David John Oates reveals reverse speech—a phenomenon where backward, intelligible phrases appear in forward speech every 10–15 seconds—as an unconscious right-brain "leak" exposing hidden truths. In Harlot’s satanic claims, reversals like "I'll bless him with Satan" (about her murdered son) and "God needs an opposer" align with her self-proclaimed beliefs, unsettling Oates despite his neutral stance. NASA transcripts allegedly contain Mars mission reversals hinting at UFOs or "dark cities," while FBI-related terms like "flogged the wing" (MiG-29 sales to Moldova) suggest possible evidence manipulation. Callers, including a self-identified "Steve" from Area 51 lore, blur lines between conspiracy and spiritual influence, leaving Oates’ theory—and its implications—open to debate as he warns listeners of risks tied to his upcoming appearances. [Automatically generated summary]
David Oates, as you uh probably will note shortly, has himself a speech impediment.
Uh that is what led David to a study of speech in general.
Our speech.
Our language, whether it be English or any other language, and reverse speech, as you will about, as you will certainly learn in a moment, applies to all language.
Otherwise, it would not be a discipline that could be scientifically proven.
At any rate, David's speech impediment obviously led him into studying language many, many years ago, and he has now developed something called reverse speech.
Now, if I understand reverse speech correctly, it will reveal, in other words, when you take a forward speech, as I am now presenting to you, forward speech, I hope you regard it that way, and you actually reverse it at the regular speed, every so often there will appear an intelligible statement in reverse.
Now, this statement is very dangerous to a lot of people, including not only those who make it, but David Oates himself.
He has had horrid things happen to him since doing all of this.
Well, essentially, I'm proposing a brand new theory about linguistics and the function of language.
Essentially, what I'm claiming is that the process of spoken communication is twofold.
As the human brain is constructing the sounds of speech, it's putting those sounds together in such a way that we're delivering two messages simultaneously.
The first message is conscious, which is forwards, which is obviously how I'm talking to you now, and that is being generated by the left brain hemisphere.
The second message is unconscious, is occurring from the right brain hemisphere and is literally backwards.
It is embedded backwards into the sounds of our speech.
So quite literally, as you said, if speech is recorded and played backwards approximately once every 10 or 15 seconds, and that varies depending on the emotional intensity of a conversation, but roughly once every 10 seconds or so, you can hear this very clear and precise, intelligent statement that my research indicates is what we are thinking and feeling at the time of speaking, not just on the conscious level, but on the unconscious level as well.
So the totality of human thought is quite literally embedded backwards into the sounds of our speech.
It is an automatic function of the human mind that has previously been undiscovered then unresearched.
Yes, society has been built on a false premise, and reverse speech cuts right through that.
And some of the things that come out are really quite shocking and mind-blowing.
I mean, I have difficulty believing some of the stuff that I find on occasion, but it always validates itself in many different ways.
You know, I just found out, I just heard from a friend of mine in Australia just last week, a murder case I worked on about 10 years ago that pinpointed a specific suspect for the crime was finally solved and the suspect was exactly who the reversal said it was.
When you are working on murder cases, whether it be the Ramsey case or any other case, and you come up with reversals indicating a suspect or indicating guilt, obviously you cannot come right out and say they are guilty, but their own words, in a sense, indict them.
Under very suspicious circumstances not long ago, but there has been even more recent horrendous threatening activity toward you, and a lot of the audience has heard about it.
So there would have been only two ways this could have occurred.
Somebody would have been out at the junction bar near your house, or they would have been connected somehow in the phone company to be able to accomplish this.
Well, you know, I mean, it's not difficult to do that with modern surveillance techniques, or I mean, there's many ways to access through computers, phone company systems.
I don't know what to say.
But it was rather frightening, to say the least.
Five minutes prior to that, there was a tremendous odour in the house.
The whole house reeked high heaven.
It smelt like skunk.
I don't know what there was.
And then the call came five minutes later.
My dog totally freaked out a few minutes after that, ran down the bottom of the property.
We didn't see him again for five or ten minutes.
And then speaking about my dog, my dog was severely sick a week later.
And I got an email that night basically threatening to, I mean I didn't take the email seriously, threatened to send someone around to attend to my sick dog so it was someone who knew or had done something.
And it's been frightening.
There's been cars outside the office.
We've been under surveillance for some reason.
I actually sent my son back to Australia last week because it was just getting too hot here.
And the famous Neil Armstrong statement as he first stepped on the moon was part of the opening sequence of the very popular morning show in Philadelphia on WPHT, our affiliate there.
And it was really funny, David.
He played that as part of sort of the opening of his show.
