All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 22, 2019 - FirePower - Will Johnson
01:28:47
20191122_Fri_FirePower
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Firepower, only at Band Dog Video.
And now, your host, Will Johnson.
Good evening, it is Friday.
Friday evening.
Welcome, welcome, welcome.
Van dot video.
Van dot video.
Okay, so look, the Democrats want to explode President Trump.
I mean, they're willing to do everything they can to get rid of him.
They hate this man beyond belief.
And just imagine, they hate President Trump, and he's just a single man.
I don't think there's anyone been in the history, next to Alex Jones, of course, that everyone has hated someone so much.
President Trump.
All right.
Okay.
Every single person should be concerned about what the Democrats are going to do next.
I mean, seriously, she'd be concerned after witness witness and another witness and the Democrats have come completely up.
They have come up completely short on a valid reason on impeaching president Trump.
For about a year, I've been saying what the Democrats are doing against President Trump is a coup d'etat.
And many people are just saying, Will, you're fear mongering.
It's not actually happening.
It's not actually happening.
But now we even have members of Congress saying this is a coup d'etat against President Trump.
Members, sitting members today are saying the same thing.
And because the Democrats are not getting anywhere, I can only imagine how frustrated they feel right now.
You can see a lot of that frustration in Adam's shifty shift in the recent closing on the impeachment hearings.
Did you see it?
I mean, he was angry.
I mean, I thought, you know, that's the, that's the most expression I've seen from him.
Other than that, he's just had those beady eyes just looking at the camera or looking at the clock when everyone was talking.
But he is absolutely upset and he's angry about what took place because they have nothing.
The liberal media is now pressuring members of Congress to go ahead and move forward!
Let's do the impeachment!
Articles of impeachment!
Do it!
Say yes, President Trump, you have been impeached in the House!
That's what they're pushing for.
That's what they want.
And they have all of the people, at least half the people in the country that are liberals, Democrats, they're all calling for impeachment as well.
And of course, we will be discussing all of this We also have some fantastic guests.
Excuse us while we have a brief technical difficulty.
Some fantastic guests.
Savannah Hernandez, producer for The War Room, was confronted at a recent event.
She got some great videos with the left showing exactly how nonsensical their worldview is.
After that, great show.
Tons of guests tonight.
We have Chrisanne Hall coming on with us.
Following that, we'll have Gene Ho.
It sounds like Will may want to continue his monologue, though.
But please, please stay tuned.
We're going to have some fantastic guests.
And then taking your calls in the second hour.
Sounds like maybe we do not have him back.
I thought I heard him.
So there he is.
I hear him.
I know you're there, Will.
We can hear you.
Yeah, I'm not sure what happened there.
It's just like all of a sudden it just went dark.
You know what it is?
It's the NSA, the CIA, the FBI.
They don't want us to talk about what we're going to talk about tonight.
They don't want us to talk about the impeachment, Tom.
They don't want any of that to take place.
All right, so let me just finish here.
So because of the Democrat failure in this whole process, it leads me to believe that the coup is going to become hot.
I mean, I truly believe that.
I truly believe because they have come up with zero, not a zip.
They have nothing else.
The Democrats are so frustrated.
They're so angry right now.
They don't even know why they want to impeach President Trump.
It's just because they just simply don't like him.
That's it.
That's all.
We don't like Trump, so he's got to go.
Mainly because they're still butthurt over the 2016 election against Hillary Rodham Clinton.
That's what it all boils down to.
They still feel that she should have been president.
Thank God she's not.
All right, so when we come back, we're gonna have a special guest in studio with us, and we're gonna show how some of these crazy, insane leftists are about this whole impeachment process and how they feel about all of it, okay?
So go to ban.video and go to firepowernews and share the link.
Ban.video.
We're gonna make sure we have the audio correct when we come back, all right?
We'll see you in a minute.
Fan that video.
Fan that video.
The question to that is make America white again.
And all his policies and what he does kind of of backs that up, that that's what he's looking to do.
He's trying to take the immigration population and diminish it and diminish the people.
So at this time in Obama's presidency, he had way more deportations than Trump has had.
What did you think about it back then when Obama was supporting all of it?
He didn't follow politics, and I have to say that that's the one good thing for me that They came out of all this over the past three years.
I didn't follow politics.
It wasn't important to me.
But when I saw what was going on three years ago with this person, and I saw the hate that he had... Well, you denounce Obama for putting kids in cages and deporting illegal immigrants?
I didn't follow politics.
Well, you denounce Obama for putting kids in cages and...
He probably didn't do it to the extent that it goes on now.
You're right, it's double what Trump is doing.
And there's a lot more behind Trump that goes on.
Well, will you denounce Obama for putting kids in cages and deporting illegal immigrants?
Would I what?
Would you denounce Obama for putting kids in cages and deporting illegal immigrants?
I would not denounce him.
He probably didn't do it to the extent that it's being done now.
He did it double.
Oh, double.
I don't know, but I wouldn't denounce him because he was, his character.
He's just, he was a gentleman.
So it's okay to deport people as long as you're a good person?
It isn't okay, but this person has many things against him.
Everything about him is just corrupt.
Okay, welcome everyone, firepowernews.com.
We have Savannah in studio with us, and we have Tom Pepper on Skype.
So Savannah, tell us, I mean, she came out just saying that he's trying to make America white.
I heard her say that.
And then they went on, she just had no valid reason why Trump should be removed, and then she didn't want to answer the question about the immigration with Obama, because Obama did double And she just would not, didn't want to acknowledge it.
Definitely was crazy because, I mean, you were out there too, Willem.
You were talking to all those protesters and asking them, hey, just give us one reason why you don't like the president, just one main thing.
And no one could seem to give us an answer.
And you're completely right in that.
Of course, it always goes back to Trump is a racist.
He's trying to deport people because he wants America to be solely a white nation.
However, again, they fail to realize that Obama did the exact same thing as did previous presidents.
And for some reason, I guess no one really does have a memory anymore nowadays because no one remembers that for some reason.
Well, she was saying that she didn't even pay attention to politics during that time.
She said, well, I didn't pay attention to it, so I'm giving Obama an excuse.
Right.
And then she tried to bring up his character too.
Oh, well, he was a good president.
He had a better character.
So it was still wrong, but I'm not going to denounce him for it.
And I was like, well, if you're here protesting Trump for that reason, you should at least be okay with denouncing, you know, Obama for doing the same thing.
Yeah, exactly.
Tom, do you want to jump in here?
Savannah, thanks for coming on with such short notice, and you really honed in on something important that none of them, at least none that you put out on video, I'm sure you did and you're not holding out the goods on us, but nobody that you interviewed was able to say anything bad about President Trump.
I wonder if we can go ahead and do clip two, where you've got a litany of people, and none of them can pick out a single thing they dislike about Trump.
They just know Orange Man bad.
What's the biggest thing that Trump has said?
What is the biggest action he's taken that's really pushed you to want to come protest?
The list is endless.
I don't think I could come up with a single one.
Can you give me one specific thing that he's done?
What's the biggest thing to you specifically he's done?
No.
No, just it's from day one he was just an evil mother .
Well, of course, I'm gonna make America great and that he's gonna bring jobs and that he's taking care of everybody and that- Wait, so one of the worst things that he said is- Those are the worst things and also that when he said that he was gonna help the people from Syria and he never did.
I thought that was one of the worst things ever.
Just his entire person.
The persona that he is.
Everything about him, just to me.
Yes, everything about him.
He just lies, everything he does.
What's one of the biggest lies that really angered you?
Michael, do you have something?
It starts from the time he has inaugurated, you know, all the way from the crowd size, all the way to, you know, oh, it's a perfect phone call, what he's saying now with his phone calls and solicitations.
Did you read the transcript?
No, I didn't read the transcript, but I listened to the, I've been following it on the news.
What is one of the most divisive things that Trump has said to you that really pushed you to want to come protest today?
I can't think right now.
No?
Just one thing, just one big thing that Trump did.
Babe, answer that, answer, answer that, answer that for her.
Maybe another exit.
No?
Nothing.
Just one thing?
Absolutely nothing.
And again, they could have at least been like, he's racist, he's a misogynist, he hates women.
They couldn't even think of that.
I mean, those are your basic talking points, too.
