967, the United Nations agreed that weapons of mass destruction must not be based in space.
The time has come to extend the ban to all weapons.
In May of 2003, speaking before the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defense and Veterans Affairs, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Canada's Lloyd Axworthy, stated, Washington's offer to Canada is not an invitation to join America under a protective shield, but it does represent a global security doctrine that violates Canadian values on many levels.
Axworthy continued, there should be an uncompromising commitment to preventing the placement of weapons in space.
On February 24, 2005, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin made official Canada's decision not to have anything to do with the U.S. government's ballistic missile defense program.
Paul Hellier, who now seeks Canadian Parliament hearings on relations with the ETs on May 15th of 2003, stated in Toronto's Globe and Mail newspaper, Canada should accept the long-standing invitation of U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio to launch a conference to seek approval of an international treaty to ban weapons in space.
That would be a positive Canadian contribution toward a more peaceful world.
In early 2005, the Canadian Senate wrote ICAIS, indicating the Senate committee just could not hold hearings on ETs in 2005 because of their already crowded schedule.
That doesn't deter us, said a spokesperson for the non-governmental organization.
We're going ahead with our request to Prime Minister Paul Martin and the official opposition leaders in the House of Commons now, and we will reapply with the Senate of Canada in early 2006.
Quote, time is on the side of open disclosure that there are ethical extraterrestrial civilizations visiting Earth.
The spokesperson went on, our Canadian government needs to openly address these important issues of the possible deployment of weapons in outer space and war plans against ethical ET societies.
The implications of this story are just incredible.
And now, I've got a number of questions for you.
Let me just quickly pose them.
And if you feel so disposed to answer, please do.
Number one, do you believe, as this would indicate, that they are here now, that they are ethical?
Well, we'll get to that.
Just basically that they are now here.
Two, should our military, as in the U.S. military, prepare to deal with them?
Now, that's not such an easy question, unless you can answer some of the following.
In other words, should all weapons, for example, be really banned from space?
What are the odds that they are going to be our friends?
What do you think the odds are they're going to be our friends?
Now, until you can answer that one, you should be very careful how you answer number two, should our military prepare to deal with them.
Since we don't know the answer to number four, it seems to me number two has got to be a yes.
Now, I'm certainly not a fan of shooting at UFOs, nor weapons in space.
But until we know their intentions, do we really want to hobble our own military so they cannot deal with them should it Occur, or if it is occurring now, do we really want to stop our own military from being able to defend us?
The End You know, there are so many other stories that I wish I had time to get to.
The snows failing to fall in the Arctic tundra.
It's just not happening, folks.
They're not getting any snow.
The weather is, you know, clearly changing.
Or this from BBC, CO2 level at the highest point in 650,000 years.
650,000 years.
Or this, how the world will end.
Very interesting story.
Whitley Strieber's unknown country comes up with it in The Guardian.
A reporter asked, get this 10 scientists.
Why do all these things come out of Great Britain?
10 scientists to name the biggest danger to human life on Earth.
Are you curious what they said?
Some say we'll go out with a big bang.
Others say Earth will have a slow lingering end.
Still others say we'll solve the problems and will evolve into what, a type two or one civilization.
According to British astronomer Royal Martin Rees, human beings have only a 50-50 chance of making it through the 21st century.
He thinks our biggest threats, such as our global warming, are caused indeed by humans.
UK researcher Nick Brooks also thinks that climate change is our greatest danger.
Viennese researcher Richard Stindle says our species has a predestined extinction date, just like the cells in our bodies.
He compares these to telomeres, which are the protective caps at the end of our chromosomes.
As our cells divide, they never copy their telomeres quite completely, you know, just like VHS tapes, never completely the same.
And so slowly you age, slowly you die.
He contends that eventually this leads to old age in humans, like cancer and Alzheimer's and strokes, and for civilization in general, exactly the same thing.
You know, there is a birth, a life, and a death.
But Stindle thinks that telomeres also get shorter as a species ages, meaning that every species is destined to eventually become extinct.
Health researcher Marie Zambon predicts that a viral pandemic like bird flu will be the end of us.
