All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 8, 2020 - X22 Report
35:51
Ep. 2348b - Countermeasures Initiated, The Constitution Will Destroy The [DS]
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, my God. my God.
Hi and welcome.
You're listening to the X22 Report.
My name is Dave and this is episode 2348BN. Today's date is December 8th, 2020 and the title of the episode is Countermeasures Initiated.
The Constitution Will Destroy the Deep State.
Let's talk about our health.
I tried the keto diet, but it wasn't for me, and it's not for most people.
It isn't feasible or convenient diet for the typical person because it requires cutting out all carbs.
Many don't have the option or desire to cut out pasta, fruit, and bread from their diet.
This is why I take Keto with X22. Get yourself a bag of Keto with X22 today while it's still 51% off.
As an added bonus, if you order today, you'll get free shipping, free VIP life health and fitness coaching for life.
A free e-report on the top 14 ketogenic foods.
A 60-day money-back guarantee.
Go to ketowithx22.com or click the link in the description.
Let's get into the economic collapse, political and geopolitical news.
Now everything, the deep state, the mainstream media, the corrupt politicians, the invisible enemy, everything they tried to do with this election, well, it's backfiring.
The tide is turning.
The patriots, they have initiated their countermeasures and they're using the greatest weapon we've ever seen.
It's called the Constitution.
The Constitution is going to destroy the deep state.
And Trump and the Patriots, they have just begun.
Remember, a lot of these federal laws, a lot of these dates that are put into place, well, they're overwritten by the Constitution.
The Constitution is the law of the land.
Trump and the Patriots, they're following the Constitution, not all the federal regulations, the federal laws that were put into place afterwards.
This is the difference.
And we can see already that Trump, his team, they are making their move.
And this move is a huge move, but we'll be getting to that in just a minute.
But first, let's talk about the people that are panicking, the people that are not going to run for re-election.
Because everything is not going the way they thought it was going to go.
Remember Seattle Mayor Jenny Jerkin?
She was the one that said, hey, let the people in Seattle have the autonomous zone.
It's the summer of love.
And the summer of love meant destroying businesses, setting things on fire, hurting people, and destroying an entire city block.
Well, she decided she's not going to be seeking a second term.
Anyone really surprised about that?
I think there's gonna be a lot of mayors and a lot of governors that are not gonna be seeking a second term.
Actually, I don't even think they'll be able to win a second term because of what they have done.
Remember, Trump and the Patriots, they wanted the people to see all of this.
Because without seeing it, you wouldn't believe it.
If I just told you, hey, by the way, we're going to have riots and they're going to destroy businesses, they're going to burn buildings down, and the police, the mayors, the governors, they're going to allow these people to do it.
They're not going to stop them.
They're just going to sit back and watch.
You wouldn't believe it.
It sounds ridiculous.
It sounds like one of those, what do they call it?
Oh yeah, conspiracy theories.
But it's not a conspiracy.
It's happening.
You can see it with your own eyes.
Of course, yes, the mainstream media, certain corrupt politicians are telling us that it didn't exist.
It was a myth.
But people understand.
People know what's real.
And we're starting to see that the social media companies, the mainstream media companies are The corrupt politicians, they've gotten caught up in this entire sting operation.
We see billionaire Mark Zuckerberg, while he may have unlawfully interfered with the U.S. elections, well, how did he do that?
Well, didn't he donate to certain election officials?
Wasn't he censoring?
And it's not just him.
Think about YouTube.
Think about Twitter.
Think about the rest.
They knowingly did this.
They knowingly went ahead and did exactly what the invisible enemy wanted them to do.
They took orders and they followed it.
Now, what's very interesting is we're starting to see the tide turn.
In Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania has filed its brief requested by Alito.
And this brief, they are saying that, listen, let's not open Pandora's box, even if federal laws of the U.S. Constitution have been violated.
This is what Pennsylvania is saying.
And this is their statement.
This is their preliminary statement.
