Major Ed Dames, a retired U.S. military remote viewing expert, details SciTech’s 1989 analysis of Russia’s Phoebus II space probe, which allegedly encountered a Martian "rescue" machine near Cydonia Crater—an incident he links to robotic activity and potential biological life forms beneath the surface. Dames dismisses TWA Flight 800 as trivial compared to ecological threats like rising UV radiation, which sterilized water bodies in 1997, and warns of future pandemics from bacteriological toxins. He confirms AIDS originated from a mutated canine virus but avoids speculation on its modern spread, citing government secrecy and flawed protocols in cases like Alcatraz or Mars research. Remote viewing, he insists, accesses the collective unconscious—revealing grays as hyper-advanced entities (100,000+ years ahead) with time-travel capabilities—and rejects physical interference methods, though he cautions against Ouija boards as dangerous portals. SciTech’s rigorous 80%+ accuracy training, adapted even for dyslexics, underscores the discipline’s scientific validity, while his refusal to engage with MJ-12 or Area 51 ET claims highlights skepticism toward sensationalized theories. Ultimately, Dames frames remote viewing as a tool for uncovering hidden truths, from planetary anomalies to health diagnostics, but stresses its limitations without controlled validation. [Automatically generated summary]
Major Dames, retired Major Dames, runs a company called SciTech.
It all began for him in the U.S. military, where, as you know, if you saw the Nightline program on remote viewing, our government spent millions of dollars over years investigating, in fact, with a program to remote view.
Major, I guess it's incumbent on us, no matter what else we do tonight, to begin by at least giving people a brief synopsis of what remote viewing is and a bit about your background.
Okay, let me handle the remote viewing aspect first.
Remote viewing was a government-sponsored project beginning in the late 70s and culminating in the, about two years ago, with the announcement, the CIA announcement, that it had dropped the program.
Over that almost decade and a half period, for most of that period, I was the operations and training officer for a unit that did this at the Department of Defense level.
And the protocols that we used, the techniques that we used, evolved over that time.
And in that interim, there was a particular breakthrough discovery that came about as a result of government funding at Stanford Research Institute that led to what in 1983, when this breakthrough occurred, was termed coordinate remote viewing.
What this technique allowed us military intelligence officers to do was to learn how natural psychics, gifted natural psychics, use their unconscious to communicate ideas, accurate information about distant targets, a target being a person, a place, a thing, or an event, to their conscious awareness.
But the set of protocols, this way that this natural syntax and grammar for the way in which that communication takes place was really the discovery itself.
It became a model that allowed those of us who were not gifted psychics, including myself, to be trained to be a gifted natural psychic.
And when this training was completed, the team that we had put together became better and more consistent than the best natural psychics in history.
And by protocols, I mean the discovery availed itself of the natural process by which unconscious communicates with conscious awareness.
And this became a set of instructions, a recipe, if you will, that if followed rigorously, just like grammar is followed in language, allowed us to hold on to a target at a distance information,
details, specific details about a target, hold on to the target and continue to produce details while at the same time recognizing, allowing us to recognize when our imagination was entering into the picture or our personal analysis, our biased opinions about the data was starting to overlay the information.
So this technique became extremely valuable as a military intelligence tool, and I've mentioned this in earlier programs.
Of course, having been a senior intelligence officer and plugged in at celestial levels of intelligence, I generally have old cronies of mine that are still there.
And it's not going on because I took all of the best and the brightest with me to form my company, SciTech.
And that technology, that technology resides with my company at present.
It's no longer within the Defense Intelligence Agency or DOD or CIA.
And those are four reasons that we've discussed in the past.
It has just become such a political liability and white elephant that a hot potato, that it was taken off the hands of all those agencies.
All right, the last time you were on the program, you clearly said before any of the news broke, and we replayed the program while I was on vacation, you said, watch Mars.
There are some very significant events to come in association with Mars.
We planned an announcement, of course, that breakthrough to occur while you were on vacation.
No, just kidding.
If you look at SciTech's website, our Transition 3000 website, you'll notice that there's a new report that's up and available to the public.
Actually, the beginnings of that report were really started years ago when the Russians actually asked SciTech to take a look at the demise of one of their space probes.
This was in 1989, and that probe was called the Phoebus II space probe.
It entered Martian orbit in 1989.
You might remember that there are photos floating around of a female cosmonaut holding a picture of what was allegedly the last photograph that Phoebus II snapped in orbit around Mars.
And this was in an elongated, bright object.
Our work, we spent a lot of professional technical remote viewing time on this.
And what you see in that report is representative of our best job.
The Russians asked I took the, as a tactic of desperation, their terminal telemetry does not really allow a complete failure analysis of the spacecraft.
They couldn't determine really what happened to it.
It was, again, it appeared as an object, an elongated, bright object that was between the spacecraft and Phobos, allegedly coming up over the planet Mars, between the spacecraft and Mars.
What SciTech did was to do a full-blown research project using that particular photo, that anomalous photo, as a start point, and develop all of the details around the demise of the spacecraft, what went wrong.
And the results are what you find in that report.
I think I fired you off a draft copy of that the other night.
Essentially, the Phoebus II spacecraft was decommissioned by a machine.
It was about to call it an alien machine.
I don't use that word in the report.
A machine that arose from the Martian surface, came into actual physical contact with the space probe, electronically disabled it, inadvertently I might add, and then later on mechanically disabled it.
Now this, essentially, what's extremely surprising is that this machine is not made by anybody down here on our planet.
It is robotic in nature.
It appears to have some type of ascentience that we don't understand, totally alien type of technology.
Nevertheless, it's there and there are others like it on the surface.
The space probe, the Phoebus II space probe, appears to have entered a sector of Martian airspace that could be comparable to an air defense interrogation zone using military Earth bound terms.
And when that happened, a whole ensemble of events followed, beginning with this object rising from the Martian surface.
In our report, we describe the technical features of the object and how it travels, among a number of other things.
I wonder also, based upon what we stand by, what my company stands by in this report, it doesn't look like they have a bright future, or the future may be too bright in terms of what happened to Phoebus II.