In some places, human life has almost been done in by HIV or SARS.
She illustrates with those how quickly it can happen.
A terrorism expert, likely, as you might imagine, thinks that that will do it, a bomb, a biological weapon, while defense expert Air Marshal Lord Gardens still thinks nuclear war will do us in.
NASA's Donald Yeomans thinks we're going to go the way of the dinosaurs, that our world will end with a meteorite strike.
I saw a very interesting piece on Discovery Channel the other day about a meteorite strike, and one of the things that would occur with a big one is that the rock would heat, and the rock would heat with this incredible temperature that would race around and cover the entire Earth in, well, something approaching the temperature of our sun, and that it might remain that way for thousands of years.
They contend that, nevertheless, life at the biological or cellular level would continue at some depths of the ocean and land and would once again emerge to bring forth life on Earth.
How many times has that happened so far?
We don't know.
We know many.
We suspect many would be a better way to put it.
From the new scientist, speaking of the little things, the new scientist, a respected Japanese scientist who works with the World Health Organization, says the Chinese are lying.
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire says 300 people actually have died of H5N1 bird flu in China.
300!
Including the seven cases caused by human-to-human transmission.
Now, that would be a monster of a story.
This in New Scientist, I guess, part of the quotes.
But he's claiming 300 people have died in China.
My God, what a lie.
And if the rest of it is true that, you know, human-to-human transmission has occurred, then that's even a bigger lie.
The allegations, which he revealed at a meeting in Germany, contrast sharply with China's official position, as you might imagine.
It reports only, well get this, three confirmed deaths of H5N1 in people, a boy in Hunan province who recovered, two women who died in Anui province, the latest of which was announced on Thursday.
There may be another probable case in Hunan province.
So they admit those, but here we have a Japanese scientist who's a whole bunch of lies.
There's 300 cases there, 300.
Toshiro could not be reached for comment for the Peace in the New Scientist.
But others said these rumors have been investigated.
We've been told by the Chinese Ministry of Health that there's absolutely no foundation to them, said Dick Thompson, a spokesman for the World Health Organization.
That was quote to the new scientist.
So you can imagine my concern when I saw a story indicating that what many people fear, myself certainly, is that human-to-human transmission already has begun.
Now, we can't really nail this down for sure, but if it has, that's a very, very serious story.
So we'll put that in Stanton's gray box for Now, I think the big story is from Canada.
My God, this is a monster story.
Virtually, on the one hand, they're saying they are here and we need to deal with them, and they are ethical, and they are moral, and they're good guys.
That's one hell of an assumption, and that's one hell of a story.
I mean, how could we not talk about this?
How could we not?
So, do you believe they're here?
Should our military prepare to deal with them by putting weapons in space?
Should weapons in space be disbanded completely?
Or, you know, I mean, what are the odds?
This is really the key question.
The last question is really the key question before you can answer the others, I think.
What are the odds that they're our friends?
Well, you know, this whole thing operates on the premise that they are.
That they're ethical, advanced, and ethical, and maybe they are.
But what if they're not?
So until you can answer that question, I don't know how you can decide that our military should not have something up there with which to defend us.
Normally, I mean, in most times, I would just be going, with horror weapons in space.
Good God, of course not.
But really, you know, you really have to consider the possibility that, though this story may have accuracy in it, I'm not fully aware that we've determined that there...
Thousands, if not millions of years ahead of us.
And so the natural inclination of people is to consider that these brute, brutish acts that we conduct here on Earth and always have, you know, from Hitler and far before Hitler and far after Hitler is just the way of the world.
We're a warrior kind of people.
So I guess it's a natural assumption to think they're good little guys and wish us nothing but well, but what if?
This is what we see here, this Yahoo story, I assume it appeared in many places, but it's a gigantic, it's a monstrous story, and it wouldn't have happened unless there was something real behind it.
So we're on the same page there.
unidentified
Yeah, I do.
As far as not having weapons in space until you know the motives of your enemy, I think the fact if they wanted to harm us, don't you think they would have done it by now?
No, I think, no, Art, I know where you're coming from, but this is a very big story.
