Major Ed Dames, a decorated U.S. Army remote viewing expert, reveals mid-1998 a comet-engineered pathogen will wipe out 80-85% of Earth’s plant life—starting in equatorial Africa—by 2001, triggering mass starvation. His SciTech team, trained in disciplined psychic intelligence gathering since the 1980s, debunks hoaxes like the "alien autopsy" and criticizes commercialized protocols for misinterpreting threats (e.g., calling it an Andromeda spaceship). While ETs may offer limited help, humanity’s survival hinges on sealed habitats, food stockpiles, and molecular-level plant pathology—urging public access to his training tapes by 1999. Dames’ warnings, from Soviet-era ops to JFK conspiracy hints, underscore a looming crisis where preparation and self-sufficiency become critical, as global systems collapse under environmental and biological assaults. [Automatically generated summary]
From the high desert in the great American Southwest, I bid you all good evening, or good morning, as the case may be, across all these many, many time zones, from the Hawaiian and Tahitian Island chains, all the way eastward to the Caribbean, the U.S. Virgin Islands, south into South America, north to the Pole, and worldwide on the internet.
This is Coast Coast A.M. I'm Mark Bell.
Good morning.
Ed Dames.
Tonight, Major Ed Dames, I text Ed Dames.
Coming up, a lot to talk about.
And I'm going to issue my standard warning.
There will be some disturbing material that you will hear tonight.
I have only hints of it.
Not the whole story, but some very disturbing material.
Therefore, please, if you are disturbed by this sort of material, and I won't call it in this case prophecy, prediction, views of the future, or whatever you want to call it, if you are disturbed by knowing the future, turn your radio off.
If you have children in the room, please consider your parental duty and have them go do something else.
With that warning and a few more words, we'll get to Ed Dames in a few moments.
After serving a year as an airborne infantryman, Mr. Dames transferred to the Army Security Agency and was assigned to the Far East to support the National Security Agency missions in that part of the world.
In 1974, he returned home to attend college, quickly earning a four-year scholarship for academic excellence.
After three years as an undergraduate at the University of California, Berkeley, where he double-majored in bioelectronics and Chinese, Mr. Dames joined Berkeley's ROTC program, becoming a distinguished military graduate in 78.
Newly commissioned as a second lieutenant in military intelligence, Mr. Dames was sent to be trained as a tactical electronic warfare officer, and for three years was assigned to Germany to intercept and jam Soviet and Czech communications.
From there, he was recruited by a scientific and technical military intelligence black unit, ultimately to direct clandestine operations against high-value foreign targets.
He remained in deep cover, traveling worldwide under assumed identities.
In 1981, Mr. Dames' life changed forever.
The Soviets had been secretly developing a sophisticated biological weapons program, and Mr. Dames and his elite military group were tasked to identify the components of these deadly toxic weapons.
Covert operatives that he had recruited were unable to penetrate the Soviets' wall of secrecy, and so out of desperation, he contemplated the use of psychics to help uncover this critical information.
In reality, the U.S. Army was actually already considering the possibility of employing psychics for intelligence collection, but very few high-ranking officers were willing to risk their careers over the stigma associated with such a project.
Nonetheless, the U.S. Army began a funded study at the Stanford Research Institute to systemize psychic phenomena and develop a working tool by which non-psychics would also be able to be utilized, functioning for the purpose of acquiring reliable and consistent information.
Mr. Dames became the operations and training officer of this team, which ultimately achieved its goal by developing the technique now known as remote viewing.
Back in Washington, D.C., in 1984, Mr. Dames and his team applied their remote viewing abilities to the toughest national intelligence problems, such as locating and tracking international terrorists and their hostages.
Finally, uncovering key data surrounding the Soviet offensive biological warfare program.
The results of these efforts were briefed to Congress and the U.S. President.
For his work, Dames was awarded two Army Meritorious Service Medals and the Legion of Merit.
Additionally, he was personally credited by the Defense Intelligence Agency with penetrating the Soviet Defense Council.
In that agency's words, a singularly profound act.
Over the years, the remote viewing information collected continued to be secretly used by numerous government agencies and all branches of the military.
As a result of increasing turmoil and turnover in the ranks of top Army intelligence leadership during the late 1980s, channelers and psychic charlatans were recruited to commingle with trained professionals in the unit.
Worse yet, various politicians desiring information about their political and personal futures began to approach the project, turning it into a three-ring Circus.
Now, rather than being forced to stand by and witness the disintegration of his unit's effectiveness and the loss of remote viewing technology, the major retired from the U.S. Army, taking the original team's best and brightest with him to form his California-based company, SciTech.
In late 91, during the Gulf War, SciTech, in fact, provided intelligence on Saddam Hussein to the National Security Council, located Iraq's hidden biological warfare stockpiles for the UN.
These endeavors earned Mr. Dames and SciTech the attention of the world press.
Currently, SciTech's clients range from the leaders of Fortune 500 corporations to academics in science, medicine, and law, as well as select individuals from the private sector who undergo the firm's specialized training.
Since 1982, when Mr. Dames began teaching and employing these incredible skills, he's perfected remote viewing methods and techniques employing his technical remote viewing training and operations protocols, which guarantee his commercial clients an unprecedented 100% data accuracy rate.
Ed's personal interests include human potential, natural history, martial arts, physical fitness, and he is fluent in Chinese Mandarin.
But before we get to them, painful as it might be for those who have heard you many times and know what remote viewing is, I've been doing a number of programs recently, open line segments.
People will call up and say, Art, please, what is remote viewing?
So, painful as it may be to hear it again for some, many new affiliates and people have no idea what remote viewing is.
Rather than a brief history, I think I'll start out with sort of a definition.
In essence, this was a technique that was used as a military intelligence tool, and it was funded with your tax dollars and my tax dollars.
A breakthrough technique that allows any individual to be trained to psychically acquire knowledge of things and events distant in time and space.
In essence, we are trained psychics, and we're trained to the degree that someone who graduates from, say, SciSex training program is better than the most gifted natural psychic in history, more consistent and better at what they do.
The breakthrough technique developed in 1983 in the laboratory essentially is the syntax and the grammar, if you will, for the way that the unconscious mind communicates information to conscious awareness.
If you compare language, as I have so often done, if we're all born with an innate ability, the faculty to speak, but unless we're taught a language, that faculty remains just grunts and is garbled.
So this was the breakthrough discovery.
It's a way in which the grammar and the syntax for the communication of unconscious data to conscious awareness very accurately.
Without imagination getting in the way, we're taught how to recognize our imagination from the target, a person, a place, a thing, or an event.
And we learn how to suppress and manage analysis, our own personal biases of the incoming data, and keep that out of the way.
So what we're left with is very, very accurate data or information about a target, a target being, again, a person, a place, a thing, or an event anywhere in space or time.
For a trained and experienced technical remote viewer, it is not a difficult process.
It's just pretty much cut and dried like any other vocation.
And the application of that technology against the present and past, targets in the present and past, are of equal value.
Sometimes we run into technical problems in analysis and dealing with future targets.
And there the problem is not, again, with the remote viewing itself, with the perceptual part of the process.
It's with analysis.
Unless you're a very experienced analyst, you are not going to be able to successfully interpret the data vis-a-vis future targets.
Let me give you an example.