And when we got into the interview, one of the first things I said is, hey, have your engineer go play that backwards and recover what he gets, playing it backwards at a regular speed, and in the next break, come back and play it on the air.
And they did.
And the engineer's mind was completely blown.
You know, I just happened to remember the Neil Armstrong statement as one of the more impressive things I've heard on Reverse Speech.
And it just, it set off the whole interview.
I mean, there was no denying it.
So let us begin by introducing the audience to that now very famous Neil Armstrong statement, if you can do it, when he landed on the moon, what it is forward, and then reverse.
That is so clear, David, that you need not play it at the third slower speed.
As a matter of fact, the audience will note, as you get used to listening to reverse speech, you will hear it more clearly and more easily as time goes on.
You've got to kind of calibrate your ears to it.
I did that as a dispatcher, 911 dispatcher, and you now have to do it to participate in this program.
At regular speed, play it in reverse, if you would, one more time.
All right, well, you are certainly deserving of it, and I hope it happens.
David, you have proven to me beyond any shadow of a doubt that speech in reverse actually begins before forward speech begins.
In other words, when you were somewhat younger and your children were a lot younger, you would compulsively follow them around with a tape recorder and a microphone in their face, and you would record infant goo-goo sounds.
It is obviously what a child would do if you put something in front of them.
If they could speak, they would say, what's that?
And if the audience would listen very carefully, there is, we've talked about this many times, an ethereal sort of something to stand your hair on end kind of sound that comes with the reversals of children before they can speak forward.
Right, and I think that's why it got the satanic label many, many years ago.
I mean, this first came to the forefront back, well, actually, really, really right back in the late 60s with the Beatles, but the fundamentalists picked up the bandwagon in the mid-70s and early 80s.
Well, I think anybody, David, would agree that a child, prior to actually saying mama, dad, dad, whatever the first words are, begins to process in their brain what language is.
I mean, that's just, you know, it does not take a rocket scientist to imagine that.
You start processing and assimilating information in your brain, and then finally that results in forward speech.
But if anything validates reverse speech, this does.
This is Bill Clinton's inauguration in his first term.
It's not Bill Clinton talking, but it's someone, it's just the announcer.
The particular thing is, notice carefully what he says about the outgoing Bush administration.
unidentified
Today, our nation bids a gracious goodbye to an outgoing administration and warmly welcome in a new one as William Jefferson Clinton takes office as the 42nd President of the United States.
All right, what David's doing is he's reversing these at three speeds.
The first speed you're hearing is the regular speed, the same speed it was spoken forward, and he's only reversing this so those of you hearing it for the first time can kind of calibrate your ear.
Okay, now let's get a little bit more complicated now, still on the same theme.
Here's Clinton talking about charges of moral dishonesty.
This is probably one of my favorite reversals of all time on this one.
This is just a classic reversal.
Here we go.
unidentified
There still has not been a single solitary shred of evidence of anything dishonest that I have done in my public life, not only as governor, or not only as governor and his president.
And actually, I did a taping with the Herabo Rivera show on Wednesday of this week, and that will actually be airing on December the 26th on the Elite 2020.
If people will go up to www.artbell.com and scroll right down to David John Oates' name and click on it, if that new site is up, you will immediately be taken there by electronic wizardry at the speed of light.
He's talking about the outgoing of support that he's received.
And just prior to this, which I don't have in this clip, but he talks about a letter that he received from a little girl and how he's been corresponding with the little girl.
And then he continues on and says, this, it's been wonderful.
unidentified
So we've come out of this perhaps differently than you would expect in believing that there really is a lot of goodness in the world.
And that's been an outcome that I think we certainly wouldn't have anticipated with this kind of tragedy.
Now you tell me how the reversal I'm about to play can occur by pure coincidence.
This is a very long, articulated sentence, and it's actually accessing right down into his unconscious mind and particularly his unconscious attitudes towards little girls.
The reversal simply says, nice little girl, then there's a little bit of gibberish followed by, let me look, let me nurse you, you get down on my fire.
The knife little girl gibberish let me look let me nurse you you get down on my fire.
And see, this is where reverse speech gets really dangerous, because it's not just accessing our conscious thoughts, what we are thinking and feeling at the time of speaking, but it's also accessing unconscious attitudes and behavior and emotives and agenda,
literally on the deeper levels, which we won't get into tonight, but it actually accesses the core structures of consciousness, why we are, the people that we are, and how our personality and behavior is literally formed at the very base level.
Well, this is a reversal on me, which was recorded back in 1988, right, when I began my public career with reverse speech.
I began researching in 1983, but in 87, 88, I published my first book.
