Ed Dames, a former military remote viewing expert, reveals metallic fragments from Roswell—used as blind training targets—originate from a "time machine" prototype that slipped back 50 years via a natural vortex. He warns of a coming global crisis: a cow’s milk virus killing immunosuppressed infants and irreversible atmospheric deterioration with 150–300 mph winds devastating U.S. agriculture, urging relocation to high-altitude or isolated sanctuaries like Switzerland. Dames dismisses Area 51 extraterrestrial claims, citing classified anti-ballistic missile tech and worker lawsuits over toxic fuels. Remote viewing detects post-death consciousness but not souls, which may reconstruct elsewhere, hinting at a broken chain of custody. Humanity faces a grim century of planetary rebuilding, with sealed habitats and survival prep as the only viable paths forward. [Automatically generated summary]
Email from the major, I can't recall what it was, some weeks ago, actually.
You know, I got something, I have something called arts parts that were sent to me, ostensibly pieces of the crashed Roswell saucer.
And we've been putting them through a rigorous scientific testing.
As a matter of fact, the results, very anomalous results of that testing, are available to be seen on my webpage now.
And it's remarkable material, bismuth and magnesium layered in a way that has a lot of people jumping.
I don't want to get too far out of the game right now.
And some of the aluminum parts and the spectrophyl and the scanning microscope pictures are all up on the internet.
It's www.artbell.com.
www.artbell.com.
And I suspect, if not already, and I know Keith, so he's probably got a link to the major's webpage already as well up there.
So you'd be well to visit my webpage and take a look.
The complete scientific report is there.
But I got a piece of email from the major not long ago, a couple weeks, three weeks ago, and you just mentioned in an offhand way, Major, that you had had your team for practice or for fun or for whatever reason working on my Roswell parts.
Actually, let me tell you what I assumed that we were dealing with.
And when my students are trained, they are not told what their targets are.
They're trained in the blind.
Their unconscious is trained to do the work.
It's similar to flying a plane at night.
You have to rely on your instruments, and you really can't, if you do not know how to read those instruments, the analogy here is if you do not understand the structure of remote viewing, you're going to slip off the target.
Trainees are not allowed to graduate until they can get it right every single time.
So as advanced training targets, day six or seven, I slipped a few trainees' arts parts.
When we do this, I've never seen those parts on your web page.
So I simply, I actually called them that.
And pieces, metallic pieces, and I called them in italics arts parts.
The collective unconscious can do the rest.
We know that it can.
But some interesting results.
I assumed as a former project officer for very secret projects, both aerospace and metallurgical, that we were probably dealing with scrap parts.
As project manager, I had many scientists working for me, university professors and industrialists, and they would be making things that I needed on the battlefield in space or somewhere else.
And I'd bring pieces of those back to my office.
All of us who were in positions similar to I had things like this, Gugas and Doodads, on our office.
Sometimes we'd even bring them home, unless they were radioactive.
And many times these projects failed if a corporation, say the Alcoa Corporation, had a classified contract with the government to build something, to make some new sheet metal.
And that didn't work out right because it was penetrated by a tungsten bullet or something like that.
Then this metal became scrap.
I felt that that's what you were dealing with.
Another case, something that's interesting to point out, the Russians, the former Soviets, their metallurgy was sometimes far superior to U.S. metallurgy.
Don't forget, they were making titanium submarines, behemoths, that we could not produce.
So keep that in mind as we talk about this.
I did, as the results started to come in, and these are initial results.
In fact, we can even become aware of the actual scientists that are working on that today.
How's that for a paradox problem?
This is a series of vehicles that the military team that I ran started to perceive about 1984, 85.
We started to gain information on these things that essentially, let me make sure that this picture is set in your listeners' minds.
A group of scientists about 10 years from now, perhaps less, happened to test a prototype design which is spinning.
And this is very important.
I'll get back to this in a moment, some of the physics of how this happened.
This device, instead of going up and out into space, disappears.
And it flies about 200 miles from its test point in the southwest desert and crashes about 50 years earlier In the desert.
Now, the people that find this about 1950, the individuals that find it, Cordonoff the area, and this was not a Roswell crash, by the way.
Roswell was alien.
This was not.
I'll get to that some other time.
