Kash Patel – [KH] Acting Resident,Trump Getting Intelligence From Other Places,Think 3D Chess
Kash Patel served as the former Chief of Staff to Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller and is responsible for leading the Secretary’s mission at the Department, including his executive staff and providing counsel to the Secretary on all matters concerning the Department’s operations. Kash oversaw the execution of several of President Donald J. Trump’s top priorities. Kash begin the conversation on how Kamala will only do one debate and at this point she is the nominee but things could change. Trump decided not to receive the clown intelligence, he is receiving intelligence from other sources, Kash, John Ratcliffe, Ric Grenell all have their intelligence clearance. Most likely [KH] will become the acting Resident, Biden will retire. The [DS] will use a cyber attack sometime during the election, they will try not to certify the election. The cyber attack will blackout certain parts of the country. The [DS] will try to make Trump ineligible to hold office, this will fail just like everything else they have tried.
With so much uncertainty in the air, it's natural to fret about the security of your retirement savings.
But there's one asset that stands the test of time, and that is gold.
For centuries, gold has been a hedge against market volatility and economic instability.
With a gold IRA from Noble Gold Investments, you can harness the power of precious metals to help protect your financial future.
By rolling over your existing IRA or 401k into a self-directed gold IRA, you can enjoy the potential for long-term growth and stability.
Diversify your portfolio with a tangible asset that has real value.
Setting up your gold IRA has never been easier with Noble Gold Investments' streamlined process and expert guidance.
This election year, don't let election volatility and uncertainty keep you up at night.
Vote for the timeless safety of gold and silver in 2024.
Noble Gold Investments will give you up to 10 one-ounce silver Trump coins or a 10-ounce silver American flag bar if you open a qualified account.
Go to x22gold.com.
That's x22gold.com or click the link in the description.
And remember, there's always a risk of investment and there's no guarantee of any kind.
Let's talk about protecting our wealth.
Economic immortality.
If you want a comfortable and secure retirement, Bitcoin is for you.
Michael Seller, a prominent advocate of Bitcoin, predicted Bitcoin could reach $10 million per coin.
With only 19.72 million of circulating supply and 21 million of total supply bitcoin is near exhaustion but demand is just starting 10 million per coin is in play and you know what's the best part if you invest with mydigitalmoney.com through a crypto roth ira you won't have to pay capital gain tax imagine buying that 60 000 selling at 1 million and zero tax and that's what my digital money can do for you my Most importantly, they have a battle-tested, multi-layered security.
My Digital Money provides military-grade security for all crypto assets through a partnership with a global leader in IRA Equity Trust.
Your coin is safe with MyDigitalMoney.com.
So if you want to safely invest, invest with MyDigitalMoney.com.
Hi, and welcome to the X22 Report Spotlight.
Today we have a returning guest, Cash Patel.
You can find all of Cash's work on fightwithcash.com.
You can find his book on government gangsters, his movie on government gangsters, and that's governmentgangsters.com.
And I am very happy and honored to have Cash back on the X22 Report Spotlight.
Cash, welcome back to the Spotlight.
Hey, thanks so much for having me back on the program, my friend.
I'm excited to hear what you want to discuss.
Yeah, I wish I had an audience here so they can clap when you came on, but I don't have one.
That'd be nice.
It's okay for me, just don't do it for that Nunes guy.
Yeah, we don't want to do it for him.
So, I mean, I wanted to start off with Kamala now, because she's, I guess, the frontrunner here who's running in the election.
Do you think she's going to make it to the election?
At this point, yes.
She's their candidate, putting aside the fact that they lit on fire the constitutional democratic process to airmail her into the candidacy after 16 million Americans voted in the primary process for Joe Biden.
It's ironic that the Democratic Party is preaching to us about the democracy in a constitutional republic.
But she's it.
They're stuck with her.
I think we are past seeing that bump.
With her being the candidate right now, she's supposed to debate Trump, and she's been arguing quite a bit about the debate rules and things like that.
her.
And now people are starting to talk or at least try to talk to her and ask what her real policies are.
And the only thing she can seem to muster is a is a video featuring Donald Trump's border wall, which she mocked for four years.
With her being the candidate right now, she's supposed to debate Trump and she's been arguing quite a bit about the debate rules and things like that.
Do you think she'll actually debate or do you think she'll back out in the end?
I think you will see one presidential debate and it'll be this one coming up, I think next week, September 10th, whatever date is.
And that's it.
Really?
It's going to be one and done.
And they'll come up with a reason that says, you know, President Trump did this or that, or the media was unfair, so we're not going to participate in it.
And of course, the Democrats and the mainstream media are the only ones that can get away with such a statement and such a maneuver.
And I think if President Trump, which I believe he will, sticks to his policies, And sticks to what he's been talking about, like at town halls and on the campaign trail.
He is going to show the world finally, one-on-one, what he has and what Kamala Harris doesn't.
And once that happens, I think it will be game over for the presidential debates.
So if she does do the debate, are they going to do what they did to Biden?
Because, again, if President Trump sticks to the issues, sticks to his policies, I mean, for her, I mean, it's really going to be bad.
I mean, I think everyone remembers the debate with Biden.
Are they going to do a Biden on Kamala then?
Because at that point, I believe that her poll numbers are going to drop like a rock.
People are going to start to see the true Kamala.
And will, I guess, Obama Who's in the background, will he say, holy... or whoever else is in the background, will they say, you know, something?
Her poll numbers are dropping.
This is really bad.
You think they'll try to swap her out?