So if this occurs, and we'll have, again, physical observables or ground truth next year, if this occurs again, then what my company will do is similar to what we used to do in military intelligence missions.
We'll look for the Achilles heel or a way to get into that airspace or to circumvent the problems that are surrounding the loss of these billions of dollars of hardware in space so that we can continue our investigation of Mars in a different way.
Perhaps landing outside of a cordoned-off area and walking a probe in or driving it in, something like that.
And in fact, we in the United States, DOD or otherwise, did not have access to the terminal Russian Soviet at that time telemetry.
They did not provide us with all the final details.
It was what SciTech provided to the Russians that woke them up because we were telling them things that only they knew based upon terminal telemetry and us trying to assist their failure analysis.
Another thing, I know it might be premature in the evening to approach this, but we about three years ago put a very advanced spy satellite on a Titan IV rocket and launched that, and there are very nice photographs of a similar meteoroid type of projectile penetrating the rocket at 110,000 feet here in our own neck of the woods.
He has a lot to say about what lies below the surface of Mars, and a lot of it seems to agree with what you are suggesting right now.
And sure enough, if there could be a meteorite that shows us there was billions of years ago rudimentary life on Mars, a shocking revelation, then it is reasonable to conclude that more advanced forms of life could easily have followed.
And you're suggesting they did.
You don't say there's Martians down there now, but there are at the very least, I guess, what's left of the technology that was developed?
We were commissioned by the Russians initially, and the company picked this up as an in-house project and looked at it more circumspectly.
What we can say about the machine that arose from the Martian surface, and we have a lot to say about that in our report, is that it seems to have a type of ascentience, something that goes beyond the idea of advanced artificial intelligence.
It has characteristics that are like a friendly, loyal guard dog, but it has behavior, some behaviors that mimic what, in anthropomorphic terms, what one would see in a St. Bernard or a dolphin that would respond to evolved intelligences are human, an injured human or a stranded human.
So there's something about this that is like an escort vehicle or a rescue vehicle, but it's not designed for a NASA spacecraft.
It's designed for someone else's conveyance.
It comes up to meet.
It's designed to meet somebody else's conveyance.
Now, who that somebody else is is the subject of a future report that Psychic will have, and we're studying that now.
Having said that, there is a control element, that is a command and control element beneath the Martian surface that does appear to have associated with it biological life forms.
We don't know very much about them now, but we will.
And that cell, that particular agency, is the one that pushed the button, figuratively and literally speaking, to take out both the Mars Observer and Phoebus II.
So are those Martians or are those anything other than intelligent robots?
At this point, we cannot say.
We have a lot to say about the object that appeared as a bright flash, the terminal flash in the Phoebus II photo.
And we just have a lot more work to do.
We have to check and double check and cross-check using the same rigor that we used in the military.
Just very briefly, because it is so important and was so shocking, you said to me during a previous interview that during your military years, you began, as sort of a side look, to pick up images of many babies dying and the jet stream coming down to the surface.
And these were things that you just picked up during the military years and did not really concentrate on because they were not your assignment.
So you sort of dismissed them, which is understandable.
You had a specific job to do.
It must have been a disturbing vision to get then.
Is there anything new on that?
Have you looked further into that since we last talked?
And it will be a while before we go into those subjects with as much detail as we have, for instance, on this particular report.
I think that the reason that we're concentrating on real-time events or near-real-time events is because there are physical observables involved.
And this does two things.
These incidents at Mars that are about to be in a short period of time validated are very important things vis-a-vis our relationship to others in the universe and as a validation to technical remote viewing, the techniques that we use in the company.
And they're near real time.
The other events are going to be, are a little bit further out and not so real time, although the kinds of things that are happening now that fosters those catastrophes are available to any scientist who really turns their scrutiny in a general way to ecological problems at hand.
Only SciTech can do the work that we did vis-a-vis the Mars Phoebus II loss, but any good ecologist can come up with some of the same conclusions that we do vis-a-vis ecology.
So we tend to concentrate on things where only technical remote viewing can solve the problem or provide pieces of the puzzle.
Right now we are not working the flight, the TWA Flight 800 problem.
But if we did, we would not work it in conjunction with the federal agencies because they would not provide feedback about our work to the public.
And that is something that we demand in our work.
We demand credit for what we do.
So why don't we do this kind of a project instead of others?
Well, simply because what we're seeing on Mars eclipses the short-term effects of something like this.
There's going to be many, many terrorist attacks in the future.
We're looking at the movie Brazil type of an environment soon enough.
And this is just going to be yet one of many such events, Art.
And it doesn't behoove us or what my company's mission is to concentrate on terrorist acts that can be solved by the FBI or the Department of Defense in the end anyway.
I think it will come when we either lose the three spacecraft that are going at One Russian mission and two American spacecraft that are hitting that way, or their photography reveals moving objects on the surface, particularly in the Sidonia region.
Now, we could always, there would always be technical remote viewers in SciTech, both in Europe and in America, that could determine how I or one of my other employees was snuffed.
But I prefer to stick with the other projects and let the drug enforcement agency handle the cartel.
Many times we take people on a first-come, first-served basis.
Lately, we've been so inundated with training requests that that's been difficult to do.
We really don't have a screening process.
We like to get a good cross-section of disciplines and occupations from people who are aerospace engineers and scientists to people who run construction businesses.
That's what we prefer to do, to have the skills out and about distributed amongst various professions and disciplines.
I would prefer that they have at least the individuals, prospective candidates, have at least some time with themselves.
That is, that they have engaged in some sort of meditation, perhaps neuro-linguistic programming, something that has enabled them to know that there's a part of themselves that is not necessarily open to awareness all the time.
And there are any number of programs that could do that.
There's a lot to be learned, and there are no postgraduate courses.
However, we want graduates for the next year to facts copies of their work to make sure that they are not going off course and to make sure that the rigorous protocols, the controls that are installed to make this work correctly are not being violated.
And we do that by having the home office monitor the work of the chosen work that our graduates do.
We choose the random numbers that are associated with a target folder.
And that's all that the trainees are provided with.
Their unconscious is trained to do the work.
In other words, we'll choose a target.