They find these pieces, and they automatically assume, because it's probably four generations of technology ahead of anything they had in 1950s, that it's alien.
But they hold on to it until one day somebody notices that a design that a certain scientist is submitting to the patent office matches this.
So it must be alien, right?
The metallurgical processes that you see in front of you and on the screen are really not that far from what we can do now.
If we really wanted to put the money into it, we could produce the kinds of pressures that would be necessary to produce the kind of density and those kinds of alloys.
It could be done, and I'm sure technicians have said as much, but they're not here yet.
It's about another generation out there of technology.
And it just looked back.
I want to illustrate how this first event occurred.
In phenomenology, there's an occasional report of when a tornado passes by a certain place, that later people find pieces of straw and sometimes wood right through a glass window.
The window supposedly fused around the straw.
It just so happens that the vortex that's created by tornadoes, when the tornado turns a specific way at a certain angle, depending on where it is, does something with time.
Bends, which shifts time, slows it down as the Earth is turning, and the Earth turns into this place where two things begin to share the same space.
Then the tornado moves away, and now they do share the same space.
This spinning, this vortex, and the angle of the vortex is very important to this discovery.
Time travel, of course, as we know it now, at most physicists state, would require an energy equivalent to a black hole to affect.
Could be done, but you need that.
It's not within our tech base to do it.
And yet, it does seem to be a little trick that nature plays at certain times.
And one of these prototype devices fell into that trick and slipped back.
It would appear that your parts fit a class of objects that we in my company know to be those things, yes.
Time travel, by the way, is quite a real thing out there in the cosmos as far as we're concerned.
You know, having had 15 years of experience looking at things for NASA and NORAD that they don't talk about.
Vehicles, races that use time travel and teleportation, they need time standards, as you know.
If you're traveling along a gravity wave or along a gravity surface and you pop in somewhere, you need to know not only where you are, but what time it is.
And so pulsars and things similar to pulsars are used as a galactic time standard, if you will, to know when you are rather than just where you are, in addition to where you are.
Crop circles, for instance, are specifically used for on-the-ground registration marks.
The crop circles that we talk about, they're so enigmatic to most people.
For us inside tech, we know what they are.
They're purposely put in perishable media, ephemeral media, to last only one day so that you know on the ground, right there in a local environment, a tactical environment, if you will, what day it is.
So that when you transit time again and you see that specific crop circle that's in a registration book of some type, you know what day you are in.
Because you know that in that book, on that specific day, some registration vehicle made that market.
It's not a vehicle, it's actually a small globe.
We will make that site tech contract available to the public via our Transition 3000 website in the future.
And the last time you care how to meet everybody else as you can reach.
And now, it was just three days ago.
It was on the news, Major.
How much of a please say our false wrong, or may have been wrong, that our climate is much more tenuous, much more fragile than we ever thought it was.
They went way beyond that.
They said there is a significant possibility, they now believe, that we may be headed toward what they called another dust bowl, or even went beyond that, and said they can see our plain states, our farm states becoming deserts.
Not only that, but that that process is actually underway right now.
And that's a frightening, frightening possibility.
And the moment I saw it, I almost fell off my couch.
And I got a lot of other facts of the same sort.
Hearkening back to what you said, what you see coming.
Now, about 10 years ago, that's quite some time ago, while you were working on other projects, you said you saw babies dying.
We think that a planet's immunosuppressed, babies are immunosuppressed, their mothers are immunosuppressed, and now all of a sudden they are toxicologically insulted with a virus that's similar to AIDS and just wreaks havoc with this nascent immune system of theirs.
Oh, it looks like it's within the next several years.
We're coming up real close.
One of the things that SciTech is doing now is establishing milestones along a timeline so that when one event occurs, people will know what the next one is and the time between them so that they can prepare.
Prepare, meaning take your babies off of cow's milk, start digging under the ground because the heavy winds are coming, move from one area to another because you'll have no fresh water, those kinds of things.
It's a really good indicator for how chaotic the atmosphere is going to quickly become.
And it may not come all the way down to the deck, but it'll come close enough to furnish us with some very heavy-duty microbursts and some vicious storms.
High, high, very serious winds.
You'll need to be underground or in very solid structures when this happens.
But moreover, the skies will become very dark over the mid-latitudes where these winds are high.