About a week before the Super Bowl, as a training target in my class, we remote viewed the winner of the Super Bowl.
And the psyche, the unconscious, is really in charge of the stratagem, the way in which it delivers up the information about the task to the remote viewer.
And in this case, across the board, the remote viewers were sketching the colors on the helmets of the CC.
But for some targets, if they're too far out, and the likelihood, hypothetically, if the likelihood of an event does not reach 100%, then we get information that's not consistent.
So let's say, using the Super Bowl again as an example, that two weeks prior to the game, it had not been adjudicated at some other level, the winner of the team.
Then we would get a mishmash of information and conflicting information and different colors from the opposing teams.
And an experienced analyst would know that it has not yet been worked out at another level yet.
We gather our information from the collective unconscious, or the global mind, if you will.
And it's very, very rigorously disciplined attention management.
And it is a skill.
It's not an experience.
It's a rigorous skill.
Very easy to do against easy targets and very easily teachable, but difficult against complex targets.
For those of your listeners who have access to the Internet, if they would like more information, SciTech has a brand new website up now, and they can download some more information.
And we have to qualify, of course, what we mean by flight 800.
You write down the name of the target.
You're taught to remote view specific problems.
And that's what this process is.
It's a problem-solving tool.
Unconscious is our best friend, and it's a master problem-solver.
So it knows, at the collective level and at the personal unconscious level, what the target is.
We used to say in the intelligence business, it's not okay to fool the enemy, or it's okay to fool the enemy, but it's not okay to fool yourself.
You're really, at the unconscious level, it's already at the target.
It's already in, since we, our individual unconsciousness, is immersed in the collective, all you're doing is turning your unconscious attention to the target in the collective.
If in your conscious mind, if your intent was turned toward a specific target, a person, a place, a thing, or an event, or a problem set, your unconscious is automatically grabbing that book in the Akashic Records Library or the Matrix, as we say in my business.
In the collective unconscious, think of it as a big database.
We're doing the required basics, and we'll get down to it shortly.
Many of you have no idea that our Senate has a bill, second time round in the Senate, that would require Treasury to issue a new money, eradicating, getting rid of our precious greenback and installing two new monies.
One would be a multicolored, well, both multicolored, really, one to use inside the U.S. and one out the possibility of a domestic devaluation of currency lurking in the remote view.
well, what should I say?
I should remote view this and know.
But I think that you don't need to be a remote viewer to see that we're headed toward an economic crisis of great magnitude, as every dollar that would go for anybody's favorite social program will, in fact, soon be going to the to service the interest on our national debt.
That's a true statement.
The number to call to get a copy of this Senate bill, for those who really want to know, and it's free and there's no obligation, is 1-800-877-9799.
Let's get back to target reference numbers, formerly called coordinates, formerly about 15 years ago when we first used them.
They're irrelevant to the task.
They're used for administrative purposes only.
If I wanted to turn my attention as a remote viewer to the perpetrators of the event down in San Diego, the persons or person who planted the pipe bomb, then I could simply do that and go through 45 minutes of protocols to establish basic identities of the people or persons who did that.
I do not need a target reference number to do it.
But when I task this task out to my professional viewers or I use it for a training target in instruction, then I assign it a random number so that the student or the professional does not know what the target is consciously.
That keeps conscious awareness out of the picture.
There are, and I know you're a stickler for controls.
And then these various people are given this target reference number.
They independently view the target.
Stop me when I've got it wrong.
And the results, in order for your company to issue a known result or something you've got 100% confidence in, all six or eight have to come back with the same or nearly the same result?
We only need mutually corroborating data from two remote viewers, two trained remote viewers.
That's it.
Because the training is so rigorous and we can trust the results, the controls are built into that regard.
When two remote viewers, two graduates, produce the same results working independently, the mutually corroborating data is what my company guarantees, and we do not need a third check.
Now, on very serious life or death situations where many lives are at stake, then we run triple and quadruple checks.
But if we're dealing with normal targets, missing persons or an Enigma or something like that, we still will go with 100%, we'll issue 100% money-back guarantee for our commercial clients with just two viewers mutually corroborating the data.
Again, there's actually a division of labor that's agreed upon at the unconscious level.
Two remote viewers will produce information, let's go back to the hostage example, on the outside of a building.
Two remote viewers will describe the interior of the building.
Two others might go, and this is done spontaneously, will describe the geographical terrain.
Or I can simply retask, refocus the targeting, and use wherever the viewer's original technical remote viewing probe took off from.
I can use that as a leverage point and say what's over here, what's over here, using very specific movement exercises.
I know this is complicated, but it's a complex tool.
It can be very simple, as simple as learning how to do a multiplication problem, or it can be advanced as solving a very advanced differential equation.
It's all mathematics, but it starts simple and it can become very complex.
But the tools that we have at our disposal as technical remote viewers, as experienced remote viewers, can indeed solve very complex problems.
Some are easy.
For instance, this metal sphere that was found in Texas the other day?
And it didn't get hit by a meteoroid, it was decommissioned.
It was not decommissioned by anybody that we know.
And so when we find things like that very enigmatic and extremely interesting, in this case I hate to use the word, I'm loath to use it, but it was a UFO that decommissioned Telstar 401.
And what my company does for living is to put together all of the science, engineering, and technical data that allowed that to happen.
And so we recreate the event the way and we establish how the satellite was decommissioned, exactly what happened, and what the perpetrators in this case were.
Yesterday, I did a very serious program on the subject of Philip Taylor Kramer.
And I talked to Philip's sister and his father.
He goes by the name of Taylor.
Two years ago, he disappeared from the face of the earth, seemingly.
Had been in the group Iron Butterfly, was doing some very esoteric work on fractal technology for data compression, designed the MX missile guidance system.
Pretty heavyweight guy.
Just poof, gone.
And I was asked by Kathy if you Would consider remote viewing in this case?
How frequently are ethics an issue in remote viewing?
In other words, what percentage of the time when people or companies, individuals come to you and they want you to do a job, how many times does it appear to be an ethical problem to you?
It was a non-problem when we were a military team.
Our operations were our operations.
And if we were remote viewing a terrorist or a foreign leader to drop a bomb on them, we would do it.
If we were remote viewing location of a hostage for Delta Force to free them, then we would do it.
We were always politically correct.
Now, in the commercial environment, and my company was founded in 1989, ethics have been an increasingly greater concern.
And what we found is that we've had to establish boundaries.
Our own ethics have come to play in this.
For instance, we have some celebrities that we use as training targets because of the impact that the trainees receive when they see what the target is.
Well, in the case of training, behind closed doors training, we have celebrities that we use, but we never enter their minds or go into their mind state.
We simply describe them, their physiognomies and countenances, their physical descriptions.
If we're dealing with deceased figures, then we'll go ahead and look at intent and those kinds of things.
And we have what we term a deep mind probe for our advanced students.
In a deep mind probe, we're going into a person's psyche to look for trauma.
Because in some cases, we do a lot of medical work also.
In some cases, a medical problem might be psychosomatic.
And if we look at the source of trauma, the trauma may be affecting behavior in an individual to the point where it may be detrimental to an individual's life or well-being or happiness.
So we do a lot of work in there, too.
We can go far deeper, far more quickly than hypnosis can go.
We work the Unibomber case with the FBI, and we have two other individuals that we've a project we call the Other Unibomber.
