Ed Dames, a former U.S. government remote viewer, warns of a 1999 economic collapse tied to global markets, ecological pressures, and food shortages (sorghum, corn, wheat, rice), with solar X-ray flux posing a "kill shot" risk by April despite missed precursor events. He confirms Clinton’s term will end early, bonds may default, and Russia’s nuclear tensions could escalate amid Yeltsin’s controversial moves. Dames dismisses conspiracy claims about Nostradamus or Scientology but suggests collective prayer or relocation to areas like Glacier National Park might mitigate chaos, though timelines remain uncertain. [Automatically generated summary]
He was in the U.S. government's remote viewing program that ran for about 20 years.
What he is about to tell you is going to scare the hell out of you.
But that's Ed Dames for you.
They didn't call him Dr. Doom back then for nothing.
He's really something.
Now, I'm just going to issue the standard warning.
If hearing this kind of predictive material, whether it be by remote viewing or prophecy or any other way that it is delivered on my program, bothers you or scares you, then turn your radio off.
If there are young children in the room, get them out of the room.
Some of what you're going to hear is not going to be appropriate for their ears and maybe not even for yours.
So I really do mean it when I say that.
It's a big caution, giving you time to get the kids out of the room and giving you time to decide if you want to hear what Ed's going to say.
And so with that caution applied, I guess I've been interviewing Ed Dames now for, boy, Ed, how long?
Okay, I should, let me give one more little preface here for the New York audience that just joined us.
Last Thursday and Friday, I was not here.
I was sick.
Really sick.
I had a stomach intestinal flu of some kind.
I had a temperature, and so I was gone.
Now, on Thursday, I got a fax from Ed Dames, Major Ed Dames.
Man, I just almost brought on there and then took off because I want to tell you this.
On Thursday, in the middle of my misery, I got a fax from Ed that essentially said, Art, look, I've got a very, very important warning and announcement for your listeners.
And I can either type it up and you can read it to them, or I can briefly come on the air and tell them about it.
And since you have no guest, what about it?
Well, I didn't respond to him Thursday because I was sick.
And earlier today, he sent me a second facts.
And not having a guest lined up, I said, well, yeah, sure.
Let's do it.
But I wanted you to know, you can believe me, because I'm telling you, the first word I had of this came last Thursday from Ed.
He wanted to get this on the air last Thursday.
But because I was sick, it's now going to get on the air tonight.
Well, to us at SciTech, this is just data, just information.
You know that it's been a year and a half to two years ago that we, on your radio program, we flat out said in late spring or summer of 1998, there would be a global economic collapse.
So when our outlook for the future is based upon actually downloading data connected with an event that already exists in time over the horizon, that's what we were looking at two years ago when we saw this collapse in late spring, summer of 98, the unthinkable occurring.
We've gotten many letters from people who have thanked us because we forewarned them they got out of the markets.
But I called you, actually I facted you last week because those selfsame people and others are about to make or may have already made a mistake.
And the money that they save by pulling out, withdrawing from the stock market, they may be throwing away somewhere else.
And that was the gist of this fact and this alert that I wanted to get out to your listeners.
And I want the listeners who have, at least the ones who have followed SciTech's data, to remember that the experts are wrong, and they're still wrong, and or they're being disingenuous when they say that the current reaction in the U.S. market is just an overreaction to the Russian situation.
Now, regarding the timing of that, you may already, if I'm, I don't know if I'm remembering correctly Ed, but you may already be wrong about the timing of that.
Now, what I do know is that there's big-time disruptions going on now on our sun.
We've been having X-class flare after X-class flare.
We've been having ejecta.
We've been having solar storms.
I'm giving reports of compass deviations.
But there certainly has not been what would yet be called a kill shot.
So what is your prediction timeline for that?
Has the shot over the bow been fired?
Or did you simply miss the timeline on that one a little bit?
No, I do not believe it occurred because the data that was connected, the technical remote viewing data that was connected with that event indicated that many, many people would be patently aware of the event when it occurred.
That probably meant satellite outages, power outages, and those kinds of things.
