Major Ed Dames of SciTech explains Technical Remote Viewing (TRV)—a disciplined, non-psychic method using sketches and words to access data beyond conventional perception, including Mars’ artificial tetrahedron in Cydonia and a vanished humanoid race. He dismisses lottery claims but confirms its use in medical diagnostics and predicting disasters like the 1998 economic collapse, advising gold investments. Dames links dolphin beachings to pollution or U.S. Navy experiments, Ebola to targetable origins, and AIDS to a canine virus mutating through primates. The Middle East peace process is declared dead, with war looming, while he warns of societal collapse, urging small survival communities. TRV’s military roots and "matrix" (possibly Jungian collective unconscious) reveal inevitabilities—like death—but prioritize extending life via behavioral or systemic changes, from quitting smoking to underground shelters in Montana or Polynesia. [Automatically generated summary]
As remote viewers, a very quite a simple thing for people who have been trained using SciTech's training modules, the home training course, to do would be to take a specific incident, not the whole topic, but a specific incident, one incident of dolphins beaching themselves or whales beaching themselves, and remote view the cause of that and see where that takes them.
Where would the pattern of information be?
Would it be inside the body of the animal?
Or would it be, would unconscious, the collective unconscious, take them to the water itself where they would sketch and draw microorganisms, those kinds of things?
Or would it be electromagnetic, perhaps acoustic?
Maybe the U.S. Navy hypothetically is testing a device that is acoustically very powerful and damaged the hearing of the animals.
Who knows?
But we would know, as remote viewers, quite easily.
Again, on my website, we have a very, very interesting picture.
I don't know if you heard it the other night.
Peter Davenport reported to us and supplied us with some photographs.
Apparently, the U.S. Air Force, I say again the Air Force, retrieved some pilot whales that had beached themselves, kept the pilot whales for about 13 months and supposedly in some way rehabilitating them.
And then we have actual photographs of Black Hawk helicopters dumping these pilot whales into the ocean about 150 miles off the coast of Florida.
Now, I was in the military, just an enlisted guy, but I know enough to know that the U.S. military does nothing like that out of the goodness of their heart.
No, there are no operational funds for anything like that unless it would be a Navy project and the Navy paid the Air Force to drop them.
You know, the Navy trains navies, I won't mention all of them, but Navies can train dolphins to do retrieval operations where a diver's life may be threatened.
Let me give you an example.
If a nuclear weapon fell off an aircraft, just fell off, the pylon.
There was a tragic case where a couple of Navy divers, because there were no trained dolphins in those days, and I won't go into specifics, had to actually go down and retrieve this weapon and had a cracked case.
So when a diver got close, there was the Serencov radiation, the blue glow.
But he had a job to do, as we all did in the military, and he did it, and a couple days later was dead because the case was cracked on the weapon.
And he exposed himself to very high levels of radiation.
Now dolphins can be trained to do things like this, to hook a weapon and hook a cable to a weapon so that we don't lose a human life.
Dolphins have large brains, actually, I think, larger than human beings.
I don't know how much of that brain they use, but I always thought it would be interesting to ask somebody like yourself whether in the course of remote viewing it is possible to get any form of communication or thinking or understanding of the way those mammals think.
In fact, this is a job that SciTech did in support of a dolphin project.
We went into, and I participated in this a great deal.
It was one of my favorite projects.
We remote viewed a pod of dolphins off the coast of Florida, specific dolphins, that researchers were working with.
In order to improve the communications, manned dolphin communication, we wanted to discern the way that dolphins were processing information.
And so as remote viewers, we were in the minds of the dolphins, particularly when they would awaken in the morning, how they would begin to process things.
And what we found was that they're extremely visually oriented and they're extremely perceptive to changes in the water and advice about changes in their environment, even the most minute change.
What we did with this team was to suggest that they do the following.
They take photographs and put them in a waterproof case of themselves on the boat.
Drop the photographs under the water so the dolphins can study the photograph.
The dolphin would then stick their head above the water, look at the researcher, and then compare that with the flat two-dimensional picture.
Then the researchers could start to shift.
The researchers could take a picture of, let's say, one son or daughter that was not present on the boat, put that next to the researcher, drop that photograph into the water, then have the dolphin begin to recognize that some of the things on the flat surface were representative of things that were not immediately apparent in the environment.
Then begin to teach the dolphin in a pictorial way, photographic way, a language that they could understand.
So in the end, a photograph could be dropped down of a thing, a symbol or something that we wanted to communicate to the dolphin.
And the dolphin would understand that that idea, the idea represented in the photograph, in the waterproof case, was not necessarily representative of the environment right there, that it was somewhere else.
Other things we found out about dolphins that they do not appear to be that much more intelligent than a very sharp German shepherd dog.
But we didn't go that far with the project.
It would be better to actually engage in the communication study and see how far in practice, in the field, in sightu, one could go with the project and then try to push it.
No, what I meant was changes in The environment, if even the most minor change happens, let's say a dolphin goes to sleep by a reef and wakes up and begins to wake up from a dream state and sees that something has been moved in the environment.
Let's say a rock was moved in the reef or a piece of garbage or a can or something had been moved, the dolphin will immediately recognize that change visually, that change, and go investigate the change.
How can you possibly consider moving away to an island where you will, I guess, continue your work, but you'll sort of be out of the hubbub of what's going on?
And now we get down to why you're doing that.
Why is Ed Dames considering moving away to an island far, far away?
Predominantly ART, because that is, we're dealing with, as I mentioned in the past, something called Project Starman.
Of all the things that we've done as remote viewers, and they've been fascinating beyond belief, I, like you and many of your listeners to the Art Bell Show, I'm intensely interested in UFOs, in the UFO phenomenon.
What I'm going to do is to remote, take that photo, circle it, make a xerox of it, circle the photo the way that we do, and call it a target, and remote view that specific thing.
Now, you have to be careful when you call it a thing, by the way.
It could be a projection.
For instance, it may look like a vehicle or it may look like a flying object, but it may be holographic in nature.
It may be a time-space opening that's moving along, and us community humans will call it a vehicle.
We turn our attention to that moment where we have that one frame, and we use that as a jump-off point, as a reference point for all the other associated and connected information.