Yes.
And I'm just curious and interested to see what American counterparts or equal politicians, equal level, would come forward and validate it or dispute it.
The early statement that there is something to this means I mean, I can't even imagine this would get released without the American government sort of winking and nodding and saying, well, yeah, it's about time let's do it this way.
Yes, if you assume that substantial contact occurred in Roswell and we do know what their intentions are, then why are we proceeding to build weapons in space?
unidentified
Well, I guess the theory was that for other countries to fight other countries, I don't know on Earth.
All right, so on the weapons in space question, how do you feel?
I mean, if you were having to make the decision and you knew there were aliens, but you didn't know their intent, for sure, would you order the weapons built or would you say, forget it, none?
unidentified
I'm afraid that we're not capable of dealing with what energy they might be able to send at us if they want to.
In other words, even if they came from, say, the closest possible inhabited star system, they would have technology so far ahead of us that they could squish us like we would step on an anthill.
unidentified
I'm afraid we would be just like we were in the Civil War days by comparison in war with them.
Well, you know, there's an international treaty against arms in space.
Now, what you had said earlier about, I mean, let's be honest, if they can travel these great distances to get to us, they could clearly squash us like a bug.
Now, any observing society, no matter how well-intentioned they may be just before they got here and began to look at us every day, what do you suppose they might be thinking now?
They might be thinking, at the very least, quarantine.
unidentified
Well, it depends on their intent.
I mean, if they're really a peaceful race, their guns just want to have nothing to do with us.
If they're a little more on the shady side, they might say, hey, why don't we show you guys how to build the big gun?
So, you know, it goes either way.
But either way, there's nothing we're going to be able to build that's going to destroy Them.
I mean, just the idea of launching an MX missile to another galaxy, I mean, our sun would burn out before it got there.
Do you think that you could explain this rationally enough to an American general, you know, a typical military cigar-chompan, you know, Pentagon kind of general?
No, I'm just talking about the entire concept that you've been presenting me with, that they'd be so far advanced that there would be no point in even trying to defend ourselves because they would squish us.
Yeah, I mean, it's nice to have them for the aliens, but hey, if we have some more problems in Afghanistan, why send over troops we don't have when we can just hit them with our big gun?
You know, as bad as it may be, the whole thing, what worries me more than anything else is the apparent suggestion in this story that there already has been human-to-human transmission.
Dear Art, I'm a longtime listener, Coast to Coast fan.
Shows helped me get through graduate school in the 1990s.
I'm now a history professor.
How about that?
At Indiana University in Bloomington, and have even used Coast to Coast in the classroom.
Thanks for all the great radio.
You're very welcome.
He goes on, I'm writing this about tonight's show with Ed Dames in the hopes that you could ask him a few things.
Dames is one of my favorite guests, but it sometimes seems as if he sidesteps and slides away from the accountability moments that he has set up for himself.
One.
He said one of the last times he was on when the shuttle was flying again near the meteor shower that he would not be surprised, that's a quote, if the shuttle did not make it back safely.
He has always maintained that a shuttle being forced to abort a mission was a key happening.
It did not get forced down.
Instead, stayed up longer.
It's not a big deal, but I noticed the last time he appeared talking to George that he no longer even mentioned the shuttle being forced down as the precursor of the kill shot.
2.
The BTK killer.
For years he's talked about he and his team would bring him in, that he'd be there.
But then it appears that the BTK screwed up by sending a note that could be traced back to his church again, not a big deal.
But after talking about it for years, when he appears on Coast Coast, I don't think he even mentions the case has been broken, what happened.
And perhaps the biggest, where's the gold?
He's told you again and again that he would show up with gold bars, and when asked, he delays and dodges.
Last time I checked, he was supposed to show up again at your house.
Wasn't it in June for a great photo op?
Again, where's the gold?
So, you know, we've got that.
We'll deal with those one at a time and then move on from there.
Now, all of that is certainly true.
On the other hand, Ed, as pointed out by another emailer, has had some pretty good hits, too.
Some of his predictions, in fact, have been right on the money, according to Scott.
It's just plain scary.
