Viva Barnes dissects the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, mocking Jimmy Kimmel's Melania jokes and critiquing media claims of AI-generated footage or hoax theories despite Cole Allen surviving multiple shots. He argues security lapses at Butler and Mar-a-Lago reveal systemic failures while condemning baseless attacks on Erica Kirk, contrasting her lack of Secret Service protection with JD Vance's safety. By analyzing the shooter's manifesto and social media vitriol, including the "That Gay Guy Candle Company" incident, Barnes concludes that political polarization has created an environment where violence is rationalized as justice against an "evil" administration. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Melania's Rotten Tomatoes Review00:07:14
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, you are looking at a chicken's foot shoot that I'm about to give to my dog while we watch Jimmy Kimmel.
Behold, let's play this video.
Everyone, get ready to retch.
Jimmy Kimmel is among the most foul people on earth, but tied with a great many others.
We miss you so much.
And of course, our first lady, Melania, is here.
Look at Melania, so beautiful.
Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.
You know, Melania's birthday is on Sunday.
That's right.
She's planning to celebrate at home, the same way she always does, looking out a window and whispering, What have I done?
As you're all aware, Melania is a movie star now.
Her documentary had a score of 10% on Rotten Tomatoes, which is a website named after her husband's testicles.
And I want to congratulate you, Madam First Lady, on your huge accomplishment the world's first.
Motionless picture.
And that.
Oh, by the way, before we go any further, Melania, this is Donald.
Donald, this is Melania.
That was my impression of Jeffrey Epstein.
Pretty good, right?
Thanks, Chris.
Okay, now here's the reality.
I don't know if this is real or not anymore.
I know it is real because everyone was reacting to, responding to the atrociousness of the opening joke.
The look of an expectant widow.
Let me just see who posted this.
This was posted by Santino, the real Santino.
Jimmy Kimmel roasts Melania in the White House correspondence dinner and many others.
I'm not playing the whole thing.
On a clip, Melania Trump appeared.
Kimmel took a jibe at her by commenting, Our first lady Melania is here.
You have the look of an expectant widow.
Jimmy Kimmel recently did a parody of the White House.
Okay, so that's its correspondence.
It's a parody.
I'm sorry.
We're going to get to living in a post truth world and not even knowing what to believe.
But what is true, at the very least, let's get this out of here.
Is that Jimmy Kimmel made that?
I want to put it in the word joke.
Jimmy Kimmel made that statement.
And you know, there's the David Mamet, every fear hides a wish phenomenon.
And then there's just the lefty murderous wishes that they put out in the universe and just hope that it yields some murderous fruits.
That's what Jimmy Kimmel is, that's what he's always been.
Imagine the idea that that would be funny.
I mean, first of all, what's funny also about envisioning another man's testicles, unless you have some deep rooted perversions?
The joke about the Rotten Tomatoes doesn't even make any sense.
A, because Rotten Tomatoes has been around for decades.
Everybody knows it's a movie reviewing website.
And B, if they accuse Trump of being any color, it's orange and not red.
And why would Jimmy want to envision Donald John Trump, the president of these United States of America's testicles?
I don't know.
He's a deranged.
Unhinged, deeply evil human being.
But we're starting off with the look of an expectant widow.
And we're going to talk about the most recent assassination attempt on Donald John Trump.
I know I was on with Alex Jones earlier today, and that's why I was running a little late because I'm not saying no.
And I wanted to get some things off my chest or at least make some points on Alex Jones.
We are getting to the realm of a world where you don't know what to believe, you don't know what's going on.
Everybody's immediate instinct is hoax, false flag, fake event, whatever.
And do bear in mind, if your first reaction is to say something like that in the absence of any substantiating evidence, I won't say something hyperbolic.
You're not as bad as the rabid lefties who celebrate assassinations and lament failed assassinations.
But we are living in a world where people don't know what to believe, they don't know what's true, and their default position is everything I'm being told is a lie, even if they know what they're told is being true, but they don't trust the source from which they are being told something that they already know to be true is coming.
Try to say that five times in a row.
Jimmy Kimmel comes out and says something absolutely evil.
And it's, you know, we've gone from the lionizing of would be assassins with Luigi Mangione to the normalizing of assassination attempts to the humorizing of assassination attempts.
And it is objectively disgusting.
It's objectively rancid.
It's objectively evil.
And it's objectively contributing to the not just normalization of hatred, but to the normalization of violence.
And you try not to get despaired and you try not to get dismayed, but that is the world in which we are living.
Now, sorry, by the way, I only set the link up about five minutes before going live.
Welcome to the show, people.
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida rumbler.
Okay, I'm looking at the camera.
Let me just see.
I'm going to go look in the chat.
Do you notice anything?
Like the camera now is so sharp.
I think you see every blemish on this punim.
And one that's driving me crazy is this tuft of white hair right here.
And I got a little blemish under my lip.
And it drives me crazy that you can see all these things.
But I'm not putting on makeup or powdering my face because I'm a man, lowish, and that's what we do.
This is the show daily, three o'clock on Rumble.
And we go over law, news, and we have our locals after party at viva barnslaw.locals.com.
And let me make sure that we are live across all platforms.
Loves Liberty over at viva barnslaw.locals.com says, I look more tan.
That I've been told.
It definitely gets the color.
Plus, I haven't turned up the heat on the camera, but I've made it look realistic in terms of actually capturing the tan.
This is our locals community.
Get some just for men.
Never relax, Viva.
You are a middle aged man.
Don't worry so much about how you look.
No, I don't.
It's all sort of semi humorous, and I got to figure out how to.
No, I just removed myself, removed myself, bring myself back in.
Peeps, we're going to talk about some stuff today.
First, I want to show you one thing.
Oh, Emmanuel.
Come and say hi.
Oh, look at this guy.
He's he.
I don't know if you heard.
He's gonna burp.
He's gonna burp.
I just gave him a chicken leg.
I have to make sure that he didn't choke on it.
He's got this thing like he's very big and he acts like total, like gelatinous, loose weight when I pick him up.
It makes very.
What do you have to say?
Oh, he smells so good.
He finished the chicken leg already.
So now we know it lasts about five minutes or six minutes.
All right, peeps, the latest going on with the latest, yet another.
Analyzing The CCTV Footage00:05:53
It's an attempted assassination, regardless of how close, if he was a floor off, you don't write this off as not an assassination attempt.
It's a foiled one.
And I'm going to get into this in a second because people are saying this was a security lapse.
And I'm going to maybe take a controversial opinion.
I'm being tongue in cheek.