And for some reason, like, people, and then the women, too, kept turning to their men, like, oh, honey, you answer that one.
Which made me laugh, because I was like, I'm sorry, I thought this was Feminist 2019, where women were supposed to speak for themselves.
Why are you turning to your man right now?
Exactly, exactly.
I mean, you know, I saw the same thing.
I asked him, I said, give me one example that will make a valid reason for Trump to be impeached.
And they couldn't give me one.
And then they said, well, you know, he's just bad.
Orange man, bad.
You know, Tom, he's reminding of us.
Orange man, bad.
Right, and that second lady that I interviewed, and I'm still baffled by this, I don't know if maybe my question was phrased confusingly, but you know, what's the worst thing that Trump's ever said?
He's going to make America great again.
He's going to bring jobs back.
That's the worst thing?
I was like, no, no, no, no, the worst thing.
And she doubles down.
She's like, yes, that is the worst thing.
And I was like... More jobs for the country, more black people working, more women in power, in positions of power, more women getting better paying jobs.
And that's the problem.
And that's the problem.
And it was truly bizarre.
I mean, I'm glad you brought that up because I'm watching and I'm like, how many of these women are going to turn to the man next to them?
Which, of course, looks like all those men look like they have been completely eroded by soy over the last decade or so of their lives.
But then, I mean, it gets better because those were kind of fun, lighthearted, showing how clueless these people are.
But then you were actually attacked.
So let's go ahead.
And if it's all right with you, well, let's go ahead and roll clip three.
Yeah, absolutely.
I don't think they wanna talk to us, but here's.
All right, sir, why do you think that's okay to touch my property?
Why is it okay to touch my property?
You think you're so big and bad, ripping out my microphone?
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
No Trump!
No KKK!
No Fascist USA!
This guy right here with the shades on that guy he is violent because when I was out there I was just standing there and they came up behind me and he was elbowing me in the back He's really violent.
He's really angry.
And again, I went to go and I stood there and I was like, you know what, if you're going to rip out my microphone cord, we're going to have a problem and I'm going to confront you about it.
Because first off, I'm a woman and I was not doing anything.
I wasn't like I was there, you know, using my First Amendment rights.
And I was asking him, hey, what are we doing here today?
You're with Antifa.
Let me know about your organization.
You're anti-fascist.
I can stand behind that.
Yeah, we shouldn't silence anybody.
And then what happens immediately is like grabs my microphone.
They start wrapping me up in their sign.
And they're like, don't touch us, don't touch us.
And I'm like, ma'am, sir, you are bumping me.
You are touching me.
I don't want to touch you.
I promise.
Get away from me.
Yeah.
You know, that's their model, though.
I mean, when they don't have any valid argument on anything, they just go right into their chant.
And then they become violent.
Like I said, that guy, he was elbowing me in my back.
And I didn't even know he was there.
And I've seen him before someplace.
Put my finger on it.
But I've seen him someplace else, and he was violent there.
He's always just, you know, very nasty.
See, Will, and the thing that frustrates me, too, is that the day that a person in a Trump hat tries to defend themselves, that little clip of them defending themselves against Antifa is what the media is going to carry to try to oppose all Trump supporters.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
They're going to cut out everything else, and they'll just show the part where the Trump supporter is defending themselves.
Mm-hmm.
Exactly.
And they'll say, look, this is the Trump supporters.
This is crazy.
Definitely.
I agree.
And I think that's why a lot of people won't defend themselves.
I mean, we've seen Caitlin Bennett get attacked by Antifa.
Owen Schreier has been assaulted by them as well many times.
And again, it's like we're defenseless.
The police aren't going to take care of us.
And if we defend ourselves, we're the ones that are going to be bad if that little clip gets out.
Because again, False editing.
Yeah, exactly.
But see, that's how they get people not to show up to these events.
Because they're trying to intimidate people, and they're violent towards people.
And in most cases, like you said, conservatives don't want to go out because they don't want to be really attacked by these monsters.
Hey, thanks for coming on with me.
Thanks for having me, Will.
Thank you so much, Tom, as well.
Yeah, awesome footage.
All right, everybody.
We'll be back after this.
Band.Video.
Go to ban.video.
See you in a minute. The case for impeachment has never been stronger.
The evidence never so riveting after yesterday's explosive testimony.
Kicking off what promises to be another explosive week in the impeachment inquiry.
We're bracing for potentially an explosive opening statement.
Those are some of the fireworks from today's explosive testimony.
Another explosive day of testimony.
High stakes heading into a potentially explosive week of testimony.
The most explosive thing.
This is a slow motion explosion.
Major breaking news right now.
The explosive, truly explosive opening remarks.
I can't emphasize how explosive this is.
How explosive.
Very explosive.
And I think it will be explosive.
Wow.
The first day of public testimony in the impeachment inquiry opening with a bombshell.
We got the bombshell.
Yesterday was a bombshell.
This has to be one of those bombshell days.
A bombshell.
It was bombshell testimony.
Bombshells.
One bombshell after another.
Bombshell after bombshell.
Stunning testimony.
The stunning conversation he heard, it was stunning.
It was historic.
Like, it started small, and now everyone's running, screaming no.
Like, you know, apocalypse now.
That was an oh you know what moment for Republicans.
Now a few hours later from the bombshell being detonated.
The fuse was lit then, the bomb went off today, but it wasn't the only bomb that went off.
There's been a bombshell, I would say nearly every witness has delivered some sort of bombshell.
Here's the other bombshell today.
Fiona Hill, I mean that was, I know we keep saying bombshell, but it is Fiona Hill who is the bomb.
She's gonna drop a bombshell.
The bombshell.
Bombshell.
Breaking news as another round of explosive impeachment testimony.
The most explosive information that we have to date.
It was so explosive.
There was a big bombshell.
Obviously, this is a bombshell.
This is a bombshell.
Bombshell.
Bombshell.
Bombshell, obviously.
What do you think, Paul?
It's certainly a bombshell.
So we have these things that keep getting called bombshells.
It's a very explosive charge.
I don't think we can overemphasize.
This could be very, very explosive.
I mean, that covers it.
That covers everything.
Listen, today was explosive.
I know, you know, we say that.
Wow.
This is insane.
Very explosive.
Very explosive, right?
Everything's explosive.
The Democrats want to explode President Trump, like I said.
They have an agenda to remove President Trump.
It's almost like, Tom, everything that they have been attempting to do has just fallen apart.
Fell apart.
Nothing's sticking together.
They take the noodle and they throw it up against the cabinet.
Is it sticking?
No, it just falls right off.
It doesn't even appear to stick.
It just bounces off like it's a rubber ball.
Nothing is holding.
They're attempting to try to demolish this president for their own agenda.
And they still hate it.
They still hate him.
And you know, I mentioned earlier, I said, you know, he's like the most hated person on the planet as of right now.
The most hated on the planet is going to be Christ, right?
Because you have the left, they all hate Christ for the most part because they support everything of Satan.
But they are a hundred percent against everything that is good.
Then they hate President Trump.
Then they hate Alex Jones.
And then they hate anyone that wants to get in between good.
They hate you as well.
All right, so we have another video.
Do we have time?
I'm here, Will.
I was actually just doing some quick math.
For those playing at home, that was, of course, the media panicking.
And so that was 20 explosions, 29 bombshells, and three stunnings.
It's amazing, Will, how the left manages every single week to get their narrative, every single day, every single moment, every single second, to get their narrative totally together.
It's explosive.
It's a bombshell.
It's stunning.
It's historic.
Well, of course, the people who actually tuned in, you know, the million or so people across the entire country, 350 million people, the one million who actually tuned in and wound up tuning out, they certainly disagreed.
Anybody who actually paid attention knows that it was a snooze fest and a total exoneration for President Trump.
But again, that's 20 explosions, 29 bombshells and three examples of stunningness.
It's just the Democrats And their allies in the media never cease to bore me to sleep, I guess is the right word.
You know what, and that's probably just a number that was recorded.
Can you imagine how many times they said it off camera?
Or how many times it's been said on social media?
And, you know, CNN and MS, Criminal News Network and MSDNC, all of them say the same thing.
They have, like, they all get the same memo.