For instance, I think a good example would be I was told by one of my officers that while I was in Europe, you had somebody do an ESP exercise where they attempted to describe something that was in front of you.
Well, we would take something like that as a target, for instance.
If I were to do that and provide that kind of a target to one of my employees, that would be called a double-blind.
I, as the teacher, would not know what the target is, nor would my student.
But by using the protocols that we have, it would be an easy task for us to sketch the object, to describe it, those kinds of things.
It's production, whatever you Wanted to know about it.
But most of the time we work blind, where we'll choose, for instance, an individual or an event.
And depending upon what day that we are talking about in the training program, the level of difficulty will vary within those days.
For instance, if any of you have seen Courtney Brown's website, you'll see that the kinds of things that he's putting up there, the sketches, that's what we call a stage three sketch.
In day three of our training, our trainees are expected to produce those very primitive elementary drawings just like that.
He did not complete the one-year established rigorous double checks that I insist upon in terms of sci-tech.
A number of my graduates have gone off to teach this.
It's an extremely life-changing type of a skill.
You're obviously very enthusiastic as a graduate.
Both some of my European graduates and American graduates have gone off to attempt to teach this, but that would be like if I were a flight instructor, giving you a solo flight lesson after 40 hours of flight training and having you go off and act as an instructor pilot.
The same kinds of problems would ensue.
If something went wrong, you are in big trouble.
And more importantly, you would not know as an inexperienced pilot that something was going wrong.
So that these rigorous protocols, when they've been abandoned in many cases, are altered to the point where the information, the accuracy rates are starting to fall off tremendously.
Extreme detail, depending upon the length of the project, particularly.
If I were to look at the inside of, let's say I wanted to describe a hydrogen leak on a space shuttle, we can sketch the actual particular part that's leaking, how fast it is leaking.
We can sketch the assemblies and sub-assemblies that are associated with it.
We could actually describe what a person's mind state or modus operandi is.
In fact, as military intelligence officers and remote viewers, we used to do this when we assessed potential spies for recruitment.
We would go into their minds first to see if they were recruitable.
We would vet them remotely using these mind techniques that we discovered.
Nope, that is one of the restrictions that we have.
It's a right-brain process.
And the problem is that we cannot, alphanumerics are one of our limitations.
If you have a document, a top-secret document in a safe somewhere, what we can do is acquire that as a target and we can detail out, we can sketch out all of the topics and subjects that appertains to that particular document, the people that are associated with it, any facilities, but we can't read it, nor can we understand speech.
We can pull out all the ideas about what a person is talking about, but we cannot replicate the speech.
Yes, but those are our trainees are taught to do that in day two of our training course.
Smells, tastes, sounds, temperatures, colors.
All of the senses plus some other senses that we teach, the ability to discern infrasonics and ultrasonics and magnetics are available to our remote viewers.
Major, if I came to SciTech, if I was somebody or another in the government, and I realized what had been going on with the probe sent to Mars, and I said, look, Major, we're about to launch so-and-so, and we would like SciTech to ride herd on it and prevent anything from occurring.
Could you do that, or would you have to sit and watch what occurred?
We would prosecute a mission like that the same way that we did in the military.
We would look for an Achilles heel in a defense system, an opening similar to a radar hole or something like that.
For instance, I've already talked about the idea that perhaps this so-called zone, this defensive zone, this air defense interrogation zone, has boundaries.
And we could perhaps land a lander on the obstacles of those boundaries and go overland into the area and observe it from the ground.
Perhaps these objects, I'm speculating now, only react to inbound vehicles coming in from space.
There is already some evidence that leads us to believe that mind to be true, although we're not certain.
That's the kind of thing we would investigate before putting a report out to an agency that was responsible for building something of those technical characteristics parameters.
And my question is, if something very disastrous is about to happen, would he inform us that it is going to happen like within a week or a month or so?
We've done some work in training with our advanced students.
And although we have not subjected Hailbop to anything that would be called a remote viewing project, it's a myth, but it's quite spectacular in the night sky.
We are in a lot of trouble, particularly with regard to water.
What's happening is that any the UV index, as I mentioned before NASA made the announcement, the ultraviolet index indices worldwide are going straight up, particularly in the mid-latitudes.
What is happening is that any cells that are in developmental stages, eggs, for instance, of insects, eggs of frogs or fishes, that are exposed constantly to these higher levels of ultraviolet radiation are going to not only mutate, they're going to flat out die.
And we're looking at a lot of just dead water, sterile, sour water, particularly in England, in the United Kingdom, they're going to get hit heavy.
We'll see the effect there first.
They'll be most noticeable in the United Kingdom, where you have waters that are just as sterile as, say, Crater Lake Oregon, where there's nothing in the water.
Because many of the organisms that live in the water, their eggs in the developmental stages are exposed to much at very shallow depths, lymphologically speaking, to very high levels of shortwave ultraviolet.
Well, here we're talking about lush green plant growth surrounding ponds and streams that have nothing in them.
The plants are going to love this.
Many, many plants will thrive in these circumstances.
And you know what else will thrive?
That blue-green algae.
Blue-green algae is one of the Earth's most primitive organisms, most primitive.
It flourished in an environment where Earth had high levels of ultraviolet radiation.
It will flourish again.
The problem, as I alluded to with the Hantavirus toxicological insult, was that blue-green algae is probably the most toxic, the metabolite, the waste products, the toxin that's produced by the algae is one of the most toxic things known to man.
In fact, it's so toxic that those of us who were involved in the U.S. biological warfare program, when it existed as an offensive program, blue-green algae toxin was the weapon of choice after years of experimentation.
If we would have had the presence and the foresight to and even if we had the presence and the foresight to predict what would happen if we continued to abuse our environment, we are not together as a group of nations enough to agree to have prevented the problem.
There would have been no remedial action that would have been practical.
But what makes me wonder if you care to comment on this is if and when someday we decide to send the first manned space Mars expedition, how fast should a spacecraft should be traveling for human travel?
And also how long will it take to get there?
And when we do get there, will there be weapons required just in case for a confrontation?
Europa also looks as though it may possibly harbor life.