Gaining closer and closer target contact, that specific event being a target.
And we fill in all the blanks in a very rigorous way that we teach, that's taught on the tapes.
Now, while you haven't done that yet with respect to these Mexico City photographs, and you're going to, obviously you've done that with other photographs in the past.
Otherwise, you wouldn't be moving headlong into Project Starman.
And I want to talk to you about that when we get back.
So stay right there.
Major Ed Dames, Sitex Major Ed Dames, is my guest.
He is a remote viewer.
And we'll talk a little bit about the origins of remote viewing when I first heard about it.
And then we'll ask him about objects that he has viewed, like the ones on my website right now.
I'm telling you, folks, I'm telling you.
Get up there and take a look.
The photos are from Mexico City, and I think they are Indisputable.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
We'll be right back.
A cassette tape of this Art Bell Encore presentation is available by calling 1-800-917-4278.
Major Dames, I've got a late-breaking story that I thought you might want to hear.
This comes from the UK news, obviously in Britain, entitled Plant Gene Loss Poses Threat to Food Supply.
The article appeared in Sunday's edition of the Daily Telegraph.
The security of global food supplies is under threat because variety in the world's plant species, notably wheat, rice, and maize, is decreasing rapidly, according to a UN study published yesterday.
The global study, the first of its kind prepared by the Rome-based Food and Agricultural Organization, gave warning that a large-scale loss of plant genes gives reason for major concern.
We did not remote view that object, but we wondered if it might have been that cylinder that we had described earlier, and so we ran more remote viewing sessions, did more work.
That particular cylinder is still en route to Earth intercept, very much closer, very close indeed.
As of the 5th of this month, it was still on an Earth-intercept trajectory.
And we don't have its exact position in space.
That's one thing we can't do as remote viewers.
That's very, very difficult, especially when an object may be moving half a million miles a day.
But we do have, as expected, Earth entry point, and that is over northwest continental Africa, Mauritania.
And it will begin to disintegrate there, moving to the southeast.
And the impact, from the studies that we have done, the impact is expected along an imaginary line from Eritrea in the north to Swaziland in the south, but center of mass in the Burundi, Lake Victoria region, where there will actually be a remnant of the cylinder that we expect to impact and crater, the rest having disintegrated in the atmosphere.
This particular cylinder appears to contain, for all intents and purposes, a plant pathogen.
Well, I had to actually do it under the table art.
This was not part of...
So I was fudging.
This was not something that the Department of Defense had any Balowic.
But I can qualify this by saying that there was one target that NORAD sent to us.
NORAD's deep space platforms, the ones that are in geosynchronous orbit, monitor and watch in this country's INW indicators and warnings network.
It watches for launches of missiles worldwide.
They were picking up what was termed fast walkers, something that was coming in from deep space, passing by the deep space platforms, monitoring satellites, and entering the Earth's atmosphere and disappearing.
And some of them appeared to be under intelligent control.
And so I began a series of projects, again, under the table.
But I did go to my boss, who was the head of science and technology for the Defense Intelligence Agency.
He was my senior raider in the military, and I said, look, we have a tool, this remote viewing.
At that time, it was coordinate remote viewing.
It was not as exacting as it is today in SciTech, but it was still powerful.
So we have a tool that for the first time can look at something that has a phenomenon, the UFO phenomenon in this case, that has heretofore been inscrutable and gather some information on it.
He was chomping at the bit personally because he was personally interested in this, as I was.
And because we were already on thin ice, since many people in the Defense Department equated what we were doing with the occult, we really had to be careful about pushing our luck.
Okay, picture a newt, we can sketch them, about, oh, three and a half, four feet high, fairly thin, that stands upright and looks very similar to a newt.
A slippery skin, but in this case, highly intelligent, advanced being.
That is the thing that peoples that world that sends this particular phenomenon Carlos Diaz's way.
There was a pronouncement from NASA back on the 9th of this month that all funding for any off-planet manned activity going to either the moon or Mars was henceforth canceled.
A remarkable thing to say.
I mean, here we have the Mars rock with possible life.
We've got water on the moon, and we've got every prospect for going forth in space.
And they said, everything beyond low Earth orbit is hereby canceled.
Well, a day or two went by, and Dan Golden reversed that without giving any specifics of missions that we might make.
And I've heard from a number of people that even the space platform, the international one, may be in danger of being canceled.
Well, we've got a new one up there now, which has entered Mars orbit, is arrow-breaking.
And Tom Van Flandren, who's responsible, I guess, for a lot of the imaging they're going to do, has been warning people that if they're able to image, in his opinion, the Sidonia region once again, there is going to be proof positive, in his opinion, that these objects are not natural objects.
The face on Mars, the various things that are around the face, that these are not natural and that it is going to destroy a lot of paradigms and cause a lot of trouble.
There is a, in the Sidonia region, there is one specific feature that we have remote viewed time and time again.
We were so astounded by it.
And again, don't forget that these are very interesting to us.
We get tired of the military operations and who killed whom and where's the dead body type of things.
Why not?
This is a real adventure and we love this work.
I've been doing it since 1985.
A specific feature that in the open literature is termed the tetrahedron is a perimetal feature that's perched on the lip of a large crater.
We absolutely stand by SciTech's data that that is an artificial read man-made feature.
That is not a natural feature.
The rest of the things in Cydonia Crater Yes, there was a race on Mars that we've done a lot of work looking back in time through time and putting together using the same technologies that we use to support military operations.
We can move back in time and look at that.
unidentified
There was a race there that built that structure, yes.
Years ago, my team wondered about how to actually establish contact.
And we came to the conclusion about four years ago that the best way to actually establish contact, and this is something that I wanted to do, this is something that I wanted to do before I died because it was an adventure.
It's an adventure that I want.
And many other people do too, I'm sure.
Why try to second guess what the requirements for contact would be?
In the movie Contact, a very interesting thing happened.
And a federation, that universe is teeming with life at various stages of evolution, a federation communicated a particular technology, think of standardized technology or military specifications that were required to transport someone somewhere for contact.
I began looking at that, and what I was after is the standard technologies that are used by all races.
Think of the United Nations.