I did some small lectures, and here is me after one of my lectures, and I'm literally saying to someone, I've suddenly been thrust into this role where I have people coming to me and saying, David, I want to know what's going on inside my head.
unidentified
I've been suddenly thrust into this role where I have people coming to me and saying, David, I want to know what's going on inside my head.
And I think, funny, hell yeah, oh, I could take tapes down with me.
Now, this is actually a very good example to illustrate the principle of what I call speech complementarity, where the forwards and the reverse relate to each other.
It's actually one of the things that convinced me back in the early stages was this direct contextual relationship.
And where I say, all I do is play taste backwards, we actually hear a reversal that says, what happens when we play taste backwards, and the reversal says, look at that.
And there's a little bit of gibberish followed by all I am inside, which is what reverse speech accesses.
In the world of reverse speech, as you fairly pull each reversal from any forward spoken words, what percentage of the time is the reversal congruent with, in other words, contextually congruent with, what is being said forward?
With Bill Donaldson, an aviation expert, and two witnesses who claim to have seen, one of them in a Black Hawk helicopter, a missile rise, turn, and explode adjacent to Flight 800 as the investigation now continues.
Coincident to that broadcast, there were several statements made the next day following my broadcast about the center fuel tank and modifications to the center fuel tank.
And as you are well aware, there are ongoing investigations.
I want to read to you a letter I just received from Tom Higgins.
Art at 62 years of age.
I'm retired electrical engineer from 9X and also a business owner and live with my wife Edna in Greenport, New York.
I'm also a licensed pilot and former owner of my own aircraft.
We live about 25 miles east-northeast of West Hampton Airport, the base of the Air National Guard, and upon whose runway the helicopter was landing when the pilot saw the initial flash and explosion.
He was a recent guest on your show.
The crash site is not more than a few miles southwest of that.
Had it not been for trees in the neighbor's yard, I could have seen the explosion.
On that evening, at approximately 8.50 p.m. while in my backyard, I heard a low-flying plane approaching from the direction of the West Hampton airport.
As a pilot and with undying interest in aircraft, I watched and waited to see it as I normally do.
This plane immediately aroused my interest to the point where I went directly into the house and told my wife about what I saw.
Note, we did not become aware of the TWA crash until we turned on the TV at about 11.30 p.m. that evening and did not know about it at the time that I saw the plane, although I knew that what I saw was significant.
What I saw was a twin-engine Piper PA, that's Pacific Alpha 23 Apache aircraft with what appeared to be modified wingtips squared off instead of rounded as I remembered from seeing such planes years ago.
As an avid fan of older aircraft, I recognized it immediately.
They only built 300 of them in the early 60s.
What struck me as so unusual was the fact that he was flying at full throttle at about 600 feet AGL, which is virtually sea level here.
He was headed northeast, and because he was so low and pushing it so hard, I immediately thought that perhaps he was a drug runner.
Believe me, I study every plane that passes over and always have.
I've never seen one of those around here before or since.
His direction of travel must have brought him very close to the crash site.
If he had departed West Hampton, he must have seen the explosion.
Was he flying so unusually low to avoid radar or reporting in to the area?
One minute after passing overhead, he would have been over the ocean headed toward Boston, which is definitely not a good idea at 600 feet.
Its paint job was rather dull and faded and looked as if it had been stored for years and not the object of a classic airplane owner's love.
I reported all this to the FBI hotlines several days later, but they never contacted me.
A similar strange incident occurred the evening before, just before dark.
Again, over my backyard, I was astonished to see either a Lear jet or a citation jet or similar jet doing lazy eights at about 1,000 feet between Greenport and Shoulder Island a few miles south of here.
Low and slow in one of those is again very dangerous.
I have never seen that again nor since.
He was not configured for a landing and the nearest airport would have been West Hampton or East Hampton where he could land many miles away.
I have very strong powers of observation and usually notice things other people do not.
All of my instincts tell me that that twin-engine Piper Apache was running scared or trying to stay out of sight, but why?
And why only 10 or 15 minutes after the crash of Flight 800?
Signed, Tom Higgins.
We will in the future interview Tom Higgins.
It is but one more interesting piece of the puzzle that is TWA was TWA Flight 800.
Okay, well we're going to add even further mystery and intrigue to the Flight 800 scenario.
I've got 13 reversals to play here.
I want to get through them in order.
This was from a press conference conducted by Jim Calstrom of the FBI approximately three weeks ago.
There's another speaker here as well.
Audio is just a touch distorted on this.
It was recorded by someone else who had the levels a bit too high, but it doesn't change the message on this ad at Paul.
I'm just explaining, if you hear a little bit of distortion, what it is.