There's talk that there's ice on Europa and below a liquid ocean.
And we already know that a new species of life, a third species, even here on Earth, lives without sunlight, any at all, near volcanic vents beneath our ocean.
And they feature the same may be occurring even with more advanced life on Europa.
We have not studied Europa, but for many years, Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, in fact the only other body in the solar system that has an atmosphere similar to Earth, has been a constant training target in the early stages for our trainees.
And we've done a lot of advanced work.
In fact, our KGB counterpart, the psychic unit that the KGB had, after the Cold War was over, Psytech and that group of officers were going to do a joint project to look through this cloud-enshrouded moon to see if there was any life below.
And so the company has studied that particular moon for a number of years.
And it does appear to be some type of saprophytic or fungi in a liquid environment, but we have found no other life form on Titan.
Let me preface what I'm about to say with the statement, and that is that my employees have no monopoly on the truth.
We only have a monopoly on accuracy, and that is by virtue of the United States government pouring lots of money into our day-to-day research and development of these tools.
So lots of people throughout history have, in fact, we're probably resurrecting something that ancient Egyptians did, but using modern 20th century requirements, intelligence gathering skills.
We have lots of work, lots of archival work on facilities on the surface and underground Mars.
Astro projection is not what we do.
It's not similar, even similar to what we do, although in the 70s, we attempted to induce out-of-body states.
Some of your listeners might be familiar with what out-of-bodies are.
That's when it appears that your consciousness physically leaves your body and you're looking back down at yourself.
This usually occurs in a sleeping state.
And it occurs to thousands and thousands of people worldwide who usually don't talk about it because they'll lose their friends.
But nevertheless, it happens.
It's a common thing.
As far as the military team goes, I could not induce this state on demand.
It happened spontaneously.
And as I've mentioned before to the public, when it happened, the subject with whom I was working would come back into a conscious state and say something like, sir, you can't believe how marvelous this was, on and on and on.
And in frustration, I would be asking Lieutenant Wilson or whatever, did you get the information I needed on this neutron flux gate or this ICBM MERV or whatever?
And the experience of being out-of-body would be so awing that it would overcome the intelligence requirements.
Now, that's not to say that if we put more work into inducing out-of-body states, that we couldn't get somebody so used to that state that they would be able to complete their military missions.
We just turned to this other technique that we now call technical remote viewing because it works.
If I'm a major manufacturer in this country, and I'm manufacturing some electronic goodie, and I have become aware that the Japanese are two or three or five steps ahead of me, and I walk into your office with a bundle of cash and say, look here, I want to know what Mitsubishi is doing right now.
I've got a fax here, and it says, during a previous interview, you said some of your people had looked back to the time of Jesus and had seen that he did exist.
The person sending the fax would like to know what Jesus looked like.
Major, with regard to Jesus, people need to know that remote viewing is not confined necessarily to contemporary events as they occur, but you can actually look back or, I guess, forward in time.
All I can say is that we use the event of Calvary as a training target for day five of our training because we're attempting to install the skills in our trainees that deal with emotions, high-level aesthetic impacts such as pathos, grief, anger.
So one of our training targets in day four and five is Calvary.
And when we work that particular target, we get an event where three men are crucified.
And I do not have descriptions on any of the three men, except that one appears to be, for all intents and purposes, a supernatural type of entity.
And that's all I can tell you.
We've never sketched the individual.
The reason we use that particular event as training, once again, is just to make sure that trainees are able to pick up on higher level aesthetics.
We've used the queue, and this is like a library search where you're searching what we call the matrix, sort of the collective unconscious stores information the way we think the library stores it.
In fact, I think that our libraries are set up based upon the way the collective unconscious stores it archetypically and primarily, but I'm not certain.
At any rate, one of the search terms we use is Satan.
When we use that search term, not all remote viewers come up.
In fact, very few individuals come up with the same personages.
But they do come up with, most of the time, contemporary instances of pure unadulterated evil, particularly having to do with children.
So if we work the remote view, we use technical remote viewing against the Q Satan, remote viewers will come up across the board with individuals that are abusing or keeping children captive, torturing or killing children.
Why that is, I can only speculate, but that's what we get when we run that particular search term.
And it's not something that's pleasant to look at because you're picking up the viewer, the trainee in this case, is picking up impressions from individuals that are not very savory and not someone that if you were there in person, you would want to be around.
Let's say you had a top-secret government project, and you had maybe an Eastern Bloc country or something that was trying to use remote viewing to discover it.
Is there any psychic or remote viewing technique you can use to block the discovery of what you're working on?
There's plenty of ways to find out that they are doing that and what they know, but there isn't any way to block it.
We actually ran into this in the 70s when the Secret Service, who had gotten the hold of a Defense Intelligence Agency report on Soviet psychotronics, walked into our unit and asked if President Reagan was under any threat by a foreign government, Czechs or the Russians at that time, psychotronically.
What I did was order our team to turn our attention to hunting down other agencies like ourselves, other units like ourselves.
And that's how we found our Russian counterparts that way.
What we discovered was that even though they were training and attempting to stop hearts and do other things like that using minds unsuccessfully, they were not doing that, but they were successful in gaining information the same way, in similar fashion, that our team was used.
So we reported back to the Secret Service that President Reagan's life or physical well-being was not being threatened, but that everything he was doing could be discerned.
And they were very happy with that and went back home because that was not their particular concern about whether or not secrets were being lost.
Major, you delineated your reasons for not investigating something like the Flight 800 incident.
But I would be very grateful if you would consider giving just a background comment based on your own general experience in the area and your core knowledge.
What do you think happened with Flight 800 in view of the fact that 200 people, four of whom I heard, say that they saw something that looked like a missile heading toward it right before it blew up?
That's particularly the case if you're dealing with something that's totally outside your range of experience, or one's psaris, I'll borrow my Russian counterpart's term.
Because there, your mind wants to try to fill in the blanks, and there one's personal analysis and imagination will fill in the blanks for you if you're not careful.
Well, I think I may have mentioned this cursorily on an earlier program, but if I have not, I'll cover some of the same ground.