Petitioners ask this court to undertake one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocations of judicial power in the history of the republic.
No court has ever issued an order nullifying a governor's certification of presidential election results.
And for good reason.
Once the door is open to judicial invalidation of presidential election results, it will be awfully hard to close that door.
The loss of the public trust in our constitutional order resulting from the exercise of this kind of judicial power would be incalculable.
What are they really saying?
They're panicking.
If you expose election fraud, it's going to bring down their system.
It's going to expose them.
And Governor Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania put this out.
The nation's attorney general, former election security chief and countless judges have confirmed there is no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election.
It's time for Republican leaders to put America first and stop these attacks on our democracy.
Of course, they're going to continually repeat that there's no evidence.
Now, we've seen evidence.
We have people that come forward and said, we've seen these things.
We have video showing there is fraud in other states.
And we're going to see a lot more of this.
And these people are going to eat their words.
Remember, you don't show your hand in the lower courts.
It's like playing a card game.
Or poker or any card?
Do you show your hand right in the beginning?
No, you don't.
You keep it until the end.
You see who's bluffing.
You see what moves the others are going to make.
You watch very carefully.
And this is exactly what Trump and the Patriots are doing.
They're not going to show their hand.
They're not going to give everything the deep state wants.
This is why they've been saying it.
Show us the evidence.
Show the evidence.
You know why they're saying this.
This way they can counter it before it gets to the Supreme Court.
Trump tweeted this out about Georgia.
Georgia Lieutenant Governor Jeff Duncan Is a rhino never-Trumper who got himself elected as LG by falsely claiming to be a pro-Trump, too dumb or corrupt to recognize massive evidence of fraud in Georgia, and should be replaced.
We need every great Georgian to call him out.
Now what's very interesting is that yesterday we read that little announcement from Governor Kemp about federal laws, about how this is the law in Georgia.
Well it seems that Jenna Ellis decided to come out and correct him.
And she said the following.
Well, if they can do that in Georgia...
The legislature can do that in Pennsylvania.
They can do that in Wisconsin.
They can do that everywhere.
Why?
Because that's what the Constitution says.
Now, the Trump team, they put out a legal statement on the safe harbor deadline.
Now, remember, those dates, December 8th and all the other dates, those were created out of thin air by federal law.
The only date in the Constitution is the 20th of January.
And this is what they put out.
The safe harbor deadline is a statutory timeline that generally denotes a last day for states to certify election results.
However, it is not unprecedented for election contests to last well beyond December 8th.
Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v.
Gore that the date of ultimate significance is January 6th when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College.
The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on January 20th at noon.
Despite the media trying to desperately to proclaim that the fight is over, we will continue to champion the election integrity until legal vote is counted fairly and accurately.
That is coming from Rudy Giuliani.
Jenna Ellis and the rest of the legal team, letting everyone know just because the mainstream media is putting these dates out there, it's meaningless.
Yes, they can go past these dates.
And what's very interesting is that we know Governor Kemp and many other governors, they've been working with the Chinese government.
And we can see what they've been trying to do.
They've been trying to get Trump out of office and Biden into office.
And I don't mean it's just China.
There are many others that would like to see this happen.
Remember, we have the deep state players, the invisible enemy hiding in the shower shadows, pulling the strings, trying to get what they want.
Now, Ron, he tweeted this out.
On July 12, 2019, Georgia Governor Kemp met Houston Council General Lee at rumored Chinese Spy Hub Consulate in Houston.
On July 29, 2019, 17 days later, Georgia signs contract for Dominion voting machines statewide.
Coincidence?
I don't think so.
Remember the list?
That Pompeo was talking about, where they had the hardliners, McMasters, Cuomo, Brian Kemp, Ron DeSantis.
It looks like Kemp, he was bought off.
Then we had the friendlies, Doug Ducey.
Sound familiar?
If we look down the list, who else do we see?
We see Newsom, Tom Wolfe, and they're in the section where it says unknown.
Doesn't seem like they're unknown anymore.