In fact, as I've mentioned before, the Bureau has mixed and matched bombers.
In the Unibomber case, Gaczynski is one of three players.
and uh...
it would be embarrassing for them to state that of course and they need that they need that some more evidence to We have, for the first time in history, we have a hand receipt from the deputy director of the Bureau for SciTech work.
But the Bureau is loath to talk about their association with us.
And this is a similar thing that we ran into in the military along these lines.
We're just a little bit tired of working bomb cases, Art, and we're not going to do it.
Another bombs could go on forever, as well as missing persons.
But it's better to train, for our company to act as a cadre, to train police forces and intelligence officials and intelligence teams to do this themselves, rather than sci-tech capacity constrained as we are to attempt to solve all these problems.
And as I'll mention later on in the program, there's something else that the public will be able to avail itself of.
I had many favorite types of targets, but our attention has been both riveted and almost entirely turned towards environmental issues now because we are discerning the loss of many, many lives.
And what we want to do is to look at prevention, prophylaxis, treatment, identification of disease vectors because we're right around the corner.
You were asking about the types of targets I like.
In a training environment, we do a lot of fun projects.
For instance, you'll see on our website in ensuing weeks our work on the so-called alien autopsy.
And we'll show you how that was faked, how water was pumped using aquarium pumps into a sack, and how the trigger pressure was kept up, and how the that's why there's no sound on the film, because you'd hear the pump in the background.
When you announce something like this, the fact that you have identified a hoax, and we're going to get to another one here in a moment, do you identify people?
Those kinds of things, how the great magicians of the world are able to do their things.
There, we're not going to really divulge.
Those are good training targets, but we're not going to divulge the methods by which someone like David Copperfield pulls off some of his stunts for obvious reasons.
Can you, for example, Ed, can you, for example, with respect again to the alien autopsy, can you remote view when there will be solid evidence of this hoax to the public?
In other words, when everybody will know through some other means than remote viewing?
It's something that would be worth doing probably.
But again, we're dealing with the Bureau, and the Bureau can't talk about their association with SciTech for two obvious reasons.
One, they're loath to do it, even though we arm twist a hand receipt out of them.
And two, they really can't talk about their ongoing cases.
So a SciTech technical remote viewing doesn't get the kind of credibility and the boost that it needs in the public eye if its results are not divulged to the public.
I understand that in the remote viewing community, everybody follows what's going on very carefully, and I'm sure that Ed has followed what has gone on with Courtney Brown.
And I know that all of you have.
So obviously, Ed, we would like to get your take on the whole Courtney Brown affair.
That is something that is going to put SciTech out of business eventually, because we expect that when this gets in the hands of the public, the attention is going to be off SciTech because the public's going to be able to do this.
And we think that people like Stephen Hawkins and others will evolve this into a much more powerful tool.
Well, what they did not know is that we were experimenting and beta testing tapes for years, more than a decade, to make sure to come up with effective means of guaranteeing that this could be taught using videotape.
And we finally did it.
It was a lot of work.
And the other reason is that people are not going to believe this.
Many people are not, because many people do, of course, because they sign up for courses.
But they're just not going to really know it's true unless they do it for themselves.
let me tell you what my warning, I think Father Malachi Martin was right.
If you are not dealing with a balanced person and you put this technology into the hands of someone like that, it's going to take them possibly over the edge.
But most people are balanced, and most people are going to take this and use it for discovery, self-discovery, exploration, And bettering the world.
In other words, if someone uses it to commit a crime or to discern information to commit a crime, other remote viewers can very quickly turn the spotlight, so to speak, on who the perpetrator of the crime was.
And when you see the tapes, when you're seeing neurosurgeons and young adults, teenagers, and children doing this, it sort of puts things in perspective.
At any rate, if people are interested in these tapes, I can give you an 800 number or the website address again, and we can talk more later in the program about these tapes.
There's a course description on that, and they can order it, or they could order through our website, or they can write my company in Beverly Hills if they choose.
Well, I think by default, I'm back in the position of having to defend it.
But what I'm defending is the idea of remote viewing.
I'm not defending technical remote viewing, which is what we developed as a military tool and what I employ in my company operations.
Courtney Brown, as many of your listeners know, was one of my students.
And what he chose to do with his nascent skills was to put together an institute, which I thought was very, very odd.
Being a new graduate, I think that would be tantamount to someone with a baccalaureate putting together a university.
And nevertheless, he did that.
But that's not the problem.
The problem was that he abandoned all of the rigor, the essential rigor that we teach in our introductory training tape.
And he threw it out the door.
Not only did he do that, but two of my other students, one, a physician, medical doctor, who was a teacher at that institute and should have known better also throughout the protocols.
And, you know, there's an analogy here.
I asked myself the other day, why am I upset at Courtney?
And I thought about it.
I knew I was upset, but I couldn't put my finger on exactly why until I remembered something.
About eight years ago, I was on an airliner, and I was talking to a young flight attendant, a young man in his early 20s.
And in response to his question about what I did for a living, I told him what I did.
And I enjoy, as always, talking about my work.
It's very interesting.
And instead of the barrage of questions that I normally get when I talk about sci-tech and tech and remote viewing, this young man looked at me and he said, I knew people could do this.
And he didn't ask me any questions.
And I watched him for the remainder of the flight walk up and down and just in another world.
And what I realized was that what Courtney has done is he's taken away people's hope.
I went onto their website and instructed them how to target, properly target that so-called companion, to not assume, to simply take a photograph, the one that they had, to put a circle, and this is actually the very unambiguous way that we can target something, to draw a circle around the photograph of the so-called companion and call that the target.
And if it is not a real thing, and in this case it apparently wasn't, what a professional remote viewer will do is start to download information and write down sketches of somebody sitting in a room somewhere hunched over a photograph or a light table instead of being out in space somewhere.
And it's just a piece of cake for SciTech or any of the people that are trained in the home study course, for goodness sake, to put a circle around a target like that, and they'll be taught how to properly target and queue in the home study course and to stay in technical remote queuing structure, that is to go right by the rules, right by the book, and they'll be able to discern exactly what the nature of that target is.
What Courtney did was to take, it's essentially, it's dilettanteism.
It would be like discovering an airliner and using it as a snowblower or a ground taxi, never knowing what he could do or knowing how to fly it.
All right, now let's get down to the harder aspect of it, the one that I have addressed.
The photograph that we were given ostensibly from a top ten university professor has, to my satisfaction and almost everybody else, has been shown to have been a fraud.
A perpetrated hoax, a fraud.
Taken originally from a photograph posted on the University of Hawaii's website, and it had been there since, I think, September 1 of 95.
And can you, will you, would you be willing to remote view who committed that fraud?
Because right now, if you've read Courtney's statement, and I'm sure you have, he is unwilling to allow us to pursue any of the alleged existing physical evidence.
We'd be perfectly willing to do that, but you have to make a decision what you would like first, Mr. Kramer or again, we are capacity constrained, and we do have an in-house project in addition to training scientists and engineers, and I'll tell you about that if you're interested.
That's why I am put in the position to defend remote viewing by default.
And I'm not happy about that.
And that is, I've experienced a great deal of angst on the part of the so-called Farsight Institute.
And this is the epitome of that, I think.