And that indeed has not happened, even though the flare last week was the disturbance last week was quite serious.
It did not.
Unless you had been following that, you would not know that something was acting up with the sun.
That being an extremely deadly event that emanates from our own sun that we predicted would be ballpark around April of 1999, April, around Easter of next year.
And it's really, it's a ballpark figure.
But what I'm looking at now, of course the sun is a very complex thing, a complex entity.
And the sun-earth system is a complex system.
But what is starting to bother me is we monitor the sun and geophysical things using TRV quite often.
And it is always the sun that is the most deadly, the most doom-laden thing out on the horizon, the sun.
What I'm looking at now, in fact, if your listeners go to our webpage, hit links, and look at Project Sunburst, there's a link in there that says Today's Space Weather.
Here's the only positive facts I've been able to find regarding the Japanese Nikkei close.
It is the only Asian market, in fact, ending with a gain today.
And I think the rumors have some merit of intervention.
That's just my opinion.
Now, that said, the facts are goes on to say the Tuesday New York Stock Exchange opening is going to be higher on the bell because the overnight trading on the S ⁇ P futures is up.
But to this Faxer, I would point out that the S ⁇ P futures were up on Sunday night, Monday morning before this bloodban.
So that's not necessarily an indicator of what's going to happen.
I guess if you want to think positive, you can sure think that it might be so, and it might be so.
But the S ⁇ P future is being up right now surely does not guarantee an update for Wall Street, though we can all hope.
Now, Ed James is here, and as I said, they don't call him Dr. Doom for nothing.
Yeah, the reason I sent you this note tonight, Art, is that I've been working since Saturday morning on something that looks initially extremely tangential, but in fact appears to be converging on the topic tonight and on events in the world, both East and West.
We have a president, as you have laid out, who seemingly is off on a wild goose chase into Moscow.
I have been, as you know, pursuing a kind of broad front investigation looking at NASA, looking at potential, I'll use the C-word, conspiracies by a small cadre.
As this investigation has proceeded, we have brought more and more people into our orbit, including some very reliable former NSA people, some of whom actually may know Ed personally and maybe not.
Beginning in the last couple of weeks with the incredible debacle in Washington, we have been very focused on trying to penetrate the agenda underneath what's on CNN.
And as you know from a couple of practices I sent you, we have a very interesting thread of evidence that at some point I would like to present.
That would be tangential to tonight.
What really has focused me on the events of the last 12 hours is that I worked, as you know, closely with David Oates since you did the first reversals with him on the NASA guys couple of, about a year ago.
And David and I have kept in touch on things that I felt were relevant to our investigation.
And I specifically had him tape a lot of things before the weekend, having to do with press conferences, Albright, the National Security Advisor, the head of the FBI, and Muamar Qaddafi.
Because, as you know, we're looking in part at things that seem to stem from the Middle East, from Egypt.
They say that today's Korean missile test was not a test, that in fact it was a failed attempt to take out a Japanese nuclear reactor, and for some reason the shot, two shots, not one missile, but two, failed.
At first I heard it was a single-stage missile, they reported, that came down in between Korea and Japan.
Then the latter reports it, no, it was a two-stage missile.
Stage one went in between Korea and Japan, and stage two went over Japanese airspace and into the drink.
unidentified
Well, I mean, look, if you haven't declared war against Japan, does it make any sense that you're going to fire a missile that you know is going to go over?
I mean, your Cuba-Florida analogy was very appropriate.
Yeah, I would say that's quite likely in view of the fact that last time Parliament didn't do what Yeltsin Watt wanted.
He had tanks there shelling it and blew them to smithereens and won that way.
Now, with the rejection of The prime minister, he might be tempted to do exactly the same thing, only this time they're going to imagine he's going to do it, and they're going to try and act first.
unidentified
Well, we have a president over there tonight in a very touchy situation.
We have from Lebodov a hundred nukes, suitcase nukes, somewhere running around the Soviet Union.
All it would take is one, and suddenly we are decapitated.
And this is a situation that needs to be considered.