And that probably is not even including all of the smaller leftist media outlets that's doing the same thing, that's wanting to get rid of President Trump.
Why, Tom, you know what, I've never asked you a question.
Let me ask you a question.
You know, we've been doing this for three, maybe four months now, you know, for a while, right?
So, why do you think, what do you think the ultimate goal is for the Glove To do this coup d'etat against President Trump.
And I'm calling it a coup d'etat because that's what it is, the way I see it.
But why do you think they're being so aggressive?
Because never before have they ever gone after a president like this.
Why do you think President Trump is so important that they get rid of?
Well, President Trump is the first president that they have not been able to control.
Of course, the GOP establishment, the rhinos, the cuckservatives, whatever you want to call them, they've been able to sink a little bit of control into President Trump, but not like President Bush and not like President Obama.
I mean, every president going back 50 plus years, all the way back to JFK, they have all been the same exact president.
It's a different suit.
It's a different tie.
It's a different face.
But they're all basically the same.
Ronald Reagan desperately tried to do some good things and a lot of folks say that he nearly died as a result.
They say he was nearly murdered.
So President Trump is not under their control.
He is not their puppet.
He makes mistakes.
He doesn't do everything we want him to do.
This is true.
But the one thing you can say about the man is that he makes up his own mind.
He makes his own decisions.
He is America first.
So they want him gone.
And if they can get him gone today, that's better.
If they can get him gone in 2020, that's still okay.
If they can just wait this presidency out and have eight years of America first and then undo that, hopefully with the next socialist or somebody who's going to make AOC look like she's in the centers who I imagine they're going to bring in 2024.
Then they'll do that.
I mean, but that is that's what it comes down to.
They have no control over President Trump.
He's doing what is best for this country.
He's doing what he wants.
He makes his own decisions.
They have no leverage on him.
They have no ability to con, manipulate or coerce him to do anything.
And it is driving them absolutely bonkers.
It's driving them nutty.
Batty!
All of the above!
And as long as I've been paying attention to politics, and as long as I've been looking at it, you know, I always thought that, okay, you run someone on a campaign, you get someone there, and then once you get them there, then they're supposed to do the job for the people.
But and if you didn't win, you're supposed to find someone who's going to go out and beat the person that they ran the last time.
I mean, that's the way it's supposed to go, right?
I mean, it happened under what the first time I saw like the biggest conflict in my lifetime was when they had the hanging chads when it was Bush against Al Gore.
And I remember that in Florida, they had all these hanging chads.
And at that point, I thought I was a Democrat.
Thank God I'm not anymore.
But I thought it was just wrong.
But you know what?
They went on, they moved on, and then the next year, the next political season, they tried to get someone better.
They failed again.
But you have to get someone better.
But in this case, they just want to get rid of him.
They just want to get rid of him.
They don't care about anything else.
Just get rid of him.
All right, we'll be back after this.
Firepower with Will Johnson. .
All right.
Welcome back, everybody.
We are working with a light crew tonight.
But you know what?
The guys are awesome in there.
And we're working out technical issues.
But you know what?
We're going to keep pushing forward, because we have to keep pushing forward.
We get knocked down, and we get back up and keep going.
That's what it's all about.
OK, so we have a special guest that's coming on with us.
This young lady has been on with us before.
Phenomenal.
I can't even express it enough.
Phenomenal.
Chris Ann Hall.
She is a national speaker and consultant on the Constitution.
She is the founder of Liberty First University, former Russian linguist for the U.S.
Army, and former prosecutor for the state of Florida.
Kris Ann has practiced First Amendment laws and traveled the country teaching the fundamental principles of liberty and our constitutional republic.
She's the author She's also the author of six books on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Thank you, Ms.
Hall, for joining us again.
So excited to have you here.
Oh, it's my pleasure to be here.
Thank you so much for having me.
I'm just really excited.
You guys are awesome.
This is awesome.
So, you know, I said, um, what a perfect person to bring on the talk about what's happening on the heel with this whole impeachment process.
And it's what they're, what the direction they're taking the country is, is something that our children should not have to experience.
And it's just, to me, it's just, it's horrible.
Well, you know, I sort of, Rolled my eyes when you talked about the impeachment process.
This isn't even anything remotely related to an impeachment process.
As the drafters of our Constitution envisioned and the fact that the media is all out there to manipulate people into to create a narrative rather than engaging in fact-finding I think is evidenced by the video that you guys played earlier with all the
I actually just flew from Baltimore, Maryland to Seattle, Washington.
I was on an airplane for five and a half hours and I was watching airplane TV.
And so I was rolling between Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN.
And even on Fox News, I mean, I'm just switching 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3.
I'm hearing the same language over and over again.
The only difference was if you listen to Fox, the Republicans are winning.
If you listen to the other two stations, the Democrats are winning.
But it's the same narrative over and over and over again.
And the thing that really struck me, Will, is that nobody, nobody is accurately portraying the Constitution.
The way the impeachment process is supposed to be working?
What are the drafters and the ratifiers of our Constitution even envisioned?
And the one thing...
And just makes my head explode is I'm watching all of these wonking heads talk about the Federalist Papers, this and Alexander Hamilton and Federalist 69.
You know, he actually said that impeachment should be for whatever Congress wants it to be.
And it's a political function.
You know what?
I don't know if these people are just functionally illiterate Or if they have some kind of confidence that the American people will never ever go back and actually read Hamilton in Federalist 69 and discover that they're lying to us.
and that they're doing this, you know, they're portraying this, this, I'll give them a benefit of the doubt, this inaccuracy intentionally, Because there is absolutely nothing in the foundation of our documents that gives Congress the unfettered authority to invent this process as they're going along.
I mean, think about it.
What in heaven's name were they thinking to actually put the impeachment process in specific terms, in writing, in the Constitution, if nowadays we think, you know, it's whatever you want?
Exactly.
Yeah, I mean, that is, that was perfect, perfect synopsis of what's been going on.
One of the thing these talking, and by the way, thank you again for coming back on, but one of the things these talking heads have been going on about, and I, we later learned it's been focus tested, is the term bribe.
Bribery.
They found a word in the Constitution, you see, that they think they can use to impeach President Trump.
Was, is this an example, this phone call, we now have the transcript, is this an example of bribery?
Is this an example of something, anything in the Constitution that the founders said we're not supposed to see a president engaged in?
You know, what I find very interesting, right, is the majority of these people who are now throwing around the Constitution, its terms, and throwing around the Federalist Papers and the founders, Nine and a half times out of ten, the only words coming out of their mouth about the Constitution are denigrating it.
The only words coming out of their mouth about the Founders is actually hatred.
And so it's really hypocritical that now they're going to go in and sort of cherry pick their way through this.
Our Founders were very specific.
Treason, bribery, high crimes, and misdemeanors.
These are all criminal terms.
And that's what they're doing.
They're redefining these terms to fit their narrative.
This is an impeachment looking, an investigation looking for a crime, not the other way around.
And so what we have under criminal terms, you know, I was a prosecutor for over a decade and I've, you know, been practicing and been involved with reading legal cases for Wow, I think nearly 20 years now.
This does not fall under any terms of bribery.
And what I find interesting is that if they want to apply this terminology to Donald Trump, Why aren't they willing to apply that same terminology, right, that same definition, but on even, I will give them even a stricter scale, on representatives on the House floor.
I don't know if you guys have ever seen the frontline video of John Boehner when he was, he was a young congressman and he did this interview about how he personally accepted checks
From the tobacco industry and then handed out those checks to members of the House on the House floor right before the House was about to vote on legislation that would affect the tobacco industry.
So when we want to talk about bribery, right?
When we have a clear example, an active House member doing a journalistic interview on public television.
I mean, seriously, taking a check from the tobacco companies when you're about to actually vote on the legislation that would affect tobacco companies.
I don't know how you can get beyond bribery.
And then if you want to now define, see what they would do, quid pro quo, quid pro quo.
Well, Boehner's example is, you know, I mean, that's just flat out bribery.
I don't even think you can mince those terms.
But then you got Biden.
In a CFR, right?
You guys love the CFR.
Everybody loves the CFR.
In a CFR conference, on stage, laughing and yucking it up, and bragging about his quid pro quo, threatening to withhold funding to the Ukraine unless they fire a prosecutor.
So, you know what?
