Scott Stevens, a KPVI-TV weatherman, presents 19 entities—including nations—potentially manipulating weather via unnatural cloud formations (squares, triangles) and scalar tech, citing HAARP, Russian "Siberian chimneys," and deleted NEXRAD radar frames. His six-year study reveals storms like Hurricane Ivan stalling or weakening on schedules, defying natural patterns, with anomalies confirmed by callers (e.g., the "Fresno Hole"). Treaties from 1967 suggest governments already possess such capabilities, possibly using chemtrails with barium/aluminum to ionize and redirect storms. Stevens warns of life-threatening forecasting inaccuracies and hidden agendas like climate masking, urging public documentation via WeatherWars.info to expose a global, high-stakes manipulation grid. [Automatically generated summary]
You know, in our history, the short human history that we have, I guess as far as UFOs are concerned, we would probably name Roswell first, right?
And then I think many people would name the Meyer case, the Billy Meyer case, and then the Phoenix Lights, probably in more modern day.
Michael Horne, coming up in a moment, has researched the Meyer case, the UFO contacts, for 26 years.
Michael Horne is now the authorized American media representative for the Meyer case.
And the new book, quote, and still they fly, unquote, in 2001, Michael challenged the top international professional skeptics to duplicate the Meyer photographic evidence.
Their complete failure to do so culminated in their public refusal to submit their photographs for scientific testing.
Even more importantly, the specific, prophetically accurate information spanning 50 years that Meyer has published continues to be confirmed by events as they unfold.
For his trouble, there have been 19 documented assassination attempts on Meyer's life.
Michael is convinced that the Meyer case is the most important story in all of human history.
In a moment, we'll examine why and whether it really is true.
I would not think there would be too many in this educated audience that would not know about the Meyer case.
However, one never knows, and so it bears asking, Michael, very quickly, just in case there are some people out there not familiar with the Meyer case, who is Billy Meyer and what happened to him?
May I take just a moment before I launch into that, because I'm delighted to do it, and just give you sincere thanks for having me on again, especially because I think you were too modest to acknowledge that the sun setting in the sea, the sizzling sounds of the skeptics disappearing into anonymity,
was probably the coup de grace was the appearance on your show in March of 2004 when they refused to have their little dinky photos of the model UFO subjected to the same testing as Myers.
And just so you and your audience will know, right after that, James Randy, who had called the case a farce any child could see through, withdrew his claim that it was a hoax.
So I'm going to be happy to answer your question, and then we can perhaps move on to the content of the case.
I'm going to say up front, we now know that the case is true, and I'm going to be delighting in telling you that and accepting your challenges.
So, who is Billy Meyer?
He is about a week away from being a 68-year-old Swiss man, often called a simple Swiss farmer, because he lives in a farm and has lived in a farm for many years, I guess.
As I say, he has one arm and has only had one arm since 1965, which is pivotal to some of the aspects of his case.
He claims that since he was five years of age, that he has been having voluntary face-to-face and on-board contacts, not abductions, on-board contacts with human beings from another star system that we have commonly but mistakenly identified as the Pleiadian star system Pleiades that we see in the night sky.
His contacts are with humans.
He has met, he claims, members of many, many different types of races, primarily human, but some others that would be considered strange to us.
Before I say any more about it, let me just put the allegedly over those parts of this that we can't prove when we speak about things that either haven't happened yet or information that pertains to past history that we have not yet either proved or disproved, okay?
A lot of people would ask, why a farmer in Switzerland, why not the President of the United States, the President or the leader of the Soviet Union or Russia now, or whatever.
Well, it is not commonly known, but it is on record, that in 1979, these ETs authorized Meyer to authorize the investigative team to present an offer to the U.S. government under President Jimmy Carter for contacts to begin between the Pleiaran, as these people are known, and the U.S. government.
I have seen that letter.
I even have an email copy of it.
The contact offer was turned down.
The primary reason, apart from other terms that may have been off-putting to the U.S. government, was that for the time being, these contacts, the intermediary for the Pleiaran would be Meyer.
And so that apparently didn't sit well with the egos that were sitting in the White House, if that story is true.
So again, these are the types of things where when you ask some of these questions, I have to simply report the information as I know it.
In other words, they would not be a substitute for the contacts with Meyer because the purpose of the contacts with Meyer, just so I'll reiterate in detail this, but to bottom line it, the long efforts of, let's say, 53 years of information that they've given him and that he has painstakingly published for at least the last 30 has been focused on a bottom line for now, and that is pertaining to our, the human race's, future survival.
That's what we're going to actually get to here.
It's not so much about technology.
It's not so much about meeting the space brothers and all that stuff.
I understand those questions and those concerns.
They fascinate me.
But after researching this as diligently as I have, and there are many other people that have done it, those are my conclusions.
But if it's a question of our survival as a planet, which is what you just said, then that information obviously would be better served going to the leaders of the planet, those who would have some possibility of having an effect on what's going on.
As far as they're concerned, and Lee was telling this to Meyer back as far as 1975 at least, it is not the leadership of the planet that is going to take the planet voluntarily in, quote-unquote, the right direction.
This has to be done at a level of self-responsibility that starts with each individual and expands upward from there.
In other words, as I say on the DVD, we must lead the leaders.
And I don't want to be cynical either, and that's why when I have tonight, I consider this tonight to be the most important appearance regarding the Meyer case I've ever done in my life.
Albeit for you and I, it's relatively brief.
But I think in the period of time that we have, I will give you and your listeners something to think about.
And if anybody can come away with anything less than this is the most important story in history and we need to wake up, they're free to, as they sometimes do, harangue me with emails.
And so however you want to look at it, whether the information comes from alleged ETs or Swiss farmers or Art Bell or Michael Horne or the man in the street and the woman in the street all over the world, we're actually perceiving we are in trouble.
I don't think that a lot of people fully understand the depth of it, the kind of momentum of events that are upon us.
And I can't tell you I fully understand everything.
We're all just living an individual life, one of 7.5 billion, if the play aren't correct.
I promise to tell you what's in that before the end of the show because it'll upset a lot of people.
So I prefer to wait.
But I want to be able to, if it's okay with you, I'd like to go into items that just happened.
And this is, let me recap it this way.
We have five categories of what remain still irreproducible physical evidence.
We know the skeptics have been unable to duplicate it.
No one has come forward.
And that alone should be enough for most people to say, hey, this is real.
We don't know what it means, but it's real.
But I'm going to actually suggest to you right now the thing that I call the higher standard of proof.
If there were no photographs, films, video, sound recordings, or metal samples that have been analyzed, if none of this existed, the higher standard of proof is compelling enough to let us know this is authentic.
And that higher standard of proof is this.
For the past 30 years, Meyer has published, and I have to use this term, prophetically accurate scientific and world event related information given to him by these people for 53 years.