Yes, we can hunt down the perpetrators like we do any other any other source of information or any other problem source.
But I would like to go after Philip Taylor Kramer first, because I think that's a lot more fun.
Because we've got a person, a living, breathing person that we can knock on, whose door we can knock on or whose remains we can dig up.
And there we have, I mean, it's not as titillating as the hoax, but it's more practical, I think, and more demonstrative of how powerful these skills are and how rapidly they can be employed.
Well, I think that the damage, I don't know what good it would do to expose someone who's already gotten away with what they got away with, but they certainly exposed the lack of prescience and foresight at the Farsight Institute.
We not only located the biological warfare or chemical canisters, we entered the bunker, the command bunker of Saddam Hussein and downloaded all his battle plans.
Then we went into his mind for the National Security Council and downloaded his intent.
Then we went deeper and looked at his emotional state and how he got there from childhood.
Folks, we're about to get to the rather grim segment here.
And so I really am serious.
If this kind of material bothers you, then please turn your radio off.
If children are present, please get them out of the room.
We are going to talk about some future events that are going to be very disturbing.
And, Ed, over the programs that we have done together, you have predicted that the environmental problems are going to worsen and quickly.
At one point, you said something I'll never forget, the jet stream is going to come down on deck.
And I'll be damned if over the last six months I've not heard, well, I don't know how many weathermen say, look out for high winds, 100, 130 miles an hour.
And either prior to or after the event, they've said the jet stream literally has been coming down low almost on The ground.
That's what they've been saying.
In front of me, from the Orgonian on the 29th, another story about frogs.
Scientists still have no idea what's going on with the frogs.
Here it says biologists are alarmed.
They consider frogs a kind of early warning system for planet Earth.
And in fact, all over the place now, deformed frogs are everywhere.
Extra legs, eyes in the wrong places, growth deformities beginning to occur.
But I want to set the stage to talk about the effects of something that is associated with hailbop by revisiting some of these issues.
The frogs, for instance, we already talked about why the frogs are mutating and dying, and that's directly attributable to the ozone layer.
Any egg, any living thing in the developmental stages that is directly exposed to increasingly high levels of shortwave ultraviolet UVB is going to die, mutate and die, and that's happening now.
So we talked about that.
We talk about a lot of insect pollinators, daytime pollinators, bees and other insects that pollinate our fruit trees and other crops.
They are dying from increased UV.
The weather changes, you see, and that's going to get worse.
And what that will do is preclude, as I've mentioned so many times before, growing crops, food crops, the way that we have done in the past.
In fact, very, very rapidly this year, beginning this year, food prices are going to skyrocket because there isn't going to be a lot of food because of these vicissitudes of the weather.
So we're going to have to start thinking about growing food in a different way, a different fashion.
So these things are happening down here now, and there's actually a coup d'égrace coming.
There's a special delivery package associated with that comet.
And to backtrack a little, when we are in training or when I give calibration targets to my professionals, sometimes I send them just a target to work, just to make sure they're still online and their skills are up.
Well, when we use comets as training targets, I generally expect a sketchback of an icy, hot, rocky thing way out in space.
And that's what we usually get, and that's what my professionals are trained to do, and that's what my students are trained to do, too.
That's the kind of thing that our home study course allows you to be capable of doing, gives you the skill to do that.
In the case of Hellbot, so it was supposed to be just another training target, but both the professionals and the students were describing something that was not quite natural associated with the comet.
And when we place that under scrutiny, using our most skilled viewers, and I took many of them, I took the best and the brightest from the military team with me, and I trained people far better than what their military viewers were ever capable of doing.
So we know what we're doing in this.
There are something awry with Hailbop, and to wit, the following.
There is not a companion to Hailbop.
But there was, and may possibly be still, something affixed to it.
And that something is a cylindrical area of the comet, a cylindrical area that is hollow.
And we do not know the scale on this, by the way, Art.
We know that it's big, but we don't know how big.
Of the cylindrical region.
And in that cylindrical region, that is, is a space.
You're familiar with the idea that comets produce meteor showers.
The comet goes away, and then in the ensuing months you have meteor showers.
The meteor showers are a result of debris that breaks off from the comet as it passes through the solar system, and then Earth passes through that debris, and we have meteor showers that are associated with comets.
And that plant pathogen will strike down, will actually lay a swath across initially equatorial Africa.
And it will quickly infect anything that's green, beginning with trees.
And the equatorial region will act as the incubator.
And this pathogen, and we're still looking at the biochemistry of it, will spread like wildfire, just like the out of a science fiction book, Andromeda Strain or what have you, and will start to eliminate everything that's green.
We think it goes after the nitrogen fixation mechanism in the plants, but we need to do more work on this, and we will.
And I began to wonder some time ago, this goes back to last night's show and a lot of other shows that I've done recently.
I began to wonder why the Vatican had such an intense interest in astronomy, so much so that they muscled their way on to Mount Graham and they've got an observatory up there in conjunction with the University of Arizona, but they mainly run the lion's share of it.
The Vatican does.
Why would the Vatican be so doggone interested in astronomy?
Well, I thought that the original intent, isn't it historically that they were trying to establish or disprove Copernican theory or something like that?
Or is it that at Fatima someone was told something and they're trying to, I think they're looking for a milestone.
I think that the Catholic Church knows something, and they know that when a certain thing happens, that is the beginning of some grand changes on Earth.
Let's say that as far as man is concerned, the gardener harvests soul, just like you harvest a crop.
When you harvest a crop, all the green stuff goes back into the ground, and you harvest something, and you take it away, the finer part of it.
If the garden is being destroyed or is weed choked, a point may be reached where you till the garden under or you let it go fallow for a while and then you replant it.
Well, in this case, I think that it's not just that analogy.
I think in this case, the earth is hurting.
There are something on the surface of the earth, again I'm still speculating, that's like a canter.
And it's like the cells have grown out of control.
And the earth needs some help for a disease that it didn't have enough information immunologically to handle.
You know, I've mentioned before to you that I've never looked at my death.
I really don't want to do that, actually.
But I've walked a fine line and stood right there at the edge, dimensionally speaking, where death was right behind me, and I've looked back so I could assess my life from that perspective in time, from the end of my life, to see if there's anything I'd like to do differently now, so to speak.
Sure.
And generally speaking, there were a few things here and there that I need to work on.
But as I leave the planet, when I die, I have one regret.
I see something that I can't change, and that's the Earth.
We've trashed the Earth, and I'm equally responsible for doing that, and there's nothing I can do to change it.
And so when I leave this planet, this world, I leave that idea behind that I trashed the Earth, and I'm partially responsible for doing that.
So especially in the developed countries where we have some wealth, but as food stocks go down, you're going to find some hard times, and the streets will be increasingly unsafe, much less products on the shelves.
And we're going to need to protect food crops.
We're going to need to look at technologies that isolate growing plants from airborne particulate matter.
That's not a hard technology to do, thank goodness.
It doesn't mean that it has to be a closed system.
We're talking about a greenhouse that's protected using filters to filter out probably one micron or better particulate matter like spores or whatever the heck this is that's going to be in the air so that plants can grow and produce food isolated from the environment.
That's not a difficult technology.
But we're going to need to start to do that now at household level and at village level, so to speak.