Given the accuracy of the obvious Korean discussion that Ed had 10 months ago, given the Muslim component of the population, given the fragility of the world economies and what would happen if there was a successful assassination attempt that not only destabilized the Soviet Union or Russia, but also took out the head of our government simultaneously.
The timeframe, by the way, according to our analysis of the calendar we keep working on, the critical time period is Thursday morning, which is when they are going to have a joint news conference in Moscow.
First thing is, if you're a military power, like the North Koreans, and you would like to hit a nuclear reactor downrange somewhere, you need to test your missiles to make sure that they can hit a pinpoint target.
You've got to do some testing of your equipment.
If you look at North Korea on the globe, you'll see that if you've got a missile that has to be tested, a medium-range ballistic missile or an intercontinental ballistic missile, where they're positioned, it's got to fly over somebody.
Now, you could test it and fire it to the west, and it would land in China.
You could fire it to the north, it would land in Russia.
You could fire it to the south in the East China Sea and maybe miss Okinawa and Taiwan and the Philippines if you're lucky.
Or you could fire it to the east and try to get it between Hokkaido and Honshu through that narrow channel.
It's still Japanese territory, but it's less risky than fire.
Let me tell you, when President Clinton came into office, those of us in the military, we did not brief the President of the United States on anything because we knew he was a transient event.
And he was not one of ours like George Bush, like Ronald Reagan.
I think that the powers that be, whether they be NSA or whoever's running the show overall, would regard this president as transient and not friendly to national security matters, and they might not have told him SWAT.
So you've got to admit, at the very least, that firing this thing in the direction of Japan was a pretty damn risky thing to do because that second stage, even if it had nothing on it whatsoever, could have come down on Japanese property, and that would have been real bad news.
Okay, Ed, you know, we did cover, you admitted to one thing you've been wrong on in the past, and maybe wrong on the timeline for this shot across the bowel of the sun, even though there's, as we discussed, a lot of activity.
Now, is there some possibility that about this bond default, about this financial meltdown that goes way beyond what we even saw yesterday on Wall Street, I mean way beyond, how much chance is there you are wrong?
Okay, normally when something like this happens, a horrid day on Wall Street, the President of the United States steps forward quickly and says, the basic structure of our economy is sound.
There's no reason for panic.
There's no reason for anybody to get out of joint over all of this.
It's a temporary dip.
The basic economy underneath all is still sound.
That's what a president would say if he was in his country.
Because, first of all, you know, we talked about the weather a lot.
What's over the horizon?
A couple of years ago, we were talking about the damage that weather would do.
How I mentioned that in the future we would not be able to grow crops, food crops, the way that we have been so accustomed to doing that is exposed to the vicissitudes of the weather.
You know, Ed, I've got to stop you and say to you, I've interviewed some American natives who said that this year they had to completely trash their crops and start all over again because their crops, this was the Hopi Elders, were burned.
Literally burned.
And here in Nevada, my wife prides herself on growing artichokes, Ed.
And we planted artichokes.
And the damnedest thing happened.
They got burned.
They were literally burned.
And something killed the early crop.
Now we've got a second crop that's trying to come back.
But the same thing that Hopi Elders observed about their mass crops occurred here in my little tiny ecological wife-tended niche.
One, I had technical facts from a fellow who's got solar panels, I don't know, it's about a week ago, and he monitors the current and voltage draw from those solar panels.
He's got meters on each.
He said that the current levels from those solar panels have been going up precipitously with no explanation.
And he's monitored these damn things for 10 years.
That I thought was weird.
Then I had people saying, you know, even here in Canada, I'm out for a little while during the day and I'm getting sunburned.
Something's different.
Then I had a fact from somebody else who said, you know Art, I went out today and I did something I shouldn't have done.
I looked at the sun and I didn't see any yellow components that it was very white.
And so I walked outside and I squinged my hand together so I could just, you know, just get a tiny view of the sun, which was stupid.
It's not the way to do it.
And I'll be damned, it looked pure white to me.
I called my boss at the network up in Oregon.
I said, do me a favor, do the test.