The security did its job here, it met the threat and the level of the threat that was met, or the level of the threat that it was facing.
The question is on the one hand, What would have happened if the level of threat was a little bit more properly trained, properly prepared than some unhinged lunatic who traveled from California to Chicago to DC carrying firearms to do this?
What if the threat were not some idiot LARPing as a Grand Theft Auto assassin, but actually a coordinated, organized, orchestrated attempt?
Would the security have caught it?
We're going to get there in a bit.
We're going to get there after we go through the manifesto of the individual.
Before we get anywhere, and I say we're living in a post truth world where we don't know what to believe anymore and where the default is, unfortunately, believe nothing, even if we know it to be true.
Let me get clear on how to do this here.
I don't want that.
No.
Hold on.
What's that?
Here.
No, I don't like that layout.
I don't like this layout.
Don't like that one.
I like this one.
This is what we're going to look at here.
There was CCTV footage of the alleged assassin.
I'll say alleged just for the legalese breaching the security barrier, running past the metal detectors.
And now you're going to see on the internet, if you go and look this up, that people are going to be out there saying, This is AI generated footage.
I'm not picking on this account.
I don't know who it is Jesse on fire, real Jesse on fire.
The Trump assassination attempt security footage is AI.
This is pulled directly from Benny Johnson's post on the security footage.
And now we're going to watch this analysis in the context of that claim that the security footage is AI.
So to be clear, this is on Benny Johnson's X account.
He's holding a sign, right?
You can zoom in on that and make it a little bit easier for everyone to see, right?
He's holding a sign.
Okay.
And now he's running with the sign.
Here he comes, guys.
He's holding a sign and his face swallows it.
Where did his sign go?
It's not on the ground.
It's nowhere.
His face swallowed the sign.
So now you're going to get people who are going to say this is proof that the security footage is AI.
And it gets to the point where even I have to say, what the heck?
I was fairly certain.
Trump had shared the CCTV the night it happened, the CCTV footage, and people were immediately clamoring that this was evidence that it was a hoax, a setup, or let it happen on whatever, a staged event, because how do they release the CCTV footage while the investigation is going on?
And then you go to the internet and you're going to have people right now thinking it's AI footage and Benny Johnson is propagating fake AI footage.
Now, luckily, I have something of a memory and I remembered where I originally saw the enhanced footage and it came from Seth.
Seth Weathers at Seth Weathers.
I also don't know who this individual is.
CEO, conservative dads, ultra right beer, border wall, tiki la.
Over 2 million beers sold.
Okay.
And he put out the video and said, I enhanced the security footage from last night's assassination attempt using AI.
The footage was extremely low quality, and it seems AI made up some things to fill in the gaps, but gives a better view of what took place.
And here.
But to the extent that I think I'm going crazy, that was the actual, that was AI enhanced from the original video.
And I want to bring up the original video because it's kind of important to see as well.
And I'm going to get it right here.
This is the original footage.
Where you're going to see it's very black, very pixelated, very.
Blurry edges.
You'll understand why the AI gave this guy a hat in the rendition.
And you'll understand, I don't know why it's giving the guy a sign.
This is the security footage or the CCTV, the original one.
But we're going to get into a world where you're not going to know what the heck is going on, and people are going to make mistakes, rely on one disinformation post, and discredit themselves entirely.
One thing I do want to see so let's look in the back now, and we're going to see why AI gave this guy a poster because presumably it was this little barrier here that it might have interpreted as a piece of paper.
When he gets past it, he eats it as he goes under, comes down running.
The color here, I believe, is the reflection of the person recording off the screen, if I'm not mistaken.
And then we have the actual video.
Now, I've heard people pontificate that the evidence that this is a false flag hoax is that Cole Allen didn't get shot.
And therefore, that's somehow evidence that it didn't happen or that it was a total staged event and he was a patsy.
To which I might respond if you wanted to.
Have this go down as a hoax with a true Patsy, you would have him die at the end of this so that he's not going to tell any stories about who put him up to this and how he might have been used as a Patsy, et cetera.
Why Charge JD Vance Too00:03:09
Let me just get something here so we can get the latest on the charges.
He's been formally charged, Cole Allen, assassination attempt on the president, and the three other charges here before we get into the manifesto.
And I got to remember every time now to bring it to stage after adding it to the Studio.
This is from CNBC.
Cole Allen charged with trying to assassinate Trump at White House Correspondents' event.
Here we go.
Cole Tolomis Allen, the man arrested after allegedly charging a security checkpoint for the White House Correspondents' dinner, was criminally charged with trying to assassinate President Donald Trump, who was in attendance at that event Saturday.
Also charged with transportation of a firearm or ammunition in interstate commerce.
He crossed state lines.
And discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence, prosecutors said at his arraignment.
The Torrance, California resident's arrest raised concerns over the Secret Service handling.
Of Saturday's event, where Trump and Vance were evacuated after gunshots rang out within hearing of the ballroom at the Washington Hilton Hotel.
Cole Thomas Allen, the man arrested for allegedly charging security checkpoint, criminally charged, yada, yada, yada.
He's also facing transportation, whatever.
He attempted to assassinate the president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, an enumerated crime of terrorism, the prosecutor said.
The magistrate judge today, it's held without bond.
Prosecutor said Allen had a 12 gauge pump action shotgun, a.38 caliber.
Semi automatic pistol and was also carrying with him three knives and other dangerous paraphernalia when he was arrested.
We didn't really see any of that on his back, but whatever.
Prosecutors said, Allen, we got that.
Sharbaugh scheduled a detention hearing for him Thursday morning, as Allen's attorney, Tazira Abe, said he agreed with the prosecutors to hold the proceedings that day.
Judge also scheduled a preliminary hearing in the case.
For Monday, Allen was allegedly armed with a shotgun, handgun, knife when he ran the checkpoint.
One Secret Service officer, I guess, was shot.
Not seriously injured, according to Trump, who credited the agent's protective gear.
The court hearing comes as concerns have been raised over the Secret Service's handling of Saturday's event, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance were evacuated after gunshots occurred.
Again, we're going to get into this in a second because we're going to get into the manifesto.
Why was he carrying a shotgun and a gun?
The question also if this is a let it happen on purpose because Deep State wants to get Trump or J.D., how do they have such lax security?
Or, how do they hold an event in an area where they can't possibly lock down the broader area?
They had counter protesters across the street.
Of people staying at the hotel, checking in with luggage that nobody was checking.
My question here is in as much as this is being charged as an attempt to assassinate Donald John Trump, why would it not be charged as an attempt to assassinate Vice President JD Vance?