I think his best one ever may have been when he said there was a big struggle in that Egyptian airline's cockpit before it crashed into the Atlantic Ocean.
Then the cockpit voice recorders, you'll recall, proved he was exactly right.
The space shuttle I talked about on your show, not on your show.
I said that two-thirds of the data ensemble were enough for me to conclude that that was the milestone for the beginning of solar hyperactivity.
That the space shuttle being up during a meteor shower, during a time when the sun was producing super flares, the one thing that was missing was the idea of the shuttle being forced down by the meteor shower.
That did not happen.
But it was still, I felt, enough in terms of through a lens darkly, which remote viewing is, to hallmark the beginning of the kill shot sequence.
If you remember, on your show, I said, in fact, after your show, George Nuri called me up at my house and asked me if we were responsible, if my team was responsible for providing information which led to his arrest.
And I flat out said no.
We all had plane tickets.
In fact, my team's photos are up on your website tonight, every one of us.
If you call those people up or have them call you, they will tell you we all had plane tickets.
We ought to fly into Wichita and hotel reservations to go find this clown.
And just before we left, a couple of, I guess it was about five days before we left, he was captured.
So we flew into Wichita anyway and looked for a missing child.
So now what my whole team is doing, and they're very upset that I just pulled them off of this target to go after Abu Musab al-Zakawi, which we just sent information to Task Force 6260.
We sent overhead photography to your website manager, along with an actual copy of the report that we sent to Task Force 626 stating that Abu Musab al-Zakawi's present location is in the town of Arupa,
which is the closest town to the border of Jordan, and that he's hiding in and conducting operations out of what appears to be a modified shell underground drainage structure.
So we're doing all the sketches and providing that through our contacts to Task Force 626.
Well, I mean, the consequences are affecting global warming, but that has nothing to do with the mission goal.
I mean, DOD could care less about the ramifications of what they do.
In fact, I and a lieutenant colonel once stopped a test that was so damaging to the atmosphere that we actually threatened to tell the Environmental Protection Agency about this top secret.
We threatened to tell the Environmental Protection Agency, and we felt we were holding enough cards, aces, to be able to get away with it without going to jail.
Well, you know, one of the things when you're in the military, I mean, I had this as a young, as a captain, a science and technology officer, I had the mentality for a long time about, you know, screw the civilians, screw the whales and all that stuff.
You know, we're going to kill those commies no matter what the cost.
So if you grow up in an environment like that, as I did, then you have a certain mentality that you become habituated to.
Well, this is going to be a real natural segue into this.
By the way, I wonder if you agree with me that this story is just a total monster.
I mean, for this program, how do you get a bigger story than former Canadian Minister of Defense asked Canadian Parliament to hold hearings on relations with alien ET civilizations and names them as ethical, advanced, you know, nice guys?
Perhaps not to Ed, but to everybody in this audience, virtually everybody, and certainly myself, the story's a monster.
So Ed may sort of, I don't know, fluff it off a little bit, but no, no.
Maybe this is a monster.
As the young lady who called said, whatever else, there's something behind this.
This is gigantic.
All of this going on in Canada.
Gigantic.
It means somebody said okay.
It may not mean everything in this story, but even taking the things that are in this story, for example, the assumption that whoever they are, they're going to be, well, they're going to be ethical.
They're going to be advanced.
I guess that's a safe assumption.
They're going to be advanced, but ethical, I don't know.
And friendly, I don't know.
And it all relates to the question of weapons in space.
But Ed says there's not one good reason that involves ETs to have weapons in space.
Instead, Ed says the reason is The Air Force could care less about ETs, but they are so happy in jumping up and down about statements like this because anything that would promote the allocation and expenditure of funds on weapons in space.
So you better believe it.
Now, let me tell you what the ultimate high ground is for the Air Force, and then we can backtrack.
From, let me see, Elmer in New Jersey, Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Hey, Art.
My name is, well, it doesn't matter.
E.J. from Stone Harbor, New Jersey.
On last night's show, Ian was talking about possible military bases on the moon.
The question I'd like to ask Major Dames is, I feel there are already military bases on the moon and other planets, for that matter, owned by the military.