You know, you can make a little hole in a box and project the sun onto something and take a look at it for me.
And the weather problems are now as severe as the I described the way in which the weather would change to preclude growing crops the way we have been used to.
That was two years ago.
That's here now.
That will result in millions of people in 1999 dying of starvation.
Years ago, when we were able to discern this economic collapse, we were also looking at something that followed right on the heels of the collapse.
And that was not the Korea nuke.
It wasn't even the plant pathogens.
It was human diseases.
We think here in SciTech, based upon our remote viewing data, that human diseases, the epidemics will spread so rapidly, they'll mirror what's now happening many ways, speaking analogically.
They'll mirror what's happening in the stock market.
They'll spread so fast that they'll go through human populations like wildfire.
The only reason that we got the current economic situation correct was we spent so much time on it over and over again working it to be able to nail it down.
It takes a tremendous amount of work to fix any event in time, both past and present.
If you have no other information to bracket the event in terms of a window of time, linear time.
Because mind is outside of time.
And it's that arena which technical remote brain works.
Mind, the fifth dimension, attempting to look down on the fourth dimension, which is time.
Now, let me take you off into a slightly more esoteric, hopefully ever so slightly encouraging area.
I have performed several experiments using literally millions of people, my audience.
They have been seemingly successful in either having craft showing themselves or three separate weather experiments that we played with.
And I guess what I'm asking is: if a large segment, millions of people, were to use what mental power they have toward changing the events you're describing now, could such an intervention in any way change what is going to occur?
Which is to suggest, then, that events are not absolutely fixed in time, and that large numbers of minds working on a modification of an event still to occur might have an effect on that.
I mean, it's just like a shot in the dark here, but I'm grasping at anything based on what you're saying.
I mean, remember the old days when we talked, you saw advertisements about the Maharishi effect, where if 100,000 or 144,000 people got together and that kind of thing.
You know, if you've got kids in the room, as I warned you earlier, and I'll warn you again, or you are upset by this kind of discussion, then do yourself a favor and turn your radio off.
Ed, I'm warning everybody, and maybe over-warning them on purpose this morning, because I, you know, this is pretty seriously bad news you're giving us.
And as a matter of fact, that was sort of the Doom review.
And that's what we have on our palette in terms of what we did to outline what's coming so that people can be prepared or shrug it off, you know, up to individuals.
I am hanging up the Dr. Doom hat.
I mentioned that on the last show.
We've got two other projects that have nothing to do with these kinds of outlooks at all.
And I am not going to get involved in them anymore.
But how do you ignore, Ed, no matter what project you may be on to now, how do you ignore your own knowledge of what's coming in terms of making any project you might have academic?
But in fact, no one knows what really happened, but we do.
And we're going to...
For many years, I had the impression, for one reason or another, I guess it's because so many people talked about it, that she had crashed, landed somewhere, and became stranded on an island or an ad hole.
I mean if she went down the odds of managing to get down in an emergency on land as you're crossing the Pacific, particularly that area, are slim in none of hitting land.
If, for instance, she had crashed at sea, deep sea, open ocean, then the entire aircraft, of course, when it sank, would go down intact, in very deep water, and would remain intact.
But in fact, she crashed near an atoll and very close to the atoll.
Well, it looks like the heavier, the front end, the engines, at least one engine and part of the nose of the aircraft is still hung up on the reef.
But because of hurricanes and tsunamis over the years, we think that parts of the aircraft have fallen off over this particular reef into the deep.
Now, there's technology available once you know, once we pinpoint the wreckage like we've done, without any problem, no matter how deep the wreckage is, to photograph it and to retrieve it.
It isn't a problem like it used to be decades ago.
But in this case, we know that at least the engine is probably in about no deeper than 60 feet of water.
So in late October, November, I and my chief operating officer and perhaps one or two others will pull a reconnaissance mission.
The purpose of that mission is to take our technical remote viewing data, our sketches and our data, to go to the site.
This is what we used to do in the military.