We're going to get to the security in a bit, and we're going to get to the security rising to the level of the threat only because the level of the threat was that of an incompetent, I say barely competent, man LARPing as a revolutionary assassin.
Motivating Factors In The Manifesto00:07:12
He had a manifesto.
And there have been some people, again, I don't know if the posts are accurate or not.
You have been seeing some defiant L type comparisons of people saying, why would they release this guy's manifesto?
Now it's only going to incite more violence, juxtaposing that to posts from the same people when it came to the transgender shooters, saying, why are they hiding the manifestos?
They should be releasing this.
Set aside any individual person's.
Potential hypocrisy, double standards.
My reluctance in going over these manifestos is sharing with a broader audience or amplifying, for lack of a better word, the words of an idiot lunatic hellbent on causing death, destruction, and misery for other people.
In a way, it's sort of exactly what they want the infamy of people talking about them, saying their names, and paying attention to their lunatic ramblings.
Flip side, obviously newsworthy in the Purely a trivial sense, but also things that you can learn from it in terms of motivating factors for deterrence, not motivating factors for more motivation.
I shared with our locals community my thoughts on what has been released as the manifesto of this shooter, Cole Allen.
And it is interesting to read in terms of what was being said in the manifesto.
It's a, you know, what's the word I'm looking for?
A lofty way of describing the notes of a madman, the notes of a madman who is the hero in his own story.
And it is.
An interesting thing to read, to appreciate, and understand how evil rationalizes its evil to itself.
And we've gone from the lionizing of Luigi Mangione, and you're having prominent celebrities with big audiences celebrating the assassination, justifying the assassination of the CEO of UnitedHealth, because in their twisted minds, nobody would ever adopt that equally psychotic, unhinged justification to go after the comics.
Who support this because they're just comics, right?
They're not doing any harm to anybody in their own minds.
But in the mind of an unhinged lunatic, someone making jokes might now be, you know, they can rationalize it to themselves.
And to the extent that comedians rationalize, justify, and promote this type of violence, be careful the hell that you usher in to this world.
Now, the manifesto is interesting.
And I said, I was reluctant to talk about it.
People were highlighting certain portions of it because it fits their political narrative.
Which we'll get into.
But there's other elements of this manifesto that are worthy of analysis.
This is from the New York Post.
Read White House Correspondents' Dinner Suspect, Cole Allen's full anti Trump manifesto.
Now, on the one hand, you're going to read through this and you're going to hear a man spouting off Rachel Maddow ish talking points.
I shouldn't use Rachel Maddow because I'm not sure that she's ever used some of this language.
And I'm not going to mention the people who do use this type of language.
You know who they are, and you've seen them online.
But you want to know how MKUltra works.
You want to know how Project Operation Mockingbird works.
This is how it works.
When you're dealing with 350 million people, a mental health crisis, you're dealing with probabilities and statistics.
And in as much as every click through on a link, statistically speaking, might yield a sale or something, you just have to put something out in volume and you're going to get your statistical anomalies or you're going to get your statistical certainties and you're going to just maximize your chances of things happening.
And when you're dealing with mentally unwell people, you go and you whip up half of a population into an absolute frothing at the mouth, rabid, frenzied, psychotic delusion.
You only need a dozen people to get sufficiently motivated, a dozen people to throw away their lives in pursuit of what they now have been brainwashed into thinking is a righteous act of violence.
Let's go through this.
Read the White House correspondent dinner suspects.
We already got that.
Accused White House correspondent dinner gunman.
Cole Allen sent a sprawling manifesto, sprawling.
It was a thousand pages, a thousand words is about three pages, maybe two and a half pages, sprawling, to family members about 10 minutes before Sunday's attack, sources told the Post.
The 1,052 word missive obtained by the Post Sunday morning, signed Cold, Cold Force, Friendly Federal Assassin Allen.
This is where you worry that if you don't sufficiently condemn this idiocy, this lunacy, you're going to encourage it in the minds of others.
Outlined his rules of engagement for the shooting and stated he believed it was righteous duty to target administration officials.
Officials.
Listen to this.
Hello, everybody.
So, I may have given a lot of people a surprise today.
Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.
You're going to have people also say, I'm just curious as to why we're seeing an ad for Abraham Lincoln in the context of that article.
You're going to have people saying that this is written by AI, and as much as people don't believe the Tyler Robinson texts to Triggs, whatever the guy's name is, people won't believe that.
Even if they see it black on white, they're going to say this is AI generated.
This is.
This is an attempt to demonize other people and to yada, yada, yada.
I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for most wanted.
Ha ha.
I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency.
By the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly do need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self inflicted status.
I apologize to all the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and the other non targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.
I apologize to everyone who was abused.
And/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all those who still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.
Here you got element number one.
If you are operating on the basis, let me just double-check something: is Cole Allen autistic?
Let's just bring this one out.
If you are operating on the basis that there are some people who are more easy to manipulate, there are some people who are mentally more fragile, is there California Institute of Technology?
Let's see this.
I don't know if the word a little autistic just means anything anymore.
Who is Cole Allen?
Peers describe shock.
Let's just go to the word that I'm looking for autistic.
Get out of here.
Here we go.
California Institute Technology classmate of Allen's, Adrian Constantino, told the Wall Street Journal he was a little autistic, even more nerdy than his peers, but remembered him as always nice and kind to the people.
I don't think we're using the word autistic in any clinical sense.
If you're dealing with people who are fragile, easily manipulated, what do you have to do?
Butler And Susie Wiles Security00:13:56
Well, let's see what he said there.
The people who were abused, murdered before all this, but to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this.
The amazing thing is just understanding that everyone is the hero in their own story, even when they are carrying out acts of villainry.
The movie Das Boot, an old German 19, you know, it's a World War II movie that told the story of World War II from the perspective of the Germans.
And if anybody thinks, you know, the Nazis thought they were doing wrong, that they knew they were evil and they were just carrying out acts of despicable, unjustifiable evil, Watch the movie.
I have to watch it again.
It's been a while, but it's a good perspective changer where everybody, even the villains, think that they are the heroes in their own story.
I don't expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it.
Again, my sincere apologies.
On why I did any of this, I am a citizen of the United States of America.
What my representatives do reflects on me.
And I'm no longer willing to permit the peepee, the pet.
I'm not even going to read this.
You've heard the clips, and we're going to play when Trump gets asked this question.
In an interview.
Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I've had to do something about it.
This catchphrase, like it's this catchphrase, is you say certain words over and over enough, and you only need to reach a dozen, two dozen of the most unhinged, mentally vulnerable people on earth, and just cross your fingers if that's what you want.