Wouldn't it seem logical that the U.S. is disclosing this information now because when Japan, Russia, or anyone else lands on the moon, they're going to see the bases and the aircraft, never seen by humans like myself anyway, basically admitting there's something on the moon.
But anyway, a beam director is the actual of the operating end, the business end of the weapon after all of the capacitors start firing and things like that.
When the final protons or whatever you're shooting come out of, it could be an X-ray laser or two, but any directed energy weapon, the beam director can telescope up above the crater wall, fire towards Earth, either at the ground or to something orbiting Earth, and then pop back down.
Well, if you watch that bit of video, there is no question, Ed, that they're adjusting the cameras, they're waiting, they've got them pointed at exactly the right place.
Do you have any idea when our plans will begin to manifest and be known widely, that that's what we're going to do, a base on the moon, and for the kind of purpose you talk about?
You know, I really would like to see us doing it for humanitarian adventurous take the next step for mankind reasons, but that's not going to be it, is it?
No, I'm talking just about going to the moon and setting up a nice bubble house or whatever we do, you know, for peaceful purposes, but it's just not going to be, is it?
In other words, that some people at some level, far above top secret, know about all of this, know who they are, what their intention is, that sort of thing.
right and from that he came up with but he And then I worked it myself front-loaded.
As a professional, I can get away with this.
We came up with the same data and the same sketches and things like that.
Now, that thing, let's just call it, as for a beginning conversation, a capsule.
Let's just say that for now.
When you go inside that capsule, it appears like there's this frenetic, energetic form moving around.
And an inexperienced viewer would not know what that is and assume it's some type of a life form they've never seen before that's made up of electricity.
But in fact, what's happening is that this thing is spinning at relativistic speeds.
And in order to really sketch and describe the life form, you have to stop it.
You have to follow it back to its origin, which in this case, the origin of that particular capsule, and I'll have more to say about capsule in a minute, is a planet that's far, far away, way, way far away.
Okay, but I don't want to leave you with this idea that this is the only extraterrestrial race or other intelligence on this planet, because the one that the Canadian ex-official is referring to probably is the other type of entity that my team wants to contact.
So let's get back to this one here, associated with the Bulgarian enigmatic object.
Well, I have done my best, not just this time, but in other times when I roll across these folks, to try to figure out what it is that they're looking at.
And the closest that I can come is that it may be, maybe, some type of a natural, invisible to the naked eye, our naked eye, elemental type of thing, like a sprite or a fairy, those ideas in mythology.
And we've tried to get our we've tried to understand in some ways how they do this.
And the only thing that we can come up with is an analogy as laypersons, as trained observers, is that they're bypassing space-time and they're going into another dimension and popping back out.
The swag is that they're actually looking at miniatures, they're looking at insects that probably don't exist on their planet, which look so much like them in terms of natural history, they're probably fascinated with them.
I mean, think about if we went to their planet and there were little homunculi that looked like us but were as intelligent as a beetle.
Okay, but if these are intelligent beetles, obviously very intelligent, interstellar travel, why wouldn't they immediately recognize the difference between I don't know, it's like us looking at an ape.
You know, maybe we were once an ape, I don't know.
We don't have the tech base in our heads, the experience to fathom or put labels on what the heck it is they're interacting with in terms of their ideation, if they have that at all.
Okay, but if you admit that, acknowledge that, Ed, then how can you not suggest that it might be prudent to build something to defend ourselves with since we don't know their objectives?
I am not bringing a weapon of any type, nor am I allowing any of my team members who are armed to go there with any weapons.
Because I feel that that's barbaric.
And I feel it's a symbol of barbarity.
I really do.
What I plan on doing is taking Brent Miller, who you see in those photos there, one of the Magnificent Seven, pushing him out there, backing off maybe with a 50-caliber machine gun or running like hell in case he vaporizes or disappears.
The problem for most of us, many of us, in this country, is that we understand that in all of history, every time a nation or a group has become weak, they've become extinct shortly thereafter.
You know, if you don't defend yourself, you're dead.