Because at this point, I don't really think they care if they follow rules or don't follow rules.
If there's an election, there is an election.
Because it seems like their party just kind of goes along with it.
Well, that's well taken.
And you're right, they just kind of make it up as they go along.
The reason I still think they're stuck with her is because the Biden swap out occurred before the DNC convention.
And now that the delegates have been awarded, and after the debate, which is going to happen on September 10th, you're talking about 50 some odd days till the election.
I think everybody on the Democratic side is already saying the things you're saying, just not publicly.
With is not the greatest candidate.
I can't believe we got her.
But this is where we landed.
So this is where they're stuck.
Even the Democratic machine, I don't believe can churn out a slip of a sitting vice presidential candidate.
I mean, the only thing I can think of where they might swap her out is if she comes down with some type of illness or something happens to her where she cannot continue on.
the things you're thinking.
I just think for now and this time around, they're stuck.
If it was 90 days out, they'd probably swap her out again.
I mean, the only thing I can think of where they might swap her out is if she comes down with some type of illness or something happens to her where she cannot continue on.
Yeah, I guess then they're stuck with Tim Walsh.
And Tim Walsh, I mean, incredible pick.
Don't you find it interesting that out of all her picks, it was, there wasn't a black woman, there wasn't a black man.
It was all the same white guys, which I find very interesting.
And they all seem the same, but they picked the worst of the worst of all those people.
I mean, why would they do that?
I was honestly shocked that she didn't go with like a Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania, Jewish guy, especially in the times that we are living in right now with the war in Israel and whatnot, and Pennsylvania being such a critical state.
It's not like you needed Minnesota.
And it's not like Tim Walz adds anything to the ticket, but a...
you know, deception campaign that he's been running since he was 10.
So I honestly don't understand the thinking there, except the only justification I can have, I've thought of about it is that she, Kamala Harris, wanted to pick someone that didn't outshine her.
And I feel like if she went with the Shapiro or one of the other folks that they were talking about, they would have easily surpassed her in not just their ability to debate and issue policy points across the board, but they would have surpassed her in the media and the skills that they possess.
I mean, Tim Walz is basically like a giant panda on stage.
I mean, this guy can't say anything that's not scripted.
And when you look at his accomplishments for the state of Minnesota, they're not accomplishments, they're negatives, like between his economic decision making and his decision making to allow Minneapolis police persons to burn down to the ground and delay the National Guard.
I mean, it's right out of Nancy Pelosi's playbook in Washington, D.C.
So he just doesn't have anything to stand on.
And they just needed an obsequious lackey for Kamala Harris.
And I think that's why they went with him.
I guess they needed someone kind of like dumber than her.
I mean, that's the way it seems to me.
I mean, it was tough to find, but I think they found the guy.
You know what?
I honestly think most of the world didn't know who Tim Walz is.
And I think the DNC and the radical left-wing machine said, we're just going to manufacture this college or this high school football coach, veteran combat guy, who's now governor of the great state of Minnesota.
And this is not a knock on Minnesotans, but, um, and they, and they were, they were able to put out this cookie cutter thing and trot them out on stage and tell them to read this line and read that line and then get off stage.
You know, but he got caught with a monumental lie about his service record and that is a huge disqualifier.
Now people are pointing out all the different things that he lied about and it's very funny because his family actually is all for Trump.
And it's funny because I think AP put out an article saying well those are his distant cousins.
So basically AP confirmed that yeah that's his family.
What AP forgot to mention was that Tim Walz's own brother actually issued a statement damning Tim Walz's sort of credentials to be the vice president.
So, you know, whether they want to distance that statement from the picture, I guess they can go ahead and try to cut that, split that hair.
But his family, wire to wire, does not support him for the vice president.
And that's absolutely incredible.
It just, it blows my mind.
So we have Kamala as the nominee.
We have Trump as the nominee for the Republican Party and Kamala for the Democratic Party.
So Trump said something very, very interesting that he is not going to accept the intelligence reports from the clown organization.
I'm assuming Kamala, it probably is.
Well, she is VP, so I'm assuming that she's getting it.
Why do you think Trump is saying, you know, something, I don't want to accept any of these intelligence reports?
I'm glad you brought this up.
And it's pretty timely because, remember, Trump said that not today, not yesterday, but a while back.
And what do we have the buffoons that authored Russiagate at the Department of Justice and FBI do with Merrick Garland?
Re-implement Russiagate all over again just this week.
So why would anyone want intelligence from the very DOJ and FBI and IC that lied to the world About Russiagate that lied to a federal court to illegally surveil President Trump.
That lied to the American public about the Russian disinformation campaign.
Allow them to regurgitate it.
Why would President Trump want to receive intelligence from them?
It was a pretty prescient thing for President Trump to go out and weeks, if not months ago, say he's not going to listen to their intelligence because their intelligence is completely bought and paid for by the Democratic National Committee, just like they did with Hillary Clinton.
And so I can't blame them one bit or President Trump one bit for saying, I don't want intelligence.
It's just a shame and an embarrassment that our Department of Justice and our FBI Of course Donald Trump was right to say, I'm not going to listen to these bozos.
are yet again relying on the media to perpetrate another fraud and rig another election.
And I think this time around, I really do, people are saying, wait a second, this is what your guys are coming down to?
You're saying it's Russia, Russia, Russia again?
Of course Donald Trump was right to say, I'm not going to listen to these bozos.
And that's part of the reason people are so attracted to President Trump's national security policy is because he's the one guy that's going to go in there and say, we're going to fix DOJ and FBI.