And that's going to preclude growing crops the way we do now.
We've essentially damaged the Earth's stratosphere, the Earth's atmosphere beyond repair.
There is not just a big ozone hole.
What scientists generally are not aware of is that there's a deterioration of the upper levels of the Earth's atmosphere now in a fashion very similar to metastasis, to cancer that's eating away at the upper levels of the atmosphere.
There aren't any remedial actions that are good enough at this juncture.
You should mention that because another news story that popped up a couple of days ago on Reuters was our government has suddenly cut loose with about $250 million, a quarter billion dollars, to establish 12 early warning centers for new disease around the world, Major.
There's a quarter billion dollars, serious amount of money to cut loose with in times like these.
Early warning centers for disease, and they're going to be looking for new stuff popping up.
And I said at the time, these guys have got to know something we don't.
Well, I worked with those guys, and most of them are virologists.
Unfortunately, viruses get most of the money these days.
But there are other things, other changes.
Bacteria, people, there's a lot of species of bacteria.
They mutate a little bit faster than viruses.
And we are not going to be, we as civilized industrial nations are not going to be able to keep up with the kinds of epidemics and pandemics that spring up.
We're not going to be able to produce vaccines fast enough.
They're going to outrun our ability to research them and chase them with vaccines.
As far as we know in the company, it appears that it's an environmental problem, that the environment has so stressed the organisms, the bacteria, that they're subject to greater numbers of mutations.
Ozone alone, for instance, I mean, ionizing radiation when it hits us may produce skin cancer or melanoma.
But ionizing radiation when it hits a single-celled animal, that's metastasis at best.
And a lot of mutations.
Lots of mutations, much more than has been the case in the last few millennia.
So you're saying that what is occurring to our upper stratosphere, atmosphere, is like a cancer that once begun is going to eat everything alive before it's done.
Well, I know that they've documented thinning of ozone across North America, for example, somewhere between, I'm trying to remember now, 3 and 7%, something like that, that will account for X number more, skin cancer, and so forth and so on.
This is why research like Biosphere 2 is important and those kinds of hermetically sealed units.
We need, first of all, first and foremost, some type of a habitat to grow crops in, a very large habitat.
My company has actually sketched these kinds of habitats that will be used to grow crops.
These crops will be protected by high winds and will have enough light so that food can be produced by humans.
And eventually these habitats for plants will become templates for cities, similar to Biosphere 2.
It's important that we start these kinds of projects now so that the technologies can mature, so that we work the bugs out by the time we really need to migrate into these.
Below-ground structures and above-ground structures are going to be necessary.
I used to be called Dr. Doom at the White House for other reasons, and I don't perpetrate necessarily that appellation, so I'm not going to get into numbers right now.
I mean, I am saying that there will be despeciation and rapid rates.
You think that it's in some ways better off that people don't know all of or how the scale of this I think it's difficult for the everyday person now enough without me prophesying, if you will, the kinds of numbers that we see in-house.
All right.
Here's something from our last interview.
After you had said most of what you've said now, not all of what we just heard, I said, well, what about you?
There you are in, where are you?
You're in Beverly Hills, of all places.
And I said, so what are you going to do personally?
And you said, well, I'm moving west and south.
And I said, to an island?
And you said, something like that.
And this was, and I said, well, gee, West, in the water, not identifying specifically where your company was going to go.
But when you gave other people advice, you told them, go north.
And so it hit me later, you're telling the population to go north, but you're saying we're going south and west.
They also have snowpack and glaciers, which provide a good source of water, you know, unknown quantity.
And water is going to be a real problem.
So and then the other reason is those climates are cold, generally speaking.
Cold enough so that these bacteria remain fairly dormant in those environments because I am telling you that bacteriological mutations are going to be a real big problem.
It's nature carrying out bacteriological warfare against us, like Mother Nature or the Earth administering antibiotics to itself, antibio.
Yeah, it's very close to what the Native Americans believe, that Earth is almost a living entity and that we have insulted Earth and continue to insult Earth.
And in fact, you're saying we have insulted Earth to the degree that it's too late.
I remember once years ago, I found a pelican on the beach with its sitting very still, a brown pelican.
And I picked it up and it bit me a few times.
I put it in the trunk of my car.