The AIDS virus and AIDS as a disease are two separate subjects for remote viewing.
The AIDS virus itself, we're interested, there was a pharmaceutical company that was interested in looking at the origin of the AIDS virus because if one could discern its Achilles heel, so to speak, it may be easier to develop antibodies or defenses against it to attack it.
And when remote viewers, technical remote viewer professionals, turn their attention to the origin of the AIDS virus itself, we know that about a number of thousands of years ago, it was a canine virus.
It was canine and it mutated into the simian community.
So that helps microbiologists and virologists to some degree to get an edge on the origin of the virus itself.
The origin of the disease as an epidemic or pandemic, we've looked at also.
And although we're certain that it started in Africa, we have not devoted enough work to see how the disease began in terms of an epidemiological factor.
Did it escape from a laboratory?
Was it part of a, you know, we just don't know.
We know how it was distributed.
It was distributed as a social disease, but we don't know its origin as a disease.
We spend most of our time looking at cures and things like that, our free time in-house.
And that is one of our in-house projects.
And we're pursuing several aspects.
We have to be careful when you do this, because if you're looking for a technology, let's say, a technology in terms of an antivirus or the standard against AIDS, you have to be careful where you are in time.
If you're focused on a cure for AIDS and you're two or three generations of microbiological technology out there, it doesn't do any good for the next two generations of AIDS victims.
And so we have to bring the cure, the idea of cures, closer to home.
When we do that, we can discern several different positive avenues that are being pursued now.
One of them is what appears to be kind of a decoy, another type of a sera or something that circulates in the body, that's injected and circulates in the body, and somehow acts as a decoy.
The AIDS essentially goes after the decoy rather than deteriorating cells in the body.
And we're looking to see who is going to produce that because these people, a particular institute or person that is working on that tact, may not know that they have the answer.
So in other words, if this decoy does not, it stays the progression of the disease.
It doesn't eliminate it from the victim's body.
But that's just one of the tax that we see being taken that is potentially successful.
And of all the researchers out there, there may only be three or four who are onto something, and they may not know that they have the solution in a test tube.
I think in the long term, storing food may not be the way to go, although that certainly has survival value in terms of waiting out the storm until you can procure some more food, but rather finding ways to grow it oneself in artificial conditions.
We might have to do it as communities at the community level, but we're going to have to start growing our own food and not depending upon massive crop production the way that we have in the last six or seven decades.
Courtney, I made Courtney take my name off that book because he changed, he took away the rigorous protocols that I taught him when he was my student in the technical remote viewing course.
And that's the long and the short of it.
He makes it look easy because, and it's not.
He's taken a lot of shortcuts, and those shortcuts have cost him in terms of the quality and confidence and value of the material.
They've gone off to do things and they've changed the names.
We've controlled remote viewing in the case of one student who failed my military course.
That wasn't even a graduate.
Then we have scientific remote viewing and God knows what else.
And more power to the students if they use these techniques for their own benefit to see if, and to research for research reasons.
But to try to attempt to promulgate their results using these very loose protocols as being equivalent to what they learned in a professional development course is just not right.
I guess if he was born some time ago, he would have been burned at the stake.
That's why Nostradamus was so cagey about everything he came up with.
Sure.
I've messed with this a few times, and it really scared me.
I think the first time was the blackout in New York City, and I was shocked today to see an ad for this trigger effect movie that's coming out.
Seems to be a direct knockoff from James Burke back in the 70s.
A couple questions.
One, in regards to the collective unconscious, do you use this as a vehicle of the matrices, or are you afraid of tainting what it is you're seeing by your own collective unconscious or what?
And the second is what's your opinion about other people focusing on what it is you and SciTech are doing, and do you focus on others in the same field, and so on at infinitum?
I think that that wouldn't altogether answer Kevin's question.
I'll answer the second question first.
We just don't have the time, nor really the interest, because there are so many fascinating things out there, to look at what other people are doing in these days and times.
There's just too much going on out there that's pretty interesting and exciting.
They could go, if they were professional remote viewers, they could go to the same collective unconscious from whence we derive our data to get the same data.
Because this is a replicable tool.
That's why the scientific community has supported it, at least the DOD scientific community.
So remote viewers go to the same source of information, the collective unconscious, to download the same information, the same way we do on the Internet or any other library database.
If we're all immersed as individuals, our individual consciousnesses and our collective unconsciousness as an extension of that, we're immersed in the collective, then anything we do is going to affect that matrix, that library.
So I think that as a, for instance, in modern times, as a race, our collective consciousness and possibly unconscious is chaos.
Take a look around you.
Is that where we're going for our information?
I don't think so.
I think that it's at another level.
And I don't want to get into that too much now because it gets into eschatological and theoretical concepts that we cover in our initial instruction in class, and it is complex.
But painting, yes, I think that all of us as individuals en masse affect the collective unconscious.
We're all painting it.
Every time we see a movie that's violent, every time we make some, create violence, that becomes our collective.
I'm a pretty simple guy, and I'd have to study that for a long time before I'd sit on a rock somewhere on top of a mountain, probably before I could come to a conclusion, and it would still probably be BS.
All right, well, let me be more specific in this area.
On a previous show, the major said, when asked about Area 51, that there wasn't any ETs there, but that they do exist, and he'd tell us about them on another show.
Well, okay, as I say, and it's been up there for quite some time, because there's massive interest in it, you can just jump right over from my website.
unidentified
Okay.
And the other question was, he speaks about these things so matter of factly, but I think a lot of the scientific community is very skeptical about paranormal phenomena.
And what I wanted to know is, did he have some kind of a mechanism, a physical mechanism, some physics we don't understand yet, by which this remote viewing or other paranormal things might happen?
I think that this subject was broached on an earlier program also.
I'm sure.
And again, the area, in common parlance, in present-day parlance, the buzzword is continuity of consciousness.
And that area, subsumed under that, are studies on the soul.
For our company, this is the most difficult, perplexing, complex area that we know of.
It's our most difficult study.
And as I've said before, the jury's out in the house here at SciTech as to what we're dealing with, whether we have over-souls or fractal souls or whatever.