They want to reinvent terms.
Then they got to be willing to understand what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
You know what it comes down to?
It comes down to that the Democrats can break laws, or the establishment, let me say it that way.
The establishment can break laws, they can make these under-the-table deals, and in this case, John Brennan, over-the-table deals, and they can do all of these deals, and it's okay as long as you go along with the establishment.
Now someone like President Trump, like Tom was mentioning earlier, that if you go against the establishment, you're not being controlled by the establishment, and you want to try to do something that's going to benefit the American people, then you're a problem.
Then you're breaking the law, because you're not going along with what they want.
As long as you go along with what they want, then you're fine.
You can break any law that you want.
This is, you know, for them to do this constantly.
And we've seen it before.
Most of us, I know when I was younger, we would always say politicians lie.
Politicians are crook.
We will all make jokes about it.
But yet we're seeing it and we're just like supposed to be, OK, this is just the norm.
These are politicians.
This is the way they're supposed to act.
OK, so when we come back, we're going to talk to Ms.
Hall some more about the Constitution and this impeachment.
But now.
This impeachment hoax.
We'll be back after this.
Welcome back to Firepower.
I am Tom Pappard, co-hosting with Will Johnson.
Our guest is Chrisanne Hall.
You, of course, know her as the founder of Liberty First University, an online school that will teach you all about the Constitution, as the founders actually wrote it, a novel concept.
You can also catch her show.
She is at ChrisAnneHall.com.
ChrisAnneHall.com.
So, Chrisanne, you were talking about kind of the insanity surrounding this impeachment push, how none of it goes back to the Constitution, how these people who are now quoting the Constitution, I guess they're all constitutional scholars, all of them typically, if they say the C word, it's to disparage it.
And you mentioned, of course, President Trump.
There is nothing criminal in anything he's done.
So I have to ask you, being that we've now dropped the Constitution, we've dropped all pretense of law and order, how do you think this is going to end for President Trump?
Well, you know, I think you have to have a little bit of forethought into thinking what is the purpose of what they're doing, right?
So the purpose is to try Donald Trump in the court of public opinion before the election.
And to put, to really slander him, to libel his name, and to fill the minds of an unsuspecting, unknowledgeable, uneducated people.
And I don't, and notice I'm not saying stupid, I'm just saying uneducated.
They're educated on all the wrong things and educated.
How many people do you know that just simply watch the news and believe what they hear on the news and never once go beyond that to think for themselves?
And so we have a population here.
OK, so the left's never going to vote for Donald Trump, no matter what we have.
And then then you have a good segment of the population that's always going to vote for Trump.
So you have these people in the middle, these people in the middle who who statistically are the ones that just simply are not engaged.
They don't go beyond what they hear from the news.
And these are the people that this impeachment fiasco is trying to manipulate and and.
And they don't have personal experience with the law, they don't have personal experience with the Constitution, because remember, we don't even teach the Constitution in law school anymore, much less K-12 or even You know, in post-secondary school.
So, we are in a situation where we're dealing with a general population that are fundamentally uneducated on the Constitution, what it means.
And when they are educated on the Constitution, you know, they believe the rhetoric that the Constitution was written by a bunch of rich, elite, white slave owners whose only purpose for independence was so that they could continue slavery.
And so we have these people who are being intentionally manipulated by a people who, if you don't mind me saying, just simply want to take over the election process.
I completely believe that.
Go ahead, Will.
Let me ask you this, because this has been the thing that I've noticed that the left has been pushing.
Hearsay.
Put her back on the screen.
Put all three of us back on the screen, please, sir.
Hearsay.
They say hearsay is now more factual than getting it directly from the horse's mouth.
So, I can, you know, I can say something, someone can come tell me something, and then I tell you, and you have to believe it.
Did you ever think, I mean, and I'm still thinking about what you just said, they're not even teaching the Constitution in law school anymore, that just blows my mind there, but, um, did you ever think that hearsay would become more factual, if I can even say that?
Or, you know, yeah, of value than actual facts?
I mean, this is,
Well, when you live in a world where the media and those in power, the real cabal behind all of this, is teaching the world to believe that good is evil and evil is good, you know, I mean this, people talk about 1984, Orwell was not a prophet, but he understood human nature, and he understood history, and he knew the mechanisms of those in power to steal the rights and liberties of the people, and he just simply applied them,
In the realm of futuristic science fiction.
This is what really, really concerns me.
And this is something that if I could have a shout from the rooftops moment.
I would wish that people could understand that what is happening to Donald Trump right now because we've seen no evidence of any crime.
Look, let me just be on the record here because I want to know if my president engaged in treason.
I want to know if he engaged in bribery.
I want to know if he's guilty of high crimes or misdemeanors.
I want to know these things.
But we're not being allowed to know these things.
There's not even a real investigation.
And what we're seeing here, my greatest fear, is not just simply what's happening to Donald Trump.
But that there's a standard being set across America.
And this is actually and realistically jeopardizing due process for all of America.
You've got an entire population of people believing what these congressional ignoramuses are feeding us.
And if they can convince the entire population that due process is not a valuable thing for the President of the United States, that hearsay and the court of public opinion is actually more reliable than a jury of our peers.
There is a huge threat to the liberty and the due process and the property of every single human being in America.
We have devolved.
At this point, if the American people actually believe what we're being fed, we are devolved into a banana republic.
Where we are ruled by a democracy of 400 and, you know, 435.
Where the majority in the House of Representatives actually, not just simply the whole House of Representatives, but the majority in the House of Representatives now dictates the rule of law in America.
And that's exactly why our founders put the Constitution in writing to protect us from that kind of despotism.
Powerful, powerful, powerful.
I mean that is, I could not have said that any better, maybe not without the years of education and experience that you have.
So let's kind of talk about that a little bit more.
We've seen now twice, once with the Mueller report where they said they could not find evidence that President Trump was guilty of obstruction, but they couldn't exonerate him either.
So basically he's guilty until proven innocent.
And then now we've seen the same exact thing with this impeachment, whatever you want to call it, where they would not allow him to face his accuser, this supposedly anonymous whistleblower, Eric Sierra Mella.
So can you explain how on earth does this work?
Is it true that the president just doesn't have the same rights that we do?
Or is this, again, just running roughshod over thousands of years of legal systems coming together to create what we have today? - Well, you're absolutely right.
We're running roughshod over hundreds, centuries of understanding about the rights of the people.
The whole ridiculous nature of the Mueller investigation.
We couldn't find anything to prove him guilty, but we couldn't exonerate him either.
And the fact that what we have is a situation now where we have actually set a precedent on a Societal level, right?
That guilty until proven innocent is now the standard.
And I want to just simply say, all of this goes back to the lack of education of the American people in understanding simple civics, due process, the judicial system.
I mean, if we are going to retain our individual rights, our properties, our liberties, we're going to have to have a revolution of the minds of the people of America to be restored to these principles.
Think about this.
You have American people who actually believe that the Mueller investigation came to a legitimate conclusion.
Anybody who knows anything about civics and due process knows that it's not the job of the investigator to prove guilt or to exonerate.
The standard is not even guilt or innocence.
It's beyond a reasonable doubt.
And so if you can't prove somebody guilty, then they are not guilty.
Yeah, but you know what, the Democrats- And the idea that they can't be exonerated is not the standard.
Exactly, but the Democrats have already convicted President Trump.
He's already guilty without even any evidence.
He was guilty three years ago, and they're still looking for something.
I thank you so much again for coming on with us.
We run out of time so quick when you come on.
We're going to have to bring you on for a longer segment most definitely in the future.
I really do appreciate you taking time coming out with us.
So tell everyone how they can connect with you.
Well, I'm on Instagram, I'm on LinkedIn, I'm on YouTube, I'm on Facebook, I'm on Twitter, and all you have to do is search ChrisAnneHall.com.
K-R-I-S-A-N-N-E-H-A-L-L.com.
And we'd love to disciple you on the content.
Thank you, thank you.
Thank you.
We'll be right back, everybody.
Are you suggesting that white people are the problem?
White people are absolutely 100% the problem.
Absolutely 100%.
Yes, yes.
That stuff you've been taught about your community is not true.
It is 100% true.
So you know more about my community than I do.
Yes, I do.