So it's the same old thing, whether it was a war in Libya with an aircraft down in the water or the civilianization of technical remote viewing, going off to Millier Heart.
We go there, we do some diving, we get some photography.
We're going to try not to touch the wreckage because aircraft historians and archaeologists can derive a great deal of data by the orientation of the wreckage.
Things that will eliminate us from having to remote view every aspect of the crash itself.
They can put the crash together by looking at the orientation of the wreckage.
So we'll get the photography, and then the next mission there will be a retrieval or a salvage mission.
The only thing that we've got some evidence about is possibly some military action in Eastern Europe that really has a first effect, another negative effect on the market.
I don't understand the dynamics and the physics behind what we're perceiving.
We can look over the horizon at the effects, but it would take a solar physicist or a geophysicist to sit down with us, interrogate us as technical remote viewers, and then put the pieces together so that the expert could define what we're describing in a general way.
That's what this is all about.
We become experts at looking over the horizon and describing effects.
But only if we're experts can we take those things and put them together in a technical sense.
No, actually, and we're not going to look anymore.
We've had enough.
And we are, you know, we're going to back out.
We've already identified actions that we in the company are going to take.
And based upon this knowledge, and I have recommended to all the people who have learned remote viewing to use this to discern where their families and they as individuals should go and what to do rather than trying to find the lost judgment mine or something like that.
Time is limited.
So I'm not going to invest any more time in this.
I think we can see that what you've described as the quickening is now accelerating.
These events are on us, and it's time to hunker down and start taking care of ourselves.
Or that things you would say or somebody who would say scare the hell out of people about a crash that's coming or even a default that's coming, precipitating panic, which, of course, is reflected rather immediately in the markets.
You faxed me desperately on Thursday last saying that you had to get on the air and warn people about a financial event or disaster that was immediately ahead.
And of course I was sick Thursday and Friday so you didn't get on the air.
It didn't get said.
But I'm telling the audience it's the truth.
Now you wanted to say then what you have said tonight.
Well, do you want me to qualify a little bit what I said about our chiefs of staff our commanders and chiefs and what they know and what they're not told?
All right, I am going to read a letter of, is it criticism?
I don't know, maybe, challenge to me, and I'm going to think about it.
Nancy, listening to KFRE 940, Presno, says, if you buy Ed's answer that we, collectively, aren't together enough as a race to effectively or to effect change, then you are part of the problem.
We, collectively, can evolve, work together, and create change if we set our minds to it.
And here she points out something that I should have pointed out.
There have not been five experiments.
There have been six.
We collectively, I believe, saved Daniel Brinkley's life.
I'd forgotten that one.
That really makes it six.
Anyway, she goes on, Daniel's miracle proves the power we, in quotes, have, as do the experiments you conducted on your show.
You, Art Bell, have the power as a director to focus it, to take the plunge, or, on the other hand, to do nothing and wonder for all time if, in quotes, we could, would, should have done it.
Nancy.
I take this fact very seriously, Nancy, and I will think about it.
I will think about it.
Ed, she has a good point.
You know, there's a couple of choices here.
One is to try and do something, and one is to be observers and to do nothing.
Anyway, I'm going to file that one under the I'll Sure Think About It Nancy category and put this one aside so I do think about it.
Ed, you said that you would like to elaborate further on our president, President William Jefferson Clinton, who was not, you have told us, told everything by the NSA that he should have been told constitutionally.
Well, there's nothing in the Constitution that says the President should be told everything, nor could the President, ever knowing the intelligence system is so complex, there is no way that one man, except at the head of something like that or in the higher ranks for more than 20 years, could begin to understand all of the different systems and the way they interoperate.
So the Secretary of Defense is the one whose job it is to buffer that from the President.
And sometimes we in the intelligence community in the past have spent a lot of time educating Secretaries of Defense, and sometimes they have breached security, compromised security, because it just took so long to educate them, they had forgotten some things.
But generally speaking, they act as a go-between, a cut-out necessarily, between the President and the intelligence agencies.
But still, there's some politics involved.
I think I'll tell you a story with me about this, just this kind of thing.
It's fairly contemporary.