I felt really bad for it because it was covered with ants, small ants.
And I took it to a vet, and the vet called me up and said, hey, we dusted the pelican with, it was just with a powder, an antibiotic powder, and it's fine now.
It was just sick.
And all of a sudden I realized that it knew to land and have those ants eat the lice that were attacking it, these mites that were attacking the bird.
If it stood very still, the ants would naturally pick off the lice and eat them, and the pelican could fly away.
So I actually prevented the pelican from continuing this process.
And it reminded me of the situation, the state of affairs, vis-a-vis the Gaia or Solaris, whatever you want to call Mother Earth.
It took us a long time by process of elimination and direct knowledge, because that's what remote viewing is, to ascertain where these winds were coming from.
I mean, we ran the gamut of G. Is this nuclear war?
Is it volcanic activity?
Is it a pole shift?
On and on and on.
And we could not find the answer until we popped up in the upper levels of the atmosphere and said, uh-oh, there's no atmosphere or it's chaos up here.
Well, I would think that governments, the governments of the world, particularly in view of your track record and your history, would be more than a little interested in what you're saying tonight.
Yeah, I was going to say, if these winds descend on the central latitudes, then there will be climate changes elsewhere as a result of that.
And so areas that previously have not been able to grow food might be able to, or areas that have been arid will be wet, or what other changes will result from this?
I would not take too much of a chance in trying to predict what might change and where might change because there'll be no continuity for crop growing unless you get crops into a place where they're protected and the light is maintained and controlled.
So rather than worrying about storing food up and having a big cache of food, as people would be tempted to do, you're more inclined to advise people to devise safe and new ways to grow that food because you're going to have to last a long time.
Well, I would think the people that know your track record, the people that you worked with, listening to this, their eyes must be getting wide and their heartbeat must be quickening.
They said that, or they asked you, well, okay, then, why haven't you predicted the stock market?
Why haven't you predicted lottery numbers?
And your answer was that those are very small spikes in the future, and that they're much harder to read, and that you see the larger events much more clearly.
There may be modifications, but remember, it's a testing area.
Things are built somewhere else and brought in.
Okay.
There's a reason why that kind of secrecy exists, and I'm going to talk about that.
That level of secrecy.
When you're dealing with nuclear weapons and defending the nation against nuclear weapons, you need to have things that are protected, operationally secure as well as secure in other ways, too.
Let me be specific.
There is a set of satellites out there that many of your listeners know about called DSBs, deep space platforms.
These satellites look down on the planet Earth, particularly places other than the United States, for signs of an intercontinental ballistic missile launch, as well as other missiles launched.
They can see the hot flame of a missile and they can see other things that are classified.
Signatures and footprints of the type of activity that would lead to the signature, the setting up of the missile, the things that are associated with that kind of a thing.
Now, we have a problem, though, because once a missile Is launched, it is extremely difficult to interdict that missile.
By the time we get around to doing it, we may or may not be able to intercept, and if we do, we don't know whether we're intercepting a decoy and wasting precious anti-ballistic missile defenses against the decoy or the real thing.
We have real problems there.
So, what to do?
What to do?
If we see somebody allegedly gearing up to launch one, do we launch a first strike or to preempt it?
If someone is getting ready to launch, a potential adversary is getting ready to launch a preemptive strike against the United States, and all indications to our intelligence community, our indications and warning community say that that's going to happen, what do we do?
Well, the answer is we wait.
We wait until we see the missile take off.
Now, that means we have to have an effective anti-ballistic missile defense for the United States, or we have to do something else.
And that's something else, is what goes on in Area 51.
There is another way to defend or attempt to defend, which is almost impossible, against missiles once they go ballistic, and once they enter the Earth's atmosphere over North America, we really can't defend effectively against them.
But there's something else that we can do.
If we can get to a missile launch site fast enough before an ICBM gets into the upper levels of the Earth's atmosphere, we can kill it there in the enemy's own country, in a potential adversary's own land.
Now, you have to move really fast to do that, and you run into all kinds of problems.
But when people like Ben Rich and the Skunk Works back years ago got together to build some really esoteric devices, satellites and SR-71s and all kinds of wonderful things, they pulled together a group of very eclectic thinkers, brilliant engineers, who really didn't work well as a group.