Okay, so here we go.
unidentified
The law enforcement's team's disengagement at this time from the TVE investigation is based solely on the overwhelming absence of evidence indicating a crime.
Yes I am and here we have the second TWA reversal.
unidentified
The investigation I've just described to you was done primarily by the men and women of the terrorist task force here in New York, augmented by many FBI agents from around the country and many others from this office.
Okay, well I wasn't too sure about that but that about that myself and as you know I've been I've played some rehearsals on your program in the past that I haven't known what they've meant and we've had people who have faxed in or emailed in with the answers.
But this one I played on a program last week and the announcer on the program, as soon as he heard that reversal, took quite a huge gasp because he had claimed, he told me he attended a lecture the night before by some top general and of course I don't have the name of that chap, but who had analyzed the crash wreckage and he claims that a missile impact had hit at the base of the wing.
And so we flogged the wing to punish or flogged is to harm, to beat.
And one more reversal coming up on the TWA 800 and I want you to listen very carefully as to what he's saying.
Forward, he says, we felt the necessity to stand up and talk about what we did.
unidentified
We felt the necessity to stand up here and talk about what we did.
See, I must tell you, I mean, I believe my ears, David, but I do not believe that we shot down.
In other words, that statement, my God Almighty, that statement is suggesting obviously that we shot down, we murdered our own people, shot down our own plane.
If it was shot down and there was a cover-up, then there's obviously a conspiracy to cover it up.
And why that is so, I don't have the answers to that.
I have got the tapes of the whole week hearing on TWA that happened last week.
I haven't even begun to look at those tapes yet, but I intend to look at them and try to get an answer to this mystery.
I know reverse speech very well.
I've worked with this stuff for 14 years and it has always validated itself in my work, in my therapeutic practice, in the cases I've done with the police.
And so now I've got this tremendous mystery on my hands.
Well, no, I've done it twice in Australia and three times here in the States.
So it hasn't been many times on that level.
In Australia, the two cases I worked on, in one case, reversals revealed the locations of the murder weapons and the police found out exactly where that was.
In another case, it was up in the state of Queensland.
The police commissioner was suspected of drug running and reversals revealed the name of a bank and branch in which he had funds.
There was a case in Dallas where the reversal...
That is along with other corroborating ev evidence, yet and in point of fact, that case actually caused the whole state of Queensland government to collapse.
There was actually a royal commission into the whole thing.
And that one piece of evidence caused the ring of corruption throughout Queensland to do you ever, ever, ever get reversals from songs, and I don't mean backmasking, but reversals from somebody who would sing a song.
And the next reversal just really goes to illustrate this.
As she talks about the scriptures and Adam and Eve, she gets into some fairly deep theology throughout the whole interview.
unidentified
If you go through your scriptures and you find out in the beginnings of Adam and Eve and so forth and so on, their eyes were pretty much closed, only opened to what God wanted them to see at that point.
And if that won't bring tears to your eyes, I interviewed Father Malachi Martin and I brought this up to him and I said, good Lord, Father, how would it be possible that any adult could take a child and be sure and insure a child would go to hell?
And I expected him to say, well, of course, that could not be done.
Instead, he said, I'm sorry to tell you, Art, it could be done, has been done.
And you know, what you just said bears out over and over and over again.
There's not a week that goes by.
My session work with my clients.
You know, I use this in therapy, as you know, and there's not a week that goes by where I don't find reversal, where people say, oh, my gosh, that's exactly what's going on.
That is what I was thinking at the time I was speaking.
What it does, though, in a very chilling way, is once again point out that contextually, what you hear forward, in this case, I'm sorry to say, is and appears to be consistent again with what you hear in reverse.
David Oates, and we are in the middle of reversals of Harlot, who I am convinced was a Satanist.
She's talking about people who enter politics almost seem to have a Christian background.
unidentified
A political person who's wanting to get up into the hierarchy of politics and government control, if you will, almost seems to have a Christian background.
Now she's in the next one, she talked about going to churches and sitting in the congregations, and we get back to the harlot who we have come to know on your program and some of her motives.
That was all.
And here we go.
unidentified
I have went into churches.
Like I saw this coast to coast.
And I have been to these churches and have sat in their congregations.
Now, the next reversal is on you, and I think about this time you're really wondering how serious this woman is, and that's one of the reasons why you sent me this tape and was really quite anxious to get the reversals on this.
I have already checked, David, and if people will go to my website right now, www.artbell.com, scroll down to the guest area and click on your name, they will be taken immediately to the new website.
And the entire Harlott transcript is up there, a plus TWA1, TWA 800.
There's some reversals there for the new British listeners.
I've just debuted in England on the largest talk show in England on Talk Radio.