It's about, oh, I'd say maybe one, two, three, four years old.
And the Guatemalan military really wanted to kill her, but they couldn't because they were afraid that aid would be cut off from the U.S. Obviously, yeah.
Well, one day, about four years ago, out there, she had visited President Clinton.
She'd set out across from the White House and was invited in to see the President.
President Clinton invited her in.
He said he would try to help find out what really happened to her.
I won't go into all the details, but what really happened to her husband.
He would go to the intelligence agencies and try to get the answer.
She said he thought U.S. intelligence had the real answer about where her husband was buried.
Well, just prior to her second visit, invited visit to President Clinton, she sat down with an agent of the U.S. government in a restaurant in Washington, D.C. And that agent told her, you realize why, first of all, the agent said, you need to realize why your husband was killed in the first place.
Because U.S. policy, state policy said that at that time, at that juncture in history, he, as a rebel leader, was an enemy of the Guatemalan military.
And the Guatemalan military was an ally of the United States.
And therefore, we assisting them, assisting the Guatemalan military, helped kill her husband.
But there was no doubt in her mind about the politics.
But she still wondered where her husband was buried, where his remains were.
And so this agent said to her, okay, this is what you need to do.
President Clinton will never be able to get the information that he needs because he doesn't know where to get it and he doesn't know what questions to ask.
Presidents don't know this.
They're involved in too many other things at the helm of the government.
And so this agent took a napkin and wrote down some things, some instructions, passed that over to Ms. Harbor, and said, tomorrow, when you see President Clinton, tell him to do this, to go to this person and to ask for this, and you will find out what happened to your husband.
Ed, you have, let's see, it was about, God, has it been a year ago now, Ed, that you turned out tapes, remote viewing tapes, that were designed to let everybody who wanted to do what you do.
And you turned out a series of videotapes in modules one, two, and three to virtually be able to do what you do, remote view, which is a skill, a very amazing skill.
I sure don't deny that.
It is an amazing skill.
People can still get those tapes, I presume, if they want to, and look at the things that you are now talking about.
I bet you pissed a lot of people off, because two years ago, when I began interviewing you and the other remote viewers from the military program, many of them, as you well know, learned remote viewing to some degree or another and then struck out on their own.
In fact, even your courses, though they were booked up and you couldn't get into them, were thousands of dollars.
What was a typical remote viewing go down and learn it course in person, how much?
And so now, so then all of a sudden, boom, here you are with videotapes just probably destroying the market, in essence, yours and other people's, in teaching them how to remote view.
We're the only game in town, and we have about 10,000 students now, and it's going quite well.
And the reason it is, is because we're the only people that call ourselves remote viewers that can actually remote view, that can actually get the job done, and that's why people are attracted to us.
All right, so if the listener now wants to learn to remote view and wants the tapes, they should begin with module one, or they can just take the plunge and get all the modules at once, I guess, at this point, because they're all out now, right?
Yes, I'd like to mention that the UPN newspiece that you saw, that's up in its entirety on our website, as well as previews of all the modules that we have so people can see what they're getting into.
In fact, I think that Keith Rowland really has some competition in terms of Patrick Duda, our own webmaster for best webmaster on the world website.
And I wonder if you feel it would be useful to confront him directly with these things that he's saying.
And if you wish, I have a statement from him and I can read it, but I would prefer not to do that, but rather to get him on the air with you at some point.
If you would prefer to handle it that way, or perhaps you don't prefer to respond in any way at all.
My question is, earlier in the program, Mr. Daines said that there would be a war.
All right.
My question is: Has he remote viewed the situations in the Middle East and how we've really upset a lot of fundamentalist terrorists in the last couple of weeks?
Has he got anything to say about the coming war in the Middle East?
It actually gets down to the point where you're so fed up with looking at the downside of things or seeing the downside of things that you stop looking at them.
I think after the Russians dump all the gold and the platinum they have to develop some more liquidity and they have no more gold left to dump, then you'll see gold start going up when the Russians unlow the volume.