We're not going to let these Muppets utilize taxpayer dollars and give these staged speeches in which they continue to lie to the world.
About who actually is interfering in our democracy.
I'm going to go with Iran, who hacked President Trump's campaign.
I'm going to go with Iran, who murdered American hostages.
I'm going to go with Iran, who started World War III.
And then we'll go to the CCP.
I'm not saying Russians aren't doing any nefarious activity, but you're giving them a hall pass, and Putin over there on the other side of the world is having a field day with these government gangsters at the FBI and DOJ.
I mean, were you shocked when all of a sudden they said Russia is interfering once again?
Wait, did you call Nunes and say, hey, dude, we're back?
We got everything.
They're trying it again.
I called Devin and I was like, have you been drinking?
Are we in the Twilight Zone?
How did we go back six years?
You know, for us, for the two of us, where this thing was extremely personal and, you know, we just put out the truth as we saw it then and it continued to hold and it continues to hold today.
But even us, even I was just shocked.
That they went back to Russiagate.
But that shows me that they have expensed every round they have in the chamber.
They don't have better policy.
Zero.
They don't have a better way to safeguard the economy, or the border, or end the wars, or stop sending our children to fight some other man's battle.
They don't have another way to end Iran's reign of terror.
They don't have another way to shut down the CCP and their advance on Taiwan.
And they certainly don't have a way to combat the cyber-intelligence offensive operations that Putin is running.
And so what they give you is a version of Russiagate, Hunter Biden's laptop, 51 Intel letter, insurrection disinformation campaign, impeachment one, impeachment two, all jammed together in the new Russiagate 2.0.
So if Trump isn't getting intelligence reports, is he getting information from other places?
Because I guess Kamala, I guess they're not feeding her crap.
I assume that they're feeding her actual information.
Well, maybe, maybe not.
But what about Trump?
I mean, are you concerned that he's not receiving or is he receiving it from other places?
Well, look, let's take Kamala first.
As the former Deputy Director of National Intelligence, my job was to make and deliver the presidential daily briefing to the President of the United States in his cabinet.
And what we were able to do with President Trump was, he said, here are my priorities on intelligence.
Iran, the CCP, narco-traffickers, terrorists, and the Afghanistan situation, Russia, things like that, right?
Because we only have so much bandwidth, so the President sets the marker and says, fire off here, here, here, here, here, and here.
And then everything else is tier two.
What Kamala and Biden have done is made DEI, climate change, the weather, and white rage tier one collection priorities, literally.
So what she generates from the intelligence community And what is delivered to her is vastly different than what could be delivered to her in what is an actual national security threat, because they want to weaponize the intelligence community.
So she is getting what she asked for, but she's not getting the material she needs to defend this nation because she's told our intelligence and defense apparatus, don't look at the actual enemy, tell me about when the sun is going to rise.
And I wish I was lying, but that's literally what they've done.
Now, Trump On the other hand, while he doesn't have access to that PDB and intelligence cycle, and doesn't have the ability to set the stage on what is a priority and what isn't, He's surrounded by individuals, guys like Johnny Ratcliffe and Rick Grinnell and Devin Nunes and all these other folks who held high positions in government, highly sensitive access to classified information.
Not that they have it now, but these guys are pretty astute at reading the tea leaves and reading the media.
And also, a lot of people continue to have their own sources in faraway places.
So you don't need to rely on a weaponized system of intelligence, and I think that's President Trump's You know, sort of ace in his back pocket.
He knows who we can count on to say, hey, I want to know what's going on in Afghanistan.
I want to know what's up with Putin in Russia.
What are we doing with DPRK?
And while he doesn't have access to that full suite of intelligence, even though Kamala Harris has access to it, she's not using it.
Donald Trump continues his priorities about defending this nation.
And I think he's got enough people he can talk to to say, hey, I need to know what's going on.
And then he's able to speak to it, unlike Kamala.
So you're saying that like Rick Grinnell and John Ratcliffe and others, they don't have security clearance at all to get intelligence information?
No, most of us still do.
I still do, right?
Wait, I didn't know that.
Wait, you still have the ability to get intelligence?
So I still have a security clearance, right?
I still have a top secret security clearance.
I'm sure most of those guys do as well.
It's whether or not intelligence is delivered to them.
They're going to say they don't have a need to know, as we say in the community.
And so it's highly unlikely Unless they were invited in by the current administration, not just them, anybody, to say, hey, we want to brief you in on this.
And because you were the former DNI or acting DNI or what have you, chairman of this and that, we want your opinion on it.
And that's happened.
That happens frequently over in Congress.
So I can't speak to what they've been given access to, but it wouldn't surprise me if they had been called upon by their former colleagues, at least the Republicans in Congress, to say, hey, We need your help navigating this because we know you dealt with X, Y, and Z when you were in your position.
So as we move towards the election, we can see that the Deep State players, they've been trying to remove Trump, stop Trump.
Actually, if you go back to 2016, I think it's very apparent now that they've tried everything.
And I think the last, one of the last things, I'm not saying it is the last, do you think he will go to prison or do you think he has the ability to stop this?
I sure hope he doesn't.
And I think if he's even sentenced to a single day in prison, the response from the American public will be an overwhelming response for President Trump, because it will be the final piece of proof That they need to see to say we have become a fully weaponized banana republic when we imprison our political opponents.
It's no longer a tagline or a campaign line or a sentence.
I don't think it's that way right now because he's already been convicted in this bogus sham trial in New York and made up charges.
