Claims: in legal standing

3 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
13 Aug 2021
A federal judge ruled that Larry Klayman had no standing to represent Cliven Bundy due to dishonesty about his disciplinary history.

He tried to be Cliven Bundy's lawyer, but the judge ruled that Clayman had been dishonest about his history of being censured and disciplined by past courts, and he had no clearance or standing to assign himself as someone else's lawyer.

13 Aug 2021
Larry Klayman was ruled dishonest by a judge and denied standing to represent Cliven Bundy because he had been censured by past courts.

He tried to be Cliven Bundy's lawyer, but the judge ruled that Clayman had been dishonest about his history of being censured and disciplined by past courts, and he had no clearance or standing to assign himself as someone else's lawyer.

13 Aug 2021
The appeals court found that Larry Klayman lacked standing to bring the case because there was no evidence his metadata was collected.

Secondarily, they found that there's no evidence that could be provided that Clayman or Strange actually were spied on at all or had their metadata collected, and therefore they had no standing in court. to bring this case.