Yeah, as a matter of fact, caller, I've been hearing that the price of gold has been kept down because of fears that Russia will dump gold, fears that China will dump gold.
I've got a New York Times piece of breaking news here.
Associated Press, see what you make of this, Ed.
Unfazed by Parliament's overwhelming rejection of his candidate for Prime Minister, Boris Yeltsin, holy mackerel, is resubmitting the name Victor Chernamirden for parliamentary consideration.
Chernamirden, meanwhile, said today he would present Yeltsin with a list of people he hoped to serve in his cabinet.
Leaders of the lower house of parliament, the state Duma, the Communists, said they would come up with a list of their own candidates for prime minister.
No doubt on that list will be the name Alexander Levitt after voting 253 to 94 on Monday to reject Chernimird.
So what do you see happening in Russia?
Do you have any insight by remote viewing at all as to where the situation in Russia is going?
To mass prayer, we need to spread the word through Oprah or Rosie O'Donnell Show.
You know, if they want to get mass prayer, and I totally agree with major things because it's realistic to think that, yeah, it's hard to get everyone to want to do that.
But if we spread the word to these mass media, you know, if we want to do it, we'll find out a way.
I've had, again, Ed, I have had now, and I rethought this on the basis of the facts a young lady sent me, six mass experiments, not on a world event-changing level, but significant experiments with mass minds working.
Six experiments, and I am not foolish enough to think that I did anything other than act as a little bit of a band director and cheerleader to get people at a single moment to try something.
Now, whether you could gather enough people together to really affect some of the hardest things that you see coming is something that I'm struggling with, and I don't know.
Well, I hear you saying that, but I think that it is proper to be somewhat afraid of or respectful of something that you don't understand.
unidentified
I understand that, but I'm trying to tell you that in your heart and in everyone else's heart, when they're trying to do something good, the consciousness becomes one.
There will never be negative repercussions for that.
I'm wondering, for instance, in my work, I know that in attempting to use technical remote viewing to discern the cause and the treatments and cures of fatal problems,
of diseases, that we oftentimes run across an individual who really caused the disease or the malady themselves.
In other words, they wanted to check out.
That was a big surprise to me in the early days of remote view.
I didn't realize that this kind of dynamic existed.
So I wonder if I and you and all of your listeners were to pray for someone like that, because that's essentially what you're doing is directed prayer, and we were in our hearts extremely dedicated towards curing an individual like that.
I'm not sure if we're doing the right thing.
Suppose it seems to me we're going counter to the will of another individual.
As long as you're covered with a white light, they say nothing can go wrong.
Well, I can't say from personal experience that I know that to be the case.
Maybe it is.
But I don't know it to be the case.
And if you perform, she says, certain rituals, and if you hear from some divine source, I would never challenge her faith, or for that matter, even her rituals, but they're not mine, and so I don't know that to be true to you.
I mean, I have standards, personal standards, personal anchor points that I trust and that I use, but they're a result to some degree of my own culture, upbringing, and I believe in them, but I'm not going to recommend them or shove them down the throat of someone in another religion.
Ed Dames knows damn well that Hal Putoff, Ingo Swan, and Pat Price, all key players in the remote viewing program, were Scientologists, and that the military intelligence community were dogging L. Ron Hubbard for decades.
Remote viewing came from Hubbard discoveries, Hubbard's discoveries, and Dames knows it underlined.
Why did he lie or play dumb when you mentioned Hubbard?
For instance, the term anchor points is only a Hubbard discovery.
After children reach a certain age, that generally stops, and the frequency of that kind of seizure goes way down, unless you have some damage, and substance abuse can do that.
Freddie had a big 60-minutes piece done on him also.
He was a very high-profile person, and so I think that even though he was my first cousin and best friend as a youngster, that since the question was on the air, the answer should have been on the air too.
So that's the answer.
And I appreciate it, Ed.
Back to the lines.
First time caller align, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
A false prophet is actually this thing that I talked about in the past that masquerades as a human being or a being, but in fact it's not something else.
Just something else.
And it is associated with what appears for all intents and purposes to be something like a flying saucer.