He was told to hold back, and many times to not publish things until certain times.
And we can always ask about that, but that's their agenda.
This week, this past week, four separate events, four separate news stories made the headlines.
And I mean Drudge, BBC, Frontline, and another website, and websites all over the world.
These four items, in addition to the things that Meyer had already predicted, such as the U.S. attack on Iraq, the increase in Islamic terrorism that was going to follow, the appearance of SARS, the spread of mad cow disease.
When we sent you originally back in about 2001, the first book, And Yet They Fly, on pages 347 and 355, etc., these things are in there, but that's not their first publication.
Even though each of them in that book with that copyright date is in the book before they happened, some of that information was written in 1995, all the way back into the 70s.
This is iron-clad proof.
You can't go back.
I can't run over to your place in Perump, pull that book off the shelf and take out the things I don't like and stick the ones in that I do and then say, see art.
I want the people at home to listen to this.
And I just will tell you, you can see a lot of this for free.
I've set my website up and my newsletter for free that people can get this information enough that they can check it out.
If people want the other stuff, that's great.
I love it.
There's DVDs and books and all that.
That's my pitch on the products.
The rest of this is free.
Find out.
Now, that book that has that information, those documents were first published years and years and years ago on the information pertaining to the U.S. attack on Iraq, the increase in Islamic fundamentalist terrors, the appearance of SARS, mad cow disease spreading, renewed concerns about chemical warfare and weapons.
And here's one so specific and so unique.
The threat of an avoidable accident at the nuclear power plant near Lyon, France.
That was in writing in 95.
I downloaded it in 98.
It's in the book from 2001 that you've got.
That last event, August 12, 2003, the nuclear power plant near Lyon, France made the news that they vented off the hot water, whatever the heck it was, and they caught the accident before it happened, as Meyer says specifically in that book, and in the new edition of the book, it's still in there, too.
Now, we have this week, that's just a few of the things that I've documented.
There's an article on my website: Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
I've got 60 of these.
Now I've got four or five more to add to it.
And here's what happened.
Superquakes and volcanic eruptions tied into petroleum extraction.
Now, if people go and if they want to follow along, I've set it up so my website, my little friend who does my web work for me today, they'll be able to follow along with them.
They can follow along.
It's theyfly.com.
E-H-E-Y.
You know, and there's the link from your site.
Thank you.
On the front page, there's a line that says, scientists confirm Meyer's information 30 years later.
If they click on that, they're going to get to a page called Breaking News, where we not only have all the PDFs, we've got some of this stuff that I've been talking about, where the documents already exist.
If they click on the link that says Plearan Earthquake Warning from 1976, and that's right there and it's easy to find, they're going to find a document from 19, they're going to actually find an article of mine, which is called When Will We Learn.
In there, I quote the Contact 45 from 1976.
Now, I first read this in 1986 when I got the contact report.
So I've had this for a long time, and other people, of course, have had it even longer.
If you scroll down through there, and by the way, let me just say right now, when people read the rest of Meyer's stuff, this is going to offend you.
It's going to offend you if you have strong political beliefs, if you have strong religious beliefs, if you've got strong anything.
There's plenty here.
He's an equal opportunity offender, and so are they, because they're not diplomats.
They tell it like they see it.
It's either true or it isn't.
We like it, we don't like it.
It's irrelevant to the truth.
But in this document, I have bolded, let's say, 60 through 62 sentences.
And for those that don't have the internet, I'm sorry, just follow along as best you can with this.
There are also further boldings where they talk about the consequences, ultimately, of this and how the shifting of weight takes place inside the earth.
And they mention here the creation of gigantic lakes by damming.
I've bolded this because the article, this new article on the tsunami, mentions this talk of the dangers now of large dams creating earthquakes.
He has, as we said before, face-to-face and voluntary contacts.
Some take place in his office or in a forest, or they take place in their ships.
The transcript, if you look and read that transcript, you're going to see that it's a conversation, though it's mainly one-sided, most of what I've transcribed there, because this is the information she's telling him.
Now, he will ask questions very often.
Well, what about this or what about that?
You know, like this starts off with his question about the mining of ore.
And she goes into this, and that leads to this whole thing about how the dangers are created for our planets.
Now, he will then, and I cut off at certain points and come back to some quotes or explanations, but we have, there's thousands of pages of this.
Most of it's in German.
We only have about 2,000 to 3,000 pages translated into English.
There's a brand new book coming up, and if anybody's in my website, you know, join my list, I'll send out a notice to people within four weeks, a dynamic, phenomenal book that's only been available in German with the digitized photos from Meyer plus texts.
And it's a beautiful thing.
Okay, let me get back to the point at hand.
They tell him this stuff.
In some cases, they take him and show him future events as they occur.
Here's a controversial one.
It's not what I was going to talk about tonight, but here it is.
In 1978, allegedly, they took him forward in time to an earthquake that had not yet and still has not yet occurred in San Francisco, a big West Coast earthquake.
He was allowed to take 11 photographs of San Francisco at that time.
Wendell Stevens, who I'm sure you know of, Lieutenant Colonel Wendell Stevens, who was investigating this case starting in about 78, was in the kitchen with Billy when the photos came back from the shop in the little village where he sent them away to get developed.
Billy does not make his own development.
It's not a model-making Photoshop opportunity in 1978.
When Wendell and about six or seven other people were sitting around the kitchen table, Billy passed the photos around, which was something he was not supposed to do.
But Wendell saw them, and at the time, in 1978, he said, he described what he saw.
He said, the Trans-America building, the top pyramidal shape, has a crack running down across it diagonally.
I think he said, and I could be wrong, that this had fallen to the ground, but if not, it was very cracked.
He said the streets were very bad there.
He said, but what struck me was the cars don't look anything like the cars of today, for the windshields are sweeping up into the roofs, and the cars have a more rounded appearance for the most part.
Now, all I ask you to do is at some point, turn on your TV or open a magazine and start looking, if you haven't looked out your window or if you don't already own one, what the development of the windshields and cars and roofs are.
Now, is that true?
Is it going to happen?
I don't know.
But basically, to fundamentally answer your question, they will tell him these things just like in that document there, or they will take him and show him some things.
But that's rare.
He just doesn't go flying around in time and space to find out everything.
The weird thing is that that which she's published and published in advance, and I've researched, and other people who've even tried to disprove it have researched, he's published this stuff before the events occurred or before any other source has discovered the things that are new discoveries.
So if we're on this page here about the tsunami and the earthquake and all of that, you can see, hopefully so, and you can read that document from 1976.
They explain the dynamics by which this happens and they warn that we will have increased frequency and intensity of these tectonic geographical, I don't even know the right word here, land and earth change type of experiences.
They also long ago, as far back as 53 and 56, told him about the climate changes, the storms, the weather patterns that were intimately connected also to the atomic bomb explosions underground and atmospheric.