We're convinced that there is something, that personality is, as of course, many savants have said through the ages, personality persists after death.
Whether or not what it is before death, we don't have a clear handle on.
As you look into the future and you get more and more distant into the future, does there come a time or a time, I guess that'd be the way to phrase it, past which you are unable to see or you see nothing?
Scientists have puzzled, and there is incredible controversy about how all that is got here.
You know, they talk about the Big Bang, and then you will ask, and I've had many physicists and people who think of these things on the air, and there's one place where they inevitably get stuck.
They say, Yes, we believe in the Big Bang.
And you ask them, what happened, in your view, one second before the Big Bang, and that's where they stop.
They're puzzled.
They have no answer.
Any thoughts on that?
It's kind of like the reverse of the question I asked you about the future.
In other words, as you go back, is there a point past which there is nothing?
Somebody wants to know, with regard to the earth changes that you have described, when is, in your view, the last possible moment that relocation would be feasible?
You have to be able to recognize when your imagination is present and overlaying the information from the target.
You have to also know and be taught when your own personal opinions, your analysis of the data, either the conscious or the pre-conscious level, is overlaying the data.
Those are just two of the real problems that I, as an instructor, run into in the classroom in the first three or four days of instruction.
Isn't not a worry of yours, you mentioned that you've got 10% rogue students, students that go out there and either don't finish the course or take off in their own direction.
Isn't that a danger for the entire reputation, not of your company, but of remote viewing in general?
In other words, as more and more students pass through, that 10% number begins to grow, the actual numerical number of those who are out there, in effect, doing harm to the reputation of remote viewing.
It reminds me of the situation vis-a-vis clairvoyant in the late 1800s where psychometry was recognized.
There was something to psychometry.
That is, psychometry is similar to clairvoyant ESP techniques.
And yet, there were so many charlatans that began to spring up around the idea of this very real phenomenon that they painted the whole field to the point where the public no longer trusted anyone in the field of psychometry at all.
And it took another 35 years before parapsychology could come along and be resurrected.
This was in the 1920s in Europe primarily and begin to build a new reputation.
I don't know what Nostradamus was doing in terms of clairvoyant activity, in terms of his mind.
But my company is going to publish a series of reports, and I think he'll be very interested in that, where we're going to call that series of reports, Through His Eyes, where we use modern technical remote doing methods to take a look at the most controversial quatrains that Nostradamus put out cryptically to protect his own height, of course.
Sure.
And put those in 21st century terms and see what he was really looking at.
Actually, I'm fairly used to that, but because of the replicability, the actual competence fact that we have in our work and our ability to do things the right way, we can counteract any negative media because we can produce real results.
We can demonstrate it for the camera.
In fact, we're doing that with several documentaries.
We're demonstrating for the camera the actuality and the validity of remote viewing.
Work in the next year, of course, on things like the Mars work that we're doing now will help to support that.
Yes, we will continue to be burned.
The vultures are hovering.
This is an extremely controversial discipline that's ahead of its time in some ways, but in other ways it's not.
It's people who tend to criticize technical remote viewing are being left behind.
There's too much support.
There's too much truth in what's going on, and people are discerning it.
There was a group that was mentioned in Howard Boom's book out there.
Yeah, I read the book.
Okay.
That particular working group, which was third or fourth-hand information to Howard Boone.
Yes, I was a member of that working group.
unidentified
In as far as being a member of that group, did you at any time or have you verified the existence or validity of either the MJ-12 group and or documents?
Not as far as we're concerned, what we know to be true is this, that the MJ-12, the terms MJ-12 and Aquarius, appear to have been trapdoors.
I think I've covered this story several times, but I'll go over it briefly again.
Because of certain events that had occurred at Socorro, New Mexico, in a nuclear weapons storage depot that dealt with unusual phenomena, UFO-related, the Operations Security Officer, a colonel in the Air Force at the time, Air Force Office of Special Investigations, was tasked with coming up with answers to what had violated physical security of storage bunkers.
Because civilian scientists were thought at the time to have more knowledge about UFO phenomena than military officers, those particular operations, those security people had to go out on the streets and try to squeeze information, obtain information about those events without giving away the fact that security had been compromised at Socorro.
And so certain things were invented.
Certain documents were ginned up and released.
Some of them came in the form of MJ12 and Aquarius, where if someone spoke the words MJ12 and Aquarius on the phone, certain lights and bells and whistles would go off and individuals would be followed and or observed to see if they had more information on what penetrated security.
unidentified
Wow.
One last comment, too.
You were talking earlier about the event beyond which you can't see where the people's consciousness tends to change, if I remember correctly.
It's something that's extremely esoteric, and we don't have a handle on it yet.
It doesn't appear to be essentially negative, but it's scary even to me.
unidentified
I do have some assistance maybe on this.
In my perusal on the web, can I mention a website on the air?
Sure.
I ran across, now, I don't know the validity of this, yay or nay, but there is reputedly and allegedly Grays having their own website, particularly Zeta Talk, Z-E-T-A, Zetatalk.com.
And that site is extensive.
In fact, it is so extensive you can order a book that is the HTML pages of the website and produce at your own convenience or if you don't have a computer.
But anyway, they concur, you know, in line with everything that you've said that you've found.
And their comments, in as far as what that is, is that they propose that the human consciousness is going, or the what have you, is going to be changed into what they refer to as a fourth density, where we go from being individual persons to being a collective, like you mentioned yourself, the collective entity.
And it's really out there.
I mean, some of that stuff I have trouble believing myself.
Yeah, but it's interesting to note that on this website, the Zeta Reticulans have also critiqued Courtney Brown's book and have also said that the data contained therein is a mix and match of Hodgepodge truth and or mistruth, being to the fact that there are, again, allegedly, good grays and bad grays.
And both of these entities have attempted to purport information to Courtney and have subsequently not gotten their meaning across.
It appears that there are because they have to govern themselves through time.
I mean, think about this.
They can travel in time.
Locally, they don't use vehicles.
They use teleportation.
So the vehicles that you see, the objects that you see, are technologies that belong predominantly to Grays, especially the red and blue spheres in the sky that dance around and talk to teenagers.