But if you really babysit these individuals and you're a good project manager, individuals, very brilliant engineers working together, they can come up with objects that, for all intents and purposes, appear to be alien.
And that is, in fact, what's happening at Area 51.
You're seeing the limits of our technological base being pushed.
Because people, these engineers, theoretically, can develop all kinds of things that can exceed most of our wildest dreams, but we're limited by our material sciences predominantly to what we can build.
But still, when you build something that flies like a bat out of hell and it's coated with diamond-coated surfaces, very expensive, can move at levels of Mach 18, something very fast, you can take it off from the United States or U.S.-held territory beyond the ground and in the area, in the neighborhood of an ICBM that has just taken off, kill it, disable it, and come back home.
We've been talking for I don't know how long and getting rumors and more than rumors of craft that are flying in from the Pacific at incredible speeds.
Well, and these, I mean, we have some very brilliant engineers in America, and they've been asked to come up with things that can, that was their task.
We have to be able to disable or kill intercontinental ballistic missiles while they're still rising up above a potential adversary's airspace.
So you're saying with a fast response, you could get one of these incredible craft to a location where an ICBM is rising and knock that damn thing down above the country.
Now there's a lot of problems technologically and engineering-wise when you do that.
For instance, you have an ionized plasma that surrounds, in many cases, it surrounds the shell, the skin of a vehicle that's moving that fast, unmanned, by the way.
There's a spontaneous combustion, the aurora, for instance, the engines outside of the craft after it gets to a certain modality of operation.
And there are follow-on vehicles that are more esoteric, that use attempted electrogravitational propulsion, those kinds of things that people see hovering about the Area 51.
All these physics is physics, and we'll build stuff that can increase our capabilities to deliver this kind of Sunday punch because that threat's still very real out there.
There's one other thing I'd like to talk about here, and that is what we're hiding.
If you remember Howard Bloom's book, Out There, which was fairly poorly written, but he talked about a UFO working group in the Pentagon.
I was a member of that.
We even had a cover name for it to disguise ourselves.
We call ourselves the Advanced Theoretical Physics Working Group.
And essentially, we had no charter to look at the UFO phenomenon.
There was no money.
There was no charter.
We tried to hide our activities under General Irvingson's Star Wars program, the SDI program, essentially attempting to develop software that could recognize something, differentiate it between alien, airliner, satellite, those kinds of things.
And those members were military officers.
I was the youngest, the junior officer at the time, and there were members of the military industrial community that were there too, Lockheed Muslim Space, McDonnell Douglas companies of that built.
And we were a bunch of wild and crazy guys who were sincerely interested in looking at this phenomenon, but could not coax money out of presidents or services to really do anything with it.
Why?
Because there's no charter.
After Project Blue Book and a few follow-on projects, there's really no national security threat there.
And the Department of Defense and the intelligence agencies are tasked with protecting the nation against other nations or potential adversaries.
There isn't any charter, and so there's no money for that.
It has to be put into the civilian community research.
Charter doesn't exist congressionally or otherwise to look at UFO things.
Now, our satellites did pick up photos that pick up things, glowing objects hovering above bases, both ours and other countries.
And those are real photos.
They are really glowing objects that defy explanation and are enigmatic That have been captured on satellite photography, but they will not be released because they cannot be released.
Number one, the place that we were looking at, those kinds of data are classified, what we are looking at at any given time.
I don't want to go too deeply into that now, except I want to make sure that we understand that the government isn't hiding anything vis-a-vis that.
The satellite photography that can't be released is because we do not want to give away, I don't watch a lot of television, but if they suggested that some of these photographs can't be released because it would divulge the capabilities of the satellite, then that's correct.
That's the reason that this is so classified.
Some of those.
And that's the only evidence that we have, other than Arts Park, of allegedly alien activity.
Now, there have been very, very enigmatic things happen at U.S. bases, but they remain unexplained.
And any government that purports to have control of its populace or maintain control of its citizenry is not going to release a report that says we don't know what this is.
You and I both understand the reasons why for that.
Well, let me tell you a little story about Gordon Cooper, the astronaut.
He said that he was at Edwards Air Force Base when a military film team was filming something or another, regular duty, and they were out on a flight line, and they saw a craft come down, three legs extend, the damn thing landed on the ground.