And they are also connected to the petroleum extraction and the imbalance, the tectonic imbalance, and how this whole interplay, along with the decimating of forests, we are bringing upon ourselves these things to a large degree.
And nature is going to be certainly cooperating with giving the effect to the cause that humanity has affected.
The following is a statement from Underground Video Inc., I don't know who they are, about the alleged photographs and stories of Billy Meyer concerning the Pleiadian visitors he encountered.
Billy Meyer exposed.
Exclamation mark.
Recently, Underground Video has begun an in-depth inquiry into the most sensational UFO case in history.
Our investigation first began as a supportive effort to verify the known facts of the Meyer case to present the truth of alien human contacts to skeptics.
With the assistance of members from the Hollywood Special Effects team of the Ultra Matrix Corporation, we studied the Meyer photographs and claims made by Meyer's Talmud Emmanuel Genesis III publishing, Light Years by Gary Kinder, The Gleiadian Connection by Randolph Winters, and the movie Contact.
We also spent considerable time tracking the claims of computer expert and PhD Jim DeLatelso, as well as claims made through Michael Hessman and Gyodo Musbrugger from Meyer's Figu FIGU cult in Switzerland.
After six months of intense inquiry, with the assistance of cinematographers, physicists, computer analysts from total research, we found the claims of the representatives of the Meyer case to absolutely be untrue.
We discovered miniature models, miniature models, a variety of deceptive methods used to create this hoax.
Additionally, an undercover hidden camera investigation penetrated the Meyer cult in Switzerland, revealing irrefutable scientific evidence of fraud.
Underground Video was one of the foremost defenders of the Meyer material.
We are disappointed to now learn the entire case is a hoax.
Representatives of any authenticity, representations rather, of any authenticity with regard to this case made by alleged scientific examination have proved to be totally unreliable and misleads the general public into believing a carefully fabricated lie.
The persons who authenticated the Meyer case are not credible scientists nor investigators.
Any previous representations of authenticity of the Meyer case in the Underground Video catalog should be ignored.
Our findings will be presented to the Attorney General for possible prosecution for a consumer class action for fraud.
It goes on, along with Underground Video's statement is a photograph showing one of Billy Meyer's alleged Pleiadian beam chips taken in 1981 after computer enhancement and careful scrutiny.
It has been shown the beam ship is really a miniature model made out of an upside-down cake pan, disconnected copper hose fitting, a bracelet, carpet tacks, and various other unidentifiable or unidentifiable objects.
The Meyer photograph of the beautiful Pleiadian alien Sumyasi turned out to be a photocopy of a model from a Sears catalog.
Another one of Meyer's photographs, where he allegedly traveled into the future aboard a Pleiadian beam ship to photograph the aftermath of a 9.0 earthquake in San Francisco showing the toppled Trans-America building turned out to be a realistic-looking painting from a geology magazine article about earthquakes.
On top of these damning examples, every single one of Billy Meyer's photographs of Pleiadian ships have been shown to be a third, fourth, and even fifth generation photographs of photographs.
This means you likely airbrushed suspension wires and other signs of fraud.
There is not one example of an original first-generation Billy Meyer photograph.
On top of that, it has been shown that the reflections on some of the Pleiadian ships are not consistent with the position of the sun, indicating possible superimposition techniques.
To top it off, a reporter found a bunch of miniature models exactly matching many of the Pleiadian ships shown in his photos.
His ex-wife has come out to denounce him as a fraud.
The evidence is overwhelming, that the whole Billy Meyer story is unquestionably, absolutely, completely, and totally 100% bogus case closed.
Billy Meyer and his cohorts have made a lot of money out of this scam.
I applaud Underground Video for seeking the truth about the Billy Meyer scam and disassociating itself from any involvement with Meyer.
Billy Meyer has done more to hurt the legitimate field of UFO research than any other person alive today.
Ultra Matrix, I haven't found anything about this.
But let's go through this kind of quickly.
Oh, my goodness.
Where do we start?
We'll start somewhere near the top when he speaks about a Hollywood special effects team.
Well, it just so happens that six months ago, I went to an Academy Award-winning special effects company in L.A., and I've promised not to reveal their name until they either do or do not attempt duplication.
But here's what they said I could say.
I showed them Myers photos and films.
And by the way, these people won multi-million dollar, an award rather, for multi-million dollar science fiction special effects with spaceships, so you might be able to figure out which one it was.
I showed them the photographs and films.
I said, can you duplicate these?
They said, if we can, we will need computer-generated imagery.
I showed them the film clip that the skeptic said was an easily duplicated hoax.
I said, is this a model where they scratch the negative?
As the skeptic said, they laughed at me.
They said, of course not.
That's way beyond it.
I said, are these films and photographs not, as I assume them to be, of better quality than any commercially produced film, sci-fi, UFOs, and spaceships made up to and excluding the date of Myers?
They said, there's no doubt about it.
Whoever did the Ultra Matrix Corporation has never come forward to refute it.
Now, this is, let me jump one by one here, and I don't want to miss the other points I'm here to do.
Basically, they say they had a hidden underground camera investigation, and it's revealing irrefutable scientific evidence of fraud.
Will somebody please bring that forward?
Why didn't they help out the poor, hapless skeptics at CFI West when you booted them off the air because they couldn't even duplicate with 21st century technology what Meyer was doing in 1975 with no computers, no Photoshop?
I'll hit you a couple other things here.
There were models here.
They were made by the investigative team of highly reputable investigators led by Wendell H. So what reporter found a bunch of miniature models?
She did it after she made a videotape affirming the validity of the case and after she passed lie detector tests with 15 other people.
So this is a case about human beings.
They were Married for 30 years.
She had no peace, probably, for most of the time, because the world traps through her living room, and her husband's running off in the middle of the night.
Their explanation is this: Wendell saw the photographs of that.
Later on, there was in that magazine, there was that painting.
What Meyer was told was that just like the E.T.'s pulse impulses of scientific discoveries and other things to screenwriters, scientists, people, and all of that, that information was put into our cosmos and somebody did a rendering of it.
All right, on that PDF, and I'm speaking fast just for the sake of time, if you go down three paragraphs, in Minnesota last year, that's 2004, researchers at the Mayo Clinic created pigs with human blood flowing through their bodies.
Well, if you look at my page there where I have the quote, and I've got to just bring it up myself so I can see it, we have from Meyer, and this is from 1995.
I downloaded first 98.
It's in your book art, sitting on your shelf, human-animal hybrids.
And it talks right there, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So-called semi-humans whom they will produce by crossing humans with pigs.
I entered into a debate, if you will, with all the professional skeptics.
Michael Shermer from Skeptic Magazine, the amazing Randy Vaughan Rees, all these guys, and on one of their pages, iig.com or something like that, there must be 30 or 40 email exchanges.