But the rest of the country in the world, if you actually sentence him to jail, They'll see it for what it is now.
I don't this judge Marchant and we'll talk about him another time, but I don't think he will issue a sentence that says you have to immediately surrender.
I think what he will do is say either.
We're going to delay this slightly or I'm going to issue a sentence.
I think he finds himself in a position where he thought at the beginning of the trial, he's the savior of the left.
And now he is starting to realize if I give this guy a day in prison, I'm probably going to hand him the presidency.
And so I don't know what balancing act he's going to pull now, but I think he overplayed his hand during this trial.
And I think September 18th will actually be a very good day for Donald Trump in terms of politics.
I think they just want it as a talking point, just to say, hey, even if he does go to prison, I'm going to tell you right now, a picture of him behind bars will be on every t-shirt, every mug.
I mean, it just, it will be, he'll make millions and millions of dollars from that.
And it will hurt the Democratic Party and all the deep state players.
I think they just want it as a talking point to say, hey, he was convicted and now he's sentenced, but it's not going to work at all.
No, I think you're right on the talking point deal.
They wanted the talking point of a conviction.
They got that talking point.
Now they want the talking point of, you know, we're going to send him to jail, but we're going to hold off for right now.
But they want to be able to just say it.
That's pretty astute.
Yeah.
And just going back to the Russian interference with the election.
I mean, back in 2016, they said, you know, Russia helped them win the election.
They interfered.
And, you know, Hillary Clinton, you know, kept pushing that narrative.
But this time around, I heard you on another podcast talking about a cyber attack.
Are they just going to say it this time?
Or are they going to show the people that Russia is actually helping Trump, even though they're really not?
Are they going to use a cyber attack to maybe say they manipulated the results?
Or, I mean, let's say Trump wins and everyone goes, oh, yay, he won.
And then all of a sudden they say, oh, well, hold on, everybody.
It was a cyber attack.
We don't know if these results are on the up and up.
They might have been manipulated, so we're gonna have to take a look at it.
I mean, do you think they'll go that far?
I think it's important to identify who the government gangsters are that are running this op again, because it's the same people.
Lisa Monaco and John Carlin were senior Obama Justice Department and White House officials who ginned up Russiagate.
Right.
John Carlin was my boss at the Department of Justice and National Security Division who authorized the illicit FISA warrant against Donald Trump.
Lisa Monaco and John Carlin are now the number two and three at the Justice Department.
Obviously we all know who Chris Wray is and who covered up the FISA abuse and then violated FISA 274,000 times himself in one year to illegally spy on Americans.
So this is the cadre of law enforcement that's there.
Then you have the intelligence community, who is also Obama administration leftovers from Russiagate.
And like Admiral Haynes, who's over at DNI, and all these other folks are going to come together.
Like they did before.
And if Donald Trump wins the election, they are going to come up with more ways than you can think to contest it, which will be the ultimate hypocrisy and irony of ironies.
They're going to say somehow it was rigged.
They're going to say, as you alluded to, that there was some sort of intrusion or incursion, whether it's the Russians or the Chinese or the Iranians, that they must look at it.
That everything's on hold and we, the Biden-Harris administration, are in charge of the U.S.
government, so we're going to dictate to you, the American people, our findings.
And what Congress, and this is our only foothold here, the Republican majority in Congress, if they start, if the White House and the Biden-Harris administration start to pull these maneuvers, they gotta come in hard and fast And demand public hearings from every single person in a leadership position and obtain every single document so they can't do what you just said and said, oh, there was an intrusion, but we can't show you because it's classified.
Too much is at stake, but you're right.
They're going to come up with a whole suite of options to say the election results are on hold if Donald Trump is shown to be the victor.
If we go back a little bit in time with the 2020 election, Trump made a very big deal with Pence saying, hey, you should have sent the results back to the legislature.
And the Democrats, they changed the law saying the vice president cannot send it back to the legislature.
So if this scenario does happen, Let's talk about protecting our wealth.
Are you worried about the future of the U.S.
economy?
With so much uncertainty in the air, it's natural to fret about the security of your retirement savings.
But there's one asset that stands the test of time, and that is gold.
For centuries, gold has been a hedge against market volatility and economic instability.
With a gold IRA from Noble Gold Investments, you can harness the power of precious metals to help protect your financial future.
By rolling over your existing IRA or 401k into a self-directed gold IRA, you can enjoy the potential for long-term growth and stability.
Diversify your portfolio with a tangible asset that has real value.
Setting up your gold IRA has never been easier with Noble Gold Investments, streamlined process, and expert guidance.
This election year, don't let election volatility and uncertainty keep you up at night.
Vote for the timeless safety of gold and silver in 2024.
Noble Gold Investments will give you up to 10 one-ounce silver Trump coins or a 10-ounce silver American flag bar if you open a qualified account.
Go to x22gold.com.
That's x22gold.com.
Or click the link in the description.
And remember, there's always a risk of investment and there's no guarantee of any kind.
Let's talk about protecting our wealth.
Economic immortality.
If you want a comfortable and secure retirement, Bitcoin is for you.
Michael Seller, a prominent advocate of Bitcoin, predicted Bitcoin could reach $10 million per coin.
With only 19.72 million of circulating supply and 21 million of total supply, Bitcoin is near exhaustion but demand is just starting.
$10 million per coin is in play.
And you know what's the best part?
If you invest with MyDigitalMoney.com through a Crypto Roth IRA, you won't have to pay capital gain tax.
Imagine buying that $60,000 selling at $1,000,000 and zero tax.