It got just tremendous response, been inundated with email, the station, inundated with letters, and I know many of the British people are listening to your show tonight.
Okay, here we have another soft side of Harlot.
unidentified
That's not the grand scheme of things.
God needs an opposer.
God needs it or he would have never existed to begin with.
reversal says mend little wee heart within What does that mean, though?
Well, her little wee heart.
See, this is the part of her that's scared of meeting Christ.
Hell, and I was scared to meet him.
Be honest, I want a son.
And there's a small part of her deep down inside, the little wee heart, the real, soft, genuine heart, or Patsy, I would choose to call that part Patsy, that really does exist.
And she wants that fixed.
She wants that little wee heart inside of her mended.
And that's exactly what it means.
She's not evil through and through.
Mind you, a large proportion of her is.
But very interestingly, just as she says that reversal about mend the little wee heart within, she actually lashes out again with a completely opposite statement just a few seconds later.
unidentified
He was allowed to do that because even in God's makeup of what he is, in his existence, in his essence.
In an entity, the church as a central location is, how should I say this with tact, I don't agree with 90% of the so-called churches in the world today.
You know, actually, I'm probably, one side of me you don't know, Art, is I'm a prolific author.
I've written probably at least 15 books in my lifetime, only two of which are published.
I've written a series of science fiction novels, and there's one book I wrote about five years ago called Apostasy in Golden Pulpits that goes into the analysis of the church system, the church structure, and part of the conclusion I come up with is that it really is a Satan shackle because we've all been caught in this structure.
And just one last reversal, and this is a reversal on you, right at the end of the program as you signed off.
And this is it for Harlet.
unidentified
I think that it did Christians a great service to hear this.
If you have access to the internet, let me tell the audience, we have on my website something called a webcam.
I have three cameras in my studio.
One, two, three.
And one takes a side shot, one takes a front shot, and one takes a shot from, not quite in reverse, but toward the back of the room, toward the front of the studio.
Let's see, this shot that I'm talking about now would have been the side shot.
It was taken at, according to this, 126 and 21 seconds.
And, you know, I have a monitor here, and we were getting these reversals on Harlot, and I happened to glance up at my own photograph, the one it took, and I said, what in the hell is that?
And I quickly reached over and froze the photograph and stopped the sequence.
And I called Keith during the break here, Keith Rowland, my wetmaster.
And I said, Keith, would you do me a favor and take a look at that photograph?
Now, I'm a smoker.
All right?
I smoke cigarettes and I don't apologize for it.
All the anti-smokers, you can go pound dirt.
I smoke.
That's the way it is.
Maybe one day I'll quit.
I don't know.
I was not smoking in this photograph.
And there is...
If you look at this photograph of me, around the whole top part of my head, there is something utterly indecipherable.
Had I been smoking, you would have seen the trail of smoke, obviously, going up there.
I've had Keith save this photograph.
You go see what you think of it yourself.
It's the damnedest thing I've ever seen.
I just barely caught it and froze it.
Again, this photograph was taken by my webcam at 126 and 21 seconds, 12, 1997, because we've got the date stamp and the time stamp at the bottom.
You go take a look at that yourself.
Go to my website right now.
And David Oates, if you happen to be out there and you can get on the web, do it now.
Go to www.artbell.com.
And I think what's happening is right now we're really loading up on the server.
Take a look at that photo.
If you don't get it now, I'm going to leave that there tonight.
I'm not going to turn the live cam back on right now.
The last four weeks of my life have been absolutely bizarre.
And I don't know whether that's connected with doing the reversals on this tape or not, but I've had tensions and chaos for no reason just spring up out of nowhere.
It is the one, it is the most profound moment I thought of that whole show when she was talking about her baby, her baby who was dead, and that she had ensured he would go to hell.
Well, they can email me at backwards at reversespeech.com.
Backwards at reversespeech.com.
You can also phone my office at 1-800-669-5789.
That's 800-669-5789.
Sometimes that line gets jammed, and if it's jammed, you can call through on our main number, which is 760-732-3097.
Either those two numbers will get me, 800-669-5789, or 760-732-3097.
I've received a couple of emails since I've been on the air, one of them requesting reversing machines.
We do sell the equipment to find reversals.
We actually have just brought out a brand new machine.
They actually hit our office tomorrow morning.
They were shipped yesterday.
It's a machine with a built-in speed control and counter, a built-in speaker.
It's just really a fantastic machine and we'll have them as of tomorrow.
A couple of announcements I'd like to make.
I'm lecturing in Portland on Saturday night.
I believe we're practically sold out on that.
I know there's a few hundred people attending.
Call my office for details on that.