It seems like they've been paid off, bribed.
Seems like they're working for another government, not the government of the United States.
Now, very interestingly, we see that the Arizona legislators, they invoked Article 2, Section 1, meaning Arizona is officially a contested election state.
And we can see that the legislatures there, they're saying, yeah, we need to stop this.
We saw what was going on and we need to look at the situation right now.
Now, the Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to hear election challenges after the 100 ballot sample, which found 3% of the ballots were deemed fraudulent in favor of Biden.
Then they got a bigger batch and they went through it.
And it seems that the Arizona Supreme Court says, yeah, we need to look at this and This doesn't make sense.
So we can see that's moving forward.
Now, the big news today is that Texas filed a lawsuit against four states.
Now, why did they do this?
Why did Texas do this?
Well, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, he announced that the state of Texas has filed a lawsuit against the four states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at the United States Supreme Court for allegedly exploiting the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state and Wisconsin at the United States Supreme Court for allegedly exploiting the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last minute
He said, trust in the integrity of our election process is sacrosanct and binds our citizenry and the states in this union together.
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin destroyed the trust and compromised the security and integrity of the 2020 election.
The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the constitution.
By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens, their own citizens vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections.
their failure to abide by the rule of law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election.
We now ask the Supreme Court to step in to correct these egregious errors.
So what does this mean?
Well, Kayleigh McEnany, she tweeted this out.
The state of Texas has sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin over election irregularities.
This means Texas will have original jurisdiction to go directly to the Supreme Court.
Huge.
So, number one, in this suit, they violated the Elector's Clause of Article II of the Constitution when executive or judicial officials in the states changed the rules of election without going through the state legislatures.
The Elector's Clause requires that each state shall appoint its presidential electors in such a manner as the legislator thereof may direct.
Now, in the early years of the Republic, We're good to go.
And only the state legislature that sets the rules.
So when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended by three days the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots, it's contrary to the law passed by the state legislature.
The state court changed the rules in violation of the Elector's Clause.
Similarly, when Georgia's secretary of state responded to a lawsuit by entering it into a compromise settlement agreement and release with the Democratic Party of Georgia and modify the signature verification requirements spelled out by the Georgia law, that changing of the rules violated the Elector's when Georgia's secretary of state responded to a lawsuit by entering
Now, the second constitutional violation occurred when individual counties in each of the four states changed the way they would receive, evaluate, or treat the ballots.
20 years ago, in the landmark case of Bush v.
Gore, the Supreme Court held that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment when one Florida county treated ballots one way and another Florida county treated ballots a different way.
Voters had the constitutional right to have their ballots treated equally from county to county.
So, when the election officials in Wayne County, Michigan, ignored the requirements of Michigan law and denied poll watchers access to voting counting, while other counties in Michigan filed the law that violated the Equal Protection Clause.
In Wisconsin, when the administrator of the city of Milwaukee elections ignored the requirements of Wisconsin law and directed election workers to write in the address of witnesses on the envelopes containing mail-in ballots, while ballots without witnesses' addresses were deemed invalid elsewhere, that resulted in the unequal treatment of ballots in the state.
The Texas lawsuit presents a pure question of law.
It is not dependent upon disputed facts.
Although these unconscionable changes to the election rules could have facilitated voter fraud, the state of Texas does not need to prove a single case of fraud to win.
It is enough that the four states violated the Constitution.
Now, Margot Cleveland, she tweeted this out.
And this.
Here Texas is explaining why it has standing, i.e.
how it, as a state, was injured.
She gives a little excerpt from the lawsuit.
Citizens who are presidential electors, like legislators, Presidential electors assert legislative injury whenever allegedly improper actions deny them a working majority.
Coleman vs.
Miller, 307, U.S. 433, 435, 1939.
The Electoral College is a zero-sum game.
If defendant states unconstitutionally appointed electors vote for a presidential candidate opposed by the plaintiff's state's electors, that operates to defeat plaintiff's state interest.