It gets a lot of attention worldwide.
People turn to it.
We're very concerned about this because the Starman Project is working with something, let's call it a system, that is very much connected with rebuilding this planet.
And this false prophet appears to take advantage of that idea.
So we don't know how this is going to pan out, but we're really concerned.
It's a lot of in-house things that we don't usually talk about because it's very worrisome to others.
I can tell you this, that it appears to involve the, well, we'll know shortly.
I'm leaving on the 7th next week.
I'm leaving on the 7th to Starman site, to our to our our field site in Polynesia, and then on to Micronesia in October to work to go out the Amelia Earhart's wreckage.
This site is not, it is a contact site, but the contact, the thing that we know best about it, it involves teleportation, the Beame Me Up Scotty, of the Beame Me Up Scotty type of teleportation.
Well, here's the idiot lesson that I use for myself to explain what's going to happen in the long term here, in the next several months, what's going to begin to happen.
So anyway, when you get a lot of people being laid off and a lot of people having to go back and cash in their CDs, then the banks have to find cash to pay those CDs.
Even though the banks are making some money, they need to have the cash.
On an earlier program, you said that you didn't know the source of intelligence that was causing the sun to create these disturbances that we're going to be experiencing.
One other thing is that do you have any information correlating, say, all of these prophecies that are like 300 some-odd prophecies around the world of the Blessed Virgin Mary about chastisement that are supposed to be coming in the next two years?
I'd have to research it because I'm not that familiar with what we have to detail this out and make sure that we articulate what we call the remote viewing cue correctly.
It's completely intriguing, but I'm telling you right now, the third secret of Fatima is said to be competitive with Ed Dame's worst moments as Dr. Doom.
Do you believe that Nasr Dhammas practiced remote viewing, or do you believe that he was just a prophet with the funniest, or to, you know, very good question.
I don't know, but I do know this, that we can take some of the most controversial quatrains in Nostradamus' prophecies, or whatever they're called, the quatrains themselves, and we can subject a quatrain, let's say quatrain 19 or 95, we can remote view it and place the details.
In fact, Joni Durf and I were going to write a book called Through His Eyes, where we would do just this.
Place the quatrains in contemporary vernacular so that we could perceive what he was actually seeing and detailing at the time using his own mind.
Now, whether he was remote viewing the way we do it or whether he was doing something else truly prophetic, I don't know.
But I do know we can do that the same way that we can subject the idea as a topic, the third secret of Fatima, to TRV, to technical remote viewing, and then break it out into its details.
I lose you at 5 o'clock, so I haven't heard the current conversation.
However, as regards to the group efforts to make wonderful things happen, I must say I've been a bit of a psychic and a prophet for a number of years and have had a bit of experience with that, both singularly and in groups.
And I think there's a real simple answer to the quandary that you're in.
I think the simple answer is that when you approach a problem, say Hurricane Bonnie, you don't say, you know, make a prayer to don't let Bonnie hit the coast.
That's a very dangerous thing to do, as you think.
I think the answer is to say, we have a problem here, and let's devote all of our energy into creating the highest good for everybody concerned.
And I think when you do that, you release the danger.
Ed, I've been listening to you on Art for a couple of years, and I agree with you that the only way to survive is in a community of like-minded people, hopefully growth-oriented people.
And I have a degree in agriculture.
I know how to grow food.
I have some friends who are good builders, and other people who are technically talented, and other friends who are healers, but basically the only one who really believes this is all going to hit the fan real soon.
So it looks like it's up to me to go to Polynesia, buy a place with the lava tube or a cave and get need supplies and equipment and all that stuff.
Now, the west edge, consider, I submit to you that you really need to consider the western edge of Glacier National Park, the center of mass Whitefish, Montana, that area, and then north into the Canadian Rockies.
That's where we have found it doing a lot of work, a lot of TRV work, to be a fairly or eminently survivable area.
With the Module 2 skills, that's what I've asked people to use these skills for as soon as they start to master them, to remote view what we term a sanctuary, sanctuary from these kinds of events.