Look at that.
You're the white person.
You know more about the black community than I do.
Yes, I do.
What did you say about Baltimore?
The black side of Baltimore.
What did he say about that?
What he said about Baltimore is that black people don't have to live in these conditions and when Elijah Cummings was here, Elijah Cummings got upset because that's his district.
I don't think it had anything to do with race.
Even Elijah Cummings admitted that the place was rat infested.
Why do you think black people are disproportionately incarcerated and poor and unhoused in this country?
Why do you think?
Why do I think?
Because there was a policy put in by the Democrats when LBJ came into play.
LBJ?
Listen, you ask me the question, I'm telling you.
When LBJ came into power, he said that he'll have every N-word voting Democrat within the 200 years.
He did it in 60.
And the way he did that, he told black people that they would get certain benefits.
That's where the ghettos came.
That's where the projects came into play.
Welfare came into play.
So a lot of black people started getting stuff and then they made the condition.
Remove the father from the household, and then you will get all of these things.
And that's exactly what took place.
So once you remove the father from the household, what happens in the community?
So you think Lyndon Johnson removed black fathers from their household?
No, they put politics.
No, the Democrats put policies in place to tell black women you can get government assistance as long as you don't have a black father in the household.
How long was Lyndon Johnson president?
But those policies are still in place.
Those policies are still in place today.
I totally disagree that the fathers were taken out of the home.
I think most black fathers are very devoted and do everything they can to care for their children.
But if we're honest with ourselves, we'll admit that too many fathers are also missing.
Too many fathers are MIA.
Too many fathers are AWOL.
Missing from too many lives and too many homes.
They've abandoned their responsibilities.
They're acting like boys instead of men.
Why do you think white people outnumber black people 10 to 1?
Well, because black people are brought here by force and enslaved.
I'm not saying you're talking about the racial difference 10 to 1.
The reason why is because Democrats push a policy to tell black women that it's good health care for you to abort your child.
No, that's a lie, actually.
So you kill him now, I kill him later?
If that's the case... You're spreading so much racist rhetoric, I'm very sad.
Really?
I'm the one spreading it?
Yes, you are.
But it's the Democrats that have been putting policies against black people forever.
And now we have President Trump, where more black people are working in this country than ever in history.
But he's the racist one?
He's not doing a really good job at it.
The stuff you've been taught about your community is not true.
It is 100% true.
So you know more about my community than I do.
Yes, I do.
Yes, I do.
Look at that.
You're the white person.
You know more about the black community than I do.
Yes, I do.
I mean, that's kind of sad, but it's true.
Oh, it's sad.
So I should believe what you're saying, and I should go along with what you're saying, other than what the facts are.
You should talk to some black people who are proud to be black people and happy and proud of their history and community.
Are you suggesting I'm not proud to be black?
I am saying that, yeah.
You're saying that?
Why am I not proud to be black?
Because you've been blaming black people for their own poverty and incarceration.
Black people should be responsible for their own actions.
It's pretty hard.
I guess you could have said that when they were enslaved too, right?
No, we can blame Democrats for that.
So, white people have all the power and privilege in this country.
Why are you so determined to lift up white people?
No, I want to lift up Americans.
Isn't that the problem?
Because the establishment has all of us fighting with one another.
We should be lifting up Americans, regardless if we agree or disagree.
I agree we should be lifting up each other as Americans regardless of race.
But I think that when a group of people are in a really unfortunate situation, those who have more power need to look at themselves and say, what are we doing to perpetuate this?
And what can we do for our neighbors who are less privileged, who've been shut out of prosperity for so many decades?
So are you suggesting that white people are the problem?
White people are absolutely 100% the problem.
Absolutely 100%.
Yes!
Yes!
White racism is the problem, is the better way to put it.
White male supremacy is the problem.
I'd like to address our star witness.
Ma'am, you said you have a connection to the president.
Would you describe that?
So my friend Becky said that her ex-boyfriend's sister Jill was into this guy Rick, who turned out to be a total creep.
But anyway, his best friend's dad's business partner used to work at Trump Towers.
I guess his manager's boss's supervisor spoke to Trump a lot.
And Becky said that he said that he said that he said that he said that Trump said if he was ever in the Oval Office, he would totally commit crimes.
You heard it straight from the source, folks.
Trump is in big trouble.
What do these bombshell accusations mean for the future of the Trump administration?
Let's go to our expert panel for discussion.
Oh, golly.
It looks like it means he's getting impeached as heck.
But only time will tell.
The real bombshells are expected to drop with the next star witness.
Trump's advisor's cousin's stepsister's ex-boyfriend who said he overheard a conversation between his ex-girlfriend and her stepsister about her cousin's time in the Trump administration.
The Trump administration.
The only thing I would have changed on that video, it was so accurate, but the only thing I would have changed on it was where they had MS, I think they had MSNSC or something.
I would have put MSDNC.
I mean, that's what I would have put on there.
So anyways, we have our guest and you probably saw a quick picture there.
This young man Absolutely awesome, young man.
Gene Ho, he's an American photographer, and he was Trump's photographer in 2016.
He wrote a book after being President Trump's photographer in 2016, and we're going to bring him on now and talk about how the impeachment and everything else that is related to attacking President Trump, because you, sir, know President Trump.
You've had first-hand conversation.
So, we actually have someone on with us tonight that's actually had first-hand conversation with the President.
Trump-ography.
Trump-ography.
You can go check it out.
Get his book.
Absolutely awesome information.
The truth that the media, the liberal media, will never allow you to hear.
Thank you for being with us, sir.
Oh, thank you very much for having me back.
Always great, as always.
Yes, absolutely.
So, welcome back again.
So tell me, you see this impeachment hearing going on, and you see how they're attacking President Trump, and you know that... Let me do it this way.
I was watching the Criminal News Network, and they were talking about how, I guess, Holmes could hear Trump on the phone from Sutherland.
When Trump talks on the telephone, is he always loud and, you know, screaming on the phone?
Or does he just talk like normal people do?
He is a normal person.
And, like, all of this is total junk.
All of this impeachment stuff.
I mean, how do people not see what's going on?
It's incredible.
I think most folks, if they're not paying attention, that's about the only way they can't see what's going on.
So, I mean, surely you guys must have seen this coming in a way all the way back in 2016 that the left just wasn't going to give up.
But I'm just curious for your personal take on this.
We've now had this impeachment hearing where you basically had what we showed in that clip happening in real life.
That's barely an exaggeration.
The media is going absolutely rabid saying, we've got proof!
Now it's all over!
It's explosive!
It's a bombshell!
It's stunning!
So what are your thoughts as somebody who worked on the campaign, worked one-on-one with the president, and now you see folks trying to destroy everything he's accomplished?
Well, let me tell you something because I have inside information of things that happened to me.
I was one of the few people that was subpoenaed We're in relationship to Trump, so I understand what this subpoena, what it's all about.
If I can explain to you what a subpoena really is, they tell you and they say, they give you, serve you with papers and it's a subpoena.
This is what happens next.
They said to me, we want every communication that you had with the Trump organization, with the Trump campaign, and you have to deliver it.
And then I'll tell you what happens next.
Then you have to get Go through a deposition, and then they have it recorded, and what they're looking for, or in this case, what they're looking for is dirt, or you say something a little off-handed.
If I could just, for example, this is just an example here, they could ask me something like this, well, did you ever delete a photo?
I'm like, of course I did.
If a person's eyes are closed, I'm gonna delete it.
And then it's suddenly like, oh, you're deleting evidence!
You're deleting evidence!
That's what's going on.
Some of these people are Trump appointees that were called to testify, but they were subpoenaed to do that, and then they go through all their emails, scour through, record everything, and that's what's really going on.
It's a kangaroo court here.
Yeah, I can see that 100%.
Now, President Trump is actually calling saying that he wants to have a hearing, or he wants it to go to trial.
And with it going to trial, you know, the Democrats are like scrambling around because if they do that, then they're going to be able to call witnesses.
They're going to be able to expose exactly what the Democrats are doing.
And for them, that is a big no-no.
So, you know, you're going through the whole subpoena situation.
How scared does that make the Democrats if they know that all their records and everything that they've been doing will have to come to the surface?
A subpoena is very powerful both ways.