While I'm discussing this, I'll go over the rules of engagement because this guy is a self.
Trained assassin.
He's operating on his own moral conduct in all of this.
Administration officials, not including Mr. Patel, they are targets prioritized from highest ranking to lowest.
And now I hadn't picked up on this.
I'm just curious as to why he threw that in.
Administration officials, not including Mr. Patel.
Maybe he believes that Patel, in his own deluded mind, is actually not part of the aforementioned catchphrase as to how to describe Trump.
Secret Service, they are targets only if necessary and to be anticipated non lethally if possible.
AKA, I hope they're wearing body armor because center mask with shotgun messes up people who aren't.
Hotel security, not targets if at all possible unless they shoot at me.
Capitol Police, same as hotel security.
National Guard, same as hotel security.
Hotel employees, not targets at all.
Guests, not targets.
In order to minimize casualties, I will be using buckshot rather than slugs, less penetration through walls.
I would still like to go through everyone.
The targets, yada, yada, yada, yada.
Rebuttals.
Listen to this.
This is how people rationalize their own insanity to themselves.
Objection one as a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.
Rebuttal.
Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed.
I'm not the person raped in a detention camp.
I'm not the fisherman executed without trial.
I'm not a school kid blown up or a child starved.
What's amazing, what's fascinating also is the selective.
I mean, if you assume every administration has been doing the same acts of war.
What makes one presidency or one president different than the other?
The only question you can answer that with, the only answer you can provide to that is which way the media is swinging.
Turning other cheek is when someone else is oppressed, is not Christian behavior.
It is complicity in the oppressor's crimes.
This is not a convenient time for you to do this.
I want to skip through a bunch of this crap.
Okay, you didn't get them all.
We'll get to the rest of this here.
Thank you to my family for my church, et cetera.
For the love over these 31 years.
Thank you to my friends.
I'd like to, I'd be curious to know what goes on at that church.
I'd be curious to know what sermons go on at these places of worship and whether or not they are, in some sick way, justifying a form of political hatred that can later be transformed into a form of political violence.
Thank you to my friends.
Thank you to my colleagues and jobs for your positivity and professionalism.
Thank you to the students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.
Oh, and by the way, look at the picture the New York Post uses of Trump in the context of this manifesto.
It's so absurdly insane, you can barely believe it as you look at it.
Thank you to the many acquaintances I've met in person and online.
This is what flagged my attention.
Which acquaintances did he meet online that might have encouraged him to do this?
Who might have played a role in online radicalization of this individual?
If you've gone to the individual's Blue Sky account, or whatever's left, or whatever you can salvage now because it's been suspended, who radicalized this person online?
I mean, this is an admission of having met people online for short interactions and long term relationships.
For your perspective and inspiration.
Who the hell online inspired Cole Allen to go do what he did?
They're going to look into it.
The only question is are we ever going to get answers to it?
Thank you all for everything, sincerely.
Cold, Cold Force, Friendly Federal.
Cold Force was his name over on Blue Sky, the online platform where he not arguably, definitively went for inspiration.
Here, now look at this.
P.S.
Okay, now all the sappy stuff is done.
What the hell is Secret Service doing?
Sorry, going to rant a bit here and drop.
The formal tone.
Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms.
I'm not sure why that would be a reasonable, unconstitutional, unlawful method of protection.
The proper method of protection is possibly not having this event with JD Vance and Donald Trump, the number two and one, respectively, of global politics in the same room, under the same roof, in a hotel open to the public with protesters across the street that you couldn't possibly, in any reasonable realm of the universe, entirely secure.
Sorry.
Armed agents at every tee, metal detectors up the wazoo.
Well, there were metal detectors there that caught you as you tried to run through like a bumbling idiot.
What I got, who knows, maybe they're pranking me, is nothing.
No damn security.
We did hear that.
People getting within the vicinity, just showing QR codes on their phone, not in transport.
Anybody who thinks that this was a lee hop for political exploitation is going to say, oh, well, if they come out with regulations that say we need more restrictions on interstate transportation of firearms, You're going to find your political potential motivation there.
Not in the hotel, not in the event.
Like, the one thing I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is a sense of arrogance.
I'd say a little confession through projection there, if I dare say that.
I walk in with multiple weapons, and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.
The security at the event is all outside, focused on protesters and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.
Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it's corrected by the time this country gets actually competent.
Leadership again.
Like, if I was an Iranian agent instead of an American citizen, I could have brought in a damn Medusa, which is down here a Browning M2.50 caliber heavy machine gun, a U.S. military staple for nearly a century, usually tripod mounted.
A Medusa.
I would love to know if that word came up anywhere in his blue sky Twitter handle feed, whatever we call it.
Actually, and saying, oh, yes, if anyone's curious about what it feels like doing something like this, it's awful.
I want to throw up.
I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do.
And never will.
For all the people whose trust this betrays, I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.
That is what you call the fruits of the labor of MKUltra type Operation Mockingbird projects.
Can't really recommend it.
Stay in cool, kids.
Ha, ha, ha.
That is the manifesto.
And what you are seeing are the chickens coming home to roost, the fruits of the labors of brainwashing and indoctrination.
And you do have to ask yourself what in the name of sweet holy hell is happening to have this event where they had it?
The security succeeded for that level of threat.
But it's unclear why this would have done.
Why expose JD Vance and Donald Trump to this level of threat, potential level of threat, knowing that you couldn't possibly?
I don't know.
Drones, I guess, are less of a concern because it's not outdoors.
People like in the Vegas shooting showing up with massive arsenals, a coordinated effort, car bombs in the parking lot.
I presume they had dog sniffing elements in there, I presume.
You have counter protesters across the streets.
And you have this done at an event, apparently at the sort of last minute.
And now, apparently, you have calls for Susie Wiles to be fired after this shooting.
It's again by the grace of God.
And when it came to Butler, no one's going to believe me that that was an organic failure of security.
Nobody's going to convince me of that.
Also, nobody's going to convince me it was a hoax and Trump was in on it and he had a packet of butt.
Feel free to think what you want.
I think anybody who espouses that has something wrong with them.
But no one's going to convince me that the Pac Man perimeter in Butler, which was preceded by a kid flying a drone over the location, being identified as a person of interest with range finders, and then allowing Trump to come out on stage and stay on stage in the minutes where people were screaming, There's a guy on the roof.
Nobody's going to convince me that that was an organic lapse of security.
And I don't know who said it.
And at the risk of it being Steve Bannon, people say Viva is now quoting Steve Bannon despite his ties to Epstein.