Indeed, even without an electoral college majority, presidential electors suffer the same voting debasement injury as voters generally.
And then she went on to say, let's talk about our health.
I tried the keto diet, but it wasn't for me and it's not for most people.
It isn't feasible or convenient diet for the typical person because it requires cutting out all carbs.
Many don't have the option or desire to cut out pasta, fruit and bread from their diet.
This is This is why I take Keto with X22. Get yourself a bag of Keto with X22 today while it's still 51% off.
As an added bonus, if you order today, you'll get free shipping, free VIP live health and fitness coaching for life, a free e-report on the top 14 ketogenic foods, a 60-day money-back guarantee.
Go to ketowithx22.com or click the link in the description.
Have any other states joined Texas lawsuit yet?
If not, they will.
Here's the tell.
Plaintiff states.
Section 19.
This court's Article 3 decisions indicate that only a state can bring certain claims.
Lance v.
Kaufman.
549 U.S. 437-442-2007, distinguishing citizen plaintiffs from citizen relators who sued in the name of a state.
Massachusetts versus EPA, 549 U.S. 497-520-2007, courts owe state special solicitude in standing analysis.
Moreover, redressability likely would undermine a suit against a single state officer or state because no one state's electoral vote will make a difference in the election outcome.
This action against multiple state defendants is the only adequate remedy for plaintiff states.
And this court is the only court that can accommodate such a suit.
So do you think more states are going to join on to this?
Most likely.
They don't have to prove fraud in this.
Remember, there's other cases that are going to prove fraud.
Trump and his legal team, they're pushing forward through the Constitution, the law of the land.
They allowed the deep state, these players to do what they do best.
They needed them to walk through the front door so they can use this against them to destroy their system.
Now what's very interesting is that Pepe Matters tweeted this out.
According to the Texas lawsuit, the probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four defendant states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, given the circumstances, is less than one in a quadrillion.
One in a quadrillion.
Major Patriot responded.
It's a Christmas miracle.
Trump responded to Major Patriot, and by the way, he did this two other times today, and said, or worse.
So, I think it's worse.
And we've come to find out that the Texas lawsuit, the Supreme Court, is going to listen to the case.
It has now begun.
The Patriots are in control.
This is all playing out the way they wanted it to play out.
Yes, in the beginning, it seemed dark.
It seemed like there was no way out of it.
But remember, if you're going to trap your enemy, if you're going to get them and catch them in a crime situation, You need to allow them to do what they do best.
Trump and the Patriots allowed them to walk through the front door.
They allowed them to cheat like we've never seen before and then pretend that it didn't happen.
Isn't this what criminals do?
They always say, I didn't do it.
There could be photographs or could be video.
You could see the crime and they'll still say, that wasn't me.
I didn't do it.
We see all these governors.
We see all these different players, the social media, the mainstream media, and the rest.
They're all out there.
Continually pushing.
There's no evidence.
There's no evidence.
Do you think Trump and the Patriots want them to continually say this?
There's no evidence.
Because what's going to happen when evidence is produced?
Because think about it.
They could find the evidence if they were really looking.
It's not that difficult.
They're going to be trapped in what they're saying right now.
And it's going to be shown that they knowingly went ahead with all of this.
They're all complicit in election fraud.
And then today we had two stories come out about China.
One with this Chinese spy who raised money for Representative Eric Swalwell.
Now, There was an intern that was in his office.
Her name was Fang Fang, also known as Christine Fang.
She targeted politicians in California between 2011 and 2015 at the direction of China's internal spy agency and even had intimate relationships with two Midwestern mayors.
Now, according to Feng's friend, she was in her late 20s or early 30s when she enrolled at the Bay Area University and began to target politicians and gather intelligence at the direction of China's Ministry of State Security, MSS. Feng's earliest known engagement with Swalwell occurred through the Chinese Student Association.
By 2014, she had risen in local politician circles and developed close ties to Swalwell's office.