It's powerful, you could use it as a weapon against someone, but it's also, a subpoena is tremendously, tremendously powerful in getting the truth out.
Because if they say, we want every single email, they have the emails going both ways.
You can't hide, really, from a subpoena.
If they say, we want all these emails, you can't say, oh, this is all I have, because they'll have the record on the other hand.
A subpoena is very, very difficult to escape.
It could be used as a powerful weapon against you, but it's a very powerful way to get to the bottom of it and the truth, and you will see that happen if it goes to the Senate.
You're going to see, it's going to be fun times, I'm telling you.
So, I'm curious, you're of course going around the country doing talks about your book, Trumpography, where you've got amazing photos that you were able to take one-on-one, or at least in very fascinating situations with President Trump.
A lot of first-hand accounts, some good inside baseball in there.
But you're going around the country, you're talking with people who ostensibly are friends, or fans rather, of President Trump.
What is the temperature of the folks you've been talking to?
A lot of the people that I talk to, no one is really worried about this impeachment.
We all know.
Anyone that knows anything about it knows that it's a sideshow.
I was watching the impeachment trials and on CNN it says that they said it was quid pro quo.
It's amazing the amount Here's something interesting.
I'm a big boxing fan, and people say, well, when you have cheating and boxing, what people do, they say, just watch the boxing fight without the sound on.
Just watch what it is, and you'll know the truth.
It's kind of like that with watching, like, CNN and other things.
People already that support Trump have been ignoring the mainstream media for a very, very long time, and they're not phased by this at all.
Not at all.
Yeah, I think that's probably why a lot of their ratings is in the dirt right now, because people are not paying attention to them.
That brings me to an interesting question.
When you were traveling around with President Trump and he was calling, you know, CNN the very fake news, when you were there and CNN would show up and try to interview them, could you tell how they would try to deliberately attack him versus some of the other media outlets, them along with MSDNC?
You saw Donald Trump, President Trump in action, you see him all the time.
Even back then, Trump wouldn't take, that's the thing, Trump didn't take anything from these people.
When he would, he was the same way back then, when they would do a media scrum, what he would do is he would look right at CNN and he goes, you're fake news.
And he would call them out, and that's why we all learned to love him.
I cannot even begin to tell you how alternative media today is changing the world.
People are starting to see fake media, CNN, as what they really are, an extension of the arm of the Democratic Party.
I don't think anybody could say otherwise.
And thank you so much.
I mean, it is alternative media that's getting this out there.
So, of course, we're going to have you back for the next segment.
But just real quick, so we don't forget, tell folks where they can get your book, because you've got some amazing, amazing stories in there.
You've shared a few of them with us in the past.
Yeah, thank you very much.
Basically, if you go to my main website, geneho.com, that's G-E-N-E-H-O dot com, and click on the Trumpography link, you can find it there, you can find it on Amazon, but you'll find a different perspective of what Trump is really like that the mainstream media will not talk about.
Yeah, they don't want anyone to know about it.
Because they want everyone to think Orange Man bad.
Orange Man bad.
I'm stealing it from you, Tom.
Orange Man bad.
I guess you stole it from the left.
So I'm stealing it from you.
That's kind of like the hearsay.
He said, she said, she said, Orange Man's bad.
We'll be back.
Welcome back to Firepower.
I'm Tom Pafford co-hosting with Will Johnson.
Our guest is Gene Ho.
Gene Ho, of course, was President Trump's photographer on the campaign trail.
He has a book out, Trumpography.
I cannot recommend it enough.
It seems absolutely fascinating.
Will, of course, got a copy.
Gene was in the studio a couple weeks ago.
And we're talking about impeachment and you mentioned in the last segment that you've been subpoenaed.
I don't think you've shared this with us before and I'm guessing it's not to do with this latest impeachment push.
So can you just kind of give us some details about what on earth this was for?
Was it part of Mueller?
And what did they think they were going to get as a result of doing this?
Uh, in connection with Robert Mueller, but it was part of something that had to do with some people that were, for lack of a better word, maybe you could say attacking or involved with the Trump campaign.
Basically, when you're involved with Trump, there's a lot of things that come with the territory with it.
But basically, it wasn't anyone suing me personally, but it was a case that I was involved in, and the pictures told the story of that.
But it's interesting though, when you do get a subpoena, it is a frightening thing, even though you're not getting sued, because I have to go out and get a lawyer.
I have to get a lawyer on my dime to basically protect me because if I say something, then I'm on the hook for it.
If I say something and it's opposite of what they find, it's not a very fun situation, but I could assure you that if you get a subpoena that they will get to the bottom of the truth of it, especially on the Trump side of it.
Yeah, that's terrible.
You know, they're willing to get anyone around him in his circle and to try to just hurt everybody.
And the main reason for trying to hurt everyone, because it makes it look like everyone that's surrounded by Trump is doing stuff or something they shouldn't be doing.
And that's their goal.
It is exactly what is going on here.
They want to cloud everyone around Trump.
I mean, just take a look at how they did it to Roger Stone.
I mean, it was almost the same process because they say, oh, you're lying.
You're lying to Congress.
I am telling you, when you have something and they could put the thumbscrews on you because they say, hey, but you said something like that.
You said something like that in one of your emails.
So you have to be lying.
A subpoena is a very difficult thing to have to deal with.
It can take and twist everything.
I'm so glad you brought that up, because I was going to ask if there was a comparison between what happened to you and Roger Stone, and it sounds like you were able to.
I mean, a photographer, of course, this isn't the 1950s, we don't shoot on film anymore, so a photographer is going to delete photos, and of course that is basically how they got Roger Stone.
So I'm curious, this is something, we're getting a little bit off topic here, but it's something that I've been meaning to ask you every time we have you on the show.
Backstage, in the Trump campaign, back in 2016, I feel like they probably understood the value of alternative media, independent media, like our sponsor InfoWars.
Of course, we weren't around yet, but Band.Video.
What alternative platforms was President Trump a fan of back in 2016?
Do you know?
Well, you have to remember, you have to remember, Alex Jones played a pivotal, pivotal role in getting Trump elected.
Everyone remembers him.
When he, when Alex Jones had Trump, on Infowars.
It was a big deal.
That was a big deal.
And Trump, I've heard Trump say it before.
He goes, he doesn't dislike all the media.
There was some media there.
He always said, they have to treat me fair.
That was his criteria, that they have to be fair.
You could call him out on stuff.
I guarantee you, you could call Trump out on stuff.
But you have to be fair.
And some of the media is not fair.
CNN is not fair.
A lot of these are not fair.
But I remember when he went on Alex Jones Show, and I believe Roger Stone had something to do with it, putting that together, that I know of.
But what people are trying to do is cloud it.
On that testimony in the impeachment trial, the ambassador, that was a Trump appointee.
But, you know, see how they twist his words?
I mean, they could do the same thing to me if they say, oh, well, suddenly the headline is, Gene Ho deletes evidence!
He deleted photos!
But that's why you see the whole story when the Republicans cross-examination.
That's what's going on.
Yes.
So what was, I guess, what was President Trump's demeanor when he would talk about Alex Jones and Infowars during that time?
Because, I mean, he had to realize that a lot of people that you know, support Infowars, our sponsor, was, you know, a big, large chunk of his supporter base in 2016.
And I'm willing to bet that is still the same case here.
And one of the reasons why they had to get rid of President, listen to me, one of the reasons why they had to get Alex Jones off of these different platforms before the 2020.
Oh, do we have a problem with the sound?
Looks like we might be having a quick technical difficulty, but of course where Will was going was, what was, if he did, if you ever heard him at least, when President Trump would speak about Alex Jones or maybe other folks on InfoWars, did that ever come up?
And what was that, what was his demeanor like when he would bring up these people?
Well, you know, here's the thing.
I was his photographer, but a lot of times I wasn't privy to, I was privy to some meetings, but I wasn't privy to all the strategy meetings that he might have had.
But I do know this.
Trump is a big person that brings people together.
And one of the big things about alternative media is that he He loves people and he trusts people that what they can do is bring people together.
And that's what Trump has done with just about everybody here.
He is a person that works together through all things because he's a businessman.
He wants to get people's ideas and I've seen him ask people for their ideas and he brings people together.
Right.