Say, don't be afraid, you want to come with us.
Those are actual technologies that belong to Grays.
The Greys have a long history, really long.
Time travel started with them way back when.
And so you have a generation, first generation of gray time travelers who decided to visit Earth, visiting Earth now, along with future generations of Grays visiting Earth too, attempting to coordinate efforts.
So it's a real mess out there, and we are being monkey with.
And that's the long and the short of it.
Beyond that, as far as my job goes, we have to take things a piece at a time, an event at a time.
It takes a long time to technically remote view an event.
For instance, now we're working on one of the things we're working on is a cash landrum event.
That's very important to us in terms of technologies and what is happening.
I think that in the end, what we would like to do, at least in-house, is to, instead of trying to piece together all these things, the histories that have happened over these vast spans of time, we would like to sit down and have a tape-to-tape or coffee clash with the Grays themselves.
Talk to them or allow them to communicate with us.
Rather than using remote viewing to try to piece together all of these elements of history.
What you're talking about is psychokinesis or telekinesis and other things that we cover in our first couple of days of lectures in class and have nothing to do with technical remote viewing.
It is as if you sent a searchlight up into a dark dimension, and the searchlight is like an open door to a lot of different things that you probably Don't want affecting your loved ones and yourself.
Please ask the major if he or his firm has ever targeted either of the following: arts parts, those parts delivered to me, and I well know you have, or the near-death experience.
It's fairly easy to do once you learn the remote viewing protocols.
However, if there is a problem that's either biochemically or microbiologically complex, then a physician or someone who has that thesaurus, who is on with that lexicon, really needs to do the work.
However, having said that, as trained remote viewers, we're really trained observers, technical observers.
So if I, not being a virologist, for instance, I could be guided the same way that an unskilled pilot could be guided from the ground into solving a problem just by virtue of looking at specific things that a technical expert would ask me to look at.
They could ask a series of questions, and I could go back into the problem, in this case being a human body, and answer a question about a molecular action site, whether or not a particular enzyme is doing something or what a particular liquid that someone is supposed to drink tastes like, those kinds of things.
The major, my guest right now, has said that one of the things he sees is the jet stream, in effect, coming down to the deck, producing tremendous winds on Earth.
unidentified
And does he know what the duration was?
Is that going to take like five years for it to happen and then it's going to last for five years?
Well, actually, it has happened, but in my memory, prior to that, it had not happened.
There was a very great deal of damage in parts of Arizona, and it was due to 120-mile-an-hour winds.
And when I heard that, I remembered what you said.
Now, somebody else writes, when the major was last on your show, you asked him what he saw regarding earth changes, earthquakes.
There was a long pause before he answered.
Quote, beyond all that, humans are more durable.
We appear to undergo some changes.
Then he expanded on the durability of future generations and stated, in terms of earth changes, only what my company stands by, in other words, high winds and other atmospheric geological changes, he previously discussed.
It appeared to me from the major's long pause and comment regarding human durability that he was specifically sidestepping The earthquake question.
That was not what I was pausing about in terms of human durability.
The pause was because it appears that there is a genetic change in humans, and I don't know what the source of that genetic change is.
That was the cause for pause.
In terms of earthquakes, we're not perceiving and describing anything that is outside of the norm.
Yes, we get some big quakes here and there, but I think statistically, no greater frequency and no greater magnitudes spreading globally than we have now.
Major, we have twice now noted shifts in the magnetic north.
This has occurred twice on my program, and I have had literally hundreds of faxes of people who have noted for hours, or in one case a full day, a shift in magnetic north, a significant one, 10 to 15 degrees, and we can literally track it across from Hawaii to the Caribbean.
In other words, that shift with respect to magnetic north is in a different direction as you travel, naturally.
But that there has been a shift in magnetic north.
A number of years ago, about eight years ago, the military, I had tasked the military team with investigating these kinds of things, pole shift types of ideas.
First of all, I'd like to know if he has any opinions as far as astrology, tarot reading, and other fortune-telling.
And also, I'd like to know with his ability and his teaching of it, what is the ultimate purpose and goal of having a knowing that other than to make money?
Actually, I meant to speak hypothetically and say that, generally speaking hypothetically, that many times when there is a technological or scientific solution to a problem, we find that someone already has that either in their head or in the laboratory or both.
And we can walk into that specific person and say, you have the answer to this engineering problem or something else.
In the case of AIDS, we really have looked at, remote viewers have independently come up with at least three separate individuals worldwide.
And there's mutually supporting data here that indicates that three individuals have three separate possible solutions, near-term solutions to the AIDS problem.
Until we do this as a corporate contract, because there's so much work involved, we're really not going to be able to make a public statement about this or to go in and solve it.
Yeah, we're capacity constrained, and we do businesses like any other business.
And there are very few corporate contracts that I will accept these days.
Most of the time, as I've said in the past, in the earlier years of this company, I founded it in 1989, that we did a lot of corporate contracts.
But now I almost insist that corporations send their chief scientists, engineers, or researchers to take the course so the problems are solved in-house.
And I send back a SciTech acting as a cadre.
I send back trained Professionals.
But in some cases, where we would anticipate a very important piece of work, for instance, a solution to the AIDS problem, we would devote our corporate resources to that for about two months.
Art, please recap any statements made by Major Dames with regard to life on Mars, especially in comparison or contrast to statements made previously by Courtney Brown.
So let's come out and ask you that.
With respect to what Courtney has said and written about Mars, where do you differ with him, if at all?
And they're just not going to believe anything other than what they want to believe.
And I think they're going to need to lose a few more spacecraft before they, with hat in hand, come to anyone for outside assistance, outside of NASA, that is.
Well, that you can even do that, though, must be a cause of wonderment for those who do it.
Major, hold on.
We're at the bottom of the hour.
We'll be right back.
Major Ed Dames is my guest.
You're listening to live overnight talk radio from the high desert.
Briefly, arts parts.
We need to come back to that with you, Major.
We have continued to test and look and try to figure out what it is that was sent to us by this anonymous source from Charleston, South Carolina, and then yet a later shipment.