If I were a native that came out of a jungle somewhere on the world, Borneo or whatever, and my nation was admitted to the United Nations, I would wear a suit and a tie or at least learn how to use the devices that were present in the UN, the microphones and other things, to be able to standardize the way that I behave so that I could communicate with others at the UN.
So what we did was to remote view the contact protocols that are used for initial entry into a federation.
And that is why we're heading for Polynesia, because there's something, there's both a place and a set of conditions that we must partake of, that we've got to engage in in order to initiate this contact that we know will happen.
And in the movie Contact, they did it by receiving a radio, actually, eventually, albeit a television signal from elsewhere, from Vega, I believe it was.
I believe in Project Starman, you are contemplating the use of laser technology, aren't you?
There is a, I'll call it a thing for all intents and purposes, that's already in place and essentially has been waiting, waiting for someone to find it.
And evidently, it could only be found through these kinds of methods because I can't see how anybody could ever have found it.
I mean, it would be beyond me to imagine.
It is in such an out-of-the-way place and disguised and hidden so well.
It is, for all intents and purposes, something like a stargate.
Only instead of us going that way, it allows for something to come down once it's initiated.
I don't want to say much more about it, but I will say that if people are really interested in this, if they learn remote viewing, they can do the same thing that we did.
They can remote view myself or that location, and they'll know what we're doing.
I want to tell everybody in the audience that not only do I have Module 1, but I now have Module 2 from Ed Dames and SciTech, which begins to get into the real meat of how to remote view.
Now, I probably was one of the first to get Module 2.
A number of people are very curious, Ed, is Module 2 on the way now, shipping now, or what's going on?
It's been shipping for a week, and I think that we have already fulfilled about 80% of the prior orders.
So within the next several days, all orders will be filled.
That's a four-tape set.
It's about eight hours of instruction, and it's a real commitment.
Module one and two are five tapes.
A lot to learn, but extremely.
It's Pandora's box.
God help us.
I don't know what we've let out of the bag, but it's a very powerful tool.
It took many years to develop this and put it into the form where an individual can learn it.
And someone with an above-average IQ, it will require about four months working an hour a day, every other day, at least, to master these techniques, to do what SciTech does.
I think that what the individual is referring to is something like astral travel, where part of oneself is really somewhere else.
Our techniques are we're downloading patterns of information.
Think of all things in the universe existing as a pattern in terms of a field.
Right now there are radio waves going through us all the time, as you know, many different frequencies.
If one has a radio receiver, that's not good enough.
You have to tune into a specific frequency and you have to be able to download that, demodulate it, and tune into a specific frequency and a signal.
That's what we do.
We use our minds to tune into specific patterns.
And then we use a pen, plain white paper, and about an hour, we gain very close contact with the target and objectify data in terms of words, sketches, and that's all that we do.
And time after time after time, remote viewers using this as a training target were sketching a man-made object, an artificial object, a cylindrical object that was not rock.
And that's why we turned so much attention to it for such a long period of time.
When we did the last show, Ed, You talked about a problem with the sun.
You talked about sort of a warning shot across the bow of an eruption on the sun that would then be followed by another really big shot in the springtime.
We did have some sun activity just within days, actually, of when you predicted it, and we've not had anything since.
Well, the kill shot that SciTech is describing, a very lethal event, we think the best that we can do, as remote viewers, is in 1999.
We're saying spring of 99.
A precursor that we were talking about, we were saying that something may happen as early as December, and that was a coronal, there was a coronal mass ejection in December.
There are so many unknowns and so many things that we're perceiving associated with that particular event in the future where we perceive ourselves there, but we don't know what's going on.
It's beyond our ken.
We don't have the software to discern what is happening.
It's too difficult.
We don't have the thesaurus or the experiential database to be able to put this into ideas.
We think that this event, this deadly event that we have been perceiving comes in the best that we can do as remote viewers, because time is a little bit slippery, we can remote view something that's next or present.
Those two search terms in terms of an encyclopedic search, the next type of event or present location.
The idea of next, the idea of present as temporal search terms work every time.
Yeah, but in terms of temporal, of time, because mind is outside of space and time.
So we're not sure where we are in space and time, in time particularly, where are we on a timeline?
But we do know that when we use the search term next, that the next type of event, for instance, the next volcanic eruption in North America, that limits the geographical area to North America, and we know that when we perceive, let's say, Mammoth Mountain blowing its top, that that is the next volcanic eruption.
That's what we're going.
We don't know when the next one is.
There, we're in a ballpark area, and it's very difficult to discern the when of the next.
And being from Oklahoma, I'm definitely interested in what happened in Oklahoma City a couple of years ago.
I lost a family member there, and I want to know if he's done any remote viewing, and if he could let us know anything about what really happened that day.
I was a 911 dispatcher, and I used to go home in the morning after a night of life-threatening situations and not be able to sleep, not be able to eat, not be able to function properly, and generally fighting with everybody around me just because of the weight of what had happened to me during the night.
So I can imagine actually seeing these events would just be horrific.
West of the Rockies, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
No, I don't think that's what the color exactly meant.
I think he meant is this as a result of existing conditions here rather than being fostered by other conditions that are prevailing.
As close as we can discern, ideas associated with this cylinder are it is some type of sucker for Earth, some type of a vaccine to help Earth fight off something like a disease.
An antidote for what is killing things at the surface of the Earth.
Think of the Earth as having a skin, a body with a skin, a skin being infected with a disease or a pathogen and not having enough internal defenses to fight it, an immune system to ward it off and needing help from a doctor.
I've had a lot of people, Dr. Lorraine Day, many, many people recently talking about our immune systems and suggesting that generally we are depleting them at an unimaginable rate and that disease is indeed, I don't know if I can think of it as a vaccine, Ed, but disease is going to get us.
What we're seeing are sets, ensembles of diseases, viral and bacterial predominantly, that are somehow, no, it's not because of our immune systems becoming more vulnerable.
It's because these diseases are becoming, these diseases organisms, these microbes are becoming so virulent so rapidly.
And when they do, the Center for Disease Control and other centers akin to that will not be able to develop vaccines, antidotes, antibiotics in the case of bacterial infections fast enough to be able to keep up with these diseases.