That's what MyDigitalMoney can do for you.
Most importantly, they have a battle-tested, multi-layered security.
MyDigitalMoney provides military-grade security for all crypto assets through a partnership with a global leader in IRA Equity Trust.
Your coin is safe with MyDigitalMoney.com.
So if you want to safely invest, invest with MyDigitalMoney.com.
Kamala Harris is the VP.
She won't be able to send the results back.
So what do they do?
They just put the whole election on hold?
I mean, I guess they theoretically could do that, but if they decided to do that, then they would have an actual scenario where you have a sitting VP committing an actual insurrection.
Again, the Democrats and the radical left-wing media are the biggest projection con artists of our time.
They continuously accuse Donald Trump and his movement of doing the very things they are always guilty of.
Rolling out disinformation campaigns, weaponizing the system of justice, two tiers of justice if you dare to be a MAGA supporter or if you're Donald Trump himself.
And now they have positioned themselves to be in a seat where they can actually halt the results of the election so they could secure the election for themselves.
That would be an actual coup, and so I just find it the irony of ironies that this is the position that they might find themselves in.
I have no idea, honestly, what they would do if they get to that position, but if they tried to hold on to power even just one second, It would be, in my opinion, an exposition of everything that we have been talking about for these last eight years that is wrong with the radical left-wing agenda.
And it might be a victory in disguise for the rest of America.
Yeah, I agree.
And with this, I mean, if there is a cyber attack or something happens, to prove that, you know, we're being attacked or foreign entities trying to manipulate the elections, do you really think there'll be, like, power outages?
And do you really think there will be problems in the country?
Well, I think, I don't necessarily connect it to the election.
I just think if I were our adversary, if I were the CCP, if I were Russia, if I were Iran, if I were North Korea, And out of the four there, the Russians probably have the best intelligence capabilities.
And it's maybe a tie in terms of combining those intelligence capabilities and cyber offensive operations between them and the CCP.
And it doesn't cost them a lot of money.
It's very hard to detect if you're not proactively looking for it, which this administration clearly is not because they've not made it a priority.
So I just think that if they were going to attack at a moment of weakness, I don't know that they necessarily care about the results of what that does to the election cycle.
Maybe they do, maybe they don't.
tracks and never actually get caught.
I don't know that they necessarily care about the results of what that does to the election cycle.
Maybe they do.
Maybe they don't.
I just can't tell.
But I think their option would be or their desire would be, how do we screw with America And in my opinion, our electric grid infrastructure systems have been deteriorating for decades, and no one has made an emphasis on it.
President Trump tried to during his first administration to upgrade these things and to secure these things, because if you shut off some of these switch stations here and there, you're going to shut off half of America from electricity for a while.
And it's not just like a simple reboot.
And so that is my warning to anyone in the Biden-Harris administration that's listening.
It's your job to safeguard this infrastructure.
It's your job to proactively protect against these cyber offensive operations.
And they're simply just not prioritizing to do so.
And the result could be pretty catastrophic.
And it unfortunately ties right into a time of historical consequence with the 2024 election.
So these systems, they're not all tied together.
I mean, are you saying that the entire country will just be blacked out?
No, no, no.
They're not tied together.
They service big geographic chunks.
And that's just if you're talking about electric, right?
Say you're talking about a specific stylized cyber attack to take out Wi-Fi.
Um, you know, to take out the Internet, to take out telecom, you know, there's a whole different set of options these folks have that is outside of just turning the electricity switch fully off, which I think is the worst one, obviously, because it shuts everything down.
So they have options.
Yeah, so I guess it's almost like the same, I think this happened in 2003 when the Northeast, all of a sudden we had a blackout and it was just a big chunk.
So we might, I mean what you're saying is we might see like a chunk of let's say California, like California might be blacked out or Texas might be blacked out or parts of Texas might be blacked out but not the entire country or everything will just shut down.
Right, I mean, you'd have to put on a massive operation for any one of those singular things to happen, and to have a total dominant blackout, you'd have to put on... I don't think even our adversaries are thinking to stage that type, or do they have the capabilities to stage that type of offensive operation.
But, you know, if anyone's out there saying, oh, they can't do it, well, look what they did to the Paris Olympics in the middle of the Paris Olympics.
That wasn't an accident.
It's not like somebody forgot to pay the electric bill.
They turned a city off in the middle of the Olympics.
So I think to me that was a show of force to say, hey, whether you're a bad actor in terms of a country or a nation or just a group of bad actors who don't like X, Y, or Z, these are things that people can do.
So since they're using the narrative that Russia is going to interfere in the election, I think we can assume, and maybe I'm wrong, that they're going to say, hey, Russia did this.
Russia is the one who did this, which then, when I think of that, if a foreign entity attacks our national infrastructure, and the election system is also part of the national infrastructure, isn't that an act of war?
You know, that's a difficult question because the answer Can almost never be delivered with exact certitude.
So if you're going to, unlike a physical 9/11 stylized attack against our country, which we can pinpoint to an Al Qaeda or a UBL or something like that, unless you're actually looking to detect this thing before it happens, and unless you actually have a definite finite piece of intelligence and unless you actually have a definite finite piece of intelligence that says it came from Vladimir Putin's house, declaring war on that kind of measure would be not in the interest of the United States, in my But that's what our adversaries are counting on.
They're just going to say, it wasn't us, it was those guys.
It wasn't those guys, it was that group of wackos, those black hat guys over there.
If it wasn't China, we would never do that.
We're too busy dealing with Taiwan or in the South China Sea.