I also have my annual reverse speech convention that's coming up on January the 2nd, the 3rd and the 4th.
That's in the Los Angeles Arboretum.
Richard Hoagland will be there, as well as Dennis Gerston, who has recommended me to the Nobel Committee, a fascinating, riveting speaker.
Elden Taylor will be there, too, who you've had on Dreamland, talking about subliminal messages.
And we're going to look at some of the connections between that.
But the prime reason for the convention is I'm really throwing reverse speech open.
I've held on to this very tightly for many years, but my baby has come of age now.
And I want to form a committee and a research organisation.
There's a whole bunch of reverse speeches out there now.
There's new reverse speech websites springing up all the time.
And I'd really like to make an appeal to all those people out there doing reverse speech.
Let's all get together and pull our resources.
Because together, if we're combined, we can make a strong impact.
And I am willing and ready to let reverse speech go and bring us all together.
And that's all going to be happening at the convention in January 2nd, 3rd, and 4th.
And once again, you can call my office at 1-800-669-5789 for the convention, the Portland lecture, to inquire about reversing machines, book tape, VDOs, et cetera, et cetera.
All right, now these were two gentlemen I had, public relations people for NASA, who came on my program and answered many questions about the face on Mars, Richard Hoagland's research, though they didn't particularly want to mention his name.
We covered those subjects, and that's what you're going to hear now.
Well, the first one I want to play is they're talk about Hubble Telescope, and they're talking about the funding and how they allocate funding of some of the projects they want to work on in the future.
The selection of suggests to use Hubble is made by committees, peer-reviewed committees of other astronomers who come to Baltimore, meet at the Institute, they sort through the proposals, make their recommendations to our director.
And in reverse, okay, so they're talking about funding for Hubble, but there's also some other funding they're wanting to pursue according to Reversal, and the reversal says what's locked up with their starship.
And in point of fact, I have never heard the word Sidonia in reverse speech except for this one occasion, and it still remains the only occasion I've heard Sidonia.
And for those listeners who don't know, the face of Mars is located in the region known as Sidonia.
So here he is talking about mapping the surface of Mars.
unidentified
Shortly after it got there, when the mapping began that year, Viking Orbiter 1 sent back the picture and somebody noticed it on there.
And, you know, there's the Mars missions, too, is not exactly, according to reversals, what it appears to be.
And I need to point out, too, that a lot of the stuff I've found on NASA has been independently corroborated by Richard Hoagland's research, which just adds even more credibility to this whole field.
And here they are still talking about the face on Mars.
unidentified
This feature that looks like a face, I believe, is about a mile across.
Okay, and it's way below Hubble's resolution.
The resolution we have is good for sort of global monitoring of Mars and sort of looking at Mars as a weather satellite would look at Earth.
Now I had no idea what that reversal meant, but if you go to Richard Hoagland's site at enterprise mission.com, he's got some stunning photographs there that really probably answer what we're doing.
I mean, there's a whole bunch of questions here that need to be answered.
And I was really thrown into this whole Mars UFO business cold.
I really was and had no idea what I was finding or had no idea what was going on.
And my whole research into this has uncovered this incredible extra scenario that's going on.
There's a whole other intent, a whole other field of knowledge and research that the public certainly isn't being told about that strongly hints at, boy, I don't know how to say this, but contact with UFOs and ETs,
knowledge of other civilizations or past civilizations on Mars, just a whole bunch of unanswered questions that must be answered as time goes on.
And let's look at a couple more.
These are some of the Mars conferences.
There's the classic reversal, of course, that caused a lot of commotion at the Richard Hoagland conference in Pasadena where the infamous man in black incident occurred.
unidentified
All right, go right ahead.
Then set even greater land distance rover records on Mars by going a full six meters in autonomous fashion, as will be described later, over to this region behind these two rocks named Calvin and Hobbes.
I've never received so many emails ever on any of your programs.
I've got one here that's a thought on the photograph on your website, okay?
This is from Dennis Gerston, who's going to be lecturing at my conference.
He says, I believe the effect on this studio cam is what is called a thought form, something well studied by the theosophist at the turn of the century, something that I discussed in detail in my book.
That is, I believe this mystical light shone over Art's brow is being generated by his thoughts, although they may be generated by the powerful thoughts of others.
First off, if I were to join you at the end of January, pay the money, take your course, satisfy all your requirements, would it be possible for me to receive the accreditation from you without signing your code of ethics?
Well, reverse speech as such is a very dangerous technology.
unidentified
I'm sorry to interrupt you, but I would think that would be the exact reason you would want to eliminate something like that, which is limiting the people that can help you and help protect you in a time when you could be in danger.