And, you know, for the people who just went through the recent hurricane season and who have been weather watchers and seen the amount of violent weather going on and so many other things.
In fact, you know what, Ed?
I sort of led you astray tonight because of the importance of this story.
And we can even come back to it.
But we should cover a couple of things that I know were advertised that you would cover.
And I know a lot of people are listening for them.
You talk about a destructive Seattle-Tacoma earthquake.
And then, of course, Black Mold, one at a time.
The Seattle-Tacoma earthquake.
A lot of my friends are up in that area, Ed, and they're going, oh, no, Seattle-Tacoma.
Don, her data does suggest that the origin of the quake is in the mountains, although I looked at her data well and scrutinized it well, and it doesn't show a volcano.
We're going to try to work on that in January if it hasn't already occurred because we have some new techniques, and as a team we're going to do it together.
People need to be really on their toes and alert for this, too, when they start experiencing, particularly when they start experiencing all of the symptoms associated with mycotoxin poisoning.
We picked this up in the military unit 20 years ago.
Two things that have been on the event horizon that loomed so large, they popped up 20 years ago in our work in the military unit, looking at things to come.
One was what we call the kill shot, the solar events, and the other was disease and dying human babies because there's no milk for the babies.
And near as I can tell, this, you know, there's a bunch of crap, as it always does, floating around the internet about how this is just somebody's scheme to profit or something or another.
This is real.
As far as I can see, if the fears come true and the fears are saying not if, but when.
I mean, these are legitimate scientists who are saying not if, but when, with regard to it being a pandemic.
Yeah, what we're doing as a team now is attempting to discern whether or not there's a natural prophylaxis in treatment for these various variations of avian fluid.
You think about 3,000, 4,000 years ago, somebody trying to describe what a television is, or what a computer is or what a telephone is or a car, an automobile, it's beyond their ken, but they do their best.
And they put it in terms that are in terms of the vernacular then.
Well, I mean, I have the same problem with some of these ET races.
How do I describe what propulsion is?
Scientists have often asked me out in the field when we were doing proprietary ET studies.
These are some of the best scientists in the U.S. and engineers.
Ed, what's the propulsion system behind this thing?
They don't have the proscriptions, and their paradigms are different.
They perfectly accept some of your listeners may have read my article in Black Belt Magazine last month about Qigong masters, how they can do amazing things using mind over matter at the local sense, the psychokinetic sense, stick their hand through the side of a glass jar and pull out a thread without changing the makeup of the glass, those kinds of things.
But that's locally.
What I'm talking about in terms of Mayan warfare is affecting that at a distance.
And I want to show you something.
I want to give you an example, a demo of what I mean, a gross demo, but nevertheless, a demo of Mayan warfare.
If you did not have a clock like that, let me revisit this for your listeners.
We used an en masse attack against a clock in Art's studio, and the clock slowed down.
He knew it slowed down because what I didn't know is he had two of the same clocks, similar clocks, in the studio, and the one we looked at slowed down vis-a-vis relative to the other one.
I'll show you a little exercise here that's akin to the use of remote interference, which the Chinese are developing and which my team is attempting to master.
So when they're under the direction and guidance of a People's Liberation Army colonel who can really direct their minds, they can use their minds to acquire a target, to actually remote view it, to attack it, and then use remote viewing again to do damage assessment.
Right now, all the effects are there in China because they're practicing and training to fight.
They're training against calibrated targets there in laboratories.
But once it goes outside of the laboratory, probably the best targets would be geosynchronous satellite systems, anything that has a sensitive magnetic field.
Mind can really affect magnetic fields.
It's done the right way.
also there's one specific material one much interesting material that's extremely responsive to mind to mind interaction and that is I can't say what it is.
I cannot say what that is because we're researching it right now.
We are affecting, when mind is directed and coherent, just like a laser, once you direct mind focus, mind energy, it becomes very coherent, and it affects a magnetic field.
But if there is one particular material that is more easily affected with that kind of power, that would be very valuable because you could then begin to conclude the nature of the power that has done the damage.
So unlike the clock exercise, we're not going to have immediate feedback either, but that's okay because this is just for demonstration purposes, okay?