You know, these guys aren't stupid.
They've actually gotten together and they also know that they can do pieces of these operations and lay the blame game around.
And they know the dummies in America will say, oh, it's Russian disinformation.
And I just want to remind the audience that remember when President Trump was running the first time back in 15, 16, whatever it was, and there was, again, the disinformation campaign that the Russians That's true.
the DNC and John Podesta's emails. - That's true, yeah. - Well, our FBI wouldn't let the FBI, James Comey would not let the FBI have access to those servers at the DNC.
He instead gave it to his buddy, Sean Henry, who owns CrowdStrike, who used to work for Comey, and CrowdStrike seized the servers, and CrowdStrike only exploited a piece of the servers, so we never had the answer as to who definitively attacked the DNC servers.
But for two years we were allowed to hear the disinformation campaign that it was the Russians that hacked it, and I interrogated Sean Henry under oath, and that interrogation is finally available in public back then, And he admitted, he admitted, he goes, we did not have the information to say whether or not the Russians hacked the DNC.
That was a cover up that the FBI ran through James Comey.
And so you can expect these same government gangsters, if there's this stylized attack yet again, this is their roadwork, the roadmap on how they will handle it, because that's how they've done it before.
And now they've injected that same campaign back into the ether.
Yeah, so the fake news, they're just gonna come out, and of course, the clowns, if they say, hey, it's Russia, everyone's gonna run with it, and everyone's gonna think it was Russia.
So without any proof, I mean, they have, you know, just like they, you know, the same clown said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, which turned out to be...
Fake.
So I think they're going to, I think you're right, I think they're going to run with the same exact thing.
But I mean, how long can they hold the elections?
I mean, if they say, hey, we have, can they say we have to do it, do it over?
Or I mean, what do you do at that point if they're saying it's manipulated?
Yeah, look, that's a situation that's never happened before, right?
Yeah.
The Supreme Court, I mean, the closest we've come to that is, you know, down in Florida, Bush v. Gore on the whole, what's the punching the card thing called?
Oh, the chads or whatever?
The chads, the hanging chad, right?
And the Supreme Court came in quickly and said, here's the decision, here's what we're doing.
That's the closest we've ever come.
I'm not saying that the cause of that is the same as what we're talking about here.
So I just don't know.
Nobody knows, because no one knows if it will go to the Supreme Court.
And even if it went to the Supreme Court, who's to say that the radical left-wing Democrats who know that the Supreme Court is More in favor of, well, not more in favor, has a majority that was appointed by conservatives versus Democrats.
They're probably like, oh, we're not taking it there.
We don't believe it.
And we're still in power and we're going to do X, Y, or Z. I don't know.
It's a guessing game.
And if they want to toy with the Constitutional Republic and set it on fire, then they will do it at their own expense.
Because on January 20th of next year, you know, it's my belief that Donald Trump's going to be sworn in as the 47th president.
Yeah, I mean, we just have to get there.
And that just, we just gotta get there.
That brings me to the SAVE Act then.
Because, I mean, again, we're speculating, but the House passed the SAVE Act.
I don't think the Senate is going to.
I don't think Mitch McConnell wants to, you know, take this on.
I know Johnson and Trump, I think they're both working to put this with the continuation of government spending bill.
Right now, it feels like Trump kind of trapped the Dees and the Rhinos because if they don't include it and there isn't no negotiation, they're just going to let the government shut down.
If they do pass it, then everyone uses paper, everyone needs an ID, everyone has to show up in person and we count in one day.
So what option are they going to choose?
Or is there a third option that they have?
Well, I think this is Donald Trump's political forte showing at its finest.
He is putting what I believe is the number one issue this election cycle front and center in Congress right before the financial shutdown of the government.
He is saying our voting is directly tied to the illegal immigration that has been occurring under the Biden-Harris regime.
And what you've never heard Kamala Harris come out and say is, I only want American citizens voting in American elections.
She will never say that, and has never said that, because she knows that states who control how the electoral process works for the federal government in their own state, determine who gets a ballot.
And why that's of critical importance is because of this SAVE Act.
You would think in the United States of America, we didn't need another law that says you have to be a US citizen to register to vote.
That law is already on the books, but because a federal court about 15 years ago interpreted how that law is enforced and left it to the states to enforce.
Verification of U.S.
citizenship for registration to receive a ballot.
States like my home state, Nevada, and others simply ask you to show up and say, check yes or no, are you a U.S.
citizen?
It's the total honor system.
There's no verification.
Hence, they want the SAVE Act to come in and close that loophole and say, you need some form of proof To show you're an American citizen.
You know, birth certificate, what have you.
And the Democrats, they don't want that.
Because that's going to take out the millions of illegal people, immigrants that have come across and are probably being sent ballots.
Because all the Democrats want at the end of the day is the thousands and thousands and thousands of ballots to fill them out and stuff them and put them in ballot boxes.
And so they will never say they are against illegal immigrants voting in this election.
They will just say, oh, they're not illegal immigrants and we shouldn't call them that and we'll fix the elections after we win in November.
And so I think what President Trump has done is forced The Democrats and Kamala Harris specifically to address that issue by saying, are you really against the SAVE Act?
Are you really against American citizens voting in an American election?
She's going to have to defend that.
And I hope it is attached to the CR, even if it just forces that conversation.
There's great warriors like Mike Lee and company on the Senate side who are championing the SAVE Act.
But let's force Mitch McConnell in the Senate.
To shoot that thing down, if that's what they want to do.