And in there, Randy, in I think it was like March of 2002 or something, or 2003, I don't have this in front of me, he says, the Meyer case is a farce that a child could see through, and blah, blah, blah.
It goes on and on.
Well, after you boot the guys off the air from CFI West, I think it's April of 2003, he claims he never said the Meyer case is a hoax.
Oh, it must have misunderstood me.
You know, to me, that's a retraction, folks.
He didn't write the check.
I'm not waiting for it.
I know Billy isn't.
But, you know, come on, take us on.
Show us the big hoax here.
But just so I do this and make my case for you and your listeners, and people can now do this for themselves, scientists confirm mad cow disease and goat.
Everybody, you know, people always say to me, well, anybody could have guessed this or that.
Now, the fact is that not anybody did, and all of these things admired, who else did it?
Now, on the same page where I've got this information on my site, you'll see a PDF for the 249th contact if people open up that PDF what they're going to see is a document which is going to offend again it's going to offend a lot of people but so be it because of all the things that are said in there but what right in the middle of that contact they talk about this you know the prion disease and the CJS and all this stuff and he even this is one of the the ETs talks to Meyer
about the specific temperatures that we are not even yet treating this animal products with to destroy the prions and how the incubation period this is nineteen ninety four eleven years ago all right in the interest of time here we are if we do not change current policies and then um...
let me just take a breath here on this one because this is it's hard for me only because i live here in the you live here
we're all in this together that's right and this is just let me say it and everybody that wants to be mad about it you can be mad on September 9th of this year and let me also go back to say that on my webpage there is a Billy's documents page where you will find documents from Meyer from about 2001 or so we've got to hurry here Michael huh we've got to hurry okay they already forecast that if the U.S. launches these wars of aggression we will get a third world war it will be precipitated by the irrational policies that are running
the country known as the U.S. Great Britain and he's also talked about about 15 others so for those that want to say it's anti-American it's anti-many people but specifically they have said and this is the other part September 9th when they told him in advance once again George Bush will be reelected fraudulently there will be votes that have been kept back in computers in key states 400,000
votes there will be at the death of yes or I thought before the end of no day we're going back to things that happened I want to stick with their saying going to have right yes the policy do not change if we allow the current administration its agenda to launch worldwide wars on the precedented destruction devastation and annihilation is never before experienced on the planet earth will befall not only the planet but specifically the United States of America under the mad
direction of the current of policymakers hmm we just people will interpret that as a definite attack and then are hurricanes firestorms yes %uh weapons weather weapons laser computer biological all of this they said folks this will come to you if you do not rise up against this to you know you're gonna get a lot angry man yes I know it but I would just say to the people everybody's already said Billy's anti-american I'm anti-american for reporting here's my bottom line art it's either true or if it's not if it's not true flush it and for
forget about it if it rings true if you can investigate this and see if there's 53 years of credibility and these people are trying to tell us warn us you're on the wrong path then I'm a guy walking down the street at night saying your house is on fire you can stay asleep you can wake up you can call the fire department you can put it out you can do whatever you want but I have to yell about it all right for those that are already yelling into their email you have an email address website you can take your shots at me it's theyfly.com T-H-E-Y-F-L-Y.com.
Everything, just about everything tonight is already on a two-hour video that we produced.
When I was in the Air Force, stationed at Emerillo Air Force Base in Texas, Lynn Widlick, who I've actually had on the show and myself, used to pack ourselves inside a little Volkswagen and chase tornadoes and take video and pedal it to local TV stations and stuff.
And, you know, we would chase them sometimes all the way up into Oklahoma.
So we were pretty crazy and pretty wild about violent weather.
Scott Stevens has been fascinated himself with weather since he began keeping a weather diary for a scouting merit badge.
That would have been a long time ago now.
A year later, he was reporting conditions in his small town in Idaho to the area TV stations.
By his senior year in high school, he was working at KIFI-TV, the NBC affiliate in Idaho Falls, as a studio camera operator, then as a photographer for the news department.
Scott went on to the University of Kansas to study meteorology.
During his sophomore year at KU, he auditioned for an opening at KPKA in Topeka, and five months later, he, in fact, landed a job.
However, it cost him twice as much to keep the job as it paid.
Typical beginnings in broadcasting.
But 13 months later, he had gone from a two-and-a-half-hour, five-day-a-week job to being the main guy.
That can happen in broadcasting, too.
Not long afterward, a phone call came from Omaha, Nebraska.
That would be RFD-TV.
He also spent a year in the capital district of New York as the chief for WRGB.
In 1996, returned home to eastern Idaho, where he does weather on KPVI-TV.
Out about four days, I was about 3.2 degrees off on high temperatures.
And that was kind of one of the red flags for me, is that accuracy began to slip, even as technology and advances in the science should have stated otherwise.
And now at four days out, I'm at about four degrees error.
I mean, look, most weather guys, TV, radio, or whatever, if you were to ask them about weather modification, they'd go, give me a break, weather modification.
Well, it was instance after instance where it goes back to the winters of 97, 98 and 98, 99, where across the entire country, there were just big struggles in forecasting winter storms any farther out Than beyond about 72 hours, three days.
And you should be able to see large events coming over the horizon.
The bigger the event, the higher it's going to poke its head up over the horizon so you can see it arriving.
And those two winters were just tough, Art.
And so I began to think that something's amiss.
And that alone opened my mind to go look at some of these fringe websites when it concerns anomalies showing up in the weather.
What I'll do is point out anomalies that show up within the satellite or radar imagery because it becomes very easy to spot them once you know what to look for.
When we find hard right angles, the capital letter L shows up frequently.
And from what I've been able to gather is to align or electrify a portion of the sky to get this L shape, we're actually, in fact, imparting or pushing the flat edge of the atmosphere in one direction.
And then we'll tuck in the short side of the capital letter L, and we just impart angular momentum.
We've got the link to weatherwars.info, and I'm on the Best of Squares page.
So if you're able to get to the internet, follow along with us.
If not, then let's let Scott, before the bottom of the hour, explain what it is, because that's what's important, about these clouds that's not right, or that leads you to believe somebody's got a hand in all this.
Well, what's curious is that we're dealing with a gas or a fluid.
And when you're studying meteorology, fluid dynamics, or dynamics is one of the courses or fundamentals of the atmosphere that you need to begin to understand.
You can basically forecast.
You need to know how it operates.
And we don't find squares showing up in fluids and gases naturally, free-flowing fluids.
In the old days, we used to call cirrus clouds mare's tails.
Just long, straight wisps with a bit of a curl on the end.
And now they have sharp hooks and turn at hard right angles in very, very short distances.
And I know there are a lot of other weather people that see things in the sky, and what's pointed out to them don't know how to explain it.
And so you have to begin a journey of discovery and figure out, all right, what in the inventory of technology is out there that is capable of doing this?
We have to begin to look at something, A, that's invisible.