I said that I wasn't going to do any more of these experiments, not mass mind concentration to affect the weather or even things that I consider positive.
I started to consider it to be dangerous, Ed, and I stopped the experiments altogether.
So instead of the clock, instead of this case, the clock the magnetic field being affected, what we would have tried to do on MAS at once.
And it has to be orchestrated, has to be directed, and it has to be done very rapidly within three seconds.
It has to be directed like an orchestra and is try to induce a transient charge in the detonator.
So if this, instead of a detonator, was a sensitive piece of electronics in, let's say, an F-117 or an Aurora or a geosynchronous satellite, something like that, the effects, unless it can reestablish homeostasis, the system has redundant abilities, for instance, or can reset itself, the effects would be permanent and may...
No, but just in case we don't have time at the end of this, I just want to let you know that I'm heading back to Ukraine, so I'll see you after the holidays, and I wish you well.
Yeah, it is, but remote viewing is generally a passive act, except for one thing.
You become part of the history of the thing that you look at forever.
Once you turn your attention to it, somebody can reverse engineer that and go back and look at that object and track that back to somebody looking at it.
You become part of the history of that object.
When you have a lot of people, brute force, turning their attention at one time towards an object, the same thing happens to happen to Art's clock, especially if there's a magnetic field, a sense of the magnetic field that's associated with a device.
There's an influence on the magnetic field.
How that works and why that works, we do not understand, but we don't understand remote viewing anymore.
I just have to point out one thing technically about that program.
Your heart produces a very strong magnetic field.
Your brain produces a magnetic field too, but your heart produces actually a strong magnetic field.
In fact, that can be used as a diagnostic device.
And believe it or not, if you're too close to the computer, it's not your mind, your brain, or the brain-mind interface that's causing the change in the computer, the change in the image.
It's actually the magnetic field in your heart affecting the very sensitive instruments in the hardware.
Wildcard Line, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
Hello.
unidentified
Good evening, gentlemen.
V. D. from Las Vegas.
My question for Ed tonight, Art, is what separates this whole technique that he uses from what has been around for thousands of years through the use of shamanic abilities?
Except this technique was developed by U.S. intelligence, by the national intelligence agencies, to gather as much information in as short a period of time as possible, and I mean technical information.
It's much more rigorous because in the past, savants and shaman and clairvoyants did not have to produce the kind of information that we need today for intelligence purposes.
You know, what makes it, where is the hydrogen leak on the space shuttle?
Okay, now, Ed, I just want to say it's an honor to speak with you finally.
You were actually the first guest I ever heard on Coast.
I've been listening for maybe a little over a year now, and I'm still trying to get my mind kind of wrapped around the whole remote viewing thing, and it's starting to come together for me.
I was just wanting to see if you could help me with the last couple of pieces.
Okay, can you only remote view the future first off?
The best things I can say in terms of good are not necessarily the future, but in terms of medical things, saving lives that way, looking at diagnosing illnesses and diseases that even the best of my students, who are some of the best doctors in the world, could not effectively diagnose and coming up with cures for those and saving lives.
West of the Rockies, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
Good morning.
unidentified
These two guys are really funny tonight.
I'm getting out.
You know, I'm getting a good laugh.
Okay, this is Ann from Walnut Creek, California.
Well, I would like to point out before I ask my question that according to you, Ed, you said that some of your people have won in Las Vegas or won the lottery a few times, so that's good.
So what I was going to ask you about, usually I can ask a pretty clear question, but I would like to just mention some elements because I don't know whether there's a connection.
Apparently the Japanese have sent some sort of a probe to a comet.
And then also, there was something, you know, I was sort of half listening to the news about how there had been a whiff of powder from the previous probe or the previous thing where we exploded.
And anyway, the Japanese are planning on bringing something back, which I think is just ridiculous.
But I'm wondering, is it possible that there could have been some sort of what I would call spectrometry so that when they caused the explosion and there seemed to have been some sort of a flash that they claimed was unexpected,
is there any possibility that they could have taken some sort of an image or gotten some sort of information that we're capable of analyzing, but it's very advanced and nobody really knows this, to analyze what was in the substance that sprayed all over the place.