I think I recall it being a Steve Bannon quote, but I presume it predates him.
Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, and three times is enemy action.
You got Butler, which was an inorganic lapse of security, almost like a let it happen on purpose.
You got Ryan Ruth at the golf course, an inexcusable lapse of security.
Bear in mind, everybody, Ryan Ruth set up his perch where paparazzi.
Knew that they could go to capture photographs of Donald John Trump.
If you can take the shot with a cannon, and I'm saying a cannon is in a camera, but I use a Nikon.
Do I use a Nikon?
I use a Nikon.
If you can take the shot with a Nikon D800 with a 7200 VR telephoto lens, you can take the shot with whatever rifle Ryan Ruth had.
And now you have this third one here.
You throw in a couple of other ones where the guy with the shotgun arrives at Mar a Lago, gets shot dead.
You got the Iranian guy back in 2020.
I think it was at a Vegas rally, 2024.
How many, I mean, yes, everybody historically has always wanted to go after the president.
It's the most dangerous job in the world.
How many inorganic lapses of security do you have to have before consequences start happening?
And bear in mind, for Butler, nothing.
As far as I know, maybe stuff's going on behind the scenes, even stopping such a complainer.
Not only did nobody get really meaningfully sanctioned, The people who were at the helm of that catastrophic inorganic failure of security actually got promoted, still working or got promoted.
And now, whether or not it's fair, now Susie Wiles looks like the one who's going to be asked to take the fall for this.
This is from the Daily Beast.
It's a leftist right, so you can take it with a grain of salt.
Take it as a political hit piece on Susie Wiles, unfairly blaming her because they're trying to sow discord with the Trump administration.
Always bear that in mind when you're reading anything from anyone.
Fox News has its bias, Daily Beast has its bias.
Blame game.
The chief of staff has entered the blame game.
Has she entered the blame game, Laura Esposito, because you threw her in or because there's actual blame there?
I think there is actual blame to be had there.
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is feeling the heat after yet another gunman came within feet of the President of the United States.
Wiles, 68, was not in attendance at the White House Coronet's dinner on Saturday where a gunman exchanged shots with Secret Service.
Oh, I got it.
Dude, I'm not subscribing to that.
Let's just do this and see if we can get there.
Oh, we're not going to be able to get there through the archive.
Oh, Tabarnouche.
Let's go back and just get another one here.
PBS.
Okay, here we go.
Let's subscribe to Daily Bean.
No, no thanks.
I'm not subscribing to you either, PBS.
Trump's many upcoming large high-profile events may present fresh security challenges after the attack.
No crap.
No, no shit.
Sherlock, they knew that after Butler.
Does Susie Wiles get blamed in here?
There we go.
White House user staff, Susie Wiles will hold a meeting this week with officials from the White House operations team, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security to discuss protocols at events with the president, according to a senior White House.
Like, how is this the discussion to be had now after Butler, after Mar-a-Lago?
After Mar-a-Lago, too, and after all, how is this the discussion to be had?
Separately, a person familiar with the matter said the US Secret Service was already reevaluating its security footprint for upcoming events.
How is this the discussion that's being had now when this was the discussion that was being had after Butler?
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, and insanity is relying on the same incompetence over and over again, expecting different results.
The agency's posture was already elevated due to the extraordinary number of threats facing Trump, including two back-to-back.
Oh, no shit, Charlotte.
Secret Service Evacuation Timing00:02:55
I can't imagine that there's any profession that is more dangerous, Trump said.
Well, the bottom line is I'm not subscribing to the Daily Beast to get it, but Susie Wiles, I mean, people are taking a little bit of flack for deciding to have hosted that event when they hosted it, where they hosted it.
And now, what else did I want to talk about with this?
The people's response to this, making light of it, making jokes about it.
And listen to this and how it's being, I won't say weaponized is not the right word, how it's being politicized.
Listen to this question during a 60 minute interview.
Is this the right one?
You see the security moving quickly, within seconds, grabbing the vice president by his coat, lifting him up, bringing him out.
Then the counter assault comes in, took 10 seconds for them to flank you, Mr. President.
And then 20 seconds to get you out.
It looked chaotic.
At one point, you were down.
What was happening?
Well, what happened is it was a little bit me.
I wanted to see what was happening.
And I wasn't making it that easy for him.
I wanted to see what was going on.
And by that time, we started to realize maybe it was a bad problem, different kind of a problem, bad one, and different than what would be normal noise from a ballroom, which you hear all the time.
And I was surrounded by great people.
And I probably made them act a little bit more slowly.
I said, wait a minute, wait a minute, let me see, wait a minute.
So, you know, I'm telling guys.
Just at that moment where it looks like you go sort of down with the service, you were telling them to wait.
What happened is then I started walking with them.
I turned, I started walking, and then said, Please go down, please go down on the floor.
So I went down, and the first lady went down also.
But we were asked to go down by the agents as I was walking.
In other words, they wanted you almost to crawl.
I was standing up pretty much.
I was standing up and then turned around the opposite direction and started pretty much walking out pretty tall, a little bent over because I, you know, I'm not looking to be standing too tall.
And, but I was walking out, it was pretty about halfway there, and they said, please go down to the floor, please go down to the floor.
So I dropped to the floor, so did the first lady.
People were making the argument that because they evacuated JD Vance 10, 20, maybe 30 seconds before Trump, that that's an indication of Secret Service failure or something more nefarious.
The counter argument to that that I would posit is maybe I'm right, maybe I'm wrong.
When there's a chaotic situation, it's not clear where the safe place is to be evacuated to.
How The Shooter Crossed State Lines00:11:39
And so, everything just gets Trump out of that room.
It presupposes they knew where the threat was, where the threat wasn't, and that it would be safer to remove Trump and bring him into another room where they might not have yet evaluated the threat in any other room.
And the safest thing might have been just to huddle in position.
And so, do I make big deals of JD Vance being evacuated before Donald Trump?
Certainly not.
Do we make a big deal of the fact that this event occurred and by all accounts, The broader security beyond that room, beyond the two floors, was an issue?
Yes, you do.
And again, oh, here we go.
This is it.
What points are going to be made from this?
What points are the media going to try to flesh out of this?
You know that they're going here.
And let's play from this is Aaron Rupar.
And the only way Aaron Rupar cannot lie in a post is by directly quoting that post.
This is Todd Blanche on Face the Nation.
Tard Blanche, and let's hear what he has.
So, the alleged shooter, as we just said, had multiple weapons in his possession.
Here in the District of Columbia, open carry is not permitted.
You just said he traveled from California across the country by train.