Let's force them to publicly say their campaign and their political party is built on a singular concept that says, we do not believe in voting rights for American citizens.
We believe in voting rights for anyone in America, as long as you get a ballot, and we're going to control who gets a ballot.
I think that is a mighty powerful argument that President Trump has shaped in his favor And whether or not the Senate approves it, I think it's worth having this battle because it's coming right in the election season and it's going to force them to either keep the government open and accept the SAVE Act or shut the government down and reject the SAVE Act and say, we are for non-Americans voting in American elections.
And, you know, I just thought of something else.
I mean, let's say they reject it and they shut the government down because, you know, because otherwise they're going to lose no matter what.
I mean, so if they do shut the government down and we are attacked or Russia helps or they say Russia manipulated the election, it's during a period of time where the government is shut down, they're blaming it on Russia.
And then everyone could just turn around saying, well, you had the government shut down.
No money was, you know, being allocated to certain areas.
You allowed this to happen.
I mean, no matter which way you look at it, they're kind of screwed.
Well, actually, I never even thought of that, but now I'm going to steal that when I do other shows.
No, it's a whole other layer on this three-dimensional chessboard.
If they shut down the government, then who is going to be standing guard, even with the jacked-up priorities of the Harris-Biden administration?
Because look, I've been furloughed as a federal employee.
Obama did it to me, and I never got my money back.
But you get sent home.
And you don't show up to work and you're not allowed to work if there's a government shutdown.
And even all the emergency necessary employees that are classified as such can't run the entire U.S.
government and protect us from that kind of nefarious activity.
So, yes, it will happen on the Biden-Harris watch, which is another brilliant reason that President Trump is going to force, hopefully force, this issue and this argument and this vote in the United States Congress, because the shutdown would be on them.
And then The shutdown and the Democrats will be responsible for whatever disastrous results we have during the election cycle.
Let's say the Senate, let's say they say, OK, you know what?
We don't want the government to shut down because all of our money laundering and everything like that.
You know, we want to we want to get our money.
So let's say they pass it.
What is Biden going to do?
Because, you know, another thing, is this guy going to sign it?
Yeah.
I don't know.
He could reject it.
Excuse me.
He could reject it.
So it's going to be a very interesting week or two here when we get to it and we force this thing, hopefully force it onto the CR, force the House to vote, force the Senate to vote.
And then if it gets to Biden's desk, is he going to be the guy that says, nah, I'm shutting down the government.
I don't want the SAVE Act.
Yet another powerful political messaging point that I think ignores in Donald Trump's favor.
So if, I just want to go back to if they decide to shut down the government, because they have to make this decision on September 30th?
Fiscal years, yeah, at the end of the month.
Okay, so we're going to have, you know, the whole month of October where the government will be shut down.
I guess every week that goes by, they have to shut down additional things because they don't have the money, you know, to keep everything open.
So it's going to continually shut down.
So if there is some type of manipulation that they're saying, that Russia manipulated the elections, and they're saying that we can't certify and we have to hold the elections, at this point do you think Congress can say, you know what, we got to do the elections over and this time we can't use the systems because we don't know if there's malware, we don't know what happened to them, we must use paper, we must use ID, we must use voting in one day, so will this force
I don't think that there's a way to have a redo in our current system.
I think Congress will be put in a position to be forced to certify the election in January if it comes down to that sort of scenario.
I just don't see a court of law in Congress saying, we gotta do it all over again.
Um, and so I don't think we get there.
I think, and I think this SAVE Act, um, that decision will be made well before.
Either it will pass or it won't be in the CR or Biden won't sign onto it.
And Americans will vote based on, on that, um, issue being another central plank, uh, of this campaign cycle.
But I just don't see any court or Congress saying, yeah, we're going to do this over.
For them holding the elections where they're saying they're not going to certify because they've been manipulated, do you think they want to make the Trump base angry?
Are they trying to force something like a civil right?
I think Jamie Raskin, if we don't certify or if the elections are manipulated, Trump supporters are going to get angry, they'll probably riot, and then we'll use the 14th Amendment on Trump saying he caused another insurrection.
Do you think that this is the direction that they're heading in?
I don't know that they have it planned out in that sort of sequential order, but I think you can count on the Democrats, the radical left wing, to come in and use every piece of hypocrisy they have thrown at us for themselves to try and secure an election victory in November.
How that all plays out, man, it's going to be interesting to watch it unravel and interesting to see what things they come up with and what distractions they want.
And it will be very interesting to see if they're the ones that want to see an actual circus in and around Congress if the Democrats fail and Congress fails to certify the elections.
You know, now we know, remember, it was Nancy Pelosi Who didn't want the National Guard and rejected it and allowed for a crowd to gather outside of the National, of the Congress.
And it wasn't the fault of anybody else's, but her failure and Mayor Bowser's to secure it after President Trump authorized it.
And again, they also didn't bring in no-climb fences.
I had to bring them in from DOD.
And why they weren't set up earlier?
Because I think there were some folks that wanted to see that sort of chaos so they could pin it on Donald Trump as another disinformation campaign.
And so those folks are still in D.C.
and they might want a version of that.
come this next election.
This time we have a different speaker.
We have Speaker Johnson.
So do you think he would actually go ahead and realistically protect the Capitol?
Well, I think for him, it's lessons learned.
You know, He knows what needs to be done and what should have been done by his predecessor, or, you know, before McCarthy, his predecessor Pelosi, and what didn't happen.
And it's now abundantly clear how the law operates and what the rules are.
So it's entirely on him to, I guess in this instance, work with Biden as the Commander-in-Chief.