It has to be something invisible that can be displayed or put in the skies to provide these just unusual shapes.
And my conclusion was that there had to be some kind of electromagnetics that was capable of imprinting itself on the skies to end up with whatever intent was deemed.
And I think as time evolves and this information becomes more widespread, there will be a lot of, well, I wondered what that was going on in the weather departments around the country and around the world for that matter.
it's a central bar and are a central cloud and then there's a sharp right angle headed west on the lower end of it and can see a little bit start where other person process this photograph put a little bit too much contrast i brought up a little too much contrast but it doesn't change shape the shape of the
Truly, if you think about it, if things are as advanced as I now believe they are, you could have your forecast show up in your mailbox Sunday night for the entire week, and by Saturday have it 95 to 99% accurate.
And he had a little article about whether there was an imprint within the hurricanes or an intentionality within those hurricanes that affected Florida this past summer.
I wrote back and said I believe there was, and then presented some images showing examples of this scalar imprint in the clouds, in the radar, and so forth.
And he posted a page, and it has just snowballed since the second week of October.
Well, let's take them at their word and say they can.
Let's take them at their word.
Because you look at the storms, and as these hurricanes tend to spin up and approach a certain velocity, almost to the limit of what the atmosphere can handle, because it looks like they're being spun up again towards category 5 and beyond, or very close to that limit, they're revealing bars, solid lines crossing the eye walls in an exceptionally high shear environment.
But the next question, of course, is why anybody would manipulate hurricanes, spool them up too near Cat5, and then head them into land where they're going to do a tremendous amount of damage.
If we have control of the weather, then why are we controlling it to our detriment?
You know, if this was a tool that had been invented publicly, it would have been used publicly for the public's betterment, the public's good.
We would have dealt with these hurricanes, probably brought them ashore in places that needed the rainfall in a somewhat weakened state, and then provided the rainfall for those parched areas.
The wholesale death and destruction that occurred in Florida in this last hurricane season, if it was manipulated by another nation-state, for example, would be considered an act of war.
Well, they made the case that the HARP project has the ability to heat the ocean ahead of a hurricane.
Now, kind of like a Pied Piper, the hurricane would follow the warmest waters was their contention.
So they could Just sort of pied piper a hurricane along where they wanted to go by heating the first little bit of the ocean, the top layer of the ocean, artificially.
It puts us weathermen in a rather precarious position because we're looking at data.
We're analyzing what's happening.
And there's a missing delta.
There's missing information that is not going into the computer models that we need to get accurate forecasts.
And that has got to be rectified.
And you've got to wonder about the guys back in D.C. or in Silver Springs, Maryland, that originate much of the information that we look at, if they're aware of it.
And my feeling is that they just have to be.
And you could read between the lines in some of their technical discussions that things are going on when they discuss three and four standard deviation from normal events.
Well, I called the National Weather Service because I read the weather from my local KNYE.
I read every night I read it.
And I finally picked up the phone and called the National Weather Service in Las Vegas, and they said, we don't know what the hell they're doing in Washington.
So here's a page you can go to.
And I've got a special page I can go to, but they've really got it screwed up, the whole national system.
And if you've got a forecaster in Flagstaff who doesn't like what the guy in Vegas is doing, they have to hammer out an agreement on those bordering counties.
As I mentioned at the top of the show, I'm a weather nerd.
So I read what's called the forecast discussion.
And in that forecast discussion, Scott, many times they're looking at, oh, for example, two or three different computer models, and they're trying to make some sort of forecast out of models that are not in agreement with each other about what's going to happen.
A TV weatherman named Scott Stevens is my guest, and he's saying there's no question about it.
It's our weather.
unidentified
it's being manipulated by man's hand.
It's too late now, it's the whole that I'm saying.
But it's still warm.
It's the whole that I'm saying.
But it's still warm.
It's better taking a chance.
Yeah, the storm moves, the sirens in my head.
The silent silence, the circuits are dead.
Yeah, the...
The silent silence, the silent silence, the silent silence.
The silent silence, the silent silence.
Time, time, time.
See what's become of me.
Time, time, time.
See what's become of me.
While I looked around All my possibilities I was so hard to please The ground Is the ground And the sky Is a hazy shade of winter Feel this damnation on the ground Down by the sun is bound to be a better island what you've got planned.
To talk with Art Bell, call the wildcard line at area code 775-727-1295.
The first-time caller line is area code 775-727-1222.
To talk with Art Bell from east of the Rockies, call toll-free at 800-825-5033.
From west of the Rockies, call 800-618-8255.
International callers may reach Art by calling your in-country sprint access number, pressing option 5, and dialing toll-free 800-893-0903.
From coast to coast and worldwide on the internet, this is Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell.
He's a television weatherman for KPBI-TV in eastern Idaho.
And I must say, he's stepping out on a limb.
There's no question about that.
For a television weatherman to come on the air nationally on national radio and say, ladies and gentlemen, our weather is being manipulated, no matter whether it would be by us or someone else, believe me, you're walking out on a limb.
On the other hand, I have this feeling that a lot of you out there agree with him.
So if you'll stay right where you are, there's much more to come.
you're listening to coast to coast a.m.
unidentified
in the night yeah the the You know, Scott, there's always a danger in speaking out.
You know what's encouraging, Art, is that people are the ones emailing their local weatherman.
They're the ones trying to get us to pay attention.
And they're not.
They're not.
And that has to change.
They need to realize that: okay, something isn't amiss, or something is amiss.
I'm not as accurate as I'd like to be.
Storms are not behaving.
We're getting additional lift, or we're getting three tornadoes out of one storm, that we're having extra strong this or too many those, or the drought is not right, or clouds are moving the wrong direction, the wind field is not matching with cloud movement.
There are so many things that are signs, that are red flags.
You take the Doppler radars, it scans the sky and the area, and it'll give you wind movements as it detects particles, be it moisture or birds or dust or something reflective in the atmosphere, and then you can get a good idea of which direction the winds are moving over a certain period of time.
Put a camera up and look at the same area and watch the clouds grow.
There are many other anomalies in that image that if you just sit and look at it, the geometry is just wrong.
These thunderstorms are not lighting up.
When we heat the afternoon day, we begin to see thunderstorms billing off the tops of mountain ridges.
I mean, that's how it's supposed to work.
That doesn't happen.
It doesn't happen like that anymore.
They're close.
They're close.
But they don't have the grid that controls the weather matching the terrain just right.
They're close.
But you can see where they've made mistakes.
And it's this way day after day after day.
And after this Sunday afternoon in June, I looked at this imagery much closer and began to save every picture.
And as you look at literally thousands of them, there are all kinds of shapes, symmetry, circles and circles, circles and squares, triangles inscribed in circles, circles inscribed in squares.
All of these things that should not, that are far more a hyper-dimensional physics kind of thing rather than convective signatures that you would like to see.