At this point, are you thinking at the federal level of changing security protocols in any way to, for example, match on trains what you are expected to go through when you fly, where you do have to declare a weapon when you cross state lines?
How did he travel by train without?
Any challenge and arrive here in the nation's capital.
And look, this isn't about, in my mind, changing the law or making the laws more restrictive around possession of firearms.
It appears he purchased these firearms the past couple years.
We don't know how those firearms ended up in his possession in D.C.
We can make some assumptions based upon what I just said about how he got to D.C.
But I don't think the narrative here is about changing laws or making our laws more restrictive.
This is about law enforcement who are doing their jobs and a suspect who tried to do something and failed miserably.
Well, I'm not talking about changing the law in terms of possession of a firearm.
I'm asking about crossing state lines with that firearm and arriving at the Capitol.
If you try to fly, you do have to have your firearms declared in some way.
You don't when you get on a train.
Well, look, you are talking about, I mean, if we're asking the question, that's talking about changing the laws.
And I don't understand what they might actually try to do.
They, being the left, anti gun, Second Amendment violating politicians.
Imagine what they are proposing right here because it's quite clear, though she doesn't want to say it.
Checkpoints interstate, metal detectors interstate, having to go through the same security to travel on train interstate that you do to travel on plane interstate.
I mean, that is exactly what this journalist is proposing right here.
But obviously, you got to shift the Overton window slowly, doesn't want to get there just yet.
That's what she's proposing.
I think that's something that we should be focused on right now in any way, shape, or form.
Okay, not a loophole.
There are lots of ways that.
Yeah.
So, I mean, look, the, we don't, and we also don't know, we don't have all the answers this morning.
We're still looking into, into what happened, how he got the guns, if he got them legally.
But what we do know is, is that, is that he tried to use them.
He did have two firearms and some knives on his person when he tried to use them.
And, and he was stopped before he got anywhere near the president, before he got near any of us that were in the room at the time of, that this occurred.
And, and that's, that's again, we can't, we can't overlook, and I'm not suggesting you are, but we can't overlook the great work of the Secret Service last night.
No, absolutely.
We're all thankful for that.
Well, you say thankful for it.
Yes.
The question is would this have happened at a ballroom if it were at the White House where they can control every aspect and every dimension of security there within the fences and even beyond the fences?
That is where they are trying to go with this.
And now say, well, my goodness, you look back at the Kyle Rittenhouse and you focus on why they were talking about the crossing state lines with a firearm.
It's going to go now beyond.
Second Amendment restrictions, and they're going to try to float the argument now that there has to be some checkpoints interstate if you're traveling on trains or buses.
Well, and then they're going to say, well, if you want to travel nationally on private whatever transportation, well, that's just what you're going to have to do.
You're going to have to declare it.
I think they already do have metal detectors in many of these places, anyhow, but that's where they're going to go with this.
And then it'll go to actual potential borders in between states because you can't let people, you know, you can't rely on people's honesty to declare the weapons, the firearms in their car.
If they're crossing state lines with it.
Someone in the chat had said, I don't understand why he didn't end up with holes in him, this being Cole Allen.
And that was one of the elements in his manifesto as well, where he said, I should land in the hospital, or in so many words, I should not be in good shape after this unless Secret Service is grossly incompetent.
Getting back to some theories that people are floating as to why this was a hoax, a fake, a setup, whatever, that he didn't die.
Motivated reasoning is a hell of a drug.
And if you want to say this is fake, Anything that happens, you will interpret to justify the conclusion that it was fake.
It's fake because he survived.
If it were a patsy in a setup, you would want that guy to be dead by the end of it.
How did he not end up dead or even shot by all accounts?
It's unclear.
They took, by all accounts, I believe they took five to eight shots and apparently missed.
How fast was he running?
How bad are those shots?
We don't know.
We will find out.
Whether or not they eased up on the shooting because it's a very densely populated, very densely populated.
Populated with people, event, and you don't want to kill innocent bystanders with friendly fire ricochets or whatever.
Flip side to that argument is if there's a man charging at full speed with a shotgun and a firearm to where the president and the vice president are, you're going to neutralize that threat, even if it does mean putting other people at risk.
What might have happened is they took five to eight shots and someone tackled the guy, and then there's no need to execute him on the ground once he's been disarmed.
We'll see.
Fair questions to ask as to how that guy was fired upon many, many times.
And apparently, they missed on all of them.
Come back to the beginning of this show, which is Jimmy Kimmel being a foul, disgusting excuse for a human being.
The amount of foul and disgusting human beings out there, foul and disgusting excuses for a human being, are more than I can count.
They're too damn high to go to the meme.
And one of the ones I wasn't going to say anything, because, in as much as, you know, unless it's necessary for educational or adaptation purposes to go over these manifestos, you don't want to give these scumbags.
More oxygen than they deserve, more infamy than they could ever want.
The flip side is you can't also just ignore without publicly shaming and publicly humiliating the most disgusting, vile excuses for humans on earth.
The campaign against Erica Kirk has been going on since the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
I should say since the day after, or maybe even the moment after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It has been some of the most inhumane.
Despicable, disgusting attacks I've ever seen in my entire life.
People saying, Why can't we ask questions?
You can damn well ask questions.
You cannot make accusations that are of the most nefarious, I won't say defamatory, because that's not the criteria here, the nastiest, most disgusting, most baseless, most malicious accusations out there.
Just asking questions, when did you stop beating your wife, is a question, morons.
It's a question that presupposes a disgusting, baseless fact.
So just asking questions.
Attacking how she mourns, whatever is not just asking questions.
You know damn well it's making accusations.
You're free to do it, and I'm free to call you an asshole for doing it.
The TPUSA event recently, where Erica Kirk backed out for security reasons.
And then people were saying, What a fake, what a phony.
She's backing out of this event, even though JD Vance is going, It's a bullcrap excuse.
If it's safe enough for JD, it's safe enough for Erica Kirk.
First of all, you're idiots in that, as far as I know, I don't think Erica Kirk has Secret Service protection.
If she does, maybe then it's just a personal decision not to want to be subjected to that type of exposure.
I don't think she does.
JD Vance does.
And the exposure to risk is not just at the event itself, it's to and from, especially when you have mobs of protesting idiots out in the streets, like you had at the Donald Trump White House Correspondents' Dinner.
They said, oh, if JD Vance is good, it's safe enough.
JD Vance and the president were at this event where a shooter didn't get close to them, different floor, but got past security, where there was a shooting event.
And after that event, There's videos circulating of Erica Kirk.
It's the saddest.