Do you think it's frustrating for President Trump, being that he is from the business world, and of course you're self-employed and own your own business, and you know, you make fast decisions.
You get the information you need and then you just, boom, it's done.
We're going forward with plan A. We've got backup plan ABC in case plan A doesn't work out.
Do you think it's frustrating for President Trump to have all of these Congress critters who just take 15 years to make a simple yes or no decision And how do you think he's navigating that in the Oval Office?
Well, one of the things I do know about Trump, and that's why I know that there was no, forget the collusion thing, but like if there was no any kind of quid pro quo or bribery or anything like that, Trump is a delegator.
He will specifically say, I want this, this and that.
Get it done.
And that's how he deals with things.
And if a person takes forever to do it or he doesn't do it quick enough or whatever, then they're out.
They are out.
But the thing with Trump, when it comes to this, is he is absolutely a delegator.
And that's why it's like all this testimony that you see in the impeachment trial, it's total junk.
They're grasping at straws to try to pin something on him.
Yeah.
So you can hear me now, right?
I think we got my audio going.
So I'm not sure what it is, what's going on, but we're getting ready to go out.
So tell everyone exactly how they can connect with you and more about your book as we go out here.
Yeah.
Please check it out because you could see, like I said before, really quick, That if I could have lied and wrote a negative book about Trump and signed a seven-figure advance deal.
My book is called Trumpography.
You can find it on Amazon.
But if you go to my website, geneho.com, G-E-N-E-H-O.com, you can check out the links there that will bring you right to it.
So I really appreciate it.
Now I appreciate you coming on with us and talking about your experience with President Trump.
Because it's one side that you never hear about in the liberal media.
And the liberal media don't want people ever to hear what you're having to say.
So thank you so much for coming on with us and telling your story.
Again, we'll have you back on in the future because we love your insight.
Firepowernews.com everyone!
Band.video!
Band.video.
The origins of the Russia probe and what, there's somebody under investigation right That's right.
Well, this is an investigation that began, then was found as part of the probe that's being done by Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General for the Justice Department.
And what he found was that there was an employee at the FBI who altered a document that was used in the preparation for one of the FISA warrants, one of the surveillance warrants that was done against Carter Page, who was the Trump campaign aide.
This document, whatever changes were made, was substantive enough to change the meaning of the document.
We don't know a lot more about it.
We don't know, for instance, whether without this change the Pfizer would have been approved or not.
But it is a substantive change that was made to this document.
And Michael Horowitz confronted this FBI employee during one of the interviews that was done as part of this review.
And that person admitted to making that change.
So now this is part of a criminal investigation that's being done by John Durham, who is the prosecutor in Connecticut, who was appointed by Bill Barr, the Attorney General, to do a wide-ranging review of everything that was used, all the intelligence that was gathered to begin what became the Mueller investigation.
So, again, this is an altered document.
There's a lot we don't know.
About this employee and what the motivations were, but it is a big deal, obviously, for you to make a change to a document, to alter it in any way, and that's why... So FBI agents under investigation, clearly this is going to reverberate and provide ammunition to the president and his allies that this whole Russia investigation was criminally wrong.
Exactly.
I mean, look, this is exactly what people close to the President have been saying, that the FBI committed wrongdoing in starting this investigation.
And so, the question now, obviously, is what other details are going to be part of the horrorist report that's going to be released on December 9th, and how much political hay the President's allies are going to make about this.
Let me bring Preet Bharara, the former U.S.
Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
What's your reaction, Preet?
Well, that's kind of an alarming bit of news.
So, someone's in trouble!
You know, they're going to release this Pfizer report, and I truly believe that once they release this Pfizer report, we're going to see something that's going to come up.
Some kind of crisis, Tom.
Some kind of event.
Something's going to take place to try to distract everyone from what they just released, and they're going to try to make it to where no one pays attention to it.
And now we're getting reports to where the FBI changed some documentation.
How do we know they didn't change documentation from the get-go?
The whole FISA report, how did it get to the FISA courts in the first place?
I think it's about to stir the whole pot.
So, Will, I actually have a source who is connected to some DC folks who has told me a little bit, and we'll see, this will be the test to see how accurate this source is, but I've been told what to expect with the FISA warrant is they're going to blame the media.
So expect to see that the media, perhaps CNN, one of these outlets, instructed or asked their contact at the FBI to make these changes.
And they did, so CNN or whatever outlet could then run with it.
You notice CNN was very distraught reading that, like, oh no, this may create some hay for the President and his team.
They may be able to use this against the Democrats.
But I fully expect the entire FISA report, the Inspector General report, December 9th, thank God it's finally coming out.
They've been teasing us for it feels like eons at this point.
But I fully expect we will not see the Deep State fry for this, as we should.
I think that the entire report is going to be aimed at the mainstream media.
This is what my source has told me, giving me some evidence and throwing around some names that I will not repeat.
But I believe it's going to be an opportunity to see exactly how corrupt the media is, the influence the media holds over the FBI and over other members of the Deep State.
And I think that this is going to be, now here's what I am concerned about, and I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm not saying there's going to be a false flag, but I am very concerned, and I would never call for violence, well you know that about me, but what I'm concerned about is that, to what you were saying earlier, there may be an uprising, an emergency, a terrible event,
I would be very, very concerned that in the next month we may see events that happen against major media outlets, CNN, MSNBC, etc.
to cast them or that would result in casting them as the victim in all of this.
Yes, victims.
They like to play the victims and then they like to tell people who can be the victim.
You know, seriously, on a serious note, I think the poster released December 9th, if I'm not mistaken.
They're gonna release it December 9th, and between now and then, or right after they release it, I'm not gonna be surprised one bit.
If something happens and then all of a sudden our attention is diverted.
Now, I don't want anything to happen.
I really would like for all this to end.
Can you imagine, and we've said it before, if President Trump could get only 10%, just 10%, Of the Democrats.
To do nothing Democrats.
To do their job.
Imagine how much better it would be.
Imagine if he got 100%.
My God.
This country would just be flourishing.
Beyond belief.
They have to fight him.
Every step of the way.
To try to prevent him.
From helping the American people.
From making America look good.
From making America greater.
Than it has ever been.
And it's actually still happening.
With them fighting him.
So you have to ask yourself, why are they doing that?
The reason why they're doing it, we all know the reason why they're doing it.
They're doing it because they hate him and because they lost in the 2016 election.
So, Tom, there's a video where You know, Obama gave blankets to the Ukrainian people.
And President Trump gave aid, actual aid, so that they can protect themselves from the Russians.
So if he's a Russian operative, why would he give them aid in the first place?
Why wouldn't he just give them more blankets?
You know?
I mean, seriously.
He's not a very good Russian agent, Will.
He's just not very good at it, not very effective.
He's putting sanctions on Russia.
He's giving people weapons to fight Russia.
He's destroying their economies.
Putin is not getting his money's worth, Will.
Exactly, he's not a good Russian agent, and he's not a good white supremacist.
He's bad at all of them.
So, let's go to this video where you can see where the Ukrainian soldiers received the aid from President Trump.
This one is number eight.
Russian tanks.
So basically it creates a deterrent from the Russian soldiers to drive in with the tanks to attack the Ukrainian government, to attack the country.
This is what President Trump did.
President Trump put this out so that they can protect themselves.
But they don't like it.
They hate it.
And with him doing this, they call him a Javelins.
Javelins.
They're called javelins.
And they're actually very interesting.
I mean, it's like this big rocket comes out of their shoulder, from their shoulder launcher, and it goes and hits the tank and destroys the tank.
Some of it, some of the tanks are very strong.
But these javelins will destroy them.
And then the Russians don't like the fact that President Trump did this.
So how is he a Russian operative, Tom?
Well, he's been very bad at it, like I was saying.
I mean, he's done insane sanctions against Russia that I think are too much, too high.
It's too punitive, frankly.
He's barely been able to meet with Putin.
His foreign policy is diametrically opposed to Putin.
What he did with the Kurds is forcing Russia to become involved in the Middle East.
Since, for the first time since they were the Soviet Union, since it destroyed the Soviet Union, Afghanistan, the graveyard of empires, he is now selling weapons to the people who, I mean Russia is invading Ukraine.
They are still in the process, they're still fighting, they're still mad about, is this our side of the border, is this your side of the border?