Who could also, by the way, slip the Commander-in-Chief hat over to Kamala in the lead up to the election here to make her quote-unquote president and give her a boost politically somehow, and he could just retire from the seat.
Do you think that'll be an October surprise?
I think it's in the works.
I've always said this.
Look, I think that no member of the Biden family will ever go to prison.
This tax trial that Hunter Biden's now underway is a total sham and a fraud.
He should have been charged with multiple serious felonies years ago.
Not to mention the fact that he's already a convicted felon.
But daddy is going to save him.
He's never going to do a day in jail.
And I think the horse trade will be, I'm going to, Joe Biden, leave or retire.
You, Kamala, are going to take the reins.
And once the election is over, you're going to pardon my son and my entire family and myself.
Because remember, presidential pardons aren't just retroactive, they're prospective.
So if you pardon someone, you pardon them for the entirety of the conduct that you put in the pardon paperwork.
And I've always thought that that was going to be some way, some deal to horse straight, because if you can count on Joe Biden to do one thing, it's to save his family from all this illicit conduct that they have been caught in.
And he can do it with the stroke of a pen.
But they can still bring charges against Biden, though.
Joe Biden.
Joe Biden.
Because he's... Why would they... With all the investigation of the House and all his shell companies... He'll pardon himself.
He'll put himself in the pardon.
Pardon from what crime, though?
He hasn't... You don't have to be... Okay, so that's the thing about pardons.
Okay.
You don't have to be charged with a crime to pardon yourself.
Really?
You can pardon anyone, not just the president.
You can pardon any human being as president to say, I pardon Kash Patel for all his activities in Afghanistan.
That's it.
That's all you need to do.
And that's game over.
And that's for everything.
Now, if you commit new crimes going forward from the date of that pardon, you're not protected.
But that's all it takes.
So do you think this time around, as Trump continually says, the election is going to be too big to rig, do you think we have more people than we had back in 2020?
And do you think the election will be too big to rig?
I do.
I think his policies are so dominating, the country's in such a catastrophic freefall, national security economy and everything else, and the cost of living is just skyrocketing during this administration that people who don't normally participate in the polls are saying, I'm getting involved.
And yes, it was better four years ago than it is now.
And so I do believe Donald Trump's message to swamp the vote and make this thing too big to rig is resonating.
And I'm seeing it everywhere I go.
And even on the Trump 47 meetings that I lead and these engagements I have around the country, people from all walks of life are coming in.
The gun owners are coming in, the Bitcoin community is coming in, and all sorts of single issue voters are coming in and saying, man, Our country is on the wrong track, and I want a better future for our children, and that's with DJT.
Hey Cash, thank you very much for being on the X22 Report Spotlight.
Once again, if people want to get your book or see a movie, where should they go?
Yeah, I appreciate it.
Just go, the book, the best-selling book, which is, it's got a cool new cover.
It's the cover of the movie, Government Gangsters.
You can buy this on Amazon or governmentgangsters.com, but go watch the best-selling documentary in America, Government Gangsters that Steve Bannon made into a film right before he went into prison.
61 minutes.
Go to warroom.film.
Warroom.film.
You can have a watch party in your community.
We're taking screenings all over the country.
But it is this book on screen showing you everything we just talked about how government gangsters are upending our democratic way of life and how we can fix it.
So check it out.
And lastly, selfishly, Plot Against the King 3 just came out.
Don't forget your kids!
It's The Return of King Donald and The Return of the Maga King.
Great.
I'll put all the links at the bottom of the video to make it a lot easier for people to go over.
Cash, once again, thank you very much for being on the Spotlight.
I really appreciate it.
Hey, thanks.
That was an awesome conversation.
Absolutely.
Let's talk about protecting our wealth.
Are you worried about the future of the U.S.
economy?
With so much uncertainty in the air, it's natural to fret about the security of your retirement savings.
But there's one asset that stands the test of time, and that is gold.
For centuries, gold has been a hedge against market volatility and economic instability.
With a gold IRA from Noble Gold Investments, you can harness the power of precious metals to help protect your financial future.
By rolling over your existing IRA or 401k into a self-directed gold IRA, you can enjoy the potential for long-term growth and stability.
Diversify your portfolio with a tangible asset that has real value.
Setting up your gold IRA has never been easier with Noble Gold Investments streamlined process and expert guidance.
This election year, don't let election volatility and uncertainty keep you up at night.
Vote for the timeless safety of gold and silver in 2024.
Noble Gold Investments will give you up to 10 one-ounce silver Trump coins or a 10-ounce silver American flag bar if you open a qualified account.
Go to x22gold.com.
That's x22gold.com.
Or click the link in the description.
And remember, there's always a risk of investment and there's no guarantee of any kind.
Let's talk about protecting our wealth.
Economic immortality.
If you want a comfortable and secure retirement, Bitcoin is for you.
Michael Seller, a prominent advocate of Bitcoin, predicted Bitcoin could reach $10 million per coin.
With only 19.72 million of circulating supply and 21 million of total supply, Bitcoin is near exhaustion, but demand is just starting.
10 million per coin is in play.
And you know what's the best part?
If you invest with MyDigitalMoney.com through a crypto Roth IRA, you won't have to pay capital gain tax.
Imagine buying that 60,000 selling at 1 million and zero tax.
And that's what My Digital Money can do for you.
Most importantly, they have a battle-tested, multi-layered security.
My Digital Money provides military-grade security for all crypto assets through a partnership with a global leader in IRA Equity Trust.