We've been taking pictures of clouds, human beings have, since we've been able to take pictures.
So it seems to me that you could go back.
We might not have had satellite imagery all that long, but you could go back and see if you found things like this at a time clearly before we could have had the technology to manipulate the weather as a control for what you're claiming we're seeing here.
And that's at least one avenue where you can begin to see something that's normal.
Because as I have delved into this farther and farther, oh, that red pill just doesn't end.
That this has been going on as long as I've been alive.
So I don't know that I've ever seen a time when clouds were entirely natural.
And that just kind of leaves you a little woozy inside, knowing that what has been promoted as natural and all of these bad weather events happening and people praying to God, praying for an end to the drought, for an end to the rain.
And that intensity is focused in very small places rather than being spread out over the western edge of the continent or the full breadth of the storm.
It's focused.
And so large swaths of area are receiving less rainfall out of a said storm than they would otherwise, while others will get two, two and a half times normal rainfall.
And you begin in the Pacific, and you essentially trap the jet stream.
And once you trap the jet stream, and if you know and can manage, and what happens when you heat, you use this energy to heat a layer of the atmosphere, what happens when you heat a gas?
It expands.
And as it expands, it exerts pressure on the layers above and below.
And as you gently add pressure farther upstream to guide a storm in a certain direction, you're going to limit its movement in that direction you're trying to guide it to.
And it becomes a relatively simple process once you understand how to do it.
And so the entire jet stream can be trapped and captured and guided.
We're at something called visible satellite imagery.
You go down the left-hand side of the page until you get to phenomena.
And then, is that correct?
And then visible satellite imagery?
Yes.
Second picture down.
First, it doesn't hit you, and then all of a sudden, boom, there it is.
it's a large i would call it rectangular area bereft the weather that is all the way around everywhere else it's like somebody took I think we're looking at every bit of about 110 miles long by about 60 miles wide.
Is there anything in the geography of the area, an obvious question, that could account?
Yeah, because that's the explanation you would like to come to, is that there's a geographic, a local or graphic reason for this, but there is not.
And we go from west of Salt Lake, which is wide open desert, and then across the Salt Lake, across the mountains that border the Bear River Valley, and into southern Idaho.
And it's fairly high terrain.
And there should have been a half or greater rainfall in those mountains.
But you have to look at this and it's intentional.
The weather is so unusual.
We've had so many bizarre events happen that three in four standard deviations from normal, which are three, four, 500-year events, that the weather is displaying intent.
And this is just a simple example of intent being displayed in the weather.
And I'm kind of thinking that was our guys beating down that storm so we didn't have any more flooding than we already did up through the Appalachians.
I mean, they had already had a torrential summer.
They just didn't need another storm, for goodness sakes.
And so it was nice to see some of that rained out.
What would you, assuming that with scalar technology of some sort, you could do what we see right here, what effect would that have on a hurricane onshore like that?
Well, in this case, it was the function of weakening it.
You're disturbing the airflow around the center to slow it down.
You could have the opposite effect if you basically turn the mode around and you could stimulate the storm so it remained much stronger than it would be otherwise.
Because the energy is going to be dissipated within friction on the ground and the absence of its source, which is the warm ocean water.
So you could replace that source of energy with this technology to keep the storm going longer than it would be otherwise.
Or you can do as what we see in this case and begin to shoot holes into it.
It was one of the military services, I can't recall which, which not long ago suggested by, what was it, 2050 or some year like that, they would own the weather.
That was our military.
So I wonder if we've taken, you know, partial possession of the weather already.
You've got to see these pictures that Scott is talking about.
Then all of a sudden the light begins to go on as you see these squares, these manipulated bits of large systems.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
I can hear it coming in the air tonight Hold on
Hold on
Hold on
Hold on Hold on Hold on Hold on Hold on The first time color line is area code 7757271295.
The first time colourline is area code 7757271222.
Trunk with our fellows from east to the rockies called 123.
At 8008255033.
From west to the Rockies Call Market at 8006188255.
International college may reach our bell by calling your internet number.
Pressing option 5.93 0903 Only posterior on the internet.
I think the average person just following along with us this evening and looking at these images would have to agree there's nothing at all natural about what we're seeing.
There is nothing natural.
And I guess that's what occurred to Scott.
And I hope you have been following along.
If not, then when you get home, you can find weatherwars.info and look through some of these photographs that we've been looking at.
And what you're going to be looking for is what we've seen, these square, unnatural areas where obviously a weather pattern, in some cases a very violent one like a hurricane, has been subjected to something.
In other words, there is something going on.
And if it is a war, Scott, then what good is it?
I mean, we have one group trying to do one thing, another group, as you put it, trying to do another.
But if you let's say you made the assumption, Scott, that insurance companies that were affected mightily by the hurricanes in Florida, I mean, they were just crippled, right?
So they're one of the big money people in the universe, insurance companies.
Well, last season, though, hurricane-wise, we saw a lot of really weird things.
For example, we saw storms that were not supposed to build to the category they did in the short time between when we saw them and then when they hit land.
It was short indeed, and one of the storms suddenly built like crazy, another one fell apart.
And just became this monster, monster, 90-mile-width-eyed beast, and she just churned in that area.
And she stalled, waiting for the next storm to come in from the Rockies to scoop her up and give her the next direction.
Slow it down, wait for the storm to come in from the west, and then we can mate the two and have a nice little rainer along the east coast.
And you focus summer after summer of these heavy rainfalls pouring off the east coast, and then you begin to affect the ocean currents flowing northbound through the Gulf Stream.
We're dumping incredible amounts of fresh water into this Gulf Stream.
I mean, if we had even three minutes nightly dedicated to our environment, we would have much greater awareness of what is happening in other lands on this planet.
That's a big question, and I think that's one that needs some serious attention, and it needs to happen very quickly.
Because of this happening, of this weather modification happening, I don't think we have an appropriate baseline to see how big or how severe global warming truly is.
And indeed, is it warming at all because of this project?
So much of the warming has happened within the last 30 years, which corresponds with the activity that's been happening with this technology.
But I sort of asked you that before, and you said, well, that's going to take a lot of research.
And now you're saying that about 30 years, there's a point where you can see this technology beginning to emerge in our cloud patterns, in our climate, in our whatever, right?
And when we look at the Arctic or these higher latitudes and discover incredible amounts of warming, you have to wonder if it isn't because the Earth isn't allowed to do its own thing.
And I've read papers discussing and basically saying that much of the warming happening on the planet is not so much in the atmosphere, but more so within the oceans.
And as these oceans are warming, then that heat is beginning to work into the atmosphere and hence into our daily lives through that method.
And when you look at sea surface temperature anomalies, and the Navy's got some nice sites for those, the higher latitudes are consistently 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 degrees warmer than what is used as the baseline.
And so that means it takes longer in the winters to ice up.