I assume that if we did a lot of remote viewing and some statistical extrapolation, we could know, but we have not done that yet.
I mean, as remote viewers, we're looking forward in time to the near future, and there are rotting, decaying bodies in countries and the smell of decay everywhere.
Corpses rotting in the street, it's like the black plague All over again in many third world countries from diseases, not war.
We have not looked at the specific microbes themselves, although we know there's at least five or six.
One very easy target, one thing that SciTech is going to do with our new students on the TAPE course is together we're going to look at, as a practice target, a very easy one.
As you might know, the host or the reservoir of the Ebola virus is not known to medical science.
We're going to take a break here at the top of the hour.
My guest is SciTech's Major Ed Dames.
I'm going to need to plug your videotapes.
These are videotapes, a series of videotapes that will actually instruct you, the general public, in how to do what Ed Dames does, how to remote view.
Now, there are some people who have said, you know what?
Ed Dames is going to take our money and run.
I'm never going to see my videotapes.
He's going to go to Polynesia and enjoy life on our money, and he's not going to deliver the tapes.
Well, you are delivering the tapes, and I would like to give you an opportunity to tell everybody how to get them, and that indeed you are going to fulfill the orders.
Now, by the way, my vice president, Joanne Dwarf, wants to take on this dolphin, this recent dolphin pod, the very large pod that you said beached itself.
She wants to take on that project as to the cause of that.
Somebody writes and asks, they can't read German, but they sure would like to because apparently there's something on there about the chupacabra, that horrid little creature that sucks blood from animals, and they're wondering what it says in German.
Again, this was a group of German trainees who we trained in technical remote viewing, and many of our commercial trainees, including doctors and surgeons, put together their own commercial operations.
Sure.
They spun off, and you're going to see that we're not accrediting remote viewers, but the tapes are so effective that people are better than the best natural psychics who ever lived.
They're consistent on target.
People will form groups, put together companies, and do this work commercially, I'm sure.
Module 1, I'll be starting my practice remote viewing tomorrow, in fact.
The reason why I'm calling, three quick questions, and I'll get off the air and I'll listen.
I was just checking the web, and some companies say that they can offer technical remote viewing, and some of their students have won the New York lottery, and they've won in silver trading, and they're using the S ⁇ P 500 with accuracy.
I want to know if that's true.
Also, number two, is there a European version of technical remote viewing?
I thought I saw that on the web.
And number three, quickly, is what do you see happening in March and spring of this year in the financial markets?
Now remember, you're going to have, there's a lot of natural psychics out there.
We don't have any monopoly on the truth at PsyTech.
We only have a monopoly on accuracy.
There are many, many people who are naturals.
If the naturals learn, if they study the five tapes that we have, that homestead training course, they become, and they apply the rigor that we require, they're not going to become just good.
There is something very different about today's young people.
They're calling them the Millennium Children, and they seem to be very much more spiritual, very much more in tune with something different than my generation.
Yes, we have taken a look at the Kennedy assassination.
I've talked about this before on your show, Zart, and I did not believe there was a conspiracy involved until I remote viewed the actual moment of JFK's death.
That's what I, as a remote viewer, was looking at.
And if some of your listeners who are interested in that event may remember that there was a flichette that penetrated the President's Adams Apple.
It was a pneumatic device, and it was fired from inside.
When I remote viewed that, it changed my life forever.
I couldn't accept it for a while.
It took a couple of days to just accept it.
Because I just did not want to believe, coming in the Army as a young soldier and serving my country, that someone would be arrogant enough to, someone within the government itself, to kill the President of the United States.
There's a lot, it's just, it's enigmatic and mysterious to the government.
There's so many cases of flybys by bases and so much and a lot of interaction mysteriously at weapons depots, actual physical interaction at weapons depots in ways that people do not understand.
But most commonly, it's in the form of photography, of satellite photography.
And I mentioned this before a number of times, that the National Reconnaissance Office and a few other agencies who have their own reconnaissance efforts have enigmatic photos of objects, Sometimes glowing objects, sometimes other objects in the visible range, visible spectra, on photographs that are unexplained.
We received many of those as a military team.
And because those kinds of photographs, there's two reasons why the government, three reasons why the government doesn't talk about them.
Number one is they're unexplained.
The government doesn't know what they are.
No analyst and any agency in the Department of Defense or another intelligence agencies connected with civilian organizations understand what that is.
So you're not about, as a responsible government official, one that's not going to say, we don't know.
That's the first point.
Second point is the look angle and what we are looking at with those satellite cameras, that gives away operational data.
So we're not going to show the photograph for that reason.
And thirdly, we're not going to show the photograph because it gives away the capability of the platform that it's capable of doing.
Can we really see an individual's face and color of eyes?
Can we really see through buildings, those kinds of things?
Well, if we can, it's going to be known when we show the photograph because Ed?
Well, I'm just using that as a hypothetical example.
You know, mathematicians can do some very wonderful things.
For all you young people who are thinking about applied mathematics, I encourage you, because using very elegant algorithms, a good mathematician with a good computer can sort through all the chaos in a photograph or an acoustic signal and come up with something that is left over through pattern analysis can be very,
But whatever these things are, these fast walkers, these things that are traversing our airspace, I don't see how they can be termed not a threat to national security.
They are a threat to national security.
Anything that comes through our airspace that we can't control or that we don't know what it is, that's got to be a threat to our national security, Ed?
Art had Sean David Morton on a couple weeks ago on the Clinton scandals, and he doesn't believe that President Clinton's going to make it through the year.
Okay, it's regarding the dolphins and the dolphin and whale thing, but there's also, okay, there was like a great light above the ocean, and out on the ocean was very rough, and up from the ocean was coming the spirits of dolphins and whales which were going up into the light.
At the same time, there were military planes going up into this light, and they were being turned back and were coming back down toward Earth.
One of the planes came around and settled into like a tree.
The top was off of it, and there were like 12, 13 men inside, one being Bush, one being Clinton.
So I guess my question, this was like a year ago, so I don't really know what my question is.
Just that's not a good thing to do globally because it could be many different causes.