It actually upsets me.
It upsets me to see someone who is saying, you know, I'll tell you in a second.
This was her reaction.
This is a woman.
This is a woman, somebody.
The fact that it's a woman changes nothing.
It could be a man, an adult, a woman, a kid.
I just want to go home.
And there's a few things that I've seen in my life where you watch things that you shouldn't watch and you see videos that you shouldn't see, or you read a book and a moment sticks with you in particular.
There's a couple of moments here.
I just want to go home is the most primordial human reaction to trauma that you can ever have.
The other one is I want my mommy, I want my daddy.
And back in the day, there was a video of these soldiers who had been kidnapped by terrorists and I mean, this had been going on for years.
There's been a number of these videos.
And there was one when you're a kid and you watch these things and you don't know what damage you're doing to yourself.
The words still stick with me to this day was one of the soldiers saying, screaming out for mommy.
This is an adult who's being brutally murdered.
And what he's saying is, I want mommy.
And in the book, it was the extremist book by what's his name?
Ron Johnson or John Ronson, whatever it is.
Ron Johnson.
And they were talking about.
Ruby Ridge.
He was doing the chapter on Ruby Ridge and Seaver, the kid Seaver, the son of the father.
When they're in the forest and they didn't know that there were ATF agents scoping out their home, and they come across some ATF agents, and I think I forget the exact timeline where they shoot the dog or they shoot the kid, who was a 14 year old kid holding a rifle because he came across armed individuals that he didn't know was ATF on his property.
And they shoot him, and the way it was described in the book is that it blew his arm.
Gay Candle Company Account Found00:04:14
In a way, nearly clean off.
And the kid turns around to his dad and says, I'm coming home, dad.
And then they shoot him in the back as he's approaching his father.
That part of the book has always stuck with me ever since.
I'm coming home.
And then the kid was shot in the back.
You're watching a woman who has been through absolute, what do you think she's appropriate CEO for a company?
And unless you're one of the ones who thinks that she was in on it because of your own demented, baseless conspiracies, you're watching a woman who has endured.
Trauma of the highest order, who in a moment of now refreshing all of that post traumatic stress of the murder of her husband, I just want to go home.
And what do assholes on the internet do?
What shocks me is that it's not just that people are ashamed to have these truly evil thoughts, they're proud to put them on blast.
Like almost like it's good for business.
And I say that tongue in cheek because this is coming from.
An account that's called That Gay Guy Candle Company, who puts out three laughing emojis and the words, the most performative woman who ever lived.
And I say, Good for business.
I'm like, It's under a handle of a business, if we believe the handle.
I go to the handle, and it's of a business.
That Gay Guy Candle Company, born in Michigan.
5% of sales go to organizations supporting the LGBTQ community, now shipping around the world.
49.2 thousand followers.
Now, I know there's jokes in there about that gay guy candle company being overtly misogynist.
This is the level of inhumanity, depravity, moral depravity.
And it's not just that people aren't ashamed of it, they're proud of it.
I wonder if that guy's on Blue Sky.
I wouldn't be surprised if he's.
I'm fairly sorry.
Let's just see this here.
Hold on one second.
Let's go.
What is it, that gay guy candle company?
And people are empowered.
People are encouraged.
People get.
I mean, he gets a lot.
There was a lot of hate in respect of that comment.
He wasn't the only one.
Is there a Blue Sky account for that gay guy candle company?
Let's see if we.
Let's see if we this.
I wonder if X is going to get.
Hey.
You want to talk about platforms where they celebrate this and then they demonize the people who are the victims of it and then they encourage other people to justify it to themselves, rationalize it to themselves?
This is what happens.
This is where it goes.
Oh, here we go.
Yes, there's a Blue Sky account.
It's called That Gay Guy.
Maybe it's not the right one.
It's almost certainly a typo.
Oh, The Gay Guy Candle Co. at Blue Sky or whatever they do.
This is the level of human interaction on social media.
That is the latest of what's going on.
I don't think I missed anything in terms of the updates of the day.
Let me see here.
No, we did.
Oh, we're going to do one more thing here, actually.
But no, that's what's going on.
So we'll get more news.
I don't know what the solution is to all of this.
You raise your kids to have intellectual quotients, IQs, you raise them to have EQs as well, basic empathy, basic.
Understanding of right and wrong, basic understanding of imagining what it's like to be somebody else, basic understanding that the internet is not just zeros and ones, it's actual humans.
That's it.
Now, let me see what's going on in our viva barnslaw.locals.com community.
Unforgiven Buckley Raid Discussion00:10:28
EQ is for chicks, says Jarrett.
No, it's not.
EQ is very, very important.
Let's see this here.
Frankly, Erica Kirk should be at home with her traumatized kids.
I don't know if that's partying, but at Washington, no one is looking out for her best interests, whether E.K. is crying or not.
Charlie was murdered six months ago.
Forget the optics.
Sorry, I haven't brought it up on stage.
Forget the optics.
Optics are just a way of saying I don't agree with it, and so I'm going to call it optics.
And I'm not picking on you, Mr. Mike.
Psychologically, I'm sure there's going to be people who are going to disagree with you.
Hiding in a room and not.
Getting out for at least momentary distractions, feeling like you have purpose in your life, feeling like you're not allowing the legacy of your husband to die with him.
I think a lot of people will disagree with you.
Now, it's not to say get out and you say parting in a judgmental way, get out at events, pursue the cause, pursue your political goals and ambitions in terms of politics, not in terms of individual politics.
But I think a lot of people would disagree with that.
Well, grieving differently is one thing.
This is not a question of like get out and date.
This is a question of, you know, sit at home and stew, lament, and rot away at home.
It's like that's not any healthier than the alternative.
And the only question is, she lives in Arizona, not on the East Coast, brother.
Irrelevant.
We're having the issue is she's got to have purpose in her life.
She's got to feel and live a life that does not feel like she's letting the legacy of Charlie Kirk.
Die with his assassination, that the assassins are not going to get away with doing what they wanted to achieve, which was destroy Charlie Kirk's legacy, future, and everything.
And so that's the way she's going to do it.
I mean, this is a White House correspondence dinner.
It's not clubbing at Ned's in Vegas or DC.
I don't know where that place is.
And now, hold on.
So I came here for this, is what I came here for, because I came here for everything.
We got Dredd Robert.
Can you explain the White House ballroom connection?
Is Trump planning on renting it to private groups?
For events.
The White House Correspondents Association is a private organization and a corrupt one at that.
Why would judges clearing it make any difference to what happened?
Can you explain the White House ballroom connection?