The way the code of ethics has been worded in the past has been limiting, and that I'll put that on the topic at the convention.
The answer to your question is yes.
I think there had to be some protection for privacy, though.
I really, if I was to want anything in the Code of Ethics, it would be to protect the privacy of private conversation.
unidentified
I would think there's many examples, Sony with beta, Apple computers, to try to limit the technology, the discovery, I think would only hinder you in your progress with this.
But that's one of the topics we'll be discussing at the convention.
Well, that's good to hear.
One more thing.
Jimmy Joe, our Area 51 pilot, I did reversals on him, and I have a package together that now that I've contacted you, Art, and David, maybe you too, I'll send them off to you now that you know who I am.
I believe Jimmy Joe, given the nature of your program, Art, and the nature of your listeners, I view Jimmy Joe as a hero.
I believe that he did what he said he did.
The reversals that I got off of his conversation with you all the way to the end were as hair-raising as anything that I've heard transpire to this point.
And that's my feelings on that particular situation.
The caller where your show went down, for my reversals on him, I viewed him as a fraud, not necessarily as somebody without the power to knock your radio station out or your satellite out, but somebody who they both have reversals that are the same.
In the caller, I'm convinced that his original call was so spastic he was trying to avoid being reversed is my feelings on it.
And one reversal I pulled out from that original phone call was flipping flip for head side up.
But anyway, what I had come across was flip for head side up, and it was the same reversal that I got off of one of Steve's.
In other words, they had the same unique phrase both on the caller with the air went dead and on Steve.
And which it was the exact same phrase and led me to believe that maybe these two guys know each other outside of their time traveling, you know, so to say.
All right, my friend.
Thank you very much for the call.
Wildcard line, you're on the air with David Oates.
Hi.
Hi.
Merry Christmas to you both.
And CAT.
I'm the caller that called in during the harlot conversation that you did the reversal on where it said that man is the beast.
The only thing that it kind of baffles me because it's kind of like a, I don't know, it's really freaking me out because I don't, I really honestly searched, like right after you played that, I searched inside and I was thinking, like, what, you know, how could I possibly be thinking that in terms of what I said?
And the only thing that seems to make sense, because even when I was just first starting to research the Bible and Jesus Christ and everything else, I found him to be a remarkable man.
I found him to be a man of total peace in every way.
So, you know, even before I believed anything about God, it was, you know, I never had any kind of offensive thoughts about him.
So it really confused me.
And the only thing I can think of is when I came onto the program, one of the biggest things that, you know, was going through my head at the time was that, you know, I'm confronting the devil in a sense.
Because I really believe this woman to be a Satan worshiper.
And I am not, you know, by any stretch of the imagination.
So it's really freaking me out.
I'd also like to add that I really 100% believe that this technology is definitely going to make a lot of headway as well in how we examine ourselves and so forth.
I believe that we have to have some communication with our brain in some way while we're speaking because when we're speaking, we don't hear that inner voice that we all hear.
It goes away.
It's like we open up our brains.
And so I kind of thought after hearing the first program with you on that possibly maybe because we're opening up our brains and we're exuding information out, that somehow maybe when we're speaking, we're also communicating back to the brain.
Just to help you with that reversal, but I want to tell you something that happened to me many, many years ago.
When I first started doing reverse speech, I was fairly active in churches.
I was a youth pastor.
And I had some reversals on me.
This was probably back in 88, 89, that really slammed my whole belief system.
It was devastating to me, absolutely devastating.
I went into shutdown for several months.
It caused me to completely rethink my whole approach to life and my faith.
And I mean, reverse speech is not easy.
When you get down to the deeper levels, it's like a two-edged sword that pierces your soul.
And it really causes us to rethink things.
See, and also, too, it's difficult to draw an argument just based on one reversal.
You could actually be referring to Satan in that reversal.
unidentified
I'm not as bold as to say that, you know, like I'm not looking to, I guess, make certain excuses, but I did feel the need right away to speak with you because one of the questions I had wanted to ask you was, did you find any other reversals during you?
East of the Rockies, you're on the air with David Oates.
unidentified
Where are you, please?
This is Troy in Columbia, Missouri.
Good morning, Archie.
Good morning, sir.
How are you?
I had a thought on the reverse speech that was played earlier where they said we flogged the wing.
Right.
I was listening to that, and it sounded to me like they almost said we flubbed the wing, which would indicate maybe a suppression or distortion of some kind of evidence that they might have found on a piece of the wing.
I thought that might be significant, particularly if it was a surface-to-air missile that brought the plane down, because sometimes they have a proximity fuse, and an explosion could have sent shrapnel into the center fuel tank and into the wing as well.