It melts off much, much quicker earlier in the season.
So we are seeing warming from that happening in those higher latitudes.
And that will affect the ocean currents.
It will dramatically affect the ocean currents when we look longer term.
Even a generation down the road, I think we're going to have to do a post-mortem on this issue and assign some blame.
What do you think it would take for the public to become generally aware or the American press that what you're showing me here tonight is the case?
And in fact, weather modification is going on, not laying it at anybody's doorstep, but just making that one jump, the one jump that you've made that, hey, look, it's being screwed with.
You can really tweak areas, but to control the big systems, the big events, it's much easier to do that when you have a grasp of the entire process.
And that was the epiphany that I had back in that June, is that if the small events are displaying these signatures, then the large events are as well, and that it's 24-7, 365.
And there are many other people that have far better data, far higher resolution, more frequency or more spatial resolution where you can get time steps that are more than every 30 minutes or more than every 15 minutes.
We're an end user.
And so we don't get the best stuff.
And the stuff that I'm showing on the website, I even have to go out and buy and subscribe to a service to be able to inspect it.
When you really lay this on somebody, it's pretty seriously convincing.
Let me put it that way.
I hope a lot of the audience that's going to call in in the next hour has had an opportunity to look at these websites or this website and these photographs.
What took me so long to come out is that when you visit the other weather modification sites and with the anomalies, there just isn't the understanding of the meteorology, those processes, meteorology behind it.
So the terminology is bad, the assumptions are bad.
And that's probably what took me the two or three years to, all right, Scott, let's bring it all together.
And then that just happened this fall and over the winter.
But once it's laid out in front of you, we're beyond a reasonable doubt.
And I think that he's come up with some pretty solid proof that indeed our weather is being manipulated by man.
I think it's pretty good proof.
I've just had a sort of a tour of it, and I hope many of you have as well.
unidentified
in a moment if you have a question for scott that's what we're up to coming right up the Absolutely incumbent on me to ask at least this before we plunge to the phones.
Barry in Los Angeles, California, says what many do.
He says, I observe fiberglass-looking clouds over Los Angeles, resulting from what he says is chemtrail spraying.
Even on hot, dry days when no jet contrails are even possible, who is it spraying?
What is being sprayed?
And why?
First of all, do you believe, Scott, that there is spraying going on in our skies that is not the normal contrail that we all have seen and even admired at times from jet planes, that it's more than that, that it's chemicals?
do you believe that to be part of weather modification or is it just an unknown knowledge you agree it's there but i think they wouldn't be doing it if it didn't have an effect You need to release the sunshine.
It could be warming the planet because we're adding an insulating blanket of cloud cover.
There are multiple things that this could do.
And because it's mobile, you can deliver it at certain locations, pre-storm, post-storm, during a storm.
I mean, the possibilities are endless with what it's capable.
And I don't know.
I mean, you live out west with me.
You know what our blue skies used to be like.
I mean, how beautiful it is out here.
I mean, weeks on end with just blue, deep blue skies.
And it doesn't happen anymore.
Very few days can I say with certainty in a forecast, sunny.
There are not many of those anymore.
And I'll even say, and this has become rather blatant since that August afternoon, you know, we'll start with blue skies and then the contrails will generate high clouds.
Yep, we'll end up with high clouds from the contrails.
You have to say that because that's what we do, we're observers.
We observe a science, we describe the process, and infer what's going to happen from that process.
And when you see day after day after day after day this process, sooner or later, it's going to hit you on the head, and you have to incorporate that in your forecasting.
But I do know a little bit about energy physics, and I'm not disputing anything Scott has said, but I'd like to suggest that if weather is being manipulated on a global scale, the only place you can do that from is space.
You can't do it from Earth.
You might be able to use cloud seeding and 747s to change the shape of cloud patterns depending on where the chemicals fall.
But the manipulation of hurricanes and tornadoes, I mean, I've lived through Great Plains thunderstorms and tornadoes and was on the edge of a hurricane.
And the amount of energy you're talking about is just unbelievable.
And although I'm, and I just don't accept the idea that human technology is currently capable of generating the amounts of energy, either in the shortwave energy area or the longwave energy area, to manipulate those kinds of massive weather patterns.
And my question would have been, is there anything other than energy physics that could have caused the squares, the unnatural, absolutely unnatural breaks in giant formations that just simply couldn't be there other than man-made?
unidentified
Okay, well, this is what I'm getting to.
And considering how on the edge this discussion is already, I admit the possibility of straight edges in cloud patterns based on cloud seating.
I could see where that might show up if you did it on a large enough, a seated large enough cloud area.
On the other hand, the other manipulations I don't see can be generated by human technology.
And since I've already said it would have to be manipulated on a global scale from space, you need to do some research then into the scaling technology.
We are talking chimneys venting this energy in Siberia, and the chimneys, I mean, you leave the trail, the condensation trail to vent this power that run 90 miles long.
And this weaponry has been in progress, in development, since the 40s.
Basically, the Russians have been, they have spent the equivalent of seven Manhattan projects developing this program in concurrent or concurrently with the nuclear program that we've run, and they matched as well.
Okay, I first of all agree that these squares and oblongs we see, these totally unnatural slams in weather or effects in weather, it would seem to me that unless there's seeding going on, that was well pointed out, that could produce, I suppose, that kind of effect, but we know that seeding wasn't going on in these particular cases, or at least not publicly announced seeding.
You know, it's a different mindset on what's capable and what is.
I think if we were to be able to unfold a portfolio of technology within the variety of nations that we would call the First Order of Nations, and then look at events that have happened globally over the last 50 years, we would be able to do a lot of, oh, well, this one did this and this one did this and this one did that.
Wildcard line, you're on the air with Scott Stevens.
Hello.
unidentified
Yes.
All right.
Great show.
And Scott, I think you're on the money.
I believe the weather is being manipulated.
I thought it was very interesting that the series of hurricanes over Florida happened right around election time, at which time FEMA came in and offered all of this money to help rebuild, and it looked very good politically.
But the point that I wanted to make was this.
If the weather in fact is being manipulated with the scalar wave technology, which some of our guests in the past have alluded to, then the question is, if we have that technology, why aren't we not using it to end our own droughts?
And if we are not using this technology against ourselves, who in the hell is?
And can we identify who it is, and can we retaliate?
Well, I mean, your point about the treaties is very good.
If something was either not possible already or about to be possible, you certainly wouldn't go to all the trouble of sitting down and hashing out treaties to prevent it.
You, I believe a few months back, were complaining about or you were bringing to somebody's attention that you were noticing electromagnetic energy around your own property.
So I say that this electromagnetic problem is all related to those solar flares that we're getting off of the sun, that this planet that is so, you know, energy responsive is getting hit by those solar flares, and that's why we're getting all these anomalies.
What we're doing is adding energy to within the Earth system that's coming off the sun.