Okay, and then I'm wondering, is there any connection, or is it just parallel activity, of disease substances that would come back not only from the Japanese thing, but that might have been analyzed and somehow replicated?
If I could, just to get my mind wrapped around this, as one person put it for a second, was this on TV where there was, I hate to use names, if you don't mind, where there was, I believe, also a Major McConnell Chief Warrant Officer Joe McMonagall.
And it's okay to have, I think, some of these cynical or skeptical feelings because I think that jerks out the Truth, the hardest way.
Could I ask you, for instance, if a person says that we won a lottery or two lotteries back to back, how could one then want to really, really be doing anything but knocking out lotteries just for the fun of it till you're a trillionaire and then go and give everybody money in the furthest out scenario?
Well, no, actually, it was just a straight-on question.
It was just, have you been able to really knock out some tangible, either, I was going to ask positive or just regular, really tangible targets in terms of information?
I'm familiar with some of what you've done in Russia with the submarines and so forth.
Have you been able to nail in terms of intelligence recently any real tangible targets?
And I'm really hoping for like an Osama that you're working on or something like that.
There'll be such a dearth of water being near fresh water supply is going to be everything.
unidentified
Yes, that would definitely be.
Art, I would like to throw in a compliment to you and your show.
Thank you.
What I have seen with the science channels and news pieces here and there.
Finally, the people involved with weather are going full guns, full out, taking steps they hadn't taken before, admitting things they wouldn't admit before.
There's just so much barren land as a result of solar activity, predominantly solar activity, that you really don't want to look any further, Art, whether you're remote view or not.
You know, first of all, I have no problems of, like, a side attack on, like, Osama Bin Laden or Al Zarqawi, but is there a way to psychically attack, I guess, the children to defend ourselves without actually hurting them?
Because in terms of the passive act of remote viewing, target acquisition and damage assessment, you're not really connecting with the target in the way that you would think.
You're actually going to the way the target exists as a pattern of information.
And it only takes one person to do that.
Whereas if you really want to affect the target, you need a lot of people and it has to be coherently orchestrated.
I don't know if that answers your question or if I get off the bat.
They've been getting a lot of earthquake activity and increased activity, which has caused some of our listeners to get nervous, but that hasn't happened.
unidentified
Okay.
Hopefully it will happen.
Yeah, and then I'd like to ask you something about you're talking about the kill shot and safe places to be.
Now, where would a place in British Columbia be a good place?
It sent the scales right, actually right off the it went right off the scale of the satellites that were up there to measure the largest possible thing that could ever occur on the Sun, and they were wrong by a factor of quite a bit.
And my question for Ed, I'm a new listener and very interested not only in the remote viewing, but particularly in the application of, I guess for lack of a better term, what I would call the remote controlling of some device.
And basically, if I understand you correctly, you're talking about using the collective energy inside of people to influence some remote object when directed properly and in the proper timing and so forth.
All right, you're going to have to yell at me because you're not too loud.
Your question?
unidentified
I actually had a comment about predictions because I've been getting premonitions and dreams and visions, and I called you on your prediction line, and of course it was all about water, and we've had a lot of flooding here and a lot of problems with water.
But what I'm wanting to ask Major Ed Daines about is something I've been sitting on here for a few decades about some gold.
Now, I know you fellas are pretty interested in gold, and this gold has been here for some time, and I'm quite certain that they haven't got it yet.
We've had a lot of diversions and occurrences and events over the years that only add to the situation, making me realize that they're definitely after the gold, and I'm just wanting to know whether Major Ed Deans could bring up you and see whether or not that that's what they're going after with all this digging going on around here.
And the Russians actually, during the tenure of the Psy Spy Unit that I was the operations officer for and training officer, the Russians actually had very gifted psychics near their leaders in a leadership position, especially during meetings of the Soviet Defense Council to sense whether or not we were targeting Defense Council meetings.
But an ordinary remote viewer like myself, for instance, or an ordinary person who is not psychically gifted would not know that someone's targeting them.