That's certainly correct, yes.
Yeah, which might have left some telltale evidence there.
Yeah, I think it's probably difficult to really come to a definite conclusion on any one specific reversal.
I think the overall trend of it, though, is that we're not being told the whole story.
Something is certainly being hidden.
I don't think there's any doubt about that based on the reversals I've found so far.
unidentified
I certainly agree with you there, David.
And I'd like to mention, by the way, I went to reversespeech.com, and I had always been extremely skeptical about this kind of thing, and all it took was one visit there, and I was an absolute believer.
Those sound files that you have there will make anyone a believer, so I recommend anyone go there.
But right now, to get to David's new website, you've got to go up through www.artbell.com, scroll down to David's name, David John Oates, and click on it, and it'll take you to the brand new website.
unidentified
West of the Rockies, you're on the air with David Oates.
Supposedly, I jammed next door to put you up on the website, looked at the picture, and very interesting.
Very, very interesting.
I have a question and a statement.
The question is, do you think possibly reversing maybe, let's say, would work in gambling?
Let's say like reading, you know, like the horses, you know, reading the thing from the horses, saying so and so will finish this way, so and so will finish this way.
All right, now so that everybody understands what you're talking about, this software, if I understand it correctly, looks through a long forward speech section, identifies where the reverse speech is.
That is not released yet, but that software is well in the progression.
Point of fact, I had some update on that today.
And what that version does is, yes, that reversals have a very unique tonal signature to them.
I mean, as you can hear when I play them on the air, a very melodious sing-song rhythmy tone to them.
The software will detect that same tonal signature backwards in speech.
So you'll be able to run it, you'll be able to load a WAV file into your computer, put the software on, and it will actually find that characteristic tonal signature.
It will not translate it for you, but it will find it, which will reduce the workload substantially.
That software is still not ready to be released yet.
The software that is being released now actually turns a computer into a reversing machine with instant forwards and backwards and speed control and automatic dumps.
That will be demonstrated at the Reverse Speech Convention.
You can also call the office at 1-800-669-5789 to get further information on that.
I just will say that I'm pretty much convinced, but I have a hard time with taking the reverse speech beyond to the point where you would be able to prove that this is, like, say, you get a reverse on someone and you say, well, this is what their subconscious is actually saying.
I have a hard time taking it to that point and saying, well, this is actually proof, because how can you ever really prove that that was actually what they were thinking?
But that's not really why I called.
That's just kind of how I feel about the issue at this point.
Well, there's nothing wrong with healthy skepticism unless we constantly question we can never learn and grow, you know.
unidentified
My question actually is kind of involves art a little bit to help me dig up the exact incident here.
But I was kind of drifting in and out of sleep the other night, and you were having a weird occurrence line or something like that.
Oh, yes.
Uh-huh.
And somebody called, and I don't remember exactly what he was dealing with.
I think he was saying something about Area 51.
He used to work there or something.
Yes.
And you commented that, and this is the only thing I really remember other than his voice, that he was pretty much saying and corroborating something that Colonel Corso said.
Do you remember that guy?
Yes, I do.
Well, I just wanted to say that his voice sounded, to me, almost exactly like the guy who got you knocked off the air.
Like the quality of his voice.
I just thought that might be kind of important if anybody else thought that.
And if you wanted to reverse that to see what was up with that.
Yeah, Satan, he sends love, I think, was the reversal.
unidentified
I found that very clear only because she was talking very much on a biblical level many times.
And there is talk in the Bible, of course, of the Antichrist, and he will be revealed in peace.
Right.
And coming with an image of what would be love or peace.
And I thought that would be very clear.
I thought that was pretty interesting.
That's something to think about.
And I was also wondering if it would not be possible that these backward and reverse speech messages, could they not possibly be spiritually influenced?
Well, that's been a test that's tried many, many times.
If you can articulate it as closely as you possibly can, you may get something that sounds similar.
But the fact is that no two people do speak alike and intonations vary dramatically from person to person.
We've been able to get something that sounds something like the reversal after many attempts of speaking it exactly right.
You know, it's interesting, I had a question was asked, that very question was asked in one of the lectures I did live on the Neil Armstrong reversal.
Someone wanted me to say that publicly and reverse it, and I did, and we got a reversal out that said this is a gamble, which is exactly what I was thinking at the time.
I've had people who've gotten close, but generally that's the exception, and you are trying to manufacture and repeat.
The fact is that no two people speak identical.
unidentified
Yeah, that's true.
I also had a comment.
I was kind of hoping that Harlotte would be listening tonight and that she would try and get through and comment on her reversals because I found it quite interesting and I'm kind of interested and to see what she had to say about it.