How we dissipate that, how we manage that, whether that energy is just left in the ionosphere and so it's incredibly hot all the time, whether this control method, this control that happens, may be absolutely necessary to keep the warming oceans and the attendant weather above it in check.
And they're doing all they can to keep it from going even more berserk than it is.
That's a possibility, that this is essentially a caller on a system that is about to go crazy because of the warming that is happening and the electricity pouring off the sun and indeed throughout the rest of the planets in the solar system.
So this may be a control program to keep the weather from going any worse than it is.
If you recall, about four hours later during that day, excuse me, they had a very large drug bust during Pocatello that involved several federal agencies.
And something that I found was quite strange was that they were going to charge these suspects $4 million.
they were spraying something in the air to manipulate communications oh I think they've they only got a little too far yeah with different agencies and i was generally always looking at this event not event try and see if they're connected but that seems like too much of a Yeah.
No, you know, you just made an awfully good point, and that is most of us are on the way out to the car, we look up, and we get a little snapshot of whatever is going on that instant, and then we have to concentrate on traffic or whatever else is in front of us.
Well, I'm just wondering, you know, well, first of all, I'd like to say that if people think that, you know, that when you look at some of these picture stuff, if you think that this isn't, you know, man-made, I think that's being pretty naive.
You know, I just saw it all for the first time, and it looks man-made to me.
unidentified
Yeah, nature doesn't just come up with, you know, 90-degree angles like that.
But one thing I'd like to know is, now that he's opened this can of worms, I'm wondering if any of this is going to have any effect on his, you know, on the way he brings us the weather here in Pocotel now.
Well, I'm just going to have to point out the oddities.
And I have, but it's been very subtle up until this point.
When a large specific storm is headed into the west coast, and they're going to turn it, they're going to change directions on it, it'll go into a very severe L shape, and then they'll break the storm.
And it's by design.
It's just obvious.
You can look at the structure of the clouds, again, invisible or even high-resolution infrared imagery, and you can see them doing it.
And these are things that I'm going to begin to point out, and I expect that other weather people will begin to educate themselves because I was looking for sources of information so I could have somebody to go to to figure this out, and it's not there.
this is close to close and in the night time the wind thrown down in a spin I gave you love I thought that we had made it to the top I gave you all I had to give why
did it have to stop you've blown it all sky high by turning me alive without a reason why you've blown it all sky high by turning me alive without a reason why you've blown it all sky high by turning me alive without a reason why you've blown it all sky high by turning me alive
without a reason why she's got something that moves my soul and she knows I'd love to love her but she lets me down every time can't make her mind she's no one's lover tonight really she'll be so inviting I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself
I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself I don't want to run for myself To talk with Art Bell.
Call the wildcard line at area code 775-727-1295.
The first-time caller line is area code 775-727-1222.
To talk with Art Bell from East to the Rockies, call toll-free at 800-825-5033.
From West to the Rockies, call ARC at 800-618-8255.
International callers may reach Art Bell by calling your in-country spread access number, pressing option 5, and dialing toll-free 800-893-0903.
From coast to coast and worldwide on the internet, this is Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell.
My feeling in what's happening is that the environment ahead of a large event like that is seated.
And some of the particles, some of the components of these persistent contrails are heavier metals.
And these barium and aluminum could be, let's just say, traction for the scalar technology to get a hold of the atmosphere and essentially turn it on, ionize it, and then attract the water molecules, and then just step the storm into wherever they want it to go.
This is how the first caller, and scratching the head, wondering where the energy is coming from, if Tesla had been allowed over Edison, if Tesla's work had been accepted and ingrained within society, we would be free of oil.
We would be free of coal-fired power stations, natural gas, hydroelectric.
I mean, the man drove a car without a drop of gasoline for 14 years, for goodness sakes.
I mean, you could spend $30 million, give $5 million to six universities, let these electrical engineering students go through patents that have already been filed and approved, and then weed out the best ones and then present a plan a few months later on how to solve our energy problems.
West of the Rockies, you're on the air with Scott Stevens.
Hi.
unidentified
Yes, good morning, gentlemen.
Good morning, Greece.
I'm speaking to you from San Diego on 600 a.m.
Cogo.
Yes, sir.
And I want to first commemorate Scott for sticking your neck out.
You're going to be in for quite a surprise.
And I want to back up your suspicions here that this is definitely something done by man's hand.
And I want to point out to you a book that I looked at a few years back.
I've been following this subject since it began back a few years ago when Will Thomas was on the air with our bill.
Perhaps you remember they were discussing taking samples, and they were talking about the sludge that was falling out.
And I didn't know what happened with that, but the book that I want to talk about is called A Shield in Space.
And it talks about discussions by the Federation of American Scientists.
And they were talking before the chemtrail issue became about public knowledge about doing exactly that.
And my suspicions that it is a multi-applicationary purpose seems to be just that.
That's why it's hard to identify and put a finger on what it really is and why they're doing it because it is multi-applicationary, such as controlling the weather, such as controlling communications.
Well, and what I'm finding is that there is something like a carrier wave just rolling constantly across the Earth.
And then there are smaller interference points where additional waves are introduced, and you get these standing wave patterns.
And you can look in the marine layer, the low clouds that are off the California coast.
And that's a wonderful test bed because there's no terrain around, no orographic effects, and you're looking for thousands of miles and you can see this pulsing through the top of that marine layer.
And it works on an angle from west-southwest to east-northeast, and it gradually lifts slowly north.
And when storms approach, it changes, and you get deeper cuts, straight lines, parallel Straight lines running hundreds of miles in this marine layer.
And it's just one area that I watch.
It's not impacted by mad.
Sure, there's some boats out there, but on the whole, this technology controls or does what these clouds want it to do.
Think about being able to blanket a whole ocean with low cloud cover.
Again, you're retaining heat or holding heat in.
It's an incredible insulator.
So we've got our pulse on the planet and trying to do either disguise warming that's happening much, much faster than is publicly stated or other just simple control agendas that have nothing beyond terror involved.
The models may tell you that that's where the bullseye of the snow or the precept is going to be, but I'm to the point now where I just don't trust it.
I mean, the storm can be on the doorstep, and I'm still uncertain as to whether it will arrive.
Hence, the square stamped out across the state.
The clouds have just been voided.
And it really adds an uncomfortable amount of uncertainty that people count on us.
I mean, these are life and death situations sometimes.
And they count on us to provide them with accurate, truthful information.
And you're trying your best, but what you're saying is you can't provide that level of accuracy that you're accustomed to providing because of the manipulation.
So I have to wonder, because this operation is so immense, whether they are scouring our data and our comments from our agencies and using that in this program.
It's just with the power of the internet, information is just here and there in no time at all.
Now, you would like people, if possible, when they, after all, a million eyes in the night and in the day can take pictures Of the anomalies that you've described and shown us tonight.