It seems, in a way, so unfair because, you know, even I know, Ed, that America, industrialized America, consuming America, has probably, in a way, done more damage to the environment by a long shot than anybody in Africa ever dreamed about.
I think my best guess at this juncture is, especially beginning about a year from now, is to start planning on how to stockpile food.
Because I think this thing is going to run its course possibly two or three years.
But stockpiling food is not good enough.
We're going to have to look at technologies to isolate food crops.
And I think there are corporations that should start getting involved here, or even individuals.
If we grow, plastic aquaria type of habitats that are sealed to grow crops, that kind of thing will work.
But you know, really, it's not going to happen because this is just so bizarre and it is so off the wall that it's going to be hard to be believable until Africa gets hit and acts as a warning and then technology will scramble to start putting things in place.
Telstar 401 decommissioned, Ed says, decommissioned the word by a UFO.
The Texas Sphere found, the one that came down the other night, a fuel cell from a satellite.
Ed is going to be remote viewing Mr. Kramer, the subject of last night's show.
That is going to be a soon project.
The big news, well, it's filled with big news.
Ed is turning remote viewing loose on the world.
He's actually issuing videotapes.
I guess he's marketing them.
That will teach you how to remote view at home.
Something that will really put Ed Dames himself out of business eventually.
There is an 800 number for those.
Glad to give it out.
It's 1-800-556-0391.
1-800-556-0391.
And I guess if the immediate future is as Ed says it's going to be, we'll get to that in a second, that he might as well let everybody know how to remote view themselves.
How many people, Ed, are going to be able to handle viewing or seeing what you're saying is coming?
All the things that you said in past shows, babies dying, the jet stream coming to the ground, the environment worsening rapidly, all of these things fit into what you're now saying, which is, check me if I'm wrong, but Comet Hailbop has, in some way, attached to it a hollow sphere.
Actually, it's a cylinder filled with very solid spheres.
These spheres appear to disintegrate.
They appear, it looks as if it would be meteoroids or a meteor shower coming in the Earth.
But they essentially use the analogy of dissolving in the atmosphere.
As you hit the atmosphere, there really doesn't seem to be an impact per se, but they come in in a swath over equatorial Africa, dissolve in the atmosphere, and in it are, we actually have some pretty good sketches of these particular spore-like things.
They look like diatoms with spikes on them, with sticky spikes.
I don't think we'll perceive it as a meteor shower.
There will be only a few of these things that appear, that we detect entering the atmosphere, and they do appear to come in initially over equatorial Africa.
Well, I mean that if that had been the case, if SciTech had been, we don't have photographic capability and we were too busy on other things, but if we did do something like that, Courtney could, if their team, if their team knew about it, and they certainly could at least mount an effort to try to remote view the perpetrators,
if they fingered his former teacher as the perpetrator, then I would not have taken down my whole institute if I were Courtney Brown and martyred everybody there to protect Ed Dames and SciTech.
I guess it's too early, since you haven't done the work, to ask you what a number of factors are asking, and that is if Courtney was set up or had knowledge.
That, I guess, is going to take quite a session for you to determine.
All right, here's somebody who says, wouldn't SciTech have a whole lot to gain by discrediting the Farsight Institute, particularly with a brand new home study course product coming out?
I could answer that one.
I think that you discredit Farsight.
Once this is out, it seems to me the remote viewing companies, institutes, people who have done it and taught people for, you know, it is thousands of dollars to go through the course.
And again, again, you're in effect going to put yourself out of business fairly quickly.
They're teaching a group experience, and they cannot go away armed with a skill from those other courses.
That's different from the training tables that SciTech's putting on the streets, and it was very difficult to develop those protocols.
But what SciTech will be doing is all of our in-house resources will be devoted, I'd say about 90%, to working with some of the world's best physicians and doctors on this, on medical problems.
We want to save as many lives as possible, and we'll need to work with the experts on that.
Dear Art, I'm sorry, but it seems to me that everyone, including you in this case, are confusing the issue about Courtney Brown and the fake photo.
Ed Dames implies that all of the Courtney Brown remote viewing was false because the photo he received from the alleged professor was not, was false, rather.
But the Courtney people were not remote viewing that photo.
They were viewing the Ed actually Chuck Schramack photo, which has not been shown to be a fake.
Well, there's a big argument about that, but it is true that what Courtney claimed to remote view was the shramak photograph, not the one that he used as backup that has now been shown to be a fraud, but the shramak photograph.
Now, let me ask you this, in all fairness, to Courtney Ed.
He did find something definitely anomalous and hollow.
He said, following or near Halebach, you are describing a sphere hollow.
Well, Courtney went on to say that the sphere was a spaceship filled with Andromedans and Pleiadeans.
In this case, it wasn't Andromedans.
It's an Andromeda strain.
That is a country mile art.
It's as much a country mile as saying that a swarthy, dark, Arab-looking person fired a shoulder-fired missile at TWA Flight 800 when, in fact, the air-driven pump in System 3 broke.
Imagination, your preconceived notions start to come in, and you'll say that if something is long and appears to be cylindrical and metallic, well, then it must be alien.
And if it's alien, it must be a spaceship.
That's what I mean about analysis.
Whereas imagination, if it comes, as people who purchase sitex tapes will know in the introductory tape, which I think is being sold for $49.95, and I think it's free if you buy the home study package, that tape shows you that if you have a clear picture in your mind,
because not all the information is visual, a clear, static, non-moving picture in your mind that you can return to time and again, that is always imagination, every single time.
And why is there such a temptation for Courtney or anybody else who might have attended your school to modify, change, and cherry-pick these protocols?
I think the excitement, the absolute, it's such an incredible thing.
About day three or four of the course, people are, it's, oh my God, this is real syndrome.
It starts to happen.
It's such an exciting thing.
It's so incredible that students begin to lose their bounds immediately.
And then if they want to commercialize this, and SciTech, there's no prescriptions on what our students do with this technology.
We have a large group that has put together an enterprise in Europe, but they're being careful about their protocols.
I think they're concerned that SciTech's protocols will sue them or will claim a copyright infringement or something else like that.
And in fact, that's not the case.
So they could have maintained the rigor of technical remote viewing.
If I would have dropped in on the Farside Institute and seen that my erstwhile students were using the same protocols, I would have been glad to put the site stamp of approval on that and say the Farside Institute is using technical remote viewing protocols in a kosher way.
But in fact, they threw them out because I think that Professor Brown was concerned that he wanted to call it his own.
Ed Dames, Major Ed Dames, SciTech Ed Dames, is with us.
Spooky, spooky, spooky.
That's what OneFaxer says, and he's sure right about that.
Anyway, we'll get back to it in just one moment.
All right, back now to Ed Dames and some very sobering, or to use this factor's words, spooky stuff.
All right, Ed, you're back on the air.
This factor goes on to say, is it possible the reason that remote viewers and time travelers hit a wall in the year 2012 and find no one after that date is that we have all gone to another time or dimension via time travel or ETs or whatever?
And the working hypothesis, and it's that only, by the way, it may be something that's truly beyond our ken, is that time changes, that there is an event that is global, that something happens to the world that makes all the event timelines change.
All right, dear Art Ned, President Clinton just recently signed a bill to spend millions of dollars to clean up and thoroughly reorganize our food inspections, processing, and so forth.
Might this have anything to do with what you're talking about tonight?