Yeah.
So if President Trump is a Russian agent, I guess Putin must really, really hate Russia.
He must want to see Russia fall because that's the only solution.
In fact, I wish that President Trump would be a little bit nicer to Russia.
Maybe we could get Russia to help us out against China.
But that's not what's happening.
So, yes, President Trump gave them the weapons, the munitions, the very highly advanced weapons, by the way, that they need to fight back against Russia.
Absolutely.
So normally we take phone calls, Maybe we can get one person to give us a call.
888-201-2244.
If you want to call in and talk to us.
Alright?
888-201-2244.
82012244.
We'll be back.
All right.
It is Friday evening.
You know, typically we like to take phone calls during the last hour or the last hour of the week.
And hear from the people and hear your opinion about things that took place during the week and the different videos that we're playing.
But we're going to take this last couple minutes here, the last segment here, and take your phone calls if we can squeeze something in here.
So let's go with Travis from New York.
You there, Travis? - I just wanted to mention that I got Gene Ho's book.
It's a beautiful book and everyone should pick it up.
The people they love.
And the thing I want to talk about the most was, uh, Sam Tripoli getting banned this week.
And, uh, I know that Alex reached out to him.
I don't know if you guys offered him a spot and banned that video, but, um, I think this, the censorship has gotten ridiculous with Trump and the way I feel personally is that we don't support him until he supports us because You know, we got him elected in 2016.
He's just letting us hang out to dry.
Well, I mean, I can understand you.
I understand what you're saying there.
But how much can President Trump actually do, you know, going to a business?
Now, I'm not giving a pass to Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, Apple.
I'm not giving a pass to them for censoring people.
But how does President Trump go to a privately owned business and tell them how to run their business?
Yeah, I mean... You see my point?
He's like stuck between a rock and a hard place.
I mean, how does he do that?
I mean, we don't like it.
I think the only thing I can suggest that people could do is tell people to go onto a certain platform.
Well, to your point, Connor, I mean... Go ahead.
I think that they're acting as a publisher, though, at this point.
And once you act as a publisher, you don't get that Yeah, I mean that's one of the main talking points that a lot of folks, and I'll kind of expand on that for you, there's Section 230, it's all very boring, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, it's an ancient law from the late 1990s that gives Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, all of these social media platforms A little special legal privilege where they're neither a publisher nor are they an open forum, a public forum.
So they use this to skirt the First Amendment.
But, I mean, you have Facebook Watch, you have YouTube curating, you have Twitter curating.
We have Tim Cook, the Tim Apple, the loser on video saying that people want a curated experience.
So you have virtually all of these companies basically admitting they're a publisher.
They've said it in legal documents that they're a publisher.
I think a lot of folks are in your position, and I just want to ask you, you know, you look and you see all of the people that, for instance, Ben Shapiro called alt-right in 2016, Alex Jones, Gavin McInnes, Milo Yiannopoulos, the whole group of them, they've all been banned from all social media.
Now, meanwhile, you have people like Ben Shapiro, like Charlie Kirk, all these people who were very much anti-Trump in 2016, they're now getting rich talking about President Trump all day and pretending like they're a supporter.
What do you think of that, Collar?
Well, I don't know.
People are going to do what they're going to do, but I just want to get back to the point that, uh, you know, I think when you put the pressure on Trump, he's obviously the best person for the job at this point, but I mean, it's just ridiculous.
The amount of support that we've given the man and we're just hanging out to dry.
I don't know.
It just feels.
You know, you hit Gene Hona on there and he was talking about how, oh yeah, he acknowledged it and everything, but it feels like, I don't know, it just feels like we've just been used this entire time.
And I mean, at this point, I'll vote for him, but pretty reluctantly, you know, because I've been sticking with you guys.
I love you guys.
And when, when they always got banned, I doubled down, you know, supporting you guys, but It just feels ridiculous at this point, you know?
Nah, I mean, I completely... I mean, I hear what you're saying, and you know what?
It does feel that way.
It feels like our hands are tied.
He's the President of the United States.
He should be able to go to these companies and tell them, say, hey, look, cut it out.
I mean, because they're shutting people down because they disagree with them, not because people are calling for violence.
It's simply because they disagree.
They want to remove him from the different social media platforms.
In the Alex Jones case, they had to remove him because they saw how powerful he was getting the American people to rally behind President Trump during the 2016 election and to make Hillary Clinton, you know, look the way she truly was, which is an evil hag, in my opinion.
Hey, Collin, I want to thank you for the call.
All right, let's go.
Thank you so much.
Let's go to Nathan from Vancouver.
How you doing, Nathan?
Yeah, yeah, Vancouver Island, Canada.
Thanks very much.
This week's Democratic debates preach about unity, right?
Well, if the hard left would love the Constitution and truly define freedom and the United States of America and its borders as much as they hate conservatives and the duly elected Donald John Trump, there might be a meeting of minds.
Well, you know what, I would agree with you on that, but we all have come to the realization that the Democrats want to remove the U.S.
Constitution and rewrite the Bill of Rights.
I mean, that's their goal.
Just the other day, Obama was saying that, hey, you guys, you need to calm down, don't be so far leftist, don't be so radical, don't try to tear down the system.
Them tearing down the system is them tearing up the U.S.
Constitution.
Yeah, I think that's right.
I mean, if these people would just love America just a little bit, imagine how much we could get done.
Exactly.
It's not the business Democrats.
It's not the business Democrats who are okay with the First and Second Amendments and borders.
You know that, sorry to use the term, flyover country.
Those Democrats are probably questioning, saying, well, I'll vote Trump if he's for borders, I hope.
Well, you know, there's a lot of people, a lot of Democrats are starting to realize, and I've seen it on social media, where they're saying these Democrats are just taking it too far with the impeachment, and then they're like watching the debates, and they're like, none of them were providing anything that would make me want to vote for them.
Because most of them on this stage, minus Tom Steyer, which he's not going to make it anywhere, but most of them on this stage have had careers in politicians that have done anything.
So, hey, I want to thank you for the call, caller.
Thank you so much.
Good night.
All right.
Let's go to Liz.
How you doing, Liz?
Hey, stranger.
Hey.
How you doing?
Good.
It's Friday.
Hey, I got Gene's book.
He actually even sent you a text message to let you know.
I got Gene's book the last time he was on, talking about his book.
And I got the book.
I love the book.
I only wish it had more pictures in it.
It's fantastic.
It's phenomenal.
I would love to have him sign it, but I don't know how I would get it to him to do that.
But yeah, fantastic, fantastic, fantastic book.
And as far as the other guy goes, the first caller, he has an 88022 is a text, and you get texts from him, and that may end up what we end up doing.
If Trump gets Tired of messing with these platforms?
He may end up starting to text us all.
And have conference calls.
It's quite possible.
And that's a possibility.
It's quite possible.
He's gotta keep the faith.
What today may be completely different tomorrow.
Okay?
And he's just gotta keep the faith.
Trump is doing what Trump has to do.
And I'll be honest with you, I honestly Really, really kind of hope that they take Trump to trial, too, because I want all this dirt to come out.
And then they can't say, oh, you lied to Congress.
It's going to be more than that.
You know what I mean?
The penalty is going to be much, much higher, especially for people like Schiff.
God help him if he lied in a court of law.
Oh, he, you know, he's already lied.
How can he not lie?
I mean, they should be held accountable for sitting up there on the hill lying to the American people.
I mean, there's no excuse for it.
So, but hey, Liz, thank you for calling.
Thank you for the call.
Have a good weekend.
Bye-bye.
All right, you too.
All right, Tom.
Another Friday.
We're at the end of the week.
And like I always say, it's been an honor and a privilege.
And I'm blessed to be on here with you and to do this with you on a nightly basis.
And I truly mean that.
I love your insight.
My wife, she said, I love when Tom brings the information onto there.
So I love it.
And I thank you for being here with me.
We will be here Monday.
It's always a pleasure.
Yeah, so we will be here Monday, everyone, God's willing.
God's willing, we will be here Monday.
All right?
Firepowernews.com, Band.Video, God bless you, God bless President Trump, and God bless America.
We will see you next Monday.
Band.Video, Infowarsstore.com.
▲
Export Selection