We're going to tackle, target that specific incident in Venezuela where that specific pod or group of dolphins beached itself and look at the reasons why.
That's what we're going to do.
We have to be very careful about that.
So we have chain of custody on our data, so if we have a target that's unequivocal, then our data won't be ambiguous.
We know exactly what we can pin that specific data to that specific pod.
Now, we as individuals could have preconceived notions about why the dolphins might have died.
For instance, I think that there's a strong possibility that they could have been, that pollution could have been the cause, possibly petroleum, because of, you know, Venezuela has a lot of offshore oil platforms.
Actually, the subjects range anywhere you want them to go, from the high desert...
Maybe I'm missing something, but what I hear is, on the one hand, through remote viewing, we learn we have the possibility of contact, or at least preparing for contact with other intelligences.
Wonderful, exciting.
Makes me want to learn this technique.
On the other hand, though, through the precognizance of this same remote viewing, we see that all hell is about to break loose and that the world could be quickly transformed into a Mad Max scenario.
I sure hope we do have a soul, but this is a very mixed bag, and I'd like to know what we have coming, more than a preview of coming attractions.
In other words, on the one hand, the great possibility of contact.
On the other hand, the deterioration of the human race, Ed.
There are sanctuaries, evidently, places that will be less affected by the Mad Mac scenario.
I've talked about these before, too.
I've spent an extensive amount of time myself looking at this idea of sanctuaries.
We know that areas based upon our data, our remote viewing data, and individuals can do this for themselves by using that search term, putting their name down and qualifying with the idea of a sanctuary.
When viewers do this, they sketch places that are consistently in the same areas.
Our European students sketch areas around the Liechtenstein, Switzerland region.
North Americans, we get places in northern Montana and in eastern British Columbia.
There are places in Polynesia, near the Hawaiian Islands, some of the Hawaiian Islands.
I was talking recently to somebody who said, Art, you know, we have progressed people into the future through hypnosis, and we have asked them to write their names.
Their response to us was, they couldn't write their names because they weren't there.
That's not to say I'm 100% happy, but I believe I'm a lot happier now, a lot happier than I would have been had I stayed on the particular track I was on prior to using remote viewing to attack that particular search term okay he asked about reverse speech David John Oates does something called reverse speech which appears to reveal what a person is really thinking in
reverse and it seems quite clear and hard to dispute I assume that you've heard it probably on the program you've heard David yes what do you make of it I don't really know our we have one of my graduates from the commercial course that I taught is an apprentice of David's and he would be in a far better position to to comment on that you'll see him Dr. Jack Johnston on module
two he is the guy the bearded individual he is an apprentice of David Oates and that is a far better person to ask that question all right we're going to have David Oates on Thursday night Friday morning and he's going to reverse among other people Dr. Zahi Awass who is the antiquities director for Giza in other words the plateau the Sphinx the pyramid and all the rest of it and we did a two hour interview
with Dr. Hawass very interesting individual is there anything you can tell the audience about the great pyramid about the sphinx about what may or may not be below the sphinx I can only imagine it would be a target you couldn't resist actually I could resist it personally but many of my students my former students could not it was a very intriguing project for them to me it was kind of boring but what we found was that there is there is a chamber
My name's Gail, and I've attempted astral projection, and I've been unsuccessful, and I wanted to know, does remote viewing have anything to do with that, or is there anything you know about it that I should be cautioned not to do with?
Ah, the similarities in what we could perceive in terms of another dimension, but one is going
is perceiving it one would be for instance a good analogy would be if we're looking at the astral plane through binoculars from a distance that would be remote viewing if if if we're floating up and into it that would be astral projection i've got you i've got you all right okay that makes sense uh first time caller line you're on the air with major ebb dames hello hi my name is garrick i'm calling from state college pennsylvania yes sir two questions uh one is do you perceive el nino as being strictly a natural earth phenomenon?
unidentified
And thing number two, are you dealing with electromagnetic signatures much along the lines of Project Rainbow and Project Phoenix of the Philadelphia experiment?
All we're doing is turning our attention, our conscious attention, to one of those patterns at a time and downloading information in terms of linear time.
We're hanging a label on that.
That's all.
The patterns of information are there.
We search our memory for labels.
We hang a label on the information pattern, go back and forth in the kistoscopic manner.
We grab a pattern, hang a label.
grab a pattern, hang a label, and we'd fill in the...
In fact, I, as a student, assumed that there were energetics involved.
But when we realized that we were perceiving matter faster than light could send it to us, we were perceiving data faster than the speed of light, we realized that something may be wrong.
If you're familiar with the idea of scalars in electromagnetic theory, think of this as a field or a scalar wave.
If you must think of it as a wave, think of it as a scalar wave and not a vector.
The weather will be consistently erratic, as I've mentioned.
We have not looked at the El Nino, the causes of El Nino, but we have, as I've mentioned before, used remote viewing to investigate the ozone loss.
In fact, there was a project that we did for the Human Potential Foundation years ago, sponsored by Lawrence Rockefeller, I believe.
My memory serves me right.
And the project was entitled Planetary Ozone Depletion, Projected Consequences in Remedial Technologies.
And there were no remedial technologies.
What we found in that project was that the ozone ebb and flow, annual ebb and flow, was natural, but that human behavior had pushed it over the brink, had pushed it beyond the point where the natural phenomenon could reacquire homeostasis or equilibrium, where it could go back to normal.
Module 3s were a series of professional technical tapes designed for specific areas, law enforcement, military intelligence, medical field, those kind of things.
For someone with an above-average IQ or an average IQ, we're talking three to four months working an hour a day, at least every other day.
You can learn it at a slower pace or at a faster pace, but that's the minimum amount of time that one would require to master those modules and solve problems, simple problems.
On my website right now, the most remarkable UFO photographs that I think I've ever seen.
They come from Mexico City.
Sightings there the 6th of August.
And they show a craft, what appears to be a saucer, passing right through a high-rise building in Mexico City.
They're very graphic.
They are in sequence from a video that is going to be shown later in the month.
This will also be, these photographs will be a target that Major Dames is going to take on.
And here's another one for you, Major.
We had Dr. Roger Lear and Darrell Sims, who's going to be on the program again tomorrow night, with electron scanning microscope photographs of implants, apparent alien implants taken out, surgically removed from human beings.