They kept rolling.
They had film of it.
This is Gordon Cooper now.
And they started moving toward this craft.
It rose into the air.
The three landing wheels or whatever it was extended into the craft and it just shot straight up.
Well, they had all this on film.
They sent it to Washington, according to Cooper, where it disappeared for all time.
I don't know if you know of Stan or have heard of him, but Stan says a lot of things about our craft, just like you're saying, that we have these things and have had them for a long time.
And by the way, my company is working on a report that we'll put out on our website about La Lande 21185, the star that had a solar system of the new solar system.
With all you have to say about what has occurred to Earth and the insult to Earth, shouldn't we be expanding our space program to look toward other planets possibly that could be inhabited by humans who don't really want to live underground?
It is one of the most fascinating projects I've ever been involved in.
The jury is still out within our own ranks as to what's going on.
But the answer to the question is yes.
There's something that survives death.
Our minds fluff off, however, which is an interesting development.
When we remote view a dying person, we see something split off that we call the soul, and we cannot track that.
It's beyond our capabilities.
We know of other places that have very strange life forms that we think might be where people are reconstructed, but we have no chain of custody.
So there is a discontinuity between what leaves a dying body and what we see in other places, which we suspect might be worlds where personalities are recreated.
A lot of times, our trainees will actually give them their own lives, what we call a personal trajectory.
And I have to be careful that they don't go through the protocols too rapidly because they'll be perceiving their own depth.
And that can be a discomforting thing.
But yes, you can perceive what appears to be, with high probability, very prominent milestones or peaks in your trajectory, including the end of your life.
Yes, it looks as if the KT event did kill off the dinosaurs or possibly lots of things during the Jurassic.
But it did something else, too, that's very interesting.
It appears to have sideswiped Mars to the point where it really disabled the atmosphere and sort of set into motion a dynamic, which robbed Mars of its atmosphere?
Well, there was a very interesting machine that rose up from the surface of the planet to meet yet another machine that was in orbit, a different type.
Both these machines, quite almost sentient vehicles, if you will, unmanned, actually converged on Bobos II, and one actually came in contact with it.
And the rest is in a report.
I'll have that report available for listeners in the next couple of months.
it'll start off as oh my god on day two or three this really works to the point where they perceive things that they may wish they'd never seen may wish they'd never seen is it is it Knowing some of the things that you know, can we change them?
Knowing some events that are coming, and I don't know whether you can, you know, you probably cannot perceive the smaller events, but have you corporately experimented with the ability to modify what appears to be the unmodifiable?
That is autological when you think about it, because how would we know, really?
We don't have a way of double-checking.
We run into a double paradox if we do that.
If we remote view something to get feedback on something that we would plan upon doing, did we, in fact, affect it?
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Did we in fact affect the event or did we affect the event?
And that's difficult.
It gives me headaches to think about.
I don't know how much leeway we have in changing the future.
It may be that the things that we as remote viewers perceive are only those things that have reached 100% likelihood in some other dimension and fallen out as data with us.
We may not indeed be able to perceive things that are less than 100% probable.
I don't have the answers with those questions yet, nor will I probably ever.
We do not do research.
We'll allow our students to do that in the future.
Humans appear a couple of generations from now to be what we would call more durable.
We are a little bit tougher, thick-skinned, allegorically.
In terms of Earth changes, only what my company stands by, and that is, again, the high winds and the atmospheric geological changes that I've already talked about.
Again, I was called Dr. Doom at the White House, and I guess I earned that.
But the truth packs a responsibility, and it isn't always pleasant and fun and entertaining.
We as Americans love to be entertained.
Well, this is not very entertaining, but it's very true.
And the tools that we teach, that, again, tax dollars paid for so many years of research and operations, it's a tool that can discern direct knowledge and truth.
And we'll try to get that in the hands of as many young people as possible in the future.
But others, like Stan Spill Turner, former head of the CIA, would not be at all.
We tend in our 11th hour of life to change.
Oftentimes I have a little practical exercise.
I move along to the moment just before I die and I look back along to the left and I ask myself at that point problematically, is there anything I regret?
And if I can find something I regret, then I make sure I take note of that so I don't let it happen.
I don't have any roads not taken that I regret not taking.