Could the government secretly be remote viewing and know the food problems are on the way?
There are some secret studies that go to the President, but that's not one.
One of them is, for instance, the Center for Disease Control has a study that's not publicly available, and that deals with mass epidemics of influenza.
And it only goes to the White House direct because responsible agencies like the CDC don't want to start a mass panic or hysteria or have it get out of hand.
You know, conspiracy theories pop up and mass hysteria manifest itself.
But that one has nothing to do with knowledge or foreknowledge or presence on the part of the administration.
The bottom line here, the proverbial bottom line, as far as we're concerned, is we must corporately as a nation, or if we can't do that, as small groups of people, protect our food crops from the ravages of weather and disease.
That's what it boils down to.
And we're going to have to start thinking about the technologies, and they're not complex, but they still have to be started now to do that.
But wouldn't it be more horrible to deny the information to people so they would not be able to survive?
And lacking that information, there are many people out there who, of course, consider this a crock.
I understand.
I would.
I certainly would, as a man of science, had I not been ensconced in a top secret unit that did this kind of thing and perfected it into a technology.
But there are many others who are listening and wondering.
And when their relatives and their sons and daughters and parents start to learn remote viewing and they all come up with the same information, you've got to sit back and begin to wonder and begin to think about insurance, insurance policy in the form of food.
Because if everybody is correct, now it's not just SciTech speaking.
Now it's a lot of people who are saying the same thing.
Well, I suppose an executor's blade, if viewed swinging in the sun and glinting, could be described possibly as a beautiful sight, but it's not going to have a beautiful result.
All right, let's try some calls and see what people have to say.
Open lines, so anything's possible, Ed.
East of the Rockies, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
Yeah, well, you're going to have, I would speculate, a certain degree of a Mad Max scenario when the food stocks start to be depleted and you have a global economic collapse.
Remote Finn is a lot of work, as you might know, and projects take some time.
For instance, just finding this Mr. Kramer will take us a week to guarantee his location.
And we can't look at everything.
And we haven't looked at the New Madrid fault area specifically.
So I don't have any information on that, nor do I have any information on volcanism in general, just predominantly other areas of geophysics, weather in particular, and the ozone layer.
We haven't looked at volcanism.
When people are trained, they can do that themselves.
A lot of times in training, we look at what we do for our trainees are what we call an optimum personal trajectory.
We look at where they should be in life as opposed to where they're going.
Sort of a sidetrack that can fulfill, make them happier.
And lots of, recently, in the last year or so, many of the so-called optimum trajectories, and in advanced courses we teach people how to do this in the tape modules, people were standing around in places planting plants and living in environments all that were fairly much homogeneous in terms of protection.
And all the optimum trajectories were beginning to look the same.
And we were wondering what was going on, and it was that the optimum trajectory is simply, if you want to be happy, you have to be alive.
And these were steps that people were taking in the future to stay alive.
And all these trajectories, these personal futures were looking the same.
And that's how we started to think, uh-oh, what's going on here in the world?
A lot of the dark matter in the universe, the matter that's not accountable for, those worlds, those spheres are not dark when you have different eyes to live there with.
And essentially, we're reconstructed on those worlds.
So your personality continues, and I won't get into all the spiritual dynamics in this conversation.
And he tried to trick him because he had a lot of secrets between his wife when he was alive.
And this medium said that I'll talk to your wife, and she can talk through me to you.
And he went ahead and did that, and he went back four times, and there was no way that he didn't get the right answers.
So he began to believe it.
So then he started talking to his wife, asking what it was like after death.
And she said, I live in an unrestricted, time is no problem.
I can be in two places almost instantly.
Her image and everything like that, she could walk through tables or walls or anything she wanted because I got to thinking about that and I figured that if you believe in mental telepathy Between a medium and the dead, there has to be some medium there.
There has to be some transmission.
And my concept was that when we die, our soul dies because that's part of our mind, but our spirit is transmitted.
It's the dogaundus thing, and the fact of the matter is, up to three-quarters of an ounce of weight, otherwise totally unaccountable for, would be lost at the exact instant of death.
Furthermore, if you completely darken the room, you can, as many of your listeners know, see, or especially people whose vision extends into the long wave, long blue, they can see something flickering above the body.
If we're dealing with large-scale events, especially geophysical events like earthquakes, volcanoes, and weather changes, we're going to stand by our information based upon our empirical data based upon the last 13 years of working problems like this.
In fact, it's one of the easiest things for a newly trained remote viewer to remote view is the next geophysical catastrophes, those types of things.
But if there are a lot of personal decisions to be made, for instance, the next presidential election or something like that, then we can't even get close until just prior to the event because you have so many individual decisions at work.
And those individual decisions, despite what people think, don't affect geophysical changes.
I know out there in a lot of the New Age community, I don't use that term disparagingly, at least I used to.
I am one now.
People think that there are tulpas or thought forms that can go out and a mass thought can influence geophysical activity, but that does not appear to be the case.
And even if it could, we're not united enough as individuals, groups, and nations to find out.
If enough people became convinced what you're suggesting about the comet and the plant pathogen are true, we do have, after all, a space program and NASA.
Would there not be something they could do about it?
And what we're talking about here is pretty far out.
The artificial structures in the Sidonia region of Mars, for instance, many people agree that there's something there, but NASA is still in denial that that's so.
It would be a much further stretch for them to accept this kind of information here.
I think that if we're connected spiritually, we'll be able to know where sanctuary is, whether it's something we have to do or someplace we have to go.
In my case, and my family's case, and for my family, it's a place where we have to go.
Is there individual predestination or predetermination, or can we individually make choices that will affect our own personal futures, irrespective of what's coming, the big one here?
I wanted to ask both of you if you're aware that Mr. Sheramick happened to be on a Worldwide Christian broadcast about two weeks prior to your Courtney Brown show.
And that I don't know if to call it a hoax or whatever or his involvement with it, but that may help you if you intend to remote view the source of the whatever you want to call it.
And, you know, I've just been reading Fred Hoyle's work on Diseases from Space that talks about some of the technical aspects of pathogens falling from the tails of comets.
It's pretty fascinating.
Anyway, I've also been reading Schnabel's book, and in the epilogue, he talks about a prediction, Ed, that you had made in March 1993 about pregnant females giving birth in the New Mexican desert.
And I'm wondering whatever happened to that prediction.
It deals with technologies that are used by extraterrestrials that are moving in and out of the atmosphere.
We cannot, as a team, reverse engineer or describe the technology that motivates those vehicles, the ones that are manned, and I use that term loosely.
We can't discern the technology.
It's too advanced.
But there is one thing we have been able, we think we can reconstruct, and the reasons why I'll get into it in a moment.
There is sort of a, if you're familiar with radar corner reflectors, when a radar, the specific bandwidth and frequency shines out, illuminates forward, if you cut a metal piece a certain way, it acts as a mirror for the radar screen in the scope that shines very brightly.
Well, if you're way out in space and you're flying something, and you had, let's say, let's hypothesize a neutrino or high-power gamma-ray emanator and you illuminated, say, an entire hemisphere of Earth looking for your landing post that was perhaps underground, then if you had a passive device that was cut to reflect neutrinos or gamma rays back up at you, this would be a passive device that would be like a mirror for neutrinos or gamma rays.
Then that would be very bright, and it might even project up a glide path so you can hone right into your base.