Do you remember I explained that as a little girl, the subject had fallen down and actually sniffed, inhaled a feather, a bird feather, and it worked its way up into her sinus cavity.
When for Carl Jung, those individuals who have studied Carl Jung, the famous psychologist in the 20th century, he thought that he studied the language of the unconscious.
What technical remote viewing is, is the alphabet of the unconscious.
And we get, when we're looking at something that is topical in nature, like the idea of God, we can only download, sketch, and describe in terms of words, ideas.
And in this case, we're looking at something, we call the collective unconscious the place where we download our ideas, the matrix.
That's our term in our vernacular.
The matrix may be, for lack of a better theory, working theory, the mind of God.
So if you're remote viewing God, you can imagine the kinds of ideas that you get when you do that.
And what happens is that in those cases, you have different symbols for different people.
It's viewer dependent.
If we were remote viewing, let's say, one of the photos on your website of an implant, any trained remote viewer would come up with the same data.
If they stayed in the rigor, the technical remote viewing rigor, if they went right through the protocols, we would all, as trained remote viewers, come up with the same data.
It would be consistent.
But were you and I to remote view God, our data in some cases may be different depending upon our personal symbology.
Ed, if there are multiple dimensions, as we seem to be on the verge of proving, how can you be sure that what you remote view is in fact occurring in the dimension that we seem to be in now?
I know it's a complicated issue, but I would enjoy an explanation.
The only statement I could make is that this tool was developed at its genesis as a military intelligence collection tool, and that's what it supported.
It supported we're material guys, and it supported a material physical world, operations in the material physical world.
How I relate to that world and other aspects of myself as I exist in other trans-dimensional states or trans-psychological states, I'm not generally concerned about.
Maybe I will be when my physical body is dead.
Sure, I will be.
But at this juncture, I'm just concerned with the physical material world.
And this tool, technical remote viewing, supports knowledge collection and working in that material world very effectively.
And that was so, it was so strange because where I lived in downstate New York, I lived off Hoston Mountain Road in the Taconic State Parkway.
I experienced unbelievable.
It was just a nightmare where people thought that because I was working so much overtime that I was just losing it.
But then after having someone in my house experience something and it brought on the whole troop of, I'm a correction officer, it brought on a whole gang of guys to come to my house and basically try to catch whomever it was which we thought was harassing me.
And they never did.
And I mean, the things with the lights, the glow, even during the day when I would sit out, you know, just to get, and I've never been so in tone with my life, my mind, my body, and close everything out and just trying to be in tune with what was going on.
And to tune down to nature, it was so deep, you know, and things I would see, you know, different.
All right, well, it's very difficult to tell whether you actually had a remote viewing experience or not, but I recall from asking Ed in the past that a lot of remote viewers have lost it.
A lot of the remote viewers, in fact, who were in the military program, didn't make it, did they, Ed?
First of all, remote viewing is not an experience.
Remote viewing has turned into a buzzword now since I took it public in 1989 and 1990 when I came out of the cold, so to speak.
So it's turned into a buzzword for all psychic experiences, but it's a skill.
This is taught as a skill, and it takes a lot of hard work and a commitment to learning it as a skill, just like ice skating or skiing or anything else.
No, you've got to work at it from the ground floor up.
It's an adventure and it's a lot of fun, but you still have to do the work, just like learning how to paint or anything else.
But it is the syntax and the grammar, learning the syntax and the grammar, so to speak, for the way that the unconscious mind communicates information accurately to conscious awareness.
If someone is not balanced, if they're not psychologically balanced when they learn this, sometimes it throws them over the edge because of the profundity of the information that they're getting.
Let me give you a small example.
I was affected greatly when I remote viewed the JFK assassination.
I was not prepared to believe that there was a conspiracy.
I flat out disbelieved it.
But my data was showing that the flachette was fired from inside the car.
So that was sort of a profound experience for me.
For other people, finding that investigating mysteries or enigma, for instance, that the universe may not be the way they thought it had been their whole lives can pull the anchor of their reality, can pull the ground right out from underneath them, and they no longer have anything to grab onto.
It's just like opening a book and a book of mysteries.
And in this case, though, it's a skill.
It is a skill, and what you do with that skill is up to you.
For instance, I have never remote viewed my own death, and I don't think I want to.
It's not that I'm afraid of remote viewing my death.
It's just something I don't want to know.
But if an individual were to decide to do that, or to get that target, remember, these targets are done many times in the blind.
You're taught to remote view without knowledge of the target.
In other words, when you begin this process, you're only remote viewing a random number that's connected with a target.
That's how you're taught to do this.
Your conscious mind is taught to stay out of the way.
So if you were to give, let's say, Art Bell death, that event, Art Bell's death, you were to give that target and you would associate a random number with that and give that random number to a trained remote viewer.
They would describe your death in a probabilistic future.
However, I think a better cue, a better way to search one's future would be to look at what we call an optimum trajectory, sort of like the divine will type of idea.
An optimum trajectory where you take your name and you use that search term, an encyclopedic search term, optimum trajectory, that puts you on a course of action that usually extends your life quite a bit.
Sometimes the data that's downloaded from something like that is really simple.
Stop smoking or disengage from the work that you're doing or something like that.
Go to the doctor if you have a psychological problem.
You start sketching the room of a psychiatrist that you know.
If you look at our website, you'll see an example where we saved an individual's life by a very common example where a neurosurgeon had an intractable problem, and I remote viewed the source of the problem.
But I have a feeling that we're going to be in contact from where he is going.
unidentified
Okay.
And I forgot the comment, but I'll just ask him the second question.
I was curious as to why your guest seems to remote view things that are describing the official size and general shape, but never describes the more important interconnected details, such as, for instance, the propulsion systems inside UFOs that are seen and reported right here in contiguous USA.
Okay, careful about propulsion systems, because sometimes we've attempted to...
at vehicles that we were watching come and go night after night, and we were attempting to discern the propulsion systems, and they were beyond our ken.
In other cases, we were not looking at a vehicle.
When we remote viewed it, it wasn't a vehicle at all.