A very odd material, bismuth, magnesium with some zinc, in a manner that rare metals manufacturers have been unable to comment on.
They've been unable to duplicate.
They don't know what the purpose is.
There's some guessing going on about that.
It's been to Carnegie in Washington, D.C. for careful analysis.
Electron scanning microscope photographs have been taken, some anomalous results from Carnegie.
And still, it remains to this moment an absolute, total mystery.
Nobody can tell us about it, duplicate it, or anything else.
So it's a mystery.
And you had words to say about it when you were on the program previously.
How those trapdoors were put out on the streets because the Department of Defense did not know or did not have the assets in-house to understand what they were dealing with?
Suppose you had a material, the origin from whence you did not understand, and all of your in-house assets could not figure out what this debris perhaps was.
So, you're not dealing with a classified material.
If it were classified, you wouldn't have it.
And it might be scrap material.
But if it were scrap material, somebody from ALCOA or somebody else that has classified government contracts to make missile fuselages or something else like that, like Aurora diamond-coated surfaces, would be able to say, oh yeah, we remember making something like that, and they have not done that.
And what I'm suggesting to you that that something else may be, is an earthbound material, but from over the horizon in time, perhaps several years, a decade away.
It slipped back in time during the test and crashed in the desert.
Was retrieved, and you have pieces of it right now.
The technology is just about what we can do now, but not quite.
Well, here's a fact to follow up on that from Hawaii.
I have an important question.
Major says we'll soon be having terrible times.
Massive disruptions, forced to live ultimately underground.
He also says arts parts are the result of future high technology sending something into the past.
Question is, how do we have high-tech, advanced science at the same time we're all struggling to live, forced underground, in the face of massive disruptions?
Question is, I was wondering if the major had done anything about research on the pyramids.
Specifically, what, if anything, is in them that no one is telling us or that they might know, and what also might be underneath the Sphinx that I've heard about.
Graham Hancock and others, many others, have talked about that.
They think there is a wealth of knowledge, a virtual library, possibly containing the knowledge of a previous civilization in a chamber below the Sphinx.
The company has not looked at any interiors of the pyramids, except perhaps for one on Mars that I told you that we're working on.
It happens to be very similar to symmetries and geometries here on Earth of pyramids of Giza, for instance.
The Sphinx is another question.
It's a very interesting target.
In fact, it's interesting enough that if we get any more requests to do it, we'll probably put it up, we'll probably do it as an on-demand, SciTech on-demand project.
If you look at the website again, you'll see that there are requests to do certain things.
And there does appear to be certain evidence that suggests that we have that there is a hidden chamber underneath the left foot of the Sphinx.
Now, what it holds, I do not know in terms of knowledge base, but nevertheless has not been discovered.
A lot of people, Major, don't understand why many times you can't or won't give specific answers or say we haven't looked at that.
And they simply don't understand that when you undertake to do a project like this, it takes a great deal of time, a lot of money, a lot of resources, and it's not a trivial matter.
It's not like you sit down and just conjure up the answer to this in a few minutes.
I wanted people to understand that, because I think casually listening to this program, they might get the impression that you sort of personally just go into a little trance and come up with sudden answers.
But it has to be done over and over again, double-checked, triple-checked.
And to the point where, again, your tax dollars are at work.
We were able to employ this in life or death situations or to support critical command decisions in national emergencies or where the use of deadly force, that is, dropping bombs on targets, was needed.
I think also the gentleman was asking about cognitive difficulties.
No, except for dyslexia.
We've had several dyslexics go through, and we can accommodate that.
There's a couple of things we have to do to correct the effects, particularly in sketching.
Sometimes, for instance, in cardinal directions, when we get into higher stages and we have to locate things, the dyslexic will often sketch the cardinal directions out of phase by 90 degrees.
They'll rotate north to east or something like that.
Art, after reading your guest's partial resume, which was contained, by the way, in our last newsletter, I'm left with a question.
I, too, was, among other agencies, a member of the Army Security Agency.
In the process of my participation in these groups, I was required to put a signature to a document that affirmed that I would not divulge anything of a classified nature.
This was under penalty of being a custodial guest of some federal detention center.
As a proof of my participation, let me say my schooling in this organization was at a facility in Virginia.
To further clarify, the first two words of this facility were Vint Hill, whatever that is.
This name should ring a bell for your guest.
I've never known the government to declassify anything that has a valid use.
So, my question for your guest is, if this procedure does indeed work, how do you get around the wording of the document that I know that he would have had to have signed?
Well, I remember Ventil Farms from my young days with ASA and NSA.
So we were in the same outfit 30 years ago.
How do I get around that?
It's simply that this technique, the techniques that we evolved over many, many long years of hard work, were about to be thrown out by the government because of controversy.
And so I took the techniques and my commission and went into the civilian world with them.
That's how I got around it.
If the government is not going to use these for any reason, they're such a powerful tool.
It's, in my mind, as significant as the discovery of fire.
I've said that before, I'll say it again.
Or the rediscovery of fire in this case.
We may be resurrecting things that have come and gone any number of times.
And I am not about to keep that in the hands of a Department of Defense or a small coiterie of people or anybody else.
Anything that allows one to recognize that there is another aspect of one's consciousness that does not come into play during normal waking hours, is a good start for my course.
And being a technocrat and a manager of scientists, as I was in the past, priding myself on my job as a technical and scientific remote viewer, I can also say that there's across the board, it looks like, generally speaking, biblical prophecy is dead on.
We have not remote viewed HAARP, except I think that the ozone problem and ultraviolet problem are going to eclipse HARP as a problem.
So that's just a personal opinion.
There is another system that has been tested in the past that is far, far more damaging than HAARP.
But I cannot go into that at this juncture.
I'll try to find a way around it somehow.
But it damages the atmosphere beyond repair to the point where other intelligence officers that I worked with resigned their commission because they could not talk about it and how damaging it was.
Those of us in the military, almost across the board, didn't care about the environment.
I think that you can relate to that as having been in the armed forces when you're there.
But later on, your conscience can get to you over the years and you realize, oh, my God, this thing is punching holes in the atmosphere and the holes aren't repairing themselves in their big hole.