Feng was a bundler for Swalwell and other candidates, according to the Bay Area Politician Operative with direct knowledge of A current U.S. intelligence official confirmed her activity for Swalwell.
A local elected official also said she brought in donors from other candidates.
Bundlers persuade others to write checks for campaigns.
They can bring in substantial sums of money as well as deepen the campaign's engagement with target communities, making bundlers a valuable and as potentially influential ally to a candidate.
Haven't we heard Eric Swalwell go after Trump?
Doesn't his family have business in China?
Hmm, it's all starting to make sense now.
And then we have this video that came out where this professor is talking to an audience and And he says very interesting things.
So there are subtitles to this.
So let me read a little bit of what he said.
During the last three to four decades, we took advantage of America's core circle.
As I said, the Wall Street have a very profound influence over America's domestic and foreign affairs since 1970.
We used to heavily rely on them.
Problem is, they have been declining since 2008.
More importantly, after 2016, the Wall Street couldn't control Trump because, awkwardly, there was a soft breach of contract between them, which made them enemies.
I won't go into details because we might run out of time.
In the U.S.-China trade war, they tried to help.
My friends in the U.S. told me that.
They tried to help, but they couldn't.
Now, with Biden winning the election...
The traditional elites, politician elites, political elites, the establishment, they have a very close relationship with Wall Street.
You all heard that, that Trump said Biden's son has security companies all over the world.
And then the video comes to an end.
So right there, you can see that they are involved in America, bribing, blackmailing, and infiltrating America from within.
And what's very interesting is that both of these stories came out today.
Very interesting.
Was this time perfectly?
It's starting to seem that way.
And I just want to flash back to April of 2020, where Bill Barr was out there and he was talking about the elections.
And he said, China is the greatest national security threat facing the United States.
He said, in my opinion, it's China.
And not just to the election process, but I think across the board, there's simply no comparison.
China is a very serious threat to the United States geopolitically, economically, militarily, and a threat to the integrity of our institutions given their ability to influence things.
Now, he said this back in April during the beginning stages of the pandemic, and he was talking about the election and many other things.
I don't believe Barr is just sitting by.
I think he's waiting his turn.
Everything is set up.
It's all moving to the Supreme Court.
The mainstream media will do the exact opposite of what they did with Russia collusion, impeachment, because with those cases, they said they have it all.
The walls are closing in on Trump.
There's no escape.
Now, when these cases head to SCOTUS, they will say there's nothing there.
They have no evidence.
There's nothing to see.
There's no case.
There's no evidence of fraud.
There's nothing.
Remember, it's always the opposite of what they're talking about.
Look how it's all starting to come together now.
Trump has the Constitution on his side.
These governors tried to create laws because of the pandemic.
These laws do not override the Constitution.
Trump is now calling them on it.
The mainstream media does not call the election.
They tried to make the public believe this.
The only strategy they had was to cheat and Have the mainstream media call the election and favor Biden.
Have the social media companies put labels on everything saying that our sources tell us something completely different, that Biden won the election.
They put labels on videos, on Facebook, on Twitter, and everything else saying that there is no such thing as election fraud.
They all push this to try to get Trump to concede because this is the only way they could win.
This was their plan to cheat in the election and then continually push the narrative that this is all on the up and up and have Trump concede to the loss of the election.
Well, when he didn't concede and he's never going to concede, what happens then?
Well, Biden is in trouble.
The whole system's going to come down around them.
Because Trump, he's not doing what they want.
Has he ever done what they wanted?
No.
Every path from this point forward favors Trump.
The Constitution is his weapon.
The Constitution was designed to tell the truth.
The Constitution was created by the Founding Fathers to stop corruption, to stop others from creating laws, trying to do things that they shouldn't be doing.
And this is why the Founding Fathers said, no, the people...
are in charge.
The Constitution is the highest law of the land.
Everything else doesn't matter.
Because once it violates the Constitution, it's null and void.
Period.
That's it.
Trump knows this.
He's using it against them.