It was an opening, what one might call a dimensional opening or the other end of a portal through which something was looking at us, and it appeared to be visually a vehicle.
So that wasn't a propulsion, had nothing to do with the propulsion system at all, because it was a false premise that that was a vehicle.
My operational base, my forward base is in the Hawaiian Islands.
That is where I'm operating from.
And there is indeed access, of course, to Internet and to phone lines there.
The place where Starman, where my operational site is, has no access to anything like that.
If I'm at my control base, a forward command post, so to speak, then there's no problem doing follow-ups.
When I turn in our report to you on the Dolphin Pods beaching themselves and the Mexico UFO, that will either be fax or phone call, depending on where we are.
You'll get the information, but I'm not sure whether it will be in interview form or fax form.
Dr. Roger Lear and Darrell Sims, who's going to be on the program again tomorrow night, with electron scanning microscope photographs of implants, apparent alien implants taken out, surgically removed from human beings.
Do you remember, I explained that as a little girl, the subject had fallen down and actually sniffed, inhaled a feather, a bird feather, and it worked its way up into her sinus cavity.
Yes, we have, including just for fun, the origin of God, those kinds of things.
For Carl Jung, those individuals who have studied Carl Jung, the famous psychologist in the 20th century, he thought that he'd studied the language of the unconscious.
What technical remote viewing is, is the alphabet, the unconscious.
And we get, when we're looking at something that is topical in nature, like the idea of God, we can only download, sketch, and describe in terms of words, And in this case, we're looking at something.
That's our term in our vernacular.
The matrix may be, for lack of a better theory, working theory, the mind of God.
So if you're remote feeling God, you can imagine the kinds of ideas that you get when you do that.
And what happens is that in those cases, you have different symbols for different people.
It's viewer dependent.
If we were remote viewing, let's say, one of the photos on your website of an implant, any trained remote viewer would come up with the same data.
If they stayed in the rigor, the technical remote viewing rigor, if they went right through the protocols, we would all, as trained remote viewers, come up with the same data.
It would be consistent.
But were you and I to remote view God, our data in some cases may be different depending upon our personal symbology.
Ed, if there are multiple dimensions, as we seem to be on the verge of proving, how can you be sure that what you remote view is in fact occurring in the dimension that we seem to be in now?
I know it's a complicated issue, but I would enjoy an explanation.
The only statement I could make is that this tool was developed at its genesis as a military intelligence collection tool, and that's what it supported.
It supported we're material guys, and it supported a material-physical world, operations in the material-physical world.
How I relate to that world and other aspects of myself, as I exist in other trans-dimensional states or trans-psychological states, I'm not generally concerned about.
Maybe I will be when my physical body is dead.
Sure, I will be.
But at this juncture, I'm just concerned with a physical material world.
And this tool, technical remote viewing, supports knowledge collection and working in that material world very effectively.
And that was so, it was so strange because where I lived in downstate New York, I lived off Host of Mountain Road in the Taconic State Parkway.
I experienced unbelievable.
It was just a nightmare where people thought that because I was working so much overtime that I was just losing it.
But then after having someone in my house experience something and it brought on the whole troop of, I'm a correction officer, it brought on a whole gang of guys to come to my house and basically try to catch whomever it was which we thought was harassing me.
And they never did.
And I mean the things with the lights, the glow, even during the day when I would sit out, you know, just to get, and I've never been so in tone with my life, my mind, my body, and close everything out and just trying to be in tune with what was going on.
And I mean, to tune down to nature, it was so deep, you know, and things I would see, you know, different.
All right, well, it's very difficult to tell whether you actually had a remote viewing experience or not, but I recall from asking Ed in the past that a lot of remote viewers have lost it.
A lot of the remote viewers, in fact, who were in the military program, didn't make it, did they, Ed?
First of all, remote viewing is not an experience.
Remote feeling has turned into a buzzword now since I took it public in 1989 and 1990 when I came out of the cold, so to speak.
So it's turned into a buzzword for all psychic experiences, but it's a skill.
This is taught as a skill, and it takes a lot of hard work and a commitment to learning it as a skill, just like ice skating or skiing or anything else.
No, you've got to work at it from the ground floor up.
It's an adventure and it's a lot of fun, but you still have to do the work, just like learning how to paint or anything else.
But it is the syntax and the grammar, learning the syntax and the grammar, so to speak, for the way that the unconscious mind communicates information accurately to conscious awareness.
If someone is not balanced, if they're not psychologically balanced when they learn this, sometimes it throws them over the edge because of the profundity of the information that they're getting.
Let me give you a small example.
I was affected greatly when I remote viewed the JFK assassination.
I was not prepared to believe that there was a conspiracy.
I flat out disbelieved it.
But my data was showing that the flashette was fired from inside the car.
So that was sort of a profound experience for me.
For other people, finding that investigating mysteries or enigma, for instance, that the universe may not be the way they thought it had been their whole lives can pull the anchor of their reality, can pull the ground right out from underneath them, and they no longer have anything to grab onto.
It's just like opening a book and a book of mysteries.
And in this case, though, it's a skill.
It is a skill, and what you do with that skill is up to you.
For instance, I have never remote viewed my own death, and I don't think I want to.
It's not that I'm afraid of remote viewing my death.
It's just something I don't want to know.
But if an individual were to decide to do that, or to give that target, remember these targets are done many times in the blind.
You're taught to remote view without knowledge of the target.
In other words, when you begin this process, you're only remote viewing a random number that's connected with a target.
That's how you're taught to do this.
Your conscious mind is taught to stay out of the way.
So if you were to give, let's say, Art Bell death, that event, Art Bell's death, you were to give that target and you would associate a random number with that and give that random number to a trained remote viewer, they would describe your death in a probabilistic future.
However, I think a better cue, a better way to search one's future would be to look at what we call an optimum trajectory.
It's sort of like the divine will type of idea.
An optimum trajectory where you take your name and you use that search term, an encyclopedic search term, optimum trajectory, that puts you on a course of action that usually extends your life quite a bit.
Sometimes the data that's downloaded from something like that is really simple.
Stop smoking or disengage from the work that you're doing or something like that.
Go to the doctor if you have a psychological problem.