Oh, I presume what you mean is the White House ballroom connection is people saying now that this was something of a hoax, let it happen on purpose so that they could justify or further strengthen the arguments for building the White House ballroom, which would eliminate many of these risks.
The flip side to that is that the concern in that argument was already out there.
The idea that everybody stating the obvious in real time is not exactly.
Conspiracy.
It's not about being on message groups where they say, now we're going to push this Trump ballroom store.
It's a common sense point to it.
I just, you know, can't say that the thought didn't cross my mind.
I'm just not running in on the one hand to try to start politicizing or scoring, you know, political points off a nearly catastrophic event like this.
But that it was a ballroom blitz.
That is the, I suspect that's the connection.
Why Trump would even go to the White House correspondence dinner?
I mean, I guess he.
Try to make friends with the enemy.
Try to pacify.
Try to show them that they're not winning and that you can still take a joke, even if it's coming from a highly garbage organization that has not been funny in a great long period of time.
King of Biltong over on Rumble has this to say.
Try our authentic Angus and Wagyu beef Biltong, premium, air dried with bold, savory flavors.
Biltong is a high protein, low carb snack.
Order now at BiltongUSA.com.
Use code VIVA for 10% off.
I will do that.
By the way, check it out.
Everyone go check it out here.
He was going to dunk on them.
The manifesto is CIA created, says Trev Corbett.
Look, CIA created is going after the substance and the creation of, not the existence of.
In it, it says, Yeah, I met a lot of people online.
Well, I'd like to know who those people online are.
Not in a doxing sense.
I would like to know what communities he was visiting online that clearly contributed to this series of events.
Now, let's see here, going down ACLU.
Okay.
Oh, hey.
Yeah, throw in the revelations with the ACLU in terms of institutions that fund this type of radicalization.
Criminals don't follow God.
Bucklebrush says Trump is building the ballroom for the next president, not himself.
And M. Sibley says the manifesto has all the hallmarks of a conspiracy.
Well, look, I did think there were some things in there that were everyone's going to be able to cut and clip and snip and whatever.
People running with that Trump is a pedo.
What pisses me off about all of it is if you ascribed to the idea that Pam Bondi was sabotaging the Trump administration, this will further, you could use it to substantiate that theory.
The fact that anybody out there now calls Trump a pedo, despite the fact that everything that was disclosed in the Epstein files, Absolutely exonerated Trump, but incriminated some other, you know, inculpated other people in his entourage.
The fact that that is the talking point is a testament to how bungled and inexcusably so was the disclosure of the Epstein files.
Now we're going to get to the after party, but I saw one come through here over in our Viva Barnes Law.
Locals. com community.
Viva says, This is a good week for you and Lord Buckley to review conspiracy theory with Mel Gibson and Julia Roberts.
Many connections.
Well, the movie that we're reviewing this week is.
Unforgiven.
And let me just share it with you.
The channel on Rumble, it's going to be there now, is called Lord Buckley.
Now, it's called Lord Buckley.
We're going to try to merge.
Okay, here we go.
It's called Lord Buckley.
It's going to be on Rumble, and we're going to do it live on Rumble, and we're going to be the best movie review channel out there.
Go subscribe.
27 subscribers.
What the heck?
I only set it up on Saturday.
So go subscribe to it.
I started watching Unforgiven with my kid, who's not yet 10 years old.
I was mistaken for The Untouchables.
Unforgiven is not appropriate.
It's, um, yeah, I had to put on pause anyhow.
So I'm going to continue watching it alone.
But Unforgiven is not the Untouchables, and it's tremendously violent.
And it starts off with tremendous violence involving hookers and slashing of a hooker of a man after the hooker or the prostitute makes a joke about the size of his penis.
And those are all very difficult things to explain to a child.
So this week's movie is Unforgiven.
I'm going to go back and watch it and finish it because I'm realizing now that I've actually never seen it.
So, With that said, everybody, we're going to go raid redacted.
We're going to have our after party.
I'm going to talk about, I'll show you what I'm going to talk about.
Armatas put out something.
Armatas, you might know him or her.
I'm not exactly sure who it is.
I believe it's an anonymous account.
We're going to go over this video in which Armatas talks about security or the lack thereof and also asks us why can't I bring up the flipping thing here?
Where did it go?
Here, security crisis, the absolute state of US security.
And it says here, when you see it, call it out in the comments so that they can see it.
We're going to watch this video and we're going to see if we can see where the lapse of security is.
But we're doing that in the after show, which is going to be for Rumble Premium and Viva Barnes Law.
Locals.com.
If you want to support the channel, you know how to do it.
You can tip with crypto.
You can go to Viva Barnes Law.
Locals.com.
You can go to shoutout.
US forward slash Viva for a custom shout out video.
It's like a digital signature in a video format.
And you know how to do it.
If you want to support the channel, you guys know what to do.
You're big boys and girls.
You know how it works.
Right now, we're going to go raid redacted and caught on camera.
New details emerging, latest Trump assassination attempt.
Redacted news.
Talking about the same thing.
It's what's in the news, peeps.
Okay, go check it out.
Confirm raid.
Bada bing, bada boom.
I don't want to end the stream.
I want to bring it over to Rumble.
I just lost the chat.
Hold on.
Let me just see if we're in here.
Did the raid come through?
Hold on.
What did the raid not go through?
I think I might have.
Oh, I might have raided in their channel, and now I'm going to get blocked.
Here, hold on a second.
Forward slash raid, bada bing.
You must wait 10 minutes in between raids.
Okay, I did raid.
Okay, good.
We've done it.
Right now, peeps, get a shout out from V. Hold on.
I got to see what this says.
Get a shout out from Viva Fry at shoutout.fans.
I think it's shoutout.us forward slash Viva Fry.
That is the landing page where you can get to all other.
Things.
Lesson says, I don't care enough about him to generate hate.
Just listened when he uninvited people.
LOL.
I support people I trust.
Viva just can't offset the feeling of not being welcome or wanted.
Hold on a second.
Who are we talking about?
I can't care enough about him to generate hate.
Lesson, I don't know what we're talking about, but I shouldn't.
That's why I shouldn't get into the chat right away.
What I wanted to do was just see where the raid was.
Oh, it doesn't show me the raid.
Okay, whatever.
It doesn't matter.
We're going to do it.
We're updating to.
Rumble premium, viva barnslaw.locals.com, and we're going to do the exercise and we're going to see if we as a community, and I'm not looking at the answers, I haven't looked at the answer.
I want to know if I can pick up on the security failure.
Tomorrow, Tuesday, same bad time, same bad channel.