Now today we've come to find out that Judge Sullivan, he finally folded.
He granted the Department of Justice motion to dismiss as moot.
Due to pardon.
And he ordered that the case is dismissed as moot.
So it's completely over.
Now of course...
Did he just say, oh, okay, it's over?
No.
He decided to write an opinion and he told the world how he really felt about Flynn.
And you could tell that he was taking instructions from above.
He really didn't read the case.
He really didn't look at the evidence.
He was just doing what he was told to do because most likely he was promised something and he was probably blackmailed.
Now what's very interesting is we know that most of the time when the mainstream media comes out and or the corrupt politicians or others come out and talk about dogs, it's usually comms.
And what's very interesting is that the news broke that Her Majesty's dog just passed away.
Does this mean that something's going to happen?
Maybe, maybe not.
Very interesting though.
We'll have to see how this all plays out.
But what we do know is that Barr, Durham, they've been preparing to move forward.
Trump is exposing the deep state, their entire system, to the world.
Durham is investigating the crimes.
Barr made him a special counsel in October of this year.
And Anon came out and said, well, wait a minute.
What is the difference between John Durham, U.S. attorney for Connecticut and John Durham special counsel?
Been poking around this interwebs and a light bulb went off.
Why did Q post Durham as his last post so far?
Why did Barr announce that Durham has been appointed special counsel?
Why did Barr make that move before the election but announce it after?
Did we miss an important clue?
What is the difference between John Durham, U.S. attorney for Connecticut and John Durham special counsel?
Well, this is big.
Huge even.
When a U.S. Attorney for Connecticut wants to take a criminal case to court, but the case must be filed in some federal court other than in Connecticut because the crime occurred elsewhere, for example, he must refer the case to a different U.S. Attorney and have them do the prosecution.
As U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, Durham would have no legal authority to prosecute in California or Michigan or Georgia.
He would only have the authority in Connecticut.
But as special counsel, John Durham has whatever legal authority that A.G. Barr gave him.
And that could include prosecuting anyone in any federal court.
Hugh and Barr are both telling us that Durham is about to make his move.
Again, everything is done according to plan.
Everything is playing out.
You're going to see a huge amount of panic.
You're going to see mayors and governors who are saying, I'm not going to be running again.
In the end, these people will not be able to walk down the street.
And as this case approaches the Supreme Court and the Constitution is brought out into the light, and the Supreme Court rules that these states violated the Constitution, well, everything starts to change, doesn't it?
What do you think is going to happen with the cases with Sidney Powell and the rest?
Do you think those are going to move forward with lightning speed?
Do you think fraud is going to be brought out into the open?
Absolutely.
The Patriots are in control.
They have been since the beginning.
Yes, sometimes it might seem like there's no hope that the deep state has the upper hand, but sometimes you have to make it seem like they do.
Sometimes it has to feel like they're in control.
So they keep pushing and they become arrogant and they feel that nobody can touch us.
We have this one.
And then they start doing stupid things.
They start making laws which violate the Constitution.
They cheat like nobody's business.
They show their true colors so everyone can see.
This is still part of the plan.
It's not just about arresting people.
It's about waking the American public up, waking the world up.
Because this is not the only battle.
There are a lot more battles moving forward.
But the people have to understand that it's their constitutional right.
It's their right to run a business.
It's their right to go to services.
It's their right to move freely.
It's their right.
Because think about the Great Reset.
The Great Reset is about taking away your rights.
Trump is trying to teach everyone you have these rights.
The Constitution protects all of this.
And without it, the elite win.
This is why they've been trying to get rid of the Constitution from the very, very beginning.
Trump is educating the public, letting them know that the Constitution protects the people.
It doesn't protect the government.
It doesn't protect the corrupt politicians.
It doesn't protect those that would do harm to this nation.
It protects the people.
And actually, it can be used as a weapon against these individuals.
Listen, everyone, thanks a lot for listening.
Be well, be safe, and especially be prepared.
▲
Export Selection