You start sketching the room of a psychiatrist that you know.
If you look at our website, you'll see an example where we saved an individual's life by a very common example where a neurosurgeon had an intractable problem and I remote viewed the source of the problem.
But I have a feeling that we're going to be in contact from where he is going.
unidentified
Okay.
And I forgot the comment, but I'll just ask him the second question.
I was curious as to why your guest seems to remote view things that are describing the official size and general shape, but never describes the more important interconnected details, such as, for instance, the propulsion systems inside UFOs that are seen and reported right here in contiguous USA.
Okay, careful about propulsion systems, because sometimes we've attempted to...
at vehicles that we were watching come and go night after night, and we were attempting to discern the propulsion systems, and they were beyond our ken.
In other cases, we were not looking at a vehicle.
When we remote viewed it, it wasn't a vehicle at all.
It was an opening, what one might call a dimensional opening or the other end of a portal through which something was looking at us.
And it appears to be visually a vehicle.
So that was...
So that wasn't a propulsion, had nothing to do with the propulsion system at all because it was a false premise that that was a vehicle.
My operational base, my forward base is in the Hawaiian Islands.
That is where I'm operating from.
And there is indeed access, of course, to internet and to phone lines there.
The place where Starman, where my operational site is, has no access to anything like that.
If I'm at my control base, a forward command post, so to speak, then there's no problem doing follow-ups.
When I turn in our report to you on the dolphin pods beaching themselves and the Mexico UFO, that will either be fax or phone call, depending on where we are.
You'll get the information, but I'm not sure whether it'll be in an interview form or fax form.
There was a contract that my company floated years ago.
And in that contract, we did some exploratory work on the origin of AIDS.
It is not man-made.
It actually was a simian virus, and researchers are now realizing that, that it was in the simian community, the monkey community.
But what we did was look at the origin of the AIDS virus.
Now remember, as remote viewers, if we target AIDS, we're targeting the disease, an epidemiological thing, topic.
So we look at the origin of AIDS, what we sketch and describe are young people in a dance hall in Africa, that type of thing, or in Haiti.
But if we look at the AIDS virus, the origin of the AIDS virus, then we're back very long ago into a cave where a man is sleeping with a dog, and we're sketching the underbelly of a dog.
And what we find is that AIDS originated as a canine virus, jumped ship, mutated, jumped ship into the simian community, then eventually into Homo sapiens.
That's important because there may be an Achilles heel inside that virus.
And for instance, I'm just throwing out hypothetical ideas.
If one were to use, let's say, a canine antisera or something that was used for distemper, there may be something at the molecular action site that would find this weak point in this juggernaut called the AIDS virus and go in and attack it because it has an ancient Achilles heel hidden deep in there, a genetic legacy from when it was a canine virus.
We have to thank all of those very hardworking, devoted statesmen, statespersons who worked so hard and so long, gave their lives to try to attain peace and probably held off war for as long as they could.
Wildcard line, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
unidentified
Yes, I have a two-part question for Major Dames.
Sure.
First of all, has he ever remote viewed what you would call the wherever we were before we were on our bodies here, you know, the soul, so to speak, the preexistence?
And if so, if you witnessed anything like a staging area where we were maybe tested and possibly had a hand in the way we were actually going to look.
The question is, I've just become kind of well-heeled through an inheritance, and it's in blue chip stock.
And I've been seriously considering way before about not leaving my money in the stock market and getting it out.
And pretty much taking the rest of the year off, excuse me, and really enjoying myself, doing the things that I've been wanting to do for the last few years.
I was a distinguished military graduate at Berkeley's ROTC program, and I majored in Chinese and biophysics.
I speak fluent Chinese.
Ego.
Ego has cost me more problems in my life than any other single aspect of my physical existence.
I continue to this day to make serious judgment calls, and I'm not kidding.
That is why remote viewing, it grows in importance to me.
Because when I remote view, the data is 100% trustworthy.
But if I try to second guess or suss out, for instance, if I were to try to assess someone that I meet on the street, their personality, I am always wrong.
Every single time.
If I remote view them, I can nail down every aspect of them and where they're coming from, the most significant events in their life, their modus operandis, and get it right.
But I just can't, I have not been able to effectively, outside of facts, scientific facts, I have not been able to effectively suss out the rest of life.
Being one of the many blue-collar listeners of your show, it kind of worries me that unless I want to go to Liechtenstein or East British Columbia or northern Montana, there seem to be no other safe havens.
I would think that surely in the entire North American continent, there should be a few other hidey holes.
I know we're getting close to the time of the hour.
Major Dames is the reason President Clinton will not go out here the remainder of his term, the same reason millions are going to suffer in D.C., and I'll listen off the air.
I don't know if millions are going to suffer in D.C. I hope not, because I have two young sons there who live there.
And yes, I'm pulling them out prior to the beginning of 1999 to take them with me, but they're there right now.
So obviously, it's not something that's going to happen.
It's not going to happen this year to massive numbers of people in D.C. I am not at liberty to say why President of the United States is not going to finish this term.
Major Ed Deans, I wish, you know, do incommunicado on us because you're the number one guest as far as I'm concerned.
I had a question about what do you say to those people that say that they just like to quit their job and take their money and, I guess, go to town, you know, or go wild, that kind of stuff.
If everything is going to go to hell in a hat basket, then what do you advise people to do as far as just, you know, sticking with their daily life?
Hook up with like-minded people, because that's the only way that life is going to be tolerable if anybody survives, is to hook up with like-minded people and work with them.
No, it doesn't, but the tapes will require some, in the first tape, tape number one, you'll need somebody to hold your hand with your pen in your hand for that first tape so that they can show you how to produce certain lines on a piece of paper.
Once that process is mastered, which should take you about three or four hours, you can go there.
You won't need sight, but you will need someone to help you do that.
You just need somebody to, because I demonstrate in the tape, some marks on the paper that your autonomic nervous system produces in response to certain things.
Particularly someone who has not been congenitally blind.
For people who have been blind since birth will not be able to do that.
The ideas will be transferable in terms of words, but the sketches will have to be, because their thesaurus is limited in terms of experiencing the three-dimensional world, someone else will have to interpret their sketches.