Well, that might be a doable technology.
And in fact, what our company is working on is replicating what appears to be something like that, let's call it a corner reflector right now that's passive.
And if we emplace it in a certain spot, and that spot is illuminated, all of a sudden there'll be a different mirror that's never been out there before.
And that will imply to any intelligent agencies that are flying vehicles that, hey, they have been able to replicate our technology.
They not only know we're here, but somehow they were able, and of course this will be deduced, they are able through consciousness to know what our technology is.
Because there's another beacon out there that hasn't been there before and it doesn't belong to us.
So in essence, that's what my company is doing, and we're placing that in a very strategic location to invoke contact rather than provoke it.
unidentified
In the meantime, your viewing does not suggest of any assistance from E.T. in this coming disaster.
I don't know specifically what the question is, but I think I can give you something that's interesting and it works very well.
If you discipline your mind, just before you go to sleep, if you push all the, I think I mentioned this before, Art, if you push all the other thoughts out of your mind and you frame a question, many of your listeners know this already, if you frame it, just like you would frame a picture, the specific question, and you go to sleep, putting a lot of energy into that question to the exclusion of all other data and noise, when you wake up, you've got about 30 seconds.
What Schnavel fails to mention is his affiliation with the CIA.
He worked in engineering at DDO, the Deputy Director for Operations, for two years.
And he attempted to not only debunk remote viewing, but he's part of the damage control effort that the CIA has as a result of this coming public 15% accuracy rate, that kind of thing.
So I wanted your listeners to know that.
Although the book is still, the history is well written, it's part of a damage control effort.
And when Jim took the course with SciTech, he did very well as a trainee, and he was very angry that it worked because he set out to debunk it.
And it was very difficult for him to do that.
In fact, he couldn't, and he became quite a good remote viewer, but nevertheless left angry.
We picked up the gauntlet and let him know, and all the people in SciCop know, but all their investors seem to have pulled out when they found out SciTech said we can do it.
And as some of your listeners know who have been on the web, Amazing Randy can't seem to respond to SciTech.
What we think is happening is all the SciCop pledges who pledged $10,000 to $20,000 to support that, when they found out the SciTech accepted the challenge and they pulled out.
It doesn't look like it may not be there any longer.
It may have already separated, but it appears to be at a point it will either degrade and split off, or it will separate in its entirety and enter the Earth's atmosphere as micro-particulate matter, essentially a meteor shower associated with the comet.
Anybody who really does study what's going on with the environment right now, really, even a shallow look and doesn't end up angry, red-faced angry, is not paying attention.
First time caller online, you're on the air with Ed Dames.
Hi.
unidentified
Hi, I'm Bill from Washington State, and I live on the Columbia River, so great.
I've got a question.
What's the difference between remote viewing and OBE or astral projection?
And as you know, over the years, and we've talked about this many times, you know I've talked about the quickening.
It's just a general observation of a non-remote viewer, me, a talk show host, who listens to the news every day.
Some might argue overexposed to it.
But I really do see events accelerating without question in every category, geophysical, political, economic, social, every single category, events are definitely quickening toward something.
For instance, when we turn our attention to something like this specific pathogen, we're going to look at this pathogen.
We have no idea what it is and its effects.
So we're going to need to go down to the molecular level as technical remote viewers and to look at its effects at molecular action sites at the plant cell level in order to perhaps come up with or help plant pathologists understand what they're dealing with.
First of all, regarding affecting someone or something from a distance, do you consider radionic technology to be valid?
And if so, why not use this technology to destroy the plant pathogens?
And also, other cases when one can block your attempts to view something, especially if it's by the person you're attempting to learn something about.
And I asked this with Courtney Brown in mind as he said, I believe it was John Mack's book, his most recent book, Courtney said they were unable to view something because of the grays blocking them up until about a month before the release of this book.
And that's the reason I'm asking you if you've encountered something like that where a block is intentionally put in your way and what it's like.
There's another race here, but we think it's, I don't, I really, at this juncture, I don't want to talk about them, but it does appear to be a colony of humanoids that do not look very dissimilar from us.
And I don't want to go into it beyond that.
But yes, they're here.
They're here on the ground with us after the stuff hits the fan and the air clears.
I've got three important questions, but before I ask, I'd like to say in response to what was said earlier, the reason for Mr. Daines giving this information out at this time, I believe I understand, for responsible people to prepare.
And I appreciate very much that you're doing this, sir.
Nowhere will be safe, but most of the survivors appear to be in temperate North America and Europe.
unidentified
Okay, I'm connected with scientists all over the world and Professor Murray Albertson, he was the co-founder of the Peace Corps, and there's a nonprofit organization, Villages.
He works with it.
These people know me and I know them.
And we're preparing to help villages all over the world.
I would like at some time to be able to speak to you privately.
I want to help Dr. Courtney Brown.
He knows me.
Also, the third question, just food for thought.
At the appropriate time, you might consider, because you said you can, in fact, give thoughts to leaders and bringing these leaders together with the proper thoughts in order to prepare.
If this is to come to pass, what about the rainforests all over the world?
They're a direct link to the weather around the world, and if they didn't exist, we here in the U.S. would not receive much rain, and without rain, the U.S. would be without water.
They discovered and they're observing an object, an asteroid object, since January 10th that they're studying that's possibly on a collision course with Earth.
And I wanted to mention that with all that's going on globally, with all the weather pattern changes, I wanted to mention that hemp flourishes in the ultraviolet light.
And it's a strong survivor.
It's a survivor of a plant.
And also that people are gaining experience growing it indoors already illegally right now, but that's not for the hemp plant.
There's a lot of plants that thrive in high levels of UV, but most, unfortunately, most other life forms, including insect eggs, that do not live below the surface of the leaves, but live on top, they die.
And that's why I say that this pathogen that's inbound will deliver the coup de grace, because it takes out the things that are going to thrive, the rest of the food that we eat.
First time caller line, you're on the air with that dames.
Hi.
unidentified
Hi, fantastic.
It is such a privilege to be able to speak with you and with Major, and I can't believe that I got in.
I wanted to call and mention a few things that I think of great importance to both of you.
I know that they will be to me in the near future.
In light of what Major Dames has said, I think that there are certain things that we should start, people will say hoarding, but there are things that we will have to have, I believe, to survive these years, these sorrowful years to come in the near present.
And one of them is simply sulfur.
Sulfur being, as you know, prior to World War II, that's what was used for wounds and to keep infection down or to stop it.
Basically, and it is not an antibiotic.
Also, seal a meals to be able to vacuum seal dry fruits and to dry your food to where it's still nutritious and edible.
Listen, you've got your radio on in the background.
unidentified
Oh, sorry.
I'm so sorry.
I should know better.
I listen to you religiously.
And I, again, thank you for you because you're a medium that we're dependent on this, I believe, for our survival.
And again, I thank you.
I also wanted to ask Major James if he was familiar with what is happening with our Meat suppliers, and with the, as one caller had mentioned, or either it was you, about the condition of our food source and how that was part of Clinton's campaign,
this past one, where he said because we are the most advanced country in the world, that it's only right that we should have a means of inspecting our meat sources more conducive to the level that we live at.
Instead of technically, and this is technically speaking, the method that the government has prescribed and only method prescribed for examination of our meat is called touch and smell.
And this is without any type of tissue sampling being done.
This is without anything other than that, which is so absurd considering where we have gone technologically speaking on a medical level and the advancements that we've been able to, the things that we are consuming in our body, all we have to do is look at it, you know, push it around a little bit and sniff it.
It's amazing.
Anyway, one of the main reasons that I'm calling other than what I've just mentioned is that I had a dealing with the federal government and it was very, very scary and it was involving these parasites.
I have two twins that are diabetic from infancy and it is non-congenital.
This also goes along with what Major James has said in regards to the milk supply.
We believe that there was a crossing over in my milk of which they absorbed a chemical that led to the breakdown of the language cells in the pancreas, which is basically the symptoms of diabetes.
The one child that readily breastfed, he succumbed to the disease 13 months prior to the other child that when, just like an animal, when I would put him to the breast and he was extremely hungry, he would look up at me, and this is from small infancy, very angry, and he would refuse the breast, even though he was very hungry.
He sent something in the milk.
Now he didn't succumb to the disease for another year, although he did breastfeed.
I was able to, I have a Bauchen Low microscope in my home, and without going in and getting very verbose, because I know time is of the essence, make a long story short, I detected in the pork supply now 60 minutes, and one of the other nationwide news programs has chastised the meat manufacturing industry in Northern California for the peak.
In fact, my challenge that I would like to take on would be Stephen Hawkins.
Because of the techniques that we use using the autonomic nervous system, we think that not only is it quite easy for a blind person to learn this, but I think I would like to personally teach Stephen Hawkins, the famous English physicist.
unidentified
Would I be able to use your video course to achieve this?
There's two important things that we illustrate in the video that you have to see prior to using our protocols, our checklist that comes with the video.
And you have to have somebody take your hand, and hold it, literally hold your hand, and produce some marks on the paper in a certain way.
After you experience that, there's no problem any longer.
I need someone to do that one time.
unidentified
So once that's over with you, I can just go on and do the rest of it.
It appears that, unfortunately, I did not want to believe this, nor did I for many years.
It appears that one, this is cursory information.
We did not double check the work, but we do have two remote viewing sessions that indicate that the lachette that punctured JFK's Adams apple was fired from within the vehicle.
There really was a day, Ed, when I believed everything the FBI, if the FBI would come to a podium, make an announcement, boy, I'll tell you, it was good as gold for me.
And I don't know exactly when that day stopped, but it was sometime after the assassination.
That changed America.
That was a real turning point in America for a lot of people, whether you believe in a conspiracy or not.
JFK's murder, assassination, was a turning point, wasn't it?
Let me answer the question about the Schnombl book first.
Jim Schnombel did a pretty good job researching the early history of remote viewing and the Department of Defense.
A very good job indeed.
It kind of fell apart in the end.
But what the public doesn't know is that Jim worked for the CIA for two years and that he was part of the disinformation campaign to discredit it last year.
Jim took my remote viewing course when the company was based in Albuquerque and did a darn good job in the course.
But he came to debunk remote viewing and he went away very angry that it worked.
So I think you can see some of the anger in his book.
Yes, I have a couple questions here, so don't hang up on me, Art, after I get done with the first one.
It strikes me as odd that with all your remote viewing that you have not remote viewed the inside of our most popular paranormal objects, such as UFOs and the ones here on Earth, that is.
And real quick, if you could answer that, and then I got another question.
One of the fascinating guests that Art has had on was Joyce Riley.
And given your technical remote viewing during the Gulf War, can you confirm the biological, in addition to the chemical, weapons used that may be causing all of the Gulf War syndrome illnesses being reported and documented now by Joyce Riley?
Not all of, most of the so-called Gulf War syndrome was a result of something that was totally unpredictable.
Think of water.
If you have oxygen and hydrogen, who would have ever imagined that if you put those two together and light a match, you have this wonderful new substance that's liquid and flows?
Well, I use that as an analogy.
You notice that all of the troops were given a tablet, and they were forced to take this tablet.
This tablet was pyridostigmine bromide.
It was an experimental drug made by a Swiss company, and the drug was supposed to ward off the effects of nerve gas.
I use ward off loosely.
I don't want to get into technical details.
It was used for prophylaxis of nerve gas treatment, as Nurse Riley knows.
But in combination with the volatile aromatic hydrocarbons from the burning oil fields constantly, constant, in combination with the pyridostengium bromide in the system, it produced an absolutely horrifying abnormality, a genetic malady that was totally unpredictable.
And that is what caused the Gulf War syndrome.
But the Department of Defense is not going to take credit for that nor assume responsibility for it because of the amount of money that it would have to pay to those veterans and their families afflicted with that genetic disease.
That is the long and the short of it.
Most of the casualties were not by enemy bio or chemical warfare.
It was by our own inadvertent, naive ignorance about the effects.
It was unpredictable.
It was a mistake, an accident, but nevertheless it happened.
Pyridostigmine bromide in combination with volatile aromatic hydrocarbons.
You've certainly given all of us a lot to think about.
Arden, in reference to what you were saying about people not wanting to know, it has been my experience that you can tell somebody something, and if they don't want to hear it, they won't hear it.
Or they will deny that it's real, and they'll go on.
Well, what's being done here is giving people information and giving them a chance to make a choice.
And that's where I believe our responsibility comes in.
And along that line, in making choices and making the proper choices, I would be interested in knowing how Major Dames views the sort of the Mad Max scenario coming about.
I mean, we can sit, those of us that choose to prepare, choose to stockpile food or whatever, we're still in a situation, most people in this country are in a situation of having a mortgaged home.
What's going to happen as far as the economic picture?
I mean, are we going to be told to take our supplies and move out on the street?
Or do you see just such a sudden economic collapse that there's not going to be anybody in the mortgage companies to collect?
Use these training courses specifically to research the idea of sanctuary and those kinds of survival conditions, effective survival conditions for yourself and your family.
unidentified
Well, it's been real strange because over the past few years, my family's been telling me I'm crazy because I have had a picture in my mind of where I needed to be, where we needed to be to survive.
I didn't know survive what, but I've had a very distinct picture, and I've spent the last many years creating that place.
I want you to know, though, I did order your tapes as soon as I heard the announcement tonight.
I was, you know, someone brought up the Kennedy assassination earlier, and I don't know if this is a question that maybe I should ask or not, but I was seven years old when that took place, and, you know, just a kid.
And I always thought, you know, at that time at Oswald, what the one did it, and all that stuff.
But I have different views now because I've gotten older.
And I've often wondered, you know, they say that Marilyn Monroe was linked with JFK and Robert and what have you.
And I've often wondered maybe if she knew too much or something, then maybe somebody might have just, maybe they have something to do with her death.
Although there was a flashette fired from close range in the JFK assassination, there was also a high-powered round that came in from the outside, so I'm not discounting that.
Marilyn Monroe, don't know.
There's just too many things to look at, or I know.
Well, this may sound strange, however, I find this kind of a relief to hear what Major Dames has been talking about tonight.
I'm 44 now.
Since I was 10, I've had a picture of the end of the millennium that people would be going longer, that people would be killed for food and just widespread insanity.
And to actually have some kind of confirmation of that gives me something to work on.
And along with this picture I had, I felt this need for people to remain solid, to be kind of a rock, to maintain sanity.